AMD A8-7410 Intel equivalent — GadgetVersus
|
|
|
Intel equivalent of the AMD A8-7410 processor in the various benchmark platforms.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the link above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
CPU-Z — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
---|---|
Intel Core i7-3537U |
228 652 |
Intel Core i7-640M |
238 651 |
Intel Core i3-7020U |
211 648 |
Intel Core i3-6157U |
202 648 |
Intel Core i5-2415M |
231 640 |
AMD A8-7410 |
170 639 |
Intel Core i5-3427U |
185 636 |
Intel Pentium Gold 5405U |
228 636 |
Intel Core i3-6100U |
190 628 |
Intel Core i5-4210U |
229 627 |
Intel Core i3-5010U |
190 623 |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.
Cinebench R20 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
---|---|
Intel Core i7-620M |
128 358 |
Intel Celeron N3450 |
105 350 |
Intel Core i3-4010U |
135 342 |
Intel Core m3-6Y30 |
149 331 |
Intel Celeron 5205U |
151 330 |
AMD A8-7410 |
134 327 |
Intel Core i5-4210U |
134 315 |
Intel Core i5-4250U |
141 313 |
Intel Pentium N3700 |
83 312 |
Intel Core m5-6Y57 |
174 311 |
Intel Core M-5Y71 |
155 309 |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R20 is a multi-platform test software which allows to evaluate the hardware capacities of a device such as a computer, a tablet, a server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant.
PassMark — CPU Mark & single thread | |
---|---|
Intel Core m3-6Y30 |
1.172 1.901 |
Intel Core M-5Y10 |
1.108 1.889 |
Intel Core M-5Y10c |
1.102 1.881 |
Intel Core i3-4030U |
1. 020 1.862 |
Intel Core i5-560M |
1.218 1.833 |
AMD A8-7410 |
792 1.817 |
Intel Core i5-540M |
1.147 1.761 |
Intel Core i5-520M |
1.082 1.708 |
Intel Core i3-4000M |
1.226 1.681 |
Intel Core i7-720QM |
957 1.642 |
Intel Core i3-4010U |
897 1.634 |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.
Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows | |
---|---|
Intel Celeron 3867U |
413 827 |
Intel Core i3-2328M |
400 822 |
Intel Pentium N3530 |
238 820 |
Intel Pentium 2020M |
448 817 |
Intel Celeron 4205U |
423 814 |
AMD A8-7410 |
273 806 |
Intel Core i3-2310M |
370 802 |
Intel Core i3-350M |
350 797 |
Intel Core i3-380M |
366 784 |
Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 |
423 754 |
Intel Pentium N3540 |
228 748 |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.
Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux | |
---|---|
Intel Core i3-370M |
410 917 |
Intel Core i3-2310M |
422 906 |
Intel Core i3-4020Y |
411 904 |
Intel Core i5-460M |
438 891 |
Intel Core i3-4010U |
420 882 |
AMD A8-7410 |
284 862 |
Intel Core i3-3217U |
395 861 |
Intel Core i3-350M |
384 858 |
Intel Core i5-6267U |
492 842 |
Intel Pentium N3540 |
253 838 |
Intel Celeron 3215U |
426 825 |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — Android | |
---|---|
Intel Core i7-6560U |
427 942 |
Intel Core m5-6Y57 |
544 940 |
Intel Core i5-4200U |
533 937 |
Intel Core i5-2450M |
466 913 |
Intel Pentium Gold 4425Y |
403 908 |
AMD A8-7410 |
300 896 |
Intel Core i3-4030U |
422 887 |
Intel Core i5-2410M |
442 884 |
Intel Core i3-4005U |
402 876 |
Intel Core i5-460M |
391 876 |
Intel Core i5-480M |
405 872 |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Disclaimer:
When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.
Information:
We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer’s website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.
AMD A8-7410 vs Intel Core i3-5010U
Comparative analysis of AMD A8-7410 and Intel Core i3-5010U processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization, Graphics image quality, Security & Reliability.
Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4. 0 — T-Rex (Fps).
AMD A8-7410
Buy on Amazon
vs
Intel Core i3-5010U
Buy on Amazon
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD A8-7410
- CPU is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
- Around 19% higher clock speed: 2.5 GHz vs 2.1 GHz
- 4x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- 4.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s): 7.405 vs 1.595
- Around 67% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 22.317 vs 13.384
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames): 3706 vs 3211
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps): 3706 vs 3211
Launch date | 7 May 2015 vs 5 January 2015 |
Number of cores | 4 vs 2 |
Maximum frequency | 2. 5 GHz vs 2.1 GHz |
L2 cache | 2 MB vs 512 KB |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) | 7.405 vs 1.595 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 22.317 vs 13.384 |
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) | 3706 vs 3211 |
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) | 3706 vs 3211 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core i3-5010U
- Around 17% higher maximum core temperature: 105°C vs 90°C
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 55% better performance in PassMark — Single thread mark: 1243 vs 803
- Around 20% better performance in PassMark — CPU mark: 2185 vs 1815
- Around 87% better performance in Geekbench 4 — Single Core: 491 vs 262
- Around 41% better performance in Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core: 1102 vs 781
- Around 92% better performance in CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s): 4.837 vs 2.521
- 5.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 34.607 vs 6.553
- Around 86% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.216 vs 0.116
- Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 944 vs 661
- Around 76% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames): 2176 vs 1234
- Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 944 vs 661
- Around 76% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps): 2176 vs 1234
Maximum core temperature | 105°C vs 90°C |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
PassMark — Single thread mark | 1243 vs 803 |
PassMark — CPU mark | 2185 vs 1815 |
Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 491 vs 262 |
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 1102 vs 781 |
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.837 vs 2.521 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 34.607 vs 6.553 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.216 vs 0.116 |
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 944 vs 661 |
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) | 2176 vs 1234 |
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 944 vs 661 |
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) | 2176 vs 1234 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD A8-7410
CPU 2: Intel Core i3-5010U
PassMark — Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark — CPU mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 — Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD A8-7410 | Intel Core i3-5010U |
---|---|---|
PassMark — Single thread mark | 803 | 1243 |
PassMark — CPU mark | 1815 | 2185 |
Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 262 | 491 |
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 781 | 1102 |
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.521 | 4.837 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6.553 | 34.607 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.116 | 0.216 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) | 7.405 | 1.595 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 22.317 | 13.384 |
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 661 | 944 |
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames) | 1234 | 2176 |
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) | 3706 | 3211 |
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 661 | 944 |
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) | 1234 | 2176 |
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) | 3706 | 3211 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD A8-7410 | Intel Core i3-5010U | |
---|---|---|
Architecture codename | Carrizo-L | Broadwell |
Family | AMD A-Series Processors | |
Launch date | 7 May 2015 | 5 January 2015 |
OPN Tray | AM7410JBY44JB | |
Place in performance rating | 1773 | 1541 |
Series | AMD A8-Series APU for Laptops | 5th Generation Intel® Core™ i3 Processors |
Vertical segment | Laptop | Mobile |
Launch price (MSRP) | $281 | |
Price now | $303. 93 | |
Processor Number | i3-5010U | |
Status | Launched | |
Value for money (0-100) | 2.95 | |
64 bit support | ||
Base frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.10 GHz |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 512 KB |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Maximum core temperature | 90°C | 105°C |
Maximum frequency | 2. 5 GHz | 2.1 GHz |
Number of cores | 4 | 2 |
Number of threads | 4 | 4 |
Transistor count | 930 Million | 1300 Million |
Unlocked | ||
Bus Speed | 5 GT/s DMI2 | |
Die size | 82 mm | |
L1 cache | 128 KB | |
L3 cache | 3 MB | |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 105 °C | |
Max memory channels | 1 | 2 |
Supported memory frequency | 1866 MHz | |
Supported memory types | DDR3L | DDR3L 1333/1600 LPDDR 1333 /1600 |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 25. 6 GB/s | |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB | |
Enduro | ||
Graphics max frequency | 847 MHz | 900 MHz |
Processor graphics | AMD Radeon R5 Graphics | Intel® HD Graphics 5500 |
Switchable graphics | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
Device ID | 0x1616 | |
Graphics base frequency | 300 MHz | |
Graphics max dynamic frequency | 900 MHz | |
Intel® Clear Video HD technology | ||
Intel® Clear Video technology | ||
Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | ||
Intel® InTru™ 3D technology | ||
Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
Max video memory | 16 GB | |
DisplayPort | ||
HDMI | ||
eDP | ||
Number of displays supported | 3 | |
Wireless Display (WiDi) support | ||
DirectX | 12 | 11. 2/12 |
Vulkan | ||
OpenGL | 4.3 | |
Sockets supported | FP4 | FCBGA1168 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 15 Watt |
Configurable TDP-down | 10 W | |
Configurable TDP-down Frequency | 600 MHz | |
Low Halogen Options Available | ||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | |
Package Size | 40mm x 24mmx 1. 3mm | |
PCI Express revision | 2.0 | 2.0 |
Max number of PCIe lanes | 12 | |
PCIe configurations | 4×1 2×4 | |
AMD App Acceleration | ||
AMD Elite Experiences | ||
AMD HD3D technology | ||
Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP) | ||
Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
PowerGating | ||
PowerNow | ||
VirusProtect | ||
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
Flexible Display interface (FDI) | ||
Idle States | ||
Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4. 1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | |
Intel 64 | ||
Intel® Fast Memory Access | ||
Intel® Flex Memory Access | ||
Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
Intel® Smart Response technology | ||
Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
Intel® TSX-NI | ||
Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
Thermal Monitoring | ||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
IOMMU 2. 0 | ||
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Max resolution over DisplayPort | [email protected] | |
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | [email protected] | |
Max resolution over VGA | N / A | |
Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
Intel® Identity Protection technology | ||
Intel® OS Guard | ||
Intel® Secure Key technology | ||
Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) |
AMD A8-7410 vs Intel Core i5-6200U — specs shootout and benchmark results
While we are working on the HP ProBook 455 G3/450 G3 review, we thought it might come in handy for some users to see what’s the performance difference between the two chips – AMD A8-7410 and Intel Core i5-6200U. If you still don’t know why we are looking at these specific CPUs, it’s because the ProBook 450 G3 offers the Core i5-6200U while the ProBook 455 G3 uses AMD’s A8-7410 chip and both variants cost just about the same. There are, however, other configurations featuring Core i7 and A10 CPUs but we are now focusing on the more affordable solutions.
Anyway, back to the chips. The AMD A8-7410 based on Puma+ architecture, this Carrizo-L chip offers four compute cores that can go up to 2.5 GHz, which is slightly more than the A8-6410 predecessor (2.4 GHz). The CPU also offers Radeon R5 integrated graphics and interestingly, the whole chip’s TDP can be configured anywhere between 12 and 25W. For instance, the Intel Core i5-6200U has a fixed TDP of 15W including the Intel HD Graphics 520 iGPU.
So while this might not seem a fair game, since the A8-7410 integrates four cores and Intel’s solution sports only two, there is a lot more to other features than you thought. The Core i5-6200U is manufactured using a 14nm FinFET process while AMD’s chip has a 28nm process and this can mean several things – the Core i5-6200U should be more power efficient, has less heat dispersion and fits into a smaller die size. Also, the Core i5-6200U’s clock speeds are slightly higher (2.3 – 2.8 GHz or 2.7 GHz for two active cores) while boasting the so-called Hyper-Threading technology. It basically emulates one virtual core for each physical. And last, but not least, Intel’s chip has level 3 cache of 3MB while AMD’s offering has only level 2 cache of 2MB.
We can easily say that Intel’s Core i5-6200U has much higher performance and more advanced features but let’s see what the benchmarks show.
If you are interested in buying one of the aforementioned configurations, make sure to check out the HP ProBook 455 G3 here and the 450 G3 here.
Intel Core i5-6200U
Intel Core i5-6200U is a 6th generation dual-core CPU. It is manufactured using 14 nm FinFET process, meaning it’s part of the Ultra-Low Voltage lineup.The CPU is clocked at 2.3GHz, but thanks to the Turbo Boost technology it could automatically increase its clock speeds up to 2.8GHz for a single core and 2.7GHz when two cores are functioning. It is designed using Intel’s Skylake architecture allowing it to have similar performance to Intel Core i7-5500U, which is part of the Broadwell lineup. The CPU boasts four logical cores and 3MB level 3 cache. It consumes 15W of energy and can operate at a maximum temperature of 100 degrees Celsius.
The SoC also integrates Intel HD Graphics 520. Its performance is similar to that of NVIDIA’s GeForce GT 820 GPU. The GPU can be clocked at up to 1000MHz. The SoC supports the Dual-Channel DDR3L-1600/DDR4-2133 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization and AES-NI technologies.
You can browse through our top CPUs ranking: http://laptopmedia.com/top-laptop-cpu-ranking
Here you will find other useful information and every notebook we’ve tested with this processor: http://laptopmedia.com/processor/intel-core-i5-6200u
AMD A8-7410
The AMD A8-7410 is based on Puma+ architecture and represents the Carrizo-L CPU lineup, which stands for entry-level devices and subnotebooks. The chip offers four compute cores clocked at up to 2.5 GHz and having a base clock of 2.2 GHz. It’s built around 28nm manufacturing process with configurable TDP of the whole SoC. It can go as low as 12W or as high as 25W and this includes the single-channel DDR3L-1866 memory controller and the integrated graphics chip – Radeon R5.
Speaking of which, it has 128 shaders running at a maximum of 850 MHz. The most impressive feature of the Radeon R5 is the ability to decode videos up to 4K resolution using the UVD (Unified Video Decoder). The chip also uses the specialized video encoder called VCE. The Radeon R5 can support up to two displays at once using either VGA, DVI, HDMI 1.4a and DisplayPort 1.2.
You can browse through our top CPUs ranking: http://laptopmedia.com/top-laptop-cpu-ranking
Here you will find other useful information and every notebook we’ve tested with this processor: http://laptopmedia.com/processor/amd-a8-7410/
Benchmarks
3D Rendering
Results are from the Cinebench 20 CPU test (the higher the score, the better)
Adobe Photoshop
Results are from our Photoshop benchmark test (the lower the score, the better)
Raw performance
Results are from the Fritz chess benchmark (the higher the score, the better)
If you want to learn more about AMD’s Carrizo architecture and Intel’s Skylake processors, make sure you check out our reviews.
Bottom line
It’s quite clear that Intel’s solution is superior to AMD’s in terms of raw performance and more importantly, Intel’s Core i5-6200U has better performance/price ratio. Both configurations – the 455 G3 with A8-7410 and 450 G3 with Core i5-6200U – have almost identical price tag of around $650 so you might want to opt for Intel’s configuration. However, we have yet to see how both notebooks perform in real-life usage like heat management and battery runtimes. It might turn out that AMD’s solution is more energy efficient or tends to run a little hotter than the Core i5-6200U.
Stay tuned for our full review of both models as we will draw a fine comparison line between the two with detailed tests of the battery, screen, performance and cooling capabilities.
If you are interested in buying one of the aforementioned configurations, make sure to check out the HP ProBook 455 G3 here and the 450 G3 here.
Amd quad-core a8-7410 processor vs intel i5?
Tác giả: Rohto Nhật Bản
You are reading: “Amd quad-core a8-7410 processor vs intel i5”. This is a “hot” topic with 73,700 searches/month. Let’s Eyelight Gaming learn more about Amd quad-core a8-7410 processor vs intel i5 in this article
Contents
Google search results:
AMD A8-7410 vs Intel Core i5-5200U – CPU-World
The AMD A8-7410 packs more CPU cores than the i5-5200U microprocessor. Large number of cores helps this CPU to tackle multiple threads or …. => Read Now
AMD A8-7410 APU (2015 M.Ca) vs Intel Core i5-5200U
Based on 140978 user benchmarks for the AMD A8-7410 APU (2015 M.Ca) and the Intel Core i5-5200U, we rank them both on effective speed and value for money …. => Read Now
AMD A8-7410 APU (2015 M.Ca) vs Intel Core i5 650
Based on 45408 user benchmarks for the AMD A8-7410 APU (2015 M.Ca) and the Intel Core i5 650, we rank them both on effective speed and value for money …. => Read Now
AMD A8-7410 APU (2015 M.
Ca) vs Intel Core i5-7200U
Based on 253563 user benchmarks for the AMD A8-7410 APU (2015 M.Ca) and the Intel Core i5-7200U, we rank them both on effective speed and value for money …. => Read Now
AMD A8-7410 APU (2015 M.Ca) vs Intel Core i5-4460
Based on 260725 user benchmarks for the AMD A8-7410 APU (2015 M.Ca) and the Intel Core i5-4460, we rank them both on effective speed and value for money …. => Read More
AMD A8-7410 APU (2015 M.Ca) vs Intel Core i5-8400
Based on 340291 user benchmarks for the AMD A8-7410 APU (2015 M.Ca) and the Intel Core i5-8400, we rank them both on effective speed and value for money …. => Read More
AMD A8-7410 APU (2015 M.Ca) vs Intel Core i5-6200U
Based on 179891 user benchmarks for the AMD A8-7410 APU (2015 M.Ca) and the Intel Core i5-6200U, we rank them both on effective speed and value for money …. => Read More
AMD A8-7410 APU (2015 M.Ca) vs Intel Core i5-10400
Based on 95662 user benchmarks for the AMD A8-7410 APU (2015 M.Ca) and the Intel Core i5-10400, we rank them both on effective speed and value for money …. => Read More
Intel Core i5-7200U vs AMD A8-7410 – Technical City
Intel Core i5-7200U satisfies 86% minimum and 76% recommended requirements of all games known to us. … AMD A8-7410 satisfies 84% minimum and 74% recommended …. => Read More
Similar Meaning:
“Amd quad-core a8-7410 processor vs intel i5”
amd a8 vs intel i5 6th gen amd a8-7410 generation amd a8-7410 release date amd a8-7410 with radeon r5 graphics AMD A8 7410 cores i5 cores AMD A8 7410 Intel Core i5 AMD A8 7410 Intel Core i5 AMD A8 7410 Intel Core i5 AMD A8 7410 Intel Core i5 AMD A8 7410 Intel Core i5 AMD A8 7410 Intel Core i5 AMD A8 7410 Intel Core i5 Intel Core i5 AMD A8 7410 Cores .
Other search quires:
- Feedback
- amd a8-7410 vs intel i5
- amd a8-7410 vs intel i3
- amd a8-7410 equivalent to intel
- amd a8 7th gen vs intel i5
- amd quad-core a8-7410 processor vs intel i5
You are reading: Amd quad-core a8-7410 processor vs intel i5 belongs to topic Game (English). If you love this topic, please share it on facebook to let your friends know.
Other references:
AMD A8-7410 APU (2015 M.Ca) vs Intel Core i5-10210U
Based on 82284 user benchmarks for the AMD A8-7410 APU (2015 M.Ca) and the Intel Core i5-10210U, we rank them both on effective speed and value for money … => Read More
AMD A8-7410 APU (2015 M.Ca) vs Intel Core i5-2430M
4-Core Avg. Quad Core Mixed Speed, 167 Pts, Much faster quad-core speed. +30% ; 8-Core Avg. Octa Core Mixed Speed, 169 Pts, Faster octa-core speed. +29% …. => Read More
AMD A8-7410 APU (2015 M.
Ca) vs Intel Core i5-8250U
Based on 276602 user benchmarks for the AMD A8-7410 APU (2015 M.Ca) and the Intel Core i5-8250U, we rank them both on effective speed and value for money … => Read More
AMD A8-7410 APU (2015 M.Ca) vs Intel Core i5-2520M
2-Core OC Dual Core Mixed Speed, 154 Pts, Hugely faster OC dual-core speed. +81% ; 4-Core OC Quad Core Mixed Speed, 214 Pts, Much faster OC quad-core speed. +39% … => Read More
AMD A8-7410 APU (2015 M.Ca) vs Intel Core i5-11400
Based on 50489 user benchmarks for the AMD A8-7410 APU (2015 M.Ca) and the Intel Core i5-11400, we rank them both on effective speed and value for money … => Read More
Same Topic: Amd quad-core a8-7410 processor vs intel i5
AMD A8-7410 APU (2015 M.Ca) vs Intel Core i5-2430M
4-Core Avg. Quad Core Mixed Speed, 167 Pts, Much faster quad-core speed. +30% ; 8-Core Avg. Octa Core Mixed Speed, 169 Pts, Faster octa-core speed. +29% … => Read More
AMD A8-7410 APU (2015 M.Ca) vs Intel Core i5-8250U
Based on 276602 user benchmarks for the AMD A8-7410 APU (2015 M.Ca) and the Intel Core i5-8250U, we rank them both on effective speed and value for money … => Read More
AMD A8-7410 APU (2015 M.Ca) vs Intel Core i5-2520M
2-Core OC Dual Core Mixed Speed, 154 Pts, Hugely faster OC dual-core speed. +81% ; 4-Core OC Quad Core Mixed Speed, 214 Pts, Much faster OC quad-core speed. +39% … => Read More
AMD A8-7410 APU (2015 M.Ca) vs Intel Core i5-11400
Based on 50489 user benchmarks for the AMD A8-7410 APU (2015 M.Ca) and the Intel Core i5-11400, we rank them both on effective speed and value for money … => Read More
AMD A8-7410 APU (2015 M.Ca) vs Intel Core i5-11300H
Based on 35445 user benchmarks for the AMD A8-7410 APU (2015 M.Ca) and the Intel Core i5-11300H, we rank them both on effective speed and value for money … => Read More
AMD A8-7410 APU (2015 M.
Ca) vs Intel Core i5-750
4-Core Avg. Quad Core Mixed Speed, 251 Pts, Hugely faster quad-core speed. +96% ; 8-Core Avg. Octa Core Mixed Speed, 254 Pts, Hugely faster octa-core speed. +92% … => Read More
AMD A8-7410 APU (2015 M.Ca) vs Intel Core i5-10300H
Based on 112524 user benchmarks for the AMD A8-7410 APU (2015 M.Ca) and the Intel Core i5-10300H, we rank them both on effective speed and value for money … => Read More
AMD A8-7410 APU (2015 M.Ca) vs Intel Core i5-6400
Based on 207869 user benchmarks for the AMD A8-7410 APU (2015 M.Ca) and the Intel Core i5-6400, we rank them both on effective speed and value for money … => Read More
=> Read More
All you need to know about: AMD A8-7410 vs Intel Core i5-5200U – CPU-World
- Definition: What is Amd quad-core a8-7410 processor vs intel i5? => Read More
- Address: Amd quad-core a8-7410 processor vs intel i5, where? => Read More
- Why: Amd quad-core a8-7410 processor vs intel i5? => Read More
- When: Amd quad-core a8-7410 processor vs intel i5? => Read More
- How to do: Amd quad-core a8-7410 processor vs intel i5 => Read More
- How can: Amd quad-core a8-7410 processor vs intel i5 => Read More
- Amd quad-core a8-7410 processor vs intel i5, when? => Read More
- Procedural Instructions: Amd quad-core a8-7410 processor vs intel i5 => Read More
- How to Amd quad-core a8-7410 processor vs intel i5? => Read More
- Amd quad-core a8-7410 processor vs intel i5 for how long/ how long does it take? => Read More
- How often does Amd quad-core a8-7410 processor vs intel i5? => Read More
- Amd quad-core a8-7410 processor vs intel i5 How much/ how much is it? => Read More
- Amd quad-core a8-7410 processor vs intel i5 Price/How much does it cost? => Read More
- Amd quad-core a8-7410 processor vs intel i5 how much interest? => Read More
- Which: Amd quad-core a8-7410 processor vs intel i5 is better? => Read More
- Amd quad-core a8-7410 processor vs intel i5 updated (latest/current) today => Read More
- Information about: Amd quad-core a8-7410 processor vs intel i5. => Read More
- Example: Amd quad-core a8-7410 processor vs intel i5. => Read More
- Lookup: Amd quad-core a8-7410 processor vs intel i5. => Read More
- Profile: Amd quad-core a8-7410 processor vs intel i5. => Read More
- Job Description: Amd quad-core a8-7410 processor vs intel i5. => Read More
- Plan:Amd quad-core a8-7410 processor vs intel i5. => Read More
- Code: Amd quad-core a8-7410 processor vs intel i5. => Read More
- Recruitment Notice: Amd quad-core a8-7410 processor vs intel i5. => Read More
- Cost: Amd quad-core a8-7410 processor vs intel i5. => Read More
- Game guide, Game play, Play it now: Amd quad-core a8-7410 processor vs intel i5. => Read More
Giới thiệu: Rohto Nhật Bản
Nước nhỏ mắt Rohto Nhật Bản Vitamin hỗ trợ mắt mỏi yếu chống cận thị. Sản phẩm giúp:
+ Tăng cường sức khỏe vùng mắt, giảm tình trạng mỏi mắt
+ Thúc đẩy quá trình trao đổi chất cho mắt và cải thiện mệt mỏi mắt
+ Bảo vệ các bề mặt góc cạnh mắt, làm giảm các triệu chứng mệt mỏi liên quan đến mắt.
+ Hỗ trợ phòng các bệnh về mắt do tác nhân môi trường như máy tính, bơi lội, khói bị
+ Mang lại cảm giác dễ chịu, mát mẻ làm cho đôi mắt đang bị mệt mỏi cảm thấy tươi tỉnh và khỏe
Xem thêm thông tin: Tại Đây | Website
CPU-Z Benchmark for AMD PRO A8-8600B R6; 10 Compute Cores 4C+6G (1T)
Best CPU performance — 64-bit — September 2022
AMD PRO A8-8600B R6; 10 Compute Cores 4C+6G (1T)
Back to validation
Intel Core i7-7700K
Intel Core i7-6700K
Intel Core i5-6600K
Intel Core i7-4790K
Intel Core i7-6850K
Intel Core i5-4690K
Intel Core i7-6900K
Intel Core i7-6800K
Intel Core i7-6950X
Intel Core i7-5930K
Intel Core i5-6600
Intel Core i7-4770K
Intel Core i7-6700
Intel Core i5-4670K
Intel Core i3-6100
Intel Pentium G3258
Intel Core i7-5820K
Intel Core i7-3770K
Intel Xeon E3-1230 v5
Intel Core i5-3570K
Intel Core i7-4790
Intel Core i7-4930K
Intel Core i7-4820K
Intel Core i5-4690
Intel Core i7-7500U
Intel Core i7-4770
Intel Core i5-6500
Intel Pentium G4400
Intel Core i5-4670
Intel Core i7-5960X
Intel Core i3-4170
Intel Core i7-3770
Intel Xeon E3-1231 v3
Intel Core i7-6820HK
Intel Core i5-4590
Intel Core i3-4160
Intel Core i5-3570
Intel Core i5-6400
Intel Xeon E3-1230 v3
Intel Core i5-2500K
Intel Core i5-4570
Intel Core i7-2700K
Intel Core i5-3550
Intel Core i3-4150
Intel Core i7-2600K
Intel Xeon E3-1230 V2
Intel Core i7-4720HQ
Intel Core i7-3960X
Intel Core i3-4130
Intel Core i5-3470
Intel Core i7-3820
Intel Core i5-7200U
Intel Pentium G3260
Intel Core i5-2550K
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
Intel Core i7-4710HQ
Intel Core i5-4460
Intel Core i7-4710MQ
Intel Core i5-4210H
Intel Core i5-3450
Intel Core i7-3930K
Intel Core i7-3520M
Intel Core i5-4200H
Intel Core i7-4700MQ
Intel Core i7-4700HQ
Intel Core i3-3240
Intel Core i5-4440
Intel Core i7-6500U
Intel Core i7 X 990
Intel Core i5-4430
Intel Core i3-3220
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
Intel Core i5-6300U
Intel Core i7-3630QM
Intel Core i5-3350P
AMD FX -9590
Intel Core i7-2600
Intel Core i5-4210M
Intel Pentium G3220
Intel Core i7-4702MQ
Intel Core i7-5500U
Intel Core i7-3610QM
Intel Core i7 X 980
Intel Core i5-3330
Intel Core i5-3320M
Intel Core i5-2500
Intel Xeon W3690
AMD FX -9370
Intel Pentium G2030
Intel Core i7-4510U
Intel Core i5-6200U
Intel Core i7-3632QM
Intel Core i5-3230M
Intel Core i5-4200M
AMD FX-8370
Intel Pentium G2020
Intel Core i7-3612QM
AMD FX -4350
Intel Core i5-2400
Intel Core i5-3210M
AMD FX -8350
AMD A10-6800K
AMD A10-7890K
Intel Xeon X5675
Intel Xeon X5470
Intel Xeon E5-2683 v3
AMD Athlon X4 880K
AMD FX-8370E
Intel Core i3-2120
Intel Xeon X5670
Intel Core i7-2620M
AMD FX -6350
Intel Core i5-4300U
Intel Core i7 870
Intel Core i5-2320
Intel Core i7 960
Intel Core i5-5200U
AMD Athlon X4 845
AMD A8-6600K
AMD A10-5800K
Intel Core i5-2540M
Intel Xeon E5-2670
AMD A6-6400K
AMD FX -8320
Intel Core i5 760
AMD Athlon X4 870K
AMD A10-7870K
Intel Core i5-2310
AMD Athlon X4 760K
Intel Core i7 950
AMD FX -8300
AMD FX -4300
AMD FX -6300
AMD Athlon X4 860K
AMD FX-8320E
Intel Core i3-2100
AMD A10-7850K
Intel Core i5 650
Intel Core 2 Duo E8600
Intel Xeon X5460
Intel Core i5-2520M
Intel Core i5-2300
Intel Core i7 860
Intel Core i3-6100U
AMD Athlon X4 750K
AMD A10-7860K
AMD A6-5400K
AMD A8-5600K
Intel Core i5 750
Intel Core i3 550
Intel Core i7-2670QM
Intel Core 2 Duo E8500
Intel Xeon E5450
AMD A10-7700K
AMD A10-7800
Intel Core i5-3337U
Intel Core i7 930
Intel Core i5-2430M
Intel Core i3 540
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9650
Intel Core i5 M 560
Intel Xeon X5650
AMD A8-7600
Intel Xeon X5450
Intel Core i5-2450M
Intel Xeon X3440
AMD A8-7650K
Pentium E5700
Intel Core 2 Duo E8400
Intel Core i5-2410M
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550
AMD Athlon X4 740
Intel Core 2 Duo E6850
Intel Core i7-2630QM
Intel Xeon E5440
Intel Core i3-3110M
Intel Core 2 Duo E7500
Intel Core i7 920
Pentium E6500
Intel Core i3 530
Intel Core i5 M 480
Intel Pentium G620
Intel Core 2 Duo E7400
Pentium E5500
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9450
Intel Core i5 M 460
Intel Core i5 M 520
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400
Intel Core i3-5005U
Intel Core 2 Duo E7300
Pentium E5400
Intel Core 2 Quad Q8400
Pentium E5300
Intel Core 2 Duo E6750
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9300
AMD FX -8150
Pentium E5200
Intel Xeon L5420
Intel Core 2 Quad Q8300
Intel Core i3 M 380
Intel Core i3-2350M
Intel Core i5 M 430
Intel Core i7 Q 720
AMD FX -8120
Intel Core i3 M 370
Intel Core i3-4030U
Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600
Intel Core i3-2330M
Intel Core 2 Quad
AMD FX -6100
AMD FX -4100
Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200
Intel Core 2 Duo E6550
Intel Core i3-2310M
Intel Core i3 M 350
AMD A10-8700P
Intel Core i3-3217U
Intel Core i3-4005U
AMD Phenom II X6 1100T
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T
Intel Core 2 Duo E4500
Intel Core i3 M 330
AMD Phenom II X6 1055T
AMD Phenom II X4 965
AMD A8-7410
AMD Phenom II X4 B55
AMD Phenom II X4 955
AMD A8-6410
AMD A8-4500M
AMD Phenom II X4 840
AMD Phenom II X4 B50
(YOU) AMD PRO A8-8600B R6; 10 Compute Cores 4C+6G
AMD A6-6310
AMD Phenom II X4 945
AMD Athlon II X2 250
AMD Athlon II X4 640
AMD Athlon II X2 245
AMD Phenom II X4 925
AMD Athlon II X4 630
AMD Athlon II X2 240
AMD Athlon II X4 620
AMD Athlon 64 X2 6000+
AMD Athlon 64 X2 5200+
AMD Athlon 64 X2 5000+
Intel Pentium N3540
Intel Celeron N2840
Intel Celeron N3050
Intel Atom x5-Z8300
AMD A8-5500 vs Intel Core i5-3470: What is the difference?
42points
AMD A8-5500
37points
Intel Core i5-3470
Comparison winner
vs
64 facts in comparison
AMD A8-5500
Intel Core i5-3470
Why is AMD A8-5500 better than Intel Core i5-3470?
- 266MHz higher ram speed?
1866MHzvs1600MHz - 110MHz faster GPU clock speed?
760MHzvs650MHz - 3. 9°C higher maximum operating temperature?
71.3°Cvs67.4°C - 3MB bigger L2 cache?
4MBvs1MB - 12W lower TDP?
65Wvs77W - 0.75MB/core more L2 cache per core?
1MB/corevs0.25MB/core - 103million more transistors?
1303 millionvs1200 million - 0.4GT/s faster bus transfer rate?
5.4GT/svs5GT/s
Why is Intel Core i5-3470 better than AMD A8-5500?
- 10nm smaller semiconductor size?
22nmvs32nm - 1.6x higher PassMark result?
6606vs4130 - 1 newer version of PCI Express (PCIe)?
3vs2 - 64KB bigger L1 cache?
256KBvs192KB - 4.6GB/s more memory bandwidth?
25.6GB/svs21GB/s - 1.5x higher PassMark result (single)?
1908vs1272 - 1.67x higher PassMark result (overclocked)?
7464vs4459 - 15. 0 more performance per watt?
108.0vs93.0
Which are the most popular comparisons?
AMD A8-5500
vs
Intel Core i3-3220
Intel Core i5-3470
vs
Intel Core i7-3770
AMD A8-5500
vs
Intel Core i5-3330
Intel Core i5-3470
vs
AMD A8-7600
AMD A8-5500
vs
Intel Core i7-3820
Intel Core i5-3470
vs
Intel Core i5-3570
AMD A8-5500
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
Intel Core i5-3470
vs
Intel Core i3-10100
AMD A8-5500
vs
Intel Core i5-4300Y
Intel Core i5-3470
vs
AMD FX-6300
AMD A8-5500
vs
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
Intel Core i5-3470
vs
Intel Core i5-2400
AMD A8-5500
vs
AMD A8-7600
Intel Core i5-3470
vs
Intel Core i7-2600
AMD A8-5500
vs
AMD Pro A8-8650B
Intel Core i5-3470
vs
Intel Core i3-6100
AMD A8-5500
vs
AMD E1-1200
Intel Core i5-3470
vs
Intel Core i3-3220
Intel Core i5-3470
vs
Intel Core i3-1115G4
Price comparison
User reviews
Overall Rating
AMD A8-5500
1 User reviews
AMD A8-5500
9. 0/10
1 User reviews
Intel Core i5-3470
3 User reviews
Intel Core i5-3470
8.3/10
3 User reviews
Features
Value for money
10.0/10
1 votes
9.0/10
3 votes
Gaming
10.0/10
1 votes
8.0/10
3 votes
Performance
10.0/10
1 votes
8.3/10
3 votes
Reliability
10.0/10
1 votes
9.3/10
3 votes
Energy efficiency
8.0/10
1 votes
9.3/10
3 votes
Performance
1.CPU speed
4 x 3.2GHz
4 x 3.2GHz
The CPU speed indicates how many processing cycles per second can be executed by a CPU, considering all of its cores (processing units). It is calculated by adding the clock rates of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors employing different microarchitectures, of each group of cores.
2.CPU threads
More threads result in faster performance and better multitasking.
3.turbo clock speed
3.7GHz
3.6GHz
When the CPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased performance.
4.Has an unlocked multiplier
✖AMD A8-5500
✖Intel Core i5-3470
Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier which makes them easy to overclock, allowing you to gain increased performance in games and other apps.
5.L2 cache
A larger L2 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
6.L3 cache
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A8-5500)
A larger L3 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
7.L1 cache
A larger L1 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
8.L2 core
1MB/core
0.25MB/core
More data can be stored in the L2 cache for access by each core of the CPU.
9.L3 core
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A8-5500)
1.5MB/core
More data can be stored in the L3 cache for access by each core of the CPU.
Memory
1.RAM speed
1866MHz
1600MHz
It can support faster memory, which will give quicker system performance.
2.maximum memory bandwidth
21GB/s
25.6GB/s
This is the maximum rate that data can be read from or stored into memory.
3.DDR memory version
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A8-5500)
DDR (Double Data Rate) memory is the most common type of RAM. Newer versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy-efficient.
4. memory channels
More memory channels increases the speed of data transfer between the memory and the CPU.
5.maximum memory amount
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A8-5500)
The maximum amount of memory (RAM) supported.
6.bus transfer rate
5.4GT/s
The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.
7.Supports ECC memory
✖AMD A8-5500
✖Intel Core i5-3470
Error-correcting code memory can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when is it essential to avoid corruption, such as scientific computing or when running a server.
8.eMMC version
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A8-5500)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-3470)
A higher version of eMMC allows faster memory interfaces, having a positive effect on the performance of a device. For example, when transferring files from your computer to the internal storage over USB.
9.bus speed
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A8-5500)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-3470)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.
Benchmarks
1.PassMark result
This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using multiple threads.
2.PassMark result (single)
This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using a single thread.
3.Geekbench 5 result (multi)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A8-5500)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s multi-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)
4.Cinebench R20 (multi) result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A8-5500)
Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s multi-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.
5.Cinebench R20 (single) result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A8-5500)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-3470)
Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s single-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.
6.Geekbench 5 result (single)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A8-5500)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s single-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)
7.Blender (bmw27) result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A8-5500)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-3470)
The Blender (bmw27) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.
8.Blender (classroom) result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A8-5500)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-3470)
The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.
9.performance per watt
This means the CPU is more efficient, giving a greater amount of performance for each watt of power used.
Features
1.uses multithreading
✖AMD A8-5500
✖Intel Core i5-3470
Multithreading technology (such as Intel’s Hyperthreading or AMD’s Simultaneous Multithreading) provides increased performance by splitting each of the processor’s physical cores into virtual cores, also known as threads. This way, each core can run two instruction streams at once.
2.Has AES
✔AMD A8-5500
✔Intel Core i5-3470
AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.
3.Has AVX
✔AMD A8-5500
✔Intel Core i5-3470
AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial apps, as well as improving Linux RAID software performance.
4.SSE version
SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing an image or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.
5.Has F16C
✔AMD A8-5500
✔Intel Core i5-3470
F16C is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.
6.bits executed at a time
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A8-5500)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-3470)
NEON provides acceleration for media processing, such as listening to MP3s.
7.Has MMX
✔AMD A8-5500
✔Intel Core i5-3470
MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.
8.Has TrustZone
✖AMD A8-5500
✖Intel Core i5-3470
A technology integrated into the processor to secure the device for use with features such as mobile payments and streaming video using digital rights management (DRM).
9.front-end width
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A8-5500)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-3470)
The CPU can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), meaning that the CPU performs better
Price comparison
Cancel
Which are the best CPUs?
Processor A8-7410 [in 19 benchmarks]
AMD
A8-7410
- Interface
- Core frequency
- Video memory size
- Memory type
- Memory frequency
- Maximum resolution
Description
AMD started AMD A8-7410 sales 7 May 2015. This is Carrizo-L architecture notebook processor primarily aimed at office systems. It has 4 cores and 4 threads and is manufactured using 28nm process technology, the maximum frequency is 2500MHz, the multiplier is locked.
In terms of compatibility, this is an FP4 socket processor with a TDP of 12 — 25W. It supports DDR3L-1866 memory.
It provides poor benchmark performance at
2.72%
from the leader, which is AMD EPYC 7h22.
A8
7410
or
Information on A8-7410 compatibility with other computer components. Useful, for example, when choosing the configuration of a future computer or to upgrade an existing one. Please note that the power consumption of some processors can significantly exceed their nominal TDP even without overclocking. Some may even double their claims if the motherboard allows you to adjust the power settings of the processor. 9001 9001 9001 9001 9001
9021 9DisplayPort
APIs supported by the A8-7410 integrated graphics card, including their versions.
A8-7410 supported peripherals and how to connect them.
These are the results of the A8-7410 performance tests in non-gaming benchmarks. The overall score is set from 0 to 100, where 100 corresponds to the fastest processor at the moment. This is our overall performance rating. We regularly improve our algorithms, but if you find any inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in the comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
A8-7410 Passmark CPU Mark is a widely used benchmark that consists of 8 different tests, including integer and floating point calculations, extended instruction tests, compression, encryption, and game physics calculations. Also includes a separate single-threaded test. Benchmark coverage: 68%
A8-7410 GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application designed as CPU benchmarks that independently recreate certain real world tasks that can accurately measure performance. This version uses only one processor core. Benchmark coverage: 37%
A8-7410 GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application designed as CPU benchmarks that independently recreate certain real world tasks that can be used to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available processor cores. Benchmark coverage: 37%
A8-7410 Cinebench R10 is a very outdated ray tracing benchmark for processors developed by the authors of Cinema 4D, Maxon. The Single-Core version uses a single CPU thread to render a futuristic motorcycle model. Benchmark coverage: 20%
A8-7410 Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 that uses all processor threads. The possible number of threads in this version is limited to 16. Benchmark coverage: 19%
A8-7410 3DMark06 is an outdated set of benchmarks based on DirectX 9 by Futuremark. Its processor part contains two tests, one of which calculates the pathfinding of game AI, the other emulates game physics using the PhysX package. Benchmark coverage: 19%
A8-7410 Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 that uses all processor threads. This version supports a maximum of 64 threads. Benchmark coverage: 17%
A8-7410 Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core (sometimes referred to as Multi-Thread) is a variant of Cinebench R15 that uses all of the processor threads. Benchmark coverage: 14%
A8-7410 Cinebench R11.5 is an old Maxon development benchmark. authors of Cinema 4D. It has been superseded by later versions of Cinebench which use more modern variants of the Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads one CPU thread with ray tracing, rendering a glossy room full of crystal spheres and lights. Benchmark coverage: 14%
A8-7410 Cinebench R15 (Release 15) is a benchmark created by Maxon, the creator of the popular Cinema 4D 3D modeling package. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench using more modern variants of the Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes referred to as Single-Thread) uses only one CPU thread to render a room full of mirror balls and complexly shaped lights. Benchmark coverage: 13%
A8-7410 TrueCrypt is a deprecated program that was widely used to encrypt disk partitions on the fly. It contains several built-in benchmarks, one of which is TrueCrypt AES. It measures the speed of data encryption using the AES algorithm. The result of the test is the encryption speed in gigabytes per second. Benchmark coverage: 13%
A8-7410 0
WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of the popular archiver. It contains an internal speed test using maximum compression by the RAR algorithm on large amounts of randomly generated data. Results are measured in kilobytes per second. Benchmark coverage: 12%
A8-7410 x264 Pass 2 is a slower MPEG4 x264 video compression benchmark, resulting in a variable bit rate output file. This results in a better quality of the resulting video file, as a higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. The benchmark result is still measured in frames per second. Benchmark coverage: 12%
A8-7410 The x264 benchmark uses the MPEG 4 x264 compression method to encode the HD (720p) sample video. Pass 1 is a faster option that produces an output file at a constant bit rate. Its result is measured in frames per second, that is, how many frames of the source video file were encoded in one second on average. Benchmark coverage: 12%
A8-7410 Benchmark coverage: 6%
A8-7410 Benchmark coverage: 6%
A8-7410 Benchmark coverage: 3%
A8-7410 Benchmark coverage: 3%
A8-7410
Overall performance of the A8-7410 compared to its closest competitor in notebook processors.
Intel Core i7-5500U
Intel Core i5-5300U
AMD PRO A12-9800B
AMD A8-7410
Intel Core i3-7100U
Intel Core i5-7Y54
Intel Celeron J4115
We believe that the nearest equivalent to A8-7410 from Intel is Core i7-5500U, which is approximately equal in speed and lower by 3 positions in our rating.
Compare
Here are some of Intel’s closest competitors to the A8-7410:
Intel Core i5-4200M
Intel Core i7-5500U
Intel Core i5-5300U
AMD A8-7410
Intel Core i3-7100U
Intel Core i5-7Y54
Intel Celeron J4115 Here we recommend several processors that are more or less similar in performance to the reviewed one.
Compare
Compare
Compare
Compare
Compare
Compare According to our statistics, these video cards are most often used with A8-7410: 44. 3% 15.3% 9.8% 2.3% 2.2% 1.9% 1.8% 1.2% 1% 0.9%
Here you can see the evaluation of the processor by users, as well as put your own rating.
Here you can ask a question about the A8-7410 processor, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site. Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus. Home / Intel Core i5-5250U VS A8-7410 Intel Core i5250U 45% Devicelist VS AMD A8-7410 9000 23% Evaluation Devicelist We compared the specifications of Intel Core i5-5250U and AMD A8-7410 and compiled a list of advantages and a comparison table for you. Find out which one to choose in 2022. Benefits of Intel Core i5-5250U Comparison winner Maximum frequency 2.7 GHz
At 0.2 GHz (8%) better than vs 2.5 GHz Process 14 nm
-14 nm (-50%) better than vs 28 nm Number of transistors 1900 million
970 million (104. 3%) better than vs 930 million Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core 4104
2187 (114.1%) better than vs 1917 Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core 8721
4056 (86.9%) better than vs 4665 Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core 107
55 (105.8%) better than vs 52 Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core 260
86 (49.4%) better than vs 174 WinRAR 4.0 2423
1131 (87.5%) better than vs 1292 x264 encoding pass 1 88
42 (91. 3%) better than vs 46 x264 encoding pass 2 16
6 (60%) better than vs 10 TrueCrypt AES 2
1 (100%) better than vs 1 3DMark06 CPU 3393
457 (15.6%) better than vs 2936 Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core 2638
1382 (110%) better than vs 1256 Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core 5216
1529 (41.5%) better than vs 3687 Advantage AMD A8-7410 Core 4
2 (100%) better than vs 2 Maximum core temperature 90°C
-15°C (-14. 3%) better than vs 105 °C Power Demand (TDP) 12 W
-3 W (-20%) better than vs 15 W Passmark 2741
240 (9.6%) better than vs 2501 Type Architecture code name Cores A large number of cores improves performance in multi-threaded applications. 2 (100%) better than Threads More threads help the cores process information more efficiently. Real performance will be noticeable in very specific tasks (video editing, databases). Base frequency Process -14 nm (-50%) better than Chip size Number of transistors 970 million (104.3%) better than Maximum frequency Faster clocked processors perform more calculations per second and thus provide better performance. Better than at 0.2 GHz (8%)
Support 64 bit Max. number of processors per configuration Socket AMD-V Series Release price Value for money The sum of all the advantages of the device divided by its price. The more%, the better the quality per unit price in comparison with all analogues. Maximum core temperature -15 °C (-14.3%) better than vPro TXT Intel Trusted Execution Technology for hardware-based malware protection. For each protected program, the processor allocates its own isolated section of RAM. PCI Express revision Number of PCI-Express lanes Secure Key Identity Protection OS Guard Flex Memory Access Quick Sync eDP HDMI FMA PowerNow PowerGating VirusProtect IOMMU 2. 0 Enduro Switchable graphics UVD VCE FDI Vulkan NVIDIA’s Vulkan technology allows developers to gain low-level access to the GPU to optimize graphics commands (better than OpenGL and Direct3D APIs). Fast Memory Access Level 1 Cache The fastest level of cache that works directly with the core. The larger the cache, the better the performance. Level 2 cache Level 3 cache Maximum case temperature (TCase) Power Demand (TDP) The calculated heat output shows the average heat dissipation in load operation, -3 W (-20%) better than EDB Video memory Clear Video InTru 3D DisplayPort Smart Response Passmark 240 (9. 6%) better than Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core 2187 (114.1%) better than Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core 4056 (86.9%) better than Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core 55 (105.8%) better than Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core At 86 (49.4%) better than WinRAR 4.0 1131 (87.5%) better than x264 encoding pass 1 42 (91.3%) better than x264 encoding pass 2 6 (60%) better than TrueCrypt AES 1 (100%) better than 3DMark06 CPU 457 (15. 6%) better than Geekbench 2 Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core 1382 (110%) better than Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core 1529 (41.5%) better than Geekbench 4.0 64-bit single-core Geekbench 4.0 64-bit multi-core Extended Instructions Turbo Boost Idle States Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) Intel’s technology that allows the processor to slow down to its lowest frequency to conserve power when the processor is idle. Thermal Monitoring Hyper-Threading A hardware technology from Intel that allows multiple threads to be processed on each processor core. For server applications, the performance improvement is up to 30%. AES-NI Technology from Intel that speeds up the AES encryption process. AVX The presence of AVX commands improves performance in floating point and processor-intensive operations Types of RAM Allowable memory The maximum amount of RAM that can be used with this processor. Number of memory channels VT-x EPT VT-d Intel virtualization technology allows you to forward devices on the PCI bus to the guest operating system so that it can work with them using its standard tools. Maximum number of monitors Clear Video HD Video core The presence of the video core allows you to use your computer without using a video card. Maximum resolution via HDMI 1.4 Maximum resolution via DisplayPort DirectX OpenGL 2.2 GHz | 2 cores VS 2.2GHz | 4 Nuclei Based on 10 tests: Intel Core i5 5200u faster Intel Core I5 5200u AMD A8 core)
Intel Core i5 5200U 310.56% faster Intel Core i5 5200U 19.78 Megheshi/C AMD A8 7410 22.01 Megheshi/C Intel Core i5 5200u is 69.05% Intel Core i5 5200u 0.71 FPS 9000 0.71 FPS 9000.71 0.42 fps
AMD A8-7410 AMD A8-7410 Number of points: 7186
Intel Core i9-10980XE Information about the AMD A8-7410 series and architecture, as well as the release date of the processor. A-Series Carrizo-L AMD A8-7410 4
Leader — AMD Epyc 7702 (64)
4
Leader — AMD Epyc 7702 (128)
2200MHz
Leader — Intel Core i7-10810U 4900 MHz
2500MHz
Leader — Intel Core i9-10980HK (5300)
2MB
Leader — AMD Epyc 7702P (32)
12W
Leader — AMD Epyc 7h22 (280)
28nm
Leader — AMD Ryzen 9 3900X (7)
Information about the type and support of the maximum amount of RAM, as well as the maximum frequency and number of channels. 1866MHz
Leader — AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS (4266)
1
Leader — AMD Epyc 7351P (8)
Integrated graphics processor specifications. Support for 4K, clock speed, as well as the amount of video core memory. Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L) Processor support for advanced technologies such as multithreading, Turbo mode, AES encryption, and x86 AVX command set extension. AMD A8-7410 AMD A8-7410 AMD A8-7410 AMD A8-7410 AMD A8-7410 . The program is based on MAXON Cinema 4D — a professional application for creating 3D animation. 174
Leader — Intel Core i7-6700K (8800)
52
Leader — Intel Core i9-9900KS (216)
1. 87
Leader — Intel Core i9-9980XE (41)
0.61
Leader — Intel Core i9-9900KS (2)
4665
Leader — Intel Core i9-9980XE (61667)
1917
Leader — Intel Core i5-8500 (8606)
Geekbench is a synthetic computer performance test. The program performs a series of test tasks that simulate real scenarios that a computer encounters in everyday work. 3460
Leader — Intel Core i9-9900KS (35932)
1356
Leader — Intel Core i9-9900KS (6313)
3687
Leader — Intel Core i9-9980XE (80967)
1256
Leader — Intel Core i9-9980XE (4875)
A range of benchmarks including 3DMark06 CPU, SuperPI, Octane and many other benchmarks. 2936
Leader — AMD Ryzen 7 2700X (106435)
27
Leader — Intel Core i9-9900KS (7)
1557
Leader — Intel Core i9-10980XE (410)
27
Leader — Intel Core i9-9980XE (2)
900
Leader — AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX (38)
1292
Leader — Intel Core i7-6950X (8450)
45.
EPYC
+
Compatibility with Windows 11
—
compatibility
Expanded instructions
MMX, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, BMI1, F16C, AMD64, VT, AMD-V
FMA
FMA4
AVX
+
PowerTune
—
TrueAudio
—
PowerNow
+
PowerGating
+
Out-of-band
—
VirusProtect
+
The technologies supported by the A8-7410 that accelerate the performance of virtual machines are listed.
AMD-V
+
Immu 2.0
+
Types, maximum size and number of channels of RAM supported by A8-7410. Higher memory frequency may be supported depending on the motherboard.
RAM types
+
HDMI
+
built -in video — support API
DirectX
Directx® 12
VULKAN
1
Peripherals
CHILDER PCI Express
2.0
of 5 (Core i9-12900K)
Tests in the benchmarks
Overall performance in tests
2.72
Passmark
2741
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
261
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
769
Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
1917
Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core
4665
3DMark06 CPU
2936
Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core
2
Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core
174
Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core
0.6
Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core
52
TrueCrypt AES
1
WinRAR 4.
1292
x264 encoding pass 2
10
x264 encoding pass 1
46
Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core
3687
Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core
1256
Geekbench 4.0 64-bit multi-core
3460
Geekbench 4.0 64-bit single-core
1356
Relative capacity
100
100
100
100
99. 26
98.9
98.9
Competitor from Intel
Core i7
5500U
101.1
100
100
100
99.26
98.9
98. 9
Other processors
Core i5
5300U
Core i7
5500U
PRO A12
9800B
Core i3
7100U
Core i5
4200M
A6
7310
Recommended video cards
Radeon R5
Graphics
Radeon R5
M330
Radeon R5
M430
Radeon R5
M320
Radeon R5
M335
Radeon R7
M340
Radeon R7
Graphics
Radeon R7
M440
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
Radeon
Graphics
User rating
Tips and comments
Comparison Intel Core i5-5250U vs AMD A8-7410 which is better?
General information
For laptops
For laptops
Broadwell-U
Carrizo-L
At the moment, increasing the number of processor cores is one of the priorities for increasing performance.
2
4
4
4
1.6 GHz
n/a
14 nm
28 nm
133 mm2
n/a
1900 million
930 million
2.7GHz
2.5 GHz
1
n/a
FCBGA1168
FP4
Intel Core i5
AMD A-Series
315 $
n/a
74.1%
n/a
105 °C
90°C
2.0
2.0
12
n/a
+
n/a
+
n/a
+
n/a
+
n/a
+
n/a
+
+
n/a
FMA4
n/a
+
n/a
+
n/a
+
n/a
+
n/a
+
n/a
+
n/a
+
n/a
+
+
n/a
It is an open, free, cross-platform standard available for all platforms.
n/a
+
+
n/a
64K (per core)
n/a
256K (per core)
2048 Kb
3 MB (total)
n/a
105 °C
n/a
the larger the value, the more the requirements for cooling and power consumption increase.
15W
12 W
+
n/a
16 GB
n/a
+
n/a
+
n/a
+
+
+
n/a
Benchmarks
2501
2741
4104
1917
8721
4665
107
52
260
174
2423
1292
88
46
16
10
2
1
3393
2936
6769
n/a
2638
1256
5216
3687
n/a
1356
n/a
3460
Technologies and Supplementary Instructions
Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
n/a
2. 0
n/a
+
+
applications.
RAM parameters
DDR3L-1333, DDR3L-1600, LPDR3-1600, LPDDR3-1866
DDR3L-1866
16 GB
n/a
2
1
Virtualization Technologies
Integrated graphics
n/a
3
n/a
+
+
2560X1600@60Hz
n/a
3840×2160@60Hz
n/a
11.2/12
DirectX® 12
4. 3
n/a
Compare Intel Core i5 5200U and AMD A8 7410
Intel Core i5 5200U
AMD A8 7410
Benchmark
General result
Compubench 1.5 (T-REX)
Reasons to choose Intel Core i5 5200U
Reasons to choose AMD A8 7410
no
no
Flows
4
4
CASH 2 levels
0.5 MB
2 MB
level 2 levels 2 levels for the nuclear 92 /Nucleus
0.5 MB/Nucleus
CASh 3 levels
3 MB
No
Technician
14 Nm
0059 mmx
sse
sse2
sse3
ssse3
sse4
SSE41
SSE42
FMA4
0925 RAM Integrated video core Advanced technologies
Cinebench tests Geekbench tests Other tests