Amd fx 6300 vs: AMD FX-6300 vs Intel Core i5-4670K

AMD FX-6300 vs AMD Ryzen 5 3450U Benchmarks, Specs, Performance Comparison and Differences








AMD FX-6300 vs AMD Ryzen 5 3450U

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the AMD FX-6300 on one side and the AMD Ryzen 5 3450U on the other side. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, It has 6 cores, 6 threads, a maximum frequency of 3,8GHz. The second is used on the notebook segment, it has a total of 4 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 3,5 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values ​​obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.

Specification comparison:

Processor

AMD FX-6300

AMD Ryzen 5 3450U
Market (main)

Desktop

Notebook
ISA

x86-64 (64 bit)

x86-64 (64 bit)
Microarchitecture

Piledriver

Zen+
Core name

Vishera

Picasso
Family

FX-6000

Ryzen 5 3000
Part number(s), S-Spec

FD6300WMW6KHK,

FD6300WMHKBOX

YM3450C4T4MFG


Release date

Q4 2012

Q4 2020
Lithography

32 nm SOI

12 nm
Transistors

1. 200.000.000


Cores

6

4
Threads

6

8
Base frequency

3,5 GHz

2,1 GHz
Turbo frequency

3,8 GHz

3,5 GHz
Cache memory

8 MB

4 MB
Max memory capacity

32 GB

32 GB
Memory types

DDR3-1866

DDR4-2400


Max # of memory channels

2

2
Max memory bandwidth

29,9 GB/s

35,76 GB/s
Max PCIe lanes

16

12
TDP

95 W

15 W
Suggested PSU

600W ATX Power Supply

GPU integrated graphics

None

AMD Radeon Vega 8 (Picasso)
GPU cores

8
GPU shading units

512
GPU base clock

300 MHz
GPU boost clock

1200 MHz
GPU FP32 floating point

1. 229 GFLOPS
Socket

AM3+

FP5
Compatible motherboard

Socket AM3+ Motherboard 


Maximum temperature

70.5°C

105°C
CPU-Z single thread

223

380
CPU-Z multi thread

1.022

1.465
PassMark single thread

1.471

1.980
PassMark CPU Mark

4.124

6.866
(Windows 64-bit)
Geekbench 4 single core

2.518

2. 351
(Windows 64-bit)
Geekbench 4 multi-core

8.133

8.147
(SGEMM)
GFLOPS performance

67,2 GFLOPS

80,9 GFLOPS
(Multi-core / watt performance)
Performance / watt ratio

86 pts / W

543 pts / W
Amazon


eBay


Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.

Suggested PSU: We assume that we have An ATX computer case, a high end graphics card, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, a 1TB HDD hard drive, a Blu-Ray drive. We will have to rely on a more powerful power supply if we want to have several graphics cards, several monitors, more memory, etc.

Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

The processor AMD FX-6300 has more cores, the maximum frequency of AMD FX-6300 is greater, that the thermal dissipation power of AMD Ryzen 5 3450U is less. The AMD Ryzen 5 3450U was started more recently.

Performance comparison with the benchmarks:

Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.





CPU-Z — Multi-thread & single thread score
AMD Ryzen 5 3450U

380

1. 465
AMD FX-6300

223

1.022

In single core, the difference is 70%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 43%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.





PassMark — CPU Mark & single thread
AMD Ryzen 5 3450U

1.980

6.866
AMD FX-6300

1. 471

4.124

In single core, the difference is 35%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 66%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.

On Windows 64-bit:





Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows 64-bit
AMD Ryzen 5 3450U

2.351

8.147
AMD FX-6300

2.518

8. 133

In single core, the difference is 7%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 0%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.

Equivalence:

AMD FX-6300 Intel equivalentAMD Ryzen 5 3450U Intel equivalent

AMD FX-6300 vs AMD FX-8300


Comparative analysis of AMD FX-6300 and AMD FX-8300 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization.
Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

AMD FX-6300

Buy on Amazon


vs

AMD FX-8300

Buy on Amazon

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD FX-6300

  • Around 2% better performance in Geekbench 4 — Single Core: 527 vs 518


Geekbench 4 — Single Core 527 vs 518

Reasons to consider the AMD FX-8300

  • Processor is unlocked, an unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
  • 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 8 vs 6
  • 2 more threads: 8 vs 6
  • Around 11% higher clock speed: 4. 2 GHz vs 3.8 GHz
  • Around 33% more L1 cache; more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
  • Around 33% more L2 cache; more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
  • Around 26% better performance in PassMark — CPU mark: 5287 vs 4182
  • Around 21% better performance in Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core: 2318 vs 1914
  • Around 29% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score: 2697 vs 2087
  • Around 28% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s): 8.817 vs 6.905
  • Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 19.41 vs 16.195
  • Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.397 vs 0.339
  • Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s): 0.995 vs 0.85
  • Around 26% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 5.999 vs 4.767
















Unlocked Unlocked vs Locked
Number of cores 8 vs 6
Number of threads 8 vs 6
Maximum frequency 4. 2 GHz vs 3.8 GHz
L1 cache 384 KB vs 288 KB
L2 cache 8 MB vs 6 MB
PassMark — Single thread mark 1491 vs 1486
PassMark — CPU mark 5287 vs 4182
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core 2318 vs 1914
3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score 2697 vs 2087
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) 8.817 vs 6.905
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 19. 41 vs 16.195
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.397 vs 0.339
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) 0.995 vs 0.85
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 5.999 vs 4.767

Compare benchmarks


CPU 1: AMD FX-6300
CPU 2: AMD FX-8300











PassMark — Single thread mark

CPU 1
CPU 2


PassMark — CPU mark

CPU 1
CPU 2


Geekbench 4 — Single Core

CPU 1
CPU 2


Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core

CPU 1
CPU 2


3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score

CPU 1
CPU 2


CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s)

CPU 1
CPU 2


CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

CPU 1
CPU 2

16.195


CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s)

CPU 1
CPU 2


CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s)

CPU 1
CPU 2


CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

CPU 1
CPU 2













Name AMD FX-6300 AMD FX-8300
PassMark — Single thread mark 1486 1491
PassMark — CPU mark 4182 5287
Geekbench 4 — Single Core 527 518
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core 1914 2318
3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score 2087 2697
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) 6.905 8.817
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 16.195 19.41
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.339 0.397
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) 0.85 0.995
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 4.767 5.999

Compare specifications (specs)































AMD FX-6300 AMD FX-8300
Architecture codename Vishera Vishera
Family AMD FX-Series Processors AMD FX-Series Processors
Launch date October 2012 October 2012
OPN PIB FD6300WMHKBOX FD8300WMHKBOX
OPN Tray FD6300WMW6KHK FD8300WMW8KHK
Place in performance rating 2253 2117
Price now $58. 99 $80.59
Series AMD FX 6-Core Black Edition Processors AMD FX 8-Core Black Edition Processors
Value for money (0-100) 31.81 28.21
Vertical segment Desktop Desktop
64 bit support
Base frequency 3.5 GHz 3.3 GHz
Die size 315 mm 315 mm
L1 cache 288 KB 384 KB
L2 cache 6 MB 8 MB
L3 cache 8 MB 8 MB
Manufacturing process technology 32 nm SOI 32 nm SOI
Maximum core temperature 70. 50°C 70.50°C
Maximum frequency 3.8 GHz 4.2 GHz
Number of cores 6 8
Number of threads 6 8
P0 Vcore voltage Min: 1.15 V — Max: 1.3875 V Min: 1.075 V — Max: 1.2875 V
Transistor count 1200 million 1200 million
Unlocked
Supported memory frequency 1866 MHz 1866 MHz
Supported memory types DDR3 DDR3
Max number of CPUs in a configuration 1 1
Sockets supported AM3+ AM3+
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 95 Watt 95 Watt
PCI Express revision 3.

2024 © All rights reserved