Amd a4 6000: AMD A4-6300 APU vs Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 6000+

AMD A4-3300M vs Intel Core i5-2410M: What is the difference?

33points

AMD A4-3300M

33points

Intel Core i5-2410M

vs

66 facts in comparison

AMD A4-3300M

Intel Core i5-2410M

Why is AMD A4-3300M better than Intel Core i5-2410M?

• 1.5MB bigger L2 cache?
  2MBvs0.5MB
• 128KB bigger L1 cache?
  256KBvs128KB
• 0.75MB/core more L2 cache per core?
  1MB/corevs0.25MB/core
• 0.9 newer version of DirectX?
  11vs10.1
• 1.2 newer version of OpenGL?
  4.2vs3
• 1 more displays supported?
  3vs2
• 0.1 newer version of OpenCL?
  1.2vs1.1

Why is Intel Core i5-2410M better than AMD A4-3300M?

• 21.05% faster CPU speed?
  2 x 2.3GHzvs2 x 1.9GHz
• 2 more CPU threads?
  4vs2
• 206MHz faster GPU clock speed?
  650MHzvs444MHz
• 12W lower TDP?
  23Wvs35W
• 0. 4GHz higher turbo clock speed?
  2.9GHzvs2.5GHz
• 2.53x higher PassMark result?
  3185vs1261
• 4.24GB/s more memory bandwidth?
  21.3GB/svs17.06GB/s
• 2.09x higher PassMark result (single)?
  1332vs638

Which are the most popular comparisons?

AMD A4-3300M

vs

AMD A8-3520M

Intel Core i5-2410M

vs

Intel Pentium Silver N6000

AMD A4-3300M

vs

AMD A8-3500M

Intel Core i5-2410M

vs

Intel Core i5-2450M

AMD A4-3300M

vs

Intel Core i3-2310M

Intel Core i5-2410M

vs

AMD A6-3410MX

AMD A4-3300M

vs

AMD A6-3400M

Intel Core i5-2410M

vs

Intel Core i5-3210M

AMD A4-3300M

vs

Intel Celeron N3060

Intel Core i5-2410M

vs

Intel Core i3-3110M

AMD A4-3300M

vs

Intel Core i3-3110M

Intel Core i5-2410M

vs

Intel Core i5-7200U

AMD A4-3300M

vs

Intel Core i3-3120M

Intel Core i5-2410M

vs

Intel Core i3-2350M

AMD A4-3300M

vs

Intel Core i3-2350M

Intel Core i5-2410M

vs

Intel Core i7-2670QM

AMD A4-3300M

vs

Intel Core i3-7020U

Intel Core i5-2410M

vs

Intel Core i3-2310M

AMD A4-3300M

vs

Intel Pentium Silver N6000

Intel Core i5-2410M

vs

Intel Core i7-2820QM

Price comparison

User reviews

Performance

CPU speed

2 x 1. 9GHz

2 x 2.3GHz

The CPU speed indicates how many processing cycles per second can be executed by a CPU, considering all of its cores (processing units). It is calculated by adding the clock rates of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors employing different microarchitectures, of each group of cores.

CPU threads

More threads result in faster performance and better multitasking.

turbo clock speed

2.5GHz

2.9GHz

When the CPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased performance.

Has an unlocked multiplier

✖AMD A4-3300M

✖Intel Core i5-2410M

Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier which makes them easy to overclock, allowing you to gain increased performance in games and other apps.

L2 cache

A larger L2 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.

L3 cache

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A4-3300M)

A larger L3 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.

L1 cache

A larger L1 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.

L2 core

1MB/core

0.25MB/core

More data can be stored in the L2 cache for access by each core of the CPU.

L3 core

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A4-3300M)

1.5MB/core

More data can be stored in the L3 cache for access by each core of the CPU.

Benchmarks

PassMark result

This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using multiple threads.

PassMark result (single)

This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using a single thread.

Cinebench R20 (multi) result

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A4-3300M)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-2410M)

Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s multi-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.

Cinebench R20 (single) result

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A4-3300M)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-2410M)

Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s single-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.

Geekbench 5 result (multi)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A4-3300M)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-2410M)

Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s multi-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2023)

Geekbench 5 result (single)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A4-3300M)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-2410M)

Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s single-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2023)

Blender (bmw27) result

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A4-3300M)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-2410M)

The Blender (bmw27) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.

Blender (classroom) result

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A4-3300M)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-2410M)

The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.

performance per watt

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A4-3300M)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-2410M)

This means the CPU is more efficient, giving a greater amount of performance for each watt of power used.

Integrated graphics

GPU clock speed

444MHz

650MHz

The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a higher clock speed.

GPU turbo

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A4-3300M)

1200MHz

When the GPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased performance.

GPU execution units

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A4-3300M)

A graphics processing unit (GPU) with a greater number of execution units can deliver better graphics.

supported displays

Using multiple displays you can create a larger workspace, making it easier to work across multiple apps.

DirectX version

DirectX is used in games, with newer versions supporting better graphics.

OpenGL version

OpenGL is used in games, with newer versions supporting better graphics.

OpenCL version

Some apps use OpenCL to apply the power of the graphics processing unit (GPU) for non-graphical computing. Newer versions introduce more functionality and better performance.

texture mapping units (TMUs)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A4-3300M)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-2410M)

TMUs take textures and map them to the geometry of a 3D scene. More TMUs will typically mean that texture information is processed faster.

render output units (ROPs)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A4-3300M)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-2410M)

The ROPs are responsible for some of the final steps of the rendering process, writing the final pixel data to memory and carrying out other tasks such as anti-aliasing to improve the look of graphics.

Memory

RAM speed

1333MHz

1333MHz

It can support faster memory, which will give quicker system performance.

maximum memory bandwidth

17.06GB/s

21.3GB/s

This is the maximum rate that data can be read from or stored into memory.

DDR memory version

DDR (Double Data Rate) memory is the most common type of RAM. Newer versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy-efficient.

memory channels

More memory channels increases the speed of data transfer between the memory and the CPU.

maximum memory amount

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A4-3300M)

The maximum amount of memory (RAM) supported.

bus transfer rate

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A4-3300M)

The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.

Supports ECC memory

✖AMD A4-3300M

✖Intel Core i5-2410M

Error-correcting code memory can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when is it essential to avoid corruption, such as scientific computing or when running a server.

eMMC version

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A4-3300M)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-2410M)

A higher version of eMMC allows faster memory interfaces, having a positive effect on the performance of a device. For example, when transferring files from your computer to the internal storage over USB.

bus speed

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A4-3300M)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-2410M)

The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.

Features

uses multithreading

✖AMD A4-3300M

✔Intel Core i5-2410M

Multithreading technology (such as Intel’s Hyperthreading or AMD’s Simultaneous Multithreading) provides increased performance by splitting each of the processor’s physical cores into virtual cores, also known as threads. This way, each core can run two instruction streams at once.

Has AES

✖AMD A4-3300M

✔Intel Core i5-2410M

AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.

Has AVX

✖AMD A4-3300M

✔Intel Core i5-2410M

AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial apps, as well as improving Linux RAID software performance.

SSE version

SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing an image or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.

Has F16C

✖AMD A4-3300M

✖Intel Core i5-2410M

F16C is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.

bits executed at a time

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A4-3300M)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-2410M)

NEON provides acceleration for media processing, such as listening to MP3s.

Has MMX

✔AMD A4-3300M

✔Intel Core i5-2410M

MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.

Has TrustZone

✖AMD A4-3300M

✖Intel Core i5-2410M

A technology integrated into the processor to secure the device for use with features such as mobile payments and streaming video using digital rights management (DRM).

front-end width

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A4-3300M)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-2410M)

The CPU can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), meaning that the CPU performs better

Price comparison

Which are the best CPUs?

Radeon APU A4-6000 R2 Folding@Home PPD Averages, Power Consumption & Research Projects

GPU PPD
1. Brands
2. AMD
3. GPU Folding@Home Profile

GPU FOLDING OVERVIEW

Folding@Home PPD for the Radeon APU A4-6000 R2 represents the averages of folding work unit
samples collected from a wide variety of users different computer hardware configurations.

Average values are used to
best represent folding PPD performance of a Radeon APU A4-6000 R2 across different F@H projects and user
variables such as power settings, overclocks, operating system and specific work units which can yield
wildly different highs and lows for PPD scores on the same GPU platform.

GPU PPD AVERAGE: ALL OS

6,313

Average of 500 most recent PPD samples

Data Samples: ALL OS

13,327

All Time

Stats as of Friday, 24 February 2023 00:10:20

TRY OUR BETTER F@H WEB CLIENT

Get more details on your GPU and CPU PPD in real-time, save money with folding time of use scheduling. Available for chrome, edge, brave and other chromium browsers.

GET IT FOR FREE NOW

Mullins [Radeon APU A4-6000 R2] — AMD

DATA SAMPLES INFO Filter applied, PPD samples all time		RECENT AVERAGE FOLDING PERFORMANCE Based on the 500 most recent, available PPD samples by filter				WORK UNIT PPD RECORDS All Time
OS FILTER	SAMPLES	PPD	WU Per 24hrs	Time Per WU	Points Per WU	BEST PPD	WORST PPD
All OS AVG	13327	6,313	0.09	271 hrs 8 mins	71,318	218,972	646
Windows	13327	6,313	0.09	271 hrs 8 mins	71,318	218,972	646

Recent Work Unit Research Type Allocations — Radeon APU A4-6000 R2

Average PPD is impacted by the types of research work units being done as they return different amounts of points and take different amounts of time.
The following shows the work unit allocation of research causes to better understand changes in PPD over time for the Radeon APU A4-6000 R2.

Radeon APU A4-6000 R2 kWh POWER CONSUMPTION & COST

Power consumption information for the Radeon APU A4-6000 R2 is based on an average wattage taken from
vendor information for the lowest and highest power draws for the GPU under folding@home compute loads.

Wattage information is only for the GPU and does not include the host computers power usage.

GPU Power Draw Watts — TDP	Daily Power Usage kWh	Points per kWh	Daily Cost at $0.10 per kWh	Power Cost per 1m Points
10 W	0.24 kWh	26,304	$0.02	$3.802

Radeon APU A4-6000 R2 COMPUTE
VS kWH USAGE
DAY, MONTH, WEEK & YEAR

Folding@Home compute projections for the Radeon APU A4-6000 R2 can be used to help inform long term point goals and related costs based on 24/7 usage.

Duration	Nick Name	Points Average	Work Units Average	Power Usage kWh	Power Cost at $0.10 per kWh
Day	PPD	6,313	0.09	0.24 kWh	$0.02
Week	PPW	44,191	0.62	1.68 kWh	$0.17
Month	PPM	192,020	2.69	7.30 kWh	$0.73
Year	PPY	2,304,245	32.31	87.60 kWh	$8.76

5 BEST PPD RESEARCH PROJECTS — Radeon APU A4-6000 R2

The following data is the average PPD values for Radeon APU A4-6000 R2 project work units based on multiple samples collected via the use of our Folding@Home dark mode web client.

PPD Rank	Project ID	Cause Research	PPD Average	Points WU Average	WUs Day Average	WU Time Average
1	18010	cancer	52,494	209,848	0. 25	96 hrs 56 mins
2	17319	covid-19	43,960	87,920	0.50	48 hrs 0 mins
3	18012	cancer	17,632	109,642	0.16	149 hrs 14 mins
4	18706	cancer	13,955	200,000	0.07	344 hrs 58 mins
5	13454	covid-19	10,955	54,400	0.20	119 hrs 11 mins

5 LOWEST PPD RESEARCH PROJECTS — Radeon APU A4-6000 R2

The following data is the average PPD values for Radeon APU A4-6000 R2 project work units based on multiple samples collected via the use of our Folding@Home dark mode web client.

PPD Rank	Project ID	Cause Research	PPD Average	Points WU Average	WUs Day Average	WU Time Average
1	14904	covid-19	1,671	21,200	0. 08	304 hrs 29 mins
2	17426	myosins	1,769	20,300	0.09	275 hrs 25 mins
3	14906	covid-19	2,297	21,200	0.11	222 hrs 30 mins
4	17742	cancer	2,334	11,370	0.21	117 hrs 55 mins
5	17711	unspecified	2,348	12,112	0.19	124 hrs 48 mins

AMD A4-6300 processor review: features, benchmark tests

The A4-6300 processor was released by AMD, release date: June 2013. The processor is designed for desktop computers and is built on the Richland architecture.

Processor unlocked for overclocking. The total number of cores — 2, threads — 2. The maximum clock frequency of the processor is 3. 9 GHz. The maximum temperature is 70°C. Technological process — 32 nm SOI. Cache size: L1 — 96 KB, L2 — 1 MB.

Supported memory type: DDR3-1600.

Supported socket type: FM2. The maximum number of processors in the configuration is 1. Power consumption (TDP): 65 Watt.

AMD Radeon HD 8370D graphics are integrated into the processor with the following graphics parameters: maximum frequency — 760 MHz, number of cores — 128.

Top1 CPU

This CPU

PassMark
CPU mark

Top1 CPU

This CPU

158404

Geekbench 4
Single Core

Top1 CPU

This CPU

Geekbench 4
Multi-Core

Top1 CPU

This CPU

CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop
Face Detection

Top1 CPU

This CPU

56.680 mPixels/s

2.112 mPixels/s

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop
Ocean Surface Simulation

Top1 CPU

This CPU

741.453 Frames/s

2.119 Frames/s

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop
T-Rex

Top1 CPU

This CPU

3. 237 Frames/s

0.100 Frames/s

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop
Video Composition

Top1 CPU

This CPU

49.002 Frames/s

6.647 Frames/s

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop
Bitcoin Mining

Top1 CPU

This CPU

218.231 mHash/s

21. 250 mHash/s

GFXBench 4.0
Car Chase Offscreen

Top1 CPU

This CPU

9047 Frames

372 Frames

GFXBench 4.0
Manhattan

Top1 CPU

This CPU

7128 Frames

1351 Frames

GFXBench 4. 0
T-Rex

Top1 CPU

This CPU

12887 Frames

2829 Frames

GFXBench 4.0
Car Chase Offscreen

Top1 CPU

This CPU

9047.000 Fps

372.000 Fps

GFXBench 4.0
Manhattan

Top1 CPU

This CPU

7128. 000 Fps

1351.000 Fps

GFXBench 4.0
T-Rex

Top1 CPU

This CPU

12887.000 Fps

2829.000 Fps

Name	Meaning
PassMark — Single thread mark	1415
PassMark — CPU mark	1432
Geekbench 4 — Single Core	440
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core	696
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection	2.112 mPixels/s
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation	2.119 Frames/s
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex	0.100 Frames/s
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition	6.647 Frames/s
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining	21.250 mHash/s
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen	372 Frames
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan	1351 Frames
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex	2829 Frames
GFXBench 4. 0 — Car Chase Offscreen	372.000 Fps
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan	1351.000 Fps
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex	2829.000 Fps

conveyors

Number of Compute	2
Core frequency	760MHz
Process	32nm
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	194.6GFLOPS
Number of shaders	128
Pixel fill rate	3040 GPixel/s
Render output units	4
Texturing speed	6080 GTexel/s
Texture Units	8
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt
Number of transistors	1,303 million

Features

Select Processor

AMD

A4-6300

versus

Intel
Pentium 4 HT 560

AMD
A4-6300

versus

Intel
Pentium 4 HT 660

AMD
A4-6300

versus

AMD
Phenom X3 8400

AMD
A4-6300

versus

AMD
Athlon 64X2 5800+

AMD
A4-6300

versus

AMD
Athlon II X3 405e

AMD
A4-6300

versus

Intel
Celeron J4125

Comparison of AMD A4-9125 and AMD Athlon 64 X2 6000+

Comparative analysis of AMD A4-9125 and AMD Athlon 64 X2 6000+ processors by all known characteristics in the categories: General Information, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphical Interfaces, Graphics API Support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Technologies, Virtualization.
Analysis of processor performance by benchmarks: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation ( Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

AMD A4-9125

versus

AMD Athlon 64 X2 6000+

Benefits

Reasons to choose AMD A4-9125

• Newer process technology makes the processor more powerful, but with lower power consumption 907 nm9 03: 28 8.3 times less power consumption: 15 Watt vs 125 Watt
• Performance in PassMark — Single thread mark about 1% higher: 1044 vs 1037
• PassMark — CPU mark about 29% better performance: 1213 vs 937

Architecture name	Richland
Family	AMD A-Series Processors
Production date	June 2013
OPN PIB	AD6300OKHLBOX
OPN Tray	AD6300OKA23HL
Place in the ranking	2018
Series	AMD A4-Series APU for Desktops
Applicability	Desktop
Support 64 bit
Base frequency	3. 7GHz
Crystal area	246mm
Level 1 cache	96KB
Level 2 cache	1MB
Process	32nm SOI
Maximum case temperature (TCase)	70 °C
Maximum core temperature	70°C
Maximum frequency	3.9 GHz
Number of cores	2
Number of threads	2
Number of transistors	1178 million
Unlocked
Maximum number of memory channels	2
Supported memory frequency	1600MHz
Supported memory types	DDR3-1600
Enduro
Maximum GPU clock	760MHz
Number of iGPU cores	128
Number of shaders	128
Integrated graphics	AMD Radeon HD 8370D
Switchable graphics
Unified Video Decoder (UVD)
Video Codec Engine (VCE)
DisplayPort
HDMI
DirectX	11
Maximum number of processors per configuration	1
Supported sockets	FM2
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt
PCI Express revision	2. 0
AMD App Acceleration
AMD Elite Experiences
AMD HD3D technology
Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP)
Fused Multiply-Add (FMA)
Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4)
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX)
Intel® AES New Instructions
PowerGating
PowerNow
VirusProtect
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™)
IOMMU 2. 0

Workflow	28 nm vs 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt vs 125 Watt
PassMark — Single thread mark	1044 vs 1037
PassMark — CPU mark	1213 vs 937

Reasons to choose AMD Athlon 64 X2 6000+

• About 15% more clock speed: 3 GHz vs 2. 6 GHz

Maximum frequency

3 GHz vs 2.6 GHz

Benchmark comparison

CPU 1: AMD A4-9125
CPU 2: AMD Athlon 64 X2 6000+

PassMark — Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2
PassMark — CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2

Name	AMD A4-9125	AMD Athlon 64 X2 6000+
PassMark — Single thread mark	1044	1037
PassMark — CPU mark	1213	937
Geekbench 4 — Single Core		288
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core		514
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s)		1.495
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		3.655
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s)		0.078
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		2.013

Performance comparison

	AMD A4-9125	AMD Athlon 64 X2 6000+
Family	AMD A-Series Processors
Production date	Q2 2018	February 2007
OPN Tray	AM9125AYN23AC
OS Support	Windows 10 — 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Linux x86_64
Place in the ranking	1963	2829
Series	AMD A4-Series APU for Laptops
Applicability	Laptop	Desktop
Architecture name		Windsor
Price now		$32. 50
Price/performance ratio (0-100)		14.55
Base frequency	2.3 GHz
Compute Cores	4
Level 2 cache	1MB	1024KB
Process	28nm	90nm
Maximum core temperature	90°C
Maximum frequency	2.6 GHz	3GHz
Number of cores	2	2
Number of GPU cores	2
Unlocked
Support 64 bit
Crystal area		220mm
Level 1 cache		256KB
Number of transistors		227 million
Maximum number of memory channels	1
Supported memory frequency	2133MHz
Enduro
Maximum GPU clock	686 MHz
Number of iGPU cores	2
Integrated graphics	AMD Radeon R3 Graphics
Switchable graphics
Unified Video Decoder (UVD)
Video Codec Engine (VCE)
DisplayPort
HDMI
DirectX	12
Vulcan
Configurable TDP	10-15 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	125 Watt
Maximum number of processors per configuration		1
Supported sockets		AM2
PCI Express revision	3.