Amd a10 4600m intel equivalent: Please click the green button to continue.

AMD A10-9700 vs Intel Core i7-4600U Benchmarks, Specs, Performance Comparison and Differences

AMD A10-9700 vs Intel Core i7-4600U

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the AMD A10-9700 on one side and the Intel Core i7-4600U on the other side. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, It has 4 cores, 4 threads, a maximum frequency of 3,8GHz. The second is used on the ultrabook segment, it has a total of 2 cores, 4 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 3,3 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values ​​obtained in Geekbench and Cinebench.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.

Specification comparison:

Processor		AMD A10-9700				Intel Core i7-4600U
Market (main)		Desktop				Ultrabook
ISA		x86-64 (64 bit)				x86-64 (64 bit)
Microarchitecture		Excavator				Haswell
Core name		Bristol Ridge				Haswell-ULT
Family		A10-9000				Core i7-4000
Part number(s), S-Spec		AD9700AGABBOX, AD9700AGM44AB				CL8064701477202, SR16Z
Release date		Q3 2017				Q3 2013
Lithography		28 nm				22 nm
Transistors		3. 100.000.000				1.300.000.000
Cores		4				2
Threads		4				4
Base frequency		3,5 GHz				2,1 GHz
Turbo frequency		3,8 GHz				3,3 GHz
High performance cores		4 Cores 4 Threads @ 3,5 / 3,8 GHz				2 Cores 4 Threads @ 2,1 / 3,3 GHz
Cache memory		2 MB				4 MB
Max memory capacity		32 GB				16 GB
Memory types		DDR4-2400				DDR3L 1333/1600, LPDDR3 1333/1600
Max # of memory channels		2				2
Max memory bandwidth		38,4 GB/s				25,6 GB/s
Max PCIe lanes		8				12
TDP		65 W				15 W
Suggested PSU		600W ATX Power Supply				—
GPU integrated graphics		AMD Radeon R7 Graphics 384 Cores (Kaveri)				Intel HD Graphics 4400 Mobile
GPU cores		6				—
GPU execution units		—				20
GPU shading units		384				160
GPU base clock		351 MHz				200 MHz
GPU boost clock		1029 MHz				1100 MHz
GPU FP32 floating point		553 GFLOPS				304 GFLOPS
Socket		AM4				BGA1168
Compatible motherboard		Socket AM4 Motherboard				—
Maximum temperature		90°C				100°C
Crypto engine		Advanced Encryption Standard instructions				AES New Instructions, Secure Key
Security		Enhanced Virus Protection				Trusted Execution Technology, Execute Disable Bit, Anti-Theft Technology
Max display resolution		—				3200 x 2000@60Hz (HDMI), 3200 x 2000@60Hz (DP)
CPU-Z single thread		205				314
CPU-Z multi thread		754				826
Cinebench R15 single thread		90				123
Cinebench R15 multi-thread		301				266
Cinebench R20 single thread		172				278
Cinebench R20 multi-thread		578				548
PassMark single thread		1. 633				1.659
PassMark CPU Mark		3.585				2.688
(Windows) Geekbench 4 single core		2.355				3.356
(Windows) Geekbench 4 multi-core		5.789				5.994
(Windows) Geekbench 5 single core		513				644
(Windows) Geekbench 5 multi-core		1.559				1.305
(SGEMM) GFLOPS performance		59,82 GFLOPS				96,08 GFLOPS
(Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio		89 pts / W				400 pts / W
Amazon
eBay

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.

Suggested PSU: We assume that we have An ATX computer case, a high end graphics card, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, a 1TB HDD hard drive, a Blu-Ray drive. We will have to rely on a more powerful power supply if we want to have several graphics cards, several monitors, more memory, etc.

Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

The processor AMD A10-9700 has more cores, the maximum frequency of AMD A10-9700 is greater, that the thermal dissipation power of Intel Core i7-4600U is less. The AMD A10-9700 was designed earlier.

Performance comparison with the benchmarks:

Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench.

	CPU-Z — Multi-thread & single thread score
Intel Core i7-4600U	314 826
AMD A10-9700	205 754

In single core, the difference is 53%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 10%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.

	Cinebench R15 — Multi-thread & single thread score
AMD A10-9700	90 301
Intel Core i7-4600U	123 266

In single core, the difference is -27%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 13%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.

	Cinebench R20 — Multi-thread & single thread score
AMD A10-9700	172 578
Intel Core i7-4600U	278 548

In single core, the difference is -38%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 5%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Cinebench R20 is a multi-platform test software which allows to evaluate the hardware capacities of a device such as a computer, a tablet, a server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant.

	PassMark — CPU Mark & single thread
AMD A10-9700	1.633 3.585
Intel Core i7-4600U	1.659 2.688

In single core, the difference is -2%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 33%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.

On Windows:

	Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows
Intel Core i7-4600U	3.356 5.994
AMD A10-9700	2.355 5.789

In single core, the difference is 43%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 4%.

On Linux:

	Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux
Intel Core i7-4600U	3. 574 6.370
AMD A10-9700	2.281 5.039

In single core, the difference is 57%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 26%.

On Android:

	Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Android
Intel Core i7-4600U	3.506 6.222
AMD A10-9700	2.304 5.880

In single core, the difference is 52%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 6%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.

On Windows:

	Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows
AMD A10-9700	513 1.559
Intel Core i7-4600U	644 1.305

In single core, the difference is -20%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 19%.

On Linux:

	Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux
Intel Core i7-4600U	780 1.390
AMD A10-9700	538 1.243

In single core, the difference is 45%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 12%.

On Android:

	Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — Android
AMD A10-9700	560 1.673
Intel Core i7-4600U	712 1.474

In single core, the difference is -21%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 14%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.

Equivalence:

AMD A10-9700 Intel equivalentIntel Core i7-4600U AMD equivalent

See also:

AMD A10-9700E

Intel Core i7-4600M

Test Setup And Benchmarks — AMD A10-4600M Review: Mobile Trinity Gets Tested

When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Here’s how it works.

We’re keeping the focus on mobility for this launch, with three products to compare. AMD provided us with a laptop equipped with its top-of-the-line A10-4600M APU, a product we’re told will cost somewhere around $600 when it’s made publicly-available (although the company’s press deck indicates a price point closer to $700).  

With similarly-priced Ivy Bridge-equipped notebooks not yet available for testing, we turned to existing products for comparison. We picked a laptop armed with a Core i5-2450M to represent Intel’s comparable effort. And although prices range from $550 to just over $1000 for laptops equipped with this same CPU, most fall in the $660 to $900 range.

To see how Trinity compares to its predecessor, we added a machine equipped with an A8-3500M to the mix. As an added bonus, this laptop is equipped with Dual Graphics, so we were also able to benchmark a discrete Radeon 6630M for comparison in some cases.

AMD’s Trinity test bed came equipped with a 128 GB SSD and two 2 GB sticks of 1600 MT/s DDR3 memory. We’re not convinced that you’d ever find an expensive SSD in a $700 laptop. So, to keep things fair, we used the same SSD and memory in all three platforms. Surprisingly, the Llano-based A8-3500M-equipped system was unwilling to run the memory at 1600 MT/s, instead forcing it to run at 1333 MT/s with lower latencies. With no BIOS options available to manually configure data rates, we were forced to keep it at this speed for our tests.

The most popular laptop resolution for models in this price range is 1366×768, but we’ll benchmark at 1280×800 because it pushes almost exactly the same number of pixels and has better external monitor support. There are fewer (but still a significant) models available shipping at 1600×900, so we’ll test that resolution as well. Finally, we’ll add 1024×600 to the mix. Before you cringe at the thought of gaming at such meager dimensions, consider that  a 27” monitor at 1080p results in about 80 DPI. Setting 1024×600 on a 15” screen results in 85 DPI—higher pixel density.

Swipe to scroll horizontally

Header Cell — Column 0	AMD Llano A8-3500M Test System	AMD Trinity A10-4600M Test System	Intel Core i5-2450M Test System
CPU	AMD A8-3500M (Llano)Quad-Core, 4 MB L21.5 GHz (2.4 GHz Max Turbo)	AMD A10-4600M (Trinity)Quad-Core, 4 MB L22.3 GHz (3.2 GHz Max Turbo)	Intel Core i5-2450M (Sandy Bridge)Dual-Core, Hyper-Threading enabled, 3 MB L32. 5 GHz (3.1 GHz Max Turbo)
Motherboard	Compal PCL10 Chipset: AMD A70 Fusion Controller HubWith USB 3.0 Support	AMD Trinity Comal FF Platform Chipset: AMD A70M	HP 1695 Chipset: Intel HM65
Networking	Onboard Gigabit LAN controller
Memory	4 GB DDR3 1346 MHz 2 x 2 GB, CL 9-9-9-23-1TMicron MT8KTF25664HZ-1G6M1	4 GB DDR3 1600 MHz  2 x 2 GB, CL 11-11-11-28-1TMicron MT8KTF25664HZ-1G6M1
Graphics	Radeon HD 6620G (integrated)444 MHz GPU, Shared DDR3 at 667 MHzRadeon HD 6630M444 MHz GPU, Shared DDR3 at 667 MHz	Radeon HD 7660G (integrated)444 MHz GPU, 1 GB DDR3 at 667 MHz	Intel HD Graphics 3000(integrated) 650 MHz GPU, Shared DDR3 at 667 MHz
Hard Drive	Samsung SSD 830 Series128 GB
Software and Drivers
Operating System	Microsoft Windows 7 x6, Service Pack 1
DirectX version	DirectX 11
Graphics Drivers	Intel Core i5-2520M Test System:Intel Graphics Driver 15. 26.8.64.2696AMD Llano A8-3500M Test System: AMD Catalyst 12.4 Mobility BETAAMD Trinity A10-4600M Test System: 8.945-120328a-136239E BETA

Swipe to scroll horizontally

Benchmark Configuration
3D Games
Metro 2033	Version 1.0.0.1, DirectX 9,benchmark tool, Low Detail, No AA, 4x AF, advanced physX disabled, tessellation disabled, DOF disabled
Crysis 2	Adrenaline benchmark tool, lowest settings
DiRT 3	V1.01, Run with -benchmark example_benchmark.xml
The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim	Update 1.4.27, Celedon Aethirborn Level 6, 25 Seconds Fraps

Swipe to scroll horizontally

Audio Benchmarks and Settings
iTunes	Version 10. 4.1.10 x64: Audio CD (Terminator II SE), 53 minutes, default AAC format
Lame MP3	Version 3.98.3: Audio CD «Terminator II SE», 53 min, convert WAV to MP3 audio format, Command: -b 160 —nores (160 Kb/s)
Video Benchmarks and Settings
HandBrake CLI	Version 0.95: «Big Buck Bunny» (720×480, 23.972 FPS) 5 Minutes, Audio: Dolby Digital, 48 000 Hz, Six-Channel, English, to Video: AVC Audio: AC3 Audio2: AAC (High Profile)
Cyberlink MediaEspresso	Version: 6.5
Arcsoft MediaConverter	Version: 7.5
Application Benchmarks and Settings
WinRAR	Version 4.1: THG-Workload (650 MB) to RAR, command line switches «winrar a -r -m3»
WinZip	Version 16. 5: THG-Workload (650 MB) to ZIP, command line switches «-a -ez -p -r»
7-Zip	Version 9.22: THG-Workload (650 MB) to .7z, command line switches «a -t7z -r -m0=LZMA2 -mx=5»
Autodesk 3ds Max 2012	Version 12.0 x64: Space Flyby Mentalray, 248 Frames, 1440×1080
Cinebench	Version 11.5 Build CB25720DEMOCPU and OpenGL tests
Adobe Photoshop CS 6 (64-Bit)	Version CS6 x64: Filter 15.7MB TIF Image: Radial Blur, Shape Blur, Median, Polar Coordinates
ABBYY Finereader	Version 10.0.102.82: Read PDF save to Doc, Source: Political Economy (J. Broadhurst 1842) 111 Pages
Synthetic Benchmarks and Settings
PCMark 7	Version: 1.0.4, Benchmark Only
3DMark 11	Version: 1.