Amd ryzen 5 3400g vs intel i5 9400f: AMD Ryzen 5 3400G vs Intel Core i5-9400F

16 февраля, 2023

AMD Ryzen 5 3400G vs Intel Core i5-9400F

AMD Ryzen 5 3400G vs Intel Core i5-9400F

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the AMD Ryzen 5 3400G on one side and the Intel Core i5-9400F on the other side. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, It has 4 cores, 8 threads, a maximum frequency of 4,2GHz. The second is used on the desktop segment, it has a total of 6 cores, 6 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 4,1 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values ​​obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.

Specifications:

Processor

AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

Intel Core i5-9400F
Market (main)

Desktop

Desktop
ISA

x86-64 (64 bit)

x86-64 (64 bit)
Microarchitecture

Zen+

Coffee Lake
Core name

Picasso

Coffee Lake-S
Family

Ryzen 5 3000

Core i5-9000
Part number(s), S-Spec

YD3400C5M4MFH,

YD3400C5FHBOX

BX80684I59400F,

CM8068403358819,

SRF6M
Release date

Q3 2019

Q1 2019
Lithography

12 nm

14 nm++
Transistors

4. 950.000.000

—
Cores

4

6
Threads

8

6
Base frequency

3,7 GHz

2,9 GHz
Turbo frequency

4,2 GHz

4,1 GHz
Cache memory

4 MB

9 MB
Max memory capacity

64 GB

128 GB
Memory types

DDR4-2933

DDR4-2666
Max # of memory channels

2

2
Max memory bandwidth

43,71 GB/s

41,6 GB/s
Max PCIe lanes

12

16
TDP

65 W

65 W
Suggested PSU

600W ATX Power Supply

600W ATX Power Supply
GPU integrated graphics

AMD Radeon RX Vega 11

None
GPU cores

11

—
GPU shading units

704

—
GPU base clock

300 MHz

—
GPU boost clock

1400 MHz

—
GPU FP32 floating point

1. 746 GFLOPS

—
Socket

AM4

LGA1151
Compatible motherboard

Socket AM4 Motherboard 

Socket LGA 1151 Motherboard 
Maximum temperature

95°C

100°C
CPU-Z single thread

461

443
CPU-Z multi thread

2.518

2.525
Cinebench R15 single thread

162

177
Cinebench R15 multi-thread

752

987
Cinebench R23 single thread

980

1. 010
Cinebench R23 multi-thread

4.814

5.571
PassMark single thread

2.353

2.470
PassMark CPU Mark

9.338

9.536
(Windows 64-bit)
Geekbench 4 single core

4.337

4.914
(Windows 64-bit)
Geekbench 4 multi-core

14.118

19.012
(SGEMM)
GFLOPS performance

237,1 GFLOPS

344,7 GFLOPS
(Multi-core / watt performance)
Performance / watt ratio

217 pts / W

292 pts / W
Amazon


eBay


Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.

Suggested PSU: We assume that we have An ATX computer case, a high end graphics card, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, a 1TB HDD hard drive, a Blu-Ray drive. We will have to rely on a more powerful power supply if we want to have several graphics cards, several monitors, more memory, etc.

Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

The processor Intel Core i5-9400F has a larger number of cores, the maximum frequency of AMD Ryzen 5 3400G is greater, that their respective TDP are of the same order. Both were produced in the same year.

Performances :

Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.





CPU-Z — Multi-thread & single thread score
Intel Core i5-9400F

443

2.525
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

461

2.518

In single core, the difference is 4%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 0%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.





Cinebench R15 — Multi-thread & single thread score
Intel Core i5-9400F

177

987
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

162

752

In single core, the difference is 9%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 31%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.





Cinebench R23 — Multi-thread & single thread score
Intel Core i5-9400F

1.010

5.571
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

980

4.814

In single core, the difference is 3%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 16%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Cinebench R23 is cross-platform testing software that allows you to assess the hardware capabilities of a device such as a computer, tablet, server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant. The test scene contains no less than 2,000 objects and more than 300,000 polygons in total.





PassMark — CPU Mark & single thread
Intel Core i5-9400F

2.470

9.536
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

2.353

9. 338

In single core, the difference is 5%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 2%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.

On Windows 64-bit:





Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows 64-bit
Intel Core i5-9400F

4.914

19.012
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

4.337

14.118

In single core, the difference is 13%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 35%.

On Linux 64-bit:





Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux 64-bit
Intel Core i5-9400F

5.288

19.278
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

5.096

17.759

In single core, the difference is 4%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 9%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.

Equivalence:

AMD Ryzen 5 3400G Intel equivalentIntel Core i5-9400F AMD equivalent

See also:

Intel Core i5-9400Intel Core i5-9400HIntel Core i5-9400T

AMD Ryzen 5 3400G vs Intel Core i5-9400F

Summary

  • AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

    100%

  • Intel Core i5-9400F

    100%

Relative performance

  • AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

    100%

  • Intel Core i5-9400F

    100%

Relative performance

  • AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

    100%

  • Intel Core i5-9400F

    101%

Relative performance

Reasons to consider AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
Has an integrated GPU, which allows to run the system without a dedicated graphics card, unlike the Intel Core i5-9400F.
Reasons to consider Intel Core i5-9400F
None

Gaming

No clear winner declared

Productivity

No clear winner declared

Features
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G Intel Core i5-9400F
MMX
SSE
SSE2
SSE3
SSSE3
SSE4A
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
AES
AVX
AVX2
BMI1
BMI2
SHA
F16C
FMA3
AMD64
EVP
AMD-V
SMAP
SMEP
SMT
Precision Boost
EIST
Intel 64
XD bit
VT-x
VT-d
AES-NI
TSX
TXT
CLMUL
Boost 2. 0

Architecture
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G Intel Core i5-9400F
Architecture AMD Zen+ vs Intel_Coffelake
Market Desktop vs Desktop
Memory Support DDR4 vs DDR4
Codename Picasso vs Coffee Lake
Release Date Jul 2019 vs Jan 2019

Cores
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G Intel Core i5-9400F
Cores 4 vs 6
Threads 8 vs 6
SMPs 1 vs 1
Integrated Graphics Radeon RX Vega 11 vs No

Cache
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G Intel Core i5-9400F
L1 Cache 128K (per core) vs 64K (per core)
L2 Cache 512K (per core) vs 256K (per core)
L3 Cache 4MB (shared) vs 9MB (shared)

Physical
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G Intel Core i5-9400F
Socket AMD Socket AM4 vs Intel Socket 1151
Max Case Temp unknown vs 72°C
Package µOPGA-1331 vs FC-LGA1151
Die Size 210mm² vs unknown
Process 12 nm vs 14 nm

Performance
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G Intel Core i5-9400F
Cpu Frequency 3700 MHz vs 2900 MHz
Turbo Clock 4200 MHz vs 4100 MHz
Base Clock 100 MHz vs 100 MHz
Voltage variable vs variable
TDP 65 W vs 65 W

  • AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

    4620 points

  • Intel Core i5-9400F

    4920 points

Points — higher is better

  • AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

    19861 points

  • Intel Core i5-9400F

    20880 points

Points — higher is better

  • AMD Ryzen 5 3400G (simulated)

    173.