AMD A10-9700 vs Intel Core i5-7400: What is the difference?
56points
AMD A10-9700
51points
Intel Core i5-7400
Comparison winner
vs
66 facts in comparison
AMD A10-9700
Intel Core i5-7400
Why is AMD A10-9700 better than Intel Core i5-7400?
- 16.67% faster CPU speed?
4 x 3.5GHzvs4 x 3GHz - 679MHz faster GPU clock speed?
1029MHzvs350MHz - 3.1MB bigger L2 cache?
4.1MBvs1MB - 0.3GHz higher turbo clock speed?
3.8GHzvs3.5GHz - 256KB bigger L1 cache?
512KBvs256KB - Has an unlocked multiplier?
- 0.77MB/core more L2 cache per core?
1.02MB/corevs0.25MB/core - 5 higher clock multiplier?
35vs30
Why is Intel Core i5-7400 better than AMD A10-9700?
- 10°C higher maximum operating temperature?
100°Cvs90°C - 14nm smaller semiconductor size?
14nmvs28nm - 2.
12x higher PassMark result?
7393vs3495 - 21.48% higher PassMark result (single)?
1934vs1592 - 18 more GPU execution units?
24vs6 - Has NX bit?
Which are the most popular comparisons?
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
vs
Intel Core i5-1135G7
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
vs
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X
AMD Ryzen 3 5300U
vs
Intel Core i3-1115G4
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U
vs
Intel Core i3-1115G4
AMD Ryzen 7 5700G
vs
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
vs
Intel Core i3-1115G4
Intel Core i5-1135G7
vs
Intel Core i5-1235U
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
vs
Intel Core i7-1165G7
Intel Core i3-1115G4
vs
Intel Core i5-1135G7
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U
vs
Intel Core i5-10210U
Price comparison
User reviews
Overall Rating
AMD A10-9700
5 User reviews
AMD A10-9700
9.
2/10
5 User reviews
Intel Core i5-7400
4 User reviews
Intel Core i5-7400
9.0/10
4 User reviews
Features
Value for money
9.0/10
4 votes
9.3/10
4 votes
Gaming
9.0/10
4 votes
8.8/10
4 votes
Performance
8.8/10
4 votes
9.0/10
4 votes
Reliability
9.8/10
4 votes
9.3/10
4 votes
Energy efficiency
10.0/10
4 votes
10.0/10
4 votes
Performance
CPU speed
4 x 3.5GHz
4 x 3GHz
The CPU speed indicates how many processing cycles per second can be executed by a CPU, considering all of its cores (processing units). It is calculated by adding the clock rates of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors employing different microarchitectures, of each group of cores.
CPU threads
More threads result in faster performance and better multitasking.
turbo clock speed
3.8GHz
3.5GHz
When the CPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased performance.
Has an unlocked multiplier
✔AMD A10-9700
✖Intel Core i5-7400
Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier which makes them easy to overclock, allowing you to gain increased performance in games and other apps.
L2 cache
A larger L2 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
L3 cache
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A10-9700)
A larger L3 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
L1 cache
A larger L1 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
L2 core
1.02MB/core
0.25MB/core
More data can be stored in the L2 cache for access by each core of the CPU.
L3 core
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A10-9700)
1.5MB/core
More data can be stored in the L3 cache for access by each core of the CPU.
Benchmarks
PassMark result
This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using multiple threads.
PassMark result (single)
This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using a single thread.
Geekbench 5 result (multi)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-7400)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s multi-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2023)
Cinebench R20 (multi) result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A10-9700)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-7400)
Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s multi-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.
Cinebench R20 (single) result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A10-9700)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-7400)
Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s single-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.
Geekbench 5 result (single)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-7400)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s single-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2023)
Blender (bmw27) result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A10-9700)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-7400)
The Blender (bmw27) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.
Blender (classroom) result
Unknown.
Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A10-9700)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-7400)
The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.
performance per watt
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-7400)
This means the CPU is more efficient, giving a greater amount of performance for each watt of power used.
Integrated graphics
GPU clock speed
1029MHz
350MHz
The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a higher clock speed.
GPU turbo
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A10-9700)
1000MHz
When the GPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased performance.
GPU execution units
A graphics processing unit (GPU) with a greater number of execution units can deliver better graphics.
supported displays
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A10-9700)
Using multiple displays you can create a larger workspace, making it easier to work across multiple apps.
DirectX version
DirectX is used in games, with newer versions supporting better graphics.
OpenGL version
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A10-9700)
OpenGL is used in games, with newer versions supporting better graphics.
OpenCL version
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A10-9700)
Some apps use OpenCL to apply the power of the graphics processing unit (GPU) for non-graphical computing. Newer versions introduce more functionality and better performance.
texture mapping units (TMUs)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A10-9700)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value.
(Intel Core i5-7400)
TMUs take textures and map them to the geometry of a 3D scene. More TMUs will typically mean that texture information is processed faster.
render output units (ROPs)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A10-9700)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-7400)
The ROPs are responsible for some of the final steps of the rendering process, writing the final pixel data to memory and carrying out other tasks such as anti-aliasing to improve the look of graphics.
Memory
RAM speed
2400MHz
2400MHz
It can support faster memory, which will give quicker system performance.
maximum memory bandwidth
38.4GB/s
38.4GB/s
This is the maximum rate that data can be read from or stored into memory.
DDR memory version
DDR (Double Data Rate) memory is the most common type of RAM.
Newer versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy-efficient.
memory channels
More memory channels increases the speed of data transfer between the memory and the CPU.
maximum memory amount
The maximum amount of memory (RAM) supported.
bus transfer rate
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A10-9700)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.
Supports ECC memory
✖AMD A10-9700
✖Intel Core i5-7400
Error-correcting code memory can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when is it essential to avoid corruption, such as scientific computing or when running a server.
eMMC version
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A10-9700)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value.
(Intel Core i5-7400)
A higher version of eMMC allows faster memory interfaces, having a positive effect on the performance of a device. For example, when transferring files from your computer to the internal storage over USB.
bus speed
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A10-9700)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-7400)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.
Features
uses multithreading
✖AMD A10-9700
✖Intel Core i5-7400
Multithreading technology (such as Intel’s Hyperthreading or AMD’s Simultaneous Multithreading) provides increased performance by splitting each of the processor’s physical cores into virtual cores, also known as threads. This way, each core can run two instruction streams at once.
Has AES
✔AMD A10-9700
✔Intel Core i5-7400
AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.
Has AVX
✔AMD A10-9700
✔Intel Core i5-7400
AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial apps, as well as improving Linux RAID software performance.
SSE version
SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing an image or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.
Has F16C
✔AMD A10-9700
✔Intel Core i5-7400
F16C is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.
bits executed at a time
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A10-9700)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-7400)
NEON provides acceleration for media processing, such as listening to MP3s.
Has MMX
✔AMD A10-9700
✔Intel Core i5-7400
MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.
Has TrustZone
✖AMD A10-9700
✖Intel Core i5-7400
A technology integrated into the processor to secure the device for use with features such as mobile payments and streaming video using digital rights management (DRM).
front-end width
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A10-9700)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-7400)
The CPU can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), meaning that the CPU performs better
Price comparison
Which are the best CPUs?
AMD A10-9700 vs Intel Core i5-7400
|
|
|
|
|
AMD A10-9700 vs Intel Core i5-7400
Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the AMD A10-9700 on one side and the Intel Core i5-7400 on the other side.
The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, It has 4 cores, 4 threads, a maximum frequency of 3,8GHz. The second is used on the desktop segment, it has a total of 4 cores, 4 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 3,5 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specifications:
| Processor | AMD A10-9700 | Intel Core i5-7400 | ||||||
| Market (main) | Desktop | Desktop | ||||||
| ISA | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) | ||||||
| Microarchitecture | Excavator | Kaby Lake | ||||||
| Core name | Bristol Ridge | Kaby Lake-S | ||||||
| Family | A10-9000 | Core i5-7000 | ||||||
| Part number(s), S-Spec | AD9700AGABBOX, AD9700AGM44AB |
CM8067702867050, BXC80677I57400, BX80677I57400, SR335 |
||||||
| Release date | Q3 2017 | Q1 2017 | ||||||
| Lithography | 28 nm | 14 nm+ | ||||||
| Transistors | 3. 100.000.000 |
— | ||||||
| Cores | 4 | 4 | ||||||
| Threads | 4 | 4 | ||||||
| Base frequency | 3,5 GHz | 3,0 GHz | ||||||
| Turbo frequency | 3,8 GHz | 3,5 GHz | ||||||
| Cache memory | 2 MB | 6 MB | ||||||
| Max memory capacity | 32 GB | 64 GB | ||||||
| Memory types | DDR4-2400 | DDR4-2133/2400, DDR3L-1333/1600 |
||||||
| Max # of memory channels | 2 | 2 | ||||||
| Max memory bandwidth | 38,4 GB/s | 38,4 GB/s | ||||||
| Max PCIe lanes | 8 | 16 | ||||||
| TDP | 65 W | 65 W | ||||||
| Suggested PSU | 600W ATX Power Supply | 600W ATX Power Supply | ||||||
| GPU integrated graphics | AMD Radeon R7 Graphics 384 Cores (Kaveri) | Intel HD Graphics 630 | ||||||
| GPU cores | 6 | — | ||||||
| GPU execution units | — | 24 | ||||||
| GPU shading units | 384 | 192 | ||||||
| GPU base clock | 351 MHz | 350 MHz | ||||||
| GPU boost clock | 1029 MHz | 1000 MHz | ||||||
| GPU FP32 floating point | 553 GFLOPS | 384 GFLOPS | ||||||
| Socket | AM4 | LGA1151 | ||||||
| Compatible motherboard | Socket AM4 Motherboard | Socket LGA 1151 Motherboard | ||||||
| Maximum temperature | 90°C | 100°C | ||||||
| Cinebench R15 single thread | 90 | 138 | ||||||
| Cinebench R15 multi-thread | 301 | 526 | ||||||
| PassMark single thread | 1. 633 |
2.008 | ||||||
| PassMark CPU Mark | 3.585 | 5.505 | ||||||
| (Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 single core |
2.355 | 4.095 | ||||||
| (Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 multi-core |
5.789 | 11.600 | ||||||
| (SGEMM) GFLOPS performance |
59,82 GFLOPS | 216,7 GFLOPS | ||||||
| (Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio |
89 pts / W | 178 pts / W | ||||||
| Amazon | ||||||||
| eBay |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.
Suggested PSU: We assume that we have An ATX computer case, a high end graphics card, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, a 1TB HDD hard drive, a Blu-Ray drive. We will have to rely on a more powerful power supply if we want to have several graphics cards, several monitors, more memory, etc.
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
We see that the two processors have an equivalent number of cores, the maximum frequency of AMD A10-9700 is greater, that their respective TDP are of the same order. Both were produced in the same year.
Performances :
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.
| Cinebench R15 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-7400 |
138 526 |
| AMD A10-9700 |
90 301 |
In single core, the difference is 53%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 75%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.
| PassMark — CPU Mark & single thread | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-7400 |
2.008 5.505 |
| AMD A10-9700 |
1.633 3.585 |
In single core, the difference is 23%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 54%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.
On Windows 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-7400 |
4.  09511.600 |
| AMD A10-9700 |
2.355 5.789 |
In single core, the difference is 74%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 100%.
On Linux 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-7400 |
4.490 10.779 |
| AMD A10-9700 |
2.281 5.039 |
In single core, the difference is 97%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 114%.
On Android 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Android 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| AMD A10-9700 |
2.304 5.880 |
| Intel Core i5-7400 |
2.  8555.343 |
In single core, the difference is -19%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 10%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
Equivalence:
AMD A10-9700 Intel equivalentIntel Core i5-7400 AMD equivalent
See also:
Intel Core i5-7400T
Compare Intel Core i5 3470T and AMD A10 7th Gen A10-9700
Intel Core i5 3470T
2.
9 GHz | 2 cores | LGA 1155
VS
AMD A10 7th Gen A10-9700
3.5GHz | 4 cores
Reasons to choose Intel Core i5 3470T
- Smaller CPU (22nm vs 28nm) allows for more performance with less heat
- Larger L3 cache (3MB vs 0MB) allows processor to access data faster nine0016
Reasons to choose AMD A10 7th Gen A10-9700
- High frequency (3.5 GHz vs 2.9 GHz) means more operations that the processor performs in 1 second
- High frequency in turbo mode: 3, 8 GHz vs. 3.6 GHz
- More cores (4 vs. 2) allows more processes to run simultaneously, speeding up computer performance and processing speed
- More L2 cache (2 MB vs. 1 MB) allows the processor to access faster to data
- Large critical temperature (90 ° C versus 65 ° C) allows the processor to operate in more rigid temperature conditions
- Large frequency of the built -in video processor: 1029 MHz versus 650 MHz
Characteristics
| Intel Core i5 3470t | AMD A10 7th Gen A10-9700 | |||
| Frequency | 2. 9GHz |
3.5GHz | ||
| Turbo Frequency
1 3.6 GHz |
3.8 GHz | |||
| Number | 2 | 4 | ||
| Benminated multiplier | no | |||
| Cache 2 levels on the kernel | 0.5 MB/Nucleus | 0.5 MB/Nucleus | cache 3 levels | 3 MB | no |
| Technical percess 900 Nm 9 | sse4 | |||
| sse41 | ||||
| sse42 | ||||
| fma4 | ||||
| avx | ||||
| aes | Dissipated power (TDP), W | 35 W | ||
| Average power consumption | 28.44 W | No data |
90,000 AMD A10-9700 APU (2016 M.BR) or Intel Core i5 661
- Home
- >
- Processors
- >5 >9
- Comparison
- >
- AMD A10-9700 APU (2016 M.Br) vs Intel Core i5 661
Family
- A12-9800 APU (2016 M.BR)
Compare - A12-9800E APU (2016 M.BR)
Compare
Family
- Core I5 660
Compare - Core i5 650
Compare
Speed in games
A10-9700 APU (2016 M.BR)
36.6
Core I5 661
38.8 (+6%)
9000 similar applications, according to our tests. nine0005
The performance of 4 cores, if any, and performance per core has the greatest impact on the result, since most games do not fully use more than 4 cores.
The speed of caches and working with RAM is also important.
Speed in office use
A10-9700 APU (2016 M.BR)
41.2
Core i5 661
45.3 (+10%)
nine0005
The performance of 1 core has the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications use only one, ignoring the rest.
Similarly, many professional applications such as various CADs ignore multi-threaded performance.
Speed in heavy applications
A10-9700 APU (2016 M.BR)
20.4
Core i5 661
20.9 (+2%) maximum
nine0005
The performance of all cores and their number have the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications willingly use all the cores and increase the speed accordingly.
At the same time, some periods of work can be demanding on the performance of one or two cores, for example, applying filters in the editor.
Data obtained from tests by users who tested their systems with and without overclocking. Thus, you see the average values corresponding to the processor.
nine0005
Speed of numerical operations
Simple household tasks |
|
A10-9700 APU (2016 M.BR) 34.5 Core i5 661 42 (+22%) |
Demanding games and tasks |
|
A10-9700 APU (2016 M.BR) 17.7 (+7%) Core i5 661 16.5 |
Extreme |
|
A10-9700 APU (2016 M.BR) 3.5 (+6%) Core i5 661 3.3 |
Different tasks require different CPU strengths. A system with few fast cores and low memory latency will be fine for the vast majority of games, but will be inferior to a system with a lot of slow cores in a rendering scenario.
nine0005
We believe that a minimum of 4/4 (4 physical cores and 4 threads) processor is suitable for a budget gaming PC. At the same time, some games can load it at 100%, slow down and freeze, and performing any tasks in the background will lead to a drop in FPS.
Ideally, the budget shopper should aim for a minimum of 4/8 and 6/6. A gamer with a big budget can choose between 6/12, 8/8 and 8/16. Processors with 10 and 12 cores can perform well in games with high frequency and fast memory, but are overkill for such tasks. Also, buying for the future is a dubious undertaking, since in a few years many slow cores may not provide sufficient gaming performance. nine0005
When choosing a processor to work with, consider how many cores your programs use. For example, photo and video editors can use 1-2 cores when working with filtering, and rendering or converting in the same editors already uses all threads.
Data obtained from tests by users who tested their systems both with overclocking (maximum value in the table) and without (minimum).
A typical result is shown in the middle, the fuller the color bar, the better the average result among all tested systems. nine0005
Features
Main
| Socket Installed in motherboards with a suitable socket. Note that a socket is not guaranteed to be compatible. The manufacturer may not add support to the BIOS. | ||
| Manufacturer Firm | AMD | Intel |
Performance
| Cores The total number of physical cores. | 4 | 2 |
| ThreadsNumber of threads. The number of logical processor cores that the operating system sees. | 4 | 4 |
Multi-Threading Technology With Intel’s Hyper-threading and AMD’s SMT technology, one physical core is recognized as two logical cores in the operating system, thereby increasing processor performance in multi-threaded applications. nine0044
| Missing | Hyper-threading (note that some games may not work well with Hyper-threading, for maximum FPS you can try to disable the technology in the BIOS of the motherboard). |
| Base frequencyThe guaranteed frequency of all cores (P-cores in the case of the corresponding architecture) of the processor at maximum load. It is important to remember that speed and frequency are not directly related. For example, a new processor at a lower frequency may be faster than an old one at a higher one. nine0044 | 3.9 GHz | 3.33 GHz |
Cache and RAM
Video core
PCI
Detailed information
Which is better
AMD A10-9700 APU (2016 M.BR)
