Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 vs AMD Radeon RX Vega 64: which top graphics card is best for you?
Audio player loading…
The Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 is finally a real, tangible GPU and with six times the power of Pascal-based GTX GPUs, it’s a beast. But how does Nvidia’s best graphics card ever stack up to its eternal rival, AMD, with its Radeon RX Vega 64?
Update: We’ve finally been able to test out the Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 in a full review. So, we’ve updated the below performance section with straight performance comparisons.
Well, it’s never going to be apples-to-apples comparisons when it comes to products from different companies. However, since they both aim to generate incredible visuals for your favorite PC games, we’ll pit them against each other on paper before taking them into the lab later this year.
That being said, from their design, to their projected performance, to how much that performance will cost you, let’s look at which graphics option for you is better: the Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 versus the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64.
The new Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 in the silicon.
Right off the bat, the designs of these two graphics card are drastically different: The AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 uses a traditional, air-based cooling mechanism with a single fan drawing cool air in and driving it out the rear vents while the RTX 2080, uses a dual-fan approach which involves a heat sink in the process of dispersing hot air. (Of course, the idea here is for greater temperature control, but we won’t see that bear fruit until a full review.)
AMD has a slight leg up here on Nvidia in producing an official liquid-cooled version of the RX Vega 64, whereas Nvidia has yet to publicly discuss any such option for its newest card. We’ll see whether Nvidia’s dual-fan air cooling system bridges that gap.
The other major important factor of design, connectivity, is where the RTX 2080 pulls ahead with the capability to house a USB-C port in addition to the usual DisplayPort and HDMI ports. This comes standard on Nvidia’s Founders Edition version of the card, and is likely available for manufacturers to implement if they so choose.
The RX Vega 64 has no such option, but of course includes all of the latest connectivity standards otherwise.
This distinction is important, because USB-C is poised to become the de facto official connection for virtual reality (VR) hardware and applications in the near future. The RTX 2080 is ready for this next phase in simplifying VR, and the RX Vega 64 is not.
Image 1 of 8
Higher is better
Higher is better Higher is better Higher is better Lower is better Lower is better Lower is better Lower is betterPerformance
Now that the Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 is finally here and benchmarked here in the TechRadar lab, we can compare the two graphics cards both on hard performance and the hardware they pack inside.
Before we tackle the RTX 2080, let’s lay out what the RX Vega 64 is capable of first. This graphics card operates at a 1,247MHz processor frequency, or clock speed, which is able to boost up to 1,546MHz using basic tools.
The RX Vega 64 GPU itself contains 4,096 stream processors and houses 8GB of High-Bandwidth Memory 2 (HBM2) video RAM that can process up to 484.3 gigabytes of data per second, or GB/s, with a speed of 1.89 gigabits per second, or Gbps.
Now, the RTX 2080 runs at a base clock speed of 1,515MHz, just a hair shy of the RX Vega 64’s boosted speed, and at 1,710MHz when boosted. While Nvidia’s CUDA cores and AMD’s stream processors are different, they generally accomplish the same task: rendering pixels and carrying out other compute tasks.
Image 1 of 4
Higher is better
Higher is better Higher is better Higher is betterTo the RX Vega 64’s 4,096 stream processors, the RTX 2080 has just 2,944 CUDA cores. However, the CUDA cores are more versatile than the stream processors, able to carry out a wider variety of compute tasks, whereas stream processors are more specialized for efficiency.
Back to more meaningful comparisons, the RTX 2080 also has 8GB of video memory, but on the new GDDR6 standard – a follow-up to GDDR5X– rather than AMD’s HBM2. This memory actually has marginally less bandwidth than the RX Vega 64, able to process up to 448GB/s, but at an exponentially higher speed of 14Gbps.
The RTX 2080 does all of this with 215 watts (W) of power, while the RX Vega 64 requires 295W from your system’s power supply.
In the end, judging by processor and memory speed alone, as well as power draw, the RTX 2080 looks to be a clear winner here. The answer is even more clear in the benchmarks, with the Nvidia card outpacing the AMD by around 10 fps on all of our gaming tests.
The Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 is far and away the more expensive option – surprising no one.
Price
Now, for the ultimate deciding factor: how much these things cost.
AMD’s current suggested retail price for its RX Vega 64 is $499 (£549, about AU$630), but third party manufacturers, like Gigabyte and Asus, are still selling the card for far more than that on account of increased demand from cryptocurrency miners.
Meanwhile, the RTX 2080 is considerably more expensive, with the Founders Edition costing $799 (AU$1,199, about £602). That’s a much higher price than the GTX 1080 of yesteryear, a mere $599 (£600, AU$925) in comparison.
Of course, you should also consider the implied cost of these graphics cards, judged largely by their power draw. The RTX 2080 requires less power than the RX Vega 64, which could see you needing a beefier power supply to support the latter – an incurred cost, if your system isn’t properly equipped for the job.
The AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 next to last generation’s Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080.
Which card is the better pick?
As pricey as it is, the RTX 2080 offers features in games that simply aren’t possible with the RX Vega 64 – namely real-time ray tracing for more realistic lighting and shadows in games. That fact alone, not to mention the price, makes this versus bout a difficult one.
Sure, on paper, the RTX 2080 wins in almost every regard. But, that doesn’t account for what you actually need from a graphics card.
If you seek the absolute most up-to-date capabilities from your graphics card, then clearly the RTX 2080 – or even the slightly cheaper $599 (AU$899, about £451) RTX 2070 – is your ticket to the latest and greatest.
The RTX 2080 looks as if it’s going to burn through games at Ultra settings and 4K resolution, much less make them look better with ray tracing. However, if you simply want to be able to game at 1080p or even 1440p resolutions with the settings all the way cranked up, the RX Vega 64 is by far a more cost-effective way there.
So, even in 2018, the classic dichotomy between Nvidia and AMD graphics cards remains: splurge for Nvidia if you need the absolute latest and greatest, but AMD’s best will serve more mainstream gamers just as fine for far less.
- How does Nvidia’s best of 2018 compare to that of 2017? Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 vs Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080
Joe Osborne is the Senior Technology Editor at Insider Inc. His role is to leads the technology coverage team for the Business Insider Shopping team, facilitating expert reviews, comprehensive buying guides, snap deals news and more. Previously, Joe was TechRadar’s US computing editor, leading reviews of everything from gaming PCs to internal components and accessories. In his spare time, Joe is a renowned Dungeons and Dragons dungeon master – and arguably the nicest man in tech.
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 vs Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Founders Edition: What is the difference?
44points
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
62points
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Founders Edition
vs
56 facts in comparison
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Founders Edition
Why is AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 better than Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Founders Edition?
- 2 TFLOPS higher floating-point performance?
12.6 TFLOPSvs10.6 TFLOPS - 64.6 GTexels/s higher texture rate?
395.8 GTexels/svs331.2 GTexels/s - 35.8GB/s more memory bandwidth?
483.8GB/svs448GB/s - 1792bit wider memory bus width?
2048bitvs256bit - 1152 more shading units?
4096vs2944 - 72 more texture mapping units (TMUs)?
256vs184 - 0. 8 newer version of OpenCL?
2vs1.2
Why is Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Founders Edition better than AMD Radeon RX Vega 64?
- 268MHz faster GPU clock speed?
1515MHzvs1247MHz - 16.26 GPixel/s higher pixel rate?
115.2 GPixel/svs98.94 GPixel/s - 70W lower TDP?
225Wvs295W - 805MHz faster memory clock speed?
1750MHzvs945MHz - 12110MHz higher effective memory clock speed?
14000MHzvs1890MHz - 254MHz faster GPU turbo speed?
1800MHzvs1546MHz - 1100million more transistors?
13600 millionvs12500 million - 2nm smaller semiconductor size?
12nmvs14nm
Which are the most popular comparisons?
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
vs
AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Founders Edition
vs
EVGA GeForce RTX 2070 Super XC
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
vs
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Founders Edition
vs
AMD Radeon RX 5600M
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
vs
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Founders Edition
vs
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
vs
Asus ROG Strix RX Vega 64 Gaming
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Founders Edition
vs
EVGA GeForce RTX 2080 XC Ultra
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
vs
AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Founders Edition
vs
Asus TUF GeForce RTX 3090 Gaming OC
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
vs
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Founders Edition
vs
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
vs
AMD Radeon RX 580X
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Founders Edition
vs
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
vs
MSI Radeon RX 6600 XT Mech 2X
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Founders Edition
vs
Gigabyte Aorus GeForce RTX 3080 Xtreme
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
vs
AMD Radeon Vega 8
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Founders Edition
vs
AMD Radeon HD 6950
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
vs
AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Founders Edition
vs
Galax GeForce RTX 2080 Ti OC
Price comparison
User reviews
Performance
1. GPU clock speed
1247MHz
1515MHz
The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a higher clock speed.
2.GPU turbo
1546MHz
1800MHz
When the GPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased performance.
3.pixel rate
98.94 GPixel/s
115.2 GPixel/s
The number of pixels that can be rendered to the screen every second.
4.floating-point performance
12.6 TFLOPS
10.6 TFLOPS
Floating-point performance is a measurement of the raw processing power of the GPU.
5.texture rate
395.8 GTexels/s
331.2 GTexels/s
The number of textured pixels that can be rendered to the screen every second.
6.GPU memory speed
945MHz
1750MHz
The memory clock speed is one aspect that determines the memory bandwidth.
7.shading units
Shading units (or stream processors) are small processors within the graphics card that are responsible for processing different aspects of the image.
8.texture mapping units (TMUs)
TMUs take textures and map them to the geometry of a 3D scene. More TMUs will typically mean that texture information is processed faster.
9.render output units (ROPs)
The ROPs are responsible for some of the final steps of the rendering process, writing the final pixel data to memory and carrying out other tasks such as anti-aliasing to improve the look of graphics.
Memory
1.effective memory speed
1890MHz
14000MHz
The effective memory clock speed is calculated from the size and data rate of the memory. Higher clock speeds can give increased performance in games and other apps.
2. maximum memory bandwidth
483.8GB/s
448GB/s
This is the maximum rate that data can be read from or stored into memory.
3.VRAM
VRAM (video RAM) is the dedicated memory of a graphics card. More VRAM generally allows you to run games at higher settings, especially for things like texture resolution.
4.memory bus width
2048bit
256bit
A wider bus width means that it can carry more data per cycle. It is an important factor of memory performance, and therefore the general performance of the graphics card.
5.version of GDDR memory
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Radeon RX Vega 64)
Newer versions of GDDR memory offer improvements such as higher transfer rates that give increased performance.
6.Supports ECC memory
✖AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
✖Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Founders Edition
Error-correcting code memory can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when is it essential to avoid corruption, such as scientific computing or when running a server.
Features
1.DirectX version
DirectX is used in games, with newer versions supporting better graphics.
2.OpenGL version
OpenGL is used in games, with newer versions supporting better graphics.
3.OpenCL version
Some apps use OpenCL to apply the power of the graphics processing unit (GPU) for non-graphical computing. Newer versions introduce more functionality and better performance.
4.Supports multi-display technology
✔AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
✔Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Founders Edition
The graphics card supports multi-display technology. This allows you to configure multiple monitors in order to create a more immersive gaming experience, such as having a wider field of view.
5. load GPU temperature
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Radeon RX Vega 64)
A lower load temperature means that the card produces less heat and its cooling system performs better.
6.supports ray tracing
✖AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
✖Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Founders Edition
Ray tracing is an advanced light rendering technique that provides more realistic lighting, shadows, and reflections in games.
7.Supports 3D
✖AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
✔Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Founders Edition
Allows you to view in 3D (if you have a 3D display and glasses).
8.supports DLSS
✖AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
✔Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Founders Edition
DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling) is an upscaling technology powered by AI. It allows the graphics card to render games at a lower resolution and upscale them to a higher resolution with near-native visual quality and increased performance. DLSS is only available on select games.
9.PassMark (G3D) result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Radeon RX Vega 64)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Founders Edition)
This benchmark measures the graphics performance of a video card. Source: PassMark.
Ports
1.has an HDMI output
✔AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
✔Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Founders Edition
Devices with a HDMI or mini HDMI port can transfer high definition video and audio to a display.
2.HDMI ports
More HDMI ports mean that you can simultaneously connect numerous devices, such as video game consoles and set-top boxes.
3.HDMI version
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Radeon RX Vega 64)
HDMI 2.0
Newer versions of HDMI support higher bandwidth, which allows for higher resolutions and frame rates.
4.DisplayPort outputs
Allows you to connect to a display using DisplayPort.
5.DVI outputs
Allows you to connect to a display using DVI.
6.mini DisplayPort outputs
Allows you to connect to a display using mini-DisplayPort.
Miscellaneous
1.USB ports
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Radeon RX Vega 64)
With more USB ports, you are able to connect more devices.
2.Has USB Type-C
✖AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
✔Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Founders Edition
The USB Type-C features reversible plug orientation and cable direction.
Price comparison
Cancel
Which are the best graphics cards?
GeForce RTX 2080 vs Radeon RX Vega 64
- Home
- VGA Benchmarks
- GeForce RTX 2080 vs Radeon RX Vega 64
-
GeForce RTX 2080
133%
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
100%
Relative performance
Reasons to consider GeForce RTX 2080 |
33% higher gaming performance. |
95 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the Radeon RX Vega 64 . |
This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
Supports PhysX |
Supports G-Sync |
Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute |
Supports DirectX Raytracing (DXR) |
Supports Deep Learning Super-Sampling (DLSS) |
Reasons to consider Radeon RX Vega 64 |
Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute |
Supports FreeSync |
Supports ReLive (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
Supports TrueAudio |
Based on an outdated architecture (AMD GCN), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
HWBench recommends GeForce RTX 2080
The GeForce RTX 2080 is the better performing card based on the game benchmark suite used (93 combinations of games and resolutions).
Core Configuration
GeForce RTX 2080 | Radeon RX Vega 64 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
GPU Name | TU104 (TU104-400A-A1) | vs | Vega 10 (Vega 10 XT) | |
Fab Process | 12 nm | vs | 14 nm | |
Die Size | 0 mm² | vs | 484 mm² | |
Transistors | unknown | vs | 12,500 million | |
Shaders | 2944 | vs | 4096 | |
Compute Units | 23 | vs | 64 | |
Core clock | 1515 MHz | vs | 1250 MHz | |
ROPs | 64 | vs | 64 | |
TMUs | 184 | vs | 256 |
Memory Configuration
GeForce RTX 2080 | Radeon RX Vega 64 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Memory Type | GDDR6 | vs | HBM2 | |
Bus Width | 256 bit | vs | 2048 bit | |
Memory Speed | 1750 MHz 14000 MHz effective |
vs | 945 MHz 1890 MHz effective |
|
Memory Size | 8192 Mb | vs | 8192 Mb |
Additional details
GeForce RTX 2080 | Radeon RX Vega 64 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
TDP | 200 watts | vs | 295 watts | |
Release Date | 20 Aug 2018 | vs | 8 Aug 2017 |
-
GeForce RTX 2080
106. 90 GP/s
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
96.00 GP/s
GigaPixels — higher is better
-
GeForce RTX 2080
307.30 GT/s
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
384.00 GT/s
GigaTexels — higher is better
-
GeForce RTX 2080
448.00 GB/s
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
483.80 GB/s
GB/s — higher is better
-
GeForce RTX 2080
9833.00 GFLOPs
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
12288.00 GFLOPs
GFLOPs — higher is better
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64
-
GeForce RTX 2080
66
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
60
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX 12, Windows 10 x64
-
GeForce RTX 2080
194
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
149
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64
-
GeForce RTX 2080
134
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
115
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10×64
-
GeForce RTX 2080
88
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
66
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra quality TTA DirectX11 Windows10 x64
-
GeForce RTX 2080
149
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
108
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra High Quality, TAA, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64
-
GeForce RTX 2080
166
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
101
FPS (higher is better)
Windows 10 x64, Ultra quality, DirectX12
-
GeForce RTX 2080
75
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
48
FPS (higher is better)
Very High Quality TAA, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64
-
GeForce RTX 2080
157
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
121
FPS (higher is better)
Highest quality DirectX11 Windows10 x64
-
GeForce RTX 2080
154
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
115
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra quality DirectX12 Windows10 x64
-
GeForce RTX 2080
114
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
100
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra quality DirectX11 Windows10 x64
-
GeForce RTX 2080
117
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
106
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra High Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64
-
GeForce RTX 2080
98
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
82
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10×64
-
GeForce RTX 2080
119
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
114
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64
-
GeForce RTX 2080
114
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
88
FPS (higher is better)
Very high Quality, DX11, Windows 10 x64
-
GeForce RTX 2080
114
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
80
FPS (higher is better)
DX11, Max Details, 16:1 AF, 2xMSAA
-
GeForce RTX 2080
176
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
126
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64
-
GeForce RTX 2080
174
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
142
FPS (higher is better)
Very high quality DirectX11 Windows10 x64
-
GeForce RTX 2080
118
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
78
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Detail,16:1 AF, DirectX12, Windows 10×64
-
GeForce RTX 2080
79
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
61
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10×64
-
GeForce RTX 2080
46
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
36
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, HR Textures, DirectX11, Windows 10 x64
-
GeForce RTX 2080
132
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
100
FPS (higher is better)
UltraTX Max Quality, Vulkan, Windows 10 x64
-
GeForce RTX 2080
77
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
60
FPS (higher is better)
Max Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64
-
GeForce RTX 2080
156
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
134
FPS (higher is better)
Maximun Quality, DX11, Windows 10 x64
-
GeForce RTX 2080
163
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
141
FPS (higher is better)
Very High Details, Pure Hair On, FXAA/HBAO+ enabled, 16x AF, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64
-
GeForce RTX 2080
172
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
130
FPS (higher is better)
Highest Details, Pure hair, HBAO+, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64
-
GeForce RTX 2080
119
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
90
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra quality DirectX12 Windows10 x64
-
GeForce RTX 2080
183
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
132
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Async Compute ,Windows 10×64
-
GeForce RTX 2080
168
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
137
FPS (higher is better)
DX11,Max Details, 16:1 HQ-AF, +AA
-
GeForce RTX 2080
154
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
103
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64
-
GeForce RTX 2080
77
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
58
FPS (higher is better)
Main Leben! quality preset- Vulkan Windows 10×64
-
GeForce RTX 2080
188
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
130
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64
-
GeForce RTX 2080
57
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
48
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX 12, Windows 10 x64
-
GeForce RTX 2080
152
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
113
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64
-
GeForce RTX 2080
106
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
89
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10×64
-
GeForce RTX 2080
69
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
49
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra quality TTA DirectX11 Windows10 x64
-
GeForce RTX 2080
117
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
84
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra High Quality, TAA, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64
-
GeForce RTX 2080
127
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
81
FPS (higher is better)
Windows 10 x64, Ultra quality, DirectX12
-
GeForce RTX 2080
52
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
32
FPS (higher is better)
Very High Quality TAA, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64
-
GeForce RTX 2080
117
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
86
FPS (higher is better)
Highest quality DirectX11 Windows10 x64
-
GeForce RTX 2080
124
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
84
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra quality DirectX12 Windows10 x64
-
GeForce RTX 2080
92
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
74
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra quality DirectX11 Windows10 x64
-
GeForce RTX 2080
104
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
87
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra High Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64
-
GeForce RTX 2080
79
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
61
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10×64
-
GeForce RTX 2080
109
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
89
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64
-
GeForce RTX 2080
83
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
62
FPS (higher is better)
Very high Quality, DX11, Windows 10 x64
-
GeForce RTX 2080
89
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
65
FPS (higher is better)
DX11, Max Details, 16:1 AF, 2xMSAA
-
GeForce RTX 2080
141
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
91
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64
-
GeForce RTX 2080
125
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
94
FPS (higher is better)
Very high quality DirectX11 Windows10 x64
-
GeForce RTX 2080
86
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
60
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Detail,16:1 AF, DirectX12, Windows 10×64
-
GeForce RTX 2080
62
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
49
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10×64
-
GeForce RTX 2080
42
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
28
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, HR Textures, DirectX11, Windows 10 x64
-
GeForce RTX 2080
99
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
72
FPS (higher is better)
UltraTX Max Quality, Vulkan, Windows 10 x64
-
GeForce RTX 2080
61
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
48
FPS (higher is better)
Max Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64
-
GeForce RTX 2080
112
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
92
FPS (higher is better)
Maximun Quality, DX11, Windows 10 x64
-
GeForce RTX 2080
106
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
92
FPS (higher is better)
Very High Details, Pure Hair On, FXAA/HBAO+ enabled, 16x AF, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64
-
GeForce RTX 2080
120
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
90
FPS (higher is better)
Highest Details, Pure hair, HBAO+, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64
-
GeForce RTX 2080
84
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
61
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra quality DirectX12 Windows10 x64
-
GeForce RTX 2080
130
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
102
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Async Compute ,Windows 10×64
-
GeForce RTX 2080
124
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
100
FPS (higher is better)
DX11,Max Details, 16:1 HQ-AF, +AA
-
GeForce RTX 2080
111
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
79
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64
-
GeForce RTX 2080
60
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
43
FPS (higher is better)
Main Leben! quality preset- Vulkan Windows 10×64
-
GeForce RTX 2080
135
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
92
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64
-
GeForce RTX 2080
36
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
29
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX 12, Windows 10 x64
-
GeForce RTX 2080
82
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
62
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64
-
GeForce RTX 2080
64
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
52
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10×64
-
GeForce RTX 2080
36
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
28
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra quality TTA DirectX11 Windows10 x64
-
GeForce RTX 2080
70
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
50
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra High Quality, TAA, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64
-
GeForce RTX 2080
73
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
51
FPS (higher is better)
Windows 10 x64, Ultra quality, DirectX12
-
GeForce RTX 2080
25
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
16
FPS (higher is better)
Very High Quality TAA, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64
-
GeForce RTX 2080
62
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
47
FPS (higher is better)
Highest quality DirectX11 Windows10 x64
-
GeForce RTX 2080
71
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
50
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra quality DirectX12 Windows10 x64
-
GeForce RTX 2080
50
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
38
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra quality DirectX11 Windows10 x64
-
GeForce RTX 2080
57
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
46
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra High Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64
-
GeForce RTX 2080
47
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
35
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10×64
-
GeForce RTX 2080
63
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
49
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64
-
GeForce RTX 2080
44
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
34
FPS (higher is better)
Very high Quality, DX11, Windows 10 x64
-
GeForce RTX 2080
55
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
39
FPS (higher is better)
DX11, Max Details, 16:1 AF, 2xMSAA
-
GeForce RTX 2080
81
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
49
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64
-
GeForce RTX 2080
70
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
48
FPS (higher is better)
Very high quality DirectX11 Windows10 x64
-
GeForce RTX 2080
43
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
30
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Detail,16:1 AF, DirectX12, Windows 10×64
-
GeForce RTX 2080
39
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
32
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10×64
-
GeForce RTX 2080
28
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
16
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, HR Textures, DirectX11, Windows 10 x64
-
GeForce RTX 2080
58
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
43
FPS (higher is better)
UltraTX Max Quality, Vulkan, Windows 10 x64
-
GeForce RTX 2080
39
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
31
FPS (higher is better)
Max Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64
-
GeForce RTX 2080
55
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
46
FPS (higher is better)
Maximun Quality, DX11, Windows 10 x64
-
GeForce RTX 2080
52
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
46
FPS (higher is better)
Very High Details, Pure Hair On, FXAA/HBAO+ enabled, 16x AF, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64
-
GeForce RTX 2080
60
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
46
FPS (higher is better)
Highest Details, Pure hair, HBAO+, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64
-
GeForce RTX 2080
46
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
31
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra quality DirectX12 Windows10 x64
-
GeForce RTX 2080
70
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
55
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Async Compute ,Windows 10×64
-
GeForce RTX 2080
68
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
61
FPS (higher is better)
DX11,Max Details, 16:1 HQ-AF, +AA
-
GeForce RTX 2080
61
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
44
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64
-
GeForce RTX 2080
35
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
25
FPS (higher is better)
Main Leben! quality preset- Vulkan Windows 10×64
-
GeForce RTX 2080
82
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
54
FPS (higher is better)
VS | ||
GeForce RTX 2080 | GeForce RTX 2070 Super |
VS | ||
GeForce RTX 2080 | Radeon RX 5700 XT |
VS | ||
Radeon RX Vega 64 | Radeon RX 6650 XT |
VS | ||
Radeon RX Vega 64 | GeForce RTX 2060 Super |
VS | ||
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | GeForce RTX 2080 Super |
VS | ||
GeForce RTX 2080 Super | TITAN V |
Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.
RX Vega 64 vs RTX 2080 ⚙️
0x1011.635MH/s137W0.085MH/W
Allium9.434MH/s87W0.108MH/W
Argon2d-dyn260.09KH/s198W1.314KH/W
Argon2d-ninja—KH/s—W—KH/W
Argon2d2501064.42KH/s209W5.093KH/W
Argon2d409644.035KH/s221W0.199KH/W
Astralhash15.523MH/s173W0.09MH/W
Autolykos272.924MH/s147W0.496MH/W
BCD31.841MH/s112W0.284MH/W
BMW512—MH/s—W—MH/W
BeamHashII33. 11H/s215W0.154H/W
BeamHashIII27.98H/s160W0.175H/W
Blake (14r)4.629GH/s—W—GH/W
Blake (2b)—GH/s—W—GH/W
Blake (2s)6.448GH/s232W0.028GH/W
Blake (2s-Kadena)1.148GH/s102W0.011GH/W
C1134.105MH/s122W0.28MH/W
CNReverseWaltz1036.36H/s156W6.643H/W
Chukwa100.016KH/s223W0.449KH/W
Chukwa235.533KH/s212W0.168KH/W
ChukwaWRKZ162. 18KH/s—W—KH/W
Cortex0.073H/s172W0H/W
CryptoNightAlloy455.92H/s—W—H/W
CryptoNightArto873.11H/s—W—H/W
CryptoNightConceal1584.6H/s112W14.148H/W
CryptoNightFast1500.83H/s138W10.876H/W
CryptoNightFastV2—H/s—W—H/W
CryptoNightGPU2239.95H/s220W10.182H/W
CryptoNightHaven863.18H/s140W6.166H/W
CryptoNightHeavy966.1H/s141W6. 852H/W
CryptoNightHeavyX420.09H/s125W3.361H/W
CryptoNightLiteV71.673KH/s141W0.012KH/W
CryptoNightR837.7H/s157W5.336H/W
CryptoNightSaber854.62H/s121W7.063H/W
CryptoNightStelliteV41468.95H/s—W—H/W
CryptoNightStelliteV51611.52H/s—W—H/W
CryptoNightTurtle6.571KH/s149W0.044KH/W
CryptoNightUPX2—KH/s—W—KH/W
CryptoNightV70.831KH/s113W0.007KH/W
CryptoNightV8834. 1H/s156W5.347H/W
CryptoNightWOW795.88H/s—W—H/W
CryptoNightZLS1051.83H/s127W8.282H/W
Cuckaroo29S4.42H/s151W0.029H/W
Cuckaroo29b4.46H/s149W0.03H/W
CuckooBFC32.97H/s113W0.292H/W
CuckooCycle8.39H/s140W0.06H/W
Darkcoin—H/s—W—H/W
Dedal10.876MH/s161W0.068MH/W
Eaglesong0.001GH/s197W0GH/W
Equihash0. 762KH/s—W—KH/W
Equihash(125,4)55.13H/s221W0.249H/W
Equihash(144,5)70H/s218W0.321H/W
Equihash(150,5)36.03H/s218W0.165H/W
Equihash(192,7)38H/s236W0.161H/W
Equihash(210,9)322H/s254W1.268H/W
Equihash(96,5)29.744KH/s247W0.12KH/W
Equihash+Scrypt32.68KH/s216W0.151KH/W
EquihashBTCZ68H/s158W0.43H/W
EquihashBTG70H/s209W0. 335H/W
EquihashSAFE69H/s157W0.439H/W
EquihashZEL72H/s—W—H/W
Etchash37.212MH/s179W0.208MH/W
Ethash37.317MH/s174W0.214MH/W
FiroPoW—MH/s—W—MH/W
Globalhash33.559MH/s143W0.235MH/W
HMQ17256.041MH/s181W0.033MH/W
Handshake—MH/s—W—MH/W
HeavyHash390.252MH/s240W1.626MH/W
Hex11.983MH/s181W0.066MH/W
HoneyComb0. 524MH/s52W0.01MH/W
Jeonghash9.412MH/s161W0.058MH/W
KAWPOW25.09MH/s223W0.113MH/W
KangarooTwelve—MH/s—W—MH/W
Keccak1.236GH/s213W0.006GH/W
Keccak-C1.218GH/s217W0.006GH/W
Lyra2REv273.413MH/s220W0.334MH/W
Lyra2REv367.465MH/s251W0.269MH/W
Lyra2vc0ban78.043MH/s125W0.624MH/W
Lyra2z2.878MH/s125W0.023MH/W
MTP—MH/s—W—MH/W
MTP-TCR16. 095MH/s240W0.067MH/W
NIST50.051GH/s182W0GH/W
NeoScrypt1.481MH/s221W0.007MH/W
Octopus47.668MH/s172W0.277MH/W
PHI161221.08MH/s187W0.113MH/W
PHI212.071MH/s—W—MH/W
Padihash0.262MH/s51W0.005MH/W
Pawelhash6.56MH/s153W0.043MH/W
ProgPow17.122MH/s120W0.143MH/W
ProgPowSERO15.6MH/s158W0.099MH/W
ProgPowVeil24. 333MH/s135W0.18MH/W
ProgPowZ21.326MH/s163W0.131MH/W
RandomKEVA1127.96H/s160W7.05H/W
RandomSFX1127.36H/s144W7.829H/W
RandomX1028.9H/s154W6.681H/W
SHA-256csm265.327MH/s43W6.17MH/W
ScryptSIPC1.073KH/s—W—KH/W
Skein1.066GH/s—W—GH/W
Skein2525.888MH/s120W4.382MH/W
Skunkhash28.935MH/s137W0.211MH/W
SonoA1. 789MH/s184W0.01MH/W
Tensority0.01KH/s226W0KH/W
TimeTravel1045.612MH/s184W0.248MH/W
Tribus105.004MH/s178W0.59MH/W
Ubqhash36.958MH/s166W0.223MH/W
Verthash—MH/s—W—MH/W
VerusHash—MH/s—W—MH/W
X11k2.397MH/s183W0.013MH/W
X1311.907MH/s—W—MH/W
X1511.256MH/s157W0.072MH/W
X16R14.627MH/s211W0. 069MH/W
X16RT11.455MH/s170W0.067MH/W
X16RTVEIL10.897MH/s194W0.056MH/W
X16Rv232.366MH/s158W0.205MH/W
X16S25.274MH/s122W0.207MH/W
X1711.425MH/s164W0.07MH/W
X17R10.824MH/s176W0.062MH/W
X180.262MH/s62W0.004MH/W
X21S8.098MH/s179W0.045MH/W
X22i0.524MH/s74W0.007MH/W
X25X5.976MH/s214W0.028MH/W
X3316. 49MH/s172W0.096MH/W
Xevan3.879MH/s169W0.023MH/W
Zhash73H/s223W0.327H/W
cuckARoo298.93H/s195W0.046H/W
cuckARood292.09H/s195W0.011H/W
cuckARoom293.98H/s141W0.028H/W
cuckARooz295.57H/s195W0.029H/W
cuckAToo310.57H/s157W0.004H/W
cuckAToo320.5H/s210W0.002H/W
vProgPow11.712MH/s176W0.067MH/W
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max Q vs Radeon RX Vega 64 Graphics cards Comparison
When comparing GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max Q and Radeon RX Vega 64, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card — this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max Q and Radeon RX Vega 64 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max Q
Check Price
Radeon RX Vega 64
Check Price
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max Q is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max Q is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max Q here:
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max Q Laptops
Main Specs
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max Q | Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 80 Watt | 295 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 8-pin |
Memory type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Check Price |
Check Price |
- Radeon RX Vega 64 has 268% more power consumption, than GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max Q.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max Q and Radeon RX Vega 64 have maximum RAM of 8 GB.
- GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max Q is used in Laptops, and Radeon RX Vega 64 — in Desktops.
- GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max Q is build with Turing architecture, and Radeon RX Vega 64 — with Vega.
- Core clock speed of Radeon RX Vega 64 is 655 MHz higher, than GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max Q.
- GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max Q is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and Radeon RX Vega 64 — by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max Q is 10055 MHz higher, than Radeon RX Vega 64.
Game benchmarks
Assassin’s Creed OdysseyBattlefield 5Call of Duty: WarzoneCounter-Strike: Global OffensiveCyberpunk 2077Dota 2Far Cry 5FortniteForza Horizon 4Grand Theft Auto VMetro ExodusMinecraftPLAYERUNKNOWN’S BATTLEGROUNDSRed Dead Redemption 2The Witcher 3: Wild HuntWorld of Tanks | ||
high / 1080p | 65−70 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 80−85 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 64 in Assassin’s Creed Odyssey is 3% more, than GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 95−100 |
QHD / 1440p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
4K / 2160p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
low / 720p | 150−160 | 150−160 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 64 in Battlefield 5 is 2% more, than GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max Q. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max Q and Radeon RX Vega 64 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 230−240 | 230−240 |
QHD / 1440p | 150−160 | 150−160 |
4K / 2160p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
high / 768p | 220−230 | 220−230 |
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max Q and Radeon RX Vega 64 have the same average FPS in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max Q and Radeon RX Vega 64 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max Q and Radeon RX Vega 64 have the same average FPS in Dota 2. | ||
high / 1080p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 85−90 |
QHD / 1440p | 60−65 | 65−70 |
4K / 2160p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
low / 720p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 64 in Far Cry 5 is 7% more, than GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 130−140 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
4K / 2160p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
low / 720p | 250−260 | 250−260 |
medium / 1080p | 170−180 | 170−180 |
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max Q and Radeon RX Vega 64 have the same average FPS in Fortnite. | ||
high / 1080p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
QHD / 1440p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
4K / 2160p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
low / 720p | 160−170 | 160−170 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 64 in Forza Horizon 4 is 2% more, than GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max Q. | ||
low / 768p | 170−180 | 170−180 |
medium / 768p | 160−170 | 160−170 |
high / 1080p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
QHD / 1440p | 60−65 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 64 in Grand Theft Auto V is 0% more, than GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
low / 720p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 80−85 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 64 in Metro Exodus is 1% more, than GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max Q. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max Q and Radeon RX Vega 64 have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
high / 1080p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 140−150 | 150−160 |
medium / 1080p | 130−140 | 130−140 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 64 in PLAYERUNKNOWN’S BATTLEGROUNDS is 5% more, than GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
medium / 1080p | 80−85 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 64 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 5% more, than GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max Q. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 180−190 | 180−190 |
high / 1080p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
4K / 2160p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 64 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1% more, than GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max Q. | ||
low / 768p | 200−210 | 210−220 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 64 in World of Tanks is 5% more, than GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max Q. |
Full Specs
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max Q | Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
Architecture | Turing | Vega |
Code name | N18E-G3 | Vega |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 2 April 2020 | 14 August 2017 |
Pipelines | 3072 | 4096 |
Core clock speed | 975 MHz | 1630 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1230 MHz | 1546 MHz |
Transistor count | 13,600 million | 12,500 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 207. 4 | 395.8 |
Floating-point performance | 13,353 gflops | |
Length | 279 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 2048 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 11000 MHz | 945 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 352.0 GB/s | 483.8 GB/s |
Shared memory | — | — |
G-SYNC support | + | |
VR Ready | + | |
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2. 0 |
Vulkan | 1.2.140 | 1.1.125 |
CUDA | 7.5 | |
Monero / XMR (CryptoNight) | 1.9 kh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto) | 31.5 Mh/s | |
Check Price |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max Q vs GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
- GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max Q vs GeForce RTX 2080 Max Q
- Radeon RX Vega 64 vs GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
- Radeon RX Vega 64 vs GeForce RTX 2080 Max Q
- GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max Q vs Quadro RTX 5000 Max Q
- GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max Q vs Radeon RX 5700
- Radeon RX Vega 64 vs Quadro RTX 5000 Max Q
- Radeon RX Vega 64 vs Radeon RX 5700
AMD Radeon VII Mega Benchmark
With the release driver on hand for the Radeon VII we decided to go back to the test bench. Steve has spent the last few days doing nothing but benchmarking… after spending the few days before that, doing nothing but benchmarking.
Since our day-one review of the Radeon VII, we were told by AMD driver improvements were coming but there would be no performance improvements, however the numerous stability issues we experience should be solved. And indeed, with the update in place the Radeon VII is now rock solid, which is a massive improvement.
Today we have over 30 games to check out, including the new World of Tanks update as well as Apex Legends. For testing we used our Core i9-9900K test bench clocked at 5 GHz with 32GB of DDR4-3400 memory. We’ll cover some of the results individually and then jump into the full performance breakdown with all 33 games.
Since the review covered results for Fortnite, Battlefield V, World of Tanks, Strange Bridge, Monster Hunter: World, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Rainbow Six Siege, Far Cry 5, Forza Horizon 4, Resident Evil 2, ARMA 3 and Hitman 2, we’re going to skip over them and instead pick a dozen different games to discuss.
Benchmarks
Apex Legends is a fresh new battle royale game that came out of nowhere, but it does seem like people are enjoying this one. It’s based on the same engine as Titanfall 2 and like Titanfall 2 it’s capped at 144 fps.
The Radeon VII does OK in this one. It’s slightly slower than the GTX 1080 Ti, 12% slower than the RTX 2080 and 26% faster than Vega 64. So that’s kind of Radeon VII in a nutshell.
The Radeon VII performs quite well in Sniper Elite 4, but who didn’t see that coming? This is a well optimised title that plays well on both AMD and Nvidia hardware. The GeForce RTX 2080 was still slightly faster but the margin is small. The Radeon VII also manages to improve on Vega 64 by a 30% margin.
Deus Ex: Mankind Divided is a late 2016 release but it’s certainly not the oldest game we test with. For those wondering DirectX 11 works better than DX12 on both AMD and Nvidia GPUs, so that’s why we use it.
The Radeon VII was able to match the GTX 1080 Ti, making it a little slower than the RTX 2080 but a good bit faster than the RTX 2070 and Vega 64.
It’s not the most well optimized title to be released last year but Just Cause 4 is still a lot of fun. Anyway, performance for the Radeon VII was… okay. The 1% low performance matched that of the GTX 1080 Ti and RTX 2080 which is good, the average frame rate positioned it squarely between the RTX 2080 and 2070, which is… okay.
The Star Wars Battlefront II results are decent, here the Radeon VII provides strong 1% low performance coupled with a slightly lower than expected average frame rate. In the end it was 10% slower than the RTX 2080 for the average frame rate, but 32% faster than Vega 64.
Project Cars 2 has always favored Nvidia hardware. We see this when comparing Vega 56 and the GTX 1070 for example, typically the Vega GPU is faster. As a result Radeon VII was only able to beat the GTX 1080, making it much slower than the RTX 2080 and way slower than the GTX 1080 Ti.
Moving on we have Assassin’s Creed Odyssey, a title that never plays nice with AMD hardware comparatively even though it’s an AMD sponsored title. Evidently that doesn’t mean much as this game prefers Intel CPUs and Nvidia GPUs.
The Radeon VII is a big step forward from Vega 64 offering 28% more performance, though it was only able to match the RTX 2070, which is not great for a $700 flagship AMD GPU.
On previous tests we were using the standalone World of Tanks benchmark, but because that hasn’t been updated and the game has received a major overhaul we’re switching back to testing with the HD client.
The game engine improvements were mostly focused on better CPU utilization, which is useful for those using low clocked multi-core processors. Before the Radeon VII was 17% slower than the RTX 2080, now it’s 16% slower, so the result is the same.
On Vermintide 2 the Radeon VII was slower than both the RTX 2080 and GTX 1080 Ti, though it was a huge step forward from Vega 64, delivering 36% more frames on average.
The Witcher 3 has the Vega 56 card matching the GTX 1070, however the Radeon VII didn’t fare as well, where it was 9% slower than the GTX 1080 Ti and even slower than the RTX 2080.
AMD no longer enjoys a performance advantage in Vulkan-based titles. Take Wolfenstein II for example, here the Radeon VII was 12% slower than the RTX 2080.
DiRT 4 is always an interesting inclusion as CMAA enables god mode on the Radeon GPUs and we again see this here with the Radeon VII. Vega 64 was able to beat the 1% low performance of the RTX 2080 Ti and here we see the Radeon VII shatter it while delivering the same 154 fps on average. AMD’s GPU division would be in pretty good shape if every game looked like this.
Performance Summary
That’s how the Radeon VII stacks up in another dozen titles, so between this feature and the day-one review we’ve closely looked at 24 games, but there’s another 9 that were part of our mega benchmark.
The graphs below will show you how the Radeon VII compares to the RTX 2080, 2060, GTX 1080 Ti and Vega 64 in all 33 games…
In our review featuring just a dozen games, Radeon VII was 4% slower than the RTX 2080. Now with 33 games it’s 7% slower, so a slight change there. The previous 12 titles are included here so an even amount of favorable and unfavorable titles for the GCN 5th-gen architecture.
What the graph above tell us is that there’s an overwhelmingly good chance that in a given title the RTX 2080 will be faster, making it the superior gaming graphics card right now.
The Radeon VII was 2% slower than the GTX 1080 Ti with our 12-game sample, now it’s 5% slower. No major changes, but for the most part the much older GTX 1080 Ti was faster. Moreover, it was faster by a 10% margin or greater in 10 of the 33 games whereas the Radeon VII was faster by a 10% margin or greater in only 2 of the 33 games.
Against the RTX 2060 the Radeon VII is 28% faster…
Finally compared to Vega 64 the latest Radeon is 24% faster. That’s a nice little performance bump, but as we said in the day-one review, you’re paying 40% more for a little over 20% more performance.
Putting It All Together
For better or worse, it seems we pretty much nailed it with our sample of games in the day-one coverage. The Radeon VII is indeed slightly slower than the RTX 2080, while costing the same amount and consuming a little extra power. Currently the reference card is extremely loud, but AMD has promised a fix is coming for that. We’re also glad to report all the stability issues we were seeing prior to release have been addressed, so anyone who bought this card should enjoy a flawless experience.
We’ve yet to delve into any overclocking and/or undervolting, something we’ll report on if we find there’s room for tweaks and squeezing more performance there.
Something worth noting, AMD does believe that the Radeon VII is performing as it should be. Even though we plan to continue benchmarking this GPU during its lifespan, as we always do, AMD is not putting up excuses and saying drivers are still immature or early revisions. A surprise would be nice, but in the meantime what you see is what you get.
The Radeon VII is a fine graphics card, but it’s not competitive enough against the RTX 2080. We review it exclusively as a gaming product (where that 16GB frame buffer is not really a factor) and frankly it under delivered. If it was more efficient than the RTX 2080 and ran quiet, maybe we could deem it a worthy alternative, but let’s not sugar coat this or beat around the bush, it’s not as efficient, it’s loud and for the most part it’s slower, only a little slower but it’s slower.
For those reasons we can’t recommend the Radeon VII over the GeForce RTX 2080. As badly as we wanted the RTX 2080 to be obliterated, forcing Nvidia to get real with their pricing, that has not happened. Therefore gamers are forced to pay 2016 pricing for 2016 performance (unless there’s a DLSS miracle, but wait, no titles supporting that…). It’s not a bleak scenario at all — read why we believe building a gaming PC right now is a good idea — but let’s still hope later in the year we see GPUs deliver better value for gamers.
Shopping Shortcuts:
- GeForce RTX 2060 on Amazon, Newegg
- GeForce RTX 2070 on Amazon, Newegg
- GeForce RTX 2080 on Amazon, Newegg
- GeForce RTX 2080 Ti on Amazon, Newegg
- Radeon RX Vega 56 on Amazon, Newegg
- Radeon RX Vega 64 on Amazon, Newegg
- Radeon RX 570 on Amazon, Newegg
- Radeon RX 580 on Amazon, Newegg
0022 2048bit vs 352bit
- GPU frequency 103MHz higher?
1350MHz vs 1247MHz - 1.63 TFLOPS higher than FLOPS?
14.23 TFLOPS vs 12.6 TFLOPS - 44.96 GPixel/s higher pixel rate?
143.9 GPixel/s vs 98.94 GPixel/s - 35W below TDP?
260W vs 295W - 805MHz faster memory speed?
1750MHz vs 945MHz - 12110MHz higher effective clock speed?
14000MHz vs 1890MHz - 35. 8% more VRAM?
11GB vs 8.1GB - 48.9 GTexels/s higher number of textured pixels?
444.7 GTexels/s vs 395.8 GTexels/s
Which comparisons are the most popular?
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
vs
AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Founders Edition
vs
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
vs
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
vs
vs
Asus ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3090 Gaming
0004 Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Founders Edition
vs
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Super
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
vs
Asus ROG Strix RX Vega 64 Gaming
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Founders Edition
vs
KFA2 GeForce RTX 3070 SG 1-Click OC
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
vs
AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Founders Edition
Tesla vs 90 Tsela0003
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
vs
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Founders Edition
vs
EVGA GeForce RTX 3080 FTW3 Ultra Gaming
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
vs
AMD Radeon RX 580X
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Founders Edition
vs
Asus Dual GeForce RTX 3070
0003
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Founders Edition
vs
Nvidia GeForce GTX Titan X
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
vs
AMD Radeon Vega 8
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Founders Edition
vs
Gigabyte GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Gaming OC
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
vs
AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Founders Edition
vs
MSI GeForce GTX Titan X
Price match
Cheaper
User reviews
Performance
2. turbo GPU
1546MHz
1635MHz
When the GPU is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.
3.pixel rate
98.94 GPixel/s
143.9 GPixel/s
The number of pixels that can be displayed on the screen every second.
4.flops
12.6 TFLOPS
14.23 TFLOPS
FLOPS is a measure of GPU processing power.
5.texture size
395.8 GTexels/s
444.7 GTexels/s
Number of textured pixels that can be displayed on the screen every second.
6.GPU memory speed
945MHz
1750MHz
Memory speed is one aspect that determines memory bandwidth.
7.shading patterns
Shading units (or stream processors) are small processors in a video card that are responsible for processing various aspects of an image.
8.textured units (TMUs)
TMUs accept textured units and bind them to the geometric layout of the 3D scene. More TMUs generally means texture information is processed faster.
9 ROPs
ROPs are responsible for some of the final steps of the rendering process, such as writing the final pixel data to memory and for performing other tasks such as anti-aliasing to improve the appearance of graphics.
Memory
1.memory effective speed
1890MHz
14000MHz
The effective memory clock frequency is calculated from the memory size and data transfer rate. A higher clock speed can give better performance in games and other applications.
2.max memory bandwidth
483.8GB/s
616GB/s
This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.
3. VRAM
VRAM (video RAM) is the dedicated memory of the graphics card. More VRAM usually allows you to run games at higher settings, especially for things like texture resolution.
4.memory bus width
2048bit
352bit
Wider memory bus means it can carry more data per cycle. This is an important factor in memory performance, and therefore the overall performance of the graphics card.
5.GDDR memory versions
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Radeon RX Vega 64)
Later versions of GDDR memory offer improvements such as faster data transfer rates, which improves performance.
6. Supports memory troubleshooting code
✖AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
✖Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Founders Edition
Memory troubleshooting code can detect and fix data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.
Functions
1.DirectX version
DirectX is used in games with a new version that supports better graphics.
2nd version of OpenGL
The newer version of OpenGL, the better graphics quality in games.
OpenCL version 3.
Some applications use OpenCL to use the power of the graphics processing unit (GPU) for non-graphical computing. Newer versions are more functional and better quality.
4. Supports multi-monitor technology
✔AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
✔Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Founders Edition
The video card has the ability to connect multiple screens. This allows you to set up multiple monitors at the same time to create a more immersive gaming experience, such as a wider field of view.
5. GPU temperature at boot
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Radeon RX Vega 64)
Lower boot temperature means the card generates less heat and the cooling system works better.
6.supports ray tracing
✖AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
✔Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Founders Edition
Ray tracing is an advanced light rendering technique that provides more realistic lighting, shadows and reflections in games.
7. Supports 3D
✖AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
✔Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Founders Edition
Allows you to view in 3D (if you have a 3D screen and glasses).
8.supports DLSS
✖AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
✔Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Founders Edition
DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling) is an AI based scaling technology. This allows the graphics card to render games at lower resolutions and upscale them to higher resolutions with near-native visual quality and improved performance. DLSS is only available in some games.
9. PassMark result (G3D)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Radeon RX Vega 64)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Founders Edition)
This test measures the graphics performance of a graphics card. Source: Pass Mark.
Ports
1.has HDMI output
✔AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
✔Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Founders Edition
Devices with HDMI or mini HDMI ports can stream HD video and audio to the connected display.
2.HDMI connectors
More HDMI connectors allow you to connect multiple devices at the same time, such as game consoles and TVs.
3rd HDMI version
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Radeon RX Vega 64)
HDMI 2.0
New versions of HDMI support higher bandwidth, resulting in higher resolutions and frame rates.
4. DisplayPort outputs
Allows connection to a display using DisplayPort.
5.DVI outputs
Allows connection to a display using DVI.
Mini DisplayPort 6.outs
Allows connection to a display using Mini DisplayPort.
Other
1.USB connectors
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Radeon RX Vega 64)
With more USB ports, you can connect more devices.
2. Has USB Type-C
✖AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
✔Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Founders Edition
USB Type-C has reversible connector orientation and cable routing.
Price Match
Cancel
Which graphics cards are better?
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti. Comparison specs and benchmarks of
VS
General information
The general information section of the video card comparison list contains release date, type, overall rating and other useful data to determine the winner between AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti . Please note that the comparison takes place on all indicators, and below are the ratings from synthetic benchmarks that define different criteria in games and work applications.
60
Position in the performance rating
43.19
Price and quality ratio
34.47
VEGA
Architecture
TURING
9000 9000 TUST
Desktop
14 August 2017 (4 years ago)
Release date0003
$ 999
$ 1330 (2.7x MSRP)
Actual price
$ 1265 (1.3x MSRP)
16.44 9000
Market segment
Desktop
Specifications
Which graphics card is better in comparison AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti in manufacturing process, power consumption, and GPU base and turbo frequency is the most important part contained in the rating of video cards.
4096
conveyors
4352
1630 MHZ
Tibility of the nucleus
1350 MHZ
1546 MHZ
Acceleration
MHZ
12. 500 MILLILION 9000 9000 9000.6,000 9000.6,000 9000 Milleion nm
Process
12 nm
295 Watt
Power Consumption (TDP)
250 Watt
395.8
Number of texels processed per second10003
420.2
13.353 GFLOPS
Swimming of
No data
4096 9000
18,600 million
295 Watt
TDP
250 Watt
Dimensions, connectors and compatibility . As well as the main types of connectors and connected interfaces
PCIE 3.0 X16
Interface
PCIe 3.0 X16
279 MM
length
267 MM
2x 8-PIN
Additional power
2X 8-PIN
Memory (Frequency and Ace Graphics card memory plays an important role in both gaming and graphics applications. The higher the standard (
GDDR ), the better. It directly affects the speed and efficiency of data processing. What is the difference in type, base and turbo frequency, GDDR bandwidth between AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti:
HBM2
Type of memory
GDDR6
8 GB
Maximum RAM AMOUNT
11 GB
2048 BIT
DISTRICTION of memory tire
352 BIT
MHZ 9000 MHITS 9000 Memory 14000 Memory. 483.8 GB/S
memory capacity
616.0 GB/S
—
Demeded memory
—
Support for ports and displays
Let’s find out the difference in ports that are equipped with AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 and NVIDIA GEFORCE RTX 2080 Ti. Pay attention to the number of ports and the maximum resolution of supported monitors.
1x HDMI, 3X DisplayPort
Connections to the display
1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
No data
Support G-Sync
+
9000 + 9000
Let’s see what the difference is. It is worth noting that NVIDIA and AMD use different technologies.
n.a.
VR support
+
n.a.
Multiple monitors
+
n/a
CUDA
7.5
API support
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti are almost over. Hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not taken into account in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests.
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
No data
VULKAN
1.2.131
No data
Shader Model
6.5
No data
OpenCl
2.09 9000
Overall performance in benchmarks
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
67.81%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
3DMark Ice Storm GPU
The Ice Storm multi-platform test shows the performance of a graphics card using the screen rendering method. Standard test conditions — 1280*720 (720p).
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
395092 (75%)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
521458 (100%)
3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
Unlike Ice Storm, 3DMark’s Cloud Gate test uses more resource intensive scenes. The better the final score, the faster your graphics card. Processing is done with DirectX 10.
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
127011 (76%)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
165122 (100%)
3DMark Fire Strike Score
This is an advanced graphics card benchmark. When using DirectX 11 for processing, typical testing time is 15 minutes. The higher the score, the faster the graphics card.
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
18253 (69%)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
26227 (100%)
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
Complex graphic scenes require all the graphics card resources. They use the entire RAM and computing power. The test’s results can be viewed below.
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
22350 (65%)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
34316 (100%)
3DMark 11 Performance GPU
This benchmark analyzes the gaming performance of a video card using Direct X 11 (multithreading, tessellation, shader calculations).
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
30824 (65%)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
47166 (100%)
3DMark Vantage Performance
This Direct X10 based benchmark contains tests for artificial intelligence, physics and 6 computational tests.
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
55262 (66%)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
83556 (100%)
SPECviewperf 12 — Solidworks
This is a world famous benchmark for determining the performance of a graphics card in applications. In testing, graphic models and real program scenes are used.
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
80 (100%)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
79 (98%)
SPECviewperf 12 — Siemens NX
Siemens NX (snx-02) is a specialized set of SPECviewperf 12 for graphical load tracing. It includes many rendering modes.
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
23 (100%)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
12 (52%)
SPECviewperf 12 — Showcase
This test is based on Autodesk Showcase 2013. It introduces shading and shadow projection modes.
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
111 (62%)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
179 (100%)
SPECviewperf 12 — Medical
This is a special set of benchmarks designed as a 3D rendering application. It uses all the resources of the video card.
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
50 (98%)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
51 (100%)
SPECviewperf 12 — Maya
Maya-04, developed by SPECviewperf 12, contains many rendering modes, including fill, anti-alias, and transparency.
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
82 (45%)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
181 (100%)
SPECviewperf 12 — Energy
This is a pre-installed SPECviewperf 12 set called Energy-01, which is used to determine the power of the video card. It performs volumetric rendering.
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
12 (75%)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
16 (100%)
SPECviewperf 12 — Creo
This benchmark offers a test of the video card’s power in various rendering modes (anti-aliasing, reflection fill and edge fill).
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
58 (92%)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
63 (100%)
SPECviewperf 12 — Catia
This test of graphics card power and speed includes rendering aircraft and car models. The better the score, the more powerful your graphics card.
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
158 (100%)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
121 (76%)
SPECviewperf 12 — 3ds Max
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
140 (51%)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
272 (100%)
Passmark
Passmark is an excellent benchmark that is updated regularly and shows relevant graphics card performance information.
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
14614 (67%)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
21552 (100%)
Popular comparisons with selected graphics cards
one. | NVIDIA Tesla T4 vs. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | |
2. | NVIDIA Quadro P2200 vs. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | |
3. | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti vs. AMD Baffin | |
four. | NVIDIA Quadro P400 vs. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | |
5. | AMD FirePro W2100 vs. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | |
6. | AMD Radeon HD 7660D vs. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | |
7. | NVIDIA TITAN Xp vs. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | |
eight. | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti vs. NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile | |
9. | NVIDIA GeForce MX330 vs. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | |
ten. | NVIDIA Quadro P620 vs. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | |
eleven. | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 vs. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | |
12. | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 vs. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | |
13. | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti vs. AMD FirePro S10000 | |
fourteen. | NVIDIA Tesla M10 vs. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | |
fifteen. | AMD FirePro W7000 vs. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti |
Compare AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti video cards by all known characteristics in the categories: General information, Specifications, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions, requirements, API support, Memory, Technology support.
Video card performance analysis by benchmarks: GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames ), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench — OpenCL, PassMark — G2D Mark, PassMark — G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) , CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score.
Reasons to choose NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
- Newer graphics card, release date difference 1 year(s) 2 month(s) Boost 5% more: 1545 MHz vs 1475 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process for the video card makes it more powerful, but with lower power consumption: 12 nm vs 14 nm
- 17.8 times more memory frequency(s): 14000 MHz vs 786 MHz (1572 MHz effective)
- About 80% more performance in GFXBench 4. 0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 23659 vs 13123
- About 80% more performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 23659 vs 13123
- About 49% more performance in PassMark — G3D Mark benchmark: 21834 vs 14631
90 About 84% more performance in Geekbench — OpenCL benchmark: 138925 vs 75438
Release date | 20 September 2018 vs 23 June 2017 |
Core frequency | 1350 MHz vs 1250 MHz |
Boost Core Clock | 1545 MHz vs 1475 MHz |
Process | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
Memory frequency | 14000 MHz vs 786 MHz (1572 MHz effective) |
GFXBench 4. 0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 23659 vs 13123 |
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 23659 vs 13123 |
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3357 |
Geekbench — OpenCL | 138925 vs 75438 |
PassMark — G3D Mark | 21834 vs 14631 |
Benchmark comparison
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
GFXBench 4. 0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) |
|
||||
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Fps) |
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) |
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) |
|
||||
Geekbench — OpenCL |
|
|
|||
PassMark — G2D Mark |
|
||||
PassMark — G3D Mark |
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4. 0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13123 | 23659 |
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13123 | 23659 |
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3358 |
Geekbench — OpenCL | 75438 | 138925 |
PassMark — G2D Mark | 948 | 939 |
PassMark — G3D Mark | 14631 | 21834 |
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 394.035 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5451.484 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 41.133 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) | 173.697 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1963.652 | |
3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score | 14639 |
Feature comparison
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Architecture | GCN 5. 0 | Turing |
Codename | Vega 10 | TU102 |
Issue date | 23 June 2017 | 20 September 2018 |
Place in the rating | 99 | 19 |
Price at first issue date | $999 | |
Price now | $1,279.99 | |
Type | Desktop | |
Price/performance ratio (0-100) | 17. 22 | |
Boost Core Clock | 1475 MHz | 1545 MHz |
Number of Compute | 64 | |
Core frequency | 1250MHz | 1350 MHz |
Process | 14nm | 12nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 755.2 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 24.17TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 12. 08 TFLOPS | |
Number of shaders | 4096 | |
Pixel fill rate | 94.40 GPixel/s | |
Texturing speed | 377.6 GTexel/s | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 250 Watt | 250 Watt |
Number of transistors | 12500 million | 18,600 million |
Video connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Interface | PCIe 3. 0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Additional power connectors | None | 2x 8-pin |
Length | 267 mm | |
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulcan | ||
High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) | ||
Maximum memory size | 16GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 402. 4 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 2048bit | |
Memory frequency | 786 MHz (1572 MHz effective) | 14000 MHz |
Memory type | HBM2 | |
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) |
GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER vs Radeon RX Vega 64
GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER vs Radeon RX Vega 64 — Th200
Contents
- Introduction
- Features
- Tests
- Games
- Key differences
- Conclusion
- Comments
Video card
Video card
Introduction
We compared two graphics cards: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER vs AMD Radeon RX Vega 64. On this page, you will learn about the key differences between them, as well as which one is better in terms of features and performance.
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER is a Turing GeForce 20 generation graphics card released on Jul 23rd, 2019. It comes with 8GB of GDDR6 memory running at 1937MHz, has 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin power connector and draws up to 165W.
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 is a Vega generation (RX Vega) graphics card based on GCN 5.0 architecture released Aug 7th, 2017. It comes with 8GB HBM2 memory running at 945MHz, has 2x 8-pin power connector and consumes up to 165 watts.
Specification
Graphics Card
Name
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER
RT Cores
48
Graphics Features
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 (12_1)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
3.0
2.1
Cuda
7.5
VULKAN
1.2
1. 2
Board Design
Heating
250W
295W
Power Conventors
1x 8-Pin
9000 9000 2x 8-PIN
003
Slot Width
Dual-slot
Dual-slot
Benchmarks
3DMark Graphics
3DMark is a benchmarking tool designed and developed by UL to measure the performance of computer hardware. Upon completion, the program gives a score, where a higher value indicates better performance.
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER
+58%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
Blender bmw27
Blender is the most popular 3D content creation software. It has its own test, which is widely used to determine the rendering speed of processors and video cards. We chose the bmw27 scene. The result of the test is the time taken to render the given scene.
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER
+248%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
Th200 RP
Th200 RP is a test created by Th200. It measures the raw power of the components and gives a score, with a higher value indicating better performance.
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER
+1%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
Games
1920×1080, Ultra
Game | GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER | Radeon RX Vega 64 |
---|---|---|
Anno 1800 | ||
Assassin’s Creed Odyssey | ||
Battlefield V | ||
Cyberpunk 2077 | ||
DOOM Eternal | ||
Far Cry 5 | ||
Hitman 2 | ||
Hitman 3 | ||
Metro Exodus | ||
Red Dead Redemption 2 | ||
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | ||
The Witcher 3 | ||
Average | 124. 60 fps | 91.69 fps |
2560×1440, Ultra
Game | GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER | Radeon RX Vega 64 |
---|---|---|
Anno 1800 | ||
Assassin’s Creed Odyssey | ||
Assassin’s Creed Valhalla | ||
Battlefield V | ||
Cyberpunk 2077 | ||
DOOM Eternal | ||
Far Cry 5 | ||
Hitman 2 | ||
Hitman 3 | ||
Metro Exodus | ||
Red Dead Redemption 2 | ||
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | ||
The Witcher 3 | ||
Average | 93. 69 fps | 69.65 fps |
3840×2160, Ultra
Game | GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER | Radeon RX Vega 64 |
---|---|---|
Anno 1800 | ||
Assassin’s Creed Odyssey | ||
Assassin’s Creed Valhalla | ||
Battlefield V | ||
Cyberpunk 2077 | ||
DOOM Eternal | ||
Far Cry 5 | ||
Hitman 2 | ||
Hitman 3 | ||
Metro Exodus | ||
Red Dead Redemption 2 | ||
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | ||
Average | 54. 58 fps | 40.10fps |
Key differences
Why is NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER better than AMD Radeon RX Vega 64?
Newer — Released 1 year later
Has 35% higher average FPS in games at 1080p — 124.60 FPS versus 91.69 FPS
Has 35% higher average FPS in games at 1440p — 93.69 Has 35% higher average FPS in games at 1440p — 93.69 69.65 FPS
Has 37% higher average FPS in games at 2160p — 54.58 FPS versus 40.10 FPS
Consumes 16% less power — 250W vs 295W
More modern manufacturing process — 12 nm vs 14 nm
Has 3% higher bandwidth — 495.9 GB/s vs 483.8 GB/s
Has 18% faster pixel fill rate — 116.2 GPixel/s vs 98.94 GPixel/s
Why is AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 better than NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER?
More advanced memory type — HBM2 vs. GDDR6
Has a slightly larger memory bus
Has a 14% faster texture fill rate — 395. 8 GTexel/s vs 348.5 GTexel/s
Has 1024 more shading units
Conclusion
Which is better GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER or Radeon RX Vega 64?
The GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER delivers 1% better performance, consumes up to 16% less energy and holds the same amount of memory. According to our research, GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER 3990X is more powerful than Radeon RX Vega 64.
Is GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER good today?
GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER has 8GB memory and shows an average of 93.69 FPS in 13 games at 1440p, making it an excellent choice for games in 2022.
This graphics card will give you a good experience in every game on reasonable graphics settings.
What AMD graphics cards is equivalent to GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER?
The Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling is AMD’s closest competitor to the GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER. It is 7% more powerful, uses 38% more energy, and holds the same amount of memory.
What NVIDIA graphics cards is equivalent to GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER?
The GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 10 GB is NVIDIA’s closest competitor to the GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER. It is 2% more powerful, uses the same amount of energy, and holds 2 GB less memory.
How does GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER perform compared to Radeon RX Vega 64 and other graphics cards?
Relative performance
Total performance
Bench performance
Compare NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q and AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q and AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid video cards by all known characteristics in the categories: General information, Specifications, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions, requirements, API support, Memory.
Analysis of video card performance by benchmarks: PassMark — G3D Mark, PassMark — G2D Mark, Geekbench — OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score.
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
versus
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid
Benefits
Reasons to choose NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
- Newer graphics card, release dates difference 2 year(s) 702 month(s) 9027 month(s) 9027 483.1 times bigger: 207.4 GTexel/s vs 429.3 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process for the video card makes it more powerful, but with lower power consumption: 12 nm vs 14 nm
- 2.8 times lower power consumption: 80 Watt vs 225 Watt
- About 9% more performance in 3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score benchmark: 8470 vs 7765
Release date | 2 Apr 2020 vs 8 August 2017 |
Texturing speed | 207. 4 GTexel/s vs 429.3 GTexel/s |
Process | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 225 Watt |
3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score | 8470 vs 7765 |
Reasons to choose AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid
- About 91% more core clock: 1406 MHz vs 735 MHz
- 55% more core clock in Boost mode: 1677 MHz vs 1080 MHz
- 33% more shader processors: 4096 vs 3072
Memory clock 37% more: 1890 MHz vs 1375 MHz (11000 MHz effective)
Core clock | 1406 MHz vs 735 MHz |
Boost 9 core clock0938 | 1677 MHz vs 1080 MHz |
Number of shaders | 4096 vs 3072 |
Memory frequency | 1890 MHz vs 1375 MHz (11000 MHz effective) |
Benchmark comparison
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid
3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score |
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid |
---|---|---|
PassMark — G3D Mark | 14014 | |
PassMark — G2D Mark | 620 | |
Geekbench — OpenCL | 86977 | |
GFXBench 4. 0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20344 | |
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) | 8912 | |
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | |
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20344 | |
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) | 8912 | |
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | |
3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score | 8470 | 7765 |
Feature comparison
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid | |
---|---|---|
Architecture | Turing | GCN 5. 0 |
Codename | TU104B | Vega 10 |
Issue date | 2 Apr 2020 | August 8, 2017 |
Place in the rating | 62 | 66 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Boost Core Clock | 1080 MHz | 1677 MHz |
Core frequency | 735MHz | 1406 MHz |
Process | 12nm | 14nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 207. 4 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 13.27TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 6.636TFLOPS | |
Number of shaders | 3072 | 4096 |
Pixel fill rate | 69.12 GPixel/s | |
Texturing speed | 207.4 GTexel/s | 429.3 GTexel/s |
Power consumption (TDP) | 80 Watt | 225 Watt |
Number of transistors | 13600 million | |
Floating point performance | 13. 738 gflops | |
Video connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Additional power connectors | None | 2x 8-pin |
Width | Dual slot | |
Length | 267 mm | |
DirectX | 12.1 | |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4. 6 | |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulcan | ||
Maximum memory size | 8GB | 8GB |
Memory bandwidth | 352.0 GB/s | 483.8 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 256bit | 2048 Bit |
Memory frequency | 1375 MHz (11000 MHz effective) | 1890 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
$700 AMD Radeon VII Video Card Announcement RTX 2080 Competitor
AMD introduced the AMD Radeon VII graphics card, which is notable for the fact that it uses a graphics processor made using a 7 nm process technology.
AMD introduced the AMD Radeon VII graphics card, which is notable for the fact that it uses a graphics processor made using a 7 nm process technology. The graphics card is equipped with 60 compute units (3840 stream processors) and 16 GB of HBM2 memory with a bandwidth of 1 TB/s.
According to AMD claims, AMD Radeon VII provides 25% performance increase in Fortnite and 35% performance increase in Battlefield V compared to Radeon RX Vega 64. In Devil May Cry V at 4K resolution with maximum graphics settings, AMD Radeon VII provides performance from 70 to 120fps.
AMD claims AMD Radeon VII performance is comparable to Nvidia RTX 2080.
AMD Radeon VII will go on sale on February 7 this year. The recommended retail price of the video card is $700.
We have a lot of great news. Subscribe to Yandex.Zen, put likes!
2019-01-09 21:40:00
Mikhail Shkredov (Thunder)
What do you think, Gabe Newell? – PC version of The Division 2 will appear in the Epic Store, Uplay, but will not be released on Steam
The Division 2 9 PC system requirements and trailer0003
News
Publications
What to play on a smartphone. Lost Light, Tank Company, Wild Arena Survivors, Railbound, Iron Marines Invasion
Results
September 30 21:28
2
In this issue: Chinese developers released «their» Escape from Tarkov and World of Tanks, French — Fortnite, Uruguayan — StarCraft. Polish developers were more original and created a puzzle for all ages. In addition, Genshin Impact 3.1 expanded Sumeru’s area, Tower of Fantasy 2.0 introduced a cyberpunk city, and Ubisoft showed off new mobile games.
French robbery. Should Ubisoft games cost $70?
Articles
September 29 20:22
ten
The announcement of an important change in the pricing policy of the French company was a thin thread through the news portals and on the same day they forgot about it. The publisher did not focus on this at the September Ubisoft Forward 2022 and, it seems, tried to make as few players as possible learn about the rise in price. This is a brazen robbery, but is it worth worrying about?
Genshin goes for mushrooms. Overview of Genshin Impact 3.
0
Reviews
September 28 13:41
5
Genshin Impact is a revolutionary game, and HoYoverse can be compared to the old Blizzard, which determined the development of the gaming industry. Update 3.0 includes a new region, new game mechanics. Genshin Impact at its peak is the most popular adventure game in the world. But when getting acquainted with the update, the thought arose: “Is everything all right in the magical world of Teyvat?”. Alas, there are problems.
Walking city. The Wandering Village Review [Early Version]
Reviews
September 27 21:24
2
The Wandering Village is a cute game from Stray Fawn Studio, an indie team from Switzerland.