Amd vega 64 vs gtx 2080: RX Vega 64 vs RTX 2080 Game Performance Benchmarks (i7-7700K vs i7-8700K)

Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 vs AMD Radeon RX Vega 64: which top graphics card is best for you?

Audio player loading…

The Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 is finally a real, tangible GPU and with six times the power of Pascal-based GTX GPUs, it’s a beast. But how does Nvidia’s best graphics card ever stack up to its eternal rival, AMD, with its Radeon RX Vega 64?

Update: We’ve finally been able to test out the Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 in a full review. So, we’ve updated the below performance section with straight performance comparisons.

Well, it’s never going to be apples-to-apples comparisons when it comes to products from different companies. However, since they both aim to generate incredible visuals for your favorite PC games, we’ll pit them against each other on paper before taking them into the lab later this year.

That being said, from their design, to their projected performance, to how much that performance will cost you, let’s look at which graphics option for you is better: the Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 versus the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64.

The new Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 in the silicon.

Right off the bat, the designs of these two graphics card are drastically different: The AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 uses a traditional, air-based cooling mechanism with a single fan drawing cool air in and driving it out the rear vents while the RTX 2080, uses a dual-fan approach which involves a heat sink in the process of dispersing hot air. (Of course, the idea here is for greater temperature control, but we won’t see that bear fruit until a full review.)

AMD has a slight leg up here on Nvidia in producing an official liquid-cooled version of the RX Vega 64, whereas Nvidia has yet to publicly discuss any such option for its newest card. We’ll see whether Nvidia’s dual-fan air cooling system bridges that gap.

The other major important factor of design, connectivity, is where the RTX 2080 pulls ahead with the capability to house a USB-C port in addition to the usual DisplayPort and HDMI ports. This comes standard on Nvidia’s Founders Edition version of the card, and is likely available for manufacturers to implement if they so choose.  

The RX Vega 64 has no such option, but of course includes all of the latest connectivity standards otherwise.

This distinction is important, because USB-C is poised to become the de facto official connection for virtual reality (VR) hardware and applications in the near future. The RTX 2080 is ready for this next phase in simplifying VR, and the RX Vega 64 is not.

Image 1 of 8

Higher is better

Higher is better
Higher is better

Higher is better
Lower is better

Lower is better
Lower is better

Lower is better

Performance

Now that the Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 is finally here and benchmarked here in the TechRadar lab, we can compare the two graphics cards both on hard performance and the hardware they pack inside.

Before we tackle the RTX 2080, let’s lay out what the RX Vega 64 is capable of first. This graphics card operates at a 1,247MHz processor frequency, or clock speed, which is able to boost up to 1,546MHz using basic tools.  

The RX Vega 64 GPU itself contains 4,096 stream processors and houses 8GB of High-Bandwidth Memory 2 (HBM2) video RAM that can process up to 484.3 gigabytes of data per second, or GB/s, with a speed of 1.89 gigabits per second, or Gbps.

Now, the RTX 2080 runs at a base clock speed of 1,515MHz, just a hair shy of the RX Vega 64’s boosted speed, and at 1,710MHz when boosted. While Nvidia’s CUDA cores and AMD’s stream processors are different, they generally accomplish the same task: rendering pixels and carrying out other compute tasks.

Image 1 of 4

Higher is better

Higher is better
Higher is better

Higher is better

To the RX Vega 64’s 4,096 stream processors, the RTX 2080 has just 2,944 CUDA cores. However, the CUDA cores are more versatile than the stream processors, able to carry out a wider variety of compute tasks, whereas stream processors are more specialized for efficiency.

Back to more meaningful comparisons, the RTX 2080 also has 8GB of video memory, but on the new GDDR6 standard – a follow-up to GDDR5X– rather than AMD’s HBM2. This memory actually has marginally less bandwidth than the RX Vega 64, able to process up to 448GB/s, but at an exponentially higher speed of 14Gbps.

The RTX 2080 does all of this with 215 watts (W) of power, while the RX Vega 64 requires 295W from your system’s power supply.

In the end, judging by processor and memory speed alone, as well as power draw, the RTX 2080 looks to be a clear winner here. The answer is even more clear in the benchmarks, with the Nvidia card outpacing the AMD by around 10 fps on all of our gaming tests.

The Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 is far and away the more expensive option – surprising no one.

Price

Now, for the ultimate deciding factor: how much these things cost. 

AMD’s current suggested retail price for its RX Vega 64 is $499 (£549, about AU$630), but third party manufacturers, like Gigabyte and Asus, are still selling the card for far more than that on account of increased demand from cryptocurrency miners.

Meanwhile, the RTX 2080 is considerably more expensive, with the Founders Edition costing $799 (AU$1,199, about £602). That’s a much higher price than the GTX 1080 of yesteryear, a mere $599 (£600, AU$925) in comparison.

Of course, you should also consider the implied cost of these graphics cards, judged largely by their power draw. The RTX 2080 requires less power than the RX Vega 64, which could see you needing a beefier power supply to support the latter – an incurred cost, if your system isn’t properly equipped for the job.

The AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 next to last generation’s Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080.

Which card is the better pick?

As pricey as it is, the RTX 2080 offers features in games that simply aren’t possible with the RX Vega 64 – namely real-time ray tracing for more realistic lighting and shadows in games. That fact alone, not to mention the price, makes this versus bout a difficult one.

Sure, on paper, the RTX 2080 wins in almost every regard. But, that doesn’t account for what you actually need from a graphics card.

If you seek the absolute most up-to-date capabilities from your graphics card, then clearly the RTX 2080 – or even the slightly cheaper $599 (AU$899, about £451) RTX 2070 – is your ticket to the latest and greatest.  

The RTX 2080 looks as if it’s going to burn through games at Ultra settings and 4K resolution, much less make them look better with ray tracing. However, if you simply want to be able to game at 1080p or even 1440p resolutions with the settings all the way cranked up, the RX Vega 64 is by far a more cost-effective way there.

So, even in 2018, the classic dichotomy between Nvidia and AMD graphics cards remains: splurge for Nvidia if you need the absolute latest and greatest, but AMD’s best will serve more mainstream gamers just as fine for far less.

  • How does Nvidia’s best of 2018 compare to that of 2017? Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 vs Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080

Joe Osborne is the Senior Technology Editor at Insider Inc. His role is to leads the technology coverage team for the Business Insider Shopping team, facilitating expert reviews, comprehensive buying guides, snap deals news and more. Previously, Joe was TechRadar’s US computing editor, leading reviews of everything from gaming PCs to internal components and accessories. In his spare time, Joe is a renowned Dungeons and Dragons dungeon master – and arguably the nicest man in tech.

AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 vs Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Founders Edition: What is the difference?

44points

AMD Radeon RX Vega 64

62points

Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Founders Edition

vs

56 facts in comparison

AMD Radeon RX Vega 64

Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Founders Edition

Why is AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 better than Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Founders Edition?

  • 2 TFLOPS higher floating-point performance?
    12.6 TFLOPSvs10.6 TFLOPS
  • 64.6 GTexels/s higher texture rate?
    395.8 GTexels/svs331.2 GTexels/s
  • 35.8GB/s more memory bandwidth?
    483.8GB/svs448GB/s
  • 1792bit wider memory bus width?
    2048bitvs256bit
  • 1152 more shading units?
    4096vs2944
  • 72 more texture mapping units (TMUs)?
    256vs184
  • 0. 8 newer version of OpenCL?
    2vs1.2

Why is Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Founders Edition better than AMD Radeon RX Vega 64?

  • 268MHz faster GPU clock speed?
    1515MHzvs1247MHz
  • 16.26 GPixel/s higher pixel rate?
    115.2 GPixel/svs98.94 GPixel/s
  • 70W lower TDP?
    225Wvs295W
  • 805MHz faster memory clock speed?
    1750MHzvs945MHz
  • 12110MHz higher effective memory clock speed?
    14000MHzvs1890MHz
  • 254MHz faster GPU turbo speed?
    1800MHzvs1546MHz
  • 1100million more transistors?
    13600 millionvs12500 million
  • 2nm smaller semiconductor size?
    12nmvs14nm

Which are the most popular comparisons?

AMD Radeon RX Vega 64

vs

AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT

Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Founders Edition

vs

EVGA GeForce RTX 2070 Super XC

AMD Radeon RX Vega 64

vs

Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060

Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Founders Edition

vs

AMD Radeon RX 5600M

AMD Radeon RX Vega 64

vs

Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060

Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Founders Edition

vs

Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080

AMD Radeon RX Vega 64

vs

Asus ROG Strix RX Vega 64 Gaming

Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Founders Edition

vs

EVGA GeForce RTX 2080 XC Ultra

AMD Radeon RX Vega 64

vs

AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT

Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Founders Edition

vs

Asus TUF GeForce RTX 3090 Gaming OC

AMD Radeon RX Vega 64

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Founders Edition

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660

AMD Radeon RX Vega 64

vs

AMD Radeon RX 580X

Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Founders Edition

vs

Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070

AMD Radeon RX Vega 64

vs

MSI Radeon RX 6600 XT Mech 2X

Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Founders Edition

vs

Gigabyte Aorus GeForce RTX 3080 Xtreme

AMD Radeon RX Vega 64

vs

AMD Radeon Vega 8

Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Founders Edition

vs

AMD Radeon HD 6950

AMD Radeon RX Vega 64

vs

AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition

Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Founders Edition

vs

Galax GeForce RTX 2080 Ti OC

Price comparison

User reviews

Performance

1. GPU clock speed

1247MHz

1515MHz

The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a higher clock speed.

2.GPU turbo

1546MHz

1800MHz

When the GPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased performance.

3.pixel rate

98.94 GPixel/s

115.2 GPixel/s

The number of pixels that can be rendered to the screen every second.

4.floating-point performance

12.6 TFLOPS

10.6 TFLOPS

Floating-point performance is a measurement of the raw processing power of the GPU.

5.texture rate

395.8 GTexels/s

331.2 GTexels/s

The number of textured pixels that can be rendered to the screen every second.

6.GPU memory speed

945MHz

1750MHz

The memory clock speed is one aspect that determines the memory bandwidth.

7.shading units

Shading units (or stream processors) are small processors within the graphics card that are responsible for processing different aspects of the image.

8.texture mapping units (TMUs)

TMUs take textures and map them to the geometry of a 3D scene. More TMUs will typically mean that texture information is processed faster.

9.render output units (ROPs)

The ROPs are responsible for some of the final steps of the rendering process, writing the final pixel data to memory and carrying out other tasks such as anti-aliasing to improve the look of graphics.

Memory

1.effective memory speed

1890MHz

14000MHz

The effective memory clock speed is calculated from the size and data rate of the memory. Higher clock speeds can give increased performance in games and other apps.

2. maximum memory bandwidth

483.8GB/s

448GB/s

This is the maximum rate that data can be read from or stored into memory.

3.VRAM

VRAM (video RAM) is the dedicated memory of a graphics card. More VRAM generally allows you to run games at higher settings, especially for things like texture resolution.

4.memory bus width

2048bit

256bit

A wider bus width means that it can carry more data per cycle. It is an important factor of memory performance, and therefore the general performance of the graphics card.

5.version of GDDR memory

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Radeon RX Vega 64)

Newer versions of GDDR memory offer improvements such as higher transfer rates that give increased performance.

6.Supports ECC memory

✖AMD Radeon RX Vega 64

✖Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Founders Edition

Error-correcting code memory can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when is it essential to avoid corruption, such as scientific computing or when running a server.

Features

1.DirectX version

DirectX is used in games, with newer versions supporting better graphics.

2.OpenGL version

OpenGL is used in games, with newer versions supporting better graphics.

3.OpenCL version

Some apps use OpenCL to apply the power of the graphics processing unit (GPU) for non-graphical computing. Newer versions introduce more functionality and better performance.

4.Supports multi-display technology

✔AMD Radeon RX Vega 64

✔Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Founders Edition

The graphics card supports multi-display technology. This allows you to configure multiple monitors in order to create a more immersive gaming experience, such as having a wider field of view.

5. load GPU temperature

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Radeon RX Vega 64)

A lower load temperature means that the card produces less heat and its cooling system performs better.

6.supports ray tracing

✖AMD Radeon RX Vega 64

✖Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Founders Edition

Ray tracing is an advanced light rendering technique that provides more realistic lighting, shadows, and reflections in games.

7.Supports 3D

✖AMD Radeon RX Vega 64

✔Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Founders Edition

Allows you to view in 3D (if you have a 3D display and glasses).

8.supports DLSS

✖AMD Radeon RX Vega 64

✔Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Founders Edition

DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling) is an upscaling technology powered by AI. It allows the graphics card to render games at a lower resolution and upscale them to a higher resolution with near-native visual quality and increased performance. DLSS is only available on select games.

9.PassMark (G3D) result

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Radeon RX Vega 64)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Founders Edition)

This benchmark measures the graphics performance of a video card. Source: PassMark.

Ports

1.has an HDMI output

✔AMD Radeon RX Vega 64

✔Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Founders Edition

Devices with a HDMI or mini HDMI port can transfer high definition video and audio to a display.

2.HDMI ports

More HDMI ports mean that you can simultaneously connect numerous devices, such as video game consoles and set-top boxes.

3.HDMI version

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Radeon RX Vega 64)

HDMI 2.0

Newer versions of HDMI support higher bandwidth, which allows for higher resolutions and frame rates.

4.DisplayPort outputs

Allows you to connect to a display using DisplayPort.

5.DVI outputs

Allows you to connect to a display using DVI.

6.mini DisplayPort outputs

Allows you to connect to a display using mini-DisplayPort.

Miscellaneous

1.USB ports

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Radeon RX Vega 64)

With more USB ports, you are able to connect more devices.

2.Has USB Type-C

✖AMD Radeon RX Vega 64

✔Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Founders Edition

The USB Type-C features reversible plug orientation and cable direction.

Price comparison

Cancel

Which are the best graphics cards?

GeForce RTX 2080 vs Radeon RX Vega 64



  1. Home
  2. VGA Benchmarks
  3. GeForce RTX 2080 vs Radeon RX Vega 64
  • GeForce RTX 2080

    133%

  • Radeon RX Vega 64

    100%

Relative performance

Reasons to consider GeForce RTX 2080
33% higher gaming performance.
95 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the Radeon RX Vega 64 .
This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support.
Supports PhysX
Supports G-Sync
Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty)
Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute
Supports DirectX Raytracing (DXR)
Supports Deep Learning Super-Sampling (DLSS)
Reasons to consider Radeon RX Vega 64
Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute
Supports FreeSync
Supports ReLive (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty)
Supports TrueAudio
Based on an outdated architecture (AMD GCN), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications

HWBench recommends GeForce RTX 2080

The GeForce RTX 2080 is the better performing card based on the game benchmark suite used (93 combinations of games and resolutions).

Core Configuration
GeForce RTX 2080 Radeon RX Vega 64
GPU Name TU104 (TU104-400A-A1) vs Vega 10 (Vega 10 XT)
Fab Process 12 nm vs 14 nm
Die Size 0 mm² vs 484 mm²
Transistors unknown vs 12,500 million
Shaders 2944 vs 4096
Compute Units 23 vs 64
Core clock 1515 MHz vs 1250 MHz
ROPs 64 vs 64
TMUs 184 vs 256

Memory Configuration
GeForce RTX 2080 Radeon RX Vega 64
Memory Type GDDR6 vs HBM2
Bus Width 256 bit vs 2048 bit
Memory Speed 1750 MHz

14000 MHz effective
vs 945 MHz

1890 MHz effective
Memory Size 8192 Mb vs 8192 Mb
Additional details
GeForce RTX 2080 Radeon RX Vega 64
TDP 200 watts vs 295 watts
Release Date 20 Aug 2018 vs 8 Aug 2017
  • GeForce RTX 2080

    106. 90 GP/s

  • Radeon RX Vega 64

    96.00 GP/s

GigaPixels — higher is better

  • GeForce RTX 2080

    307.30 GT/s

  • Radeon RX Vega 64

    384.00 GT/s

GigaTexels — higher is better

  • GeForce RTX 2080

    448.00 GB/s

  • Radeon RX Vega 64

    483.80 GB/s

GB/s — higher is better

  • GeForce RTX 2080

    9833.00 GFLOPs

  • Radeon RX Vega 64

    12288.00 GFLOPs

GFLOPs — higher is better

Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64

  • GeForce RTX 2080

    66

  • Radeon RX Vega 64

    60

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX 12, Windows 10 x64

  • GeForce RTX 2080

    194

  • Radeon RX Vega 64

    149

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64

  • GeForce RTX 2080

    134

  • Radeon RX Vega 64

    115

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10×64

  • GeForce RTX 2080

    88

  • Radeon RX Vega 64

    66

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra quality TTA DirectX11 Windows10 x64

  • GeForce RTX 2080

    149

  • Radeon RX Vega 64

    108

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra High Quality, TAA, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

  • GeForce RTX 2080

    166

  • Radeon RX Vega 64

    101

FPS (higher is better)

Windows 10 x64, Ultra quality, DirectX12

  • GeForce RTX 2080

    75

  • Radeon RX Vega 64

    48

FPS (higher is better)

Very High Quality TAA, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

  • GeForce RTX 2080

    157

  • Radeon RX Vega 64

    121

FPS (higher is better)

Highest quality DirectX11 Windows10 x64

  • GeForce RTX 2080

    154

  • Radeon RX Vega 64

    115

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra quality DirectX12 Windows10 x64

  • GeForce RTX 2080

    114

  • Radeon RX Vega 64

    100

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra quality DirectX11 Windows10 x64

  • GeForce RTX 2080

    117

  • Radeon RX Vega 64

    106

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra High Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

  • GeForce RTX 2080

    98

  • Radeon RX Vega 64

    82

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10×64

  • GeForce RTX 2080

    119

  • Radeon RX Vega 64

    114

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

  • GeForce RTX 2080

    114

  • Radeon RX Vega 64

    88

FPS (higher is better)

Very high Quality, DX11, Windows 10 x64

  • GeForce RTX 2080

    114

  • Radeon RX Vega 64

    80

FPS (higher is better)

DX11, Max Details, 16:1 AF, 2xMSAA

  • GeForce RTX 2080

    176

  • Radeon RX Vega 64

    126

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64

  • GeForce RTX 2080

    174

  • Radeon RX Vega 64

    142

FPS (higher is better)

Very high quality DirectX11 Windows10 x64

  • GeForce RTX 2080

    118

  • Radeon RX Vega 64

    78

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Detail,16:1 AF, DirectX12, Windows 10×64

  • GeForce RTX 2080

    79

  • Radeon RX Vega 64

    61

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10×64

  • GeForce RTX 2080

    46

  • Radeon RX Vega 64

    36

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, HR Textures, DirectX11, Windows 10 x64

  • GeForce RTX 2080

    132

  • Radeon RX Vega 64

    100

FPS (higher is better)

UltraTX Max Quality, Vulkan, Windows 10 x64

  • GeForce RTX 2080

    77

  • Radeon RX Vega 64

    60

FPS (higher is better)

Max Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64

  • GeForce RTX 2080

    156

  • Radeon RX Vega 64

    134

FPS (higher is better)

Maximun Quality, DX11, Windows 10 x64

  • GeForce RTX 2080

    163

  • Radeon RX Vega 64

    141

FPS (higher is better)

Very High Details, Pure Hair On, FXAA/HBAO+ enabled, 16x AF, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

  • GeForce RTX 2080

    172

  • Radeon RX Vega 64

    130

FPS (higher is better)

Highest Details, Pure hair, HBAO+, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

  • GeForce RTX 2080

    119

  • Radeon RX Vega 64

    90

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra quality DirectX12 Windows10 x64

  • GeForce RTX 2080

    183

  • Radeon RX Vega 64

    132

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Async Compute ,Windows 10×64

  • GeForce RTX 2080

    168

  • Radeon RX Vega 64

    137

FPS (higher is better)

DX11,Max Details, 16:1 HQ-AF, +AA

  • GeForce RTX 2080

    154

  • Radeon RX Vega 64

    103

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64

  • GeForce RTX 2080

    77

  • Radeon RX Vega 64

    58

FPS (higher is better)

Main Leben! quality preset- Vulkan Windows 10×64

  • GeForce RTX 2080

    188

  • Radeon RX Vega 64

    130

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64

  • GeForce RTX 2080

    57

  • Radeon RX Vega 64

    48

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX 12, Windows 10 x64

  • GeForce RTX 2080

    152

  • Radeon RX Vega 64

    113

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64

  • GeForce RTX 2080

    106

  • Radeon RX Vega 64

    89

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10×64

  • GeForce RTX 2080

    69

  • Radeon RX Vega 64

    49

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra quality TTA DirectX11 Windows10 x64

  • GeForce RTX 2080

    117

  • Radeon RX Vega 64

    84

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra High Quality, TAA, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

  • GeForce RTX 2080

    127

  • Radeon RX Vega 64

    81

FPS (higher is better)

Windows 10 x64, Ultra quality, DirectX12

  • GeForce RTX 2080

    52

  • Radeon RX Vega 64

    32

FPS (higher is better)

Very High Quality TAA, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

  • GeForce RTX 2080

    117

  • Radeon RX Vega 64

    86

FPS (higher is better)

Highest quality DirectX11 Windows10 x64

  • GeForce RTX 2080

    124

  • Radeon RX Vega 64

    84

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra quality DirectX12 Windows10 x64

  • GeForce RTX 2080

    92

  • Radeon RX Vega 64

    74

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra quality DirectX11 Windows10 x64

  • GeForce RTX 2080

    104

  • Radeon RX Vega 64

    87

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra High Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

  • GeForce RTX 2080

    79

  • Radeon RX Vega 64

    61

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10×64

  • GeForce RTX 2080

    109

  • Radeon RX Vega 64

    89

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

  • GeForce RTX 2080

    83

  • Radeon RX Vega 64

    62

FPS (higher is better)

Very high Quality, DX11, Windows 10 x64

  • GeForce RTX 2080

    89

  • Radeon RX Vega 64

    65

FPS (higher is better)

DX11, Max Details, 16:1 AF, 2xMSAA

  • GeForce RTX 2080

    141

  • Radeon RX Vega 64

    91

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64

  • GeForce RTX 2080

    125

  • Radeon RX Vega 64

    94

FPS (higher is better)

Very high quality DirectX11 Windows10 x64

  • GeForce RTX 2080

    86

  • Radeon RX Vega 64

    60

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Detail,16:1 AF, DirectX12, Windows 10×64

  • GeForce RTX 2080

    62

  • Radeon RX Vega 64

    49

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10×64

  • GeForce RTX 2080

    42

  • Radeon RX Vega 64

    28

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, HR Textures, DirectX11, Windows 10 x64

  • GeForce RTX 2080

    99

  • Radeon RX Vega 64

    72

FPS (higher is better)

UltraTX Max Quality, Vulkan, Windows 10 x64

  • GeForce RTX 2080

    61

  • Radeon RX Vega 64

    48

FPS (higher is better)

Max Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64

  • GeForce RTX 2080

    112

  • Radeon RX Vega 64

    92

FPS (higher is better)

Maximun Quality, DX11, Windows 10 x64

  • GeForce RTX 2080

    106

  • Radeon RX Vega 64

    92

FPS (higher is better)

Very High Details, Pure Hair On, FXAA/HBAO+ enabled, 16x AF, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

  • GeForce RTX 2080

    120

  • Radeon RX Vega 64

    90

FPS (higher is better)

Highest Details, Pure hair, HBAO+, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

  • GeForce RTX 2080

    84

  • Radeon RX Vega 64

    61

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra quality DirectX12 Windows10 x64

  • GeForce RTX 2080

    130

  • Radeon RX Vega 64

    102

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Async Compute ,Windows 10×64

  • GeForce RTX 2080

    124

  • Radeon RX Vega 64

    100

FPS (higher is better)

DX11,Max Details, 16:1 HQ-AF, +AA

  • GeForce RTX 2080

    111

  • Radeon RX Vega 64

    79

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64

  • GeForce RTX 2080

    60

  • Radeon RX Vega 64

    43

FPS (higher is better)

Main Leben! quality preset- Vulkan Windows 10×64

  • GeForce RTX 2080

    135

  • Radeon RX Vega 64

    92

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64

  • GeForce RTX 2080

    36

  • Radeon RX Vega 64

    29

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX 12, Windows 10 x64

  • GeForce RTX 2080

    82

  • Radeon RX Vega 64

    62

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64

  • GeForce RTX 2080

    64

  • Radeon RX Vega 64

    52

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10×64

  • GeForce RTX 2080

    36

  • Radeon RX Vega 64

    28

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra quality TTA DirectX11 Windows10 x64

  • GeForce RTX 2080

    70

  • Radeon RX Vega 64

    50

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra High Quality, TAA, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

  • GeForce RTX 2080

    73

  • Radeon RX Vega 64

    51

FPS (higher is better)

Windows 10 x64, Ultra quality, DirectX12

  • GeForce RTX 2080

    25

  • Radeon RX Vega 64

    16

FPS (higher is better)

Very High Quality TAA, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

  • GeForce RTX 2080

    62

  • Radeon RX Vega 64

    47

FPS (higher is better)

Highest quality DirectX11 Windows10 x64

  • GeForce RTX 2080

    71

  • Radeon RX Vega 64

    50

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra quality DirectX12 Windows10 x64

  • GeForce RTX 2080

    50

  • Radeon RX Vega 64

    38

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra quality DirectX11 Windows10 x64

  • GeForce RTX 2080

    57

  • Radeon RX Vega 64

    46

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra High Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

  • GeForce RTX 2080

    47

  • Radeon RX Vega 64

    35

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10×64

  • GeForce RTX 2080

    63

  • Radeon RX Vega 64

    49

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

  • GeForce RTX 2080

    44

  • Radeon RX Vega 64

    34

FPS (higher is better)

Very high Quality, DX11, Windows 10 x64

  • GeForce RTX 2080

    55

  • Radeon RX Vega 64

    39

FPS (higher is better)

DX11, Max Details, 16:1 AF, 2xMSAA

  • GeForce RTX 2080

    81

  • Radeon RX Vega 64

    49

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64

  • GeForce RTX 2080

    70

  • Radeon RX Vega 64

    48

FPS (higher is better)

Very high quality DirectX11 Windows10 x64

  • GeForce RTX 2080

    43

  • Radeon RX Vega 64

    30

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Detail,16:1 AF, DirectX12, Windows 10×64

  • GeForce RTX 2080

    39

  • Radeon RX Vega 64

    32

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10×64

  • GeForce RTX 2080

    28

  • Radeon RX Vega 64

    16

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, HR Textures, DirectX11, Windows 10 x64

  • GeForce RTX 2080

    58

  • Radeon RX Vega 64

    43

FPS (higher is better)

UltraTX Max Quality, Vulkan, Windows 10 x64

  • GeForce RTX 2080

    39

  • Radeon RX Vega 64

    31

FPS (higher is better)

Max Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64

  • GeForce RTX 2080

    55

  • Radeon RX Vega 64

    46

FPS (higher is better)

Maximun Quality, DX11, Windows 10 x64

  • GeForce RTX 2080

    52

  • Radeon RX Vega 64

    46

FPS (higher is better)

Very High Details, Pure Hair On, FXAA/HBAO+ enabled, 16x AF, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

  • GeForce RTX 2080

    60

  • Radeon RX Vega 64

    46

FPS (higher is better)

Highest Details, Pure hair, HBAO+, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

  • GeForce RTX 2080

    46

  • Radeon RX Vega 64

    31

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra quality DirectX12 Windows10 x64

  • GeForce RTX 2080

    70

  • Radeon RX Vega 64

    55

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Async Compute ,Windows 10×64

  • GeForce RTX 2080

    68

  • Radeon RX Vega 64

    61

FPS (higher is better)

DX11,Max Details, 16:1 HQ-AF, +AA

  • GeForce RTX 2080

    61

  • Radeon RX Vega 64

    44

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64

  • GeForce RTX 2080

    35

  • Radeon RX Vega 64

    25

FPS (higher is better)

Main Leben! quality preset- Vulkan Windows 10×64

  • GeForce RTX 2080

    82

  • Radeon RX Vega 64

    54

FPS (higher is better)

VS
GeForce RTX 2080 GeForce RTX 2070 Super
VS
GeForce RTX 2080 Radeon RX 5700 XT
VS
Radeon RX Vega 64 Radeon RX 6650 XT
VS
Radeon RX Vega 64 GeForce RTX 2060 Super
VS
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti GeForce RTX 2080 Super
VS
GeForce RTX 2080 Super TITAN V

Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.

RX Vega 64 vs RTX 2080 ⚙️

0x1011.635MH/s137W0.085MH/W

Allium9.434MH/s87W0.108MH/W

Argon2d-dyn260.09KH/s198W1.314KH/W

Argon2d-ninjaKH/sWKH/W

Argon2d2501064.42KH/s209W5.093KH/W

Argon2d409644.035KH/s221W0.199KH/W

Astralhash15.523MH/s173W0.09MH/W

Autolykos272.924MH/s147W0.496MH/W

BCD31.841MH/s112W0.284MH/W

BMW512MH/sWMH/W

BeamHashII33. 11H/s215W0.154H/W

BeamHashIII27.98H/s160W0.175H/W

Blake (14r)4.629GH/sWGH/W

Blake (2b)GH/sWGH/W

Blake (2s)6.448GH/s232W0.028GH/W

Blake (2s-Kadena)1.148GH/s102W0.011GH/W

C1134.105MH/s122W0.28MH/W

CNReverseWaltz1036.36H/s156W6.643H/W

Chukwa100.016KH/s223W0.449KH/W

Chukwa235.533KH/s212W0.168KH/W

ChukwaWRKZ162. 18KH/sWKH/W

Cortex0.073H/s172W0H/W

CryptoNightAlloy455.92H/sWH/W

CryptoNightArto873.11H/sWH/W

CryptoNightConceal1584.6H/s112W14.148H/W

CryptoNightFast1500.83H/s138W10.876H/W

CryptoNightFastV2H/sWH/W

CryptoNightGPU2239.95H/s220W10.182H/W

CryptoNightHaven863.18H/s140W6.166H/W

CryptoNightHeavy966.1H/s141W6. 852H/W

CryptoNightHeavyX420.09H/s125W3.361H/W

CryptoNightLiteV71.673KH/s141W0.012KH/W

CryptoNightR837.7H/s157W5.336H/W

CryptoNightSaber854.62H/s121W7.063H/W

CryptoNightStelliteV41468.95H/sWH/W

CryptoNightStelliteV51611.52H/sWH/W

CryptoNightTurtle6.571KH/s149W0.044KH/W

CryptoNightUPX2KH/sWKH/W

CryptoNightV70.831KH/s113W0.007KH/W

CryptoNightV8834. 1H/s156W5.347H/W

CryptoNightWOW795.88H/sWH/W

CryptoNightZLS1051.83H/s127W8.282H/W

Cuckaroo29S4.42H/s151W0.029H/W

Cuckaroo29b4.46H/s149W0.03H/W

CuckooBFC32.97H/s113W0.292H/W

CuckooCycle8.39H/s140W0.06H/W

DarkcoinH/sWH/W

Dedal10.876MH/s161W0.068MH/W

Eaglesong0.001GH/s197W0GH/W

Equihash0. 762KH/sWKH/W

Equihash(125,4)55.13H/s221W0.249H/W

Equihash(144,5)70H/s218W0.321H/W

Equihash(150,5)36.03H/s218W0.165H/W

Equihash(192,7)38H/s236W0.161H/W

Equihash(210,9)322H/s254W1.268H/W

Equihash(96,5)29.744KH/s247W0.12KH/W

Equihash+Scrypt32.68KH/s216W0.151KH/W

EquihashBTCZ68H/s158W0.43H/W

EquihashBTG70H/s209W0. 335H/W

EquihashSAFE69H/s157W0.439H/W

EquihashZEL72H/sWH/W

Etchash37.212MH/s179W0.208MH/W

Ethash37.317MH/s174W0.214MH/W

FiroPoWMH/sWMH/W

Globalhash33.559MH/s143W0.235MH/W

HMQ17256.041MH/s181W0.033MH/W

HandshakeMH/sWMH/W

HeavyHash390.252MH/s240W1.626MH/W

Hex11.983MH/s181W0.066MH/W

HoneyComb0. 524MH/s52W0.01MH/W

Jeonghash9.412MH/s161W0.058MH/W

KAWPOW25.09MH/s223W0.113MH/W

KangarooTwelveMH/sWMH/W

Keccak1.236GH/s213W0.006GH/W

Keccak-C1.218GH/s217W0.006GH/W

Lyra2REv273.413MH/s220W0.334MH/W

Lyra2REv367.465MH/s251W0.269MH/W

Lyra2vc0ban78.043MH/s125W0.624MH/W

Lyra2z2.878MH/s125W0.023MH/W

MTPMH/sWMH/W

MTP-TCR16. 095MH/s240W0.067MH/W

NIST50.051GH/s182W0GH/W

NeoScrypt1.481MH/s221W0.007MH/W

Octopus47.668MH/s172W0.277MH/W

PHI161221.08MH/s187W0.113MH/W

PHI212.071MH/sWMH/W

Padihash0.262MH/s51W0.005MH/W

Pawelhash6.56MH/s153W0.043MH/W

ProgPow17.122MH/s120W0.143MH/W

ProgPowSERO15.6MH/s158W0.099MH/W

ProgPowVeil24. 333MH/s135W0.18MH/W

ProgPowZ21.326MH/s163W0.131MH/W

RandomKEVA1127.96H/s160W7.05H/W

RandomSFX1127.36H/s144W7.829H/W

RandomX1028.9H/s154W6.681H/W

SHA-256csm265.327MH/s43W6.17MH/W

ScryptSIPC1.073KH/sWKH/W

Skein1.066GH/sWGH/W

Skein2525.888MH/s120W4.382MH/W

Skunkhash28.935MH/s137W0.211MH/W

SonoA1. 789MH/s184W0.01MH/W

Tensority0.01KH/s226W0KH/W

TimeTravel1045.612MH/s184W0.248MH/W

Tribus105.004MH/s178W0.59MH/W

Ubqhash36.958MH/s166W0.223MH/W

VerthashMH/sWMH/W

VerusHashMH/sWMH/W

X11k2.397MH/s183W0.013MH/W

X1311.907MH/sWMH/W

X1511.256MH/s157W0.072MH/W

X16R14.627MH/s211W0. 069MH/W

X16RT11.455MH/s170W0.067MH/W

X16RTVEIL10.897MH/s194W0.056MH/W

X16Rv232.366MH/s158W0.205MH/W

X16S25.274MH/s122W0.207MH/W

X1711.425MH/s164W0.07MH/W

X17R10.824MH/s176W0.062MH/W

X180.262MH/s62W0.004MH/W

X21S8.098MH/s179W0.045MH/W

X22i0.524MH/s74W0.007MH/W

X25X5.976MH/s214W0.028MH/W

X3316. 49MH/s172W0.096MH/W

Xevan3.879MH/s169W0.023MH/W

Zhash73H/s223W0.327H/W

cuckARoo298.93H/s195W0.046H/W

cuckARood292.09H/s195W0.011H/W

cuckARoom293.98H/s141W0.028H/W

cuckARooz295.57H/s195W0.029H/W

cuckAToo310.57H/s157W0.004H/W

cuckAToo320.5H/s210W0.002H/W

vProgPow11.712MH/s176W0.067MH/W

GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max Q vs Radeon RX Vega 64 Graphics cards Comparison

When comparing GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max Q and Radeon RX Vega 64, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card — this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max Q and Radeon RX Vega 64 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.

GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max Q

Check Price

Radeon RX Vega 64

Check Price

GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max Q is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max Q is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max Q here:

GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max Q Laptops

Main Specs

  GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max Q Radeon RX Vega 64
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 295 Watt
Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None 2x 8-pin
Memory type GDDR6 HBM2
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 8 GB
Display Connectors No outputs 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
 

Check Price

Check Price

  • Radeon RX Vega 64 has 268% more power consumption, than GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max Q.
  • Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
  • GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max Q and Radeon RX Vega 64 have maximum RAM of 8 GB.
  • GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max Q is used in Laptops, and Radeon RX Vega 64 — in Desktops.
  • GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max Q is build with Turing architecture, and Radeon RX Vega 64 — with Vega.
  • Core clock speed of Radeon RX Vega 64 is 655 MHz higher, than GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max Q.
  • GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max Q is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and Radeon RX Vega 64 — by 14 nm process technology.
  • Memory clock speed of GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max Q is 10055 MHz higher, than Radeon RX Vega 64.

Game benchmarks

Assassin’s Creed OdysseyBattlefield 5Call of Duty: WarzoneCounter-Strike: Global OffensiveCyberpunk 2077Dota 2Far Cry 5FortniteForza Horizon 4Grand Theft Auto VMetro ExodusMinecraftPLAYERUNKNOWN’S BATTLEGROUNDSRed Dead Redemption 2The Witcher 3: Wild HuntWorld of Tanks
high / 1080p 65−70 65−70
ultra / 1080p 45−50 50−55
QHD / 1440p 40−45 40−45
4K / 2160p 24−27 24−27
low / 720p 90−95 90−95
medium / 1080p 75−80 80−85
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 64 in Assassin’s Creed Odyssey is 3% more, than GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max Q.
high / 1080p 100−110 100−110
ultra / 1080p 95−100 95−100
QHD / 1440p 75−80 75−80
4K / 2160p 40−45 40−45
low / 720p 150−160 150−160
medium / 1080p 110−120 120−130
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 64 in Battlefield 5 is 2% more, than GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max Q.
low / 768p 45−50 45−50
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max Q and Radeon RX Vega 64 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p 250−260 250−260
medium / 768p 230−240 230−240
QHD / 1440p 150−160 150−160
4K / 2160p 100−110 100−110
high / 768p 220−230 220−230
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max Q and Radeon RX Vega 64 have the same average FPS in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive.
low / 768p 70−75 70−75
medium / 1080p 50−55 50−55
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max Q and Radeon RX Vega 64 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p 120−130 120−130
medium / 768p 110−120 110−120
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max Q and Radeon RX Vega 64 have the same average FPS in Dota 2.
high / 1080p 85−90 90−95
ultra / 1080p 80−85 85−90
QHD / 1440p 60−65 65−70
4K / 2160p 30−35 35−40
low / 720p 110−120 120−130
medium / 1080p 90−95 95−100
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 64 in Far Cry 5 is 7% more, than GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max Q.
high / 1080p 130−140 130−140
ultra / 1080p 100−110 100−110
QHD / 1440p 70−75 70−75
4K / 2160p 21−24 21−24
low / 720p 250−260 250−260
medium / 1080p 170−180 170−180
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max Q and Radeon RX Vega 64 have the same average FPS in Fortnite.
high / 1080p 110−120 110−120
ultra / 1080p 90−95 95−100
QHD / 1440p 70−75 75−80
4K / 2160p 45−50 50−55
low / 720p 160−170 160−170
medium / 1080p 120−130 120−130
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 64 in Forza Horizon 4 is 2% more, than GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max Q.
low / 768p 170−180 170−180
medium / 768p 160−170 160−170
high / 1080p 120−130 120−130
ultra / 1080p 70−75 70−75
QHD / 1440p 60−65 65−70
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 64 in Grand Theft Auto V is 0% more, than GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max Q.
high / 1080p 55−60 55−60
ultra / 1080p 45−50 45−50
QHD / 1440p 35−40 35−40
4K / 2160p 21−24 21−24
low / 720p 120−130 120−130
medium / 1080p 75−80 80−85
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 64 in Metro Exodus is 1% more, than GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max Q.
low / 768p 120−130 120−130
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max Q and Radeon RX Vega 64 have the same average FPS in Minecraft.
high / 1080p 110−120 120−130
ultra / 1080p 85−90 90−95
4K / 2160p 18−20 18−20
low / 720p 140−150 150−160
medium / 1080p 130−140 130−140
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 64 in PLAYERUNKNOWN’S BATTLEGROUNDS is 5% more, than GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max Q.
high / 1080p 50−55 55−60
ultra / 1080p 30−35 35−40
QHD / 1440p 27−30 27−30
4K / 2160p 18−20 18−20
low / 720p 120−130 120−130
medium / 1080p 80−85 85−90
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 64 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 5% more, than GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max Q.
low / 768p 250−260 250−260
medium / 768p 180−190 180−190
high / 1080p 100−110 110−120
ultra / 1080p 60−65 60−65
4K / 2160p 40−45 40−45
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 64 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1% more, than GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max Q.
low / 768p 200−210 210−220
ultra / 1080p 95−100 100−110
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 64 in World of Tanks is 5% more, than GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max Q.

Full Specs

  GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max Q Radeon RX Vega 64
Architecture Turing Vega
Code name N18E-G3 Vega
Type Laptop Desktop
Release date 2 April 2020 14 August 2017
Pipelines 3072 4096
Core clock speed 975 MHz 1630 MHz
Boost Clock 1230 MHz 1546 MHz
Transistor count 13,600 million 12,500 million
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm 14 nm
Texture fill rate 207. 4 395.8
Floating-point performance 13,353 gflops
Length 279 mm
Memory bus width 256 Bit 2048 Bit
Memory clock speed 11000 MHz 945 MHz
Memory bandwidth 352.0 GB/s 483.8 GB/s
Shared memory
G-SYNC support +
VR Ready +
DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) 12 (12_1)
Shader Model 6.5 6.4
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
OpenCL 1.2 2. 0
Vulkan 1.2.140 1.1.125
CUDA 7.5
Monero / XMR (CryptoNight) 1.9 kh/s
Laptop size large
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto) 31.5 Mh/s
 

Check Price

Check Price

Similar compares

  • GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max Q vs GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
  • GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max Q vs GeForce RTX 2080 Max Q
  • Radeon RX Vega 64 vs GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
  • Radeon RX Vega 64 vs GeForce RTX 2080 Max Q
  • GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max Q vs Quadro RTX 5000 Max Q
  • GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max Q vs Radeon RX 5700
  • Radeon RX Vega 64 vs Quadro RTX 5000 Max Q
  • Radeon RX Vega 64 vs Radeon RX 5700

AMD Radeon VII Mega Benchmark

With the release driver on hand for the Radeon VII we decided to go back to the test bench. Steve has spent the last few days doing nothing but benchmarking… after spending the few days before that, doing nothing but benchmarking.

Since our day-one review of the Radeon VII, we were told by AMD driver improvements were coming but there would be no performance improvements, however the numerous stability issues we experience should be solved. And indeed, with the update in place the Radeon VII is now rock solid, which is a massive improvement.

Today we have over 30 games to check out, including the new World of Tanks update as well as Apex Legends. For testing we used our Core i9-9900K test bench clocked at 5 GHz with 32GB of DDR4-3400 memory. We’ll cover some of the results individually and then jump into the full performance breakdown with all 33 games.

Since the review covered results for Fortnite, Battlefield V, World of Tanks, Strange Bridge, Monster Hunter: World, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Rainbow Six Siege, Far Cry 5, Forza Horizon 4, Resident Evil 2, ARMA 3 and Hitman 2, we’re going to skip over them and instead pick a dozen different games to discuss.

Benchmarks

Apex Legends is a fresh new battle royale game that came out of nowhere, but it does seem like people are enjoying this one. It’s based on the same engine as Titanfall 2 and like Titanfall 2 it’s capped at 144 fps.

The Radeon VII does OK in this one. It’s slightly slower than the GTX 1080 Ti, 12% slower than the RTX 2080 and 26% faster than Vega 64. So that’s kind of Radeon VII in a nutshell.

The Radeon VII performs quite well in Sniper Elite 4, but who didn’t see that coming? This is a well optimised title that plays well on both AMD and Nvidia hardware. The GeForce RTX 2080 was still slightly faster but the margin is small. The Radeon VII also manages to improve on Vega 64 by a 30% margin.

Deus Ex: Mankind Divided is a late 2016 release but it’s certainly not the oldest game we test with. For those wondering DirectX 11 works better than DX12 on both AMD and Nvidia GPUs, so that’s why we use it.

The Radeon VII was able to match the GTX 1080 Ti, making it a little slower than the RTX 2080 but a good bit faster than the RTX 2070 and Vega 64.

It’s not the most well optimized title to be released last year but Just Cause 4 is still a lot of fun. Anyway, performance for the Radeon VII was… okay. The 1% low performance matched that of the GTX 1080 Ti and RTX 2080 which is good, the average frame rate positioned it squarely between the RTX 2080 and 2070, which is… okay.

The Star Wars Battlefront II results are decent, here the Radeon VII provides strong 1% low performance coupled with a slightly lower than expected average frame rate. In the end it was 10% slower than the RTX 2080 for the average frame rate, but 32% faster than Vega 64.

Project Cars 2 has always favored Nvidia hardware. We see this when comparing Vega 56 and the GTX 1070 for example, typically the Vega GPU is faster. As a result Radeon VII was only able to beat the GTX 1080, making it much slower than the RTX 2080 and way slower than the GTX 1080 Ti.

Moving on we have Assassin’s Creed Odyssey, a title that never plays nice with AMD hardware comparatively even though it’s an AMD sponsored title. Evidently that doesn’t mean much as this game prefers Intel CPUs and Nvidia GPUs.

The Radeon VII is a big step forward from Vega 64 offering 28% more performance, though it was only able to match the RTX 2070, which is not great for a $700 flagship AMD GPU.

On previous tests we were using the standalone World of Tanks benchmark, but because that hasn’t been updated and the game has received a major overhaul we’re switching back to testing with the HD client.

The game engine improvements were mostly focused on better CPU utilization, which is useful for those using low clocked multi-core processors. Before the Radeon VII was 17% slower than the RTX 2080, now it’s 16% slower, so the result is the same.

On Vermintide 2 the Radeon VII was slower than both the RTX 2080 and GTX 1080 Ti, though it was a huge step forward from Vega 64, delivering 36% more frames on average.

The Witcher 3 has the Vega 56 card matching the GTX 1070, however the Radeon VII didn’t fare as well, where it was 9% slower than the GTX 1080 Ti and even slower than the RTX 2080.

AMD no longer enjoys a performance advantage in Vulkan-based titles. Take Wolfenstein II for example, here the Radeon VII was 12% slower than the RTX 2080.

DiRT 4 is always an interesting inclusion as CMAA enables god mode on the Radeon GPUs and we again see this here with the Radeon VII. Vega 64 was able to beat the 1% low performance of the RTX 2080 Ti and here we see the Radeon VII shatter it while delivering the same 154 fps on average. AMD’s GPU division would be in pretty good shape if every game looked like this.

Performance Summary

That’s how the Radeon VII stacks up in another dozen titles, so between this feature and the day-one review we’ve closely looked at 24 games, but there’s another 9 that were part of our mega benchmark.

The graphs below will show you how the Radeon VII compares to the RTX 2080, 2060, GTX 1080 Ti and Vega 64 in all 33 games…

In our review featuring just a dozen games, Radeon VII was 4% slower than the RTX 2080. Now with 33 games it’s 7% slower, so a slight change there. The previous 12 titles are included here so an even amount of favorable and unfavorable titles for the GCN 5th-gen architecture.

What the graph above tell us is that there’s an overwhelmingly good chance that in a given title the RTX 2080 will be faster, making it the superior gaming graphics card right now.

The Radeon VII was 2% slower than the GTX 1080 Ti with our 12-game sample, now it’s 5% slower. No major changes, but for the most part the much older GTX 1080 Ti was faster. Moreover, it was faster by a 10% margin or greater in 10 of the 33 games whereas the Radeon VII was faster by a 10% margin or greater in only 2 of the 33 games.

Against the RTX 2060 the Radeon VII is 28% faster…

Finally compared to Vega 64 the latest Radeon is 24% faster. That’s a nice little performance bump, but as we said in the day-one review, you’re paying 40% more for a little over 20% more performance.

Putting It All Together

For better or worse, it seems we pretty much nailed it with our sample of games in the day-one coverage. The Radeon VII is indeed slightly slower than the RTX 2080, while costing the same amount and consuming a little extra power. Currently the reference card is extremely loud, but AMD has promised a fix is coming for that. We’re also glad to report all the stability issues we were seeing prior to release have been addressed, so anyone who bought this card should enjoy a flawless experience.

We’ve yet to delve into any overclocking and/or undervolting, something we’ll report on if we find there’s room for tweaks and squeezing more performance there.

Something worth noting, AMD does believe that the Radeon VII is performing as it should be. Even though we plan to continue benchmarking this GPU during its lifespan, as we always do, AMD is not putting up excuses and saying drivers are still immature or early revisions. A surprise would be nice, but in the meantime what you see is what you get.

The Radeon VII is a fine graphics card, but it’s not competitive enough against the RTX 2080. We review it exclusively as a gaming product (where that 16GB frame buffer is not really a factor) and frankly it under delivered. If it was more efficient than the RTX 2080 and ran quiet, maybe we could deem it a worthy alternative, but let’s not sugar coat this or beat around the bush, it’s not as efficient, it’s loud and for the most part it’s slower, only a little slower but it’s slower.

For those reasons we can’t recommend the Radeon VII over the GeForce RTX 2080. As badly as we wanted the RTX 2080 to be obliterated, forcing Nvidia to get real with their pricing, that has not happened. Therefore gamers are forced to pay 2016 pricing for 2016 performance (unless there’s a DLSS miracle, but wait, no titles supporting that…). It’s not a bleak scenario at all — read why we believe building a gaming PC right now is a good idea — but let’s still hope later in the year we see GPUs deliver better value for gamers.

Shopping Shortcuts:
  • GeForce RTX 2060 on Amazon, Newegg
  • GeForce RTX 2070 on Amazon, Newegg
  • GeForce RTX 2080 on Amazon, Newegg
  • GeForce RTX 2080 Ti on Amazon, Newegg
  • Radeon RX Vega 56 on Amazon, Newegg
  • Radeon RX Vega 64 on Amazon, Newegg
  • Radeon RX 570 on Amazon, Newegg
  • Radeon RX 580 on Amazon, Newegg

0022 2048bit vs 352bit

  • GPU frequency 103MHz higher?
    1350MHz vs 1247MHz
  • 1.63 TFLOPS higher than FLOPS?
    14.23 TFLOPS vs 12.6 TFLOPS
  • 44.96 GPixel/s higher pixel rate?
    143.9 GPixel/s vs 98.94 GPixel/s
  • 35W below TDP?
    260W vs 295W
  • 805MHz faster memory speed?
    1750MHz vs 945MHz
  • 12110MHz higher effective clock speed?
    14000MHz vs 1890MHz
  • 35. 8% more VRAM?
    11GB vs 8.1GB
  • 48.9 GTexels/s higher number of textured pixels?
    444.7 GTexels/s vs 395.8 GTexels/s

Which comparisons are the most popular?

AMD Radeon RX Vega 64

vs

AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT

Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Founders Edition

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

AMD Radeon RX Vega 64

vs

Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060

AMD Radeon RX Vega 64

vs

vs

Asus ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3090 Gaming

0004 Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Founders Edition

vs

Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Super

AMD Radeon RX Vega 64

vs

Asus ROG Strix RX Vega 64 Gaming

Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Founders Edition

vs

KFA2 GeForce RTX 3070 SG 1-Click OC

AMD Radeon RX Vega 64

vs

AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT

Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Founders Edition

Tesla vs 90 Tsela0003

AMD Radeon RX Vega 64

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Founders Edition

vs

EVGA GeForce RTX 3080 FTW3 Ultra Gaming

AMD Radeon RX Vega 64

vs

AMD Radeon RX 580X

Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Founders Edition

vs

Asus Dual GeForce RTX 3070

0003

Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Founders Edition

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX Titan X

AMD Radeon RX Vega 64

vs

AMD Radeon Vega 8

Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Founders Edition

vs

Gigabyte GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Gaming OC

AMD Radeon RX Vega 64

vs

AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition

Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Founders Edition

vs

MSI GeForce GTX Titan X

Price match

Cheaper

User reviews

Performance

2. turbo GPU

1546MHz

1635MHz

When the GPU is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.

3.pixel rate

98.94 GPixel/s

143.9 GPixel/s

The number of pixels that can be displayed on the screen every second.

4.flops

12.6 TFLOPS

14.23 TFLOPS

FLOPS is a measure of GPU processing power.

5.texture size

395.8 GTexels/s

444.7 GTexels/s

Number of textured pixels that can be displayed on the screen every second.

6.GPU memory speed

945MHz

1750MHz

Memory speed is one aspect that determines memory bandwidth.

7.shading patterns

Shading units (or stream processors) are small processors in a video card that are responsible for processing various aspects of an image.

8.textured units (TMUs)

TMUs accept textured units and bind them to the geometric layout of the 3D scene. More TMUs generally means texture information is processed faster.

9 ROPs

ROPs are responsible for some of the final steps of the rendering process, such as writing the final pixel data to memory and for performing other tasks such as anti-aliasing to improve the appearance of graphics.

Memory

1.memory effective speed

1890MHz

14000MHz

The effective memory clock frequency is calculated from the memory size and data transfer rate. A higher clock speed can give better performance in games and other applications.

2.max memory bandwidth

483.8GB/s

616GB/s

This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.

3. VRAM

VRAM (video RAM) is the dedicated memory of the graphics card. More VRAM usually allows you to run games at higher settings, especially for things like texture resolution.

4.memory bus width

2048bit

352bit

Wider memory bus means it can carry more data per cycle. This is an important factor in memory performance, and therefore the overall performance of the graphics card.

5.GDDR memory versions

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Radeon RX Vega 64)

Later versions of GDDR memory offer improvements such as faster data transfer rates, which improves performance.

6. Supports memory troubleshooting code

✖AMD Radeon RX Vega 64

✖Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Founders Edition

Memory troubleshooting code can detect and fix data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.

Functions

1.DirectX version

DirectX is used in games with a new version that supports better graphics.

2nd version of OpenGL

The newer version of OpenGL, the better graphics quality in games.

OpenCL version 3.

Some applications use OpenCL to use the power of the graphics processing unit (GPU) for non-graphical computing. Newer versions are more functional and better quality.

4. Supports multi-monitor technology

✔AMD Radeon RX Vega 64

✔Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Founders Edition

The video card has the ability to connect multiple screens. This allows you to set up multiple monitors at the same time to create a more immersive gaming experience, such as a wider field of view.

5. GPU temperature at boot

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Radeon RX Vega 64)

Lower boot temperature means the card generates less heat and the cooling system works better.

6.supports ray tracing

✖AMD Radeon RX Vega 64

✔Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Founders Edition

Ray tracing is an advanced light rendering technique that provides more realistic lighting, shadows and reflections in games.

7. Supports 3D

✖AMD Radeon RX Vega 64

✔Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Founders Edition

Allows you to view in 3D (if you have a 3D screen and glasses).

8.supports DLSS

✖AMD Radeon RX Vega 64

✔Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Founders Edition

DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling) is an AI based scaling technology. This allows the graphics card to render games at lower resolutions and upscale them to higher resolutions with near-native visual quality and improved performance. DLSS is only available in some games.

9. PassMark result (G3D)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Radeon RX Vega 64)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Founders Edition)

This test measures the graphics performance of a graphics card. Source: Pass Mark.

Ports

1.has HDMI output

✔AMD Radeon RX Vega 64

✔Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Founders Edition

Devices with HDMI or mini HDMI ports can stream HD video and audio to the connected display.

2.HDMI connectors

More HDMI connectors allow you to connect multiple devices at the same time, such as game consoles and TVs.

3rd HDMI version

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Radeon RX Vega 64)

HDMI 2.0

New versions of HDMI support higher bandwidth, resulting in higher resolutions and frame rates.

4. DisplayPort outputs

Allows connection to a display using DisplayPort.

5.DVI outputs

Allows connection to a display using DVI.

Mini DisplayPort 6.outs

Allows connection to a display using Mini DisplayPort.

Other

1.USB connectors

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Radeon RX Vega 64)

With more USB ports, you can connect more devices.

2. Has USB Type-C

✖AMD Radeon RX Vega 64

✔Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Founders Edition

USB Type-C has reversible connector orientation and cable routing.

Price Match

Cancel

Which graphics cards are better?

AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti. Comparison specs and benchmarks of

VS

General information

The general information section of the video card comparison list contains release date, type, overall rating and other useful data to determine the winner between AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti . Please note that the comparison takes place on all indicators, and below are the ratings from synthetic benchmarks that define different criteria in games and work applications.

60

Position in the performance rating

43.19

Price and quality ratio

34.47

VEGA

Architecture

TURING

9000 9000 TUST

Desktop

14 August 2017 (4 years ago)

Release date0003

$ 999

$ 1330 (2.7x MSRP)

Actual price

$ 1265 (1.3x MSRP)

16.44 9000

Market segment

Desktop

Specifications

Which graphics card is better in comparison AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti in manufacturing process, power consumption, and GPU base and turbo frequency is the most important part contained in the rating of video cards.

4096

conveyors

4352

1630 MHZ

Tibility of the nucleus

1350 MHZ

1546 MHZ

Acceleration

MHZ

12. 500 MILLILION 9000 9000 9000.6,000 9000.6,000 9000 Milleion nm

Process

12 nm

295 Watt

Power Consumption (TDP)

250 Watt

395.8

Number of texels processed per second10003

420.2

13.353 GFLOPS

Swimming of

No data

4096 9000

18,600 million

295 Watt

TDP

250 Watt

Dimensions, connectors and compatibility . As well as the main types of connectors and connected interfaces

PCIE 3.0 X16

Interface

PCIe 3.0 X16

279 MM

length

267 MM

2x 8-PIN

Additional power

2X 8-PIN

Memory (Frequency and Ace Graphics card memory plays an important role in both gaming and graphics applications. The higher the standard (

GDDR ), the better. It directly affects the speed and efficiency of data processing. What is the difference in type, base and turbo frequency, GDDR bandwidth between AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti:

HBM2

Type of memory

GDDR6

8 GB

Maximum RAM AMOUNT

11 GB

2048 BIT

DISTRICTION of memory tire

352 BIT

MHZ 9000 MHITS 9000 Memory 14000 Memory. 483.8 GB/S

memory capacity

616.0 GB/S

Demeded memory

Support for ports and displays

Let’s find out the difference in ports that are equipped with AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 and NVIDIA GEFORCE RTX 2080 Ti. Pay attention to the number of ports and the maximum resolution of supported monitors.

1x HDMI, 3X DisplayPort

Connections to the display

1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C

No data

Support G-Sync

+

9000 + 9000

Let’s see what the difference is. It is worth noting that NVIDIA and AMD use different technologies.

n.a.

VR support

+

n.a.

Multiple monitors

+

n/a

CUDA

7.5

API support

AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti are almost over. Hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not taken into account in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests.

12 (12_1)

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_1)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

No data

VULKAN

1.2.131

No data

Shader Model

6.5

No data

OpenCl

2.09 9000

Overall performance in benchmarks

AMD Radeon RX Vega 64

67.81%

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

The Ice Storm multi-platform test shows the performance of a graphics card using the screen rendering method. Standard test conditions — 1280*720 (720p).

AMD Radeon RX Vega 64

395092 (75%)

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti

521458 (100%)

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Unlike Ice Storm, 3DMark’s Cloud Gate test uses more resource intensive scenes. The better the final score, the faster your graphics card. Processing is done with DirectX 10.

AMD Radeon RX Vega 64

127011 (76%)

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti

165122 (100%)

3DMark Fire Strike Score

This is an advanced graphics card benchmark. When using DirectX 11 for processing, typical testing time is 15 minutes. The higher the score, the faster the graphics card.

AMD Radeon RX Vega 64

18253 (69%)

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti

26227 (100%)

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Complex graphic scenes require all the graphics card resources. They use the entire RAM and computing power. The test’s results can be viewed below.

AMD Radeon RX Vega 64

22350 (65%)

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti

34316 (100%)

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

This benchmark analyzes the gaming performance of a video card using Direct X 11 (multithreading, tessellation, shader calculations).

AMD Radeon RX Vega 64

30824 (65%)

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti

47166 (100%)

3DMark Vantage Performance

This Direct X10 based benchmark contains tests for artificial intelligence, physics and 6 computational tests.

AMD Radeon RX Vega 64

55262 (66%)

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti

83556 (100%)

SPECviewperf 12 — Solidworks

This is a world famous benchmark for determining the performance of a graphics card in applications. In testing, graphic models and real program scenes are used.

AMD Radeon RX Vega 64

80 (100%)

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti

79 (98%)

SPECviewperf 12 — Siemens NX

Siemens NX (snx-02) is a specialized set of SPECviewperf 12 for graphical load tracing. It includes many rendering modes.

AMD Radeon RX Vega 64

23 (100%)

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti

12 (52%)

SPECviewperf 12 — Showcase

This test is based on Autodesk Showcase 2013. It introduces shading and shadow projection modes.

AMD Radeon RX Vega 64

111 (62%)

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti

179 (100%)

SPECviewperf 12 — Medical

This is a special set of benchmarks designed as a 3D rendering application. It uses all the resources of the video card.

AMD Radeon RX Vega 64

50 (98%)

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti

51 (100%)

SPECviewperf 12 — Maya

Maya-04, developed by SPECviewperf 12, contains many rendering modes, including fill, anti-alias, and transparency.

AMD Radeon RX Vega 64

82 (45%)

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti

181 (100%)

SPECviewperf 12 — Energy

This is a pre-installed SPECviewperf 12 set called Energy-01, which is used to determine the power of the video card. It performs volumetric rendering.

AMD Radeon RX Vega 64

12 (75%)

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti

16 (100%)

SPECviewperf 12 — Creo

This benchmark offers a test of the video card’s power in various rendering modes (anti-aliasing, reflection fill and edge fill).

AMD Radeon RX Vega 64

58 (92%)

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti

63 (100%)

SPECviewperf 12 — Catia

This test of graphics card power and speed includes rendering aircraft and car models. The better the score, the more powerful your graphics card.

AMD Radeon RX Vega 64

158 (100%)

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti

121 (76%)

SPECviewperf 12 — 3ds Max

AMD Radeon RX Vega 64

140 (51%)

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti

272 (100%)

Passmark

Passmark is an excellent benchmark that is updated regularly and shows relevant graphics card performance information.

AMD Radeon RX Vega 64

14614 (67%)

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti

21552 (100%)

Popular comparisons with selected graphics cards

one. NVIDIA Tesla T4 vs. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
2. NVIDIA Quadro P2200 vs. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
3. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti vs. AMD Baffin
four. NVIDIA Quadro P400 vs. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
5. AMD FirePro W2100 vs. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
6. AMD Radeon HD 7660D vs. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
7. NVIDIA TITAN Xp vs. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
eight. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti vs. NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile
9. NVIDIA GeForce MX330 vs. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
ten. NVIDIA Quadro P620 vs. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
eleven. NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 vs. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
12. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 vs. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
13. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti vs. AMD FirePro S10000
fourteen. NVIDIA Tesla M10 vs. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
fifteen. AMD FirePro W7000 vs. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti

Compare AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti video cards by all known characteristics in the categories: General information, Specifications, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions, requirements, API support, Memory, Technology support.
Video card performance analysis by benchmarks: GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames ), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench — OpenCL, PassMark — G2D Mark, PassMark — G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) , CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score.

Reasons to choose NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti

  • Newer graphics card, release date difference 1 year(s) 2 month(s) Boost 5% more: 1545 MHz vs 1475 MHz
  • A newer manufacturing process for the video card makes it more powerful, but with lower power consumption: 12 nm vs 14 nm
  • 17.8 times more memory frequency(s): 14000 MHz vs 786 MHz (1572 MHz effective)
  • About 80% more performance in GFXBench 4. 0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 23659 vs 13123
  • About 80% more performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 23659 vs 13123
  • 90 About 84% more performance in Geekbench — OpenCL benchmark: 138925 vs 75438

  • About 49% more performance in PassMark — G3D Mark benchmark: 21834 vs 14631
Release date 20 September 2018 vs 23 June 2017
Core frequency 1350 MHz vs 1250 MHz
Boost Core Clock 1545 MHz vs 1475 MHz
Process 12 nm vs 14 nm
Memory frequency 14000 MHz vs 786 MHz (1572 MHz effective)
GFXBench 4. 0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 23659 vs 13123
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 23659 vs 13123
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) 3718 vs 3715
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) 3718 vs 3715
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) 3358 vs 3357
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) 3358 vs 3357
Geekbench — OpenCL 138925 vs 75438
PassMark — G3D Mark 21834 vs 14631

Benchmark comparison

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti

GFXBench 4. 0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
Geekbench — OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
138925
PassMark — G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
PassMark — G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
Name AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
GFXBench 4. 0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 13123 23659
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 13123 23659
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) 3715 3718
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) 3715 3718
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) 3357 3358
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) 3357 3358
Geekbench — OpenCL 75438 138925
PassMark — G2D Mark 948 939
PassMark — G3D Mark 14631 21834
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) 394.035
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 5451.484
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) 41.133
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) 173.697
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 1963.652
3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score 14639

Feature comparison

conveyors

AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
Architecture GCN 5. 0 Turing
Codename Vega 10 TU102
Issue date 23 June 2017 20 September 2018
Place in the rating 99 19
Price at first issue date $999
Price now $1,279.99
Type Desktop
Price/performance ratio (0-100) 17. 22
Boost Core Clock 1475 MHz 1545 MHz
Number of Compute 64
Core frequency 1250MHz 1350 MHz
Process 14nm 12nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 755.2 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 24.17TFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 12. 08 TFLOPS
Number of shaders 4096
Pixel fill rate 94.40 GPixel/s
Texturing speed 377.6 GTexel/s
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 250 Watt
Number of transistors 12500 million 18,600 million
Video connectors No outputs 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
Interface PCIe 3. 0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Additional power connectors None 2x 8-pin
Length 267 mm
DirectX 12.1 12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL 2.0
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Shader Model 6.4
Vulcan
High Bandwidth Memory (HBM)
Maximum memory size 16GB
Memory bandwidth 402. 4 GB/s
Memory bus width 2048bit
Memory frequency 786 MHz (1572 MHz effective) 14000 MHz
Memory type HBM2
Unified Video Decoder (UVD)
Video Code Engine (VCE)

GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER vs Radeon RX Vega 64

GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER vs Radeon RX Vega 64 — Th200

Contents

  1. Introduction
  2. Features
  3. Tests
  4. Games
  5. Key differences
  6. Conclusion
  7. Comments

Video card

Video card

Introduction

We compared two graphics cards: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER vs AMD Radeon RX Vega 64. On this page, you will learn about the key differences between them, as well as which one is better in terms of features and performance.

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER is a Turing GeForce 20 generation graphics card released on Jul 23rd, 2019. It comes with 8GB of GDDR6 memory running at 1937MHz, has 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin power connector and draws up to 165W.

AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 is a Vega generation (RX Vega) graphics card based on GCN 5.0 architecture released Aug 7th, 2017. It comes with 8GB HBM2 memory running at 945MHz, has 2x 8-pin power connector and consumes up to 165 watts.

Specification

Graphics Card

Name

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER

RT Cores

48

Graphics Features

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_2)

12 (12_1)

OpenGL

4.6

4.6

OpenCL

3.0

2.1

Cuda

7.5

VULKAN

1.2

1. 2

Board Design

Heating

250W

295W

Power Conventors

1x 8-Pin

9000 9000 2x 8-PIN

003

Slot Width

Dual-slot

Dual-slot

Benchmarks

3DMark Graphics

3DMark is a benchmarking tool designed and developed by UL to measure the performance of computer hardware. Upon completion, the program gives a score, where a higher value indicates better performance.

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER
+58%

AMD Radeon RX Vega 64

Blender bmw27

Blender is the most popular 3D content creation software. It has its own test, which is widely used to determine the rendering speed of processors and video cards. We chose the bmw27 scene. The result of the test is the time taken to render the given scene.

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER
+248%

AMD Radeon RX Vega 64

Th200 RP

Th200 RP is a test created by Th200. It measures the raw power of the components and gives a score, with a higher value indicating better performance.

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER
+1%

AMD Radeon RX Vega 64

Games

1920×1080, Ultra

Game GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Radeon RX Vega 64
Anno 1800
Assassin’s Creed Odyssey
Battlefield V
Cyberpunk 2077
DOOM Eternal
Far Cry 5
Hitman 2
Hitman 3
Metro Exodus
Red Dead Redemption 2
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
The Witcher 3
Average 124. 60 fps 91.69 fps

2560×1440, Ultra

Game GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Radeon RX Vega 64
Anno 1800
Assassin’s Creed Odyssey
Assassin’s Creed Valhalla
Battlefield V
Cyberpunk 2077
DOOM Eternal
Far Cry 5
Hitman 2
Hitman 3
Metro Exodus
Red Dead Redemption 2
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
The Witcher 3
Average 93. 69 fps 69.65 fps

3840×2160, Ultra

Game GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Radeon RX Vega 64
Anno 1800
Assassin’s Creed Odyssey
Assassin’s Creed Valhalla
Battlefield V
Cyberpunk 2077
DOOM Eternal
Far Cry 5
Hitman 2
Hitman 3
Metro Exodus
Red Dead Redemption 2
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
Average 54. 58 fps 40.10fps

Key differences

Why is NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER better than AMD Radeon RX Vega 64?

Newer — Released 1 year later

Has 35% higher average FPS in games at 1080p — 124.60 FPS versus 91.69 FPS

Has 35% higher average FPS in games at 1440p — 93.69 Has 35% higher average FPS in games at 1440p — 93.69 69.65 FPS

Has 37% higher average FPS in games at 2160p — 54.58 FPS versus 40.10 FPS

Consumes 16% less power — 250W vs 295W

More modern manufacturing process — 12 nm vs 14 nm

Has 3% higher bandwidth — 495.9 GB/s vs 483.8 GB/s

Has 18% faster pixel fill rate — 116.2 GPixel/s vs 98.94 GPixel/s

Why is AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 better than NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER?

More advanced memory type — HBM2 vs. GDDR6

Has a slightly larger memory bus

Has a 14% faster texture fill rate — 395. 8 GTexel/s vs 348.5 GTexel/s

Has 1024 more shading units

Conclusion

Which is better GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER or Radeon RX Vega 64?

The GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER delivers 1% better performance, consumes up to 16% less energy and holds the same amount of memory. According to our research, GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER 3990X is more powerful than Radeon RX Vega 64.

Is GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER good today?

GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER has 8GB memory and shows an average of 93.69 FPS in 13 games at 1440p, making it an excellent choice for games in 2022.
This graphics card will give you a good experience in every game on reasonable graphics settings.

What AMD graphics cards is equivalent to GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER?

The Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling is AMD’s closest competitor to the GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER. It is 7% more powerful, uses 38% more energy, and holds the same amount of memory.

What NVIDIA graphics cards is equivalent to GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER?

The GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 10 GB is NVIDIA’s closest competitor to the GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER. It is 2% more powerful, uses the same amount of energy, and holds 2 GB less memory.

How does GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER perform compared to Radeon RX Vega 64 and other graphics cards?

Relative performance

Total performance

Bench performance

Compare NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q and AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q and AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid video cards by all known characteristics in the categories: General information, Specifications, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions, requirements, API support, Memory.
Analysis of video card performance by benchmarks: PassMark — G3D Mark, PassMark — G2D Mark, Geekbench — OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score.

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q

versus

AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid

Benefits

Reasons to choose NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q

  • Newer graphics card, release dates difference 2 year(s) 702 month(s) 9027 month(s) 9027 483.1 times bigger: 207.4 GTexel/s vs 429.3 GTexel / s
  • A newer manufacturing process for the video card makes it more powerful, but with lower power consumption: 12 nm vs 14 nm
  • 2.8 times lower power consumption: 80 Watt vs 225 Watt
  • About 9% more performance in 3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score benchmark: 8470 vs 7765
Release date 2 Apr 2020 vs 8 August 2017
Texturing speed 207. 4 GTexel/s vs 429.3 GTexel/s
Process 12 nm vs 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt vs 225 Watt
3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score 8470 vs 7765

Reasons to choose AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid

  • About 91% more core clock: 1406 MHz vs 735 MHz
  • 55% more core clock in Boost mode: 1677 MHz vs 1080 MHz
  • 33% more shader processors: 4096 vs 3072
  • Memory clock 37% more: 1890 MHz vs 1375 MHz (11000 MHz effective)

Core clock 1406 MHz vs 735 MHz
Boost 9 core clock0938

1677 MHz vs 1080 MHz
Number of shaders 4096 vs 3072
Memory frequency 1890 MHz vs 1375 MHz (11000 MHz effective)

Benchmark comparison

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid

3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score
GPU 1
GPU 2
Name NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid
PassMark — G3D Mark 14014
PassMark — G2D Mark 620
Geekbench — OpenCL 86977
GFXBench 4. 0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 20344
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) 8912
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) 3355
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 20344
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) 8912
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) 3355
3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score 8470 7765

Feature comparison

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid
Architecture Turing GCN 5. 0
Codename TU104B Vega 10
Issue date 2 Apr 2020 August 8, 2017
Place in the rating 62 66
Type Laptop Desktop
Boost Core Clock 1080 MHz 1677 MHz
Core frequency 735MHz 1406 MHz
Process 12nm 14nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 207. 4 GFLOPS (1:32)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 13.27TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 6.636TFLOPS
Number of shaders 3072 4096
Pixel fill rate 69.12 GPixel/s
Texturing speed 207.4 GTexel/s 429.3 GTexel/s
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 225 Watt
Number of transistors 13600 million
Floating point performance 13. 738 gflops
Video connectors No outputs 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Additional power connectors None 2x 8-pin
Width Dual slot
Length 267 mm
DirectX 12.1
OpenCL 1.2
OpenGL 4. 6
Shader Model 6.5
Vulcan
Maximum memory size 8GB 8GB
Memory bandwidth 352.0 GB/s 483.8 GB/s
Memory bus width 256bit 2048 Bit
Memory frequency 1375 MHz (11000 MHz effective) 1890 MHz
Memory type GDDR6 HBM2

$700 AMD Radeon VII Video Card Announcement RTX 2080 Competitor

AMD introduced the AMD Radeon VII graphics card, which is notable for the fact that it uses a graphics processor made using a 7 nm process technology.

AMD introduced the AMD Radeon VII graphics card, which is notable for the fact that it uses a graphics processor made using a 7 nm process technology. The graphics card is equipped with 60 compute units (3840 stream processors) and 16 GB of HBM2 memory with a bandwidth of 1 TB/s.

According to AMD claims, AMD Radeon VII provides 25% performance increase in Fortnite and 35% performance increase in Battlefield V compared to Radeon RX Vega 64. In Devil May Cry V at 4K resolution with maximum graphics settings, AMD Radeon VII provides performance from 70 to 120fps.

AMD claims AMD Radeon VII performance is comparable to Nvidia RTX 2080.

AMD Radeon VII will go on sale on February 7 this year. The recommended retail price of the video card is $700.

We have a lot of great news. Subscribe to Yandex.Zen, put likes!

2019-01-09 21:40:00

Mikhail Shkredov (Thunder)

What do you think, Gabe Newell? – PC version of The Division 2 will appear in the Epic Store, Uplay, but will not be released on Steam

The Division 2 9 PC system requirements and trailer0003

News

Publications

What to play on a smartphone. Lost Light, Tank Company, Wild Arena Survivors, Railbound, Iron Marines Invasion

Results

September 30 21:28

2

In this issue: Chinese developers released «their» Escape from Tarkov and World of Tanks, French — Fortnite, Uruguayan — StarCraft. Polish developers were more original and created a puzzle for all ages. In addition, Genshin Impact 3.1 expanded Sumeru’s area, Tower of Fantasy 2.0 introduced a cyberpunk city, and Ubisoft showed off new mobile games.

French robbery. Should Ubisoft games cost $70?

Articles

September 29 20:22

ten

The announcement of an important change in the pricing policy of the French company was a thin thread through the news portals and on the same day they forgot about it. The publisher did not focus on this at the September Ubisoft Forward 2022 and, it seems, tried to make as few players as possible learn about the rise in price. This is a brazen robbery, but is it worth worrying about?

Genshin goes for mushrooms. Overview of Genshin Impact 3.

0

Reviews

September 28 13:41

5

Genshin Impact is a revolutionary game, and HoYoverse can be compared to the old Blizzard, which determined the development of the gaming industry. Update 3.0 includes a new region, new game mechanics. Genshin Impact at its peak is the most popular adventure game in the world. But when getting acquainted with the update, the thought arose: “Is everything all right in the magical world of Teyvat?”. Alas, there are problems.

Walking city. The Wandering Village Review [Early Version]

Reviews

September 27 21:24

2

The Wandering Village is a cute game from Stray Fawn Studio, an indie team from Switzerland.