Amd fx vs intel core i7: AMD FX-8350 vs Intel Core i7-4770K: What is the difference?

AMD FX-8350 vs Intel Core i7-4770K: What is the difference?

35points

AMD FX-8350

49points

Intel Core i7-4770K

64 facts in comparison

AMD FX-8350

Intel Core i7-4770K

Why is AMD FX-8350 better than Intel Core i7-4770K?

2.29x faster CPU speed?
8 x 4GHzvs4 x 3.5GHz
266MHz higher ram speed?
1866MHzvs1600MHz
7MB bigger L2 cache?
8MBvs1MB
0.3GHz higher turbo clock speed?
4.2GHzvs3.9GHz
128KB bigger L1 cache?
384KBvs256KB
0.75MB/core more L2 cache per core?
1MB/corevs0.25MB/core
32GB larger maximum memory amount?
64GBvs32GB
0.4GT/s faster bus transfer rate?
5.4GT/svs5GT/s

Why is Intel Core i7-4770K better than AMD FX-8350?

10nm smaller semiconductor size?
22nmvs32nm
18. 83% higher PassMark result?
7042vs5926
41W lower TDP?
84Wvs125W
1 newer version of PCI Express (PCIe)?
3vs2
Has integrated graphics?
4.6GB/s more memory bandwidth?
25.6GB/svs21GB/s
37.43% higher PassMark result (single)?
2148vs1563
34.83% higher multi-core Geekbench 5 result?
3705vs2748

Which are the most popular comparisons?

AMD FX-8350

AMD Ryzen 5 3600

Intel Core i7-4770K

AMD A10-7850K

AMD FX-8350

AMD Ryzen 5 5600G

Intel Core i7-4770K

Intel Core i7-4790K

AMD FX-8350

AMD FX-6300

Intel Core i7-4770K

Intel Core i5-9400F

AMD FX-8350

AMD Phenom II X4 965

Intel Core i7-4770K

Intel Core i5-11400H

AMD FX-8350

AMD Ryzen 5 5500U

Intel Core i7-4770K

Intel Atom x5-Z8350

AMD FX-8350

AMD FX-8320

Intel Core i7-4770K

AMD Ryzen 5 3600

AMD FX-8350

Intel Core i7-3770

Intel Core i7-4770K

AMD Ryzen 3 2200G

AMD FX-8350

Intel Core i7-4770

Intel Core i7-4770K

Intel Core i3-9100F

AMD FX-8350

AMD Ryzen 3 3200G

Intel Core i7-4770K

Intel Core i5-10400

Price comparison

User reviews

Overall Rating

AMD FX-8350

5 User reviews

AMD FX-8350

9. 8/10

5 User reviews

Intel Core i7-4770K

0 User reviews

Intel Core i7-4770K

0.0/10

0 User reviews

Features

Value for money

9.6/10

5 votes

No reviews yet

Gaming

9.6/10

5 votes

No reviews yet

Performance

9.2/10

5 votes

No reviews yet

Reliability

9.6/10

5 votes

No reviews yet

Energy efficiency

8.6/10

5 votes

No reviews yet

Performance

1.CPU speed

8 x 4GHz

4 x 3.5GHz

The CPU speed indicates how many processing cycles per second can be executed by a CPU, considering all of its cores (processing units). It is calculated by adding the clock rates of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors employing different microarchitectures, of each group of cores.

2. CPU threads

More threads result in faster performance and better multitasking.

3.turbo clock speed

4.2GHz

3.9GHz

When the CPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased performance.

4.Has an unlocked multiplier

✔AMD FX-8350

✔Intel Core i7-4770K

Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier which makes them easy to overclock, allowing you to gain increased performance in games and other apps.

5.L2 cache

A larger L2 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.

6.L3 cache

A larger L3 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.

7.L1 cache

A larger L1 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.

8.L2 core

1MB/core

0. 25MB/core

More data can be stored in the L2 cache for access by each core of the CPU.

9.L3 core

1MB/core

2MB/core

More data can be stored in the L3 cache for access by each core of the CPU.

Memory

1.RAM speed

1866MHz

1600MHz

It can support faster memory, which will give quicker system performance.

2.maximum memory bandwidth

21GB/s

25.6GB/s

This is the maximum rate that data can be read from or stored into memory.

3.DDR memory version

DDR (Double Data Rate) memory is the most common type of RAM. Newer versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy-efficient.

4.memory channels

More memory channels increases the speed of data transfer between the memory and the CPU.

5. maximum memory amount

The maximum amount of memory (RAM) supported.

6.bus transfer rate

5.4GT/s

The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.

7.Supports ECC memory

✖AMD FX-8350

✖Intel Core i7-4770K

Error-correcting code memory can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when is it essential to avoid corruption, such as scientific computing or when running a server.

8.eMMC version

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD FX-8350)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i7-4770K)

A higher version of eMMC allows faster memory interfaces, having a positive effect on the performance of a device. For example, when transferring files from your computer to the internal storage over USB.

9.bus speed

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD FX-8350)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i7-4770K)

The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.

Benchmarks

1.PassMark result

This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using multiple threads.

2.PassMark result (single)

This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using a single thread.

3.Geekbench 5 result (multi)

Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s multi-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)

4.Cinebench R20 (multi) result

Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s multi-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.

5.Cinebench R20 (single) result

Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s single-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.

6.Geekbench 5 result (single)

Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s single-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)

7.Blender (bmw27) result

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD FX-8350)

440.7seconds

The Blender (bmw27) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.

8.Blender (classroom) result

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD FX-8350)

1376.9seconds

The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.

9.performance per watt

This means the CPU is more efficient, giving a greater amount of performance for each watt of power used.

Features

1. uses multithreading

✖AMD FX-8350

✔Intel Core i7-4770K

Multithreading technology (such as Intel’s Hyperthreading or AMD’s Simultaneous Multithreading) provides increased performance by splitting each of the processor’s physical cores into virtual cores, also known as threads. This way, each core can run two instruction streams at once.

2.Has AES

✔AMD FX-8350

✔Intel Core i7-4770K

AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.

3.Has AVX

✔AMD FX-8350

✔Intel Core i7-4770K

AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial apps, as well as improving Linux RAID software performance.

4.SSE version

SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing an image or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.

5.Has F16C

✔AMD FX-8350

✔Intel Core i7-4770K

F16C is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.

6.bits executed at a time

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD FX-8350)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i7-4770K)

NEON provides acceleration for media processing, such as listening to MP3s.

7.Has MMX

✔AMD FX-8350

✔Intel Core i7-4770K

MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.

8.Has TrustZone

✖AMD FX-8350

✖Intel Core i7-4770K

A technology integrated into the processor to secure the device for use with features such as mobile payments and streaming video using digital rights management (DRM).

9.front-end width

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD FX-8350)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i7-4770K)

The CPU can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), meaning that the CPU performs better

Price comparison

Cancel

Which are the best CPUs?

AMD FX-8350 vs Intel Core i7-3770: What is the difference?

35points

AMD FX-8350

42points

Intel Core i7-3770

64 facts in comparison

AMD FX-8350

Intel Core i7-3770

Why is AMD FX-8350 better than Intel Core i7-3770?

2. 35x faster CPU speed?
8 x 4GHzvs4 x 3.4GHz
266MHz higher ram speed?
1866MHzvs1600MHz
7MB bigger L2 cache?
8MBvs1MB
0.3GHz higher turbo clock speed?
4.2GHzvs3.9GHz
128KB bigger L1 cache?
384KBvs256KB
Has an unlocked multiplier?
0.75MB/core more L2 cache per core?
1MB/corevs0.25MB/core
32GB larger maximum memory amount?
64GBvs32GB

Why is Intel Core i7-3770 better than AMD FX-8350?

44°C higher maximum operating temperature?
105°Cvs61°C
10nm smaller semiconductor size?
22nmvs32nm
1.6x higher PassMark result?
9460vs5926
48W lower TDP?
77Wvs125W
1 newer version of PCI Express (PCIe)?
3vs2
Has integrated graphics?
4. 6GB/s more memory bandwidth?
25.6GB/svs21GB/s
32.63% higher PassMark result (single)?
2073vs1563

Which are the most popular comparisons?

AMD FX-8350

AMD Ryzen 5 3600

Intel Core i7-3770

Intel Core i5-3470

AMD FX-8350

Intel Core i7-4770K

Intel Core i7-3770

Intel Core i5-3570

AMD FX-8350

AMD Ryzen 5 5600G

Intel Core i7-3770

Intel Core i5-6500

AMD FX-8350

AMD FX-6300

Intel Core i7-3770

Intel Core i7-2600

AMD FX-8350

AMD Phenom II X4 965

Intel Core i7-3770

Intel Core i7-3770K

AMD FX-8350

AMD Ryzen 5 5500U

Intel Core i7-3770

Intel Core i7-3770S

AMD FX-8350

AMD FX-8320

Intel Core i7-3770

Intel Core i5-10400

AMD FX-8350

Intel Core i7-4770

Intel Core i7-3770

Intel Core i5-4570

AMD FX-8350

AMD Ryzen 3 3200G

Intel Core i7-3770

Intel Core i3-10100

Intel Core i7-3770

Intel Core i5-7400

Price comparison

User reviews

Overall Rating

AMD FX-8350

5 User reviews

AMD FX-8350

9. 8/10

5 User reviews

Intel Core i7-3770

3 User reviews

Intel Core i7-3770

9.0/10

3 User reviews

Features

Value for money

9.6/10

5 votes

8.7/10

3 votes

Gaming

9.6/10

5 votes

9.0/10

3 votes

Performance

9.2/10

5 votes

10.0/10

3 votes

Reliability

9.6/10

5 votes

10.0/10

3 votes

Energy efficiency

8.6/10

5 votes

9.0/10

3 votes

Performance

1.CPU speed

8 x 4GHz

4 x 3.4GHz

2. CPU threads

More threads result in faster performance and better multitasking.

3.turbo clock speed

4.2GHz

3.9GHz

When the CPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased performance.

4.Has an unlocked multiplier

✔AMD FX-8350

✖Intel Core i7-3770

Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier which makes them easy to overclock, allowing you to gain increased performance in games and other apps.

5.L2 cache

A larger L2 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.

6.L3 cache

A larger L3 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.

7.L1 cache

A larger L1 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.

8.L2 core

1MB/core

0. 25MB/core

More data can be stored in the L2 cache for access by each core of the CPU.

9.L3 core

1MB/core

2MB/core

More data can be stored in the L3 cache for access by each core of the CPU.

Memory

1.RAM speed

1866MHz

1600MHz

It can support faster memory, which will give quicker system performance.

2.maximum memory bandwidth

21GB/s

25.6GB/s

This is the maximum rate that data can be read from or stored into memory.

3.DDR memory version

DDR (Double Data Rate) memory is the most common type of RAM. Newer versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy-efficient.

4.memory channels

More memory channels increases the speed of data transfer between the memory and the CPU.

5. maximum memory amount

The maximum amount of memory (RAM) supported.

6.bus transfer rate

5.4GT/s

The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.

7.Supports ECC memory

✖AMD FX-8350

✖Intel Core i7-3770

Error-correcting code memory can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when is it essential to avoid corruption, such as scientific computing or when running a server.

8.eMMC version

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD FX-8350)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i7-3770)

9.bus speed

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD FX-8350)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i7-3770)

The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.

Benchmarks

1.PassMark result

This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using multiple threads.

2.PassMark result (single)

This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using a single thread.

3.Geekbench 5 result (multi)

Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s multi-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)

4.Cinebench R20 (multi) result

Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s multi-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.

5.Cinebench R20 (single) result

Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s single-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.

6.Geekbench 5 result (single)

Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s single-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)

7.Blender (bmw27) result

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD FX-8350)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i7-3770)

The Blender (bmw27) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.

8.Blender (classroom) result

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD FX-8350)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i7-3770)

The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.

9.performance per watt

This means the CPU is more efficient, giving a greater amount of performance for each watt of power used.

Features

1.uses multithreading

✖AMD FX-8350

✔Intel Core i7-3770

2.Has AES

✔AMD FX-8350

✔Intel Core i7-3770

AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.

3.Has AVX

✔AMD FX-8350

✔Intel Core i7-3770

AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial apps, as well as improving Linux RAID software performance.

4.SSE version

SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing an image or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.

5.Has F16C

✔AMD FX-8350

✔Intel Core i7-3770

F16C is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.

6.bits executed at a time

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD FX-8350)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i7-3770)

NEON provides acceleration for media processing, such as listening to MP3s.

7.Has MMX

✔AMD FX-8350

✔Intel Core i7-3770

MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.

8.Has TrustZone

✖AMD FX-8350

✖Intel Core i7-3770

A technology integrated into the processor to secure the device for use with features such as mobile payments and streaming video using digital rights management (DRM).

9.front-end width

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD FX-8350)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i7-3770)

The CPU can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), meaning that the CPU performs better

Price comparison

Cancel

Which are the best CPUs?

FX-8350 vs Core i7-12700K — How Many FPS

Availability

AMD FD8350FRHKBOX FX-8350 FX-Series 8-Core Black Edition Processor

Buy on Amazon

$207.22

In Stock

Updated 98 minutes ago

Availability

Intel Core i7-12700K Desktop Processor 12 (8P+4E) Cores up to 5.0 GHz Unlocked LGA1700 600 Series Chipset 125W

Buy on Amazon

$399.99

In Stock

Updated 98 minutes ago

Key Differences

In short — Core i7-12700K outperforms the cheaper FX-8350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-12700K is 3299 days newer than the cheaper FX-8350.

Advantages of AMD FX-8350

Advantages of Intel Core i7-12700K

Performs up to 73% better in Apex Legends than FX-8350 — 383 vs 221 FPS
Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8350 — 20 vs 8 threads
Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8350 doesn’t have integrated graphics

Apex Legends

Resolution

1920×1080

Game Graphics

High

FX-8350

Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012

FPS

221

58%

Value, $/FPS

$0.94/FPS

100%

Price, $

$207.22

100%

Value Winner

AMD FD8350FRHKBOX FX-8350 FX-Series 8-Core Black Edition Processor

Buy for $207.22 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 98 minutes ago

Core i7-12700K

Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021

FPS

383

100%

Value, $/FPS

$1.04/FPS

90%

Price, $

$399.99

51%

FPS Winner

Intel Core i7-12700K Desktop Processor 12 (8P+4E) Cores up to 5. 0 GHz Unlocked LGA1700 600 Series Chipset 125W

Buy for $399.99 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 98 minutes ago

Resolution

1920×1080

Game Graphics

High

FX-8350

Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012

Core i7-12700K

Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021

838

FPS

1360

FPS

League of Legends

360

FPS

599

FPS

VALORANT

206

FPS

345

FPS

Grand Theft Auto V

221

FPS

383

FPS

Apex Legends

509

FPS

844

FPS

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Geekbench 5 Benchmarks

FX-8350

Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012

Single-Core

566

30%

Multi-Core

2773

20%

Core i7-12700K

Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021

Single-Core

1898

100%

Multi-Core

13767

100%

AMD FX-8350	vs	Intel Core i7-12700K
Oct 23rd, 2012	Release Date	Nov 4th, 2021
FX	Collection	Core i7
Vishera	Codename	Alder Lake
AMD Socket AM3+	Socket	Intel Socket 1700
Desktop	Segment	Desktop
8	Cores	12
8	Threads	20
4. 0 GHz	Base Clock Speed	3.6 GHz
4.2 GHz	Turbo Clock Speed	5.0 GHz
125 W	TDP	125 W
32 nm	Process Size	10 nm
20.0x	Multiplier	36.0x
None	Integrated Graphics	UHD Graphics 770
Yes	Overclockable	Yes

Builds Using FX-8350 or Core i7-12700K

Apex Legends, 1080p, High

Acer Predator Orion 7000 PO7-640-UR11 Gaming Desktop PC

364 FPS

$6.87/FPS

GeForce RTX 3080

Core i7-12700K

32 GB, 2 TB HDD

Buy on Amazon

$2,499

In Stock

Updated 85 minutes ago

Skytech Chronos Gaming PC

364 FPS

$6.32/FPS

GeForce RTX 3080

Core i7-12700K

16 GB, 1 TB SSD

Buy on Amazon

$2,299.99

In Stock

Updated 89 minutes ago

Dell XPS 8950 Desktop PC

238 FPS

$6. 6/FPS

GeForce RTX 3060

Core i7-12700K

16 GB, 512 GB SSD + 1 TB HDD

Buy on Amazon

$1,569.99

In Stock

Updated 86 minutes ago

Skytech Prism II Gaming PC

399 FPS

$6.27/FPS

GeForce RTX 3080 Ti

Core i7-12700K

16 GB, N/A Storage

Buy on Amazon

$2,499.99

In Stock

Updated 86 minutes ago

Dell XPS 8950 Gaming Desktop PC

238 FPS

$7.42/FPS

GeForce RTX 3060

Core i7-12700K

32 GB, 2 TB SSD + 2 TB HDD

Buy on Amazon

$1,765.4

In Stock

Updated 90 minutes ago

MSI Aegis RS (Tower) Gaming Desktop PC

341 FPS

$6.06/FPS

GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

Core i7-12700K

16 GB, 1 TB SSD

Buy on Amazon

$2,064.99

In Stock

Updated 90 minutes ago

MSI Aegis RS (Tower) Gaming Desktop PC

364 FPS

$6.93/FPS

GeForce RTX 3080

Core i7-12700K

32 GB, 1 TB SSD + 2 TB HDD

Buy on Amazon

$2,523. 26

In Stock

Updated 89 minutes ago

Acer Predator Orion 7000 PO7-640-UR11 Tower, Intel i7-12700K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, 32GB DDR5, 1TB SSD, 2TB HDD | Intel Wi-Fi 6E with Acer Predator XB283K KVbmiipruzx 28″ UHD 144Hz IPS Monitor PC

364 FPS

$9.12/FPS

GeForce RTX 3080

Core i7-12700K

32 GB, 1 TB SSD + 2 TB HDD

Buy on Amazon

$3,319.98

In Stock

Updated 83 minutes ago

Skytech Chronos Gaming PC

364 FPS

$6.87/FPS

GeForce RTX 3080

Core i7-12700K

32 GB, 1 TB SSD

Buy on Amazon

$2,499.99

In Stock

Updated 84 minutes ago

MSI Aegis RS (Tower) Gaming Desktop PC

314 FPS

$6.57/FPS

GeForce RTX 3070

Core i7-12700K

16 GB, 1 TB SSD

Buy on Amazon

$2,064

In Stock

Updated 90 minutes ago

Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Core i9-12900K

$582.7

Core i7-12700K

$399.99

Core i7-8700K

Core i7-12700K

$399.99

Core i7-12700K

$399.99

Ryzen 9 5900X

Core i7-12700K

$399.99

Core i5-12600K

$277.99

Core i7-12700K

$399.99

Core i9-11900K

Core i7-6700K

$239.99

Core i7-12700K

$399.99

Core i7-11700K

$272.43

Core i7-12700K

$399.99

Core i7-10700K

$259.99

Core i7-12700K

$399.99

Core i7-12700K

$399.99

Core i9-9900K

AMD FX-8350 vs Intel Core i7-11700F

AMD FX-8350 vs Intel Core i7-11700F

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the AMD FX-8350 on one side and the Intel Core i7-11700F on the other side. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, It has 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximum frequency of 4,2GHz. The second is used on the desktop segment, it has a total of 8 cores, 16 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 4,9 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.

Specifications:

Processor	AMD FX-8350	Intel Core i7-11700F
Market (main)	Desktop	Desktop
ISA	x86-64 (64 bit)	x86-64 (64 bit)
Microarchitecture	Piledriver	Rocket Lake
Core name	Vishera	Rocket Lake-S
Family	FX-8000	Core i7-11000
Part number(s), S-Spec	FD8350FRW8KHK, FD8350FRHKBOX, FX-8350 Black Edition	BX8070811700F, BXC8070811700F, CM8070804491213, QWJQ, SRKNR
Release date	Q4 2012	Q1 2021
Lithography	32 nm SOI	14 nm+++
Transistors	1. 200.000.000	—
Cores	8	8
Threads	8	16
Base frequency	4,0 GHz	2,5 GHz
Turbo frequency	4,2 GHz	4,9 GHz
Cache memory	8 MB	16 MB
Max memory capacity	32 GB	128 GB
Memory types	DDR3-1866	DDR4-3200
Max # of memory channels	2	2
Max memory bandwidth	29,9 GB/s	50 GB/s
Max PCIe lanes	16	20
TDP	125 W	65 W
Suggested PSU	650W ATX Power Supply	600W ATX Power Supply
GPU integrated graphics	None	None
Socket	AM3+	LGA1200
Compatible motherboard	Socket AM3+ Motherboard	Socket LGA 1200 Motherboard
Maximum temperature	61°C	100°C
Drystone MIPS	97. 114 DMIPS	—
AI accelerator	—	Gaussian & Neural Accelerator, Deep Learning Boost
Crypto engine	—	AES New Instructions, Secure Key
Security	—	OS Guard, Execute Disable Bit, Boot Guard
CPU-Z single thread	231	641
CPU-Z multi thread	1.597	6.051
Cinebench R23 single thread	484	1.514
Cinebench R23 multi-thread	3. 355	10.053
PassMark single thread	1.573	3.389
PassMark CPU Mark	5.944	21.014
(Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 single core	2.738	7.180
(Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 multi-core	10.978	36.651
(SGEMM) GFLOPS performance	99,6 GFLOPS	663,9 GFLOPS
(Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio	88 pts / W	564 pts / W
Amazon
eBay

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.

Suggested PSU: We assume that we have An ATX computer case, a high end graphics card, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, a 1TB HDD hard drive, a Blu-Ray drive. We will have to rely on a more powerful power supply if we want to have several graphics cards, several monitors, more memory, etc.

Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

We see that the two processors have an equivalent number of cores, the turbo frequency of Intel Core i7-11700F is bigger, that the thermal dissipation power of Intel Core i7-11700F is less. The Intel Core i7-11700F was started more recently.

Performances :

Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.

	CPU-Z — Multi-thread & single thread score
Intel Core i7-11700F	641 6.051
AMD FX-8350	231 1.597

In single core, the difference is 177%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 279%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.

	Cinebench R23 — Multi-thread & single thread score
Intel Core i7-11700F	1. 514 10.053
AMD FX-8350	484 3.355

In single core, the difference is 213%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 200%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Cinebench R23 is cross-platform testing software that allows you to assess the hardware capabilities of a device such as a computer, tablet, server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant. The test scene contains no less than 2,000 objects and more than 300,000 polygons in total.

	PassMark — CPU Mark & single thread
Intel Core i7-11700F	3. 389 21.014
AMD FX-8350	1.573 5.944

In single core, the difference is 115%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 254%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.

On Windows 64-bit:

	Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows 64-bit
Intel Core i7-11700F	7.180 36. 651
AMD FX-8350	2.738 10.978

In single core, the difference is 162%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 234%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.

Equivalence:

AMD FX-8350 Intel equivalentIntel Core i7-11700F AMD equivalent

AMD FX-9800P vs Intel Core i7-7500U

log 03. 14:15:34

#0 checking url part for id 8158 +0s … 0s

#1 checking url part for id 8149 +0s … 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s … 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 30 Sep 2022 13:14:19 +0200 +0s … 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.009s … 0.009s

#5 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s … 0.01s

#6 composed specs +0.001s … 0.012s

#7 did output specs +0s … 0.012s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 8158 +0s … 0.012s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.013s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.013s

#11 got single benchmarks 8158 +0.008s … 0.021s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 8149 +0s … 0.021s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.021s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.021s

#15 got single benchmarks 8149 +0.018s … 0.039s

#16 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s … 0.039s

#17 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.039s

#18 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s … 0.04s

#19 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s … 0.04s

#20 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.04s

#21 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.04s

#22 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s … 0.041s

#23 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.041s

#24 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.041s

#25 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s … 0.042s

#26 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.042s

#27 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s … 0.044s

#28 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.149s … 0.193s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.193s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.193s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.193s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.193s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.193s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.193s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.193s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.193s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.193s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.193s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.193s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.193s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.193s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.194s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.194s

#44 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.194s

#45 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s . .. 0.194s

#46 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.194s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.194s

#48 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.194s

#49 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.194s

#50 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.194s

#51 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.194s

#52 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.194s

#53 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.194s

#54 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.194s

#55 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.194s

#56 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.194s

#57 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.194s

#58 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.194s

#59 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.194s

#60 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.194s

#61 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.194s

#62 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.194s

#63 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.194s

#64 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.194s

#65 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.194s

#66 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.194s

#67 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.194s

#68 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.194s

#69 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.194s

#70 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.194s

#71 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.194s

#72 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.194s

#73 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.194s

#74 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.194s

#75 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.194s

#76 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.194s

#77 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.194s

#78 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.194s

#79 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.194s

#80 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.194s

#81 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.194s

#82 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s … 0.194s

#83 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.195s

#84 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.195s

#85 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.195s

#86 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.195s

#87 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.195s

#88 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.195s

#89 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.195s

#90 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.195s

#91 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.195s

#92 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.195s

#93 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.195s

#94 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.195s

#95 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.195s

#96 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.195s

#97 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.195s

#98 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.195s

#99 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.195s

#100 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.195s

#101 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.195s

#102 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.195s

#103 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.195s

#104 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.195s

#105 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s . .. 0.195s

#106 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.196s

#107 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.196s

#108 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.196s

#109 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.196s

#110 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.196s

#111 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.196s

#112 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.196s

#113 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.196s

#114 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.196s

#115 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.196s

#116 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.196s

#117 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.196s

#118 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.196s

#119 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.196s

#120 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.196s

#121 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.196s

#122 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.196s

#123 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.196s

#124 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.196s

#125 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.196s

#126 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.196s

#127 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.196s

#128 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.196s

#129 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.196s

#130 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.196s

#131 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.196s

#132 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.196s

#133 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.196s

#134 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s .. . 0.197s

#135 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.197s

#136 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.197s

#137 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.197s

#138 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.197s

#139 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.197s

#140 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.197s

#141 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.197s

#142 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.197s

#143 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.197s

#144 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.197s

#145 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.197s

#146 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.197s

#147 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.197s

#148 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.197s

#149 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.197s

#150 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.197s

#151 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.197s

#152 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.197s

#153 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s … 0.197s

#154 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.197s

#155 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.197s

#156 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.197s

#157 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.197s

#158 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.197s

#159 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.197s

#160 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.197s

#161 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.197s

#162 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.197s

#163 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.197s

#164 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.197s

#165 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.197s

#166 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.197s

#167 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.197s

#168 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.197s

#169 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.197s

#170 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.197s

#171 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.197s

#172 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.197s

#173 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.197s

#174 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.197s

#175 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.197s

#176 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s .. . 0.197s

#177 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.198s

#178 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.198s

#179 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.198s

#180 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.198s

#181 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.198s

#182 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.198s

#183 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.199s

#184 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.199s

#185 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.199s

#186 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.199s

#187 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.199s

#188 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.199s

#189 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s … 0.199s

#190 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.199s

#191 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.199s

#192 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.199s

#193 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.2s

#194 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.2s

#195 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.2s

#196 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.2s

#197 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.2s

#198 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.2s

#199 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.2s

#200 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.2s

#201 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.2s

#202 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.2s

#203 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.2s

#204 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.2s

#205 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s .. . 0.2s

#206 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.2s

#207 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.2s

#208 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.2s

#209 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.2s

#210 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.2s

#211 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.2s

#212 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.2s

#213 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.2s

#214 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.2s

#215 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.2s

#216 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.2s

#217 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.2s

#218 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.2s

#219 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.2s

#220 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.2s

#221 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.2s

#222 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.2s

#223 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.2s

#224 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.2s

#225 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.2s

#226 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.2s

#227 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.2s

#228 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s … 0.201s

#229 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.201s

#230 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.201s

#231 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.201s

#232 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.201s

#233 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.201s

#234 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.201s

#235 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.201s

#236 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s … 0.202s

#237 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.202s

#238 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.202s

#239 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.202s

#240 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.202s

#241 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.202s

#242 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.202s

#243 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.202s

#244 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.202s

#245 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.202s

#246 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s … 0.202s

#247 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.202s

#248 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.202s

#249 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.202s

#250 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.202s

#251 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.202s

#252 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.202s

#253 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.202s

#254 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.202s

#255 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.202s

#256 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s … 0.203s

#257 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.203s

#258 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.203s

#259 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.203s

#260 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.203s

#261 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.203s

#262 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.203s

#263 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.203s

#264 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.203s

#265 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.203s

#266 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s … 0.203s

#267 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.204s

#268 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.204s

#269 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.204s

#270 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.204s

#271 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.204s

#272 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.204s

#273 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.204s

#274 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.204s

#275 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.204s

#276 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.204s

#277 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.204s

#278 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.204s

#279 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s .. . 0.204s

#280 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.204s

#281 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.204s

#282 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.204s

#283 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.204s

#284 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.204s

#285 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.204s

#286 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.205s

#287 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.205s

#288 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.205s

#289 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.205s

#290 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.205s

#291 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.205s

#292 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.205s

#293 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.205s

#294 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.205s

#295 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.205s

#296 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.205s

#297 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s … 0.205s

#298 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.206s

#299 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.206s

#300 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.206s

#301 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.206s

#302 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.206s

#303 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.206s

#304 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.206s

#305 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.206s

#306 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.206s

#307 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.206s

#308 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.206s

#309 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.206s

#310 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.206s

#311 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.206s

#312 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.206s

#313 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.206s

#314 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.206s

#315 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.206s

#316 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.207s

#317 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.207s

#318 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.207s

#319 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.207s

#320 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.207s

#321 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.207s

#322 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.207s

#323 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s . .. 0.207s

#324 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.207s

#325 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.207s

#326 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.207s

#327 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.207s

#328 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.207s

#329 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.207s

#330 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.207s

#331 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.207s

#332 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.207s

#333 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.207s

#334 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.207s

#335 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.207s

#336 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.208s

#337 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.208s

#338 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.208s

#339 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.208s

#340 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.208s

#341 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.208s

#342 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.208s

#343 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.208s

#344 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.208s

#345 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.208s

#346 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.208s

#347 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.208s

#348 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.208s

#349 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.208s

#350 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.208s

#351 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.208s

#352 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.208s

#353 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.208s

#354 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.208s

#355 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.208s

#356 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.208s

#357 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.208s

#358 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.208s

#359 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s … 0.209s

#360 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.209s

#361 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.209s

#362 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.209s

#363 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.209s

#364 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.209s

#365 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.209s

#366 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.209s

#367 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0. 209s

#368 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.209s

#369 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.209s

#370 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.209s

#371 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.209s

#372 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.21s

#373 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.21s

#374 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.21s

#375 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.21s

#376 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.21s

#377 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.21s

#378 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.21s

#379 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.21s

#380 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.21s

#381 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.21s

#382 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.21s

#383 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.21s

#384 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.21s

#385 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.21s

#386 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.21s

#387 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.21s

#388 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.21s

#389 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.21s

#390 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.21s

#391 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.21s

#392 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.21s

#393 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.21s

#394 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.21s

#395 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.21s

#396 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.21s

#397 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.21s

#398 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.21s

#399 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.21s

#400 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.21s

#401 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.21s

#402 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.21s

#403 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.21s

#404 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.21s

#405 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.21s

#406 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.21s

#407 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.21s

#408 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.21s

#409 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.21s

#410 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.21s

#411 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.21s

#412 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0. 001s … 0.21s

#413 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.211s

#414 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.211s

#415 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.211s

#416 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.211s

#417 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.211s

#418 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.211s

#419 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.211s

#420 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.211s

#421 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.211s

#422 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.211s

#423 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.211s

#424 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.211s

#425 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.211s

#426 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.211s

#427 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s . .. 0.211s

#428 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.211s

#429 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.211s

#430 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.211s

#431 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.211s

#432 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.211s

#433 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.211s

#434 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.211s

#435 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.211s

#436 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.211s

#437 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.211s

#438 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.211s

#439 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.211s

#440 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.211s

#441 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.211s

#442 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.211s

#443 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.211s

#444 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.211s

#445 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.211s

#446 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.211s

#447 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.211s

#448 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.211s

#449 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.211s

#450 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.211s

#451 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.211s

#452 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.211s

#453 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.211s

#454 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.211s

#455 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.212s

#456 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.212s

#457 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s . .. 0.212s

#458 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.212s

#459 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s … 0.212s

#460 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.212s

#461 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.212s

#462 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.212s

#463 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.212s

#464 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.212s

#465 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.212s

#466 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.212s

#467 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.212s

#468 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.212s

#469 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.212s

#470 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.212s

#471 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0. 212s

#472 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.212s

#473 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.212s

#474 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.212s

#475 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.212s

#476 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.212s

#477 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.213s

#478 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.213s

#479 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.213s

#480 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.213s

#481 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.213s

#482 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.213s

#483 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.213s

#484 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.213s

#485 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.213s

#486 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.213s

#487 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.213s

#488 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.213s

#489 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.213s

#490 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.213s

#491 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.213s

#492 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.213s

#493 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.213s

#494 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.213s

#495 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.213s

#496 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.213s

#497 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.213s

#498 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.213s

#499 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.213s

#500 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.213s

#501 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.213s

#502 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.213s

#503 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.213s

#504 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.213s

#505 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.213s

#506 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.213s

#507 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.213s

#508 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.213s

#509 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.213s

#510 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.213s

#511 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.213s

#512 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.213s

#513 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.213s

#514 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.213s

#515 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.213s

#516 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s . .. 0.213s

#517 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.213s

#518 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.213s

#519 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.213s

#520 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.213s

#521 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.213s

#522 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.213s

#523 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.213s

#524 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.213s

#525 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.213s

#526 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.214s

#527 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.214s

#528 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.214s

#529 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.214s

#530 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.214s

#531 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.214s

#532 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.214s

#533 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.214s

#534 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.214s

#535 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.214s

#536 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.214s

#537 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.214s

#538 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.214s

#539 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.214s

#540 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.214s

#541 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.214s

#542 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.214s

#543 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.214s

#544 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.214s

#545 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.214s

#546 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.214s

#547 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.214s

#548 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.214s

#549 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.214s

#550 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.214s

#551 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.214s

#552 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.214s

#553 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.214s

#554 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.214s

#555 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.214s

#556 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.214s

#557 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.214s

#558 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.214s

#559 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.214s

#560 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.214s

#561 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.214s

#562 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.214s

#563 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.214s

#564 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.214s

#565 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.214s

#566 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.214s

#567 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.214s

#568 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.214s

#569 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.214s

#570 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.214s

#571 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.214s

#572 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.214s

#573 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.214s

#574 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.215s

#575 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.215s

#576 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.215s

#577 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.215s

#578 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.215s

#579 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.216s

#580 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.216s

#581 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.217s

#582 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.217s

#583 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.217s

#584 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.217s

#585 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.218s

#586 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.218s

#587 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.218s

#588 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.218s

#589 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.218s

#590 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.218s

#591 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.218s

#592 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.218s

#593 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.218s

#594 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.218s

#595 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.218s

#596 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.218s

#597 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s … 0.219s

#598 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.219s

#599 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.219s

#600 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s … 0.22s

#601 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.22s

#602 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.22s

#603 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.221s

#604 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s . .. 0.221s

#605 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.221s

#606 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.221s

#607 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.221s

#608 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.221s

#609 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.221s

#610 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.222s

#611 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.222s

#612 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.222s

#613 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.222s

#614 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.222s

#615 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.222s

#616 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.222s

#617 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.222s

#618 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.222s

#619 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.222s

#620 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.222s

#621 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.222s

#622 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.222s

#623 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.222s

#624 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.222s

#625 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.222s

#626 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.222s

#627 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.222s

#628 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.222s

#629 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.222s

#630 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.222s

#631 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.222s

#632 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.222s

#633 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.222s

#634 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.223s

#635 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.223s

#636 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.223s

#637 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.223s

#638 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.223s

#639 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.223s

#640 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.223s

#641 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.223s

#642 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.223s

#643 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.223s

#644 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.223s

#645 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.223s

#646 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s . .. 0.223s

#647 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.223s

#648 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.223s

#649 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.223s

#650 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.223s

#651 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.223s

#652 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.224s

#653 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.224s

#654 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.224s

#655 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.224s

#656 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.224s

#657 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.224s

#658 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.224s

#659 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.224s

#660 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.224s

#661 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.224s

#662 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.224s

#663 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.224s

#664 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.224s

#665 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.224s

#666 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.224s

#667 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.224s

#668 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.224s

#669 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.224s

#670 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.224s

#671 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.224s

#672 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.224s

#673 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.224s

#674 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.224s

#675 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.225s

#676 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.225s

#677 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.225s

#678 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.225s

#679 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.225s

#680 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.225s

#681 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.225s

#682 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.225s

#683 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.225s

#684 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.225s

#685 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.225s

#686 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.225s

#687 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.225s

#688 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s .. . 0.225s

#689 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s … 0.225s

#690 min, max, avg, median took s +0.001s … 0.226s

#691 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.226s

#692 return log +0.004s … 0.23s

The Best CPU for the Money: AMD vs. Intel Budget Shootout

The CPU space has been somewhat stagnant for a while now. AMD’s FX series is four years old and although it received an update, nothing major was altered, while the Piledriver-based Vishera FX range is over two years old and AMD has resorted to overclocking and even underclocking to create the illusion of new models.

Likewise, Intel hasn’t really wowed us since Sandy Bridge four years ago. Its chips have become more powerful and efficient since then, but the generational improvements haven’t been as significant as you would expect in that amount of time.

The biggest achievement for desktop processors in recent memory was the eight-core Core i7-5960X, though at $1,000 it’s well beyond the reach of mainstream users.

Given how little has changed, you might expect buying a new processor to be fairly straightforward. For us, the choice seems clear: Intel has proven to offer superior core performance with considerably greater efficiency.

However, many enthusiasts argue that AMD offers better overclocking on its more affordable processors and therefore delivers a better bang for your buck.

It’s a valid point, as you can buy a quad-core AMD chip for little more than $100 and overclock the snot out of it while the cheapest overclockable quad-core Intel part costs well over $200 — around 70% more.

On top of that, AMD recently released the $150 FX-8320E, an unlocked 4.0GHz chip with four floating point cores and eight integer cores (not truly a full eight-core part as marketed). At that price, Intel only offers the non-overclockable dual-core Core i3-4360 for $155 while a quad-core Core i5-4430 costs $35 more at $185.

With those parts in hand, we’re going put the AMD FX-8320E against Intel’s Core i3-4360 and the slightly more expensive Core i5-4430 to see which processor offers the best value for budget builders.

Testing Methodology

We will be looking closely at application and gaming performance as well as power consumption figures in each test.

The FX-8320E was tested at its default operating frequency and overclocked at 4.6GHz. The Core i5-4430 and Core i3-4360 don’t support overclocking and therefore were only tested at their standard frequencies.

The GeForce GTX 980 was used in all tests, though it played the biggest role in the 3DMark and gaming tests. Although it may seem unrealistic to pair a $600 graphics card with a $140 CPU, by using a powerful GPU we hope to remove related bottlenecks for the purpose of the CPUs comparison.

AMD Vishera System Specs

AMD FX-8320E (3.2GHz — 4.0GHz)

AMD FX-8320E (4.6GHz)

MSI 970 Gaming (AMD 970)

8GB DDR3-2133 RAM

Nvidia GeForce GTX 980

Samsung SSD 850 Pro 512GB SSD

SilverStone Essential Gold 750w

Windows 8. 1 Pro 64-bit

Intel Haswell System Specs

Intel Core i5-4430 (3.0GHz — 3.2GHz)

Intel Core i3-4360 (3.7GHz)

Asrock Z97 Extreme6 (Intel Z97)

8GB DDR3-2133 RAM

Nvidia GeForce GTX 980

Samsung SSD 850 Pro 512GB SSD

SilverStone Essential Gold 750w

Windows 8.1 Pro 64-bit

AMD’s FX-8320E performed well in Excel 2013, taking just 5.9 seconds to complete the workload and 4.5 seconds once overclocked. At its stock settings, the FX-8320E was 15% faster than the i5-4430 and 51% faster than the i3-4360. Those numbers jumped to 51% and 98% after overclocking.

Excel 2013’s power consumption results paint quite the picture. Although the FX-8320E was 15% faster than the i5-4430 and 51% faster than the i3-4360, it also consumed 55% and 65% more power.

Overclocking might have improved performance by 31% but it boosted system power consumption by 78%.

The Power Point performance results were close with the i3-4360 topping our graph at 6% ahead of the i5-4430 and 17% over the FX-8320E, though AMD’s part was on par with the i5-4430 once overclocked.

The FX-8320E was 15% slower than the i3-4360 and yet it consumed 72% more power — 154% more power after overclocking, which put the FX-8320E in line with the Core i5-4430 performance-wise.

7-zip makes good use of multi-core processors and as a result the heavily-clocked FX-8320E delivers 27% more performance than the i5-4430 and 62% more than the i3-4360. Overclocking the FX-8320E boosted performance by another 39% for a 77% lead over the i5-4430.

To deliver 27% more performance than the i5-4430, the FX-8320E had to consume 61% more power and overclocking the latter to 4.6GHz increased consumption by another 71%, making it 175% more power hungry than the i5-4430.

The i3-4360 was actually slightly faster than the i5-4430 in the WinRAR multi-threading test. Again, keep in mind that it’s clocked higher and supports four threads via Hyper-Threading.

Despite compressing at 5349KB/s, the i3-4360 was still 23% slower than the FX-8320E and overclocking yielded another 17% for 8175KB/s. However, if we only look at the single thread performance, the i3-4360 was the fastest processor tested, narrowly beating the overclocked FX-8320E.

When it comes to WinRAR power consumption the FX-8320E used 69% more power than Intel’s processors. Overclocking brought another 56% increase in consumption, making the AMD chip 165% more power hungry than Intel’s contenders.

The FX-8320E took 31.9 seconds to complete the workload for 5% better than the i3-4360 and 7% worse the i5-4430. After overclocking, AMD’s part was 16% faster than the i3-4360 and 6% faster than the i5-4430.

Here we see that the FX-8320E consumed 41% more power than the i3-4360 while delivering just 5% more performance. The overclocked FX-8320E consumed a whopping 262 watts, which was 45% higher than the stock results.

The FX-8320E was 19% slower than the i5-4430 and 23% slower than the i3-4360 when testing with InDesign. Overclocking improved performance by 14% — enough to make AMD’s chip just 3% slower than the Core i5-4430.

The FX-8320E consumed 49% more power than Intel’s processors in InDesign. Overclocking the FX-8320E increased consumption by 73%, making it 158% more power hungry than Intel’s chips.

The FX-8320E was 6% slower than the i5-4430 in After Effects CC but it was 10% faster than the i3-4360 and after overclocking it matched the i5-4430.

The FX-8320E was 6% slower than the i5-4430 when testing with After Effects CC, yet it consumed 59% more power. Although it was able to match the i5-4430 once overclocked, AMD’s part consumed 140% more power.

The last application we are testing with is Adobe Illustrator CC and here the FX-8320E is slower than both Intel processors — 5% slower than the i5-4430 and 26% slower than the i3-4360. Once overclocked, the FX-8320E managed to top the i5-4430 but was still 17% slower than the i3-4360.

Here the FX-8320E consumed just 13% more power than the i3-4360 but that ballooned to 88% more than the i5-4430 after overclocking.

AMD FX-8350 vs Intel Core i7-4770K: What is the difference?

35 BALLLA

AMD FX-8350

49 BALLLA

Intel Core i7-4770K

64 Facts compared to

AMD FX-8350

Intel Core i7-4770K

Why AMD FX. Intel Core i7-4770K?

2.29x higher CPU speed?
8 x 4GHz vs 4 x 3.5GHz
266MHz higher RAM speed?
1866MHz vs 1600MHz
7MB more L2 cache?
8MB vs 1MB
0.3GHz higher turbo clock speed?
4.2GHz vs 3.9GHz
128KB more L1 cache?
384KB vs 256KB
0. 75MB/core more L2 cache per core?
1MB/core vs 0.25MB/core
32GB more max memory?
64GB vs 32GB
0.4GT/s higher data rate?
5.4GT/s vs 5GT/s

Why is Intel Core i7-4770K better than AMD FX-8350?

Smaller 10nm semiconductors?
22nm vs 32nm
18.83% higher PassMark score?
7042 vs 5926
41W below TDP?
84W vs 125W
1 newer PCI Express (PCIe) version?
3 vs 2
Has integrated graphics?
4.6GB/s more memory bandwidth?
25.6GB/s vs 21GB/s
37.43% higher PassMark score (single)?
2148 vs 1563
34.83% higher Geekbench 5 multi-core result?
3705 vs 2748

Which comparisons are the most popular?

AMD FX-8350

AMD Ryzen 5 3600

Intel Core i7-4770k

AMD A10-7850K

AMD FX-8350

AMD RYZEN 5 5600G

Intel Core

AMD FX-8350

AMD FX-6300

Intel Core i7-4770K

Intel Core i5-9400F

AMD FX-8350

AMD Phenom II X4 965

Intel Core i7-4770K

Intel Core i5-11400H

AMD FX-8350

AMD Ryzen 5 5500U

Intel Core i7-4770K

Intel Atom x5-Z8350

AMD FX-8350

AMD FX-8320

Intel Core i7-4770K

AMD Ryzen 5 3600

AMD FX-8350

Intel Core i7-3770

Intel Core I7-4770K 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 3 2200G

AMD FX-8350

Intel Core i7-4770

Intel Core i7-4770K

Intel Core i3-9100f

AMD

AMD Ryzen 3 3200G 9000 ICTEL TITL I7 ° Ker.

Intel Core i5-10400

Comparison prices

Users reviews

General rating

AMD FX-8350

5 Users

AMD FX-8350 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000

5 Reviews of users

Intel Core i7-4770K

0 Reviews of users

Intel Core i7-4770k

0.0257 /10

0 Reviews of Users

9000 10

5 Votes

reviews yet there is no

Games

/10

5 Votes

003

9.2 /10

5 Votes

Reviews not yet

Reliability

/10

5 VOTES

9000

5 votes

No reviews yet

Performance

1.cpu speed

8 x 4GHz

4 x 3.5GHz

4 x 3.5GHz CPU speed shows how many processing cycles it can execute in the CPU

90 sec04 (processors). It is calculated by adding the clock speeds of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors, each group of cores.

2nd processor thread

More threads result in better performance and better multitasking.

3.speed turbo clock

4.2GHz

3.9GHz

When the processor is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.

4. Has unlocked multiplier

✔AMD FX-8350

✔Intel Core i7-4770K

Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier and are easier to overclock, allowing for better performance in games and other applications.

5.L2 Cache

More L2 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.

6.L3 cache

More L3 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.

7.L1 cache

More L1 cache results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.

8.core L2

1MB/core

0.25MB/core

More data can be stored in the L2 scratchpad for access by each processor core.

9.core L3

1MB/core

2MB/core

More data can be stored in L3 scratchpad for access by each processor core.

Memory

1.RAM speed

1866MHz

1600MHz

Can support faster memory which speeds up system performance.

2.max memory bandwidth

21GB/s

25.6GB/s

This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.

3. DDR version

DDR (Dynamic Dynamic Random Access Memory Double Data Rate) is the most common type of RAM. New versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy efficient.

4.Memory channels

More memory channels increase the speed of data transfer between memory and processor.

5.maximum memory capacity

Maximum memory capacity (RAM).

6.baud rate bus

5.4GT/s

The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.

7. Supports memory troubleshooting code

✖AMD FX-8350

✖Intel Core i7-4770K

Memory error recovery code can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.

8.eMMC version

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-8350)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-4770K)

A newer version of eMMC — built-in flash memory card — speeds up the memory interface, has a positive effect on device performance, for example, when transferring files from a computer to internal memory via USB.

9. bus frequency

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-8350)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-4770K)

The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device

Geotagging

1. PassMark result

This test measures processor performance using multi-threading.

2. PassMark result (single)

This test measures processor performance using a thread of execution.

3.Geekbench 5 result (multi-core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures the performance of a multi-core processor. (Source: Primate Labs,2022)

4.Cinebench R20 result (multi-core)

Cinebench R20 is a test that measures the performance of a multi-core processor by rendering a 3D scene.

5.Result Cinebench R20 (single core)

Cinebench R20 is a test to evaluate the performance of a single core processor when rendering a 3D scene.

6.Geekbench 5 result (single core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform test that measures the single core performance of a processor. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)

7. Blender test result (bmw27)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-8350)

440.7seconds

The Blender benchmark (bmw27) measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.

8.Blender result (classroom)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-8350)

1376.9seconds

The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.

9.performance per watt

This means that the processor is more efficient, giving more performance per watt of power used.

Functions

1. uses multi-threading

✖AMD FX-8350

✔Intel Core i7-4770K

processor cores into logical cores, also known as threads. Thus, each core can run two instruction streams at the same time.

2. Has AES

✔AMD FX-8350

✔Intel Core i7-4770K

AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.

3. Has AVX

✔AMD FX-8350

✔Intel Core i7-4770K

AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial applications, and to improve the performance of the Linux RAID program.

4.Version SSE

SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing images or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.

5. Has F16C

✔AMD FX-8350

✔Intel Core i7-4770K

F16C is used to speed up tasks such as image contrast adjustment or volume control.

6.bits transmitted at the same time

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-8350)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-4770K)

NEON provides faster media processing such as MP3 listening.

7. Has MMX

✔AMD FX-8350

✔Intel Core i7-4770K

MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting image contrast or adjusting volume.

8.Has TrustZone

✖AMD FX-8350

✖Intel Core i7-4770K

Technology is integrated into the processor to ensure device security when using features such as mobile payments and streaming video using Digital Rights Management (DRM) technology ).

9.interface width

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-8350)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-4770K)

The processor can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), which means that the processor performs better

Price comparison

Cancel

Which CPUs are better?

AMD FX-8350 vs Intel Core i7-4770: What is the difference?

35 points

AMD FX-8350

42 points

Intel Core i7-4770

vs

64 facts in comparison

AMD FX-8350

Intel Core i7-4770

2. 35x higher CPU speed?
8 x 4GHz vs 4 x 3.4GHz

266MHz higher RAM speed?
1866MHz vs 1600MHz

7MB more L2 cache?
8MB vs 1MB

0.3GHz higher turbo clock speed?
4.2GHz vs 3.9GHz

128KB more L1 cache?
384KB vs 256KB

Has an unlocked multiplier?

0.75MB/core more L2 cache per core?
1MB/core vs 0.25MB/core

32GB more max memory?
64GB vs 32GB

Why is Intel Core i7-4770 better than AMD FX-8350?

11.72°C higher than maximum operating temperature?
72.72°C vs 61°C

Are 10nm smaller semiconductors?
22nm vs 32nm

1.69x higher PassMark result?
9996 vs 5926

41W below TDP?
84W vs 125W

1 newer PCI Express (PCIe) version?
3 vs 2

Does it have integrated graphics?

4. 6GB/s more memory bandwidth?
25.6GB/s vs 21GB/s

44.59% higher PassMark score (single)?
2260 vs 1563

Which comparisons are the most popular?

AMD FX-8350

VS

AMD RYZEN 5 3600

Intel Core i7-4770

Intel Core i5-7400

9000 3,0003.703470470370. Intel Core i7-4770

VS

Intel Core i5-4570

AMD FX-8350

VS

AMD Ryzen 5 5600G

Intel Core i7-4770

Intel Core I3-10100

AMD FX-8350 vs

AMD FX-6300

Intel Core i7-4770

VS

Intel Core i7-3770

AMD FX-8350

VS

AMD Phenom II X4 965 9000

Intel Core i5-6500

AMD FX-8350

vs

AMD Ryzen 5 5500U

Intel Core i7-4770

vs

Intel Core i5-10400

AMD FX-8350

vs

AMD FX-8320

Intel Core i7-4770

VS

Intel Core i7-6700

AMD FX-8350

VS

Intel Core i7-3770

Intel Core I7-4770

VS

9000 INTEL CORE INTEL ANTEC FX-8350

vs

AMD RYZEN 3 3200G

Intel Core i7-4770

VS

Intel Core i3-9100f

Intel Core i7-4770

VS

Complex rating

AMD FX-8350

5 User reviews

AMD FX-8350

9. 8 /10

5 User reviews

Intel Core i7-4770

users0003

Intel Core i7-4770

10.0 /10

1 reviews of users

Functions

Quality ratio

9

Games

9.0 /10

1 Votes

Reliability

/10

5 Votes

10.0 /10

1 VOTES 9000 7.0 /10

1 votes

Performance

1.CPU speed

8 x 4GHz

4 x 3.4GHz

4 x 3.4GHz

processors). It is calculated by adding the clock speeds of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors, each group of cores.

2nd processor thread

More threads result in better performance and better multitasking.

3.speed turbo clock

4.2GHz

3.9GHz

When the processor is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.

4. Has unlocked multiplier

✔AMD FX-8350

✖Intel Core i7-4770

Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier and are easier to overclock, allowing for better performance in games and other applications.

5.L2 Cache

More L2 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.

6.L3 cache

More L3 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.

7.L1 cache

More L1 cache results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.

8.core L2

1MB/core

0.25MB/core

More data can be stored in the L2 scratchpad for access by each processor core.

9.core L3

1MB/core

2MB/core

More data can be stored in L3 scratchpad for access by each processor core.

Memory

1.RAM speed

1866MHz

1600MHz

Can support faster memory which speeds up system performance.

2.max memory bandwidth

21GB/s

25.6GB/s

This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.

3. DDR version

DDR (Dynamic Dynamic Random Access Memory Double Data Rate) is the most common type of RAM. New versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy efficient.

4.Memory channels

More memory channels increase the speed of data transfer between memory and processor.

5.maximum memory capacity

Maximum memory capacity (RAM).

6.bus baud rate

5.4GT/s

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-4770)

The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device.

7.Supports memory troubleshooting code

✖AMD FX-8350

✖Intel Core i7-4770

The memory error recovery code can detect and repair data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.

8.eMMC version

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-8350)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-4770)

A newer version of eMMC — built-in flash memory card — speeds up the memory interface, has a positive effect on device performance, for example, when transferring files from a computer to internal memory via USB.

9.bus frequency

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-8350)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-4770)

The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device

Geotagging

1. PassMark result

This test measures processor performance using multi-threading.

2. PassMark result (single)

This test measures processor performance using a thread of execution.

3.Geekbench 5 result (multi-core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures the performance of a multi-core processor. (Source: Primate Labs,2022)

4. Cinebench R20 result (multi-core)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-4770)

Cinebench R20 is a benchmark that measures the performance of a multi-core processor by rendering a 3D scene.

5.Cinebench R20 result (single core)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-4770)

Cinebench R20 is a test to evaluate the performance of a single core processor when rendering a 3D scene.

6. Geekbench 5 result (single core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform test that measures the single core performance of a processor. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)

7. Blender test result (bmw27)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-8350)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-4770)

The Blender benchmark (bmw27) measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.

8.Blender result (classroom)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-8350)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-4770)

The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.

9.performance per watt

This means that the processor is more efficient, giving more performance per watt of power used.

Functions

1.uses multi-threading

✖AMD FX-8350

✔Intel Core i7-4770

processor cores into logical cores, also known as threads. Thus, each core can run two instruction streams at the same time.

2. Has AES

✔AMD FX-8350

✔Intel Core i7-4770

AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.

3. Has AVX

✔AMD FX-8350

✔Intel Core i7-4770

AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial applications, and to improve the performance of the Linux RAID program.

4.Version SSE

SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing images or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.

5. Has F16C

✔AMD FX-8350

✔Intel Core i7-4770

F16C is used to speed up tasks such as image contrast adjustment or volume control.

6.bits transmitted at the same time

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-8350)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-4770)

NEON provides faster media processing such as MP3 listening.

7. Has MMX

✔AMD FX-8350

✔Intel Core i7-4770

MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting image contrast or adjusting volume.

8.Has TrustZone

✖AMD FX-8350

✖Intel Core i7-4770

Technology is integrated into the processor to ensure device security when using features such as mobile payments and streaming video using Digital Rights Management (DRM) technology ).

9.interface width

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-8350)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-4770)

The processor can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), which means that the processor performs better

Price comparison

Cancel

Which CPUs are better?

Comparison of AMD FX-8350 and Intel Core i7-2600

Comparative analysis of AMD FX-8350 and Intel Core i7-2600 processors by all known characteristics in the categories: General Information, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals, Technologies, Virtualization, Graphics, Graphical Interfaces, Security and Reliability.
Analysis of processor performance by benchmarks: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

AMD FX-8350

versus

Intel Core i7-2600

Benefits

Reasons to choose AMD FX-8350

Newer processor, release dates difference 1 year(s) 9 month(s)

make overclocking

4 cores more, the ability to run more applications at the same time: 8 vs 4

About 11% more clock speed: 4.2 GHz vs 3.80 GHz

L1 cache is about 50% larger, which means more data can be stored in it for quick access

L2 cache is 8 times larger, which means more data can be stored in it for quick access

Performance in PassMark — CPU benchmark mark approx. 12% increase: 5999 vs 5348

approx. 1% increase in Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core benchmark: 2751 vs 2727

approx. 4% increase in 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score performance: 3132 vs 3013

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mHash/s) 2.3x better performance: 9.886 vs 4.393 vs 5.019

Release date 23 October 2012 vs January 2011

Unlocked Unlocked / Locked

Number of cores 8 vs 4

Maximum frequency 4.2 GHz vs 3.80 GHz

Level 1 cache 384 KB vs 64 KB (per core)

Level 2 cache 8 MB vs 256 KB (per core)

PassMark — CPU mark 5999 vs 5348

Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core 2751 vs 2727

3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score 3132 vs 3013

CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) 9.886 vs 4.393

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 7.137 vs 5.019

Reasons to choose Intel Core i7-2600

About 19% more max core temperature: 72.6°C vs 61°C

About 32% less power consumption: 95 Watt vs 125 Watt

About 10% more performance in PassMark — Single thread mark benchmark: 1742 vs 1577

About 28% more performance in Geekbench 4 — Single Core benchmark: 727 vs 566

3.4 times more performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) benchmark: 74.312 vs 21.912

Performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) benchmark by about 27 % more: 0.54 vs 0.424

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) performance about 76% better: 2. 109 vs 1.199

72.6°C vs 61°C

Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt vs 125 Watt

PassMark — Single thread mark 1742 vs 1577

Geekbench 4 — Single Core 727 vs 566

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 74.312 vs 21.912

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.54 vs 0.424

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) 2.109 vs 1.199

Benchmark comparison

CPU 1: AMD FX-8350
CPU 2: Intel Core i7-2600

PassMark — Single thread mark

CPU 1

CPU 2

PassMark — CPU mark

CPU 1

CPU 2

Geekbench 4 — Single Core

CPU 1

CPU 2

Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core

CPU 1

CPU 2

3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score

CPU 1

CPU 2

CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s)

CPU 1

CPU 2

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

CPU 1

CPU 2

21.912

74.312

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s)

CPU 1

CPU 2

CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s)

CPU 1

CPU 2

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

CPU 1

CPU 2

Name AMD FX-8350 Intel Core i7-2600

PassMark — Single thread mark 1577 1742

PassMark — CPU mark 5999 5348

Geekbench 4 — Single Core 566 727

Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core 2751 2727

3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score 3132 3013

CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) 9.886 4.393

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 21.912 74.312

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.424 0.54

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) 1.199 2.109

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 7.137 5.019

Feature comparison

configuration

Core i7-2600k
Compare

Core i7-2600
Compare

Core i7-2700K
Compare

Speed in games
FX-8350
57. 8 (+0.7%) 9000 Core Core Core Core Core Core
57.4
Performance in games and similar applications, according to our tests.
The performance of 4 cores, if any, and performance per core has the greatest impact on the result, since most games do not fully use more than 4 cores.
The speed of caches and working with RAM is also important.
Speed in office use
FX-8350
58.6
Core i7-2600S
60.4 (+3%)
Performance in everyday work such as browsers and office programs.
The performance of 1 core has the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications use only one, ignoring the rest.
Similarly, many professional applications such as various CADs ignore multi-threaded performance.
Speed in heavy applications
FX-8350
35.1 (+6.6%)
Core i7-2600S
32.8
Performance in resource-intensive tasks loading up to 8 cores.
The performance of all cores and their number has the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications willingly use all the cores and increase the speed accordingly.
At the same time, some periods of work can be demanding on the performance of one or two cores, for example, applying filters in the editor.
Data obtained from tests by users who tested their systems with and without overclocking. Thus, you see the average values corresponding to the processor.
Speed of numerical operations

AMD FX-8350 Intel Core i7-2600

Architecture name Vishera Sandy Bridge

Family AMD FX-Series Processors

Issue date 23 October 2012 January 2011

OPN PIB FD8350FRHKBOX

OPN Tray FD8350FRW8KHK

Place in the ranking 1723 1652

Price now $79. 99 $148.99

Series AMD FX 8-Core Black Edition Processors Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors

Price/performance ratio (0-100) 32.95 16.20

Applicability Desktop Desktop

Price at first issue date $247

Processor Number i7-2600

Status Launched

Support 64 bit

Base frequency 4GHz 3. 40 GHz

Crystal area 315 mm 216 mm

Level 1 cache 384KB 64 KB (per core)

Level 2 cache 8MB 256 KB (per core)

Level 3 cache 8MB 8192 KB (shared)

Process 32nm SOI 32nm

Maximum core temperature 61°C 72.6°C

Maximum frequency 4. 2 GHz 3.80 GHz

Number of cores 8 4

Number of threads 8 8

Voltage P0 Vcore Min: 1.2 V — Max: 1.4 V

Number of transistors 1200 Million 1160 million

Unlocked

Bus Speed 5 GT/s DMI

Supported memory frequency 1866 MHz

Supported memory types DDR3 DDR3 1066/1333

Maximum number of memory channels 2

Maximum memory bandwidth 21 GB/s

Maximum memory size 32GB

Maximum number of processors in 1 1

Supported sockets AM3+ LGA1155

Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 95 Watt

Low Halogen Options Available

Package Size 37. 5mm x 37.5mm

PCI Express revision n/a 2.0

Number of PCI Express lanes 16

Fused Multiply-Add (FMA)

Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX)

Intel® AES New Instructions

Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® Technology

Flexible Display interface (FDI)

Idle States

Extended instructions Intel® SSE4. 1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX

Intel 64

Intel® Fast Memory Access

Intel® Flex Memory Access

Intel® Hyper-Threading Technology

Intel® Turbo Boost Technology

Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility

Thermal Monitoring

AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™)

Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x)

Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d)

Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT)

Device ID 0x102

Graphics base frequency 850 MHz

Graphics max dynamic frequency 1. 35 GHz

Maximum GPU clock 1.35 GHz

Intel® Clear Video HD Technology

Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI)

Intel® InTru™ 3D Technology

Intel® Quick Sync Video

Integrated graphics Intel® HD Graphics 2000

Maximum number of monitors supported 2

WiDi support

Execute Disable Bit (EDB)

Intel® Identity Protection Technology

Intel® Trusted Execution Technology (TXT)

Simple household tasks

FX-8350

50.2

Core i7-2600S

55.6 (+9.7%)

Demanding games and tasks

FX-8350

31.3 (+13.1%)

Core i7-2600S

27.2

Extreme

FX-8350

8.4 (+21.4%)

Core i7-2600S

6. 6

Different tasks require different CPU strengths. A system with few fast cores and low memory latency will be fine for the vast majority of games, but will be inferior to a system with a lot of slow cores in a rendering scenario.

We believe that a minimum of 4/4 (4 physical cores and 4 threads) processor is suitable for a budget gaming PC. At the same time, some games can load it at 100%, slow down and freeze, and performing any tasks in the background will lead to a drop in FPS.

Ideally, the budget shopper should aim for a minimum of 4/8 and 6/6. A gamer with a big budget can choose between 6/12, 8/8 and 8/16. Processors with 10 and 12 cores can perform well in games with high frequency and fast memory, but are overkill for such tasks. Also, buying for the future is a dubious undertaking, since in a few years many slow cores may not provide sufficient gaming performance.

When choosing a processor for your work, consider how many cores your programs use. For example, photo and video editors can use 1-2 cores when working with filtering, and rendering or converting in the same editors already uses all threads.

Data obtained from tests by users who tested their systems both with overclocking (maximum value in the table) and without (minimum). A typical result is shown in the middle, the more filled in the color bar, the better the average result among all tested systems.

Characteristics

The data is not yet filled in, so the tables may lack information or existing functions may be omitted.

Basic

Manufacturer AMD Intel

DescriptionInformation about the processor, taken from the official website of the manufacturer. Intel® Core™ i7-2600S Processor (8M Cache, up to 3.80 GHz)

ArchitectureCode name for the microarchitecture generation. Sandy Bridge

Process The manufacturing process, measured in nanometers. The smaller the technical process, the more perfect the technology, the lower the heat dissipation and power consumption. No data 32

Release dateMonth and year the processor was released. 10-2015 10-2016

Model Official name. i7-2600S

Cores The number of physical cores. 8 4

ThreadsNumber of threads. The number of logical processor cores that the operating system sees. 8 8

Multi-Threading Technology With Intel’s Hyper-threading and AMD’s SMT technologies, one physical core is recognized as two logical cores by the operating system, thereby increasing processor performance in multi-threaded applications. Missing Hyper-threading (note that some games may not work well with Hyper-threading, you can disable the technology in the BIOS of the motherboard for maximum FPS).

Base frequencyGuaranteed frequency of all processor cores at maximum load. Performance in single-threaded and multi-threaded applications and games depends on it. It is important to remember that speed and frequency are not directly related. For example, a new processor at a lower frequency may be faster than an old one at a higher one. 4GHz 2.8 GHz

Turbo frequencyThe maximum frequency of one processor core in turbo mode. Manufacturers allow modern processors to independently increase the frequency of one or more cores under heavy load, due to which performance is noticeably increased. It may depend on the nature of the load, the number of loaded cores, temperature and the specified limits. Significantly affects the speed in games and applications that are demanding on the frequency of the CPU. No data 3.8

L3 cache size The third level cache acts as a buffer between the computer’s RAM and the processor’s level 2 cache. Used by all cores, the speed of information processing depends on the volume. No data 8

Instructions 64-bit

Extended instruction set Allows you to speed up calculations, processing and execution of certain operations. Also, some games require instruction support. SSE4.1/4.2, AVX

Embedded Options Available Two enclosure versions. Standard and designed for mobile devices. In the second version, the processor can be soldered on the motherboard. No No

Bus frequency The speed of communication with the system. 5 GT/s DMI

Number of QPI links

TDPThermal Design Power is an indicator that determines the heat dissipation in standard operation. The cooler or water cooling system must be rated for a larger value. Remember that with a factory bus or manual overclocking, TDP increases significantly. No data 65

Cooling system specifications

Video core

Integrated graphics core Allows you to use your computer without a discrete graphics card. The monitor is connected to the video output on the motherboard. If earlier integrated graphics made it possible to simply work at a computer, today it can replace budget video accelerators and makes it possible to play most games at low settings. Intel® HD Graphics 2000

GPU base clockFrequency in 2D and idle. No data 850

Max GPU ClockMaximum 3D clock. No data 1350

Intel® Wireless Display (Intel® WiDi) Supports Wireless Display technology over Wi-Fi 802.11n. Thanks to it, a monitor or TV equipped with the same technology does not require a cable to connect. No data

Supported monitorsThe maximum number of monitors that can be connected to the integrated video core at the same time. 2

RAM

Maximum RAM Amount of RAM that can be installed on the motherboard with this processor. No data 32

Supported type of RAM The type of RAM depends on its frequency and timings (speed), availability, price. DDR3 1066/1333

RAM Channels The multi-channel memory architecture increases data transfer speed. On desktop platforms, two-channel, three-channel and four-channel modes are available. 2

Memory bandwidth 21 GB/s

ECC memory Support for error-correcting memory, which is used in servers. Usually more expensive than usual and requires more expensive server components. However, second-hand server processors, Chinese motherboards and ECC memory sticks, which are sold relatively cheaply in China, have become widespread. No data No data

PCI

PCI-E Computer bus version of PCI Express. The bandwidth and power limit depend on the version. There is backward compatibility. No data 2

PCI configuration options

Number of PCI lanes No data

Data security

AES-NI The AES command set extension speeds up applications that use appropriate encryption. No data No data

Intel® Secure Key An RDRAND instruction that allows you to create a high performance random number generator. No data No data

Decoration

Dimensions No data No data

Supported sockets No data No data

Maximum processors per motherboard No data No data

Which is better

AMD FX-8350

On average, gaming performance is 0% better.

In complex multi-threaded applications, faster and outperforms by 2%.

The price is 301 $ lower.

The number of physical cores is 4 more.

The base frequency is 1.2 GHz higher.

Intel Core i7-2600S

2% faster performance in office applications and browsers.

How are they similar

The number of threads is equal.

AMD FX-8350 vs. Intel Core i7-6700K

AMD FX-8350

AMD FX-8350 runs with 8 and 8 CPU threads It runs at 4.20 GHz base 4.10 GHz all cores while TDP is set to 125 W .CPU connects to CPU socket AM3+ This version includes 8.00 MB of L3 cache on a single chip, supports 2 for RAM support, and supports PCIe Gen . Tjunction is kept below — degrees C. In particular, the Vishera (Bulldozer) Architecture is advanced beyond 32 nm and supports AMD-V . The product was launched Q4/2012

Intel Core i7-6700K

Intel Core i7-6700K runs with 4 and 8 CPU threads It runs at 4.20 GHz base 4.00 GHz all cores while TDP is set to 91 W .The processor connects to LGA 1151 CPU socket This the version includes 8. 00 MB of L3 cache on a single die, supports 2 for RAM support, and supports 3.0 PCIe Gen 16 . Tjunction is kept below — degrees C. In particular, Skylake S Architecture is advanced over 14 nm and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d . The product was launched Q3/2015

AMD FX-8350

Intel Core i7-6700K

Frequency 4.00 GHz 8 Cores 4 4.20 GHz Turbo (1 core) 4.20 GHz 4.10GHz Turbo (all cores) 4.00 GHz No. Hyper Threading Yes Yes Acceleration Yes normal Basic architecture normal no iGPU GPU
Intel HD Graphics 530
no turbo GPU (Turbo) 1.15 GHz 32 nm Technology 14nm no turbo GPU (Turbo) 1. 15 GHz DirectX Version 12 Max. displays 3 memory size 2 Memory channels 2 Maximum memory Yes ECC No. — L2 Cache — 8.00MB L3 Cache 8.00 MB PCIe version 3.0 PCIe lanes 16 32 nm Technology 14nm AM3+ Connector LGA 1151 125W TDP 91W AMD-V Virtualization VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d Q4/2012 Release date Q3/2015
Show more details

Show more details

Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R23 is the successor to Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D shapes. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.

Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R23 is the successor to Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D forms. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.

Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor to Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D forms. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.

Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor to Cinebench R15 and is also based on Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D forms. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor to Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D forms. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor to Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D forms. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a memory-intensive cross-platform benchmark. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a memory-intensive, cross-platform benchmark. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.

iGPU — FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

Theoretical processing performance of the processor’s internal graphics unit with simple precision (32 bits) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS specifies how many billions of floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.

Blender 2.81 (bmw27)

Blender is a free 3D graphics software for rendering (creating) 3D bodies that can also be textured and animated in the program. The Blender test creates predefined scenes and measures the time(s) required for the entire scene. The less time it takes, the better. We chose the bmw27 as our reference scene.

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 3 is a cross-platform benchmark that is memory intensive. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 3 is a cross-platform benchmark that is memory intensive. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular for creating shapes and other things in 3D. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Cinebench 11.5 is based on Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular for creating shapes and other things in 3D. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)

Cinebench 11.5 is based on Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular for creating shapes and other things in 3D. The iGPU test uses the CPU’s internal graphics unit to execute OpenGL commands.

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the processors listed below have been tested with CPU-Comparison. However, most of the processors were not tested and the results were evaluated by the secret patented CPU-Comparison formula. As such, they do not accurately reflect the actual values of Passmark CPU ratings and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.

Estimated energy use

Average hours of use per day

Average CPU usage (0-100%)

Cost of electricity, USD/kWh

Estimated energy use

Average hours of use per day

Average CPU usage (0-100%)

Cost of electricity, USD/kWh

AMD FX-8350 Intel Core i7-6700K

125W Max TDP 91W

NA Power consumption per day (kWh) NA

NA Operating cost per day NA

NA Power consumption per year (kWh) NA

NA Cost per year NA

Popular comparison

Comments

0001 Core i7-4700MQ vs FX-8350 — Th200

Contents

Introduction

Features

Tests

Key differences

Conclusion

Comments

Processor

Processor

Introduction

We compared two processors: Intel Core i7-4700MQ versus AMD FX-8350. On this page, you will learn about the key differences between them, as well as which one is the best in terms of features and performance.

Intel Core i7-4700MQ is a Core i7 (Haswell) generation mobile processor released on May 27th, 2013. It has 4 cores and 8 threads. Operates at a frequency of 2400 MHz and consumes up to 47 watts.

AMD FX-8350 is an FX generation (Vishera) desktop processor released Oct 23rd, 2012. It has 8 cores and 8 threads. Operates at a frequency of 4000 MHz and consumes up to 125 watts.

Features

Generation

Core i7 (Haswell)

FX (Vishera)

Release date

May 27TH, 2013

Oct 23rd, 2012

Heating

47 W

125 W

Frequency

2400 MHz 9000

Nuclei

4

8

Flowers

8

8

CASH L1

64K (Per Core)

384K

CASH L2

256K (Per Core)

004 8MB

Built-in graphics

Intel HD 4600

N/A

Memory Support

DDR3

DDR3 Dual-channel

ECC memory

no

PCI-Express 9000 Instructions

AES-NI, AVX, AVX2, CLMUL, EIST, FMA3, HTT, Intel 64, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4. 2, SSSE3, TSX, TXT, VT-x, XD bit

AES, AMD-V, AMD64, AVX, CLMUL, CVT16, EVP, FMA4, HT3.1, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4a, SSSE3, Turbo Core, XOP

Tests

Blender bmw27

Blender is the most popular program for creating 3D content. It has its own test, which is widely used to determine the rendering speed of processors and video cards. We chose the bmw27 scene. The result of the test is the time taken to render the given scene.

Intel Core i7-4700MQ

AMD FX-8350

Geekbench 5 Multi-thread

GeekBench is a cross-platform benchmarking utility that runs a series of tests that simulate real-life tasks. There are two versions of the program. This is a multi-threaded version, i.e. all cores are used, making it suitable for evaluating server performance.

Intel Core i7-4700MQ

AMD FX-8350
+6%

Geekbench 5 Single-thread

GeekBench is a cross-platform benchmarking utility that runs a series of benchmarks that simulate real-life tasks. There are two versions of the program. This is a single threaded version. Most applications (MS Word, web browsers, games) rarely use more than one thread at a time, making it suitable for performance evaluation in everyday tasks.

Intel Core i7-4700MQ
+32%

AMD FX-8350

3DMark Physics

3DMark is a testing tool designed and developed by UL to measure the performance of computer hardware. Upon completion, the program gives a score, where a higher value indicates better performance.

Intel Core i7-4700MQ

AMD FX-8350

Key differences

Why is Intel Core i7-4700MQ better than AMD FX-8350?

Newer — 7 months late release

More modern manufacturing process — 22 nm vs. 32 nm

Uses 63% less power — 47 W vs. 125 W

Why is AMD FX-8350 better than Intel Core i7-4700MQ ?

Has a 67% higher frequency — 4000 MHz vs. 2400 MHz

Has a 24% higher Turbo Boost frequency — 4200 MHz vs.

Amd fx vs intel core i7: AMD FX-8350 vs Intel Core i7-4770K: What is the difference?

AMD FX-8350 vs Intel Core i7-4770K: What is the difference?

Why is AMD FX-8350 better than Intel Core i7-4770K?

Why is Intel Core i7-4770K better than AMD FX-8350?

Which are the most popular comparisons?

Price comparison

User reviews

Overall Rating

Features

Performance

Memory

Benchmarks

Features

Price comparison

Which are the best CPUs?

AMD FX-8350 vs Intel Core i7-3770: What is the difference?

Why is AMD FX-8350 better than Intel Core i7-3770?

Why is Intel Core i7-3770 better than AMD FX-8350?

Which are the most popular comparisons?

Price comparison

User reviews

Overall Rating

Features

Performance

Memory

Benchmarks

Features

Price comparison

Which are the best CPUs?

FX-8350 vs Core i7-12700K — How Many FPS

Key Differences

Apex Legends

League of Legends

VALORANT

Grand Theft Auto V

Apex Legends

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Geekbench 5 Benchmarks

Builds Using FX-8350 or Core i7-12700K

Core i9-12900K

Core i7-12700K

Core i7-8700K

Core i7-12700K

Core i7-12700K

Ryzen 9 5900X

Core i7-12700K

Core i5-12600K

Core i7-12700K

Core i9-11900K

Core i7-6700K

Core i7-12700K

Core i7-11700K

Core i7-12700K

Core i7-10700K

Core i7-12700K

Core i7-12700K

Core i9-9900K

AMD FX-8350 vs Intel Core i7-11700F

AMD FX-8350 vs Intel Core i7-11700F

Specifications:

Performances :

Equivalence:

See also:

AMD FX-9800P vs Intel Core i7-7500U

The Best CPU for the Money: AMD vs. Intel Budget Shootout

Testing Methodology

AMD Vishera System Specs

Intel Haswell System Specs

AMD FX-8350 vs Intel Core i7-4770K: What is the difference?

Why AMD FX. Intel Core i7-4770K?

Why is Intel Core i7-4770K better than AMD FX-8350?

Which comparisons are the most popular?

Comparison prices

Users reviews

General rating

003

Performance

Memory

Geotagging

Functions

Speed in games

Speed in office use

Speed in heavy applications

Speed of numerical operations