AMD FX-6200 vs AMD FX-6300: What is the difference?
37points
AMD FX-6200
40points
AMD FX-6300
vs
64 facts in comparison
AMD FX-6200
AMD FX-6300
Why is AMD FX-6200 better than AMD FX-6300?
- 8.57% faster CPU speed?
6 x 3.8GHzvs6 x 3.5GHz - 1.51x higher PassMark result?
6220vs4125
Why is AMD FX-6300 better than AMD FX-6200?
- 30W lower TDP?
95Wvs125W - 1 newer version of PCI Express (PCIe)?
3vs2 - 11.37% higher PassMark result (single)?
1479vs1328 - 7.6% higher PassMark result (overclocked)?
7536vs7004 - 17.0 more performance per watt?
80.0vs63.0
Which are the most popular comparisons?
AMD FX-6200
vs
Intel Core i5-4570
AMD FX-6300
vs
Intel Core i5-3470
AMD FX-6200
vs
AMD FX-8320
AMD FX-6300
vs
Intel Core i5-4570
AMD FX-6200
vs
Intel Core i3-4130
AMD FX-6300
vs
Intel Core i5-7400
AMD FX-6200
vs
Intel Core i5-7500
AMD FX-6300
vs
Intel Core i7-3770
AMD FX-6200
vs
Intel Core i3-6100
AMD FX-6300
vs
AMD Phenom II X4 955
AMD FX-6200
vs
Intel Core i5-3470
AMD FX-6300
vs
AMD A8-7600
AMD FX-6200
vs
AMD A6-7480
AMD FX-6300
vs
AMD FX-8350
AMD FX-6200
vs
AMD FX-8350
AMD FX-6300
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
AMD FX-6200
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
AMD FX-6300
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
AMD FX-6300
vs
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
Price comparison
User reviews
Overall Rating
AMD FX-6200
1 User reviews
AMD FX-6200
10. 0/10
1 User reviews
AMD FX-6300
2 User reviews
AMD FX-6300
9.5/10
2 User reviews
Features
Value for money
10.0/10
1 votes
9.0/10
2 votes
Gaming
10.0/10
1 votes
8.0/10
2 votes
Performance
10.0/10
1 votes
8.5/10
2 votes
Reliability
10.0/10
1 votes
8.5/10
2 votes
Energy efficiency
10.0/10
1 votes
7.5/10
2 votes
Performance
1.CPU speed
6 x 3.8GHz
6 x 3.5GHz
The CPU speed indicates how many processing cycles per second can be executed by a CPU, considering all of its cores (processing units). It is calculated by adding the clock rates of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors employing different microarchitectures, of each group of cores.
2. CPU threads
More threads result in faster performance and better multitasking.
3.turbo clock speed
4.1GHz
4.1GHz
When the CPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased performance.
4.Has an unlocked multiplier
✔AMD FX-6200
✔AMD FX-6300
Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier which makes them easy to overclock, allowing you to gain increased performance in games and other apps.
5.L2 cache
A larger L2 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
6.L3 cache
A larger L3 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
7.L1 cache
A larger L1 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
8.L2 core
1MB/core
1MB/core
More data can be stored in the L2 cache for access by each core of the CPU.
9.L3 core
1.33MB/core
1.33MB/core
More data can be stored in the L3 cache for access by each core of the CPU.
Memory
1.RAM speed
1866MHz
1866MHz
It can support faster memory, which will give quicker system performance.
2.maximum memory bandwidth
21GB/s
21GB/s
This is the maximum rate that data can be read from or stored into memory.
3.DDR memory version
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD FX-6200)
DDR (Double Data Rate) memory is the most common type of RAM. Newer versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy-efficient.
4.memory channels
More memory channels increases the speed of data transfer between the memory and the CPU.
5.maximum memory amount
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD FX-6200)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD FX-6300)
The maximum amount of memory (RAM) supported.
6.bus transfer rate
5.4GT/s
5.4GT/s
The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.
7.Supports ECC memory
✖AMD FX-6200
✖AMD FX-6300
Error-correcting code memory can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when is it essential to avoid corruption, such as scientific computing or when running a server.
8.eMMC version
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD FX-6200)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD FX-6300)
A higher version of eMMC allows faster memory interfaces, having a positive effect on the performance of a device. For example, when transferring files from your computer to the internal storage over USB.
9.bus speed
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD FX-6200)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD FX-6300)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.
Benchmarks
1.PassMark result
This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using multiple threads.
2.PassMark result (single)
This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using a single thread.
3.Geekbench 5 result (multi)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD FX-6200)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD FX-6300)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s multi-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)
4.Cinebench R20 (multi) result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD FX-6200)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD FX-6300)
Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s multi-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.
5.Cinebench R20 (single) result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD FX-6200)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD FX-6300)
Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s single-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.
6.Geekbench 5 result (single)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD FX-6200)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD FX-6300)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s single-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)
7.Blender (bmw27) result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD FX-6200)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD FX-6300)
The Blender (bmw27) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.
8.Blender (classroom) result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD FX-6200)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD FX-6300)
The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.
9.performance per watt
This means the CPU is more efficient, giving a greater amount of performance for each watt of power used.
Features
1.uses multithreading
✖AMD FX-6200
✖AMD FX-6300
Multithreading technology (such as Intel’s Hyperthreading or AMD’s Simultaneous Multithreading) provides increased performance by splitting each of the processor’s physical cores into virtual cores, also known as threads. This way, each core can run two instruction streams at once.
2. Has AES
✔AMD FX-6200
✔AMD FX-6300
AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.
3.Has AVX
✔AMD FX-6200
✔AMD FX-6300
AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial apps, as well as improving Linux RAID software performance.
4.SSE version
SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing an image or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.
5.Has F16C
✔AMD FX-6200
✔AMD FX-6300
F16C is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.
6.bits executed at a time
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD FX-6200)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD FX-6300)
NEON provides acceleration for media processing, such as listening to MP3s.
7. Has MMX
✔AMD FX-6200
✔AMD FX-6300
MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.
8.Has TrustZone
✖AMD FX-6200
✖AMD FX-6300
A technology integrated into the processor to secure the device for use with features such as mobile payments and streaming video using digital rights management (DRM).
9.front-end width
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD FX-6200)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD FX-6300)
The CPU can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), meaning that the CPU performs better
Price comparison
Cancel
Which are the best CPUs?
AMD FX-6200 vs AMD FX-6300
Summary
-
AMD FX-6200
100%
-
AMD FX-6300
100%
Relative performance
-
AMD FX-6200
100%
-
AMD FX-6300
103%
Relative performance
-
AMD FX-6200
102%
-
AMD FX-6300
100%
Relative performance
Reasons to consider AMD FX-6200 |
None |
Reasons to consider AMD FX-6300 |
None |
Gaming
No clear winner declared
Productivity
No clear winner declared
Features
AMD FX-6200 | AMD FX-6300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
MMX | ||||
SSE | ||||
SSE2 | ||||
SSE3 | ||||
SSSE3 | ||||
SSE4. 1 | ||||
SSE4.2 | ||||
SSE4a | ||||
AMD64 | ||||
AMD-V | ||||
AES | ||||
AVX | ||||
CLMUL | ||||
CVT16 | ||||
EVP | ||||
FMA4 | ||||
XOP | ||||
Turbo Core | ||||
HT3.1 |
Architecture
AMD FX-6200 | AMD FX-6300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Architecture | AMD Bulldozer | vs | AMD Piledriver | |
Market | Desktop | vs | Desktop | |
Memory Support | DDR3 | vs | DDR3 | |
Codename | Zambezi | vs | Vishera | |
Release Date | Feb 2012 | vs | Oct 2012 |
Cores
AMD FX-6200 | AMD FX-6300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Cores | 6 | vs | 6 | |
Threads | 6 | vs | 6 | |
SMPs | 1 | vs | 1 | |
Integrated Graphics | No | vs | No |
Cache
AMD FX-6200 | AMD FX-6300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
L1 Cache | 288 KB | vs | 288 KB | |
L2 Cache | 6144 KB | vs | 6144 KB | |
L3 Cache | 8192 KB (shared) | vs | 8192 KB (shared) |
Physical
AMD FX-6200 | AMD FX-6300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ | vs | AMD Socket AM3+ | |
Max Case Temp | unknown | vs | unknown | |
Package | uPGA | vs | uPGA | |
Die Size | 315mm² | vs | 315mm² | |
Process | 32 nm | vs | 32 nm |
Performance
AMD FX-6200 | AMD FX-6300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Cpu Frequency | 3800 MHz | vs | 3500 MHz | |
Turbo Clock | 4100 MHz | vs | 4100 MHz | |
Base Clock | 200 MHz | vs | 200 MHz | |
Voltage | 1. 4 V | vs | 1.4 V | |
TDP | 125 W | vs | 95 W |
-
AMD FX-6200
2419 points
-
AMD FX-6300
2501 points
Points — higher is better
-
AMD FX-6200
11030 points
-
AMD FX-6300
10504 points
Points — higher is better
-
AMD FX-6200
7606
-
AMD FX-6300
7392
points — higher is better
-
AMD FX-6200
1915
-
AMD FX-6300
1974
points — higher is better
VS | ||
AMD FX-6200 | AMD Athlon 3000G |
VS | ||
AMD FX-6200 | Intel Core i5-10210U |
VS | ||
AMD FX-6300 | AMD Athlon Silver 3050GE |
VS | ||
AMD FX-6300 | AMD Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE |
VS | ||
AMD Ryzen 5 3580U | Intel Core i7-10710U |
VS | ||
Intel Core i7-10710U | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U |
Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.
AMD FX-6300 vs AMD FX-6200
Comparative analysis of AMD FX-6300 and AMD FX-6200 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization.
Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
AMD FX-6300
Buy on Amazon
vs
AMD FX-6200
Buy on Amazon
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD FX-6300
- CPU is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
- Around 15% higher maximum core temperature: 70. 50°C vs 61.10°C
- Around 32% lower typical power consumption: 95 Watt vs 125 Watt
- Around 7% better performance in PassMark — Single thread mark: 1489 vs 1398
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark — CPU mark: 4176 vs 4079
- Around 3% better performance in Geekbench 4 — Single Core: 527 vs 513
- Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s): 6.905 vs 6.114
- Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 16.195 vs 15.71
- Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.339 vs 0.324
- Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s): 0.85 vs 0.845
- Around 38% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 4.767 vs 3.445
Launch date | October 2012 vs February 2012 |
Maximum core temperature | 70. 50°C vs 61.10°C |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt vs 125 Watt |
PassMark — Single thread mark | 1489 vs 1398 |
PassMark — CPU mark | 4176 vs 4079 |
Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 527 vs 513 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.905 vs 6.114 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 16.195 vs 15.71 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.339 vs 0.324 |
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.85 vs 0.845 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.767 vs 3.445 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FX-6200
- Processor is unlocked, an unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
- Around 8% higher clock speed: 4.1 GHz vs 3.8 GHz
- Around 1% better performance in Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core: 1934 vs 1914
Unlocked | Unlocked vs Locked |
Maximum frequency | 4.1 GHz vs 3.8 GHz |
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 1934 vs 1914 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD FX-6300
CPU 2: AMD FX-6200
PassMark — Single thread mark |
|
|
|||
PassMark — CPU mark |
|
|
|||
Geekbench 4 — Single Core |
|
|
|||
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core |
|
|
|||
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
|||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
|||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
|||
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
|||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | AMD FX-6300 | AMD FX-6200 |
---|---|---|
PassMark — Single thread mark | 1489 | 1398 |
PassMark — CPU mark | 4176 | 4079 |
Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 527 | 513 |
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 1914 | 1934 |
3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score | 2098 | |
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.905 | 6.114 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 16.195 | 15.71 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.339 | 0.324 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.85 | 0.845 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.767 | 3.445 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD FX-6300 | AMD FX-6200 | |
---|---|---|
Architecture codename | Vishera | Zambezi |
Family | AMD FX-Series Processors | AMD FX-Series Processors |
Launch date | October 2012 | February 2012 |
OPN PIB | FD6300WMHKBOX | FD6200FRGUBOX |
OPN Tray | FD6300WMW6KHK | FD6200FRW6KGU |
Place in performance rating | 1981 | 2075 |
Price now | $58. 99 | $339.95 |
Series | AMD FX 6-Core Black Edition Processors | AMD FX 6-Core Black Edition Processors |
Value for money (0-100) | 31.81 | 5.31 |
Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
64 bit support | ||
Base frequency | 3.5 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
Die size | 315 mm | 315 mm |
L1 cache | 288 KB | 288 KB |
L2 cache | 6 MB | 6 MB |
L3 cache | 8 MB | 8 MB |
Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm SOI | 32 nm SOI |
Maximum core temperature | 70. 50°C | 61.10°C |
Maximum frequency | 3.8 GHz | 4.1 GHz |
Number of cores | 6 | 6 |
Number of threads | 6 | 6 |
P0 Vcore voltage | Min: 1.15 V — Max: 1.3875 V | Min: 1.3 V — Max: 1.4125 V |
Transistor count | 1200 million | 1200 million |
Unlocked | ||
Supported memory frequency | 1866 MHz | 1866 MHz |
Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Sockets supported | AM3+ | AM3+ |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt | 125 Watt |
PCI Express revision | 3. 0 | n / a |
Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) |
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare AMD FX-6300 with others
AMD
FX-6300
vs
Intel
Core 2 Duo E8300
AMD
FX-6300
vs
Intel
Core i7-975
AMD
FX-6300
vs
Intel
Core i7-950
AMD
FX-6300
vs
AMD
Phenom II X4 820
AMD
FX-6300
vs
AMD
Phenom II X4 975 BE
AMD
FX-6300
vs
AMD
A8-3870K
AMD FX-6300 review | TechRadar
Skip to main content
TechRadar is supported by its audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Here’s why you can trust us.
Six Piledriver cores at 5GHz? Don’t mind if I do
AMD FX-6300
TechRadar Verdict
Pros
- +
Good overclocking
- +
Great price
- +
Good gaming chops
Last month saw AMD finally unleash the latest update to its Bulldozer CPU technology, codenamed Piledriver.
The first chip we had in the labs was, somewhat inevitably, the top-spec, eight-core AMD FX-8350. And well received it was too. But by virtue of only being a little cheaper than the excellent Intel i5-3570K, it was almost pricing itself out of the market.
The one that we’ve been interested in getting our techy mitts on is this six-core FX-6300. It’s almost the perfect sweet spot for budget gaming CPUs.
The original FX-6200 impressed us recently with its combination of bargain price, impressive multi-threading performance and serious overclocking chops too. In fact, you could push it up to almost the same CPU performance as quad-core king, the i5-3570K.
Happy engineers
With that sort of raw processing power from a cheaper chip you could then drop the money you’re saving going for an AMD platform and plough that cash into a superior graphics card. After all, in gaming terms, it’s the GPU that will make the difference in frame rates.
Still, the same Bulldozer problems reared their heads with that six-core chip as with the eight-core: namely weak single-threaded performance. The enhancements in Piledriver don’t represent a massive change to the Bulldozer architecture though.
The essential make-up still remains the same with each module housing most of the silicon that makes up a traditional core. But, crucially, not all the silicon. What AMD has done is tighten up the code a little, offering a quicker approach to processing. It has improved engineer-pleasing goodies such as branch prediction and scheduling, but it is leaving the major architectural changes for the Steamroller update that ought to be arriving next year to give AMD a bit of help when Intel’s Haswell tips up.
Steamroller should squeeze more into each Bulldozer module to allow each core to function much more like a traditional CPU core, and should seriously beef up the single-threaded performance of the next generation processors. But that’s quite a way off, and so we have to be content with this current heavy plant update.
In a bit of a switch around from the FX-8350, where it turned up with a 4GHz clockspeed compared to the FX-8150’s 3.6GHz, this six-core CPU is set up slower than its Bulldozer ancestors. The FX-6200 was originally set to run at 3.8GHz while this Piledriver version is set at just 3.5GHz.
That’s not the only difference between this and the previous chip as, despite having the same general make-up and 14MB cache size, the FX-6300 has got a lower TDP than the Bulldozer. At 95W then it’s a little more efficient than its progenitor.
Pleasingly that drop in both TDP and clockspeed doesn’t mean this is a slower chip in real-world terms.
The benchmarks show that almost across the board this chip is faster than the higher clocked six-core CPU. Only the x264 video encoding test highlights the slower clockspeed, posting slower frame rates than the FX-6200.
In the other straight CPU performance tests in Cinebench it shows a very slight advantage, though the improvements in single-threaded performance aren’t as pronounced as with the FX-8350. But I think that has more to do with the eight-core chip’s 4GHz clockspeed.
Still, to post the same sort of ballpark figures at a lower frequency than the previous generation is impressive, but what’s more impressive is the boost in gaming performance that the Piledriver update seems to offer.
In our Batman: Arkham City test it adds another 10fps on average over the FX-6200, and a couple of frames per second in the tighter Shogun 2 CPU test.
Benchmarks
CPU multi-threaded rendering performance
Cinebench R11.5: Index score: Higher is better
AMD FX-6300: 4.34
AMD FX-6200: 4.32
INTEL CORE I5-3570K: 5.70
AMD FX-8350: 6. 71
OC multi-threaded rendering performance
Cinebench R11.5: Index score: Higher is better
AMD FX-6300: 6.30
AMD FX-6200: 5.57
INTEL CORE I5-3570K: 7.45
AMD FX-8350: 7.79
CPU single-threaded rendering performance
Cinebench R11.5: Index score: Higher is better
AMD FX-6300: 0.96
AMD FX-6200: 0.92
INTEL CORE I5-3570K: 1.58
AMD FX-8350: 1.07
CPU encoding performance
x264 v4.0: Frames per second: Higher is better
AMD FX-6300: 26.46
AMD FX-6200: 27.81
INTEL CORE I5-3570K: 33.43
AMD FX-8350: 40.99
CPU gaming performance
Batman: AC: Frames per second: Higher is better
AMD FX-6300: 120
AMD FX-6200: 110
INTEL CORE I5-3570K: 164
AMD FX-8350: 114
CPU gaming performance
Shogun 2: Frames per second: Higher is better
AMD FX-6300: 21
AMD FX-6200: 19
INTEL CORE I5-3570K: 35
AMD FX-8350: 25
Hot clocks
With the clockspeeds taking a cut compared to the previous processor, and a lower overall TDP to boot, you might be forgiven for thinking the overclocking prowess of this Piledriver CPU may have been compromised. Not so. In fact if anything the overclocking performance has been enhanced.
We’ve even managed to push the FX-6300 over 5GHz and had it stably posting benchmark scores. I did have it booting at 5.1GHz, but we couldn’t stop it falling over under the rigours of x264.
Part of that is down to the fact that it’s a very cool-running chip — at stock speeds it’s running at 28°C under load. Sure the temperature starts getting rather toasty under your CPU cooler, but the performance figures take a huge jump too.
The multi-threaded performance easily eclipses a stock Core i5, and almost manages to do the same in single-threaded performance too. It’s not far off in terms of gaming, with our low-end Batman: AC scores showing 155fps for the FX-6300 versus 164FPS for the stock-clocked i5-3570K.
You will need a massive cooler and quality mobo to get to that sort of overclock, but it shows how competitive the Piledriver chip can be made. Especially considering it’s only just over $150.
That said you don’t really need to have an overclocking mobo to push the Core i5 up over 4.5GHz and gaming performance will quickly outstrip the AMD chip. Still, as a budget alternative, the FX-6300 is a very capable CPU offering decent multi-threaded performance, even at stock speed for use in productivity-related tasks and improved gaming performance too.
There’s still no getting away from the fact that the Intel Ivy Bridge chips are ideally what you want in your machine, but the AMD alternatives are there if you can’t afford to stretch all the way to a full Intel platform.
By virtue of its Black Edition status, the overclocking is relatively easy and gives you multiple ways — baseclock or multiplier — to get to the highest frequency you can. Being able to run happily at 5GHz is nothing to be sniffed at and has the makings of a top budget CPU.
TODAY’S BEST DEALS
TechRadar is part of Future US Inc, an international media group and leading digital publisher. Visit our corporate site .
©
Future US, Inc. Full 7th Floor, 130 West 42nd Street,
New York,
NY 10036.
i5-7400 vs FX-6200 Six-Core — Call of Duty Modern Warfare with GTX 1660 Benchmarks 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K Comparison
GTX 1660 with
Intel Core i5-7400 @ 3.00GHz
Call of Duty Modern Warfare
GTX 1660 with
AMD FX-6200 Six-Core
i5-7400
FX-6200 Six-Core
Multi-Thread Performance
7352 Pts
6126 Pts
Single-Thread Performance
1952 Pts
1306 Pts
Call of Duty Modern Warfare
i5-7400 vs FX-6200 Six-Core in Call of Duty Modern Warfare using GTX 1660 — CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions
i5-7400
FX-6200 Six-Core
Ultra Quality
Resolution | Frames Per Second |
---|---|
1080p |
87. 7 FPS |
1080p |
52.9 FPS |
1440p |
63.1 FPS |
1440p |
38.1 FPS |
2160p |
37.7 FPS |
2160p |
22.7 FPS |
w1440p |
53.9 FPS |
w1440p |
32.5 FPS |
High Quality
Resolution | Frames Per Second |
---|---|
1080p |
141.1 FPS |
1080p |
91.8 FPS |
1440p |
106.7 FPS |
1440p |
69.2 FPS |
2160p |
68.6 FPS |
2160p |
44.2 FPS |
w1440p |
93.3 FPS |
w1440p |
60.3 FPS |
Medium Quality
Resolution | Frames Per Second |
---|---|
1080p |
194. 4 FPS |
1080p |
130.6 FPS |
1440p |
150.3 FPS |
1440p |
100.3 FPS |
2160p |
99.5 FPS |
2160p |
65.7 FPS |
w1440p |
132.6 FPS |
w1440p |
88.2 FPS |
Low Quality
Resolution | Frames Per Second |
---|---|
1080p |
301.1 FPS |
1080p |
208.4 FPS |
1440p |
237.4 FPS |
1440p |
162.6 FPS |
2160p |
161.3 FPS |
2160p |
108.6 FPS |
w1440p |
211.3 FPS |
w1440p |
143.9 FPS |
i5-7400
FX-6200 Six-Core
Compare i5-7400 vs FX-6200 Six-Core specifications
i5-7400 vs FX-6200 Six-Core Architecture
i5-7400 | FX-6200 Six-Core |
---|
i5-7400 vs FX-6200 Six-Core Cache
i5-7400 | FX-6200 Six-Core |
---|
i5-7400 vs FX-6200 Six-Core Cores
i5-7400 | FX-6200 Six-Core |
---|
i5-7400 vs FX-6200 Six-Core Features
i5-7400 | FX-6200 Six-Core |
---|
i5-7400 vs FX-6200 Six-Core Performance
i5-7400 | FX-6200 Six-Core |
---|
i5-7400 vs FX-6200 Six-Core Physical
i5-7400 | FX-6200 Six-Core |
---|
Share Your Comments 91
Compare i5-7400 vs FX-6200 Six-Core in more games
Elden Ring
2022
God of War
2022
Overwatch 2
2022
Forza Horizon 5
2021
Halo Infinite
2021
Battlefield 2042
2021
Assassin’s Creed Valhalla
2020
Microsoft Flight Simulator
2020
Valorant
2020
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War
2020
Death Stranding
2020
Marvel’s Avengers
2020
Godfall
2020
Cyberpunk 2077
2020
Apex Legends
2019
Anthem
2019
Far Cry New Dawn
2019
Resident Evil 2
2019
Metro Exodus
2019
World War Z
2019
Gears of War 5
2019
F1 2019
2019
GreedFall
2019
Borderlands 3
2019
Call of Duty Modern Warfare
2019
Red Dead Redemption 2
2019
Need For Speed: Heat
2019
Assassin’s Creed Odyssey
2018
Battlefield V
2018
Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
2018
Final Fantasy XV
2018
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
2018
Forza Horizon 4
2018
Fallout 76
2018
Hitman 2
2018
Just Cause 4
2018
Monster Hunter: World
2018
Strange Brigade
2018
Assassin’s Creed Origins
2017
Dawn of War III
2017
Ghost Recon Wildlands
2017
Destiny 2
2017
PlayerUnknown’s Battlegrounds
2017
Fortnite Battle Royale
2017
Need For Speed: Payback
2017
For Honor
2017
Project CARS 2
2017
Forza Motorsport 7
2017
Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation
2016
Battlefield 1
2016
Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
2016
Doom
2016
F1 2016
2016
Total War: Warhammer
2016
Overwatch
2016
Dishonored 2
2016
Grand Theft Auto V
2015
Rocket League
2015
Need For Speed
2015
Project CARS
2015
Rainbow Six Siege
2015
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
2012
League of Legends
2009
Minecraft
2009
1 | 2020 | AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
>> compare FX-6200 vs Ryzen 9 5950X |
$ 710. 0 | ||||
2 | 2021 | Intel Core i7-12700K
>> compare FX-6200 vs Core i7-12700K |
$ 470.0 | ||||
3 | 2021 | Intel Core i9-12900K
>> compare FX-6200 vs Core i9-12900K |
$ 590.0 | ||||
4 | 2022 | AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D
>> compare FX-6200 vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D |
$ 450.0 | ||||
5 | 2021 | Intel Core i9-11900K
>> compare FX-6200 vs Core i9-11900K |
$ 488.0 | ||||
6 | 2020 | AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
>> compare FX-6200 vs Ryzen 9 5900X |
$ 499.0 | ||||
7 | 2021 | Intel Core i5-12600K
>> compare FX-6200 vs Core i5-12600K |
$ 290. 0 | ||||
8 | 2020 | AMD Ryzen 7 5800X
>> compare FX-6200 vs Ryzen 7 5800X |
$ 399.0 | ||||
9 | 2021 | Intel Core i7-11700K
>> compare FX-6200 vs Core i7-11700K |
$ 410.0 | ||||
10 | 2020 | AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
>> compare FX-6200 vs Ryzen 5 5600X |
$ 299.0 | ||||
11 | 2020 | Intel Core i9-10900K
>> compare FX-6200 vs Core i9-10900K |
$ 590.0 | ||||
12 | 2018 | Intel Core i9-9900K @ 3.60GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i9-9900K |
$ 835.0 | ||||
13 | 2020 | Intel Core i7-10700K
>> compare FX-6200 vs Core i7-10700K |
$ 409. 1 | ||||
14 | 2021 | Intel Core i5-11600K
>> compare FX-6200 vs Core i5-11600K |
$ 262.0 | ||||
15 | 2018 | Intel Core i9-9900 @ 3.10GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i9-9900 |
$ 440.0 | ||||
16 | 2022 | Intel Core i5-12400
>> compare FX-6200 vs Core i5-12400 |
$ 143.0 | ||||
17 | 2018 | Intel Core i7-9700K @ 3.60GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i7-9700K |
$ 410.0 | ||||
18 | 2021 | Intel Core i5-11400
>> compare FX-6200 vs Core i5-11400 |
$ 182.0 | ||||
19 | 2018 | Intel Core i7-8086K @ 4. 00GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i7-8086K |
$ 553.0 | ||||
20 | 2018 | Intel Core i7-9700 @ 3.00GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i7-9700 |
$ 330.0 | ||||
21 | 2018 | Intel Core i7-9700F @ 3.00GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i7-9700F |
$ 368.0 | ||||
22 | 2020 | Intel Core i5-10600K
>> compare FX-6200 vs Core i5-10600K |
$ 236.8 | ||||
23 | 2017 | Intel Core i7-8700K @ 3.70GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i7-8700K |
$ 369.9 | ||||
24 | 2017 | Intel Core i9-7940X @ 3.10GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i9-7940X |
$ 1,192. 1 | ||||
25 | 2020 | Intel Core i5-10400
>> compare FX-6200 vs Core i5-10400 |
$ 182.0 | ||||
26 | 2019 | AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
>> compare FX-6200 vs Ryzen 9 3900X |
$ 499.0 | ||||
27 | 2019 | AMD Ryzen 9 3950X
>> compare FX-6200 vs Ryzen 9 3950X |
$ 750.0 | ||||
28 | 2019 | AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
>> compare FX-6200 vs Ryzen 7 3700X |
$ 330.0 | ||||
29 | 2019 | AMD Ryzen 7 3800X
>> compare FX-6200 vs Ryzen 7 3800X |
$ 399.0 | ||||
30 | 2019 | AMD Ryzen 5 3600X
>> compare FX-6200 vs Ryzen 5 3600X |
$ 249. 0 | ||||
31 | 2018 | Intel Core i5-9600KF @ 3.70GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i5-9600KF |
$ 215.0 | ||||
32 | 2018 | Intel Core i5-9600K @ 3.70GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i5-9600K |
$ 280.0 | ||||
33 | 2019 | AMD Ryzen 5 3600
>> compare FX-6200 vs Ryzen 5 3600 |
$ 199.0 | ||||
34 | 2022 | AMD Ryzen 7 5700X
>> compare FX-6200 vs Ryzen 7 5700X |
$ 300.0 | ||||
35 | 2022 | AMD Ryzen 5 5500
>> compare FX-6200 vs Ryzen 5 5500 |
$ 160.0 | ||||
36 | 2022 | Intel Core i3-12300
>> compare FX-6200 vs Core i3-12300 |
$ 143. 0 | ||||
37 | 2017 | Intel Core i5-8600K @ 3.60GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i5-8600K |
$ 377.7 | ||||
38 | 2017 | Intel Core i9-7900X @ 3.30GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i9-7900X |
$ 1,380.0 | ||||
39 | 2017 | Intel Core i9-7980XE @ 2.60GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i9-7980XE |
$ 2,005.5 | ||||
40 | 2019 | AMD Ryzen 5 3500X
>> compare FX-6200 vs Ryzen 5 3500X |
$ 160.5 | ||||
41 | 2022 | Intel Core i3-12100
>> compare FX-6200 vs Core i3-12100 |
$ 122.0 | ||||
42 | 2017 | Intel Core i7-8700 @ 3. 20GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i7-8700 |
$ 454.5 | ||||
43 | 2017 | Intel Core i9-7920X @ 2.90GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i9-7920X |
$ 1,096.7 | ||||
44 | 2017 | Intel Core i9-7960X @ 2.80GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i9-7960X |
$ 2,000.0 | ||||
45 | 2019 | Intel Core i5-9400F @ 2.90GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i5-9400F |
$ 170.0 | ||||
46 | 2019 | Intel Core i5-9400 @ 2.90GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i5-9400 |
$ 170.0 | ||||
47 | 2021 | Intel Core i3-11300
>> compare FX-6200 vs Core i3-11300 |
$ 143. 0 | ||||
48 | 2019 | AMD Ryzen 5 3500
>> compare FX-6200 vs Ryzen 5 3500 |
$ 148.0 | ||||
49 | 2018 | Intel Core i5-8600 @ 3.10GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i5-8600 |
$ 244.5 | ||||
50 | 2017 | Intel Core i7-7740X @ 4.30GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i7-7740X |
$ 349.0 | ||||
51 | 2020 | AMD Ryzen 3 3300X
>> compare FX-6200 vs Ryzen 3 3300X |
$ 120.0 | ||||
52 | 2020 | AMD Ryzen 3 3100
>> compare FX-6200 vs Ryzen 3 3100 |
$ 90.0 | ||||
53 | 2021 | Intel Core i3-11100
>> compare FX-6200 vs Core i3-11100 |
$ 122. 0 | ||||
54 | 2020 | Intel Core i3-10300
>> compare FX-6200 vs Core i3-10300 |
$ 143.0 | ||||
55 | 2018 | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
>> compare FX-6200 vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X |
$ 900.0 | ||||
56 | 2018 | Intel Core i5-8500 @ 3.00GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i5-8500 |
$ 239.0 | ||||
57 | 2016 | Intel Core i7-7700K @ 4.20GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i7-7700K |
$ 355.0 | ||||
58 | 2017 | Intel Core i7-7820X @ 3.60GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i7-7820X |
$ 930.0 | ||||
59 | 2014 | Intel Core i7-4790K @ 4. 00GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i7-4790K |
$ 307.0 | ||||
60 | 2020 | Intel Core i3-10100
>> compare FX-6200 vs Core i3-10100 |
$ 122.0 | ||||
61 | 2018 | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
>> compare FX-6200 vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX |
$ 1,720.0 | ||||
62 | 2017 | Intel Core i5-7640X @ 4.00GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i5-7640X |
$ 250.0 | ||||
63 | 2017 | Intel Core i5-8400 @ 2.80GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i5-8400 |
$ 200.0 | ||||
64 | 2019 | Intel Core i3-9350KF @ 4.00GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i3-9350KF |
$ 224. 0 | ||||
65 | 2019 | Intel Core i3-9320 @ 3.70GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i3-9320 |
$ 162.0 | ||||
66 | 2017 | Intel Core i3-8350K @ 4.00GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i3-8350K |
$ 184.0 | ||||
67 | 2019 | Intel Core i3-9100F @ 3.60GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i3-9100F |
$ 105.0 | ||||
68 | 2019 | Intel Core i3-9100 @ 3.60GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i3-9100 |
$ 170.0 | ||||
69 | 2017 | Intel Core i5-7600K @ 3.80GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i5-7600K |
$ 251.0 | ||||
70 | 2016 | Intel Core i7-6950X @ 3. 00GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i7-6950X |
$ 1,576.0 | ||||
71 | 2017 | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
>> compare FX-6200 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
$ 680.0 | ||||
72 | 2015 | Intel Core i7-6700K @ 4.00GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i7-6700K |
$ 335.0 | ||||
73 | 2016 | Intel Core i7-6900K @ 3.20GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i7-6900K |
$ 1,200.0 | ||||
74 | 2017 | Intel Core i7-7800X @ 3.50GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i7-7800X |
$ 370.0 | ||||
75 | 2018 | AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
>> compare FX-6200 vs Ryzen 7 2700X |
$ 305. 0 | ||||
76 | 2018 | Intel Core i3-8300 @ 3.70GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i3-8300 |
$ 179.4 | ||||
77 | 2016 | Intel Core i7-7700 @ 3.60GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i7-7700 |
$ 325.1 | ||||
78 | 2017 | Intel Core i5-7600 @ 3.50GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i5-7600 |
$ 240.0 | ||||
79 | 2015 | Intel Core i7-6700 @ 3.40GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i7-6700 |
$ 433.7 | ||||
80 | 2016 | Intel Core i7-6800K @ 3.40GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i7-6800K |
$ 420.0 | ||||
81 | 2017 | Intel Core i3-8100 @ 3. 60GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i3-8100 |
$ 130.0 | ||||
82 | 2013 | Intel Core i7-4770K @ 3.50GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i7-4770K |
$ 285.0 | ||||
83 | 2014 | Intel Core i7-4790 @ 3.60GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i7-4790 |
$ 279.0 | ||||
84 | 2015 | Intel Core i7-5775C @ 3.30GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i7-5775C |
$ 450.0 | ||||
85 | 2014 | Intel Core i7-5930K @ 3.50GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i7-5930K |
$ 499.0 | ||||
86 | 2016 | Intel Core i7-6850K @ 3.60GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i7-6850K |
$ 550. 0 | ||||
87 | 2018 | AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
>> compare FX-6200 vs Ryzen 5 2600X |
$ 210.0 | ||||
88 | 2017 | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
>> compare FX-6200 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
$ 420.0 | ||||
89 | 2013 | Intel Core i7-4770 @ 3.40GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i7-4770 |
$ 240.0 | ||||
90 | 2013 | Intel Core i7-4771 @ 3.50GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i7-4771 |
$ 300.0 | ||||
91 | 2014 | Intel Core i7-4790S @ 3.20GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i7-4790S |
$ 342.6 | ||||
92 | 2018 | AMD Ryzen 7 2700
>> compare FX-6200 vs Ryzen 7 2700 |
$ 249. 2 | ||||
93 | 2017 | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
>> compare FX-6200 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
$ 350.0 | ||||
94 | 2013 | Intel Core i7-4770S @ 3.10GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i7-4770S |
$ 250.0 | ||||
95 | 2013 | Intel Core i7-4960X @ 3.60GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i7-4960X |
$ 770.0 | ||||
96 | 2014 | Intel Core i5-4690 @ 3.50GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i5-4690 |
$ 200.0 | ||||
97 | 2014 | Intel Core i5-4690K @ 3.50GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i5-4690K |
$ 200.0 | ||||
98 | 2014 | Intel Core i5-4690S @ 3. 20GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i5-4690S |
$ 269.9 | ||||
99 | 2015 | Intel Core i5-6600K @ 3.50GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i5-6600K |
$ 288.9 | ||||
100 | 2016 | Intel Core i5-7500 @ 3.40GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i5-7500 |
$ 210.0 | ||||
101 | 2014 | Intel Core i7-5820K @ 3.30GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i7-5820K |
$ 300.0 | ||||
102 | 2014 | Intel Core i7-5960X @ 3.00GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i7-5960X |
$ 770.0 | ||||
103 | 2018 | AMD Ryzen 5 2600
>> compare FX-6200 vs Ryzen 5 2600 |
$ 150. 0 | ||||
104 | 2017 | AMD Ryzen 7 1800X
>> compare FX-6200 vs Ryzen 7 1800X |
$ 250.0 | ||||
105 | 2012 | Intel Core i7-3970X @ 3.50GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i7-3970X |
$ 954.0 | ||||
106 | 2017 | AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
>> compare FX-6200 vs Ryzen 5 1600X |
$ 178.4 | ||||
107 | 2017 | Intel Core i3-7350K @ 4.20GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i3-7350K |
$ 230.0 | ||||
108 | 2013 | Intel Core i5-4670 @ 3.40GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i5-4670 |
$ 188.0 | ||||
109 | 2013 | Intel Core i5-4670K @ 3. 40GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i5-4670K |
$ 250.0 | ||||
110 | 2018 | Intel Core i5-4670R @ 3.00GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i5-4670R |
$ 276.0 | ||||
111 | 2015 | Intel Core i5-5675C @ 3.10GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i5-5675C |
$ 400.0 | ||||
112 | 2015 | Intel Core i5-6600 @ 3.30GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i5-6600 |
$ 220.0 | ||||
113 | 2012 | Intel Core i7-3770 @ 3.40GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i7-3770 |
$ 179.0 | ||||
114 | 2012 | Intel Core i7-3770K @ 3.50GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i7-3770K |
$ 249. 0 | ||||
115 | 2011 | Intel Core i7-3960X @ 3.30GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i7-3960X |
$ 800.0 | ||||
116 | 2013 | Intel Core i7-4930K @ 3.40GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i7-4930K |
$ 399.0 | ||||
117 | 2014 | Intel Core i5-4590 @ 3.30GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i5-4590 |
$ 185.0 | ||||
118 | 2017 | AMD Ryzen 7 1700X
>> compare FX-6200 vs Ryzen 7 1700X |
$ 200.0 | ||||
119 | 2017 | Intel Core i3-7320 @ 4.10GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i3-7320 |
$ 174.8 | ||||
120 | 2013 | Intel Core i5-4570 @ 3. 20GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i5-4570 |
$ 175.0 | ||||
121 | 2014 | Intel Core i5-4590S @ 3.00GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i5-4590S |
$ 198.0 | ||||
122 | 2017 | Intel Core i5-7400 @ 3.00GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i5-7400 |
$ 213.5 | ||||
123 | 2011 | Intel Core i7-2700K @ 3.50GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i7-2700K |
$ 200.0 | ||||
124 | 2012 | Intel Core i7-3770S @ 3.10GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i7-3770S |
$ 200.0 | ||||
125 | 2011 | Intel Core i7-3930K @ 3.20GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i7-3930K |
$ 399. 0 | ||||
126 | 2013 | Intel Core i7-4820K @ 3.70GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i7-4820K |
$ 500.0 | ||||
127 | 2019 | AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
>> compare FX-6200 vs Ryzen 5 3400G |
$ 150.0 | ||||
128 | 2017 | Intel Core i3-7300 @ 4.00GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i3-7300 |
$ 210.0 | ||||
129 | 2017 | AMD Ryzen 5 1500X
>> compare FX-6200 vs Ryzen 5 1500X |
$ 144.9 | ||||
130 | 2017 | AMD Ryzen 5 1600
>> compare FX-6200 vs Ryzen 5 1600 |
$ 155.0 | ||||
131 | 2018 | AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
>> compare FX-6200 vs Ryzen 5 2400G |
$ 159. 0 | ||||
132 | 2017 | AMD Ryzen 7 1700
>> compare FX-6200 vs Ryzen 7 1700 |
$ 190.0 | ||||
133 | 2015 | Intel Core i5-6500 @ 3.20GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i5-6500 |
$ 234.4 | ||||
134 | 2010 | Intel Core i7-2600 @ 3.40GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i7-2600 |
$ 150.0 | ||||
135 | 2010 | Intel Core i7-2600K @ 3.40GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i7-2600K |
$ 198.0 | ||||
136 | 2012 | Intel Core i7-3820 @ 3.60GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i7-3820 |
$ 200.0 | ||||
137 | 2019 | AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
>> compare FX-6200 vs Ryzen 3 3200G |
$ 99. 0 | ||||
138 | 2012 | Intel Core i5-3570 @ 3.40GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i5-3570 |
$ 140.0 | ||||
139 | 2012 | Intel Core i5-3570K @ 3.40GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i5-3570K |
$ 144.0 | ||||
140 | 2013 | Intel Core i5-4570S @ 2.90GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i5-4570S |
$ 221.6 | ||||
141 | 2016 | Intel Core i5-6402P @ 2.80GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i5-6402P |
$ 190.0 | ||||
142 | 2018 | AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
>> compare FX-6200 vs Ryzen 3 2200G |
$ 98.0 | ||||
143 | 2017 | Intel Core i3-7100 @ 3. 90GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i3-7100 |
$ 170.0 | ||||
144 | 2012 | Intel Core i5-3550 @ 3.30GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i5-3550 |
$ 330.0 | ||||
145 | 2012 | Intel Core i5-3550S @ 3.00GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i5-3550S |
$ 341.0 | ||||
146 | 2012 | Intel Core i5-3570S @ 3.10GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i5-3570S |
$ 285.0 | ||||
147 | 2017 | AMD Ryzen 3 1300X
>> compare FX-6200 vs Ryzen 3 1300X |
$ 125.0 | ||||
148 | 2012 | Intel Core i5-2550K @ 3.40GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i5-2550K |
$ 130. 0 | ||||
149 | 2012 | Intel Core i5-3470 @ 3.20GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i5-3470 |
$ 125.0 | ||||
150 | 2012 | Intel Core i5-3475S @ 2.90GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i5-3475S |
$ 143.5 | ||||
151 | 2014 | Intel Core i5-4460 @ 3.20GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i5-4460 |
$ 170.0 | ||||
152 | 2014 | Intel Core i5-4460S @ 2.90GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i5-4460S |
$ 660.0 | ||||
153 | 2015 | Intel Core i5-6400 @ 2.70GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i5-6400 |
$ 200.0 | ||||
154 | 2013 | Intel Core i5-4440 @ 3. 10GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i5-4440 |
$ 170.0 | ||||
155 | 2013 | Intel Core i5-4440S @ 2.80GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i5-4440S |
$ 463.0 | ||||
156 | 2011 | Intel Core i7-2600S @ 2.80GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i7-2600S |
$ 200.0 | ||||
157 | 2010 | Intel Core i5-2500 @ 3.30GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i5-2500 |
$ 105.0 | ||||
158 | 2010 | Intel Core i5-2500K @ 3.30GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i5-2500K |
$ 124.0 | ||||
159 | 2012 | Intel Core i5-3450 @ 3.10GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i5-3450 |
$ 128. 0 | ||||
160 | 2012 | Intel Core i5-3470S @ 2.90GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i5-3470S |
$ 140.1 | ||||
161 | 2013 | Intel Core i5-4430 @ 3.00GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i5-4430 |
$ 180.0 | ||||
162 | 2017 | AMD Ryzen 5 1400
>> compare FX-6200 vs Ryzen 5 1400 |
$ 134.0 | ||||
163 | 2012 | Intel Core i5-3450S @ 2.80GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i5-3450S |
$ 100.0 | ||||
164 | 2017 | AMD Ryzen 3 1200
>> compare FX-6200 vs Ryzen 3 1200 |
$ 95.0 | ||||
165 | 2012 | Intel Core i5-2450P @ 3. 20GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i5-2450P |
$ 90.0 | ||||
166 | 2011 | Intel Core i5-2500S @ 2.70GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i5-2500S |
$ 75.0 | ||||
167 | 2013 | Intel Core i5-3340 @ 3.10GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i5-3340 |
$ 262.0 | ||||
168 | 2013 | Intel Core i5-4430S @ 2.70GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i5-4430S |
$ 160.0 | ||||
169 | 2011 | Intel Core i7-990X @ 3.47GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i7-990X |
$ 350.0 | ||||
170 | 2010 | Intel Core i5-2400 @ 3.10GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i5-2400 |
$ 84. 0 | ||||
171 | 2013 | Intel Core i5-3340S @ 2.80GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i5-3340S |
$ 150.0 | ||||
172 | 2012 | Intel Core i5-3350P @ 3.10GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i5-3350P |
$ 170.0 | ||||
173 | 2011 | Intel Core i5-2320 @ 3.00GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i5-2320 |
$ 195.3 | ||||
174 | 2012 | Intel Core i5-2380P @ 3.10GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i5-2380P |
$ 90.0 | ||||
175 | 2012 | Intel Core i5-3330 @ 3.00GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i5-3330 |
$ 100.0 | ||||
176 | 2012 | Intel Core i5-3330S @ 2. 70GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i5-3330S |
$ 95.0 | ||||
177 | 2010 | Intel Core i7-980X @ 3.33GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i7-980X |
$ 220.0 | ||||
178 | 2013 | AMD FX-9590 Eight-Core
>> compare FX-6200 vs FX-9590 |
$ 122.0 | ||||
179 | 2011 | Intel Core i5-2310 @ 2.90GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i5-2310 |
$ 80.0 | ||||
180 | 2011 | Intel Core i5-2400S @ 2.50GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i5-2400S |
$ 65.7 | ||||
181 | 2011 | Intel Core i5-2405S @ 2.50GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i5-2405S |
$ 164. 4 | ||||
182 | 2011 | Intel Core i7-980 @ 3.33GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i7-980 |
$ 200.0 | ||||
183 | 2013 | AMD FX-9370 Eight-Core
>> compare FX-6200 vs FX-9370 |
$ 178.9 | ||||
184 | 2010 | Intel Core i5-680 @ 3.60GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i5-680 |
$ 90.0 | ||||
185 | 2014 | AMD FX-8370 Eight-Core
>> compare FX-6200 vs FX-8370 |
$ 135.0 | ||||
186 | 2014 | AMD FX-8370E Eight-Core
>> compare FX-6200 vs FX-8370E |
$ 180.0 | ||||
187 | 2011 | Intel Core i5-2300 @ 2. 80GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i5-2300 |
$ 80.0 | ||||
188 | 2010 | Intel Core i7-970 @ 3.20GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i7-970 |
$ 150.0 | ||||
189 | 2009 | Intel Core i7-975 @ 3.33GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i7-975 |
$ 180.0 | ||||
190 | 2012 | AMD FX-8350 Eight-Core
>> compare FX-6200 vs FX-8350 |
$ 80.0 | ||||
191 | 2014 | Intel Core i3-4370 @ 3.80GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i3-4370 |
$ 450.0 | ||||
192 | 2015 | Intel Core i3-6320 @ 3.90GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i3-6320 |
$ 160. 0 | ||||
193 | 2013 | AMD Athlon X4 760K Quad Core
>> compare FX-6200 vs Athlon X4 760K |
$ 46.0 | ||||
194 | 2012 | AMD FX-8320 Eight-Core
>> compare FX-6200 vs FX-8320 |
$ 79.5 | ||||
195 | 2015 | Intel Core i3-6300 @ 3.80GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i3-6300 |
$ 143.0 | ||||
196 | 2010 | Intel Core i5-655K @ 3.20GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i5-655K |
$ 60.0 | ||||
197 | 2010 | Intel Core i5-670 @ 3.47GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i5-670 |
$ 90.0 | ||||
198 | 2010 | Intel Core i7-880 @ 3. 07GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i7-880 |
$ 583.0 | ||||
199 | 2009 | Intel Core i7-960 @ 3.20GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i7-960 |
$ 100.0 | ||||
200 | 2008 | Intel Core i7-965 @ 3.20GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i7-965 |
$ 140.0 | ||||
201 | 2015 | Intel Core i3-4170 @ 3.70GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i3-4170 |
$ 150.0 | ||||
202 | 2014 | Intel Core i3-4360 @ 3.70GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i3-4360 |
$ 280.0 | ||||
203 | 2015 | Intel Core i3-6100 @ 3.70GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i3-6100 |
$ 166. 1 | ||||
204 | 2013 | AMD FX-8300 Eight-Core
>> compare FX-6200 vs FX-8300 |
$ 80.6 | ||||
205 | 2014 | Intel Core i3-4160 @ 3.60GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i3-4160 |
$ 140.0 | ||||
206 | 2013 | Intel Core i3-4340 @ 3.60GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i3-4340 |
$ 170.0 | ||||
207 | 2014 | Intel Core i3-4350 @ 3.60GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i3-4350 |
$ 170.0 | ||||
208 | 2016 | Intel Core i3-6098P @ 3.60GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i3-6098P |
$ 133.7 | ||||
209 | 2009 | Intel Core i5-660 @ 3. 33GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i5-660 |
$ 49.0 | ||||
210 | 2009 | Intel Core i7-870 @ 2.93GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i7-870 |
$ 310.0 | ||||
211 | 2009 | Intel Core i7-950 @ 3.07GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i7-950 |
$ 245.0 | ||||
212 | 2008 | Intel Core2 Extreme X9770 @ 3.20GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs X9770 |
$ 1,609.0 | ||||
213 | 2009 | Intel Core2 Extreme X9775 @ 3.20GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs X9775 |
$ 1,806.0 | ||||
214 | 2014 | AMD FX-8320E Eight-Core
>> compare FX-6200 vs FX-8320E |
$ 98. 9 | ||||
215 | 2011 | AMD FX-8150 Eight-Core
>> compare FX-6200 vs FX-8150 |
$ 383.5 | ||||
216 | 2010 | AMD Phenom II X6 1100T
>> compare FX-6200 vs Phenom II X6 1100T |
$ 200.0 | ||||
217 | 2014 | Intel Core i3-4150 @ 3.50GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i3-4150 |
$ 260.0 | ||||
218 | 2013 | Intel Core i3-4330 @ 3.50GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i3-4330 |
$ 180.0 | ||||
219 | 2010 | Intel Core i5-650 @ 3.20GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i5-650 |
$ 100.0 | ||||
220 | 2010 | Intel Core i5-661 @ 3. 33GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i5-661 |
$ 100.0 | ||||
221 | 2011 | Intel Core i7-860S @ 2.53GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i7-860S |
$ 200.0 | ||||
222 | 2010 | Intel Core i7-875K @ 2.93GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i7-875K |
$ 200.0 | ||||
223 | 2008 | Intel Core i7-940 @ 2.93GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i7-940 |
$ 70.7 | ||||
224 | 2012 | AMD Athlon X4 740 Quad Core
>> compare FX-6200 vs Athlon X4 740 |
$ 277.0 | ||||
225 | 2011 | AMD FX-8120 Eight-Core
>> compare FX-6200 vs FX-8120 |
$ 100. 0 | ||||
226 | 2010 | AMD Phenom II X6 1090T
>> compare FX-6200 vs Phenom II X6 1090T |
$ 396.1 | ||||
227 | 2010 | Intel Core i5-760 @ 2.80GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i5-760 |
$ 100.0 | ||||
228 | 2009 | Intel Core i7-860 @ 2.80GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i7-860 |
$ 290.0 | ||||
229 | 2010 | Intel Core i7-930 @ 2.80GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i7-930 |
$ 60.0 | ||||
230 | 2008 | Intel Core2 Duo E8600 @ 3.33GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs E8600 |
$ 50.0 | ||||
231 | 2008 | Intel Core2 Extreme X9650 @ 3. 00GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs X9650 |
$ 909.0 | ||||
232 | 2013 | Intel Core i3-4130 @ 3.40GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i3-4130 |
$ 140.0 | ||||
233 | 2013 | AMD FX-6350 Six-Core
>> compare FX-6200 vs FX-6350 |
$ 130.0 | ||||
234 | 2010 | AMD Phenom II X6 1075T
>> compare FX-6200 vs Phenom II X6 1075T |
$ 260.0 | ||||
235 | 2008 | Intel Core i7-920 @ 2.67GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i7-920 |
$ 174.0 | ||||
236 | 2008 | Intel Core2 Duo E8500 @ 3.16GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs E8500 |
$ 40. 0 | ||||
237 | 2009 | AMD Phenom II X4 965
>> compare FX-6200 vs Phenom II X4 965 |
$ 59.5 | ||||
238 | 2010 | AMD Phenom II X6 1055T
>> compare FX-6200 vs Phenom II X6 1055T |
$ 185.0 | ||||
239 | 2013 | Intel Core i3-3250 @ 3.50GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i3-3250 |
$ 95.0 | ||||
240 | 2009 | Intel Core i5-750 @ 2.67GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i5-750 |
$ 160.5 | ||||
241 | 2008 | Intel Core2 Extreme Q6850 @ 3.00GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs Q6850 |
$ 1,496.0 | ||||
242 | 2012 | AMD FX-6300 Six-Core
>> compare FX-6200 vs FX-6300 |
$ 59. 0 | ||||
243 | 2012 | Intel Core i3-3240 @ 3.40GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i3-3240 |
$ 46.0 | ||||
244 | 2013 | Intel Core i3-3245 @ 3.40GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i3-3245 |
$ 80.0 | ||||
245 | 2018 | Intel Pentium Gold G5600 @ 3.90GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs Pentium Gold G5600 |
$ 100.9 | ||||
246 | 2011 | AMD Athlon II X3 460
>> compare FX-6200 vs Athlon II X3 460 |
$ 50.0 | ||||
247 | 2012 | AMD FX-6200 Six-Core
>> compare FX-6200 vs FX-6200 |
$ 340.0 | ||||
248 | 2009 | AMD Phenom II X4 955
>> compare FX-6200 vs Phenom II X4 955 |
$ 130. 2 | ||||
249 | 2011 | AMD Phenom II X4 960T
>> compare FX-6200 vs Phenom II X4 960T |
$ 135.0 | ||||
250 | 2010 | AMD Phenom II X4 B97
>> compare FX-6200 vs Phenom II X4 B97 |
$ 90.0 | ||||
251 | 2010 | AMD Phenom II X6 1045T
>> compare FX-6200 vs Phenom II X6 1045T |
$ 175.0 | ||||
252 | 2011 | Intel Core i3-2130 @ 3.40GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i3-2130 |
$ 70.0 | ||||
253 | 2012 | Intel Core i3-3220 @ 3.30GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i3-3220 |
$ 34.9 | ||||
254 | 2012 | Intel Core i3-3225 @ 3. 30GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i3-3225 |
$ 100.0 | ||||
255 | 2009 | Intel Core2 Duo E7500 @ 2.93GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs E7500 |
$ 15.0 | ||||
256 | 2009 | Intel Core2 Duo E7600 @ 3.06GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs E7600 |
$ 120.0 | ||||
257 | 2008 | Intel Core2 Duo E8400 @ 3.00GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs E8400 |
$ 9.8 | ||||
258 | 2008 | Intel Core2 Extreme Q6800 @ 2.93GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs Q6800 |
$ 1,125.0 | ||||
259 | 2008 | Intel Core2 Quad Q9650 @ 3.00GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs Q9650 |
$ 69. 8 | ||||
260 | 2018 | Intel Pentium Gold G5400 @ 3.70GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs Pentium Gold G5400 |
$ 123.9 | ||||
261 | 2018 | Intel Pentium Gold G5500 @ 3.80GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs Pentium Gold G5500 |
$ 100.3 | ||||
262 | 2011 | AMD Athlon II X2 270
>> compare FX-6200 vs Athlon II X2 270 |
$ 24.0 | ||||
263 | 2012 | AMD Athlon II X2 B28
>> compare FX-6200 vs Athlon II X2 B28 |
$ 49.1 | ||||
264 | 2010 | AMD Athlon II X3 455
>> compare FX-6200 vs Athlon II X3 455 |
$ 116.9 | ||||
265 | 2010 | AMD Athlon II X4 645
>> compare FX-6200 vs Athlon II X4 645 |
$ 50. 0 | ||||
266 | 2011 | AMD Phenom II X4 840
>> compare FX-6200 vs Phenom II X4 840 |
$ 90.0 | ||||
267 | 2010 | AMD Phenom II X6 1035T
>> compare FX-6200 vs Phenom II X6 1035T |
$ 189.0 | ||||
268 | 2013 | Intel Core i3-3210 @ 3.20GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i3-3210 |
$ 100.0 | ||||
269 | 2008 | Intel Core2 Duo E8300 @ 2.83GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs E8300 |
$ 20.0 | ||||
270 | 2008 | Intel Core2 Quad Q9550 @ 2.83GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs Q9550 |
$ 49.0 | ||||
271 | 2010 | AMD Athlon II X2 265
>> compare FX-6200 vs Athlon II X2 265 |
$ 82. 9 | ||||
272 | 2010 | AMD Athlon II X3 450
>> compare FX-6200 vs Athlon II X3 450 |
$ 40.0 | ||||
273 | 2010 | AMD Athlon II X4 640
>> compare FX-6200 vs Athlon II X4 640 |
$ 80.0 | ||||
274 | 2011 | AMD Phenom II X2 565
>> compare FX-6200 vs Phenom II X2 565 |
$ 30.0 | ||||
275 | 2009 | AMD Phenom II X4 940
>> compare FX-6200 vs Phenom II X4 940 |
$ 120.0 | ||||
276 | 2009 | AMD Phenom II X4 945
>> compare FX-6200 vs Phenom II X4 945 |
$ 50.0 | ||||
277 | 2010 | AMD Phenom II X4 B95
>> compare FX-6200 vs Phenom II X4 B95 |
$ 73. 0 | ||||
278 | 2011 | Intel Core i3-2120 @ 3.30GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i3-2120 |
$ 30.0 | ||||
279 | 2011 | Intel Core i3-2125 @ 3.30GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i3-2125 |
$ 199.0 | ||||
280 | 2008 | Intel Core2 Duo E6850 @ 3.00GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs E6850 |
$ 50.0 | ||||
281 | 2008 | Intel Core2 Duo E7300 @ 2.66GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs E7300 |
$ 20.0 | ||||
282 | 2008 | Intel Core2 Duo E7400 @ 2.80GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs E7400 |
$ 29.0 | ||||
283 | 2008 | Intel Core2 Duo E8200 @ 2. 66GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs E8200 |
$ 50.0 | ||||
284 | 2008 | Intel Core2 Extreme X6800 @ 2.93GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs X6800 |
$ 263.6 | ||||
285 | 2010 | Intel Core2 Quad Q9500 @ 2.83GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs Q9500 |
$ 35.0 | ||||
286 | 2017 | Intel Pentium G4620 @ 3.70GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs Pentium G4620 |
$ 105.9 | ||||
287 | 2016 | Intel Core i3-2102 @ 3.10GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i3-2102 |
$ 58.0 | ||||
288 | 2009 | Intel Core2 Quad Q9505 @ 2.83GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs Q9505 |
$ 190. 0 | ||||
289 | 2014 | Intel Pentium G3258 @ 3.20GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs Pentium G3258 |
$ 178.3 | ||||
290 | 2015 | Intel Pentium G3470 @ 3.60GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs Pentium G3470 |
$ 104.3 | ||||
291 | 2015 | Intel Pentium G4520 @ 3.60GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs Pentium G4520 |
$ 110.9 | ||||
292 | 2017 | Intel Pentium G4600 @ 3.60GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs Pentium G4600 |
$ 100.0 | ||||
293 | 2010 | AMD Athlon II X2 260
>> compare FX-6200 vs Athlon II X2 260 |
$ 20.0 | ||||
294 | 2009 | AMD Athlon II X3 435
>> compare FX-6200 vs Athlon II X3 435 |
$ 50. 0 | ||||
295 | 2010 | AMD Athlon II X3 440
>> compare FX-6200 vs Athlon II X3 440 |
$ 47.0 | ||||
296 | 2010 | AMD Athlon II X3 445
>> compare FX-6200 vs Athlon II X3 445 |
$ 91.0 | ||||
297 | 2009 | AMD Athlon II X4 630
>> compare FX-6200 vs Athlon II X4 630 |
$ 43.0 | ||||
298 | 2010 | AMD Athlon II X4 635
>> compare FX-6200 vs Athlon II X4 635 |
$ 70.0 | ||||
299 | 2012 | AMD Athlon II X4 641 Quad-Core
>> compare FX-6200 vs Athlon II X4 641 |
$ 91.5 | ||||
300 | 2009 | AMD Phenom II X2 550
>> compare FX-6200 vs Phenom II X2 550 |
$ 50. 0 | ||||
301 | 2010 | AMD Phenom II X2 555
>> compare FX-6200 vs Phenom II X2 555 |
$ 142.1 | ||||
302 | 2009 | AMD Phenom II X4 820
>> compare FX-6200 vs Phenom II X4 820 |
$ 75.0 | ||||
303 | 2009 | AMD Phenom II X4 920
>> compare FX-6200 vs Phenom II X4 920 |
$ 67.0 | ||||
304 | 2009 | AMD Phenom II X4 925
>> compare FX-6200 vs Phenom II X4 925 |
$ 160.0 | ||||
305 | 2011 | Intel Core i3-2100 @ 3.10GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i3-2100 |
$ 60.0 | ||||
306 | 2011 | Intel Core i3-2105 @ 3. 10GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i3-2105 |
$ 80.0 | ||||
307 | 2012 | Intel Core i5 750S @ 2.40GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i5 750S |
$ 100.0 | ||||
308 | 2014 | Intel Pentium G3450 @ 3.40GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs Pentium G3450 |
$ 100.0 | ||||
309 | 2014 | Intel Pentium G3460 @ 3.50GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs Pentium G3460 |
$ 288.2 | ||||
310 | 2017 | Intel Pentium G4560 @ 3.50GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs Pentium G4560 |
$ 103.1 | ||||
311 | 2009 | AMD Athlon II X2 250
>> compare FX-6200 vs Athlon II X2 250 |
$ 39. 0 | ||||
312 | 2010 | AMD Athlon II X2 255
>> compare FX-6200 vs Athlon II X2 255 |
$ 65.2 | ||||
313 | 2010 | AMD Athlon II X2 B24
>> compare FX-6200 vs Athlon II X2 B24 |
$ 40.0 | ||||
314 | 2009 | AMD Athlon II X4 620
>> compare FX-6200 vs Athlon II X4 620 |
$ 60.0 | ||||
315 | 2011 | AMD Athlon II X4 631 Quad-Core
>> compare FX-6200 vs Athlon II X4 631 |
$ 80.0 | ||||
316 | 2009 | AMD Phenom II X2 545
>> compare FX-6200 vs Phenom II X2 545 |
$ 44.0 | ||||
317 | 2009 | AMD Phenom II X2 B55
>> compare FX-6200 vs Phenom II X2 B55 |
$ 48. 0 | ||||
318 | 2009 | AMD Phenom II X3 720
>> compare FX-6200 vs Phenom II X3 720 |
$ 70.0 | ||||
319 | 2010 | AMD Phenom II X3 B73
>> compare FX-6200 vs Phenom II X3 B73 |
$ 75.0 | ||||
320 | 2009 | AMD Phenom II X4 810
>> compare FX-6200 vs Phenom II X4 810 |
$ 116.0 | ||||
321 | 2009 | AMD Phenom II X4 910
>> compare FX-6200 vs Phenom II X4 910 |
$ 100.0 | ||||
322 | 2010 | AMD Phenom II X4 910e
>> compare FX-6200 vs Phenom II X4 910e |
$ 157.0 | ||||
323 | 2008 | Intel Core2 Duo E6750 @ 2. 66GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs E6750 |
$ 13.0 | ||||
324 | 2008 | Intel Core2 Duo E7200 @ 2.53GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs E7200 |
$ 75.0 | ||||
325 | 2008 | Intel Core2 Quad Q9450 @ 2.66GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs Q9450 |
$ 335.0 | ||||
326 | 2015 | Intel Pentium G4500 @ 3.50GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs Pentium G4500 |
$ 85.3 | ||||
327 | 2008 | AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 6400+
>> compare FX-6200 vs Athlon 64 X2 Dual 6400+ |
$ 260.0 | ||||
328 | 2009 | AMD Athlon 7850 Dual-Core
>> compare FX-6200 vs Athlon 7850 |
$ 209. 7 | ||||
329 | 2009 | AMD Athlon II X2 245
>> compare FX-6200 vs Athlon II X2 245 |
$ 35.0 | ||||
330 | 2010 | AMD Athlon II X2 B22
>> compare FX-6200 vs Athlon II X2 B22 |
$ 36.0 | ||||
331 | 2009 | AMD Athlon II X3 425
>> compare FX-6200 vs Athlon II X3 425 |
$ 104.2 | ||||
332 | 2008 | AMD Phenom 9950 Quad-Core
>> compare FX-6200 vs Phenom 9950 |
$ 180.0 | ||||
333 | 2009 | AMD Phenom II X3 710
>> compare FX-6200 vs Phenom II X3 710 |
$ 84.5 | ||||
334 | 2009 | AMD Phenom II X4 805
>> compare FX-6200 vs Phenom II X4 805 |
$ 174. 0 | ||||
335 | 2009 | AMD Phenom II X4 905e
>> compare FX-6200 vs Phenom II X4 905e |
$ 212.4 | ||||
336 | 2008 | Intel Core2 Duo E4700 @ 2.60GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs E4700 |
$ 100.0 | ||||
337 | 2010 | Intel Core2 Duo E6700 @ 2.66GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs E6700 |
$ 30.0 | ||||
338 | 2009 | Intel Core2 Quad Q8400 @ 2.66GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs Q8400 |
$ 99.5 | ||||
339 | 2008 | Intel Core2 Quad Q9400 @ 2.66GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs Q9400 |
$ 34.0 | ||||
340 | 2015 | Intel Pentium G3260 @ 3. 30GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs Pentium G3260 |
$ 105.0 | ||||
341 | 2016 | AMD Athlon X4 845
>> compare FX-6200 vs Athlon X4 845 |
$ 50.0 | ||||
342 | 2013 | AMD FX-4350 Quad-Core
>> compare FX-6200 vs FX-4350 |
$ 130.0 | ||||
343 | 2008 | Intel Core2 Quad Q6700 @ 2.66GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs Q6700 |
$ 45.0 | ||||
344 | 2009 | Intel Core2 Quad Q8300 @ 2.50GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs Q8300 |
$ 50.0 | ||||
345 | 2008 | Intel Core2 Quad Q9300 @ 2.50GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs Q9300 |
$ 50. 0 | ||||
346 | 2014 | Intel Pentium G3250 @ 3.20GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs Pentium G3250 |
$ 110.0 | ||||
347 | 2013 | Intel Pentium G3420 @ 3.20GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs Pentium G3420 |
$ 110.0 | ||||
348 | 2013 | Intel Pentium G3430 @ 3.30GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs Pentium G3430 |
$ 90.0 | ||||
349 | 2014 | Intel Pentium G3440 @ 3.30GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs Pentium G3440 |
$ 159.9 | ||||
350 | 2015 | Intel Pentium G4400 @ 3.30GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs Pentium G4400 |
$ 80.0 | ||||
351 | 2009 | AMD Athlon 7750 Dual-Core
>> compare FX-6200 vs Athlon 7750 |
$ 148. 7 | ||||
352 | 2009 | AMD Athlon II X2 215
>> compare FX-6200 vs Athlon II X2 215 |
$ 12.0 | ||||
353 | 2010 | AMD Athlon II X2 220
>> compare FX-6200 vs Athlon II X2 220 |
$ 32.2 | ||||
354 | 2009 | AMD Athlon II X2 240
>> compare FX-6200 vs Athlon II X2 240 |
$ 35.0 | ||||
355 | 2017 | AMD Athlon X4 950
>> compare FX-6200 vs Athlon X4 950 |
$ 60.0 | ||||
356 | 2012 | AMD FX-4300 Quad-Core
>> compare FX-6200 vs FX-4300 |
$ 53.4 | ||||
357 | 2008 | AMD Phenom 9750 Quad-Core
>> compare FX-6200 vs Phenom 9750 |
$ 60. 0 | ||||
358 | 2008 | AMD Phenom 9850 Quad-Core
>> compare FX-6200 vs Phenom 9850 |
$ 50.0 | ||||
359 | 2008 | Intel Core2 Duo E6600 @ 2.40GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs E6600 |
$ 15.0 | ||||
360 | 2014 | Intel Pentium G2140 @ 3.30GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs Pentium G2140 |
$ 50.0 | ||||
361 | 2009 | AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5800+
>> compare FX-6200 vs Athlon 64 X2 Dual 5800+ |
$ 25.0 | ||||
362 | 2008 | AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 6000+
>> compare FX-6200 vs Athlon 64 X2 Dual 6000+ |
$ 46.0 | ||||
363 | 2016 | AMD Athlon X4 880K
>> compare FX-6200 vs Athlon X4 880K |
$ 90. 0 | ||||
364 | 2013 | AMD FX-4200 Quad-Core
>> compare FX-6200 vs FX-4200 |
$ 228.2 | ||||
365 | 2010 | AMD Phenom 9450e Quad-Core
>> compare FX-6200 vs Phenom 9450e |
$ 105.0 | ||||
366 | 2008 | AMD Phenom 9550 Quad-Core
>> compare FX-6200 vs Phenom 9550 |
$ 40.0 | ||||
367 | 2009 | AMD Phenom 9600B Quad-Core
>> compare FX-6200 vs Phenom 9600B |
$ 147.2 | ||||
368 | 2008 | AMD Phenom 9650 Quad-Core
>> compare FX-6200 vs Phenom 9650 |
$ 55.0 | ||||
369 | 2009 | AMD Phenom II X3 705e
>> compare FX-6200 vs Phenom II X3 705e |
$ 152. 3 | ||||
370 | 2010 | Intel Core i3-560 @ 3.33GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i3-560 |
$ 30.0 | ||||
371 | 2008 | Intel Core2 Duo E4600 @ 2.40GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs E4600 |
$ 158.0 | ||||
372 | 2008 | Intel Core2 Duo E6550 @ 2.33GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs E6550 |
$ 15.0 | ||||
373 | 2014 | Intel Pentium G3240 @ 3.10GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs Pentium G3240 |
$ 80.0 | ||||
374 | 2008 | AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5200+
>> compare FX-6200 vs Athlon 64 X2 Dual 5200+ |
$ 53.1 | ||||
375 | 2008 | AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5400+
>> compare FX-6200 vs Athlon 64 X2 Dual 5400+ |
$ 53. 0 | ||||
376 | 2008 | AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5600+
>> compare FX-6200 vs Athlon 64 X2 Dual 5600+ |
$ 150.0 | ||||
377 | 2009 | AMD Athlon 7550 Dual-Core
>> compare FX-6200 vs Athlon 7550 |
$ 60.0 | ||||
378 | 2012 | AMD FX-4170 Quad-Core
>> compare FX-6200 vs FX-4170 |
$ 100.0 | ||||
379 | 2009 | AMD Phenom 8600 Triple-Core
>> compare FX-6200 vs Phenom 8600 |
$ 53.0 | ||||
380 | 2009 | AMD Phenom 8600B Triple-Core
>> compare FX-6200 vs Phenom 8600B |
$ 53.0 | ||||
381 | 2008 | AMD Phenom 8650 Triple-Core
>> compare FX-6200 vs Phenom 8650 |
$ 50. 0 | ||||
382 | 2008 | AMD Phenom 9500 Quad-Core
>> compare FX-6200 vs Phenom 9500 |
$ 60.0 | ||||
383 | 2008 | AMD Phenom 9600 Quad-Core
>> compare FX-6200 vs Phenom 9600 |
$ 50.0 | ||||
384 | 2009 | Intel Core2 Duo E6400 @ 2.13GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs E6400 |
$ 20.0 | ||||
385 | 2008 | Intel Core2 Duo E6420 @ 2.13GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs E6420 |
$ 50.0 | ||||
386 | 2008 | Intel Core2 Duo E4500 @ 2.20GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs E4500 |
$ 40.0 | ||||
387 | 2008 | Intel Core2 Quad Q6600 @ 2. 40GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs Q6600 |
$ 40.0 | ||||
388 | 2008 | Intel Core2 Quad Q8200 @ 2.33GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs Q8200 |
$ 23.0 | ||||
389 | 2013 | Intel Pentium G2130 @ 3.20GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs Pentium G2130 |
$ 50.0 | ||||
390 | 2013 | Intel Pentium G3220 @ 3.00GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs Pentium G3220 |
$ 120.0 | ||||
391 | 2008 | AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5200+
>> compare FX-6200 vs Athlon 64 X2 Dual 5200+ |
$ 53.1 | ||||
392 | 2008 | AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5400+
>> compare FX-6200 vs Athlon 64 X2 Dual 5400+ |
$ 53. 0 | ||||
393 | 2014 | AMD Athlon X4 860K
>> compare FX-6200 vs Athlon X4 860K |
$ 64.0 | ||||
394 | 2016 | AMD Athlon X4 870K
>> compare FX-6200 vs Athlon X4 870K |
$ 80.0 | ||||
395 | 2011 | AMD FX-4100 Quad-Core
>> compare FX-6200 vs FX-4100 |
$ 130.0 | ||||
396 | 2012 | AMD FX-4130 Quad-Core
>> compare FX-6200 vs FX-4130 |
$ 76.0 | ||||
397 | 2010 | Intel Core i3-550 @ 3.20GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i3-550 |
$ 180.0 | ||||
398 | 2008 | AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5000+
>> compare FX-6200 vs Athlon 64 X2 Dual 5000+ |
$ 331. 5 | ||||
399 | 2009 | AMD Athlon Dual Core 5000B
>> compare FX-6200 vs Athlon Dual 5000B |
$ 95.0 | ||||
400 | 2015 | AMD Athlon X4 840
>> compare FX-6200 vs Athlon X4 840 |
$ 78.7 | ||||
401 | 2011 | AMD E2-3200 APU
>> compare FX-6200 vs E2-3200 APU |
$ 8.0 | ||||
402 | 2008 | AMD Phenom 8450 Triple-Core
>> compare FX-6200 vs Phenom 8450 |
$ 30.0 | ||||
403 | 2009 | AMD Phenom 9350e Quad-Core
>> compare FX-6200 vs Phenom 9350e |
$ 3,382.1 | ||||
404 | 2009 | AMD Phenom X3 8550
>> compare FX-6200 vs Phenom X3 8550 |
$ 170. 0 | ||||
405 | 2010 | Intel Core i3-540 @ 3.07GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i3-540 |
$ 21.0 | ||||
406 | 2013 | Intel Pentium G2030 @ 3.00GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs Pentium G2030 |
$ 41.0 | ||||
407 | 2012 | Intel Pentium G2120 @ 3.10GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs Pentium G2120 |
$ 46.0 | ||||
408 | 2012 | Intel Pentium G870 @ 3.10GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs Pentium G870 |
$ 97.0 | ||||
409 | 2008 | AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5000+
>> compare FX-6200 vs Athlon 64 X2 Dual 5000+ |
$ 331.5 | ||||
410 | 2009 | AMD Athlon 5000 Dual-Core
>> compare FX-6200 vs Athlon 5000 |
$ 100. 0 | ||||
411 | 2010 | AMD Athlon 5200 Dual-Core
>> compare FX-6200 vs Athlon 5200 |
$ 30.0 | ||||
412 | 2008 | AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4600+
>> compare FX-6200 vs Athlon 64 X2 Dual 4600+ |
$ 360.0 | ||||
413 | 2008 | AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4800+
>> compare FX-6200 vs Athlon 64 X2 Dual 4800+ |
$ 460.0 | ||||
414 | 2009 | AMD Phenom 9150e Quad-Core
>> compare FX-6200 vs Phenom 9150e |
$ 40.0 | ||||
415 | 2008 | Intel Core2 Duo E4400 @ 2.00GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs E4400 |
$ 9.0 | ||||
416 | 2008 | Intel Core2 Duo E6320 @ 1. 86GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs E6320 |
$ 50.0 | ||||
417 | 2011 | Intel Pentium G860 @ 3.00GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs Pentium G860 |
$ 30.0 | ||||
418 | 2009 | AMD Athlon 5000 Dual-Core
>> compare FX-6200 vs Athlon 5000 |
$ 100.0 | ||||
419 | 2010 | AMD Athlon 5200 Dual-Core
>> compare FX-6200 vs Athlon 5200 |
$ 30.0 | ||||
420 | 2008 | AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4600+
>> compare FX-6200 vs Athlon 64 X2 Dual 4600+ |
$ 360.0 | ||||
421 | 2008 | AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4800+
>> compare FX-6200 vs Athlon 64 X2 Dual 4800+ |
$ 460. 0 | ||||
422 | 2010 | Intel Core i3-530 @ 2.93GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs i3-530 |
$ 20.0 | ||||
423 | 2013 | Intel Pentium G2020 @ 2.90GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs Pentium G2020 |
$ 32.9 | ||||
424 | 2011 | Intel Pentium G850 @ 2.90GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs Pentium G850 |
$ 30.0 | ||||
425 | 2008 | AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4200+
>> compare FX-6200 vs Athlon 64 X2 Dual 4200+ |
$ 130.0 | ||||
426 | 2008 | AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4400+
>> compare FX-6200 vs Athlon 64 X2 Dual 4400+ |
$ 60.0 | ||||
427 | 2009 | AMD Phenom 8250e Triple-Core
>> compare FX-6200 vs Phenom 8250e |
$ 47. 0 | ||||
428 | 2009 | AMD Phenom 9100e Quad-Core
>> compare FX-6200 vs Phenom 9100e |
$ 40.0 | ||||
429 | 2009 | Intel Core2 Duo E4300 @ 1.80GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs E4300 |
$ 158.0 | ||||
430 | 2008 | Intel Core2 Duo E6300 @ 1.86GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs E6300 |
$ 13.0 | ||||
431 | 2013 | Intel Pentium G2010 @ 2.80GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs Pentium G2010 |
$ 34.9 | ||||
432 | 2012 | Intel Pentium G645 @ 2.90GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs Pentium G645 |
$ 95.0 | ||||
433 | 2011 | Intel Pentium G840 @ 2. 80GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs Pentium G840 |
$ 35.0 | ||||
434 | 2008 | AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4200+
>> compare FX-6200 vs Athlon 64 X2 Dual 4200+ |
$ 130.0 | ||||
435 | 2008 | AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4400+
>> compare FX-6200 vs Athlon 64 X2 Dual 4400+ |
$ 60.0 | ||||
436 | 2012 | Intel Pentium G640 @ 2.80GHz
>> compare FX-6200 vs Pentium G640 |
$ 25.0 |
AMD FX-6200 vs AMD FX-6300: What is the difference?
Smartphone-graphic wire headphones
37 ballla
AMD FX-6200
40 BALLLA
AMD FX-6300
VS
64 Facts compared to
AMD FX-6200
AMD FX-6300 9000 9000 AMD FX Is 6200 better than AMD FX-6300?
- 8. 57% higher CPU speed?
6 x 3.8GHz vs 6 x 3.5GHz - 1.51x higher PassMark score?
6220 vs 4125
Why is AMD FX-6300 better than AMD FX-6200?
- 30W below TDP?
95W vs 125W - 1 newer PCI Express (PCIe) version?
3 vs 2 - 11.37% higher PassMark score (single)?
1479 vs 1328 - 7.6% higher PassMark result (overclocked)?
7536 vs 7004 - 17.0 higher performance per watt?
80.0 vs 63.0
Which comparisons are the most popular?
AMD FX-6200
vs
Intel Core i5-4570
AMD FX-6300
vs
Intel Core i5-3470
AMD FX-6200
vs
AMD FX-8320
AMD FX-6300
vs
Intel Core i5-4570
AMD FX-6200
vs
Intel Core i3-4130
AMD FX-6300
vs
Intel Core i5-7400
AMD FX-6200
VS
Intel Core i5-7500
AMD FX-6300
VS
Intel Core i7-3770
AMD FX-6200
VS 9000 ° Vs 9000 Core i3-6100
AMD FX-6300
VS
AMD Phenom II X4 955
AMD FX-6200
VS
Intel Core i5-3470
AMD FX-6300
VS
VS
AMD A8- 7600
AMD FX-6200
vs
AMD A6-7480
AMD FX-6300
VS
AMD FX-8350
AMD FX-6200
VS
AMD FX-8350
AMD FX-6300
9000 VS
AMD RyZen 5 3600
AMD FX-6200
VS
AMD Ryzen 5 5600x
AMD FX-6300
VS
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
AMD FX-6300
VS
9002 AMD Ryzen 3 32002
User reviews
7. 5 /10
2 votes
performance cores (processors). It is calculated by adding the clock speeds of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors, each group of cores.
2nd processor thread
More threads result in better performance and better multitasking.
3.speed turbo clock
4.1GHz
4.1GHz
When the processor is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.
4. Unlocked
✔AMD FX-6200
✔AMD FX-6300
Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier and can be easily overclocked for better performance in games and other applications.
5.L2 cache
More L2 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
6.L3 cache
More L3 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
7.L1 cache
More L1 cache results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
8.core L2
1MB/core
1MB/core
More data can be stored in L2 scratchpad for access by each processor core.
9.core L3
1.33MB/core
1.33MB/core
More data can be stored in the L3 scratchpad for access by each processor core.
Memory
1.RAM speed
1866MHz
1866MHz
Can support faster memory which speeds up system performance.
2.max memory bandwidth
21GB/s
21GB/s
This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.
3rd DDR memory version
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-6200)
DDR (Double Data Rate Synchronous Dynamic Random Access Memory) is the most common type of main memory. New versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy efficient.
4.Memory channels
More memory channels increase the speed of data transfer between memory and processor.
5.max memory
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-6200)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-6300)
Maximum amount of memory (RAM).
6.baud rate bus
5.4GT/s
5.4GT/s
The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.
7.Supports memory error recovery code
✖AMD FX-6200
✖AMD FX-6300
Memory error recovery code can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.
8.eMMC version
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-6200)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-6300)
The newer version of eMMC — built-in flash memory card — speeds up the memory interface, has a positive effect on device performance, for example, when transferring files from a computer to internal memory via USB.
9.bus frequency
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-6200)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-6300)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device
Geotagging
1. PassMark result
This benchmark measures CPU performance using multithreading.
2. PassMark result (single)
This test measures processor performance using a thread of execution.
3.Geekbench 5 result (multi-core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-6200)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-6300)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures multi-core processor performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)
4.Cinebench R20 result (multi-core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-6200)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-6300)
Cinebench R20 is a benchmark that measures the performance of a multi-core processor by rendering a 3D scene.
5.Cinebench R20 result (single core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-6200)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-6300)
Cinebench R20 is a test to evaluate the performance of a single core processor when rendering a 3D scene.
6.Geekbench 5 result (single core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-6200)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-6300)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures the single-core performance of a processor. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)
7. Blender test result (bmw27)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-6200)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-6300)
The Blender benchmark (bmw27) measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.
8.Blender result (classroom)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-6200)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-6300)
The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.
9.performance per watt
This means that the processor is more efficient, giving more performance per watt of power used.
Features
1.uses multi-threading
✖AMD FX-6200
✖AMD FX-6300
processor into logical cores, also known as threads. Thus, each core can run two instruction streams at the same time.
2. Has AES
✔AMD FX-6200
✔AMD FX-6300
AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.
3. Has AVX
✔AMD FX-6200
✔AMD FX-6300
AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial applications, and to improve the performance of the Linux RAID program.
4.Version SSE
SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing images or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.
5. Has F16C
✔AMD FX-6200
✔AMD FX-6300
F16C is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting image contrast or adjusting volume.
6.bits transmitted at the same time
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-6200)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-6300)
NEON provides faster media processing such as MP3 listening.
7. Has MMX
✔AMD FX-6200
✔AMD FX-6300
MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting image contrast or adjusting volume.
8. TrustZone enabled
✖AMD FX-6200
✖AMD FX-6300
Technology is integrated into the processor to ensure device security when using features such as mobile payments and digital rights management (DRM) video streaming .
9.interface width
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-6200)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-6300)
The processor can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), which means the processor performs better
Price comparison
Cancel
Which CPUs are better?
This page is currently only available in English.
Comparison of AMD FX-6300 and AMD FX-6200
Comparative analysis of AMD FX-6300 and AMD FX-6200 processors according to all known characteristics in the categories: General information, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals, Technologies, Virtualization.
Analysis of processor performance by benchmarks: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
AMD FX-6300
versus
AMD FX-6200
Benefits
Reasons to choose AMD FX-6300
- Newer processor, 8 month(s) difference in release dates
- Approximately 15°C higher max core temperature: 61. 10°C
- About 32% less power consumption: 95 Watt vs 125 Watt
- PassMark — Single thread mark about 7% more performance: 1489vs 1398
- About 2% more performance in PassMark — CPU mark benchmark: 4176 vs 4079
- About 3% more performance in Geekbench 4 — Single Core benchmark: 527 vs 513
- Performance in CompuBench 1.5 — FaceDetection Desktop Detection benchmark (mPixels/s) about 13% more: 6.905 vs 6.114
- Performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) about 3% more: 16.195 vs 15.71
- Performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T -Rex (Frames/s) about 5% more: 0.339vs 0.324
- About 1% more performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s): 0.85 vs 0.845
- About 38% more performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 4.767 vs 3.445
Release date | October 2012 vs February 2012 |
Maximum core temperature | 70. 50°C vs 61.10°C |
Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt vs 125 Watt |
PassMark — Single thread mark | 1489 vs 1398 |
PassMark — CPU mark | 4176 vs 4079 |
Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 527 vs 513 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.905 vs 6.114 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 16.195 vs 15.71 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.339 vs 0.324 |
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.85 vs 0.845 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.767 vs 3.445 |
Reasons to choose AMD FX-6200
- CPU unlocked, unlocked multiplier makes it easy to overclock
- About 8% more clock speed: 4.1 GHz vs 3.8 GHz
- About 1% more performance in Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core benchmark: 1934 vs 1914
7Unlocked Unlocked / Locked Maximum frequency 4.1 GHz vs 3.8 GHz Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core 1934 vs 1914 Benchmark comparison
CPU 1: AMD FX-6300
CPU 2: AMD FX-6200PassMark — Single thread mark CPU 1 CPU 2 PassMark — CPU mark CPU 1 CPU 2 Geekbench 4 — Single Core CPU 1 CPU 2 Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core CPU 1 CPU 2 CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) CPU 1 CPU 2 CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) CPU 1 CPU 2 16.195 CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) CPU 1 CPU 2 CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) CPU 1 CPU 2 CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) CPU 1 CPU 2 Name AMD FX-6300 AMD FX-6200 PassMark — Single thread mark 1489 1398 PassMark — CPU mark 4176 4079 Geekbench 4 — Single Core 527 513 Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core 1914 1934 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score 2098 CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) 6.905 6.114 CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 16.195 15.71 CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.339 0.324 CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) 0.85 0.845 CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 4.767 3.445 Feature comparison
AMD FX-6300 AMD FX-6200 Architecture name Vishera Zambezi Family AMD FX-Series Processors AMD FX-Series Processors Issue date October 2012 February 2012 OPN PIB FD6300WMHKBOX FD6200FRGUBOX OPN Tray FD6300WMW6KHK FD6200FRW6KGU Place in the ranking 1981 2075 Price now $58. 99 $339.95 Series AMD FX 6-Core Black Edition Processors AMD FX 6-Core Black Edition Processors Price/performance ratio (0-100) 31.81 5.31 Applicability Desktop Desktop Support 64 bit Base frequency 3.5 GHz 3.8 GHz Crystal area 315 mm 315 mm Level 1 cache 288KB 288KB Level 2 cache 6MB 6MB Level 3 cache 8MB 8MB Process 32nm SOI 32nm SOI Maximum core temperature 70. 50°C 61.10°C Maximum frequency 3.8 GHz 4.1 GHz Number of cores 6 6 Number of threads 6 6 Voltage P0 Vcore Min: 1.15V — Max: 1.3875V Min: 1.3 V — Max: 1.4125 V Number of transistors 1200 million 1200 million Unlocked Supported memory frequency 1866 MHz 1866 MHz Supported memory types DDR3 DDR3 Maximum number of processors per configuration 1 1 Supported sockets AM3+ AM3+ Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 125 Watt PCI Express 9 revision0605 3. 0 n/a Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) Intel® AES New Instructions AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) AMD FX-6200 SIX-Core or AMD FX-6300
- Main page
- >
- Processors
- >
- Comparison
- >
- AMD FX-6200 SIX-COR
Family
- FX-6100
Compare - FX-6120 SIX-Core
Compare - FX-6300
Compare - FX-6350 SIX-Core
FAMILY 9002The speed of caches and working with RAM is also important.
Speed in office use
FX-6200 Six-Core
54.3
FX-6300
55.2 (+1.6%)
Performance in everyday work such as browsers and office programs.
The performance of 1 core has the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications use only one, ignoring the rest.
Similarly, many professional applications such as various CADs ignore multi-threaded performance.
Speed in heavy applications
FX-6200 Six-Core
29.9
FX-6300
29.9
Performance in resource-intensive tasks loading a maximum of 8 cores.
The performance of all cores and their number has the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications willingly use all the cores and increase the speed accordingly.
At the same time, certain periods of work can be demanding on the performance of one or two cores, for example, applying filters in the editor.
Data obtained from tests by users who tested their systems with and without overclocking. Thus, you see the average values corresponding to the processor.
Speed of numerical operations
Simple household tasks
FX-6200 Six-Core
46.5
FX-6300
47.2 (+1.5%)
Demanding games and tasks
FX-6200 Six-Core
23.7 (+1.3%)
FX-6300
23.4
Extreme
FX-6200 Six-Core
5.6 (+1.8%)
FX-6300
5.5
Different tasks require different CPU strengths. A system with few fast cores and low memory latency will be fine for the vast majority of games, but will be inferior to a system with a lot of slow cores in a rendering scenario.
We believe that a minimum of 4/4 (4 physical cores and 4 threads) processor is suitable for a budget gaming PC. At the same time, some games can load it at 100%, slow down and freeze, and performing any tasks in the background will lead to a drop in FPS.
Ideally, the budget shopper should aim for a minimum of 4/8 and 6/6. A gamer with a big budget can choose between 6/12, 8/8 and 8/16. Processors with 10 and 12 cores can perform well in games with high frequency and fast memory, but are overkill for such tasks. Also, buying for the future is a dubious undertaking, since in a few years many slow cores may not provide sufficient gaming performance.
When choosing a processor for your work, consider how many cores your programs use. For example, photo and video editors can use 1-2 cores when working with filtering, and rendering or converting in the same editors already uses all threads.
Data obtained from tests by users who tested their systems both with overclocking (maximum value in the table) and without (minimum). A typical result is shown in the middle, the more filled in the color bar, the better the average result among all tested systems.
Characteristics
The data is not yet filled in, therefore the tables may lack information or existing functions may be omitted.
Basic
Manufacturer AMD AMD DescriptionInformation about the processor, taken from the official website of the manufacturer. ArchitectureCode name for the microarchitecture generation. Process The manufacturing process, measured in nanometers. The smaller the technical process, the more perfect the technology, the lower the heat dissipation and power consumption. No data No data Date of Issue The month and year the processor was released. 10-2016 10-2015 Model Official name. Cores The number of physical cores. 3 6 ThreadsNumber of threads. The number of logical processor cores that the operating system sees. 6 6 Multi-Threading Technology With Intel’s Hyper-threading and AMD’s SMT technology, one physical core is recognized by the operating system as two logical cores, thereby increasing processor performance in multi-threaded applications. SMT (note that some games may not work well with SMT, for maximum FPS, you can disable the technology in the BIOS of the motherboard). Missing Base frequencyGuaranteed frequency of all processor cores at maximum load. Performance in single-threaded and multi-threaded applications and games depends on it. It is important to remember that speed and frequency are not directly related. For example, a new processor at a lower frequency may be faster than an old one at a higher one. 3.8 GHz 3.5 GHz Turbo Frequency The maximum frequency of a single processor core in turbo mode. Manufacturers allow modern processors to independently increase the frequency of one or more cores under heavy load, due to which performance is noticeably increased. It may depend on the nature of the load, the number of loaded cores, temperature and the specified limits. Significantly affects the speed in games and applications that are demanding on the frequency of the CPU. 3.85 No data L3 cache size The third level cache acts as a buffer between the computer’s RAM and the processor’s level 2 cache. Used by all cores, the speed of information processing depends on the volume. No data No data Instructions Extended instruction set Allows you to speed up calculations, processing and execution of certain operations. Also, some games require instruction support. Embedded Options Available Two housing versions. Standard and designed for mobile devices. In the second version, the processor can be soldered on the motherboard. No No Bus frequency The speed of communication with the system. Number of QPI links TDPThermal Design Power is an indicator that determines heat dissipation in standard operation. The cooler or water cooling system must be rated for a larger value. Remember that with a factory bus or manual overclocking, TDP increases significantly. No data No data Cooling system specifications Video core
Integrated graphics core Allows you to use your computer without a discrete graphics card. The monitor is connected to the video output on the motherboard. If earlier integrated graphics made it possible to simply work at a computer, today it can replace budget video accelerators and makes it possible to play most games at low settings. GPU base clockFrequency in 2D and idle. No data No data Maximum GPU frequencyMaximum 3D frequency. No data No data Intel® Wireless Display (Intel® WiDi) Supports Wireless Display technology using the Wi-Fi 802.11n standard. Thanks to it, a monitor or TV equipped with the same technology does not require a cable to connect. Supported monitorsThe maximum number of monitors that can be connected to the integrated video core at the same time. RAM
Maximum amount of RAMThe amount of RAM that can be installed on the motherboard with this processor. No data No data Supported type of RAM The type of RAM depends on its frequency and timings (speed), availability, price. RAM Channels The multi-channel memory architecture increases data transfer speed. On desktop platforms, two-channel, three-channel and four-channel modes are available. RAM bandwidth ECC memory Support for error-correcting memory, which is used in servers. Usually more expensive than usual and requires more expensive server components. However, second-hand server processors, Chinese motherboards and ECC memory sticks, which are sold relatively cheaply in China, have become widespread. No data No data PCI
PCI-E Computer bus version of PCI Express. The bandwidth and power limit depend on the version. There is backward compatibility. No data No data PCI configuration options
Number of PCI lanes No data Data Security
AES-NI The AES command set extension speeds up applications that use appropriate encryption. No data No data Intel® Secure Key An RDRAND instruction that allows you to create a high performance random number generator. No data No data Decoration
Dimensions No data No data Supported sockets No data No data Maximum processors per motherboard No data No data Which is better
AMD FX-6200 Six-Core
- In complex multi-threaded applications, faster and outperforms by 0%.
- Price lower by $40
- Base clock higher by 0.3 GHz.
AMD FX-6300
- 1% faster performance in office applications and browsers.
- The number of physical cores is 3 more.
What are the similarities
- Game performance is about the same.
- The number of threads is equal.
Comparison AMD FX-6300 vs Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 which is better?
Home / Processor / AMD FX-6300 VS Intel Xeon E5-2670 V3
AMD FX-6300
6%
Devicelist
VS
Intel Xeon E5-2670 V3
6%
Assess
We compared the specifications of AMD FX-6300 and Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 and compiled a list of advantages and a comparison table for you. Find out which one to choose in 2022.
AMD FX-6300 Benefits
Maximum frequency
3.8 GHz
0.7 GHz (22.6%) better than
vs
3. 1 GHz
Value for money
95.1%
88.5% (1340.9%) better than
vs
6.6%
Maximum core temperature
71°C
-14°C (-16.5%) better than
vs
85 °C
Power Demand (TDP)
95 W
-25 W (-20.8%) better than
vs
120 W
Benefits of Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3
Comparison winner
Core
12
6 (100%) better than
vs
6
Threads
24
18 (300%) better than
vs
6
Process
22 nm
-10 nm (-31. 2%) better than
vs
32 nm
Number of transistors
4700 million
4699 million (469900%) better than
vs
1 million
Passmark
12901
8764 (211.8%) better than
vs
4137
General Type
Desktop Server Architecture code name
Vishera Haswell Cores
A large number of cores improves performance in multi-threaded applications.
At the moment, increasing the number of processor cores is one of the priorities for increasing performance.6 12 6 (100%) better than
Threads
More threads help the cores process information more efficiently. Real performance will be noticeable in very specific tasks (video editing, databases).
6 24 18 (300%) better than
Base frequency
3.5GHz n/a Process
32 nm 22 nm -10 nm (-31.2%) better than
Chip size
315 mm2 306.18 mm2 Number of transistors
1 million 4700 million 4699 million (469900%) better than
Maximum frequency
Higher clock speed processors perform more calculations per second and thus provide better performance.
3.8GHz At 0.7 GHz (22.6%) better than
3.1GHz Support 64 bit
Max. number of processors per configuration
1 2 Socket
AM3+ FCLGA2011-3 AMD-V
Series
n/a Intel Xeon E5 Release price
n/a 1589 $ Value for money
The sum of all the advantages of the device divided by its price. The more%, the better the quality per unit price in comparison with all analogues.
95.1% 88.5% (1340.9%) better than
6.6% Tire
n/a 2 × 9.6 GT/s Maximum core temperature
71 °C -14 °C (-16.5%) better than
85°C vPro
TXT
Intel Trusted Execution Technology for hardware-based malware protection. For each protected program, the processor allocates its own isolated section of RAM.
Revision PCI Express
3.0 3.0 Number of PCI-Express lanes
n/a 40 Demand Based Switching
n/a + PAE
n/a 46 bit Secure Key
OS Guard
n/a + Flex Memory Access
n/a — FMA
+ + Voltage P0 Vcore
Min: 1. 15 V — Max: 1.3875 V n/a Level 1 Cache
The fastest level of cache that works directly with the core. The larger the cache, the better the performance.
288 Kb n/a Level 2 cache
6144 KB 3 Mb Level 3 cache
8192 KB 30 Mb Power Demand (TDP)
The calculated heat output indicates the average heat dissipation during load operation,
the larger the value, the more the requirements for cooling and power consumption increase.95W -25 W (-20.8%) better than
120 W EDB
n/a + Permissible core voltage
n/a 0. 65V–1.3V Benchmarks Passmark
4137 12901 8764 (211.8%) better than
3DMark Fire Strike Physics
4900 n/a Technology and additional instructions Extended instructions
n/a Intel® AVX2 Turbo Boost
n/a 2.0 Idle States
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)
Technology from Intel that allows the processor to slow down to a minimum frequency to save power when the processor is idle.
Thermal Monitoring
Hyper-Threading
Hardware technology from Intel that allows multiple threads to be processed on each processor core. For server applications, the performance improvement is up to 30%.
AES-NI
Technology from Intel that speeds up the AES encryption process.
+ + AVX
The presence of AVX instructions improves performance in floating point and processor-intensive operations
applications.RAM options DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133 Allowable Memory
The maximum amount of RAM that can be used with this processor.
n/a 768 GB Number of memory channels
n/a 4 ECC memory support
EEC memory is designed specifically for systems with high requirements for data processing reliability.
This type of memory automatically recognizes errors that occur. Commonly used in server computers.Virtualization technologies EPT
VT-d
Intel virtualization technology allows you to forward devices on the PCI bus to the guest operating system so that it can work with them using its standard tools.
AMD FX-6300
Integrated Graphics Top specifications and features
- PassMark CPU score
- Heat dissipation (TDP)
- Technological process
- Number of transistors
- Number of Cores
PassMark CPU
AMD FX-6300 score:
3868
Best score:
89379Test results for
AMD FX-6300:
30294
Best score:
AMD FX-6300 technologies:
500
Best score:
Performance
AMD FX-6300:
3761
Best score:
Memory specification
AMD FX-6300:
897
Best score:
Description
AMD FX-6300 processor runs at 3. 5 Hz. At the same time, the maximum frequency in Boost mode reaches 3.8 Hz. 6 cores available. The L1 cache is 288 KB, L2 6 MB and L3 6 MB. Power consumption at peak times can reach 95 watts.
The maximum number of threads that AMD FX-6300 can handle is 6.
AMD FX-6300 works on 32nm architecture. Total number of transistors 1200 million
Regarding memory specification. The AMD FX-6300 processor supports DDR3. The frequency of the RAM is 1866. The maximum memory bandwidth is 21.
If we talk about the integrated graphics AMD FX-6300, then the Discrete Graphics Card Required core is installed here.
Now about the AMD FX-6300 tests. According to PassMark, the processor scored 3868 of the possible points. Based on the analysis of more than 4000 processors, AMD FX-6300 ranked 1216 in the ranking of the best.
Why the AMD FX-6300 is better than others
- 32 nm process technology. This parameter is lower than that of 45%
- Number of cores 6 . This parameter is higher than that of 71%
- L2 cache size 6 MB. This parameter is higher than that of 66%
- PassMark CPU score 3868 . This parameter is lower than that of 23%
- Thermal Dissipation (TDP) 95 W. This parameter is higher than that of 73%
- Number of transistors 1200 million. This parameter is lower than that of 21%
- Number of threads 6 . This parameter is lower than 41%
- L1 cache size 288 KB. This parameter is lower than that of 19%
AMD FX-6300 Review
Test results
Technology
Performance
Memory specification
Interfaces and communications
Main characteristics
AMD FX-6300 Review: Highlights
PassMark CPU scoreThe PassMark benchmark considers read speed, write speed, and seek time when testing SSD performance.
Show all3868
max 89379
Average: 6033. 5
89379
AESYes
Number of threadsThe more threads, the higher the performance of the processor, and it will be able to perform several tasks at the same time.
Show all6
max 256
Average: 10.7
256
L1 cache sizeA large amount of L1 memory accelerates results in the CPU and system performance settings
Show all288KB
max 4608
Average: 299.3 KB
4608KB
L2 Cache SizeL2 cache with large scratchpad memory to increase processor speed and overall system performance.
Show all6MB
max 512
Average: 4. 5 MB
512MB
L3 cache sizeLarge amount of L3 memory accelerates results in CPU and system performance settings
Show all8MB
max 768
Average: 16.3 MB
768MB
Maximum Turbo Clock Speed When the processor’s speed drops below its limit, it can jump to a higher clock speed to improve performance.
Show all3.8GHz
max 5.5
Average: 3.2 GHz
5.5GHz
Number of cores6
max 72
Mean: 5.8
72
Processor base clock speed3.5GHz
max 4. 7
Average: 2.5 GHz
4.7GHz
Unlocked CPU multiplierSome processors have an unlocked multiplier, thanks to which they work faster and improve the quality in games and other applications.
Show allNo
Graphics SystemDiscrete Graphics Card Required
Max. number of processors in the configurationone
Mean: 1.3
8
DDR Version3
Mean: 3.5
5
Max. memory bandwidthThis is the speed at which the device stores or reads information.
21GB/s
max 352
Average: 41. 4 GB/s
352GB/s
Memory frequencyThe RAM can be faster to improve system performance.
Show all1866 MHz
max 4800
Average: 2106.2 MHz
4800MHz
System bus frequencyData between computer components and other devices is transferred via the bus.
Show all5.4 GT/s
max 1600
Average: 156.1 GT/s
1600 GT/s
Intel® AES-NI CommandsAES is required to speed up encryption and decryption.
Yes
AVXAVX allows you to increase the speed of calculations in multimedia, financial and scientific applications, it also improves the performance of Linux RAID.
Show allYes
Version sseAllows you to speed up multimedia tasks (such as adjusting the sound intensity). Each subsequent version has a number of improvements
Show all4.2
max 4.2
Mean: 4.1
4.2
SocketAM3+
Manufacturing processThe small size of the semiconductor means it is a new generation chip.
32 nm
Average: 36.8 nm
5nm
Number of transistorsThe higher their number, the more processor power it indicates
1200 million
max 57000
Average: 1517. 3 million
57000 million
Heat Dissipation (TDP)The Heat Dissipation Requirements (TDP) is the maximum amount of energy that can be dissipated by the cooling system. The lower the TDP, the less power will be consumed.
Show all95W
Average: 67.6 W
0.025W
PCI Express Revision3
Mean: 2.9
5
LineAMD FX-Series Processors
Maximum processor temperatureIf the maximum temperature at which the processor operates is exceeded, a reset may occur.
Show all70.5°C
max 110
Average value: 96 °C
110°C
CodenameVishera
AppointmentBoxed Processor
FAQ
How fast is the AMD FX-6300 5600X?
The processor runs at 3. 5 GHz.
How many cores does the AMD FX-6300 have?
6 cores.
Does the AMD FX-6300 have integrated graphics?
Discrete Graphics Card Required
What RAM does AMD FX-6300 support
AMD FX-6300 supports DDR3.
What is the socket of AMD FX-6300
AMD FX-6300 is installed using AM3+.
Is the AMD FX-6300 multiplier unlocked?
No
How does the AMD FX-6300 processor perform in benchmarks?
According to PassMark, the AMD FX-6300 scored 3868 points.
What is the frequency of the AMD FX-6300 processor?
AMD FX-6300 processor runs at 3.5 Hz.
What is the maximum frequency of the AMD FX-6300 processor?
In this case, the maximum frequency in Boost mode reaches 3.8 Hz.
How much cache is the AMD FX-6300?
L1 cache size is 288 KB, L2 6 MB and L3 6 MB.
How many watts does the AMD FX-6300 consume?
Power consumption at peak times can be up to 95 watts.
leave your feedback
RX 470 with FX-6300 references in Ultra quality quality settings
Compare with
Select..AMD Radeon HD 6850 — RUB 13,052AMD Radeon HD 6870 — RUB 13,052AMD Radeon HD 6950 — RUB 16,398AMD Radeon HD 6970 — ₽ 19,611amd Radeon HD 6990 — ₽ 45,847AMD Radeon HD 7750 — ₽ 9,183AMD Radeon HD 7750M — ₽ 56,276AMD Radeon HD 7790 — ₽ 9,773AMD RADEON HD 7850 — ₽ 16,332AMD RADEON HD 7850M — ₽ 63,29.29.29.29.29.29.29.29.29.29. — Rs. 9,773AMD Radeon HD 7950M — Rs. 67,099AMD Radeon HD 7970 — Rs. 19,611AMD Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition — Rs. Radeon R5 — RUB 46,569AMD Radeon R5 — RUB 45,979AMD Radeon R7 250 — RUB 6,231AMD Radeon R7 265 — RUB 97733AMD Radeon R7 370 — ₽ 13,249AMD Radeon R9 270 — ₽ 18,037AMD Radeon R9 280 — ₽ 22,957AMD RADEON R9 280X — ₽ 22.957AMD Radeon R9 285 — ₽ 24,924AMD RADEON R9 290 — ₽ 20.3.333AMD RADEN AMD Radeon R9 295×2 — ₽ 98,319AMD Radeon R9 380 — ₽ 19,611amd Radeon R9 380x — ₽ 15.020AMD RADEON R9 390 — ₽ 30,4999AMD RADEON R9 390X — ₽ 32,467AMD RADEON R9 Fury — ₽ 36. 009.009.009.009AM AMD Radeon R9 M270X — RUB 66,639AMD Radeon R9 M280X — RUB 70,181AMD Radeon R9 M280X 2GB — RUB 70,181AMD Radeon R9M290X — £79,298AMD Radeon R9 M380 — RUB 70,444AMD Radeon R9 Nano — RUB 100,287AMD Radeon RX 460 — RUB 9,183AMD Radeon RX 470 Mobile — RUB 78,905AMD Radeon RX 480 — RUB 26,1708AMD Radeon RX 482 Mobile RX 540 Mobile — RUB 42,306AMD Radeon RX 550 — RUB 4,854AMD Radeon RX 550 Mobile — RUB 60,540AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 4GB — RUB 11,085AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 8GB — RUB 13,052AMD Radeon RX 550X Mobile 560 — RUB 6,493AMD Radeon RX 560 Mobile — RUB 64,737AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT — RUB 18,300AMD Radeon RX 560X Mobile — RUB 42,043AMD Radeon RX 560X Mobile 2GB — RUB 64,737AMD Radeon RX 570 — RUB680 Mobile 8 AMD Radeon RX 5700 — RUB 22.891AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT — RUB 26,170 AMD Radeon RX 580 — RUB 9,904 AMD Radeon RX 580 Mobile — RUB 85,726AMD Radeon RX 580X Mobile — RUB 85,726 XT — RUB 31,418AMD Radeon RX 6800 — RUB 37,977AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT — RUB 42,568AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT — RUB 65,524AMD Radeon RX VEGA 10 — RUB 41,453AMD Radeon RX VEGA 3 — RX VEGA AMD 37. 1 73,395AMD Radeon RX VEGA 8 — RUB 39,420AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 — RUB 17,644AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 Mobile — RUB 103,567AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 — RUB 27,482AMD Radeon VII — RUB 43,552ATI Radeon HD 4870 — RUB 19,611NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 — ₽ 5,182NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 — ₽ 5,182NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 — ₽ 13,052NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 — ₽ 8,461NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q — ₽ 84,086NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile — ₽ 49,193NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 2GB — ₽ 69,657NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti — ₽ 8,461NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q — ₽ 83,299NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile — ₽ 57,457NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB — ₽ 11,150NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB — ₽ 10,429 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q — RUB 77,724NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile — RUB 64,737NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 — RUB 21,579NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q — Rs. 72,543NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile — Rs. 102,255NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti — Rs. 121,801NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti — ₽ 52,931NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 — ₽ 9,773NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q — ₽ 81,266NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile — ₽ 75,494NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER — ₽ 10,494NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 — ₽ 14,430NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER — RUB 15,020NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti — RUB 18,300NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q — RUB 77,724NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile — RUB 115,307NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 — RUB 29,450NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 — ₽ 19,611NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280 — ₽ 42,568NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 — ₽ 16,332NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470 — ₽ 19,611NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 — ₽ 32,729NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti — ₽ 13,052NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 — ₽ 10,035NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti — ₽ 14,430NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 — ₽ 22,891NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 — ₽ 26,170NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590 — ₽ 45,847NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 — ₽ 3,214NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti — ₽ 4,198NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost — $11,085NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 — $5,182NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti — $19,611NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M — ₽ 64,737NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 — ₽ 5,182NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M — ₽ 69,394NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670MX — ₽ 69,394NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 — ₽ 31,811NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M — ₽ 71,034NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 — ₽ 28,794 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti — ₽ 18,300NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 — ₽ 20,989NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M — ₽ 67,951NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 — ₽ 11,741NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M — ₽ 72,149NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 — ₽ 23,285NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti — ₽ 26,892NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M — ₽ 76,216NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M — ₽ 76,216NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 — ₽ 5,838NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 — ₽ 5,838NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M — ₽ 69,919NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 — ₽ 29,450NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M — ₽ 81,922NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M 6GB — ₽ 81,922NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 — ₽ 16,332NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Mobile — ₽ 88,219NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti — ₽ 40,600NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M — ₽ 88,219NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980MX — ₽ 88,219NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN — ₽ 42,634NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK — ₽ 65,524NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X — ₽ 72,083 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 — $22. 891NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile — ₽ 72,411NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER — ₽ 26,236NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 — ₽ 30,762NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q — ₽ 99,434NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile — ₽ 113,077NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER — ₽ 32,729NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 — ₽ 45,454NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q — ₽ 116,226NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile — ₽ 127,376NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER — ₽ 45,847NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti — ₽ 77,855NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 — ₽ 13,118NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti — $16,332NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 — $21,579NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti — ₽ 26,170NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 — ₽ 32,729NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti — ₽ 39,288NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 — ₽ 45,847NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti — ₽ 52,406NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 — ₽ 98,319NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 — ₽ 13,118NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 — ₽ 21,579NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti — ₽ 26,170NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 — ₽ 32,729NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 — ₽ 45,847NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Ti — ₽ 52,406NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 — ₽ 98,319NVIDIA TITAN RTX — $163,909NVIDIA TITAN V — $196,704NVIDIA TITAN Xp — RUB 78,642Change CPU to
Select. .AMD Athlon 5000 Dual-Core — RUB 6555.7AMD Athlon 5200 Dual-Core — RUB 1967AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4200+ — RUB 8523.4 — RUB 23609.1AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4800+ — RUB 30168.1AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5000+ — RUB 21742.4AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5200+ — RUB 3482.2AMD Athlon 64 X4 Dual Core 6DAM56 5400+ — RUB 3482.2AMD Athlon 64 X4 Dual Core 5400+ X2 Dual Core 5600+ — RUB 9835.2AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5800+ — RUB 1639.1AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 6000+ — RUB 3013.9AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 6400+ — RUB 17050.1AMD Athlon 7550 Dual-Core — RUB 3935.4 AMD Athlon Dual Core 5000B — $ 6231.1AMD Athlon II X2 215 — $ 786.4AMD Athlon II X2 220 — $ 2111.3 II X2 255 — RUB 4277.8AMD Athlon II X2 260 — RUB 1311.1AMD Athlon II X2 265 — RUB 5436.1AMD Athlon II X2 270 — RUB 1573.5AMD Athlon II X2 B22 — RUB 2358AMD Athlon II X2AMD II2 X20. — ₽ 3217.2AMD Athlon II X3 425 — ₽ 6835.1AMD Athlon II X3 435 — ₽ 3278.8AMD Athlon II X3 440 — ₽ 3079.5AMD ATHLON II X3 445 — ₽ 5968.7AMD athlon II X3 450 — ₽ 2622. 9AMD ATHLON II X3 455 — ₽ 7664.2AMD ATHLON II X3 460 — ₽ 3278.8AMD ATHO X4 620 — ₽ 3932.1AMD ATHLON 28 Athlon II X4 631 Quad-Core — $ 5247.2AMD Athlon II X4 635 — $ 4588AMD Athlon II X4 640 — $ 5243.9AMD Athlon II X4 641 Quad-Core — $ 6001.5 — ₽ 18168.4AMD Athlon X4 760K Quad Core — ₽ 3017.1AMD Athlon X4 840 — ₽ 5164.6AMD Athlon X4 845 — ₽ 3278.8AMD Athlon X4 860K — ₽ 4196.4AMD ATHLON X4 870K — ₽ 5246.5AMD Athlon X4 880K — ₽ 5902.4AMD ATHLON X4 950 — ₽ 3934.7AMD E2-3200 APU — ₽ 524.1AMD FX -4100 Quad -Core — ₽ 8526AMD FX -4130 QUAD -₽ 4984. FX-4170 Quad-Core — RUB 6558.3AMD FX-4200 Quad-Core — RUB 14968.3AMD FX-4300 Quad-Core — RUB 3501.9AMD FX-4350 Quad-Core — RUB 8526AMD FX-6200 Six-Core — RUB 22297.3FX -6300 Six-Core — RUB 3869.2AMD FX-6350 Six-Core — RUB 8526AMD FX-8120 Eight-Core — RUB 6558.3AMD FX-8150 Eight-Core — RUB 25153.8AMD FX-8300 Eight-Core — RUB 5285.9AMD 8320 Eight-Core — ₽ 5214.4AMD FX-8320E Eight-Core — ₽ 6484.9AMD FX-8350 Eight-Core — RUB 5246.5 AMD FX-8370 Eight-Core — RUB 8853. 3AMD FX-8370E Eight-Core — RUB 11805.5 Phenom 8250e Triple-Core — ₽ 3082.1AMD Phenom 8450 Triple-Core — ₽ 1964.4AMD Phenom 8600 Triple-Core — ₽ 3475.6AMD Phenom 8600B Triple-Core — ₽ 3475.6AMD Phenom 8650 Triple-Core — ₽ 3278.8AMD Phenom 9100e Quad-Core — ₽ 2620.3AMD Phenom 9150e Quad-Core — ₽ 2620.3AMD Phenom 9350e Quad-Core — ₽ 221830AMD Phenom 9450e Quad-Core — ₽ 6887AMD Phenom 9500 Quad-Core — ₽ 3934.7AMD Phenom 9550 Quad-Core — ₽ 2620.3AMD Phenom 9600 Quad-Core — ₽ 3276.2AMD Phenom 9600B Quad-Core — ₽ 9654.2AMD Phenom 9650 Quad-Core — ₽AMD-Core 360 ₽ 3932.1AMD Phenom 9850 Quad -Core — ₽ 3279.5AMD Phenom 9950 Quad -Core — ₽ 11804.9AMD Phenom II X2 545 — ₽ 2884.6AMD Phenom II X2 550 — ₽ 3278.8AMD PHENOM II X2 555 — ₽ 9323AMD PEN 1967AMD Phenom II X2 B550.6AMD Phenom II X3 B73 — ₽ 4919.3AMD Phenom II X4 805 — ₽ 11412AMD Phenom II X4 810 — ₽ 7607.8AMD Phenom II X4 820 — ₽ 4916AMD Phenom II X4 840 — ₽ 5899.8AMD Phenom II X4 905E — ₽ 13 905E — ₽ 13 910 — ₽ 65559AMD Phenom II X4 910e — ₽ 10297AMD Phenom II X4 920 — ₽ 4393. 9AMD Phenom II X4 925 — ₽ 10493.7AMD Phenom II X4 940 — ₽ 7870.1AMD PHENOM II X4 945 — ₽ 3278.8AMD Phenomd Phenomd Phenomd Phenomd Phenomd Phenomd Phenomd Phenomd Phenomd Phenomd Phenomd Phenomd Phenomd Phenomd Phenomd Phenomd AMD Phenom II X4 960T — RUB 8854AMD Phenom II X4 965 — RUB 3902.6AMD Phenom II X4 B95 — RUB 4784.8AMD Phenom II X4 B97 — ₽ 5899.8AMD Phenom II X6 1035T — ₽ 12396.5AMD Phenom II X6 1045T — ₽ 11478.3AMD Phenom II X6 1055T — ₽ 12134.2AMD Phenom II X6 1075T — ₽ 17052.7AMD PHENOM II X6 1090T — ₽ 259978.90T — ₽ 259978.90T ₽ 13117.3AMD Phenom X3 8550 — ₽ 11147AMD RYZEN 3 1200 — ₽ 6230.4AMD RYZEN 3 1300X — ₽ 8198.1AMD RYZEN 3 2200G — ₽ 6427.2AMD RYZEN 3 3100 — ₽ 5903.1AMD RYZEN 3 3200G — ₽ 6493.4AMD RYZEN 3300 — AMD Ryzen 5 1400 — $ 8789.1AMD Ryzen 5 1500X — $ 9503.3AMD Ryzen 5 1600 — $ 10165.8AMD Ryzen 5 1600X — $ 11701.3837.8AMD RYZEN 5 2600X — ₽ 13773.2AMD RYZEN 5 3400G — ₽ 9837.8AMD RYZEN 5 3500 — ₽ 9707.3AMD RYZEN 5 3500X — ₽ 10527.2AMD RYZEN 5 3600 — ₽ 13052.4AMD RYZEN 5 3600X — ₽ 16331. AMD RYZEN 5 5600X — ₽ 19611.4AMD RYZEN 7 1700 — ₽ 12461.4AMD RYZEN 7 1700X — ₽ 13117.3AMD RYZEN 7 1800X — ₽ 16396.8AMD RYZEN 7 2700 — ₽ 16347AMD RYZEN 7 2700X — ₽ 20004.3AMD RYZEN 7, 3700X — ₽ ₽ ₽ ¦ 3800X — RUB 26170.4AMD Ryzen 7 5700X — RUB 19676.3AMD Ryzen 7 5800X — RUB 26170.4AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D — RUB 29514.8AMD Ryzen 9 3900X — ₽ 32729.4AMD Ryzen 9 3950X — ₽ 49192.5AMD Ryzen 9 5900X — ₽ 32729.4AMD Ryzen 9 5950X — ₽ 46568.9AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X — ₽ 22955.8AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X — ₽ 27547.1AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X — ₽ 44600.5 AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X — ₽ 59030.3AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX — ₽ 112814.1Intel Core i3-10100 — ₽ 8002Intel Core i3-10300 — ₽ 9379.4Intel Core i3-11100 — ₽ 8002Intel Core i3-11300 — ₽ 9379.4Intel Core i3-12100 — ₽ 8002Intel Core i3-12300 — ₽ 9379.4Intel Core i3-2100 @ 3.10GHz — ₽ 3934.7Intel Core i3-2102 @ 3.10GHz — RUB 3804.2Intel Core i3-2105 @ 3.10GHz — RUB 5246.5Intel Core i3-2120 @ 3.30GHz — RUB 1967.7Intel Core i3-2125 @ 3.30GHz — RUB 13052. 4Intel Core0 @ 3.40GHz — $ 4590.6Intel Core i3-3210 @ 3.20GHz — $ 6558.3Intel Core i3-3220 @ 3.30GHz — $ 2289.1Intel Core i3-3225 @ 3.30GHz — $ 6558.3 Intel Core i3-3245 @ 3.40GHz — $ 5246.5 Intel Core i3-3250 @ 3.50GHz — $ 6230.4 Intel Core i3-4130 @ 3.40GHz — $ 9181.9 3.60GHz — ₽ 9181.9Intel Core i3-4170 @ 3.70GHz — Rs. 9837.8Intel Core i3-4330 @ 3.50GHz — Rs. 11805.5Intel Core i3-4340 @ 3.60GHz — Rs. @ 3.70GHz — $18361.9Intel Core i3-4370 @ 3.80GHz — $29513.5Intel Core i3-530 @ 2.93GHz — $1311.8Intel Core i3-540 @ 3.07GHz — $1377.4Intel Core i3-550 @ 3.20GHz — $1377.4 Intel Core i3-560 @ 3.33GHz — RUB 1966.4Intel Core i3-6098P @ 3.60GHz — RUB 8772Intel Core i3-6100 @ 3.70GHz — RUB 10895.2Intel Core i3-6300 @ 3.80GHz — RUB 9Intel Core i3-7320 @ 3.90GHz Intel Core i3-8100 @ 3.60GHz — RUB 8526 i3-9100F @ 3.60GHz — $ 6886.3Intel Core i3-9320 @ 3.70GHz — $ 10625.6Intel Core i3-9350KF @ 4.00GHz — $ 14691.537.4Intel Core i5-10600K — $15533.7Intel Core i5-11400 — $11937.4Intel Core i5-11600K — $17184. 6Intel Core i5-12400 — $9379.4Intel Core i5-12600K — $19.05GHz ₽ 5246.5Intel Core i5-2310 @ 2.90GHz — ₽ 5245.9Intel Core i5-2320 @ 3.00GHz — ₽ 12806.4Intel Core i5-2380P @ 3.10GHz — ₽ 5902.4Intel Core i5-2400 @ 3.10GHz — ₽ tel5 Core508.9 2400S @ 2.50GHz — RUB 4309.3 Intel Core i5-2405S @ 2.50GHz — RUB 10783 Intel Core i5-2450P @ 3.20GHz — RUB 5902.4 Intel Core i5-2500 @ 3.30GHz — RUB 6886.3 Intel Core i5-2500S @ 2.70GHz — ₽ 4918.6Intel Core i5-2550K @ 3.40GHz — Rs. 8526Intel Core i5-3330 @ 3.00GHz — Rs. 6558.3Intel Core i5-3330S @ 2.70GHz — Rs. 2.80GHz — $ 9837.8 Intel Core i5-3350P @ 3.10GHz — $ 11149.6 Intel Core i5-3450 @ 3.10GHz — $ 8394.9 Intel Core i5-3470S @ 2.90GHz — RUB 9188.5 Intel Core i5-3475S @ 2.90GHz — RUB 9412.2 GHz — ₽ 9Intel Core [email protected] @ 3.10GHz — $ 11149.6 Intel Core i5-4440S @ 2.80GHz — $ 30366.2 Intel Core i5-4460 @ 3.20GHz — $ 11149.6 Intel Core i5-4460S @ 2.90GHz — $ 43288.7 Intel Core i5-4570S @ 2.90GHz — RUB 14536.7 Intel Core i5-4590 @ 3.30GHz — RUB 12133. 5 Intel Core i5-4590S @ 3.00GHz — RUB 12986.2 3.40GHz — ₽ 16396.8Intel Core i5-4670R @ 3.00GHz — Rs. 18102.8Intel Core i5-4690 @ 3.50GHz — Rs. 13117.3Intel Core i5-4690K @ 3.50GHz — Rs. @ 3.10GHz — $ 26235.3 Intel Core i5-6400 @ 2.70GHz — $ 13117.3 Intel Core i5-6402P @ 2.80GHz — $ 12461.4 Intel Core i5-650 @ 3.20GHz — $ 6558.3 Intel Core i5-655K @ 3.20GHz — RUB 3934.7 Intel Core i5-660 @ 3.33GHz — RUB 3213.9 Intel Core i5-6600 @ 3.30GHz — RUB 14429.148.3Intel Core i5-661 @ 3.33GHz — Rs. 6558.3Intel Core i5-670 @ 3.47GHz — Rs. 5902.4Intel Core i5-680 @ 3.60GHz — Rs. @ 2.67GHz — $ 10527.2 Intel Core i5-7500 @ 3.40GHz — $ 13773.2 Intel Core i5-760 @ 2.80GHz — $ 6558.3 Intel Core i5-7600 @ 3.50GHz — $ 15739.6 Intel Core i5-7640X @ 4.00GHz — $16396.8 Intel Core i5-8400 @ 2.80GHz — $13117.3Intel Core i5-8500 @ 3.00GHz — $15676 GHz — ₽ 24770.1Intel Core i5-9400 @ 2.90GHz — $ 11149.6Intel Core i5-9400F @ 2.90GHz — $ 11149.6Intel Core i5-9600K @ 3.70GHz — $ 18364.5 i7-11700K — $ 26891.9Intel Core i7-12700K — $ 30826. 6Intel Core i7-2600 @ 3.40GHz — $ 9837.2 -2700K @ 3.50GHz — $13117.3Intel Core i7-3770 @ 3.40GHz — $11740Intel Core i7-3770K @ 3.50GHz — $16330.6Intel Core i7-3770S @ 3.10GHz — $13117.3Intel Core i7-3820 13117.3Intel Core i7-3930K @ 3.20GHz — RUB 26169.1Intel Core i7-3960X @ 3.30GHz — RUB 52471.3Intel Core i7-3970X @ 3.50GHz — RUB 62572.2Intel Core i7-4770 @ 3.40GHz — RUB 15740.9Intel Core i7-4770K 20tel Core135 3.20GHz — RUB 22470.5 Intel Core i7-4820K @ 3.70GHz — RUB 32794.3 Intel Core i7-4930K @ 3.40GHz — RUB 26169.1514.8Intel Core i7-5820K @ 3.30GHz — RUB 19676.3Intel Core i7-5930K @ 3.50GHz — RUB 32728.1Intel Core i7-5960X @ 3.00GHz — RUB 50503.6Intel Core i7-6700 @ 3.40GHz — RUB 28444 Intel Core i7-6800K @ 3.40GHz — RUB 27547.1 Intel Core i7-6850K @ 3.60GHz — RUB 36073.8 Intel Core i7-7700 @ 3.60GHz — RUB 21325.3 Intel Core i7-7700K @ 4.20GHz — RUB 23283.8 Intel Core i7-7740X @ 4.30GHz — RUB 22890.3 GHz — ₽ 60998Intel Core i7-8086K @ 4.00GHz — Rs. 36268.6Intel Core i7-860 @ 2.80GHz — Rs. 19017.8Intel Core i7-860S @ 2.53GHz — Rs. 3.20GHz — RUB 29810Intel Core i7-8700K @ 3.70GHz — RUB 24261.1Intel Core i7-875K @ 2.93GHz — RUB 13117.3Intel Core i7-880 @ 3.07GHz — RUB 38239Intel Core i7-920 @ 2.67GHz — RUB 38239Intel Core i7-920 @ 2.67GHz — RUB 12. -930 @ 2.80GHz — RUB 3934.7 Intel Core i7-940 @ 2.93GHz — RUB 4637.2 Intel Core i7-950 @ 3.07GHz — RUB 16069.6 Intel Core i7-960 @ 3.20GHz — RUB 6558.365 @ 3.20GHz — $ 9181.9Intel Core i7-970 @ 3.20GHz — $ 9837.2Intel Core i7-9700 @ 3.00GHz — $ 21644 Intel Core i7-975 @ 3.33GHz — RUB 11805.5 Intel Core i7-980 @ 3.33GHz — RUB 13116.7 Intel Core i7-980X @ 3.33GHz — RUB 14428.5 ₽ 38698.1Intel Core i9-11900K — ₽ 32007.9Intel Core i9-12900K — ₽ 38697.4Intel Core i9-7900X @ 3.30GHz — ₽.5Intel Core i9-7920X @ 2.90GHz — $ 71932.6 Intel Core i9-7940X @ 3.10GHz — $ 78191.2 Intel Core i9-7960X @ 2.80GHz — $ 131179.3 i9-9900K @ 3.60GHz — ₽ 54767Intel Core2 Duo E4300 @ 1.80GHz — ₽ 10359.9Intel Core2 Duo E4400 @ 2. 00GHz — ₽ 587Intel Core2 Duo E4500 @ 2.20GHz — ₽ 2622.9Intel Core2 Duo E4600 @ 2.40GHz — ₽ 10359.9Intel Core2 Duo E4700 @ 2.60GHz — ₽ 6559Intel Core2 Duo E6300 @ 1.86GHz — ₽ 852Intel Core2 Duo E6320 @ 1.86GHz — ₽ 3278.8Intel Core2 Duo E6400 @ 2.13GHz — ₽ 1308.5Intel Core2 Duo E6420 @ 2.13GHz — ₽ 3278.8Intel Core2 Duo E6550 @ 2.33GHz — ₽ 980.6Intel Core2 Duo E6600 @ 2.40GHz — ₽ 983.2Intel Core2 Duo E6700 @ 2.66GHz — ₽ 1967Intel Core2 Duo E6750 @ 2.66GHz — ₽ 849.4Intel Core2 Duo E6850 @ 3.00GHz — ₽ 3278.8Intel Core2 Duo E7200 @ 2.53GHz — ₽ 4919.3 Intel Core2 Duo E7300 @ 2.66GHz — $1311.1 Intel Core2 Duo E7400 @ 2.80GHz — $1901.5 Intel Core2 Duo E7500 @ 2.93GHz — $ 983.2 Intel Core2 Duo E8300 @ 2.83GHz — RUB 1311.1Intel Core2 Duo E8400 @ 3.00GHz — RUB 642.1Intel Core2 Duo E8500 @ 3.16GHz — RUB 2622.9Intel Core2 Duo E8600 @ 3.33GHz — ₽ 3278.8Intel Core2 Extreme Q6800 @ 2.93GHz — ₽ 73788.8Intel Core2 Extreme Q6850 @ 3.00GHz — ₽ 98119.4Intel Core2 Extreme X6800 @ 2.93GHz — ₽ 17292.1Intel Core2 Extreme X9650 @ 3. 00GHz — ₽ 59621.3 Intel Core2 Extreme X9770 @ 3.20GHz — ₽ 105531Intel Core2 Extreme X9775 @ 3.20GHz — ₽ 118452.3Intel Core2 Quad Q6600 @ 2.40GHz — ₽ 2622.3Intel Core2 Quad Q6700 @ 2.66GHz — ₽ 2950.9Intel Core2 Quad Q8200 @ 2.33GHz — ₽ 1507.9Intel Core2 Quad Q8300 @ 2.50GHz — RUB 3278.8Intel Core2 Quad Q8400 @ 2.66GHz — RUB 6526.2Intel Core2 Quad Q9300 @ 2.50GHz — ₽ 3278.8Intel Core2 Quad Q9400 @ 2.66GHz — ₽ 2228.7Intel Core2 Quad Q9450 @ 2.66GHz — ₽ 21972.7Intel Core2 Quad Q9500 @ 2.83GHz — ₽ 2295Intel Core2 Quad Q9505 @ 2.83GHz — ₽ 12462.1Intel Core2 Quad Q9550 @ 2.83GHz — ₽ 3213.3Intel Core2 Quad Q9650 @ 3.00GHz — ₽ 4576.9Intel Pentium G2010 @ 2.80GHz — ₽ 2288.4Intel Pentium G2020 @ 2.90GHz — ₽ 2155.3Intel Pentium G2030 @ 3.00GHz — ₽ 2688.5Intel Pentium G2120 @ 3.10GHz — ₽ 3016.5Intel Pentium G2130 @ 3.20GHz — ₽ 3278.8Intel Pentium G2140 @ 3.30GHz — ₽ 3278.8Intel Pentium G3220 @ 3.00GHz — ₽ 7867.5Intel Pentium G3240 @ 3.10GHz — ₽ 5246.5Intel Pentium G3250 @ 3.20GHz — ₽ 7214.2Intel Pentium G3258 @ 3.