Amd a10 7300 vs intel i7: Core i7-7500U vs A10-7300 [in 15 benchmarks]

Core i7-12700KF vs A10-7300 — How Many FPS

Availability

Intel Core i7-12700KF Desktop Processor 12 (8P+4E) Cores up to 5.0 GHz Unlocked  LGA1700 600 Series Chipset 125W

Buy on Amazon

$377.99

In Stock

Updated 78 minutes ago

Availability

No items available

Key Differences

In short — Core i7-12700KF outperforms A10-7300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value.

Advantages of Intel Core i7-12700KF

Advantages of AMD A10-7300

League of Legends

Resolution

1920×1080

Game Graphics

High

Core i7-12700KF

Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021


FPS

1359

100%

Value, $/FPS

$0.28/FPS

100%

Price, $

$377.99

100%

FPS and Value Winner

Intel Core i7-12700KF Desktop Processor 12 (8P+4E) Cores up to 5.0 GHz Unlocked  LGA1700 600 Series Chipset 125W

Buy for $377. 99 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 78 minutes ago

A10-7300


FPS

740

16%

Value, $/FPS

Price, $

Resolution

1920×1080

Game Graphics

High

Core i7-12700KF

Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021

A10-7300

1359

FPS

740

FPS

League of Legends

345

FPS

180

FPS

Grand Theft Auto V

599

FPS

315

FPS

VALORANT

371

FPS

195

FPS

Fortnite

383

FPS

191

FPS

Apex Legends

Geekbench 5 Benchmarks

Core i7-12700KF

Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021


Single-Core

1897

100%

Multi-Core

13744

100%

A10-7300


Single-Core

309

-414%

Multi-Core

816

-1484%

Intel Core i7-12700KF

vs

AMD A10-7300

Nov 4th, 2021 Release Date Unknown
Core i7 Collection Not Available
Alder Lake Codename Kaveri
Intel Socket 1700 Socket Socket FP3 (906)

Desktop

Segment

12

Cores 4

20

Threads 4

3. 6 GHz

Base Clock Speed 1.9 GHz

5.0 GHz

Turbo Clock Speed 3.2 GHz
125 W TDP

19 W

10 nm Process Size Not Available
36.0x Multiplier Not Available
None Integrated Graphics

Radeon R6 Series

Yes

Overclockable No

Builds Using Core i7-12700KF or A10-7300

League of Legends, 1080p, High

iBUYPOWER Pro Gaming PC

1233 FPS

$1.38/FPS

GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

Core i7-12700KF

16 GB, 1 TB SSD

Buy on Amazon

$1,699.99

In Stock

Updated 70 minutes ago

iBUYPOWER Pro Gaming PC

1037 FPS

$1.54/FPS

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

Core i7-12700KF

8 GB, 500 GB SSD + 1 TB HDD

Buy on Amazon

$1,599. 99

In Stock

Updated 64 minutes ago

CLX Set Gaming Desktop PC

1233 FPS

$1.62/FPS

GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

Core i7-12700KF

16 GB, 500 GB SSD + 2 TB HDD

Buy on Amazon

$1,999.49

In Stock

Updated 63 minutes ago

Advanced Battlestations Gladiator Gaming PC

1233 FPS

$1.66/FPS

GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

Core i7-12700KF

16 GB, N/A Storage

Buy on Amazon

$2,049.99

In Stock

Updated 67 minutes ago

MSI Aegis RS (Tower) Gaming Desktop PC

1123 FPS

$1.67/FPS

GeForce RTX 3070

Core i7-12700KF

16 GB, 1 TB SSD

Buy on Amazon

$1,879

In Stock

Updated 65 minutes ago

2022 MSI Aegis RS 12TD-297US (i7-12700KF, 16GB RAM, 1TB NVMe SSD, RTX 3070 8GB, Windows 11) Gaming Desktop PC

1123 FPS

$1.67/FPS

GeForce RTX 3070

Core i7-12700KF

16 GB, 1 TB SSD

Buy on Amazon

$1,879

In Stock

Updated 66 minutes ago

MSI Aegis RS (Tower) Gaming Desktop PC

1233 FPS

$1. 69/FPS

GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

Core i7-12700KF

16 GB, 1 TB SSD

Buy on Amazon

$2,079

In Stock

Updated 64 minutes ago

MSI Aegis RS Gaming Desktop PC

1037 FPS

$1.69/FPS

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

Core i7-12700KF

16 GB, 1 TB SSD

Buy on Amazon

$1,752.78

In Stock

Updated 65 minutes ago

YEYIAN Katana X22 Gaming PC

1123 FPS

$1.69/FPS

GeForce RTX 3070

Core i7-12700KF

16 GB, N/A Storage

Buy on Amazon

$1,899

In Stock

Updated 69 minutes ago

2022 MSI Aegis RS 12TE-296US (i7-12700KF, 16GB RAM, 1TB NVMe SSD, RTX 3070Ti 8GB, Windows 11) Gaming Desktop PC

1233 FPS

$1.69/FPS

GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

Core i7-12700KF

16 GB, 1 TB SSD

Buy on Amazon

$2,079

In Stock

Updated 66 minutes ago

Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Core i9-12900KF

$559.89

Core i7-12700KF

$377.99

Core i7-12700KF

$377.99

Xeon E5-1607 v3

N/A Stock

Core i7-12700KF

$377.99

Turion X2 Mobile RM-72

N/A Stock

Core i7-12700KF

$377.99

Core i3-6157U

N/A Stock

Core i7-12700KF

$377.99

Core i3-8145U

N/A Stock

Core i7-12700KF

$377.99

Core i7-930

$84.86

Core i7-12700KF

$377.99

Pentium Silver J5005

$215.77

Core i7-12700KF

$377.99

Athlon II X4 635

$59.95

Core i7-12700KF

$377.99

Celeron 3965Y

N/A Stock

AMD A10-7300 vs Intel Core i9-10900KF — CPU Specs & Benchmark

VS

Which to select

It is time to pick the winner. What is the difference between AMD A10-7300 vs Intel Core i9-10900KF? What CPU is more powerful? It is quite easy to determine – look at comparison table. The processor with more cores/ threads and also with higher frequency is the absolute winner!

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

Who will win between AMD A10-7300 vs  Intel Core i9-10900KF. The general performance of a CPU can easily be determined based on the number of its cores and the thread count, as well as the base frequency and Turbo frequency. The more GHz and cores a CPU has, the better. Please note that high technical specs require using a powerful cooling system.

1.90 GHz

Frequency

3.70 GHz

4

CPU Cores

10

3.20 GHz

Turbo (1 Core)

5.30 GHz

4

CPU Threads

20

No

Hyperthreading

Yes

No

Overclocking

Yes

2.70 GHz

Turbo (4 Cores)

Turbo (10 Cores)

4.90 GHz

CPU generation and family

Internal Graphics

Some manufacturers complement their CPUs with graphic chips, such a solution being especially popular in laptops. The higher the clock frequency of a GPU is and the bigger its memory, the better. Find a winner — AMD A10-7300 vs Intel Core i9-10900KF. 

AMD Radeon R6 (Kaveri)

GPU name

0.46 GHz

GPU frequency

0.53 GHz

GPU (Turbo)

No turbo

6

Generation

12

DirectX Version

6

Execution units

384

Shader

2 GB

Max. Memory

2

Max. displays

28 nm

Technology

Q2/2015

Release date

Hardware codec support

Here we deal with specs that are used by some CPU manufacturers. These numbers are mainly technical and can be neglected for the purpose of the comparison analysis.

Decode / Encode

h364

No

Decode / Encode

JPEG

No

No

h365 8bit

No

No

h365 10bit

No

No

VP8

No

No

VP9

No

Decode

VC-1

No

Decode

AVC

No

Memory & PCIe

These are memory standards supported by CPUs. The higher such standards, the better a CPU’s performance is.

DDR3-1600

Memory type

DDR4-2933

Max. Memory

128 GB

2

Memory channels

2

No

ECC

No

PCIe version

3.0

PCIe lanes

16

Encryption

Data encryption support

Yes

AES-NI

Yes

Memory & AMP; PCIe

Thermal Management

The thermal design power (TDP), sometimes called thermal design point, is the maximum amount of heat generated by a computer chip or component (often a CPU, GPU or system on a chip) that the cooling system in a computer is designed to dissipate under any workload.

19 W

TDP

125 W

Tjunction max.

100 °C

TDP up

TDP down

95 W

Technical details

4.00 MB

L3-Cache

20.00 MB

28nm

Technology

14 nm

Kaveri

Architecture

Comet Lake

AMD-V

Virtualization

VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d

FM2+

Socket

LGA 1200

Q2/2014

Release date

Q2/2020

Market price

ca. 474 $

Instruction set (ISA)

64-bit

L2-Cache

2.56 MB

Devices using this processor

You probably know already what devices use CPUs. These can be a desktop or a laptop.

Unknown

Used in

PC/Client/Tablet

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)

This synthetic test will help you determine the real computing power of a single core in the central processing unit. Cinebench R11.5 is based on MAXON CINEMA 4D and employs various testing scenarios

AMD A10-7300
4x 1.90 GHz (3.20 GHz)

49 (100 %)

Intel Core i9-10900KF
10x 3. 70 GHz (5.30 GHz) HT

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R11.5 carries out simultaneous cross-platform tests on all the processor’s cores. By running realistic 3D scenes, this benchmark will reveal all the potential of your Intel or AMD single-unit processor

AMD A10-7300
4x 1.90 GHz (3.20 GHz)

175 (100 %)

Intel Core i9-10900KF
10x 3.70 GHz (5.30 GHz) HT

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

The latter is used for creation of 3D models and forms. Cinebench R15 is used for single-core processor performance benchmark test. The hyperthreading ability doesn’t count. It is the updated version of Cinebench 11.5. As all new versions, the updated benchmark is based on Cinema 4 Suite software

AMD A10-7300
4x 1.90 GHz (3.20 GHz)

44 (18 %)

Intel Core i9-10900KF
10x 3.70 GHz (5.30 GHz) HT

232 (100 %)

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R15 can be used for multi-core processor performance benchmark testing. The test produces precise and accurate results. This benchmark is the updated version of the Cinebench 11.5 which is based on Cinema 4 Suite soft.

AMD A10-7300
4x 1.90 GHz (3.20 GHz)

139 (5 %)

Intel Core i9-10900KF
10x 3.70 GHz (5.30 GHz) HT

2668 (100 %)

Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R20 is based on Cinema 4 Suite. It is the software used to create 3D forms. The benchmark runs for single-core test procedure without counting of hyperthreading ability.

AMD A10-7300
4x 1.90 GHz (3.20 GHz)

Intel Core i9-10900KF
10x 3.70 GHz (5.30 GHz) HT

645 (100 %)

Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)

It is the new version of the benchmark which is developed on the basis of Cinebench R15 (both versions are operated on the basis of Cinema 4 — the most popular 3D modeling software). Cinebench R20 is used for multi-core processor performance benchmark tests and hyperthreading ability.

AMD A10-7300
4x 1. 90 GHz (3.20 GHz)

Intel Core i9-10900KF
10x 3.70 GHz (5.30 GHz) HT

6419 (100 %)

Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R23 is the newest instalment of the most popular CPU Rendering Benchmark Single-Core Cinebench. We have the Score Results for all modern Processors

AMD A10-7300
4x 1.90 GHz (3.20 GHz)

Intel Core i9-10900KF
10x 3. 70 GHz (5.30 GHz) HT

1382 (100 %)

Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R23 is the newest instalment of the most popular CPU Rendering Benchmark Multi-Core Cinebench. We have the Score Results for all modern Processors

AMD A10-7300
4x 1.90 GHz (3.20 GHz)

Intel Core i9-10900KF
10x 3.70 GHz (5.30 GHz) HT

15945 (100 %)

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 3 is the benchmark for Intel and AMD 64-bit processors. It employs a new power estimation system for a single CPU core. This software carries out the modeling of real scenarios to provide accurate results

AMD A10-7300
4x 1.90 GHz (3.20 GHz)

1310 (100 %)

Intel Core i9-10900KF
10x 3.70 GHz (5.30 GHz) HT

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 3 benchmark supports AMD and Intel multi-core processors. Being based on MAXON CINEMA 4D, it allows obtaining the real comparative CPU potential

AMD A10-7300
4x 1. 90 GHz (3.20 GHz)

3224 (100 %)

Intel Core i9-10900KF
10x 3.70 GHz (5.30 GHz) HT

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 benchmark is the newest software suit. Completely new algorithms provide the quite accurate benchmark testing results of the single-core CPU.

AMD A10-7300
4x 1.90 GHz (3.20 GHz)

322 (22 %)

Intel Core i9-10900KF
10x 3. 70 GHz (5.30 GHz) HT

1417 (100 %)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 software suite shows benchmark testing results of the memory performance and speed of the multi-core processor. Here the hyperthreading ability is counted.

AMD A10-7300
4x 1.90 GHz (3.20 GHz)

823 (7 %)

Intel Core i9-10900KF
10x 3.70 GHz (5.30 GHz) HT

11344 (100 %)

Blender 2. 81 (bmw27)

We use Blender benchmark to trace performance of the central processing unit. The testing results show you how fast the unit runs on the implementation of the multi-processing tasks

AMD A10-7300
4x 1.90 GHz (3.20 GHz)

Intel Core i9-10900KF
10x 3.70 GHz (5.30 GHz) HT

1260 (100 %)

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

It tests entire and overall performance of the central processing unit (mathematical calculations, compression and decompression speed, 2D&3D graphic tests). Please note that data can differ from the real-world situations.

AMD A10-7300
4x 1.90 GHz (3.20 GHz)

3010 (100 %)

Intel Core i9-10900KF
10x 3.70 GHz (5.30 GHz) HT

iGPU — FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

This test serves for determining the performance of integrated graphics in Intel and AMD processors. The result is the estimated computing power in the Single-Precision FP32 mode

AMD A10-7300
4x 1. 90 GHz (3.20 GHz)

409 (100 %)

Intel Core i9-10900KF
10x 3.70 GHz (5.30 GHz) HT

Monero Hashrate kH/s

Using a Graphics Card (GPU) is the ideal way to mine Monero. While it requires substantially more investment compared to using a CPU, its hash rate is significantly higher

AMD A10-7300
4x 1.90 GHz (3.20 GHz)

Intel Core i9-10900KF
10x 3. 70 GHz (5.30 GHz) HT

700 (100 %)

Popular comparisons containing this CPUs

1. Intel Core i9-10900KF vs.
Intel Core i3-2100T
2. Intel Core i9-10900KF vs.
AMD FX-8320E
3. AMD Ryzen 9 5950X vs.
Intel Core i9-10900KF
4. AMD Ryzen 9 5900X vs.
Intel Core i9-10900KF
5. AMD A8-7650K vs.
Intel Core i9-10900KF
6. AMD Ryzen 5 2600 vs.
Intel Core i9-10900KF
7. Intel Core i9-9900KF vs.
Intel Core i9-10900KF
8. AMD Ryzen 7 5800X vs.
Intel Core i9-10900KF
9. AMD Ryzen 9 3950X vs.
Intel Core i9-10900KF
10. AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X vs.
Intel Core i9-10900KF
11. Intel Core i9-10900KF vs.
Intel Core i9-10900KF
12. Intel Celeron N4020 vs.
Intel Core i9-10900KF
13. Intel Core i7-1160G7 vs.
Intel Core i9-10900KF
14. Intel Core i5-4210M vs.
Intel Core i9-10900KF
15. Intel Core i7-5950HQ vs.
Intel Core i9-10900KF

Comparison AMD A10-7300 vs Intel Core i7-3820QM what is better?

Home / CPU / AMD A10-7300 vs Intel Core i7-3820QM

AMD A10-7300

22%

DeviceList score

vs

Intel Core i7-3820QM

43%

DeviceList score

We compared the characteristics of AMD A10-7300 and Intel Core i7-3820QM and compiled a list of advantages and a comparison table for you. Find out which one to choose in 2022 year.

AMD A10-7300 benefits

Transistor count

2410 million

2409 million (240900%) better

vs

1 million

Power Consumption (TDP)

19 Wt

-26 Wt (-57.8%) better

vs

45 Wt

Intel Core i7-3820QM benefits

Winner in comparison

Number of threads

8

4 (100%) better

vs

4

Maximum frequency

3.7 GGz

0.5 GGz (15.6%) better

vs

3. 2 GGz

Manufacturing process technology

22 nm

-6 nm (-21.4%) better

vs

28 nm

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

5008

3016 (151.4%) better

vs

1992

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

19364

14172 (273%) better

vs

5192

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

4575

4517 (7787.9%) better

vs

58

x264 encoding pass 1

150

88 (141. 9%) better

vs

62

x264 encoding pass 2

37

25 (208.3%) better

vs

12

TrueCrypt AES

4

3 (300%) better

vs

1

3DMark06 CPU

6849

4331 (172%) better

vs

2518

























































General information

Type

Для ноутбуков Для ноутбуков

Architecture codename

Kaveri Ivy Bridge

Number of cores

A large number of cores improves performance in multithreaded applications.
At the moment, increasing the number of processor cores is one of the priorities for increasing performance.

4 4

Number of threads

More threads help the cores process information more efficiently. Real performance will be noticeable in very specific tasks (video editing, databases).

4 8

4 (100%) better

Base frequency

no data 2.7 GGz

Manufacturing process technology

28 nm 22 nm

-6 nm (-21.4%) better

Crystal size

245 мм2 160 мм2

Transistor count

2410 million

2409 million (240900%) better

1 million

Maximum frequency

Processors with high clock speeds perform more calculations per second and thus provide better performance.

3.2 GGz 3.7 GGz

0.5 GGz (15.6%) better

64 bit support

Max number of CPUs in a configuration

no data 1

Socket

FP3 FCBGA1224, FCPGA988

AMD-V

Series

AMD Kaveri Intel Core i7

Start price

no data 498 USD

Price-quality ratio

The sum of all the advantages of the device divided by its price. The higher the%, the better the quality per unit price in comparison with all analogues.

no data 62.5 %

Maximum core temperature

no data 105 °C

vPro

TXT

Intel Trusted Execution Technology for hardware protection against malware. For each protected program, the processor allocates its own isolated section of RAM.

PCI Express revision

3.0 3.0

PCI-Express line count

no data 16

Demand Based Switching

no data

Secure Key

Identity Protection

no data +

Flex Memory Access

no data +

Quick Sync

no data +

eDP

no data +

HDMI

+ +

FMA

+ no data

My WiFi

no data +

FRTC

+ no data

TrueAudio

+ no data

PowerNow

+ no data

PowerGating

+ no data

Out-of-band

+ no data

VirusProtect

+ no data

HSA

+ no data

IOMMU 2. 0

+ no data

Number of iGPU cores

6 no data

Enduro

+ no data

Switchable graphics

+ no data

UVD

+ no data

VCE

+ no data

FDI

no data +

Anti-Theft

no data +

Vulkan

NVIDIA’s Vulkan technology allows developers to gain low-level GPU access to optimize graphics instructions (better than OpenGL and Direct3D APIs).
It is an open, free, cross-platform standard available for all platforms.

+ no data

Fast Memory Access

no data +

CRT

no data +

L1 Cache

More threads help the cores process information more efficiently. Real performance will be noticeable in very specific tasks (video editing, databases).

no data 64K (на ядро)

L2 Cache

4096 Кб 256K (на ядро)

L3 Cache

no data 8 Мб (всего)

Power Consumption (TDP)

The calculated heat output shows the average heat output in operation under load,
the larger the value — the more the requirements for cooling and energy consumption increase.

19 Wt

-26 Wt (-57.8%) better

45 Wt

EDB

no data +

InTru 3D

no data +

DisplayPort

+ +

SDVO

no data +














Benchmarks

Passmark

no data 5337

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

1992 5008

3016 (151.4%) better

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

5192 19364

14172 (273%) better

Cinebench 11. 5 64-bit single-core

58 4575

4517 (7787.9%) better

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

158 no data

WinRAR 4.0

1510 no data

x264 encoding pass 1

62 150

88 (141.9%) better

x264 encoding pass 2

12 37

25 (208.3%) better

TrueCrypt AES

1 4

3 (300%) better

3DMark06 CPU

2518 6849

4331 (172%) better

Geekbench 2

3865 no data

Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core

1565 no data

Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core

3758 no data









Technologies and extensions

Advanced instructions

no data Intel® AVX

Turbo Boost

no data 2. 0

Idle States

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)

More threads help the cores process information more efficiently. Real performance will be noticeable in very specific tasks (video editing, databases).

Thermal Monitoring

Hyper-Threading

More threads help the cores process information more efficiently. Real performance will be noticeable in very specific tasks (video editing, databases).

AES-NI

More threads help the cores process information more efficiently. Real performance will be noticeable in very specific tasks (video editing, databases).

+ +

AVX

The presence of AVX commands improves performance in floating-point operations and in processor-demanding
applications.




RAM parameters

Supported memory types

no data DDR3/L/-RS 1333/1600

Maximum memory size

The maximum amount of RAM that can be used with this processor.

no data 32 Gb

Max memory channels

2 2




Virtualization technologies

VT-x

EPT

VT-d

Intel’s virtualization technology allows devices on the PCI bus to be forwarded to the guest operating system so that it can work with them using its standard tools.






Graphics specifications

maximum frequency of the graphics core

no data 1.25 ГГц

Maximum number of monitors

no data 3

Clear Video HD

Integrated graphics

The presence of a video core allows you to use a computer without using a video card.

+ +

DirectX

DirectX® 12 no data

Intel Core i3-1115G4 vs AMD A10-7300


Comparative analysis of Intel Core i3-1115G4 and AMD A10-7300 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics image quality, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization, Peripherals.
Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps).

Intel Core i3-1115G4

Buy on Amazon


vs

AMD A10-7300

Buy on Amazon

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Core i3-1115G4

  • CPU is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 2 month(s) later
  • Around 28% higher clock speed: 4. 10 GHz vs 3.2 GHz
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 10 nm SuperFin vs 28 nm
  • 3.1x better performance in PassMark — Single thread mark: 2686 vs 857
  • 3.6x better performance in PassMark — CPU mark: 6234 vs 1731






Launch date 2 Sep 2020 vs 4 June 2014
Maximum frequency 4.10 GHz vs 3.2 GHz
Manufacturing process technology 10 nm SuperFin vs 28 nm
PassMark — Single thread mark 2686 vs 857
PassMark — CPU mark 6234 vs 1731

Reasons to consider the AMD A10-7300

  • 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
  • Around 60% more L2 cache; more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later



Number of cores 4 vs 2
L2 cache 4 MB vs 2. 5 MB

Compare benchmarks


CPU 1: Intel Core i3-1115G4
CPU 2: AMD A10-7300



PassMark — Single thread mark

CPU 1
CPU 2


PassMark — CPU mark

CPU 1
CPU 2


















Name Intel Core i3-1115G4 AMD A10-7300
PassMark — Single thread mark 2686 857
PassMark — CPU mark 6234 1731
Geekbench 4 — Single Core

303
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core

794
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s)

0.897
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

10.705
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s)

0.124
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s)

0.375
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

2.351
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

994
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames)

1904
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames)

2948
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

994
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps)

1904
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps)

2948

Compare specifications (specs)
























































Intel Core i3-1115G4 AMD A10-7300
Architecture codename Tiger Lake Kaveri
Launch date 2 Sep 2020 4 June 2014
Place in performance rating 440 1841
Processor Number i3-1115G4
Series 11th Generation Intel Core i3 Processors AMD A10-Series APU for Laptops
Status Launched
Vertical segment Mobile Laptop
Family

AMD A-Series Processors
OPN Tray

AM7300ECh54JA
64 bit support
Bus Speed 4 GT/s
L1 cache 192 KB
L2 cache 2. 5 MB 4 MB
L3 cache 6 MB
Manufacturing process technology 10 nm SuperFin 28 nm
Maximum core temperature 100°C
Maximum frequency 4.10 GHz 3.2 GHz
Number of cores 2 4
Number of threads 4 4
Base frequency

1. 9 GHz
Compute Cores

10
Die size

245 mm
Number of GPU cores

6
Transistor count

2410 Million
Unlocked

Max memory channels 2 2
Maximum memory size 64 GB
Supported memory types DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-3733 Not Listed
Device ID 0x9A78
Execution Units 48
Graphics max dynamic frequency 1. 25 GHz
Intel® Clear Video HD technology
Intel® Quick Sync Video
Processor graphics Intel UHD Graphics for 11th Gen Intel Processors AMD Radeon R6 Graphics
Enduro

Graphics max frequency

553 MHz
iGPU core count

6
Switchable graphics

Unified Video Decoder (UVD)

Video Codec Engine (VCE)

Number of displays supported 4
DisplayPort

HDMI

Max resolution over DisplayPort [email protected]
Max resolution over eDP [email protected]
DirectX 12. 1 12
OpenGL 4.6
Vulkan

Configurable TDP-down 12 Watt
Configurable TDP-down Frequency 1.70 GHz
Configurable TDP-up 28 Watt
Configurable TDP-up Frequency 3.00 GHz
Max number of CPUs in a configuration 1
Package Size 46. 5×25
Sockets supported FCBGA1449 FP3
Thermal Design Power (TDP)

20 Watt
Intel® OS Guard
Intel® Software Guard Extensions (Intel® SGX)
Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT)
Mode-based Execute Control (MBE)
Secure Boot
Idle States
Instruction set extensions Intel SSE4. 1, Intel SSE4.2, Intel AVX2, Intel AVX-512
Intel® AES New Instructions
Intel® Hyper-Threading technology
Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported
Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP)
Intel® Turbo Boost technology
Intel® Volume Management Device (VMD)
Speed Shift technology
Thermal Monitoring
AMD App Acceleration

AMD Elite Experiences

AMD HD3D technology

AMD Mantle API

Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP)

Frame Rate Target Control (FRTC)

Fused Multiply-Add (FMA)

Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4)

Heterogeneous System Architecture (HSA)

Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX)

Out-of-band client management

PowerGating

PowerNow

System Image Stability

TrueAudio

VirusProtect

Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x)
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d)
Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT)
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™)

IOMMU 2. 0

PCI Express revision

3.0

AMD A8-6410 vs. AMD A10-7300

AMD A8-6410

The AMD A8-6410 operates with 4 cores and 4 CPU threads. It run at 2.40 GHz base 2.40 GHz all cores while the TDP is set at 15 W.The processor is attached to the AM1 CPU socket. This version includes 2.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 2 memory channels to support DDR3L-1600 SO-DIMM RAM and features PCIe Gen lanes. Tjunction keeps below — degrees C. In particular, Richland (Piledriver) Architecture is enhanced with 32 nm technology and supports AMD-V. The product was launched on Q2/2014

AMD A10-7300

The AMD A10-7300 operates with 4 cores and 4 CPU threads. It run at 3.20 GHz base 2.70 GHz all cores while the TDP is set at 19 W.The processor is attached to the FM2+ CPU socket. This version includes 4.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 2 memory channels to support DDR3-1600 RAM and features PCIe Gen lanes. Tjunction keeps below — degrees C. In particular, Kaveri (Steamroller) Architecture is enhanced with 28 nm technology and supports AMD-V. The product was launched on Q2/2014

AMD A8-6410

AMD A10-7300

Compare Detail

2.00 GHz Frequency 1.90 GHz
4 Cores 4
2.40 GHz Turbo (1 Core) 3.20 GHz
2.40 GHz Turbo (All Cores) 2.70 GHz
No Hyperthreading No
No Overclocking No
normal Core Architecture normal

AMD Radeon R5 (Beema)

GPU

AMD Radeon R6 (Kaveri)

No turbo GPU (Turbo) 0.53 GHz
32 nm Technology 28 nm
No turbo GPU (Turbo) 0. 53 GHz
12 DirectX Version 12
2 Max. displays 2
DDR3L-1600 SO-DIMM Memory DDR3-1600
2 Memory channels 2
Max memory
No ECC No
L2 Cache
2.00 MB L3 Cache 4.00 MB
PCIe version
PCIe lanes
32 nm Technology 28 nm
AM1 Socket FM2+
15 W TDP 19 W
AMD-V Virtualization AMD-V
Q2/2014 Release date Q2/2014

Show more data

Show more data

Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.

Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

iGPU — FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-Comparison. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-Comparison’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.

Electric Usage Estimate

Average hours of use per day

Average CPU Utilization (0-100%)

Power cost, dollar per kWh

Electric Usage Estimate

Average hours of use per day

Average CPU Utilization (0-100%)

Power cost, dollar per kWh

AMD A8-6410 AMD A10-7300
15 W Max TDP 19 W
NA Power consumption per day (kWh) NA
NA Running cost per day NA
NA Power consumption per year (kWh) NA
NA Running cost per year NA

Popular Comparision

Comments

Intel Core i7-6700 vs AMD A10-7300

Comparing technical specs and benchmarks

VS

Intel Core i7-6700 14 nm — 3. 40 GHz DDR3-1600
DDR4-2133 

AMD A10-7300 28 nm — 1.90 GHz DDR3-1600 

Intel Core i7-6700

AMD A10-7300

Intel Core i7-6700 vs. AMD A10-7300

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

In comparison between Intel Core i7-6700 and AMD A10-7300, you should choose the model which has more cores and threads with base and turbo frequencies. All the features influence the system’s high-speed performance.

no data

Cores

4x

4 / 8

CPU Cores / Threads

4 / 4

no data

Core architecture

normal

Yes

Hyperthreading

No

No

Overclocking

No

3.40 GHz

Frequency

1.90 GHz

4.00 GHz

Turbo Frequency (1 Core)

3.20 GHz

3.70 GHz

Turbo Frequency (4 Cores)

2.70 GHz

Intel Core i7-6700 vs. AMD A10-7300

CPU generation and family

4

CPU Cores

4

ca. 350 $

Market price

no data

Name

AMD A10-7300

no data

Family

AMD A

no data

CPU group

AMD A10-7000

9

Generation

6

no data

Segment

Mobile

no data

Predecessor

no data

Successor

Intel Core i7-6700 vs. AMD A10-7300

Internal Graphics

Some manufacturers build a graphic core in many CPUs being an additional advantage. If you use a video card which is separated from a CPU, we recommend you skip this comparison as there is no need to compare Intel Core i7-6700 to AMD A10-7300 across a built-in video card.

Intel HD Graphics 530

GPU name

AMD Radeon R6 (Kaveri)

0.35 GHz

GPU frequency

0.46 GHz

1.15 GHz

GPU (Turbo)

0.53 GHz

24

Execution units

6

192

Shader

384

no data

Max. GPU Memory

2 GB

3

Max. displays

2

9

Generation

6

12

Direct X

12

14 nm

Technology

28 nm

Q3/2015

Release date

Q2/2015

Intel Core i7-6700 vs.

AMD A10-7300
Hardware codec support

Pay attention to support of different technological options by CPUs. The general performance is not influenced. In the interest of time, you can skip this section.

Decode / Encode

h365 8bit

No

Decode

h365 10bit

No

no data

h365 / HEVC (8 bit)

No

no data

h365 / HEVC (10 bit)

No

Decode / Encode

h364

Decode / Encode

Decode / Encode

VP8

No

Decode

VP9

No

no data

AV1

No

Decode / Encode

AVC

Decode

Decode

VC-1

Decode

Decode / Encode

JPEG

Decode / Encode

Intel Core i7-6700 vs. AMD A10-7300

Memory & PCIe

Modern CPUs support memory which operates in a multi-channel regime that provides high-speed data exchange and improves productivity. The higher the ram’s clock frequency, its standard (for example, DDR3, DDR4, DDR5) and maximum space in a system are, the better it is.

3.0

PCIe version

16

PCIe lanes

DDR3-1600
DDR4-2133

Memory type

DDR3-1600

64 GB

Max. Memory

2

Memory channels

2

no data

Bandwidth

No

ECC

No

Yes

AES-NI

Yes

Intel Core i7-6700 vs. AMD A10-7300

Thermal Management

High-performance and powerful CPUs require the essence of a good power supply. Here you learn how much TDP Intel Core i7-6700 and AMD A10-7300 have. We recommend paying attention to the model which has lower TDP.

65 W

TDP

19 W

no data

TDP (PL1)

19 W

no data

TDP (PL2)

TDP up

TDP down

Tjunction max.

Intel Core i7-6700 vs. AMD A10-7300

Technical details

Here is the main information which can define the best CPU comparing technical specifications. Thus, the higher cash L2 and L3, the better it is. The lower the technological process of CPU production, the better it is. Another important factor is a production year that directly influences the manufacturer’s support terms and the opportunity of a system modernization at minimal cost in the future.

no data

Instruction set (ISA)

x86-64 (64 bit)

no data

ISA extensions

SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, FMA3, FMA4

no data

L2-Cache

8.00 MB

L3-Cache

4.00 MB

Skylake

Architecture

Kaveri

14 nm

Technology

28nm

VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d

Virtualization

AMD-V

LGA 1151

Socket

FM2+

Q3/2015

Release date

Q2/2014

no data

Part Number

Intel Core i7-6700 vs. AMD A10-7300

Devices using this processor

In completing the comparison between Intel Core i7-6700 and AMD A10-7300, you can learn in which computer systems these models are used.

Unknown

Used in

Unknown

Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)

The version, having become a gold standard of a synthetic benchmark, allows accurately define a CPU performance in Cinema 4 Suite software complex. The most points mean a model’s best efficiency. Hyperthreading is not included.

Intel Core i7-6700
4x 3.40 GHz (4.00 GHz) HT

406 (100 %)

AMD A10-7300
4x 1.90 GHz (3.20 GHz)

Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)

It is a testing performance standard of CPU by Maxon. It is a specialized multi-platform number of tests that estimate the power of all processor cores in rendering mode.

Intel Core i7-6700
4x 3. 40 GHz (4.00 GHz) HT

1774 (100 %)

AMD A10-7300
4x 1.90 GHz (3.20 GHz)

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R15 is Maxon’s actual benchmark for older processors versions that test the processor’s performance without hyperthreading in single-core mode.

Intel Core i7-6700
4x 3.40 GHz (4.00 GHz) HT

171 (100 %)

AMD A10-7300
4x 1. 90 GHz (3.20 GHz)

44 (25 %)

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R15 benchmark reflects the efficiency of your processor operation in assessment mode. It works on Cinema 4 Suite software complex of the earlier version. Hyperthreading is not included.

Intel Core i7-6700
4x 3.40 GHz (4.00 GHz) HT

816 (100 %)

AMD A10-7300
4x 1.90 GHz (3.20 GHz)

139 (17 %)

iGPU — FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

A benchmark is designed to determine graphics cards’ performance and speed, built into their central processor. It works in iGPU mode, FP32 Performance. The higher the rate is, the better it is.

Intel Core i7-6700
4x 3.40 GHz (4.00 GHz) HT

442 (100 %)

AMD A10-7300
4x 1.90 GHz (3.20 GHz)

409 (92 %)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

A new approach to testing processor performance opens up the GeekBench 5 benchmark! A detailed under-load system analysis gives an accurate assessment of the quality. The higher the estimation is, the faster and more efficient the processor is. It is a version for testing a single core.

Intel Core i7-6700
4x 3.40 GHz (4.00 GHz) HT

983 (100 %)

AMD A10-7300
4x 1.90 GHz (3.20 GHz)

322 (32 %)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

A modern version of the GeekBench 5 benchmark reveals all opportunities and potential of your processor. As a result of testing, you can understand to what extent a processor is fast and efficient in operation with graphic apps or games.

Intel Core i7-6700
4x 3.40 GHz (4.00 GHz) HT

3801 (100 %)

AMD A10-7300
4x 1.90 GHz (3.20 GHz)

823 (21 %)

Blender 2.81 (bmw27)

Universal benchmark Blender 2.81 (bmw27) starts processor testing in rendering animated 3D images. The faster the processor copes with the task, the higher the overall performance estimation is.

Intel Core i7-6700
4x 3. 40 GHz (4.00 GHz) HT

4097 (100 %)

AMD A10-7300
4x 1.90 GHz (3.20 GHz)

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)

To define how efficient and powerful a processor is among several models or in comparison with another, we recommend paying attention to Geekbench 3 benchmark, which tests the single-core processor performance.

Intel Core i7-6700
4x 3.40 GHz (4.00 GHz) HT

4519 (100 %)

AMD A10-7300
4x 1. 90 GHz (3.20 GHz)

1310 (28 %)

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)

To reveal the whole potential of the equipment, the Geekbench 3 benchmark uses all cores for 64bit models in a specialised software complex that imitates modelling various 3D scenarios. The higher estimation is, the better the performance is.

Intel Core i7-6700
4x 3.40 GHz (4.00 GHz) HT

15655 (100 %)

AMD A10-7300
4x 1. 90 GHz (3.20 GHz)

3224 (20 %)

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Cinebench R11.5 is an outdated version of the benchmark for processors of earlier generations. To find out the potential or compare it with a modern processor model, it is enough to check the performance estimate. The higher it is, the better it is. Hyperthreading is not included.

Intel Core i7-6700
4x 3.40 GHz (4.00 GHz) HT

208 (100 %)

AMD A10-7300
4x 1. 90 GHz (3.20 GHz)

49 (23 %)

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R11.5 benchmark is designed for testing early-generation processors. The overall final performance is based on 3D scene simulations in Cinema 4 Suite. It engages all processor cores.

Intel Core i7-6700
4x 3.40 GHz (4.00 GHz) HT

912 (100 %)

AMD A10-7300
4x 1.90 GHz (3.20 GHz)

175 (19 %)

Cinebench R11. 5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)

A classic benchmark is designed for testing the built-in graphics processor that works in the OpenGL standard.

Intel Core i7-6700
4x 3.40 GHz (4.00 GHz) HT

414 (100 %)

AMD A10-7300
4x 1.90 GHz (3.20 GHz)

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

The authoritative benchmark PassMark shows how efficient the processor is in the overall performance rating. It takes into account the operation mode of all cores and supports hyperthreading. The benchmark is based on various scenarios for performing calculations, 2D and 3D modelling.

Intel Core i7-6700
4x 3.40 GHz (4.00 GHz) HT

10212 (100 %)

AMD A10-7300
4x 1.90 GHz (3.20 GHz)

3010 (29 %)

Popular comparisons with these processors

1. AMD Athlon 200GE vs.
AMD A10-7300
2. Intel Core i5-9500 vs.
AMD A10-7300
3. Intel Core i7-4722HQ vs.
AMD A10-7300
4. Intel Core i5-6500T vs.
AMD A10-7300
5. AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 1700X vs.
AMD A10-7300
6. Intel Core i3-4330 vs.
AMD A10-7300
7. Intel Core i7-6700 vs.
Intel Core i5-9300H

Compare AMD A10 7300 and Intel Core i7 5775C

AMD A10 7300

1.9GHz | 4 cores | FM2+

VS

Intel Core i7 5775C

3.3GHz | 4 nuclei

Benchmark

General result

Based on 8 tests:

Intel Core i7 5775c faster than 211%

AMD A10 7300

100

Intel Core 5775c 9000 core)

Intel Core i7 5775C 317. 17% faster

  • More L2 cache per core: 1 MB/core vs. 0.25 MB/core
  • High frequency (3.3 GHz vs 1.9 GHz) means more operations per second
  • High turbo frequency: 3.7 GHz vs 3.2GHz Intel Core i7 5775C mmx sse sse2 sse3 ssse3 SSE4 SSE41 SSE0151 sse42 fma3 fma4 amd64 amd_v xop avx 0154

    19 W 65 W Average power consumption 15. 44 W 52.81 W

    AMD A10-7300 vs Intel Core i7-3520M — comparative characteristics and benchmarks of processors

    VS

    AMD A10-7300

    Intel Core i7-3520M

    Which one to choose?

    It’s time to choose the winner. What is the difference and which is better in AMD A10-7300 vs Intel Core i7-3520M comparison? Which processor is more powerful and faster? It is quite simple to determine — look at the comparative table of all characteristics. A processor with more cores/threads, as well as a higher frequency and large L2-L3 is the absolute winner!

    Cores, base and turbo frequency of the processor

    Who will win in the comparison of AMD A10-7300 and Intel Core i7-3520M. The overall performance of a processor can be easily determined based on the number of cores, threads, base and turbo clock speed + L2-L3 volume. The more cores, L3, and clock speed, the more efficient the processor. Please note that high specifications require the use of a powerful cooling system.

    1.90 GHz

    Clock frequency

    2.90 GHZ

    4

    Nuclei

    2

    3.20 GHZ

    turbo (1 core)

    3.60 GHZ

    4

    Flows

    4

    9000 TURBO (2 Cores)

    3.40 GHHZ

    NO

    Hypertureuding

    YES

    NO

    Acceleration

    NO

    2.70 GHZ

    TURBO

    No Data

    Family and generation of processor

    Internal graphics

    It’s hard to compare AMD A10-7300 vs. Intel Core i7-3520M when graphics card function and specs matter only in laptops. In workstations, this is not an advantage, due to the installation of an additional graphics accelerator.

    AMD Radeon R6 (Kaveri)

    GPU name

    Intel HD Graphics 4000

    0.46 GHz

    GPU frequency

    0.65 GHz

    0. 53

    GPU (Turbo)

    1.25 GHZ

    6

    generation

    7

    12

    version DirectX

    6

    Executive blocks

    16

    384

    9000 2 GB

    Maximum memory

    2

    Number of monitors

    3

    28 nm

    Technology

    22 nm

    0005

    Release date

    Q1/2011

    Hardware codec support

    Here we are dealing with specifications that are used by some processor manufacturers. These figures are mostly technical and can be disregarded for comparative purposes.

    Decode / Encode

    h364

    Decode / Encode

    Decode / Encode

    JPEG

    Decode

    No

    No 90 50005

    No

    h365 10bit

    No

    No

    VP8

    No

    No

    VP9

    No

    Decode

    VC-1

    Decode

    Decode

    AVC

    Decode / Encode

    RAM and PCIe

    These are the memory standards supported by processors. The processor can support multi-channel RAM with a high clock speed, this directly affects its speed and performance.

    DDR3-1600

    Memory type

    DDR3-1333
    DDR3-1600
    DDR3L-1333 SODIMM
    DDR3L-1600 SO-Dimm

    2

    Memory channels

    2

    NO

    ECC

    NO

    version PCIe

    3.0

    PCIE

    9000 9000

    AES-NI

    Yes

    Memory & AMP; PCIe

    Thermal management and TDP

    Today’s systems are loaded with demanding games and work applications, which consequently unleash the full potential of the processor. When choosing between AMD A10-7300 and Intel Core i7-3520M, it is better to choose the option with less heat dissipation (TDP).

    19 W

    TDP

    35 W

    Maximum temperature

    Maximum TDP

    TDP Download

    Technical details

    4.00 MB

    L3-CACHE

    4. 00 MB

    28NM

    Technology

    22 NM

    Kaveri

    IVY

    AMD-V 9000 9000 9000 AMD-V 9000 -x, VT-x EPT, VT-d

    FM2+

    Socket (connector)

    BGA 1023

    Q2/2014

    Release date

    Price

    Q2/2012

    ca 346 $

    Devices compatible with this processor

    You probably already know which devices use processors. It can be a desktop computer or a laptop.

    Unknown

    Used in

    Unknown

    Popular CPU comparisons

    one. AMD A6-9225 vs.
    Intel Core i7-3520M
    2. AMD Athlon 200GE vs.
    AMD A10-7300
    3. Intel Core i5-9500 vs.
    AMD A10-7300
    four. Intel Core i5-6500T vs.
    AMD A10-7300
    5. Intel Core i7-4722HQ vs.
    AMD A10-7300
    6. Intel Core i3-4100U vs.
    AMD A10-7300
    7. AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 1700X vs.
    AMD A10-7300
    eight. Intel Core i3-4330 vs.
    AMD A10-7300
    9. AMD A10-4657M vs.
    AMD A10-7300
    ten. AMD A10-7300 vs.
    Intel Core i9-10900KF
    eleven. AMD A10-5745M vs.
    AMD A10-7300
    12. AMD A4-5100 vs.
    Intel Core i7-3520M
    13. AMD A4-5050 vs.
    Intel Core i7-3520M
    fourteen. AMD A10-4600M vs.
    Intel Core i7-3520M
    fifteen. Intel Core i7-3520M vs.
    Intel Core i9-10900KF

    Comparison AMD A10-7300 vs Intel Core i7-4980HQ which is better?

    Main / CPU / AMD A10-7300 vs Intel Core i7-4980HQ

    AMD A10-7300

    22%

    DeviceList Score

    vs

    Intel Core i7-4980HQ 90 %

    05

    DeviceList Score

    We compared the specifications of AMD A10-7300 and Intel Core i7-4980HQ and compiled a list of benefits and comparison table for you. Find out which one to choose in 2022.

    AMD A10-7300 Advantage

    Number of transistors

    2410 million

    2409 million (240900%) better than

    vs

    1 million

    Power Demand (TDP)

    19 W

    -28 W (-59.6%) better than

    vs

    47W

    Benefits of Intel Core i7-4980HQ

    Comparison winner

    threads

    8

    4 (100%) better than

    vs

    4

    Maximum frequency

    4 GHz

    At 0.8 GHz (25%) better than

    vs

    3.2 GHz

    Process

    22 nm

    -6 nm (-21. 4%) better than

    vs

    28 nm

    Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

    5737

    3745 (188%) better than

    vs

    1992

    Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

    21137

    15945 (307.1%) better than

    vs

    5192

    Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

    154

    96 (165.5%) better than

    vs

    58

    Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

    696

    538 (340.5%) better than

    vs

    158

    x264 encoding pass 1

    174

    112 (180.6%) better than

    vs

    62

    x264 encoding pass 2

    41

    29 (241. 7%) better than

    vs

    12

    TrueCrypt AES

    5

    4 (400%) better than

    vs

    1

    3DMark06 CPU

    7609

    5091 (202.2%) better than

    vs

    2518

    General information

    Type

    For laptops For laptops

    Architecture code name

    Kaveri Crystalwell

    Cores

    A large number of cores improves performance in multi-threaded applications.
    At the moment, increasing the number of processor cores is one of the priorities for increasing performance.

    4 4

    Threads

    More threads help the cores process information more efficiently. Real performance will be noticeable in very specific tasks (video editing, databases).

    4 8

    4 (100%) better than

    Base frequency

    n/a 2.8 GHz

    Process

    28 nm 22 nm

    -6 nm (-21.4%) better than

    Chip size

    245 mm2 264 mm2

    Number of transistors

    2410 million

    2409 million (240900%) better than

    1 million

    Maximum frequency

    Faster clocked processors perform more calculations per second and thus provide better performance.

    3.2GHz 4 GHz

    Better at 0.8 GHz (25%) than

    Support 64 bit

    Max. number of processors in configuration

    n/a 1

    Socket

    FP3 FCBGA1364

    AMD-V

    Series

    AMD Kaveri Intel Core i7

    Release price

    n/a 623 $

    Value for money

    The sum of all the advantages of the device divided by its price. The more%, the better the quality per unit price in comparison with all analogues.

    n/a 62.5%

    Maximum core temperature

    n/a 100 °C

    vPro

    TXT

    Intel Trusted Execution Technology for hardware-based malware protection. For each protected program, the processor allocates its own isolated section of RAM.

    PCI Express revision

    3.0 3

    Number of PCI-Express lanes

    n/a 16

    Secure Key

    Identity Protection

    n/a +

    Quick Sync

    n/a +

    eDP

    n/a +

    HDMI

    + +

    Maximum resolution via VGA

    n/a 2880×[email protected]

    FMA

    + n/a

    FRTC

    + n/a

    TrueAudio

    + n/a

    PowerNow

    + n/a

    PowerGating

    + n/a

    Out-of-band

    + n/a

    VirusProtect

    + n/a

    HSA

    + n/a

    IOMMU 2. 0

    + n/a

    Number of iGPU cores

    6 n/a

    Enduro

    + n/a

    Switchable graphics

    + n/a

    UVD

    + n/a

    VCE

    + n/a

    FDI

    n/a +

    Vulkan

    NVIDIA’s Vulkan technology allows developers to gain low-level access to the GPU to optimize graphics commands (better than OpenGL and Direct3D APIs).
    It is an open, free, cross-platform standard available for all platforms.

    + n/a

    VGA

    n/a +

    Level 1 Cache

    The fastest level of cache that works directly with the core. The larger the cache, the better the performance.

    n/a 64K (per core)

    Level 2 cache

    4096 KB 256K (per core)

    Level 3 cache

    n/a 8 MB (total)

    Maximum case temperature (TCase)

    n/a 100 °C

    Power consumption (TDP)

    Calculated heat output shows the average heat output during load operation,
    the larger the value, the more the requirements for cooling and power consumption increase.

    19W

    -28 W (-59.6%) better than

    47W

    EDB

    n/a +

    Video memory size

    n/a 2 GB

    InTru 3D

    n/a +

    DisplayPort

    + +
    Benchmarks

    Passmark

    n/a 6710

    Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

    1992 5737

    3745 (188%) better than

    Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

    5192 21137

    15945 (307. 1%) better than

    Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

    58 154

    96 (165.5%) better than

    Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

    158 696

    538 (340.5%) better than

    WinRAR 4.0

    1510 n/a

    x264 encoding pass 1

    62 174

    112 (180.6%) better than

    x264 encoding pass 2

    12 41

    29 (241.7%) better than

    TrueCrypt AES

    1 5

    4 (400%) better than

    3DMark06 CPU

    2518 7609

    5091 (202.2%) better than

    Geekbench 2

    3865 n/a

    Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core

    1565 n/a

    Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core

    3758 n/a
    Technology and additional instructions

    Extended instructions

    n/a Intel® SSE4. 1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2

    Turbo Boost

    n/a 2.0

    Idle States

    Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)

    Technology from Intel that reduces the processor frequency to a minimum to save power when the processor is idle.

    Thermal Monitoring

    Hyper-Threading

    Intel hardware technology that allows multiple threads to be processed on each processor core. For server applications, the performance improvement is up to 30%.

    AES-NI

    Technology from Intel that speeds up the AES encryption process.

    + +

    AVX

    The presence of AVX instructions improves performance in floating point and processor-intensive operations
    applications.

    RAM parameters

    RAM types

    n/a DDR3L-1333, DDR3L-1600

    Allowable memory

    The maximum amount of RAM that can be used with this processor.

    n/a 32 GB

    Number of memory channels

    2 2
    Virtualization technologies

    EPT

    VT-d

    Intel virtualization technology allows you to forward devices on the PCI bus to the guest operating system so that it can work with them using its standard tools.

    Integrated graphics

    Maximum GPU clock

    n/a 1. 30 GHz

    Maximum number of monitors

    n/a 3

    Clear Video HD

    Video core

    The presence of the video core allows you to use your computer without using a video card.

    + +

    Maximum resolution via HDMI 1.4

    n/a 3840×[email protected]

    Maximum resolution via DisplayPort

    n/a 3840×[email protected]

    DirectX

    DirectX® 12 11.2/12

    OpenGL

    n/a 4.3

    AMD A10-7300 vs. Intel Core i7-1165G7

    AMD A10-7300

    AMD A10-7300 runs with 4 and 4 CPU threads It runs at 3. 20 GHz base 2.70 GHz all cores while TDP is set to 19 W .CPU connects to CPU socket FM2+ This version includes 4.00 MB of L3 cache on a single die, supports 2 to support DDR3-1600 RAM, and supports PCIe Gen . Tjunction keeps below — degrees C. In particular, the Kaveri (Steamroller) architecture is advanced over 28 nm and supports AMD-V. The product was launched Q2/2014

    Intel Core i7-1165G7

    Intel Core i7-1165G7 runs with 4 and 4 CPU threads It runs at 4.70 GHz base 4.10 GHz all cores while the TDP is set to 15 W .The processor connects to a BGA 1526 CPU socket This the version includes 12.00 MB of L3 cache on a single die, supports 2 to support DDR4-3200 RAM, and supports 4.0 PCIe Gen 4. Tjunction is kept below 100°C degrees C. In particular, the Tiger Lake U architecture is advanced beyond 10 nm and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d . The product was launched Q3/2020

    AMD A10-7300

    Intel Core i7-1165G7

    Frequency 2. 80 GHz 4 Cores 4 3.20GHz Turbo (1 core) 4.70 GHz 2.70GHz Turbo (all cores) 4.10 GHz No. Hyper Threading Yes No. Acceleration No. normal Basic architecture normal

    AMD Radeon R6 (Kaveri)

    GPU

    Intel Iris Xe Graphics 96 (Tiger Lake G7)

    0.53GHz GPU (Turbo) 1.30 GHz 28 nm Technology 10 nm 0.53GHz GPU (Turbo) 1.30 GHz 12 DirectX Version 12 2 Max. displays 4 DDR3-1600 memory size DDR4-3200 2 Memory channels 2 Maximum memory No. ECC No. — L2 Cache 5.00 MB 4.00MB L3 Cache 12.00 MB PCIe version 4.0 PCIe lanes 4 28 nm Technology 10nm FM2+ Connector BGA 1526 19 W TDP 15W AMD-V Virtualization VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d Q2/2014 Release date Q3/2020

    Show more details

    Show more details

    Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)

    Cinebench R23 is the successor to Cinebench R20 and is also based on Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D forms. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.

    Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)

    Cinebench R23 is the successor to Cinebench R20 and is also based on Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D shapes. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and gives a big advantage of hyper-threading.

    Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)

    Cinebench R20 is the successor to Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D shapes. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.

    Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)

    Cinebench R20 is the successor to Cinebench R15 and is also based on Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D shapes. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and gives a big advantage of hyper-threading.

    Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

    Cinebench R15 is the successor to Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D shapes. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.

    Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

    Cinebench R15 is the successor to Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D shapes. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and gives a big advantage of hyper-threading.

    Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

    Geekbench 5 is a memory-intensive, cross-platform test. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.

    Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

    Geekbench 5 is a memory-intensive, cross-platform benchmark. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and gives a big advantage of hyper-threading.

    iGPU — FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

    Theoretical processing performance of the processor’s internal graphics unit with simple precision (32 bits) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS specifies how many billions of floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.

    Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)

    Geekbench 3 is a cross-platform benchmark that is memory intensive. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.

    Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)

    Geekbench 3 is a cross-platform benchmark that is memory intensive. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and gives a big advantage of hyper-threading.

    Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)

    Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular for creating shapes and other things in 3D. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.

    Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

    Cinebench 11. 5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular for creating shapes and other things in 3D. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and gives a big advantage of hyper-threading.

    Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

    Some of the processors listed below have been tested with CPU-Comparison. However, most of the processors were not tested and the results were evaluated by the secret patented CPU-Comparison formula. As such, they do not accurately reflect the actual values ​​of Passmark CPU ratings and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.

    Energy usage estimate

    Average hours of use per day

    Average CPU usage (0-100%)

    Electricity cost, USD/kWh

    Energy usage estimate

    Average hours of use per day

    Average CPU usage (0-100%)

    Electricity cost, USD/kWh

    Popular comparison

    Comments

    AMD A10-7300 vs Intel Core i7-6950X — VsRank

    Benefits
    General information
    Specifications
    RAM Integrated video core Advanced technologies
    Cinebench 9 tests1071 Geekbench tests Other tests

    AMD A10-7300

    AMD A10-7300 lost!

    Number of points: 7088

    Intel Core i7-6950X

    Intel Core i7-6950X won!

    Number of points: 11215

    1. +1 MB advantage of L2 cache
    2. 101 W less power consumption
    3. Has integrated graphics processor Radeon R6 (Kaveri)
    4. 6 cores over
    5. 16 threads more
    6. +1100 MHz CPU clock advantage
    7. +300 MHz CPU turbo clock advantage
    8. +25 MB L3 cache advantage
    9. 14 nm less process technology
    10. +128 GB RAM advantage
    11. +2400 MHz RAM 9 clock advantage0128
    12. 2 channels for RAM more than
    13. Supports virtualization technology
    14. Has dynamic processor frequency
    15. Supports multi-threading
    16. Supports AVX command set extension

    AMD A10-7300 and Intel Core i7-6950X series and architecture information, and processor release date.

    Kaveri

    Core i7 (Desktop)

    Kaveri

    Broadwell-E

    AMD A10-7300

    Intel Core i7-6950x

    2014-06-04

    2016-05-31

    3.0

    3.0 Intel Core i7-6950X.

    4

    10

    Leader — AMD Epyc 7702 (64)

    4

    20

    Leader — AMD Epyc 7702 (128)

    1900 MHz

    3000 MHz

    Leader — Intel Core i7-10810U 4900 MHz

    3200 MHz

    3500 MHz

    Leader — Intel Core i9-10980HK (5300)

    4MB

    3MB

    Leader — AMD Epyc 7702P (32)

    No data

    25MB

    Leader — AMD Epyc 7742
    256 MB

    19W

    120W

    Leader — AMD Epyc 7h22 (280)

    28 nm

    14 nm

    Leader — AMD Ryzen 9 3900X (7)

    Information about the type and support of the maximum amount of RAM, as well as the maximum frequency and number of channels.

    n/a

    128 GB

    Leader — AMD Epyc 7282 (4000)

    No data

    2400 MHz

    Leader — AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS (4266)

    2

    4

    Leader — AMD Epyc 7351P (8)

    N/A

    DDR4

    Integrated GPU specifications. Support for 4K, clock speed, as well as the amount of video core memory.

    Radeon R6 (Kaveri)

    N/A

    Processor support for advanced technologies such as multithreading, Turbo mode, AES encryption algorithm and x86 AVX command set extension.

    AMD A10-7300

    Intel Core i7-6950X

    AMD A10-7300

    Intel Core i7-6950x

    AMD A10-7300

    Intel Core i7-6950x

    Intel Core I7-INTEL Core-INTEL CORE 7300

    Intel Core i7-6950X

    Cinebench benchmark is a widely known and free benchmark of computer performance (processor and video card). The program was developed on the basis of MAXON Cinema 4D — a professional application for creating 3D animation.

    158

    1859

    Leader — Intel Core i7-6700K (8800)

    58

    155.5

    Leader — Intel Core i9-9900KS (216)

    1.8

    20

    Leader — Intel Core i9-9980XE (41)

    0.67

    1.9

    Leader — Intel Core i9-9900KS (2)

    5192

    40378

    Leader — Intel Core i9-9980XE (61667)

    1992

    6231

    Leader — Intel Core i5-8500 (8606)

    Geekbench is a synthetic computer performance test. The program performs a series of test tasks that simulate real scenarios that a computer encounters in everyday work.

    No data

    26761

    Leader — Intel Core i9-9900KS (35932)

    No data

    4049

    Leader — Intel Core i9-9900KS (6313)

    3757.5

    31129

    Leader — Intel Core i9-9980XE (80967)

    1565

    3387

    Leader — Intel Core i9-9980XE (4875)

    3865

    22114

    Leader — Intel Core i9-9980XE (43557)

    A range of benchmarks including 3DMark06 CPU, SuperPI, Octane and many other benchmarks.

    2518

    10658

    Leader — AMD Ryzen 7 2700X (106435)

    25.36

    15

    Leader — Intel Core i9-9900KS (7)

    1513.68

    495

    Leader — Intel Core i9-10980XE (410)

    23.79

    3.5

    Leader — Intel Core i9-9980XE (2)

    846.6

    94

    Leader — AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX (38)

    1510

    8450

    Leader — Intel Core i7-6950X (8450)

    62. 05

    196

    Leader — Intel Core i9-9900KS (279)

    11.93

    101

    Leader — Intel Core i9-9980XE (167)

    1.2

    10.5

    Leader — AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X (20)

    0.24

    1.7

    Leader — Intel Core i9-9980XE (3)

    0.15

    1.4

    Leader — Intel Core i9-9980XE (2)

    62.05

    196

    Leader — Intel Core i7-7740X (50)

    10553. 5

    35813

    Leader — Intel Core i7-7740X (48268)

    AMD A10-7890K vs Intel Core i7-3770K: What is the difference?

    52 points

    AMD A10-7890K

    47 points

    Intel Core i7-3770K

    vs

    64 facts in comparison

    AMD A10-7890K

    Intel Core i7-3770K

    • 17.14% higher CPU speed?
      4 x 4.1GHz vs 4 x 3.5GHz
    • 533MHz higher RAM speed?
      2133MHz vs 1600MHz
    • 5°C higher than maximum operating temperature?
      72.4°C vs 67.4°C
    • GPU frequency 216MHz higher?
      866MHz vs 650MHz
    • 3MB more L2 cache?
      4MB vs 1MB
    • 0.4GHz higher turbo clock speed?
      4. 3GHz vs 3.9GHz
    • 0.75MB/core more L2 cache per core? more memory bandwidth?
      34.1GB/s vs 25.6GB/s

    Why is Intel Core i7-3770K better than AMD A10-7890K?

    • 4 more CPU threads?
      8 vs 4
    • Are 6nm semiconductors smaller?
      22nm vs 28nm
    • 18W below TDP?
      77W vs 95W
    • 64KB more L1 cache?
      256KB vs 192KB
    • Uses multithreading?

    What are the most popular comparisons?

    AMD A10-7890K

    VS

    AMD A10-7860K

    Intel Core i7-3770k

    Intel Core i7-37770 AMD A10-7890K

    VS

    AMDLN X Core i7-3770K

    VS

    Intel Core i3-10100

    AMD A10-7890K

    VS

    AMD A10-78705

    Intel Core I7-37705

    VS

    Intel Core INTEL CORE INTEL CORE INTEL CORE INTEL CORE0004 AMD A10-7890K

    VS

    AMD A8-7600

    Intel Core i7-3770K

    VS

    AMD RYZEN 5 5600G

    AMD A10-78904 9000 9000 °

    AMD A10-9700

    AMD ATEL C -3770K

    VS

    Intel Core i7-3770s

    AMD A10-7890K

    VS

    AMD PRO A10-87505

    Intel Core I7-37705

    VS

    Intel Core I2500K

    AMD AMD 7890K

    vs

    AMD A6-7480

    Intel Core i7-3770k

    VS

    Intel Core i7-2600K

    AMD A10-7890K

    Intel Core i5-7400

    VS 9000 9000 9000 9000

    AMD A10-7890K

    VS

    AMD A10-7850K

    Intel Core i7-3770K

    VS

    Intel Core i5-3470

    AMD A10-7890K 9000

    VS

    9000 AMD AMD AMD AMD AMD AMD AMD AMD AMD AMD AMD AMD AMD AMD AMD AMD AMD AMD AMD AMD AMD AMD AMD AMD AMD AMD AMD AMD AMD AMD AMD AMD AMD AMD AMD AD i7-3770K

    VS

    Intel Core i5-4570

    Comparison prices

    Users reviews

    General rating

    AMD A10-7890K

    1 Reviews of users

    AMD A10-7890K

    9000 9000 9000 9,000

    Intel Core i7-3770K

    1 User reviews

    Intel Core i7-3770K

    10. 0 /10

    1 User reviews

    Value for money

    0005

    10.0 /10

    1 Votes

    9.0 /10

    1 Votes

    Games

    10.0 /10

    1 VOTES

    9.0 /10 9000 9000 9000

    10.0 /10

    1 Votes

    8.0 /10

    1 Votes

    Reliability

    10.0 /10

    1 VOTES

    10.0 /10 9000 /10 9000 /10 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000

    004 1 votes

    Energy efficiency

    10.0 /10

    1 Votes

    9.0 /10

    1 Votes

    performance

    1. Spray

    4 X 4.1GHZ

    9000 4 X

    CPU speed indicates how many processing cycles per second the processor can perform, considering all its cores (processors). It is calculated by adding the clock speeds of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors, each group of cores.

    2. processor thread

    More threads result in better performance and better multitasking.

    3.speed turbo clock

    4.3GHz

    3.9GHz

    When the processor is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.

    4. Has unlocked multiplier

    ✔AMD A10-7890K

    ✔Intel Core i7-3770K

    Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier and are easier to overclock, allowing for better performance in games and other applications.

    5.L2 Cache

    More L2 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.

    6.L3 cache

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A10-7890K)

    More L3 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.

    7.L1 cache

    More L1 cache results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.

    8.core L2

    1MB/core

    0.25MB/core

    More data can be stored in L2 scratchpad for access by each processor core.

    9. L3 core

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A10-7890K)

    2MB/core

    More data can be stored in L3 scratchpad for access by each processor core.

    Memory

    1.RAM speed

    2133MHz

    1600MHz

    Can support faster memory which speeds up system performance.

    2.max memory bandwidth

    34.1GB/s

    25.6GB/s

    This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.

    3rd version of DDR memory

    DDR (Double Data Rate Synchronous Dynamic Random Access Memory) is the most common type of main memory. New versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy efficient.

    4 memory channels

    More memory channels increase the speed of data transfer between memory and processor.

    5.max memory

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A10-7890K)

    Maximum amount of memory (RAM).

    6.bus baud rate

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A10-7890K)

    The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device.

    7. Supports memory debug code

    ✖AMD A10-7890K

    ✖Intel Core i7-3770K

    Memory debug code can detect and fix data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.

    8.eMMC version

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A10-7890K)

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-3770K)

    A newer version of eMMC — built-in flash memory — speeds up the memory interface, has a positive effect on device performance, for example, when transferring files from a computer to internal memory via USB.

    9.bus frequency

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A10-7890K)

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-3770K)

    The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device

    Geotagging

    1. PassMark result

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A10-7890K)

    This test measures processor performance using multithreading.

    2nd PassMark result (single)

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A10-7890K)

    This benchmark measures processor performance using a thread of execution.

    3.Geekbench 5 result (multi-core)

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A10-7890K)

    Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures the performance of a multi-core processor. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)

    4. Cinebench R20 result (multi-core)

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A10-7890K)

    Cinebench R20 is a benchmark that measures the performance of a multi-core processor by rendering a 3D scene.

    5.Cinebench R20 result (single core)

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A10-7890K)

    Cinebench R20 is a test to evaluate the performance of a single core processor when rendering a 3D scene.

    6.Geekbench 5 result (single core)

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A10-7890K)

    Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures the single-core performance of a processor. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)

    7. Blender test result (bmw27)

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A10-7890K)

    577.2seconds

    The Blender benchmark (bmw27) measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.

    8.Blender result (classroom)

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A10-7890K)

    2186.2seconds

    The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.

    9.performance per watt

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A10-7890K)

    This means the processor is more efficient, giving more performance per watt of power used.

    Functions

    1.uses multithreading

    ✖AMD A10-7890K

    ✔Intel Core i7-3770K

    processor cores into logical cores, also known as threads. Thus, each core can run two instruction streams at the same time.

    2. Has AES

    ✔AMD A10-7890K

    ✔Intel Core i7-3770K

    AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.

    3. Has AVX

    ✔AMD A10-7890K

    ✔Intel Core i7-3770K

    AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial applications, and to improve the performance of the Linux RAID program.

    4.Version SSE

    SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing images or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.

    5.Has F16C

    ✔AMD A10-7890K

    ✔Intel Core i7-3770K

    F16C is used to speed up tasks such as image contrast adjustment or volume control.

    6 bits transmitted at the same time

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A10-7890K)

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-3770K)

    NEON provides faster media processing such as MP3 listening.

    7. Has MMX

    ✔AMD A10-7890K

    ✔Intel Core i7-3770K

    MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting image contrast or adjusting volume.

    2022 © All rights reserved
    AMD A10-7300 Intel Core i7-1165G7
    19 W Max TDP 15W
    N. A. Power consumption per day (kWh) NA
    NA Operating cost per day NA
    NA Power consumption per year (kWh) NA
    NA Operating cost per year NA