AMD Athlon 240GE and 220GE Review: Retaking the Low Ground — Tom’s Hardware
When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Here’s how it works.
Tom’s Hardware Verdict
AMD’s Athlon line-up dominates the low-end for gaming on integrated graphics, and the low price points undercut competing Intel Pentium processors. The addition of unofficial overclocking sweetens the deal, and similar host and graphics processing resources on all three models levels the playing field after tuning, meaning you can score the cheapest model and enjoy the same performance as the most expensive Athlon.
TODAY’S BEST DEALS
Includes a bundled thermal solution
Overclocking is possible, though officially unsupported
All models provide similar performance after overclocking
Why you can trust Tom’s Hardware
Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.
Today’s best AMD Athlon 220GE deals
118 Amazon customer reviews
No price information
No price information
For more information visit their website
AMD Athlon 240GE and 220GE Review
AMD is slowly stealing market share from Intel as the chip-making giant struggles with an ongoing shortage of 14nm processors. Intel, focused on maximizing profits during this period of limited production capacity, is prioritizing high-margin Xeons and enthusiast CPUs, leading to availability issues and price gouging in its low-end Pentium line-up.
It’s especially timely, then, that AMD recently dusted off its 20-year-old Athlon brand to attack the sub-$100 market with capable Zen cores paired with Radeon Vega 3 graphics. Its onslaught began with the Athlon 200GE, which demonstrates exceptional value at its $55 price point. And now AMD is fleshing out the Athlon family with a $65 Athlon 220GE and $75 Athlon 240GE. Both processors slot in nicely between the $100 Ryzen 3 2200G and $55 Athlon 200GE.
The two new chips employ a dual-core/quad-thread design paired with a 192-shader Radeon Vega 3 graphics engine. They’re meant to employ locked ratio multipliers, preventing overclocking and giving enthusiasts a reason to spend more for higher clock rates on the pricier models. However, motherboard manufacturers developed firmware to circumvent this, albeit in a limited fashion, across the Athlon portfolio. Officially, AMD maintains that Athlons are locked processors and points to motherboard manufacturers for answers on policy changes. So, for now, overclocking Athlon CPUs is game-on. Better still, these ultra-affordable chips come bundled with a solid thermal solution that can handle the extra heat of overclocking, increasing their value.
Ultimately, an unofficial unlocked multiplier serves as the equalizer between all three Athlons. You can purchase the cheapest model and gain access to similar performance as the most expensive model, but at a $20 savings.
- Intel Pentium Gold G5600 (Gold) at Newegg for $65
AMD Athlon 200GE
The 2C/4T Athlons drop into Socket AM4 motherboards. Their Radeon Vega-based graphics engine is composed of three Compute Units (CUs), serving up a modest 192 Stream processors, 12 TMUs, and four ROPs. Across all three models, the Vega 3 component operates at 1000 MHz. Thus, slightly higher CPU frequencies (3.4 and 3.5 GHz) are the only reason to buy a pricier Athlon 220GE or 240GE. Like the competing Pentium chips, Athlon processors do not run at higher clock rates via boosting algorithms.
The three Athlons come with eight PCIe 3.0 lanes dedicated to expansion slots instead of the 16 lanes found on fully-featured Ryzen models. The missing eight lanes aren’t much of a concern due to a focus on integrated graphics. Moreover, the reduced bandwidth should have a negligible effect on most add-in cards, especially since Athlon-based systems are bound to host low-end discrete GPUs, at most.
Swipe to scroll horizontally
|Row 0 — Cell 0||Athlon 200GE||Athlon 220GE||Athlon 240GE||Pentium Gold G5600||Pentium Gold G5400||Ryzen 3 1300X||Ryzen 3 2200G|
|Architecture||Zen||Zen||Zen||Coffee Lake||Coffee Lake||Zen||Zen|
|Cores / Threads||2 / 4||2 / 4||2 / 4||2 / 4||2 / 4||4 /4||4 / 4|
|Frequency Base / Boost||3. 2 / —||3.4 / —||3.5 / —||3.9 / —||3.7 / —||3.5 / 3.7||3.5 / 3.7|
|Integrated Graphics||Vega 3 (3 CU)||Vega 3 (3CU)||Vega 3 (3 CU)||UHD Graphics 630||UHD Graphics 610||No||RX Vega 8 (8 CU)|
Even though it is possible to overclock the Athlon’s host processing cores, the graphics engine and memory remain locked. It is important to remember that AMD’s warranty doesn’t cover overclocking-related damage on any of its processors. We’re sure that limitation is even more strictly enforced on CPUs like the Athlon, since it’s officially multiplier-locked.
The 35W Athlon processors are a natural fit for entry-level Socket AM4 motherboards with the A320 chipset. These sell for as little as $50, and they offer the flexibility to upgrade to a faster Ryzen CPU in the future. You also get the benefit of USB 3.1 Gen 2 and NVMe support (though features vary by board).
The 14nm Athlon processors feature the same underlying design as AMD’s Ryzen 3 2200G and 2400G processors, albeit with a pared-down feature set that allows the company to offload Raven Ridge dies that suffered defects during manufacturing. Similar to the aforementioned Ryzen 3s, the Athlon processors all come with 4MB of L3 cache. They also support the AVX instruction set, which is a notable advantage over Intel’s Pentium and Celeron line-up.
It’s no surprise that the new Athlons aren’t performance-oriented processors. Instead, AMD says they’re ideal for basic computing tasks like Web browsing, word processing, and low-end gaming. The idea here is that you don’t need to pair the Athlon 200GE with a discrete graphics card. The three Vega CUs, with 64 Stream processors each, come together in a very entry-level configuration. The Ryzen 3 2200G’s eight CUs are far more capable. But AMD says the Athlons should still muster playable frame rates at 720p in eSports games. The experience it enables is helped along by FreeSync support, so long as you own a compatible monitor.
MORE: Best Cheap CPUs
MORE: Intel & AMD Processor Hierarchy
MORE: All CPUs Content
AMD Athlon 200GE
AMD Athlon 220GE
AMD Athlon 240GE
Intel Pentium Gold G5600: Price Comparison
64 Amazon customer reviews
No price information
AMD Athlon 240GE and 220GE Review
Next Page Overclocking and Test Setup
Paul Alcorn is the Deputy Managing Editor for Tom’s Hardware US. He writes news and reviews on CPUs, storage and enterprise hardware.
AMD Athlon 220GE Review
Add to compare
Add your review
*Disclaimer: The price & specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer’s website before buying.
Launched in late 2019, AMD’s Athlon 220GE is a desktop processor with 2 cores 4 threads based on 14 nm Zen architecture with a base clock speed of 3.4 GHz. The CPU is locked for overclocking. Other key specs include 1 MB of L2 and 4 MB of L3 cache, a default TDP of 35 watts, dual channels of DDR4-2667 RAM, and PCIe 3.0 lanes. Athlon Pro 220GE comes with Radeon Vega 3 integrated graphics which has 3 graphics cores.
Review and test of AMD Athlon 240GE, 220GE and 200GE processors — i2HARD
AMD Athlon 240GE, Athlon 220GE and Athlon 200GE processors with integrated Vega 3 graphics. Performance tests and overclocking of all three CPUs in this material.
AMD strengthens its position in the budget processor segment with the Athlon 240GE , Athlon 220GE and Athlon 200GE . All three presented processor models are designed for the AMD AM4 platform. The key feature of these solutions are two cores with SMT technology, as well as a Vega 3 video core for image output. Athlon 240GE, Athlon 220GE and Athlon 200GE differ from each other only in operating clock frequencies. The processor controller supports DDR4 memory up to 2666 MHz. The processors themselves do not have a locked multiplier, which allows them to be overclocked. The cost of each of the presented AMD solutions does not exceed $100, which positions them as competitors for Intel Pentium Gold processors.
|Model||Athlon 240GE||Athlon 220GE||Athlon 200GE|
|Frequency||3500 MHz||3400 MHz||3200 MHz|
|L2 cache||512 KB per core||512 KB per core||512 KB per core|
|L3 cache||4 MB||4 MB||4 MB|
|Integrated graphics||Vega 3||Vega 3||Vega 3|
|GPU frequency||1000 MHz||1000 MHz||1000 MHz|
|TDP||35 W||35 W||35 W|
About the New AMD Athlon 200 Series 9 Processors0013
The Athlon 240GE, Athlon 220GE, and Athlon 200GE processors are based on the 14nm process technology. They have two Zen cores and also support SMT multithreading. This allows you to process up to 4 streams simultaneously, which is in demand now even in the budget segment. These processors do not have technologies like Core Performance Boost or advanced XFR / XFR2, so they operate at a constant clock frequency during load. For the Athlon 240GE model, the operating frequency is 3500 MHz, for the Athlon 220GE — 3400 MHz and for the Athlon 200GE — 3200 MHz. The multiplier of any of these processors is not locked, so overclocking of these CPUs is possible on motherboards with B350/B450 and X370/X470 chipsets, respectively.
Speaking about the possibility of overclocking Athlon 240GE, Athlon 220GE and Athlon 200GE, we should also note their hard work with RAM. The processor data controller supports DDR4 memory up to 2666 MHz. But it makes no sense to use faster modules, since with these processors for such memory kits it will be possible to set the maximum in the BIOS to only 2666 MHz. This frequency is also a kind of limiter in terms of the performance of the integrated graphics core Vega 3, which uses RAM as video memory.
The Athlon 240GE, Athlon 220GE, and Athlon 200GE processors each have a 4 MB L3 cache. The manufacturer left support for AVX / AVX2 instructions, which allows you to count on an acceptable level of performance in optimized applications. The weak point of the CPU data is the number of PCIe lines in the amount of 12 pieces, which, in the presence of a discrete video adapter, will partially limit its performance by the processor. But the potential use of Athlon 240GE, Athlon 220GE and Athlon 200GE are budget builds, which will most often be based on a motherboard with an A320 chipset and without the use of a discrete graphics card.
An important feature of the Athlon 240GE, Athlon 220GE and Athlon 200GE is a modest TDP, which, according to the manufacturer, does not exceed 35 W. Therefore, as a cooling system, a small and modest cooler is included with the CPU data. Of course, it may not be enough for experiments with overclocking, but for regular work it is more than enough.
|Motherboard||ASUS ROG Strix X370-F Gaming|
|Video card||MSI GeForce GTX 1070 Ti Gaming X|
|Cooling system||ID Cooling ZoomFlow 240|
|Thermal interface||Arctic MX-2|
|RAM||Corsair Vengeance RGB Pro DDR4-3600 8Gb*4|
|Storage device||SSD Silicon Power 128 Gb, HDD WD 3 Tb|
|power unit||Corsair RM850x 850W|
|Frame||Corsair 540 Air|
|Monitor||ASUS PB298Q, 29″, 2560×1080, IPS|
|operating system||Windows 10 Pro 64-bit|
We used the ASUS ROG Strix X370-F Gaming motherboard to test the Athlon 240GE, Athlon 220GE and Athlon 200GE processors. The selected board model will allow you to check the overclocking capabilities of the processors. Corsair Vengeance RGB Pro modules were used as RAM, which, at the maximum possible frequency under current conditions of 2666 MHz, worked with timings of 14-14-14-34-1T.
The components of the test system were assembled into a case. We used the ID-Cooling ZoomFlow 240 liquid cooling system for the tested processors.
AMD Vega 3 Integrated Graphics Performance
The Athlon 240GE, Athlon 220GE, and Athlon 200GE processors have an integrated Vega 3 graphics core. This rendering engine has 192 universal shaders, 4 ROPs, and 12 texture units. RAM is used as video memory. The Vega 3 GPU runs at 1000 MHz.
The integrated Vega 3 graphics core should not be considered as an analogue of discrete video cards, but only as a component for displaying an image on a monitor screen. Tests in the 3D Mark graphics package numerically evaluate the performance of Vega 3. We tested the Athlon 240GE processor as the oldest model considered in this material.
Features of AMD Athlon 240GE, 220GE and 200GE
Of more interest is the work of Athlon 240GE, Athlon 220GE and Athlon 200GE processors, as well as their performance parameters under load. It should be noted that the Athlon 220GE and Athlon 200GE processors operate at a supply voltage of 1.05-1.09Q. And only the Athlon 240GE requires a slightly higher voltage of about 1.15-1.16 V to operate at the highest frequency of 3500 MHz.
Due to the increase for Athlon 240GE, this model is the hottest of the three test processors. Under the Prime95 stress test, the maximum temperature of this CPU was 47 degrees Celsius. Peak power consumption did not exceed 37 watts.
The Athlon 220GE and Athlon 200GE processors turned out to be colder solutions, demonstrating only 42 degrees at the peak. At the same time, their maximum power consumption was 32 watts.
All these practical indicators of temperature and power consumption of Athlon 240GE, Athlon 220GE and Athlon 200GE allow us to say that the nominal cooling of these processors will really be enough.
Overclocking AMD Athlon 240GE, 220GE and 200GE
Athlon 240GE, Athlon 220GE and Athlon 200GE processors are solutions for the budget segment. And the fact that they will be used in tandem with a motherboard endowed with overclocking capabilities is unlikely. The intended use of these processors is justified with the A320 logic set. But for the purity of the experiment, we touched upon the issue of overclocking the Athlon 240GE, Athlon 220GE and Athlon 200GE processors and tested the potential of each of them. The result surprised us by the fact that it was not the oldest Athlon 240GE that overclocked the most, but the average Athlon 220GE. During overclocking, we limited the voltage to the processors to no more than 1.375 V.
Models Athlon 240GE frequency 39 50MHz (39.5*100), Athlon 220GE — frequency 4025MHz 9000 6 (40.25*100), and Athlon 200GE — frequency 3875 MHz (38.75*100).
The Athlon 240GE processor showed a good overclocking result, adding 450 MHz to the nominal frequency. At the same time, the temperature in the load was 59 degrees Celsius, and the peak power consumption was 49 watts.
The Athlon 220GE processor showed the best overclocking result, adding 625 MHz to the nominal frequency. At the same time, the temperature in the load was 63 degrees Celsius, and the peak power consumption was 51 watts.
The Athlon 200GE processor showed the third result in absolute frequency, despite the fact that it added 675 MHz to the nominal frequency. At the same time, the temperature in the load was 60 degrees Celsius, and the peak power consumption was 50 watts.
Having finished our overclocking experiments, we evaluated the performance of all three Athlon 240GE, Athlon 220GE and Athlon 200GE processors in a number of complex benchmarks and applications. The most successful Athlon 220GE, which was able to overclock to 4025 MHz, also participated in the performance assessment as the best solution in terms of speed.
The performance of all three Athlon 240GE, Athlon 220GE, and Athlon 200GE processors was proportional to the level of CPU clock speeds in many tasks. It is not possible to single out the best here, since all three models show a level of performance close to each other. Athlon 220GE overclocked to 4025 MHz stands apart from them, but its results should be taken into account as out of the standings.
Another interesting issue was the possibility of using the Athlon 240GE, Athlon 220GE and Athlon 200GE processes for games with a discrete graphics card. For these purposes, we added an MSI GeForce GTX 1070 Ti Gaming X graphics adapter to our test bench. Tests in the games we selected were carried out at ultra settings at a resolution of 1280 * 720 pixels. The Athlon 240GE processor was used as the base model, and the Athlon 220GE overclocked to 4025 MHz became its opponent.
The difference of 525 MHz in the operating clock frequency of the same processors had a strong effect on the average number of frames per second. This indicates that it was the processors in gaming tasks that acted as a bottleneck in the system, and a video card of the GeForce GTX 1070 Ti level for such CPUs is a redundant and unbalanced solution.
The AMD Athlon 240GE, Athlon 220GE , and Athlon 200GE processors hit the market at what seems to be the best time for them. While the CPU market continues to storm from a partial shortage of Intel processors, a direct competitor releases retail solutions that are quite affordable, and most importantly, decent in terms of performance. The price grid of $75, $65 and $55 for Athlon 240GE, Athlon 220GE and Athlon 200GE, respectively, strengthens AMD’s position in the budget segment from the start of sales. The presence of two fast Zen cores with SMT multi-threading technology and the presence of an integrated Vega 3 video core make these processors the best choice for budget users. The models Athlon 240GE, Athlon 220GE and Athlon 200GE may also receive due demand as an object for assembling office PCs. From the point of view of upgrading such systems, the Athlon 240GE, Athlon 220GE and Athlon 200GE processors should also not be a stumbling block. Since they are intended for the AMD AM4 platform, which, as you know, promises to be a long-term player in the market.
- affordable price and flexible model selection;
- good performance for a budget solution;
- processing of 4 computational threads simultaneously;
- the presence of the Vega 3 video core;
- low TDP at 35W;
- cooling system included.
- total 12 PCIe lanes.
AMD Athlon 200GE, 220GE, and 240GE Budget Processor Express Test
Methodology for testing computer systems of the sample of 2017
Testing budget processors AMD Athlon and Intel Celeron and Pentium in comparison with A-series APUs, Core i3 and Ryzen 3
Until the fall of last year, the AMD AM4 platform managed almost without budget solutions — or rather, the positions of those were occupied by the «old» APUs of the Bristol Ridge family, released back in 2016 based on the mid-decade microarchitecture. They coped with their tasks in an average way, so as soon as the company «reached its hands» in this segment, the Athlon 200GE entered the market, which we met in the fall. The model turned out to be very successful — there were not enough stars from the sky, but, having a performance at the level of the old A-series, it could boast of significantly lower power consumption and an extremely affordable price. Such a budget offer looked especially good against the background of Intel solutions in the corresponding segment. Not even because Intel’s GPUs in terms of 3D performance have not changed since 2015, and the Celeron processor component generally dates back to the past decade (the Pentium was redesigned in 2017, but the effect of this was already «mastered») — when finances come in, it rarely comes to technical features. In this case, too, Athlon 200GE was out of competition — it even officially cost less than the cheapest Pentium, and had no problems with deliveries, so real retail prices differed even more.
Literally at once the company also announced its desire to expand the Athlon family «upward» by releasing models with the 220GE and 240GE indices. But no one was specifically waiting for them — it was clear that with the «live» 200GE they could not claim the role of processors with the lowest price, and no significant changes were promised. Moreover, just at the end of the year, 200GE again became the hero of the news: it turned out that on some motherboards, when updating firmware to AGESA version 1.0. 14nm Ryzen. According to reviews, sometimes even a part of the PCIe interface was unlocked, i.e. 8 lines became available (like the Ryzen APU), and not the original four. True, this noise subsided just as quickly due to the practical insignificance of the discovery: now, if the processor cores were unlocked (as was the case with some Athlon and Phenom for AM3) … But pay extra for a suitable fee in some places (far from everywhere) catching up with the Ryzen 3 2200G in normal mode, remaining on the same old video core, with the same two cores and a maximum of DDR4-2666, is a completely different matter. Especially since it’s a size 9.0346 surcharge for the board is comparable to the difference in the price of processors, and if you still buy something on the B450, Ryzen, of course, overclocks just as well. At the same time, Ryzen are overclocked with great effect and officially, while AMD’s position on Athlon overclocking remains unchanged: as is . In general, they talked (in separate narrow circles) — and forgot.
Now it’s time to return to this line, fortunately, as promised, it has replenishment — models with indices 220GE and 240GE. Officially, they are slightly more expensive than the «ancestor» of the family, so as a solution to the «minimum price» they are slightly less interesting. But since the processors turned out to be in our hands, and it would be time to release the final test material, we decided to conduct their express testing as well.
Test stand configuration
|Processor||AMD Athlon 200GE||AMD Athlon 220GE||AMD Athlon 240GE|
|Core name||Raven Ridge||Raven Ridge||Raven Ridge|
|Production technology||14 nm||14 nm||14 nm|
|Core frequency, GHz||3. 2||3.4||3.5|
|Number of cores/threads||2/4||2/4||2/4|
|L1 cache (total), I/D, KB||128/64||128/64||128/64|
|L2 cache, KB||2×512||2×512||2×512|
|L3 cache, MiB||4||4||4|
|GPU||Vega 3||Vega 3||Vega 3|
In its finished form, the family of desktop Athlons now looks exactly like this: it is a trio of almost identical processors, since they have the same GPU, and the pair of processor cores is the same, only slightly different in frequency. Until recently, this was a normal phenomenon, since the “scatter” in the number of those same CPU cores within one desktop platform was small: usually twofold. Accordingly, clock speeds and/or SMT support in some models (and its absence in others) led to dense filling of the range from minimum to maximum performance without significant jumps. Now the situation has changed somewhat — in particular, within the framework of AM4, AMD already offers customers two (the same Athlon), four, six or eight cores (Ryzen 3/5/7), and single-threaded ones are found only in the amount of four. And the “working” clock frequencies are constantly changing depending on the load, so multi-core models have ceased to lose to the younger representatives of the families on “low-threaded” code — simply increasing the frequency in such cases to the same, or even to a higher level.
|Processor||AMD Ryzen 3 2200G||AMD A10-7850K||Intel Pentium Gold G5400|
|Core name||Raven Ridge||Kaveri||Coffee Lake|
|Production technology||14 nm||28 nm||14 nm|
|Core frequency, GHz||3. 5/3.7||3.7/4.0||3.7|
|Number of cores/threads||4/4||2/4||2/4|
|L1 cache (total), I/D, KB||256/128||192/64||64/64|
|L2 cache, KB||4×512||2×2048||2×256|
|L3 cache, MiB||4||—||4|
|GPU||Vega 8||Radeon R7||UHD Graphics 610|
Therefore, it makes sense to evaluate whether there are practically significant differences between Athlon models in comparison with other families. For example, the same Ryzen 3 2200G: designed for the same platform, but there are more cores and a more powerful GPU . .. In general, the results will immediately show what you can get for a small (especially against the background of the full cost of the computer) surcharge. We also once again decided to take the A10-7850K as an example — this is not the fastest solution for FM2 +, but it is well studied and familiar to many. Moreover, Athlon 200GE sometimes lagged behind it a little — let’s see what new models of the family will change here. And the old Athlon 200GE lagged far behind the Pentium G5400 noticeably everywhere, so it’s all the more worth comparing the new Athlons with it. We don’t need other Intel processors today — they are noticeably more expensive… However, the G5400 is a little expensive today, but it is popular, and it’s wrong to do without Intel processors at all.
Testing conditions were the same: using only integrated graphics and 16 GB of memory that meets the specifications of the processors. And the same SSD.
The method is described in detail in a separate article. Here we briefly recall that it is based on the following four pillars:
- iXBT.com performance measurement method based on real applications of the 2017 sample
- Processor Test Power Consumption Measurement Methodology
- How to Monitor Power, Temperature, and Processor Load During Testing
- 2017 Game Performance Measurement Methodology
Detailed results for all tests are available as a complete results spreadsheet (Microsoft Excel 97-2003 format). Directly in the articles, we use already processed data. This is especially true for application tests, where everything is normalized relative to the reference system (AMD FX-8350 with 16 GB of memory, GeForce GTX 1070 graphics card and Corsair Force LE 9 SSD60 GB) and grouped according to the areas of application of the computer.
However, today we did not use game tests — it’s better to see what’s in more modern applications in the near future. And today, first of all, we need to replenish the database of results for the final article. Moreover, as it was already mentioned above, at the moment in the Athlon family the gradation is only in terms of the clock frequency of processor cores — so testing the graphics will not give any new information.
iXBT Application Benchmark 2017
As you might expect, a slight increase in frequency leads to a slight increase in performance. No quality changes. As such, perhaps, we can consider the fact that the 240GE has finally overtaken the A10-7850K — an old one, but once positioned by the company as a competitor to the Core i5 and sold at the appropriate price. But the Pentium G5400 failed to catch up a little. However, more importantly, from a qualitative point of view, modern Pentiums, along with Athlon and old A10/Athlon (primarily for FM2+), can be considered processors of the same class. Without any specification by model numbers. Here Ryzen 3 is already a qualitatively different level, not quantitative changes.
In rendering, the picture does not change — and could not. True, Athlon 220GE is already enough here to overtake A10-7850K. But, in principle, everything is equivalent — the «most interesting» APU continues to be the Ryzen 3 2200G. Athlon, of course, is cheaper — but also significantly slower.
Athlon 240GE has already managed to keep up with and Pentium G5400. To some extent — the result, but the ranks of participants are so dense that it can be ignored. And on Ryzen 3 — it’s worth paying attention. In general, at present, to work with video, it is desirable to acquire at least a quad-core processor — an unexpected discovery, isn’t it? 🙂
In this case, we recall that the results of Ryzen 3 “spoils” one of the Photoshop filters (more precisely, its incorrect operation in batch mode on processors without SMT) — but thanks to its superiority (up to twofold) in other programs, it still turns out to be the fastest » average». And the whole trio of Athlons essentially «degenerates» into one processor: plus or minus 5% is comparable in some cases with measurement errors. The new models have become even more convincing than compared to the «old» generations of APUs, but still noticeably slower than the Pentium. On the other hand, and noticeably cheaper, too, as before.
And also — the only thing that can be noted: the formal lag behind the A10-7850K has been eliminated. But once again it is clearly seen that a “big leap” cannot be made in our time by frequency alone. If only it could be raised one and a half times, but even at the best of times this was not such a mass phenomenon.
In some places, there are practically no changes at all: after all, Athlon and cores have little compared to the «adult» Ryzen (which in this scenario do not «shine» themselves), and the RAM frequency is limited (and it has not even been possible to increase it yet on boards that allow you to increase the clock frequency of the cores).
There was no talk of competition from the «old» platform before, and the new models have already almost caught up with the Pentium G5400, but it remains to be repeated once again — this does not matter much: the additional payment for is not so big another level performance.
And the grand total remains the same: Athlon and and are much slower than Pentium, and both of them are and much slower than Ryzen 3 2000G. What kind of Athlon and what kind of Pentium — in general, it does not matter.
The only interesting thing is that the processors lined up almost in an even line — although the frequency of 220GE is much closer to 240GE than 200GE. Actually, for this reason, many a priori assumed its «uselessness» — what is 100 MHz? As you can see, in practice, paying attention to the base frequency is not always useful, even in the case of models that officially do not know how to control it. However, it is quite possible that this behavior is connected with other characteristics of the new processors.
Energy consumption and energy efficiency
That Athlon is a very economical processor, and in this capacity it can compete not only with Ryzen, but with models for LGA1151, it was known from the very beginning. Actually, the company itself gave a direct hint at this by setting the TDP to 35 watts. But it was interesting how AMD will dispose of these features when updating the family. And here’s the answer: 220GE is not only slightly faster than 200GE, but also consumes the same amount of power. Apparently, if the manufacturer did not limit this parameter, the performance difference would be higher. But this is done in 240GE.
However, in the end, its “energy efficiency” is lower than even that of the 200GE. But the 220GE output is interesting. On the other hand, all younger Ryzen, as well as Athlon, are very similar in this regard. Especially if you remember the nightmares of the FM2+ or AM3+ times 🙂
In principle, AMD is doing what it should be: saturating the market with processors. Moreover, it is difficult to rely on Intel in this regard now: the company is faced with a supply shortage, which, of course, caused desktop processor models to suffer in the first place (since you won’t reduce shipments of more mass-produced laptop ones), and the cheapest of them. And in this regard, two more budget APUs are good: there is at least something to choose from. Another question is that the «choice» as such is only apparent here — in fact, we are talking about almost the same processor. Slight differences in frequency lead to the same in terms of performance, and the graphics component is generally the same. Although, as it seems to us, it is precisely its modernization that would make sense: between 192 (Vega 3) and 512 (Vega 8) GPUs are just an abyss that can be filled. Those wishing to buy Athlon with graphics, almost like for Ryzen 3, would certainly be found at an intermediate price — after all, games in this class «rest» precisely on the GPU. Suffice it to recall the days of APU for FM1 or FM2/FM2+, when you could choose graphics with the same number of cores. And the APUs of the Bristol Ridge family, by the way, also applied: the two-module A8, A10 and A12 had different GPUs. And now some Vega 5, for example, would not hurt.
It seems to us that this is not being done simply because AMD has left too little room for maneuver for itself.