AMD A10-9620P vs Intel Core i5-9300H Benchmarks, Specs, Performance Comparison and Differences
|
|
|
|
|
AMD A10-9620P vs Intel Core i5-9300H
Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the AMD A10-9620P on one side and the Intel Core i5-9300H on the other side. The first is dedicated to the laptop sector, It has 4 cores, 4 threads, a maximum frequency of 3,4GHz. The second is used on the laptop segment, it has a total of 4 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 4,1 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specification comparison:
| Processor | AMD A10-9620P | Intel Core i5-9300H | ||||||
| Market (main) | Laptop | Laptop | ||||||
| ISA | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) | ||||||
| Microarchitecture | Excavator | Coffee Lake | ||||||
| Core name | Bristol Ridge | Coffee Lake-H | ||||||
| Family | A10-9000 | Core i5-9000 | ||||||
| Part number(s), S-Spec |
AM962PADY44AB |
CL8068404069606, |
||||||
| Release date | Q1 2017 | Q2 2019 | ||||||
| Lithography | 28 nm | 14 nm++ | ||||||
| Transistors | 3. 100.000.000 |
— | ||||||
| Cores | 4 | 4 | ||||||
| Threads | 4 | 8 | ||||||
| Base frequency | 2,5 GHz | 2,4 GHz | ||||||
| Turbo frequency | 3,4 GHz | 4,1 GHz | ||||||
| Cache memory | 2 MB | 8 MB | ||||||
| Max memory capacity | 32 GB | 64 GB | ||||||
| Memory types |
DDR4-1866 |
DDR4-2666, |
||||||
| Max # of memory channels | 2 | 2 | ||||||
| Max memory bandwidth | 29,9 GB/s | 41,8 GB/s | ||||||
| Max PCIe lanes | 8 | 16 | ||||||
| TDP | 15 W | 45 W | ||||||
| GPU integrated graphics | AMD Radeon R5 Mobile Graphics (Wani) | Intel UHD Graphics 630 Mobile (Coffee Lake) | ||||||
| GPU cores | 6 | — | ||||||
| GPU execution units | — | 24 | ||||||
| GPU shading units | 384 | 192 | ||||||
| GPU base clock | 200 MHz | 350 MHz | ||||||
| GPU boost clock | 720 MHz | 1050 MHz | ||||||
| GPU FP32 floating point | 553 GFLOPS | 384 GFLOPS | ||||||
| Socket | FP4 | BGA1440 | ||||||
| Crypto engine |
Advanced Encryption Standard instructions |
— |
||||||
| Security |
Enhanced Virus Protection, |
— |
||||||
| CPU-Z single thread | 193 | 429 | ||||||
| CPU-Z multi thread | 622 | 2. 268 |
||||||
| Cinebench R15 single thread | 63 | 170 | ||||||
| Cinebench R15 multi-thread | 221 | 840 | ||||||
| Cinebench R20 single thread | 88 | 410 | ||||||
| Cinebench R20 multi-thread | 357 | 2.030 | ||||||
| PassMark single thread | 1.271 | 2.355 | ||||||
| PassMark CPU Mark | 2.523 | 7.831 | ||||||
| (Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 single core |
1.824 | 4.395 | ||||||
| (Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 multi-core |
4. 275 |
13.752 | ||||||
| (SGEMM) GFLOPS performance |
48,5 GFLOPS | 301 GFLOPS | ||||||
| (Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio |
285 pts / W | 306 pts / W | ||||||
| Amazon | ||||||||
| eBay |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
We see that the two processors have an equivalent number of cores, the turbo frequency of Intel Core i5-9300H is bigger, that the PDT of AMD A10-9620P is lower. The Intel Core i5-9300H was started more recently.
Performance comparison with the benchmarks:
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.
| CPU-Z — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-9300H |
429 2.268 |
| AMD A10-9620P |
193 622 |
In single core, the difference is 122%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 265%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.
| Cinebench R15 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-9300H |
170 840 |
| AMD A10-9620P |
63 221 |
In single core, the difference is 170%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 280%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene.
The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.
| Cinebench R20 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-9300H |
410 2.030 |
| AMD A10-9620P |
88 357 |
In single core, the difference is 366%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 469%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R20 is a multi-platform test software which allows to evaluate the hardware capacities of a device such as a computer, a tablet, a server.
This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant.
| PassMark — CPU Mark & single thread | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-9300H |
2.355 7.831 |
| AMD A10-9620P |
1.271 2.523 |
In single core, the difference is 85%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 210%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting.
The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.
On Windows 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-9300H |
4.395 13.752 |
| AMD A10-9620P |
1.824 4.275 |
In single core, the difference is 141%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 222%.
On Linux 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-9300H |
5.373 16.358 |
| AMD A10-9620P |
1.528 2.017 |
In single core, the difference is 252%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 711%.
On Android 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Android 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-9300H |
4.222 12.199 |
| AMD A10-9620P |
2.301 5.167 |
In single core, the difference is 83%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 136%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices.
For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
Equivalence:
AMD A10-9620P Intel equivalentIntel Core i5-9300H AMD equivalent
See also:
Intel Core i5-9300HF
Intel Core i5-8300H vs AMD A10-8700P Benchmarks, Specs, Performance Comparison and Differences
|
|
|
|
|
Intel Core i5-8300H vs AMD A10-8700P
Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the Intel Core i5-8300H on one side and the AMD A10-8700P on the other side. The first is dedicated to the laptop sector, It has 4 cores, 8 threads, a maximum frequency of 4,0GHz. The second is used on the laptop segment, it has a total of 4 cores, 4 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 3,2 GHz.
The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specification comparison:
| Processor | Intel Core i5-8300H | AMD A10-8700P | ||||||
| Market (main) | Laptop | Laptop | ||||||
| ISA | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) | ||||||
| Microarchitecture | Coffee Lake | Excavator | ||||||
| Core name | Coffee Lake-H | Carrizo | ||||||
| Family | Core i5-8000 | A10-8000 | ||||||
| Part number(s), S-Spec |
CL8068403373522, |
AM870PAAY43KA, |
||||||
| Release date | Q2 2018 | Q2 2015 | ||||||
| Lithography | 14 nm++ | 28 nm | ||||||
| Transistors | — | 3. 100.000.000 |
||||||
| Cores | 4 | 4 | ||||||
| Threads | 8 | 4 | ||||||
| Base frequency | 2,3 GHz | 1,8 GHz | ||||||
| Turbo frequency | 4,0 GHz | 3,2 GHz | ||||||
| Cache memory | 8 MB | 2 MB | ||||||
| Max memory capacity | 64 GB | 32 GB | ||||||
| Memory types |
DDR4-2666, LPDDR3-2133 |
DDR3-2133 |
||||||
| Max # of memory channels | 2 | 2 | ||||||
| Max memory bandwidth | 41,8 GB/s | 34,1 GB/s | ||||||
| Max PCIe lanes | 16 | 8 | ||||||
| TDP | 45 W | 15 W | ||||||
| GPU integrated graphics | Intel UHD Graphics 630 Mobile (Coffee Lake) | AMD Radeon R6 Mobile Graphics (Carrizo) | ||||||
| GPU cores | — | 6 | ||||||
| GPU execution units | 24 | — | ||||||
| GPU shading units | 192 | 384 | ||||||
| GPU base clock | 350 MHz | 200 MHz | ||||||
| GPU boost clock | 1000 MHz | 800 MHz | ||||||
| GPU FP32 floating point | 384 GFLOPS | 553 GFLOPS | ||||||
| Socket | BGA1440 | FP4 | ||||||
| Maximum temperature | 100°C | 90°C | ||||||
| Crypto engine |
— |
Advanced Encryption Standard instructions |
||||||
| Security |
— |
Enhanced Virus Protection, |
||||||
| CPU-Z single thread | 457 | 137 | ||||||
| CPU-Z multi thread | 1. 619 |
465 | ||||||
| Cinebench R15 single thread | 173 | 71 | ||||||
| Cinebench R15 multi-thread | 807 | 203 | ||||||
| Cinebench R20 single thread | 399 | 139 | ||||||
| Cinebench R20 multi-thread | 1.865 | 397 | ||||||
| PassMark single thread | 2.310 | 1.152 | ||||||
| PassMark CPU Mark | 7.525 | 2.265 | ||||||
| (Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 single core |
4.321 | 1.711 | ||||||
| (Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 multi-core |
13. 620 |
3.872 | ||||||
| (SGEMM) GFLOPS performance |
199,9 GFLOPS | 45,6 GFLOPS | ||||||
| (Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio |
303 pts / W | 258 pts / W | ||||||
| Amazon | ||||||||
| eBay |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
We see that the two processors have an equivalent number of cores, the maximum frequency of Intel Core i5-8300H is greater, that the thermal dissipation power of AMD A10-8700P is less. The Intel Core i5-8300H was designed earlier.
Performance comparison with the benchmarks:
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.
| CPU-Z — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-8300H |
457 1.619 |
| AMD A10-8700P |
137 465 |
In single core, the difference is 234%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 248%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.
| Cinebench R15 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-8300H |
173 807 |
| AMD A10-8700P |
71 203 |
In single core, the difference is 144%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 298%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene.
The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.
| Cinebench R20 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-8300H |
399 1.865 |
| AMD A10-8700P |
139 397 |
In single core, the difference is 187%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 370%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R20 is a multi-platform test software which allows to evaluate the hardware capacities of a device such as a computer, a tablet, a server.
This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant.
| PassMark — CPU Mark & single thread | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-8300H |
2.310 7.525 |
| AMD A10-8700P |
1.152 2.265 |
In single core, the difference is 101%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 232%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting.
The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.
On Windows 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-8300H |
4.321 13.620 |
| AMD A10-8700P |
1.711 3.872 |
In single core, the difference is 153%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 252%.
On Linux 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-8300H |
4.971 14.209 |
| AMD A10-8700P |
1.958 4.384 |
In single core, the difference is 154%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 224%.
On Android 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Android 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-8300H |
3.428 9.268 |
| AMD A10-8700P |
2.303 5.202 |
In single core, the difference is 49%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 78%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices.
For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
Equivalence:
Intel Core i5-8300H AMD equivalentAMD A10-8700P Intel equivalent
AMD A10-4600M APU:
processor specifications
AMD started selling the A10-4600M on May 15, 2012. This is a processor for laptops, it has 4 cores and 4 threads, the processor is made according to the 32 nm process technology.
Processor made for socket FS1r2, TDP 35W. DDR3 memory is supported.
Specifications
General Information
- Release date
- 15 May 2012
- Market price
- $222
- Purpose
- for laptops
- Architecture
- Trinity
- Series
- AMD A-Series
- Process
- 32 nm
- Crystal size
- 246 mm²
- Number of transistors
- 178 million
- Processor capacity
- 64 bit
Frequencies and performance
- Clock speed
- 2300 MHz
- Maximum frequency
- 3200 MHz
- Number of cores
- 4
- Number of threads
- 4
- Level 1 cache
- 192 KB
- Level 2 cache
- 4 MB
Memory
- Memory type
- DDR3
Integrated graphics
- Integrated graphics
- AMD Radeon HD 7660G
Compatible
- Socket
- FS1r2
- Heat dissipation
- 35W
- Maximum number of processors in configuration
- 1
- Windows 11 support
- No
Technology and instructions
- Virtualization technologies
- AMD-V
- Instruction sets
- SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE3S, SSE4.
1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, FMA, AES-NI
Benchmarks
Comparison with other processors
Processor 1:
Processor 2:
Video reviews and tests
Error 403 The request cannot be completed because you have exceeded your quota. : quotaExceeded
If you find a mistake or have something to add, write in the comments. Have you had any experience with this processor? Is it worth buying one today?
Share with friends
AMD A10, Core i5 gaming laptops and Acer B1-A71 8GB tablet.
Weapon archive
diman81
Gaming laptop Asus X75VC-TY059H
New condition. Purchased at the end of August 2013.
Under warranty.
Price 18500 rub. (In Yulmart 25190 rub.) (1600×900),Windows8.
Samsung Gaming Laptop NP355V4C-S01RU.
CPU AMD A10-4600M(2.3Ghz),RAM 6GB,HDD 750GB,Video AMD HD7660+7670 2Gb,DVD-RW,Wi-Fi,Bluetooth ,WebCam,Screen 14″(1366*768),Windows7.Excellent condition.Battery up to 5 hours.
Price 13500 rub.
laptop Packard Bell LM85
Excellent condition. Battery up to 2.5 hours.
Price 13333r.
Processor Intel Core i5-430M(2300Mhz),RAM 4GB,HDD 500GB,Video card Ati Radeon 5650-1GB,DVD-RW,Wi-Fi,Display 17.3″(1600×900).
tablet Acer B1-A71 8GB
Excellent condition
Price 4000 RUB
screen 7″, 1024×600, capacitive, multi-touch, Android 4.1, built-in memory 8 GB, microSDHC, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, GPS, weight 320g.
kamchal
Packard Bell LM85 laptop-possible forwarding? Regards Alexander.
diman81
kamchal
Packard Bell LM85 laptop-forwarding possible? Regards Alexander.
What city?
kamchal
To the Kamchatka Territory. Sincerely, Alexander.
diman81 9
JagdDog
diman81
Gaming Notebook Hp Envy Dv6-7260er
Matrix FullHD 1920*1080 Processor excellent condition 60 Core008
There is a guarantee.
Price 20000 rub. (in stores from 32000 and above)
Is it new or used?
Warranty by serial on the HP website until what date?
Why is it gaming with discrete graphics?
JagdDog
Stupid on the last question, sorry
DIMAN81
JAGDDOG
The last question dull, sorry
with the integral one, probably
SPb 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000
9000
9000
9000 9023 Gaming laptop Samsung NP355V4C-S01RU.
