Amd a8 7410 equivalent to intel: cpu — with which intel processor do you compare AMD A8-7410 Quad Core?

AMD A8-7410 Intel equivalent — GadgetVersus








Intel equivalent of the AMD A8-7410 processor in the various benchmark platforms.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the link above.

This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.














CPU-Z — Multi-thread & single thread score

Intel Core i7-3537U


228

652

Intel Core i7-640M


238

651

Intel Core i3-7020U


211

648

Intel Core i3-6157U


202

648

Intel Core i5-2415M


231

640

AMD A8-7410


170

639

Intel Core i5-3427U


185

636

Intel Pentium Gold 5405U


228

636

Intel Core i3-6100U


190

628

Intel Core i5-4210U


229

627

Intel Core i3-5010U


190

623

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.














Cinebench R20 — Multi-thread & single thread score

Intel Core i7-620M


128

358

Intel Celeron N3450


105

350

Intel Core i3-4010U


135

342

Intel Core m3-6Y30


149

331

Intel Celeron 5205U


151

330

AMD A8-7410


134

327

Intel Core i5-4210U


134

315

Intel Core i5-4250U


141

313

Intel Pentium N3700


83

312

Intel Core m5-6Y57


174

311

Intel Core M-5Y71


155

309

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Cinebench R20 is a multi-platform test software which allows to evaluate the hardware capacities of a device such as a computer, a tablet, a server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant.














PassMark — CPU Mark & single thread

Intel Core m3-6Y30


1.172

1.901

Intel Core M-5Y10


1.108

1.889

Intel Core M-5Y10c


1.102

1.881

Intel Core i3-4030U


1. 020

1.862

Intel Core i5-560M


1.218

1.833

AMD A8-7410


792

1.817

Intel Core i5-540M


1.147

1.761

Intel Core i5-520M


1.082

1.708

Intel Core i3-4000M


1.226

1.681

Intel Core i7-720QM


957

1.642

Intel Core i3-4010U


897

1.634

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.














Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows

Intel Celeron 3867U


413

827

Intel Core i3-2328M


400

822

Intel Pentium N3530


238

820

Intel Pentium 2020M


448

817

Intel Celeron 4205U


423

814

AMD A8-7410


273

806

Intel Core i3-2310M


370

802

Intel Core i3-350M


350

797

Intel Core i3-380M


366

784

Intel Core 2 Duo T9600


423

754

Intel Pentium N3540


228

748

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.














Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux

Intel Core i3-370M


410

917

Intel Core i3-2310M


422

906

Intel Core i3-4020Y


411

904

Intel Core i5-460M


438

891

Intel Core i3-4010U


420

882

AMD A8-7410


284

862

Intel Core i3-3217U


395

861

Intel Core i3-350M


384

858

Intel Core i5-6267U


492

842

Intel Pentium N3540


253

838

Intel Celeron 3215U


426

825

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.













Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — Android

Intel Core i7-6560U


427

942

Intel Core m5-6Y57


544

940

Intel Core i5-4200U


533

937

Intel Core i5-2450M


466

913

Intel Pentium Gold 4425Y


403

908

AMD A8-7410


300

896

Intel Core i3-4030U


422

887

Intel Core i5-2410M


442

884

Intel Core i3-4005U


402

876

Intel Core i5-460M


391

876

Intel Core i5-480M


405

872

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Disclaimer:

When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.

Information:

We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer’s website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.

AMD A8-7410 vs Intel Core i3-5010U


Comparative analysis of AMD A8-7410 and Intel Core i3-5010U processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization, Graphics image quality, Security & Reliability.
Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4. 0 — T-Rex (Fps).

AMD A8-7410

Buy on Amazon


vs

Intel Core i3-5010U

Buy on Amazon

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD A8-7410

  • CPU is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
  • 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
  • Around 19% higher clock speed: 2.5 GHz vs 2.1 GHz
  • 4x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
  • 4.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s): 7.405 vs 1.595
  • Around 67% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 22.317 vs 13.384
  • Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames): 3706 vs 3211
  • Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps): 3706 vs 3211









Launch date 7 May 2015 vs 5 January 2015
Number of cores 4 vs 2
Maximum frequency 2. 5 GHz vs 2.1 GHz
L2 cache 2 MB vs 512 KB
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) 7.405 vs 1.595
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 22.317 vs 13.384
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) 3706 vs 3211
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) 3706 vs 3211

Reasons to consider the Intel Core i3-5010U

  • Around 17% higher maximum core temperature: 105°C vs 90°C
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 14 nm vs 28 nm
  • Around 55% better performance in PassMark — Single thread mark: 1243 vs 803
  • Around 20% better performance in PassMark — CPU mark: 2185 vs 1815
  • Around 87% better performance in Geekbench 4 — Single Core: 491 vs 262
  • Around 41% better performance in Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core: 1102 vs 781
  • Around 92% better performance in CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s): 4.837 vs 2.521
  • 5.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 34.607 vs 6.553
  • Around 86% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.216 vs 0.116
  • Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 944 vs 661
  • Around 76% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames): 2176 vs 1234
  • Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 944 vs 661
  • Around 76% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps): 2176 vs 1234














Maximum core temperature 105°C vs 90°C
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 28 nm
PassMark — Single thread mark 1243 vs 803
PassMark — CPU mark 2185 vs 1815
Geekbench 4 — Single Core 491 vs 262
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core 1102 vs 781
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) 4.837 vs 2.521
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 34.607 vs 6.553
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.216 vs 0.116
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 944 vs 661
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) 2176 vs 1234
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 944 vs 661
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) 2176 vs 1234

Compare benchmarks


CPU 1: AMD A8-7410
CPU 2: Intel Core i3-5010U
















PassMark — Single thread mark

CPU 1
CPU 2


PassMark — CPU mark

CPU 1
CPU 2


Geekbench 4 — Single Core

CPU 1
CPU 2


Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core

CPU 1
CPU 2


CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s)

CPU 1
CPU 2


CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

CPU 1
CPU 2

34.607

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s)

CPU 1
CPU 2


CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s)

CPU 1
CPU 2


CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

CPU 1
CPU 2

22.317

13.384

GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

CPU 1
CPU 2


GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames)

CPU 1
CPU 2


GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames)

CPU 1
CPU 2


GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

CPU 1
CPU 2


GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Fps)

CPU 1
CPU 2


GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps)

CPU 1
CPU 2


















Name AMD A8-7410 Intel Core i3-5010U
PassMark — Single thread mark 803 1243
PassMark — CPU mark 1815 2185
Geekbench 4 — Single Core 262 491
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core 781 1102
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) 2.521 4.837
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 6.553 34.607
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.116 0.216
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) 7.405 1.595
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 22.317 13.384
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 661 944
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames) 1234 2176
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) 3706 3211
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 661 944
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) 1234 2176
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) 3706 3211

Compare specifications (specs)






















































































AMD A8-7410 Intel Core i3-5010U
Architecture codename Carrizo-L Broadwell
Family AMD A-Series Processors
Launch date 7 May 2015 5 January 2015
OPN Tray AM7410JBY44JB
Place in performance rating 1773 1541
Series AMD A8-Series APU for Laptops 5th Generation Intel® Core™ i3 Processors
Vertical segment Laptop Mobile
Launch price (MSRP)

$281
Price now

$303. 93
Processor Number

i3-5010U
Status

Launched
Value for money (0-100)

2.95
64 bit support
Base frequency 2.2 GHz 2.10 GHz
L2 cache 2 MB 512 KB
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 14 nm
Maximum core temperature 90°C 105°C
Maximum frequency 2. 5 GHz 2.1 GHz
Number of cores 4 2
Number of threads 4 4
Transistor count 930 Million 1300 Million
Unlocked
Bus Speed

5 GT/s DMI2
Die size

82 mm
L1 cache

128 KB
L3 cache

3 MB
Maximum case temperature (TCase)

105 °C
Max memory channels 1 2
Supported memory frequency 1866 MHz
Supported memory types DDR3L DDR3L 1333/1600 LPDDR 1333 /1600
Maximum memory bandwidth

25. 6 GB/s
Maximum memory size

16 GB
Enduro
Graphics max frequency 847 MHz 900 MHz
Processor graphics AMD Radeon R5 Graphics Intel® HD Graphics 5500
Switchable graphics
Unified Video Decoder (UVD)
Video Codec Engine (VCE)
Device ID

0x1616
Graphics base frequency

300 MHz
Graphics max dynamic frequency

900 MHz
Intel® Clear Video HD technology

Intel® Clear Video technology

Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI)

Intel® InTru™ 3D technology

Intel® Quick Sync Video

Max video memory

16 GB
DisplayPort
HDMI
eDP

Number of displays supported

3
Wireless Display (WiDi) support

DirectX 12 11. 2/12
Vulkan
OpenGL

4.3
Sockets supported FP4 FCBGA1168
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt 15 Watt
Configurable TDP-down

10 W
Configurable TDP-down Frequency

600 MHz
Low Halogen Options Available

Max number of CPUs in a configuration

1
Package Size

40mm x 24mmx 1. 3mm
PCI Express revision 2.0 2.0
Max number of PCIe lanes

12
PCIe configurations

4×1 2×4
AMD App Acceleration
AMD Elite Experiences
AMD HD3D technology
Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP)
Fused Multiply-Add (FMA)
Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4)
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX)
Intel® AES New Instructions
PowerGating
PowerNow
VirusProtect
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology

Flexible Display interface (FDI)

Idle States

Instruction set extensions

Intel® SSE4. 1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
Intel 64

Intel® Fast Memory Access

Intel® Flex Memory Access

Intel® Hyper-Threading technology

Intel® Smart Response technology

Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP)

Intel® TSX-NI

Intel® Turbo Boost technology

Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility

Thermal Monitoring

AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™)
IOMMU 2. 0
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x)

Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d)

Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT)

Max resolution over DisplayPort

[email protected]
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4

[email protected]
Max resolution over VGA

N / A
Execute Disable Bit (EDB)

Intel® Identity Protection technology

Intel® OS Guard

Intel® Secure Key technology

Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT)

AMD A8-7410 vs Intel Core i5-6200U — specs shootout and benchmark results

While we are working on the HP ProBook 455 G3/450 G3 review, we thought it might come in handy for some users to see what’s the performance difference between the two chips – AMD A8-7410 and Intel Core i5-6200U. If you still don’t know why we are looking at these specific CPUs, it’s because the ProBook 450 G3 offers the Core i5-6200U while the ProBook 455 G3 uses AMD’s A8-7410 chip and both variants cost just about the same. There are, however, other configurations featuring Core i7 and A10 CPUs but we are now focusing on the more affordable solutions.

Anyway, back to the chips. The AMD A8-7410 based on Puma+ architecture, this Carrizo-L chip offers four compute cores that can go up to 2.5 GHz, which is slightly more than the A8-6410 predecessor (2.4 GHz). The CPU also offers Radeon R5 integrated graphics and interestingly, the whole chip’s TDP can be configured anywhere between 12 and 25W. For instance, the Intel Core i5-6200U has a fixed TDP of 15W including the Intel HD Graphics 520 iGPU.

So while this might not seem a fair game, since the A8-7410 integrates four cores and Intel’s solution sports only two, there is a lot more to other features than you thought. The Core i5-6200U is manufactured using a 14nm FinFET process while AMD’s chip has a 28nm process and this can mean several things – the Core i5-6200U should be more power efficient, has less heat dispersion and fits into a smaller die size. Also, the Core i5-6200U’s clock speeds are slightly higher (2.3 – 2.8 GHz or 2.7 GHz for two active cores) while boasting the so-called Hyper-Threading technology. It basically emulates one virtual core for each physical. And last, but not least, Intel’s chip has level 3 cache of 3MB while AMD’s offering has only level 2 cache of 2MB.

We can easily say that Intel’s Core i5-6200U has much higher performance and more advanced features but let’s see what the benchmarks show.

If you are interested in buying one of the aforementioned configurations, make sure to check out the HP ProBook 455 G3 here and the 450 G3 here.

Intel Core i5-6200U

Intel Core i5-6200U is a 6th generation dual-core CPU. It is manufactured using 14 nm FinFET process, meaning it’s part of the Ultra-Low Voltage lineup.The CPU is clocked at 2.3GHz, but thanks to the Turbo Boost technology it could automatically increase its clock speeds up to 2.8GHz for a single core and 2.7GHz when two cores are functioning. It is designed using Intel’s Skylake architecture allowing it to have similar performance to Intel Core i7-5500U, which is part of the Broadwell lineup. The CPU boasts four logical cores and 3MB level 3 cache. It consumes 15W of energy and can operate at a maximum temperature of 100 degrees Celsius.

The SoC also integrates Intel HD Graphics 520. Its performance is similar to that of NVIDIA’s GeForce GT 820 GPU. The GPU can be clocked at up to 1000MHz. The SoC supports the Dual-Channel DDR3L-1600/DDR4-2133 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization and AES-NI technologies.

You can browse through our top CPUs ranking: http://laptopmedia.com/top-laptop-cpu-ranking

Here you will find other useful information and every notebook we’ve tested with this processor: http://laptopmedia.com/processor/intel-core-i5-6200u

AMD A8-7410

The AMD A8-7410 is based on Puma+ architecture and represents the Carrizo-L CPU lineup, which stands for entry-level devices and subnotebooks. The chip offers four compute cores clocked at up to 2.5 GHz and having a base clock of 2.2 GHz. It’s built around 28nm manufacturing process with configurable TDP of the whole SoC. It can go as low as 12W or as high as 25W and this includes the single-channel DDR3L-1866 memory controller and the integrated graphics chip – Radeon R5.

Speaking of which, it has 128 shaders running at a maximum of 850 MHz. The most impressive feature of the Radeon R5 is the ability to decode videos up to 4K resolution using the UVD (Unified Video Decoder). The chip also uses the specialized video encoder called VCE. The Radeon R5 can support up to two displays at once using either VGA, DVI, HDMI 1.4a and DisplayPort 1.2.

You can browse through our top CPUs ranking: http://laptopmedia.com/top-laptop-cpu-ranking

Here you will find other useful information and every notebook we’ve tested with this processor: http://laptopmedia.com/processor/amd-a8-7410/

Benchmarks

3D Rendering

Results are from the Cinebench 20 CPU test (the higher the score, the better)

Adobe Photoshop

Results are from our Photoshop benchmark test (the lower the score, the better)

Raw performance

Results are from the Fritz chess benchmark (the higher the score, the better)

If you want to learn more about AMD’s Carrizo architecture and Intel’s Skylake processors, make sure you check out our reviews.

Bottom line

It’s quite clear that Intel’s solution is superior to AMD’s in terms of raw performance and more importantly, Intel’s Core i5-6200U has better performance/price ratio. Both configurations – the 455 G3 with A8-7410 and 450 G3 with Core i5-6200U – have almost identical price tag of around $650 so you might want to opt for Intel’s configuration. However, we have yet to see how both notebooks perform in real-life usage like heat management and battery runtimes. It might turn out that AMD’s solution is more energy efficient or tends to run a little hotter than the Core i5-6200U.

Stay tuned for our full review of both models as we will draw a fine comparison line between the two with detailed tests of the battery, screen, performance and cooling capabilities.

If you are interested in buying one of the aforementioned configurations, make sure to check out the HP ProBook 455 G3 here and the 450 G3 here.

Amd quad-core a8-7410 processor vs intel i5?

Tác giả: Rohto Nhật Bản

You are reading: “Amd quad-core a8-7410 processor vs intel i5”. This is a “hot” topic with 73,700 searches/month. Let’s Eyelight Gaming learn more about Amd quad-core a8-7410 processor vs intel i5 in this article

Contents

Google search results:

AMD A8-7410 vs Intel Core i5-5200U – CPU-World

The AMD A8-7410 packs more CPU cores than the i5-5200U microprocessor. Large number of cores helps this CPU to tackle multiple threads or …. => Read Now

AMD A8-7410 APU (2015 M.Ca) vs Intel Core i5-5200U

Based on 140978 user benchmarks for the AMD A8-7410 APU (2015 M.Ca) and the Intel Core i5-5200U, we rank them both on effective speed and value for money …. => Read Now

AMD A8-7410 APU (2015 M.Ca) vs Intel Core i5 650

Based on 45408 user benchmarks for the AMD A8-7410 APU (2015 M.Ca) and the Intel Core i5 650, we rank them both on effective speed and value for money …. => Read Now

AMD A8-7410 APU (2015 M.

Ca) vs Intel Core i5-7200U

Based on 253563 user benchmarks for the AMD A8-7410 APU (2015 M.Ca) and the Intel Core i5-7200U, we rank them both on effective speed and value for money …. => Read Now

AMD A8-7410 APU (2015 M.Ca) vs Intel Core i5-4460

Based on 260725 user benchmarks for the AMD A8-7410 APU (2015 M.Ca) and the Intel Core i5-4460, we rank them both on effective speed and value for money …. => Read More

AMD A8-7410 APU (2015 M.Ca) vs Intel Core i5-8400

Based on 340291 user benchmarks for the AMD A8-7410 APU (2015 M.Ca) and the Intel Core i5-8400, we rank them both on effective speed and value for money …. => Read More

AMD A8-7410 APU (2015 M.Ca) vs Intel Core i5-6200U

Based on 179891 user benchmarks for the AMD A8-7410 APU (2015 M.Ca) and the Intel Core i5-6200U, we rank them both on effective speed and value for money …. => Read More

AMD A8-7410 APU (2015 M.Ca) vs Intel Core i5-10400

Based on 95662 user benchmarks for the AMD A8-7410 APU (2015 M.Ca) and the Intel Core i5-10400, we rank them both on effective speed and value for money …. => Read More

Intel Core i5-7200U vs AMD A8-7410 – Technical City

Intel Core i5-7200U satisfies 86% minimum and 76% recommended requirements of all games known to us. … AMD A8-7410 satisfies 84% minimum and 74% recommended …. => Read More

Similar Meaning:

“Amd quad-core a8-7410 processor vs intel i5”

amd a8 vs intel i5 6th gen amd a8-7410 generation amd a8-7410 release date amd a8-7410 with radeon r5 graphics AMD A8 7410 cores i5 cores AMD A8 7410 Intel Core i5 AMD A8 7410 Intel Core i5 AMD A8 7410 Intel Core i5 AMD A8 7410 Intel Core i5 AMD A8 7410 Intel Core i5 AMD A8 7410 Intel Core i5 AMD A8 7410 Intel Core i5 Intel Core i5 AMD A8 7410 Cores .

Other search quires:

  • Feedback
  • amd a8-7410 vs intel i5
  • amd a8-7410 vs intel i3
  • amd a8-7410 equivalent to intel
  • amd a8 7th gen vs intel i5
  • amd quad-core a8-7410 processor vs intel i5

You are reading: Amd quad-core a8-7410 processor vs intel i5 belongs to topic Game (English). If you love this topic, please share it on facebook to let your friends know.

Other references:

AMD A8-7410 APU (2015 M.Ca) vs Intel Core i5-10210U

Based on 82284 user benchmarks for the AMD A8-7410 APU (2015 M.Ca) and the Intel Core i5-10210U, we rank them both on effective speed and value for money … => Read More

AMD A8-7410 APU (2015 M.Ca) vs Intel Core i5-2430M

4-Core Avg. Quad Core Mixed Speed, 167 Pts, Much faster quad-core speed. +30% ; 8-Core Avg. Octa Core Mixed Speed, 169 Pts, Faster octa-core speed. +29% …. => Read More

AMD A8-7410 APU (2015 M.

Ca) vs Intel Core i5-8250U

Based on 276602 user benchmarks for the AMD A8-7410 APU (2015 M.Ca) and the Intel Core i5-8250U, we rank them both on effective speed and value for money … => Read More

AMD A8-7410 APU (2015 M.Ca) vs Intel Core i5-2520M

2-Core OC Dual Core Mixed Speed, 154 Pts, Hugely faster OC dual-core speed. +81% ; 4-Core OC Quad Core Mixed Speed, 214 Pts, Much faster OC quad-core speed. +39% … => Read More

AMD A8-7410 APU (2015 M.Ca) vs Intel Core i5-11400

Based on 50489 user benchmarks for the AMD A8-7410 APU (2015 M.Ca) and the Intel Core i5-11400, we rank them both on effective speed and value for money … => Read More

Same Topic: Amd quad-core a8-7410 processor vs intel i5

AMD A8-7410 APU (2015 M.Ca) vs Intel Core i5-2430M

4-Core Avg. Quad Core Mixed Speed, 167 Pts, Much faster quad-core speed. +30% ; 8-Core Avg. Octa Core Mixed Speed, 169 Pts, Faster octa-core speed. +29% … => Read More

AMD A8-7410 APU (2015 M.Ca) vs Intel Core i5-8250U

Based on 276602 user benchmarks for the AMD A8-7410 APU (2015 M.Ca) and the Intel Core i5-8250U, we rank them both on effective speed and value for money … => Read More

AMD A8-7410 APU (2015 M.Ca) vs Intel Core i5-2520M

2-Core OC Dual Core Mixed Speed, 154 Pts, Hugely faster OC dual-core speed. +81% ; 4-Core OC Quad Core Mixed Speed, 214 Pts, Much faster OC quad-core speed. +39% … => Read More

AMD A8-7410 APU (2015 M.Ca) vs Intel Core i5-11400

Based on 50489 user benchmarks for the AMD A8-7410 APU (2015 M.Ca) and the Intel Core i5-11400, we rank them both on effective speed and value for money … => Read More

AMD A8-7410 APU (2015 M.Ca) vs Intel Core i5-11300H

Based on 35445 user benchmarks for the AMD A8-7410 APU (2015 M.Ca) and the Intel Core i5-11300H, we rank them both on effective speed and value for money … => Read More

AMD A8-7410 APU (2015 M.

Ca) vs Intel Core i5-750

4-Core Avg. Quad Core Mixed Speed, 251 Pts, Hugely faster quad-core speed. +96% ; 8-Core Avg. Octa Core Mixed Speed, 254 Pts, Hugely faster octa-core speed. +92% … => Read More

AMD A8-7410 APU (2015 M.Ca) vs Intel Core i5-10300H

Based on 112524 user benchmarks for the AMD A8-7410 APU (2015 M.Ca) and the Intel Core i5-10300H, we rank them both on effective speed and value for money … => Read More

AMD A8-7410 APU (2015 M.Ca) vs Intel Core i5-6400

Based on 207869 user benchmarks for the AMD A8-7410 APU (2015 M.Ca) and the Intel Core i5-6400, we rank them both on effective speed and value for money … => Read More

=> Read More

All you need to know about: AMD A8-7410 vs Intel Core i5-5200U – CPU-World

  • Definition: What is Amd quad-core a8-7410 processor vs intel i5? => Read More
  • Address: Amd quad-core a8-7410 processor vs intel i5, where? => Read More
  • Why: Amd quad-core a8-7410 processor vs intel i5? => Read More
  • When: Amd quad-core a8-7410 processor vs intel i5? => Read More
  • How to do: Amd quad-core a8-7410 processor vs intel i5 => Read More
  • How can: Amd quad-core a8-7410 processor vs intel i5 => Read More
  • Amd quad-core a8-7410 processor vs intel i5, when? => Read More
  • Procedural Instructions: Amd quad-core a8-7410 processor vs intel i5 => Read More
  • How to Amd quad-core a8-7410 processor vs intel i5? => Read More
  • Amd quad-core a8-7410 processor vs intel i5 for how long/ how long does it take? => Read More
  • How often does Amd quad-core a8-7410 processor vs intel i5? => Read More
  • Amd quad-core a8-7410 processor vs intel i5 How much/ how much is it? => Read More
  • Amd quad-core a8-7410 processor vs intel i5 Price/How much does it cost? => Read More
  • Amd quad-core a8-7410 processor vs intel i5 how much interest? => Read More
  • Which: Amd quad-core a8-7410 processor vs intel i5 is better? => Read More
  • Amd quad-core a8-7410 processor vs intel i5 updated (latest/current) today => Read More
  • Information about: Amd quad-core a8-7410 processor vs intel i5. => Read More
  • Example: Amd quad-core a8-7410 processor vs intel i5. => Read More
  • Lookup: Amd quad-core a8-7410 processor vs intel i5. => Read More
  • Profile: Amd quad-core a8-7410 processor vs intel i5. => Read More
  • Job Description: Amd quad-core a8-7410 processor vs intel i5. => Read More
  • Plan:Amd quad-core a8-7410 processor vs intel i5. => Read More
  • Code: Amd quad-core a8-7410 processor vs intel i5. => Read More
  • Recruitment Notice: Amd quad-core a8-7410 processor vs intel i5. => Read More
  • Cost: Amd quad-core a8-7410 processor vs intel i5. => Read More
  • Game guide, Game play, Play it now: Amd quad-core a8-7410 processor vs intel i5. => Read More

Giới thiệu: Rohto Nhật Bản

Nước nhỏ mắt Rohto Nhật Bản Vitamin hỗ trợ mắt mỏi yếu chống cận thị. Sản phẩm giúp:

+ Tăng cường sức khỏe vùng mắt, giảm tình trạng mỏi mắt

+ Thúc đẩy quá trình trao đổi chất cho mắt và cải thiện mệt mỏi mắt

+ Bảo vệ các bề mặt góc cạnh mắt, làm giảm các triệu chứng mệt mỏi liên quan đến mắt.

+ Hỗ trợ phòng các bệnh về mắt do tác nhân môi trường như máy tính, bơi lội, khói bị

+ Mang lại cảm giác dễ chịu, mát mẻ làm cho đôi mắt đang bị mệt mỏi cảm thấy tươi tỉnh và khỏe

Xem thêm thông tin: Tại Đây | Website

CPU-Z Benchmark for AMD PRO A8-8600B R6; 10 Compute Cores 4C+6G (1T)

Best CPU performance — 64-bit — September 2022

AMD PRO A8-8600B R6; 10 Compute Cores 4C+6G (1T)

Back to validation

Intel Core i7-7700K

Intel Core i7-6700K

Intel Core i5-6600K

Intel Core i7-4790K

Intel Core i7-6850K

Intel Core i5-4690K

Intel Core i7-6900K

Intel Core i7-6800K

Intel Core i7-6950X

Intel Core i7-5930K

Intel Core i5-6600

Intel Core i7-4770K

Intel Core i7-6700

Intel Core i5-4670K

Intel Core i3-6100

Intel Pentium G3258

Intel Core i7-5820K

Intel Core i7-3770K

Intel Xeon E3-1230 v5

Intel Core i5-3570K

Intel Core i7-4790

Intel Core i7-4930K

Intel Core i7-4820K

Intel Core i5-4690

Intel Core i7-7500U

Intel Core i7-4770

Intel Core i5-6500

Intel Pentium G4400

Intel Core i5-4670

Intel Core i7-5960X

Intel Core i3-4170

Intel Core i7-3770

Intel Xeon E3-1231 v3

Intel Core i7-6820HK

Intel Core i5-4590

Intel Core i3-4160

Intel Core i5-3570

Intel Core i5-6400

Intel Xeon E3-1230 v3

Intel Core i5-2500K

Intel Core i5-4570

Intel Core i7-2700K

Intel Core i5-3550

Intel Core i3-4150

Intel Core i7-2600K

Intel Xeon E3-1230 V2

Intel Core i7-4720HQ

Intel Core i7-3960X

Intel Core i3-4130

Intel Core i5-3470

Intel Core i7-3820

Intel Core i5-7200U

Intel Pentium G3260

Intel Core i5-2550K

Intel Core i7-6700HQ

Intel Core i7-4710HQ

Intel Core i5-4460

Intel Core i7-4710MQ

Intel Core i5-4210H

Intel Core i5-3450

Intel Core i7-3930K

Intel Core i7-3520M

Intel Core i5-4200H

Intel Core i7-4700MQ

Intel Core i7-4700HQ

Intel Core i3-3240

Intel Core i5-4440

Intel Core i7-6500U

Intel Core i7 X 990

Intel Core i5-4430

Intel Core i3-3220

Intel Core i5-6300HQ

Intel Core i5-6300U

Intel Core i7-3630QM

Intel Core i5-3350P

AMD FX -9590

Intel Core i7-2600

Intel Core i5-4210M

Intel Pentium G3220

Intel Core i7-4702MQ

Intel Core i7-5500U

Intel Core i7-3610QM

Intel Core i7 X 980

Intel Core i5-3330

Intel Core i5-3320M

Intel Core i5-2500

Intel Xeon W3690

AMD FX -9370

Intel Pentium G2030

Intel Core i7-4510U

Intel Core i5-6200U

Intel Core i7-3632QM

Intel Core i5-3230M

Intel Core i5-4200M

AMD FX-8370

Intel Pentium G2020

Intel Core i7-3612QM

AMD FX -4350

Intel Core i5-2400

Intel Core i5-3210M

AMD FX -8350

AMD A10-6800K

AMD A10-7890K

Intel Xeon X5675

Intel Xeon X5470

Intel Xeon E5-2683 v3

AMD Athlon X4 880K

AMD FX-8370E

Intel Core i3-2120

Intel Xeon X5670

Intel Core i7-2620M

AMD FX -6350

Intel Core i5-4300U

Intel Core i7 870

Intel Core i5-2320

Intel Core i7 960

Intel Core i5-5200U

AMD Athlon X4 845

AMD A8-6600K

AMD A10-5800K

Intel Core i5-2540M

Intel Xeon E5-2670

AMD A6-6400K

AMD FX -8320

Intel Core i5 760

AMD Athlon X4 870K

AMD A10-7870K

Intel Core i5-2310

AMD Athlon X4 760K

Intel Core i7 950

AMD FX -8300

AMD FX -4300

AMD FX -6300

AMD Athlon X4 860K

AMD FX-8320E

Intel Core i3-2100

AMD A10-7850K

Intel Core i5 650

Intel Core 2 Duo E8600

Intel Xeon X5460

Intel Core i5-2520M

Intel Core i5-2300

Intel Core i7 860

Intel Core i3-6100U

AMD Athlon X4 750K

AMD A10-7860K

AMD A6-5400K

AMD A8-5600K

Intel Core i5 750

Intel Core i3 550

Intel Core i7-2670QM

Intel Core 2 Duo E8500

Intel Xeon E5450

AMD A10-7700K

AMD A10-7800

Intel Core i5-3337U

Intel Core i7 930

Intel Core i5-2430M

Intel Core i3 540

Intel Core 2 Quad Q9650

Intel Core i5 M 560

Intel Xeon X5650

AMD A8-7600

Intel Xeon X5450

Intel Core i5-2450M

Intel Xeon X3440

AMD A8-7650K

Pentium E5700

Intel Core 2 Duo E8400

Intel Core i5-2410M

Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550

AMD Athlon X4 740

Intel Core 2 Duo E6850

Intel Core i7-2630QM

Intel Xeon E5440

Intel Core i3-3110M

Intel Core 2 Duo E7500

Intel Core i7 920

Pentium E6500

Intel Core i3 530

Intel Core i5 M 480

Intel Pentium G620

Intel Core 2 Duo E7400

Pentium E5500

Intel Core 2 Quad Q9450

Intel Core i5 M 460

Intel Core i5 M 520

Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400

Intel Core i3-5005U

Intel Core 2 Duo E7300

Pentium E5400

Intel Core 2 Quad Q8400

Pentium E5300

Intel Core 2 Duo E6750

Intel Core 2 Quad Q9300

AMD FX -8150

Pentium E5200

Intel Xeon L5420

Intel Core 2 Quad Q8300

Intel Core i3 M 380

Intel Core i3-2350M

Intel Core i5 M 430

Intel Core i7 Q 720

AMD FX -8120

Intel Core i3 M 370

Intel Core i3-4030U

Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600

Intel Core i3-2330M

Intel Core 2 Quad

AMD FX -6100

AMD FX -4100

Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200

Intel Core 2 Duo E6550

Intel Core i3-2310M

Intel Core i3 M 350

AMD A10-8700P

Intel Core i3-3217U

Intel Core i3-4005U

AMD Phenom II X6 1100T

AMD Phenom II X6 1090T

Intel Core 2 Duo E4500

Intel Core i3 M 330

AMD Phenom II X6 1055T

AMD Phenom II X4 965

AMD A8-7410

AMD Phenom II X4 B55

AMD Phenom II X4 955

AMD A8-6410

AMD A8-4500M

AMD Phenom II X4 840

AMD Phenom II X4 B50

(YOU) AMD PRO A8-8600B R6; 10 Compute Cores 4C+6G

AMD A6-6310

AMD Phenom II X4 945

AMD Athlon II X2 250

AMD Athlon II X4 640

AMD Athlon II X2 245

AMD Phenom II X4 925

AMD Athlon II X4 630

AMD Athlon II X2 240

AMD Athlon II X4 620

AMD Athlon 64 X2 6000+

AMD Athlon 64 X2 5200+

AMD Athlon 64 X2 5000+

Intel Pentium N3540

Intel Celeron N2840

Intel Celeron N3050

Intel Atom x5-Z8300

AMD A8-5500 vs Intel Core i5-3470: What is the difference?

42points

AMD A8-5500

37points

Intel Core i5-3470

Comparison winner

vs

64 facts in comparison

AMD A8-5500

Intel Core i5-3470

Why is AMD A8-5500 better than Intel Core i5-3470?

  • 266MHz higher ram speed?
    1866MHzvs1600MHz
  • 110MHz faster GPU clock speed?
    760MHzvs650MHz
  • 3. 9°C higher maximum operating temperature?
    71.3°Cvs67.4°C
  • 3MB bigger L2 cache?
    4MBvs1MB
  • 12W lower TDP?
    65Wvs77W
  • 0.75MB/core more L2 cache per core?
    1MB/corevs0.25MB/core
  • 103million more transistors?
    1303 millionvs1200 million
  • 0.4GT/s faster bus transfer rate?
    5.4GT/svs5GT/s

Why is Intel Core i5-3470 better than AMD A8-5500?

  • 10nm smaller semiconductor size?
    22nmvs32nm
  • 1.6x higher PassMark result?
    6606vs4130
  • 1 newer version of PCI Express (PCIe)?
    3vs2
  • 64KB bigger L1 cache?
    256KBvs192KB
  • 4.6GB/s more memory bandwidth?
    25.6GB/svs21GB/s
  • 1.5x higher PassMark result (single)?
    1908vs1272
  • 1.67x higher PassMark result (overclocked)?
    7464vs4459
  • 15. 0 more performance per watt?
    108.0vs93.0

Which are the most popular comparisons?

AMD A8-5500

vs

Intel Core i3-3220

Intel Core i5-3470

vs

Intel Core i7-3770

AMD A8-5500

vs

Intel Core i5-3330

Intel Core i5-3470

vs

AMD A8-7600

AMD A8-5500

vs

Intel Core i7-3820

Intel Core i5-3470

vs

Intel Core i5-3570

AMD A8-5500

vs

AMD Ryzen 5 1600X

Intel Core i5-3470

vs

Intel Core i3-10100

AMD A8-5500

vs

Intel Core i5-4300Y

Intel Core i5-3470

vs

AMD FX-6300

AMD A8-5500

vs

AMD Ryzen 7 2700X

Intel Core i5-3470

vs

Intel Core i5-2400

AMD A8-5500

vs

AMD A8-7600

Intel Core i5-3470

vs

Intel Core i7-2600

AMD A8-5500

vs

AMD Pro A8-8650B

Intel Core i5-3470

vs

Intel Core i3-6100

AMD A8-5500

vs

AMD E1-1200

Intel Core i5-3470

vs

Intel Core i3-3220

Intel Core i5-3470

vs

Intel Core i3-1115G4

Price comparison

User reviews

Overall Rating

AMD A8-5500

1 User reviews

AMD A8-5500

9. 0/10

1 User reviews

Intel Core i5-3470

3 User reviews

Intel Core i5-3470

8.3/10

3 User reviews

Features

Value for money

10.0/10

1 votes

9.0/10

3 votes

Gaming

10.0/10

1 votes

8.0/10

3 votes

Performance

10.0/10

1 votes

8.3/10

3 votes

Reliability

10.0/10

1 votes

9.3/10

3 votes

Energy efficiency

8.0/10

1 votes

9.3/10

3 votes

Performance

1.CPU speed

4 x 3.2GHz

4 x 3.2GHz

The CPU speed indicates how many processing cycles per second can be executed by a CPU, considering all of its cores (processing units). It is calculated by adding the clock rates of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors employing different microarchitectures, of each group of cores.

2.CPU threads

More threads result in faster performance and better multitasking.

3.turbo clock speed

3.7GHz

3.6GHz

When the CPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased performance.

4.Has an unlocked multiplier

✖AMD A8-5500

✖Intel Core i5-3470

Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier which makes them easy to overclock, allowing you to gain increased performance in games and other apps.

5.L2 cache

A larger L2 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.

6.L3 cache

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A8-5500)

A larger L3 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.

7.L1 cache

A larger L1 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.

8.L2 core

1MB/core

0.25MB/core

More data can be stored in the L2 cache for access by each core of the CPU.

9.L3 core

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A8-5500)

1.5MB/core

More data can be stored in the L3 cache for access by each core of the CPU.

Memory

1.RAM speed

1866MHz

1600MHz

It can support faster memory, which will give quicker system performance.

2.maximum memory bandwidth

21GB/s

25.6GB/s

This is the maximum rate that data can be read from or stored into memory.

3.DDR memory version

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A8-5500)

DDR (Double Data Rate) memory is the most common type of RAM. Newer versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy-efficient.

4. memory channels

More memory channels increases the speed of data transfer between the memory and the CPU.

5.maximum memory amount

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A8-5500)

The maximum amount of memory (RAM) supported.

6.bus transfer rate

5.4GT/s

The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.

7.Supports ECC memory

✖AMD A8-5500

✖Intel Core i5-3470

Error-correcting code memory can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when is it essential to avoid corruption, such as scientific computing or when running a server.

8.eMMC version

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A8-5500)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-3470)

A higher version of eMMC allows faster memory interfaces, having a positive effect on the performance of a device. For example, when transferring files from your computer to the internal storage over USB.

9.bus speed

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A8-5500)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-3470)

The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.

Benchmarks

1.PassMark result

This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using multiple threads.

2.PassMark result (single)

This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using a single thread.

3.Geekbench 5 result (multi)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A8-5500)

Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s multi-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)

4.Cinebench R20 (multi) result

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A8-5500)

Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s multi-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.

5.Cinebench R20 (single) result

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A8-5500)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-3470)

Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s single-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.

6.Geekbench 5 result (single)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A8-5500)

Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s single-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)

7.Blender (bmw27) result

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A8-5500)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-3470)

The Blender (bmw27) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.

8.Blender (classroom) result

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A8-5500)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-3470)

The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.

9.performance per watt

This means the CPU is more efficient, giving a greater amount of performance for each watt of power used.

Features

1.uses multithreading

✖AMD A8-5500

✖Intel Core i5-3470

Multithreading technology (such as Intel’s Hyperthreading or AMD’s Simultaneous Multithreading) provides increased performance by splitting each of the processor’s physical cores into virtual cores, also known as threads. This way, each core can run two instruction streams at once.

2.Has AES

✔AMD A8-5500

✔Intel Core i5-3470

AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.

3.Has AVX

✔AMD A8-5500

✔Intel Core i5-3470

AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial apps, as well as improving Linux RAID software performance.

4.SSE version

SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing an image or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.

5.Has F16C

✔AMD A8-5500

✔Intel Core i5-3470

F16C is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.

6.bits executed at a time

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A8-5500)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-3470)

NEON provides acceleration for media processing, such as listening to MP3s.

7.Has MMX

✔AMD A8-5500

✔Intel Core i5-3470

MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.

8.Has TrustZone

✖AMD A8-5500

✖Intel Core i5-3470

A technology integrated into the processor to secure the device for use with features such as mobile payments and streaming video using digital rights management (DRM).

9.front-end width

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A8-5500)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-3470)

The CPU can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), meaning that the CPU performs better

Price comparison

Cancel

Which are the best CPUs?

Processor A8-7410 [in 19 benchmarks]

AMD
A8-7410

  • Interface
  • Core frequency
  • Video memory size
  • Memory type
  • Memory frequency
  • Maximum resolution

Description

AMD started AMD A8-7410 sales 7 May 2015. This is Carrizo-L architecture notebook processor primarily aimed at office systems. It has 4 cores and 4 threads and is manufactured using 28nm process technology, the maximum frequency is 2500MHz, the multiplier is locked.

In terms of compatibility, this is an FP4 socket processor with a TDP of 12 — 25W. It supports DDR3L-1866 memory.

It provides poor benchmark performance at

2.72%

from the leader, which is AMD EPYC 7h22.


A8
7410

or


EPYC + Compatibility with Windows 11

compatibility

Information on A8-7410 compatibility with other computer components. Useful, for example, when choosing the configuration of a future computer or to upgrade an existing one.

Please note that the power consumption of some processors can significantly exceed their nominal TDP even without overclocking. Some may even double their claims if the motherboard allows you to adjust the power settings of the processor.

9001 9001 9001 9001 9001

Expanded instructions MMX, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, BMI1, F16C, AMD64, VT, AMD-V
FMA FMA4
AVX +
PowerTune
TrueAudio
PowerNow +
PowerGating +
Out-of-band
VirusProtect +

The technologies supported by the A8-7410 that accelerate the performance of virtual machines are listed.

AMD-V +
Immu 2.0 +

9021
Types, maximum size and number of channels of RAM supported by A8-7410. Higher memory frequency may be supported depending on the motherboard.

9DisplayPort

RAM types +
HDMI +

built -in video — support API

APIs supported by the A8-7410 integrated graphics card, including their versions.

DirectX Directx® 12
VULKAN 1

Peripherals

A8-7410 supported peripherals and how to connect them.

CHILDER PCI Express 2.0 of 5 (Core i9-12900K)

Tests in the benchmarks

These are the results of the A8-7410 performance tests in non-gaming benchmarks. The overall score is set from 0 to 100, where 100 corresponds to the fastest processor at the moment.


Overall performance in tests

This is our overall performance rating. We regularly improve our algorithms, but if you find any inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in the comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A8-7410
2.72

  • Passmark
  • GeekBench 5 Single-Core
  • GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
  • Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
  • Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core
  • 3DMark06 CPU
  • Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core
  • Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core
  • Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core
  • Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core
  • TrueCrypt AES
  • WinRAR 4.0
  • x264 encoding pass 2
  • x264 encoding pass 1
  • Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core
  • Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core
  • Geekbench 4. 0 64-bit multi-core
  • Geekbench 4.0 64-bit single-core
Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widely used benchmark that consists of 8 different tests, including integer and floating point calculations, extended instruction tests, compression, encryption, and game physics calculations. Also includes a separate single-threaded test.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

A8-7410
2741

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application designed as CPU benchmarks that independently recreate certain real world tasks that can accurately measure performance. This version uses only one processor core.

Benchmark coverage: 37%

A8-7410
261

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application designed as CPU benchmarks that independently recreate certain real world tasks that can be used to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available processor cores.

Benchmark coverage: 37%

A8-7410
769

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is a very outdated ray tracing benchmark for processors developed by the authors of Cinema 4D, Maxon. The Single-Core version uses a single CPU thread to render a futuristic motorcycle model.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

A8-7410
1917

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 that uses all processor threads. The possible number of threads in this version is limited to 16.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

A8-7410
4665

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is an outdated set of benchmarks based on DirectX 9 by Futuremark. Its processor part contains two tests, one of which calculates the pathfinding of game AI, the other emulates game physics using the PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

A8-7410
2936

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 that uses all processor threads. This version supports a maximum of 64 threads.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

A8-7410
2

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core (sometimes referred to as Multi-Thread) is a variant of Cinebench R15 that uses all of the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

A8-7410
174

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old Maxon development benchmark. authors of Cinema 4D. It has been superseded by later versions of Cinebench which use more modern variants of the Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads one CPU thread with ray tracing, rendering a glossy room full of crystal spheres and lights.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

A8-7410
0.6

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (Release 15) is a benchmark created by Maxon, the creator of the popular Cinema 4D 3D modeling package. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench using more modern variants of the Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes referred to as Single-Thread) uses only one CPU thread to render a room full of mirror balls and complexly shaped lights.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

A8-7410
52

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a deprecated program that was widely used to encrypt disk partitions on the fly. It contains several built-in benchmarks, one of which is TrueCrypt AES. It measures the speed of data encryption using the AES algorithm. The result of the test is the encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

A8-7410
1

WinRAR 4.

0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of the popular archiver. It contains an internal speed test using maximum compression by the RAR algorithm on large amounts of randomly generated data. Results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 12%

A8-7410
1292

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower MPEG4 x264 video compression benchmark, resulting in a variable bit rate output file. This results in a better quality of the resulting video file, as a higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. The benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.

Benchmark coverage: 12%

A8-7410
10

x264 encoding pass 1

The x264 benchmark uses the MPEG 4 x264 compression method to encode the HD (720p) sample video. Pass 1 is a faster option that produces an output file at a constant bit rate. Its result is measured in frames per second, that is, how many frames of the source video file were encoded in one second on average.

Benchmark coverage: 12%

A8-7410
46

Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core

Benchmark coverage: 6%

A8-7410
3687

Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core

Benchmark coverage: 6%

A8-7410
1256

Geekbench 4.0 64-bit multi-core

Benchmark coverage: 3%

A8-7410
3460

Geekbench 4.0 64-bit single-core

Benchmark coverage: 3%

A8-7410
1356


Relative capacity

Overall performance of the A8-7410 compared to its closest competitor in notebook processors.


Intel Core i7-5500U
100

Intel Core i5-5300U
100

AMD PRO A12-9800B
100

AMD A8-7410
100

Intel Core i3-7100U
99. 26

Intel Core i5-7Y54
98.9

Intel Celeron J4115
98.9

Competitor from Intel

We believe that the nearest equivalent to A8-7410 from Intel is Core i7-5500U, which is approximately equal in speed and lower by 3 positions in our rating.


Core i7
5500U

Compare

Here are some of Intel’s closest competitors to the A8-7410:

Intel Core i5-4200M
101.1

Intel Core i7-5500U
100

Intel Core i5-5300U
100

AMD A8-7410
100

Intel Core i3-7100U
99.26

Intel Core i5-7Y54
98.9

Intel Celeron J4115
98. 9

Other processors

Here we recommend several processors that are more or less similar in performance to the reviewed one.


Core i5
5300U

Compare


Core i7
5500U

Compare


PRO A12
9800B

Compare


Core i3
7100U

Compare


Core i5
4200M

Compare


A6
7310

Compare

Recommended video cards

According to our statistics, these video cards are most often used with A8-7410:


Radeon R5
Graphics

44. 3%


Radeon R5
M330

15.3%


Radeon R5
M430

9.8%


Radeon R5
M320

2.3%


Radeon R5
M335

2.2%


Radeon R7
M340

1.9%


Radeon R7
Graphics

1.8%


Radeon R7
M440

1.2%


GeForce GTX
1050 Ti

1%


Radeon
Graphics

0.9%

User rating

Here you can see the evaluation of the processor by users, as well as put your own rating.


Tips and comments

Here you can ask a question about the A8-7410 processor, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.


Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.

Comparison Intel Core i5-5250U vs AMD A8-7410 which is better?

Home / Intel Core i5-5250U VS A8-7410

Intel Core i5250U

45%

Devicelist

VS

AMD A8-7410 9000

23%

Evaluation Devicelist We compared the specifications of Intel Core i5-5250U and AMD A8-7410 and compiled a list of advantages and a comparison table for you. Find out which one to choose in 2022.

Benefits of Intel Core i5-5250U

Comparison winner

Maximum frequency

2.7 GHz

At 0.2 GHz (8%) better than

vs

2.5 GHz

Process

14 nm

-14 nm (-50%) better than

vs

28 nm

Number of transistors

1900 million

970 million (104. 3%) better than

vs

930 million

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

4104

2187 (114.1%) better than

vs

1917

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

8721

4056 (86.9%) better than

vs

4665

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

107

55 (105.8%) better than

vs

52

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

260

86 (49.4%) better than

vs

174

WinRAR 4.0

2423

1131 (87.5%) better than

vs

1292

x264 encoding pass 1

88

42 (91. 3%) better than

vs

46

x264 encoding pass 2

16

6 (60%) better than

vs

10

TrueCrypt AES

2

1 (100%) better than

vs

1

3DMark06 CPU

3393

457 (15.6%) better than

vs

2936

Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core

2638

1382 (110%) better than

vs

1256

Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core

5216

1529 (41.5%) better than

vs

3687

Advantage AMD A8-7410

Core

4

2 (100%) better than

vs

2

Maximum core temperature

90°C

-15°C (-14. 3%) better than

vs

105 °C

Power Demand (TDP)

12 W

-3 W (-20%) better than

vs

15 W

Passmark

2741

240 (9.6%) better than

vs

2501

General information

Type

For laptops For laptops

Architecture code name

Broadwell-U Carrizo-L

Cores

A large number of cores improves performance in multi-threaded applications.
At the moment, increasing the number of processor cores is one of the priorities for increasing performance.

2 4

2 (100%) better than

Threads

More threads help the cores process information more efficiently. Real performance will be noticeable in very specific tasks (video editing, databases).

4 4

Base frequency

1.6 GHz n/a

Process

14 nm

-14 nm (-50%) better than

28 nm

Chip size

133 mm2 n/a

Number of transistors

1900 million

970 million (104.3%) better than

930 million

Maximum frequency

Faster clocked processors perform more calculations per second and thus provide better performance.

2.7GHz

Better than

at 0.2 GHz (8%)

2.5 GHz

Support 64 bit

Max. number of processors per configuration

1 n/a

Socket

FCBGA1168 FP4

AMD-V

Series

Intel Core i5 AMD A-Series

Release price

315 $ n/a

Value for money

The sum of all the advantages of the device divided by its price. The more%, the better the quality per unit price in comparison with all analogues.

74.1% n/a

Maximum core temperature

105 °C 90°C

-15 °C (-14.3%) better than

vPro

TXT

Intel Trusted Execution Technology for hardware-based malware protection. For each protected program, the processor allocates its own isolated section of RAM.

PCI Express revision

2.0 2.0

Number of PCI-Express lanes

12 n/a

Secure Key

Identity Protection

+ n/a

OS Guard

+ n/a

Flex Memory Access

+ n/a

Quick Sync

+ n/a

eDP

+ n/a

HDMI

+ +

FMA

n/a FMA4

PowerNow

n/a +

PowerGating

n/a +

VirusProtect

n/a +

IOMMU 2. 0

n/a +

Enduro

n/a +

Switchable graphics

n/a +

UVD

n/a +

VCE

n/a +

FDI

+ n/a

Vulkan

NVIDIA’s Vulkan technology allows developers to gain low-level access to the GPU to optimize graphics commands (better than OpenGL and Direct3D APIs).
It is an open, free, cross-platform standard available for all platforms.

n/a +

Fast Memory Access

+ n/a

Level 1 Cache

The fastest level of cache that works directly with the core. The larger the cache, the better the performance.

64K (per core) n/a

Level 2 cache

256K (per core) 2048 Kb

Level 3 cache

3 MB (total) n/a

Maximum case temperature (TCase)

105 °C n/a

Power Demand (TDP)

The calculated heat output shows the average heat dissipation in load operation,
the larger the value, the more the requirements for cooling and power consumption increase.

15W 12 W

-3 W (-20%) better than

EDB

+ n/a

Video memory

16 GB n/a

Clear Video

+ n/a

InTru 3D

+ n/a

DisplayPort

+ +

Smart Response

+ n/a
Benchmarks

Passmark

2501 2741

240 (9. 6%) better than

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

4104

2187 (114.1%) better than

1917

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

8721

4056 (86.9%) better than

4665

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

107

55 (105.8%) better than

52

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

260

At 86 (49.4%) better than

174

WinRAR 4.0

2423

1131 (87.5%) better than

1292

x264 encoding pass 1

88

42 (91.3%) better than

46

x264 encoding pass 2

16

6 (60%) better than

10

TrueCrypt AES

2

1 (100%) better than

1

3DMark06 CPU

3393

457 (15. 6%) better than

2936

Geekbench 2

6769 n/a

Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core

2638

1382 (110%) better than

1256

Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core

5216

1529 (41.5%) better than

3687

Geekbench 4.0 64-bit single-core

n/a 1356

Geekbench 4.0 64-bit multi-core

n/a 3460
Technologies and Supplementary Instructions

Extended Instructions

Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 n/a

Turbo Boost

2. 0 n/a

Idle States

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)

Intel’s technology that allows the processor to slow down to its lowest frequency to conserve power when the processor is idle.

Thermal Monitoring

Hyper-Threading

A hardware technology from Intel that allows multiple threads to be processed on each processor core. For server applications, the performance improvement is up to 30%.

AES-NI

Technology from Intel that speeds up the AES encryption process.

+ +

AVX

The presence of AVX commands improves performance in floating point and processor-intensive operations
applications.

RAM parameters

Types of RAM

DDR3L-1333, DDR3L-1600, LPDR3-1600, LPDDR3-1866 DDR3L-1866

Allowable memory

The maximum amount of RAM that can be used with this processor.

16 GB n/a

Number of memory channels

2 1
Virtualization Technologies

VT-x

EPT

VT-d

Intel virtualization technology allows you to forward devices on the PCI bus to the guest operating system so that it can work with them using its standard tools.

Integrated graphics

n/a

Maximum number of monitors

3 n/a

Clear Video HD

Video core

The presence of the video core allows you to use your computer without using a video card.

+ +

Maximum resolution via HDMI 1.4

[email protected] n/a

Maximum resolution via DisplayPort

3840×[email protected] n/a

DirectX

11.2/12 DirectX® 12

OpenGL

4. 3 n/a

Compare Intel Core i5 5200U and AMD A8 7410

Intel Core i5 5200U

2.2 GHz | 2 cores

VS

AMD A8 7410

2.2GHz | 4 Nuclei

Benchmark

General result

Based on 10 tests:

Intel Core i5 5200u faster

Intel Core I5 ​​5200u

AMD A8 core)

Intel Core i5 5200U 310.56% faster

Intel Core i5 5200U

19.78 Megheshi/C

AMD A8 7410

22.01 Megheshi/C

Compubench 1.5 (T-REX)

Intel Core i5 5200u is 69.05%

Intel Core i5 5200u

0.71 FPS 9000 0.71 FPS 9000.71

0.42 fps

Reasons to choose Intel Core i5 5200U

  • Smaller CPU (14nm vs 28nm) allows for more performance with less heat dissipation
  • Higher turbo frequency: 2.7GHz vs 2.5GHz
  • More L3 cache (3MB vs. 0MB) allows the processor to access data faster

Reasons to choose AMD A8 7410

  • More cores (4 vs. 2) allows more processes to run simultaneously, speeding up the computer and processing speed
  • More L2 cache (2MB vs. 0.5MB) allows the processor to access data faster
  • More L2 cache per core: 0.5MB/core vs. 0.25MB/core no no Flows 4 4 CASH 2 levels 0.5 MB 2 MB level 2 levels 2 levels for the nuclear 92 /Nucleus 0.5 MB/Nucleus CASh 3 levels 3 MB No Technician 14 Nm

    0059 mmx

    sse sse2 sse3 ssse3 sse4 SSE41 SSE42 FMA4 0925 RAM Integrated video core Advanced technologies
    Cinebench tests Geekbench tests Other tests

    AMD A8-7410

    AMD A8-7410

    Number of points: 7186

    Intel Core i9-10980XE

    Information about the AMD A8-7410 series and architecture, as well as the release date of the processor.

    A-Series

    Carrizo-L

    AMD A8-7410

    4

    Leader — AMD Epyc 7702 (64)

    4

    Leader — AMD Epyc 7702 (128)

    2200MHz

    Leader — Intel Core i7-10810U 4900 MHz

    2500MHz

    Leader — Intel Core i9-10980HK (5300)

    2MB

    Leader — AMD Epyc 7702P (32)

    12W

    Leader — AMD Epyc 7h22 (280)

    28nm

    Leader — AMD Ryzen 9 3900X (7)

    Information about the type and support of the maximum amount of RAM, as well as the maximum frequency and number of channels.

    1866MHz

    Leader — AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS (4266)

    1

    Leader — AMD Epyc 7351P (8)

    Integrated graphics processor specifications. Support for 4K, clock speed, as well as the amount of video core memory.

    Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L)

    Processor support for advanced technologies such as multithreading, Turbo mode, AES encryption, and x86 AVX command set extension.

    AMD A8-7410

    AMD A8-7410

    AMD A8-7410

    AMD A8-7410

    AMD A8-7410

    . The program is based on MAXON Cinema 4D — a professional application for creating 3D animation.

    174

    Leader — Intel Core i7-6700K (8800)

    52

    Leader — Intel Core i9-9900KS (216)

    1. 87

    Leader — Intel Core i9-9980XE (41)

    0.61

    Leader — Intel Core i9-9900KS (2)

    4665

    Leader — Intel Core i9-9980XE (61667)

    1917

    Leader — Intel Core i5-8500 (8606)

    Geekbench is a synthetic computer performance test. The program performs a series of test tasks that simulate real scenarios that a computer encounters in everyday work.

    3460

    Leader — Intel Core i9-9900KS (35932)

    1356

    Leader — Intel Core i9-9900KS (6313)

    3687

    Leader — Intel Core i9-9980XE (80967)

    1256

    Leader — Intel Core i9-9980XE (4875)

    A range of benchmarks including 3DMark06 CPU, SuperPI, Octane and many other benchmarks.

    2936

    Leader — AMD Ryzen 7 2700X (106435)

    27

    Leader — Intel Core i9-9900KS (7)

    1557

    Leader — Intel Core i9-10980XE (410)

    27

    Leader — Intel Core i9-9980XE (2)

    900

    Leader — AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX (38)

    1292

    Leader — Intel Core i7-6950X (8450)

    45.