AMD A6-9220e vs Intel Core i5-4300U
|
|
|
|
|
AMD A6-9220e vs Intel Core i5-4300U
Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the AMD A6-9220e on one side and the Intel Core i5-4300U on the other side. The first is dedicated to the notebook sector, It has 2 cores, 2 threads, a maximum frequency of 2,4GHz. The second is used on the ultrabook segment, it has a total of 2 cores, 4 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 2,9 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specifications:
| Processor | AMD A6-9220e | Intel Core i5-4300U | ||||||
| Market (main) | Notebook | Ultrabook | ||||||
| ISA | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) | ||||||
| Microarchitecture | Excavator | Haswell | ||||||
| Core name | Stoney Ridge | Haswell-ULT | ||||||
| Family | A6-9000 | Core i5-4000 | ||||||
| Part number(s), S-Spec |
AM922EANN23AC |
CL8064701477400, |
||||||
| Release date | Q1 2018 | Q3 2013 | ||||||
| Lithography | 28 nm | 22 nm | ||||||
| Transistors | 1. 200.000.000 |
1.400.000.000 | ||||||
| Cores | 2 | 2 | ||||||
| Threads | 2 | 4 | ||||||
| Base frequency | 1,6 GHz | 1,9 GHz | ||||||
| Turbo frequency | 2,4 GHz | 2,9 GHz | ||||||
| Cache memory | 1 MB | 3 MB | ||||||
| Max memory capacity | 8 GB | 16 GB | ||||||
| Memory types |
DDR4-2133 |
DDR3L 1333/1600, |
||||||
| Max # of memory channels | 1 | 2 | ||||||
| Max memory bandwidth | 17,1 GB/s | 25,6 GB/s | ||||||
| Max PCIe lanes | 6 | 12 | ||||||
| TDP | 6 W | 15 W | ||||||
| GPU integrated graphics | AMD Radeon R4 Mobile Graphics (Stoney) | Intel HD Graphics 4400 Mobile | ||||||
| GPU cores | 3 | — | ||||||
| GPU execution units | — | 20 | ||||||
| GPU shading units | 192 | 160 | ||||||
| GPU base clock | 600 MHz | 200 MHz | ||||||
| GPU boost clock | 655 MHz | 1100 MHz | ||||||
| GPU FP32 floating point | 251,5 GFLOPS | 304 GFLOPS | ||||||
| Socket | BGA | BGA1168 | ||||||
| Maximum temperature | 90°C | 100°C | ||||||
| CPU-Z single thread | 139 | 257 | ||||||
| CPU-Z multi thread | 233 | 712 | ||||||
| Cinebench R15 single thread | 37 | 110 | ||||||
| Cinebench R15 multi-thread | 73 | 250 | ||||||
| PassMark single thread | 879 | 1. 488 |
||||||
| PassMark CPU Mark | 1.098 | 2.486 | ||||||
| (Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 single core |
1.351 | 2.955 | ||||||
| (Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 multi-core |
1.951 | 5.365 | ||||||
| (SGEMM) GFLOPS performance |
14,84 GFLOPS | 88,6 GFLOPS | ||||||
| (Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio |
325 pts / W | 358 pts / W | ||||||
| Amazon | ||||||||
| eBay |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
We see that the two processors have an equivalent number of cores, the turbo frequency of Intel Core i5-4300U is bigger, that the PDT of AMD A6-9220e is lower. The AMD A6-9220e was designed earlier.
Performances :
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.
| CPU-Z — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-4300U |
257 712 |
| AMD A6-9220e |
139 233 |
In single core, the difference is 85%.
In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 206%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.
| Cinebench R15 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-4300U |
110 250 |
| AMD A6-9220e |
37 73 |
In single core, the difference is 197%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 242%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.
| PassMark — CPU Mark & single thread | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-4300U |
1.488 2.486 |
| AMD A6-9220e |
879 1.098 |
In single core, the difference is 69%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 126%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.
On Windows 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-4300U |
2.955 5.365 |
| AMD A6-9220e |
1.351 1.951 |
In single core, the difference is 119%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 175%.
On Linux 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-4300U |
3.  2765.174 |
| AMD A6-9220e |
1.538 2.134 |
In single core, the difference is 113%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 142%.
On Android 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Android 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-4300U |
3.072 5.033 |
| AMD A6-9220e |
1.100 1.474 |
In single core, the difference is 179%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 241%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing.
This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
Equivalence:
AMD A6-9220e Intel equivalentIntel Core i5-4300U AMD equivalent
See also:
AMD A6-9220AMD A6-9220C
Intel Core i5-4300M
AMD A6-9220 vs Intel Core i5-5200U
|
|
|
|
|
AMD A6-9220 vs Intel Core i5-5200U
Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the AMD A6-9220 on one side and the Intel Core i5-5200U on the other side. The first is dedicated to the notebook sector, It has 2 cores, 2 threads, a maximum frequency of 2,9GHz. The second is used on the laptop segment, it has a total of 2 cores, 4 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 2,7 GHz.
The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specifications:
| Processor | AMD A6-9220 | Intel Core i5-5200U | ||||||
| Market (main) | Notebook | Laptop | ||||||
| ISA | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) | ||||||
| Microarchitecture | Excavator | Broadwell | ||||||
| Core name | Stoney Ridge | Broadwell-U | ||||||
| Family | A6-9000 | Core i5-5000 | ||||||
| Part number(s), S-Spec |
AM9220AYN23AC |
FH8065801620204, |
||||||
| Release date | Q2 2017 | Q1 2015 | ||||||
| Lithography | 28 nm | 14 nm | ||||||
| Transistors | 1. 200.000.000 |
1.300.000.000 | ||||||
| Cores | 2 | 2 | ||||||
| Threads | 2 | 4 | ||||||
| Base frequency | 2,5 GHz | 2,2 GHz | ||||||
| Turbo frequency | 2,9 GHz | 2,7 GHz | ||||||
| Cache memory | 1 MB | 3 MB | ||||||
| Max memory capacity | 8 GB | 16 GB | ||||||
| Memory types |
DDR4-2133 |
DDR3L 1333/1600, |
||||||
| Max # of memory channels | 1 | 2 | ||||||
| Max memory bandwidth | 17,1 GB/s | 25,6 GB/s | ||||||
| Max PCIe lanes | 6 | 12 | ||||||
| TDP | 15 W | 15 W | ||||||
| GPU integrated graphics | AMD Radeon R4 Mobile Graphics (Stoney) | Intel HD Graphics 5500 | ||||||
| GPU cores | 3 | — | ||||||
| GPU execution units | — | 24 | ||||||
| GPU shading units | 192 | 192 | ||||||
| GPU base clock | 200 MHz | 300 MHz | ||||||
| GPU boost clock | 655 MHz | 900 MHz | ||||||
| GPU FP32 floating point | 251,5 GFLOPS | 364,8 GFLOPS | ||||||
| Socket | BGA | BGA1168 | ||||||
| Maximum temperature | 90°C | 105°C | ||||||
| CPU-Z single thread | 166 | 224 | ||||||
| CPU-Z multi thread | 284 | 761 | ||||||
| Cinebench R15 single thread | 68 | 110 | ||||||
| Cinebench R15 multi-thread | 110 | 260 | ||||||
| PassMark single thread | 1. 120 |
1.506 | ||||||
| PassMark CPU Mark | 1.252 | 2.499 | ||||||
| (Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 single core |
1.669 | 2.818 | ||||||
| (Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 multi-core |
2.490 | 5.175 | ||||||
| (SGEMM) GFLOPS performance |
29,22 GFLOPS | 54,5 GFLOPS | ||||||
| (Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio |
166 pts / W | 345 pts / W | ||||||
| Amazon | ||||||||
| eBay |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
We see that the two processors have an equivalent number of cores, the maximum frequency of AMD A6-9220 is greater, that their respective TDP are of the same order. The AMD A6-9220 was designed earlier.
Performances :
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.
| CPU-Z — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-5200U |
224 761 |
| AMD A6-9220 |
166 284 |
In single core, the difference is 35%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 168%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.
| Cinebench R15 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-5200U |
110 260 |
| AMD A6-9220 |
68 110 |
In single core, the difference is 62%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 136%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.
| PassMark — CPU Mark & single thread | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-5200U |
1.506 2.499 |
| AMD A6-9220 |
1.120 1.252 |
In single core, the difference is 34%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 100%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.
On Windows 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-5200U |
2.818 5.175 |
| AMD A6-9220 |
1.669 2.490 |
In single core, the difference is 69%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 108%.
On Linux 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-5200U |
2. 5.074 |
| AMD A6-9220 |
1.791 2.432 |
In single core, the difference is 64%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 109%.
On Android 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Android 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-5200U |
2.436 4.184 |
| AMD A6-9220 |
2.081 3.127 |
In single core, the difference is 17%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 34%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
Equivalence:
AMD A6-9220 Intel equivalentIntel Core i5-5200U AMD equivalent
See also:
AMD A6-9220CAMD A6-9220eAMD A6-9225
AMD A6-3400M vs Intel Core i5-3230M: comparison
AMD A6-3400M
Intel Core i5-3230M
VS
AMD A6-3400M
Rating: 1 points
WINNER
Intel Core i5-3230M
Rating: 6 points
Test results
Performance
Memory specification
Interfaces and communications
3
3 Main characteristics
nine0010
Top specifications and features
- Heat dissipation (TDP)
- Technological process
- Number of transistors
- Number of Cores
- CPU base clock
Thermal Dissipation (TDP)
AMD A6-3400M: 35 W
Intel Core i5-3230M: 35 W
Process
AMD A6-3400M: 32 nm
Intel Core i5-3230M: 22 nm
Number of transistors
AMD A6-3400M: 1178 million
Intel Core i5-3230M: 1200 million
Cores
AMD A6-3400M: 4
Intel Core i5-3230M: 2
CPU base clock
AMD A6-3400M: 1. 4 GHz
Intel Core i5-3230M: 2.6 GHz
Description
AMD A6-3400M processor runs at 1.4Hz, second Intel Core i5-3230M runs at 2.6Hz. AMD A6-3400M is capable of overclocking up to 2.3 Hz, and the second up to 3.2 Hz. The maximum power consumption of the first processor is 35W, while the Intel Core i5-3230M has 35W. nine0003
In terms of architecture, AMD A6-3400M is based on 32nm technology. Intel Core i5-3230M on 22 nm architecture.
Regarding processor memory. AMD A6-3400M can support DDR No data available. Maximum supported size N/A MB. It should be noted that the maximum memory bandwidth is 17.1. The second processor Intel Core i5-3230M is capable of supporting DDR3. The throughput is 25.6. And the maximum amount of supported RAM is 32 MB. nine0003
Graphics. AMD A6-3400M has a graphics core No data available. The frequency of which is — 400 MHz. The Intel Core i5-3230M received the Intel HD Graphics 4000 video core. Here the frequency is 650 MHz.
How processors perform in benchmarks. In the PassMark benchmark, the AMD A6-3400M scored No data. And the Intel Core i5-3230M scored 2592 points.
Why Intel Core i5-3230M is better than AMD A6-3400M
- Number of cores 4 vs. 2, 100% more
- L2 cache size 4 MB vs. 0.5 MB, 700% more
- L1 cache size 512 KB vs 128 KB, 300% more
Comparison AMD A6-3400M and Intel Core i5-3230M: Main points
AMD A6-3400M
Intel Core i5-3230M
CREASH R111.5 /64BIT (MUTHITI) Assess
1.782
max 45.3622
Average: 5.3
2.889
max 45.3622
Average: 5.3
Number of threads
The more threads, the higher the performance of the processor, and it will be able to perform several tasks at the same time.
Show all
four
max 256
Average: 10.7
four
max 256
Average: 10.7
L1 cache size
A large amount of L1 memory accelerates results in the CPU and system performance settings
Show all
512KB
max 4608
Average: 299.3 KB
128KB
max 4608
Average: 299.3 KB
L2 Cache Size
L2 cache with large scratchpad memory to increase processor speed and overall system performance.
Show all
4MB
max 512
Average: 4. 5 MB
0.5MB
max 512
Average: 4.5 MB
Maximum Turbo Clock Speed
When the processor speed drops below its limit, it can jump to a higher clock speed to improve performance.
Show all
2.3GHz
max 5.5
Average: 3.2 GHz
3.2GHz
max 5.5
Average: 3.2 GHz
nine0003
Number of cores
four
max 72
Mean: 5.8
2
max 72
Mean: 5.8
Processor base clock speed
1. 4GHz
max 4.7
Average: 2.5 GHz
2.6GHz
max 4.7
Average: 2.5 GHz
Max. number of processors in configuration
1
Mean: 1.3
1
Mean: 1.3
Max. memory bandwidth
This is the speed at which the device stores or reads information.
17.1GB/s
max 352
Average: 41.4 GB/s
25.6GB/s
max 352
Average: 41.4 GB/s
OpenCL
1. 2
max 4.6
Average: 4.1
max 4.6
Average: 4.1
sse version
Allows you to speed up multimedia tasks (such as volume control). Each subsequent version has a number of improvements
Show all
four
max 4.2
Average: 4.1
max 4.2
Average: 4.1
nine0003
SOCKET 9000
32 nm
Average: 36.8 nm
22 nm
Average: 36.8 nm
Number of transistors
The higher the number, the more powerful the processor is
1178 million
max 57000
Average: 1517. 3 million
1200 million
max 57000
Average: 1517.3 million
Heat dissipation (TDP)
Heat dissipation requirement (TDP) is the maximum amount of energy that can be dissipated by the cooling system. The lower the TDP, the less power will be consumed.
Show all
35W
Average: 67.6 W
35W
Average: 67.6 W
GPU base clock
The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a high clock speed.
400MHz
max 2400
Average: 535.8 MHz
650MHz
max 2400
Average: 535. 8 MHz
Supports 64-bit system
A 64-bit system can support more than 4 GB of RAM, unlike a 32-bit system. This increases productivity. It also allows you to run 64-bit applications.
Show all
Yes
Yes
Monitor support
Multiple monitors can be connected to the device, which makes it easier to work by increasing the working space.
Show all
3
Mean: 2.9
3
Mean: 2.9
Code name
Llano
Ivy Bridge
Purpose
Laptop
Mobile
nine0010
FAQ
Can AMD A6-3400M and Intel Core i5-3230M work in 4K mode?
AMD A6-3400M — Not available. Intel Core i5-3230M — No data.
How many PCIe lanes
AMD A6-3400M — Not available. Intel Core i5-3230M — 16.
How much RAM do they support?
AMD A6-3400M supports No GB data. Intel Core i5-3230M supports 32GB.
How fast are the processors?
AMD A6-3400M operates at 1.4 GHz.6 GHz. nine0003
How many cores does the processor have?
AMD A6-3400M has 4 cores. Intel Core i5-3230M has 2 cores.
Do the processors support ECC memory?
AMD A6-3400M — Not available. Intel Core i5-3230M — no.
Does the AMD A6-3400M have integrated graphics?
AMD A6-3400M — Not available. Intel Core i5-3230M — Intel HD Graphics 4000
What kind of RAM does the
AMD A6-3400M support DDRUnknown. The Intel Core i5-3230M supports DDR3. nine0003
What is the socket of the processors?
FS1 is used to install AMD A6-3400M. The FCBGA1023 is used to install the Intel Core i5-3230M.
What architecture is used?
AMD A6-3400M is based on the Llano architecture. The Intel Core i5-3230M is based on the Ivy Bridge architecture.
Is the AMD A6-3400M multiplier unlocked?
AMD A6-3400M — Not available. Intel Core i5-3230M — No data.
How do processors perform in benchmarks? nine0009
PassMark scored an AMD A6-3400M No data points. Intel Core i5-3230M scored 2592 points.
What is the maximum frequency of the processors?
The maximum frequency of AMD A6-3400M reaches 2.3 Hz. The maximum frequency of the Intel Core i5-3230M reaches 3.2 Hz.
How much energy do they consume?
The power consumption of the AMD A6-3400M can be up to 35 watts. The Intel Core i5-3230M has up to 35 watts.
AMD A6-3400M
VS
Intel Core i5-3230M
nine0003
Intel Core i7-7500U
VS
Intel Core i7-7Y75
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
VS
Intel Core i5-6600K
AMD FX-6300
VS
Intel Core i5-6600
AMD Athlon Gold 3150U
VS
AMD Ryzen 5 4500U
Intel Core i7-2600K
VS
Intel Core i7-3770
Intel Core i9-7900X
VS
Intel Xeon E5-2698 v4
AMD FX-8370
VS
Intel Core i7-7700K
nine0003
Intel Core i3-10110U
VS
Intel Core i3-2370M
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
VS
Intel Core i5-6500
Intel Core i5-2400
VS
Intel Core i5-7400
Intel Core i3-8100
VS
Intel Core i3-8300
AMD FX-6300
VS
Intel Core i7-6700
Intel Core i7-4790K
VS
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
Intel Core i5-10600K
VS
Intel Core i5-9600K
AMD Ryzen 3 1300X
VS
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
Intel Core i5-2500
VS
Intel Core i7-3770
Intel Core i5-6400
VS
Intel Core i5-7500
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
VS
Intel Core i7-10510U
Intel Core i3-8100
VS
Intel Core i5-2400
6-core 12-thread Intel Core i5-10500 falls behind AMD Ryzen 5 3600X in SiSoftware
benchmark
Blogs
id_1 A reward has been added for the post
Achievements of the novelty are not impressive yet.
recommendations
Despite the mysterious silence on the part of Intel representatives, who are not in a hurry to share details with the computer community about the new line of desktop processors codenamed Comet Lake-S, new items continually strive to appear in one test package or another: for example, today , thanks to the well-known enthusiast momomo_us, information has appeared on the network about the performance level of one of the yet unannounced models, which was seen in the popular SiSoftware benchmark. nine0003
Image Source: SiSoftware
Based on available data, the Intel Core i5-10500 processor has 6 Hyper-Threading Technology cores running at a base frequency of 3.1 GHz with boost up to 4.5 GHz at max. In the processor multi-media test (Processor Multi-Media), the novelty showed a result of 607.47 Mpix/s, and in the discipline that measures the level of cryptographic computing performance (Processor Cryptography (High Security)), the CPU achieved 10.