Amd e series vs intel pentium: AMD E1-1200 vs Intel Pentium G3220: What is the difference?

AMD E1-1200 vs Intel Pentium G3220: What is the difference?

26points

AMD E1-1200

39points

Intel Pentium G3220

Comparison winner

vs

66 facts in comparison

AMD E1-1200

Intel Pentium G3220

Why is AMD E1-1200 better than Intel Pentium G3220?

• 28°C higher maximum operating temperature?
  100°Cvs72°C
• 150MHz faster GPU clock speed?
  500MHzvs350MHz
• 0.5MB bigger L2 cache?
  1MBvs0.5MB
• 35W lower TDP?
  18Wvs53W
• 0.25MB/core more L2 cache per core?
  0.5MB/corevs0.25MB/core

Why is Intel Pentium G3220 better than AMD E1-1200?

• 2.14x faster CPU speed?
  2 x 3GHzvs2 x 1.4GHz
• 267MHz higher ram speed?
  1333MHzvs1066MHz
• 18nm smaller semiconductor size?
  22nmvs40nm
• 2. 62x higher PassMark result?
  1877vs717
• 2 newer version of PCI Express (PCIe)?
  3vs1
• 4.49x higher PassMark result (single)?
  1701vs379
• Uses multithreading?
• Has AVX?

Which are the most popular comparisons?

AMD Ryzen 5 5500U

vs

Intel Core i5-1135G7

AMD Ryzen 5 5600H

vs

Intel Core i5-12500H

AMD Ryzen 3 3250U

vs

Intel Core i3-1115G4

AMD Ryzen 7 6800H

vs

Intel Core i7-12700H

Intel Core i5-1135G7

vs

Intel Core i5-1235U

AMD Ryzen 5 5600X

vs

AMD Ryzen 7 5700X

Apple M2

vs

Intel Core i9-12900K

AMD Ryzen 7 5700G

vs

AMD Ryzen 7 5700X

AMD Ryzen 7 5800H

vs

Intel Core i7-11800H

AMD Ryzen 3 5300U

vs

Intel Core i3-1115G4

Price comparison

User reviews

Overall Rating

AMD E1-1200

1 User reviews

AMD E1-1200

9. 0/10

1 User reviews

Intel Pentium G3220

1 User reviews

Intel Pentium G3220

10.0/10

1 User reviews

Features

Value for money

10.0/10

1 votes

10.0/10

1 votes

Gaming

9.0/10

1 votes

10.0/10

1 votes

Performance

8.0/10

1 votes

10.0/10

1 votes

Reliability

10.0/10

1 votes

10.0/10

1 votes

Energy efficiency

9.0/10

1 votes

7.0/10

1 votes

Performance

CPU speed

2 x 1.4GHz

2 x 3GHz

The CPU speed indicates how many processing cycles per second can be executed by a CPU, considering all of its cores (processing units). It is calculated by adding the clock rates of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors employing different microarchitectures, of each group of cores.

CPU threads

More threads result in faster performance and better multitasking.

turbo clock speed

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD E1-1200)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Pentium G3220)

When the CPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased performance.

Has an unlocked multiplier

✖AMD E1-1200

✖Intel Pentium G3220

Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier which makes them easy to overclock, allowing you to gain increased performance in games and other apps.

L2 cache

A larger L2 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.

L3 cache

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD E1-1200)

A larger L3 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.

L1 cache

A larger L1 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.

L2 core

0.5MB/core

0.25MB/core

More data can be stored in the L2 cache for access by each core of the CPU.

L3 core

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD E1-1200)

1.5MB/core

More data can be stored in the L3 cache for access by each core of the CPU.

Benchmarks

PassMark result

This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using multiple threads.

PassMark result (single)

This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using a single thread.

Cinebench R20 (multi) result

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD E1-1200)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Pentium G3220)

Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s multi-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.

Cinebench R20 (single) result

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD E1-1200)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Pentium G3220)

Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s single-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.

Geekbench 5 result (multi)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD E1-1200)

Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s multi-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2023)

Geekbench 5 result (single)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD E1-1200)

Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s single-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2023)

Blender (bmw27) result

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD E1-1200)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Pentium G3220)

The Blender (bmw27) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.

Blender (classroom) result

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD E1-1200)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Pentium G3220)

The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.

performance per watt

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD E1-1200)

This means the CPU is more efficient, giving a greater amount of performance for each watt of power used.

Integrated graphics

GPU clock speed

500MHz

350MHz

The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a higher clock speed.

GPU turbo

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD E1-1200)

1100MHz

When the GPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased performance.

GPU execution units

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD E1-1200)

A graphics processing unit (GPU) with a greater number of execution units can deliver better graphics.

supported displays

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD E1-1200)

Using multiple displays you can create a larger workspace, making it easier to work across multiple apps.

DirectX version

DirectX is used in games, with newer versions supporting better graphics.

OpenGL version

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD E1-1200)

OpenGL is used in games, with newer versions supporting better graphics.

OpenCL version

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD E1-1200)

Some apps use OpenCL to apply the power of the graphics processing unit (GPU) for non-graphical computing. Newer versions introduce more functionality and better performance.

texture mapping units (TMUs)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD E1-1200)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Pentium G3220)

TMUs take textures and map them to the geometry of a 3D scene. More TMUs will typically mean that texture information is processed faster.

render output units (ROPs)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD E1-1200)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Pentium G3220)

The ROPs are responsible for some of the final steps of the rendering process, writing the final pixel data to memory and carrying out other tasks such as anti-aliasing to improve the look of graphics.

Memory

RAM speed

1066MHz

1333MHz

It can support faster memory, which will give quicker system performance.

maximum memory bandwidth

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD E1-1200)

25.6GB/s

This is the maximum rate that data can be read from or stored into memory.

DDR memory version

DDR (Double Data Rate) memory is the most common type of RAM. Newer versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy-efficient.

memory channels

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD E1-1200)

More memory channels increases the speed of data transfer between the memory and the CPU.

maximum memory amount

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD E1-1200)

The maximum amount of memory (RAM) supported.

bus transfer rate

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD E1-1200)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Pentium G3220)

The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.

Supports ECC memory

✖AMD E1-1200

✔Intel Pentium G3220

Error-correcting code memory can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when is it essential to avoid corruption, such as scientific computing or when running a server.

eMMC version

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD E1-1200)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Pentium G3220)

A higher version of eMMC allows faster memory interfaces, having a positive effect on the performance of a device. For example, when transferring files from your computer to the internal storage over USB.

bus speed

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD E1-1200)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Pentium G3220)

The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.

Features

uses multithreading

✖AMD E1-1200

✔Intel Pentium G3220

Multithreading technology (such as Intel’s Hyperthreading or AMD’s Simultaneous Multithreading) provides increased performance by splitting each of the processor’s physical cores into virtual cores, also known as threads. This way, each core can run two instruction streams at once.

Has AES

✖AMD E1-1200

✖Intel Pentium G3220

AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.

Has AVX

✖AMD E1-1200

✔Intel Pentium G3220

AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial apps, as well as improving Linux RAID software performance.

SSE version

SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing an image or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.

Has F16C

✖AMD E1-1200

✔Intel Pentium G3220

F16C is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.

bits executed at a time

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD E1-1200)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Pentium G3220)

NEON provides acceleration for media processing, such as listening to MP3s.

Has MMX

✔AMD E1-1200

✔Intel Pentium G3220

MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.

Has TrustZone

✖AMD E1-1200

✖Intel Pentium G3220

A technology integrated into the processor to secure the device for use with features such as mobile payments and streaming video using digital rights management (DRM).

front-end width

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD E1-1200)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Pentium G3220)

The CPU can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), meaning that the CPU performs better

Price comparison

Which are the best CPUs?

AMD E-350 vs Intel Pentium Silver N6000 Benchmarks, Specs, Performance Comparison and Differences

AMD E-350 vs Intel Pentium Silver N6000

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the AMD E-350 on one side and the Intel Pentium Silver N6000 on the other side. The first is dedicated to the notebook sector, It has 2 cores, 2 threads, a maximum frequency of 1,6GHz. The second is used on the entry-level notebook segment, it has a total of 4 cores, 4 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 3,3 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values ​​obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.

Specification comparison:

Processor		AMD E-350				Intel Pentium Silver N6000
Market (main)		Notebook				Entry-level notebook
ISA		x86-64 (64 bit)				x86-64 (64 bit)
Microarchitecture		Bobcat				Tremont
Core name		Zacate				Jasper Lake
Family		E-300				Pentium 6000
Part number(s), S-Spec		EME350GBB22GT				Pentium Silver N6000
Release date		Q1 2011				Q1 2021
Lithography		40 nm				10 nm
Cores		2				4
Threads		2				4
Base frequency		1,6 GHz				1,1 GHz
Turbo frequency		—				3,3 GHz
Cache memory		1 MB				4 MB
Max memory capacity		8 GB				16 GB
Memory types		DDR3-1066, DDR3L-1066				DDR4-2933, LPDDR4x
Max # of memory channels		1				2
Max PCIe lanes		16				8
TDP		18 W				6 W
GPU integrated graphics		AMD Radeon HD 6310				Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32EU)
GPU cores		2				—
GPU execution units		—				32
GPU shading units		80				256
GPU base clock		492 MHz				350 MHz
GPU boost clock		492 MHz				850 MHz
GPU FP32 floating point		78,08 GFLOPS				384 GFLOPS
Socket		FT1, BGA413				BGA1338
Maximum temperature		90°C				105°C
AI accelerator		—				Gaussian & Neural Accelerator
Crypto engine		—				AES New Instructions
Security		—				OS Guard, Boot Guard, Mode-based Execute Control
Max display resolution		—				4096×[email protected]
Cinebench R15 single thread		25				138
Cinebench R15 multi-thread		48				367
Cinebench R20 single thread		51				279
Cinebench R20 multi-thread		103				774
PassMark single thread		471				1. 464
PassMark CPU Mark		390				3.816
(Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 single core		727				2.882
(Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 multi-core		1.182				6.605
(Windows) Geekbench 5 single core		137				669
(Windows) Geekbench 5 multi-core		245				1.505
(SGEMM) GFLOPS performance		5,3 GFLOPS				47,3 GFLOPS
(Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio		66 pts / W				1. 101 pts / W
Amazon
eBay

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.

Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

The processor Intel Pentium Silver N6000 has a larger number of cores, the turbo frequency of Intel Pentium Silver N6000 is bigger, that the thermal dissipation power of Intel Pentium Silver N6000 is less. The Intel Pentium Silver N6000 was started more recently.

Performance comparison with the benchmarks:

Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.

	Cinebench R15 — Multi-thread & single thread score
Intel Pentium Silver N6000	138 367
AMD E-350	25 48

In single core, the difference is 452%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 665%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.

	Cinebench R20 — Multi-thread & single thread score
Intel Pentium Silver N6000	279 774
AMD E-350	51 103

In single core, the difference is 447%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 651%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Cinebench R20 is a multi-platform test software which allows to evaluate the hardware capacities of a device such as a computer, a tablet, a server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant.

	PassMark — CPU Mark & single thread
Intel Pentium Silver N6000	1.464 3.816
AMD E-350	471 390

In single core, the difference is 211%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 878%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.

On Windows 64-bit:

	Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows 64-bit
Intel Pentium Silver N6000	2. 882 6.605
AMD E-350	727 1.182

In single core, the difference is 296%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 459%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.

On Windows:

	Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows
Intel Pentium Silver N6000	669 1. 505
AMD E-350	137 245

In single core, the difference is 388%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 514%.

On Android:

	Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — Android
Intel Pentium Silver N6000	712 1.664
AMD E-350	121 234

In single core, the difference is 488%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 611%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.

Equivalence:

AMD E-350 Intel equivalentIntel Pentium Silver N6000 AMD equivalent

See also:

Intel Pentium Silver N6005

Compare AMD E-350 and Intel Pentium Dual Core T2370

Comparative analysis of AMD E-350 and Intel Pentium Dual Core T2370 processors according to all known characteristics in the categories: General Information, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Virtualization, Security and Reliability, Technology.
Analysis of processor performance by benchmarks: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation ( Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames ), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps).

AMD E-350

versus

Intel Pentium Dual Core T2370

Benefits

Reasons to choose AMD E-350

• Newer processor, release dates difference 2 year(s) 10 month(s)

90 Processor more9 new manufacturing process allows1 make it more powerful, but with less power consumption: 40 nm vs 65 nm

• Approximately 94% less power consumption: 18 Watt vs 35 Watt

Issue date	November 9, 2010 vs January 1, 2008
Process	40 nm vs 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	18 Watt vs 35 Watt

Reasons to choose Intel Pentium Dual Core T2370

• About 8% more clock speed: 1. 73 GHz vs 1.6 GHz
• About 19% more performance in PassMark — Single thread mark: 578 vs 486
• About 33% more performance in PassMark — CPU mark: 555 vs 418
• About 57% more performance in Geekbench 4 — Single Core: 212 vs 135
• About 44% more performance in Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core: 359 vs 250

Maximum frequency	1.73 GHz vs 1.6 GHz
PassMark — Single thread mark	578 vs 486
PassMark — CPU mark	555 vs 418
Geekbench 4 — Single Core	212 vs 135
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core	359 vs 250

Benchmark comparison

CPU 1: AMD E-350
CPU 2: Intel Pentium Dual Core T2370

PassMark — Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2
PassMark — CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2
Geekbench 4 — Single Core	CPU 1 CPU 2
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core	CPU 1 CPU 2

Name	AMD E-350	Intel Pentium Dual Core T2370
PassMark — Single thread mark	486	578
PassMark — CPU mark	418	555
Geekbench 4 — Single Core	135	212
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core	250	359
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s)	0.522
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1.936
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.036
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s)	2.275
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	0.725
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	244
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames)	887
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames)	1798
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	244
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps)	887
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps)	1798

Performance comparison

configuration

	AMD E-350	Intel Pentium Dual Core T2370
Architecture name	Zacate	Merom
Production date	November 9, 2010	January 1, 2008
Place in the ranking	2703	2837
Series	AMD E-Series	Legacy Intel® Pentium® Processor
Applicability	Laptop	Mobile
Processor Number		T2370
Status		Discontinued
Support 64 bit
Crystal area	75mm	143 mm2
Level 1 cache	128KB
Level 2 cache	1024KB	1024KB
Process	40nm	65nm
Maximum frequency	1. 6 GHz	1.73 GHz
Number of cores	2	2
Number of threads	2	2
Base frequency		1.73 GHz
Bus Speed ​​		533 MHz FSB
System bus (FSB)		533MHz
Maximum core temperature		100°C
Number of transistors		291 million
Permissible core voltage		1. 075V-1.175V
Supported memory types	DDR3
Maximum number of processors in	1
Supported sockets	FT1 BGA 413-Ball	PPGA478
Power consumption (TDP)	18 Watt	35 Watt
Low Halogen Options Available
Package Size		35mm x 35mm
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™)
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x)
Execute Disable Bit (EDB)
Intel® Trusted Execution Technology (TXT)
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® Technology
Parity FSB
Intel 64
Intel® Demand Based Switching
Intel® Hyper-Threading Technology
Intel® Turbo Boost Technology

Compare AMD E-300 and Intel Pentium Dual Core T4500

Comparative analysis of AMD E-300 and Intel Pentium Dual Core T4500 processors according to all known characteristics in the categories: General Information, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Virtualization, Security and Reliability, Technology.
Analysis of processor performance by benchmarks: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames ), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s).

AMD E-300

versus

Intel Pentium Dual Core T4500

Benefits

Reasons to choose AMD E-300

• Newer processor, release date difference 2 year(s) 7 month(s)
• Newer manufacturing process allows1 make it more powerful, but with lower power consumption: 40 nm vs 45 nm
• Approximately 94% less power consumption: 18 Watt vs 35 Watt
• 2. 9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 4.83 vs 1.639

Release date	22 August 2011 vs 10 January 2009
Process	40 nm vs 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	18 Watt vs 35 Watt
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	4.83 vs 1.639

Reasons to choose Intel Pentium Dual Core T4500

• About 77% more clock speed: 2.3 GHz vs 1.3 GHz
• PassMark — Single thread mark performance 2.3x faster: 9110 9011 vs 3932.4 times greater performance in PassMark — CPU mark benchmark: 811 vs 341
• 2.6 times greater performance in Geekbench 4 — Single Core benchmark: 272 vs 104
• Performance in Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core benchmark 2. 5 times more: 474 vs 186

Maximum frequency	2.3 GHz vs 1.3 GHz
PassMark — Single thread mark	911 vs 393
PassMark — CPU mark	811 vs 341
Geekbench 4 — Single Core	272 vs 104
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core	474 vs 186

Benchmark comparison

CPU 1: AMD E-300
CPU 2: Intel Pentium Dual Core T4500

PassMark — Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2
PassMark — CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2
Geekbench 4 — Single Core	CPU 1 CPU 2
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core	CPU 1 CPU 2
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	CPU 1 CPU 2

Name	AMD E-300	Intel Pentium Dual Core T4500
PassMark — Single thread mark	393	911
PassMark — CPU mark	341	811
Geekbench 4 — Single Core	104	272
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core	186	474
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	4.83	1.639
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	250
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames)	754
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames)	1461
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	250
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps)	754
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps)	1461
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s)		0.226
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		7.743
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s)		0.058
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s)		0.387

Performance comparison

	AMD E-300	Intel Pentium Dual Core T4500
Architecture name	Zacate	Penryn
Production date	22 August 2011	January 10, 2009
Place in the ranking	2635	2925
Series	AMD E-Series	Legacy Intel® Pentium® Processor
Applicability	Laptop	Mobile
Processor Number		T4500
Status		Discontinued
Support 64 bit
Crystal area	75mm	107 mm2
Level 1 cache	128KB	128KB
Level 2 cache	1024KB	1024KB
Process	40nm	45nm
Maximum frequency	1.