AMD FX-9590 processor review: CPU specs, performance benchmarks
Buy on Amazon
FX-9590 processor released by AMD; release date: July 2013. The processor is designed for desktop-computers and based on Vishera microarchitecture.
CPU is unlocked for overclocking. Total number of cores — 8, threads — 8. Maximum CPU clock speed — 5 GHz. Maximum operating temperature — 57°C. Manufacturing process technology — 32 nm SOI. Cache size: L1 — 384 KB, L2 — 8 MB, L3 — 8 MB.
Supported memory types: DDR3.
Supported socket types: AM3+. Maximum number of processors in a configuration — 1. Power consumption (TDP): 220 Watt.
Benchmarks
| PassMark Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike Physics Score |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1. Face Detection |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop Ocean Surface Simulation |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop T-Rex |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop Video Composition |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop Bitcoin Mining |
|
|
237 Frames/s
590 mHash/s| Name | Value |
|---|---|
| PassMark — Single thread mark | 1816 |
| PassMark — CPU mark | 6749 |
| Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 633 |
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 3042 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score | 3336 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection | 10.765 mPixels/s |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation | 25. 735 Frames/s |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex | 0.450 Frames/s |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition | 1.418 Frames/s |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining | 8.590 mHash/s |
Specifications (specs)
| Architecture codename | Vishera |
| Family | AMD FX-Series Processors |
| Launch date | July 2013 |
| OPN PIB | FD9590FHHKWOF |
| OPN Tray | FD9590FHW8KHK |
| Place in performance rating | 1593 |
| Price now | $99. 99 |
| Series | AMD FX 8-Core Black Edition Processors |
| Value for money (0-100) | 30.03 |
| Vertical segment | Desktop |
| 64 bit support | |
| Base frequency | 4.7 GHz |
| Die size | 315 mm |
| L1 cache | 384 KB |
| L2 cache | 8 MB |
| L3 cache | 8 MB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm SOI |
| Maximum core temperature | 57°C |
| Maximum frequency | 5 GHz |
| Number of cores | 8 |
| Number of threads | 8 |
| P0 Vcore voltage | Min: 1. 375 V — Max: 1.5375 V |
| Transistor count | 1200 million |
| Unlocked | |
|
|
|
| Supported memory frequency | 1866 MHz |
| Supported memory types | DDR3 |
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 |
| Sockets supported | AM3+ |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 220 Watt |
| PCI Express revision | n / a |
| Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | |
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | |
| Intel® AES New Instructions | |
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | |
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare AMD FX-9590 with others
AMD
FX-9590
vs
AMD
Phenom X3 8600
AMD
FX-9590
vs
AMD
Athlon X2 5050e
AMD
FX-9590
vs
Intel
Core i5-670
AMD
FX-9590
vs
Intel
Core i7-2700K
AMD
FX-9590
vs
AMD
A6-3620
AMD
FX-9590
vs
Intel
Core i5-3570K
FX-9590 [in 4 benchmarks]
AMD
FX-9590
Buy
- Interface
- Core clock speed
- Max video memory
- Memory type
- Memory clock speed
- Maximum resolution
Summary
AMD started AMD FX-9590 sales 6 July 2013.
This is Vishera architecture desktop processor primarily aimed at office systems. It has 8 cores and 8 threads, and is based on 32nm manufacturing technology, with a maximum frequency of 5000 MHz and a locked multiplier.
Compatibility-wise, this is AM3+ processor with a TDP of 220 Watt. It supports DDR3 memory.
It provides poor benchmark performance at
10.11%
of a leader’s which is AMD EPYC 7h22.
FX
9590
vs
EPYC
7h22
General info
FX-9590 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and pricing.
| Place in performance rating | 700 | |
| Value for money | 2. 84 |
|
| Market segment | Desktop processor | |
| Architecture codename | Vishera (2012−2015) | |
| Release date | 6 July 2013 (9 years ago) | |
| Current price | $344 | of 14999 (Xeon Platinum 9282) |
Value for money
To get the index we compare the characteristics of the processors and their cost, taking into account the cost of other processors.
- 0
- 50
- 100
Technical specs
Basic microprocessor parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters can generally indicate CPU performance, but to be more precise you have to review its test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | |
| Threads | 8 | |
| Base clock speed | 4.7 GHz | |
| Boost clock speed | 5 GHz | of 5.8 (Core i9-13900K) |
| L2 cache | 8192 KB | of 12288 (Core 2 Quad Q9550) |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | of 5 (Apple M1) |
| Die size | 315 mm2 | |
| Maximum core temperature | 57 °C | of 110 (Atom x7-E3950) |
| Number of transistors | 1,200 million | of 57000 (Apple M1 Max) |
| 64 bit support | + | |
| Windows 11 compatibility | — | |
| Unlocked multiplier | 1 | |
| P0 Vcore voltage | Min: 1. 375 V — Max: 1.5375 V |
Compatibility
Information on FX-9590 compatibility with other computer components and devices: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one.
Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | of 8 (Opteron 842) |
| Socket | AM3+ | |
| Thermal design power (TDP) | 220 Watt | of 400 (Xeon Platinum 9282) |
Technologies and extensions
Technological capabilities and additional instructions supported by FX-9590.
You’ll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | |
| FMA | + | |
| AVX | + |
Virtualization technologies
Supported virtual machine optimization technologies. Some are specific to Intel only, some to AMD.
| AMD-V | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel number of RAM supported by FX-9590’s memory controller. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequency may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | of 5200 (Ryzen 5 7600X) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection types of supported peripherals.
| PCIe version | n/a | of 5 (Core i9-12900K) |
Benchmark performance
Single-core and multi-core benchmark results of FX-9590.
Overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Overall score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
FX-9590
10.11
- Passmark
- GeekBench 5 Single-Core
- GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
- 3DMark Fire Strike Physics
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
FX-9590
10194
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance.
This version uses only a single CPU core.
Benchmark coverage: 37%
FX-9590
647
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Benchmark coverage: 37%
FX-9590
3171
3DMark Fire Strike Physics
Benchmark coverage: 4%
FX-9590
8670
Relative perfomance
Overall FX-9590 performance compared to nearest competitors among desktop CPUs.
Intel Core i3-10325
101.09
Intel Core i5-10500T
100.99
Intel Core i5-8600K
100.
59
AMD FX-9590
100
Intel Core i3-10320
98.42
Intel Core i5-10400T
98.02
Intel Core i7-4960X
97.82
Intel equivalent
We believe that the nearest equivalent to FX-9590 from Intel is Core i5-8600K, which is faster by 1% and higher by 3 positions in our rating.
Core i5
8600K
Compare
Here are some closest Intel rivals to FX-9590:
Intel Core i3-10325
101.09
Intel Core i5-10500T
100.99
Intel Core i5-8600K
100.59
AMD FX-9590
100
Intel Core i3-10320
98.
42
Intel Core i5-10400T
98.02
Intel Core i7-4960X
97.82
Similar processors
Here is our recommendation of several processors that are more or less close in performance to the one reviewed.
Core i7
5930K
Compare
Core i7
4960X
Compare
Core i7
5820K
Compare
Core i7
3960X Extreme Edition
Compare
Core i7
6800K
Compare
Core i7
3970X Extreme Edition
Compare
Recommended graphics cards
These graphics cards are most commonly used with FX-9590 according to our statistics.
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
10.2%
GeForce GTX
1060 6 GB
5.6%
GeForce GTX
1060 3 GB
3.6%
Radeon RX
580
3.3%
GeForce GTX
970
3%
GeForce GTX
1660 Super
2.4%
GeForce GTX
750 Ti
2.2%
GeForce GTX
1050
2.
1%
GeForce GTX
1070
2.1%
GeForce GTX
1650 SUPER
2%
User rating
Here is the rating given to the reviewed processor by our users. Let others know your opinion by rating it yourself.
Questions and comments
Here you can ask a question about FX-9590, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.
Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.
AMD FX-9590 Specs, Price, and FPS in Games
| 8 | 8 | 4.7 GHz | 5.0 GHz |
| Cores | Threads | Base Frequency | Turbo Frequency |
|---|
Geekbench 5 Single-Core
641
29%
Geekbench 5 Multi-Core
3131
12%
Availability
AMD FD9590FHHKWOF FX-9590 8-core 4.
7 GHz Socket AM3+ 220W Black Edition Desktop Processor
Buy on Amazon
$344.04
In Stock
Updated 77 minutes ago
Graphics Card
Resolution
Select game resolution
Graphics Settings
Select game graphics
Offset
…
Apply Offset
Value Rating
Performance Rating
Value per FPS
You will receive
… FPS
Alternatives for FX-9590
1080p, High
No alternatives — this is the best option
Specifications
| General | |
|---|---|
| Release Date | Jul 6th, 2013 |
| Segment | Desktop |
| Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
| Collection | FX |
| Codename | Vishera |
| Performance | |
|---|---|
| Cores | 8 |
| Threads | 8 |
| Base Frequency | 4. 7 GHz |
| Turbo Frequency | 5.0 GHz |
| Other | |
|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 220 W |
| Overclockable | Yes |
| Integrated Graphics | None |
Builds Using AMD FX-9590
1080p, High
Find out which of the 2 CPUs performs better, view a side-by-side specification comparison.
Ryzen 5 5600X
$193.99
Ryzen 7 5800X
$271.84
Ryzen 7 5800X
$271.84
Ryzen 5 3600
$138.44
Ryzen 7 5800X
$271.84
Ryzen 9 5900X
Ryzen 5 5600X
$193.99
Ryzen 9 5900X
Core i9-12900K
$579.99
Core i9-9900K
Ryzen 7 5800X
$271.84
Ryzen 5 3600X
Refine results to filter 1558 processors by performance, release date, price, and value. Click on a CPU to view more in-depth specifications and game FPS.
Found 1558 CPUs.
Popularity
Processor
Performance
Ryzen 5 5600X
Release Date: Nov 5th, 2020
Performance Rating
$193.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Ryzen 7 5800X
Release Date: Nov 5th, 2020
Performance Rating
$271.84 on Amazon
In Stock
Core i9-9900
Release Date: Apr 23rd, 2019
Performance Rating
$715.51 on Amazon
In Stock
Core i7-12700K
Release Date: Nov 4th, 2021
Performance Rating
$401.26 on Amazon
In Stock
Ryzen 9 5900X
Release Date: Nov 5th, 2020
Performance Rating
$399 on Amazon
In Stock
Core i5-9600K
Release Date: Oct 19th, 2018
Performance Rating
$229.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Core i9-12900K
Release Date: Nov 4th, 2021
Performance Rating
$579.
99 on Amazon
In Stock
Ryzen 5 3600
Release Date: Jul 7th, 2019
Performance Rating
$138.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Core i5-11260H
Release Date: May 11th, 2021
Performance Rating
Core i5-12600K
Release Date: Nov 4th, 2021
Performance Rating
$277.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Ryzen 7 5700U
Release Date: Unknown
Performance Rating
Core i7-6700K
Release Date: Aug 1st, 2015
Performance Rating
$239.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Core i9-10900K
Release Date: Apr 30th, 2020
Performance Rating
$345.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Ryzen 5 5600G
Release Date: Apr 13th, 2021
Performance Rating
$154 on Amazon
In Stock
Ryzen 9 5950X
Release Date: Nov 5th, 2020
Performance Rating
$529.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Ryzen 5 3600X
Release Date: Jul 7th, 2019
Performance Rating
$245 on Amazon
In Stock
Ryzen 9 3900X
Release Date: Jul 7th, 2019
Performance Rating
$350 on Amazon
In Stock
Core i5-11400F
Release Date: Mar 16th, 2021
Performance Rating
$149.
99 on Amazon
In Stock
Ryzen 7 4800H
Release Date: Jan 6th, 2020
Performance Rating
Core i7-8700K
Release Date: Oct 5th, 2017
Performance Rating
$330 on Amazon
In Stock
Core i7-11800H
Release Date: May 11th, 2021
Performance Rating
Core i5-10400F
Release Date: Apr 30th, 2020
Performance Rating
$127.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Core i7-4790K
Release Date: May 1st, 2014
Performance Rating
$312.74 on Amazon
In Stock
Core i5-3550
Release Date: Apr 29th, 2012
Performance Rating
$34.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Core i5-11400H
Release Date: May 11th, 2021
Performance Rating
- Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- …
- 61
- 62
- 63
- Next
AMD FX-9590 Specs, Price, and FPS in Games
| 8 | 8 | 4. |
5.0 GHz |
| Cores | Threads | Base Frequency | Turbo Frequency |
|---|
Geekbench 5 Single-Core
641
29%
Geekbench 5 Multi-Core
3131
12%
Availability
AMD FD9590FHHKWOF FX-9590 8-core 4.7 GHz Socket AM3+ 220W Black Edition Desktop Processor
Buy on Amazon
€309.95
In Stock
Updated 77 minutes ago
Graphics Card
Resolution
Select game resolution
Graphics Settings
Select game graphics
Offset
…
Apply Offset
Value Rating
Performance Rating
Value per FPS
You will receive
… FPS
Alternatives for FX-9590
1080p, High
No alternatives — this is the best option
Specifications
| General | |
|---|---|
| Release Date | Jul 6th, 2013 |
| Segment | Desktop |
| Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
| Collection | FX |
| Codename | Vishera |
| Performance | |
|---|---|
| Cores | 8 |
| Threads | 8 |
| Base Frequency | 4. 7 GHz |
| Turbo Frequency | 5.0 GHz |
| Other | |
|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 220 W |
| Overclockable | Yes |
| Integrated Graphics | None |
Builds Using AMD FX-9590
1080p, High
Find out which of the 2 CPUs performs better, view a side-by-side specification comparison.
Ryzen 5 5600X
€174.77
Ryzen 7 5800X
€244.9
Ryzen 7 5800X
€244.9
Ryzen 5 3600
€124.72
Ryzen 7 5800X
€244.9
Ryzen 9 5900X
€359.46
Ryzen 5 5600X
€174.77
Ryzen 9 5900X
€359.46
Core i9-12900K
€522.51
Core i9-9900K
€495.5
Ryzen 7 5800X
€244.9
Ryzen 5 3600X
€220.72
Refine results to filter 1558 processors by performance, release date, price, and value. Click on a CPU to view more in-depth specifications and game FPS.
Found 1558 CPUs.
Popularity
Processor
Performance
Ryzen 5 5600X
Release Date: Nov 5th, 2020
Performance Rating
€174.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Ryzen 7 5800X
Release Date: Nov 5th, 2020
Performance Rating
€244.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Core i9-9900
Release Date: Apr 23rd, 2019
Performance Rating
€644.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Core i7-12700K
Release Date: Nov 4th, 2021
Performance Rating
€361.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Ryzen 9 5900X
Release Date: Nov 5th, 2020
Performance Rating
€359.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Core i5-9600K
Release Date: Oct 19th, 2018
Performance Rating
€207.2 on Amazon
In Stock
Core i9-12900K
Release Date: Nov 4th, 2021
Performance Rating
€522.
51 on Amazon
In Stock
Ryzen 5 3600
Release Date: Jul 7th, 2019
Performance Rating
€124.72 on Amazon
In Stock
Core i5-11260H
Release Date: May 11th, 2021
Performance Rating
Core i5-12600K
Release Date: Nov 4th, 2021
Performance Rating
€250.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Ryzen 7 5700U
Release Date: Unknown
Performance Rating
Core i7-6700K
Release Date: Aug 1st, 2015
Performance Rating
€216.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Core i9-10900K
Release Date: Apr 30th, 2020
Performance Rating
€311.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Ryzen 5 5600G
Release Date: Apr 13th, 2021
Performance Rating
€138.74 on Amazon
In Stock
Ryzen 9 5950X
Release Date: Nov 5th, 2020
Performance Rating
€477.47 on Amazon
In Stock
Ryzen 5 3600X
Release Date: Jul 7th, 2019
Performance Rating
€220.
72 on Amazon
In Stock
Ryzen 9 3900X
Release Date: Jul 7th, 2019
Performance Rating
€315.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Core i5-11400F
Release Date: Mar 16th, 2021
Performance Rating
€135.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Ryzen 7 4800H
Release Date: Jan 6th, 2020
Performance Rating
Core i7-8700K
Release Date: Oct 5th, 2017
Performance Rating
€297.3 on Amazon
In Stock
Core i7-11800H
Release Date: May 11th, 2021
Performance Rating
Core i5-10400F
Release Date: Apr 30th, 2020
Performance Rating
€115.31 on Amazon
In Stock
Core i7-4790K
Release Date: May 1st, 2014
Performance Rating
€281.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Core i5-3550
Release Date: Apr 29th, 2012
Performance Rating
€31.52 on Amazon
In Stock
Core i5-11400H
Release Date: May 11th, 2021
Performance Rating
- Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- .
.. - 61
- 62
- 63
- Next
AMD FX-9590 Full Specifications — CPUAgent
The AMD FX-9590 is a Desktop processor with 8 cores, launched in 2013. It is part of the FX lineup, using the Piledriver architecture with Socket AM3+. The core-count is effectively doubled, to 8 threads. FX-9590 has 8MB of L3 cache and operates at 4.7 GHz by default, but can boost up to 5 GHz, depending on the workload. AMD is building the FX-9590 on a 32 nm production process. You may freely adjust the unlocked multiplier on FX-9590, which simplifies overclocking greatly, as you can dial in any overclocking frequency up to 5GHz. With a TDP of 220 W, the FX-9590 consumes a lot of power, so good cooling is definitely needed. AMD’s processor supports DDR3 memory with a dual-channel interface. It is worth noting that this processor does not have integrated graphics. This processor can run on motherboards with the following chipsets: 760G, 770, 870, 880G, 890FX, 890GX, 970, 990FX, 990X, A78, NVIDIA GeForce 7025, NVIDIA GeForce 7025 / nForce 630a.
AMD FX-9590 General
| Manufacturer | AMD |
|---|---|
| Core Family | Vishera |
| Model | FX-9590 |
| Series | AMD FX |
| Type | Desktop |
| Architecture | Centurion |
| Achitecture codename | Vishera |
| Microarchitecture | Piledriver |
| Market price | $ 495.92 |
| Release date | on July 2013 |
| Price now | $496 |
| Place in performance rating | 309 |
| Value for money (0-100) | 6. 14 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm |
AMD FX-9590 Compatibility
| Power consumption (TDP) | 220 Watt |
|---|---|
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 |
| PCIe lanes | |
| PCIe revision | n / a |
| PCIe version | |
| Socket | AM3+ |
AMD FX-9590 Benchmarks
| Boost Clock | 5 GHz |
|---|---|
| CPU Cores | 8 |
| CPU Threads | 8 |
| Core Clock | 4. 7 GHz |
| Core Count | 8 |
| Frequency | 4.70 GHz |
| Hyperthreading | No |
| L1 Cache | 4 x 64 kB Instruction 8 x 16 kB Data |
| L2 Cache | 4 x 2 MB |
| L2 cache | 8192 KB |
| L3 Cache | 1 x 8 MB |
| L3-Cache | 8.00 MB |
| Maximum frequency | 5 GHz |
| Simultaneous Multithreading | No |
| TDP | 220 W |
| TDP down | — |
| TDP up | — |
| Turbo (1 Core) | 5. 00 GHz |
| Turbo (8 Cores) | 5.00 GHz |
AMD FX-9590 Memory Specifications
| ECC | Yes |
|---|---|
| ECC Support | No |
| Memory channels | 2 |
| Memory type | DDR3-1866 |
| Supported memory types | Not Listed |
| Max. Memory |
AMD FX-9590 Technical Specs
| 64 bit support | + |
|---|---|
| Die size | 315 mm2 |
| Includes CPU Cooler | No |
| Maximum core temperature | 57 °C |
| Number of cores | 8 |
| Number of threads | 8 |
| Overclocking | Yes |
| P0 Vcore voltage | Min: 1. 375 V — Max: 1.5375 V |
| Part # | FD9590FHW8KHK |
| Technology | 32 nm |
| Tjunction max. | — |
| Transistor count | 1,200 million |
| Unlocked | + |
AMD FX-9590 Integrated Graphics
| DirectX Version | |
|---|---|
| Execution units | |
| GPU (Turbo) | No turbo |
| GPU frequency | |
| Generation | |
| Integrated Graphics | None |
| Lithography | 32 nm |
Max. displays |
0 |
AMD FX-9590 Technologies and Extensions
| AES-NI | + |
|---|---|
| AVX | + |
| FMA | + |
AMD FX-9590 Virtualization Technologies
| AMD-V | + |
|---|---|
| Virtualization | AMD-V |
AMD FX-9590 Other
| Packaging | OEM/Tray |
|---|
AMD FX-9590 Specs — GadgetVersus
|
|
|
|
|
AMD FX-9590 Specs
Specifications of the AMD FX-9590 processor dedicated to the desktop sector, it has 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximum frequency of 5,0GHz.
The table below makes it possible to observe well the lithography, the number of transistors (if present), the offered cache memory, the maximum capacity of RAM memory that we can get, the type of compatible memory, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in the Passmark platform, Cinebench R23 and Geekbench 5.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the link above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specifications:
| Processor | AMD FX-9590 | |||
| Market (main) | Desktop | |||
| ISA | x86-64 (64 bit) | |||
| Microarchitecture | Piledriver | |||
| Core name | Vishera | |||
| Family | FX-9000 | |||
| Part number(s), S-Spec | FD9590FHW8KHK, FD9590FHHKWOF, FD9590FHHKWOX, FX-9590 Black Edition |
|||
| Release date | Q2 2013 | |||
| Lithography | 32 nm SOI | |||
| Transistors | 1. 200.000.000 |
|||
| Cores | 8 | |||
| Threads | 8 | |||
| Base frequency | 4,7 GHz | |||
| Turbo frequency | 5,0 GHz | |||
| Cache memory | 8 MB | |||
| Max memory capacity | 32 GB | |||
| Memory types | DDR3-1866 | |||
| Max # of memory channels | 2 | |||
| Max memory bandwidth | 29,9 GB/s | |||
| Max PCIe lanes | 32 | |||
| TDP | 220 W | |||
| Suggested PSU | 750W ATX Power Supply | |||
| GPU integrated graphics | None | |||
| Socket | AM3+ | |||
| Compatible motherboard | Socket AM3+ Motherboard | |||
| Maximum temperature | 57°C | |||
| CPU-Z single thread | 262 | |||
| CPU-Z multi thread | 1. 772 |
|||
| Cinebench R15 single thread | 110 | |||
| Cinebench R15 multi-thread | 730 | |||
| Cinebench R20 single thread | 250 | |||
| Cinebench R20 multi-thread | 1.630 | |||
| Cinebench R23 single thread | 554 | |||
| Cinebench R23 multi-thread | 3.824 | |||
| PassMark single thread | 1.831 | |||
| PassMark CPU Mark | 6.762 | |||
| (Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 single core |
2.907 | |||
| (Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 multi-core |
11.922 | |||
| (Windows) Geekbench 5 single core |
591 | |||
| (Windows) Geekbench 5 multi-core |
2. 990 |
|||
| (SGEMM) GFLOPS performance |
91,52 GFLOPS | |||
| (Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio |
54 pts / W | |||
| Amazon | ||||
| eBay |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
Performances :
Performance comparison between this processor and those of equivalent power, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark softwares such as Geekbench 4.
Suggested PSU: We assume that we have An ATX computer case, a high end graphics card, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, a 1TB HDD hard drive, a Blu-Ray drive. We will have to rely on a more powerful power supply if we want to have several graphics cards, several monitors, more memory, etc.
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
Performance comparison on the CPU-Z benchmark software for IT processors:
| CPU-Z — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
|
Intel Core i3-9320 |
513 1.906 |
|
AMD Ryzen 5 1400 |
321 1.886 |
|
Intel Core i5-8400T |
346 1.872 |
|
Intel Core i5-7600 |
451 1.822 |
|
Intel Core i7-9700T |
231 1.  792 |
|
AMD FX-9590 |
262 1.772 |
|
AMD Athlon Gold 3150G |
441 1.770 |
|
Intel Core i3-9100F |
465 1.752 |
|
AMD Ryzen 3 1200 AF |
433 1.747 |
|
AMD Ryzen 3 3200GE |
431 1.722 |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory.
It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.
Performance comparison on the Cinebench R15 benchmark platform for IT devices:
| Cinebench R15 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
|
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE |
170 760 |
|
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G |
162 752 |
|
Intel Core i3-9350K |
177 749 |
|
Intel Core i5-9400T |
149 736 |
|
Intel Core i7-7700T |
155 734 |
|
AMD FX-9590 |
110 730 |
|
Intel Core i5-7640X |
184 716 |
|
Intel Core i5-8400T |
138 709 |
|
AMD Ryzen 5 1400 |
134 705 |
|
Intel Core i3-8350K |
175 669 |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.
Performance comparison on the Cinebench R20 benchmark platform for computers:
| Cinebench R20 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
|
Intel Core i5-8500T |
346 1.817 |
|
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE |
380 1.800 |
|
Intel Core i5-9400T |
364 1.  780 |
|
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE |
400 1.750 |
|
Intel Core i3-9100 |
456 1.688 |
|
AMD FX-9590 |
250 1.630 |
|
AMD Ryzen 5 2400GE |
336 1.590 |
|
Intel Pentium Gold G7400 |
565 1.458 |
|
Intel Core i3-9100F |
393 1.451 |
|
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200GE |
360 1.430 |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R20 is a multi-platform test software which allows to evaluate the hardware capacities of a device such as a computer, a tablet, a server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant.
Performance comparison on the Cinebench R23 benchmark platform for computer processors:
| Cinebench R23 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
|
Intel Core i3-9100 |
1.109 4.098 |
|
Intel Core i5-7500 |
1.050 4.004 |
|
AMD Ryzen 5 1400 |
808 3.935 |
|
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G |
982 3.  909 |
|
Intel Core i5-7600K |
1.024 3.908 |
|
AMD FX-9590 |
554 3.824 |
|
Intel Pentium Gold G7400 |
1.385 3.823 |
|
AMD Ryzen 5 2400GE |
781 3.750 |
|
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G |
953 3.637 |
|
AMD Ryzen 3 2200GE |
1.004 3.577 |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R23 is cross-platform testing software that allows you to assess the hardware capabilities of a device such as a computer, tablet, server.
This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant. The test scene contains no less than 2,000 objects and more than 300,000 polygons in total.
Performance comparison on the Passmark benchmark platform for computing machines:
| PassMark — CPU Mark | |
|---|---|
|
AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B |
1.961 6.858 |
|
Intel Core i5-7600K |
2.558 6.845 |
|
Intel Core i3-8350K |
2.488 6.827 |
|
Intel Core i3-9100F |
2.517 6.768 |
|
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G |
2.  0476.766 |
|
AMD FX-9590 |
1.831 6.762 |
|
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G |
2.047 6.712 |
|
Intel Core i5-7600 |
2.471 6.649 |
|
Intel Core i5-7640X |
2.485 6.625 |
|
AMD Ryzen 3 2200GE |
2.020 6.422 |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting.
The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.
On Windows: performance comparison in Geekbench 4 with Windows operating system.
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows 64-bit | |
|---|---|
|
Intel Celeron G6900 |
7.357 12.614 |
|
AMD Ryzen 5 1400 |
3.685 12.460 |
|
Intel Core i3-8100 |
4.327 12.377 |
|
Intel Core i5-7500 |
4.353 12.306 |
|
AMD Ryzen 3 2300X |
4.316 12.132 |
|
AMD FX-9590 |
2.907 11.922 |
|
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE |
4.  09311.846 |
|
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G |
3.958 11.738 |
|
Intel Core i3-9100T |
4.271 11.733 |
|
Intel Core i5-7400 |
4.095 11.600 |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
On Linux: performance comparison in Geekbench 4 with Linux operating system.
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux 64-bit | |
|---|---|
|
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G |
4.160 12.101 |
|
Intel Core i3-7350K |
5.  83411.554 |
|
Intel Core i5-9400 |
4.187 11.228 |
|
Intel Core i5-7400T |
3.979 11.114 |
|
AMD Ryzen 5 1400 |
3.788 10.944 |
|
AMD FX-9590 |
2.863 10.935 |
|
AMD Ryzen 3 1200 AF |
3.600 10.870 |
|
Intel Core i5-7400 |
4.490 10.779 |
|
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE |
4.175 10.633 |
|
AMD Ryzen 3 2200GE |
4.302 10.369 |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
On MAC OS X: performance comparison in Geekbench 4 with MAC OS X operating system.
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Mac OS X 64-bit | |
|---|---|
|
Intel Core i5-7500 |
4.829 14.081 |
|
AMD Ryzen 3 2300X |
4.642 14.076 |
|
AMD Ryzen 5 1500X |
4.094 13.916 |
|
Intel Core i3-9100T |
4.507 13.173 |
|
Intel Core i3-8100 |
4.480 13.074 |
|
AMD FX-9590 |
2.  86612.820 |
|
AMD Ryzen 5 1400 |
3.854 12.786 |
|
Intel Core i5-7400 |
4.450 12.783 |
|
AMD Ryzen 3 1300X |
4.247 12.413 |
|
Intel Core i3-8100T |
4.144 12.390 |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices.
For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
On Windows: performance comparison in Geekbench 5 with Windows operating system.
| Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows | |
|---|---|
|
Intel Core i3-8300 |
952 3.137 |
|
Intel Core i3-9100F |
1.026 3.113 |
|
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE |
873 3.111 |
|
Intel Core i3-8100 |
962 3.031 |
|
Intel Core i3-9100T |
956 3.019 |
|
AMD FX-9590 |
591 2.990 |
|
Intel Core i3-7350K |
1.  2992.921 |
|
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE |
856 2.919 |
|
Intel Core i3-9300T |
982 2.911 |
|
AMD Ryzen 3 1300X |
881 2.896 |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
On Linux: performance comparison in Geekbench 5 with Linux operating system.
| Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux | |
|---|---|
|
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE |
870 2.837 |
|
AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B |
801 2.  809 |
|
AMD Ryzen 5 2400GE |
860 2.742 |
|
Intel Core i5-7500T |
869 2.706 |
|
Intel Core i3-8100T |
867 2.659 |
|
AMD FX-9590 |
632 2.634 |
|
Intel Core i5-9600T |
476 2.563 |
|
Intel Pentium Gold G5600 |
1.083 2.444 |
|
Intel Core i3-8109U |
971 2.236 |
|
Intel Core i3-1115GRE |
1.175 2.233 |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
On macOS: performance comparison in Geekbench 5 with macOS operating system.
| Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — macOS | |
|---|---|
|
AMD Ryzen 3 1200 AF |
861 2.860 |
|
AMD Ryzen 3 1300X |
930 2.832 |
|
Intel Core i3-8100T |
804 2.821 |
|
Intel Core i5-7400T |
815 2.781 |
|
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G |
832 2.768 |
|
AMD FX-9590 |
613 2.695 |
|
Intel Core i5-7500T |
794 2.613 |
|
Intel Core i3-7350K |
1.  0412.390 |
|
Intel Pentium Gold G6500 |
1.005 2.208 |
|
Intel Core i3-7300 |
957 2.186 |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.
List of comparisons:
AllwinnerAMDAMD A10AMD A12AMD A4AMD A6AMD A8AMD A9AMD AthlonAMD Athlon 64AMD Athlon 64 X2AMD Athlon GoldAMD Athlon SilverAMD EPYCAMD FXAMD JaguarAMD OpteronAMD PhenomAMD RyzenAMD Ryzen 1000AMD Ryzen 2000AMD Ryzen 3AMD Ryzen 3 1000AMD Ryzen 3 2000AMD Ryzen 3 3000AMD Ryzen 3 4000AMD Ryzen 3 5000AMD Ryzen 3000AMD Ryzen 4000AMD Ryzen 5AMD Ryzen 5 1000AMD Ryzen 5 2000AMD Ryzen 5 3000AMD Ryzen 5 4000AMD Ryzen 5 5000AMD Ryzen 5000AMD Ryzen 6000AMD Ryzen 7AMD Ryzen 7 1000AMD Ryzen 7 2000AMD Ryzen 7 3000AMD Ryzen 7 4000AMD Ryzen 7 5000AMD Ryzen 7000AMD Ryzen 9AMD Ryzen 9 3000AMD Ryzen 9 4000AMD Ryzen 9 5000AMD Ryzen ThreadripperAMD Ryzen Threadripper 1000AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2000AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3000AMD Ryzen Threadripper 5000AMD ZenAMD Zen 2AMD Zen 3AMD Zen+AmlogicAppleARMARM CortexARM Cortex-A15ARM Cortex-A17ARM Cortex-A35ARM Cortex-A5ARM Cortex-A53ARM Cortex-A55ARM Cortex-A57ARM Cortex-A7ARM Cortex-A72ARM Cortex-A73ARM Cortex-A75ARM Cortex-A76ARM Cortex-A77ARM Cortex-A78ARM Cortex-A8ARM Cortex-A9ARM Cortex-X1ARM920TAutoChipsBroadcomDeca coreDodeca coreDual AMDDual AMD EPYCDual AMD OpteronDual coreDual Intel XeonDual Intel Xeon PlatinumHexa coreHexadeca coreHiSiliconHiSilicon KirinIBMIBM POWERIBM POWER10IBM POWER9Icosi coreIngenicIntelIntel AtomIntel BroadwellIntel Cascade LakeIntel Cascade Lake-XIntel CeleronIntel Celeron NIntel Coffee LakeIntel Comet LakeIntel CoreIntel Core 1000Intel Core 10000Intel Core 1100Intel Core 11000Intel Core 1200Intel Core 12000Intel Core 13000Intel Core 2Intel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 QuadIntel Core 2000Intel Core 3000Intel Core 4000Intel Core 5000Intel Core 6000Intel Core 7000Intel Core 8000Intel Core 9000Intel Core DuoIntel Core iIntel Core i3Intel Core i3-1000Intel Core i3-10000Intel Core i3-1100Intel Core i3-11000Intel Core i3-1200Intel Core i3-12000Intel Core i3-2000Intel Core i3-3000Intel Core i3-4000Intel Core i3-5000Intel Core i3-6000Intel Core i3-7000Intel Core i3-8000Intel Core i3-9000Intel Core i5Intel Core i5-1000Intel Core i5-10000Intel Core i5-1100Intel Core i5-11000Intel Core i5-1200Intel Core i5-12000Intel Core i5-2000Intel Core i5-3000Intel Core i5-4000Intel Core i5-5000Intel Core i5-6000Intel Core i5-7000Intel Core i5-8000Intel Core i5-9000Intel Core i7Intel Core i7-1000Intel Core i7-10000Intel Core i7-1100Intel Core i7-11000Intel Core i7-1200Intel Core i7-12000Intel Core i7-2000Intel Core i7-3000Intel Core i7-4000Intel Core i7-5000Intel Core i7-6000Intel Core i7-7000Intel Core i7-8000Intel Core i7-9000Intel Core i9Intel Core i9-10000Intel Core i9-11000Intel Core i9-12000Intel Core i9-7000Intel Core i9-8000Intel Core i9-9000Intel Core m3Intel Core m5Intel Core XIntel Gemini LakeIntel HaswellIntel Ice LakeIntel Ivy BridgeIntel Kaby LakeIntel PentiumIntel Pentium 4Intel Pentium GoldIntel Pentium IIIntel Pentium IIIIntel Pentium SilverIntel Rocket LakeIntel Sandy BridgeIntel SkylakeIntel Skylake-XIntel Tiger LakeIntel XeonIntel Xeon BronzeIntel Xeon E5Intel Xeon GoldIntel Xeon PlatinumIntel Xeon WJLQLGA1150LGA1151MarvellMediaTekMediaTek DimensityMediaTek Helio GMediaTek Helio PMicrosoftMono coreNvidiaNvidia TegraNXPNXP i.
MXNXP i.MX 8NXP i.MX 8MNXP i.MX 8XOcta coreOcta Intel XeonOctodeca coreQuad coreQuad Intel XeonQualcommQualcomm Kryo 260Qualcomm Kryo 468Qualcomm Kryo 585Qualcomm Kryo 670Qualcomm SnapdragonQualcomm Snapdragon 700Qualcomm Snapdragon 8Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 seriesRealtekRockchipSamsungSamsung ExynosSamsung Exynos 7Samsung Exynos 7 OctaSamsung Exynos 9Samsung Exynos 9 OctaSonyTessaradeca coreTexas InstrumentsUnisocUnisoc TigerXiaomiProcessors groups
List of benchmarks:
CPU-ZCinebench R15Cinebench R20Cinebench R23Geekbench 4 on LinuxGeekbench 4 on Mac OS XGeekbench 4 on WindowsGeekbench 5 on LinuxGeekbench 5 on macOSGeekbench 5 on WindowsPassMarkGFLOPS performance
Equivalence:
AMD FX-9590 Intel equivalent
Processor FX-9590 [in 4 benchmarks]
AMD
FX-9590
- Interface
- Core frequency
- Video memory size
- Memory type
- Memory frequency
- Maximum resolution
Description
AMD started AMD FX-9590 sales 6 July 2013.
This is Vishera architecture desktop processor primarily aimed at office systems. It has 8 cores and 8 threads and is manufactured using 32nm process technology, the maximum frequency is 5000MHz, the multiplier is locked.
In terms of compatibility, this is an AM3+ processor with a TDP of 220W. It supports DDR3 memory.
It provides poor benchmark performance at
10.11%
from the leader, which is AMD EPYC 7h22.
FX
9590
or
EPYC
7h22
General information
Information about the type (desktop or laptop) and architecture of the FX-9590, as well as when sales started and cost at that time.
| place in the performance rating | 700 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Price-quality | 2. 84
| 005
FeaturesFX-9590 quantitative parameters such as number of cores and threads, clock speeds, manufacturing process, cache size and multiplier lock state. They indirectly speak about the performance of the processor, but for an accurate assessment, you need to consider the results of the tests.
RAM support
Types, maximum size and number of channels of RAM supported by FX-9590.
peripheryFX-9590 supported peripherals and how to connect them.
Tests in the benchmarksThese are the results of the FX-9590 performance tests in non-gaming benchmarks. The overall score is set from 0 to 100, where 100 corresponds to the fastest processor at the moment. Overall performance in testsThis is our overall performance rating. We regularly improve our algorithms, but if you find any inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in the comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
FX-9590
Passmark Passmark CPU Mark is a widely used benchmark that consists of 8 different tests, including integer and floating point calculations, extended instruction tests, compression, encryption, and game physics calculations. Benchmark coverage: 68%
FX-9590 GeekBench 5 Single-CoreGeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application designed as CPU benchmarks that independently recreate certain real world tasks that can be used to accurately measure performance. This version uses only one processor core. Benchmark coverage: 37%
FX-9590 GeekBench 5 Multi-CoreGeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application designed as CPU benchmarks that independently recreate certain real world tasks that can accurately measure performance. This version uses all available processor cores. Benchmark coverage: 37%
FX-9590 3DMark Fire Strike PhysicsBenchmark coverage: 4%
FX-9590 Relative capacity
Overall performance of the FX-9590 compared to its closest competitor in desktop processors.
Intel Core i3-10325
Intel Core i5-10500T
Intel Core i5-8600K
AMD FX-9590
Intel Core i3-10320
Intel Core i5-10400T
Intel Core i7-4960X Competitor from IntelWe believe that the closest competitor to the FX-9590 from Intel is the Core i5-8600K, which is on average 1% faster and 3 positions higher in our rating. Compare Here are some of Intel’s closest competitors to the FX-9590:
Intel Core i3-10325
Intel Core i5-10500T
Intel Core i5-8600K
AMD FX-9590
Intel Core i3-10320
Intel Core i5-10400T
Intel Core i7-4960X Other processorsHere we recommend several processors that are more or less similar in performance to the one considered. Compare Compare Compare Compare Compare Compare Recommended video cardsAccording to our statistics, these video cards are most often used with FX-9590: 10. 5.6% 3.6% 3.3% 3% 2.4% 2.2% 2.1% 2.1% 2% User rating
Here you can see the evaluation of the processor by users, as well as put your own rating. Tips and commentsHere you can ask a question about the FX-9 processor590, agree or disagree with our assessments, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site. Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus. 90,000 AMD FX-9590 Vishera (4700MHz, AM3+, L3 8192 KB, L2 8192 KB) You are hereHome Processor brand:Processor line:Processor number:Processor nuclearNumber of cores:Processor clock speed:type of socket:Process:Cache volume L1:Cache volume L2:Cache volume L3:Maximum memory passage:Processor type:Date of production: AMD brand processor with FX line (model range) and processor number: 9590. Information about the technical characteristics of the goods listed on the pages of the site is solely reference character and does not mean the presence of goods from sellers on the radio market. Specify the availability of goods directly from sellers of , contacting them using the contacts listed in the catalog of radio market companies. CPUs most unlike this CPUThe AMD CPU is represented by the Opteron model line with the number 8435 . This processor uses the Istanbul Core and is made in Process 45 nm . The number of cores in it is 6 , and the total clock frequency of this processor is 2600MHz . This AMD Corporation product is connected to the computer motherboard using the S1207 connector (socket). The memory of the third level is 6144 KB , and the amount of memory of the second level is 3072 KB . Maximum memory bandwidth found on the manufacturer’s website: — . This processor is presented by the company as a CPU for systems: Server . Start date of production (release) of this processor: 06/02/2009 . CPU company Intel represented by the model range Core 2 Quad with the number Q9650 . The Intel CPU represented by the Pentium 4 model number — . This processor uses the Prescott Core and the processor itself is made using the 90nm process technology. The number of cores in it is 1 , and the total clock frequency of this processor is 3000MHz . You were looking atProcessor AMD FX-9590 Vishera (4700MHz, AM3+, L3 8192 KB, L2 8192 KB) Similar processors:
Moscow, 17 Kostromskaya st. The FX-9590 processor was released by AMD, release date: July 2013. The processor is designed for desktop computers and is built on the Vishera architecture. Processor unlocked for overclocking. The total number of cores is 8, threads — 8. The maximum clock frequency of the processor is 5 GHz. The maximum temperature is 57°C. Technological process — 32 nm SOI. Cache size: L1 — 384 KB, L2 — 8 MB, L3 — 8 MB. Supported memory type: DDR3. Supported socket type: AM3+. The maximum number of processors in the configuration is 1. Power consumption (TDP): 220 Watt. Benchmarks
Features
NavigationChoose a processorProcessor comparisonAMD FX-9590 vs.
AMD versus AMD AMD versus AMD AMD versus Intel AMD versus Intel AMD versus AMD AMD versus Intel AMD FX-9590 Specifications and Benchmarks — TestingAmd fx 9590 Gaming Tests AMD started AMD FX-9590 sales on July 6, 2013 . In terms of compatibility, this is an AM3+ processor with a TDP of 220W. It supports DDR3 memory. It delivers poor benchmark performance at From the leader, which is the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX. General informationInformation about the type (desktop or laptop) and architecture of the FX-9590, as well as the time when sales began and the cost at that time.
To obtain an index, we compare the characteristics of processors and their cost, taking into account the cost of other processors. CharacteristicsQuantities FX-9590: Number of cores and threads, clock speeds, manufacturing process, cache size, and multiplier lock status. They indirectly speak about the performance of the processor, but for an accurate assessment, you need to consider the results of the tests.
CompatibilitySpecifies the compatibility of the FX-9590 with other computer components. Useful, for example, when choosing the configuration of a future computer or to upgrade an existing one. Please note that the power consumption of some processors can significantly exceed their nominal TDP even without overclocking. Some may even double their claims if the motherboard allows you to adjust the power settings of the processor.
Technologies and Additional Instructions This lists the technologies and additional instructions supported by the FX-9590. This information is needed if the processor is required to support specific technologies.
Virtualization technologiesLists technologies supported by the FX-9590 to speed up virtual machines. RAM supportTypes, maximum size and number of channels of RAM supported by the FX-9590. Higher memory frequency may be supported depending on the motherboard.
PeripheralsFX-9590 supported peripherals and how to connect them.
BenchmarksThese are the results of the FX-9590 non-gaming benchmarks. The overall score is set from 0 to 100, where 100 corresponds to the fastest processor at the moment. Overall performance in tests This is our overall performance rating.
Benchmark coverage: 66% Passmark CPU Mark is a widely used benchmark, consisting of 8 different tests, including integer and floating point calculations , advanced instruction checks, compression, encryption, and game physics calculations. Also includes a separate single-threaded test. Virtualization technologiesLists technologies supported by the FX-9590 to speed up virtual machines. Types, maximum size, and number of channels of RAM supported by the FX-9590. Higher memory frequency may be supported depending on the motherboard.
In terms of compatibility, this is an AM3 processor with a TDP of 220W. Technical. city 05/24/2017 1:45:36 2017-05-24 01:45:36 Sources:Https://technical. city/ru/cpu/FX-9590 AMD FX-9590 Centurion specifications, price, test, competitors » /> » /> .keyword { color: red; } Amd fx 9590 tests in games Processor FX-9590, new price on amazon and ebay — 270 USD Marked by the manufacturer as: FD9590FHHKWOF. Number of cores — 8, Centurion architecture. The base frequency of the FX-9590 cores is 4.7 GHz. The maximum frequency in AMD Turbo Core mode reaches 5 GHz. Please note that the AMD FX-9590 cooler must cool processors with a TDP of at least 220W at stock frequencies. When overclocked, the requirements increase. Price in RussiaWant to buy cheap FX-9590? Look at the list of stores that already sell the processor in your city. FamilyBenchmarks AMD FX-9590Gaming speed Performance in games and similar applications, according to our tests. The performance of 4 cores, if any, and performance per core has the greatest impact on the result, since most games do not fully use more than 4 cores. The speed of caches and working with RAM is also important. Speed in office usePerformance in everyday work such as browsers and office applications. The performance of 1 core has the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications use only one, ignoring the rest. Similarly, many professional applications such as various CADs ignore multi-threaded performance. Speed in heavy applicationsPerformance in resource-intensive tasks loading a maximum of 8 cores. The performance of all cores and their number has the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications willingly use all the cores and increase the speed accordingly. At the same time, certain periods of work can be demanding on the performance of one or two cores, for example, applying filters in the editor. Data obtained from tests by users who tested their systems with and without overclocking. Thus, you see the average values corresponding to the processor. Speed of numerical operationsSimple household tasksDemanding games and tasksExtreme loadDifferent tasks require different strengths of the CPU. A system with few fast cores and low memory latency will be fine for the vast majority of games, but will be inferior to a system with a lot of slow cores in a rendering scenario. We believe that a minimum of 4/4 (4 physical cores and 4 threads) processor is suitable for a budget gaming PC. At the same time, some games can load it at 100%, slow down and freeze, and performing any tasks in the background will lead to a drop in FPS. Ideally, the budget shopper should aim for a minimum of 4/8 and 6/6. A gamer with a big budget can choose between 6/12, 8/8 and 8/16. Processors with 10 and 12 cores can perform well in games with high frequency and fast memory, but are overkill for such tasks. When choosing a processor to work with, consider how many cores your programs use. For example, photo and video editors can use 1-2 cores when working with filtering, and rendering or converting in the same editors already uses all threads. Data obtained from tests by users who tested their systems both with overclocking (maximum value in the table) and without (minimum). A typical result is shown in the middle, the more filled in the color bar, the better the average result among all tested systems. BenchmarksBenchmarks were run on stock hardware, that is, without overclocking and with factory settings. Therefore, on overclocked systems, the points can noticeably differ upwards. Also, small performance changes may be due to the BIOS version. Price in Russia Want to buy cheap FX-9590? Look at the list of stores that already sell the processor in your city. Speed in gamesPerformance in games and similar applications, according to our tests. The performance of 4 cores, if any, and performance per core has the greatest impact on the result, since most games do not fully use more than 4 cores. The speed of caches and working with RAM is also important. Speed in office usePerformance in everyday work such as browsers and office applications. The performance of 1 core has the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications use only one, ignoring the rest. Similarly, many professional applications such as various CADs ignore multi-threaded performance. Speed in heavy applicationsPerformance in resource-intensive tasks loading a maximum of 8 cores. The performance of all cores and their number has the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications willingly use all the cores and increase the speed accordingly. At the same time, certain periods of work can be demanding on the performance of one or two cores, for example, applying filters in the editor. Data obtained from tests by users who tested their systems with and without overclocking. Thus, you see the average values corresponding to the processor. Performance in resource-intensive tasks loading a maximum of 8 cores. Benchmarkdb. en 07.12.2018 23:40:01 2018-12-07 23:40:01 Sources:Https://benchmarkdb. ru/cpu/amd/fx-9590/ Waiting for AMD Ryzen: exploring what the FX-9 processor can do590 BE in modern games » /> » /> .keyword { color: red; } Amd fx 9590 tests in games Test of AMD FX-9590 BE (Vishera), Core i7-6700K (Skylake) processors and eleven video cards in two operating modes and 1920 x 1080 resolution. new Ryzen CPUs will enter the processor market. AMD and many of its users have great hopes for new products, hoping that at least they will catch up with the older Intel Core i7 models, and at the maximum, they will get ahead of them. The main hero of this material will be the older eight-core CPU AMD FX-9590 BE, tested in conjunction with current video cards:
GeForce GTX 1080 8192 MB; GeForce GTX 1070 8192 MB; GeForce GTX 1060 6144 MB; GeForce GTX 1060 3072 MB; GeForce GTX 1050 Ti 4096 MB; GeForce GTX 1050 2048 MB. In addition, the Core i7-6700K processor will be tested with these models. When compared with its performance, we will determine the performance level of the FX-9590 B.E. In the future, a similar test will be conducted with a representative of the new AMD Ryzen processors. It is already interesting what will be presented to us in a few weeks. But for now, let’s start small. Recall that you can learn about the work of test benches, methodology and processing of results from a detailed story about testing components in games. ContentsAdvertisementNew Ryzen CPUs are coming to the processor market very soon. AMD and many of its users have great hopes for new products, hoping that at least they will catch up with the older Intel Core i7 models, and at the maximum, they will get ahead of them. Just like in the good old days when AMD K8 Athlon 64 processors were introduced to us. The main hero of this material will be the older eight-core CPU AMD FX-9590 BE, tested in conjunction with current video cards:
GeForce GTX 1080 8192 MB; GeForce GTX 1070 8192 MB; GeForce GTX 1060 6144 MB; GeForce GTX 1060 3072 MB; GeForce GTX 1050 Ti 4096 MB; GeForce GTX 1050 2048 MB. In addition, the Core i7-6700K processor will be tested with these models. When compared with its performance, we will determine the performance level of the FX-9590 B.E. In the future, a similar test will be conducted with a representative of the new AMD Ryzen processors. It is already interesting what will be presented to us in a few weeks. But for now, let’s start small. Recall that you can learn about the work of test benches, methodology and processing of results from a detailed story about testing components in games. Advertisement While waiting for AMD Ryzen, we are exploring what the FX-9590 BE processor is capable of in modern games. Overclockers. en 03/04/2017 20:08:41 2017-03-04 20:08:41 Sources:Https://overclockers. ru/lab/show/82120/v-ozhidanii-amd-ryzen-izuchaem-na-chto-sposoben-processor-fx-9590-be-v-sovremennyh-igrah AMD FX-9590 — Processor specifications and tests AMD FX-9590 runs with 8 and 8 CPU threads It runs at 5.00 GHz base 5.00 GHz all cores while TDP is set to 220 W 2 to support DDR3-1866 RAM and supports PCIe Gen . Tjunction is kept below — degrees C.
Where to buy?Buy AMD FX-9590
Memory & PCIe
Encryption
Internal graphics
Technical details
Temperature control
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core) Cinebench R15 is the successor to Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on Cinema 4 Suite. Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)Cinebench R15 is the successor to Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D forms. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading. Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)Geekbench 5 is a memory-intensive, cross-platform test. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account. Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)Geekbench 5 is a memory-intensive, cross-platform test. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading. Blender 2.
Blender is a free 3D graphics software for rendering (creating) 3D bodies that can also be textured and animated in the program. The Blender test creates predefined scenes and measures the time(s) required for the entire scene. The less time it takes, the better. We chose the bmw27 as our reference scene. Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)Geekbench 3 is a cross-platform benchmark that is memory intensive. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account. Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)Geekbench 3 is a cross-platform benchmark that is memory intensive. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading. Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core) Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular for creating shapes and other things in 3D. Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)Cinebench 11.5 is based on Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular for creating shapes and other things in 3D. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading. Estimated results for PassMark CPU MarkSome of the processors listed below have been tested with CPU-Comparison. However, most of the processors were not tested and the results were evaluated by the secret patented CPU-Comparison formula. As such, they do not accurately reflect the actual values of Passmark CPU ratings and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd. Popular comparisonComments In both processor models, the number of transistors coincides: 1200 million |
Know channels for working with RAM in two CPUs 2 |
Two CPU models |
9 die area is 315 mm square |
CPUs have the same 3rd cache size 8192 Kilobytes |
Comparison of instructions and technologies
Other data
BenchmarksOverall performance ratingThe rating is calculated according to the formula, taking into account indicators such as test results of all benchmarks, technology, number of cores, threads, architecture, temperature data, socket, instructions, release year, frequency, and much more. The results of the overall rating showed that FX-9590 surpasses its rival FX-6300 in most parameters. The FX-6300 barely scores 4755.28 points compared to its competitor.
PassMark CPU Mark Perhaps the most popular benchmark tester on the Internet. The benchmark has a wide range of tests for a comprehensive assessment of PC performance, in particular the processor. Among them are game physics calculations, encryption, compression, extended instruction checking, floating point calculations, integer calculations, single-threaded and multi-threaded tests.
Cinebench 10 (32 bit) Single-threaded testThis benchmark for testing processors and video cards is very outdated nowadays. The Single-Core version in its test uses only one core and one thread for rendering. Works on Mac, Windows operating systems. Uses the method of geometric optics — ray tracing. The basic mode of passing tests for speed is spatial light sources, multilevel reflections, working with light, simulating global illumination, photorealistic rendering of a 3D scene, and procedural shaders. It is possible to check many processor systems. MAXON appeared, it is based on the 3D editor Cinema 4D.
Cinebench 10 (32 bit) Multi-thread test Multi-Thread is another test method in Cinebench R10 benchmark that uses multi-thread and multi-core test method.
Cinebench 11.5 (64-bit) Multi-threaded testMulti-threaded version of the CINEBENCH 11.5 test, it has the ability to load the CPU at 100 percent, including all threads and cores. It differs from previous versions of the program, 64 threads are already supported here. FX-9 testing590 in the Cinebench R11.5 benchmark gave 7.4 points, which indicates a higher performance of this model. While the FX-6300 scores 5.31 points, it is way behind its rival in this test.
Cinebench 11.5 (64-bit) Single-threaded test Excellent multifunctional Cinebench version 11.5 from Maxon. In this Single-Core variant, tests are performed using one thread and one core. His tests to this day have not lost their relevance. In tests, as before, the ray tracing process is used, a highly detailed 3D space is calculated with many crystalline and glass and translucent spheres.
Cinebench 15 (64-bit)Multi Core Cinebench R15 will test your system to its fullest, demonstrating everything it can do. It is ideal for testing modern multi-threaded CPUs from AMD and Intel, as it is capable of using 256 computation threads. All CPU cores and threads are involved in the process of rendering complex 3D models. FX-9The 590, with a score of 713, unequivocally scores more in the Multi-Core test from Cinebench 15. While its competitor FX-6300 is far behind with a score of 456 in the test.
Cinebench 15 (64-bit) Single-threaded test Cinebench 15 is the most modern tester from the Finns from Maxon to date. In the Single Core version of the program, only 1 thread is involved in the rendering.
Geekbench 4.0 (64-bit) Multi-threaded test64-bit multi-threaded Geekbench 4 test. It is the multi-platform support of operating systems and devices that makes Geekbench tests the most popular now. It’s Geekbench 4 64-bit multi-core processor FX-9590 received 12075 points, which is significantly higher than the FX-6300. In this test, the FX-6300 scores an extremely low score of 8615 — compared to the FX-9590.
Geekbench 4.0 (64-bit) Single threaded benchmark The latest single threaded version of Geekbench 4 to test laptops and home PCs.
Geekbench 3 (32 bit) Multi-threaded testThe Multi Core version of the Geekbench 3 benchmark — will allow you to make a big «strength» test of your processor and show how productive your system is.
Geekbench 3 (32 bit) Single-threaded test The Geekbench cross-platform tester is often used to test a Mac system, but it works on both Linux and Windows. The basic purpose is to test the efficiency of the CPU. The 32-bit version of the test uses no more than one processor core and one thread.
Geekbench 2The version of Geekbench 2 is no longer relevant. In our archive you can find about 200 processor models that have test results in this benchmark. To date, there are newer options, the fourth and fifth.
X264 HD 4.0 Pass 1In essence, this is a practical test of processor performance by transcoding HD video files to H.264 format or the so-called MPEG 4 x264 codec. The number of frames processed per second is the result of the test. This test is faster than Pass 2 because it encodes at the same speed. This is the most suitable test for multi-threaded processors and multi-core ones. MPEG 4 video processing speed for FX-9590 is much higher at 178.18 FPS. But the FX-6300 did a poor job, its speed was 116.19 FPS.
X264 HD 4.0 Pass 2 This is a slightly different, slower test based on video file compression. You need to be aware that the real task is being carried out, and the x264 codec is used in a variety of video encoders.
3DMark06 CPU Benchmark program for evaluating the performance of the video system and CPU. This test is often used by gamers and overclockers and those who like to overclock processors. Processors are tested in 2 ways: artificial intelligence calculates the pathfinding, and the second test emulates the engine using PhysX. Written using the DirectX 9 API.0 by the Finnish company Futuremark. The FX-9590 performed significantly faster in the pathfinding and game physics tests, with a score of 9248. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Higher memory frequency may be supported depending on the motherboard. 
Also includes a separate single-threaded test. 
99
2% 
This processor runs on the Vishera Core, the CPU itself is designed using a 32 nm process technology (lithography). The number of cores in the processor is 8, and the total clock speed is 4700MHz . This AMD brand CPU has a socket (connector) to connect to the AM3+ motherboard. The third level cache (L3) is 8192 KB, and the second level cache (L2) is 8192 KB. Maximum memory bandwidth information: 21 Gb/s. By the manufacturer, this processor is positioned as a CPU for systems of the type: Desktop PCs. Known start date for the release (production) of this processor: 07/23/2013. 
This processor uses the Yorkfield core, and the processor itself is made according to the 45 nm manufacturing process. The number of cores in it is 4 , and the total clock speed of this processor is 3000MHz . This Intel product connects to the computer motherboard using the LGA775 connector (socket). The third level memory is — , and the second level memory is 12288 KB . Maximum memory bandwidth found on the manufacturer’s website: — . This processor is presented by the company as a CPU for systems: Desktop PCs . Start date of production (release) of this processor: Q3 2008 . 
This Intel product is connected to the computer motherboard using a connector (socket) S478 . The third level memory is — , and the second level memory is 1024 KB . Maximum memory bandwidth found on the manufacturer’s website: — . This processor is presented by the company as a CPU for systems: Desktop PCs . Start date of production (release) of this processor: Q1 2004 . 
0001 
5 Desktop 
237 Frames/s 
590 mHash/s 
735 Frames/s 
99 
375V — Max: 1.5375V 
other processor comparison
This is a desktop processor based on the Vishera architecture, primarily designed for office systems. It has 8 cores and 8 threads and is manufactured using 32nm process technology, the maximum frequency is 5000MHz, the multiplier is locked. 
375 V — Max: 1.5375 V 
We regularly improve our algorithms, but if you find any inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in the comments section, we usually fix problems quickly. 
Also, buying for the future is a dubious undertaking, since in a few years many slow cores may not provide sufficient gaming performance. 
Just like in the good old days when AMD K8 Athlon 64 processors were introduced to us. 
In particular, the Vishera (Piledriver) architecture has been advanced over 32 nm and supports AMD-V . The product was launched Q3/2013 
displays 
Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D forms. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account. 
81 (bmw27)
The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account. 
8 
0 
15 V — Max: 1.3875 V 
In particular, it is possible to compare the received data with other configurations in a common database. Almost all of our processors have passed PassMark tests. Performance Test showed a clear advantage of the FX-9 processor590 (10194 points) over FX-6300 (4137 points). The FX-6300 with a score of 4137 clearly loses in this test. 
Keep in mind that the number of threads in this version of the program is limited to sixteen. 
The result of the test is the value «number of frames per second». Testing in single-threaded mode of the FX-9 processor590 in Cinebench 11.5 Single-Core showed that with a score of 0.77 points, it is not far ahead of the competitor. But the FX-6300 itself scored 0.73 points in this test. 
A complex 3D scene is rendered with many detailed objects, light sources and reflections. The whole system is tested: both processors and video cards. For the CPU, the result of the analysis will be the number of PTS points, and for video cards, the value of frames per second. FPS. Single-threaded test of the FX-9 processor590 in the Cinebench R15 program showed a result of 114 points, slightly ahead of the competitor. With a score of 94 on this test, the FX-6300 is not far behind. 
For the first time in this version of the program, both smartphones and tablets running iOS and Android operating systems are supported. The Single-Core version uses 1 processor thread. This product, like its earlier versions, can still run on operating systems: Linux, Windows, Mac OS. The FX-9590 scores the highest in Geekbench 4 single-threaded testing with a score of 3109points, but not much ahead of the opponent. But the FX-6300 itself also showed a good score of 2743 points, slightly losing its place to the FX-9590 model. 
The resulting value is also measured in frames per second. As a result, we get a higher quality video file. The same MPEG4 x264 codec is used, but the processing is performed at an inconsistent rate. And this means that the results of the checks realistically reflect the performance of the platform. When measuring the speed of video file compression by the FX-9 processor590 in mpeg4 format — the result was 42.34 FPS. Its competitor FX-6300 showed a much lower video encoding rate compared to it — 28.21 FPS. 