Amd a8 6410 vs intel i7: AMD A8-6410 APU R5 Graphics vs Intel Core i7-4510U

Core i7-12700K vs A8-6410 — How Many FPS

Availability

Intel Core i7-12700K Desktop Processor 12 (8P+4E) Cores up to 5.0 GHz Unlocked LGA1700 600 Series Chipset 125W

Buy on Amazon

$401.26

In Stock

Updated 1 minutes ago

Availability

No items available

Key Differences

In short — Core i7-12700K outperforms A8-6410 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value.

Advantages of Intel Core i7-12700K

Advantages of AMD A8-6410

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Resolution

1920×1080

Game Graphics

High

Core i7-12700K

Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021

FPS

844

100%

Value, $/FPS

$0.48/FPS

100%

Price, $

$401.26

100%

FPS and Value Winner

Intel Core i7-12700K Desktop Processor 12 (8P+4E) Cores up to 5.0 GHz Unlocked LGA1700 600 Series Chipset 125W

Buy for $401. 26 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 1 minutes ago

A8-6410

Value, $/FPS

Price, $

Resolution

1920×1080

Game Graphics

High

Core i7-12700K

Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021

A8-6410

1360

FPS

723

FPS

League of Legends

345

FPS

175

FPS

Grand Theft Auto V

599

FPS

307

FPS

VALORANT

844

FPS

435

FPS

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

383

FPS

186

FPS

Apex Legends

Geekbench 5 Benchmarks

Core i7-12700K

Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021

Single-Core

1898

100%

Multi-Core

13767

100%

A8-6410

Single-Core

254

-547%

Multi-Core

743

-1653%

Intel Core i7-12700K	vs	AMD A8-6410
Nov 4th, 2021	Release Date	Unknown
Core i7	Collection	Not Available
Alder Lake	Codename	Beema
Intel Socket 1700	Socket	BGA769 (FT3b)
Desktop	Segment
12	Cores	4
20	Threads	4
3. 6 GHz	Base Clock Speed	2.0 GHz
5.0 GHz	Turbo Clock Speed	2.4 GHz
125 W	TDP	15 W
10 nm	Process Size	Not Available
36.0x	Multiplier	Not Available
UHD Graphics 770	Integrated Graphics	Radeon R5 Series
Yes	Overclockable	No

Builds Using Core i7-12700K or A8-6410

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, 1080p, High

Centaurus Warlock 2 Intel i7-12700K 12-Core 4.7GHz TB, 16GB RAM, Radeon RX 6600 XT, 1TB NVMe SSD, Liquid Cooled, Windows 11 PRO, Tempered Glass, RGB, WiFi. 4K Gaming Professional PC

610 FPS

$2.46/FPS

Radeon RX 6600 XT

Core i7-12700K

16 GB, 1 TB SSD

Buy on Amazon

$1,498

In Stock

Updated 95 minutes ago

MSI Aegis RS (Tower) Gaming Desktop PC

756 FPS

$2. 88/FPS

GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

Core i7-12700K

16 GB, 1 TB SSD

Buy on Amazon

$2,174

In Stock

Updated 101 minutes ago

Skytech Chronos Gaming PC

808 FPS

$2.98/FPS

GeForce RTX 3080

Core i7-12700K

16 GB, 1 TB SSD

Buy on Amazon

$2,403.93

In Stock

Updated 100 minutes ago

MSI Aegis RS (Tower) Gaming Desktop PC

685 FPS

$3.01/FPS

GeForce RTX 3070

Core i7-12700K

16 GB, 1 TB SSD

Buy on Amazon

$2,058.99

In Stock

Updated 101 minutes ago

2022 MSI Aegis RS 12TD-260US (i7-12700K, 16GB RAM, 1TB NVMe SSD, RTX 3070 8GB, Windows 11) Gaming Desktop PC

685 FPS

$3.01/FPS

GeForce RTX 3070

Core i7-12700K

16 GB, 1 TB SSD

Buy on Amazon

$2,065

In Stock

Updated 98 minutes ago

2022 MSI Aegis RS 12TE-258US (i7-12700K, 16GB RAM, 2TB NVMe SSD, RTX 3070Ti 8GB, Windows 11) Gaming Desktop PC

756 FPS

$3. 04/FPS

GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

Core i7-12700K

16 GB, 2 TB SSD

Buy on Amazon

$2,299

In Stock

Updated 101 minutes ago

Skytech Chronos Gaming PC

808 FPS

$3.09/FPS

GeForce RTX 3080

Core i7-12700K

32 GB, 1 TB SSD

Buy on Amazon

$2,499.99

In Stock

Updated 95 minutes ago

Dell XPS 8950 Desktop PC

521 FPS

$3.1/FPS

GeForce RTX 3060

Core i7-12700K

16 GB, 512 GB SSD + 1 TB HDD

Buy on Amazon

$1,617

In Stock

Updated 97 minutes ago

MSI Aegis RS (Tower) Gaming Desktop PC

808 FPS

$3.17/FPS

GeForce RTX 3080

Core i7-12700K

32 GB, 1 TB SSD + 2 TB HDD

Buy on Amazon

$2,558.21

In Stock

Updated 101 minutes ago

Acer Predator Orion 7000 PO7-640-UR11 Gaming Desktop PC

808 FPS

$3.22/FPS

GeForce RTX 3080

Core i7-12700K

32 GB, 2 TB HDD

Buy on Amazon

$2,599. 99

In Stock

Updated 97 minutes ago

Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Core i9-12900K

Core i7-12700K

$401.26

Core i7-12700K

$401.26

Core i9-11900K

Core i7-12700K

$401.26

Core i5-12600K

$277.99

Core i7-8700K

Core i7-12700K

$401.26

Core i7-11700K

$268.97

Core i7-12700K

$401.26

Core i7-10700K

$259.99

Core i7-12700K

$401.26

Core i7-9700K

Core i7-12700K

$401.26

Core i7-7700K

Core i7-12700K

$401.26

Core i7-12700K

$401.26

Core i7-4790K

AMD A8-6410 vs Intel Core i7-2630QM

Comparative analysis of AMD A8-6410 and Intel Core i7-2630QM processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization, Security & Reliability.
Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps).

AMD A8-6410

Buy on Amazon

Intel Core i7-2630QM

Buy on Amazon

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD A8-6410

CPU is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 4 month(s) later
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 28 nm vs 32 nm
2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 45 Watt
4. 4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s): 2.344 vs 0.53
Around 71% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 98.139 vs 57.448
8.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s): 6.441 vs 0.731

Launch date	1 June 2014 vs 3 January 2011
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm vs 32 nm
L2 cache	2 MB vs 1 MB
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt vs 45 Watt
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s)	2.344 vs 0.53
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	98.139 vs 57.448
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s)	6.441 vs 0.731

Reasons to consider the Intel Core i7-2630QM

4 more threads: 8 vs 4
Around 21% higher clock speed: 2.90 GHz vs 2.4 GHz
Around 11% higher maximum core temperature: 100 C vs 90°C
Around 55% better performance in PassMark — Single thread mark: 1218 vs 785
2x better performance in PassMark — CPU mark: 3554 vs 1769
2x better performance in Geekbench 4 — Single Core: 509 vs 252
2.5x better performance in Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core: 1837 vs 749
3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.313 vs 0.1
8.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 13. 909 vs 1.59

Number of threads	8 vs 4
Maximum frequency	2.90 GHz vs 2.4 GHz
Maximum core temperature	100 C vs 90°C
PassMark — Single thread mark	1218 vs 785
PassMark — CPU mark	3554 vs 1769
Geekbench 4 — Single Core	509 vs 252
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core	1837 vs 749
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s)	0. 313 vs 0.1
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	13.909 vs 1.59

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD A8-6410
CPU 2: Intel Core i7-2630QM

PassMark — Single thread mark

CPU 1

CPU 2

PassMark — CPU mark

CPU 1

CPU 2

Geekbench 4 — Single Core

CPU 1

CPU 2

Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core

CPU 1

CPU 2

CompuBench 1.

5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s)

CPU 1

CPU 2

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

CPU 1

CPU 2

98.139

57.448

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s)

CPU 1

CPU 2

CompuBench 1.

5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s)

CPU 1

CPU 2

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

CPU 1

CPU 2

13.909

Name	AMD A8-6410	Intel Core i7-2630QM
PassMark — Single thread mark	785	1218
PassMark — CPU mark	1769	3554
Geekbench 4 — Single Core	252	509
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core	749	1837
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s)	2.344	0.53
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	98.139	57.448
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.1	0.313
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s)	6.441	0.731
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	1.59	13.909
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	685
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames)	1097
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames)	3853
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	685
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps)	1097
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps)	3853

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD A8-6410	Intel Core i7-2630QM
Architecture codename	Beema	Sandy Bridge
Family	AMD A-Series Processors
Launch date	1 June 2014	3 January 2011
OPN Tray	AM6410ITJ44JB
Place in performance rating	1788	2128
Series	AMD A8-Series APU for Laptops	Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors
Vertical segment	Laptop	Mobile
Launch price (MSRP)		$185
Price now		$108. 24
Processor Number		i7-2630QM
Status		Launched
Value for money (0-100)		15.06
64 bit support
Base frequency	2 GHz	2.00 GHz
L2 cache	2 MB	1 MB
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	32 nm
Maximum core temperature	90°C	100 C
Maximum frequency	2. 4 GHz	2.90 GHz
Number of cores	4	4
Number of threads	4	8
Transistor count	930 Million	995 Million
Unlocked
Bus Speed		5 GT/s DMI
Die size		216 mm
L1 cache		256 KB
L3 cache		6 MB
Max memory channels	1	2
Supported memory frequency	1866 MHz
Supported memory types	DDR3L	DDR3 1066/1333
Maximum memory bandwidth		21. 3 GB/s
Maximum memory size		16 GB
Enduro
Graphics max frequency	847 MHz	1.1 GHz
Processor graphics	AMD Radeon R5 Graphics	Intel® HD Graphics 3000
Switchable graphics
Unified Video Decoder (UVD)
Video Codec Engine (VCE)
Device ID		0x116
Graphics base frequency		650 MHz
Graphics max dynamic frequency		1. 10 GHz
Intel® Clear Video HD technology
Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI)
Intel® InTru™ 3D technology
Intel® Quick Sync Video
DisplayPort
HDMI
CRT
eDP
Number of displays supported		2
SDVO
Wireless Display (WiDi) support
DirectX	12
Vulkan
Sockets supported	FT3b	FCPGA988
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt	45 Watt
Low Halogen Options Available
Max number of CPUs in a configuration		1
Package Size		37. 5mm x 37.5 (rPGA998)
PCI Express revision	2.0	2.0
Max number of PCIe lanes		16
PCIe configurations		1×16, 2×8, 1×8+2×4
AMD App Acceleration
AMD Elite Experiences
AMD HD3D technology
Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP)
Fused Multiply-Add (FMA)
Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4)
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX)
Intel® AES New Instructions
PowerGating
PowerNow
VirusProtect
4G WiMAX Wireless
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology
Flexible Display interface (FDI)
Idle States
Instruction set extensions		Intel® AVX
Intel 64
Intel® Demand Based Switching
Intel® Fast Memory Access
Intel® Flex Memory Access
Intel® Hyper-Threading technology
Intel® My WiFi technology
Intel® Turbo Boost technology
Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility
Thermal Monitoring
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™)
IOMMU 2. 0
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x)
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d)
Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT)
Anti-Theft technology
Execute Disable Bit (EDB)
Intel® Identity Protection technology
Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT)

AMD A8-6410 vs Intel Core i7-7500U

AMD A8-6410 vs Intel Core i7-7500U

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the AMD A8-6410 on one side and the Intel Core i7-7500U on the other side. The first is dedicated to the notebook sector, It has 4 cores, 4 threads, a maximum frequency of 2,4GHz. The second is used on the mid-range laptop segment, it has a total of 2 cores, 4 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 3,5 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.

Specifications:

Processor	AMD A8-6410	Intel Core i7-7500U
Market (main)	Notebook	Mid-range laptop
ISA	x86-64 (64 bit)	x86-64 (64 bit)
Microarchitecture	Puma	Kaby Lake
Core name	Beema	Kaby Lake-U
Family	A8-6000	Core i7-7000
Part number(s), S-Spec	AM6410ITJ44JB	FJ8067702739740, SR341, SR2ZV
Release date	Q2 2014	Q3 2016
Lithography	28 nm	14 nm+
Transistors	930. 000.000	—
Cores	4	2
Threads	4	4
Base frequency	2,0 GHz	2,7 GHz
Turbo frequency	2,4 GHz	3,5 GHz
Cache memory	2 MB	4 MB
Max memory capacity	8 GB	32 GB
Memory types	DDR3L-1866	DDR4-2133, LPDDR3-1866, DDR3L-1600
Max # of memory channels	1	2
Max PCIe lanes	8	12
TDP	15 W	15 W
GPU integrated graphics	AMD Radeon R5 Graphics (Beema)	Intel HD Graphics 620
GPU cores	8	—
GPU execution units	—	24
GPU shading units	128	192
GPU base clock	800 MHz	300 MHz
GPU boost clock	847 MHz	1050 MHz
GPU FP32 floating point	216,8 GFLOPS	403,2 GFLOPS
Socket	BGA769, FT3b	BGA1356
Maximum temperature	90°C	100°C
CPU-Z single thread	126	247
CPU-Z multi thread	462	876
Cinebench R15 single thread	49	144
Cinebench R15 multi-thread	164	339
Cinebench R23 single thread	217	834
Cinebench R23 multi-thread	811	2. 111
PassMark single thread	781	1.947
PassMark CPU Mark	1.759	3.635
(Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 single core	1.213	3.784
(Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 multi-core	3.136	7.291
(SGEMM) GFLOPS performance	22,8 GFLOPS	108 GFLOPS
(Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio	209 pts / W	486 pts / W
Amazon
eBay

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.

Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

The processor AMD A8-6410 has more cores, the turbo frequency of Intel Core i7-7500U is bigger, that their respective TDP are of the same order. The Intel Core i7-7500U was started more recently.

Performances :

Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.

	CPU-Z — Multi-thread & single thread score
Intel Core i7-7500U	247 876
AMD A8-6410	126 462

In single core, the difference is 96%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 90%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.

	Cinebench R15 — Multi-thread & single thread score
Intel Core i7-7500U	144 339
AMD A8-6410	49 164

In single core, the difference is 194%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 107%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.

	Cinebench R23 — Multi-thread & single thread score
Intel Core i7-7500U	834 2.111
AMD A8-6410	217 811

In single core, the difference is 284%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 160%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Cinebench R23 is cross-platform testing software that allows you to assess the hardware capabilities of a device such as a computer, tablet, server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant. The test scene contains no less than 2,000 objects and more than 300,000 polygons in total.

	PassMark — CPU Mark & single thread
Intel Core i7-7500U	1.947 3.635
AMD A8-6410	781 1.759

In single core, the difference is 149%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 107%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.

On Windows 64-bit:

	Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows 64-bit
Intel Core i7-7500U	3.784 7.291
AMD A8-6410	1.213 3.136

In single core, the difference is 212%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 132%.

On Linux 64-bit:

	Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux 64-bit
Intel Core i7-7500U	4.126 7.296
AMD A8-6410	1.019 1.961

In single core, the difference is 305%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 272%.

On Android 64-bit:

	Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Android 64-bit
Intel Core i7-7500U	3.705 6.509
AMD A8-6410	1.209 3.294

In single core, the difference is 206%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 98%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.

Equivalence:

AMD A8-6410 Intel equivalentIntel Core i7-7500U AMD equivalent

Lenovo G50 15.6″ AMD A8-6410 2GHz / 4GB / 500GB vs Toshiba Portege Z30 13.3″ Intel i7-4600U 2.1GHz / 8GB / 256GB: What is the difference?

29points

Lenovo G50 15.6″ AMD A8-6410 2GHz / 4GB / 500GB

39points

Toshiba Portege Z30 13. 3″ Intel i7-4600U 2.1GHz / 8GB / 256GB

Comparison winner

108 facts in comparison

Lenovo G50 15.6″ AMD A8-6410 2GHz / 4GB / 500GB

Toshiba Portege Z30 13.3″ Intel i7-4600U 2.1GHz / 8GB / 256GB

Why is Lenovo G50 15.6″ AMD A8-6410 2GHz / 4GB / 500GB better than Toshiba Portege Z30 13.3″ Intel i7-4600U 2.1GHz / 8GB / 256GB?

244GB more internal storage?
500GBvs256GB
17.29% bigger screen size?
15.6″vs13.3″
1.9x faster CPU speed?
4 x 2GHzvs2 x 2.1GHz
4 more CPU threads?
8vs4
Has an optical disc drive?
2 more USB 2.0 ports?
2vs0

Why is Toshiba Portege Z30 13.3″ Intel i7-4600U 2.1GHz / 8GB / 256GB better than Lenovo G50 15.6″ AMD A8-6410 2GHz / 4GB / 500GB?

Has a backlit keyboard?
4GB more RAM memory?
8GBvs4GB
916.3g lighter?
1. 18kgvs2.1kg
7.25h longer battery life?
12.25hvs5h
Has a touch screen?
17% higher pixel density?
117ppivs100ppi
Uses flash storage?
8.93mm thinner?
13.97mmvs22.9mm

Which are the most popular comparisons?

Lenovo G50 15.6″ AMD A8-6410 2GHz / 4GB / 500GB

HP Notebook 15-af148ca 15.6″ AMD A-Series A8-7410 2.2GHz / 8GB / 1TB

Toshiba Portege Z30 13.3″ Intel i7-4600U 2.1GHz / 8GB / 256GB

Toshiba Portege Z30-C1320 13.3″ Intel Core i7-6600U 2.6GHz / 8GB / 256GB

Lenovo G50 15.6″ AMD A8-6410 2GHz / 4GB / 500GB

Asus Vivobook 15 K513 Intel Core i7-1165G7 2.8GHz / 8GB RAM / 512GB SSD

Toshiba Portege Z30 13.3″ Intel i7-4600U 2.1GHz / 8GB / 256GB

Toshiba Portege Z30T 13.3″ Intel Core i7-5600U 2.6GHz / 8GB / 256GB

Lenovo G50 15.6″ AMD A8-6410 2GHz / 4GB / 500GB

Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE 15. 6″ Intel Core i9-8950HK 2.9GHz / 16GB / 1TB SSD

Lenovo G50 15.6″ AMD A8-6410 2GHz / 4GB / 500GB

Apple MacBook Pro (2021) 16.2″ Apple M1 Max / 32GB RAM / 1TB SSD

Lenovo G50 15.6″ AMD A8-6410 2GHz / 4GB / 500GB

LG Gram 13 13.3″ Intel Core i5-5200U 2.2GHz / 8GB / 128GB

Lenovo G50 15.6″ AMD A8-6410 2GHz / 4GB / 500GB

Asus BR1100C 11.6″ Intel Celeron N4500 1.1GHz / 8GB RAM / 1TB SSD

Lenovo G50 15.6″ AMD A8-6410 2GHz / 4GB / 500GB

Asus ROG Strix G15 Intel Core i5-10300H 2.5GHz / 8GB RAM / 1TB SSD

Lenovo G50 15.6″ AMD A8-6410 2GHz / 4GB / 500GB

Lenovo IdeaPad 330 14” AMD A9-9425 3.1GHz / 4GB RAM / 1TB HDD

Lenovo G50 15.6″ AMD A8-6410 2GHz / 4GB / 500GB

Lenovo IdeaPad 330 15.6” Intel Core i3-7020U 2.3GHz / 4GB RAM / 1TB HDD

Lenovo G50 15.6″ AMD A8-6410 2GHz / 4GB / 500GB

Lenovo IdeaPad 330 14” AMD A4-9125 2.3GHz / 4GB RAM / 1TB HDD

Price comparison

User reviews

Overall Rating

Lenovo G50 15. 6″ AMD A8-6410 2GHz / 4GB / 500GB

1 User reviews

Lenovo G50 15.6″ AMD A8-6410 2GHz / 4GB / 500GB

7.0/10

1 User reviews

Toshiba Portege Z30 13.3″ Intel i7-4600U 2.1GHz / 8GB / 256GB

0 User reviews

Toshiba Portege Z30 13.3″ Intel i7-4600U 2.1GHz / 8GB / 256GB

0.0/10

0 User reviews

Features

Build quality

7.0/10

1 votes

No reviews yet

Portability

4.0/10

1 votes

No reviews yet

Battery life

8.0/10

1 votes

No reviews yet

Performance

7.0/10

1 votes

No reviews yet

Keyboard & trackpad

8.0/10

1 votes

No reviews yet

Display

1.resolution

1366 x 768px

Resolution is an essential indicator of a screen’s image quality, representing the maximum amount of pixels that can be shown on the screen. The resolution is given as a compound value, comprised of horizontal and vertical pixels.

2.pixel density

100ppi

117ppi

Pixel density is a measurement of a screen’s resolution, expressed as the number of pixels per inch (PPI) on the screen. A higher pixel density translates into more clarity and sharpness for the images rendered on the screen, thus improving the quality of the viewing experience.

3.has a touch screen

✖Lenovo G50 15.6″ AMD A8-6410 2GHz / 4GB / 500GB

✔Toshiba Portege Z30 13.3″ Intel i7-4600U 2.1GHz / 8GB / 256GB

You can operate the device easily, by pressing the screen with your fingers.

4.has anti-reflection coating

✖Lenovo G50 15.6″ AMD A8-6410 2GHz / 4GB / 500GB

✖Toshiba Portege Z30 13.3″ Intel i7-4600U 2.1GHz / 8GB / 256GB

This helps to reduce the reflection from your device.

5. brightness

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Lenovo G50 15.6″ AMD A8-6410 2GHz / 4GB / 500GB)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Toshiba Portege Z30 13.3″ Intel i7-4600U 2.1GHz / 8GB / 256GB)

A nit is a measurement of the light that a display emits, equal to one candela per square meter. Brighter displays ensure a screen’s contents are easy to read, even in sunny conditions.

6.screen size

The bigger the screen size is, the better the user experience.

7.refresh rate

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Lenovo G50 15.6″ AMD A8-6410 2GHz / 4GB / 500GB)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Toshiba Portege Z30 13.3″ Intel i7-4600U 2.1GHz / 8GB / 256GB)

The frequency at which the screen is refreshed. Higher frequency results in less flickering (less noise) and more natural movement representation in action-intense scenes.

8. has an LED-backlit display

✔Lenovo G50 15.6″ AMD A8-6410 2GHz / 4GB / 500GB

✔Toshiba Portege Z30 13.3″ Intel i7-4600U 2.1GHz / 8GB / 256GB

Uses LED backlighting, resulting in better image quality, more vibrant colors and richer blacks.

9.has an IPS screen

✖Lenovo G50 15.6″ AMD A8-6410 2GHz / 4GB / 500GB

✖Toshiba Portege Z30 13.3″ Intel i7-4600U 2.1GHz / 8GB / 256GB

IPS (In-Plane Switching) is a technology used for LCDs. It was designed to overcome the main limitations of conventional twisted nematic TFT displays: limited viewing angles and low-quality color reproduction. PLS (Plane-to-Line Switching) is a type of IPS screen developed by Samsung, with increased brightness and lower production costs.

Performance

Random-access memory (RAM) is a form of volatile memory used to store working data and machine code currently in use. It is a quick-access, temporary virtual storage that can be read and changed in any order, thus enabling fast data processing.

2.RAM speed

1600MHz

It can support faster memory, which will give quicker system performance.

3.Uses flash storage

✖Lenovo G50 15.6″ AMD A8-6410 2GHz / 4GB / 500GB

✔Toshiba Portege Z30 13.3″ Intel i7-4600U 2.1GHz / 8GB / 256GB

Flash-based storage devices such as SSDs have no mechanical components. Due to this, they are typically faster, run silently, and are more shock resistant than traditional HDDs.

4.internal storage

The internal storage refers to the built-in storage space available in a device for system data, apps, and user-generated data. With a large amount of internal storage, you can save more files and apps on your device.

5.CPU speed

4 x 2GHz

2 x 2.1GHz

The CPU speed indicates how many processing cycles per second can be executed by a CPU, considering all of its cores (processing units). It is calculated by adding the clock rates of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors employing different microarchitectures, of each group of cores.

6.CPU threads

More threads result in faster performance and better multitasking.

7.Is an NVMe SSD

✖Lenovo G50 15.6″ AMD A8-6410 2GHz / 4GB / 500GB

✖Toshiba Portege Z30 13.3″ Intel i7-4600U 2.1GHz / 8GB / 256GB

NVMe SSDs use the PCIe interface, which has a higher bandwidth than the SATA interface. This results in much faster read/write speeds compared to SSDs which use the SATA interface.

8.VRAM

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Lenovo G50 15.6″ AMD A8-6410 2GHz / 4GB / 500GB)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Toshiba Portege Z30 13.3″ Intel i7-4600U 2.1GHz / 8GB / 256GB)

VRAM (video RAM) is the dedicated memory of a graphics card. More VRAM generally allows you to run games at higher settings, especially for things like texture resolution.

9.GPU clock speed

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Lenovo G50 15.6″ AMD A8-6410 2GHz / 4GB / 500GB)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Toshiba Portege Z30 13.3″ Intel i7-4600U 2.1GHz / 8GB / 256GB)

The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a higher clock speed.

Benchmarks

1.Geekbench 5 result (multi)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Lenovo G50 15.6″ AMD A8-6410 2GHz / 4GB / 500GB)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Toshiba Portege Z30 13.3″ Intel i7-4600U 2.1GHz / 8GB / 256GB)

Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s multi-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)

2.Geekbench 5 result (single)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Lenovo G50 15.6″ AMD A8-6410 2GHz / 4GB / 500GB)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Toshiba Portege Z30 13.3″ Intel i7-4600U 2. 1GHz / 8GB / 256GB)

Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s single-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)

3.PassMark result

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Lenovo G50 15.6″ AMD A8-6410 2GHz / 4GB / 500GB)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Toshiba Portege Z30 13.3″ Intel i7-4600U 2.1GHz / 8GB / 256GB)

This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using multiple threads.

4.PassMark result (single)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Lenovo G50 15.6″ AMD A8-6410 2GHz / 4GB / 500GB)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Toshiba Portege Z30 13.3″ Intel i7-4600U 2.1GHz / 8GB / 256GB)

This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using a single thread.

5.Cinebench R20 (multi) result

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Lenovo G50 15.6″ AMD A8-6410 2GHz / 4GB / 500GB)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Toshiba Portege Z30 13.3″ Intel i7-4600U 2.1GHz / 8GB / 256GB)

Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s multi-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.

6.Cinebench R20 (single) result

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Lenovo G50 15.6″ AMD A8-6410 2GHz / 4GB / 500GB)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Toshiba Portege Z30 13.3″ Intel i7-4600U 2.1GHz / 8GB / 256GB)

Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s single-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.

Connectivity

1.USB 3.2 Gen 2 ports (USB-C)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Lenovo G50 15.6″ AMD A8-6410 2GHz / 4GB / 500GB)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Toshiba Portege Z30 13.3″ Intel i7-4600U 2.1GHz / 8GB / 256GB)

USB 3.2 Gen 2 supports speeds of up to 10Gbps. It was formerly known as USB 3.1 Gen 2. These ports use the USB-C connector.

2.USB 3.2 Gen 2 ports (USB-A)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Lenovo G50 15.6″ AMD A8-6410 2GHz / 4GB / 500GB)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Toshiba Portege Z30 13.3″ Intel i7-4600U 2.1GHz / 8GB / 256GB)

USB 3.2 Gen 2 supports speeds of up to 10Gbps. It was formerly known as USB 3.1 Gen 2. These ports use the older USB-A connector.

3.USB 4 20Gbps ports

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Lenovo G50 15.6″ AMD A8-6410 2GHz / 4GB / 500GB)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Toshiba Portege Z30 13.3″ Intel i7-4600U 2.1GHz / 8GB / 256GB)

This version of USB 4 supports speeds of up to 20Gbps. Unlike USB 3.2, USB 4 can dynamically allocate bandwidth to video and data. These ports use the USB-C connector.

4.USB 4 40Gbps ports

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Lenovo G50 15.6″ AMD A8-6410 2GHz / 4GB / 500GB)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Toshiba Portege Z30 13.3″ Intel i7-4600U 2.1GHz / 8GB / 256GB)

This version of USB 4 supports very high speeds of up to 40Gbps. Unlike USB 3.2, USB 4 can dynamically allocate bandwidth to video and data. These ports use the USB-C connector.

5.Thunderbolt 3 ports

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Lenovo G50 15.6″ AMD A8-6410 2GHz / 4GB / 500GB)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Toshiba Portege Z30 13.3″ Intel i7-4600U 2.1GHz / 8GB / 256GB)

The number of USB ports that are compatible with Thunderbolt 3. These ports support speeds of up to 40Gbps, including a minimum of PCIe 16Gbps. This guarantees that it can support one external 4K display.

6.Thunderbolt 4 ports

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Lenovo G50 15.6″ AMD A8-6410 2GHz / 4GB / 500GB)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Toshiba Portege Z30 13.3″ Intel i7-4600U 2. 1GHz / 8GB / 256GB)

The number of USB ports that are compatible with Thunderbolt 4. These ports support speeds of up to 40Gbps, including a minimum of PCIe 32Gbps. This guarantees that it can support two external 4K displays (or one external 8K display).

7.USB 3.2 Gen 1 ports (USB-C)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Lenovo G50 15.6″ AMD A8-6410 2GHz / 4GB / 500GB)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Toshiba Portege Z30 13.3″ Intel i7-4600U 2.1GHz / 8GB / 256GB)

USB 3.2 Gen 1 supports speeds of up to 5Gbps. It was formerly known as USB 3.1 Gen 1 and USB 3.0. These ports use the USB-C connector.

8.USB 3.2 Gen 1 ports (USB-A)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Lenovo G50 15.6″ AMD A8-6410 2GHz / 4GB / 500GB)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Toshiba Portege Z30 13.3″ Intel i7-4600U 2.1GHz / 8GB / 256GB)

USB 3.2 Gen 1 supports speeds of up to 5Gbps. It was formerly known as USB 3.1 Gen 1 and USB 3.0. These ports use the older USB-A connector.

9.has an HDMI output

✔Lenovo G50 15.6″ AMD A8-6410 2GHz / 4GB / 500GB

✔Toshiba Portege Z30 13.3″ Intel i7-4600U 2.1GHz / 8GB / 256GB

Devices with a HDMI or mini HDMI port can transfer high definition video and audio to a display.

Battery

1.Battery life

12.25h

The device’s battery life (when in use) as given by the manufacturer. With a longer battery life you have to charge the device less often.

2.charge time

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Lenovo G50 15.6″ AMD A8-6410 2GHz / 4GB / 500GB)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Toshiba Portege Z30 13.3″ Intel i7-4600U 2.1GHz / 8GB / 256GB)

The time it takes to fully charge the battery.

3.battery power

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Lenovo G50 15.6″ AMD A8-6410 2GHz / 4GB / 500GB)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Toshiba Portege Z30 13.3″ Intel i7-4600U 2.1GHz / 8GB / 256GB)

Battery power, or battery capacity, represents the amount of electrical energy that a battery can store. More battery power can be an indication of longer battery life.

4.Has sleep-and-charge USB ports

✔Lenovo G50 15.6″ AMD A8-6410 2GHz / 4GB / 500GB

✔Toshiba Portege Z30 13.3″ Intel i7-4600U 2.1GHz / 8GB / 256GB

Sleep-and-charge USB ports can charge electronic devices when the laptop is in sleep mode, hibernate mode, or even switched off.

5.Has a MagSafe power adapter

✖Lenovo G50 15.6″ AMD A8-6410 2GHz / 4GB / 500GB

✖Toshiba Portege Z30 13.3″ Intel i7-4600U 2.1GHz / 8GB / 256GB

The MagSafe power adapter uses a power connector that is attached magnetically. When pulled or tugged, the connector will come out of the socket safely.

Features

1.has stereo speakers

✔Lenovo G50 15.6″ AMD A8-6410 2GHz / 4GB / 500GB

✔Toshiba Portege Z30 13.3″ Intel i7-4600U 2.1GHz / 8GB / 256GB

Devices with stereo speakers deliver sound from independent channels on both left and right sides, creating a richer sound and a better experience.

2.has a socket for a 3.5 mm audio jack

✔Lenovo G50 15.6″ AMD A8-6410 2GHz / 4GB / 500GB

✔Toshiba Portege Z30 13.3″ Intel i7-4600U 2.1GHz / 8GB / 256GB

With a standard mini jack socket, you can use the device with most headphones.

3.megapixels (front camera)

The number of megapixels determines the resolution of the images captured with the front camera. A higher megapixel count means that the front camera is capable of capturing more details, an essential factor for taking high-resolution selfies.

4.Stylus included

✖Lenovo G50 15. 6″ AMD A8-6410 2GHz / 4GB / 500GB

✖Toshiba Portege Z30 13.3″ Intel i7-4600U 2.1GHz / 8GB / 256GB

A stylus is a pen-like accessory that allows you to interact with the touchscreen with greater precision, and is particularly useful for drawing and writing.

5.Has a fingerprint scanner

✖Lenovo G50 15.6″ AMD A8-6410 2GHz / 4GB / 500GB

✔Toshiba Portege Z30 13.3″ Intel i7-4600U 2.1GHz / 8GB / 256GB

The device has a fingerprint scanner which identifies the user.

6.number of microphones

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Lenovo G50 15.6″ AMD A8-6410 2GHz / 4GB / 500GB)

More microphones result in better sound quality and enable the device to filter out background noise.

7.Uses 3D facial recognition

✖Lenovo G50 15.6″ AMD A8-6410 2GHz / 4GB / 500GB

✖Toshiba Portege Z30 13.3″ Intel i7-4600U 2.1GHz / 8GB / 256GB

3D facial recognition systems, like Apple’s Face ID, provide secure biometric authentication for unlocking devices and authorizing mobile payments.

8.video recording (main camera)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Lenovo G50 15.6″ AMD A8-6410 2GHz / 4GB / 500GB)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Toshiba Portege Z30 13.3″ Intel i7-4600U 2.1GHz / 8GB / 256GB)

The maximum resolution available for videos shot with the main camera. Although it may be possible to choose among other frame rates, those recordings usually have lower resolutions.

9.has voice commands

✖Lenovo G50 15.6″ AMD A8-6410 2GHz / 4GB / 500GB

✖Toshiba Portege Z30 13.3″ Intel i7-4600U 2.1GHz / 8GB / 256GB

You can use your voice to control key functions of the device and you can easily access your device without pushing any button.

Price comparison

Cancel

Which are the best laptops?

AMD A8-6410 vs Intel Core i7-10875H

Comparing technical specs and benchmarks

AMD A8-6410 28 nm — 2.00 GHz DDR3L-1600 SO-DIMM

Intel Core i7-10875H 14 nm — 2. 30 GHz DDR4-2933

AMD A8-6410 vs. Intel Core i7-10875H

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

In comparison between AMD A8-6410 and Intel Core i7-10875H, you should choose the model which has more cores and threads with base and turbo frequencies. All the features influence the system’s high-speed performance.

Cores

no data

4 / 4

CPU Cores / Threads

8 / 16

normal

Core architecture

no data

Hyperthreading

Yes

Overclocking

2.00 GHz

Frequency

2.30 GHz

2.40 GHz

Turbo Frequency (1 Core)

5.10 GHz

2.40 GHz

Turbo Frequency (4 Cores)

no data

Turbo Frequency (8 Cores)

3.20 GHz

AMD A8-6410 vs. Intel Core i7-10875H

CPU generation and family

CPU Cores

AMD A8-6410

Name

no data

AMD A

Family

no data

AMD A8-6000

CPU group

no data

Generation

9. 5

Desktop / Server

Segment

no data

—

Predecessor

no data

—

Successor

no data

AMD A8-6410 vs. Intel Core i7-10875H

Internal Graphics

Some manufacturers build a graphic core in many CPUs being an additional advantage. If you use a video card which is separated from a CPU, we recommend you skip this comparison as there is no need to compare AMD A8-6410 to Intel Core i7-10875H across a built-in video card.

AMD Radeon R5 (Beema)

GPU name

Intel UHD Graphics 630

0.80 GHz

GPU frequency

0.35 GHz

No turbo

GPU (Turbo)

1.20 GHz

Execution units

128

Shader

192

2 GB

Max. GPU Memory

no data

Max. displays

Generation

9.5

Direct X

28 nm

Technology

14 nm

Q2/2014

Release date

Q4/2017

AMD A8-6410 vs. Intel Core i7-10875H

Hardware codec support

Pay attention to support of different technological options by CPUs. The general performance is not influenced. In the interest of time, you can skip this section.

h365 8bit

Decode / Encode

h365 10bit

Decode / Encode

h365 / HEVC (8 bit)

no data

h365 / HEVC (10 bit)

no data

Decode

h364

Decode / Encode

VP8

Decode / Encode

VP9

Decode / Encode

AV1

no data

Decode

AVC

Decode / Encode

Decode

VC-1

Decode

Decode / Encode

JPEG

Decode / Encode

AMD A8-6410 vs. Intel Core i7-10875H

Memory & PCIe

Modern CPUs support memory which operates in a multi-channel regime that provides high-speed data exchange and improves productivity. The higher the ram’s clock frequency, its standard (for example, DDR3, DDR4, DDR5) and maximum space in a system are, the better it is.

PCIe version

3.0

PCIe lanes

DDR3L-1600 SO-DIMM

Memory type

DDR4-2933

Max. Memory

128 GB

Memory channels

—

Bandwidth

no data

ECC

Yes

AES-NI

Yes

AMD A8-6410 vs. Intel Core i7-10875H

Thermal Management

High-performance and powerful CPUs require the essence of a good power supply. Here you learn how much TDP AMD A8-6410 and Intel Core i7-10875H have. We recommend paying attention to the model which has lower TDP.

15 W

TDP

45 W

15 W

TDP (PL1)

no data

—

TDP (PL2)

no data

—

TDP up

—

TDP down

35 W

—

Tjunction max.

100 °C

AMD A8-6410 vs. Intel Core i7-10875H

Technical details

Here is the main information which can define the best CPU comparing technical specifications. Thus, the higher cash L2 and L3, the better it is. The lower the technological process of CPU production, the better it is. Another important factor is a production year that directly influences the manufacturer’s support terms and the opportunity of a system modernization at minimal cost in the future.

x86-64 (64 bit)

Instruction set (ISA)

no data

SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, FMA3, FMA4

ISA extensions

no data

—

L2-Cache

no data

2.00 MB

L3-Cache

16.00 MB

Beema

Architecture

Comet Lake H

28nm

Technology

14 nm

AMD-V

Virtualization

VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d

AM1

Socket

BGA 1440

Q2/2014

Release date

Q2/2020

—

Part Number

no data

AMD A8-6410 vs. Intel Core i7-10875H

Devices using this processor

In completing the comparison between AMD A8-6410 and Intel Core i7-10875H, you can learn in which computer systems these models are used.

Unknown

Used in

Unknown

Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)

The version, having become a gold standard of a synthetic benchmark, allows accurately define a CPU performance in Cinema 4 Suite software complex. The most points mean a model’s best efficiency. Hyperthreading is not included.

AMD A8-6410
4x 2.00 GHz (2.40 GHz)

105 (20 %)

Intel Core i7-10875H
8x 2.30 GHz (5.10 GHz) HT

506 (100 %)

Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)

It is a testing performance standard of CPU by Maxon. It is a specialized multi-platform number of tests that estimate the power of all processor cores in rendering mode.

AMD A8-6410
4x 2. 00 GHz (2.40 GHz)

349 (9 %)

Intel Core i7-10875H
8x 2.30 GHz (5.10 GHz) HT

3569 (100 %)

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R15 is Maxon’s actual benchmark for older processors versions that test the processor’s performance without hyperthreading in single-core mode.

AMD A8-6410
4x 2.00 GHz (2.40 GHz)

49 (23 %)

Intel Core i7-10875H
8x 2. 30 GHz (5.10 GHz) HT

212 (100 %)

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R15 benchmark reflects the efficiency of your processor operation in assessment mode. It works on Cinema 4 Suite software complex of the earlier version. Hyperthreading is not included.

AMD A8-6410
4x 2.00 GHz (2.40 GHz)

165 (10 %)

Intel Core i7-10875H
8x 2.30 GHz (5.10 GHz) HT

1563 (100 %)

iGPU — FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

A benchmark is designed to determine graphics cards’ performance and speed, built into their central processor. It works in iGPU mode, FP32 Performance. The higher the rate is, the better it is.

AMD A8-6410
4x 2.00 GHz (2.40 GHz)

205 (44 %)

Intel Core i7-10875H
8x 2.30 GHz (5.10 GHz) HT

461 (100 %)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

A new approach to testing processor performance opens up the GeekBench 5 benchmark! A detailed under-load system analysis gives an accurate assessment of the quality. The higher the estimation is, the faster and more efficient the processor is. It is a version for testing a single core.

AMD A8-6410
4x 2.00 GHz (2.40 GHz)

256 (20 %)

Intel Core i7-10875H
8x 2.30 GHz (5.10 GHz) HT

1278 (100 %)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

A modern version of the GeekBench 5 benchmark reveals all opportunities and potential of your processor. As a result of testing, you can understand to what extent a processor is fast and efficient in operation with graphic apps or games.

AMD A8-6410
4x 2.00 GHz (2.40 GHz)

746 (9 %)

Intel Core i7-10875H
8x 2.30 GHz (5.10 GHz) HT

7576 (100 %)

Blender 2.81 (bmw27)

Universal benchmark Blender 2.81 (bmw27) starts processor testing in rendering animated 3D images. The faster the processor copes with the task, the higher the overall performance estimation is.

AMD A8-6410
4x 2. 00 GHz (2.40 GHz)

Intel Core i7-10875H
8x 2.30 GHz (5.10 GHz) HT

2250 (100 %)

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)

To define how efficient and powerful a processor is among several models or in comparison with another, we recommend paying attention to Geekbench 3 benchmark, which tests the single-core processor performance.

AMD A8-6410
4x 2.00 GHz (2.40 GHz)

1136 (100 %)

Intel Core i7-10875H
8x 2. 30 GHz (5.10 GHz) HT

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)

To reveal the whole potential of the equipment, the Geekbench 3 benchmark uses all cores for 64bit models in a specialised software complex that imitates modelling various 3D scenarios. The higher estimation is, the better the performance is.

AMD A8-6410
4x 2.00 GHz (2.40 GHz)

3297 (100 %)

Intel Core i7-10875H
8x 2.30 GHz (5.10 GHz) HT

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Cinebench R11. 5 is an outdated version of the benchmark for processors of earlier generations. To find out the potential or compare it with a modern processor model, it is enough to check the performance estimate. The higher it is, the better it is. Hyperthreading is not included.

AMD A8-6410
4x 2.00 GHz (2.40 GHz)

60 (100 %)

Intel Core i7-10875H
8x 2.30 GHz (5.10 GHz) HT

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R11.5 benchmark is designed for testing early-generation processors. The overall final performance is based on 3D scene simulations in Cinema 4 Suite. It engages all processor cores.

AMD A8-6410
4x 2.00 GHz (2.40 GHz)

203 (100 %)

Intel Core i7-10875H
8x 2.30 GHz (5.10 GHz) HT

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

The authoritative benchmark PassMark shows how efficient the processor is in the overall performance rating. It takes into account the operation mode of all cores and supports hyperthreading. The benchmark is based on various scenarios for performing calculations, 2D and 3D modelling.

AMD A8-6410
4x 2. 00 GHz (2.40 GHz)

2501 (100 %)

Intel Core i7-10875H
8x 2.30 GHz (5.10 GHz) HT

Popular comparisons with these processors

1.		Intel Core i7-10870H vs. Intel Core i7-10875H
2.		Intel Core i3-4000M vs. AMD A8-6410
3.		AMD A8-6410 vs. Intel Xeon E3-1245 v3
4.		Intel Xeon E3-1575M v5 vs. Intel Core i7-10875H
5.		AMD A8-6410 vs. AMD A8-7650K
6.		Intel Core i7-10875H vs. Intel Core i9-10900KF
7.		AMD A8-6410 vs. Intel Core i9-10900KF

AMD A8-6410 vs Intel Celeron N4020 — CPU Specs & Benchmark

AMD A8-6410

Intel Celeron N4020

Which to select

It is time to pick the winner. What is the difference between AMD A8-6410 vs Intel Celeron N4020? What CPU is more powerful? It is quite easy to determine – look at comparison table. The processor with more cores/ threads and also with higher frequency is the absolute winner!

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

Who will win between AMD A8-6410 vs Intel Celeron N4020. The general performance of a CPU can easily be determined based on the number of its cores and the thread count, as well as the base frequency and Turbo frequency. The more GHz and cores a CPU has, the better. Please note that high technical specs require using a powerful cooling system.

2.00 GHz

Frequency

1.10 GHz

CPU Cores

2.40 GHz

Turbo (1 Core)

2.80 GHz

CPU Threads

Turbo (2 Cores)

2.70 GHz

Hyperthreading

Overclocking

2.40 GHz

Turbo (4 Cores)

CPU generation and family

Internal Graphics

Some manufacturers complement their CPUs with graphic chips, such a solution being especially popular in laptops. The higher the clock frequency of a GPU is and the bigger its memory, the better. Find a winner — AMD A8-6410 vs Intel Celeron N4020.

AMD Radeon R5 (Beema)

GPU name

Intel UHD Graphics 600

0. 80 GHz

GPU frequency

0.20 GHz

No turbo

GPU (Turbo)

0.65 GHz

Generation

9.5

DirectX Version

Execution units

128

Shader

2 GB

Max. Memory

8 GB

Max. displays

28 nm

Technology

14 nm

Q2/2014

Release date

Q4/2017

Hardware codec support

Here we deal with specs that are used by some CPU manufacturers. These numbers are mainly technical and can be neglected for the purpose of the comparison analysis.

Decode

h364

Decode / Encode

JPEG

Decode / Encode

h365 8bit

Decode / Encode

h365 10bit

Decode / Encode

VP8

Decode / Encode

VP9

Decode / Encode

Decode

VC-1

Decode

AVC

Decode / Encode

Memory & PCIe

These are memory standards supported by CPUs. The higher such standards, the better a CPU’s performance is.

DDR3L-1600 SO-DIMM

Memory type

DDR4-2400LPDDR4-2400

Memory channels

ECC

PCIe version

2.0

PCIe lanes

Encryption

Data encryption support

Yes

AES-NI

Yes

Memory & AMP; PCIe

Thermal Management

The thermal design power (TDP), sometimes called thermal design point, is the maximum amount of heat generated by a computer chip or component (often a CPU, GPU or system on a chip) that the cooling system in a computer is designed to dissipate under any workload.

15 W

TDP

6 W

—

Tjunction max.

—

TDP up

—

TDP down

—

Technical details

2.00 MB

L3-Cache

4.00 MB

28nm

Technology

14 nm

Beema

Architecture

Gemini Lake Refresh

AMD-V

Virtualization

VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d

AM1

Socket

BGA 1090

Q2/2014

Release date

Q4/2019

Devices using this processor

You probably know already what devices use CPUs. These can be a desktop or a laptop.

Unknown

Used in

Unknown

Popular comparisons containing this CPUs

1.		Intel Celeron N4020 vs. Intel Celeron J4125
2.		Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c vs. Intel Celeron N4020
3.		Intel Celeron N4020 vs. AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
4.		Intel Core i7-2960XM vs. Intel Celeron N4020
5.		Intel Celeron N4020 vs. Intel Core i9-10900KF
6.		Intel Celeron N5095 vs. Intel Celeron N4020
7.		Intel Core i7-1160G7 vs. Intel Celeron N4020
8.		Intel Celeron N4020 vs. AMD A6-9225
9.		Intel Core i7-4701EQ vs. Intel Celeron N4020
10.		AMD FX-4320 vs. Intel Celeron N4020
11.		AMD A10-4600M vs. Intel Celeron N4020
12.		AMD Phenom II X3 710 vs. Intel Celeron N4020
13.		Intel Celeron N4020 vs. Intel Core i7-1160G7
14.		AMD A10-5700 vs. Intel Celeron N4020
15.		AMD A8-3510MX vs. Intel Celeron N4020

Comparison of Intel Core i7-8569U and AMD A8-6410

Comparative analysis of Intel Core i7-8569U and AMD A8-6410 processors by all known characteristics in the categories: General information, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphic interfaces, Picture quality in graphics, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security and reliability, Technology, Virtualization.
Processor performance analysis by benchmarks: Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core, PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation ( Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames ), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps).

Intel Core i7-8569U

versus

AMD A8-6410

Advantages

Reasons to choose Intel Core i7-8569U

9 Flowers more: 8 VS 4

about 96% more clock frequency: 4.70 GHZ VS VS 2.4 GHZ

11% higher max core temperature: 100°C vs 90°C

Newer CPU manufacturing process allows for more powerful but lower power consumption: 14 nm vs 28 nm

4.5 times greater performance in Geekbench 4 — Single Core: 1134 vs 252

5. 7 times greater performance in Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core: 4245 vs 749

PassMark performance — Single thread mark 3.5 times greater: 2731 vs 785

Performance in PassMark — CPU mark 4.8 times greater: 8479 vs 1769

15 Watt vs 28 Watt

Number of threads	8 vs 4
Maximum frequency	4.70 GHz vs 2.4 GHz
Maximum core temperature	100°C vs 90°C
Process	14 nm vs 28 nm
Geekbench 4 — Single Core	1134 vs 252
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core	4245 vs 749
PassMark — Single thread mark	2731 vs 785
PassMark — CPU mark	8479vs 1769	15 Watt vs 28 Watt

Benchmark comparison

CPU 1: Intel Core i7-8569U
CPU 2: AMD A8-6410

Geekbench 4 — Single Core

CPU 1

CPU 2

Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core

CPU 1

CPU 2

PassMark — Single thread mark

CPU 1

CPU 2

PassMark — CPU mark

CPU 1

CPU 2

Name	Intel Core i7-8569U	AMD A8-6410
Geekbench 4 — Single Core	1134	252
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core	4245	749
PassMark — Single thread mark	2731	785
PassMark — CPU mark	8479	1769
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s)		2.344
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		98.139
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s)		0.1
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s)		6.441
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		1.59
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)		685
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames)		1097
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames)		3853
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)		685
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps)		1097
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps)		3853

Performance comparison

configuration

	Intel Core i7-8569U	AMD A8-6410
Architecture name	Coffee Lake	Beema
Production date	Q2’19	June 1, 2014
Price at first issue date	$431
Place in the ranking	710	1788
Processor Number	i7-8569U
Applicability	Mobile	Laptop
Family		AMD A-Series Processors
OPN Tray		AM6410ITJ44JB
Series		AMD A8-Series APU for Laptops
Support 64 bit
Base frequency	2. 80 GHz	2 GHz
Bus Speed	4 GT/s OPI
Level 3 cache	8MB
Process	14nm	28nm
Maximum core temperature	100 °C	90°C
Maximum frequency	4.70 GHz	2.4 GHz
Number of cores	4	4
Number of threads	8	4
Level 2 cache		2MB
Number of transistors		930 Million
Unlocked
ECC support
Maximum number of memory channels	2	1
Maximum memory bandwidth	37. 5 GB/s
Maximum memory size	32GB
Supported memory types	DDR4-2400, LPDDR3-2133	DDR3L
Supported memory frequency		1866 MHz
Device ID	0x3EA5
eDRAM	128MB
Graphics base frequency	300MHz
Graphics max dynamic frequency	1. 20 GHz
Intel® Clear Video Technology HD
Intel® Clear Video Technology
Intel® InTru™ 3D Technology
Intel® Quick Sync Video
Video memory size	32GB
Integrated graphics	Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655	AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
Enduro
Maximum GPU clock		847MHz
Switchable graphics
Unified Video Decoder (UVD)
Video Codec Engine (VCE)
DisplayPort
DVI
eDP
HDMI
Maximum number of monitors supported	3
4K support
Maximum resolution via DisplayPort	[email protected]
Maximum resolution via eDP	[email protected]
Maximum resolution via HDMI 1. 4	[email protected]
DirectX	12	12
OpenGL	4.5
Vulcan
Maximum number of processors in	1
Supported sockets	FCBGA1528	FT3b
Power consumption (TDP)	28 Watt	15 Watt
Number of PCI Express lanes	16
PCI Express revision	3. 0	2.0
PCIe configurations	1×4, 2×2, 1×2+2×1, 4×1
Execute Disable Bit (EDB)
Intel® Identity Protection Technology
Intel® Memory Protection Extensions (Intel® MPX)
Intel® OS Guard
Intel® Secure Key Technology
Intel® Software Guard Extensions (Intel® SGX)
Intel® Trusted Execution Technology (TXT)
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® Technology
Idle States
Intel 64
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions 2 (AVX2)
Intel® AES New Instructions
Intel® Flex Memory Access
Intel® Hyper-Threading Technology
Intel® My WiFi Technology
Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported
Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP)
Intel® TSX-NI
Intel® Turbo Boost Technology
Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility
Speed Shift technology
Thermal Monitoring
AMD App Acceleration
AMD Elite Experiences
AMD HD3D technology
Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP)
Fused Multiply-Add (FMA)
Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4)
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX)
PowerGating
PowerNow
VirusProtect
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x)
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d)
Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT)
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™)
IOMMU 2. 0

AMD A8-6410 vs AMD A8-6410 processor comparison

Overall rating

Release date
Q2/2014

Issue date
Q2/2015

Overall rating

Detailed comparison of AMD A8-6410 32 nm and AMD A8-6410 32 nm in benchmarks and specifications.

The main differences between the models
Performance Tests
Characteristics
Reviews

Main differences between models

Reasons to choose
AMD A8-6410

Report a bug

Performance per watt

15 W 47W

O 3. 13 0.97 less power per watt

Reasons to choose
Intel Core i7-5700EQ

Report a bug

Higher clock frequency

2.60 GHz 2.00 GHz

Approximately 23%
higher clock frequency
Higher turbo frequency

3. 40 GHz 2.40 GHz

Approximately 29% higher clock speed in overclocking

Performance tests

Accurate performance tests AMD A8-6410 vs Intel Core i7-5700EQ

iGPU — FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

AMD A8-6410

205

Intel Core i7-5700EQ

384

Features

Exact specifications for model comparison

AMD A8-6410

Intel Core i7-5700EQ

Processor generation and family

description_compare ✍(◔◡◔) Description on comparison page AMD A8-6410 and Intel Core i7-5700EQ

Name

AMD A8-6410 Intel Core i7-5700EQ
Segment

Desktop / Server Desktop / Server
Family

AMD A Intel Core i7
Generation

3 5
CPU group

AMD A8-6000 Intel Core i 5000

Processor cores and frequency

Frequency

2. 00 GHz 2.60 GHz
CPU cores

4 4
Turbo (1 core)

2.40 GHz 3.40 GHz
CPU Threads

4 8
Turbo (4 cores)

2. 40 GHz No turbo
Hyperthreading

No Yes
Overclocking

No. No.
Basic architecture

normal normal

Integrated video card

Codec support

h365 / HEVC (8 bit)

No. No.
h365 / HEVC (10bit)

No. No.
h364

Decode Decode / Encode
VP9

No. No.
VP8

No Decode
AV1

No. No.
AVC

Decode Decode / Encode
VC-1

Decode Decode
JPEG

Decode / Encode Decode

Memory & PCIe

Encryption

AES-NI

Yes Yes

Temperature rating

TDP (PL1)

15W 47W
TDP down

— 37W

Specifications

Instruction Set (ISA)

x86-64 (64 bit) x86-64 (64 bit)
Virtualization

AMD-V VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
ISA Extensions

SSE4a, SSE4. 1, SSE4.2, AVX, FMA3, FMA4 SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2
L3 cache

2.00MB 6.00MB
Architecture

Richland (Piledriver) Broadwell S
Technology

32 nm 14 nm
Socket

AM1 BGA 1364
Issue date

Q2/2014 Q2/2015

Used in

Where is

used

Unknown Unknown

Latest comparisons

AMD A4-6300

AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE

EVGA GeForce GT 1030 DDR4

MANLI GeForce RTX 3080 (M3478+N613-00)

AMD A4-9120

Intel Core i3-10100T

AMD A10-5745M

Qualcomm Snapdragon 460

AMD A4-6210

Intel Core i5-4570

MSI GeForce GTX 1650 D6 AERO ITX OC

INNO3D GeForce GTX 1660 TWIN X2

AMD A4-6320

Intel Core i5-3340S

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X

Intel Xeon Gold 6258R

AMD A4-6210

Intel Core i7-3687U

INNO3D GeForce RTX 2080 iCHILL FROSTBITE

MSI GeForce RTX 3090 Super 24G

MSI GeForce GTX 1650 D6 AERO ITX OC

GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Turbo 8G

AMD A4-6210

AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U

AMD A4-6320

Intel Xeon Gold 6138

AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE

Intel Xeon Platinum 8352S

Report a bugDescription of the bug

Link to source

Intel Core i5-4200M vs.

AMD A8-6410

Intel Core i5-4200M

Intel Core i5-4200M runs with 2 and 4 CPU threads It runs at 3.10 GHz base 3.10 GHz all cores while TDP is set to 37 W single die, supports 2 to support DDR3L-1333 SO-DIMM, DDR3L-1600 SO-DIMM RAM and supports 3.0 PCIe Gen 16 . Tjunction is kept below 100°C degrees C. In particular, Haswell H architecture is advanced beyond 22 nm and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d . The product was launched Q4/2013

AMD A8-6410

AMD A8-6410 runs with 4 and 4 CPU threads It runs at 2.40 GHz base 2.40 GHz all cores while TDP is set to 15 W .CPU connects to CPU socket AM1 This version includes 2.00 MB of L3 cache on a single die, supports 2 to support DDR3L-1600 SO-DIMM RAM, and supports PCIe Gen . Tjunction is kept below — degrees C. In particular, the Richland (Piledriver) architecture has been advanced over 32 nm and supports AMD-V . The product was launched Q2/2014

Intel Core i5-4200M

AMD A8-6410

Frequency 2. 00 GHz 2 Kernels 4 3.10 GHz Turbo (1 core) 2.40 GHz 3.10 GHz Turbo (all cores) 2.40 GHz Yes Hyper Threading No. No. Acceleration No. normal Basic architecture normal

Intel HD Graphics 4600

GPU

AMD Radeon R5 (Beema)

1.15GHz GPU (Turbo) No turbo 22nm Technologies 32nm 1.15GHz GPU (Turbo) No turbo 11.1 DirectX Version 12 3 Max. displays 2 DDR3L-1333 SO-DIMM
DDR3L-1600 SO-DIMM memory size DDR3L-1600 SO-DIMM 2 Memory channels 2 Maximum memory size No. ECC No. — L2 Cache — 3.00MB L3 Cache 2.00 MB 3.0 PCIe version 16 PCIe lanes 22nm Technologies 32nm PGA 946 Connector AM1 37 W TDP 15W VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d Virtualization AMD-V Q4/2013 Release date Q2/2014

Show more details

Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor to Cinebench R15 and is also based on Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D forms. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.

Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor to Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D forms. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor to Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D forms. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor to Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D forms. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a memory-intensive, cross-platform test. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a memory-intensive, cross-platform test. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.

iGPU — FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

Theoretical processing performance of the processor’s internal graphics unit with simple precision (32 bits) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS specifies how many billions of floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 3 is a cross-platform benchmark that is memory intensive. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 3 is a cross-platform benchmark that is memory intensive. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular for creating shapes and other things in 3D. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Cinebench 11.5 is based on Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular for creating shapes and other 3D. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)

Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular for creating shapes and other things in 3D. The iGPU test uses the CPU’s internal graphics unit to execute OpenGL commands.

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the processors listed below have been tested with CPU-Comparison. However, most of the processors were not tested and the results were evaluated by the secret patented CPU-Comparison formula. As such, they do not accurately reflect the actual values of Passmark CPU ratings and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.

Energy usage estimate

Average hours of use per day

Average CPU usage (0-100%)

Cost of electricity, USD/kWh

Energy usage estimate

Average hours of use per day

Average CPU usage (0-100%)

Cost of electricity, USD/kWh

Intel Core i5-4200M		AMD A8-6410
37 W	Max TDP	15W
NA	Power consumption per day (kWh)	NA
NA	Operating cost per day	NA
NA	Power consumption per year (kWh)	NA
NA	Operating cost per year	NA

Popular comparison

Comments

Intel Core i7-6700HQ VS A8-6410 Comparison of processors in 14 benchmarks

Intel Core i7-6700HQ: 14 NM, SKYLAKE-M, 4 X 2. 6 -2133 SO-DIMMs.

AMD A8-6410: 28 nm, Beema, 4 X 2.00 GHz, DDR3L-1600 SO-DIMM.

Main Specifications

Comparison of Intel Core i7-6700HQ and AMD A8-6410 processors by cores, threads, base clock and turbo clock. Pay attention to the model, the characteristics of which are higher, this is reflected in the overall performance.

no data

Colors

4/8

Processor Threads

4 / 4

no data

Basic architecture

normal

Yes

Hyper threads

Overclocking

2. 60GHz

Frequency

2.00GHz

3.50GHz

Turbo (1 core)

2.40GHz

3.20GHz

Turbo (4 cores)

2.40GHz

Generation and family

Comparison of processors by type of use (segment: mobile, desktop, laptop). Baseline comparison of Intel Core i7-6700HQ vs AMD A8-6410.

four

Processor cores

four

no data

Name

AMD A8-6410

no data

A family

AMD A

no data

CPU group

AMD A8-6000

Generation

no data

Segment

Desktop/Server

no data

Predecessor

—

no data

Successor

—

iGPU (integrated graphics)

Processor comparison does not always show the full picture, since not all models are equipped with an integrated graphics core. Therefore, in comparing {{cpu_name_1} with AMD A8-6410, one column may be empty due to missing iGPU specifications. If an embedded core is present, we recommend that you pay attention to the clock speed, because. other indicators are secondary.

Intel HD Graphics 530

GPU name

AMD Radeon R5 (Beema)

0.35GHz

GPU frequency

0.80GHz

1. 05GHz

GPU (turbo)

no turbo

Execution units

192

shader

128

no data

Maximum. GPU memory

2GB

Maximum. displays

Generation

Direct X

14 nm

Technology

28 nm

Q3/2015

Release date

Q2/2014

Hardware codec support

Comparison of Intel Core i7-6700HQ vs AMD A8-6410 processors in terms of hardware support for various codecs and add-ons. An exclusively introductory section that is not taken into account by benchmarks in synthetic performance tests.

Decode/Encode

h365 8bit

decode

h365 10bit

no data

h365/HEVC (8bit)

no data

h365/HEVC (10bit)

Decode/Encode

h364

decode

Decode/Encode

VP8

decode

WP9

no data

AB1

Decode/Encode

AVC

decode

VK-1

decode

Decode/Encode

JPEG

Decode/Encode

Memory Specifications

Compare what type of memory is supported by the processors, how much maximum memory can be used, and examine the memory bus bandwidth and clock speed.

3.0

PCI version

twenty

PCIe lanes

DDR4-2133 SODIMM

Memory type

DDR3L-1600 SODIMM

Memory channels

no data

bandwidth

—

ECC

Yes

AES-NI

Yes

Temperature (TDP)

The TDPs of the Intel Core i7-6700HQ and AMD A8-6410 processors display all thermal information. Here you can easily conclude which processor will consume more electricity and, accordingly, require a larger power supply. We recommend paying attention to a model with a lower TDP, since the system of components requires a reserve of power not only for the power supply, but also for the cooling system.

45W

Estimated power

15W

no data

Rated power (PL1)

15W

no data

Design power (PL2)

—

TDP up

—

TDP down

—

Connection max.

—

Additional specifications

Based on the comparison of the technical characteristics of the Intel Core i7-6700HQ with the AMD A8-6410, you can understand how much faster the information flow will be processed in the cache memory of the second and third levels (L2 and L3), and also here you can compare the architecture cores, motherboard socket, and processor release dates.

no data

Instruction set (ISA)

x86-64 (64bit)

no data

ISA extensions

SSE4a, SSE4. 1, SSE4.2, AVX, FMA3, FMA4

no data

L2 cache

—

6.00MB

L3 cache

2.00MB

Skylake-M

Architecture

Beema

14 nm

Technology

28nm

VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d

Virtualization

AMD-V

BGA 1440

socket

AM1

Q3/2015

Release date

Q2/2014

no data

part number

—

Terms of use

unknown

Used in

unknown

Cinebench R20 (single core)

The Cinebench R20 benchmark is an updated version of the Cinebench R15 benchmark, similarly to the previous version developed on the Cinema 4 Suite software. In this version, the benchmark tests the performance of a single processor core without regard to hyperthreading. We present the updated results for review.

Intel Core i7-6700HQ
4x 2.60 GHz (3.50 GHz) HT

AMD A8-6410
4x 2.00 GHz (2.40 GHz)

105 (100%)

Cinebench R20 (multi-core)

Based on the Cinema 4 Suite, Maxon has developed an accurate processor performance benchmark — Cinebench R20. Processing and compute scenarios display processor efficiency and performance across all cores and support for hyper-threading.

Intel Core i7-6700HQ
4x 2.60 GHz (3.50 GHz) HT

1651 (100%)

AMD A8-6410
4x 2.00 GHz (2.40 GHz)

349 (21%)

Cinebench R15 (single core)

Cinebench R15 benchmark for testing processors in single-core mode without hyperthreading. Real performance in rendering testing is excellent across all processor segments. Check out the Cinebench R15 results and scores below.

Intel Core i7-6700HQ
4x 2.60 GHz (3.50 GHz) HT

148 (100%)

AMD A8-6410
4x 2.00 GHz (2.40 GHz)

49 (33%)

Cinebench R15 (multi-core)

Cinebench R15 benchmark supporting all processor cores in testing and taking into account hyperthreading. Developed on the basis of proprietary Maxon software — Cinema 4 Suite. The number of points in the Cinebench R15 evaluation is presented below.

Intel Core i7-6700HQ
4x 2.60 GHz (3.50 GHz) HT

692 (100%)

AMD A8-6410
4x 2.00 GHz (2.40 GHz)

165 (23%)

iGPU — FP32 performance (single precision gigaflops)

Benchmark for testing iGPU (integrated graphics core in the central processing unit). The overall graphics performance is tested to evaluate the speed of the video chip. Evaluation scores are presented in the rating below. Please note that not all processor manufacturers implement an internal graphics core, so this parameter does not affect the overall performance results, but is considered a good plus.

Intel Core i7-6700HQ
4x 2.60 GHz (3.50 GHz) HT

403 (100%)

AMD A8-6410
4x 2.00 GHz (2.40 GHz)

205 (50%)

Geekbench 5 64 bit (single core)

Many people are wondering how good the Geekbench 5 scores are in testing processors — the answer is that they are accurate and unbiased to brands. The higher the Geekbench 5 score in single core CPU benchmark mode, the better. Look at the results or compare them.

Intel Core i7-6700HQ
4x 2.60 GHz (3.50 GHz) HT

806 (100%)

AMD A8-6410
4x 2.00 GHz (2.40 GHz)

256 (31%)

Geekbench 5 64-bit (multi-core)

Geekbench 5 (64-bit version) for testing the performance of processors in the mode of using all cores and threads. The Geekbench 5 benchmark for multi-core models shows in points how productive and fast the chip is in the review or comparison.

Intel Core i7-6700HQ
4x 2.60 GHz (3.50 GHz) HT

3079 (100%)

AMD A8-6410
4x 2.00 GHz (2.40 GHz)

746 (24%)

Blender 2.81 (bmw27)

Benchmark Blender 2.81 (bmw27) tests the gaming performance of the processor, which is verified by running various scenarios for rendering 3d models of the image. The test result is shown below.

Intel Core i7-6700HQ
4x 2.60 GHz (3.50 GHz) HT

5403 (100%)

AMD A8-6410
4x 2.00 GHz (2.40 GHz)

Geekbench 3 64 bit (single core)

Geekbench 3 64-bit (single-core) is an early benchmark designed to test the processor in harsh scenarios — performing calculations and rendering in single-core mode. The performance test results are shown below.

Intel Core i7-6700HQ
4x 2. 60 GHz (3.50 GHz) HT

3694 (100%)

AMD A8-6410
4x 2.00 GHz (2.40 GHz)

1136 (30%)

Geekbench 3 64-bit (multi-core)

Geekbench 3 64-bit (multi-core) is the first version of a professional synthetic benchmark that tests CPU performance in various rendering and math scenarios. The benchmark uses all cores and enables processor hyperthreading.

Intel Core i7-6700HQ
4x 2. 60 GHz (3.50 GHz) HT

13611 (100%)

AMD A8-6410
4x 2.00 GHz (2.40 GHz)

3297 (24%)

Cinebench R11.5 64 bit (single core)

The Cinebench R11.5 benchmark for single core processors is the first version of a professional synthetic benchmark application. Cinebench R11.5 performs hyper-threading-free testing of a single CPU core based on the Cinema 4 Suite application. Well suited for assessing the speed of early generation processors.

Intel Core i7-6700HQ
4x 2. 60 GHz (3.50 GHz) HT

170 (100%)

AMD A8-6410
4x 2.00 GHz (2.40 GHz)

60 (35%)

Cinebench R11.5 64 bit (multi-core)

Cinebench R11.5 for multi-core processors with hyperthreading. Cinebench R11.5 tests the performance of all processor cores in Cinema 4 Suite software. The results of evaluating the performance of all processor cores in Cinebench R11.5 are presented below.

Intel Core i7-6700HQ
4x 2. 60 GHz (3.50 GHz) HT

753 (100%)

AMD A8-6410
4x 2.00 GHz (2.40 GHz)

203 (26%)

Cinebench R11.5 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)

Cinebench R11.5 benchmark for testing the performance of the integrated graphics core in the central processor. An early version of the benchmark that shows an accurate estimate of the performance of the integrated graphics card in an OpenGL application.

Intel Core i7-6700HQ
4x 2. 60 GHz (3.50 GHz) HT

327 (100%)

AMD A8-6410
4x 2.00 GHz (2.40 GHz)

PassMark CPU Mark

The PassMark score is the most authoritative among advanced users. It is the PassMark benchmark that is the leader in testing processor performance. The results of evaluating the speed of the processor are checked in the conditions of complex mathematical calculations and rendering of 3D models.

Intel Core i7-6700HQ
4x 2.60 GHz (3. 50 GHz) HT

8216 (100%)

AMD A8-6410
4x 2.00 GHz (2.40 GHz)

9Core i7-7500U
Compare

Core i7-7560U
Compare

Core i7-7567U
Compare

Core i7-7600U

A8-6410 APU R5 GRAPHICS APU
Compare

Gaming speed

Core i7-7660U

48.2

A8-6600K APU

49.1 (+1.8%)

The performance of 4 cores, if any, and performance per core has the greatest impact on the result, since most games do not fully use more than 4 cores.

The speed of caches and working with RAM is also important.

Speed in office use

Core i7-7660U

53. 8 (+0.7%)

A8-6600K APU

53.4

Performance in everyday work, such as browsers and office programs.

The performance of 1 core has the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications use only one, ignoring the rest.

Similarly, many professional applications such as various CADs ignore multi-threaded performance.

Speed in heavy applications

Core i7-7660U

26.5

A8-6600K APU

26.6 (+0.4%)

maximum

The performance of all cores and their number have the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications willingly use all the cores and increase the speed accordingly.

At the same time, certain periods of work can be demanding on the performance of one or two cores, for example, applying filters in the editor.

Data obtained from tests by users who tested their systems with and without overclocking. Thus, you see the average values corresponding to the processor.

Speed of numerical operations

Simple household tasks

Core i7-7660U

54.1 (+14.4%)

A8-6600K APU

46.3

Demanding games and tasks

Core i7-7660U

23.4 (+13.2%)

A8-6600K APU

20.3

Extreme

Core i7-7660U

4.6 (+13%)

A8-6600K APU

Different tasks require different CPU strengths. A system with few fast cores and low memory latency will be fine for the vast majority of games, but will be inferior to a system with a lot of slow cores in a rendering scenario.

We believe that a minimum of 4/4 (4 physical cores and 4 threads) processor is suitable for a budget gaming PC. At the same time, some games can load it at 100%, slow down and freeze, and performing any tasks in the background will lead to a drop in FPS.

Ideally, the budget shopper should aim for a minimum of 4/8 and 6/6. A gamer with a big budget can choose between 6/12, 8/8 and 8/16. Processors with 10 and 12 cores can perform well in games with high frequency and fast memory, but are overkill for such tasks. Also, buying for the future is a dubious undertaking, since in a few years many slow cores may not provide sufficient gaming performance.

When choosing a processor for your work, consider how many cores your programs use. For example, photo and video editors can use 1-2 cores when working with filtering, and rendering or converting in the same editors already uses all threads.

Data obtained from tests of users who tested their systems both with overclocking (maximum value in the table) and without (minimum). A typical result is shown in the middle, the more filled in the color bar, the better the average result among all tested systems.

Benchmarks

Benchmarks were run on stock hardware, that is, without overclocking and with factory settings. Therefore, on overclocked systems, the points can noticeably differ upwards. Also, small performance changes may be due to the BIOS version.

Geekbench 3 Multi Core

Intel Core i7-7660u

8693 (+30.5%)

A8-6600K APU

6038

Intel Core I7777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777A %)

AMD A8-6600K APU

3.43

Passmark

Intel Core i7-7660U

4207 (+29.4%)

A8-6600K APU

2972 9000

data are not in the following characteristics tables may be missing information or missing existing functions.

Basic

Manufacturer	Intel	AMD
DescriptionInformation about the processor, taken from the official website of the manufacturer.	Intel® Core™ i7-7660U Processor (4M Cache, up to 4.00 GHz)
ArchitectureCode name for the microarchitecture generation.	Kaby Lake
Process The manufacturing process, measured in nanometers. The smaller the technical process, the more perfect the technology, the lower the heat dissipation and power consumption.	14	No data
Release dateMonth and year of the processor’s availability.	09-2019	09-2016
Model Official name.	i7-7660U
Cores The number of physical cores.	2	2
ThreadsNumber of threads. The number of logical processor cores that the operating system sees.	4	4
Multi-Threading Technology With Intel’s Hyper-threading and AMD’s SMT technology, one physical core is recognized by the operating system as two logical cores, which improves processor performance in multi-threaded applications.	Hyper-threading (note that some games may not work well with Hyper-threading, you can disable the technology in the BIOS of the motherboard for maximum FPS).	SMT (note that some games may not work well with SMT, for maximum FPS, you can disable the technology in the BIOS of the motherboard).
Base frequencyGuaranteed frequency of all processor cores at maximum load. Performance in single-threaded and multi-threaded applications and games depends on it. It is important to remember that speed and frequency are not directly related. For example, a new processor at a lower frequency may be faster than an old one at a higher one.	2.5 GHz	3.9 GHz
Turbo frequencyThe maximum frequency of one processor core in turbo mode. Manufacturers allow modern processors to independently increase the frequency of one or more cores under heavy load, due to which performance is noticeably increased. It may depend on the nature of the load, the number of loaded cores, temperature and the specified limits. Significantly affects the speed in games and applications that are demanding on the frequency of the CPU.	4GHz	4.1 GHz
L3 cache size The third level cache acts as a buffer between the computer’s RAM and the processor’s level 2 cache. Used by all cores, the speed of information processing depends on the volume.	4	No data
Instructions	64-bit
Extended instruction set Allows you to speed up calculations, processing and execution of certain operations. Also, some games require instruction support.	SSE4.1/4.2, AVX 2.0
Embedded Options Available Two enclosure versions. Standard and designed for mobile devices. In the second version, the processor can be soldered on the motherboard.	No	No
Bus frequency The speed of communication with the system.	4 GT/s OPI
Number of QPI links
TDPThermal Design Power is an indicator that determines the heat dissipation in standard operation. The cooler or water cooling system must be rated for a larger value. Remember that with a factory bus or manual overclocking, TDP increases significantly.	15	No data
Cooling system specifications

Video core

Integrated graphics core Allows you to use your computer without a discrete graphics card. The monitor is connected to the video output on the motherboard. If earlier integrated graphics made it possible to simply work at a computer, today it can replace budget video accelerators and makes it possible to play most games at low settings.	Intel® Iris™ Plus Graphics 640
GPU base clockFrequency of 2D and idle operation.	300	No data
Max GPU ClockMaximum 3D clock.	1100	No data
Intel® Wireless Display (Intel® WiDi) Supports Wireless Display technology using the Wi-Fi 802.11n standard. Thanks to it, a monitor or TV equipped with the same technology does not require a cable to connect.
Supported monitorsThe maximum number of monitors that can be connected to the integrated video core at the same time.	3

RAM

Maximum amount of RAMThe amount of RAM that can be installed on the motherboard with this processor.	32	No data
Supported type of RAM The type of RAM depends on its frequency and timings (speed), availability, price.	DDR4-2133, LPDDR3-1866, DDR3L-1600
RAM Channels The multi-channel memory architecture increases data transfer speed. On desktop platforms, two-channel, three-channel and four-channel modes are available.	2
RAM bandwidth	34.1 GB/s
ECC memory Support for error-correcting memory that is used in servers. Usually more expensive than usual and requires more expensive server components. However, second-hand server processors, Chinese motherboards and ECC memory sticks, which are sold relatively cheaply in China, have become widespread.	No data	No data

PCI

configuration options

PCI-E PCI Express computer bus version. The bandwidth and power limit depend on the version. There is backward compatibility.	3	No data
PCI	1×4, 2×2, 1×2+2×1 and 4×1	1×4, 2×2, 1×2+2×1 and 4×1
Number of PCI lanes	12	1×4, 2×2, 1×2+2×1 and 4×1

Data Protection

AES-NI The AES command set extension speeds up applications that use appropriate encryption.	No data	No data
Intel® Secure Key An RDRAND instruction that allows you to create a high performance random number generator.	No data	No data

Decoration

Dimensions	No data	No data
Supported sockets	No data	No data
Maximum processors per motherboard	No data	No data

Which one is better

Intel Core i7-7660U

0% faster performance in office applications and browsers
In complex multi-threaded applications, faster and outperforms by 1%.

AMD A8-6600K APU

On average, gaming performance is 1% better.
The base frequency is 1.4 GHz higher.

How are they similar

Prices for new processors are approximately equal.
The number of physical cores is equal.
The number of threads is equal.

AMD A8-6410 vs. AMD A8-4500M

Cpu Benchmark with tests

AMD A8-6410		AMD A8-4500M
2.00GHz	Frequency	1.90 GHz
2.40 GHz	Turbo (1 core)	2.80 GHz
2.40 GHz	Turbo (all cores)	2.80 GHz
4	Kernels	4
No	Hyperthreading ?	No
No	Overclocking?	No
normal	Basic architecture	normal
AMD Radeon R5 (Beema)	GPU	AMD Radeon HD 7640G
12	DirectX Version	11
2	Max. displays	2
DDR3L-1600 SO-DIMM	memory size	DDR3-1600
2	Memory channels	2
	Max. memory size
No	ECC	No
—	L2 Cache	—
2.00MB	L3 Cache	4.00 MB
	PCIe version
	PCIe lanes
32nm	Technology	32nm
AM1	Socket	FS1r2
15W	TDP	35W
AMD-V	Virtualization	AMD-V
Q2/2014	Issue date	Q2/2012
show more details		show more details

Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a memory-intensive, cross-platform test. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.