Amd a9 9410 review: AMD Bristol Ridge A9-9410 Notebook Processor

A9-9410 [in 18 benchmarks]

Summary

AMD started A9-9410 sales 1 June 2016. This is a Stoney Ridge architecture notebook processor primarily aimed at office systems. It has 2 cores and 2 threads, and is based on 28nm manufacturing technology, with a maximum frequency of 3500 MHz and a locked multiplier.

Compatibility-wise, this is FP4 processor with a TDP of 25 Watt and a maximum temperature of 74 °C. It supports DDR4-2133 memory.

It provides poor benchmark performance at


1.20%

of a leader’s which is AMD EPYC 9654.

EPYC9654

Compare

General info


A9-9410 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and pricing.

Place in performance ranking 2190
Market segment Laptop
Series AMD Bristol Ridge
Architecture codename Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date 1 June 2016 (7 years old)
Current price $722 of 14999 (Xeon Platinum 9282)

Technical specs


Basic microprocessor parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters can generally indicate CPU performance, but to be more precise you have to review its test results.

Physical cores 2 (Dual-core)
Threads 2
Base clock speed 2.9 GHz of 4.7 (FX-9590)
Boost clock speed 3.5 GHz of 6 (Core i9-13900KS)
L2 cache 2048 KB of 36864 (Apple M2 Max)
Chip lithography 28 nm of 4 (Ryzen 9 7940HS)
Die size 124.5 mm2
Maximum core temperature 90 °C of 110 (Atom x7-E3950)
Maximum case temperature (TCase) 74 °C of 105 (Core i7-5950HQ)
Number of transistors 1,200 million of 9900000 (Ryzen 5 7645HX)
64 bit support +
Windows 11 compatibility

Compatibility


Information on A9-9410 compatibility with other computer components and devices: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one.

Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration 1 of 8 (Opteron 842)
Socket FP4
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt of 400 (Xeon Platinum 9282)

Technologies and extensions


Technological capabilities and additional instructions supported by A9-9410. You’ll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions Single-Channel DDR4-2133, Virtualization,
AES-NI +
FMA +
AVX +
FRTC 1
FreeSync 1
PowerTune
TrueAudio
PowerNow
PowerGating
Out-of-band client management
VirusProtect
RAID

Virtualization technologies


Supported virtual machine optimization technologies. Some are specific to Intel only, some to AMD.

AMD-V +
IOMMU 2.0

Memory specs


Types, maximum amount and channel number of RAM supported by A9-9410’s memory controller. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequency may be supported.

Supported memory types DDR4-2133 of 5600 (Ryzen 9 7940HS)
Max memory channels 1 of 12 (Xeon Platinum 9221)

Graphics specifications


General parameters of a GPU integrated into A9-9410.

Integrated graphics card AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
iGPU core count 3
Enduro +
Switchable graphics 1
UVD +
VCE +

Graphics interfaces


Available interfaces and connections of A9-9410’s integrated GPU.

DisplayPort +
HDMI +

Graphics API support


APIs supported by A9-9410’s integrated GPU, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX DirectX® 12
Vulkan 1

Peripherals


Specifications and connection types of supported peripherals.

PCIe version 3.0 of 5 (Core i9-12900K)
PCI Express lanes 8 of 128 (EPYC 7551P)

Benchmark performance


Single-core and multi-core benchmark results of A9-9410. Overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.


A9-9410
1.20

    Passmark

    Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

    Benchmark coverage: 68%


    A9-9410
    1514

    Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

    Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

    Benchmark coverage: 20%


    A9-9410
    2694

    Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

    Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

    Benchmark coverage: 19%


    A9-9410
    4619

    3DMark06 CPU

    3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

    Benchmark coverage: 19%


    A9-9410
    2455

    Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

    Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

    Benchmark coverage: 17%


    A9-9410
    2

    Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

    Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

    Benchmark coverage: 14%


    A9-9410
    130

    Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

    Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

    Benchmark coverage: 14%


    A9-9410
    63

    Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

    Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

    Benchmark coverage: 14%


    A9-9410
    0.8

    TrueCrypt AES

    TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

    Benchmark coverage: 13%


    A9-9410
    1

    x264 encoding pass 1

    x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

    Benchmark coverage: 13%


    A9-9410
    54

    x264 encoding pass 2

    x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

    Benchmark coverage: 13%


    A9-9410
    10

    WinRAR 4.

    0

    WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using ‘Best’ setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

    Benchmark coverage: 12%


    A9-9410
    879

    Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core

    Benchmark coverage: 6%


    A9-9410
    2134

    Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core

    Benchmark coverage: 6%


    A9-9410
    3299

    Geekbench 2

    Benchmark coverage: 5%


    A9-9410
    4260

    Geekbench 4.0 64-bit multi-core

    Benchmark coverage: 3%


    A9-9410
    3182

    Geekbench 4.0 64-bit single-core

    Benchmark coverage: 3%


    A9-9410
    2133


    Relative perfomance


    Overall A9-9410 performance compared to nearest competitors among notebook CPUs.



    Intel Pentium 4405Y
    100.83


    Intel Core i7-640LM
    100.83


    Intel Celeron 1017U
    100


    AMD A9-9410
    100


    AMD A9-9420
    99.17


    Intel Celeron 2970M
    99.17


    Intel Core i5-4300Y
    98.33

    Intel equivalent


    According to our data, the closest Intel alternative to A9-9410 is Celeron 1017U, which is nearly equal in speed and lower by 1 position in our ranking.

    Celeron1017U

    Compare


    Here are some closest Intel rivals to A9-9410:


    Intel Pentium 4405Y
    100.83


    Intel Core i7-640LM
    100. 83


    Intel Celeron 1017U
    100


    AMD A9-9410
    100


    Intel Celeron 2970M
    99.17


    Intel Core i5-4202Y
    98.33


    Intel Celeron 3867U
    98.33

    Similar processors

    Here is our recommendation of several processors that are more or less close in performance to the one reviewed.



    Celeron
    1017U




    Celeron
    2970M


    A99420

    Compare



    Pentium
    4405Y




    Core i5
    4300Y




    A8 Pro
    7150B

    Recommended GPUs

    People consider these graphics cards to be good for A9-9410, according to our PC configuration statistics.



    Radeon R5
    Graphics

    46.1%



    Radeon R5
    M430

    9%



    Radeon R5
    M330

    8%



    Radeon R5
    M420

    4.7%



    Radeon R7
    M340

    4.1%



    Radeon R7
    M440

    3.8%



    Radeon
    Graphics

    3.3%



    Radeon R5
    (Stoney Ridge)

    1.8%



    Radeon R5
    230

    1.4%

    These are the fastest graphics cards for A9-9410 in our user configuration statistics.

    There is a total of 836 configurations based on A9-9410 in our database.



    GeForce RTX
    4090

    0.1% (1/836)



    GeForce RTX
    4070 Ti

    0.1% (1/836)



    Radeon RX
    6950 XT

    0.1% (1/836)



    Radeon RX
    6900 XT

    0.1% (1/836)



    GeForce RTX
    3070

    0.2% (2/836)



    GeForce RTX
    2080 Super

    0.1% (1/836)



    GeForce GTX
    1070 SLI Mobile

    0.1% (1/836)



    GeForce GTX
    1070 SLI

    0. 1% (1/836)



    GeForce GTX
    1660 Super

    0.1% (1/836)



    GeForce RTX
    3050 8 GB

    0.1% (1/836)

    User ratings: view and submit


    Here is the rating given to the reviewed processor by our users. Let others know your opinion by rating it yourself.


    Questions and comments


    Here you can ask a question about A9-9410, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.


    Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.

    Page not found

    Page not found









    We couldn’t find such page: /en/cpu/a9-9410%23characteristics

    Popular graphics cards comparisons



    GeForce RTX
    3060 Ti

    vs



    GeForce RTX
    3060




    GeForce RTX
    2060 Super

    vs



    GeForce RTX
    3060




    GeForce GTX
    1060 6 GB

    vs



    Radeon RX
    580




    GeForce RTX
    3060 Ti

    vs



    GeForce RTX
    3070




    GeForce GTX
    1660 Super

    vs



    GeForce RTX
    3050 8 GB




    GeForce GTX
    1660 Super

    vs



    Radeon RX
    580

    Popular graphics cards



    GeForce RTX
    4090




    Radeon RX
    580




    Radeon RX
    Vega 7




    GeForce GTX
    1050 Ti




    GeForce GTX
    1650




    GeForce RTX
    3060

    Popular CPU comparisons



    Ryzen 5
    5600X

    vs



    Core i5
    12400F




    Ryzen 5
    3600

    vs



    Ryzen 5
    5500




    Core i5
    10400F

    vs



    Core i3
    12100F




    Ryzen 5
    3600

    vs



    Core i5
    10400F




    Ryzen 5
    3600

    vs



    Core i3
    12100F




    Ryzen 5
    3600

    vs



    Ryzen 5
    5600X

    Popular CPUs



    EPYC
    9654




    Ryzen 5
    5500U




    Core i3
    1115G4




    Core i5
    12400F




    Core i5
    1135G7




    Ryzen 5
    3600








    A9-9410 processor [in 18 benchmarks]

    Description

    AMD started A9-9410 sales on June 1, 2016. This is Stoney Ridge architecture notebook processor primarily aimed at office systems. It has 2 cores and 2 threads and is manufactured using 28nm process technology, the maximum frequency is 3500MHz, the multiplier is locked.

    In terms of compatibility, this is an FP4 socket processor with a TDP of 25W and a maximum temperature of 74°C. It supports DDR4-2133 memory.

    It provides poor benchmark performance at

    1.20%

    from the leader AMD EPYC 9654

    Information about the type (desktop or laptop) and architecture of the A9-9410, as well as when sales started and cost at that time.

    Performance ranking 2190
    Type Notebook
    Series AMD Bristol Ridge
    Architecture Code Name Stoney Ridge (2016-2019)
    0023
    price now

    Features

    A9-9410 quantitative parameters: number of cores and threads, clock speeds, manufacturing process, cache size and multiplier lock state. They indirectly speak about the performance of the processor, but for an accurate assessment it is necessary to consider the results of the tests.

    Cores 2
    Threads 2
    Base frequency 2.9 GHz of 4.7 (FX-9590)
    Maximum frequency 3.5 GHz of 6 (Core i9-13900KS)
    L2 cache 9 0022 2048 Kb of 36864 (Apple M2 Max)
    Process 28 nm of 4 (Ryzen 9 7940HS)
    Crystal size 124.5 mm 2
    Max core temperature 90°C out of 110 (Atom x7-E3950)
    Max case temperature (TCase) 74°C of 105 (Core i7-5950HQ)
    Number of transistors 1. 200M of 9

    0 (Ryzen 5 7645HX)

    64 bit support +
    Windows 11 compatible 2

    Compatible

    A9 Compatibility Parameters-9410 with the rest of the computer components. Useful, for example, when choosing the configuration of a future computer or to upgrade an existing one.

    Please note that the power consumption of some processors can significantly exceed their nominal TDP even without overclocking. Some may even double their claims if the motherboard allows you to adjust the power settings of the processor.

    Max. number of processors in configuration 1 of 8 (Opteron 842)
    Socket FP4
    Power consumption (TDP) 25 W of 400 (Xeon Platinum 9282 )

    Technology and additional instructions

    Here are the technology solutions supported by the A9-9410 and additional instruction sets. This information is needed if the processor is required to support specific technologies. 9

    90 036

    Extended instructions 037

    +
    FMA +
    AVX +
    FRTC 1
    FreeSync 1
    045

    TrueAudio
    PowerNow
    PowerGating
    Out-of-band 43
    VirusProtect
    RAID

    Virtualization technologies

    The technologies supported by the A9-9410 that accelerate the performance of virtual machines are listed.

    AMD-V +
    IOMMU 2.0 90 022 —

    RAM support

    Types, maximum size and number of channels of RAM supported by A9-9410. Higher memory frequency may be supported depending on the motherboard.

    RAM types

    Number of memory channels 1 of 12 (Xeon Platinum 9221)

    Built-in video specifications

    General parameters of the integrated video card in A9-9410.

    GPU AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
    Number of iGPU cores 3
    Enduro 6 switchable graphics 1
    UVD 45

    VCE +

    Integrated video interfaces

    Interfaces and connections supported by the A9-9410 integrated video card. HDMI 9

    DisplayPort 0037

    +

    Integrated video — API support

    APIs supported by the A9-9410 integrated graphics card, including their versions.

    DirectX DirectX 12
    Vulkan 022 1

    Peripherals

    A9-9410 supported peripherals and how to connect them.

    9 0036 Number of PCI-Express lanes
    PCI Express revision 3.0 of 5 (Core i9-12900K)
    8 out of 128 (EPYC 7551P)

    Benchmark tests

    These are the results of the A9-9410 performance tests in non-gaming benchmarks. The overall score is set from 0 to 100, where 100 corresponds to the fastest processor at the moment.


    Overall benchmark performance

    This is our overall performance rating. We regularly improve our algorithms, but if you find any inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in the comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

    A9-9410
    1.20

      Passmark

      Passmark CPU Mark is a widely used benchmark that consists of 8 different tests, including integer and floating point calculations, extended instruction tests, compression, encryption and game physics calculations. Also includes a separate single-threaded test.

      Benchmark coverage: 68%

      A9-9410
      1514

      Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

      Cinebench R10 is a very outdated ray tracing benchmark for processors developed by the authors of Cinema 4D, Maxon. The Single-Core version uses a single CPU thread to render a futuristic motorcycle model.

      Benchmark coverage: 20%

      A9-9410
      2694

      Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

      Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 that uses all processor threads. The possible number of threads in this version is limited to 16.

      Benchmark coverage: 19%

      A9-9410
      4619

      3DMark06 CPU

      3DMark06 is an outdated set of benchmarks based on DirectX 9 by Futuremark. Its processor part contains two tests, one of which calculates the pathfinding of game AI, the other emulates game physics using the PhysX package.

      Benchmark coverage: 19%

      A9-9410
      2455

      Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

      Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 that uses all processor threads. This version supports a maximum of 64 threads.

      Benchmark coverage: 17%

      A9-9410
      2

      Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

      Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 that uses all CPU threads.

      Benchmark coverage: 14%

      A9-9410
      130

      Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

      Cinebench R15 (Release 15) is a benchmark created by Maxon, the creator of the popular Cinema 4D 3D modeling package. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench using more modern variants of the Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes referred to as Single-Thread) uses only one CPU thread to render a room full of mirror balls and complexly shaped lights.

      Benchmark coverage: 14%

      A9-9410
      63

      Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

      Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark developed by Maxon. authors of Cinema 4D. It has been superseded by later versions of Cinebench which use more modern variants of the Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads one CPU thread with ray tracing, rendering a glossy room full of crystal spheres and lights.

      Benchmark coverage: 14%

      A9-9410
      0.8

      TrueCrypt AES

      TrueCrypt is a deprecated program that was widely used to encrypt disk partitions on the fly. It contains several built-in benchmarks, one of which is TrueCrypt AES. It measures the speed of data encryption using the AES algorithm. The result of the test is the encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

      Benchmark coverage: 13%

      A9-9410
      1

      x264 encoding pass 1

      The x264 benchmark uses the MPEG 4 x264 compression method to encode the sample video in HD (720p). Pass 1 is a faster option that produces an output file at a constant bit rate. Its result is measured in frames per second, that is, how many frames of the source video file were encoded in one second on average.

      Benchmark coverage: 13%

      A9-9410
      54

      x264 encoding pass 2

      x264 Pass 2 is a slower MPEG4 x264 video compression benchmark that results in a variable bit rate output file. This results in a better quality of the resulting video file, as a higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. The benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.

      Benchmark coverage: 13%

      A9-9410
      10

      WinRAR 4.

      0

      WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of the popular archiver. It contains an internal speed test using maximum compression by the RAR algorithm on large amounts of randomly generated data. Results are measured in kilobytes per second.

      Benchmark coverage: 12%

      A9-9410
      879

      Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core

      Benchmark coverage: 6%

      A9-9410
      2134

      Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core

      Benchmark coverage: 6%

      A9-9410
      3299

      Geekbench 2

      Benchmark coverage: 5%

      A9-9410
      4260

      Geekbench 4.0 64-bit multi-core

      Benchmark coverage: 3%

      A9-9410
      3182

      Geekbench 4.0 64-bit single-core

      Benchmark coverage: 3%

      A9-9410
      2133


      Relative capacity

      Overall performance of the A9-9410 compared to its closest competitor in notebook processors.


      Intel Pentium 4405Y
      100.83

      Intel Core i7-640LM
      100.83

      Intel Celeron 1017U
      100

      AMD A9-9410
      100

      AMD A9-9420
      99.17

      Intel Celeron 2970M
      99.17

      Intel Core i5-4300Y
      98.33

      Competitor from Intel

      We believe that the nearest equivalent to A9-9410 from Intel is Celeron 1017U, which is approximately equal in speed and lower by 1 position in our rating.

      Celeron 1017U

      Compare

      Here are some of Intel’s closest competitors to the A9-9410:

      Intel Pentium 4405Y
      100.83

      Intel Core i7-640LM
      100.83

      Intel Celeron 1017U
      100

      AMD A9-9410
      100

      Intel Celeron 2970M
      99. 17

      Intel Core i5-4202Y
      98.33

      Intel Celeron 3867U
      98.33

      Other processors

      Here we recommend several processors that are more or less similar in performance to the reviewed one.

      Celeron 1017U

      Compare


      Celeron
      2970M

      A9 9420

      Compare

      Pentium 4405Y

      Compare

      Core i5 4300Y 90 023

      Compare


      A8 Pro
      7150B

      Best graphics cards for A9-9410

      We have 836 configurations based on A9-9410 in our database.

      According to statistics, these cards are most often used with A9-9410:


      Radeon R5
      Graphics

      46.1%


      Radeon R5
      M430

      9%


      Radeon R5
      M330

      8%


      Radeon R5
      M420

      4. 7%


      Radeon R7
      M340

      4.1%


      Radeon R7
      M440

      3.8%


      Radeon
      Graphics

      3.3%


      Radeon R5
      (Stoney Ridge)

      1.8%


      Radeon R5
      230

      1.4%

      Here are the most powerful graphics cards used with the A9-9410 according to user statistics:


      GeForce RTX
      4090

      0.1% (1/836)


      GeForce RTX
      4070 Ti

      0.1% (1/836)


      Radeon RX
      6950XT

      0.1% (1/836)


      Radeon RX
      6900XT

      0.1% (1/836)


      GeForce RTX
      3070

      0.2% (2/836)


      GeForce RTX
      2080 Super

      0.1% (1/836)

      GeForce GTX
      1070 SLI (mobile)

      0.