Amd fx 9 series: AMD FD9590FHHKWOF FX-9590 8-core 4.7 GHz Socket AM3+ 220W Black Edition Desktop Processor : Electronics

AMD FX-8350 vs AMD Ryzen 9 3950X: What is the difference?

47points

AMD FX-8350

75points

AMD Ryzen 9 3950X

Comparison winner

vs

66 facts in comparison

AMD FX-8350

AMD Ryzen 9 3950X

Why is AMD FX-8350 better than AMD Ryzen 9 3950X?

  • 0.5MB/core more L2 cache per core?
    1MB/corevs0.5MB/core
  • Has NX bit?
  • Has FMA4?

Why is AMD Ryzen 9 3950X better than AMD FX-8350?

  • 1.75x faster CPU speed?
    16 x 3.5GHzvs8 x 4GHz
  • 1334MHz higher ram speed?
    3200MHzvs1866MHz
  • 24 more CPU threads?
    32vs8
  • 34°C higher maximum operating temperature?
    95°Cvs61°C
  • 25nm smaller semiconductor size?
    7nmvs32nm
  • 0.5GHz higher turbo clock speed?
    4.7GHzvs4.2GHz
  • 20W lower TDP?
    105Wvs125W
  • 6. 59x higher PassMark result?
    39068vs5926

Which are the most popular comparisons?

AMD FX-8350

vs

AMD Ryzen 5 3600

AMD Ryzen 9 3950X

vs

AMD Ryzen 9 5950X

AMD FX-8350

vs

Intel Core i7-3770

AMD Ryzen 9 3950X

vs

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

AMD FX-8350

vs

Intel Core i7-4770

AMD Ryzen 9 3950X

vs

AMD Ryzen 9 5900X

AMD FX-8350

vs

Intel Core i7-4770K

AMD Ryzen 9 3950X

vs

AMD Ryzen 9 3900X

AMD FX-8350

vs

Intel Core i7-4790K

AMD Ryzen 9 3950X

vs

AMD Ryzen 5 5600X

AMD FX-8350

vs

AMD Ryzen 5 5600G

AMD Ryzen 9 3950X

vs

AMD Ryzen 7 5800X

AMD FX-8350

vs

AMD Ryzen 5 5600X

AMD Ryzen 9 3950X

vs

Intel Core i9-12900K

AMD FX-8350

vs

AMD FX-9590

AMD Ryzen 9 3950X

vs

AMD Ryzen 7 3700X

AMD FX-8350

vs

AMD Ryzen 5 5500U

AMD Ryzen 9 3950X

vs

Intel Core i9-9900K

AMD FX-8350

vs

AMD Ryzen 3 3200G

AMD Ryzen 9 3950X

vs

Intel Core i9-10900K

Price comparison

Cheap alternatives

User reviews

Overall Rating

AMD FX-8350

5 User reviews

AMD FX-8350

9. 8/10

5 User reviews

AMD Ryzen 9 3950X

2 User reviews

AMD Ryzen 9 3950X

10.0/10

2 User reviews

Features

Value for money

9.6/10

5 votes

8.5/10

2 votes

Gaming

9.6/10

5 votes

9.0/10

2 votes

Performance

9.2/10

5 votes

10.0/10

2 votes

Reliability

9.6/10

5 votes

10.0/10

2 votes

Energy efficiency

8.6/10

5 votes

10.0/10

2 votes

Performance

CPU speed

8 x 4GHz

16 x 3.5GHz

The CPU speed indicates how many processing cycles per second can be executed by a CPU, considering all of its cores (processing units). It is calculated by adding the clock rates of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors employing different microarchitectures, of each group of cores.

CPU threads

More threads result in faster performance and better multitasking.

turbo clock speed

4.2GHz

4.7GHz

When the CPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased performance.

Has an unlocked multiplier

✔AMD FX-8350

✔AMD Ryzen 9 3950X

Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier which makes them easy to overclock, allowing you to gain increased performance in games and other apps.

L2 cache

A larger L2 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.

L3 cache

A larger L3 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.

L1 cache

1536KB

A larger L1 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.

L2 core

1MB/core

0.5MB/core

More data can be stored in the L2 cache for access by each core of the CPU.

L3 core

1MB/core

4.5MB/core

More data can be stored in the L3 cache for access by each core of the CPU.

Benchmarks

PassMark result

This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using multiple threads.

PassMark result (single)

This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using a single thread.

Geekbench 5 result (multi)

Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s multi-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2023)

Cinebench R20 (multi) result

Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s multi-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.

Cinebench R20 (single) result

Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s single-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.

Geekbench 5 result (single)

Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s single-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2023)

Blender (bmw27) result

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD FX-8350)

90.8seconds

The Blender (bmw27) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.

Blender (classroom) result

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD FX-8350)

270.7seconds

The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.

performance per watt

This means the CPU is more efficient, giving a greater amount of performance for each watt of power used.

Integrated graphics

OpenCL version

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD FX-8350)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 9 3950X)

Some apps use OpenCL to apply the power of the graphics processing unit (GPU) for non-graphical computing. Newer versions introduce more functionality and better performance.

Memory

RAM speed

1866MHz

3200MHz

It can support faster memory, which will give quicker system performance.

maximum memory bandwidth

21GB/s

47.68GB/s

This is the maximum rate that data can be read from or stored into memory.

DDR memory version

DDR (Double Data Rate) memory is the most common type of RAM. Newer versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy-efficient.

memory channels

More memory channels increases the speed of data transfer between the memory and the CPU.

maximum memory amount

The maximum amount of memory (RAM) supported.

bus transfer rate

5.4GT/s

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 9 3950X)

The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.

Supports ECC memory

✖AMD FX-8350

✔AMD Ryzen 9 3950X

Error-correcting code memory can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when is it essential to avoid corruption, such as scientific computing or when running a server.

eMMC version

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD FX-8350)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 9 3950X)

A higher version of eMMC allows faster memory interfaces, having a positive effect on the performance of a device. For example, when transferring files from your computer to the internal storage over USB.

bus speed

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD FX-8350)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 9 3950X)

The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.

Features

uses multithreading

✖AMD FX-8350

✔AMD Ryzen 9 3950X

Multithreading technology (such as Intel’s Hyperthreading or AMD’s Simultaneous Multithreading) provides increased performance by splitting each of the processor’s physical cores into virtual cores, also known as threads. This way, each core can run two instruction streams at once.

Has AES

✔AMD FX-8350

✔AMD Ryzen 9 3950X

AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.

Has AVX

✔AMD FX-8350

✔AMD Ryzen 9 3950X

AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial apps, as well as improving Linux RAID software performance.

SSE version

SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing an image or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.

Has F16C

✔AMD FX-8350

✔AMD Ryzen 9 3950X

F16C is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.

bits executed at a time

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD FX-8350)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 9 3950X)

NEON provides acceleration for media processing, such as listening to MP3s.

Has MMX

✔AMD FX-8350

✔AMD Ryzen 9 3950X

MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.

Has TrustZone

✖AMD FX-8350

✖AMD Ryzen 9 3950X

A technology integrated into the processor to secure the device for use with features such as mobile payments and streaming video using digital rights management (DRM).

front-end width

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD FX-8350)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 9 3950X)

The CPU can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), meaning that the CPU performs better

Price comparison

Which are the best CPUs?

CPU Benchmarks: Comparing the AMD FX-9590

by Ian Cutresson August 9, 2014 8:00 AM EST

  • Posted in
  • CPUs
  • AMD
  • ASRock
  • Motherboards
  • 990FX
  • FX-9590
  • AM3+

146 Comments
|

146 Comments

AMD’s 5 GHz CPU in Retail: The FX-9590 and ASRock 990FX Extreme9 ReviewASRock 990FX Extreme9 Overview, Visual Inspection, Board FeaturesASRock 990FX Extreme9 BIOS and SoftwareASRock 990FX Extreme9 In The Box, Overclocking2014 Test Setup and System BenchmarksCPU Benchmarks: Comparing the AMD FX-9590CPU Benchmarks: Comparing the ASRock 990FX Extreme9Gaming BenchmarksAMD FX-9590 and ASRock 990FX Extreme9 Conclusions


The dynamics of CPU Turbo modes, both Intel and AMD, can cause concern during environments with a variable threaded workload. There is also an added issue of the motherboard remaining consistent, depending on how the motherboard manufacturer wants to add in their own boosting technologies over the ones that Intel would prefer they used. In order to remain consistent, we implement an OS-level unique high performance mode on all the CPUs we test which should override any motherboard manufacturer performance mode.


It is worth noting that the FX-9590, against the A10-7850K for example, has double the threads and +1 GHz of core speed, despite the generational gap. Considering only these factors, the FX-9590 is most likely similar if not better at single threaded performance, but also 2x for multithreaded results.


HandBrake v0.9.9: link


For HandBrake, we take two videos (a 2h30 640×266 DVD rip and a 10min double UHD 3840×4320 animation short) and convert them to x264 format in an MP4 container. Results are given in terms of the frames per second processed, and HandBrake uses as many threads as possible.


The eight threads of the FX-9590 give it almost another third of performance over the A10-7850K for small frame videos and nearly 2x for the larger frame conversion.


Agisoft Photoscan – 2D to 3D Image Manipulation: link


Agisoft Photoscan creates 3D models from 2D images, a process which is very computationally expensive. The algorithm is split into four distinct phases, and different phases of the model reconstruction require either fast memory, fast IPC, more cores, or even OpenCL compute devices to hand. Agisoft supplied us with a special version of the software to script the process, where we take 50 images of a stately home and convert it into a medium quality model. This benchmark typically takes around 15-20 minutes on a high end PC on the CPU alone, with GPUs reducing the time.


The FX-9590 puts in the best AMD CPU performance, similar to that of the i5-2500K.


Dolphin Benchmark: link


Many emulators are often bound by single thread CPU performance, and general reports tended to suggest that Haswell provided a significant boost to emulator performance. This benchmark runs a Wii program that raytraces a complex 3D scene inside the Dolphin Wii emulator. Performance on this benchmark is a good proxy of the speed of Dolphin CPU emulation, which is an intensive single core task using most aspects of a CPU. Results are given in minutes, where the Wii itself scores 17.53 minutes.


The FX-9590 beats almost everything pre-Haswell, showing the strength of a 5.0 GHz turbo mode. Note that it compares to the 3.5 GHz, 4MB L3 cache Haswell, which is 1.5 GHz slower and has half the L3.


WinRAR 5.0.1: link


PCMark8 v2 OpenCL on R7 240


A new addition to our CPU testing suite is PCMark8 v2, where we test the Work 2.0 and Creative 3.0 suites in OpenCL mode.


Hybrid x265


Hybrid is a new benchmark, where we take a 4K 1500 frame video and convert it into an x265 format without audio. Results are given in frames per second.


The FX-9590 holds up very well in the Hybrid x265 conversion, which makes me wonder how well an 8-thread Kaveri CPU would perform.


Cinebench R15


The FX-9590 still has the single thread edge over the newer AMD CPUs due to the high frequency, but is easily overtaken by the modern cheap Intel CPUs. For multithreaded competition, the 8 threads needs an 8 threaded Intel CPU to compete.


3D Particle Movement


3DPM is a self-penned benchmark, taking basic 3D movement algorithms used in Brownian Motion simulations and testing them for speed. High floating point performance, MHz and IPC wins in the single thread version, whereas the multithread version has to handle the threads and loves more cores.


Although the FX-9590 again performs as the best AMD CPU, the floating point nature of the calculations in this test seems not to be favored by this architecture.


FastStone Image Viewer 4.9


FastStone is the program I use to perform quick or bulk actions on images, such as resizing, adjusting for color and cropping. In our test we take a series of 170 images in various sizes and formats and convert them all into 640×480 .gif files, maintaining the aspect ratio. FastStone does not use multithreading for this test, and results are given in seconds.


Similarly to 3DPM, for basic photo conversion any base 3.2 GHz Haswell CPU can outperform a 5.0 GHz AMD.

2014 Test Setup and System Benchmarks
CPU Benchmarks: Comparing the ASRock 990FX Extreme9
AMD’s 5 GHz CPU in Retail: The FX-9590 and ASRock 990FX Extreme9 ReviewASRock 990FX Extreme9 Overview, Visual Inspection, Board FeaturesASRock 990FX Extreme9 BIOS and SoftwareASRock 990FX Extreme9 In The Box, Overclocking2014 Test Setup and System BenchmarksCPU Benchmarks: Comparing the AMD FX-9590CPU Benchmarks: Comparing the ASRock 990FX Extreme9Gaming BenchmarksAMD FX-9590 and ASRock 990FX Extreme9 Conclusions

Tweet

PRINT THIS ARTICLE

List table of all AMD socket AM3+ FX processors — Features, specifications, prices

kaban@fxeon Processors 27 comments

AM3+ processors:

  • AMD FX-9000 series (8 cores)
  • AMD FX-8000 series (8 cores)
  • AMD FX-6000 series (6 cores)
  • AMD FX-4000 series (4 cores)
  • AMD Opteron 3000 series

Vishera, Zambezi, Jakarta, Delhi and Zurich processors for socket AM3+.

FX-9590 14400 ₽ 8 4.7 (5) GHz 8+8 MB 2600 MHz 220 W. DDR3-1866 19
FX-9370 8 4.4 (4.7) GHz 8+8 MB 2600 MHz 220 W DDR3-1866 9007
FX-8370 9258 RUB 8 4(4.3)GHz 8+8MB 2600MHz 125W 32nm DDR3-1866 Vishera FX-8350 4985 ₽ 8 4 (4,2) GHC 8+8 MB 2600 MHz 125 W DDR3-1866 9 VIS
FX-8150 2308 RUB 8 3.6(4.2) GHz0069 125W 32nm DDR3-1866 Zambezi FX-8320 2133 ₽ 8 3.5 (4) GHz 8+8 MB 2600 MHz 125 W 32 Nm DDR3-1866 9
FX-8310 3459 ₽ 8 3. 4 (4.3) GHC 8 MB 2600 MHz

900 WT 32 nm nm

DDR3-1866

Vishera FX-8370E 9407 ₽ 8 3.3 (4,3) GHz 8+8 MB 2600 MHz

900 95

32 Nm

900 9007 DDR3-187 FX-8300 2087 ₽ 8 3.3 (4,2) GHz 8+8 MB 2600 MHz

95 W 32 nm nm

DDR3-1866 9 FX-8140 2894 ₽ 8 3.2 (4.1) GHz 8+8 MB 2600 MHz 900

32 nm DDR3-1866 Zambezi FX-8320E 4116 ₽ 8 3.2 (4) GHz 8+8 MB 2600 MHz

95 W 32 nm

DDR3-1866 9 VIS
FX-8120 1886 RUB 8 3.1(4) GHz 8+8 MB 2600MHz 95/125W 32nm DDR3-1866 Zambezi FX-8100 2289 ₽ 8 2,8 (3. 7) GHC 8+8 MB 2600 MHz

95 W 32 nm nm

DDR3-1866

Opteron
3380 8 2.6 (3.6) GHC 8+8 MB 2600 MHz 65 W 32 nm DDR3-1866 Delhi Opteron
3280 8 2.4 (3.5) GHz 8+8 MB 2600 MHz 65 W

9007 DDR3-1866 9
Opteron
3365 8 2,3 (3.3) GHz 8+8 MB 2600 MHz 65 W 32 Nm DDR3-1866 9
FX-6350 2737 ₽ 6 3.9 (4,1) GHz 6+8 MB 2600 MHz 125 W 32 nm DDR3-1866 VISHERARA
FX-6200 1440 ₽ 6 3.8 (4.1) GHC 6+8 MB 2600 MHz 125 W DDR3-1866

FX-6330 $22 6 3. 6(4.2) GHz 6+8MB 2600MHz 95W 32nm DDR3-1866 Vishera FX-6300 1351 ₽ 6 3.5 (4.1) GHC 6+8 MB 2600 MHz

900 WT 32 nm DDR3-1866 FX-6120 $1430 6 3.5(4.1) GHz 6+8 MB 2600 MHz 900 900 MHz0070

32 nm DDR3-1866 Zambezi FX-6100 1277 ₽ 6 3.3 (3.9) GHC 6+8 MB 2600 MHz

95 W 32 nm nm

DDR3-1866

FX-4350 1441 ₽ 4 4.2 (4,3) GHC 4+8 MB 2600 MHz 125 W 32 nm nm

DDR3-1866 9 FX-4170 940 ₽ 4 4.2 (4,3) GHC 4+8 MB 2600 MHz 125 W. FX-4320 4 4 (4,2) GHz 4+4 MB 2600 MHz 95 W 32 nm DDR3-1866 VIISERARA
FX-4330 3907 RUB 4 4GHz 4+8MB 2600MHz 95W 32nm DDR3 Vishera FX-4300 717 ₽ 4 3. 8 (4) GHC 4+4 MB 2600 MHz

900 WT 32 Nm DDR3-186669 VIS
FX-4150 4 3.8(3.9)GHz 4+8MB 2600MHz 90W0069 32 nm DDR3-1866 Zambezi FX-B4150 4 3.8 (3.9) GHz 4+8 MB 2600 MHz 95 W DDR3-1866

ZABEZB
FX-4130 622 ₽ 4 3.8 (3.9) GHz 4+4 MB 2600 MHz 125 W DDR3-1866 9 FX-4100 564 ₽ 4 3.6 (3.8) GHz 4+8 MB 2600 MHz 900

32 nm

66666666669 ZAM
FX-4200 696 ₽ 4 3.3 GHz 8+8 MB 2600 MHz 125 W

66666666669 ZAM
Opteron
3350 HE 4 2. 8(3.8)GHz 4+8MB 2600MHz 45W 32nm DDR3-1866

70 Jakarta Opteron
3260 he 4 2.7 (3) GHC 4+4 MB 2600 MHz 45 W

9007 DDR3-1866 ZUM
Opteron
3250 HE 4 2.5(3.5) GHz 4+4 MB 2600 MHz 45W 32nm DDR3-1866 Zurich Opteron
3320 EE 4 1,9 (2.5) GHz 4+8 MB 2600 MHz 25 W

9007 DDR3-1333 3

AM3+AMD

processors

AMD FX processor table for socket AM3+

Hardware


Views: 54289

Ratings

(57)

Table of AMD processors from the FX line for socket AM3+.

These processors were built on the Bulldozer architecture on the Zambezi core and the Piledriver architecture built on the Vishera core.

Both of these architectures were built on the 32 nm process technology. (this parameter was in the table, but I decided to delete it so that the table intervenes better on the page)

The table is divided into 4 cores, 6 cores and 8 cores.

The table also shows the frequencies in the turbo core for all cores.

I see no point in specifying the maximum turbo core frequency for several cores, since this parameter will not greatly affect performance.

Designation Frequency Frequency
Turbo core
(for all cores)

Core (year)

L2/L3 cache. TDP
4 cores
AMD FX-4100 3. 6 Ghz 3.7 Ghz Zambezi (2011) 4096 Kb/8192 Kb 95
AMD FX-4120 3.9 Ghz 4.0 Ghz Zambezi (2011) 4096 Kb/8192 Kb 95
AMD FX-4130 3.8 Ghz 3.9 Ghz Zambezi (2011) 4096 Kb/4096 Kb 125
AMD FX-4150 3.8 Ghz 3.9Ghz Zambezi (2011) 4096 Kb/8192 Kb 95
AMD FX-4170 4.2 Ghz 4.3Ghz Zambezi (2011) 4096 Kb/8192 Kb 125
AMD FX-4200 4.2 Ghz 4.3 Ghz Zambezi (2011) 4096 Kb/4096 Kb 125
AMD FX-4300 3. 8 Ghz 3.9Ghz Vishera (2012) 4096 Kb/4096 Kb 95
AMD FX-4320 4.0 Ghz 4.1Ghz Vishera (2012) 4096 Kb/4096 Kb 95
AMD FX-4330 4.0 Ghz 4.2Ghz Vishera (2012) 4096 Kb/8192 Kb 125
AMD FX-4350 4.2 Ghz 4.3Ghz Vishera (2012) 4096 Kb/8192 Kb 125
6 cores
AMD FX-6100 3.3 Ghz 3.6Ghz Zambezi (2011) 6144Kb/8192Kb 95
AMD FX-6120 3.6 Ghz 3.9Ghz Zambezi (2011) 6144Kb/8192Kb 95
AMD FX-6130 3. 6 Ghz 3.8Ghz Zambezi (2011) 6144Kb/8192Kb 95
AMD FX-6200 3.8 Ghz 4.0 Ghz Zambezi (2011) 6144Kb/8192Kb 125
AMD FX-6300 3.5 Ghz 3.8Ghz Vishera (2012) 6144Kb/8192Kb 95
AMD FX-6330 3.6 Ghz 4.2Ghz Vishera (2012) 6144Kb/8192Kb 95
AMD FX-6350 3.9 Ghz 4.2Ghz Vishera (2012) 6144Kb/8192Kb 95
8 core
AMD FX-8100 2.8Ghz 3.1Ghz Zambezi (2011) 8192 Kb/8192 Kb 95
AMD FX-8120 3. 1 Ghz 3.4Ghz Zambezi (2011) 8192 Kb/8192 Kb 125
AMD FX-8140 3.2 Ghz 3.6Ghz Zambezi (2011) 8192 Kb/8192 Kb 95
AMD FX-8150 3.6 Ghz 3.9Ghz Zambezi (2011) 8192 Kb/8192 Kb 125
AMD FX-8170 3.9 Ghz 4.2Ghz Zambezi (2011) 8192 Kb/8192 Kb 125
AMD FX-8300 3.3 Ghz 3.6Ghz Vishera (2012) 8192 Kb/8192 Kb 95
AMD FX-8310 3.4 Ghz 3.7Ghz Vishera (2012) 8192 Kb/8192 Kb 95
AMD FX-8320 3.

2024 © All rights reserved