Radeon HD 3870 [in 1 benchmark]
ATI
Radeon HD 3870
Buy
- Interface PCIe 2.0 x16
- Core clock speed 777 MHz
- Max video memory 512 MB
- Memory type GDDR4
- Memory clock speed 2252 MHz
- Maximum resolution
Summary
ATI started Radeon HD 3870 sales 19 November 2007 at a recommended price of $269. This is TeraScale architecture desktop card based on 55 nm manufacturing process and primarily aimed at office use. 512 MB of GDDR4 memory clocked at 2.25 GHz are supplied, and together with 256 Bit memory interface this creates a bandwidth of 72.06 GB/s.
Compatibility-wise, this is dual-slot card attached via PCIe 2.0 x16 interface. Its manufacturer default version has a length of 241 mm. 1x 6-pin power connector is required, and power consumption is at 106 Watt.
It provides poor gaming and benchmark performance at
1.95%
of a leader’s which is NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti.
Radeon HD
3870
vs
GeForce RTX
3090 Ti
General info
Of Radeon HD 3870’s architecture, market segment and release date.
Place in performance rating | 863 | |
Value for money | 0.03 | |
Architecture | TeraScale (2005−2013) | |
GPU code name | RV670 | |
Market segment | Desktop | |
Release date | 19 November 2007 (14 years ago) | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $269 | |
Current price | $242 (0.![]() |
of 49999 (A100 SXM4) |
Value for money
To get the index we compare the characteristics of video cards and their relative prices.
- 0
- 50
- 100
Technical specs
Radeon HD 3870’s general performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU base clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of Radeon HD 3870’s performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 320 | of 18432 (AD102) |
Core clock speed | 777 MHz | of 2610 (Radeon RX 6500 XT) |
Number of transistors | 666 million | of 14400 (GeForce GTX 1080 SLI Mobile) |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | of 4 (GeForce RTX 4080 Ti) |
Thermal design power (TDP) | 106 Watt | of 900 (Tesla S2050) |
Texture fill rate | 12.![]() |
of 939.8 (h200 SXM5) |
Floating-point performance | 497.3 gflops | of 16384 (Radeon Pro Duo) |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Information on Radeon HD 3870’s compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it’s interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Length | 241 mm | |
Width | 2-slot | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin |
Memory
Parameters of memory installed on Radeon HD 3870: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors don’t have dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | GDDR4 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | of 128 (Radeon Instinct MI250X) |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | of 8192 (Radeon Instinct MI250X) |
Memory clock speed | 2252 MHz | of 21000 (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti) |
Memory bandwidth | 72.06 GB/s | of 14400 (Radeon R7 M260) |
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on Radeon HD 3870. As a rule, this section is relevant only for desktop reference video cards, since for notebook ones the availability of certain video outputs depends on the laptop model.
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
API support
APIs supported by Radeon HD 3870, sometimes including their particular versions.
DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | |
Shader Model | 4.1 | |
OpenGL | 3.3 | of 4.6 (GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile) |
OpenCL | N/A | |
Vulkan | N/A |
Benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark performance of Radeon HD 3870. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.
Overall score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
ATI HD 3870
1.95
- Passmark
Passmark
This is probably the most ubiquitous benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Benchmark coverage: 26%
ATI HD 3870
572
Game benchmarks
Let’s see how good Radeon HD 3870 is for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in frames per second. Comparisons with game system requirements are included, but remember that sometimes official requirements may reflect reality inaccurately.
Average FPS
Popular games
Relative perfomance
Overall Radeon HD 3870 performance compared to nearest competitors among desktop video cards.
NVIDIA GeForce GT 430
103.08
AMD Radeon R5 A240
100. 51
AMD Radeon HD 7650A
100
ATI Radeon HD 3870
100
NVIDIA GeForce 820A
98.97
AMD Radeon HD 6610M
98.46
NVIDIA GF117
96.41
NVIDIA equivalent
We believe that the nearest equivalent to Radeon HD 3870 from NVIDIA is GeForce 820A, which is slower by 1% and lower by 3 positions in our rating.
GeForce
820A
Compare
Here are some closest NVIDIA rivals to Radeon HD 3870:
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 512
104.1
NVIDIA GeForce GT 820M
104. 1
NVIDIA GeForce GT 430
103.08
ATI Radeon HD 3870
100
NVIDIA GeForce 820A
98.97
NVIDIA GF117
96.41
NVIDIA GeForce 615
95.9
Similar GPUs
Here is our recommendation of several graphics cards that are more or less close in performance to the one reviewed.
GeForce
8800 GTS 512
Compare
GeForce
8800 GTX
Compare
GeForce GTS
250
Compare
Radeon HD
2900 PRO
Compare
GeForce
8800 GT
Compare
GeForce
9800 GTX+
Compare
Recommended processors
These processors are most commonly used with Radeon HD 3870 according to our statistics.
Core 2
Quad Q6600
5.6%
Core 2
Duo E8400
4.5%
Athlon II
X4 640
3.3%
Athlon II
X2 250
3%
Athlon 64
X2 6000+
2.2%
Core 2
Duo E7500
2.2%
Core i3
2100
1.9%
Core 2
Duo E7400
1. 9%
Core 2
Duo E8600
1.9%
Athlon II
X4 641
1.9%
User rating
Here you can see the user rating of the graphics card, as well as rate it yourself.
Questions and comments
Here you can ask a question about Radeon HD 3870, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.
Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.
2 GPUs 1 Card, A Return to the High End
by Anand Lal Shimpion January 28, 2008 12:00 AM EST
- Posted in
- GPUs
74 Comments
|
74 Comments
IndexSingle-board CrossFireBioshockCall of Duty 4CrysisEnemy Territory: Quake WarsHalf Life 2: Episode TwoOblivion: Shivering IslesUnreal Tournament 3The WitcherWorld in ConflictPower ConsumptionFinal Words
Last May, AMD introduced its much delayed Radeon HD 2900 XT at $399. In a highly unexpected move, AMD indicated that it would not be introducing any higher end graphics cards. We discussed this in our original 2900 XT review:
«In another unique move, there is no high end part in AMD’s R600 lineup. The Radeon HD 2900 XT is the highest end graphics card in the lineup and it’s priced at $399. While we appreciate AMD’s intent to keep prices in check, the justification is what we have an issue with. According to AMD, it loses money on high end parts which is why we won’t see anything more expensive than the 2900 XT this time around. The real story is that AMD would lose money on a high end part if it wasn’t competitive, which is why we feel that there’s nothing more expensive than the 2900 XT. It’s not a huge deal because the number of people buying > $399 graphics cards is limited, but before we’ve started the review AMD is already giving up ground to NVIDIA, which isn’t a good sign.»
AMD has since released even more graphics cards, including the competitive Radeon HD 3870 and 3850, but it still lacked a high end offering. The end of 2007 saw a slew of graphics cards released that brought GeForce 8800 GTX performance to the masses at lower price points, but nothing any faster. Considering we have yet to achieve visual perfection in PC games, there’s still a need for even faster hardware.
At the end of last year both AMD and NVIDIA hinted at bringing back multi-GPU cards to help round out the high end. The idea is simple: take two fast GPUs, put them together on a single card and sell them as a single faster video card.
These dual GPU designs are even more important today because of the SLI/CrossFire limitations that exist on various chipsets. With few exceptions, you can’t run SLI on anything other than a NVIDIA chipset; and unless you’re running an AMD or Intel chipset, you can’t run CrossFire. These self-contained SLI/CrossFire graphics cards will work on anything however.
AMD is the first out of the gates with the Radeon HD 3870 X2, based on what AMD is calling its R680 GPU. Despite the codename, the product name tells the entire story: the Radeon HD 3870 X2 is made up of two 3870s on a single card.
Click to Enlarge
The card is long, measuring 10.5″ it’s the same length as a GeForce 8800 GTX or Ultra. AMD is particularly proud of its PCB design which is admittedly quite compact despite featuring more than twice the silicon of a single Radeon HD 3870.
On the board we’ve got two 3870 GPUs, separated by a 48-lane PCIe 1.1 bridge (no 2.0 support here guys). Each GPU has 16 lanes going to it, and then the final 16 lanes head directly to the PCIe connector and out to the motherboard’s chipset.
Two RV670 GPUs surround the PCIe bridge chip — Click to Enlarge
Click to Enlarge
Thanks to the point-to-point nature of the PCI Express interface, that’s all you need for this elegant design to work.
The 3870’s board layout is far simpler (left) than the X2’s (right) thanks to less stringent power requirements and lack of a bridge chip + 2nd GPU — Click to Enlarge
Each GPU has its own 512MB frame buffer, but the power delivery on the board has been reworked to deal with supplying two 3870 GPUs.
The Radeon HD 3870 X2 is built on a 12-layer PCB, compared to the 8-layer design used by the standard 3870. The more layers you have on a PCB the easier routing and ground/power isolation becomes, AMD says that this is the reason it is able to run the GPUs on the X2 faster than on the single GPU board. A standard 3870 runs its GPU at 775MHz, while both GPUs on the X2 run at 825MHz.
Memory speed is reduced however; the Radeon HD 3870 X2 uses slower, more available GDDR3 in order to keep board cost under control. While the standard 3870 uses 2.25GHz data rate GDDR4, the X2 runs its GDDR3 at a 1.8GHz data rate.
The 3870 has 8 x 64MB GDDR4 memory devices on one side of the PCB, the X2 has 4 x 32MB GDDR3 per GPU on each side of the PCB for a total of 16 GDDR3 memory devices, or 1GB of memory total — Click to Enlarge
AMD expects the Radeon HD 3870 X2 to be priced at $449, which is actually cheaper than a pair of 3870s — making it sort of a bargain high end product. We reviewed so many sub-$300 cards at the end of last year that we were a bit put off by the $500 pricetag at first; then we remembered how things used to be, and it seems that the 3870 X2 will be the beginning of a return to normalcy in the graphics industry.
One GPU on the Radeon HD 3870
Two GPUs on the Radeon HD 3870 X2 — Click to Enlarge
Single-board CrossFire
IndexSingle-board CrossFireBioshockCall of Duty 4CrysisEnemy Territory: Quake WarsHalf Life 2: Episode TwoOblivion: Shivering IslesUnreal Tournament 3The WitcherWorld in ConflictPower ConsumptionFinal Words
Tweet
PRINT THIS ARTICLE
GPU Compare | Graphics Card Comparison
The Radeon HD 3870 will run 50% of the top 10,000 PC games. It will also run 24% of these games at the recommended or best experience levels.
- Manufacturer
-
AMD - Generation
- 15 generations old
- Category
-
Enthusiast - Dedicated RAM
-
512 MB - DirectX
-
10.1
- Rank
-
37th percentile of AMD GPUs - Rank in Power
-
335th of AMD GPUs - Rank in Popularity
-
233rd of AMD GPUs
Can the Radeon HD 3870 run the Top PC games? You can see a GPU comparison by choosing another video card. How many games can your GPU run?
Radeon HD 3870
|
Radeon RX 6950 XT
|
||
---|---|---|---|
Rank | Game |
|
|
1 |
Cyberpunk 2077 |
|
|
2 |
Grand Theft Auto V |
|
|
3 |
FIFA 23 |
|
|
4 |
VALORANT |
|
|
5 |
Call of Duty: Warzone |
|
|
6 |
Elden Ring |
|
|
7 |
Red Dead Redemption 2 |
|
|
8 |
Marvel’s Spider-Man Remastered |
|
|
9 |
Fortnite |
|
|
10 |
FIFA 22 |
|
|
11 |
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II |
|
|
12 |
Minecraft |
|
|
13 |
God of War |
|
|
14 |
League of Legends |
|
|
15 |
Genshin Impact |
|
|
16 |
Apex Legends |
|
|
17 |
Forza Horizon 5 |
|
|
18 |
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive |
|
|
19 |
ARK: Survival Evolved |
|
|
20 |
The Sims 4 |
|
|
21 |
Assassin’s Creed Valhalla |
|
|
22 |
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt |
|
|
23 |
Phasmophobia |
|
|
24 |
Overwatch 2 |
|
|
25 |
PLAYERUNKNOWN’S BATTLEGROUNDS |
|
|
26 |
Far Cry 6 |
|
|
27 |
Battlefield 2042 |
|
|
28 |
Grounded |
|
|
29 |
Dying Light 2 Stay Human |
|
|
30 |
Slime Rancher 2 |
|
|
31 |
Overwatch |
|
|
32 |
Assassin’s Creed: Origins |
|
|
33 |
Kena: Bridge of Spirits |
|
|
34 |
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare |
|
|
35 |
Assassin’s Creed Odyssey |
|
|
36 |
Destiny 2 |
|
|
37 |
Battlefield 1 |
|
|
38 |
Grand Theft Auto IV |
|
|
39 |
GTA 5 Thor Mod |
|
|
40 |
Call of Duty: WW2 |
|
|
41 |
Forza Horizon 4 |
|
|
42 |
Assassin’s Creed Unity |
|
|
43 |
Assassin’s Creed IV Black Flag |
|
|
44 |
Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six: Siege |
|
|
45 |
Battlefield 4 |
|
|
46 |
Fallout 4 |
|
|
47 |
Hogwarts Legacy |
|
|
48 |
Call of Duty: Black Ops II |
|
|
49 |
Dota 2 |
|
|
50 |
Call of Duty: Black Ops III |
|
|
51 |
Rocket League |
|
|
52 |
Rust |
|
|
53 |
Far Cry 3 |
|
|
54 |
Sea of Thieves |
|
|
55 |
Project Zomboid |
|
|
56 |
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 |
|
|
57 |
FIFA 19 |
|
|
58 |
GTA 5 Premium Online Edition |
|
|
59 |
Far Cry 4 |
|
|
60 |
Forza Horizon 3 |
|
|
61 |
Far Cry 5 |
|
|
62 |
Battlefield 5 |
|
|
63 |
Roblox |
|
|
64 |
Dark Souls 3 |
|
|
65 |
Stray |
|
|
66 |
FIFA 17 |
|
|
67 |
Hearts of Iron IV |
|
|
68 |
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3 |
|
|
69 |
Assassin’s Creed III |
|
|
70 |
Monster Hunter: World |
|
|
71 |
Fall Guys: Ultimate Knockout |
|
|
72 |
WARZONE |
|
|
73 |
PUBG Lite |
|
|
74 |
Devil May Cry 5 |
|
|
75 |
SEKIRO: SHADOWS DIE TWICE |
|
|
76 |
Batman: Arkham Knight |
|
|
77 |
Assassin’s Creed |
|
|
78 |
Assassin’s Creed II |
|
|
79 |
The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim |
|
|
80 |
Fortnite: Battle Royale |
|
|
81 |
Escape from Tarkov |
|
|
82 |
Assassin’s Creed Syndicate |
|
|
83 |
The Forest |
|
|
84 |
CS:GO — Operation Riptide |
|
|
85 |
World of Warcraft |
|
|
86 |
Lost Ark |
|
|
87 |
eFootball 2022 |
|
|
88 |
Dead by Daylight |
|
|
89 |
Need for Speed Heat |
|
|
90 |
FIFA 18 |
|
|
91 |
War Thunder |
|
|
92 |
eFootball PES 2021 |
|
|
93 |
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War |
|
|
94 |
Euro Truck Simulator 2 |
|
|
95 |
FIFA 15 |
|
|
96 |
FIFA 21 |
|
|
97 |
Valheim |
|
|
98 |
FIFA 16 |
|
|
99 |
Slime Rancher |
|
|
100 |
No Man’s Sky |
|
|
AMD
NVIDIA
Intel
Rank | GPU |
---|---|
AMD Delivers ATI Radeon HD 3870 X2 GPU
AMD today announced the immediate availability of the ATI Radeon HD 3870 X2 graphics processor, expanding the visual boundaries of PC entertainment well beyond the 1080P High Definition (HD) threshold. The industry’s first graphics processor to break the Teraflop (one trillion floating point operations per second) barrier, the ATI Radeon HD 3870 X2 nearly doubles the performance of the award-winning ATI Radeon HD 3870 introduced in November 2007.
Through an elegant yet aggressive design, the 55 nanometer process-based ATI Radeon 3870 X2 combines two ATI Radeon HD 3870s on a single graphics board, connected through integrated CrossFire technology. ATI Radeon 3870 X2 is also the first performance-leadership graphics product in the world to support Microsoft’s upcoming DirectX 10.1 technology. The ATI Radeon 3870 X2 delivers a new class of price and performance leadership with unbelievable enthusiast value at a suggested retail price of US $449.
This launch follows on the success of the recently released ATI Radeon HD 3400 and ATI Radeon HD 3600 series graphics products, completing a comprehensive portfolio of next-generation 55nm GPUs that deliver unparalleled price, performance and energy efficiency from entry-level to performance-leadership class products.
“PC gaming enthusiasts demand the ultimate in performance and scalability for their HD gaming experience and the ATI Radeon 3870 X2 sets the standard by which all should be compared in this segment,” said Rick Bergman, senior vice president and general manager, Graphics Product Group, AMD. “With this launch we reaffirm our commitment to enthusiast performance leadership and send a clear message that the ATI Radeon 3870 X2 is the new gold standard of the PC gaming world.”
With the upcoming introduction of Microsoft’s DirectX 10.1 specification, gamers can expect more realistic gaming environments while developers have access to an increased amount of tools and resources to enhance overall image quality. Through delivering top-to-bottom DirectX 10.1 support, ATI Radeon HD 3000 series users can enjoy a more complete gaming experience now and in the future.
“We’re pleased to see our newest DirectX 10 technology brought to market so soon with the introduction of AMD’s latest enthusiast hardware,” said Kevin Unangst, senior global director of Games for Windows, Microsoft. “One of the greatest advantages of PC gaming is the rapid pace at which the experiences evolve and improve. ATI Radeon HD 3870 X2 delivers on the promise of DirectX 10 gaming with significantly improved visuals and enhanced performance.”
ATI Radeon HD 3870 X2 will also provide support for ATI CrossFireX, the innovative next-generation AMD multi-GPU technology designed to support up to four GPUs. Software support to enable ATI CrossFireX is planned for late Q1 2008.
With the launch of ATI Radeon HD 3870 X2, AMD continues to support the industry-leading Unified Video Decoder (UVD) and ATI Avivo HD for exceptional platform efficiency and image quality for H.264 and VC-1 high definition content. Enhanced HDMI functionality is also offered via integrated HDCP and audio for HDMI video.
“Alienware prides itself on staying at the forefront of HD gaming innovation so that our brand stands for the best possible experience for our customers,” said Patrick Cooper, director of product group, Alienware. “With the launch of the ATI Radeon HD 3870 X2 in our Area-51 ALX CrossFire platform, we can push the boundaries of visual realism one step further and provide enthusiast gamers with the perfect blend of next-generation features, performance and platform efficiency.”
The ATI Radeon HD 3870 X2 is the first enthusiast graphics processors to use TSMC’s 55nm process technology. The smooth transition to 55nm has allowed for a 2X increase in performance-per-watt over the previous generation. Through an elegant board design, the ATI Radeon 3870 X2 delivers exceptional acoustics that are roughly equivalent to a single ATI Radeon HD 3870. When combined with ATI PowerPlay technology, the ATI Radeon 3870 X2 delivers exceptional idle power efficiency with the ability to dynamically raise or lower GPU power depending on the usage scenario.
Source: AMD
Explore further
Custom suits for worms that can deliver functional cargo
Citation:
AMD Delivers ATI Radeon HD 3870 X2 GPU (2008, January 28)
retrieved 28 September 2022
from https://phys. org/news/2008-01-amd-ati-radeon-hd-x2.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no
part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
AMD ATI Radeon HD 3870 X2 Review
Verdict
Key Specifications
- Review Price: £280.00
ATi’s had a rough time of it over the past year or so with every single one of its last generation cards failing to live up to expectations and nVidia’s equivalents consistently beating them on performance. However, with the release of the HD 3870 and HD 3850 at the tail end of last year, ATI looked to be on the up again. With decent performance, unbeatable features, and competitive prices these cards made for a worthwhile alternative to nVidia’s mainstream and enthusiast products.
Unfortunately, while the big money is to be made in these mid-range (£50 – £150) markets, something called the halo effect means that having the fastest card available still has significant influence over the general public’s buying habits. Put simply, if someone hears one company makes the fastest card available, they’re going to assume the other products the company produces are also the fastest in their respective sectors. The fact this mentality is completely ridiculous causes much frustration for manufacturers and journalists alike but there’s nothing we or they can do about it so manufacturers will always seek to gain the performance crown just to convince these people.
The problem for ATI is that modifying or augmenting R670 (the chip at the core of the HD 3870) to make it significantly faster would require a complete redesign of the underlying architecture and for a number of reasons this is something it simply isn’t in the position to do.
An architectural redesign requires a significant investment in research and design and rushing this would cost large amounts of money and potentially lead to mistakes, which would be even more catastrophic than not releasing anything. Also, releasing a completely new chip now would’ve cut into ATI’s plans for its next generation of hardware and potentially disrupted sales of cards based on what would be perceived to be its ‘old’ architecture.
So, if a brand new chip wasn’t the solution, how could ATI leverage its current capabilities to create a single competition-beating graphics card? Simple, it stuck two R670 chips on one card and ran them in Crossfire. The result is called the HD 3870 X2.
The first thing you’ll notice about the X2 is the size of the card. At 265mm in length it is as long as an 8800 GTX or 8800 Ultra and with its standard cooler attached it weighs a colossal 1.023 KGs, which is actually significantly heavier than either of the above nVidia cards.
The reason for the extra weight is mainly due to the extra metal used in the cooling mechanism which, unlike the coolers used on nVidia’s high-end cards, includes a section of heatsink that covers most of the back as well as the front. Also, the front heatsink is considerably longer than anything we’ve seen before and it incorporates a lot of copper, which is heavier than more oft used aluminium.
There’s actually a fair bit of science going on with the stock cooler on this card. According to ATI it has been developed with “enhanced weight management” in mind, which is a term I’m sure you’re all familiar with – no?
Basically what this amounts to is the heatsink uses a combination of copper and aluminium to distribute the weight of the card so the extreme length of the card doesn’t lead to it pulling itself out its PCI-E slot. Whatever it’s called, it seems to work and the card sat secure and happy in our test bed. Of course, the big test will come from mounting it in a tower case, where the card is no longer resting on the motherboard but hanging from the PCI bracket and PCI-E slot. You’ll have to make sure it’s securely screwed in place or we can guarantee you’ll end up with either a snapped PCI-E connector on your card or a PCI-E slot ripped from your motherboard.
Like most large graphics cards, the X2 uses a centrifugal fan to suck air from inside the case and blow it over the heatsinks and out the back of the card. As we would have expected, it performed very well, remaining reasonably quiet when under load and to all intents and purposes becoming silent when the card was idling.
One last note on the cooler, we’ve seen at least one card partner going a completely different route to the ATI stock cooler by removing the heatsink on the back and replacing the single exhaust fan with two fans that blow down onto the card. We’ve given this card a quick run through (expect a full review soon) and these changes don’t seem to affect performance but they have made the card considerably lighter, which is no bad thing.
So, finely we come to the all important testing, which this time is a bit different to usual. Bearing in mind the previous page’s caveats about how this card is likely to perform we have extended our game testing just this once to include five of our favourite games of the last year or so. It’s not a comprehensive list and there’s every chance you may find a game that doesn’t play nice with the X2, but we reckon if it can get through our extended list of titles it shows the X2 is well on its way to being a viable solution.
New to the table are Bioshock (our Game Of The Year), The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion, World In Conflict, Call Of Duty 4, and Supreme Commander. Each game is run at three resolutions – 1,680 x 1,050, 1,920 x 1,200, and 2,560 x 1,600 – with anisotropic filtering set to 16x and multi-sampling transparency anti-aliasing turned on. Due to time constraints we’ve only tested at two full screen anti-aliasing settings – off and 4x – where applicable but we feel that should be enough to demonstrate things nicely.
We used a combination of in-game benchmarks and manual run-throughs, using FRAPs, to record results and each setting was repeated three times and the average taken, to ensure a fair and accurate final figure.
As can clearly be seen, the X2 and 8800 Ultra take turns in claiming top spot with the Ultra probably just coming in ahead overall. What’s important to note, though, is how relatively small the increase in performance from the single 3870 to the X2 is for many of the games. Sure there’s a good 50% increase for most games but considering the card contains twice the processing power it’s reasonable to hope for more.
This is potentially both a good and a bad thing as it means there could still be performance to be gleaned from the card through a bit more optimisation. On the flip side, however, this could be as good as it gets, in which case it’s difficult to recommend the HD 3870 X2 on performance alone, which is why it’s lucky for ATI we also take into account price in our evaluation.
With 8800 Ultras still demanding the best part of £400, the HD 3870 X2 is actually a good wedge cheaper – certainly there’s enough of a saving to buy yourself a couple of games. This brings it more in line with the 8800 GTX which, although not tested in all these games, is generally around ten percent slower than the Ultra in any given game. With this in mind, the HD 3870 X2 suddenly becomes a much more tempting proposition. Moreover, the extra multimedia functionality of the X2 certainly puts it ahead of either the GTX or Ultra.
That said, we still wouldn’t out and out recommend you go out and buy the HD 3870 X2 because there’s just a nagging doubt in the back of our minds that, no matter how much ATI assures us, driver support for the latest and greatest games or for more obscure titles is going to be slow to arrive, if it ever does. Sure, if you have a spare £300, you are in the market for a graphics card, and you don’t already have a 8800 GTX or 8800 Ultra, then the X2 would be a good purchase but if you’re a bit hard up, it’s probably not worth losing any limbs over.
”’Verdict”’
The ATI HD3870 X2 is probably the most convincing example of multi-GPU on a single card we’ve ever seen with it often beating the long standing performance champion, the nVidia 8800 Ultra. However the heavy reliance on after market support and co-operation from games and driver developers means there’s always going to be the risk the latest games won’t play nice with this card. So, for that reason we can’t unreservedly recommend it.
Before we move onto how the HD 3870 X2 performs, we should really talk a bit more about the merits of this whole multi GPU idea because although multi-GPU solutions have been around for a long time they’ve never really managed to convince completely, at least perhaps up until now.
We’ve seen a number of dual GPU graphics cards come and go over the years but they’ve seldom stuck around for long, been readily available, or used particularly elegant designs. However, it’s none of these issues that have been the real sticking point of dual (or multi) GPU solutions. No, the real killer is the variable nature of their performance.
(centre)”The nVidia GeForce 7950 GX2 is one of the more successful examples of dual-GPU on one card. ”(/centre)
The problem is that for a multi GPU solution to work properly you need software – both drivers and games – to support it. If that support isn’t there, at best performance will only equal what you’d get using a single card and at worst it could actually make performance worse than a single card or even cause the game to not work at all.
Now, these issues can and generally are all fixed eventually but it can take weeks or even months for new drivers or game patches to be released and, if you’ve just spent a few hundred pounds on a new graphics card, having to wait even a week is not going to sit well.
(centre)”Can the AMD ATI Radeon HD 3870 X2 prove to be a reliable multi-GPU solution?”(/centre)
Of course, ATI has promised that supporting the X2 will be of utmost priority with ever more co-development work being put in to ensure games work properly straight out of the box. Moreover, it has also been suggested that multiple GPU is here to stay and we will be seeing single card-multi GPU solutions more and more often as both nVidia and ATI look for more ways to push the performance envelope. So, hopefully multi-GPU compatibility issues will be a thing of the past.
All we know today though is that performance will vary wildly depending on what games (or other programs, for that matter) you’re running. During our testing we encountered problems with both Call Of Duty 4 and Enemy Territory: Quake Wars and, although we eventually got figures that looked correct, it took a fair amount of toing and froing with ATI and tinkering with our test system to get to that stage and even then the performance was mediocre at best. More to the point though, we had no such problems with any of the single cards.
Ultimately, whether you’re willing to take the risk depends on your gaming habits. If you’re the type that wants the latest games the day they’re released then there’s a very real chance, the HD 3870 X2 may not deliver the performance you expect immediately. On the other hand, if you’re a bit more relaxed about your gaming and are willing to wait a while for new drivers or game patches, if they’re needed, then the HD 3870 X2 will suit you fine.
As the cores that power the HD 3870 X2 are exactly the same as those used in the HD 3870, we won’t talk in detail about the features to be found therein. However, we will just reiterate that, by virtue of it using two R670s, the R680 (as the HD 3870 X2 is codenamed) features 640 stream processors split into 10 clusters of 64 and also has 32 texture units and 32 render output units (ROPs). It also incorporates all the new PowerPlay power saving features, although inevitably it still consumes about twice the power of a single HD3870 at any given load level, resulting in it being the most power hungry card we’ve ever tested when under full load.
Also present are all the new multimedia capabilities that were added to the HD 3870. So you get full acceleration of HD video playback and all the image enhancement techniques as well as HDCP compliant outputs so you can play protected HD content like commercial Blu-ray and HD-DVD discs on your computer.
The cores run slightly faster than on the single HD 3870, seeing an increase of 50MHz from 775MHz to 825MHz so even if Crossfire is having trouble, you should at least get an extra frame or two per second over a single card. Aside from that, though, it really is just what you’d expect from two R670s bolted together.
In contrast to the increase in core clock speed, ATI has swapped the faster GDDR4 (2.25GHz) memory of the HD 3870 and replaced it with slower GDDR3 (1.8GHz) for the X2. Although no reason was given for the switch, it’s reasonable to assume that memory bandwidth isn’t a limiting factor and using slower memory could save ATI some money on what is already an expensive card.
Taking a look at the PCB, we can see nestling inbetween the two graphics cores is an additional chip. This is a PCI-Express bridge that controls the communication between the two GPUs. This communication would normally be performed across the motherboards PCI-E bus, which is where all this who ha about numbers of PCI-E lanes on motherboards comes from – the more you have, the faster graphics cards can communicate. By keeping all this communication onboard, the X2 bypasses any limitations the motherboard may have.
Along the top edge of the PCB is a Crossfire connector that can be used to join two of these cards for quad Crossfire or couple an X2 with a regular HD 3870 for three-way Crossfire. Unfortunately, drivers for neither of these configurations are yet available so we’ll have to wait a while to see how this performs.
Output configuration is standard fair with two dual-link DVI sockets and TV-out available on the back plate. However, without wishing to steal our own thunder too much, the aforementioned partner card has included four DVI outputs so if quad monitor setups are your thing, variants on the HD 3870 X2 could be the thing to look for.
One strange difference between this card and all similarly large cards is the orientation of the two auxiliary power connectors on the top edge. Just as with the HD 2900 XT, the card requires two six-pin PCI-E power connectors to run properly, and for overclocking you should use one six-pin and one eight-pin connector. The odd thing about the reference connectors, though, is that, rather than facing the connectors upwards, where they’re easy to reach when installed in a case, ATI has chosen to mount them perpendicular to the PCB. In our experience this makes it more difficult to attach and remove the power cables, particularly if you’re using two of these cards at once.
Fortunately, once again the great unmentionable partner card (ok, it’s made by ASUS) shows that ATI’s board partners really are willing to tread a different path to that dictated by ATI as they’ve oriented the power connectors in the conventional way.
Score in detail
-
Value 7
-
Features 9
-
Performance 8
ATI Breaks Teraflop Barrier with Radeon HD 3870 X2 GPU
By
Wilson Rothman
Comments (37)
Remember that honkin’ ATI graphics card we showed you at CES? The one that was 1,000 times as fast as a Cray-1? Well, it’s official, making its debut today as the $450 ATI Radeon HD 3870 X2. It’s the first GPU to break the teraflop barrier, and is nearly double the performance of the HD 3870 you spent all your money on back in November. Press release with technical details after jump. [Product Page]
AMD Delivers Enthusiast Performance Leadership(1) with the Introduction of the ATI Radeon(TM) HD 3870 X2
— Industry’s First Teraflop Consumer Graphics Card Redefines High-Definition Performance for 1080P Gaming and beyond —
SUNNYVALE, Calif. —(Business Wire)— Jan. 28, 2008 AMD (NYSE:AMD) today announced the immediate availability of the ATI Radeon(TM) HD 3870 X2 graphics processor, expanding the visual boundaries of PC entertainment well beyond the 1080P High Definition (HD) threshold. The industry’s first graphics processor to break the Teraflop (one trillion floating point operations per second) barrier, the ATI Radeon HD 3870 X2 nearly doubles the performance of the award-winning ATI Radeon(TM) HD 3870 introduced in November 2007.(2)
Through an elegant yet aggressive design, the 55 nanometer process-based ATI Radeon 3870 X2 combines two ATI Radeon HD 3870s on a single graphics board, connected through integrated CrossFire(TM) technology. ATI Radeon 3870 X2 is also the first performance-leadership graphics product in the world to support Microsoft’s upcoming DirectX(R) 10.1 technology. The ATI Radeon 3870 X2 delivers a new class of price and performance leadership with unbelievable enthusiast value at a suggested retail price of US $449.
This launch follows on the success of the recently released ATI Radeon(TM) HD 3400 and ATI Radeon(TM) HD 3600 series graphics products, completing a comprehensive portfolio of next-generation 55nm GPUs that deliver unparalleled price, performance and energy efficiency from entry-level to performance-leadership class products.
«PC gaming enthusiasts demand the ultimate in performance and scalability for their HD gaming experience and the ATI Radeon 3870 X2 sets the standard by which all should be compared in this segment,» said Rick Bergman, senior vice president and general manager, Graphics Product Group, AMD.
«With this launch we reaffirm our commitment to enthusiast performance leadership and send a clear message that the ATI Radeon 3870 X2 is the new gold standard of the PC gaming world.»
Ultimate Performance
With the upcoming introduction of Microsoft’s DirectX 10.1 specification, gamers can expect more realistic gaming environments while developers have access to an increased amount of tools and resources to enhance overall image quality. Through delivering top-to-bottom DirectX 10.1 support, ATI Radeon HD 3000 series users can enjoy a more complete gaming experience now and in the future.
«We’re pleased to see our newest DirectX 10 technology brought to market so soon with the introduction of AMD’s latest enthusiast hardware,» said Kevin Unangst, senior global director of Games for Windows, Microsoft. «One of the greatest advantages of PC gaming is the rapid pace at which the experiences evolve and improve. ATI Radeon HD 3870 X2 delivers on the promise of DirectX 10 gaming with significantly improved visuals and enhanced performance.
«
ATI Radeon HD 3870 X2 will also provide support for ATI CrossFireX(TM), the innovative next-generation AMD multi-GPU technology designed to support up to four GPUs. Software support to enable ATI CrossFireX is planned for late Q1 2008.
Ultimate HD Experiences
With the launch of ATI Radeon HD 3870 X2, AMD continues to support the industry-leading Unified Video Decoder (UVD) and ATI Avivo(TM) HD for exceptional platform efficiency and image quality for H.264 and VC-1 high definition content. Enhanced HDMI functionality is also offered via integrated HDCP and audio for HDMI video.
«Alienware prides itself on staying at the forefront of HD gaming innovation so that our brand stands for the best possible experience for our customers,» said Patrick Cooper, director of product group, Alienware. «With the launch of the ATI Radeon HD 3870 X2 in our Area-51 ALX CrossFire platform, we can push the boundaries of visual realism one step further and provide enthusiast gamers with the perfect blend of next-generation features, performance and platform efficiency.
«
Ultimate Efficiency
The ATI Radeon HD 3870 X2 is the first enthusiast graphics processors to use TSMC’s 55nm process technology. The smooth transition to 55nm has allowed for a 2X increase in performance-per-watt over the previous generation. Through an elegant board design, the ATI Radeon 3870 X2 delivers exceptional acoustics that are roughly equivalent to a single ATI Radeon HD 3870. When combined with ATI PowerPlay(TM) technology, the ATI Radeon 3870 X2 delivers exceptional idle power efficiency with the ability to dynamically raise or lower GPU power depending on the usage scenario.
The ATI Radeon HD 3870 X2 launches with broad availability and ecosystem support from AMD’s Add-in-Board (AIB) and Systems Integrators (SI) partners. AIB partners building boards based on the ATI Radeon HD 3870 X2 include Asus, ASK, Club3D, Diamond Multimedia, HIS, ITC, Jetway, MSI, Sapphire, Triplex, Tul and Visiontek. Systems integrators launching ATI Radeon HD 3870 X2 series include ABS, Alienware, Canada Computers, CyberPower, Falcon-Northwest, iBUYPOWER, Maingear, Systemax and Velocity Micro.
![]()
About AMD
Advanced Micro Devices (NYSE:AMD) is a leading global provider of innovative processing solutions in the computing, graphics and consumer electronics markets. AMD is dedicated to driving open innovation, choice and industry growth by delivering superior customer-centric solutions that empower consumers and businesses worldwide. For more information, visit http://www.amd.com.
(1) Performance comparisons using ATI Radeon HD 3870 X2 versus NVIDIA 8800 Ultra using 3D Mark 2006, Supreme Commander, Call of Juarez, BioShock and Unreal Tournament 3 at 2560X1600 on AMD Phenom 2.6GHz CPU, AMD 790FX chipset, 2GB DDR2-800, Windows VISTA 64bit and ATI Catalyst display driver v. 8.45
(2) Performance comparisons of ATI Radeon HD 3870 versus ATI Radeon HD 3870 X2 using 3D Mark 2006, Supreme Commander and Unreal Tournament 3 at 2560X1600 on AMD Phenom 2.6GHz CPU, AMD 790FX chipset, 2GB DDR2-800, Windows VISTA 64bit and ATI Catalyst display driver v.
8.45
3870 AMD to UZS — Convert դր3870 Armenian Dram to Uzbekistani som
- Currencies
- AMD
- UZS
- AMD vs UZS
- դր3870
ten
100
1000
AED — UAE Dirham د.إAFN — Afghan Afghani ؋ALL — Albanian Lek LekAMD — Armenian Dram դրAOA — Angolan Kwanza KzARS — Argentine Peso $AUD — Australian Dollar $AWG — Aruban Florin ƒAZN — Azerbaijani Manat ₼BAM — Bosnia and Herzegovina convertible mark KMBBD — Barbadian Dollar $BDT — Bangladeshi Taka ৳BGN — Bulgarian Lev lvBHD — Bahraini Dinar .د.بBIF — Burundian Franc FrBMD — Bermudian Dollar $BND — Brunei Dollar $BOB — Bolivian Boliviano $bBRL — Brazilian Real R$BSD — Bahamian Dollar $ BTN — Bhutanese Ngultrum NuBTC — Bitcoin ɃBWP — Botswana Pula PBYR — Belarusian Ruble BrBZD — Belize Dollar $CAD — Canadian Dollar $CDF — Congolese Franc FrCHF — Swiss Franc FrCLP — Chilean Peso $CNY — Chinese Yuan ¥RMB — Chinese Yuan Renminbi ¥COP — Colombian Peso $CRC — Costa Rican Colón ₡CUP — Cuban Convertible Peso $CVE — Cape Verdean Escudo $CZK — Czech Koruna KčDJF — Djiboutian Franc FrDKK — Danish Krone krDOP — Dominican Peso $DZD — Algerian Dinar د. جEGP — Egyptian pound ج .مERN — Eritrean nakfa NfkETB — Ethiopian birr BrEUR — Euro €FJD — Fijian Dollar $FKP — Falkland Islands pound £GBP — British Pound Sterling £GEL — Georgian Lari ლGHS — Ghana Cedi ₵GMD — Gambian Dalasi DGNF — Guinean Franc FrGTQ — Guatemalan Quetzal QGYD — Guyanese Dollar $ HKD — Hong Kong Dollar $HNL — Honduran Lempira LHRK — Croatian Kuna knHTG — Haitian Gourde GHUF — Hungarian Forint FtIDR — Indonesian Rupiah RpILS — Israeli New Shekel ₪IMP — Manx pound £INR — Indian Rupee ₹IQD — Iraqi Dinar ع.دIRR — Iranian Rial ﷼ISK — Icelandic Króna krJEP — Jersey Pound £JMD — Jamaican Dollar $JOD — Jordanian Dinar د.اJPY — Japanese Yen ¥KES — Kenyan Shilling ShKGS — Kyrgyzstani Som lvKHR — Cambodian Riel ៛KMF — Comorian Franc FrKPW — North Korean Won ₩KRW — South Korean Won ₩KWD — Kuwaiti Dinar د.كKYD — Cayman Islands Dollar $KZT — Kazakhstani Tenge ₸LAK — Lao Kip ₭LBP — Lebanese Pound ل.لLKR — Sri Lankan Rupee RsLRD — Liberian Dollar $LSL — Lesotho Loti LLTL — Lithuanian Litas LtLVL — Latvian Lats LsLYD — Libyan Dinar ل.
دMA D — Moroccan Dirham د.م.MDL — Moldovan Leu LMGA — Malagasy ariary ArMKD — Macedonian denar denMMK — Burmese kyat KsMNT — Mongolian tögrög ₮MOP — Macanese pataca PMRO — Mauritanian ouguiya UMMUR — Mauritian rupee RsMVR — Maldivian rufiyaa .UTMWKcha — Malawian kwa MKMXN — Mexican peso $MYR — Malaysian ringgit MRMZN — Mozambican metical MTNAD — Namibian Dollar $NGN — Nigerian naira ₦NIO — Nicaraguan córdoba C$NOK — Norwegian krone krNPR — Nepalese rupee RsNZD — New Zealand Dollar $OMR — Omani rial ر.ع .PAB — Panamanian balboa B/.PEN — Peruvian nuevo sol S/.PGK — Papua New Guinean kina KPHP — Philippine peso ₱PKR — Pakistani rupee RsPLN — Polish zloty złPRB — Transnistrian ruble .PYG — Paraguayan guaraní ₲QAR — Qatari riyal ر.قRON — Romanian leu LRSD — Serbian dinar RsSDG — Sudanese Pound ج.س.SEK - Swedish krona krSGD — Singapore Dollar $SHP — Saint Helena pound £SLL — Si erra Leonean leone LeSOS — Somali shilling ShSRD — Surinamese Dollar $SSP — South Sudanese pound £STD — São Tomé and Príncipe dobra DbSVC — Salvadoran colón ₡SYP — Syrian pound £SZL — Swazi lilangeni LTHB — Thai baht ฿TJS — Tajikistani somoni SMTMT — Turkmenistan manat mTND — Tunisian dinar د.
تTOP — Tongan pa?anga T$TRY — Turkish lira ₺TTD — Trinidad and Tobago Dollar $TWD — New Taiwan Dollar $TZS — Tanzanian shilling ShUAH — Ukrainian hryvnia ₴UGX — Ugandan Shilling ShUSD — US Dollar $UYU — Uruguayan Peso $UZS — Uzbekistani som lvVEF — Venezuelan bolívar BsVND — Vietnamese d?ng ₫VUV — Vanuatu vatu VtWST — Samoan tala TXAF — Central African CFA franc FrXCD — East Caribbean Dollar $XOF — West African CFA franc FrXPF — CFP franc FrYER — Yemeni rial ﷼ZAR — South African Rand RZMW — Zambian kwacha ZKZWL — Zimbabwean Dollar $
AED — UAE Dirham د.إAFN — Afghan Afghani ؋ALL — Albanian Lek LekAMD — Armenian Dram դրAOA — Angolan Kwanza KzARS — Argentine Peso $AUD — Australian Dollar $AWG — Aruban Florin ƒAZN — Azerbaijani Manat ₼BAM — Bosnia and Herzegovina convertible mark KMBBD — Barbadian Dollar $BDT — Bangladeshi Taka ৳BGN — Bulgarian Lev lvBHD — Bahraini Dinar .د.بBIF — Burundian Franc FrBMD — Bermudian Dollar $BND — Brunei Dollar $BOB — Bolivian Boliviano $bBRL — Brazilian Real R$BSD — Bahamian Dollar $ BTN — Bhutanese Ngultrum NuBTC — Bitcoin ɃBWP — Botswana Pula PBYR — Belarusian Ruble BrBZD — Belize Dollar $CAD — Canadian Dollar $CDF — Congolese Franc FrCHF — Swiss Franc FrCLP — Chilean Peso $CNY — Chinese Yuan ¥RMB — Chinese Yuan Renminbi ¥COP — Colombian Peso $CRC — Costa Rican Colón ₡CUP — Cuban Convertible Peso $CVE — Cape Verdean Escudo $CZK — Czech Koruna KčDJF — Djiboutian Franc FrDKK — Danish Krone krDOP — Dominican Peso $DZD — Algerian Dinar د. جEGP — Egyptian pound ج .مERN — Eritrean nakfa NfkETB — Ethiopian birr BrEUR — Euro €FJD — Fijian Dollar $FKP — Falkland Islands pound £GBP — British Pound Sterling £GEL — Georgian Lari ლGHS — Ghana Cedi ₵GMD — Gambian Dalasi DGNF — Guinean Franc FrGTQ — Guatemalan Quetzal QGYD — Guyanese Dollar $ HKD — Hong Kong Dollar $HNL — Honduran Lempira LHRK — Croatian Kuna knHTG — Haitian Gourde GHUF — Hungarian Forint FtIDR — Indonesian Rupiah RpILS — Israeli New Shekel ₪IMP — Manx pound £INR — Indian Rupee ₹IQD — Iraqi Dinar ع.دIRR — Iranian Rial ﷼ISK — Icelandic Króna krJEP — Jersey Pound £JMD — Jamaican Dollar $JOD — Jordanian Dinar د.اJPY — Japanese Yen ¥KES — Kenyan Shilling ShKGS — Kyrgyzstani Som lvKHR — Cambodian Riel ៛KMF — Comorian Franc FrKPW — North Korean Won ₩KRW — South Korean Won ₩KWD — Kuwaiti Dinar د.كKYD — Cayman Islands Dollar $KZT — Kazakhstani Tenge ₸LAK — Lao Kip ₭LBP — Lebanese Pound ل.لLKR — Sri Lankan Rupee RsLRD — Liberian Dollar $LSL — Lesotho Loti LLTL — Lithuanian Litas LtLVL — Latvian Lats LsLYD — Libyan Dinar ل.
دMA D — Moroccan Dirham د.م.MDL — Moldovan Leu LMGA — Malagasy ariary ArMKD — Macedonian denar denMMK — Burmese kyat KsMNT — Mongolian tögrög ₮MOP — Macanese pataca PMRO — Mauritanian ouguiya UMMUR — Mauritian rupee RsMVR — Maldivian rufiyaa .UTMWKcha — Malawian kwa MKMXN — Mexican peso $MYR — Malaysian ringgit MRMZN — Mozambican metical MTNAD — Namibian Dollar $NGN — Nigerian naira ₦NIO — Nicaraguan córdoba C$NOK — Norwegian krone krNPR — Nepalese rupee RsNZD — New Zealand Dollar $OMR — Omani rial ر.ع .PAB — Panamanian balboa B/.PEN — Peruvian nuevo sol S/.PGK — Papua New Guinean kina KPHP — Philippine peso ₱PKR — Pakistani rupee RsPLN — Polish zloty złPRB — Transnistrian ruble .PYG — Paraguayan guaraní ₲QAR — Qatari riyal ر.قRON — Romanian leu LRSD — Serbian dinar RsSDG — Sudanese Pound ج.س.SEK - Swedish krona krSGD — Singapore Dollar $SHP — Saint Helena pound £SLL — Si erra Leonean leone LeSOS — Somali shilling ShSRD — Surinamese Dollar $SSP — South Sudanese pound £STD — São Tomé and Príncipe dobra DbSVC — Salvadoran colón ₡SYP — Syrian pound £SZL — Swazi lilangeni LTHB — Thai baht ฿TJS — Tajikistani somoni SMTMT — Turkmenistan manat mTND — Tunisian dinar د.
تTOP — Tongan pa?anga T$TRY — Turkish lira ₺TTD — Trinidad and Tobago Dollar $TWD — New Taiwan Dollar $TZS — Tanzanian shilling ShUAH — Ukrainian hryvnia ₴UGX — Ugandan Shilling ShUSD — US Dollar $UYU — Uruguayan Peso $UZS — Uzbekistani som lvVEF — Venezuelan bolívar BsVND — Vietnamese d?ng ₫VUV — Vanuatu vatu VtWST — Samoan tala TXAF — Central African CFA franc FrXCD — East Caribbean Dollar $XOF — West African CFA franc FrXPF — CFP franc FrYER — Yemeni rial ﷼ZAR — South African Rand RZMW — Zambian kwacha ZKZWL — Zimbabwean Dollar $
The fast and reliable converter shows how much you would get when exchanging three thousand, eight hundred and seventy Armenian Dram to Uzbekistani som.
Converter X provides up-to-date exchange rates on global currencies based on Open Exchange Rates. Check out the market overview
for even more real-time currency quotes or try to apply technical analysis tools on interactive charts.
AMD to UZS | 3920 AMD to UZS | 3970 AMD to UZS | 4020 AMD to UZS | 4070 AMD to UZS |
---|
Conversion from Armenian Dram to Uzbekistani som
try trading demo
1 AMD to UZS | = | BGN 26. |
1 UZS to AMD | = | AMD 0.04 AMD |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
5 AMD to UZS | = | lv 134.14 UZS | 5 UZS to AMD | = | AMD 0.19 AMD |
10 AMD to UZS | = | lv 268.27 UZS | 10 UZS to AMD | = | դր 0.37 AMD |
20 AMD to UZS | = | BGN 536.55 UZS | USD 20 to AMD | = | դր 0.75 AMD |
50 AMD to UZS | = | lv 1341.36 UZS | USD 50 to AMD | = | դր 1. |
100 AMD to UZS | = | BGN 2682.73 UZS | USD 100 to AMD | = | դր 3.73 AMD |
500 AMD to UZS | = | lv 13413.63 UZS | USD 500 to AMD | = | դր 18.64 AMD |
1000 AMD to UZS | = | lv 26827.26 UZS | USD 1000 to AMD | = | դր 37.28 AMD |
2000 AMD to UZS | = | lv 53654.52 UZS | 2000 UZS to AMD | = | դր 74.55 AMD |
4000 AMD to UZS | = | lv 107309. |
4000 UZS to AMD | = | դր 149.10 AMD |
5000 AMD to UZS | = | lv 134136.29 UZS | USD 5000 to AMD | = | դր 186.38 AMD |
10000 AMD to UZS | = | lv 268272.58 UZS | USD 10000 to AMD | = | դր 372.76 AMD |
3870 RUB to AMD — Convert ₽3870 Russian ruble to Armenian Dram
- Currencies
- RUB
- AMD
- RUB vs AMD
- ₽3870
ten
100
1000
AED — UAE Dirham د. إAFN — Afghan Afghani ؋ALL — Albanian Lek LekAMD — Armenian Dram դրAOA — Angolan Kwanza KzARS — Argentine Peso $AUD — Australian Dollar $AWG — Aruban Florin ƒAZN — Azerbaijani Manat ₼BAM — Bosnia and Herzegovina convertible mark KMBBD — Barbadian Dollar $BDT — Bangladeshi Taka ৳BGN — Bulgarian Lev lvBHD — Bahraini Dinar .د.بBIF — Burundian Franc FrBMD — Bermudian Dollar $BND — Brunei Dollar $BOB — Bolivian Boliviano $bBRL — Brazilian Real R$BSD — Bahamian Dollar $ BTN — Bhutanese Ngultrum NuBTC — Bitcoin ɃBWP — Botswana Pula PBYR — Belarusian Ruble BrBZD — Belize Dollar $CAD — Canadian Dollar $CDF — Congolese Franc FrCHF — Swiss Franc FrCLP — Chilean Peso $CNY — Chinese Yuan ¥RMB — Chinese Yuan Renminbi ¥COP — Colombian Peso $CRC — Costa Rican Colón ₡CUP — Cuban Convertible Peso $CVE — Cape Verdean Escudo $CZK — Czech Koruna KčDJF — Djiboutian Franc FrDKK — Danish Krone krDOP — Dominican Peso $DZD — Algerian Dinar د.جEGP — Egyptian pound ج .مERN — Eritrean nakfa NfkETB — Ethiopian birr BrEUR — Euro €FJD — Fijian Dollar $FKP — Falkland Islands pound £GBP — British Pound Sterling £GEL — Georgian Lari ლGHS — Ghana Cedi ₵GMD — Gambian Dalasi DGNF — Guinean Franc FrGTQ — Guatemalan Quetzal QGYD — Guyanese Dollar $ HKD — Hong Kong Dollar $HNL — Honduran Lempira LHRK — Croatian Kuna knHTG — Haitian Gourde GHUF — Hungarian Forint FtIDR — Indonesian Rupiah RpILS — Israeli New Shekel ₪IMP — Manx pound £INR — Indian Rupee ₹IQD — Iraqi Dinar ع.
دIRR — Iranian Rial ﷼ISK — Icelandic Króna krJEP — Jersey Pound £JMD — Jamaican Dollar $JOD — Jordanian Dinar د.اJPY — Japanese Yen ¥KES — Kenyan Shilling ShKGS — Kyrgyzstani Som lvKHR — Cambodian Riel ៛KMF — Comorian Franc FrKPW — North Korean Won ₩KRW — South Korean Won ₩KWD — Kuwaiti Dinar د.كKYD — Cayman Islands Dollar $KZT — Kazakhstani Tenge ₸LAK — Lao Kip ₭LBP — Lebanese Pound ل.لLKR — Sri Lankan Rupee RsLRD — Liberian Dollar $LSL — Lesotho Loti LLTL — Lithuanian Litas LtLVL — Latvian Lats LsLYD — Libyan Dinar ل.دMA D — Moroccan Dirham د.م.MDL — Moldovan Leu LMGA — Malagasy ariary ArMKD — Macedonian denar denMMK — Burmese kyat KsMNT — Mongolian tögrög ₮MOP — Macanese pataca PMRO — Mauritanian ouguiya UMMUR — Mauritian rupee RsMVR — Maldivian rufiyaa .UTMWKcha — Malawian kwa MKMXN — Mexican peso $MYR — Malaysian ringgit MRMZN — Mozambican metical MTNAD — Namibian Dollar $NGN — Nigerian naira ₦NIO — Nicaraguan córdoba C$NOK — Norwegian krone krNPR — Nepalese rupee RsNZD — New Zealand Dollar $OMR — Omani rial ر.
ع .PAB — Panamanian balboa B/.PEN — Peruvian nuevo sol S/.PGK — Papua New Guinean kina KPHP — Philippine peso ₱PKR — Pakistani rupee RsPLN — Polish zloty złPRB — Transnistrian ruble .PYG — Paraguayan guaraní ₲QAR — Qatari riyal ر.قRON — Romanian leu LRSD — Serbian dinar RsSDG — Sudanese Pound ج.س.SEK - Swedish krona krSGD — Singapore Dollar $SHP — Saint Helena pound £SLL — Si erra Leonean leone LeSOS — Somali shilling ShSRD — Surinamese Dollar $SSP — South Sudanese pound £STD — São Tomé and Príncipe dobra DbSVC — Salvadoran colón ₡SYP — Syrian pound £SZL — Swazi lilangeni LTHB — Thai baht ฿TJS — Tajikistani somoni SMTMT — Turkmenistan manat mTND — Tunisian dinar د.تTOP — Tongan pa?anga T$TRY — Turkish lira ₺TTD — Trinidad and Tobago Dollar $TWD — New Taiwan Dollar $TZS — Tanzanian shilling ShUAH — Ukrainian hryvnia ₴UGX — Ugandan Shilling ShUSD — US Dollar $UYU — Uruguayan Peso $UZS — Uzbekistani som lvVEF — Venezuelan bolívar BsVND — Vietnamese d?ng ₫VUV — Vanuatu vatu VtWST — Samoan tala TXAF — Central African CFA franc FrXCD — East Caribbean Dollar $XOF — West African CFA franc FrXPF — CFP franc FrYER — Yemeni rial ﷼ZAR — South African Rand RZMW — Zambian kwacha ZKZWL — Zimbabwean Dollar $
AED — UAE Dirham د. إAFN — Afghan Afghani ؋ALL — Albanian Lek LekAMD — Armenian Dram դրAOA — Angolan Kwanza KzARS — Argentine Peso $AUD — Australian Dollar $AWG — Aruban Florin ƒAZN — Azerbaijani Manat ₼BAM — Bosnia and Herzegovina convertible mark KMBBD — Barbadian Dollar $BDT — Bangladeshi Taka ৳BGN — Bulgarian Lev lvBHD — Bahraini Dinar .د.بBIF — Burundian Franc FrBMD — Bermudian Dollar $BND — Brunei Dollar $BOB — Bolivian Boliviano $bBRL — Brazilian Real R$BSD — Bahamian Dollar $ BTN — Bhutanese Ngultrum NuBTC — Bitcoin ɃBWP — Botswana Pula PBYR — Belarusian Ruble BrBZD — Belize Dollar $CAD — Canadian Dollar $CDF — Congolese Franc FrCHF — Swiss Franc FrCLP — Chilean Peso $CNY — Chinese Yuan ¥RMB — Chinese Yuan Renminbi ¥COP — Colombian Peso $CRC — Costa Rican Colón ₡CUP — Cuban Convertible Peso $CVE — Cape Verdean Escudo $CZK — Czech Koruna KčDJF — Djiboutian Franc FrDKK — Danish Krone krDOP — Dominican Peso $DZD — Algerian Dinar د.جEGP — Egyptian pound ج .مERN — Eritrean nakfa NfkETB — Ethiopian birr BrEUR — Euro €FJD — Fijian Dollar $FKP — Falkland Islands pound £GBP — British Pound Sterling £GEL — Georgian Lari ლGHS — Ghana Cedi ₵GMD — Gambian Dalasi DGNF — Guinean Franc FrGTQ — Guatemalan Quetzal QGYD — Guyanese Dollar $ HKD — Hong Kong Dollar $HNL — Honduran Lempira LHRK — Croatian Kuna knHTG — Haitian Gourde GHUF — Hungarian Forint FtIDR — Indonesian Rupiah RpILS — Israeli New Shekel ₪IMP — Manx pound £INR — Indian Rupee ₹IQD — Iraqi Dinar ع.
دIRR — Iranian Rial ﷼ISK — Icelandic Króna krJEP — Jersey Pound £JMD — Jamaican Dollar $JOD — Jordanian Dinar د.اJPY — Japanese Yen ¥KES — Kenyan Shilling ShKGS — Kyrgyzstani Som lvKHR — Cambodian Riel ៛KMF — Comorian Franc FrKPW — North Korean Won ₩KRW — South Korean Won ₩KWD — Kuwaiti Dinar د.كKYD — Cayman Islands Dollar $KZT — Kazakhstani Tenge ₸LAK — Lao Kip ₭LBP — Lebanese Pound ل.لLKR — Sri Lankan Rupee RsLRD — Liberian Dollar $LSL — Lesotho Loti LLTL — Lithuanian Litas LtLVL — Latvian Lats LsLYD — Libyan Dinar ل.دMA D — Moroccan Dirham د.م.MDL — Moldovan Leu LMGA — Malagasy ariary ArMKD — Macedonian denar denMMK — Burmese kyat KsMNT — Mongolian tögrög ₮MOP — Macanese pataca PMRO — Mauritanian ouguiya UMMUR — Mauritian rupee RsMVR — Maldivian rufiyaa .UTMWKcha — Malawian kwa MKMXN — Mexican peso $MYR — Malaysian ringgit MRMZN — Mozambican metical MTNAD — Namibian Dollar $NGN — Nigerian naira ₦NIO — Nicaraguan córdoba C$NOK — Norwegian krone krNPR — Nepalese rupee RsNZD — New Zealand Dollar $OMR — Omani rial ر.
ع .PAB — Panamanian balboa B/.PEN — Peruvian nuevo sol S/.PGK — Papua New Guinean kina KPHP — Philippine peso ₱PKR — Pakistani rupee RsPLN — Polish zloty złPRB — Transnistrian ruble .PYG — Paraguayan guaraní ₲QAR — Qatari riyal ر.قRON — Romanian leu LRSD — Serbian dinar RsSDG — Sudanese Pound ج.س.SEK - Swedish krona krSGD — Singapore Dollar $SHP — Saint Helena pound £SLL — Si erra Leonean leone LeSOS — Somali shilling ShSRD — Surinamese Dollar $SSP — South Sudanese pound £STD — São Tomé and Príncipe dobra DbSVC — Salvadoran colón ₡SYP — Syrian pound £SZL — Swazi lilangeni LTHB — Thai baht ฿TJS — Tajikistani somoni SMTMT — Turkmenistan manat mTND — Tunisian dinar د.تTOP — Tongan pa?anga T$TRY — Turkish lira ₺TTD — Trinidad and Tobago Dollar $TWD — New Taiwan Dollar $TZS — Tanzanian shilling ShUAH — Ukrainian hryvnia ₴UGX — Ugandan Shilling ShUSD — US Dollar $UYU — Uruguayan Peso $UZS — Uzbekistani som lvVEF — Venezuelan bolívar BsVND — Vietnamese d?ng ₫VUV — Vanuatu vatu VtWST — Samoan tala TXAF — Central African CFA franc FrXCD — East Caribbean Dollar $XOF — West African CFA franc FrXPF — CFP franc FrYER — Yemeni rial ﷼ZAR — South African Rand RZMW — Zambian kwacha ZKZWL — Zimbabwean Dollar $
The fast and reliable converter shows how much you would get when exchanging three thousand, eight hundred and seventy Russian ruble to Armenian Dram.
Converter X provides up-to-date exchange rates on global currencies based on Open Exchange Rates. Check out the market overview
for even more real-time currency quotes or try to apply technical analysis tools on interactive charts.
USD to AMD | AMD | AMD | AMD | AMD |
---|
Conversion from Russian ruble to Armenian Dram
try trading demo
1 RUB to AMD | = | դր 6.94 AMD | 1 AMD to RUB | = | ₽ 0.14 RUB |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
5 RUB to AMD | = | դր 34.70 AMD | 5 AMD to RUB | = | RUB 0.72 RUB |
10 RUB to AMD | = | դր 69. |
10 AMD to RUB | = | RUB 1.44 RUB |
20 RUB to AMD | = | դր 138.80 AMD | 20 USD to RUB | = | RUB 2.88 RUB |
AMD | = | AMD 347.01 AMD | 50 AMD to RUB | = | RUB 7.20 RUB |
100 RUB to AMD | = | դր 694.02 AMD | 100 AMD to RUB | = | RUB 14.41 RUB |
500 RUB to AMD | = | դր 3470.10 AMD | 500 AMD to RUB | = | RUB 72. |
1000 RUB to AMD | = | AMD 6940.21 AMD | 1000 AMD to RUB | = | RUB 144.09 RUB |
= | դր 13880.41 AMD | 2000 AMD to RUB | = | RUB 288.18 RUB | |
AMD | = | AMD 27760.83 AMD | 4000 AMD to RUB | = | RUB 576.35 RUB |
AMD | = | AMD 34701.04 AMD | 5000 AMD to RUB | = | RUB 720.44 RUB |
AMD | = | դր 69402. |
10000 AMD to RUB | = | RUB 1440.88 RUB |
Chip Hi-Black for cartridge Samsung SL-M3320/3820/3870 (D203L), Bk, 5K (new firmware) D203L
0 ratings |
Price
160 rubles
from 5 pcs
130 rubles
In the basket
Availability: few
Compare
Compared
Add to Compare
Remove from comparison
To favorites
Favorites
Add to favorites
Remove from favorites
Shipping
- Loading.
..
Similar products
Chip Hi-Black for cartridge Samsung SL-M3320/3820/4020/M3370/3870/4070 (D203L), Bk, 5K
Chips
FIRMWARE DO NOT UPDATE
Price
145 rub
from 5 pcs
120 rub
In the cartMore
id: D203L
there is
CompareIn comparison
FavoritesFavoritesAdd to favoritesRemove from favorites
-
Description
-
Characteristics
-
Delivery
Description
FIRMWARE DO NOT UPDATE
Price
725 RUB
from 5 pcs
700 rub
Toner-cartridge TK-1200 (those packaging) Kyocera P2335D/P2335DN/P2335DW/M2235DN 3K
pcs
5 975 rub
Toner-cartridge HI-BLACK (HB-TK-8375 Y) for KyoCera Taskalfa 3554CI, Y, 20K
Price
6 855
of 5 pcs
6 79 rub
Hi-Black Toner Cartridge (HB-TK-8375 M) for Kyocera TASKalfa 3554ci, M, 20K
Price
6 855 rub
from 5 pcs
6 790 rub
toner-cartridge HI-Black (HB-TK-8375 C) for Kyocera Taskalfa 3554CI, C, 20K
6 6 855 rub
from 5 pcs
6 790 rub
toner-cartridge HI-Black (HB-TK-8375 BK) for Kyocera Taskalfa 3554CI, BK, 30K
4 205 rub
dated 5 pp.
Hi-Black Toner Cartridge (HB-TK-8365 Y) for Kyocera TASKalfa 2554ci, Y, 12K
Price
5 945 rub
from 5 pcs
5 890 rub
toner-cartridge HI-Black (HB-TK-8365 M) for Kyocera Taskalfa 2554ci, M, 12k
5 5
from 5 pcs.
Hi-Black Toner Cartridge (HB-TK-8365 BK) for Kyocera TASKalfa 2554ci, Bk, 25K
Price
5 945 rub
from 5 pcs
Price
2 730 rub
from 5 pcs
2 680 rub
HI-Black cartridge (HB-W1500A) for hp lj m111/141, 0.97k (without chip)
950 rub
from 5 pcs
915 rub
Refill Xerox cartridge 106R02312 ( WorkCentre 3315 / 3325 )
Price
1 050 rub
from 5 pcs
1 030 rub
DK-7300 Drama-UNIT (those packaging) KyoCera Ecosys P4040DN
61 210 RUB 900 p.
60 600 rub
Patent drum for cartridges Hi-Black HP 280/505
Price
120 rub
100 rub
302k39480 The main supply unit (those /6030MFP
Price
10 215 rub
from 5 pcs
10 115 rub
HI-BLACK rubber shaft boiling for HP LJ 5000/5100, RS5-1389-C, set 2 pcs
Price
80 rubles
from 5 pcs
60 rub
302LV94130 VAL CHARASE OF (those PACK) KyoCera Ecosys M3040DN/M3540IDN
2 715
9 SPs 5 SCs 9 Sep 9 Sep 9 Sep. -cartridge TK-1170 (technical packaging) Kyocera M2040dn/M2540dn/M2640idw 7.2K
Price
10 600 rub
from 5 pcs
10 495 rub
Replacing chip xerox dc 2020 013r00677 b/s/y Drum (76k)
of 5 pcs
Popular popular goods. Popular popular goods
1 — 20 of 9686
Home | Previous |
1
2
3
four
5
|
Track. |
End
Characteristics and reviews of the video card ATI Radeon HD 3870 / Overclockers.ua
Name | 16 | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Memory Frequency (DDR), MHz | 1125 (2250) | ||||||||||||||
memory bus | GDDR4 256 Bit | ||||||||||||||
512 | 72 | ||||||||||||||
textures for the beat | 16 | ||||||||||||||
textures for passage | 16 | ||||||||||||||
Shaders Model | 4.1 | ||||||||||||||
Fill Rate, MPIX/SA0Radeon RX 580 XTRRadeon RX 580Radeon RX 570Radeon RX 560Radeon RX 550Radeon RX 480Radeon RX 470Radeon RX 460Radeon R9 Fury XRadeon R9 FuryRadeon R9 NanoRadeon R9 390XRadeon R9 390Radeon R9 380XRadeon R9 380Radeon R7 370Radeon R7 360Radeon R9 295X2Radeon R9 290XRadeon R9 290Radeon R9 280XRadeon R9 285Radeon R9 280Radeon R9 270XRadeon R9 270Radeon R7 265Radeon R7 260XRadeon R7 260Radeon R7 250Radeon R7 240Radeon HD 7970Radeon HD 7950Radeon HD 7870 XTRadeon HD 7870Radeon HD 7850Radeon HD 7790Radeon HD 7770 HD 7770Radeon90Radeon HD 6970Radeon HD 6950Radeon HD 6930Radeon HD 6870Radeon HD 6850Radeon HD 6790Radeon HD 6770Radeon HD 6750Radeon HD 6670 GDDR5Radeon HD 6670 GDDR3Radeon HD 6570 GDDR5Radeon HD 6570 GDDR3Radeon HD 6450 GDDR5Radeon HD 6450 GDDR3Radeon HD 5570 GDDR5Radeon HD 3750Radeon HD 3730Radeon HD 5970Radeon HD 5870Radeon HD 5850Radeon HD 5830Radeon HD 5770Radeon HD 5750Radeon HD 5670Radeon HD 5570Radeon HD 5550Radeon HD 5450Radeon HD 4890Radeon HD 4870 X2Radeon HD 4870Radeon HD 4860Radeon HD 4850 X2Radeon HD 4850Radeon HD 4830Radeon HD 4790Radeon HD 4770Radeon HD 4730Radeon HD 4670Radeon HD 4650Radeon HD 4550Radeon HD 4350Radeon HD 4290 (IGP 890GX) Radeon HD 4200 (IGP)Radeon HD 3870 X2Radeon HD 3870Radeon HD 3850Radeon HD 3690Radeon HD 3650Radeon HD 3470Radeon HD 3450Radeon HD 3300 (IGP)Radeon HD 3200 ( IGP)Radeon HD 3100 (IGP)Radeon HD 2900 XT 1Gb GDDR4Radeon HD 2900 XTRadeon HD 2900 PRORadeon HD 2900 GTRadeon HD 2600 XT DUALRadeon HD 2600 XT50 CrossFire EditionRadeon X1950 XTXRadeon X1950 XTRadeon X1950 PRO DUALRadeon X1950 PRORadeon X1950 GTRadeon X1900 CrossFire EditionRadeon X1900 XTXRadeon X1900 XTRadeon X1900 GT Rev2Radeon X1900 GTRadeon X1800 CrossFire EditionRadeon X1800 XT PE 512MBRadeon X1800 XTRadeon X1800 XLRadeon X1800 GTORadeon X1650 XTRadeon X1650 GTRadeon X1650 XL DDR3Radeon X1650 XL DDR2Radeon X1650 PRO on RV530XTRadeon X1650 PRO on RV535XTRadeon X1650Radeon X1600 XTRadeon X1600 PRORadeon X1550 PRORadeon X1550Radeon X1550 LERadeon X1300 XT on RV530ProRadeon X1300 XT on RV535ProRadeon X1300 CERadeon X1300 ProRadeon X1300Radeon X1300 LERadeon X1300 HMRadeon X1050Radeon X850 XT Platinum EditionRadeon X850 XT CrossFire EditionRadeon X850 XT Radeon X850 Pro Radeon X800 XT Platinum Edition Radeon X800 XTRadeon X800 CrossFire Edition ProRadeon X700Radeon X600 XTRadeon X600 ProRadeon X550 XTRadeon X550Radeon X300 SE 128MB HM-256MBRadeon X300 SE 32MB HM-128MBRadeon X300Radeon X300 SERadeon 9800 XTRadeon 9800 PRO /DDR IIRadeon 9800 PRO /DDRRadeon 9800Radeon 9800 SE-256 bitRadeon 9800 SE-128 bitRadeon 9700 PRORadeon 9700Radeon 9600 XTRadeon 9600 PRORadeon 9600Radeon 9600 SERadeon 9600 TXRadeon 9550 XTRadeon 9550Radeon 9550 SERadeon 9500 PRORadeon 9500 /128 MBRadeon 9500 /64 MBRadeon 9250Radeon 9200 PRORadeon 9200Radeon 9200 SERadeon 9000 PRORadeon 9000Radeon 9000 XTRadeon 8500 LE / 9100Radeon 8500Radeon 7500Radeon 7200 Radeon LE Radeon DDR OEM Radeon DDR Radeon SDR Radeon VE / 7000Rage 128 GL Rage 128 VR Rage 128 PRO AFRRage 128 PRORage 1283D Rage ProNVIDIAGeForce RTX 4090GeForce RTX 4080 16GBGeForce RTX 4080 12GBGeForce RTX 3090 TiGeForce RTX 3090GeForce RTX 3080 TiGeForce RTX 3080 12GBGeForce RTX 3080GeForce RTX 3070 TiGeForce RTX 3070GeForce RTX 3060 TiGeForce RTX 3060 rev. You can simultaneously select Reviews of video cards ATI Radeon HD 3870:
Car Hire Cagliari Pirri from $3609 per day — FREE Cancellation: Best Deals of 2022✓ No Hidden Fees ✓ 24/7 Support ✓ Free Cancellation Place of receipt Cagliari Pirri, Cagliari, Sardinia Cannot find any location Return ibid Place of return Received date 00:3001:0001:3002:0002:3003:0003:3004:0004:3005:0005:3006:0006:3007:0007:3008:0008:3009:0009:3010:0010:3011:0011:3012:0012:3013:0013:3014:0014:3015:0015:3016:0016:3017:0017:3018:0018:3019:0019:3020:0020:3021:0021 :3022:0022:3023:0023:30 Return date 00:3001:0001:3002:0002:3003:0003:3004:0004:3005:0005:3006:0006:3007:0007:3008:0008:3009:0009:3010:0010:301 :3012:0012:3013:0013:3014:0014:3015:0015:3016:0016:3017:0017:3018:0018:3019:0019:3020:0020:3021:0021:3022:0022:3023:0023:30 Driver’s country of residence — Germany , age 30-65
More than 500 reliable distributors: Lowest car rental pricesEconomy Fiat 500 Compact Fiat 500L Medium Jeep Renegade Standard Jeep Compass Most Popular Car RentalsEconomy Lancia Ypsilon Economy Fiat 500 Standard Jeep Compass Standard Jeep Cherokee Prices shown above are estimates only and were last updated on 2022-09-27 at 19:05. Actual prices may vary depending on booking dates, rental period and car class. Awards World Travel Awards — Best Car Rental Site in the World 2020 World Travel Awards — World’s Best Car Booking App 2020 Magellan Awards 2021 — Silver Award Travel & Hospitality Awards 2021 2021 FT 1000: Europe’s Fastest Growing Companies — Top 100 Best Companies 2020 FT 1000: Europe’s Fastest Growing Companies — Top 100 Best Companies Uzakrota Travel Awards – Best Car Rental Site in the World 2020 2019 Inc. Trustpilot — Top 10 Best Car Rental Companies SimilarWeb — Top 50 Car Rental Sites Map of car rental locationsMost popular car brands and models for rent
Top distributors 2022Leasys Superb 8. |