Mining with AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 4800+
AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 4800+ can generate more than
0.03 USD monthly income with a
36.98 H/s hashrate on the
XMR — RandomX (XMRig) algorithm.
Algorithm | Hashrate | Monthly Income | Monthly BTC Income | Monthly USD Income |
---|---|---|---|---|
XMR — RandomX (XMRig) | ≈36.98 H/s | ≈0.00020180 XMR | ≈0.00000175 BTC | ≈0.03 USD |
- ≈ There isn’t enough data provided to make an accurate evaluation.
Select a different hardware (If your CPU or GPU is not on the list, it means it’s not profitable for
mining)
- The information on this page contains estimations based on hash rate measurements submitted by our users.
Due to software and hardware glitches, some users submit exaggeratedly high or exaggeratedly low hash rates that don’t correspond to reality. Thus, the estimations calculated for some video cards are either too high or too low.
- Please don’t make hardware purchase decisions based solely on this information, or
disappointment may follow. Please do more comprehensive research before purchasing hardware, and confirm the hash
rate and daily income from multiple sources. - Also, keep in mind that the crypto mining income may be highly variable because of multiple factors such as difficulty and exchange rate variation, mining algorithm changes that some coins do from time to time, and even pool luck.
- Make sure you deactivate all your antivirus programs, including Windows Defender’s Live Scanning
feature. All antivirus programs detect mining applications as viruses and delete files from
them, causing them to malfunction.This is called a false positive, a miner doesn’t cause any
harm. - If you understand, type in the box below to proceed with the download:
Home
The functional snapshot
The only page you need to keep an eye on. It’s the main page
that shows you all there is to know: your daily and monthly income by currency, and
their USD and BTC equivalent. You can re-start the benchmarking process and access
your online wallet.
Activity
Active miners and hashing speeds
The list of all installed miners and all the mining
algorithms. Here you can see the hashing speed for each algorithm as well as the
daily and monthly income estimation. The upper panel will display a red message in
case one of the monitored miners fails.
Settings
Wallets, payments and startup
We designed the settings page with the help of our users, by
implementing features that you desired. You can set BetterHash to do what works best
for you. From automatic sign in to your online wallet, to scheduling mining hours,
BetterHash can be personalized to what suits you best.
AMD Athlon 64 X2 4800+ Specs
|
|
|
AMD Athlon 64 X2 4800+ Specs
Specifications of the AMD Athlon 64 X2 4800+ processor dedicated to the desktop sector, it has 2 cores, 2 threads, a maximum frequency of 2,5GHz. The table below makes it possible to observe well the lithography, the number of transistors (if present), the offered cache memory, the maximum capacity of RAM memory that we can get, the type of compatible memory, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in the Passmark platform, Cinebench R23 and Geekbench 5.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the link above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specifications:
Processor | AMD Athlon 64 X2 4800+ | |||
Market (main) | Desktop | |||
ISA | x86-64 (64 bit) | |||
Microarchitecture | K8 | |||
Core name | Brisbane | |||
Family | Athlon 64 X2 4000 | |||
Part number(s), S-Spec | ADO4800DOBOX, ADO4800IAA5DO |
|||
Release date | Q2 2006 | |||
Lithography | 65 nm | |||
Transistors | 221.![]() |
|||
Cores | 2 | |||
Threads | 2 | |||
Frequency | 2,5 GHz | |||
Bus speed | 2 GT/s | |||
Cache memory | 1 MB | |||
Max memory capacity | 8 GB | |||
Memory types | DDR2-800 | |||
Max # of memory channels | 2 | |||
Max memory bandwidth | 12,8 GB/s | |||
Max PCIe lanes | 16 | |||
TDP | 65 W | |||
Suggested PSU | 600W ATX Power Supply | |||
GPU integrated graphics | None | |||
Socket | AM2 | |||
Compatible motherboard | Socket AM2 Motherboard | |||
Maximum temperature | 68°C | |||
Security | Enhanced Virus Protection | |||
CPU-Z single thread | 86 | |||
CPU-Z multi thread | 172 | |||
Cinebench R15 single thread | 55 | |||
Cinebench R15 multi-thread | 115 | |||
Cinebench R20 single thread | 102 | |||
Cinebench R20 multi-thread | 213 | |||
PassMark single thread | 868 | |||
PassMark CPU Mark | 693 | |||
(Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 single core |
1.![]() |
|||
(Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 multi-core |
1.833 | |||
(Windows) Geekbench 5 single core |
238 | |||
(Windows) Geekbench 5 multi-core |
443 | |||
(SGEMM) GFLOPS performance |
10,8 GFLOPS | |||
(Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio |
28 pts / W | |||
Amazon | ||||
eBay |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
Performances :
Performance comparison between this processor and those of equivalent power, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark softwares such as Geekbench 4.
Suggested PSU: We assume that we have An ATX computer case, a high end graphics card, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, a 1TB HDD hard drive, a Blu-Ray drive. We will have to rely on a more powerful power supply if we want to have several graphics cards, several monitors, more memory, etc.
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
Performance comparison on the CPU-Z benchmark software for IT processors:
CPU-Z — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
---|---|
Intel Celeron G4930 |
342 686 |
Intel Celeron G3930 |
307 648 |
Intel Celeron J4025 |
211 439 |
AMD A6-9500 |
228 381 |
AMD A6-7480 |
195 318 |
AMD Athlon 64 X2 4800+ |
86 172 |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.
Performance comparison on the Cinebench R15 benchmark platform for IT devices:
Cinebench R15 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
---|---|
Intel Celeron G4900 |
124 250 |
Intel Celeron G4930 |
125 238 |
Intel Celeron G3930 |
118 232 |
AMD A6-9500 |
95 159 |
Intel Celeron J4005 |
74 146 |
AMD Athlon 64 X2 4800+ |
55 115 |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.
Performance comparison on the Cinebench R20 benchmark platform for computers:
Cinebench R20 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
---|---|
Intel Celeron G5900 |
296 546 |
Intel Celeron G4900 |
252 514 |
Intel Pentium Silver J5005 |
170 510 |
AMD A6-9500 |
235 392 |
Intel Celeron J4005 |
160 314 |
AMD Athlon 64 X2 4800+ |
102 213 |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R20 is a multi-platform test software which allows to evaluate the hardware capacities of a device such as a computer, a tablet, a server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant.
Performance comparison on the Passmark benchmark platform for computing machines:
PassMark — CPU Mark | |
---|---|
Intel Celeron G3930 |
1.785 2.261 |
Intel Celeron J4025 |
1.325 1.936 |
AMD A6-7480 |
1. ![]() 1.884 |
AMD A6-9500 |
1.616 1.878 |
Intel Celeron J4005 |
1.105 1.570 |
AMD Athlon 64 X2 4800+ |
868 693 |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.
On Windows: performance comparison in Geekbench 4 with Windows operating system.
Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows 64-bit | |
---|---|
Intel Celeron J4115 |
1. ![]() 5.195 |
Intel Celeron J4025 |
2.194 3.888 |
AMD A6-7480 |
2.422 3.619 |
AMD A6-9500 |
2.384 3.605 |
Intel Celeron J4005 |
1.942 3.335 |
AMD Athlon 64 X2 4800+ |
1.138 1.833 |
Broadcom BCM2711 |
415 958 |
Broadcom BCM2711B0 |
400 931 |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
On Linux: performance comparison in Geekbench 4 with Linux operating system.
Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux 64-bit | |
---|---|
Intel Celeron G4900 |
3.630 5.058 |
AMD A10-9700 |
2.281 5.039 |
Intel Celeron J4025 |
2.181 3.579 |
Intel Celeron J4005 |
2.161 3.261 |
AMD A6-9500 |
2.230 2.872 |
AMD Athlon 64 X2 4800+ |
1.119 1.658 |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
On Windows: performance comparison in Geekbench 5 with Windows operating system.
Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows | |
---|---|
Intel Celeron J4105 |
414 1.355 |
AMD Ryzen Embedded R1600 |
551 1. ![]() |
Intel Celeron J4025 |
491 923 |
AMD A6-7480 |
467 784 |
Intel Celeron J4005 |
413 748 |
AMD Athlon 64 X2 4800+ |
238 443 |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
On Linux: performance comparison in Geekbench 5 with Linux operating system.
Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux | |
---|---|
AMD A10-9700 |
538 1.243 |
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200GE |
680 1. ![]() |
AMD A6-7480 |
604 954 |
Intel Celeron J4025 |
503 906 |
Intel Celeron J4005 |
482 816 |
AMD Athlon 64 X2 4800+ |
196 314 |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.
List of comparisons:
AllwinnerAMDAMD A10AMD A12AMD A4AMD A6AMD A8AMD A9AMD AthlonAMD Athlon 64AMD Athlon 64 X2AMD Athlon GoldAMD Athlon SilverAMD EPYCAMD FXAMD JaguarAMD OpteronAMD PhenomAMD RyzenAMD Ryzen 1000AMD Ryzen 2000AMD Ryzen 3AMD Ryzen 3 1000AMD Ryzen 3 2000AMD Ryzen 3 3000AMD Ryzen 3 4000AMD Ryzen 3 5000AMD Ryzen 3000AMD Ryzen 4000AMD Ryzen 5AMD Ryzen 5 1000AMD Ryzen 5 2000AMD Ryzen 5 3000AMD Ryzen 5 4000AMD Ryzen 5 5000AMD Ryzen 5 6000AMD Ryzen 5 7000AMD Ryzen 5000AMD Ryzen 6000AMD Ryzen 7AMD Ryzen 7 1000AMD Ryzen 7 2000AMD Ryzen 7 3000AMD Ryzen 7 4000AMD Ryzen 7 5000AMD Ryzen 7 7000AMD Ryzen 7000AMD Ryzen 9AMD Ryzen 9 3000AMD Ryzen 9 4000AMD Ryzen 9 5000AMD Ryzen 9 7000AMD Ryzen ThreadripperAMD Ryzen Threadripper 1000AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2000AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3000AMD Ryzen Threadripper 5000AMD ZenAMD Zen 2AMD Zen 3AMD Zen+AmlogicAppleARMARM CortexARM Cortex-A15ARM Cortex-A17ARM Cortex-A35ARM Cortex-A5ARM Cortex-A53ARM Cortex-A55ARM Cortex-A57ARM Cortex-A7ARM Cortex-A72ARM Cortex-A73ARM Cortex-A75ARM Cortex-A76ARM Cortex-A77ARM Cortex-A78ARM Cortex-A8ARM Cortex-A9ARM Cortex-X1ARM920TAutoChipsBroadcomDeca coreDodeca coreDual AMDDual AMD EPYCDual AMD OpteronDual coreDual Intel XeonDual Intel Xeon PlatinumHexa coreHexadeca coreHiSiliconHiSilicon KirinIBMIBM POWERIBM POWER10IBM POWER9Icosi coreIngenicIntelIntel Alder LakeIntel AtomIntel BroadwellIntel Cascade LakeIntel Cascade Lake-XIntel CeleronIntel Celeron NIntel Coffee LakeIntel Comet LakeIntel CoreIntel Core 1000Intel Core 10000Intel Core 1100Intel Core 11000Intel Core 1200Intel Core 12000Intel Core 13000Intel Core 2Intel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 QuadIntel Core 2000Intel Core 3000Intel Core 4000Intel Core 5000Intel Core 6000Intel Core 7000Intel Core 8000Intel Core 9000Intel Core DuoIntel Core iIntel Core i3Intel Core i3-1000Intel Core i3-10000Intel Core i3-1100Intel Core i3-11000Intel Core i3-1200Intel Core i3-12000Intel Core i3-13000Intel Core i3-2000Intel Core i3-3000Intel Core i3-4000Intel Core i3-5000Intel Core i3-6000Intel Core i3-7000Intel Core i3-8000Intel Core i3-9000Intel Core i5Intel Core i5-1000Intel Core i5-10000Intel Core i5-1100Intel Core i5-11000Intel Core i5-1200Intel Core i5-12000Intel Core i5-13000Intel Core i5-2000Intel Core i5-3000Intel Core i5-4000Intel Core i5-5000Intel Core i5-6000Intel Core i5-7000Intel Core i5-8000Intel Core i5-9000Intel Core i7Intel Core i7-1000Intel Core i7-10000Intel Core i7-1100Intel Core i7-11000Intel Core i7-1200Intel Core i7-12000Intel Core i7-13000Intel Core i7-2000Intel Core i7-3000Intel Core i7-4000Intel Core i7-5000Intel Core i7-6000Intel Core i7-7000Intel Core i7-8000Intel Core i7-9000Intel Core i9Intel Core i9-10000Intel Core i9-11000Intel Core i9-12000Intel Core i9-13000Intel Core i9-7000Intel Core i9-8000Intel Core i9-9000Intel Core m3Intel Core m5Intel Core XIntel deca coreIntel dual coreIntel Gemini LakeIntel HaswellIntel hexa coreIntel Ice LakeIntel Ivy BridgeIntel Kaby LakeIntel octa coreIntel PentiumIntel Pentium 4Intel Pentium dual coreIntel Pentium GoldIntel Pentium IIIntel Pentium IIIIntel Pentium quad coreIntel Pentium SilverIntel quad coreIntel Raptor LakeIntel Rocket LakeIntel Sandy BridgeIntel SkylakeIntel Skylake-XIntel Tiger LakeIntel XeonIntel Xeon BronzeIntel Xeon E5Intel Xeon GoldIntel Xeon PlatinumIntel Xeon WJLQLGA1150LGA1151MarvellMediaTekMediaTek DimensityMediaTek Helio GMediaTek Helio PMicrosoftMono coreNvidiaNvidia TegraNXPNXP i. MXNXP i.MX 8NXP i.MX 8MNXP i.MX 8XOcta coreOcta Intel XeonOctodeca coreQuad coreQuad Intel XeonQualcommQualcomm Kryo 260Qualcomm Kryo 468Qualcomm Kryo 585Qualcomm Kryo 670Qualcomm SnapdragonQualcomm Snapdragon 700Qualcomm Snapdragon 8Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 seriesRealtekRockchipSamsungSamsung ExynosSamsung Exynos 7Samsung Exynos 7 OctaSamsung Exynos 9Samsung Exynos 9 OctaSonyTessaradeca coreTexas InstrumentsUnisocUnisoc TigerXiaomiProcessors groups
List of benchmarks:
CPU-ZCinebench R15Cinebench R20Geekbench 4 on LinuxGeekbench 4 on WindowsGeekbench 5 on LinuxGeekbench 5 on WindowsPassMarkGFLOPS performance
Equivalence:
AMD Athlon 64 X2 4800+ Intel equivalent
IT industry news, reviews and tests of computers and components
- PCs and components
- Desktop PCs and monoblocks
- Portable PCs
- Servers
- Motherboards
- Enclosures
- Power supplies
- RAM
- Processors
- Graphics cards
- Hard drives and SSDs
- Optical drives and media
- Sound cards
- TV tuners
- Controllers
- PC cooling systems
- Modding
- Notebook accessories
- Peripherals
- Printers, scanners, MFPs
- Monitors and projectors
- Input devices
- External drives
- Acoustic systems, headsets, headphones
- UPS
- Webcams
- KVM equipment
- Digital home
- Network media players
- HTPCs and Mini Computers
- TV and home theater systems
- DLNA Technology
- Home appliances controls
- Gadgets
- Tablets
- Smartphones
- Portable drives
- Electronic readers
- Portable media players
- GPS navigators and trackers
- Wearable gadgets
- Automotive infotainment systems
nine0003 Chargers
- Accessories for mobile devices
- Digital cameras and optics
- Video cameras
- Photo accessories
- Photo editing
- Video editing
- Operating systems
- Development tools
- Office software
- Testing, monitoring and diagnostic tools
- Useful utilities
- Graphic editors
- 3D Modeling Tools
- Web browsers
- Search engines
- Social networks
- Cloud Services
- Messaging and conferencing services
- Website development
- Mobile Internet
- Useful tools
- Anti-Malware
nine0003 Access controls
- Wired networks
- Wireless networks
- Network infrastructure
- Cellular communication
- IP Telephony
- NAS drives
- Network management tools
- Remote access tools
- System Integration
- Education projects
- Electronic document management
- Cloud Services for Business
- Virtualization technologies
Our Youtube channel
Archive of publications
1999 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 10 | 11 | 12 | |
2000 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
2001 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
2002 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | |
2003 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | |
2004 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 12 | |
2005 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
2006 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | |
2007 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | |
2008 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 10 | 11 | 12 | |
2009 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
2010 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
2011 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | |
2012 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | |
2013 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 12 |
- About us
- Advertising placement
- Contacts
Featured articles
HP 205 G4 22 AiO is one of the best solutions for office and remote work
offices. The HP 205 G4 22 All-in-One is a model of a new family based on the latest generation of AMD processors and offers good performance coupled with an attractive price
Logitech G PRO X Superlight — a lightweight wireless mouse for professional eSports players
Logitech G from Switzerland has introduced the Logitech G PRO X Superlight wireless gaming mouse. The new product is designed for professional e-sportsmen, and the word Superlight in its name indicates the low weight of this model, which does not exceed 63 g. This is almost a quarter less than the Logitech G PRO Wireless
9019 manipulator announced a couple of years ago6 ASRock h210 Pro BTC+
Home Mining Motherboard As a recent study by the University of Cambridge showed, the number of people who use cryptocurrencies today is approaching the size of the population of a small country and this is just the beginning, the world is changing. Therefore, ASRock has developed and put on sale a very unusual motherboard — h210 PRO BTC +, which we will consider in this review
The top panel of the Rapoo Ralemo Pre 5 Fabric Edition keyboard is covered with fabric0197
Rapoo has announced the Ralemo Pre 5 Fabric Edition wireless keyboard in China. The novelty is made in TKL format (without number keys section) and attracts attention with its original design. The MSI Optix MAG301 CR2 has a curved screen for maximum gaming immersion.
MSI’s Optix MAG301 CR2 series of computer monitors has expanded its line of computer monitors with the Optix MAG301 CR2, aimed at gamers. It is equipped with a VA type LCD panel with ultra wide (21:9)) curved screen (radius of curvature — 1.5 m). It measures 29.5 inches diagonally and has a resolution of 2560×1080 pixels
The SilverStone MS12 Kit converts an M.2 2280 SSD into a portable drive
SilverStone’s product catalog has been expanded with the MS12 Kit. It allows you to create a portable drive based on a standard PCI Express M.2 2280 SSD
ADATA XPG Spectrix S20G SSDs combine performance with an eye-catching design
ADATA Technology has announced the XPG Spectrix S20G Series SSDs. They are designed to equip gaming PCs and, according to their creators, combine high performance and spectacular appearance
ASUS GeForce RTX 3070 Turbo graphics card is equipped with a cooling system with a single centrifugal fan
GeForce RTX 3070 model has replenished the line of ASUS video adapters based on NVIDIA GPUs Turbo (factory index TURBO-RTX3070-8G), designed to equip gaming PCs. One of the features of the novelty is the design of the cooling system
ComputerPress uses
Athlon 64 X2 4800+ processor [in 2 benchmarks]
AMD
Athlon 64 X2 4800+
- Interface
- Core frequency
- Video memory size
- Memory type
- Memory frequency
- Maximum resolution
Description
This is a Windsor architecture desktop processor primarily aimed at office systems. It has 2 cores and 2 threads and is manufactured according to process 90, the maximum frequency is 2400 MHz, the multiplier is locked.
In terms of compatibility, this is a processor with a TDP of 65W.
It provides poor benchmark performance at
0.65%
from the leader, which is AMD EPYC 7h22. nine0206
Athlon 64
X2 4800+
vs
EPYC
7h22
General information
Information about the type (desktop or laptop) and architecture of the Athlon 64 X2 4800+, as well as when sales started and cost at that time.
Performance ranking |
Core | 2 | |
threads | ||
Windows 11 compatible | — |
compatible
Information on Athlon 64 X2 4800+ compatibility with other computer components. Useful, for example, when choosing the configuration of a future computer or to upgrade an existing one.
Please note that the power consumption of some processors can significantly exceed their nominal TDP even without overclocking. Some may even double their claims if the motherboard allows you to adjust the power settings of the processor. nine0197
Energy consumption (TDP) | 65 W | out of 400 (Xeon Platinum 9282) |
Tests in benchmers
These are the results of Athlon 64 X2 4800+ performance tests in non-gaming benchmarks. The overall score is set from 0 to 100, where 100 corresponds to the fastest processor at the moment.
Overall performance in tests
This is our overall performance rating. We regularly improve our algorithms, but if you find any inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in the comments section, we usually fix problems quickly. nine0197
Athlon 64 X2 4800+
0.65
- Passmark
- 3DMark06 CPU
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widely used benchmark that consists of 8 different tests, including integer and floating point calculations, extended instruction tests, compression, encryption and game physics calculations. Also includes a separate single-threaded test. nine0197
Benchmark coverage: 69%
Athlon 64 X2 4800+
652
3DMark06 CPU
3DMark06 is an outdated set of benchmarks based on DirectX 9 by Futuremark. Its processor part contains two tests, one of which calculates the pathfinding of game AI, the other emulates game physics using the PhysX package.
Benchmark coverage: 19%
Athlon 64 X2 4800+
nine0740 1798
Relative capacity
Overall Athlon 64 X2 4800+ performance compared to its nearest competitor desktop processors.
AMD Athlon II X2 260u
101.54
AMD Athlon 64 X2 4400+
101.54
AMD Athlon 64 X2 4000+
100
AMD Athlon 64 X2 4800+
100
AMD Athlon 64 FX-53
98.46
Intel Core 2 Duo E4400
98. 46
AMD Athlon 64 3800+
96.92
Competitor from Intel
We believe that the nearest equivalent to Athlon 64 X2 4800+ from Intel is Core 2 Duo E4400, which is slower by 2% and lower by 1 position in our rating on average. nine0197
Core 2
Duo E4400
Compare
Here are some of Intel’s closest competitors to the Athlon 64 X2 4800+:
Intel Celeron J3060
103.08
Intel Pentium Dual-Core E2180
101.54
Intel Pentium E2180
101.54
AMD Athlon 64 X2 4800+
100
Intel Core 2 Duo E4400
98.46
Intel Pentium Dual-Core E2160
96.92
Intel Celeron E1500
95. 38
Other processors
Here we recommend several processors that are more or less similar in performance to the reviewed one. nine0197
Athlon 64
X2 4400+
Compare
Athlon 64
X2 4600+
Compare
Core 2
Duo E6600
Compare
Athlon 64
FX-62
Compare
Core 2
Duo E6700
Compare
Core 2
Duo E6850
Compare
Recommended video cards
According to our statistics, these video cards are most often used with Athlon 64 X2 4800+:
GeForce
9600 GT
7. 1%
GeForce
9500 GT
4.2%
GeForce
8600 GT
4%
GeForce GT
430
3.8%
GeForce GTS
450
3.8%
nine0698
GeForce GT
730
3.6%
GeForce
210
3.3%
GeForce GT
440
2.9%
GeForce GT
610
2.9%
GeForce GTS
nine0740 250
2.5%
Here are 448 configurations based on Athlon 64 X2 4800+ in our database.
GeForce RTX
3090 Ti
0. 2% (1/448)
GeForce RTX
3090
0.7% (3/448)
Radeon RX
6800
nine0206
0.2% (1/448)
GeForce GTX
1070 SLI
0.2% (1/448)
GeForce GTX
1660 Super
0.4% (2/448)
GeForce GTX
1060 6GB
0.7% (3/448)
Radeon RX
nine0740 6500XT
0.2% (1/448)
Radeon RX
580
0.2% (1/448)
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
0.7% (3/448)
GeForce GTX
960
0.