A10-8700P [in 17 benchmarks]
AMD
A10-8700P
Buy
- Interface
- Core clock speed
- Max video memory
- Memory type
- Memory clock speed
- Maximum resolution
Summary
AMD started AMD A10-8700P sales 3 June 2015. This is a Carrizo architecture notebook processor primarily aimed at office systems. It has 4 cores and 4 threads, and is based on 28nm manufacturing technology, with a maximum frequency of 3200 MHz and a locked multiplier.
Compatibility-wise, this is FP4 processor with a TDP of 12 — 35 Watt. It supports DDR3-2133 memory.
It provides poor benchmark performance at
1.79%
of a leader’s which is AMD EPYC 9654.
EPYC
9654
Compare
General info
A10-8700P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and pricing.
| Place in performance rating | 1835 | |
| Market segment | Laptop | |
| Series | AMD Carrizo | |
| Architecture codename | Carrizo (2015−2018) | |
| Release date | 3 June 2015 (7 years old) | |
| Current price | $466 | of 25332 (Xeon Platinum 8276L) |
Technical specs
Basic microprocessor parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters can generally indicate CPU performance, but to be more precise you have to review its test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | |
| Threads | 4 | |
| Base clock speed | 1. 8 GHz |
of 4.7 (Ryzen 9 7900X) |
| Boost clock speed | 3.2 GHz | of 6 (Core i9-13900KS) |
| L2 cache | 2048 KB | of 36864 (Apple M2 Max) |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | of 4 (Ryzen 9 7940HS) |
| Maximum core temperature | 90 °C | of 110 (Atom x7-E3950) |
| Number of transistors | 3100 Million | of 9900000 (Ryzen 9 7845HX) |
| 64 bit support | + | |
| Windows 11 compatibility | — |
Compatibility
Information on A10-8700P compatibility with other computer components and devices: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one.
Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | FP4 | |
| Thermal design power (TDP) | 12 — 35 Watt | of 400 (Xeon Platinum 9282) |
Technologies and extensions
Technological capabilities and additional instructions supported by A10-8700P. You’ll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | HSA 1.0 | |
| AES-NI | 1 | |
| FMA | FMA4 | |
| AVX | AVX | |
| FRTC | 1 | |
| FreeSync | 1 | |
| PowerTune | — | |
| DualGraphics | 1 | |
| TrueAudio | + | |
| PowerNow | + | |
| PowerGating | + | |
| Out-of-band client management | + | |
| VirusProtect | + | |
| HSA | + |
Virtualization technologies
Supported virtual machine optimization technologies.
Some are specific to Intel only, some to AMD.
| AMD-V | 1 | |
| IOMMU 2.0 | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel number of RAM supported by A10-8700P’s memory controller. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequency may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3-2133 | of 5600 (Ryzen 9 7940HS) |
| Max memory channels | 2 | of 12 (Xeon Platinum 9221) |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of a GPU integrated into A10-8700P.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon R6 Graphics | |
| iGPU core count | 6 | |
| Enduro | + | |
| Switchable graphics | 1 | |
| UVD | + | |
| VCE | + |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of A10-8700P’s integrated GPU.
| DisplayPort | + | |
| HDMI | + |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by A10-8700P’s integrated GPU, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | DirectX® 12 | |
| Vulkan | 1 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection types of supported peripherals.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | of 5 (EPYC 9654) |
Benchmark performance
Single-core and multi-core benchmark results of A10-8700P. Overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Overall score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
A10-8700P
1.79
- Passmark
- GeekBench 5 Single-Core
- GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
- Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
- Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core
- 3DMark06 CPU
- Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core
- Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core
- Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core
- Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core
- TrueCrypt AES
- x264 encoding pass 2
- x264 encoding pass 1
- WinRAR 4.0
- Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core
- Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation.
There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 67%
A10-8700P
2226
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
Benchmark coverage: 37%
A10-8700P
351
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Benchmark coverage: 37%
A10-8700P
951
Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D.
Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.
Benchmark coverage: 20%
A10-8700P
2334
Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.
Benchmark coverage: 19%
A10-8700P
6394
3DMark06 CPU
3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.
Benchmark coverage: 19%
A10-8700P
2978
Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads.
A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.
Benchmark coverage: 17%
A10-8700P
2
Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.
Benchmark coverage: 14%
A10-8700P
194
Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core
Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.
Benchmark coverage: 14%
A10-8700P
69
Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core
Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D.
It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.
Benchmark coverage: 14%
A10-8700P
0.9
TrueCrypt AES
TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.
Benchmark coverage: 13%
A10-8700P
2
x264 encoding pass 2
x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more.
Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.
Benchmark coverage: 12%
A10-8700P
15
x264 encoding pass 1
x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.
Benchmark coverage: 12%
A10-8700P
74
WinRAR 4.0
WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using ‘Best’ setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.
Benchmark coverage: 12%
A10-8700P
1328
Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core
Benchmark coverage: 6%
A10-8700P
4677
Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core
Benchmark coverage: 6%
A10-8700P
1975
Relative perfomance
Overall A10-8700P performance compared to nearest competitors among notebook CPUs.
Intel Core i5-2520M
100.56
AMD A8-8600P
100.56
Intel Core i5-3427U
100
AMD A10-8700P
100
Intel Core i7-940XM
99.44
Intel Pentium 4415U
98.88
Intel Core i5-4200U
98.32
Intel equivalent
We believe that the nearest equivalent to A10-8700P from Intel is Core i5-3427U, which is nearly equal in speed and lower by 1 position in our rating.
Core i5
3427U
Compare
Here are some closest Intel rivals to A10-8700P:
Intel Core i3-5020U
101.
12
Intel Core i5-2520M
100.56
Intel Core i5-3427U
100
AMD A10-8700P
100
Intel Core i7-940XM
99.44
Intel Pentium 4415U
98.88
Intel Celeron 7305
98.32
Similar processors
Here is our recommendation of several processors that are more or less close in performance to the one reviewed.
A8
8600P
Compare
Core i3
5020U
Compare
Core i5
4250U
Compare
Core i5
4200U
Compare
Celeron
J3455
Compare
Core i7
4550U
Compare
Recommended GPUs
People consider these graphics cards to be good for A10-8700P, according to our PC configuration statistics.
Radeon R6
Graphics
32.2%
Radeon R6
M340DX
20.1%
Radeon R7
M360
6.3%
Radeon R7
Graphics
4.7%
Radeon R8
M365DX
3.3%
Radeon R5
M335
2.9%
Radeon R6
(Carrizo)
2.3%
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
1.
2%
Radeon R7
360
1.1%
Radeon
Graphics
1%
These are the fastest graphics cards for A10-8700P in our user configuration statistics.
There is a total of 989 configurations based on A10-8700P in our database.
GeForce RTX
4090
0.1% (1/989)
Radeon RX
6950 XT
0.1% (1/989)
GeForce RTX
3080 Ti
0.1% (1/989)
Radeon RX
6900 XT
0.
2% (2/989)
GeForce RTX
2080 Ti
0.2% (2/989)
GeForce GTX
1080 Ti
0.1% (1/989)
GeForce RTX
3060
0.1% (1/989)
GeForce GTX
1070 SLI Mobile
0.1% (1/989)
GeForce GTX
1660 Ti
0.1% (1/989)
GeForce GTX
1060 6 GB
0.1% (1/989)
User rating
Here is the rating given to the reviewed processor by our users.
Let others know your opinion by rating it yourself.
Questions and comments
Here you can ask a question about A10-8700P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.
Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.
Page not found — Technical City
Page not found — Technical City
We couldn’t find such page: /en/cpu/a10-8700p%23characteristics
Popular graphics cards comparisons
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
vs
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce RTX
2060 Super
vs
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce GTX
1060 6 GB
vs
Radeon RX
580
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
vs
GeForce RTX
3070
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
vs
GeForce GTX
1650
GeForce GTX
1660 Ti
vs
GeForce GTX
1660 Super
Popular graphics cards
GeForce RTX
4090
GeForce GTX
1660 Super
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
Radeon RX
580
Popular CPU comparisons
Ryzen 5
5600X
vs
Core i5
12400F
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Core i5
10400F
Core i5
10400F
vs
Core i3
12100F
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Ryzen 5
5600X
Ryzen 5
5600X
vs
Ryzen 5
5600G
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Core i3
12100F
Popular CPUs
Ryzen 5
5500U
Ryzen 5
5600X
Core i5
12400F
Core i3
1115G4
Core i3
12100F
EPYC
7h22
Processor A10-8700P [in 17 benchmarks]
AMD
A10-8700P
- Interface
- Core frequency
- Video memory size
- Memory type
- Memory frequency
- Maximum resolution
Description
AMD started AMD A10-8700P sales 3 June 2015.
This is Carrizo architecture notebook processor primarily aimed at office systems. It has 4 cores and 4 threads and is manufactured using 28nm process technology, the maximum frequency is 3200MHz, the multiplier is locked.
In terms of compatibility, this is an FP4 socket processor with a TDP of 12 — 35W. It supports DDR3-2133 memory.
It provides poor benchmark performance at
1.79%
from the leader which is AMD EPYC 9654.
EPYC
9654
Compare
General information
Compatible
Information on A10-8700P compatibility with other computer components. Useful, for example, when choosing the configuration of a future computer or to upgrade an existing one.
Please note that the power consumption of some processors can significantly exceed their nominal TDP even without overclocking. Some may even double their claims if the motherboard allows you to adjust the power settings of the processor.
055
RAM support
Types, maximum size and number of channels of RAM supported by A10-8700P. Higher memory frequency may be supported depending on the motherboard.
| Memory types | DDR3-2133 | of 5600 (Ryzen 9 7940HS) |
| HDMI | + |
Built-in video support 90 -20
APIs supported by A10-8700P integrated graphics card, including their versions.
| DirectX | Directx® 12 | |
| Vulkan | 1 | 9005 |
200021
A10-8700P supported peripherals and how to connect them.
| Aviation PCI Express | 3.0 | of 5 (EPYC 9654) |
Tests in benchmark
These are the results of the A10-8700P performance tests in non-gaming benchmarks. The overall score is set from 0 to 100, where 100 corresponds to the fastest processor at the moment.
Overall test performance
This is our overall performance rating. We regularly improve our algorithms, but if you find any inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in the comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
A10-8700P
1.79
- Passmark
- GeekBench 5 Single-Core
- GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
- Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
- Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core
- 3DMark06 CPU
- Cinebench 11.
5 64-bit multi-core - Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core
- Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core
- Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core
- TrueCrypt AES
- x264 encoding pass 2
- x264 encoding pass 1
- WinRAR 4.0
- Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core
- Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widely used benchmark that consists of 8 different tests, including integer and floating point calculations, extended instruction tests, compression, encryption, and game physics calculations. Also includes a separate single-threaded test.
Benchmark coverage: 67%
A10-8700P
2226
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application designed as CPU benchmarks that independently recreate certain real world tasks that can accurately measure performance. This version uses only one processor core.
Benchmark coverage: 37%
A10-8700P
351
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application designed as CPU benchmarks that independently recreate certain real world tasks that can accurately measure performance. This version uses all available processor cores.
Benchmark coverage: 37%
A10-8700P
951
Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
Cinebench R10 is a very outdated ray tracing benchmark for processors developed by the authors of Cinema 4D — Maxon. The Single-Core version uses a single CPU thread to render a futuristic motorcycle model.
Benchmark coverage: 20%
A10-8700P
2334
Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 that uses all processor threads. The possible number of threads in this version is limited to 16.
Benchmark coverage: 19%
A10-8700P
6394
3DMark06 CPU
3DMark06 is an outdated set of benchmarks based on DirectX 9 by Futuremark. Its processor part contains two tests, one of which calculates the pathfinding of game AI, the other emulates game physics using the PhysX package.
Benchmark coverage: 19%
A10-8700P
2978
Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 that uses all processor threads. This version supports a maximum of 64 threads.
Benchmark coverage: 17%
A10-8700P
2
Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 that uses all CPU threads.
Benchmark coverage: 14%
A10-8700P
194
Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core
Cinebench R15 (Release 15) is a benchmark created by Maxon, the creator of the popular Cinema 4D 3D modeling package.
It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench using more modern variants of the Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes referred to as Single-Thread) uses only one CPU thread to render a room full of mirror balls and complexly shaped lights.
Benchmark coverage: 14%
A10-8700P
69
Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core
Cinebench R11.5 is an old Maxon development benchmark. authors of Cinema 4D. It has been superseded by later versions of Cinebench which use more modern variants of the Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads one CPU thread with ray tracing, rendering a glossy room full of crystal spheres and lights.
Benchmark coverage: 14%
A10-8700P
0.9
TrueCrypt AES
TrueCrypt is a deprecated program that was widely used to encrypt disk partitions on the fly. It contains several built-in benchmarks, one of which is TrueCrypt AES. It measures the speed of data encryption using the AES algorithm.
The result of the test is the encryption speed in gigabytes per second.
Benchmark coverage: 13%
A10-8700P
2
x264 encoding pass 2
x264 Pass 2 is a slower MPEG4 x264 video compression benchmark, resulting in a variable bit rate output file. This results in a better quality of the resulting video file, as a higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. The benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.
Benchmark coverage: 12%
A10-8700P
15
x264 encoding pass 1
The x264 benchmark uses the MPEG 4 x264 compression method to encode the HD (720p) sample video. Pass 1 is a faster option that produces an output file at a constant bit rate. Its result is measured in frames per second, that is, how many frames of the source video file were encoded in one second on average.
Benchmark coverage: 12%
A10-8700P
74
WinRAR 4.
0
WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of the popular archiver. It contains an internal speed test using maximum compression by the RAR algorithm on large amounts of randomly generated data. Results are measured in kilobytes per second.
Benchmark coverage: 12%
A10-8700P
1328
Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core
Benchmark coverage: 6%
A10-8700P
4677
Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core
Benchmark coverage: 6%
A10-8700P
1975
Relative capacity
Overall performance of the A10-8700P compared to its closest competitor in notebook processors.
Intel Core i5-2520M
100.56
AMD A8-8600P
100.56
Intel Core i5-3427U
100
AMD A10-8700P
100
Intel Core i7-940XM
99.
44
Intel Pentium 4415U
98.88
Intel Core i5-4200U
98.32
Competitor from Intel
We believe that the nearest equivalent to A10-8700P from Intel is Core i5-3427U, which is approximately equal in speed and lower by 1 position in our rating.
Core i5
3427U
Compare
Here are some of Intel’s closest competitors to the A10-8700P:
Intel Core i3-5020U
101.12
Intel Core i5-2520M
100.56
Intel Core i5-3427U
100
AMD A10-8700P
100
Intel Core i7-940XM
99.44
Intel Pentium 4415U
98.88
Intel Celeron 7305
98.
32
Other processors
Here we recommend several processors that are more or less similar in performance to the reviewed one.
A8
8600P
Compare
Core i3
5020U
Compare
Celeron
J3455
Compare
Core i5
4250U
Compare
Core i5
4200U
Compare
A10
5750M
Compare
Best graphics cards for A10-8700P
We have 989 configurations based on A10-8700P in our database.
According to statistics, these cards are most often used with A10-8700P:
Radeon R6
Graphics
32.2%
Radeon R6
M340DX
20.1%
Radeon R7
M360
6.3%
Radeon R7
Graphics
4.7%
Radeon R8
M365DX
3.3%
Radeon R5
M335
2.9%
Radeon R6
(Carrizo)
2.3%
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
1.2%
Radeon R7
360
1.
1%
Radeon
Graphics
1%
Here are the most powerful graphics cards used with the A10-8700P according to user statistics:
GeForce RTX
4090
0.1% (1/989)
Radeon RX
6950XT
0.1% (1/989)
GeForce RTX
3080 Ti
0.1% (1/989)
Radeon RX
6900XT
0.2% (2/989)
GeForce RTX
2080 Ti
0.2% (2/989)
GeForce GTX
1080 Ti
0.1% (1/989)
GeForce RTX
3060
0.