Comparison Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 vs AMD Turion X2 RM-74 what is better?
Home / CPU / Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 vs AMD Turion X2 RM-74
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600
15%
DeviceList score
vs
AMD Turion X2 RM-74
4%
DeviceList score
We compared the characteristics of Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 and AMD Turion X2 RM-74 and compiled a list of advantages and a comparison table for you. Find out which one to choose in 2022 year.
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 benefits
Winner in comparison
Maximum frequency |
2.4 GGz 0.2 GGz (9.1%) better
vs
2.2 GGz
|
Manufacturing process technology |
45 nm -20 nm (-30.8%) better
vs
65 nm
|
Power Consumption (TDP) |
25 Wt -10 Wt (-28. 6%) better
vs
35 Wt
|
Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core |
2618 878 (50.5%) better
vs
1740
|
Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core |
4910 1530 (45.3%) better
vs
3380
|
3DMark06 CPU |
2155 594 (38.1%) better
vs
1561
|
AMD Turion X2 RM-74 benefits
General information | |
Type |
|
Architecture codename |
|
Penryn | Lion |
Number of cores A large number of cores improves performance in multithreaded applications.
|
|
2 | 2 |
Number of threads More threads help the cores process information more efficiently. Real performance will be noticeable in very specific tasks (video editing, databases). |
|
2 | 2 |
Manufacturing process technology |
|
45 nm
-20 nm (-30.8%) better
|
65 nm |
Crystal size |
|
81 2 | no data |
Transistor count |
|
274 million | no data |
Maximum frequency Processors with high clock speeds perform more calculations per second and thus provide better performance. |
|
2.4 GGz
0.2 GGz (9.1%) better
|
2.2 GGz |
64 bit support |
|
Max number of CPUs in a configuration |
|
no data | 1 |
Socket |
|
PGA478, BGA479 | S1 |
AMD-V |
|
Series |
|
Intel Core 2 Duo | 2x AMD Turion |
Start price |
|
209 USD | no data |
Price-quality ratio The sum of all the advantages of the device divided by its price. The higher the%, the better the quality per unit price in comparison with all analogues. |
|
52.8 % | no data |
Bus |
|
1066 | 3600 |
Maximum core temperature |
|
105 °C | no data |
TXT Intel Trusted Execution Technology for hardware protection against malware. For each protected program, the processor allocates its own isolated section of RAM. |
|
Demand Based Switching |
|
— | no data |
PowerNow |
|
no data | + |
FSB |
|
— | no data |
L1 Cache More threads help the cores process information more efficiently. Real performance will be noticeable in very specific tasks (video editing, databases). |
|
128 | 256 |
L2 Cache |
|
3 | 1 |
Power Consumption (TDP) The calculated heat output shows the average heat output in operation under load,
|
|
25 Wt
-10 Wt (-28.6%) better
|
35 Wt |
EDB |
|
+ | no data |
Permissible core voltage |
|
1.05V-1.15V | no data |
Benchmarks | |
Passmark |
|
828 | no data |
Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core |
|
2618
878 (50. 5%) better
|
1740 |
Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core |
|
4910
1530 (45.3%) better
|
3380 |
Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core |
|
118 | no data |
3DMark06 CPU |
|
2155
594 (38.1%) better
|
1561 |
Geekbench 2 |
|
3466 | no data |
Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core |
|
1248 | no data |
Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core |
|
2302 | no data |
Cinebench 11. 5 64-bit multi-core |
|
65 | no data |
Technologies and extensions | |
Turbo Boost |
|
— | no data |
Idle States |
|
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) More threads help the cores process information more efficiently. Real performance will be noticeable in very specific tasks (video editing, databases). |
|
Hyper-Threading More threads help the cores process information more efficiently. Real performance will be noticeable in very specific tasks (video editing, databases). |
|
RAM parameters |
Virtualization technologies | |
VT-x |
|
Graphics specifications |
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 vs AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-64
Comparative analysis of Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 and AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-64 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization, Memory.
Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600
Buy on Amazon
vs
AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-64
Buy on Amazon
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Duo P8600
- CPU is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 9% higher clock speed: 2.4 GHz vs 2.2 GHz
- Around 11% higher maximum core temperature: 105°C vs 95°C
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 45 nm vs 65 nm
- 3x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 40% lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 35 Watt
- Around 33% better performance in PassMark — Single thread mark: 937 vs 702
- Around 25% better performance in PassMark — CPU mark: 846 vs 675
Launch date | 15 July 2008 vs 13 April 2007 |
Maximum frequency | 2. 4 GHz vs 2.2 GHz |
Maximum core temperature | 105°C vs 95°C |
Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm vs 65 nm |
L2 cache | 3072 KB vs 1 MB |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 35 Watt |
PassMark — Single thread mark | 937 vs 702 |
PassMark — CPU mark | 846 vs 675 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-64
- 2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 3.6x better performance in Geekbench 4 — Single Core: 1087 vs 306
- 3. 4x better performance in Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core: 1806 vs 538
L1 cache | 256 KB vs 128 KB |
Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 1087 vs 306 |
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 1806 vs 538 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Core 2 Duo P8600
CPU 2: AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-64
PassMark — Single thread mark |
|
|
||
PassMark — CPU mark |
|
|
||
Geekbench 4 — Single Core |
|
|
||
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core |
|
|
Name | Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 | AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-64 |
---|---|---|
PassMark — Single thread mark | 937 | 702 |
PassMark — CPU mark | 846 | 675 |
Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 306 | 1087 |
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 538 | 1806 |
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.261 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 16.1 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.074 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.498 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.788 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 | AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-64 | |
---|---|---|
Architecture codename | Penryn | Trinidad |
Launch date | 15 July 2008 | 13 April 2007 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $209 | |
Place in performance rating | 2616 | 1836 |
Price now | $49. 18 | |
Processor Number | P8600 | |
Series | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors | AMD Turion 64 X2 Dual-Core Mobile Technology |
Status | Discontinued | |
Value for money (0-100) | 9.20 | |
Vertical segment | Mobile | Laptop |
Family | AMD Turion | |
OPN Tray | TMDTL64HAX5DM | |
64 bit support | ||
Base frequency | 2. 40 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
Bus Speed | 1066 MHz FSB | |
Die size | 107 mm2 | 147 mm |
Front-side bus (FSB) | 1066 MHz | 800 MHz |
L1 cache | 128 KB | 256 KB |
L2 cache | 3072 KB | 1 MB |
Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm | 65 nm |
Maximum core temperature | 105°C | 95°C |
Maximum frequency | 2. 4 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
Number of cores | 2 | 2 |
Number of threads | 2 | 2 |
Transistor count | 410 million | 154 Million |
VID voltage range | 1.050V-1.150V | |
Unlocked | ||
Low Halogen Options Available | ||
Package Size | 35 mm x 35mm | |
Sockets supported | PGA478, BGA479 | S1 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 35 Watt |
Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
FSB parity | ||
Idle States | ||
Intel 64 | ||
Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
Supported memory frequency | 667 MHz | |
Supported memory types | DDR2 |
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 with others
Intel
Core 2 Duo P8600
vs
Intel
Core 2 Duo T7700
Intel
Core 2 Duo P8600
vs
Intel
Celeron Dual-Core SU2300
Intel
Core 2 Duo P8600
vs
Intel
Core i3-2367M
Comparison Intel Core 2 Duo SP7500 vs AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-64 which is better?
Home / Intel Core 2 Duo SP7500 VS AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-64
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7500
3%
Devicelist
VS
AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-64 9000 9000 9000 9000
DeviceList Score
We compared the specifications of Intel Core 2 Duo SP7500 and AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-64 and compiled a list of benefits and comparison table for you. Find out which one to choose in 2022. nine0003
Benefits of Intel Core 2 Duo SP7500
Power Demand (TDP) |
20 W -15 W (-42.9%) better than vs 35 W |
Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core |
1766 40 (2.3%) better than nine0002 vs 1726 |
Advantages of AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-64
Comparison winner
Maximum frequency |
2.2 GHz 0.6 GHz (37.5%) better than vs 1.6 GHz |
Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core |
3201 420 (15.1%) better than vs 2781 |
3DMark06 CPU |
1518 536 (54. 6%) better than vs 982 |
General | |
Type |
|
Notebook | For laptops |
Architecture code name |
|
Merom | Trinidad |
Cores A large number of cores improves performance in multi-threaded applications. |
|
2 | 2 |
Threads More threads help the cores process information more efficiently. Real performance will be noticeable in very specific tasks (video editing, databases). |
|
2 | 2 |
Process |
|
65 nm | 65 nm |
Crystal size |
|
n/a | 147 mm2 |
Number of transistors |
|
n/a | 154 million |
Maximum frequency Faster clocked processors perform more calculations per second and thus provide better performance. nine0003 |
|
1.6GHz | 2.2 GHz
Better than at 0.6 GHz (37.5%) |
Support 64 bit |
|
Socket |
|
n/a | S1 |
Series |
|
Intel Core 2 Duo | 2x AMD Turion 64 |
Bus |
|
800 MHz | 800 MHz |
Maximum core temperature |
|
n/a | 95 °C |
Level 1 Cache The fastest level of cache that works directly with the core. The larger the cache, the better the performance. nine0003 |
|
n/a | 256 Kb |
Level 2 cache |
|
4 MB | 1 Mb |
Power Demand (TDP) The calculated heat output shows the average heat dissipation in load operation, |
|
20W
-15 W (-42.9%) better than |
35 W |
Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core | |
1766
40 (2.3%) better than |
1726 |
Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core |
|
2781 | 3201
420 (15.1%) better than |
3DMark06 CPU |
|
982 | 1518
536 (54.6%) better than |
Technologies and additional instructions |
RAM parameters0027 |
Virtualization technologies |
Built-in graphics |
Comparison Intel Core 2 Duo T7500 and AMD TURION TURION TURION TURION TURION TURONION
Comparative analysis of Intel Core 2 Duo T7500 and AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-58 processors according to all known characteristics in the categories: General information, Performance, Compatibility, Security and reliability, Technologies, Virtualization.
Analysis of processor performance by benchmarks: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation ( Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
nine0003
Intel Core 2 Duo T7500
versus
AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-58
Advantages
reasons to choose the Intel Core 2 Duo T7500
- about 16% more clock frequency: 2.2 GHZ VS 1.9 GHZ
- Kesh L2 V. more means more data can be stored in it for quick access
- Performance in the PassMark — Single thread mark benchmark is about 57% higher: 875 vs 559
- Performance in PassMark benchmark — CPU mark about 74% higher: 827 vs 476
Maximum frequency | 2. 2 GHz vs 1.9 GHz |
Level 2 cache | 4096 KB vs 1024 KB |
PassMark — Single thread mark | 875 vs 559 |
PassMark — CPU mark | 827 vs 476 |
Reasons to choose AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-58
- approx.
- 3.1x better performance in Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core benchmark: 1584 vs 507
Power consumption (TDP) | 31 Watt vs 35 Watt |
Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 938 vs 301 |
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 1584 vs 507 |
Benchmark comparison
CPU 1: Intel Core 2 Duo T7500
CPU 2: AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-58
PassMark — Single thread mark |
|
|||
PassMark — CPU mark |
|
|||
Geekbench 4 — Single Core |
|
|||
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core |
|
nine0027 |
Name | Intel Core 2 Duo T7500 | AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-58 |
---|---|---|
PassMark — Single thread mark | 875 | 559 |
PassMark — CPU mark | 476 | |
Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 301 | 938 |
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 507 | 1584 |
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.235 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 15.316 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.072 | nine0028 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.264 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.59 |
Performance comparison
Intel Core 2 Duo T7500 | AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-58 | |
---|---|---|
Architecture name | Merom | Tyler |
Production date | May 8, 2007 | May 4, 2007 |
Price at first issue date | ||
Place in the ranking | 2639 | 2041 |
Price now | $42. 99 | |
Processor Number | T7500 | |
Series | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors | 2x AMD Turion 64 |
Status | Discontinued | |
Price/performance ratio (0-100) | 8.72 | |
Applicability | Mobile | Laptop |
Support 64 bit | ||
Base frequency | 2. 20 GHz | nine0028 |
Bus Speed | 800 MHz FSB | |
Crystal area | 143 mm2 | |
System bus (FSB) | 800MHz | 800MHz |
Level 1 cache | 128KB | |
Level 2 cache | 4096KB | 1024KB |
Process | 65nm | 65nm |
Maximum core temperature | 100°C | |
Maximum frequency | 2.
|