Amd turion vs intel duo: Intel Core2 Duo P7350 @ 2.00GHz vs AMD Turion 64 X2 Mobile TL-60 [cpubenchmark.net] by PassMark Software

Comparison Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 vs AMD Turion X2 RM-74 what is better?

Home / CPU / Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 vs AMD Turion X2 RM-74

Intel Core 2 Duo P8600

15%

DeviceList score

vs

AMD Turion X2 RM-74

4%

DeviceList score

We compared the characteristics of Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 and AMD Turion X2 RM-74 and compiled a list of advantages and a comparison table for you. Find out which one to choose in 2022 year.

Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 benefits

Winner in comparison

Maximum frequency

2.4 GGz

0.2 GGz (9.1%) better

vs

2.2 GGz

Manufacturing process technology

45 nm

-20 nm (-30.8%) better

vs

65 nm

Power Consumption (TDP)

25 Wt

-10 Wt (-28. 6%) better

vs

35 Wt

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

2618

878 (50.5%) better

vs

1740

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

4910

1530 (45.3%) better

vs

3380

3DMark06 CPU

2155

594 (38.1%) better

vs

1561

AMD Turion X2 RM-74 benefits



























General information

Type

Для ноутбуков Для ноутбуков

Architecture codename

Penryn Lion

Number of cores

A large number of cores improves performance in multithreaded applications.
At the moment, increasing the number of processor cores is one of the priorities for increasing performance.

2 2

Number of threads

More threads help the cores process information more efficiently. Real performance will be noticeable in very specific tasks (video editing, databases).

2 2

Manufacturing process technology

45 nm

-20 nm (-30.8%) better

65 nm

Crystal size

81 мм2 no data

Transistor count

274 million no data

Maximum frequency

Processors with high clock speeds perform more calculations per second and thus provide better performance.

2.4 GGz

0.2 GGz (9.1%) better

2.2 GGz

64 bit support

Max number of CPUs in a configuration

no data 1

Socket

PGA478, BGA479 S1

AMD-V

Series

Intel Core 2 Duo 2x AMD Turion

Start price

209 USD no data

Price-quality ratio

The sum of all the advantages of the device divided by its price. The higher the%, the better the quality per unit price in comparison with all analogues.

52.8 % no data

Bus

1066 МГц 3600 МГц

Maximum core temperature

105 °C no data

TXT

Intel Trusted Execution Technology for hardware protection against malware. For each protected program, the processor allocates its own isolated section of RAM.

Demand Based Switching

no data

PowerNow

no data +

Четность FSB

no data

L1 Cache

More threads help the cores process information more efficiently. Real performance will be noticeable in very specific tasks (video editing, databases).

128 Кб 256 Кб

L2 Cache

3 Мб 1 Мб

Power Consumption (TDP)

The calculated heat output shows the average heat output in operation under load,
the larger the value — the more the requirements for cooling and energy consumption increase.

25 Wt

-10 Wt (-28.6%) better

35 Wt

EDB

+ no data

Permissible core voltage

1.05V-1.15V no data










Benchmarks

Passmark

828 no data

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

2618

878 (50. 5%) better

1740

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

4910

1530 (45.3%) better

3380

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

118 no data

3DMark06 CPU

2155

594 (38.1%) better

1561

Geekbench 2

3466 no data

Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core

1248 no data

Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core

2302 no data

Cinebench 11. 5 64-bit multi-core

65 no data





Technologies and extensions

Turbo Boost

no data

Idle States

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)

More threads help the cores process information more efficiently. Real performance will be noticeable in very specific tasks (video editing, databases).

Hyper-Threading

More threads help the cores process information more efficiently. Real performance will be noticeable in very specific tasks (video editing, databases).

RAM parameters


Virtualization technologies

VT-x

Graphics specifications

Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 vs AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-64


Comparative analysis of Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 and AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-64 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization, Memory.
Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

Intel Core 2 Duo P8600

Buy on Amazon


vs

AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-64

Buy on Amazon

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Duo P8600

  • CPU is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 3 month(s) later
  • Around 9% higher clock speed: 2.4 GHz vs 2.2 GHz
  • Around 11% higher maximum core temperature: 105°C vs 95°C
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 45 nm vs 65 nm
  • 3x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
  • Around 40% lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 35 Watt
  • Around 33% better performance in PassMark — Single thread mark: 937 vs 702
  • Around 25% better performance in PassMark — CPU mark: 846 vs 675









Launch date 15 July 2008 vs 13 April 2007
Maximum frequency 2. 4 GHz vs 2.2 GHz
Maximum core temperature 105°C vs 95°C
Manufacturing process technology 45 nm vs 65 nm
L2 cache 3072 KB vs 1 MB
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 25 Watt vs 35 Watt
PassMark — Single thread mark 937 vs 702
PassMark — CPU mark 846 vs 675

Reasons to consider the AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-64

  • 2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
  • 3.6x better performance in Geekbench 4 — Single Core: 1087 vs 306
  • 3. 4x better performance in Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core: 1806 vs 538




L1 cache 256 KB vs 128 KB
Geekbench 4 — Single Core 1087 vs 306
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core 1806 vs 538

Compare benchmarks


CPU 1: Intel Core 2 Duo P8600
CPU 2: AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-64





PassMark — Single thread mark

CPU 1
CPU 2


PassMark — CPU mark

CPU 1
CPU 2


Geekbench 4 — Single Core

CPU 1
CPU 2


Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core

CPU 1
CPU 2







Name Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-64
PassMark — Single thread mark 937 702
PassMark — CPU mark 846 675
Geekbench 4 — Single Core 306 1087
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core 538 1806
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) 0.261
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 16.1
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.074
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) 0.498
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 1.788

Compare specifications (specs)


























Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-64
Architecture codename Penryn Trinidad
Launch date 15 July 2008 13 April 2007
Launch price (MSRP) $209
Place in performance rating 2616 1836
Price now $49. 18
Processor Number P8600
Series Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors AMD Turion 64 X2 Dual-Core Mobile Technology
Status Discontinued
Value for money (0-100) 9.20
Vertical segment Mobile Laptop
Family

AMD Turion
OPN Tray

TMDTL64HAX5DM
64 bit support
Base frequency 2. 40 GHz 2.2 GHz
Bus Speed 1066 MHz FSB
Die size 107 mm2 147 mm
Front-side bus (FSB) 1066 MHz 800 MHz
L1 cache 128 KB 256 KB
L2 cache 3072 KB 1 MB
Manufacturing process technology 45 nm 65 nm
Maximum core temperature 105°C 95°C
Maximum frequency 2. 4 GHz 2.2 GHz
Number of cores 2 2
Number of threads 2 2
Transistor count 410 million 154 Million
VID voltage range 1.050V-1.150V
Unlocked

Low Halogen Options Available
Package Size 35 mm x 35mm
Sockets supported PGA478, BGA479 S1
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 25 Watt 35 Watt
Execute Disable Bit (EDB)
Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT)
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology
FSB parity
Idle States
Intel 64
Intel® Demand Based Switching
Intel® Hyper-Threading technology
Intel® Turbo Boost technology
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x)
Supported memory frequency

667 MHz
Supported memory types

DDR2

Navigation

Choose a CPU

Compare processors

Compare Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 with others




Intel
Core 2 Duo P8600



vs



Intel
Core 2 Duo T7700




Intel
Core 2 Duo P8600



vs



Intel
Celeron Dual-Core SU2300




Intel
Core 2 Duo P8600



vs



Intel
Core i3-2367M

Comparison Intel Core 2 Duo SP7500 vs AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-64 which is better?

Home / Intel Core 2 Duo SP7500 VS AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-64

Intel Core 2 Duo SP7500

3%

Devicelist

VS

AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-64 9000 9000 9000 9000

DeviceList Score

We compared the specifications of Intel Core 2 Duo SP7500 and AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-64 and compiled a list of benefits and comparison table for you. Find out which one to choose in 2022. nine0003

Benefits of Intel Core 2 Duo SP7500

Power Demand (TDP)

20 W

-15 W (-42.9%) better than

vs

35 W

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

1766

40 (2.3%) better than

nine0002 vs

1726

Advantages of AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-64

Comparison winner

Maximum frequency

2.2 GHz

0.6 GHz (37.5%) better than

vs

1.6 GHz

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

3201

420 (15.1%) better than

vs

2781

3DMark06 CPU

1518

536 (54. 6%) better than

vs

982

General

Type

Notebook For laptops

Architecture code name

Merom Trinidad

Cores

A large number of cores improves performance in multi-threaded applications.
At the moment, increasing the number of processor cores is one of the priorities for increasing performance. nine0003

2 2

Threads

More threads help the cores process information more efficiently. Real performance will be noticeable in very specific tasks (video editing, databases).

2 2

Process

65 nm 65 nm

Crystal size

n/a 147 mm2

Number of transistors

n/a 154 million

Maximum frequency

Faster clocked processors perform more calculations per second and thus provide better performance. nine0003

1.6GHz 2.2 GHz

Better than

at 0.6 GHz (37.5%)

Support 64 bit

Socket

n/a S1

Series

Intel Core 2 Duo 2x AMD Turion 64

Bus

800 MHz 800 MHz

Maximum core temperature

n/a 95 °C

Level 1 Cache

The fastest level of cache that works directly with the core. The larger the cache, the better the performance. nine0003

n/a 256 Kb

Level 2 cache

4 MB 1 Mb

Power Demand (TDP)

The calculated heat output shows the average heat dissipation in load operation,
the larger the value, the more the requirements for cooling and power consumption increase.

20W

-15 W (-42.9%) better than

35 W
Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

1766

40 (2.3%) better than

1726

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

2781 3201

420 (15.1%) better than

3DMark06 CPU

982 1518

536 (54.6%) better than

Technologies and additional instructions
RAM parameters0027
Virtualization technologies
Built-in graphics

Comparison Intel Core 2 Duo T7500 and AMD TURION TURION TURION TURION TURION TURONION
Comparative analysis of Intel Core 2 Duo T7500 and AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-58 processors according to all known characteristics in the categories: General information, Performance, Compatibility, Security and reliability, Technologies, Virtualization.


Analysis of processor performance by benchmarks: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation ( Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
nine0003

Intel Core 2 Duo T7500

versus

AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-58

Advantages

reasons to choose the Intel Core 2 Duo T7500

  • about 16% more clock frequency: 2.2 GHZ VS 1.9 GHZ
  • Kesh L2 V. more means more data can be stored in it for quick access
  • Performance in the PassMark — Single thread mark benchmark is about 57% higher: 875 vs 559
  • Performance in PassMark benchmark — CPU mark about 74% higher: 827 vs 476
Maximum frequency 2. 2 GHz vs 1.9 GHz
Level 2 cache 4096 KB vs 1024 KB
PassMark — Single thread mark 875 vs 559
PassMark — CPU mark 827 vs 476

Reasons to choose AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-58

  • approx.
  • 3.1x better performance in Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core benchmark: 1584 vs 507
Power consumption (TDP) 31 Watt vs 35 Watt
Geekbench 4 — Single Core 938 vs 301
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core 1584 vs 507

Benchmark comparison

CPU 1: Intel Core 2 Duo T7500
CPU 2: AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-58

nine0028

PassMark — Single thread mark
CPU 1
CPU 2
PassMark — CPU mark
CPU 1
CPU 2
Geekbench 4 — Single Core
CPU 1
CPU 2
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core
CPU 1
CPU 2

nine0027

nine0024 827

Name Intel Core 2 Duo T7500 AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-58
PassMark — Single thread mark 875 559
PassMark — CPU mark 476
Geekbench 4 — Single Core 301 938
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core 507 1584
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) 0.235
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 15.316
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.072 nine0028

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) 0.264
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 1.59

Performance comparison

nine0024 $234

nine0648

nine0648

Intel Core 2 Duo T7500 AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-58
Architecture name Merom Tyler
Production date May 8, 2007 May 4, 2007
Price at first issue date
Place in the ranking 2639 2041
Price now $42. 99
Processor Number T7500
Series Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors 2x AMD Turion 64
Status Discontinued
Price/performance ratio (0-100) 8.72
Applicability Mobile Laptop
Support 64 bit
Base frequency 2. 20 GHz nine0028

Bus Speed ​​ 800 MHz FSB
Crystal area 143 mm2
System bus (FSB) 800MHz 800MHz
Level 1 cache 128KB
Level 2 cache 4096KB 1024KB
Process 65nm 65nm
Maximum core temperature 100°C
Maximum frequency 2.

2023 © All rights reserved