Amd athlon ii x2215: AMD Athlon II X2 215 Specs

Long product name HP AMD Athlon II X2 215 processor 2. 7 GHz 0.512 MB L2
:

The short editorial description of HP AMD Athlon II X2 215 processor 2.7 GHz 0.512 MB L2

AMD Athlon II X2 215 2.7GHz, 65W, 128KB L1, 512KB L2, 45nm

More>>>

HP AMD Athlon II X2 215 processor 2.7 GHz 0.512 MB L2:

The official marketing text of HP AMD Athlon II X2 215 processor 2.7 GHz 0.512 MB L2 as supplied by the manufacturer

We are in a multi-year journey to turn HP around, and we have put in place a plan to restore HP to growth. We know where we need to go, and we’re making progress.

We continue to drive product innovation in our core markets, with a focus on cloud, security, and big data.

We see big opportunities ahead, and we are well positioned to take advantage of these opportunities with our remarkable set of assets and strengths. We have the people, the plan, and the foundation in place to help us succeed on the next phase of the journey.

Short summary description HP AMD Athlon II X2 215 processor 2.7 GHz 0.512 MB L2:

This short summary of the HP AMD Athlon II X2 215 processor 2.7 GHz 0.512 MB L2 data-sheet is auto-generated and uses the product title and the first six key specs.

HP AMD Athlon II X2 215, AMD Athlon II X2, Socket AM3, 45 nm, 2.7 GHz, 32-bit, 64-bit, PC

Long summary description HP AMD Athlon II X2 215 processor 2. 7 GHz 0.512 MB L2:

This is an auto-generated long summary of HP AMD Athlon II X2 215 processor 2.7 GHz 0.512 MB L2 based on the first three specs of the first five spec groups.

HP AMD Athlon II X2 215. Processor family: AMD Athlon II X2, Processor socket: Socket AM3, Processor lithography: 45 nm. Market segment: Desktop. L1 cache: 0.125 MB

Embed the product datasheet into your content

Icecat LIVE: JS for HP 586730-001

Icecat Live DOC

CSV product data for HP 586730-001

CSV DOC

Download images pack

Icecat Add-ons

Download the free Open Icecat data-sheets

Download the Icecat taxonomy for&nbsp»Processors»

Report mistake

EN Access to this product is restricted. Please contact your account manager at Icecat.

Specs

Distributors

Specs

Processor

Processor model
*

215

Processor base frequency
*

2. 7 GHz

Processor family
*

AMD Athlon II X2

Processor cores
*

2

Processor socket
*

Socket AM3

Component for

PC

Processor lithography
*

45 nm

Processor operating modes
*

32-bit, 64-bit

Processor cache

0. 512 MB

Processor cache type

L2

Thermal Design Power (TDP)

65 W

Processor

VID Voltage Range

0.85 — 1.425 V

Stepping

C2

Features

Market segment

Desktop

Processor special features

AMD Virtualization Technology

Operational conditions

Tcase

74 °C

Other features

L1 cache

0.125 MB

Distributors

1

Login
or Register as new user (free)
if you want to see more distributor details .

If you represent a supplier and want to include your information here, please contact us.

AMD Athlon II X2 215 Specs, Price, and FPS in Games

Geekbench 5 Single-Core

316

12%

Geekbench 5 Multi-Core

572

1%

Availability

AMD Athlon II X2 215 x2 215 2.70GHz ADX215OCK22GQ Dual Core 938pin Desktop

Buy on Amazon

$10.98

In Stock

Updated 70 minutes ago

Graphics Card

Resolution

Select game resolution

Graphics Settings

Select game graphics

Offset

. ..

Apply Offset

Value Rating

Performance Rating

Value per FPS

You will receive

… FPS

Alternatives for Athlon II X2 215

1080p, High

No alternatives — this is the best option

Specifications

Builds Using AMD Athlon II X2 215

1080p, High

Find out which of the 2 CPUs performs better, view a side-by-side specification comparison.

Ryzen 5 5600X

$191.34

Ryzen 7 5800X

Ryzen 7 5800X

Ryzen 5 3600

$137.99

Ryzen 7 5800X

Ryzen 9 5900X

Core i9-12900K

$561.94

Core i9-9900K

Ryzen 5 5600X

$191.34

Ryzen 5 5600G

$151.99

Core i7-8700K

Core i7-12700K

$399.99

Refine results to filter 1558 processors by performance, release date, price, and value. Click on a CPU to view more in-depth specifications and game FPS.

Found 1558 CPUs.

Popularity

Processor

Performance

Ryzen 5 5600X

Release Date: Nov 5th, 2020

Performance Rating

$191.34 on Amazon

In Stock

Ryzen 9 5900X

Release Date: Nov 5th, 2020

Performance Rating

$399 on Amazon

In Stock

Ryzen 7 5800X

Release Date: Nov 5th, 2020

Performance Rating

$269 on Amazon

In Stock

Ryzen 5 5600G

Release Date: Apr 13th, 2021

Performance Rating

$151. 99 on Amazon

In Stock

Core i7-10700K

Release Date: Apr 30th, 2020

Performance Rating

$259.99 on Amazon

In Stock

Ryzen 5 3600

Release Date: Jul 7th, 2019

Performance Rating

$137.99 on Amazon

In Stock

Core i5-12600K

Release Date: Nov 4th, 2021

Performance Rating

$277.99 on Amazon

In Stock

Ryzen 7 5700G

Release Date: Apr 13th, 2021

Performance Rating

$235.09 on Amazon

In Stock

Core i9-12900K

Release Date: Nov 4th, 2021

Performance Rating

$561.94 on Amazon

In Stock

Core i7-12700K

Release Date: Nov 4th, 2021

Performance Rating

$399.99 on Amazon

In Stock

Core i9-11900K

Release Date: Mar 16th, 2021

Performance Rating

$328 on Amazon

In Stock

Ryzen 9 5950X

Release Date: Nov 5th, 2020

Performance Rating

$549 on Amazon

In Stock

Core i7-12700KF

Release Date: Nov 4th, 2021

Performance Rating

$379. 99 on Amazon

In Stock

Core i7-11700K

Release Date: Mar 16th, 2021

Performance Rating

$285.99 on Amazon

In Stock

Ryzen 9 3900X

Release Date: Jul 7th, 2019

Performance Rating

$345 on Amazon

In Stock

Core i9-12900KF

Release Date: Nov 4th, 2021

Performance Rating

$534.98 on Amazon

In Stock

Ryzen 7 3700X

Release Date: Jul 7th, 2019

Performance Rating

$260 on Amazon

In Stock

Core i5-11600K

Release Date: Mar 16th, 2021

Performance Rating

$179.99 on Amazon

In Stock

Core i3-10100

Release Date: Apr 30th, 2020

Performance Rating

$105 on Amazon

In Stock

Core i7-11700KF

Release Date: Mar 16th, 2021

Performance Rating

$255.99 on Amazon

In Stock

Ryzen 7 3800X

Release Date: Jul 7th, 2019

Performance Rating

$257. 99 on Amazon

In Stock

Core i5-9400F

Release Date: Jan 8th, 2019

Performance Rating

$135.89 on Amazon

In Stock

Core i9-10900K

Release Date: Apr 30th, 2020

Performance Rating

$349 on Amazon

In Stock

Core i5-10400

Release Date: Apr 30th, 2020

Performance Rating

$159 on Amazon

In Stock

Ryzen 3 3200G

Release Date: Jul 7th, 2019

Performance Rating

$134.95 on Amazon

In Stock

• Previous
• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• …
• 61
• 62
• 63
• Next

AMD Athlon II X2 215 Full Specifications

The AMD Athlon II X2 215 is a Desktop processor with 2 cores, launched in 2009. It is part of the Athlon II X2 lineup, using the K10 architecture with Socket AM3. The core-count is effectively doubled, to 2 threads. AMD is building the Athlon II X2 215 on a 45 nm production process. AMD’s processor supports DDR3 memory with a dual-channel interface. It is worth noting that this processor does not have integrated graphics. This processor can run on motherboards with the following chipsets: 690G, 740G, 760G, 770, 780L, 785G, 790FX, 790GX, 790X, 870, 880G, 880GX, 890FX, 890GX, NVIDIA GeForce 6100, NVIDIA GeForce 6150, NVIDIA GeForce 6150SE, NVIDIA GeForce 7025, NVIDIA nForce 750a, NVIDIA nForce 750a SLI, NVIDIA nForce 980a, NVIDIA nForce 980a SLI.

AMD Athlon II X2 215 General

Manufacturer	AMD
Codename	Regor
Core Family	Regor
Market	Desktop
Model	Athlon II X2 215
Series	AMD Athlon II X2
Type	Desktop
Achitecture codename	Regor
Microarchitecture	K10
Production Status	End-of-life
Release date	on October 2009
Released	Oct 2009
Launch price (MSRP)	$45
Price now	$11. 99
Place in performance rating	1556
Value for money (0-100)	39.06
Manufacturing process technology	45 nm
Process Size	45 nm

AMD Athlon II X2 215 Compatibility

AMD Athlon II X2 215 Benchmarks

# of Cores	2
# of Threads	2
Base Clock	200 MHz
Cache L1	128K
Cache L2	512K
Core Clock	2. 7 GHz
Core Count	2
Frequency	2.7 GHz
L1 Cache	2 x 64 kB Instruction 2 x 64 kB Data
L1 cache	128 KB
L2 Cache	2 x 512 kB
L2 cache	512 KB
L3 Cache	None
Maximum frequency	2.7 GHz
Simultaneous Multithreading	No
TDP	65 W
Turbo Clock	N/A

AMD Athlon II X2 215 Memory Specifications

AMD Athlon II X2 215 Technical Specs

64 bit support	+
Die Size	117 mm²
Die size	117 mm2
Includes CPU Cooler	No
Multiplier	13. 5x
Multiplier Unlocked	No
Number of cores	2
Number of threads	2
Package	µPGA
Part #	ADX215OCK22GQ
Part#	ADX215OCK22GQ
SMP # CPUs	1
Transistor count	410 million
Transistors	410 million
Voltage	1.15 V
tCaseMax	unknown

AMD Athlon II X2 215 Integrated Graphics

AMD Athlon II X2 215 Other

Athlon II X2 — AMD

Athlon II X2 was a family of 64-bit x86 dual-core budget microprocessors designed by AMD and introduced in 2008.

Introduced in 2009, the Athlon II X2 processors were based on the K10 microarchitecture.

Model Number	Arch	Frequency	Cores	Threads	Process	L2$	TDP	Introduced
Athlon II X2 210e	K10	2.6 GHz	2	2	45 nm	2×512 KB	45 W	2010-09
Athlon II X2 215	K10	2. 7 GHz	2	2	45 nm	2×512 KB	65 W	2009-09
Athlon II X2 220	K10	2.8 GHz	2	2	45 nm	2×512 KB	65 W	2010-05
Athlon II X2 221	K10	2.8 GHz	2	2	32 nm	2×512 KB	65 W	2012-03
Athlon II X2 235e	K10	2.7 GHz	2	2	45 nm	2×1 MB	45 W	2009-10
Athlon II X2 240	K10	2.8 GHz	2	2	45 nm	2×1 MB	65 W	2009-07
Athlon II X2 240e	K10	2.8 GHz	2	2	45 nm	2×1 MB	45 W	2009-10
Athlon II X2 245	K10	2. 9 GHz	2	2	45nm	2×1 MB	65 W	2009-07
Athlon II X2 245e	K10	2.9 GHz	2	2	45 nm	2×1 MB	45 W	2010-05
Athlon II X2 250	K10	3 GHz	2	2	45nm	2×1 MB	65 W	2009-06
Athlon II X2 250e	K10	3 GHz	2	2	45 nm	2×1 MB	45 W	2010-09
Athlon II X2 250u	K10	1.6 GHz	2	2	45nm	2×1 MB	25 W	2009-12
Athlon II X2 255	K10	3.1 GHz	2	2	45 nm	2×1 MB	65 W	2010-01
Athlon II X2 260	K10	3.2 GHz	2	2	45 nm	2×1 MB	65 W	2010-05
Athlon II X2 260u	K10	1. 8 GHz	2	2	45 nm	2×1 MB	25 W	2009-12
Athlon II X2 265	K10	3.3 GHz	2	2	45 nm	2×1 MB	65 W	2010-09
Athlon II X2 270	K10	3.4 GHz	2	2	45 nm	2×1 MB	65 W	2011-06
Athlon II X2 270u	K10	2 GHz	2	2	45 nm	2×1 MB	25 W	2010-09
Athlon II X2 280	K10	3.6 GHz	2	2	45nm	2×1 MB	65 W	2013-01
Athlon II X2 B22	K10	2.8 GHz	2	2	45 nm	2×1 MB	65 W	?
Athlon II X2 B24	K10	3 GHz	2	2	45 nm	2×1 MB	65 W	2009-06
Athlon II X2 B26	K10	3. 2 GHz	2	2	45 nm	2×1 MB	65 W	2010-05
Athlon II X2 B28	K10	3.4 GHz	2	2	45 nm	2×1 MB	65 W	2010-12
Athlon II X2 B30	K10	3.6 GHz	2	2	45 nm	2×1 MB	65 W	?

Facts about «Athlon II X2 — AMD»

RDF feed

designer	AMD +
first announced	2008 +
full page name	amd/athlon ii x2 +
instance of	microprocessor family +
instruction set architecture	x86-64 +
main designer	AMD +
manufacturer	AMD + and GlobalFoundries +
microarchitecture	K10 +
name	Athlon II X2 +
process	45 nm (0. 045 μm, 4.5e-5 mm) + and 32 nm (0.032 μm, 3.2e-5 mm) +
socket	Socket AM2 +, Socket AM3 + and Socket FM1 +
technology	CMOS +
word size	64 bit (8 octets, 16 nibbles) +

90,000 characteristics and reviews of the AMD Athlon II X2 215 / Overclockers.ua 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000

2 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000. 45 SOI connector AM3 Frequency, MHz 2700 Multiplier 13.5 htt/bclk 200 cache L1, KB 128 x 2 CASH L2, KB

x 2

0

900XTRyzen 9 3900XRyzen 7 3800XTRyzen 7 3800XRyzen 7 3700XRyzen 5 3600XTRyzen 5 3600XRyzen 5 3600Ryzen 5 3400GRyzen 3 3300XRyzen 3 3200GRyzen 3 3100Athlon 3000GRyzen 7 2700XRyzen 7 2700Ryzen 5 2600XRyzen 5 2600Ryzen 5 2500XRyzen 5 2400GRyzen 5 2400GERyzen 3 2300XRyzen 3 2200GRyzen 3 2200GEAthlon 240GEAthlon 220GEAthlon 200GERyzen 7 1800XRyzen 7 1700XRyzen 7 1700Ryzen 5 1600XRyzen 5 1600 AFRyzen 5 1600Ryzen 5 1500XRyzen 5 1400Ryzen 3 1300XRyzen 3 1200 AFRyzen 3 1200FX-8350FX-8320FX-8150FX-8120FX-8100FX-6350FX-6100FX-4170FX-4100A10-7870KAthlon 5350A10-7850KAthlon X4 860KAthlon X4 760KAthlon X4 750KAthlon X4 740Athlon X2 340A10-5800KA10-5700A8-5600KA8-5500A6-5400KA4-5300A8-3850A8-3800Athlon II X4 631A6-3650A6-3600A6-3500A4-3400A4-3 300Phenom II X6 10600T BEPhenom II X6 1075TPhenom II X6 1065TPhenom II X6 1055TPhenom II X6 1045TPhenom II X6 1035TAthlon II X4 650Athlon II X4 645Athlon II X4 640Athlon II X4 635Athlon II X4 630Athlon II X4 620eAthlon II X4 620Athlon II X4 615eAthlon II X4 615Athlon II X4 610eAthlon II X4 605eAthlon II X4 605Athlon II X4 600eAthlon II X3 460Athlon II X3 455Athlon II X3 450Athlon II X3 445Athlon II X3 440Athlon II X3 435Athlon II X3 425eAthlon II X3 425Athlon II X3 420Athlon II X3 420eAthlon II X3 415eAthlon II X3 410Athlon II X3 405eAthlon II X3 400Athlon II X2 265Athlon II X2 270uAthlon II X2 260Athlon II X2 255Athlon II X2 250eAthlon II X2 250Athlon II X2 245eAthlon II X2 245Athlon II X2 240eAthlon II X2 240Athlon II X2 235eAthlon II X2 220Athlon II X2 215Athlon II X2 210eAthlon II 160uSempron 180Sempron 150Sempron 145Sempron 140Sempron 130Athlon X2 7850Athlon X2 7750Athlon X2 7550Athlon X2 7450Athlon X2 6500 BEPhenom II X4 980 BEPhenom II X4 975 BEPhenom II X4 970 BE (Zosma)Phenom II X4 970 BEPhenom II X4 965 BEPhenom II X4 960T BEPhenom II X4 955 BEPhenom II X4 945Phenom II X4 940Phenom II X4 925Phenom II X4 920Phenom II X4 IIphenom 910 905ePhenom II X4 900ePhenom II X4 850Phenom II X4 840Phenom II X4 840TPhenom II X4 830Phenom II X4 820Phenom II X4 810Phenom II X4 805Phenom II X3 740 BEPhenom II X3 720Phenom II X3 715 BEPhenom II X3 710Phenom II X3 705ePhenom II X3 700ePhenom II X2 570 BEPhenom II X2 565 BEPhenom II X2 560 BEPhenom II X2 555 BEPhenom II X2 550 BEPhenom II X2 550Phenom II X2 545Phenom II X2 521Phenom II X2 511Phenom X4 9950 BEPhenom X4 9850 BEPhenom X4 9850Phenom X4 9750BPhenom X4 9750Phenom X4 9650Phenom X4 9600 Black EditionPhenom X4 9600BPhenom X4 9600Phenom X4 9550Phenom X4 9500Phenom X4 9450ePhenom X4 9350ePhenom X4 9150ePhenom X4 9100ePhenom X3 8850Phenom X3 8750 BEPhenom X3 8750BPhenom X3 8750Phenom X3 8650Phenom X3 8600BPhenom X3 8600Phenom X3 8550Phenom X3 8450ePhenom X3 8450Phenom X3 8400Phenom X3 8250eAthlon X2 BE-2400Athlon X2 BE-2350Athlon X2 BE-2300Athlon 64 FX-74Athlon 64 FX-72Athlon 64 FX-70Athlon 64 FX-62Athlon 64 FX-60Athlon 64 X2 6400+ Black EditionAthlon 64 X2 6400+ Athlon 64 X2 6000+ (Brisbane) Athlon 64 X2 6000+ (Windsor) Athlon 64 X2 5800+ (Brisbane) Athlon 64 X2 5600+ (Brisbane) X2 5400+ (Windsor)Athlon 64 X2 5200+ (Brisbane)Athlon 64 X2 5200+ (Windsor)Athlon 64 X2 5000+ Black EditionAthlon 64 X2 5000+ (Brisbane)Athlon 64 X2 5000+ (Windsor 2MB)Athlon 64 X2 5000+ (Windsor 1MB)Athlon 64 X2 4850eAthlon 64 X2 4800+ (Bris bane)Athlon 64 X2 4800+ (Windsor 2MB)Athlon 64 X2 4600+Athlon 64 X2 4450eAthlon 64 X2 4400+ (Brisbane) Windsor 1MB)Athlon 64 X2 4050eAthlon 64 X2 4000+ (Brisbane) Athlon 64 X2 4000+ (Windsor 2MB) Athlon 64 X2 3800+Athlon 64 X2 3600+ (Brisbane) Athlon 64 X2 4600+ (Toledo)Athlon 64 X2 4600+ (Manchester)Athlon 64 X2 4400+Athlon 64 X2 4200+ (Toledo)Athlon 64 X2 4200+ (Manchester) (Manchester)Athlon 64 LE-1660Athlon 64 LE-1640Athlon 64 LE-1620Athlon 64 LE-1600Athlon 64 4000+Athlon 64 3800+Athlon 64 3500+Athlon 64 3200+Athlon 64 3Athlon 64 FX-557 -55Athlon 64 FX-53Athlon 64 FX-51Athlon 64 4200+Athlon 64 4000+ (San Diego)Athlon 64 4000+ (Clawhammer)Athlon 64 3800+ (Venice)Athlon 64 3800+ (Newcastle)Athlon 64 3700 +Athlon 64 (Manchester)Athlon 64 3500+ (Venice)Athlon 64 3500+ (San Diego)At hlon 64 3500+ (Winchester)Athlon 64 3500+ (Newcastle)Athlon 64 3500+ (Clawhammer)Athlon 64 3200+ (Manchester)Athlon 64 3200+ (Venice)Athlon 64 3200+ (Winchester)Athlon 64 3000+ (Venice)Athlon 64 3000+ (Winchester)Athlon 64 3700+Athlon 64 3400+ (Newcastle)Athlon 64 3400+ (Clawhammer)Athlon 64 3200+ (Venice)Athlon 64 3200+ (Newcastle)Athlon 64 3200+ (Clawhammer)Athlon 64 3000+ ( Venice) Athlon 64 3000+ (Newcastle) Athlon 64 3000+ (Clawhammer) Athlon 64 2800+ (Newcastle) Athlon 64 2800+ (Clawhammer) +Sempron 3000+ (Palermo)Sempron 3400+Sempron 3300+Sempron 3100+ (Palermo)Sempron 3100+ (Paris)Sempron 3000+ (Palermo)Sempron 3000+ (Paris)Sempron 2800+Sempron 2600+ (Winchester)Sernpron 2600+ ( Palermo) Sempron 2500+Sempron 3000+Sempron 2800+ (Thorton) )Athlon XP 3200+ (FSB333)Athlon XP 3100+Athlon XP 3000+ (FSB400)Athlon XP 3000+ (FSB333)Athlon XP 2900+Athlon XP 2800+ (FSB333)Athlon XP 2800+ (FSB266)Athlon XP 2800+ (FSB333)Athlon XP 2700+Athlon XP 2600+ (FSB333)Athlon XP 2600+ (FSB333)Athlon XP 2600+ (FSB333)Athlon XP 2600+ (FSB266)Athlon XP 2600+ (FSB266)Athlon XP 2600+ (FSB266)Athlon XP 2500+ (FSB333)Athlon XP 2500+ (FSB266)Athlon XP 2400+ (Thorton)Athlon XP 2400+ (Thoroughbred)Athlon XP 2200 + (Thorton)Athlon XP 2200+ (Thorubbred)Athlon XP 2100+ (Thoroughbred)Athlon XP 2100+ (Palomino)Athlon XP 2000+ (Thorton)Athlon XP 2000+ (Thorubbred)Athlon XP 2000+ (Palomino)Athlon XP 1900+ (Thoroughbred)Athlon XP 1900+ (Palomino)Athlon XP 1800+ (Thoroughbred)Athlon XP 1800+ (Palomino)Athlon XP 1700+ (Thoroughbred)Athlon XP 1700+ (Palomino)Athlon XP 1600+ (Thoroughbred)Athlon XP 1600 + (Palomino) Athlon XP 1500+ Athlon 1400 (FSB266) ATHLON 1400 (FSB200) Athlon 1333athlon 1300athlon 1200 (FSB266) Athlon 1200 (FSB200) Ath26 (FSB200) ATHLON (FSB200) ATHLON (FSB200) ATHLON (FSB200) Athlon (FSB200) Athlon (FSB200) Athlon (FSB200) Athlon) Athlon 950Athlon 900Athlon 850Athlon 800Athlon 750Athlon 700Duron 1800Duron 1600Duron 1400Duron 1300Duron 1200Duron 1100Duron 1000Duron 950 (Morgan)Duron 950 (Spitfire)Duron 900 (Morgan)Duron 900 (Spitfire)Duron 850Duron 800Duron 750Duron 700Duron 650Duron 600Athlon 1000 (Orion)Athlon 1000 (Thunderbird) Athlon 950 (Pluto) Athlon 900 (Thunderbird) Athlon 850 (Pluto) Athlon 850 (Thundebird) Athlon 800 (Pluto) Athlon 800 (Thunderbird) Athlon 750 (Pluto) Athlon 750 (Thunderbird) Athlon 700 (Pluto) Athlon 650 (Pluto) Athlon 650 (Argon) Athlon 650 (Thunderbird) Athlon 600 (Pluto) Athlon 600 (Argon) Athlon 550 (Pluto) -2 533 (CXT)K6-2 500 (CXT)K6-2 475 (CXT)K6-2 450 (CXT)K6-2 400 (CXT)K6-2 380 (CXT)K6-2 366 (CXT)K6- 2 350 (CXT)K6-2 350K6-2 333 (CXT)K6-2 333 (CXT)K6-2 333K6-2 300 (CXT)K6-2 300 (CXT)K6-2 300K6-2 266K6 300K6 266K6 233K6 200K6 166K5 PR166K5 PR150K5 PR133K5 PR120K5 PR100K5 PR90K5 PR75IntelPentium Gold G7400Celeron G6900Core i9-11900KCore i9-11900KFCore i9-11900Core i9-11900FCore i9-11900TCore i7-11700KCore i7-11700KFCore i7-11700Core i7-11700FCore i7-11700TCore i5-11600KCore i5-11600KFCore i5-11600Core i5-11600TCore i5-11500Core i5-11500TCore i5-11400Core i5-11400FCore i5-11400TCore i3-10325Core i3-10305Core i3-10305TCore i3-10105Core i3-10105FCore i3-10105TPentium Gold G6605Pentium Gold G6505Pentium Gold G6505TPentium Gold G6405Pentium Gold G6405TCore i9-10900KCore i9-10900KFCore i9-10900Core i9-10900FCore i7-10700KCore i7-10700KFCore i7-10700Core i7-10700FCore i5-10600KCore i5-10600KFCore i5-10600Core i5-10500Core i5-10400Core i5-10400FCore i3-10320Core i3-10300Core i3-10100Pentium Gold G6600Pentium Gold G6500Pentium Gold G6400Celeron G5925Celeron G5920Celeron G5905Celeron G5900Core i9-9900KCore i7-9700KCore i5-9600KCore i7-8700KCore i7-8700Core i5-8600KCore i5-8400Core i3-8350KCore i3-8100Pentium Gold G5400Core i7-7700KCore i7-7700Core i7-7700TCore i5-7600KCore i5- 7600Core i5-7600TCore i5-7500Core i5-7500TCore i5-7400Core i5-7400TCore i3-7350KCore i3-7320Core i3-7300Core i3-7300TCore i3-7100Core i3-7100TCore i7-6950XCore i7-6700KCore i7-6700Core i7-6700TCore i5-6600KCore i5-6600Core i5-6600TCore i5-6500Core i5-6500TCore i5-6400Core i5-6400TCore i3-6300Core i3-6300TCore i3-6100Core i3-6100TCore i7-5960XCore i7-5775CCore i5 -5675CCore i7-4960XCore i7-4930KCore i7-4820KCore i7-4790KCore i5-4690KCore i7-4770KCore i7-4770Core i5-4670KCore i5-4670Core i5-4570Core i7-3970XCore i7-3960XCore i7-3930KCore i7-3820Core i7-2700KCore i7-2600KCore i7-2600Core i7-2600SCore i5-3330Core i5-2500KCore i5-2500Core i5-2500SCore i5-2500TCore i5-2405SCore i5-2400Core i5-2400SCore i5-2390TCore i5-2320Core i5-2310Core i5-2300Core i3-2130Core i3-2125Core i3-2120Core i3-2105Core i3-2100Core i3-2100TPentium G860Pentium G850Pentium G840Pentium G632Pentium G630Pentium G622Pentium G620Celeron G540Celeron G530Celeron G440Core i7-990XCore i7-980Core i7 980XCore i7-975 ExtremeCore i7 970Core i7 965 ExtremeCore i7 960Core i7 950Core i7 940Core i7 930Core i7 920Core i7-880Core i7-875KCore i7-870Core i7-860SCore i7-860Core i5-760Core i5-750SCore i5-750Core i5-680Core i5-670Core i5-661Core i5- 660Core i5-655KCore i5-650Core i3-560Core i3-550Core i3-540Core i3-530Pentium G6960Pentium G6951Pentium G6950Atom D525Atom D510Atom D425Atom D410Atom 330Atom 230Core 2 Extreme QX9775Core 2 Extreme QX9770Core 2 Extreme QX9650Core 2 Quad Q9650Core 2 Quad Q9550sCore 2 Quad Q9550Core 2 Quad Q9505Core 2 Quad Q9450Core 2 Quad Q9400sCore 2 Quad Q9400Core 2 Quad Q9300Core 2 Quad Q8400sCore 2 Quad Q8400Core 2 Quad Q8300Core 2 Quad Q8200sCore 2 Quad Q8200Core 2 Duo E8600Core 2 Duo E8500Core 2 Duo E8400Core 2 Duo E8300Core 2 Duo E8200Core 2 Duo E8190Core 2 Duo E7600Core 2 Duo E7500Core 2 Duo E7400Core 2 Duo E7300Core 2 Duo E7200Core 2 Extreme QX6850Core 2 Extreme OX6800Core 2 Extreme QX6700Core 2 Quad Q6700Core 2 Quad Q6600Core 2 Extreme X6900Core 2 Extreme X6800Core 2 Duo E6850Core 2 Duo E6800Core 2 Duo E6750Core 2 Duo E6700Core 2 Duo E6600Core 2 Duo E6550Core 2 Duo E6540Core 2 Duo E6420Core 2 Duo E6400 (Allendale)Core 2 Duo E6400 (Conroe 2M)Core 2 Duo E6320Core 2 Duo E6300 ( Allendale)Core 2 Duo E6300 (Conroe 2M)Core 2 Duo E4700Core 2 Duo E4600Core 2 Duo E4500Core 2 Duo E4400Core 2 Duo E4300Pentium Dual-Core E6800Pentium Dual-Core E6700Pentium Dual-Core E6600Pentium Dual-Core E6500Pentium Dual-Core E6300Pentium Dual-Core E5800Pentium Dual-Core E5700Pentium Dual-Core E5500Pentium Dual-Core E5400Pentium Dual-Core E5300Pentium Dual-Core E5200Pentium Dual-Core E2220Pentium Dual-Core E2210Pentium Dual-Core E2200Pentium Dual-Core E2180Pentium Dual-Core E2160Pentium Dual-Core E21 4065 XEPentium D 960Pentium D 955 XEPentium D 950Pentium D 945Pentium D 940Pentium D 935Pentium D 930Pentium D 925Pentium D 920Pentium D 915Pentium D 840 XEPentium D 840Pentium D 830Pentium D 820Pentium D 805Pentium 4 EE 3. 73Pentium 4 EE 3.46Pentium 4 EE 3.4Pentium 4 EE 3.2Pentium 4 672Pentium 4 671Pentium 4 670Pentium 4 662Pentium 4 661Pentium 4 660Pentium 4 651Pentium 4 650Pentium 4 641Pentium 4 640Pentium 4 631Pentium 4 630Pentium 4 620Pentium 4 571Pentium 4 570JPentium 4 561Pentium 4 560JPentium 4 560Pentium 4 551Pentium 4 550JPentium 4 550Pentium 4 541Pentium 4 540JPentium 4 540Pentium 4 531Pentium 4 530JPentium 4 530Pentium 4 521Pentium 4 520JPentium 4 520Pentium 4 519KPentium 4 519JPentium 4 517Pentium 4 516Pentium 4 515JPentium 4 515Pentium 4 511Pentium 4 506Pentium 4 505JPentium 4 505Pentium 4 3.8FPentium 4 3.6FPentium 4 3.4FPentium 4 3.2FPentium 4 3.4EPentium 4 EE 3.4Pentium 4 3.4Pentium 4 3.2EPentium 4 EE 3.2Pentium 4 3.2 Pentium 4 3.06Pentium 4 3.0EPentium 4 3.0Pentium 4 2.8EPentium 4 2.8APentium 4 2.8CPentium 4 2.8Pentium 4 2.8Pentium 4 2.67Pentium 4 2.66Pentium 4 2.6CPentium 4 2.6Pentium 4 2.53Pentium 4 2.5Pentium 4 2.4EPentium 4 2.4APentium 4 2.4CPentium 4 2.4BPentium 4 2.4Pentium 4 2.26APentium 4 2. 26Pentium 4 2.2Pentium 4 2.0APentium 4 2.0Pentium 4 1.9Pentium 4 1.8 APentium 4 1.8 Pentium 4 1.7Pentium 4 1.6 APentium 4 1.6Pentium 4 1.5Pentium 4 1.4Pentium 4 2.0Pentium 4 1.9Pentium 4 1.8Pentium 4 1.7Pentium 4 1.6Pentium 4 1.5Pentium 4 1.4Pentium 4 1.3Pentium III-S 1400Pentium III 1400Pentium III 1333Pentium III-S 1266Pentium III 1200Pentium III-S 1133Pentium III 1133APentium III 1000BPentium III 1133Pentium III 1100Pentium III 1000EBPentium III 1000Pentium III 933Pentium III 900Pentium III 866Pentium III 850Pentium III 800EBPentium III 800Pentium III 750Pentium III 733Pentium III 700Pentium III 667Pentium III 650Pentium III 600EBPentium III 600EPentium III 550EPentium III 533EBPentium III 500EPentium III 1000BPentium III 1000Pentium III 933Pentium III 866Pentium III 850Pentium III 800EBPentium III 800Pentium III 750Pentium III 733Pentium III 700Pentium III 667Pentium III 650Pentium III 600BPentium III 600Pentium III 600EBPentium III 600EPentium III 550Pentium III 550EPentium III 533BPentium III 533EBPentium III 500Pentium III 450Pentium II Overdrive 333Pentium II Overdrive 300Pentium II 450Pentium II 400Pentium II 350Pentium II 333Pentium II 300APentium II 300Pentium II 266APentium II 266Pentium II 233Pentium Overdrive MMX 200Pentium Overdrive MMX 180Pentium Overdrive MMX 166Pentium Overdrive MMX 150Pentium Overdrive 166Pentium Overdrive 150Pentium Overdrive 125Pentium Overdrive 133Pentium Overdrive 120Pentium Pro 200MHz (1024 KB)Pentium Pro 200MHz (512 KB)Pentium Pro 200MHz (256 KB)Pentium Pro 180MHzPentium Pro 166MHzPentium Pro 150MHzPentium 233 MMXPentium 200 MMXPentium 166 MMXPentium 200Pentium 166Pentium 150Pentium 133Pentium 120Pentium 100Pentium 90Pentium 75Pentium 66Pentium 60Celeron G1101Celeron E3500Celeron E3400Celeron E3300Celeron E3200Celeron E1600Celeron E1500Celeron E1400Celeron E1200Celeron 450Celeron 445Celeron 440Celeron 430Celeron 420Celeron 220Celeron D 365Celeron D 360Celeron D 356Celeron D 352Celeron D 355Celeron D 351Celeron D 350Celeron D 346Celeron D 345JCeleron D 345Celeron D 341Celeron D 340JCeleron D 340Celeron D 336Celeron D 335JCeleron D 335Celeron D 331Celeron D 330JCeleron D 330Celeron D 326Celeron D 325JCeleron D 325Celeron D 320Celeron D 315Celeron D 310Celeron 2. 8Celeron 2.7Celeron 2.6Celeron 2.5Celeron 2.4Celeron 2.3Celeron 2.2Celeron 2.1Celeron 2.0Celeron 1.8Celeron 1.7Celeron 1400Celeron 1300Celeron 1200Celeron 1100ACeleron 1000ACeleron 1100Celeron 1000Celeron 950Celeron 900Celeron 850Celeron 800Celeron 766Celeron 733Celeron 700Celeron 667Celeron 633Celeron 600Celeron 566Celeron 533ACeleron 533Celeron 500Celeron 466Celeron 433 (S370)Celeron 433 (Slot 1)Celeron 400 (S370)Celeron 400 (Slot 1)Celeron 366 (S370)Celeron 366 (Slot 1)Celeron 333 ( S370) Celeron 333 (Slot 1) Celeron 300A (S370) Celeron 300A (SLOT 1) Celeron 300CELERON 266

Go to all processors

Compare

AMDryzen 9 7950xryzen 9 7900xryzen 76600xryzen 76600xryzen 76600xryzen 76600xryzen 76600xryzen5950XRyzen 9 5900XRyzen 7 5800X3DRyzen 7 5800XRyzen 7 5700XRyzen 7 5700GRyzen 5 5600XRyzen 5 5600Ryzen 5 5600GRyzen 5 5500Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GRyzen 7 PRO 4750GERyzen 5 PRO 4650GRyzen 5 PRO 4650GERyzen 3 PRO 4350GRyzen 3 PRO 4350GERyzen Threadripper 3960XRyzen 9 3950XRyzen 9 3900XTRyzen 9 3900XRyzen 7 3800XTRyzen 7 3800XRyzen 7 3700XRyzen 5 3600XTRyzen 5 3600XRyzen 5 3600Ryzen 5 3400GRyzen 3 3300XRyzen 3 3200GRyzen 3 3100Athlon 3000GRyzen 7 2700XRyzen 7 2700Ryzen 5 2600XRyzen 5 2600Ryzen 5 2500XRyzen 5 2400GRyzen 5 2400GERyzen 3 2300XRyzen 3 2200GRyzen 3 2200GEAthlon 240GEAthlon 220GEAthlon 200GERyzen 7 1800XRyzen 7 1700XRyzen 7 1700Ryzen 5 1600XRyzen 5 1600 AFRyzen 5 1600Ryzen 5 1500XRyzen 5 1400Ryzen 3 1300XRyzen 3 1200 AFRyzen 3 1200FX-8350FX-8320FX-8150FX-8120FX-8100FX-6350FX-6100FX-4170FX-4100A10-7870KAthlon 5350A10-7850KAthlon X4 860KAthlon X4 760KAthlon X4 750KAthlon X4 740Athlon X2 340A10-5800KA10-5700A8 -5600KA8-5500A6-5400KA4-5300A8-3850A8-3800Athlon II X4 631A6-3650A6-3600A6-3500 A4-3400A4-3300Phenom II X6 1100TPhenom II X6 1090T BEPhenom II X6 1075TPhenom II X6 1065TPhenom II X6 1055TPhenom II X6 1045TPhenom II X6 1035TAthlon II X4 650Athlon II X4 645Athlon II X4 640Athlon II X4 635Athlon II X4 630Athlon II X4 620eAthlon II X4 620Athlon II X4 615eAthlon II X4 615Athlon II X4 610eAthlon II X4 605eAthlon II X4 605Athlon II X4 600eAthlon II X3 460Athlon II X3 455Athlon II X3 450Athlon II X3 445Athlon II X3 440Athlon II X3 435Athlon II X3 425eAthlon II X3 425Athlon II X3 420Athlon II X3 420eAthlon II X3 415eAthlon II X3 410Athlon II X3 405eAthlon II X3 400Athlon II X2 265Athlon II X2 270uAthlon II X2 260Athlon II X2 255Athlon II X2 250eAthlon II X2 250Athlon II X2 245eAthlon II X2 245Athlon II X2 240eAthlon II X2 240Athlon II X2 235eAthlon II X2 220Athlon II X2 215Athlon II X2 210eAthlon II 160uSempron 180Sempron 150Sempron 145Sempron 140Sempron 130Athlon X2 7850Athlon X2 7750Athlon X2 7550Athlon X2 7450Athlon X2 6500 BEPhenom II X4 980 BEPhenom II X4 975 BEPhenom II X4 970 BE (Zosma)Phenom II X4 970 BEPhenom II X4 965 BEPhenom II X4 960T BEPhenom II X4 955 BEPhenom II X4 945Phenom II X4 940Phenom II X4 925Phenom II X4 920Phenom II X4 IIphenom 910 905ePhenom II X4 900ePhenom II X4 850Phenom II X4 840Phenom II X4 840TPhenom II X4 830Phenom II X4 820Phenom II X4 810Phenom II X4 805Phenom II X3 740 BEPhenom II X3 720Phenom II X3 715 BEPhenom II X3 710Phenom II X3 705ePhenom II X3 700ePhenom II X2 570 BEPhenom II X2 565 BEPhenom II X2 560 BEPhenom II X2 555 BEPhenom II X2 550 BEPhenom II X2 550Phenom II X2 545Phenom II X2 521Phenom II X2 511Phenom X4 9950 BEPhenom X4 9850 BEPhenom X4 9850Phenom X4 9750BPhenom X4 9750Phenom X4 9650Phenom X4 9600 Black EditionPhenom X4 9600BPhenom X4 9600Phenom X4 9550Phenom X4 9500Phenom X4 9450ePhenom X4 9350ePhenom X4 9150ePhenom X4 9100ePhenom X3 8850Phenom X3 8750 BEPhenom X3 8750BPhenom X3 8750Phenom X3 8650Phenom X3 8600BPhenom X3 8600Phenom X3 8550Phenom X3 8450ePhenom X3 8450Phenom X3 8400Phenom X3 8250eAthlon X2 BE-2400Athlon X2 BE-2350Athlon X2 BE-2300Athlon 64 FX-74Athlon 64 FX-72Athlon 64 FX-70Athlon 64 FX-62Athlon 64 FX-60Athlon 64 X2 6400+ Black EditionAthlon 64 X2 6400+ Athlon 64 X2 6000+ (Brisbane) Athlon 64 X2 6000+ (Windsor) Athlon 64 X2 5800+ (Brisbane) Athlon 64 X2 5600+ (Brisbane) X2 5400+ (Windsor)Athlon 64 X2 5200+ (Brisbane)Athlon 64 X2 5200+ (Windsor)Athlon 64 X2 5000+ Black EditionAthlon 64 X2 5000+ (Brisbane)Athlon 64 X2 5000+ (Windsor 2MB)Athlon 64 X2 5000+ (Windsor 1MB)Athlon 64 X2 4850eAthlon 64 X2 4800+ (Bris bane)Athlon 64 X2 4800+ (Windsor 2MB)Athlon 64 X2 4600+Athlon 64 X2 4450eAthlon 64 X2 4400+ (Brisbane) Windsor 1MB)Athlon 64 X2 4050eAthlon 64 X2 4000+ (Brisbane) Athlon 64 X2 4000+ (Windsor 2MB) Athlon 64 X2 3800+Athlon 64 X2 3600+ (Brisbane) Athlon 64 X2 4600+ (Toledo)Athlon 64 X2 4600+ (Manchester)Athlon 64 X2 4400+Athlon 64 X2 4200+ (Toledo)Athlon 64 X2 4200+ (Manchester) (Manchester)Athlon 64 LE-1660Athlon 64 LE-1640Athlon 64 LE-1620Athlon 64 LE-1600Athlon 64 4000+Athlon 64 3800+Athlon 64 3500+Athlon 64 3200+Athlon 64 3Athlon 64 FX-557 -55Athlon 64 FX-53Athlon 64 FX-51Athlon 64 4200+Athlon 64 4000+ (San Diego)Athlon 64 4000+ (Clawhammer)Athlon 64 3800+ (Venice)Athlon 64 3800+ (Newcastle)Athlon 64 3700 +Athlon 64 (Manchester)Athlon 64 3500+ (Venice)Athlon 64 3500+ (San Diego)At hlon 64 3500+ (Winchester)Athlon 64 3500+ (Newcastle)Athlon 64 3500+ (Clawhammer)Athlon 64 3200+ (Manchester)Athlon 64 3200+ (Venice)Athlon 64 3200+ (Winchester)Athlon 64 3000+ (Venice)Athlon 64 3000+ (Winchester)Athlon 64 3700+Athlon 64 3400+ (Newcastle)Athlon 64 3400+ (Clawhammer)Athlon 64 3200+ (Venice)Athlon 64 3200+ (Newcastle)Athlon 64 3200+ (Clawhammer)Athlon 64 3000+ ( Venice) Athlon 64 3000+ (Newcastle) Athlon 64 3000+ (Clawhammer) Athlon 64 2800+ (Newcastle) Athlon 64 2800+ (Clawhammer) +Sempron 3000+ (Palermo)Sempron 3400+Sempron 3300+Sempron 3100+ (Palermo)Sempron 3100+ (Paris)Sempron 3000+ (Palermo)Sempron 3000+ (Paris)Sempron 2800+Sempron 2600+ (Winchester)Sernpron 2600+ ( Palermo) Sempron 2500+Sempron 3000+Sempron 2800+ (Thorton) )Athlon XP 3200+ (FSB333)Athlon XP 3100+Athlon XP 3000+ (FSB400)Athlon XP 3000+ (FSB333)Athlon XP 2900+Athlon XP 2800+ (FSB333)Athlon XP 2800+ (FSB266)Athlon XP 2800+ (FSB333)Athlon XP 2700+Athlon XP 2600+ (FSB333)Athlon XP 2600+ (FSB333)Athlon XP 2600+ (FSB333)Athlon XP 2600+ (FSB266)Athlon XP 2600+ (FSB266)Athlon XP 2600+ (FSB266)Athlon XP 2500+ (FSB333)Athlon XP 2500+ (FSB266)Athlon XP 2400+ (Thorton)Athlon XP 2400+ (Thoroughbred)Athlon XP 2200 + (Thorton)Athlon XP 2200+ (Thorubbred)Athlon XP 2100+ (Thoroughbred)Athlon XP 2100+ (Palomino)Athlon XP 2000+ (Thorton)Athlon XP 2000+ (Thorubbred)Athlon XP 2000+ (Palomino)Athlon XP 1900+ (Thoroughbred)Athlon XP 1900+ (Palomino)Athlon XP 1800+ (Thoroughbred)Athlon XP 1800+ (Palomino)Athlon XP 1700+ (Thoroughbred)Athlon XP 1700+ (Palomino)Athlon XP 1600+ (Thoroughbred)Athlon XP 1600 + (Palomino) Athlon XP 1500+ Athlon 1400 (FSB266) ATHLON 1400 (FSB200) Athlon 1333athlon 1300athlon 1200 (FSB266) Athlon 1200 (FSB200) Ath26 (FSB200) ATHLON (FSB200) ATHLON (FSB200) ATHLON (FSB200) Athlon (FSB200) Athlon (FSB200) Athlon (FSB200) Athlon) Athlon 950Athlon 900Athlon 850Athlon 800Athlon 750Athlon 700Duron 1800Duron 1600Duron 1400Duron 1300Duron 1200Duron 1100Duron 1000Duron 950 (Morgan)Duron 950 (Spitfire)Duron 900 (Morgan)Duron 900 (Spitfire)Duron 850Duron 800Duron 750Duron 700Duron 650Duron 600Athlon 1000 (Orion)Athlon 1000 (Thunderbird) Athlon 950 (Pluto) Athlon 900 (Thunderbird) Athlon 850 (Pluto) Athlon 850 (Thundebird) Athlon 800 (Pluto) Athlon 800 (Thunderbird) Athlon 750 (Pluto) Athlon 750 (Thunderbird) Athlon 700 (Pluto) Athlon 650 (Pluto) Athlon 650 (Argon) Athlon 650 (Thunderbird) Athlon 600 (Pluto) Athlon 600 (Argon) Athlon 550 (Pluto) -2 533 (CXT)K6-2 500 (CXT)K6-2 475 (CXT)K6-2 450 (CXT)K6-2 400 (CXT)K6-2 380 (CXT)K6-2 366 (CXT)K6- 2 350 (CXT)K6-2 350K6-2 333 (CXT)K6-2 333 (CXT)K6-2 333K6-2 300 (CXT)K6-2 300 (CXT)K6-2 300K6-2 266K6 300K6 266K6 233K6 200K6 166K5 PR166K5 PR150K5 PR133K5 PR120K5 PR100K5 PR90K5 PR75IntelPentium Gold G7400Celeron G6900Core i9-11900KCore i9-11900KFCore i9-11900Core i9-11900FCore i9-11900TCore i7-11700KCore i7-11700KFCore i7-11700Core i7-11700FCore i7-11700TCore i5-11600KCore i5-11600KFCore i5-11600Core i5-11600TCore i5-11500Core i5-11500TCore i5-11400Core i5-11400FCore i5-11400TCore i3-10325Core i3-10305Core i3-10305TCore i3-10105Core i3-10105FCore i3-10105TPentium Gold G6605Pentium Gold G6505Pentium Gold G6505TPentium Gold G6405Pentium Gold G6405TCore i9-10900KCore i9-10900KFCore i9-10900Core i9-10900FCore i7-10700KCore i7-10700KFCore i7-10700Core i7-10700FCore i5-10600KCore i5-10600KFCore i5-10600Core i5-10500Core i5-10400Core i5-10400FCore i3-10320Core i3-10300Core i3-10100Pentium Gold G6600Pentium Gold G6500Pentium Gold G6400Celeron G5925Celeron G5920Celeron G5905Celeron G5900Core i9-9900KCore i7-9700KCore i5-9600KCore i7-8700KCore i7-8700Core i5-8600KCore i5-8400Core i3-8350KCore i3-8100Pentium Gold G5400Core i7-7700KCore i7-7700Core i7-7700TCore i5-7600KCore i5- 7600Core i5-7600TCore i5-7500Core i5-7500TCore i5-7400Core i5-7400TCore i3-7350KCore i3-7320Core i3-7300Core i3-7300TCore i3-7100Core i3-7100TCore i7-6950XCore i7-6700KCore i7-6700Core i7-6700TCore i5-6600KCore i5-6600Core i5-6600TCore i5-6500Core i5-6500TCore i5-6400Core i5-6400TCore i3-6300Core i3-6300TCore i3-6100Core i3-6100TCore i7-5960XCore i7-5775CCore i5 -5675CCore i7-4960XCore i7-4930KCore i7-4820KCore i7-4790KCore i5-4690KCore i7-4770KCore i7-4770Core i5-4670KCore i5-4670Core i5-4570Core i7-3970XCore i7-3960XCore i7-3930KCore i7-3820Core i7-2700KCore i7-2600KCore i7-2600Core i7-2600SCore i5-3330Core i5-2500KCore i5-2500Core i5-2500SCore i5-2500TCore i5-2405SCore i5-2400Core i5-2400SCore i5-2390TCore i5-2320Core i5-2310Core i5-2300Core i3-2130Core i3-2125Core i3-2120Core i3-2105Core i3-2100Core i3-2100TPentium G860Pentium G850Pentium G840Pentium G632Pentium G630Pentium G622Pentium G620Celeron G540Celeron G530Celeron G440Core i7-990XCore i7-980Core i7 980XCore i7-975 ExtremeCore i7 970Core i7 965 ExtremeCore i7 960Core i7 950Core i7 940Core i7 930Core i7 920Core i7-880Core i7-875KCore i7-870Core i7-860SCore i7-860Core i5-760Core i5-750SCore i5-750Core i5-680Core i5-670Core i5-661Core i5- 660Core i5-655KCore i5-650Core i3-560Core i3-550Core i3-540Core i3-530Pentium G6960Pentium G6951Pentium G6950Atom D525Atom D510Atom D425Atom D410Atom 330Atom 230Core 2 Extreme QX9775Core 2 Extreme QX9770Core 2 Extreme QX9650Core 2 Quad Q9650Core 2 Quad Q9550sCore 2 Quad Q9550Core 2 Quad Q9505Core 2 Quad Q9450Core 2 Quad Q9400sCore 2 Quad Q9400Core 2 Quad Q9300Core 2 Quad Q8400sCore 2 Quad Q8400Core 2 Quad Q8300Core 2 Quad Q8200sCore 2 Quad Q8200Core 2 Duo E8600Core 2 Duo E8500Core 2 Duo E8400Core 2 Duo E8300Core 2 Duo E8200Core 2 Duo E8190Core 2 Duo E7600Core 2 Duo E7500Core 2 Duo E7400Core 2 Duo E7300Core 2 Duo E7200Core 2 Extreme QX6850Core 2 Extreme OX6800Core 2 Extreme QX6700Core 2 Quad Q6700Core 2 Quad Q6600Core 2 Extreme X6900Core 2 Extreme X6800Core 2 Duo E6850Core 2 Duo E6800Core 2 Duo E6750Core 2 Duo E6700Core 2 Duo E6600Core 2 Duo E6550Core 2 Duo E6540Core 2 Duo E6420Core 2 Duo E6400 (Allendale)Core 2 Duo E6400 (Conroe 2M)Core 2 Duo E6320Core 2 Duo E6300 ( Allendale)Core 2 Duo E6300 (Conroe 2M)Core 2 Duo E4700Core 2 Duo E4600Core 2 Duo E4500Core 2 Duo E4400Core 2 Duo E4300Pentium Dual-Core E6800Pentium Dual-Core E6700Pentium Dual-Core E6600Pentium Dual-Core E6500Pentium Dual-Core E6300Pentium Dual-Core E5800Pentium Dual-Core E5700Pentium Dual-Core E5500Pentium Dual-Core E5400Pentium Dual-Core E5300Pentium Dual-Core E5200Pentium Dual-Core E2220Pentium Dual-Core E2210Pentium Dual-Core E2200Pentium Dual-Core E2180Pentium Dual-Core E2160Pentium Dual-Core E21 4065 XEPentium D 960Pentium D 955 XEPentium D 950Pentium D 945Pentium D 940Pentium D 935Pentium D 930Pentium D 925Pentium D 920Pentium D 915Pentium D 840 XEPentium D 840Pentium D 830Pentium D 820Pentium D 805Pentium 4 EE 3. 73Pentium 4 EE 3.46Pentium 4 EE 3.4Pentium 4 EE 3.2Pentium 4 672Pentium 4 671Pentium 4 670Pentium 4 662Pentium 4 661Pentium 4 660Pentium 4 651Pentium 4 650Pentium 4 641Pentium 4 640Pentium 4 631Pentium 4 630Pentium 4 620Pentium 4 571Pentium 4 570JPentium 4 561Pentium 4 560JPentium 4 560Pentium 4 551Pentium 4 550JPentium 4 550Pentium 4 541Pentium 4 540JPentium 4 540Pentium 4 531Pentium 4 530JPentium 4 530Pentium 4 521Pentium 4 520JPentium 4 520Pentium 4 519KPentium 4 519JPentium 4 517Pentium 4 516Pentium 4 515JPentium 4 515Pentium 4 511Pentium 4 506Pentium 4 505JPentium 4 505Pentium 4 3.8FPentium 4 3.6FPentium 4 3.4FPentium 4 3.2FPentium 4 3.4EPentium 4 EE 3.4Pentium 4 3.4Pentium 4 3.2EPentium 4 EE 3.2Pentium 4 3.2 Pentium 4 3.06Pentium 4 3.0EPentium 4 3.0Pentium 4 2.8EPentium 4 2.8APentium 4 2.8CPentium 4 2.8Pentium 4 2.8Pentium 4 2.67Pentium 4 2.66Pentium 4 2.6CPentium 4 2.6Pentium 4 2.53Pentium 4 2.5Pentium 4 2.4EPentium 4 2.4APentium 4 2.4CPentium 4 2.4BPentium 4 2.4Pentium 4 2.26APentium 4 2. 26Pentium 4 2.2Pentium 4 2.0APentium 4 2.0Pentium 4 1.9Pentium 4 1.8 APentium 4 1.8 Pentium 4 1.7Pentium 4 1.6 APentium 4 1.6Pentium 4 1.5Pentium 4 1.4Pentium 4 2.0Pentium 4 1.9Pentium 4 1.8Pentium 4 1.7Pentium 4 1.6Pentium 4 1.5Pentium 4 1.4Pentium 4 1.3Pentium III-S 1400Pentium III 1400Pentium III 1333Pentium III-S 1266Pentium III 1200Pentium III-S 1133Pentium III 1133APentium III 1000BPentium III 1133Pentium III 1100Pentium III 1000EBPentium III 1000Pentium III 933Pentium III 900Pentium III 866Pentium III 850Pentium III 800EBPentium III 800Pentium III 750Pentium III 733Pentium III 700Pentium III 667Pentium III 650Pentium III 600EBPentium III 600EPentium III 550EPentium III 533EBPentium III 500EPentium III 1000BPentium III 1000Pentium III 933Pentium III 866Pentium III 850Pentium III 800EBPentium III 800Pentium III 750Pentium III 733Pentium III 700Pentium III 667Pentium III 650Pentium III 600BPentium III 600Pentium III 600EBPentium III 600EPentium III 550Pentium III 550EPentium III 533BPentium III 533EBPentium III 500Pentium III 450Pentium II Overdrive 333Pentium II Overdrive 300Pentium II 450Pentium II 400Pentium II 350Pentium II 333Pentium II 300APentium II 300Pentium II 266APentium II 266Pentium II 233Pentium Overdrive MMX 200Pentium Overdrive MMX 180Pentium Overdrive MMX 166Pentium Overdrive MMX 150Pentium Overdrive 166Pentium Overdrive 150Pentium Overdrive 125Pentium Overdrive 133Pentium Overdrive 120Pentium Pro 200MHz (1024 KB)Pentium Pro 200MHz (512 KB)Pentium Pro 200MHz (256 KB)Pentium Pro 180MHzPentium Pro 166MHzPentium Pro 150MHzPentium 233 MMXPentium 200 MMXPentium 166 MMXPentium 200Pentium 166Pentium 150Pentium 133Pentium 120Pentium 100Pentium 90Pentium 75Pentium 66Pentium 60Celeron G1101Celeron E3500Celeron E3400Celeron E3300Celeron E3200Celeron E1600Celeron E1500Celeron E1400Celeron E1200Celeron 450Celeron 445Celeron 440Celeron 430Celeron 420Celeron 220Celeron D 365Celeron D 360Celeron D 356Celeron D 352Celeron D 355Celeron D 351Celeron D 350Celeron D 346Celeron D 345JCeleron D 345Celeron D 341Celeron D 340JCeleron D 340Celeron D 336Celeron D 335JCeleron D 335Celeron D 331Celeron D 330JCeleron D 330Celeron D 326Celeron D 325JCeleron D 325Celeron D 320Celeron D 315Celeron D 310Celeron 2. 8Celeron 2.7Celeron 2.6Celeron 2.5Celeron 2.4Celeron 2.3Celeron 2.2Celeron 2.1Celeron 2.0Celeron 1.8Celeron 1.7Celeron 1400Celeron 1300Celeron 1200Celeron 1100ACeleron 1000ACeleron 1100Celeron 1000Celeron 950Celeron 900Celeron 850Celeron 800Celeron 766Celeron 733Celeron 700Celeron 667Celeron 633Celeron 600Celeron 566Celeron 533ACeleron 533Celeron 500Celeron 466Celeron 433 (S370)Celeron 433 (Slot 1)Celeron 400 (S370)Celeron 400 (Slot 1)Celeron 366 (S370)Celeron 366 (Slot 1)Celeron 333 ( S370)Celeron 333 (Slot 1)Celeron 300A (S370)Celeron 300A (Slot 1)Celeron 300Celeron 266

You can simultaneously select
up to 10 processors by holding Ctrl

AMD Athlon II X2 215 processor reviews:

• The full range of dual, triple and quad-core AMD processors in one big test and comparison against Intel processors

Processor AMD Athlon II X2 215

Discussion of the article about the representative of the ultra-budget Intel processor family represented by the Celeron E3300 led to the fact that some readers, in general, agreed with the conclusion that even in the budget segment you should not overdo it with savings, and some objected no less reasonably that «yes, it’s slow, but it’s cheaper by 10 dollars than the younger Pentium models, but still not so slow as to be critical. » It is clear that both points of view have every right to exist — someone is quite satisfied with the price and about a hundred dollars, so he wants to get more for his money, but many have enough performance and the youngest today’s (and even yesterday’s processors), therefore I want to spend as little as possible on a purchase. It would have been different, both companies would not have released processors priced below $ 80, in principle, since they would not have been in any demand. And since it exists (albeit a small one, compared to slightly higher segments), there is also an offer. We already know what Intel offers, but suddenly it turned out that we somehow lost sight of the offers of the only (already) competitor, which, generally speaking, specializes in inexpensive processors. Is it fair? Of course not! Although even the youngest tested Athlon II X2 250 is already able to compete with Celeron in price, AMD does not stop there, offering users 245 and 240 processors, which differ from the ancestor of the family only in a reduced clock speed and price.

But you can save even more radically — some markets (including ours) are supplied with such an interesting model as the Athlon II X2 215. It differs from other Athlon II X2 not only in the minimum clock frequency — only 2.7 GHz, but also halved cache memory capacity — only 512K bytes per core. Back to basics? After all, all the old Athlons had that much L2 cache. Not only that — the fact is that just 1M L2 per core is atypical for 45 nm AMD processors: it is found only in the Athlon II X2 family. But in Athlon II X3 and X4, as well as in all Phenom II cache memory of the second level, just the same 512K bytes. Thus, the 215 model exists in the AMD assortment not only to «close» the ultra-budget segment: this processor can be obtained on any of the used crystals. Have a Regor with a partially broken cache? It turned out Propus, where there are problems with half the cores? Did the unsuccessful Deneb leave the assembly line, whose cache and half of the cores do not work? All this raw material does not have to be thrown into a landfill at all — there is a processor for the production of which it will fit. No wonder AMD plans to release this model go far enough. As the frequencies of «full-fledged» processors of the family grow as planned, it is supposed to be thinned out. In particular, formally the younger Athlon II X2 240 will «live» only until the middle of the year (hereinafter — only deliveries of already ordered processors), and the 245th will last until the end of the year at best. But all this does not concern the 215th — it has been produced for half a year, and the whole of 2010 will definitely continue to do so.

However, we have serious suspicions, of course, that all the talk about the disposal of manufacturing defects, there are talks, and the main reason for the release of «cut down» models is pure marketing. In this case, one cannot hope for the existence of 215 on any crystals other than Regor. However… hope is the last to die 🙂 Since the company is releasing the Phenom II X2 (and it once made the Athlon X2 with Phenom L3 cache with two disabled cores), the probability of this model getting into the sales network on Propus is still different from zero . And the probability of unlocking one or two cores in this case is also different from zero, which radically distinguishes this cheap processor from other Athlon II X2, where there is guaranteed nothing to unlock. Here — at least the second half of the cache memory can definitely be tried.

On the other hand, the issue of unlocking is of concern to a very small number of users. For the vast majority, something else is extremely important — how fast this processor is in normal operation. In other words, won’t it turn out like in the fairy tale about the priest and his worker Balda? That such a situation is extremely possible when you take a mid-range processor and start cutting everything that made it possible to match this level (cache memory, frequency, bus frequency) we have already seen on the example of Celeron. Here, the situation is slightly different — just a slight reduction in processors originally designed for the budget sector. So let’s see — it’s better, worse, or the same effect. 2 2 L1, I/D, 64/64 64/64 L2, 64/64 64/64 CASH L2, KB 2 x 512 2 x 512 RAM 2 x DDR3-1066

2 x DDR3-1227 nT, MSC

9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000

Our main character was protested (as well as Celeron last time ) in two modes — regular and with a slight overclocking. Relatively small, but allowed to increase the clock speed to the level of the older model in the family, namely the Athlon II X2 255.

The last processor we used for comparison also boasts twice as much L2 cache, however, it loses to the overclocked 215th in terms of the speed of working with RAM — since only one overclocking method is available for Athlon II: increasing the reference clock frequency (hence, all tires — such a “gift” as several standard reference frequencies, which greatly helps to overclock representatives of younger families of Intel processors, AMD does not offer us). Another benchmark is the Athlon II X3 425: AMD positions these processors in the same price segment as the Athlon II X2, giving the user a choice of what to spend money on — a higher frequency and cache capacity, or an «extra» core with saving the same frequency (the 215th and 425th have exactly the same frequency) and support for faster memory (don’t forget that among AM3 processors the most «offended» are all Athlon II X2, which support a maximum of DDR3-1066). And in this test there will be two Intel processors that directly compete with the Athlon II X2 215 in terms of price and positioning: Celeron E3300 and Pentium E5300.

Memory of the DDR3 and DDR2 types has almost become equal in price (in Russia, however, some advantage of the latter is still preserved, but correcting this skew is a matter of the near future), so the main In testing, we focus on the first. With one exception — the results of processors under LGA775 are taken from the second one, since the use of DDR3 is hardly justified for them. This is especially true for Celeron and younger Pentiums with 800 MHz FSB — in such conditions, the use of DDR3 leads to too noticeable losses. For Athlon II, on the contrary, the use of such memory is more than justified, which at present can already be considered their competitive advantage.

Testing

The performance testing methodology (the list of software used and testing conditions) is described in detail in the article. For ease of perception, the results on the diagrams are presented as a percentage (the result of Intel Core 2 Quad Q9300 is taken as 100% in each of the tests). Detailed results in absolute terms are available as a spreadsheet in Microsoft Excel format.

3D visualization

Interactive work in 3D modeling packages (and not only in them — this is true for almost all unoptimized and poorly optimized applications) is not the first time it favors processors with the Core 2 architecture — AMD devices are capable of demonstrate competitive results only with a noticeable head start in the form of clock frequency of the cores, or faster memory (which, for example, «pulls» Athlon II X3 to third place). However, Celeron family processors are still cut too much compared to full-fledged budget models, so, having a price on the level of the E3200, the Athlon II X2 215 can easily cope with the more expensive E3300. Overclocking allows it to catch up with the older model in the family (the smaller cache memory capacity was compensated by the higher speed of the RAM), but even the younger Pentium could not reach a little.

Rendering 3D scenes

But the modules for the final rendering of scenes, software manufacturers “lick” carefully, since at this stage the performance is determined by the computer and the application package, and not by the user 🙂 forget it altogether, since even the Pentium E5300 is a bit slower. The increase in performance during overclocking is almost linear, but it was not possible to catch up with X2 255 at an equal frequency: after all, the capacity of the cache memory also matters during rendering (when there is a very limited amount of it, as in this case). And the question is “is it possible to catch up with at least the youngest Athlon II X3?” in this group of applications it is simply not worth it: for this it would be necessary to overclock the processor to more than 4 GHz, which is somewhat beyond the capabilities of the average home user;)

Scientific and engineering calculations

As in the first group of tests, the third (and subsequent) core does not give anything, but a good increase can be obtained by increasing the speed and reducing memory latency. But then there are already differences. Firstly, the performance gain during overclocking is close to linear (which is similar to the second group). Secondly, the difference between 512K bytes and 1M bytes of cache memory per core is very clear. And between 1M and 2M of the shared cache, it is also visible well. All in all, the Athlon II X2 215, when running normally, sits exactly between the Celeron E3300 and the Pentium E5300. Judging by the absolute result, one can generally state that this processor is faster than any existing Celeron (including the E3400), but slower than any Pentium at 45 nm (including the recently discontinued E5200). Taking into account the retail price at the level of Celeron E3200, the result is not bad.

Bitmap graphics

The crookeder the applications, the better the Core 2 architecture looks. In general, in this group of programs, even Celeron can be considered a normal processor, since it is not so far behind the older Athlon II, and any Pentium is even faster . The main «culprits» of this state of affairs, as one would expect, are «purely amateur» programs such as ACDSee, Corel PaintShop Pro and PhotoImpact — in a more «serious» Photoshop, we can talk about parity. But parity is only between the older Athlon II X2 (X3, obviously due to the partial optimization of this application for multi-core, breaks away from its rivals) and the younger Pentiums. Accordingly, the younger Athlon II X2, which is the 215th, has nothing to catch here: the maximum it can do in normal mode is competition with the «old» Athlon X2, Celeron, Pentium and some Core 2 Duo.

Data compression

There is not enough cache memory, and the RAM mode is limited to DDR3-1066 — it is obvious that it makes no sense to wait for records in archiving tests. However, the processor copes well with the Celeron E3300 even if the latter works with DDR2 and that’s it! «Put» on processors for LGA775 DDR3 — it would be a «convincing victory» in general, and compared with the younger Pentium 🙂 If we do without jokes, then the only thing that can be said is that the performance corresponds to the positioning, but nothing more. Acceleration allows you to «pull up» it to the average level, but not to set any record.

Compilation (VC++)

As we’ve seen many times, Visual Studio is an excellent example of optimization for all existing ways to increase processor performance. The most «advanced» of them is the increase in the number of computing cores, so it is clear that the results of Athlon II X3 425 in this case do not need comments. Our main character, as it could be assumed in advance, at an equal frequency overtakes about one and a half times — an almost linear dependence on the number of cores and memory bandwidth. But little more than memory, VS2008 loves cache, so overclocked X2 215 results are significantly behind X2 255, despite the same core clock and more memory. Well, from the point of view of comparison with the competitor’s processors, everything is exactly according to AMD’s plans — at the time of its appearance, the 215th had to compete with the Pentium E5200, which was then the junior. He was quite successful in this, while our hero falls short of the E5300 (although if we supplied the latest DDR3, he would overtake him easily and noticeably), but he doesn’t need this — at a price at the Celeron E3200 level, even that defeat is enough, what does he do to E3300 🙂

Java

The behavior of the JVM is similar to VS2008, with one major exception — low cache capacity. As a result, it is not surprising that the Athlon II X2 215 operating in the normal mode even slightly outperforms the Pentium E5300 (fortunately, the latter has a 100 MHz lower clock frequency), and, being overclocked to the Athlon II X2 255 frequency, it lags behind it only by 3%. But even the youngest Athlon II X3 demonstrates a completely different level of performance in this task — as expected.

Audio encoding

Audio codecs, firstly, do not need a large amount of cache memory, and secondly, they are extremely skeptical about any AMD processors. The result is natural: in order to at least catch up with Intel processors, you need to have half a gigahertz more, and in order to overtake by a noticeable amount, it is very useful to get one or two additional cores. Lacking these two extensive «improvers», the Athlon II X2 215 in this task can compete only with the old Pentium or Core 2 Duo, but is no longer able to overtake even the new Celeron. However, as we have said more than once, the absolute level of performance in audio coding is now such that for any user who occasionally converts one or two albums from format to format for personal use, any modern (and not even very modern) processor will be quite sufficient .

Video encoding

Video codecs have much higher needs, so the fact that they don’t have such selectivity in terms of processor architecture leads to a rather pleasant result — Athlon II X2 215 works at the Pentium E5300 level. Yes, now it is the youngest Pentium, but we also have the youngest Athlon II in the line, while having a price at the level of Celeron. Those who are planning to study video seriously, obviously, should not pay attention to dual-core processors at all, since the youngest tri-core processor is again radically faster than all of them. However, the last word in domestic video transcoding has not yet been said — AMD also has such an «ace up its sleeve» as support for this operation from its discrete video cards or even integrated chipsets. So far, however, only one — 785G, but there is no doubt that in the chipsets of the 800th family, expected in a couple of months, these capabilities will be preserved and enhanced. And they are not so bad, as we have already found out: when using h364, a combination of Athlon II X2 250 and 785G copes with the task in about the same time as Athlon II X4 630 alone. However, for users of the platform from Intel, this method of speeding up work is also available, but only when using a discrete graphics card. But hardware acceleration of video transcoding in a system with integrated graphics is an almost exclusive feature of Socket AM3. «Almost» since those who choose Intel have one loophole — just use the NVIDIA GeForce 9 chipset300 or 9400, however, the prevalence of such boards in comparison with the «canonically correct» Intel G43/G45 leaves much to be desired.

Gaming 3D

We have serious (and growing stronger) suspicions that when comparing the positioning of its processors, AMD relies heavily on their gaming use. In any case, as we have already seen, it is difficult to explain the same position in the rankings of Athlon II X3 and Phenom II X2 (as well as Athlon II X4 and Phenom II X3) in any other way. And now — the company usually «does not pay» attention to Celeron as a competitor for Athlon II X2, although, as we have seen above, sometimes the first processors demonstrate even higher performance, and often they are only as inferior as Athlon II X2 are behind. from Pentium. But in games — everything is «as expected.» The youngest Athlon II X2 is equal to the youngest Pentium (even despite the fact that the youngest has already become the E5300, not the E5200), and the rest of the models are even faster.

Let’s look at the situation in games from the other side — not at the average temperature in the hospital, but at the number of games that can be played with the settings we have chosen and with the video card on the GTX 275 chip used. Average 30 FPS should be considered the comfort limit — the minimum frequency frames would be more indicative, but there are not so many applications in which it can be measured correctly. So, the Celeron E3300 fails completely and completely in three games out of eight, and in Crysis: Warhead its results are almost on the verge: 32 FPS. For the Pentium E5300 and Athlon II X2 215, this game is no longer «conditionally playable», but the remaining three failures remain. Although in FC2 the number of frames is already very close to the lower limit. Overclocking these processors or switching to Athlon II X2 255 or Pentium E6500 (generally, comparable measures) still does not allow you to achieve good results in GTA4 (30-32 FPS for a dynamic game is on the verge), but World in Conflict in general is extremely skeptical about any dual-core processors, with the possible exception of the Core i3 / i5. But even the youngest tri-core Athlon II X3 425, which fits in at $ 100 even in Moscow retail, allows you to get the desired 30 frames per second in WiC, and its performance in other games does not leave any special questions at all. Here, in fact, is the answer to a frequently asked question — do you need more than two cores in a processor for a gaming computer?

Total

In the end, no miracle happened — the processor turned out to be slightly faster than the Celeron, but slower than the Pentium. However, it is at the level of the youngest Celeron, and it works normally with modern DDR3 memory (which LGA775 processors cannot boast of, especially their younger representatives), so you can extract the meaning from its existence. But small — after all, from the point of view of today, the performance is low. And since the computer is purchased for more than one month, and the price of the central processor is not at all a determinant of its cost (within reasonable limits), we remain of the same opinion — too much saving is fraught with consequences. Unless, of course, we consider it as a temporary solution, focusing on a “creeping upgrade”: first we collect the cheapest, but on a modern platform (perhaps even using a certain number of used components), then we “bring it to mind”, and then, you see , and inexpensive six-core processors will appear, so it will be enough to buy one and enjoy high performance 🙂 However, such a path, for all its seeming attractiveness, cannot be called particularly reasonable, and it is possible only from the point of view of those who assemble / sort through computers on their own but not the majority of users. The Athlon II X2 215 will suit the latter just as another version of the next ultra-budget processor, but for a completely relevant platform.

Another test result is more interesting: as we can see, the Athlon II X2 255 and the 215th overclocked to its frequency reached the finish line literally head to head — with a gap of only around 3%. Yes, of course, you can’t discount the more efficient memory mode, but still — even taking it into account, the difference between the processors does not exceed 4% (maximum). The question is — do the processors of this line really need a megabyte of cache memory per core? Regor area is 117 mm ² , the number of transistors is 234 million. Propus / Rana — respectively, 169 mm ² and 300 million transistors. Of course, part of the budget is spent on the units existing in all processors in a single number (memory controllers and NT), so the head-on calculations are not entirely correct, however … «Budget overrun» can be estimated at least 20 mm ² area and 60 million transistors, i.e. the cost increased by about 20%, providing less than a 5% increase in productivity. And it would be fine if we were talking about processors of the upper price range, but we have a crystal that was originally created specifically for the budget segment. Moreover, such a capacity of cache memory cannot be explained by traditions: at times 130 and 90 nm process technology 1M byte L2 was mainly found in top models, according to 65 nm standards neither Athlon nor Phenom were released with such a cache, and for 45 nm Regor and Sargas are unique: all other chips contain exactly 512K bytes per core. To what do we owe this phenomenon? This secret is covered in darkness, and only AMD knows the answer 🙂

Athlon II X2 215 processor [in 3 benchmarks]

AMD
Athlon II X2 215

• Interface
• Core frequency
• Video memory size
• Memory type
• Memory frequency
• Maximum resolution

Description

AMD started AMD Athlon II X2 215 sales in October 2009 at a suggested price of $45. This is a desktop processor based on the Regor architecture, primarily designed for office systems. It has 2 cores and 2 threads and is manufactured using 45 nm process technology, the maximum frequency is 2700 MHz, the multiplier is locked.

In terms of compatibility, this is an AMD Socket AM3 processor with a TDP of 65W. It supports DDR3 memory.

It provides poor benchmark performance at

0.94%

from the leader, which is AMD EPYC 7h22.

Athlon II
X2 215

or

EPYC
7h22

General information

Information about the type (desktop or laptop) and architecture of the Athlon II X2 215, as well as when sales started and cost at that time.

9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000

011

out of 14999 (Xeon Platinum 9282)

place in the performance rating	2419
Price-quality	8. 66

Value for money

To obtain an index, we compare the characteristics of processors and their cost, taking into account the cost of other processors.

• 0
• 50
• 100

Features

Athlon II X2 215 quantitative parameters such as number of cores and threads, clock speeds, manufacturing process, cache size and multiplier lock state. They indirectly speak about the performance of the processor, but for an accurate assessment, you need to consider the results of the tests.

Tests in the benchmarks

These are the results of the Athlon II X2 215 performance tests in non-gaming benchmarks. The overall score is set from 0 to 100, where 100 corresponds to the fastest processor at the moment.

Overall performance in tests

This is our overall performance rating. We regularly improve our algorithms, but if you find any inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in the comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon II X2 215
0.94

• Passmark
• GeekBench 5 Single-Core
• GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widely used benchmark that consists of 8 different tests, including integer and floating point calculations, extended instruction tests, compression, encryption, and game physics calculations. Also includes a separate single-threaded test.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Athlon II X2 215
952

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application designed as CPU benchmarks that independently recreate certain real world tasks that can accurately measure performance. This version uses only one processor core.

Benchmark coverage: 37%

Athlon II X2 215
316

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application designed as CPU benchmarks that independently recreate certain real world tasks that can be used to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available processor cores.

Benchmark coverage: 37%

Athlon II X2 215
573

Relative capacity

Overall performance of the Athlon II X2 215 compared to its closest competitor in desktop processors.

Intel Core 2 Duo E7200
101.06

AMD E2-3200
101.06

AMD Athlon 64 FX-62
100

AMD Athlon II X2 215
100

Intel Celeron E3500
98.94

Intel Pentium E5400
98. 94

AMD Athlon 64 X2 6000+
96.81

Competitor from Intel

We believe that the nearest equivalent to Athlon II X2 215 from Intel is Celeron E3500, which is slower by 1% on average and lower by 8 positions in our rating.

Celeron
E3500

Compare

Here are some of Intel’s closest competitors to the Athlon II X2 215:

Intel Core 2 Duo E6700
104.26

Intel Core 2 Duo E7300
102.13

Intel Core 2 Duo E7200
101.06

AMD Athlon II X2 215
100

Intel Celeron E3500
98.94

Intel Pentium E5400
98.94

Intel Pentium E5300
95.74

Other processors

Here we recommend several processors that are more or less similar in performance to the reviewed one.

Core 2
Duo E7200

Compare

E2
3200

Compare

Celeron
E3500

Compare

Pentium
E5400

Compare

Athlon 64
FX-74

Compare

Core 2
Duo E7300

Compare

Recommended video cards

According to our statistics these video cards are most often used with Athlon II X2 215:

GeForce
9600 GT

5. 9%

GeForce GT
240

3.9%

GeForce
9500 GT

3.4%

GeForce GT
710

3.3%

GeForce GT
730

3.3%

GeForce GT
440

3.1%

GeForce
7025 + nForce 630a

3.1%

GeForce GT
220

2.9%

GeForce GTS
450

2.8%

GeForce GT
610

2.7%

User rating

Here you can see the evaluation of the processor by users, as well as put your own rating.

Tips and comments

Here you can ask a question about the Athlon II X2 215 processor, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.

Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.

Speed ​​in office use

Performance in everyday work such as browsers and office applications.

The performance of 1 core has the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications use only one, ignoring the rest.

Similarly, many professional applications such as various CADs ignore multi-threaded performance.

Speed ​​in heavy applications

Performance in resource-intensive tasks loading a maximum of 8 cores.

The performance of all cores and their number have the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications willingly use all the cores and increase the speed accordingly.

At the same time, certain periods of work can be demanding on the performance of one or two cores, for example, applying filters in the editor.

Data obtained from tests by users who tested their systems with and without overclocking. Thus, you see the average values ​​corresponding to the processor.

Speed ​​of numerical operations

Different tasks require different CPU strengths. A system with few fast cores and low memory latency will be fine for the vast majority of games, but will be inferior to a system with a lot of slow cores in a rendering scenario.

We believe that a minimum of 4/4 (4 physical cores and 4 threads) processor is suitable for a budget gaming PC. At the same time, some games can load it at 100%, slow down and freeze, and performing any tasks in the background will lead to a drop in FPS.

Ideally, the budget shopper should aim for a minimum of 4/8 and 6/6. A gamer with a big budget can choose between 6/12, 8/8 and 8/16. Processors with 10 and 12 cores can perform well in games with high frequency and fast memory, but are overkill for such tasks. Also, buying for the future is a dubious undertaking, since in a few years many slow cores may not provide sufficient gaming performance.

When choosing a processor for your work, consider how many cores your programs use. For example, photo and video editors can use 1-2 cores when working with filtering, and rendering or converting in the same editors already uses all threads.

Data obtained from tests by users who tested their systems both with overclocking (maximum value in the table) and without (minimum). A typical result is shown in the middle, the more filled in the color bar, the better the average result among all tested systems.

Benchmarks

Benchmarks were run on stock hardware, that is, without overclocking and with factory settings. Therefore, on overclocked systems, the points can noticeably differ upwards. Also, small performance changes may be due to the BIOS version.

Passmark

Intel Pentium B950

966

Intel Pentium E6300

964

AMD A4-3300 APU

961

Intel Core2 Duo P9500

959

Intel Core2 Duo P8700

945

AMD Athlon II X2 215

944

Intel Core2 Duo E7200

942

Intel Celeron 3205U

935

Intel Core2 Duo E7300

929

AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 6000+

922

AMD Athlon X2 240

921

Game Tests

FPS measured by us in popular games on AMD Athlon II X2 215 and meets system requirements. Please note that the official requirements of developers in games do not always match the data of real tests. Also, the result is strongly influenced by the overclocking of the system and the graphic settings in the game. We test at high settings in FullHD resolution to get numbers close to real gameplay. 9300M GS, SSD — SSD 240GB.

Characteristics

The data is not yet complete, so the tables may be missing information or missing existing features.

Basic

Manufacturer	AMD
Release dateMonth and year of the processor’s availability.	10-2016
Cores The number of physical cores.	2
ThreadsNumber of threads. The number of logical processor cores that the operating system sees.	2
Multi-Threading Technology With Intel’s Hyper-threading and AMD’s SMT technology, one physical core is recognized as two logical cores in the operating system, thereby increasing processor performance in multi-threaded applications.	Missing
Base frequencyGuaranteed frequency of all processor cores at maximum load. Performance in single-threaded and multi-threaded applications and games depends on it. It is important to remember that speed and frequency are not directly related. For example, a new processor at a lower frequency may be faster than an old one at a higher one.	2.7 GHz
Turbo frequencyThe maximum frequency of one processor core in turbo mode. Manufacturers allow modern processors to independently increase the frequency of one or more cores under heavy load, due to which performance is noticeably increased. It may depend on the nature of the load, the number of loaded cores, temperature and the specified limits. Significantly affects the speed in games and applications that are demanding on the frequency of the CPU.	2.7 GHz
Embedded Options Available Two enclosure versions. Standard and designed for mobile devices. In the second version, the processor can be soldered on the motherboard.	No

Video core

RAM

PCI

Data protection

Design

Competitors

Please note that competitors are selected automatically based on performance in a particular task. Therefore, some may puzzle you. We are improving our selection algorithm, treat with understanding.

Compare

AMD Athlon II X2 215 vs Intel Core i5 M 520

AMD Athlon II X2 215 vs Intel Pentium E6600

AMD Athlon II X2 215 vs Intel Core i3 M 370

AMD Athlon II X2 215 vs Intel Core2 Duo P9500

AMD Athlon II X2 215 vs Intel Xeon X3220

AMD Athlon II X2 215 vs Intel Pentium E5800

Processor AMD Athlon II X2 215

Home / Processors / AMD Athlon II X2 215

• Edelmark rating — 1. 1 out of 10;
• Release date: September, 2009;
• Number of cores: 2;
• Frequency: 2.7 GHz;
• Power consumption (TDP): 65W;

Specifications AMD Athlon II X2 215

General parameters

Functions

Power consumption

Power consumption	65W
Annual cost of electricity (NON-commercial use)	$15. 66/year
Annual cost of electricity (commercial use)	$56.94/year
Capacity per W	1.62pt/W
Average energy consumption	52.81W

Bus

Parts and Features

Overclocking Athlon II X2 215

Overclocking Clock	3. 56 GHz
Water-cooled boost clock	3.79 GHz
PassMark (Overclocked)	1,923.6
Air cooled boost clock	3.56 GHz

Integrated (integrated) graphics

Comparison of Athlon II X2 215 with similar processors

Performance

Performance using all cores.

Tested on: PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark, Geekbench 3 Multi-Core.

Athlon II X2 215	4.7 out of 10
Core i3 3225	6. 3 out of 10
Core2 Duo E8400	5.1 out of 10

Performance per core

Base performance per processor core.

Tests used: PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core, Geekbench 3 AES Single Core.

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics tasks.

Integrated graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing.

Tested using: CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining, CompuBench 1.5 Face detection, CompuBench 1.5 Ocean Surface Simulation, CompuBench 1. 5 T-Rex, CompuBench 1.5 Video composition.

Performance per W

How efficiently the processor uses electricity.

Tested on: Fire Strike, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining, CompuBench 1.5 Face detection, CompuBench 1.5 Ocean Surface Simulation, CompuBench 1.5 T-Rex, CompuBench 1.5 Video composition, PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark, Geekbench 3 Multi-Core , PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core, Geekbench 3 AES Single Core, TDP.

Price-performance ratio

How much you overpay for performance.

Tests used: Fire Strike, CompuBench 1. 5 Bitcoin mining, CompuBench 1.5 Face detection, CompuBench 1.5 Ocean Surface Simulation, CompuBench 1.5 T-Rex, CompuBench 1.5 Video composition, PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark, Geekbench 3 Multi-Core , PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core, Geekbench 3 AES Single Core, Price.

Total Edelmark rating

Total processor rating.

Benchmarks Athlon II X2 215

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core)

Athlon II X2 215	2.535
Core i3 3225	5.412
Core2 Duo E8400	2. 982

GeekBench 3 (Single Core)

GeekBench 3 (AES single core)

GeekBench (32-bit)

GeekBench (64-bit)

GeekBench

Athlon II X2 215	3.229
Core i3 3225	9. 384
Core2 Duo E8400	4.794

PassMark

PassMark (Single Core)

Video reviews

My old computer | AMD Athlon II X2 215 (2.7 Ghz) / Biostar MCP6PB M2+ / 2Gb DDR2

Processor AMD Athlon II X2 215 2. 7Ghz from China AliExpress + check

Athlon2 X2 240 review and comparison with older brothers.

Reviews of Athlon II X2 215

+Dmitry Mokrushin amd x2 215th overclocked to 3. 2 GHz (overclocked to 3.5 but there is no difference), 4 GB of RAM and geforce 9600gt fucking pulls, settings are slightly better minimum, with prog from nvidia and the 64th seven in the total of 20-28 fps is easy, in some places it sags up to 17 but rarely mainly during explosions and then for no more than 9 seconds0101

+Andy Miles Write the config, but without the bug! I fully admit that Athlon 215 and GTX-550 ti would be enough for her, but only 2 gigabytes of RAM, despite the fact that one win7 eats about 1.2 giga, it seems to me that it will not be enough. However, who knows, the graphon is ugly there, if it’s completely at the minimum, then maybe …

Gentlemen, professionals Tell me please its very limit, do not tell me how much it can be maxed out. and if anyone fumbles explain how and how much voltage to raise.

The meaning of the processor is not enough at \»max \» … 650 is not enough to play at max, you had to slow down the settings. And 560se will be more powerful. At the same time, do not forget: the processor does not suffer at all from most graphics settings.

Tags:2.7 GHz, 65W, AMD, Athlon II X2 215, CPU

Processor AMD Athlon II X2 215

Processor search

Athlon II X2 215

RAM controller

There are

Types of RAM

DDR3, DDR2

memory channels

2

The performance rating of Athlon II X2 215

attention! The general rating calculation method is selected, which means that the rating percentage is calculated relative to the most powerful processor participating on our site.

General performance rating

1193. 13

(1.12%)

Passmark CPU MARK

957

(1.09%) 9,0002,000.5 (64-Byt) Multi-grade 901.5 (64-Byt (1.32%)

Cinebench 11.5 (64-bit) Single-threaded test

0.59

(6.82%)

Cinebench 15 (64-bit) Multi-threaded test

122.83

(1.32%)

Cinebench 15 (64-bit) Single thread test

62.41

(18.62%)

Geekbench 4.0 (64-bit) Multipoque test

3071

(1.66%)

9000 Geekbench 4.0 (64-bit) single-circuit test 901

11.23%)

x264 HD 4.0 Pass 1

32.8

(1.27%)

x264 HD 4.0 PASS 2

7.55

(1.22%)

9000 3DMARK06 CPU

1801. (1.26%)

WinRAR 4.0

797.81

(1.34%)

Positions in the rating

Attention! The general rating calculation method is selected, which means that the rating percentage is calculated relative to the most powerful processor participating on our site.

Rating calculation method:
Overall rankingBy Regor architectureBy socket AM3, Socket AM2+Among Intel processorsAmong AMD processorsAmong desktop processorsAmong Athlon family processorsAmong Athlon II processorsAmong 2-core processorsAmong 2009 processors0101

1166 place

(out of 3215)

Cinebench 15 (64-bit) multi-control test
in the ranking 3218 processors

970 place

(out of 3218)

9000 Cinebench 15 (64-Byt) one-over tune The rating is participated in 3217 processors

1332 place

(out of 3217)

Geekbench 4. 0 (64-bit) multipropoped test
in the ranking 3209 processors

1016 1016

(of 3209)

Geekben 4) Single Thread Test
The ranking is involved in 3209 processors

1206 place

(out of 3209)

x264 HD 4.0 Pass 1
In the ranking 3211 processors

920 920 920 (out of 3211)

x264 HD 211 3211 processors

950 place

(from 3211)

3dmark06 CPU
In the ranking 3242 processors

966

(out of 3242)

Winrar 4.0
in the ranking is participated in the ranking0101

848 place

(out of 3212)

Energy saving technologies

Technology or instruction name	Meaning	Short description
Cool’n’Quiet		Coolness and silence.
CoolCore Technology		Complements Cool’n’Quiet. Temporarily disable unused processor blocks.
DDPM (Dual Dynamic Power Management)		Dual dynamic power management.

Standard extension set

Technology or instruction name	Meaning	Short description
MMX (Multimedia Extensions)		Multimedia extensions.
SSE (Streaming SIMD Extensions)		Streaming SIMD processor extension.
SSE2 (Streaming SIMD Extensions 2)		Streaming SIMD Processor Extension 2.
SSE3 (Streaming SIMD Extensions 3)		Streaming SIMD Processor Extension 3.
SSE4A (Streaming SIMD Extensions 4A)		Processor Streaming SIMD 4A Extension.
AMD64		64-bit microprocessor architecture developed by AMD.
3DNow!		Optional MMX extension for AMD processors.

Safety Technology

Technology or instruction name	Meaning	Short description
EVP (Enhanced Virus Protection)		Improved virus protection.

Virtualization Technologies

Technology or instruction name	Meaning	Short description
AMD-V		AMD-V Virtualization Technology.

AMD Athlon II X2 215 Processor Overview

The Athlon II X2 215 desktop CPU is based on Regor cores. Began appearing in stores since October 2009of the year.

AMD Athlon II X2 215 is only for Socket AM3, Socket AM2+ motherboards. With a technological process of 45 Nm, the total number of transistors reaches 234 million. The temperature of the processor reaches 74 degrees when loaded. This processor requires an expensive cooling system, since its calculated thermal power reaches 65 watts. AMD claims that the bus speed will be 2000 MHz 16-bit HyperTransport (4.0 GT/s).

Budget processor 2009year of release, perfect for office tasks, work and study.

Competitors and analogues

On socket AM3, Socket AM2+, among other processors, AMD models should be distinguished: model 450 from the Athlon II processor family, model 605 among the Athlon II series, model 605e from the Athlon II series, Athlon II X3 455 from 2010, Athlon II X3 445 on Rana microarchitecture, Athlon II X4 610e on Propus microarchitecture. Intel’s competitors include the Core 2 Duo E8300 from 2008, the later Pentium E6800, the G620T from the Pentium processor family, the Pentium E6700 from 2010, the E7600 on an LGA775 socket in the Core 2 Duo line, and the G630T in the Core 2 Duo line. the Pentium family.

The most similar processor models from AMD are Athlon II X2 250e, Athlon II X2 255, Athlon II X2 B24, Athlon II X2 250u, Athlon II X2 B28, Athlon II X2 240, Athlon II X2 210e, Athlon II X2 235e, Athlon II X2 225, Athlon II X2 265.