Core i7-12700KF vs A10-7300 — How Many FPS
Availability
Intel Core i7-12700KF Desktop Processor 12 (8P+4E) Cores up to 5.0 GHz Unlocked LGA1700 600 Series Chipset 125W
Buy on Amazon
$377.99
In Stock
Updated 78 minutes ago
Availability
No items available
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-12700KF outperforms A10-7300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-12700KF
Advantages of AMD A10-7300
League of Legends
Resolution
1920×1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i7-12700KF
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
1359
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.28/FPS
100%
Price, $
$377.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i7-12700KF Desktop Processor 12 (8P+4E) Cores up to 5.0 GHz Unlocked LGA1700 600 Series Chipset 125W
Buy for $377. 99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 78 minutes ago
A10-7300
FPS
740
16%
Value, $/FPS
Price, $
Resolution
1920×1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i7-12700KF
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
A10-7300
1359
FPS
740
FPS
League of Legends
345
FPS
180
FPS
Grand Theft Auto V
599
FPS
315
FPS
VALORANT
371
FPS
195
FPS
Fortnite
383
FPS
191
FPS
Apex Legends
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-12700KF
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Single-Core
1897
100%
Multi-Core
13744
100%
A10-7300
Single-Core
309
-414%
Multi-Core
816
-1484%
|
Intel Core i7-12700KF |
vs |
AMD A10-7300 |
|---|---|---|
| Nov 4th, 2021 | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7 | Collection | Not Available |
| Alder Lake | Codename | Kaveri |
| Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Socket FP3 (906) |
|
Desktop |
Segment | |
|
12 |
Cores | 4 |
|
20 |
Threads | 4 |
|
3. |
Base Clock Speed | 1.9 GHz |
|
5.0 GHz |
Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 125 W | TDP |
19 W |
| 10 nm | Process Size | Not Available |
| 36.0x | Multiplier | Not Available |
| None | Integrated Graphics |
Radeon R6 Series |
|
Yes |
Overclockable | No |
6 GHzBuilds Using Core i7-12700KF or A10-7300
League of Legends, 1080p, High
iBUYPOWER Pro Gaming PC
1233 FPS
$1.38/FPS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
Core i7-12700KF
16 GB, 1 TB SSD
Buy on Amazon
$1,699.99
In Stock
Updated 70 minutes ago
iBUYPOWER Pro Gaming PC
1037 FPS
$1.54/FPS
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Core i7-12700KF
8 GB, 500 GB SSD + 1 TB HDD
Buy on Amazon
$1,599.
99
In Stock
Updated 64 minutes ago
CLX Set Gaming Desktop PC
1233 FPS
$1.62/FPS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
Core i7-12700KF
16 GB, 500 GB SSD + 2 TB HDD
Buy on Amazon
$1,999.49
In Stock
Updated 63 minutes ago
Advanced Battlestations Gladiator Gaming PC
1233 FPS
$1.66/FPS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
Core i7-12700KF
16 GB, N/A Storage
Buy on Amazon
$2,049.99
In Stock
Updated 67 minutes ago
MSI Aegis RS (Tower) Gaming Desktop PC
1123 FPS
$1.67/FPS
GeForce RTX 3070
Core i7-12700KF
16 GB, 1 TB SSD
Buy on Amazon
$1,879
In Stock
Updated 65 minutes ago
2022 MSI Aegis RS 12TD-297US (i7-12700KF, 16GB RAM, 1TB NVMe SSD, RTX 3070 8GB, Windows 11) Gaming Desktop PC
1123 FPS
$1.67/FPS
GeForce RTX 3070
Core i7-12700KF
16 GB, 1 TB SSD
Buy on Amazon
$1,879
In Stock
Updated 66 minutes ago
MSI Aegis RS (Tower) Gaming Desktop PC
1233 FPS
$1.
69/FPS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
Core i7-12700KF
16 GB, 1 TB SSD
Buy on Amazon
$2,079
In Stock
Updated 64 minutes ago
MSI Aegis RS Gaming Desktop PC
1037 FPS
$1.69/FPS
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Core i7-12700KF
16 GB, 1 TB SSD
Buy on Amazon
$1,752.78
In Stock
Updated 65 minutes ago
YEYIAN Katana X22 Gaming PC
1123 FPS
$1.69/FPS
GeForce RTX 3070
Core i7-12700KF
16 GB, N/A Storage
Buy on Amazon
$1,899
In Stock
Updated 69 minutes ago
2022 MSI Aegis RS 12TE-296US (i7-12700KF, 16GB RAM, 1TB NVMe SSD, RTX 3070Ti 8GB, Windows 11) Gaming Desktop PC
1233 FPS
$1.69/FPS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
Core i7-12700KF
16 GB, 1 TB SSD
Buy on Amazon
$2,079
In Stock
Updated 66 minutes ago
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons.
Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
Core i9-12900KF
$559.89
Core i7-12700KF
$377.99
Core i7-12700KF
$377.99
Xeon E5-1607 v3
N/A Stock
Core i7-12700KF
$377.99
Turion X2 Mobile RM-72
N/A Stock
Core i7-12700KF
$377.99
Core i3-6157U
N/A Stock
Core i7-12700KF
$377.99
Core i3-8145U
N/A Stock
Core i7-12700KF
$377.99
Core i7-930
$84.86
Core i7-12700KF
$377.99
Pentium Silver J5005
$215.77
Core i7-12700KF
$377.99
Athlon II X4 635
$59.95
Core i7-12700KF
$377.99
Celeron 3965Y
N/A Stock
AMD A10-7300 vs Intel Core i9-10900KF — CPU Specs & Benchmark
VS
Which to select
It is time to pick the winner. What is the difference between AMD A10-7300 vs Intel Core i9-10900KF? What CPU is more powerful? It is quite easy to determine – look at comparison table.
The processor with more cores/ threads and also with higher frequency is the absolute winner!
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
Who will win between AMD A10-7300 vs Intel Core i9-10900KF. The general performance of a CPU can easily be determined based on the number of its cores and the thread count, as well as the base frequency and Turbo frequency. The more GHz and cores a CPU has, the better. Please note that high technical specs require using a powerful cooling system.
1.90 GHz
Frequency
3.70 GHz
4
CPU Cores
10
3.20 GHz
Turbo (1 Core)
5.30 GHz
4
CPU Threads
20
No
Hyperthreading
Yes
No
Overclocking
Yes
2.70 GHz
Turbo (4 Cores)
Turbo (10 Cores)
4.90 GHz
CPU generation and family
Internal Graphics
Some manufacturers complement their CPUs with graphic chips, such a solution being especially popular in laptops. The higher the clock frequency of a GPU is and the bigger its memory, the better.
Find a winner — AMD A10-7300 vs Intel Core i9-10900KF.
AMD Radeon R6 (Kaveri)
GPU name
0.46 GHz
GPU frequency
0.53 GHz
GPU (Turbo)
No turbo
6
Generation
12
DirectX Version
6
Execution units
384
Shader
2 GB
Max. Memory
2
Max. displays
28 nm
Technology
Q2/2015
Release date
Hardware codec support
Here we deal with specs that are used by some CPU manufacturers. These numbers are mainly technical and can be neglected for the purpose of the comparison analysis.
Decode / Encode
h364
No
Decode / Encode
JPEG
No
No
h365 8bit
No
No
h365 10bit
No
No
VP8
No
No
VP9
No
Decode
VC-1
No
Decode
AVC
No
Memory & PCIe
These are memory standards supported by CPUs. The higher such standards, the better a CPU’s performance is.
DDR3-1600
Memory type
DDR4-2933
Max. Memory
128 GB
2
Memory channels
2
No
ECC
No
PCIe version
3.0
PCIe lanes
16
Encryption
Data encryption support
Yes
AES-NI
Yes
Memory & AMP; PCIe
Thermal Management
The thermal design power (TDP), sometimes called thermal design point, is the maximum amount of heat generated by a computer chip or component (often a CPU, GPU or system on a chip) that the cooling system in a computer is designed to dissipate under any workload.
19 W
TDP
125 W
—
Tjunction max.
100 °C
—
TDP up
—
—
TDP down
95 W
Technical details
4.00 MB
L3-Cache
20.00 MB
28nm
Technology
14 nm
Kaveri
Architecture
Comet Lake
AMD-V
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
FM2+
Socket
LGA 1200
Q2/2014
Release date
Q2/2020
Market price
ca.
474 $
Instruction set (ISA)
64-bit
L2-Cache
2.56 MB
Devices using this processor
You probably know already what devices use CPUs. These can be a desktop or a laptop.
Unknown
Used in
PC/Client/Tablet
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
This synthetic test will help you determine the real computing power of a single core in the central processing unit. Cinebench R11.5 is based on MAXON CINEMA 4D and employs various testing scenarios
AMD A10-7300
4x 1.90 GHz (3.20 GHz)
49 (100 %)
Intel Core i9-10900KF
10x 3.
70 GHz (5.30 GHz) HT
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R11.5 carries out simultaneous cross-platform tests on all the processor’s cores. By running realistic 3D scenes, this benchmark will reveal all the potential of your Intel or AMD single-unit processor
AMD A10-7300
4x 1.90 GHz (3.20 GHz)
175 (100 %)
Intel Core i9-10900KF
10x 3.70 GHz (5.30 GHz) HT
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
The latter is used for creation of 3D models and forms.
Cinebench R15 is used for single-core processor performance benchmark test. The hyperthreading ability doesn’t count. It is the updated version of Cinebench 11.5. As all new versions, the updated benchmark is based on Cinema 4 Suite software
AMD A10-7300
4x 1.90 GHz (3.20 GHz)
44 (18 %)
Intel Core i9-10900KF
10x 3.70 GHz (5.30 GHz) HT
232 (100 %)
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 can be used for multi-core processor performance benchmark testing.
The test produces precise and accurate results. This benchmark is the updated version of the Cinebench 11.5 which is based on Cinema 4 Suite soft.
AMD A10-7300
4x 1.90 GHz (3.20 GHz)
139 (5 %)
Intel Core i9-10900KF
10x 3.70 GHz (5.30 GHz) HT
2668 (100 %)
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R20 is based on Cinema 4 Suite. It is the software used to create 3D forms. The benchmark runs for single-core test procedure without counting of hyperthreading ability.
AMD A10-7300
4x 1.90 GHz (3.20 GHz)
Intel Core i9-10900KF
10x 3.70 GHz (5.30 GHz) HT
645 (100 %)
Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
It is the new version of the benchmark which is developed on the basis of Cinebench R15 (both versions are operated on the basis of Cinema 4 — the most popular 3D modeling software). Cinebench R20 is used for multi-core processor performance benchmark tests and hyperthreading ability.
AMD A10-7300
4x 1.
90 GHz (3.20 GHz)
Intel Core i9-10900KF
10x 3.70 GHz (5.30 GHz) HT
6419 (100 %)
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the newest instalment of the most popular CPU Rendering Benchmark Single-Core Cinebench. We have the Score Results for all modern Processors
AMD A10-7300
4x 1.90 GHz (3.20 GHz)
Intel Core i9-10900KF
10x 3.
70 GHz (5.30 GHz) HT
1382 (100 %)
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the newest instalment of the most popular CPU Rendering Benchmark Multi-Core Cinebench. We have the Score Results for all modern Processors
AMD A10-7300
4x 1.90 GHz (3.20 GHz)
Intel Core i9-10900KF
10x 3.70 GHz (5.30 GHz) HT
15945 (100 %)
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 3 is the benchmark for Intel and AMD 64-bit processors.
It employs a new power estimation system for a single CPU core. This software carries out the modeling of real scenarios to provide accurate results
AMD A10-7300
4x 1.90 GHz (3.20 GHz)
1310 (100 %)
Intel Core i9-10900KF
10x 3.70 GHz (5.30 GHz) HT
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 3 benchmark supports AMD and Intel multi-core processors. Being based on MAXON CINEMA 4D, it allows obtaining the real comparative CPU potential
AMD A10-7300
4x 1.
90 GHz (3.20 GHz)
3224 (100 %)
Intel Core i9-10900KF
10x 3.70 GHz (5.30 GHz) HT
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 benchmark is the newest software suit. Completely new algorithms provide the quite accurate benchmark testing results of the single-core CPU.
AMD A10-7300
4x 1.90 GHz (3.20 GHz)
322 (22 %)
Intel Core i9-10900KF
10x 3.
70 GHz (5.30 GHz) HT
1417 (100 %)
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 software suite shows benchmark testing results of the memory performance and speed of the multi-core processor. Here the hyperthreading ability is counted.
AMD A10-7300
4x 1.90 GHz (3.20 GHz)
823 (7 %)
Intel Core i9-10900KF
10x 3.70 GHz (5.30 GHz) HT
11344 (100 %)
Blender 2.
81 (bmw27)
We use Blender benchmark to trace performance of the central processing unit. The testing results show you how fast the unit runs on the implementation of the multi-processing tasks
AMD A10-7300
4x 1.90 GHz (3.20 GHz)
Intel Core i9-10900KF
10x 3.70 GHz (5.30 GHz) HT
1260 (100 %)
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
It tests entire and overall performance of the central processing unit (mathematical calculations, compression and decompression speed, 2D&3D graphic tests).
Please note that data can differ from the real-world situations.
AMD A10-7300
4x 1.90 GHz (3.20 GHz)
3010 (100 %)
Intel Core i9-10900KF
10x 3.70 GHz (5.30 GHz) HT
iGPU — FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
This test serves for determining the performance of integrated graphics in Intel and AMD processors. The result is the estimated computing power in the Single-Precision FP32 mode
AMD A10-7300
4x 1.
90 GHz (3.20 GHz)
409 (100 %)
Intel Core i9-10900KF
10x 3.70 GHz (5.30 GHz) HT
Monero Hashrate kH/s
Using a Graphics Card (GPU) is the ideal way to mine Monero. While it requires substantially more investment compared to using a CPU, its hash rate is significantly higher
AMD A10-7300
4x 1.90 GHz (3.20 GHz)
Intel Core i9-10900KF
10x 3.
70 GHz (5.30 GHz) HT
700 (100 %)
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
| 1. |
Intel Core i9-10900KF vs. Intel Core i3-2100T |
|
| 2. |
Intel Core i9-10900KF vs. AMD FX-8320E |
|
| 3. |
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X vs. Intel Core i9-10900KF |
|
| 4. |
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X vs. Intel Core i9-10900KF |
|
5.
|
AMD A8-7650K vs. Intel Core i9-10900KF |
|
| 6. |
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 vs. Intel Core i9-10900KF |
|
| 7. |
Intel Core i9-9900KF vs. Intel Core i9-10900KF |
|
| 8. |
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X vs. Intel Core i9-10900KF |
|
| 9. |
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X vs. Intel Core i9-10900KF |
|
10.
|
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X vs. Intel Core i9-10900KF |
|
| 11. |
Intel Core i9-10900KF vs. Intel Core i9-10900KF |
|
12.
|
Intel Celeron N4020 vs. Intel Core i9-10900KF |
|
| 13. |
Intel Core i7-1160G7 vs. Intel Core i9-10900KF |
|
| 14. |
Intel Core i5-4210M vs. Intel Core i9-10900KF |
|
| 15. |
Intel Core i7-5950HQ vs. Intel Core i9-10900KF |
Comparison AMD A10-7300 vs Intel Core i7-3820QM what is better?
Home / CPU / AMD A10-7300 vs Intel Core i7-3820QM
AMD A10-7300
22%
DeviceList score
vs
Intel Core i7-3820QM
43%
DeviceList score
We compared the characteristics of AMD A10-7300 and Intel Core i7-3820QM and compiled a list of advantages and a comparison table for you.
Find out which one to choose in 2022 year.
AMD A10-7300 benefits
|
Transistor count |
|
2410 million 2409 million (240900%) better
vs
1 million
|
|
Power Consumption (TDP) |
|
19 Wt -26 Wt (-57.8%) better
vs
45 Wt
|
Intel Core i7-3820QM benefits
Winner in comparison
|
Number of threads |
|
8 4 (100%) better
vs
4
|
|
Maximum frequency |
|
3.7 GGz 0.5 GGz (15.6%) better
vs
3.
|
|
Manufacturing process technology |
|
22 nm -6 nm (-21.4%) better
vs
28 nm
|
|
Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core |
|
5008 3016 (151.4%) better
vs
1992
|
|
Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core |
|
19364 14172 (273%) better
vs
5192
|
|
Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core |
|
4575 4517 (7787.9%) better
vs
58
|
|
x264 encoding pass 1 |
|
150 88 (141.
vs
62
|
|
x264 encoding pass 2 |
|
37 25 (208.3%) better
vs
12
|
|
TrueCrypt AES |
|
4 3 (300%) better
vs
1
|
|
3DMark06 CPU |
|
6849 4331 (172%) better
vs
2518
|
2 GGz
9%) better| General information | |
|
Type |
|
|
Architecture codename |
|
| Kaveri | Ivy Bridge |
|
Number of cores A large number of cores improves performance in multithreaded applications. |
|
| 4 | 4 |
|
Number of threads More threads help the cores process information more efficiently. Real performance will be noticeable in very specific tasks (video editing, databases). |
|
| 4 | 8
4 (100%) better
|
|
Base frequency |
|
| no data | 2.7 GGz |
|
Manufacturing process technology |
|
| 28 nm | 22 nm
-6 nm (-21.4%) better
|
|
Crystal size |
|
| 245 2 | 160 2 |
|
Transistor count |
|
| 2410 million
2409 million (240900%) better
|
1 million |
|
Maximum frequency Processors with high clock speeds perform more calculations per second and thus provide better performance. |
|
| 3.2 GGz | 3.7 GGz
0.5 GGz (15.6%) better
|
|
64 bit support |
|
|
Max number of CPUs in a configuration |
|
| no data | 1 |
|
Socket |
|
| FP3 | FCBGA1224, FCPGA988 |
|
AMD-V |
|
|
Series |
|
| AMD Kaveri | Intel Core i7 |
|
Start price |
|
| no data | 498 USD |
|
Price-quality ratio The sum of all the advantages of the device divided by its price. The higher the%, the better the quality per unit price in comparison with all analogues. |
|
| no data | 62.5 % |
|
Maximum core temperature |
|
| no data | 105 °C |
|
vPro |
|
|
TXT Intel Trusted Execution Technology for hardware protection against malware. For each protected program, the processor allocates its own isolated section of RAM. |
|
|
PCI Express revision |
|
| 3.0 | 3.0 |
|
PCI-Express line count |
|
| no data | 16 |
|
Demand Based Switching |
|
| no data | — |
|
Secure Key |
|
|
Identity Protection |
|
| no data | + |
|
Flex Memory Access |
|
| no data | + |
|
Quick Sync |
|
| no data | + |
|
eDP |
|
| no data | + |
|
HDMI |
|
| + | + |
|
FMA |
|
| + | no data |
|
My WiFi |
|
| no data | + |
|
FRTC |
|
| + | no data |
|
TrueAudio |
|
| + | no data |
|
PowerNow |
|
| + | no data |
|
PowerGating |
|
| + | no data |
|
Out-of-band |
|
| + | no data |
|
VirusProtect |
|
| + | no data |
|
HSA |
|
| + | no data |
|
IOMMU 2. |
|
| + | no data |
|
Number of iGPU cores |
|
| 6 | no data |
|
Enduro |
|
| + | no data |
|
Switchable graphics |
|
| + | no data |
|
UVD |
|
| + | no data |
|
VCE |
|
| + | no data |
|
FDI |
|
| no data | + |
|
Anti-Theft |
|
| no data | + |
|
Vulkan NVIDIA’s Vulkan technology allows developers to gain low-level GPU access to optimize graphics instructions (better than OpenGL and Direct3D APIs). |
|
| + | no data |
|
Fast Memory Access |
|
| no data | + |
|
CRT |
|
| no data | + |
|
L1 Cache More threads help the cores process information more efficiently. Real performance will be noticeable in very specific tasks (video editing, databases). |
|
| no data | 64K ( ) |
|
L2 Cache |
|
| 4096 | 256K ( ) |
|
L3 Cache |
|
| no data | 8 () |
|
Power Consumption (TDP) The calculated heat output shows the average heat output in operation under load,
|
|
| 19 Wt
-26 Wt (-57.8%) better
|
45 Wt |
|
EDB |
|
| no data | + |
|
InTru 3D |
|
| no data | + |
|
DisplayPort |
|
| + | + |
|
SDVO |
|
| no data | + |
0
| Benchmarks | |
|
Passmark |
|
| no data | 5337 |
|
Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core |
|
| 1992 | 5008
3016 (151.4%) better
|
|
Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core |
|
| 5192 | 19364
14172 (273%) better
|
|
Cinebench 11. |
|
| 58 | 4575
4517 (7787.9%) better
|
|
Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core |
|
| 158 | no data |
|
WinRAR 4.0 |
|
| 1510 | no data |
|
x264 encoding pass 1 |
|
| 62 | 150
88 (141.9%) better
|
|
x264 encoding pass 2 |
|
| 12 | 37
25 (208.3%) better
|
|
TrueCrypt AES |
|
| 1 | 4
3 (300%) better
|
|
3DMark06 CPU |
|
| 2518 | 6849
4331 (172%) better
|
|
Geekbench 2 |
|
| 3865 | no data |
|
Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core |
|
| 1565 | no data |
|
Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core |
|
| 3758 | no data |
5 64-bit single-core| Technologies and extensions | |
|
Advanced instructions |
|
| no data | Intel® AVX |
|
Turbo Boost |
|
| no data | 2. 0 |
|
Idle States |
|
|
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) More threads help the cores process information more efficiently. Real performance will be noticeable in very specific tasks (video editing, databases). |
|
|
Thermal Monitoring |
|
|
Hyper-Threading More threads help the cores process information more efficiently. Real performance will be noticeable in very specific tasks (video editing, databases). |
|
|
AES-NI More threads help the cores process information more efficiently. Real performance will be noticeable in very specific tasks (video editing, databases). |
|
| + | + |
|
AVX The presence of AVX commands improves performance in floating-point operations and in processor-demanding
|
|
| RAM parameters | |
|
Supported memory types |
|
| no data | DDR3/L/-RS 1333/1600 |
|
Maximum memory size The maximum amount of RAM that can be used with this processor. |
|
| no data | 32 Gb |
|
Max memory channels |
|
| 2 | 2 |
| Virtualization technologies | |
|
VT-x |
|
|
EPT |
|
|
VT-d Intel’s virtualization technology allows devices on the PCI bus to be forwarded to the guest operating system so that it can work with them using its standard tools. |
|
| Graphics specifications | |
|
maximum frequency of the graphics core |
|
| no data | 1.25 |
|
Maximum number of monitors |
|
| no data | 3 |
|
Clear Video HD |
|
|
Integrated graphics The presence of a video core allows you to use a computer without using a video card. |
|
| + | + |
|
DirectX |
|
| DirectX® 12 | no data |
Intel Core i3-1115G4 vs AMD A10-7300
Comparative analysis of Intel Core i3-1115G4 and AMD A10-7300 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics image quality, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization, Peripherals.
Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps).
Intel Core i3-1115G4
Buy on Amazon
vs
AMD A10-7300
Buy on Amazon
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Core i3-1115G4
- CPU is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 28% higher clock speed: 4.
10 GHz vs 3.2 GHz - A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 10 nm SuperFin vs 28 nm
- 3.1x better performance in PassMark — Single thread mark: 2686 vs 857
- 3.6x better performance in PassMark — CPU mark: 6234 vs 1731
| Launch date | 2 Sep 2020 vs 4 June 2014 |
| Maximum frequency | 4.10 GHz vs 3.2 GHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm SuperFin vs 28 nm |
| PassMark — Single thread mark | 2686 vs 857 |
| PassMark — CPU mark | 6234 vs 1731 |
Reasons to consider the AMD A10-7300
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
- Around 60% more L2 cache; more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
| Number of cores | 4 vs 2 |
| L2 cache | 4 MB vs 2. 5 MB |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Core i3-1115G4
CPU 2: AMD A10-7300
| PassMark — Single thread mark |
|
|
||
| PassMark — CPU mark |
|
|
| Name | Intel Core i3-1115G4 | AMD A10-7300 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark — Single thread mark | 2686 | 857 |
| PassMark — CPU mark | 6234 | 1731 |
| Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 303 | |
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 794 | |
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
0.897 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 10.705 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.124 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.375 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2.351 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 994 | |
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames) |
1904 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) | 2948 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 994 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) | 1904 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) | 2948 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Core i3-1115G4 | AMD A10-7300 | |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture codename | Tiger Lake | Kaveri |
| Launch date | 2 Sep 2020 | 4 June 2014 |
| Place in performance rating | 440 | 1841 |
| Processor Number | i3-1115G4 | |
| Series | 11th Generation Intel Core i3 Processors | AMD A10-Series APU for Laptops |
| Status | Launched | |
| Vertical segment | Mobile | Laptop |
| Family | AMD A-Series Processors | |
| OPN Tray | AM7300ECh54JA | |
| 64 bit support | ||
| Bus Speed | 4 GT/s | |
| L1 cache | 192 KB | |
| L2 cache | 2. 5 MB |
4 MB |
| L3 cache | 6 MB | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm SuperFin | 28 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 100°C | |
| Maximum frequency | 4.10 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| Number of cores | 2 | 4 |
| Number of threads | 4 | 4 |
| Base frequency | 1. 9 GHz |
|
| Compute Cores | 10 | |
| Die size | 245 mm | |
| Number of GPU cores | 6 | |
| Transistor count | 2410 Million | |
| Unlocked | ||
| Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB | |
| Supported memory types | DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-3733 | Not Listed |
| Device ID | 0x9A78 | |
| Execution Units | 48 | |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1. 25 GHz |
|
| Intel® Clear Video HD technology | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Processor graphics | Intel UHD Graphics for 11th Gen Intel Processors | AMD Radeon R6 Graphics |
| Enduro | ||
| Graphics max frequency | 553 MHz | |
| iGPU core count | 6 | |
| Switchable graphics | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
| Number of displays supported | 4 | |
| DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Max resolution over DisplayPort | [email protected] | |
| Max resolution over eDP | [email protected] | |
| DirectX | 12. 1 |
12 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| Vulkan | ||
| Configurable TDP-down | 12 Watt | |
| Configurable TDP-down Frequency | 1.70 GHz | |
| Configurable TDP-up | 28 Watt | |
| Configurable TDP-up Frequency | 3.00 GHz | |
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | |
| Package Size | 46. 5×25 |
|
| Sockets supported | FCBGA1449 | FP3 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt | |
| Intel® OS Guard | ||
| Intel® Software Guard Extensions (Intel® SGX) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
| Mode-based Execute Control (MBE) | ||
| Secure Boot | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Instruction set extensions | Intel SSE4. 1, Intel SSE4.2, Intel AVX2, Intel AVX-512 |
|
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Intel® Volume Management Device (VMD) | ||
| Speed Shift technology | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
| AMD App Acceleration | ||
| AMD Elite Experiences | ||
| AMD HD3D technology | ||
| AMD Mantle API | ||
| Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP) | ||
| Frame Rate Target Control (FRTC) | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
| Heterogeneous System Architecture (HSA) | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Out-of-band client management | ||
| PowerGating | ||
| PowerNow | ||
| System Image Stability | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| VirusProtect | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
IOMMU 2. 0 |
||
| PCI Express revision | 3.0 |
AMD A8-6410 vs. AMD A10-7300
AMD A8-6410
The AMD A8-6410 operates with 4 cores and 4 CPU threads. It run at 2.40 GHz base 2.40 GHz all cores while the TDP is set at 15 W.The processor is attached to the AM1 CPU socket. This version includes 2.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 2 memory channels to support DDR3L-1600 SO-DIMM RAM and features PCIe Gen lanes. Tjunction keeps below — degrees C. In particular, Richland (Piledriver) Architecture is enhanced with 32 nm technology and supports AMD-V. The product was launched on Q2/2014
AMD A10-7300
The AMD A10-7300 operates with 4 cores and 4 CPU threads. It run at 3.20 GHz base 2.70 GHz all cores while the TDP is set at 19 W.The processor is attached to the FM2+ CPU socket.
This version includes 4.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 2 memory channels to support DDR3-1600 RAM and features PCIe Gen lanes. Tjunction keeps below — degrees C. In particular, Kaveri (Steamroller) Architecture is enhanced with 28 nm technology and supports AMD-V. The product was launched on Q2/2014
AMD A8-6410
AMD A10-7300
Compare Detail
| 2.00 GHz | Frequency | 1.90 GHz |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 2.40 GHz | Turbo (1 Core) | 3.20 GHz |
| 2.40 GHz | Turbo (All Cores) | 2.70 GHz |
| No | Hyperthreading | No |
| No | Overclocking | No |
| normal | Core Architecture | normal |
|
AMD Radeon R5 (Beema) |
GPU |
AMD Radeon R6 (Kaveri) |
| No turbo | GPU (Turbo) | 0.53 GHz |
| 32 nm | Technology | 28 nm |
| No turbo | GPU (Turbo) | 0. 53 GHz |
| 12 | DirectX Version | 12 |
| 2 | Max. displays | 2 |
| DDR3L-1600 SO-DIMM | Memory | DDR3-1600 |
| 2 | Memory channels | 2 |
| Max memory | ||
| No | ECC | No |
| — | L2 Cache | — |
| 2.00 MB | L3 Cache | 4.00 MB |
| PCIe version | ||
| PCIe lanes | ||
| 32 nm | Technology | 28 nm |
| AM1 | Socket | FM2+ |
| 15 W | TDP | 19 W |
| AMD-V | Virtualization | AMD-V |
| Q2/2014 | Release date | Q2/2014 |
|
Show more data |
Show more data |
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite.
Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
iGPU — FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-Comparison. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-Comparison’s secret proprietary formula.
As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
Electric Usage Estimate
Average hours of use per day
Average CPU Utilization (0-100%)
Power cost, dollar per kWh
Electric Usage Estimate
Average hours of use per day
Average CPU Utilization (0-100%)
Power cost, dollar per kWh
| AMD A8-6410 | AMD A10-7300 | |
| 15 W | Max TDP | 19 W |
| NA | Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA |
| NA | Running cost per day | NA |
| NA | Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA |
| NA | Running cost per year | NA |
Popular Comparision
Comments
Intel Core i7-6700 vs AMD A10-7300
Comparing technical specs and benchmarks
VS
Intel Core i7-6700 14 nm — 3.
40 GHz DDR3-1600
DDR4-2133
AMD A10-7300 28 nm — 1.90 GHz DDR3-1600
Intel Core i7-6700
AMD A10-7300
Intel Core i7-6700 vs. AMD A10-7300
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
In comparison between Intel Core i7-6700 and AMD A10-7300, you should choose the model which has more cores and threads with base and turbo frequencies. All the features influence the system’s high-speed performance.
no data
Cores
4x
4 / 8
CPU Cores / Threads
4 / 4
no data
Core architecture
normal
Yes
Hyperthreading
No
No
Overclocking
No
3.40 GHz
Frequency
1.90 GHz
4.00 GHz
Turbo Frequency (1 Core)
3.20 GHz
3.70 GHz
Turbo Frequency (4 Cores)
2.70 GHz
Intel Core i7-6700 vs. AMD A10-7300
CPU generation and family
4
CPU Cores
4
ca.
350 $
Market price
no data
Name
AMD A10-7300
no data
Family
AMD A
no data
CPU group
AMD A10-7000
9
Generation
6
no data
Segment
Mobile
no data
Predecessor
—
no data
Successor
—
Intel Core i7-6700 vs. AMD A10-7300
Internal Graphics
Some manufacturers build a graphic core in many CPUs being an additional advantage. If you use a video card which is separated from a CPU, we recommend you skip this comparison as there is no need to compare Intel Core i7-6700 to AMD A10-7300 across a built-in video card.
Intel HD Graphics 530
GPU name
AMD Radeon R6 (Kaveri)
0.35 GHz
GPU frequency
0.46 GHz
1.15 GHz
GPU (Turbo)
0.53 GHz
24
Execution units
6
192
Shader
384
no data
Max. GPU Memory
2 GB
3
Max. displays
2
9
Generation
6
12
Direct X
12
14 nm
Technology
28 nm
Q3/2015
Release date
Q2/2015
Intel Core i7-6700 vs.
AMD A10-7300
Hardware codec support
Pay attention to support of different technological options by CPUs. The general performance is not influenced. In the interest of time, you can skip this section.
Decode / Encode
h365 8bit
No
Decode
h365 10bit
No
no data
h365 / HEVC (8 bit)
No
no data
h365 / HEVC (10 bit)
No
Decode / Encode
h364
Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode
VP8
No
Decode
VP9
No
no data
AV1
No
Decode / Encode
AVC
Decode
Decode
VC-1
Decode
Decode / Encode
JPEG
Decode / Encode
Intel Core i7-6700 vs. AMD A10-7300
Memory & PCIe
Modern CPUs support memory which operates in a multi-channel regime that provides high-speed data exchange and improves productivity. The higher the ram’s clock frequency, its standard (for example, DDR3, DDR4, DDR5) and maximum space in a system are, the better it is.
3.0
PCIe version
16
PCIe lanes
DDR3-1600
DDR4-2133
Memory type
DDR3-1600
64 GB
Max. Memory
2
Memory channels
2
no data
Bandwidth
—
No
ECC
No
Yes
AES-NI
Yes
Intel Core i7-6700 vs. AMD A10-7300
Thermal Management
High-performance and powerful CPUs require the essence of a good power supply. Here you learn how much TDP Intel Core i7-6700 and AMD A10-7300 have. We recommend paying attention to the model which has lower TDP.
65 W
TDP
19 W
no data
TDP (PL1)
19 W
no data
TDP (PL2)
—
—
TDP up
—
—
TDP down
—
—
Tjunction max.
—
Intel Core i7-6700 vs. AMD A10-7300
Technical details
Here is the main information which can define the best CPU comparing technical specifications. Thus, the higher cash L2 and L3, the better it is.
The lower the technological process of CPU production, the better it is. Another important factor is a production year that directly influences the manufacturer’s support terms and the opportunity of a system modernization at minimal cost in the future.
no data
Instruction set (ISA)
x86-64 (64 bit)
no data
ISA extensions
SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, FMA3, FMA4
no data
L2-Cache
—
8.00 MB
L3-Cache
4.00 MB
Skylake
Architecture
Kaveri
14 nm
Technology
28nm
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
Virtualization
AMD-V
LGA 1151
Socket
FM2+
Q3/2015
Release date
Q2/2014
no data
Part Number
—
Intel Core i7-6700 vs. AMD A10-7300
Devices using this processor
In completing the comparison between Intel Core i7-6700 and AMD A10-7300, you can learn in which computer systems these models are used.
Unknown
Used in
Unknown
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
The version, having become a gold standard of a synthetic benchmark, allows accurately define a CPU performance in Cinema 4 Suite software complex.
The most points mean a model’s best efficiency. Hyperthreading is not included.
Intel Core i7-6700
4x 3.40 GHz (4.00 GHz) HT
406 (100 %)
AMD A10-7300
4x 1.90 GHz (3.20 GHz)
Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
It is a testing performance standard of CPU by Maxon. It is a specialized multi-platform number of tests that estimate the power of all processor cores in rendering mode.
Intel Core i7-6700
4x 3.
40 GHz (4.00 GHz) HT
1774 (100 %)
AMD A10-7300
4x 1.90 GHz (3.20 GHz)
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 is Maxon’s actual benchmark for older processors versions that test the processor’s performance without hyperthreading in single-core mode.
Intel Core i7-6700
4x 3.40 GHz (4.00 GHz) HT
171 (100 %)
AMD A10-7300
4x 1.
90 GHz (3.20 GHz)
44 (25 %)
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 benchmark reflects the efficiency of your processor operation in assessment mode. It works on Cinema 4 Suite software complex of the earlier version. Hyperthreading is not included.
Intel Core i7-6700
4x 3.40 GHz (4.00 GHz) HT
816 (100 %)
AMD A10-7300
4x 1.90 GHz (3.20 GHz)
139 (17 %)
iGPU — FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
A benchmark is designed to determine graphics cards’ performance and speed, built into their central processor.
It works in iGPU mode, FP32 Performance. The higher the rate is, the better it is.
Intel Core i7-6700
4x 3.40 GHz (4.00 GHz) HT
442 (100 %)
AMD A10-7300
4x 1.90 GHz (3.20 GHz)
409 (92 %)
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
A new approach to testing processor performance opens up the GeekBench 5 benchmark! A detailed under-load system analysis gives an accurate assessment of the quality.
The higher the estimation is, the faster and more efficient the processor is. It is a version for testing a single core.
Intel Core i7-6700
4x 3.40 GHz (4.00 GHz) HT
983 (100 %)
AMD A10-7300
4x 1.90 GHz (3.20 GHz)
322 (32 %)
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
A modern version of the GeekBench 5 benchmark reveals all opportunities and potential of your processor. As a result of testing, you can understand to what extent a processor is fast and efficient in operation with graphic apps or games.
Intel Core i7-6700
4x 3.40 GHz (4.00 GHz) HT
3801 (100 %)
AMD A10-7300
4x 1.90 GHz (3.20 GHz)
823 (21 %)
Blender 2.81 (bmw27)
Universal benchmark Blender 2.81 (bmw27) starts processor testing in rendering animated 3D images. The faster the processor copes with the task, the higher the overall performance estimation is.
Intel Core i7-6700
4x 3.
40 GHz (4.00 GHz) HT
4097 (100 %)
AMD A10-7300
4x 1.90 GHz (3.20 GHz)
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
To define how efficient and powerful a processor is among several models or in comparison with another, we recommend paying attention to Geekbench 3 benchmark, which tests the single-core processor performance.
Intel Core i7-6700
4x 3.40 GHz (4.00 GHz) HT
4519 (100 %)
AMD A10-7300
4x 1.
90 GHz (3.20 GHz)
1310 (28 %)
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
To reveal the whole potential of the equipment, the Geekbench 3 benchmark uses all cores for 64bit models in a specialised software complex that imitates modelling various 3D scenarios. The higher estimation is, the better the performance is.
Intel Core i7-6700
4x 3.40 GHz (4.00 GHz) HT
15655 (100 %)
AMD A10-7300
4x 1.
90 GHz (3.20 GHz)
3224 (20 %)
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Cinebench R11.5 is an outdated version of the benchmark for processors of earlier generations. To find out the potential or compare it with a modern processor model, it is enough to check the performance estimate. The higher it is, the better it is. Hyperthreading is not included.
Intel Core i7-6700
4x 3.40 GHz (4.00 GHz) HT
208 (100 %)
AMD A10-7300
4x 1.
90 GHz (3.20 GHz)
49 (23 %)
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R11.5 benchmark is designed for testing early-generation processors. The overall final performance is based on 3D scene simulations in Cinema 4 Suite. It engages all processor cores.
Intel Core i7-6700
4x 3.40 GHz (4.00 GHz) HT
912 (100 %)
AMD A10-7300
4x 1.90 GHz (3.20 GHz)
175 (19 %)
Cinebench R11.
5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)
A classic benchmark is designed for testing the built-in graphics processor that works in the OpenGL standard.
Intel Core i7-6700
4x 3.40 GHz (4.00 GHz) HT
414 (100 %)
AMD A10-7300
4x 1.90 GHz (3.20 GHz)
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
The authoritative benchmark PassMark shows how efficient the processor is in the overall performance rating. It takes into account the operation mode of all cores and supports hyperthreading.
The benchmark is based on various scenarios for performing calculations, 2D and 3D modelling.
Intel Core i7-6700
4x 3.40 GHz (4.00 GHz) HT
10212 (100 %)
AMD A10-7300
4x 1.90 GHz (3.20 GHz)
3010 (29 %)
Popular comparisons with these processors
| 1. |
AMD Athlon 200GE vs. AMD A10-7300 |
|
| 2. |
Intel Core i5-9500 vs. AMD A10-7300 |
|
| 3. |
Intel Core i7-4722HQ vs. AMD A10-7300 |
|
4.
|
Intel Core i5-6500T vs. AMD A10-7300 |
|
| 5. |
AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 1700X vs. AMD A10-7300 |
|
| 6. |
Intel Core i3-4330 vs. AMD A10-7300 |
|
| 7. |
Intel Core i7-6700 vs. Intel Core i5-9300H |
Compare AMD A10 7300 and Intel Core i7 5775C
AMD A10 7300
1.9GHz | 4 cores | FM2+
VS
Intel Core i7 5775C
3.3GHz | 4 nuclei
Benchmark
General result
Based on 8 tests:
Intel Core i7 5775c faster than 211%
AMD A10 7300
100
Intel Core 5775c 9000 core)
Intel Core i7 5775C 317.
17% faster
44 W AMD A10-7300 vs Intel Core i7-3520M — comparative characteristics and benchmarks of processors
VS
AMD A10-7300
Intel Core i7-3520M
Which one to choose?
It’s time to choose the winner. What is the difference and which is better in AMD A10-7300 vs Intel Core i7-3520M comparison? Which processor is more powerful and faster? It is quite simple to determine — look at the comparative table of all characteristics. A processor with more cores/threads, as well as a higher frequency and large L2-L3 is the absolute winner!
Cores, base and turbo frequency of the processor
Who will win in the comparison of AMD A10-7300 and Intel Core i7-3520M. The overall performance of a processor can be easily determined based on the number of cores, threads, base and turbo clock speed + L2-L3 volume.
The more cores, L3, and clock speed, the more efficient the processor. Please note that high specifications require the use of a powerful cooling system.
1.90 GHz
Clock frequency
2.90 GHZ
4
Nuclei
2
3.20 GHZ
turbo (1 core)
3.60 GHZ
4
Flows
4
9000 TURBO (2 Cores)
3.40 GHHZ
NO
Hypertureuding
YES
NO
Acceleration
NO
2.70 GHZ
TURBO
No Data
Family and generation of processor
Internal graphics
It’s hard to compare AMD A10-7300 vs. Intel Core i7-3520M when graphics card function and specs matter only in laptops. In workstations, this is not an advantage, due to the installation of an additional graphics accelerator.
AMD Radeon R6 (Kaveri)
GPU name
Intel HD Graphics 4000
0.46 GHz
GPU frequency
0.65 GHz
0.
53
GPU (Turbo)
1.25 GHZ
6
generation
7
12
version DirectX
6
Executive blocks
16
384
9000 2 GB
Maximum memory
—
2
Number of monitors
3
28 nm
Technology
22 nm
0005
Release date
Q1/2011
Hardware codec support
Here we are dealing with specifications that are used by some processor manufacturers. These figures are mostly technical and can be disregarded for comparative purposes.
Decode / Encode
h364
Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode
JPEG
Decode
No
No 90 50005
No
h365 10bit
No
No
VP8
No
No
VP9
No
Decode
VC-1
Decode
Decode
AVC
Decode / Encode
RAM and PCIe
These are the memory standards supported by processors.
The processor can support multi-channel RAM with a high clock speed, this directly affects its speed and performance.
DDR3-1600
Memory type
DDR3-1333
DDR3-1600
DDR3L-1333 SODIMM
DDR3L-1600 SO-Dimm
2
Memory channels
2
NO
ECC
NO
version PCIe
3.0
PCIE
9000 9000
AES-NI
Yes
Memory & AMP; PCIe
Thermal management and TDP
Today’s systems are loaded with demanding games and work applications, which consequently unleash the full potential of the processor. When choosing between AMD A10-7300 and Intel Core i7-3520M, it is better to choose the option with less heat dissipation (TDP).
19 W
TDP
35 W
—
Maximum temperature
—
—
Maximum TDP
—
TDP Download
—
Technical details
4.00 MB
L3-CACHE
4.
00 MB
28NM
Technology
22 NM
Kaveri
IVY
AMD-V 9000 9000 9000 AMD-V 9000 -x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
FM2+
Socket (connector)
BGA 1023
Q2/2014
Release date
Price
Q2/2012
ca 346 $
Devices compatible with this processor
You probably already know which devices use processors. It can be a desktop computer or a laptop.
Unknown
Used in
Unknown
Popular CPU comparisons
| one. |
AMD A6-9225 vs. Intel Core i7-3520M |
|
2.
|
AMD Athlon 200GE vs. AMD A10-7300 |
|
| 3. |
Intel Core i5-9500 vs. AMD A10-7300 |
|
| four. |
Intel Core i5-6500T vs. AMD A10-7300 |
|
| 5. |
Intel Core i7-4722HQ vs. AMD A10-7300 |
|
| 6. |
Intel Core i3-4100U vs. AMD A10-7300 |
|
7.
|
AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 1700X vs. AMD A10-7300 |
|
| eight. |
Intel Core i3-4330 vs. AMD A10-7300 |
|
| 9. |
AMD A10-4657M vs. AMD A10-7300 |
|
| ten. |
AMD A10-7300 vs. Intel Core i9-10900KF |
|
| eleven. |
AMD A10-5745M vs. AMD A10-7300 |
|
12.
|
AMD A4-5100 vs. Intel Core i7-3520M |
|
| 13. |
AMD A4-5050 vs. Intel Core i7-3520M |
|
| fourteen. |
AMD A10-4600M vs. Intel Core i7-3520M |
|
| fifteen. |
Intel Core i7-3520M vs. Intel Core i9-10900KF |
Comparison AMD A10-7300 vs Intel Core i7-4980HQ which is better?
Main / CPU / AMD A10-7300 vs Intel Core i7-4980HQ
AMD A10-7300
22%
DeviceList Score
vs
Intel Core i7-4980HQ 90 %
DeviceList Score
We compared the specifications of AMD A10-7300 and Intel Core i7-4980HQ and compiled a list of benefits and comparison table for you.
Find out which one to choose in 2022.
AMD A10-7300 Advantage
|
Number of transistors |
|
2410 million 2409 million (240900%) better than vs 1 million |
|
Power Demand (TDP) |
|
19 W -28 W (-59.6%) better than vs 47W |
Benefits of Intel Core i7-4980HQ
Comparison winner
|
threads |
|
8 4 (100%) better than vs 4 |
|
Maximum frequency |
|
4 GHz At 0.8 GHz (25%) better than vs 3.2 GHz |
|
Process |
|
22 nm -6 nm (-21. vs 28 nm |
|
Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core |
|
5737 3745 (188%) better than vs 1992 |
|
Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core |
|
21137 15945 (307.1%) better than vs 5192 |
|
Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core |
|
154 96 (165.5%) better than vs 58 |
|
Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core |
|
696 538 (340.5%) better than vs 158 |
|
x264 encoding pass 1 |
|
174 112 (180.6%) better than vs 62 |
|
x264 encoding pass 2 |
|
41 29 (241. vs 12 |
|
TrueCrypt AES |
|
5 4 (400%) better than vs 1 |
|
3DMark06 CPU |
|
7609 5091 (202.2%) better than vs 2518 |
4%) better than 
7%) better than | General information | |
|
Type |
|
| For laptops | For laptops |
|
Architecture code name |
|
| Kaveri | Crystalwell |
|
Cores A large number of cores improves performance in multi-threaded applications. |
|
| 4 | 4 |
|
Threads More threads help the cores process information more efficiently. |
|
| 4 | 8
4 (100%) better than |
|
Base frequency |
|
| n/a | 2.8 GHz |
|
Process |
|
| 28 nm | 22 nm
-6 nm (-21.4%) better than |
|
Chip size |
|
| 245 mm2 | 264 mm2 |
|
Number of transistors |
|
| 2410 million
2409 million (240900%) better than |
1 million |
|
Maximum frequency Faster clocked processors perform more calculations per second and thus provide better performance. |
|
| 3.2GHz | 4 GHz
Better at 0.8 GHz (25%) than |
|
Support 64 bit |
|
|
Max. |
|
| n/a | 1 |
|
Socket |
|
| FP3 | FCBGA1364 |
|
AMD-V |
|
|
Series |
|
| AMD Kaveri | Intel Core i7 |
|
Release price |
|
| n/a | 623 $ |
|
Value for money The sum of all the advantages of the device divided by its price. The more%, the better the quality per unit price in comparison with all analogues. |
|
| n/a | 62.5% |
|
Maximum core temperature |
|
| n/a | 100 °C |
|
vPro |
|
|
TXT Intel Trusted Execution Technology for hardware-based malware protection. |
|
|
PCI Express revision |
|
| 3.0 | 3 |
|
Number of PCI-Express lanes |
|
| n/a | 16 |
|
Secure Key |
|
|
Identity Protection |
|
| n/a | + |
|
Quick Sync |
|
| n/a | + |
|
eDP |
|
| n/a | + |
|
HDMI |
|
| + | + |
|
Maximum resolution via VGA |
|
| n/a | 2880×1800@60Hz |
|
FMA |
|
| + | n/a |
|
FRTC |
|
| + | n/a |
|
TrueAudio |
|
| + | n/a |
|
PowerNow |
|
| + | n/a |
|
PowerGating |
|
| + | n/a |
|
Out-of-band |
|
| + | n/a |
|
VirusProtect |
|
| + | n/a |
|
HSA |
|
| + | n/a |
|
IOMMU 2. |
|
| + | n/a |
|
Number of iGPU cores |
|
| 6 | n/a |
|
Enduro |
|
| + | n/a |
|
Switchable graphics |
|
| + | n/a |
|
UVD |
|
| + | n/a |
|
VCE |
|
| + | n/a |
|
FDI |
|
| n/a | + |
|
Vulkan NVIDIA’s Vulkan technology allows developers to gain low-level access to the GPU to optimize graphics commands (better than OpenGL and Direct3D APIs). |
|
| + | n/a |
|
VGA |
|
| n/a | + |
|
Level 1 Cache The fastest level of cache that works directly with the core. |
|
| n/a | 64K (per core) |
|
Level 2 cache |
|
| 4096 KB | 256K (per core) |
|
Level 3 cache |
|
| n/a | 8 MB (total) |
|
Maximum case temperature (TCase) |
|
| n/a | 100 °C |
|
Power consumption (TDP) Calculated heat output shows the average heat output during load operation, |
|
| 19W
-28 W (-59.6%) better than |
47W |
|
EDB |
|
| n/a | + |
|
Video memory size |
|
| n/a | 2 GB |
|
InTru 3D |
|
| n/a | + |
|
DisplayPort |
|
| + | + |
Real performance will be noticeable in very specific tasks (video editing, databases). 
number of processors in configuration 
For each protected program, the processor allocates its own isolated section of RAM. 
0 
The larger the cache, the better the performance. | Benchmarks | |
|
Passmark |
|
| n/a | 6710 |
|
Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core |
|
| 1992 | 5737
3745 (188%) better than |
|
Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core |
|
| 5192 | 21137
15945 (307. |
|
Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core |
|
| 58 | 154
96 (165.5%) better than |
|
Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core |
|
| 158 | 696
538 (340.5%) better than |
|
WinRAR 4.0 |
|
| 1510 | n/a |
|
x264 encoding pass 1 |
|
| 62 | 174
112 (180.6%) better than |
|
x264 encoding pass 2 |
|
| 12 | 41
29 (241.7%) better than |
|
TrueCrypt AES |
|
| 1 | 5
4 (400%) better than |
|
3DMark06 CPU |
|
| 2518 | 7609
5091 (202.2%) better than |
|
Geekbench 2 |
|
| 3865 | n/a |
|
Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core |
|
| 1565 | n/a |
|
Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core |
|
| 3758 | n/a |
1%) better than | Technology and additional instructions | |
|
Extended instructions |
|
| n/a | Intel® SSE4. 1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 |
|
Turbo Boost |
|
| n/a | 2.0 |
|
Idle States |
|
|
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) Technology from Intel that reduces the processor frequency to a minimum to save power when the processor is idle. |
|
|
Thermal Monitoring |
|
|
Hyper-Threading Intel hardware technology that allows multiple threads to be processed on each processor core. For server applications, the performance improvement is up to 30%. |
|
|
AES-NI Technology from Intel that speeds up the AES encryption process. |
|
| + | + |
|
AVX The presence of AVX instructions improves performance in floating point and processor-intensive operations |
|
| RAM parameters | |
|
RAM types |
|
| n/a | DDR3L-1333, DDR3L-1600 |
|
Allowable memory The maximum amount of RAM that can be used with this processor. |
|
| n/a | 32 GB |
|
Number of memory channels |
|
| 2 | 2 |
| Virtualization technologies | ||
|
EPT |
||
|
VT-d Intel virtualization technology allows you to forward devices on the PCI bus to the guest operating system so that it can work with them using its standard tools. |
||
| Integrated graphics | |
|
Maximum GPU clock |
|
| n/a | 1. 30 GHz |
|
Maximum number of monitors |
|
| n/a | 3 |
|
Clear Video HD |
|
|
Video core The presence of the video core allows you to use your computer without using a video card. |
|
| + | + |
|
Maximum resolution via HDMI 1.4 |
|
| n/a | 3840×2160@60Hz |
|
Maximum resolution via DisplayPort |
|
| n/a | 3840×2160@60Hz |
|
DirectX |
|
| DirectX® 12 | 11.2/12 |
|
OpenGL |
|
| n/a | 4.3 |
AMD A10-7300 vs. Intel Core i7-1165G7
AMD A10-7300
AMD A10-7300 runs with 4 and 4 CPU threads It runs at 3.
20 GHz base 2.70 GHz all cores while TDP is set to 19 W .CPU connects to CPU socket FM2+ This version includes 4.00 MB of L3 cache on a single die, supports 2 to support DDR3-1600 RAM, and supports PCIe Gen . Tjunction keeps below — degrees C. In particular, the Kaveri (Steamroller) architecture is advanced over 28 nm and supports AMD-V. The product was launched Q2/2014
Intel Core i7-1165G7
Intel Core i7-1165G7 runs with 4 and 4 CPU threads It runs at 4.70 GHz base 4.10 GHz all cores while the TDP is set to 15 W .The processor connects to a BGA 1526 CPU socket This the version includes 12.00 MB of L3 cache on a single die, supports 2 to support DDR4-3200 RAM, and supports 4.0 PCIe Gen 4. Tjunction is kept below 100°C degrees C. In particular, the Tiger Lake U architecture is advanced beyond 10 nm and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d . The product was launched Q3/2020
AMD A10-7300
Intel Core i7-1165G7
80 GHz AMD Radeon R6 (Kaveri)
Intel Iris Xe Graphics 96 (Tiger Lake G7)
Show more details
Show more details
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor to Cinebench R20 and is also based on Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D forms. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor to Cinebench R20 and is also based on Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D shapes. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and gives a big advantage of hyper-threading.
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor to Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D shapes. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.
Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor to Cinebench R15 and is also based on Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D shapes. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and gives a big advantage of hyper-threading.
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor to Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite.
Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D shapes. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor to Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D shapes. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and gives a big advantage of hyper-threading.
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a memory-intensive, cross-platform test. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a memory-intensive, cross-platform benchmark. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and gives a big advantage of hyper-threading.
iGPU — FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
Theoretical processing performance of the processor’s internal graphics unit with simple precision (32 bits) in GFLOPS.
GFLOPS specifies how many billions of floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross-platform benchmark that is memory intensive. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross-platform benchmark that is memory intensive. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and gives a big advantage of hyper-threading.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular for creating shapes and other things in 3D. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Cinebench 11.
5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular for creating shapes and other things in 3D. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and gives a big advantage of hyper-threading.
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the processors listed below have been tested with CPU-Comparison. However, most of the processors were not tested and the results were evaluated by the secret patented CPU-Comparison formula. As such, they do not accurately reflect the actual values of Passmark CPU ratings and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
Energy usage estimate
Average hours of use per day
Average CPU usage (0-100%)
Electricity cost, USD/kWh
Energy usage estimate
Average hours of use per day
Average CPU usage (0-100%)
Electricity cost, USD/kWh
| AMD A10-7300 | Intel Core i7-1165G7 | |
| 19 W | Max TDP | 15W |
N. A. |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA |
| NA | Operating cost per day | NA |
| NA | Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA |
| NA | Operating cost per year | NA |
The program was developed on the basis of MAXON Cinema 4D — a professional application for creating 3D animation. 
The program performs a series of test tasks that simulate real scenarios that a computer encounters in everyday work. 
05 
5 
3GHz vs 3.9GHz 
0 /10 
processor thread 
Cinebench R20 result (multi-core) 
Has AVX 