Amd fx 4160: AMD FX-4200 Quad-Core vs Intel Core i3-4160 @ 3.60GHz [cpubenchmark.net] by PassMark Software

22 июля, 2023

AMD FX-8350 vs Intel Core i3-4160

Summary

  • AMD FX-8350

    118%

  • Intel Core i3-4160

    100%

Relative performance

  • AMD FX-8350

    100%

  • Intel Core i3-4160

    146%

Relative performance

  • AMD FX-8350

    169%

  • Intel Core i3-4160

    100%

Relative performance

Reasons to consider AMD FX-8350
Much higher multi threaded performance (around 69% higher). This allows for higher performance in professional applications like encoding or heavy multitasking.
Reasons to consider Intel Core i3-4160
Much higher single threaded performance (around 46% higher), makes a noticeable performance difference in gaming and the majority of applications.
71 watts lower power draw.
This is a newer product, it might have better application compatibility/performance (check features chart below).
Has an integrated GPU, which allows to run the system without a dedicated graphics card, unlike the AMD FX-8350.

Gaming

No clear winner declared

Productivity

HWBench recommends AMD FX-8350

Based on productivity benchmarks, overall multithreaded performance and theoretical specifications.

Features
AMD FX-8350 Intel Core i3-4160
MMX
SSE
SSE2
SSE3
SSSE3
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
SSE4a
AMD64
AMD-V
AES
AVX
CLMUL
CVT16
EVP
FMA4
XOP
Turbo Core
HT3. 1
AVX2
EIST
Intel 64
XD bit
VT-x
Hyper-Threading
AES-NI
TSX
FMA3

Architecture
AMD FX-8350 Intel Core i3-4160
Architecture AMD Piledriver vs Intel_Haswell
Market Desktop vs Desktop
Memory Support DDR3 vs DDR3
Codename Vishera vs Haswell
Release Date Oct 2012 vs Jul 2014

Cores
AMD FX-8350 Intel Core i3-4160
Cores 8 vs 2
Threads 8 vs 4
SMPs 1 vs 1
Integrated Graphics No vs Intel HD 4400

Cache
AMD FX-8350 Intel Core i3-4160
L1 Cache 384 KB vs 64 KB (per core)
L2 Cache 8192 KB vs 256 KB (per core)
L3 Cache 8192 KB (shared) vs 3072 KB (shared)

Physical
AMD FX-8350 Intel Core i3-4160
Socket AMD Socket AM3+ vs Intel Socket 1150
Max Case Temp unknown vs 72°C
Package uPGA vs FC-LGA12C
Die Size 315mm² vs 177mm²
Process 32 nm vs 22 nm

Performance
AMD FX-8350 Intel Core i3-4160
Cpu Frequency 4000 MHz vs 3600 MHz
Turbo Clock 4200 MHz vs none
Base Clock 200 MHz vs 100 MHz
Voltage 1. 45 V vs unknown
TDP 125 W vs 54 W

  • AMD FX-8350

    2562 points

  • Intel Core i3-4160

    4032 points

Points — higher is better

  • AMD FX-8350

    16006 points

  • Intel Core i3-4160

    9676 points

Points — higher is better

  • AMD FX-8350

    10913

  • Intel Core i3-4160

    6647

points — higher is better

  • AMD FX-8350

    2425

  • Intel Core i3-4160

    3417

points — higher is better

  • AMD FX-8350

    12225

  • Intel Core i3-4160

    7278

points — higher is better

  • AMD FX-8350

    2121

  • Intel Core i3-4160

    3151

points — higher is better

points — higher is better

points — higher is better

VS
AMD FX-8350 Intel Pentium Gold G6600
VS
AMD FX-8350 Intel Core i7-1068G7
VS
Intel Core i3-4160 AMD Athlon 3000G
VS
Intel Core i3-4160 Intel Core i5-10210U
VS
AMD Athlon Gold 3150GE AMD Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE
VS
AMD Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE AMD Athlon Gold 3150G

Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.

Intel Core i3-4160 vs AMD FX-6300 Benchmarks, Specs, Performance Comparison and Differences

Intel Core i3-4160 vs AMD FX-6300

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the Intel Core i3-4160 on one side and the AMD FX-6300 on the other side. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, It has 2 cores, 4 threads, a maximum frequency of 3,6GHz. The second is used on the desktop segment, it has a total of 6 cores, 6 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 3,8 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values ​​obtained in Geekbench and Cinebench.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.

Specification comparison:

Processor

Intel Core i3-4160

AMD FX-6300
Market (main)

Desktop

Desktop
ISA

x86-64 (64 bit)

x86-64 (64 bit)
Microarchitecture

Haswell

Piledriver
Core name

Haswell-DT

Vishera
Family

Core i3-4000

FX-6000
Part number(s), S-Spec

BX80646I34160,

BXC80646I34160,

CM8064601483644,

CM8064601483608,

SR1KQ, SR1PK

FD6300WMW6KHK,

FD6300WMHKBOX,

FX-6300 Black Edition
Release date

Q3 2014

Q4 2012
Lithography

22 nm

32 nm SOI
Transistors

1. 400.000.000

1.200.000.000
Cores

2

6
Threads

4

6
Base frequency

3,6 GHz

3,5 GHz
Turbo frequency

—

3,8 GHz
High performance cores

2 Cores 4 Threads @ 3,6 GHz

—
Cache memory

3 MB

8 MB
Max memory capacity

32 GB

32 GB
Memory types

DDR3-1333/1600,

DDR3L-1333/1600

DDR3-1866
Max # of memory channels

2

2
Max memory bandwidth

25,6 GB/s

29,9 GB/s
Max PCIe lanes

16

16
TDP

54 W

95 W
Suggested PSU

600W ATX Power Supply

600W ATX Power Supply
GPU integrated graphics

Intel HD Graphics 4400

None
GPU execution units

20

—
GPU shading units

160

—
GPU base clock

350 MHz

—
GPU boost clock

1150 MHz

—
GPU FP32 floating point

368 GFLOPS

—
Socket

LGA1150

AM3+
Compatible motherboard

Socket LGA 1150 Motherboard 

Socket AM3+ Motherboard 
Maximum temperature

72°C

70. 5°C
Crypto engine

AES New Instructions,

Secure Key

—
Security

Execute Disable Bit

—
Max display resolution

4096 x 2304@24Hz (HDMI),

3840 x 2160@60Hz (DP),

3840 x 2160@60Hz (eDP),

1920 x 1200@60Hz (VGA)

—
CPU-Z single thread

359

223
CPU-Z multi thread

993

1.022
Cinebench R15 single thread

143

95
Cinebench R15 multi-thread

347

412
PassMark single thread

1. 996

1.471
PassMark CPU Mark

3.445

4.124
(Windows)
Geekbench 4 single core

3.781

2.518
(Windows)
Geekbench 4 multi-core

7.067

8.133
(SGEMM)
GFLOPS performance

108,04 GFLOPS

67,2 GFLOPS
(Multi-core / watt performance)
Performance / watt ratio

131 pts / W

86 pts / W
Amazon


eBay


Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.

Suggested PSU: We assume that we have An ATX computer case, a high end graphics card, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, a 1TB HDD hard drive, a Blu-Ray drive. We will have to rely on a more powerful power supply if we want to have several graphics cards, several monitors, more memory, etc.

Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

The processor AMD FX-6300 has a larger number of cores, the turbo frequency of AMD FX-6300 is bigger, that the PDT of Intel Core i3-4160 is lower. The Intel Core i3-4160 was designed earlier.

Performance comparison with the benchmarks:

Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench.





CPU-Z — Multi-thread & single thread score
AMD FX-6300

223

1.022
Intel Core i3-4160

359

993

In single core, the difference is 61%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 3%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.





Cinebench R15 — Multi-thread & single thread score
AMD FX-6300

95

412
Intel Core i3-4160

143

347

In single core, the difference is 51%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 19%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.





PassMark — CPU Mark & single thread
AMD FX-6300

1.471

4.124
Intel Core i3-4160

1.996

3.445

In single core, the difference is 36%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 20%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.

On Windows:





Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows
AMD FX-6300

2.518

8.133
Intel Core i3-4160

3.781

7.067

In single core, the difference is 50%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 15%.

On Linux:





Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux
AMD FX-6300

2. 676

8.944
Intel Core i3-4160

4.183

7.824

In single core, the difference is 56%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 14%.

On Android:





Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Android
Intel Core i3-4160

4.009

7.092
AMD FX-6300

2.217

6.862

In single core, the difference is 81%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 3%.

On Mac OS X:




Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Mac OS X
AMD FX-6300

2.266

8.231
Intel Core i3-4160

3.

2023 © All rights reserved