Amd vision a4 vs intel core i5: AMD A4-9120 vs Intel Core i5-10400H vs Intel Core i5-10200H

108 Comments

IntroductionCPU Performance & Power vs Pentium 2020MGPU Performance & Power vs. Intel HD GraphicsFinal Words

Looking at 3DMark’s Ice Storm test, the comparison between Intel’s 22nm HD Graphics in the Pentium 2020M and the Radeon HD 8830 in the A4-5000 is extremely close. In fact, across almost all of the 3DMark benchmarks we see the two perform very similarly. The lone exception being 3DMark 11 where the A4-5000 maintains a significant lead and even approaches Trinity in terms of performance (making it feel more like a fluke than the norm).

Turning to GFXBenchmark (formerly GL/DXBenchmark), we see performance tilt in favor of Kabini once again. The T-Rex HD test is extremely shader intensive. There’s about a 20% gap in raw shader performance between the 2-CU GCN implementation in Kabini and the 6 EU Gen7 graphics core in the Pentium 2020M, which maps almost perfectly to the performance delta we see in T-Rex HD. Now we see where the Pentium/Core i3 comparison comes from.

All of this is fine if we’re looking at theoretical GPU benchmarks but what about actual games? In our Kabini review Jarred found the A4-5000 to be incapable of playing modern titles at reasonable frame rates, but what about titles from a few years ago? To find out, I dusted off Oblivion (with the Shivering Isles expansion) and threw it on my Kabini, Brazos and IVB Pentium systems.

I configured all three systems the same way: 1366 x 768, with medium graphics quality presets. I even used our old Oblivion SI benchmark from 2007. The results seemed to mirror what we saw in 3DMark:

GPU Performance
	Oblivion — 1366 x 768 Medium	Diablo III — 1366 x 768 Low	Oblivion — Power Consumption
AMD E-350 (Radeon HD 6310)	20.1 fps	21.9 fps
AMD A4-5000 (Radeon HD 8330)	26.1 fps	25.8 fps	15. 2W
Intel Pentium 2020M (HD Graphics)	27.7 fps	20.3 fps	31.4W

Kabini is about 30% faster than Brazos in GPU performance, and almost identical to the Pentium 2020M. Intel has a 6% performance advantage here, but I’m wondering if that’s from the CPU and not the GPU (Oblivion tends to hit both pretty hard). At lower quality settings (and/or resolution) you can definitely get Kabini above 30 fps, but even here I’d say it’s playable. More importantly, it’s performance competitive with Intel’s HD graphics.

I was also curious to see how Diablo III ran on Kabini so I fired up an early save and ran through the Cemetery of the Forsaken recording average frame rate. On a more modern title, both Kabini and Brazos actually hold a performance advantage over the Pentium 2020M.

As far as power goes, Kabini delivers relatively similar performance at roughly half the power of the Pentium 2020M.

With any of these integrated GPUs, the gaming experience even on previous generation high-end titles isn’t going to be a walk in the park.

CPU Performance & Power vs Pentium 2020M
Final Words
IntroductionCPU Performance & Power vs Pentium 2020MGPU Performance & Power vs. Intel HD GraphicsFinal Words

PRINT THIS ARTICLE

HP Laptop AMD Dual-Core A4-9120C AMD RadeonR4 4GB 64GB HDD Chrome OS

Edition

IN

• IN
• US

Wed, Mar 01, 2023 | Updated 06.03PM IST

News

Tech NewsSocialMobilesPCsAppsGamingMore GadgetsTelecomFAQsAppliancesWearablesDevice Care

Compare

Compare Mobile PhonesCompare LaptopsCompare TabletsCompare CamerasCompare TelevisionsCompare Power banksCompare Smart watchesCompare Air conditionersCompare Washing machinesCompare RefrigeratorsCompare Fitness bandsCompare EpilatorsCompare HaircurlersCompare TrimmersCompare HairstraightenersCompare HairdryersCompare Bluetooth SpeakersCompare HeadphonesCompare Air PurifiersCompare Water PurifiersCompare IronsCompare FansCompare Air FryersCompare Air CoolersCompare Hand BlendersCompare Food ProcessorsCompare Room HeatersCompare Chimneys

Gadgets

Mobile PhonesTabletsLaptopsCamerasTelevisionsPower banksSmart watchesAir conditionersWashing machinesFitness bandsPersonal GroomingHome AppliancesKitchen AppliancesAudio

Slideshows

Reviews

GN Awards

More

VideosRechargeVisual StoriesDevice CareUSHow ToBrandsTop GadgetsFeaturedDeals

Top Searches

Tech News
• Laptops
• HP Chromebook 14-DB Laptop AMD Dual-Core A4-9120C AMD RadeonR4 4GB 64GB HDD Chrome OS Price In India

FacebookTwitterLinkedin

Explore More HP laptops

Gadgets

• HP-Chromebook-14-DB-Laptop-AMD-Dual-Core-A4-9120C-AMD-RadeonR4-4GB-64GB-HDD-Chrome-OS
• Lenovo-V14-82C40104IH-Laptop-Core-i5-10th-Gen4-GB1-TBDOS
• Lenovo-V15-AMD-Ryzen-3-3250U-133-inch-156-inch-HD-Laptop-4GB1TBAMD-Radeon-GraphicsGrey185Kg-82C70017IH-Window-10
• Asus-X540UA-GQ683T-Laptop-Core-i3-7th-Gen4-GB1-TBWindows-10
• HP-15s-du1052tu-15-Pentium-156-inch-FHD-Laptop-Pentium-Gold-6405U4GB1TBWin-10Jet-Black174kg

Overview

Specifications

User Review

View Photos (4)

Rate & Review

Compare

Related Laptops

Buy the HP Chromebook 14-DB Laptop AMD Dual-Core A4-9120C AMD RadeonR4 4GB 64GB HDD Chrome OS that comes with striking features and specifications. This ideal computing device is powered with a AMD Dual-Core A4-9120C with 1.6 GHz clock speed that lets you multitask without any lags or interruptions

You can work for extended working hours with the utmost convenience on this laptop as it comes with a sturdy, full-length, and ergonomically designed Full-size Island-Style Keyboard. Also, there are zero chances of battery overheating or battery swelling.

The dimensions of this laptop are 22.68 x 1.83 x 33.78 cm and it weighs around 1.5 Kg. Hence, you can carry this lightweight and compact laptop in your backtop.

But the HP Chromebook 14-DB Laptop AMD Dual-Core A4-9120C AMD RadeonR4 4GB 64GB HDD Chrome OS in India at Rs 36,089. Also, you get 1 Year warranty on the product from the manufacturer from the date of purchase.

Summary

storage64GB HDD

display14 Inches

processorAMD Dual-Core A4-9120C

performanceAMD Radeon R4

ram4GB

batteryLi-Ion

HP Chromebook 14-DB Laptop AMD Dual-Core A4-9120C AMD RadeonR4 4GB 64GB HDD Chrome OS Specifications

general information (8)

type	Chromebook
brand	HP
model	Chromebook 14-DB
os	Chrome OS
operating system type	64-bit
dimensions wxhxd	22. 68 x 1.83 x 33.78 cm
weight	1.5 Kg
colors	Black

storage (2)

display details (5)

performance (3)

memory (4)

battery (3)

networking (10)

secondary camrearfacing	No
bluetooth	Yes
bluetooth version	v4. 2
usb 20 slots	1
usb 30 slots	3
wireless lan	802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
hdmi	Yes
inbuilt microphone	Yes
webcam	Yes
speakers	Dual Speakers

ports (2)

peripherals (6)

others (2)

general (1)

!Disclaimer: Some of the information on the page is subject to change.

Be the First one to review

Rate & Review

Similar Products

Lenovo V14 (82C40104IH) Laptop (Core i5 10th Gen/4 GB/1 TB/DOS)

Lenovo V15 AMD Ryzen 3 3250U 13.3-inch 15.6-inch HD Laptop (4GB/1TB/AMD Radeon Graphics/Grey/1.85Kg),82C70017IH Window 10

Asus X540UA-GQ683T Laptop (Core i3 7th Gen/4 GB/1 TB/Windows 10)

HP 15s-du1052tu 15 Pentium 15.6-inch FHD Laptop (Pentium Gold 6405U/4GB/1TB/Win 10/Jet Black/1.74kg),

HP 14s-DQ3018TU (3Y0H5PA) Laptop Intel Pentium Quad Core N6000 Intel UHD 8GB 256GB SSD Windows 10

Recent Comparision

HP Chromebook 14-DB Laptop AMD Dual-Core A4-9120C AMD RadeonR4 4GB 64GB HDD Chrome OS vs Lenovo V15 AMD Ryzen 3 3250U 13.3-inch 15.6-inch HD Laptop

HP Chromebook 14-DB Laptop AMD Dual-Core A4-9120C AMD RadeonR4 4GB 64GB HDD Chrome OS vs Lenovo V14

HP SlideShows

Start Slideshow

Amazon Freedom sale: Top offers on printers from HP, Epson, Canon and others with up to 22% discount

Trending Articles

end of article

Trending Gadgets

Lenovo IdeaPad 5 82LN00A3IN Laptop AMD Ryzen 7 5700U AMD Radeon 16GB 512GB SSD Windows 10

HP Victus 16 Laptop AMD Ryzen 7 5800H Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 32GB 1TB SSD Windows 10

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 Laptop 11th gen Intel Core i9-11900H GeForce RTX 3070 48GB 2TB SSD Windows 10

Lenovo Ideapad S145 (81MV0096IN) Laptop (Core i5 8th Gen/8 GB/1 TB/Windows 10)

Dell Inspiron 15 3593 (C560510WIN9) Laptop (Core i5 10th Gen/8 GB/1 TB 256 GB SSD/Windows 10/2 GB)

Acer Swift X Laptop AMD Ryzen 7 5800U Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Ti 16GB 1TB SSD Windows 10

Asus ROG Strix G531GT-AL150T Laptop (Core i7 9th Gen/16 GB/1 TB SSD/Windows 10/4 GB)

Dell Inspiron 3501 15-inch FHD Laptop (11th Gen i5-1135G7/8GB/1TB HDD/256GB SSD/Win 10 + MS Office/2GB Graphics/Black)

HP Probook 440 G8 364C1PA Laptop Intel Core i5 11th Gen-1135G7 Intel UHD 8GB 512 GB SSD Windows 10 Home Basic

Dell Vostro 3500 Laptop 11th Gen Intel Core i5-1135G7 Integrated 8GB 512GB SSD Windows 10 Home Basic

More Trending Gadgets

HP News

Popular Gadgets

Lenovo IdeaPad 5 82LN00A3IN Laptop AMD Ryzen 7 5700U AMD Radeon 16GB 512GB SSD Windows 10

HP Victus 16 Laptop AMD Ryzen 7 5800H Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 32GB 1TB SSD Windows 10

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 Laptop 11th gen Intel Core i9-11900H GeForce RTX 3070 48GB 2TB SSD Windows 10

Lenovo Ideapad S145 (81MV0096IN) Laptop (Core i5 8th Gen/8 GB/1 TB/Windows 10)

Dell Inspiron 15 3593 (C560510WIN9) Laptop (Core i5 10th Gen/8 GB/1 TB 256 GB SSD/Windows 10/2 GB)

Acer Swift X Laptop AMD Ryzen 7 5800U Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Ti 16GB 1TB SSD Windows 10

Asus ROG Strix G531GT-AL150T Laptop (Core i7 9th Gen/16 GB/1 TB SSD/Windows 10/4 GB)

Dell Inspiron 3501 15-inch FHD Laptop (11th Gen i5-1135G7/8GB/1TB HDD/256GB SSD/Win 10 + MS Office/2GB Graphics/Black)

HP Probook 440 G8 364C1PA Laptop Intel Core i5 11th Gen-1135G7 Intel UHD 8GB 512 GB SSD Windows 10 Home Basic

Dell Vostro 3500 Laptop 11th Gen Intel Core i5-1135G7 Integrated 8GB 512GB SSD Windows 10 Home Basic

More Popular Gadgets

UP NEXT

Intel Core i5-2550k vs AMD A4-4000

• Main

&nbsp/&nbsp

• CPU Comparison

&nbsp/&nbsp

Overall rating

Issued
Q1/2012

Issued
Q2/2013

Overall rating

What is better to choose Intel Core i5-2550k or AMD A4-4000?

We have prepared a comparison to help you choose the best processor. Compare their characteristics and benchmark results.

Intel Core i5-2550k has a maximum frequency of 3.40 GHz. 4 cores. Power consumption 95 W. Released Q1/2012.

AMD A4-4000 has a maximum frequency of 3.00 GHz. 2 cores. Power consumption 65 W. Released Q2/2013.

Differences
Characteristics
Benchmarks (tests)
Reviews

Differences

Reasons to choose
Intel Core i5-2550k

Report a bug

Positions in benchmark results

General positions of Intel Core i5-2550k CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

no data

Reasons to choose
AMD A4-4000

Report a bug

Positions in benchmark results

General positions of AMD A4-4000 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

• Cinebench R15 (Single Core)

  951 place

• Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

  1018 place

• Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

  1155 place

• Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

  1275 place

• iGPU — FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

  1267 place

• Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)

  715 place

• Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)

  829 place

• Cinebench R11. 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

  585 place

• Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

  721 place

• Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

  1050 place

Characteristics

Technical data

Intel Core i5-2550k

AMD A4-4000

CPU group and family

Reference information on compared processors, series, generation and market segment.

CPU specifications

Basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base and turbo frequency, cache size. These parameters indirectly speak about the speed of the processor, the higher they are, the better.

• Frequency

  3.40 GHz 3.00 GHz

• CPU Cores

  4 2

• Turbo (1 Core)

  3. 80 GHz 3.20GHz

• Threads

  4 2

• Hypertrading

  No No

• Acceleration

  Yes No

• Kernel architecture

  normal normal

IGPU

Internal graphics does not affect CPU performance, performs the work of a graphics card in its absence or on mobile devices.

• Graphic processor

  no iGPU AMD Radeon HD 7480D

• GPU frequency

  0.72GHz

• GPU (Turbo)

  no turbo no turbo

• Processing units

  2

• Shaders

  128

• Max. GPU Memory

  — 2GB

• Max. displays

  2

• Generation

  4

• DirectX Version

  11

• Tech. process

  32nm

• Issue

  Q2/2012

Hardware codec support

Built-in codecs used to encode and decode content. Significantly speed up the work with the required operations.

RAM & PCI Specifications

Types, number of channels of RAM supported by AMD A4-4000 and Intel Core i5-2550k. Higher or lower memory frequencies may be supported depending on motherboards.

• Memory type

  DDR3-1333 DDR3-1333

• Maximum memory

  32GB

• ECC

  No No

• Memory channels

  2 2

• PCIe version

  2.0

• PCIe channels

  16

Encryption

• AES-NI

  Yes Yes

Power Consumption

Compare the TDP requirements of Intel Core i5-2550k and AMD A4-4000 for cooling system selection. The TDP value refers to thermal watts, not electrical watts.

• TDP (PL1)

  95W 65W

Technologies and extensions

Architecture, interfaces, instruction sets supported by Intel Core i5-2550k and Intel Core i5-2550k, virtualization technology and process technology.

• Instruction set (ISA)

  x86-64 (64 bit) x86-64 (64 bit)

• Virtualization

  VT-x, VT-x EPT AMD-V

• ISA Extensions

  SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, FMA3, FMA4

• Cash L3

  6.00MB 1.00MB

• Architecture

  Sandy Bridge S Richland (Piledriver)

• Tech. process

  32 nm 32 nm

• Socket

  LGA 1155 FM2

• Issue

  Q1/2012 Q2/2013

Benchmarks (tests)

CPUs performance tests

Based on the results of several benchmarks, you can more accurately assess the performance difference between the Intel Core i5-2550k and AMD A4-4000.

Compare synthetic benchmarks and choose the best processor!

Last comparisons

Intel Celeron 5205U

Intel Celeron J4125

AMD Ryzen 5 3500

Intel Xeon E5-2667 v4

Intel Celeron 5205U

Intel Core i5-7200U

Intel Celeron J4125

Intel Core i5-7200U

AMD Ryzen 3 4300G

AMD Ryzen 5 4500

Samsung Exynos 850

Raspberry Pi 4B (Broadcom BCM2711)

Samsung Exynos 880

Raspberry Pi 4B (Broadcom BCM2711)

Intel Core i7-12800H

AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H

Intel Celeron G6900T

Intel Core i3-8100T

AMD Epyc 72F3

Intel Xeon W-2125

Apple M2

Intel Core i7-7700K

AMD FX-6350

Intel Xeon E5-1650 v2

Intel Core i3-4170

Intel Core i3-L13G4

Intel Core i5-6400

Intel Core i7-3770K

Comparison AMD A4-1200 vs Intel Core i5-3470 which is better?

Home / processor / AMD A4-1200 VS Intel Core i5-3470

A4-1200

3%

Devicelist

VS

Intel Core 9000

31% 9000 9001% DVICEL We have compared the specifications of AMD A4-1200 and Intel Core i5-3470 and compiled a list of advantages and a comparison table for you. Find out which one to choose in 2023.

AMD A4-1200 Benefits

Power Demand (TDP)

4 W -73 W (-94.8%) better than vs 77W

Benefits of Intel Core i5-3470

Comparison winner

Core

4 2 (100%) better vs 2

threads

4 2 (100%) better than vs 2

Base frequency

3.2 GHz At 2.2 GHz (220%) better than vs 1 GHz

Process

22 nm -10 nm (-31.2%) better than vs 32 nm

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

5006 4300 (609. 1%) better than vs 706

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

17192 15944 (1277.6%) better than vs 1248

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

9721 for 9702 (51063.2%) better than vs 19

3DMark06 CPU

6179 5446 (743%) better than vs 733

General information
Type
For laptops	Desktop
Architecture code name
Temash	Ivy Bridge
Cores A large number of cores improves performance in multi-threaded applications. At the moment, increasing the number of processor cores is one of the priorities for increasing performance.
2	4 2 (100%) better than
Threads More threads help the cores process information more efficiently. Real performance will be noticeable in very specific tasks (video editing, databases).
2	4 2 (100%) better than
Base frequency
1 GHz	3.2 GHz At 2.2 GHz (220%) better than
Process
32 nm	22 nm -10 nm (-31.2%) better than
Chip size
246 mm2	132.8 mm2
Number of transistors
1 million	n/a
Maximum frequency Higher clock speed processors perform more calculations per second and thus provide better performance.
n/a	3.6 GHz
Support 64 bit
Max. number of processors per configuration
1	1
Socket
FT3	FCLGA1155
AMD-V
Series
AMD A-Series	Intel Core i5 (Desktop)
Release price
n/a	184 $
Value for money The sum of all the advantages of the device divided by its price. The more%, the better the quality per unit price in comparison with all analogues.
n/a	71.8%
Maximum core temperature
n/a	67 °C
vPro
TXT Intel Trusted Execution Technology for hardware-based malware protection. For each protected program, the processor allocates its own isolated section of RAM.
PCI Express revision
no data	3.0
Secure Key
Identity Protection
n/a	+
Quick Sync
n/a	+
FDI
n/a	+
Anti-Theft
n/a	+
Level 1 Cache The fastest level of cache that works directly with the core. The larger the cache, the better the performance.
128K (per core)	64 KB (per core)
L2 cache
512K (per core)	256K (per core)
Level 3 cache
n/a	6 MB (total)
Maximum case temperature (TCase)
90 °C	67 °C
Power Demand (TDP) Calculated thermal power shows the average heat dissipation in load operation, the larger the value, the more the requirements for cooling and power consumption increase.
4W -73 W (-94.8%) better than	77W
EDB
n/a	+
InTru 3D
n/a	+

		4666
Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
706	5006 4300 (609.1%) better than
Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core
1248	17192 15944 (1277.6%) better than
Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core
19	9721 9702 (51063.2%) better than
Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core
31	n/a
WinRAR 4.0
447	n/a
x264 encoding pass 1
11	n/a
x264 encoding pass 2
3	n/a
3DMark06 CPU
733	6179 5446 (743%) better than
Geekbench 2
1395	n/a
Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core
564	n/a
Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core
986	n/a
3DMark Fire Strike Physics
n/a	5660

Technology and additional instructions
Extended instructions
n/a	Intel® SSE4. 1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX
Turbo Boost
n/a	2.0
Idle States
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) Technology from Intel that reduces the processor frequency to its lowest setting to conserve power when the processor is idle.
Thermal Monitoring
Hyper-Threading Hardware technology from Intel that allows multiple threads to be processed on each processor core. For server applications, the performance improvement is up to 30%.
AES-NI Technology from Intel that speeds up the AES encryption process.
+	+
AVX The presence of AVX instructions improves performance in floating point and processor-intensive operations applications.

RAM options
		DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600
Allowable memory The maximum amount of RAM that can be used with this processor.
n/a	32 GB
Number of memory channels
n/a	2

Virtualization technologies
VT-x
EPT
VT-d Virtualization technology from Intel allows you to forward devices on the PCI bus to the guest operating system so that it can work with them using its standard tools.

Integrated graphics
Max GPU clock
n/a	1.