Amd turion vs intel core 2 duo processor: Intel Core2 Duo P7350 @ 2.00GHz vs AMD Turion 64 X2 Mobile TL-60 [cpubenchmark.net] by PassMark Software

Page not found — Technical City

Page not found — Technical City









We couldn’t find such page: /en/cpu/core-2-duo-t7500-vs-turion-64-x2-tl-60%23general-info

Popular graphics cards comparisons


GeForce RTX
3060 Ti

vs


GeForce RTX
3060



GeForce RTX
3060 Ti

vs


GeForce RTX
3070



GeForce GTX
1050 Ti

vs


GeForce GTX
1650



GeForce GTX
1660 Ti

vs


GeForce GTX
1660 Super



GeForce RTX
2060 Super

vs


GeForce RTX
3060



GeForce GTX
1060 6 GB

vs


Radeon RX
580

Popular graphics cards


GeForce RTX
4090



GeForce GTX
1050 Ti



GeForce RTX
3060



Radeon RX
580



GeForce GTX
1660 Super



GeForce GTX
1650

Popular CPU comparisons


Ryzen 5
5600X

vs


Core i5
12400F



Ryzen 5
3600

vs


Core i5
10400F



Core i5
10400F

vs


Core i3
12100F



Ryzen 5
5600X

vs


Ryzen 5
5600G



Ryzen 5
3600

vs


Ryzen 5
5600X



Core i5
1135G7

vs


Ryzen 5
5500U

Popular CPUs


Ryzen 5
5500U



EPYC
7h22



Core i3
1115G4



Core i5
1135G7



Ryzen 5
3500U



Ryzen 5
5600X











Page not found — Technical City

Page not found — Technical City









We couldn’t find such page: /en/cpu/core-2-duo-t7500-vs-turion-64-x2-tl-60%23benchmarks

Popular graphics cards comparisons


GeForce RTX
3060 Ti

vs


GeForce RTX
3060



GeForce RTX
3060 Ti

vs


GeForce RTX
3070



GeForce GTX
1050 Ti

vs


GeForce GTX
1650



GeForce GTX
1660 Ti

vs


GeForce GTX
1660 Super



GeForce RTX
2060 Super

vs


GeForce RTX
3060



GeForce GTX
1060 6 GB

vs


Radeon RX
580

Popular graphics cards


GeForce RTX
4090



GeForce GTX
1050 Ti



GeForce RTX
3060



Radeon RX
580



GeForce GTX
1660 Super



GeForce GTX
1650

Popular CPU comparisons


Ryzen 5
5600X

vs


Core i5
12400F



Ryzen 5
3600

vs


Core i5
10400F



Core i5
10400F

vs


Core i3
12100F



Ryzen 5
5600X

vs


Ryzen 5
5600G



Ryzen 5
3600

vs


Ryzen 5
5600X



Core i5
1135G7

vs


Ryzen 5
5500U

Popular CPUs


Ryzen 5
5500U



EPYC
7h22



Core i3
1115G4



Core i5
1135G7



Ryzen 5
3500U



Ryzen 5
5600X











Compare Intel Core 2 Duo SL7100 vs AMD Turion X2 RM-75

Similarities
Intel Core 2 Duo SL7100 AMD Turion X2 RM-75
Both processors came out at the same time
Both processor models belong to the mobile type 2 cores each
Core 2 Duo SL7100 belongs to the family of processors Core Turion X2 RM-75 belongs to the Turion
9005 9005 9005 9005 9005 9005 9005 9005 9005. belongs to the Turion X2 processor line
The core architecture of the Core 2 Duo SL7100 processor is called Merom The core architecture of the Turion X2 RM-75 processor is called Lion
Intel Core 2 Duo SL7100 operates on the BGA592 AMD Turion X2 RM -75 operates on the Socket S1 SOLE

0 SOL7100 — 800 MHA) AMD Turion X2 RM-75 — 2000 MHz 16-bit HyperTransport (4 GT/s)

Core 2 Duo SL7100 is significantly inferior in terms of clock speed, 1200 MHz compared to 2200 MHz Turion X2 RM -75 is vastly superior in terms of frequency, 2200 MHz compared to 1200 MHz Core 2 Duo SL7100
Core 2 Duo SL7100 has a strong advantage in terms of TDP, its TDP is lower than the competitor and goes up to 12W Watt
N/a Turion X2 RM-75 supports x64 architecture
The L1 cache of the Core 2 Duo SL7100 processor is significantly less than the Turion X2 RM2-785 KB and 1-785 KB0017

The Turion X2 RM-75 L1 cache is much larger than the Core 2 Duo SL7100 and is 256 Kilobytes
The L2 cache of the Core 2 Duo SL7100 is much larger than the Turion X2 RM -75 and equals 4096 KB The Turion X2 RM-75 L2 cache size is much smaller compared to the Core 2 Duo SL7100 and is 1024 KB

Comparison of instructions and technologies

Energy saving technologies0007

Technology or instruction name Intel Core 2 Duo SL7100 AMD Turion X2 RM-75 Short description EIST (Enhanced Intel SpeedStep) — Enhanced Intel SpeedStep Energy Saving Technology. Stop Grant state — Energy saving status. Sleep state — Sleep state. Deep Sleep state — Deep sleep state. Deeper Sleep state — Deeper sleep state. Enhanced Deeper Sleep state — Improved state of deeper sleep. Dynamic Cache sizing — Dynamic cache resizing. PowerNow! — PowerNow! idle frequency reduction technology. Enhanced PowerNow! — Enhanced idle frequency reduction technology «PowerNow!». CoolCore Technology

nine0055 — Complements Cool’n’Quiet. Temporarily disable unused processor blocks. DPM (Dynamic Power management) — Dynamic Power Management.

Standard extension set
Technology or instruction name Intel Core 2 Duo SL7100 AMD Turion X2 RM-75 Brief description
MMX (Multimedia Extensions) Multimedia extensions.
SSE (Streaming SIMD Extensions) Streaming SIMD processor extension.
SSE2 (Streaming SIMD Extensions 2) Streaming SIMD Processor Extension 2.
SSE3 (Streaming SIMD Extensions 3) Processor Streaming SIMD Extension 3.
SSSE3 (Supplemental Streaming SIMD Extension 3) Additional SIMD extensions for streaming 3.
EM64T (Extended Memory 64-bit Technology) 64-bit extended memory technology.
NX (Execute disable bit) Execution inhibit bit.
AMD64 64-bit microprocessor architecture developed by AMD.
3DNow! Optional MMX extension for AMD processors.

nine0152 Intel Core 2 Duo SL7100

Safety Technology
Technology or instruction name AMD Turion X2 RM-75 Short description
EVP (Enhanced Virus Protection) Improved virus protection.
Virtualization technologies
Technology or instruction name Intel Core 2 Duo SL7100 AMD Turion X2 RM-75 Short description
VT-x (Virtualization technology) Virtualization technology.
AMD-V AMD-V Virtualization Technology.

Benchmarks

Overall performance rating

The rating is calculated according to the formula, taking into account all the data: test results in benchmarks, year of release, number of cores, threads, architecture, frequency, socket, instructions, technology, temperature, and also much more. The results of the overall rating showed that the Turion X2 RM-75 surpasses its rival Core 2 Duo SL7100 in most parameters. The Core 2 Duo SL7100 barely scores 575.1 points compared to its competitor. nine0142

PassMark CPU Mark

All of our processors have passed PassMark tests. The benchmark has a wide range of tools for a large-scale assessment of the performance of a computer, in particular the CPU. Among which are encryption, integer calculations, compression, game physics calculations, extended instruction checking, floating point calculations, single-threaded and multi-threaded tests. At the same time, you can compare indicators with other configurations in a common database. This is perhaps the most popular benchmark on the Internet. The Performance Test showed a clear advantage for the Turion X2 RM-75 processor (670 points) over the Core 2 Duo SL7100 (476 points). The Core 2 Duo SL7100 with a score of 476 clearly loses in this test. nine0142

Cinebench 10 (32 bit) Single-threaded test

This benchmark for testing video cards and processors is obsolete nowadays. The main speed testing mode is multi-level reflections, spatial light sources, photorealistic rendering of a 3D scene, working with light, global illumination simulation, and procedural shaders. Uses the ray tracing method. MAXON appeared, it is based on the 3D editor Cinema 4D. Works on Mac OS X, Windows. It is possible to test many processor systems. Single-Core — uses only one core and one thread for rendering in its work. nine0142

Cinebench 10 (32 bit) Multi-thread test

Multi-Thread version is another way to test in Cinebench R10 benchmark, which already uses multi-thread and multi-core test method. It is important to note that the number of threads in this version of the program is limited to sixteen.

Cinebench 11.5 (64-bit) Multi-threaded test

64-bit version of the CINEBENCH 11.5 benchmark — which has the ability to test the CPU at 100 using all threads and cores. Unlike previous versions of the program, 64 threads are used here. Testing the Turion X2 RM-75 in the Cinebench 11.5 benchmark showed a result of 0.92 points, slightly ahead of its competitor. At this time, the Core 2 Duo SL7100 gets its 0.75 points, which fully justifies their close positions in the rating.

Cinebench 11.5 (64-bit) Single-threaded test

Good old multifunctional Cinebench 11.5 from the Maxon team. In this case, Single-Core tests are performed using one thread and one core. His tests have not lost their relevance today. In the tests, as before, the ray tracing method is used, rendering a complex 3D space with a large number of crystalline and translucent and glass balls. The result of the check is the «number of frames per second» parameter. Testing in single-threaded mode of the Turion X2 RM-75 processor in Cinebench 11.5 Single-Core showed that with a score of 0.38 points, it is not far ahead of the competitor. But the Core 2 Duo SL7100 itself scored 0.35 points in this test. nine0142

Cinebench 15 (64-bit) Multi-threaded test

Multi Core Cinebench 15 — will fully load your assembly, demonstrating everything that it is capable of. All threads and CPU cores will be involved in testing when rendering complex 3D objects. Ideal for new multi-thread processors from AMD and Intel, as it is capable of using 256 computing threads. The Turion X2 RM-75, with a score of 81.98, unequivocally scores higher in the Multi-Core test from Cinebench 15. While its rival Core 2 Duo SL7100 is far behind with 64.24 points in the test. nine0142

Cinebench 15 (64-bit) Single-threaded test

Cinebench Release 15 is the most up-to-date benchmark from Finns from Maxon. In the Single Core version of the program, only 1 thread is used in rendering. A complex 3D scene is rendered with many light sources, complex objects and reflections. It checks the system: both video cards and processors. For CPU, the result of the calculation is the number of PTS points, and for GPUs, the value of frames per second FPS. The single-threaded test of the Turion X2 RM-75 processor in the Cinebench R15 program indicates its high performance, the result is 41.68 points. Compared to it, its Core 2 Duo SL7100 competitor fails this test with a score of 29..22 points.

Geekbench 4.0 (64-bit) Multi-threaded benchmark

Geekbench 4 64-bit multi-threaded benchmark. Support for a variety of devices and operating systems makes Geekbench benchmarks the most popular at the moment. It’s already In Geekbench 4, the 64-bit multi-core Turion X2 RM-75 processor scored 1946, which is significantly higher than the Core 2 Duo SL7100. In this test, the Core 2 Duo SL7100 scores a very low score of 1448.43 compared to the Turion X2 RM-75. nine0142

Geekbench 4.0 (64-bit) Single-threaded test

The Single-Core version uses one processor thread. This tester, like its earlier versions, can still be run on OS: Windows, Mac OS, Linux. For the first time ever, smartphones and tablets running Android and iOS are also supported in this version. The latest single-threaded version of Geekbench 4 to date for testing laptops and home PCs. The processors in this benchmark do not have much difference in points: Core 2 Duo SL7100 scores 886.87 points, Turion X2 RM-75 scores 895 points.

Geekbench 3 (32 bit) Multi-thread test

Multi-Thread Geekbench 3 — can allow you to make a big stress test on your PC and show how stable your system is.

Geekbench 3 (32 bit) Single-threaded test

Cross-platform Geekbench is often used to evaluate a system under Mac, although it can run on both Windows and Linux. The basic purpose is to test the performance of processors. The 32-bit version of the test loads one processor core and one thread. nine0142

Geekbench 2

An outdated version of the Geekbench 2 tester. Our archive contains about 200 CPU models that have test data in this program. Today there are newer options: fourth and 5v.

X264 HD 4.0 Pass 1

This is a practical system performance test by transcoding HD video files to the new H.264 format, the so-called MPEG 4 x264 codec. This test is faster than Pass 2, as encoding is done at the same speed. Frame rate processed in sec. is the benchmark for the test. An ideal benchmark for multi-core and multi-threaded CPUs. The MPEG 4 video processing speed of the Turion X2 RM-75 is slightly higher than that of the Core 2 Duo SL7100, and amounted to 21. 7 FPS. The Core 2 Duo SL7100 managed to score 18.72 FPS, slightly behind the first processor. nine0142

X264 HD 4.0 Pass 2

This is a slightly different, slower test based on video file compression. The result is a better quality video file. It is important to understand that a very real task is being simulated, and the x264 codec is used in a large number of video encoders. The result obtained is also determined by frames per second. The same MPEG4 x264 codec is used, but encoding is already done at a variable rate. Therefore, the test results really reflect the effectiveness of the platform. When measuring the speed of video file compression by the Turion X2 RM-75 processor in mpeg4 format, the result was 5.04 Frames / s. Its rival Core 2 Duo SL7100 showed a much lower video encoding rate compared to it — 4.02 FPS. nine0142

3DMark06 CPU

Based on DirectX 9.0 by Futuremark. Processors are tested in two ways: the game AI calculates the pathfinding, and the second test simulates the system using PhysX. This benchmark is often used by overclockers and overclockers and gamers. Benchmark to evaluate the performance of the video system, and the processor. Turion X2 RM-75 showed itself a little faster in tests for game physics, pathfinding, while gaining up to 1205.93 points. The Core 2 Duo SL7100 also coped with these tasks, showing a good result 995 points.

3DMark Fire Strike Physics

Almost two hundred CPUs on our Internet resource have data in the 3DMark Physics test. This is an arithmetic test that makes calculations in game physics.

WinRAR 4.0

A well-known archiver. The tests were carried out under Windows OS. The speed of compression by the RAR algorithm was estimated; for these purposes, large amounts of random data were taken. The resulting speed in the process of compression «Kb / s» — this is the test indicator. Turion X2 RM-75 is slightly ahead of its competitor in WinRAR file compression speed, the result of data encoding was 532. 63 Kb/s. Core 2 Duo SL7100 achieved 512.9 encoding speed2 Kb/s.

TrueCrypt AES

Not exactly a tester, but the results of its use can help evaluate system performance. It so happened that support for this project was stopped on May 28, 2014. It can run on different operating systems Windows, Mac OS X and Linux. The program includes the ability to instantly encrypt disk partitions. Our website shows the results of encryption speed in Gb / s when using the AES algorithm.

Comparison of Intel Core 2 Duo T5850 and AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-52

Comparative analysis of Intel Core 2 Duo T5850 and AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-52 processors according to all known characteristics in the categories: General Information, Performance, Compatibility.
Analysis of processor performance by benchmarks: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core.

Intel Core 2 Duo T5850

versus

AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-52

Benefits

Reasons to choose Intel Core 2 Duo T5850

  • Newer processor, approx. clock speed: 2.1 GHz vs 1.6 GHz
  • Newer manufacturing process of the processor allows it to be more powerful, but with lower power consumption: 65 nm vs 90 nm
  • Performance in the PassMark — Single thread mark benchmark is about 46% higher: 787 vs 539
  • Performance in PassMark benchmark — CPU mark about 38% better: 687 vs 498
Release date 1 October 2008 vs 17 May 2006
Maximum frequency 2.1 GHz vs 1.6 GHz
Process 65 nm vs 90 nm
PassMark — Single thread mark 787 vs 539
PassMark — CPU mark 687 vs 498

Reasons to choose AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-52

  • About 10% less power consumption: 31 Watt vs 34 Watt
Power consumption (TDP) 31 Watt vs 34 Watt

Benchmark comparison

CPU 1: Intel Core 2 Duo T5850
CPU 2: AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-52

PassMark — Single thread mark
CPU 1
CPU 2
PassMark — CPU mark
CPU 1
CPU 2

nine0017

nine0160 687

Name Intel Core 2 Duo T5850 AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-52
PassMark — Single thread mark 787 539
PassMark — CPU mark 498
Geekbench 4 — Single Core 241
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core 430

Performance comparison

nine0013

nine0152 Intel Core 2 Duo T5850 AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-52
Architecture name Merom Trinidad
Production date October 1, 2008 May 17, 2006
Place in the ranking 2380 2319
Price now $15. 90
Series Intel Core 2 Duo AMD Turion 64 X2 Dual-Core Mobile Technology
Price/performance ratio (0-100) 13/22
Applicability Laptop Laptop
Family AMD Turion
OPN PIB TMDTL52CTWOF
OPN Tray TMDTL52HAX5CT
Support 64 bit
System bus (FSB) 667MHz 800MHz
Level 2 cache 2MB 2MB
Process 65nm 90nm
Maximum frequency 2.

2023 © All rights reserved