AMD Turion X2 Dual-Core Mobile RM-70 vs Intel Core i3-10100
UserBenchmark: AMD Turion X2 Dual-Core Mobile RM-70 vs Intel Core i3-10100
- CPU
- GPU
- SSD
- HDD
- RAM
- USB
BX8070110100
VS
YouTube*NEW*
About
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 28,291 user samples
Benchmark your CPU here
27,796 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 91% Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 70% Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Poor: 70%
Great: 91%
SPEED RANK: 154th / 1367
Gaming 83% Aircraft carrier |
Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier |
Workstation 69% Battle cruiser |
495 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 40% Base clock 2 GHz
Worst Bench: 20% Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 0. 5 GHz (avg)
Poor: 20%
Great: 40%
SPEED RANK: 1261st / 1367
Gaming 30% Raft |
Desktop 33% Sail boat |
Workstation 20% Surfboard |
Effective Speed Effective CPU Speed |
82.9 % | Hugely faster effective speed. +178% |
29.8 % |
Memory Avg. Memory Latency |
87.7 Pts | Much lower memory latency. +71% |
51.4 Pts | |||
1-Core Avg. Single Core Speed |
123 Pts | Hugely faster single-core speed. +382% |
25.5 Pts | |||
2-Core Avg. Dual Core Speed |
234 Pts | Hugely faster dual-core speed. +374% |
49.4 Pts | |||
4-Core Avg. Quad Core Speed |
421 Pts | Hugely faster quad-core speed. +740% |
50.1 Pts | |||
8-Core Avg. Octa Core Speed |
644 Pts | Insanely faster octa-core speed. +1,160% |
51.1 Pts |
Memory OC Memory Latency |
95 Pts | Much lower OC memory latency. +34% |
71 Pts | |||
1-Core OC Single Core Speed |
131 Pts | Hugely faster OC single-core speed. +343% |
29.6 Pts | |||
2-Core OC Dual Core Speed |
256 Pts | Hugely faster OC dual-core speed. +334% |
59 Pts | |||
4-Core OC Quad Core Speed |
480 Pts | Hugely faster OC quad-core speed. +712% |
59.1 Pts | |||
8-Core OC Octa Core Speed |
696 Pts | Insanely faster OC octa-core speed. +1,080% |
59 Pts |
Market Share
Based on 55,945,618 CPUs tested.
See market share leaders
Market Share Market Share (trailing 30 days) |
0.23 % | Insanely higher market share. +∞% |
0 % | |||
Value Value For Money |
103 % | Slightly better value. +8% |
95.7 % | |||
User Rating UBM User Rating |
90 % | Much more popular. +80% |
50 % | |||
Price Price (score) |
$125 | $4 | Hugely cheaper. +97% |
Age Newest |
29 Months | Much more recent. +73% |
106+ Months | |||
64-Core OC Multi Core Speed |
696 Pts | Insanely faster OC 64-core speed. +1,080% |
59 Pts | |||
64-Core Avg. Multi Core Speed |
654 Pts | Insanely faster 64-core speed. +1,170% |
51.5 Pts |
ADVERTISEMENT
The i3-10100 is Intel’s entry level 10th generation Comet Lake processor and represents the best value for money within the line-up. This quad-core hyper-threaded 65 Watt processor ships with a cooler and is capable of 4.3 GHz single and 4.1 GHz all core boosts. Although the i3-10100 requires a new LGA1200 motherboard, Intel have guaranteed that LGA1200 will be compatible with the next generation of Rocket Lake CPUs, expected later this year. Running at stock (2666 MHz) RAM frequency handicaps performance by as much as 15% so gamers should pair the 10100 with a Z490 motherboard. This will both open an upgrade path to higher tier «K» tier CPUs and unlock higher XMP RAM speeds (here is one of the builds from our EFps test lab). When paired with an RTX 2060S, the 10100 lags just 13% behind the i9-10900K flagship. The 10100 allows budget gamers to allocate more money towards a better GPU which often results in a stronger overall gaming system. At a retail price of $122 USD, the 10100 competes against AMD’s quad-core Ryzen 3 3300X. Game EFps and effective speed benchmarks show that the 10100’s lower memory latency gives it the edge. In addition, unlike the 3300X, the 10100 also packs integrated graphics with Quick Sync hardware encoding, which alleviates the need for desktop users to purchase a separate GPU. In order to achieve better value for money, it is necessary to consider the older generation 9100F, which, when paired with a 2060S, is 39% cheaper ($75 USD) for comparable gaming performance. [Jun ’20 CPUPro]
MORE DETAILS
Systems with these CPUs
Top Builds that include these CPUs
- HP Desktop M01-F1xxx (292)
- MSI H510M-A PRO (MS-7D22) (289)
- Asus PRIME h510M-E (276)
- HP Pavilion Gaming Desktop TG01-1xxx (260)
- Asrock h570M-HDV/M.2 (256)
- Gigabyte h510M H (254)
- Gigabyte GA-h510M S2H (241)
- Acer, Aspire 6530G (6)
- HP Pavilion dv5 Notebook PC (3)
- HP Pavilion dv7 Notebook PC (2)
- Toshiba Satellite A300D (1)
- Acer Aspire 7535 (1)
- Acer, Aspire 7530G (1)
- Packard EasyNote SL81 (1)
Custom PC Builder (Start a new build)
Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.
CHOOSE A COMPONENT:
CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance)
October 2022 CPU Rankings.
We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]
ADVERTISEMENT
Group Test Results
- Best user rated — User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
- Best value for money — Value for money is based on real world performance.
- Fastest real world speed — Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build)
Size up your PC in less than a minute.
Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.
UserBenchmark of the month
Gaming
Desktop
ProGaming
CPUGPUSSDHDDRAMUSB
How it works
- — Download and run UserBenchmark.
- — CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
- — GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
- — Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
- — RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
- — SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy.
- — Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
- — Identify the strongest components in your PC.
- — See speed test results from other users.
- — Compare your components to the current market leaders.
- — Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
- — Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
Frequently Asked Questions
Best User Rated
-
Intel Core i5-12600K
-
Intel Core i5-12400F
-
Intel Core i7-12700K
-
Intel Core i3-12100F
-
Intel Core i5-12400
-
Intel Core i5-11600K
-
Intel Core i7-11700K
-
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
-
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
-
Intel Core i5-11400F
-
Intel Core i5-9600K
-
Intel Core i5-10400F
About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube
Feedback
c — Technical City
c — Technical City
We couldn’t find such page: /en/cpu/core-i3-2370m-vs-turion-64-x2-tl-60%23general-info
Popular video cards comparisons
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
vs
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce RTX
2060
vs
GeForce RTX
3050 8 GB
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
vs
GeForce GTX
1650
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
vs
GeForce RTX
3070
GeForce GTX
1660 Super
vs
GeForce RTX
3050 8 GB
GeForce RTX
2060 Super
vs
GeForce RTX
3060
Popular video cards
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
GeForce RTX
3090 Ti
Radeon RX
Vega 7
GeForce GTX
1650
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce GTX
1060 6 GB
Popular CPU comparisons
Ryzen 5
5600X
vs
Core i5
12400F
Core i5
1135G7
vs
Ryzen 5
5500U
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Core i5
10400F
Ryzen 5
5600X
vs
Ryzen 5
5600G
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Ryzen 5
5600X
Ryzen 7
3700X
vs
Ryzen 5
5600X
Popular CPUs
Ryzen 5
5500U
EPYC
7h22
Core i3
1115G4
Core i5
1135G7
Ryzen 5
3500U
Ryzen 3
5300U
c — Technical City
c — Technical City
We couldn’t find such page: /en/cpu/core-i3-2370m-vs-turion-64-x2-tl-60%23characteristics
Popular video cards comparisons
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
vs
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce RTX
2060
vs
GeForce RTX
3050 8 GB
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
vs
GeForce GTX
1650
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
vs
GeForce RTX
3070
GeForce GTX
1660 Super
vs
GeForce RTX
3050 8 GB
GeForce RTX
2060 Super
vs
GeForce RTX
3060
Popular video cards
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
GeForce RTX
3090 Ti
Radeon RX
Vega 7
GeForce GTX
1650
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce GTX
1060 6 GB
Popular CPU comparisons
Ryzen 5
5600X
vs
Core i5
12400F
Core i5
1135G7
vs
Ryzen 5
5500U
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Core i5
10400F
Ryzen 5
5600X
vs
Ryzen 5
5600G
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Ryzen 5
5600X
Ryzen 7
3700X
vs
Ryzen 5
5600X
Popular CPUs
Ryzen 5
5500U
EPYC
7h22
Core i3
1115G4
Core i5
1135G7
Ryzen 5
3500U
Ryzen 3
5300U
Comparison Intel Core i5-750 vs AMD Turion X2 RM-75 which is better?
Home / Intel Core i5-750 VS AMD Turion X2 RM-75
Intel Core i5-750
24%
Devicelist
VS
AMD Turion X2 RM-75
% 2%
DeviceList Score
We compared the specifications of Intel Core i5-750 and AMD Turion X2 RM-75 and compiled a list of benefits and comparison table for you. Find out which one to choose in 2022.
Benefits of Intel Core i5-750
Comparison winner
Core |
4 2 (100%) better than vs 2 |
threads |
4 2 (100%) better than vs 2 |
Maximum frequency |
3.2 GHz At 1 GHz (45.5%) better than vs 2.2 GHz |
Process |
45 nm -20 nm (-30.8%) better than vs 65 nm |
Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core |
3458 1741 (101.4%) better than vs 1717 |
Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core |
11048 7658 (225. 9%) better than vs 3390 |
Advantage AMD Turion X2 RM-75
Power Demand (TDP) |
35 W -60 W (-63.2%) better than vs 95 W |
General | |
Type |
|
Desktop | For laptops |
Architecture code name |
|
Lynnfield | Lion |
Cores A large number of cores improves performance in multi-threaded applications. |
|
4
2 (100%) better than |
2 |
Threads More threads help the cores process information more efficiently. Real performance will be noticeable in very specific tasks (video editing, databases). |
|
4
2 (100%) better than |
2 |
Process |
|
45 nm
-20 nm (-30.8%) better than |
65 nm |
Chip size |
|
296 mm2 | n/a |
Number of transistors |
|
774 million | n/a |
Maximum frequency Faster clocked processors perform more calculations per second and thus provide better performance. |
|
3.2GHz
At 1 GHz (45.5%) better than |
2.2 GHz |
Support 64 bit |
|
Max. number of processors in the configuration |
|
1 | 1 |
Socket |
|
LGA1156 | S1 |
AMD-V |
|
Series |
|
Core i5 (Desktop) | 2x AMD Turion |
Release price |
|
150 $ | n/a |
Value for money The sum of all the advantages of the device divided by its price. The more%, the better the quality per unit price in comparison with all analogues. |
|
67.6% | no data |
Bus |
|
2500 MHz | 4000 MHz |
Maximum core temperature |
|
73 °C | n/a |
vPro |
|
TXT Intel Trusted Execution Technology for hardware-based malware protection. For each protected program, the processor allocates its own isolated section of RAM. |
|
PCI Express revision |
|
2.0 | n/a |
Number of PCI-Express lanes |
|
16 | n/a |
Demand Based Switching |
|
— | no data |
PAE |
|
36bit | n/a |
PowerNow |
|
n/a | + |
Level 1 Cache The fastest level of cache that works directly with the core. The larger the cache, the better the performance. |
|
256 Kb | 256 Kb |
Level 2 cache |
|
1 Mb | 1 Mb |
L3 cache |
|
8 MB | n/a |
Power Demand (TDP) Calculated thermal power shows the average heat dissipation in load operation, |
|
95W | 35 W
-60 W (-63.2%) better than |
EDB |
|
+ | n/a |
Permissible core voltage |
|
0.65V-1.4V | n/a |
Benchmarks | |
Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core |
|
3458
1741 (101. 4%) better than |
1717 |
Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core |
|
11048
7658 (225.9%) better than |
3390 |
3DMark06 CPU |
|
4320 | n/a |
3DMark Fire Strike Physics |
|
7370 | n/a |
Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core |
|
2352 | n/a |
Technology and additional instructions | |
Extended instructions |
|
Intel® SSE4.2 | n/a |
Turbo Boost |
|
1.0 | n/a |
Idle States |
|
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) Technology from Intel that allows the processor to slow down to a minimum frequency to save power when the processor is idle. |
|
Hyper-Threading Intel hardware technology that allows multiple threads to be processed on each processor core. For server applications, the performance improvement is up to 30%. |
|
RAM parameters | |
RAM types |
|
DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333 | n/a |
Allowable memory The maximum amount of RAM that can be used with this processor. |
|
16 GB | n/a |
Number of memory channels |
|
2 | n/a |
Virtualization technologies | |
VT-x |
|
EPT |
|
Integrated graphics |
Compare
in games
Celeron N4000
24. 5
Turion X2 Dual-Core Mobile RM-70
26.7 (+8.2%)
Production of VAMS and SOU .
The performance of 4 cores, if any, and performance per core has the greatest impact on the result, since most games do not fully use more than 4 cores.
The speed of caches and working with RAM is also important.
Speed in office use
Celeron N4000
29.8
Turion X2 Dual-Core Mobile RM-70
30.2 (+1.3%)
Performance in everyday work such as browsing and office applications.
The performance of 1 core has the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications use only one, ignoring the rest.
Similarly, many professional applications such as various CADs ignore multi-threaded performance.
Speed in heavy applications
Celeron N4000
12.6
Turion X2 Dual-Core Mobile RM-70
13.6 (+7.4%)
max.
The performance of all cores and their number have the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications willingly use all the cores and increase the speed accordingly.
At the same time, certain periods of work can be demanding on the performance of one or two cores, for example, applying filters in the editor.
Data obtained from tests by users who tested their systems with and without overclocking. Thus, you see the average values corresponding to the processor.
Speed of numerical operations
Simple household tasks |
Celeron N4000 30.2 (+16.2%) Turion X2 Dual-Core Mobile RM-70 25.3 |
Demanding games and tasks |
Celeron N4000 9 (+37.8%) Turion X2 Dual-Core Mobile RM-70 5.6 |
Extreme |
Celeron N4000 1. 7 (+35.3%) Turion X2 Dual-Core Mobile RM-70 1.1 |
Different tasks require different CPU strengths. A system with few fast cores and low memory latency will be fine for the vast majority of games, but will be inferior to a system with a lot of slow cores in a rendering scenario.
We believe that a minimum of 4/4 (4 physical cores and 4 threads) processor is suitable for a budget gaming PC. At the same time, some games can load it at 100%, slow down and freeze, and performing any tasks in the background will lead to a drop in FPS.
Ideally, the budget shopper should aim for a minimum of 4/8 and 6/6. A gamer with a big budget can choose between 6/12, 8/8 and 8/16. Processors with 10 and 12 cores can perform well in games with high frequency and fast memory, but are overkill for such tasks. Also, buying for the future is a dubious undertaking, since in a few years many slow cores may not provide sufficient gaming performance.
When choosing a processor for your work, consider how many cores your programs use. For example, photo and video editors can use 1-2 cores when working with filtering, and rendering or converting in the same editors already uses all threads.
Data obtained from tests by users who tested their systems both with overclocking (maximum value in the table) and without (minimum). A typical result is shown in the middle, the more filled in the color bar, the better the average result among all tested systems.
Benchmarks
Benchmarks were run on stock hardware, that is, without overclocking and with factory settings. Therefore, on overclocked systems, the points can noticeably differ upwards. Also, small performance changes may be due to the BIOS version.
Passmark
Intel Celeron N4000
1436 (+55.8%)
AMD Turion X2 Dual-Core Mobile RM-70
634
missing existing features.
Basic
Manufacturer | Intel | |
DescriptionInformation about the processor, taken from the official website of the manufacturer. | Intel® Celeron® Processor N4000 (4M Cache, up to 2.60 GHz) | |
ArchitectureCode name for the microarchitecture generation. | Gemini Lake | |
Process The manufacturing process, measured in nanometers. The smaller the technical process, the more perfect the technology, the lower the heat dissipation and power consumption. | 14 | No data |
Release dateMonth and year of the processor’s availability. | 10-2020 | 10-2016 |
Model Official name. | N4000 | |
Cores The number of physical cores. | 2 | 2 |
ThreadsNumber of threads. The number of logical processor cores that the operating system sees. | 2 | 2 |
Multi-Threading Technology With Intel’s Hyper-threading and AMD’s SMT technology, one physical core is recognized as two logical cores in the operating system, thereby increasing processor performance in multi-threaded applications. | Missing | Missing |
Base frequencyGuaranteed frequency of all processor cores at maximum load. Performance in single-threaded and multi-threaded applications and games depends on it. It is important to remember that speed and frequency are not directly related. For example, a new processor at a lower frequency may be faster than an old one at a higher one. | 1.1 GHz | 2GHz |
Turbo frequencyThe maximum frequency of one processor core in turbo mode. Manufacturers allow modern processors to independently increase the frequency of one or more cores under heavy load, due to which performance is noticeably increased. It may depend on the nature of the load, the number of loaded cores, temperature and the specified limits. Significantly affects the speed in games and applications that are demanding on the frequency of the CPU. | 2.5GHz | 2 GHz |
L3 cache size The third level cache acts as a buffer between the computer’s RAM and the processor’s level 2 cache. Used by all cores, the speed of information processing depends on the volume. | 4 | No data |
Instructions | 64-bit | |
Extended instruction set Allows you to speed up calculations, processing and execution of certain operations. Also, some games require instruction support. | ||
Embedded Options Available Two enclosure versions. Standard and designed for mobile devices. In the second version, the processor can be soldered on the motherboard. | No | No |
Bus frequency The speed of communication with the system. | ||
Number of QPI links | ||
TDPThermal Design Power is an indicator that determines the heat dissipation in standard operation. The cooler or water cooling system must be rated for a larger value. Remember that with a factory bus or manual overclocking, TDP increases significantly. | 6 | No data |
Cooling system specifications | 105 deg C |
Video core
Integrated graphics core Allows you to use your computer without a discrete graphics card. The monitor is connected to the video output on the motherboard. If earlier integrated graphics made it possible to simply work at a computer, today it can replace budget video accelerators and makes it possible to play most games at low settings. | Intel® UHD Graphics 600 | |
GPU base clockFrequency of 2D and idle operation. | 200 | No data |
Maximum GPU frequencyMaximum 3D frequency. | 650 | No data |
Intel® Wireless Display (Intel® WiDi) Supports Wireless Display technology over Wi-Fi 802.11n. Thanks to it, a monitor or TV equipped with the same technology does not require a cable to connect. | ||
Supported monitorsThe maximum number of monitors that can be connected to the integrated video core at the same time. | 3 |
RAM
Maximum amount of RAMThe amount of RAM that can be installed on the motherboard with this processor. | 8 | No data |
Supported type of RAM The type of RAM depends on its frequency and timings (speed), availability, price. | DDR4/LPDDR4 upto 2400MT/s | |
RAM Channels The multi-channel memory architecture increases data transfer speed. On desktop platforms, two-channel, three-channel and four-channel modes are available. | 2 | |
RAM bandwidth | ||
ECC memory Support for error-correcting memory that is used in servers. Usually more expensive than usual and requires more expensive server components. However, second-hand server processors, Chinese motherboards and ECC memory sticks, which are sold relatively cheaply in China, have become widespread. | No data | No data |
PCI
PCI-E The PCI Express computer bus version. The bandwidth and power limit depend on the version. There is backward compatibility. | 2 | No data |
PCI | 1×4 + 1×2 or 4×1 or 2×1+1×2 + 1×2 | 1×4 + 1×2 or 4×1 or 2×1+1×2 + 1×2 |
Number of PCI lanes | 6 | 1×4 + 1×2 or 4×1 or 2×1+1×2 + 1×2 |
Data Security
AES-NI The AES command set extension speeds up applications that use appropriate encryption. | No data | No data |
Intel® Secure Key An RDRAND instruction that allows you to create a high performance random number generator. | No data | No data |
Decoration
Dimensions | No data | No data |
Supported sockets | No data | No data |
Maximum processors per motherboard | No data | No data |
Which is better
Intel Celeron N4000
- In complex multi-threaded applications, faster and outperforms by 1%.
AMD Turion X2 Dual-Core Mobile RM-70
- On average, 2% better gaming performance.
- The speed of work in office applications and browsers is increased by 0%.
- Base frequency 0.9 higher0003
27 (+1.1%)
Performance in games and similar applications, according to our tests.
The performance of 4 cores, if any, and performance per core has the greatest impact on the result, since most games do not fully use more than 4 cores.
The speed of caches and working with RAM is also important.
Office speed
Turion 64 X2 Mobile Technology TL-52
30.2 (+1.3%)
Pentium 4 3.40GHz
29.8
Performance in day to day activities such as browsing and office applications.
The performance of 1 core has the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications use only one, ignoring the rest.
Similarly, many professional applications such as various CADs ignore multi-threaded performance.
Speed in heavy applications
Turion 64 X2 Mobile Technology TL-52
13
Pentium 4 3. 40GHz
13.2 (+1.5%)
Performance in resource-intensive tasks loading a maximum of 8 cores.
The performance of all cores and their number have the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications willingly use all the cores and increase the speed accordingly.
At the same time, certain periods of work can be demanding on the performance of one or two cores, for example, applying filters in the editor.
Data obtained from tests by users who tested their systems with and without overclocking. Thus, you see the average values corresponding to the processor.
Speed of numerical operations
Simple household tasks
Turion 64 X2 Mobile Technology TL-52
23.9
Pentium 4 3.40GHz
24.7 (+3.2%)
Demanding games and tasks
Turion 64 X2 Mobile Technology TL-52
4. 5 (+15.6%)
Pentium 4 3.40GHz
3.8
Extreme
Turion 64 X2 Mobile Technology TL-52
0.9 (+11.1%)
Pentium 4 3.40GHz
0.8
Different tasks require different CPU strengths. A system with few fast cores and low memory latency will be fine for the vast majority of games, but will be inferior to a system with a lot of slow cores in a rendering scenario.
We believe that a minimum of 4/4 (4 physical cores and 4 threads) processor is suitable for a budget gaming PC. At the same time, some games can load it at 100%, slow down and freeze, and performing any tasks in the background will lead to a drop in FPS.
Ideally, the budget shopper should aim for a minimum of 4/8 and 6/6. A gamer with a big budget can choose between 6/12, 8/8 and 8/16. Processors with 10 and 12 cores can perform well in games with high frequency and fast memory, but are overkill for such tasks. Also, buying for the future is a dubious undertaking, since in a few years many slow cores may not provide sufficient gaming performance.
When choosing a processor for your work, consider how many cores your programs use. For example, photo and video editors can use 1-2 cores when working with filtering, and rendering or converting in the same editors already uses all threads.
Data obtained from tests by users who tested their systems both with overclocking (maximum value in the table) and without (minimum). A typical result is shown in the middle, the fuller the color bar, the better the average result among all tested systems.
Characteristics
The data is not yet filled in, so the tables may lack information or existing functions may be omitted.
Basic
Manufacturer AMD
Intel DescriptionInformation about the processor, taken from the official website of the manufacturer. ArchitectureCode name for the microarchitecture generation. Process The manufacturing process, measured in nanometers. The smaller the technical process, the more perfect the technology, the lower the heat dissipation and power consumption. No data No data Release dateMonth and year of the processor’s availability. 10-2016 10-2016 Model Official name. Cores The number of physical cores. 2 No data ThreadsNumber of threads. The number of logical processor cores that the operating system sees. 2 2 Multi-Threading Technology With Intel’s Hyper-threading and AMD’s SMT technology, one physical core is recognized as two logical cores in the operating system, thereby increasing processor performance in multi-threaded applications. Missing Hyper-threading (note that some games may not work well with Hyper-threading, you can disable the technology in the BIOS of the motherboard for maximum FPS). Base frequencyGuaranteed frequency of all processor cores at maximum load. Performance in single-threaded and multi-threaded applications and games depends on it. It is important to remember that speed and frequency are not directly related. For example, a new processor at a lower frequency may be faster than an old one at a higher one. 1.6 GHz 3.55 GHz Turbo frequencyThe maximum frequency of one processor core in turbo mode. Manufacturers allow modern processors to independently increase the frequency of one or more cores under heavy load, due to which performance is noticeably increased. It may depend on the nature of the load, the number of loaded cores, temperature and the specified limits. Significantly affects the speed in games and applications that are demanding on the frequency of the CPU. 1.6 GHz 3.4 GHz L3 cache size The third level cache acts as a buffer between the computer’s RAM and the processor’s level 2 cache. Used by all cores, the speed of information processing depends on the volume. No data No data Instructions Extended instruction set Allows you to speed up calculations, processing and execution of certain operations. Also, some games require instruction support. Embedded Options Available Two enclosure versions. Standard and designed for mobile devices. In the second version, the processor can be soldered on the motherboard. No No Bus frequency The speed of communication with the system. Number of QPI links TDPThermal Design Power is an indicator that determines the heat dissipation in standard operation. The cooler or water cooling system must be rated for a larger value. Remember that with a factory bus or manual overclocking, TDP increases significantly. No data No data Cooling system specifications Video core
Integrated graphics core Allows you to use your computer without a discrete graphics card. The monitor is connected to the video output on the motherboard. If earlier integrated graphics made it possible to simply work at a computer, today it can replace budget video accelerators and makes it possible to play most games at low settings. GPU base clockFrequency of 2D and idle operation. No data No data Maximum GPU frequencyMaximum 3D frequency. No data No data Intel® Wireless Display (Intel® WiDi) Supports Wireless Display technology using the Wi-Fi 802.11n standard. Thanks to it, a monitor or TV equipped with the same technology does not require a cable to connect. Supported monitorsThe maximum number of monitors that can be connected to the integrated video core at the same time. RAM
Maximum amount of RAMThe amount of RAM that can be installed on the motherboard with this processor. No data No data Supported type of RAM The type of RAM depends on its frequency and timings (speed), availability, price. RAM Channels The multi-channel memory architecture increases data transfer speed. On desktop platforms, two-channel, three-channel and four-channel modes are available. RAM bandwidth ECC memory Support for error-correcting memory that is used in servers. Usually more expensive than usual and requires more expensive server components. However, second-hand server processors, Chinese motherboards and ECC memory sticks, which are sold relatively cheaply in China, have become widespread. No data No data PCI
PCI-E Computer bus version of PCI Express. The bandwidth and power limit depend on the version. There is backward compatibility. No data No data PCI configuration options
Number of PCI lanes No data Data Security
AES-NI The AES command set extension speeds up applications that use appropriate encryption. No data No data Intel® Secure Key An RDRAND instruction that allows you to create a high performance random number generator. No data No data Decoration
Dimensions No data No data Supported sockets No data No data Maximum processors per motherboard No data No data Which one is better?
- In complex multi-threaded applications, faster and outperforms by 0%.
- Number of physical cores increased by 1.