Intel Core i7-8550U vs AMD Ryzen 5 3500U Benchmarks, Specs, Performance Comparison and Differences
|
|
|
|
|
Intel Core i7-8550U vs AMD Ryzen 5 3500U
Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the Intel Core i7-8550U on one side and the AMD Ryzen 5 3500U on the other side. The first is dedicated to the laptop sector, It has 4 cores, 8 threads, a maximum frequency of 4,0GHz. The second is used on the mainstream-class laptop segment, it has a total of 4 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 3,7 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specification comparison:
| Processor | Intel Core i7-8550U | AMD Ryzen 5 3500U | ||||||
| Market (main) | Laptop | Mainstream-class laptop | ||||||
| ISA | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) | ||||||
| Microarchitecture | Kaby Lake | Zen+ | ||||||
| Core name | Kaby Lake Refresh | Picasso | ||||||
| Family | Core i7-8000 | Ryzen 5 3000 | ||||||
| Part number(s), S-Spec |
FJ8067703281816, |
YM3500C4T4MFG |
||||||
| Release date | Q3 2017 | Q1 2019 | ||||||
| Lithography | 14 nm+ | 12 nm | ||||||
| Transistors | — | 4. 940.000.000 |
||||||
| Cores | 4 | 4 | ||||||
| Threads | 8 | 8 | ||||||
| Base frequency | 1,8 GHz | 2,1 GHz | ||||||
| Turbo frequency | 4,0 GHz | 3,7 GHz | ||||||
| Cache memory | 8 MB | 4 MB | ||||||
| Max memory capacity | 32 GB | 32 GB | ||||||
| Memory types |
DDR4-2400, |
DDR4-2400 |
||||||
| Max # of memory channels | 2 | 2 | ||||||
| Max memory bandwidth | 37,5 GB/s | 35,76 GB/s | ||||||
| Max PCIe lanes | 12 | 12 | ||||||
| TDP | 15 W | 15 W | ||||||
| GPU integrated graphics | Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Kaby Lake) | AMD Radeon Vega 8 (Picasso) | ||||||
| GPU cores | — | 8 | ||||||
| GPU execution units | 24 | — | ||||||
| GPU shading units | 192 | 512 | ||||||
| GPU base clock | 300 MHz | 300 MHz | ||||||
| GPU boost clock | 1150 MHz | 1200 MHz | ||||||
| GPU FP32 floating point | 441,6 GFLOPS | 1. 229 GFLOPS |
||||||
| Socket | BGA1356 | FP5 | ||||||
| Maximum temperature | 100°C | 105°C | ||||||
| Crypto engine |
AES New Instructions, |
— |
||||||
| Security |
Software Guard Extensions, |
— |
||||||
| Max display resolution |
4096 x 2304@60Hz |
— |
||||||
| CPU-Z single thread | 365 | 366 | ||||||
| CPU-Z multi thread | 1.752 | 1. 991 |
||||||
| Cinebench R15 single thread | 162 | 140 | ||||||
| Cinebench R15 multi-thread | 634 | 658 | ||||||
| Cinebench R23 single thread | 971 | 784 | ||||||
| Cinebench R23 multi-thread | 3.097 | 3.451 | ||||||
| PassMark single thread | 2.057 | 2.112 | ||||||
| PassMark CPU Mark | 5.918 | 7.915 | ||||||
| (Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 single core |
4.194 | 3.218 | ||||||
| (Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 multi-core |
12. 400 |
9.297 | ||||||
| (SGEMM) GFLOPS performance |
191,5 GFLOPS | 117,3 GFLOPS | ||||||
| (Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio |
827 pts / W | 620 pts / W | ||||||
| Amazon | ||||||||
| eBay |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
We see that the two processors have an equivalent number of cores, the maximum frequency of Intel Core i7-8550U is greater, that their respective TDP are of the same order. The AMD Ryzen 5 3500U was started more recently.
Performance comparison with the benchmarks:
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.
| CPU-Z — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 5 3500U |
366 1.991 |
| Intel Core i7-8550U |
365 1.752 |
In single core, the difference is 0%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 14%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.
| Cinebench R15 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 5 3500U |
140 658 |
| Intel Core i7-8550U |
162 634 |
In single core, the difference is 16%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 4%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene.
The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.
| Cinebench R23 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 5 3500U |
784 3.451 |
| Intel Core i7-8550U |
971 3.097 |
In single core, the difference is 24%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 11%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R23 is cross-platform testing software that allows you to assess the hardware capabilities of a device such as a computer, tablet, server.
This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant. The test scene contains no less than 2,000 objects and more than 300,000 polygons in total.
| PassMark — CPU Mark & single thread | |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 5 3500U |
2.112 7.915 |
| Intel Core i7-8550U |
2.057 5.918 |
In single core, the difference is 3%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 34%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting.
The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.
On Windows 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i7-8550U |
4.194 12.400 |
| AMD Ryzen 5 3500U |
3.218 9.297 |
In single core, the difference is 30%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 33%.
On Linux 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i7-8550U |
4.205 11.155 |
| AMD Ryzen 5 3500U |
2.765 6.011 |
In single core, the difference is 52%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 86%.
On Android 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Android 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i7-8550U |
3.301 9.950 |
| AMD Ryzen 5 3500U |
3.112 7.308 |
In single core, the difference is 6%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 36%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices.
For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
Equivalence:
Intel Core i7-8550U AMD equivalentAMD Ryzen 5 3500U Intel equivalent
See also:
AMD Ryzen 5 3500AMD Ryzen 5 3500CAMD Ryzen 5 3500X
HP Envy X360 Powered by AMD Ryzen 2500u vs HP Envy Intel Core i7-8550U – TipsGeeks
In light of the recent release by AMD Ryzen 2nd Generation of Mobile Processors, we take a look at the recent releases by AMD under the first generation of mobile processors, the HP Envy x360 2018.
The HP Envy x360 is a light and compact convertible laptop in a very elegant design. Most laptops nowadays come with Intel processors and Nvidia graphics, the HP Envy x360 is fully equipped with AMD components. The unit we currently have is equipped with AMD’s Ryzen 5 2500u with Vega 8 graphics.
We would initially like to commend HP for giving customers more choices in terms of configurations.
Offering both Intel and AMD variants.
Specifications:
- 13.3-inch IPS display
- AMD Ryzen 5 2500U / AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
- Intel Core i7-8550u with Nvidia GeForce MX150
- 8GB DDR4 SDRAM
- 256GB SSD / 360 GB SSD
- Windows 10
- 4-cell 52.2 Wh Li-ion polymer battery
- Bang & Olufsen Quad Speakers
- HP Imagepad with multi-touch gesture support (AMD Variant)
- HP Active Pen (AMD Variant)
- 720p webcam with far-field microphones
- 802.11ac (2×2) Wi-Fi
- Bluetooth 4.2
- Price:
AMD: ₱ 56,990 / Intel: ₱70,990
Design
The Envy x360 is easily distinguishable by its colours: Silver (Intel) and Black (AMD). Both feature a sleek design aesthetic that helps HP maintain their mid-to-high end laptops. We feel as though the AMD version is more distinct while the silver design on Intel will get lost when placed beside other laptops.
The aluminum chassis is very compact with a thin bezel surrounding the 13.3-inch display. Portability is things we liked about the HP Envy x360, weighing only 1.3kg and can be slipped into any decent-sized handbag.
It has an easy-to-rotate screen but we found it a bit too loose. When we tapped the screen with our fingers to use the touch functions, it shook at each contact.
Keyboard
The HP Envy x360’s keyboard gives a sufficient and felt typing experience. The keyboard has a similar feel to the Spectre x360 device. A good point to note is that it won’t work during the tablet mode. This prevents any accidental presses.
The 4.7 x 2.3-inch touch pad gave accurate responses during use and provided clicky and speedy recognition of Windows 10’s navigation gestures. Probably not the best choice for those with big hands though as it tends to feel uncomfortable after sometime.
Performance
HP’s Envy notebooks provide similar performance, sufficient speed for multi-tasking.
The AMD version of the Envy x360 we tested is equipped with a Ryzen 5 2500U CPU and 8GB of RAM, while the counterpart features an Intel Core i7-8550U with 16GB of RAM.
It does the job with daily tasks and with the added 256GB SSD, it was just felt a bit short of what we really needed. 256GB is not enough to store files anymore. Comparing it to the Intel version though, it still performed better in terms of a transfer. Taking 2 minutes and 19 seconds (AMD) and 2 minutes and 49 seconds (Intel) to copy 4.7GB of multimedia files, for rates of 32 megabytes per second (AMD) and 27.7 MBps (Intel).
We wouldn’t really recommend gaming on these two PCs though. We did test it out on a little bit of DOTA 2 and Counter Strike : Global Offensive and it managed well between low to mid settings.
Conclusion
The Ryzen-powered HP Envy offers better aesthetics compared to the Intel variant. They both pack adequate performance for daily tasks in a small chassis. It is a gorgeous showpiece but difficult to readily recommend when it stumbles so often in terms of practicality.