AMD A4-9125 vs Intel Core i3-2120
|
|
|
|
|
AMD A4-9125 vs Intel Core i3-2120
Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the AMD A4-9125 on one side and the Intel Core i3-2120 on the other side. The first is dedicated to the notebook sector, It has 2 cores, 2 threads, a maximum frequency of 2,6GHz. The second is used on the desktop segment, it has a total of 2 cores, 4 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 3,3 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specifications:
| Processor | AMD A4-9125 | Intel Core i3-2120 | ||||||
| Market (main) | Notebook | Desktop | ||||||
| ISA | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) | ||||||
| Microarchitecture | Excavator | Sandy Bridge | ||||||
| Core name | Stoney Ridge | Sandy Bridge | ||||||
| Family | A4-9000 | Core i3-2000 | ||||||
| Part number(s), S-Spec | AM9125AYN23AC | BX80623I32120, BXC80623I32120, CM8062301044204, Q1FM, SR05Y |
||||||
| Release date | Q4 2018 | Q1 2011 | ||||||
| Lithography | 28 nm | 32 nm | ||||||
| Transistors | 1. 200.000.000 |
504.000.000 | ||||||
| Cores | 2 | 2 | ||||||
| Threads | 2 | 4 | ||||||
| Base frequency | 2,3 GHz | 3,3 GHz | ||||||
| Turbo frequency | 2,6 GHz | — | ||||||
| Cache memory | 1 MB | 3 MB | ||||||
| Max memory capacity | 12 GB | 32 GB | ||||||
| Memory types | DDR4-1866 | DDR3 1066/1333 | ||||||
| Max # of memory channels | 1 | 2 | ||||||
| Max memory bandwidth | 13,91 GB/s | 21 GB/s | ||||||
| Max PCIe lanes | 8 | 16 | ||||||
| TDP | 15 W | 65 W | ||||||
| Suggested PSU | — | 600W ATX Power Supply | ||||||
| GPU integrated graphics | AMD Radeon R3 Mobile Graphics (Stoney) | Intel HD Graphics 2000 | ||||||
| GPU cores | 2 | — | ||||||
| GPU execution units | — | 6 | ||||||
| GPU shading units | 128 | 48 | ||||||
| GPU base clock | 200 MHz | 850 MHz | ||||||
| GPU boost clock | 686 MHz | 1100 MHz | ||||||
| GPU FP32 floating point | 167,7 GFLOPS | 110,4 GFLOPS | ||||||
| Socket | BGA | LGA1155 | ||||||
| Compatible motherboard | — | Socket LGA 1155 Motherboard | ||||||
| Maximum temperature | 90°C | 69. 1°C |
||||||
| CPU-Z single thread | 142 | 258 | ||||||
| CPU-Z multi thread | 265 | 808 | ||||||
| Cinebench R15 single thread | 60 | 109 | ||||||
| Cinebench R15 multi-thread | 100 | 272 | ||||||
| Cinebench R20 single thread | 160 | 233 | ||||||
| Cinebench R20 multi-thread | 240 | 582 | ||||||
| PassMark single thread | 1.028 | 1.503 | ||||||
| PassMark CPU Mark | 1.202 | 1. 902 |
||||||
| (Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 single core |
1.560 | 2.814 | ||||||
| (Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 multi-core |
2.393 | 5.355 | ||||||
| (Windows) Geekbench 5 single core |
308 | 567 | ||||||
| (Windows) Geekbench 5 multi-core |
518 | 1.357 | ||||||
| (SGEMM) GFLOPS performance |
28,83 GFLOPS | 54,6 GFLOPS | ||||||
| (Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio |
160 pts / W | 82 pts / W | ||||||
| Amazon | ||||||||
| eBay |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.
Suggested PSU: We assume that we have An ATX computer case, a high end graphics card, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, a 1TB HDD hard drive, a Blu-Ray drive. We will have to rely on a more powerful power supply if we want to have several graphics cards, several monitors, more memory, etc.
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
We see that the two processors have an equivalent number of cores, the turbo frequency of Intel Core i3-2120 is bigger, that the PDT of AMD A4-9125 is lower. The AMD A4-9125 was designed earlier.
Performances :
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.
| CPU-Z — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i3-2120 |
258 808 |
| AMD A4-9125 |
142 265 |
In single core, the difference is 82%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 205%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.
| Cinebench R15 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i3-2120 |
109 272 |
| AMD A4-9125 |
60 100 |
In single core, the difference is 82%.
In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 172%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.
| Cinebench R20 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i3-2120 |
233 582 |
| AMD A4-9125 |
160 240 |
In single core, the difference is 46%.
In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 143%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R20 is a multi-platform test software which allows to evaluate the hardware capacities of a device such as a computer, a tablet, a server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant.
| PassMark — CPU Mark & single thread | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i3-2120 |
1.503 1.902 |
| AMD A4-9125 |
1.028 1.202 |
In single core, the difference is 46%.
In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 58%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.
On Windows 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i3-2120 |
2.814 5.355 |
| AMD A4-9125 |
1.560 2.393 |
In single core, the difference is 80%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 124%.
On Linux 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i3-2120 |
2.768 4.749 |
| AMD A4-9125 |
1.430 1.513 |
In single core, the difference is 94%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 214%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices.
For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
On Windows:
| Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i3-2120 |
567 1.357 |
| AMD A4-9125 |
308 518 |
In single core, the difference is 84%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 162%.
On Linux:
| Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i3-2120 |
503 915 |
| AMD A4-9125 |
361 473 |
In single core, the difference is 39%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 93%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.
Equivalence:
AMD A4-9125 Intel equivalentIntel Core i3-2120 AMD equivalent
See also:
AMD A4-9120AMD A4-9120CAMD A4-9120e
Intel Core i3-2120T
AMD A4-9125 vs Intel Core i3-8145U
Comparative analysis of AMD A4-9125 and Intel Core i3-8145U processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization, Graphics image quality, Security & Reliability.
Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core, GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps).
AMD A4-9125
Buy on Amazon
vs
Intel Core i3-8145U
Buy on Amazon
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Core i3-8145U
- Around 50% higher clock speed: 3.90 GHz vs 2.6 GHz
- Around 11% higher maximum core temperature: 100°C vs 90°C
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark — Single thread mark: 2136 vs 1041
- 3.2x better performance in PassMark — CPU mark: 3852 vs 1210
| Maximum frequency | 3. 90 GHz vs 2.6 GHz |
| Maximum core temperature | 100°C vs 90°C |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| PassMark — Single thread mark | 2136 vs 1041 |
| PassMark — CPU mark | 3852 vs 1210 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD A4-9125
CPU 2: Intel Core i3-8145U
| PassMark — Single thread mark |
|
|
||
| PassMark — CPU mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD A4-9125 | Intel Core i3-8145U |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark — Single thread mark | 1041 | 2136 |
| PassMark — CPU mark | 1210 | 3852 |
| Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 4325 | |
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 8121 | |
GFXBench 4. 0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
1590 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) | 3228 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) | 5815 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1590 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) | 3228 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) | 5815 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD A4-9125 | Intel Core i3-8145U | |
|---|---|---|
| Family | AMD A-Series Processors | |
| Launch date | Q2 2018 | 21 August 2018 |
| OPN Tray | AM9125AYN23AC | |
| OS Support | Windows 10 — 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Linux x86_64 | |
| Place in performance rating | 1609 | 364 |
| Series | AMD A4-Series APU for Laptops | 8th Generation Intel® Core™ i3 Processors |
| Vertical segment | Laptop | Mobile |
| Architecture codename | Whiskey Lake | |
| Price now | $281 | |
| Processor Number | i3-8145U | |
| Status | Launched | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 6. 00 |
|
| Base frequency | 2.3 GHz | 2.10 GHz |
| Compute Cores | 4 | |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 90°C | 100°C |
| Maximum frequency | 2.6 GHz | 3.90 GHz |
| Number of cores | 2 | 2 |
| Number of GPU cores | 2 | |
| Unlocked | ||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Bus Speed | 4 GT/s OPI | |
| Die size | 123 mm | |
| L1 cache | 256 KB | |
| L3 cache | 4 MB | |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 72 °C | |
| Number of threads | 4 | |
| Max memory channels | 1 | 2 |
| Supported memory frequency | 2133 MHz | |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 37. 5 GB/s |
|
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB | |
| Supported memory types | DDR4-2400, LPDDR3-2133 | |
| Enduro | ||
| Graphics max frequency | 686 MHz | |
| iGPU core count | 2 | |
| Processor graphics | AMD Radeon R3 Graphics | Intel® UHD Graphics 620 |
| Switchable graphics | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
| Device ID | 0x3EA0 | |
| Graphics base frequency | 300 MHz | |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1. 00 GHz |
|
| Intel® Clear Video HD technology | ||
| Intel® Clear Video technology | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Max video memory | 32 GB | |
| DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
| DVI | ||
| eDP | ||
| Number of displays supported | 3 | |
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| Vulkan | ||
| OpenGL | 4. 5 |
|
| Configurable TDP | 10-15 Watt | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Configurable TDP-down | 10 W | |
| Configurable TDP-down Frequency | 800 MHz | |
| Configurable TDP-up | 25 W | |
| Configurable TDP-up Frequency | 2.30 GHz | |
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | |
| Package Size | 46×24 | |
| Sockets supported | FCBGA1528 | |
| PCI Express revision | 3. 0 |
3.0 |
| Max number of PCIe lanes | 16 | |
| PCIe configurations | 1×4, 2×2, 1×2+2×1 and 4×1 | |
| Adaptive Voltage and Frequency Scaling (AVFS) | ||
| AMD App Acceleration | ||
| AMD HD3D technology | ||
| AMD Mantle API | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4. 1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 |
|
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® Flex Memory Access | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® My WiFi technology | ||
| Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported | ||
| Intel® Smart Response technology | ||
| Intel® TSX-NI | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Speed Shift technology | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
| 4K resolution support | ||
| Max resolution over DisplayPort | [email protected] | |
| Max resolution over eDP | [email protected] | |
Max resolution over HDMI 1. 4 |
[email protected] | |
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Identity Protection technology | ||
| Intel® OS Guard | ||
| Intel® Secure Key technology | ||
| Intel® Software Guard Extensions (Intel® SGX) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) |
AMD A4-9125 vs Intel Core i3-7020U: What is the difference?
40 Ballla
A4-9125
44 BALLLA
Intel Core i3-7020U
Winter when comparing
VS
63 facts compared to
AMD A4-9125
9000U 9000U
Is A4-9125 better than Intel Core i3-7020U?
- 0.
5MB more L2 cache?
1MB vs 0.5MB - 32KB more L1 cache?
160KB vs 128KB - 0.25MB/core more L2 cache per core?
0.5MB/core vs 0.25MB/core - Has FMA4?
Why is Intel Core i3-7020U better than AMD A4-9125?
- 2 more CPU threads?
4 vs 2 - 10°C higher than maximum operating temperature?
100°C vs 90°C - GPU clock 33MHz higher?
300MHz vs 267MHz - Is 14nm semiconductor smaller?
14nm vs 28nm - 2.02x higher PassMark result? more memory bandwidth?
34.1GB/s vs 13.91GB/s - 25.78% higher PassMark score (single)?
1337 vs 1063 - 20GB more max memory?
32GB vs 12GB
Which comparisons are the most popular?
AMD RYZEN 5 5500U
VS
Intel Core i5-1135G7
AMD Ryzen 3 5300U
VS
Intel Core I3-1115G4
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
VS 9000 RA.
Ryzen 3 3250U
vs
AMD Ryzen 7 5700G
vs
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X
AMD RYZEN 7 5800H
VS
Intel Core i7-11800H
Intel Core i3-1115G4
Intel Core i5-1135g7
AMD RYZEN 5 5600G
VS
000 9000 AMD RYZEN Ryzen 7 5700u
VS
Intel Core i7-1165g7
AMD Ryzen 5 5500u
VS
Intel Core i3-1115g4
Reviews of Users
General rating 9000 AMD AMD125
5 reviews of users
AMD A4-9125
6.8 /10
5 Reviews of users
Intel Core i3-7020U 9000u
4 Reviews of users
Intel Core i3-7020u
83 /
4 Reviews of users
Functions
Price and quality ratio
7.0183 /10
5 Votes
5.8 /10
Votes
5.8 /10
4 Votes
5.8 /10
4 Votes
performance
6.2 /10
5 VOTES
7.5 /10,000 VOTES 9000 Votes
5.
6 /10
5 Votes
8.0 /10
4 Votes
Energy Efficiency
8.0 /10
4 Votes
8.8 /10 9 9
4 votes
Performance
CPU speed
2 x 2.3GHz
2 x 2.3GHz
CPU speed indicates how many processing cycles per second a processor can perform, given all its cores (processors). It is calculated by adding the clock speeds of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors, each group of cores.
processor thread
More threads result in better performance and better multitasking.
turbo clock speed
2.6GHz
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-7020U)
When the processor is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.
Unlocked
✖AMD A4-9125
✖Intel Core i3-7020U
Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier and can be easily overclocked for better performance in games and other applications.
L2 Cache
More L2 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
L3 cache
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A4-9125)
More L3 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
L1 cache
More L1 cache results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
L2 core
0.5MB/core
0.25MB/core
More data can be stored in L2 scratchpad for access by each processor core.
L3 core
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A4-9125)
1.5MB/core
More data can be stored in L3 scratchpad for access by each processor core.
Geotagging
PassMark result
This benchmark measures CPU performance using multithreading.
PassMark result (single)
This benchmark measures processor performance using a thread of execution.
Geekbench 5 result (multi-core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform test that measures the performance of a multi-core processor. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)
Cinebench R20 result (multi-core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A4-9125)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-7020U)
Cinebench R20 is a test that measures the performance of a multi-core processor by rendering a 3D scene.
Cinebench R20 result (single core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A4-9125)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-7020U)
Cinebench R20 is a test to evaluate the performance of a single core processor when rendering a 3D scene.
Geekbench 5 result (single core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures the single-core performance of a processor.
(Source: Primate Labs, 2022)
Blender test result (bmw27)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A4-9125)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-7020U)
The Blender benchmark (bmw27) measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.
Blender result (classroom)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A4-9125)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-7020U)
The Blender benchmark (classroom) measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.
performance per watt
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A4-9125)
This means that the processor is more efficient, giving more performance per watt of power used.
Integrated graphics
GPU clock speed
267MHz
300MHz
The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a higher clock speed.
turbo GPU
600MHz
1000MHz
When the GPU is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.
GPU Executors
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A4-9125)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-7020U)
A graphics processing unit (GPU) with more execution units can provide better graphics.
monitor support
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A4-9125)
By using multiple displays, you can expand your workspace, making it easier to work across multiple applications.
DirectX version
DirectX is used in games with a new version that supports better graphics.
OpenGL version
The newer the OpenGL version, the better graphics quality in games.
version of OpenCL
Some applications use OpenCL to use the power of the graphics processing unit (GPU) for non-graphical computing.
Newer versions are more functional and better quality.
texture units (TMUs)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-7020U)
TMUs take texture units and bind them to the geometric layout of the 3D scene. More TMUs generally means texture information is processed faster.
imaging units ROPs
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-7020U)
ROPs are responsible for some of the final steps of the rendering process, such as writing the final pixel data to memory and for performing other tasks such as anti-aliasing to improve the appearance of graphics.
Memory
RAM speed
2133MHz
2133MHz
Can support faster memory which speeds up system performance.
maximum memory bandwidth
13.91GB/s
34.1GB/s
This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.
DDR version
DDR (Double Data Rate Synchronous Dynamic Random Access Memory) is the most common type of main memory. New versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy efficient.
memory channels
More memory channels increase the speed of data transfer between memory and processor.
maximum memory
Maximum memory (RAM).
bus baud rate
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A4-9125)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device.
Supports memory recovery code
✖AMD A4-9125
✖Intel Core i3-7020U
Memory error recovery code can detect and repair data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.
eMMC version
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A4-9125)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-7020U)
Newer version of eMMC — built-in flash memory card — speeds up the memory interface, has a positive effect on device performance, for example, when transferring files from a computer to internal memory via USB.
bus frequency
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A4-9125)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-7020U)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device
Functions
uses multi-threading
Intel’s Hyperthreading or AMD’s Simultaneous Multithreading provides better performance by dividing each physical processor core into logical cores, also known as threads. Thus, each core can run two instruction streams at the same time.
Has AES
✔AMD A4-9125
✔Intel Core i3-7020U
AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.
Has AVX
✔AMD A4-9125
✔Intel Core i3-7020U
AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial applications, and to improve the performance of the Linux RAID program.
version of SSE
SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing images or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.
Has F16C
✔AMD A4-9125
✔Intel Core i3-7020U
F16C is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting image contrast or adjusting volume.
bits transmitted at the same time
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A4-9125)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-7020U)
NEON provides faster media processing such as MP3 listening.
Has MMX
✔AMD A4-9125
✔Intel Core i3-7020U
MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting image contrast or adjusting volume.
Has TrustZone
✖AMD A4-9125
✖Intel Core i3-7020U
The technology is integrated into the processor to ensure device security when using features such as mobile payments and digital rights management (DRM) video streaming.
interface width
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A4-9125)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-7020U)
The processor can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), which means the processor performs better
Price comparison
Which CPUs are better?
Compare AMD A4-9125 and Intel Core i3-2332M
Comparative analysis of AMD A4-9125 and Intel Core i3-2332M processors by all known characteristics in the categories: General Information, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphical Interfaces, Graphics API Support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Technologies, Virtualization.
Analysis of processor performance by benchmarks: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark.
AMD A4-9125
versus
Intel Core i3-2332M
Advantages
Reasons to choose AMD A4-9125
- Approximately 18% more clock speed: 2.6 GHz vs 2.2 GHz The new process technology makes it more powerful
- 9 , but with lower power consumption: 28 nm vs 32 nm
- L2 cache is 2 times larger, which means more data can be stored in it for quick access
- 2.3 times lower power consumption: 15 Watt vs 35 Watt
- Approximately 11% more performance in PassMark — Single thread mark benchmark: 1041 vs 936
| Maximum frequency | 2.6 GHz vs 2.2 GHz |
| Process | 28 nm vs 32 nm |
| Level 2 cache | 1 MB vs 256 KB (per core) |
| Power Demand (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 35 Watt |
| PassMark — Single thread mark | 1041 vs 936 |
Reasons to choose Intel Core i3-2332M
- Performance in PassMark benchmark — CPU mark about 12% higher: 1353 vs 1210
| PassMark — CPU mark | 1353 vs 1210 |
Benchmark comparison
CPU 1: AMD A4-9125
CPU 2: Intel Core i3-2332M
| PassMark — Single thread mark |
|
|||
| PassMark — CPU mark |
|
| Name | AMD A4-9125 | Intel Core i3-2332M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark — Single thread mark | 1041 | 936 |
| PassMark — CPU mark | 1210 | 1353 |
Feature comparison
| AMD A4-9125 | Intel Core i3-2332M | |
|---|---|---|
| Family | AMD A-Series Processors | |
| Issue date | Q2 2018 | September 2011 |
| OPN Tray | AM9125AYN23AC | |
| OS Support | Windows 10 — 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Linux x86_64 | |
| Place in the rating | 1609 | 1726 |
| Series | AMD A4-Series APU for Laptops | |
| Applicability | Laptop | Laptop |
| Architecture name | Sandy Bridge | |
| Base frequency | 2. 3 GHz |
|
| Compute Cores | 4 | |
| Level 2 cache | 1MB | 256 KB (per core) |
| Process | 28nm | 32nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 90°C | |
| Maximum frequency | 2.6 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| Number of cores | 2 | 2 |
| Number of GPU cores | 2 | |
| Unlocked | ||
| Support 64 bit | ||
| Crystal area | 149 mm | |
| Level 1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | |
| Level 3 cache | 3072 KB (shared) | |
| Number of transistors | 624 million | |
| Maximum number of memory channels | 1 | |
| Supported memory frequency | 2133MHz | |
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | |
| Enduro | ||
| Maximum GPU clock | 686MHz | |
| Number of iGPU cores | 2 | |
| Integrated graphics | AMD Radeon R3 Graphics | |
| Switchable graphics | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
| DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
| DirectX | 12 | |
| Vulcan | ||
| Configurable TDP | 10-15 Watt | |
| Power Demand (TDP) | 15 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Maximum number of processors in | 1 | |
| Supported sockets | G2 (988B) | |
| PCI Express revision | 3.
|