AMD Ryzen 5 2600 vs Intel Core i5-8400
Summary
-
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
118%
-
Intel Core i5-8400
100%
Relative performance
-
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
100%
-
Intel Core i5-8400
105%
Relative performance
-
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
141%
-
Intel Core i5-8400
100%
Relative performance
Reasons to consider AMD Ryzen 5 2600 |
| Much higher multi threaded performance (around 41% higher). This allows for higher performance in professional applications like encoding or heavy multitasking. |
Reasons to consider Intel Core i5-8400 |
| 5% higher single threaded performance. |
| Has an integrated GPU, which allows to run the system without a dedicated graphics card, unlike the AMD Ryzen 5 2600. |
Gaming
No clear winner declared
Productivity
HWBench recommends AMD Ryzen 5 2600
Based on productivity benchmarks, overall multithreaded performance and theoretical specifications.
Features
| AMD Ryzen 5 2600 | Intel Core i5-8400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MMX | ||||
| 3DNow! | ||||
| SSE | ||||
| SSE2 | ||||
| SSE3 | ||||
| SSE4A | ||||
| AMD64 | ||||
| CnQ | ||||
| NX bit | ||||
| AMD-V | ||||
| SMT | ||||
| SSSE3 | ||||
| SSE4.2 | ||||
| AVX | ||||
| AVX2 | ||||
| EIST | ||||
| Intel 64 | ||||
| XD bit | ||||
| VT-x | ||||
| VT-d | ||||
| AES-NI | ||||
| TSX | ||||
| TXT | ||||
| CLMUL | ||||
| FMA3 | ||||
| F16C | ||||
| BMI1 | ||||
| BMI2 | ||||
Boost 2. 0 |
||||
Architecture
| AMD Ryzen 5 2600 | Intel Core i5-8400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | AMD Zen+ | vs | Intel_Coffelake | |
| Market | Desktop | vs | Desktop | |
| Memory Support | DDR4 | vs | DDR4 | |
| Codename | Zen | vs | Coffee Lake | |
| Release Date | Mar 2018 | vs | Jan 2018 |
Cores
| AMD Ryzen 5 2600 | Intel Core i5-8400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cores | 6 | vs | 6 | |
| Threads | 12 | vs | 6 | |
| SMPs | 1 | vs | 1 | |
| Integrated Graphics | No | vs | Intel UHD 630 |
Cache
| AMD Ryzen 5 2600 | Intel Core i5-8400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| L1 Cache | 96 KB (per core) | vs | 64 KB (per core) | |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB (per core) | vs | 256 KB (per core) | |
| L3 Cache | 16384 KB (shared) | vs | 9216 KB (shared) |
Physical
| AMD Ryzen 5 2600 | Intel Core i5-8400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Socket | AMD Socket AM4 | vs | Intel Socket 1151 | |
| Max Case Temp | unknown | vs | 72°C | |
| Package | uPGA | vs | FC-LGA1151 | |
| Die Size | 192mm² | vs | 151mm² | |
| Process | 14 nm | vs | 14 nm |
Performance
| AMD Ryzen 5 2600 | Intel Core i5-8400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cpu Frequency | 3400 MHz | vs | 2800 MHz | |
| Turbo Clock | 3900 MHz | vs | 4000 MHz | |
| Base Clock | 100 MHz | vs | 100 MHz | |
| Voltage | unknown | vs | unknown | |
| TDP | 65 W | vs | 65 W |
-
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
4290 points
-
Intel Core i5-8400
4800 points
Points — higher is better
-
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
27376 points
-
Intel Core i5-8400
20160 points
Points — higher is better
points — higher is better
points — higher is better
Intel Core i5-8400 vs AMD Ryzen 5 2600
|
|
|
|
|
Intel Core i5-8400 vs AMD Ryzen 5 2600
Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the Intel Core i5-8400 on one side and the AMD Ryzen 5 2600 on the other side.
The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, It has 6 cores, 6 threads, a maximum frequency of 4,0GHz. The second is used on the desktop segment, it has a total of 6 cores, 12 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 3,9 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specifications:
| Processor | Intel Core i5-8400 | AMD Ryzen 5 2600 | ||||||
| Market (main) | Desktop | Desktop | ||||||
| ISA | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) | ||||||
| Microarchitecture | Coffee Lake | Zen+ | ||||||
| Core name | Coffee Lake-S | Pinnacle Ridge | ||||||
| Family | Core i5-8000 | Ryzen 5 2000 | ||||||
| Part number(s), S-Spec | BX80684I58400, BXC80684I58400, CM8068403358811, BOC80684I58400, BO80684I58400, SR3QT, QNMN |
YD2600BBM6IAF | ||||||
| Release date | Q4 2017 | Q2 2018 | ||||||
| Lithography | 14 nm++ | 12 nm | ||||||
| Transistors | — | 4. 800.000.000 |
||||||
| Cores | 6 | 6 | ||||||
| Threads | 6 | 12 | ||||||
| Base frequency | 2,8 GHz | 3,4 GHz | ||||||
| Turbo frequency | 4,0 GHz | 3,9 GHz | ||||||
| Cache memory | 9 MB | 16 MB | ||||||
| Max memory capacity | 64 GB | 64 GB | ||||||
| Memory types | DDR4-2666 | DDR4-2933 | ||||||
| Max # of memory channels | 2 | 2 | ||||||
| Max memory bandwidth | 41,6 GB/s | 43,71 GB/s | ||||||
| Max PCIe lanes | 16 | 20 | ||||||
| TDP | 65 W | 65 W | ||||||
| Suggested PSU | 600W ATX Power Supply | 600W ATX Power Supply | ||||||
| GPU integrated graphics | Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Coffee Lake) | None | ||||||
| GPU execution units | 23 | — | ||||||
| GPU shading units | 184 | — | ||||||
| GPU base clock | 350 MHz | — | ||||||
| GPU boost clock | 1050 MHz | — | ||||||
| GPU FP32 floating point | 423,2 GFLOPS | — | ||||||
| Socket | LGA1151 | AM4, PGA-1331 | ||||||
| Compatible motherboard | Socket LGA 1151 Motherboard | Socket AM4 Motherboard | ||||||
| Maximum temperature | 100°C | 95°C | ||||||
| CPU-Z single thread | 442 | 438 | ||||||
| CPU-Z multi thread | 2. 666 |
3.542 | ||||||
| Cinebench R15 single thread | 169 | 161 | ||||||
| Cinebench R15 multi-thread | 954 | 1.384 | ||||||
| Cinebench R23 single thread | 1.017 | 1.022 | ||||||
| Cinebench R23 multi-thread | 5.839 | 8.126 | ||||||
| PassMark single thread | 2.401 | 2.243 | ||||||
| PassMark CPU Mark | 9.206 | 13.215 | ||||||
| (Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 single core |
4.765 | 4.441 | ||||||
| (Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 multi-core |
18. 154 |
20.954 | ||||||
| (SGEMM) GFLOPS performance |
299,4 GFLOPS | 267,1 GFLOPS | ||||||
| (Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio |
279 pts / W | 322 pts / W | ||||||
| Amazon | ||||||||
| eBay |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.
Suggested PSU: We assume that we have An ATX computer case, a high end graphics card, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, a 1TB HDD hard drive, a Blu-Ray drive. We will have to rely on a more powerful power supply if we want to have several graphics cards, several monitors, more memory, etc.
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
We see that the two processors have an equivalent number of cores, the maximum frequency of Intel Core i5-8400 is greater, that their respective TDP are of the same order. The AMD Ryzen 5 2600 was started more recently.
Performances :
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.
| CPU-Z — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 5 2600 |
438 3.542 |
| Intel Core i5-8400 |
442 2.666 |
In single core, the difference is 1%.
In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 33%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.
| Cinebench R15 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 5 2600 |
161 1.384 |
| Intel Core i5-8400 |
169 954 |
In single core, the difference is 5%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 45%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.
| Cinebench R23 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 5 2600 |
1.022 8.126 |
| Intel Core i5-8400 |
1.017 5.839 |
In single core, the difference is 0%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 39%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R23 is cross-platform testing software that allows you to assess the hardware capabilities of a device such as a computer, tablet, server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant. The test scene contains no less than 2,000 objects and more than 300,000 polygons in total.
| PassMark — CPU Mark & single thread | |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 5 2600 |
2.243 13.215 |
| Intel Core i5-8400 |
2.401 9.206 |
In single core, the difference is 7%.
In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 44%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.
On Windows 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 5 2600 |
4.441 20.954 |
| Intel Core i5-8400 |
4.765 18.154 |
In single core, the difference is 7%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 15%.
On Linux 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 5 2600 |
4.570 20.707 |
| Intel Core i5-8400 |
5.100 18.750 |
In single core, the difference is 12%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 10%.
On Android 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Android 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-8400 |
4.145 14.898 |
| AMD Ryzen 5 2600 |
4.361 13.960 |
In single core, the difference is -5%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 7%.
On Mac OS X 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Mac OS X 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-8400 |
5. 
|