AMD A8-4500M vs Intel Core i7-3960X: What is the difference?
41points
AMD A8-4500M
44points
Intel Core i7-3960X
vs
64 facts in comparison
AMD A8-4500M
Intel Core i7-3960X
Why is AMD A8-4500M better than Intel Core i7-3960X?
- 2.5MB bigger L2 cache?
4MBvs1.5MB - 95W lower TDP?
35Wvs130W - Has integrated graphics?
- 0.75MB/core more L2 cache per core?
1MB/corevs0.25MB/core - 1 newer version of DirectX?
11.1vs10.1 - 1.2 newer version of OpenGL?
4.2vs3 - 62.4 more performance per watt?
100.0vs37.6 - Has F16C?
Why is Intel Core i7-3960X better than AMD A8-4500M?
- 2.61x faster CPU speed?
6 x 3.3GHzvs4 x 1.9GHz - 8 more CPU threads?
12vs4 - 5. 29x higher PassMark result?
8866vs1676 - 1.1GHz higher turbo clock speed?
3.9GHzvs2.8GHz - 192KB bigger L1 cache?
384KBvs192KB - Has an unlocked multiplier?
- 1.94x higher PassMark result (single)?
1815vs934 - 2 more memory channels?
4vs2
Which are the most popular comparisons?
AMD A8-4500M
vs
Intel Core i5-3210M
Intel Core i7-3960X
vs
Intel Core i7-2600K
AMD A8-4500M
vs
Intel Core i5-3380M
Intel Core i7-3960X
vs
Intel Celeron G1620
AMD A8-4500M
vs
AMD A10-4600M
Intel Core i7-3960X
vs
Intel Core i7-4960X
AMD A8-4500M
vs
AMD A8-5550M
Intel Core i7-3960X
vs
Intel Core i5-3470
AMD A8-4500M
vs
Intel Core i3-3120M
Intel Core i7-3960X
vs
Intel Core i7-3820
AMD A8-4500M
vs
Intel Core i3-3130M
Intel Core i7-3960X
vs
Intel Core i7-4790K
AMD A8-4500M
vs
Intel Core i3-3110M
Intel Core i7-3960X
vs
Intel Core i7-3770
AMD A8-4500M
vs
AMD A6-4400M
Intel Core i7-3960X
vs
Intel Core i7-9700
AMD A8-4500M
vs
Intel Core i5-4570
Intel Core i7-3960X
vs
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X
Price comparison
User reviews
Overall Rating
AMD A8-4500M
2 User reviews
AMD A8-4500M
10. 0/10
2 User reviews
Intel Core i7-3960X
0 User reviews
Intel Core i7-3960X
0.0/10
0 User reviews
Features
Value for money
9.5/10
2 votes
No reviews yet
Gaming
7.5/10
2 votes
No reviews yet
Performance
10.0/10
2 votes
No reviews yet
Reliability
10.0/10
2 votes
No reviews yet
Energy efficiency
9.0/10
2 votes
No reviews yet
Performance
1.CPU speed
4 x 1.9GHz
6 x 3.3GHz
The CPU speed indicates how many processing cycles per second can be executed by a CPU, considering all of its cores (processing units). It is calculated by adding the clock rates of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors employing different microarchitectures, of each group of cores.
2. CPU threads
More threads result in faster performance and better multitasking.
3.turbo clock speed
2.8GHz
3.9GHz
When the CPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased performance.
4.Has an unlocked multiplier
✖AMD A8-4500M
✔Intel Core i7-3960X
Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier which makes them easy to overclock, allowing you to gain increased performance in games and other apps.
5.L2 cache
A larger L2 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
6.L3 cache
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A8-4500M)
A larger L3 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
7.L1 cache
A larger L1 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
8. L2 core
1MB/core
0.25MB/core
More data can be stored in the L2 cache for access by each core of the CPU.
9.L3 core
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A8-4500M)
2.5MB/core
More data can be stored in the L3 cache for access by each core of the CPU.
Memory
1.RAM speed
1600MHz
1600MHz
It can support faster memory, which will give quicker system performance.
2.maximum memory bandwidth
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A8-4500M)
51.2GB/s
This is the maximum rate that data can be read from or stored into memory.
3.DDR memory version
DDR (Double Data Rate) memory is the most common type of RAM. Newer versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy-efficient.
4.memory channels
More memory channels increases the speed of data transfer between the memory and the CPU.
5.maximum memory amount
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A8-4500M)
The maximum amount of memory (RAM) supported.
6.bus transfer rate
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A8-4500M)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.
7.Supports ECC memory
✖AMD A8-4500M
✖Intel Core i7-3960X
Error-correcting code memory can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when is it essential to avoid corruption, such as scientific computing or when running a server.
8.eMMC version
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A8-4500M)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i7-3960X)
A higher version of eMMC allows faster memory interfaces, having a positive effect on the performance of a device. For example, when transferring files from your computer to the internal storage over USB.
9.bus speed
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A8-4500M)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i7-3960X)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.
Benchmarks
1.PassMark result
This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using multiple threads.
2.PassMark result (single)
This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using a single thread.
3.Geekbench 5 result (multi)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A8-4500M)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s multi-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)
4.Cinebench R20 (multi) result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A8-4500M)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i7-3960X)
Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s multi-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.
5.Cinebench R20 (single) result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A8-4500M)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i7-3960X)
Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s single-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.
6.Geekbench 5 result (single)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A8-4500M)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s single-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)
7.Blender (bmw27) result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A8-4500M)
426.4seconds
The Blender (bmw27) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.
8.Blender (classroom) result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A8-4500M)
1513.8seconds
The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.
9.performance per watt
This means the CPU is more efficient, giving a greater amount of performance for each watt of power used.
Features
1.uses multithreading
✖AMD A8-4500M
✔Intel Core i7-3960X
Multithreading technology (such as Intel’s Hyperthreading or AMD’s Simultaneous Multithreading) provides increased performance by splitting each of the processor’s physical cores into virtual cores, also known as threads. This way, each core can run two instruction streams at once.
2.Has AES
✔AMD A8-4500M
✔Intel Core i7-3960X
AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.
3.Has AVX
✔AMD A8-4500M
✔Intel Core i7-3960X
AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial apps, as well as improving Linux RAID software performance.
4.SSE version
SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing an image or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.
5.Has F16C
✔AMD A8-4500M
✖Intel Core i7-3960X
F16C is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.
6.bits executed at a time
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A8-4500M)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i7-3960X)
NEON provides acceleration for media processing, such as listening to MP3s.
7.Has MMX
✔AMD A8-4500M
✔Intel Core i7-3960X
MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.
8.Has TrustZone
✖AMD A8-4500M
✖Intel Core i7-3960X
A technology integrated into the processor to secure the device for use with features such as mobile payments and streaming video using digital rights management (DRM).
9.front-end width
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A8-4500M)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i7-3960X)
The CPU can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), meaning that the CPU performs better
Price comparison
Cancel
Which are the best CPUs?
AMD Ryzen 7 vs Intel Core i7: Which is Faster?
Give your gadgets a new life.
At Gadget Salvation, our mission is to contribute to the electronics reselling market as much as possible so that we extend the life of our gadgets and diminish waste. Our process is simple and seamless.
1
Answer a few questions and get an estimate.
2
Ship your gadget for free.
3
Get paid within two business days of our receiving your gadgets.
Sell Your Gadgets
In this AMD Ryzen 7 vs Intel Core i7 comparison review, we will start with the vital statistics. CPU benchmarks often offer an insight into how good a processor is when compared with another. But the thing with AMD Ryzen 7 and Intel Core i7 processor families is that they are almost equally matched in terms of performance. Therefore, this post goes into a few practical details on how these two processors work when you actually use them in real life.
The AMD Ryzen 7 has eight cores and so does the Intel Core i7. Both have eight cores with 16 threads. The Intel base speed is 3.6 GHz, whereas the Ryzen has 3.8 GHz. As for the Peak Boost (Dual/All Core), Intel caps at 5.0/4.6 GHz, whereas Ryzen reaches 4.7 GHz. And in terms of architecture, Intel uses Cypress Cover, while Ryzen is Zen 3. For the iGPU, Intel has the UHD Graphics 750 Xe 32EU, but the iGPU is not applicable for the Ryzen. For L3, Intel has16MB where Ryzen has 32MB.
As you can see, this doesn’t tell you a whole lot about how each CPU performs when installed on the computer. But looking at statistics, it appears that they should work about the same. Going forward, we will highlight a few differences, and how they are potentially are negligible. Fundamentally, it is no different to comparing different types of mineral water – i.e. they are far more similar than different.
How Does Each Processor Affect Battery Performance?
Power consumption on a laptop will often depend upon the following factors:
- What you are using the device for.
- Your operating system and software you run.
- Other hardware components.
Looking at it as a processor-only basis, here is how things stack up:
The Intel Core i7 is better by some margin if you undertake simple tasks like watching a movie on your device. It seems that Intel knows how to knock it down a gear when it comes to simpler less-processor-heavy tasks. The Intel Core i7 beats AMD Ryzen 7, and in fact, even the Ryzen 5 beats it on saving battery power.
However, if you were doing something processor-heavy, then the amount of battery power used will sort of even out. The Intel Core i7 will still have a slight edge, but not by much.
AMD Ryzen 7 vs Intel Core i7: Gaming Performance
When it comes to AMD Ryzen 7 vs Intel Core i7, it was a poor showing in terms of modern-gen gaming. Some newer Ryzen laptops are good for gaming, but as for these processors alone, they are not ideal for gaming without further hardware additions.
Neither of these processors is very good at running modern games. They will both perform adequately with the older sorts of games you find on websites like GOG. They are also especially good at running mobile/freemium games where high graphics are not required, but where lots of processing needs to be done.
A good example of this is Fallout Shelter. In this game, the graphics are fine using both of these processors. But as you progress through the game and gain nearly 200 dwellers, many CPUs start to struggle. In the case of the AMD Ryzen 7 and Intel Core i7, both did just fine, however. Added dwellers were only demanding more processing work and did not require higher graphics.
Considering modern-gen games, these processors are not up to scratch. It takes a lot of effort to get a game like Far Cry 5, for example, to run. And even though the AMD Ryzen 7 wins out slightly with all the settings turned down, it is not worth the effort trying to play modern games banking on the processor alone. Instead, your GPU is far more important. Especially if you are a laptop gamer, it would make sense to pick a model with NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 graphics, for example. RTX 3080 will give a great boost to either processor and optimize its gaming performance. And PC gamers should look into buying an NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 video card for their gaming rig.
Multi-Media Editing Performance Comparison
Somehow the Ryzen falls behind just slightly in this case. Core/thread count and clock speeds are big factors here. Both processors should theoretically be equal, but in practice, they seem to differ.
For example, if you were using programs like Inkscape, Handbrake, and even GIMP, then Intel seems to perform ever so slightly better every time. However, if you were rendering with a processor-heavy program like Blender.org, then the Ryzen seems to get the job done a little quicker.
There are no doubt some good reasons why this is the case, but the reasons don’t matter. What matters is how these processors perform with real-world use. In the cold light of day, it seems that these two processors are equal for all but a few minor differences. So choosing between the Intel Core i7 vs AMD Ryzen 7 would ultimately depend on the line of work you do and how you use your computer day-to-day.
In Conclusion
So is the Intel Core i7 processor faster than the AMD Ryzen 7? We cannot definitively say. For certain tasks, Ryzen 7 can outperform Intel and vice versa. But if you need a good basic computer, both will work out just fine or may even be overkill. And if you are not happy with your current device, maybe it is time to upgrade or trade up? Perhaps you should submit your used laptop for sale at Gadget Salvation? Just an idea to consider.
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X vs Intel Core i7-11700K: 8-Core Faceoff
(Image credit: Shutterstock, Future)
The Intel Core i7-11700K vs AMD Ryzen 7 5800X rivalry is a heated battle for supremacy at the ~$400 price point. These two chips jockey for positioning on our CPU Benchmark hierarchy to score a spot on the list of Best CPUs for Gaming, but they both come with their own eccentricities.
With the emergence of the Ryzen 5000 family, AMD shifted to premium pricing for its admittedly premium products. That’s a sound business decision, but it hasn’t been particularly popular with enthusiasts. AMD also left a glaring gap in its product stack that exacerbates the issue — there’s a massive $150 gulf between the six-core $299 Ryzen 5 5600X and the eight-core 16-thread $449 Ryzen 7 5800X. As a result, you either have to settle for a six-core or pay up big time to jump to an eight-core. Odder still, you can step up to the 12-core Ryzen 9 5900X for a mere $100 more.
To make matters worse, the global pandemic and unprecedented demand conspired to create chip shortages that led to unavailability and scalper pricing for the 5800X, making an otherwise stellar processor, well, not so stellar.
Luckily some of these issues have subsided over time, and the Ryzen 7 5800X is now widely available and often sells for $30 below its recommended pricing. At $420, the Ryzen 7 5800X is hard to beat if you need an eight-core chip, but there’s still room for a cheaper competitor.
Enter Intel’s Core i7-11700K. Intel’s new chip strides into the ring with eight cores and 16 threads, the Cypress Cove architecture that grants a 19% increase in IPC, a friendlier $399 price tag, and broad availability. However, Intel’s Rocket Lake family remains on the 14nm process, which means the 11700K consumes far more power than the 5800X, requiring a more expensive cooler and robust motherboard power circuitry to extract the best the silicon has to offer.
However, the 11700K can more than hold its own where the rubber meets the road in our benchmarks, setting up a pitched battle in the $400 price range.
We put the Core i7-11700K up against the Ryzen 7 5800X in a six-round faceoff to see which chip takes the crown in our gaming and application benchmarks, along with other key criteria like power consumption and pricing. Let’s see how the chips stack up.
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X vs Core i7-11700K Features and Specifications
Suggested Price | Cores / Threads | Base (GHz) | Peak Boost (Dual/All Core) | TDP | Architecture | iGPU | L3 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RKL-S Core i7-11700K (KF) | $399 (K) — $374 (KF) | 8 / 16 | 3.6 | 5.0 / 4.6 | 125W | Cypress Cove | UHD Graphics 750 Xe 32EU | 16MB |
Ryzen 7 5800X | $449 | 8 / 16 | 3. 8 | 4.7 | 105W | Zen 3 | N/A | 32MB (1×32 |
The eight-core 16-thread Ryzen 7 5800X comes with a 3.8 GHz base and 4.7 GHz boost clock paired with a beefy 32MB of L3 cache. AMD specs the chip with a 105W TDP, but bear in mind that it isn’t comparable to the 11700K’s TDP rating because both chipmakers use different measurement criteria.
Intel’s Core i7-11700K also arrives with eight cores and 16-threads, but Intel etches those cores on the 14nm process. That means this chip undoubtedly consumes far more power than its peak 125W rating, especially if you allow the motherboard to ignore the power limits (which most do by default). We’ll have power testing below to suss out the most efficient chip, but it’s a given that AMD’s Zen 3-powered 7nm chips hold the advantage over Intel’s competing chips.
Neither chip comes with a cooler and both support PCIe 4.0, though it is noteworthy that Intel’s chipset doesn’t support the speedier interface. Instead, devices connected to Intel’s chipset operate at PCIe 3.0 speeds. Unfortunately, that means you’ll only have support for one PCIe 4.0 m.2 SSD port on your motherboard. In contrast, AMD’s chipset is fully PCIe 4.0-enabled, providing you with more connectivity options for faster devices.
Both chips support two channels of DDR4-3200 memory, but Intel’s new Gear memory feature does involve a few tradeoffs. The Core i7-11700K supports DDR4-2933 in Gear 1 mode at stock settings, which provides the best latency and performance for most tasks, like gaming. On the other hand, you’ll have to operate the chip in Gear 2 mode for warrantied DDR4-3200 support. That results in performance penalties in some latency-sensitive apps, like gaming, which you can read about here.
For some users, the 11700K does have an insurmountable advantage over the Ryzen 7 5800X: The 11700K comes with the UHD Graphics 750 engine that comes armed with 32 EUs based on the Xe graphics engine, while all Ryzen 5000 processors come without integrated graphics. That means Intel wins by default if you don’t plan on using a discrete GPU.
Notably, you could also buy Intel’s i7-11700KF to save some cash. This chip comes with disabled integrated graphics, saving you $25 off the suggested price. That’s a decent discount if you plan on using a discrete graphics card and don’t need Intel’s Quick Sync functionality.
Winner: Tie
The AMD Ryzen 7 5800X vs Intel Core i7-11700K battle is close if boiled down to the spec sheet alone, so this category lands as a tie. Both chips come with the same number of cores and threads and ship without a cooler. AMD’s support for DDR4-3200 memory without the need for a separate gear mode is a plus, but the Core i7-11700K also has the advantage of integrated graphics, so it wins by default if you don’t plan to use a discrete GPU.
Conversely, you can go with the Core i7-11700KF and sacrifice the graphics to save some cash. Unfortunately, AMD’s high-end Ryzen 5000 chips don’t come with integrated graphics, though that will change in August when the Ryzen 5000 Cezanne APUs arrive.
Gaming Performance on Core i7-11700K vs Ryzen 7 5800X
Below you can see the geometric mean of our gaming tests at 1080p and 1440p, with each resolution split into its own chart to give us a decent overall view of the Core i7-11700K vs Ryzen 7 5800X battle.
As per usual, we’re testing with an Nvidia GeForce RTX 3090 to reduce GPU-imposed bottlenecks as much as possible, and differences between test subjects will shrink with lesser cards or higher resolutions. These are cumulative metrics, so individual wins vary on a per-title basis. We don’t include the synthetic benchmarks in our overall performance measurements (first four slides). We tested the stock Core i7-11700K with the power limits lifted, which is a warrantied configuration. You’ll find test configurations at the bottom of the article and more fine-grained setup details (including performance with enforced power limits) in our Intel Core i7-11700K review.
Image 1 of 18
(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)
(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware) (Image credit: Tom’s Hardware) (Image credit: Tom’s Hardware) (Image credit: Tom’s Hardware) (Image credit: Tom’s Hardware) (Image credit: Tom’s Hardware) (Image credit: Tom’s Hardware) (Image credit: Tom’s Hardware) (Image credit: Tom’s Hardware) (Image credit: Tom’s Hardware) (Image credit: Tom’s Hardware) (Image credit: Tom’s Hardware) (Image credit: Tom’s Hardware) (Image credit: Tom’s Hardware) (Image credit: Tom’s Hardware) (Image credit: Tom’s Hardware) (Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)Our faceoff covers the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X vs Core i7-11700K, but the Ryzen 5 5600X is the elephant in the room due to its exceptional gaming performance and lower price point. If you’re only interested in gaming, the Ryzen 5 5600X is hands-down the best chip for the job, provided you can find it near its recommended pricing. Keep that in mind as you flip through the test results.
At 1080p, the stock Ryzen 7 5800X is 5% faster in our selection of tests than the stock Core i7-10700K. After overclocking, the 5800X is 2.5% faster, but the differences here can vary based on the silicon lottery.
The deltas between the two chips shrink to the imperceptible range at 1440p: The stock Ryzen 7 5800X leads by 2%, but the overclocked 11700K takes a 2fps lead. Both of these results are largely meaningless — you would be hard-pressed to notice the difference during a normal gaming session.
The chips offer similar 99th percentile measurements at stock settings, but the 11700K opens up a 3.4% lead after overclocking. We didn’t detect any noticeable difference in smoothness between the two chips, and these measurements can vary based on overclockability (silicon lottery).
The extra $50 you pay for the 5800X buys you essentially the same gaming performance as the Ryzen 5 5600X, both at stock and overclocked settings at 1080p and 1440p, along with an additional two cores that help out if you’re after more than just gaming. Given the 5800X’s big markup over the 5600X, it remains a tough sell for the gaming-focused, though.
We can say the same thing about the Core i7-11700K — it offers solid performance in our gaming test suite, but you should look to less expensive alternatives, like the Ryzen 5 5600X or Core i5-11400, if gaming is your primary goal.
Winner: AMD
AMD wins this round. Be aware that the leader in the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X vs Intel Core i7-11700K gaming battle can swing wildly based on the title that you play. As you’ll see in the album above, Intel and AMD processors often clump together at the top or bottom of the chart for any given game, showing that different game code could favor either processor. However, when taken as a cumulative measure, the Ryzen 7 5800X comes out on top.
That said, unless you specifically need an extra two cores, we don’t recommend either of these chips if you’re building a system for gaming only; the six-core Ryzen 5 5600X is the hands-down champ at the $300 price point, while the Core i5-11400 is the uncontested value champ in the sub-$200 market.
Application Performance of AMD Ryzen 7 5800X vs Intel Core i7-11700K
Image 1 of 11
(Image credit: Future)
(Image credit: Future) (Image credit: Future) (Image credit: Future) (Image credit: Future) (Image credit: Future) (Image credit: Future) (Image credit: Future) (Image credit: Future) (Image credit: Future) (Image credit: Future)We can boil down productivity application performance into two broad categories: single- and multi-threaded. The first slide in the above album has a geometric mean of performance in several of our single-threaded tests. As with all cumulative measurements, use this as a general guide and be aware that performance will vary based on workload.
The stock Core i7-11700K is 1.5% faster than the Ryzen 7 5800X in our cumulative measure of lightly-threaded work. The Ryzen 5 5600X is a competitor here, but the Core i7-11700K is 5.7% faster. Tuning the Zen 3 silicon gives the Ryzen 7 5800X a slight advantage, but the Ryzen 5 5600X can’t match the 11700K in any configuration.
You would need to step up to the Core i9-11900K if you wanted a substantial/noticeable increase in single-threaded performance over the 5800X, 11700K, or 5600X. The 11900K comes with a much steeper price tag for what is arguably a small return. Rocket Lake’s higher single-thread performance in applications doesn’t seem to translate to increased gaming performance as much as we’ve seen in the past, and differences could be tough to spot in typical applications.
The Core i7-11700K trails the Ryzen 7 5800X in our LAME tests at stock settings, but the overclocked 11700K suffers an odd tendency to drop into its AVX offset during a few single-threaded tests, like the LAME and FLAC encoders. That causes the chip to actually run slower after overclocking.
Web browsers are the quintessential example of lightly-threaded work, and the Core i7-11700K is surprisingly strong in these tests — it even beats the Core i9-11900K in Speedometer. The 11700K sweeps the Ryzen competition, with the lone AMD win coming from the overclocked Ryzen 7 5800X in WebXPRT 3.
Image 1 of 23
(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)
(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware) (Image credit: Tom’s Hardware) (Image credit: Tom’s Hardware) (Image credit: Tom’s Hardware) (Image credit: Tom’s Hardware) (Image credit: Tom’s Hardware) (Image credit: Tom’s Hardware) (Image credit: Tom’s Hardware) (Image credit: Tom’s Hardware) (Image credit: Tom’s Hardware) (Image credit: Tom’s Hardware) (Image credit: Tom’s Hardware) (Image credit: Tom’s Hardware) (Image credit: Tom’s Hardware) (Image credit: Tom’s Hardware) (Image credit: Tom’s Hardware) (Image credit: Tom’s Hardware) (Image credit: Tom’s Hardware) (Image credit: Tom’s Hardware) (Image credit: Tom’s Hardware) (Image credit: Tom’s Hardware) (Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)The geometric mean of our threaded applications finds the Core i7-11700K offering a slight boost over the stock and overclocked Ryzen 7 5800X, but it accomplishes that feat in its stock configuration. The 11700K is 5.7% faster than the 5800X after overclocking, but we’d consider the two chips very closely matched at stock settings.
The Ryzen 5 5600X has two fewer cores, so it trails by quite a bit more — the 11700K is ~31% faster at stock settings and 22% faster after we overclock both chips.
The Core i7-11700K is competitive with the Ryzen 7 5800X, though as you can see in the slides, that does vary based on the type of application. The 5800X leads in a broader spate of threaded rendering applications, like Corona, Cinebench, and Blender. Overclocking the 11700K either significantly reduces the deltas in those applications or grants it the lead, as we see in V-Ray, two of the Blender renders, and Cinebench.
The Core i7-11700K and Ryzen 7 5800X tie in the HandBrake x264 workload at stock settings, but the 5800X is noticeably faster in the x265 test that has a heavier distribution of AVX instructions. The Core i7-11700K beats the Ryzen 7 5800X in the timed LLVM compilation workload by decent margins at both stock and overclocked settings. The Ryzen 7 5800X turns the tables in the NAMD test, a highly parallelized benchmark that serves as the gold standard for quantifying the performance of simulation code.
Winner: Intel
The Core i7-11700K comes with a slightly more forgiving price tag than the Ryzen 7 5800X and carves out a decent lead in lightly-threaded apps while maintaining a slight edge in our cumulative measure of threaded workloads. That gives the Core i7-11700K the win, but only because we measure by the absolute best performance available.
Looking through the full gamut of our tests shows that the best performer varies based on workload, and the differences between the two chips can be slight. As a result, you should examine benchmarks for your specific workload if you’re most concerned about performance in specific creativity and productivity applications.
Overclocking AMD Ryzen 7 5800X vs Intel Core i7-11700K
We have reached the land of diminishing returns for overclocking the highest-end chips from both AMD and Intel, largely because both companies are engaged in a dogfight for superiority. As a result, much of the overclocking frequency headroom is rolled into standard stock performance, leaving little room for tuners, making memory and fabric overclocking all the more important. However, those limits are typically the most restrictive with the highest-end chips, while mid-range and low-end silicon still have room for pushing the voltage and extracting a bit more performance. Just bear in mind that your mileage will vary.
Intel has long restricted overclocking to its pricey K-series models, while AMD freely allows overclocking with all SKUs on almost any platform, earning plenty of cachet with enthusiasts. Intel’s new paradigm of Gear 1 and Gear 2 modes does reduce the value of memory overclocking, which you can read more about here, but Intel’s chips still offer the highest attainable all-core frequencies. Of course, how that translates to performance can vary by application, and we do see a diminishing point of returns as we climb up the frequency/voltage curve. Additionally, you’ll need an exceptionally robust cooler to push the limits.
AMD’s Ryzen 5000 chips come with innovative boost technology that largely consumes most of the available frequency headroom, so there is precious little room for bleeding-edge all-core overclocks. As a result, all-core overclocking with AMD’s chips is lackluster; you’re often better off using its auto-overclocking Precision Boost Overdrive 2 (PBO2) feature that boosts multi-threaded performance. AMD also has plenty of Curve Optimization features that leverage undervolting to increase boost activity.
However, as we can see in our performance results, AMD’s Ryzen 7 5800X still has some room on the table for additional performance via automated overclocking, so you’ll get a solid return from the automated features when combined with a basic memory overclock.
Speaking of which, Ryzen 5000’s improved fabric overclocking, which allows you to tune in higher memory overclocks, is vastly improved over the prior-gen Ryzen models. We hit a 1900 MHz fabric speed on our chip, allowing us to run the memory in a 1:1 mode at a higher DDR4-3800 memory speed than the DDR4-3600 we could pull off with the 11700K with the same 1:1 ratio. Naturally, that could vary by chip.
It also isn’t uncommon to see enthusiasts hit DDR4-4000 in 1:1 mode with Ryzen 5000 processors. There’s no doubt that Intel’s new Gear 1 and 2 memory setup isn’t that refined — you can adjust the 5800X’s fabric ratio to expand the 1:1 window to higher frequencies, while Intel does not have a comparable adjustable parameter.
Winner: Tie
The Intel Core i7-11700K and Ryzen 7 5800X both come with unlocked multipliers and have more overclocking headroom than their flagship counterparts. There’s also still room for a sizeable performance boost from overclocking the core, fabric, and memory. Both platforms have their respective overclocking advantages and a suite of auto-overclocking and software utilities, meaning this contest will often boil down to personal preference.
Power Consumption, Efficiency, and Cooling of Intel Core i7-11700K vs Ryzen 7 5800X
Image 1 of 16
(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)
(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware) (Image credit: Tom’s Hardware) (Image credit: Tom’s Hardware) (Image credit: Tom’s Hardware) (Image credit: Tom’s Hardware) (Image credit: Tom’s Hardware) (Image credit: Tom’s Hardware) (Image credit: Tom’s Hardware) (Image credit: Tom’s Hardware) (Image credit: Tom’s Hardware) (Image credit: Tom’s Hardware) (Image credit: Tom’s Hardware) (Image credit: Tom’s Hardware) (Image credit: Tom’s Hardware) (Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)The winner of this category will be no surprise to enthusiasts familiar with the Intel vs AMD landscape. AMD tends to score an easy win here due to the benefits of its Zen 3 architecture paired with the 7nm process. On the other hand, Intel’s Rocket Lake comes with the Cypress Cove architecture (originally designed for 10nm) etched on the now-ancient 14nm process, equating to higher power consumption.
The Intel Core i7-11700K comes with the same 125W TDP rating as its predecessor, but that rating is a rough approximation of power consumption during long-duration workloads. To improve performance in shorter-term workloads, Intel increased the PL2 rating (boost) to 251W, a 27W increase over the previous-gen 10700K. As usual, Intel allows its motherboard partners to exceed those power limit recommendations and remain within warranty, so it isn’t uncommon to see Intel chips exceed those values during peak activity — even at stock settings. For example, we recorded a peak of 207W during extended workloads, well over the 125W rating.
Heat and power consumption are interrelated, so you’ll have to accommodate Intel’s increased power consumption with a robust cooler. The Core i7-11700K ran fine with our 280mm liquid cooler, and we recommend you budget for an equivalent or better cooler.
The Ryzen 7 5800X is downright green in comparison, reaching a maximum of 118W at stock settings. In fact, a quick look at the renders-per-day charts reveals that AMD’s Ryzen 7 5800X is in another league in terms of power efficiency — you get far more performance per watt consumed, resulting in lower power consumption and heat generation. Due to the lower power requirements, the Ryzen 7 5800X isn’t as demanding in terms of cooling, though you should plan for a 280mm liquid cooler or greater if you plan on overclocking.
Winner: AMD
AMD wins this round easily with lower power consumption, higher efficiency, and less thermal output. In stark contrast, Intel has turned the power up to the extreme to stay competitive with AMD’s 7nm Ryzen 5000 chips, and as a result, the Core i7-11700K pulls more power and generates more heat than the Ryzen 7 5800X.
Pricing and Value of Intel Core i7-11700K and AMD Ryzen 7 5800X
We’re in the midst of a global chip shortage, so pricing is volatile and can change hourly. As such, you’ll need to make sure to check current pricing for the most up-to-date information.
We don’t like the Ryzen 7 5800X’s suggested pricing — at launch, its $449 suggested price was $150 more than the six-core 5600X and only $100 less than the 12-core 5900X, meaning you could score a far better value by moving either up or down the Ryzen product stack. It also left the door open for competitors, not to mention the addition of a crushing shortage and scalper pricing that made the 5800X a tough sell.
Since then, things have changed a bit, though, and now we regularly see the Ryzen 7 5800X sell below its suggested pricing — you can often score the chip for $420.
Suggested Price | Current | Price Per Core | |
---|---|---|---|
Core i7-11700K | $400 to $409 | $389 to $419 | ~$48 |
Ryzen 7 5800X | $449 | $421 to $449 | ~$53 |
Core i7-11700KF | $374 to $384 | $429 to $459 | ~$54 |
That does a lot to assuage our pricing concerns, but the Core i7-11700K still lands with a lower $400 tray price. In fact, you can find it at retailers for ~$390, a solid deal for an eight-core chip.
However, while the 11700K’s lower retail price is a factor, we also have to take platform pricing into account. You’ll need a motherboard with robust power circuitry to take full advantage of the 11700K and attain the results you see in our tests. Given the current pricing deltas between Intel and AMD motherboards, that largely levels the playing field. You’ll also need to plan for a capable cooler to grapple with the 11700K’s prodigious power draw.
Finally, although it isn’t normally a huge concern for most buyers, platform upgradeability is an important aspect in the Core i7-11700K vs Ryzen 7 5800X battle. You can step up to 12- or 16-core Ryzen 5000 models in the future with 400- and 500-series motherboards, while the only option for a Rocket Lake upgrade consists of moving up to the 11900K, an overpriced piece of silicon that comes with the same eight cores as the 11700K.
Additionally, though AMD hasn’t confirmed that it would bring its new 3D V-Cache processors to existing platforms, the company has confirmed that Zen 3 Ryzen processors with 3D V-Cache will enter production later this year. These chips come with an additional 64MB of 7nm SRAM cache (called 3D V-Cache) stacked vertically atop the core complex die (CCD) to triple the L3 cache. This tech enables up to a whopping 192MB of L3 cache on a single Ryzen chip, delivering up to a 15% improvement in gaming.
AMD demoed a Ryzen 9 5900X prototype with 3D V-Cache bolted on, and it had the standard AM4-compatible design. All these things mean that it’s rational to think we’ll see chips with 3D V-Cache come to AM4 platforms, but that remains unconfirmed.
Winner: Tie
AMD’s Ryzen 7 5800X currently comes with a street price of $420. That’s $30 more than the lowest-priced Core i7-11700K we could find, but the difference in broader platform pricing largely levels the playing field. As a result of its higher power consumption, the Core i7-11700K requires motherboards with more robust power circuitry and a more powerful cooler than you’ll need for the Ryzen 7 5800X, meaning the chips are pretty closely matched in terms of overall platform costs.
AMD also has a clear-cut upgrade path to 12- or 16-core Ryzen 5000 models, while Intel’s only upgrade path consists of the 11900K with the same number of cores, and thus a comparatively small performance increase.
Intel Core i7-11700K | AMD Ryzen 7 5800X | |
---|---|---|
Features and Specifications | x | x |
Gaming | x | |
Application Performance | x | |
Overclocking | x | x |
Power Consumption, Efficiency, and Cooling | x | |
Pricing and Value Proposition | x | x |
Total | 4 | 5 |
Here’s the tale of the tape: The AMD Ryzen 7 5800X vs Intel Core i7-11700K battle boils down to a four-to-five victory in favor of the Ryzen 7 5800X, but that win comes with plenty of caveats.
Our faceoff considers these two chips as your only buying options, but given proper availability of alternatives, we typically recommend that you consider stepping up or down the product stack from either of these chips. For example, if you’re looking for a gaming-only rig, the Ryzen 5 5600X is the hands-down best chip (if you can find it near recommended pricing). Additionally, for the productivity-minded, the Ryzen 9 5900X offers a superior price-to-performance ratio over competing chips (including the Ryzen 7 5800X).
These aren’t normal times, though. We’re in the unforgiving grip of the global chip shortage, so the alternative AMD chips suffer from spotty supply and price gouging. Unfortunately, that means the chip that you actually can buy often wins by default.
The Ryzen 7 5800X and Core i7-11700K are both good all-rounder chips and have been widely available over the last month, often below suggested pricing. Assuming you can find it at reasonable pricing, the Ryzen 7 5800X is the better chip.
The Ryzen 7 5800X is slightly more expensive than the Core i7-11700K, but it’s worth it. The 5800X is faster in gaming and offers close-enough performance in the full span of our application test suite. Additionally, you’ll also benefit from the advantages of the Ryzen 7 5800X’s lower power consumption, like the ability to extract the full performance of the chip from less expensive motherboards. Not to mention that its lower power consumption results in a cooler and quieter system.
The Ryzen 7 5800X also drops into the same AM4 sockets that support the 12-core Ryzen 9 5900X and 16-core Ryzen 9 5950X, leaving room for a future upgrade. There’s a chance that current-gen AMD motherboards could support future AMD 3D V-Cache chips, but that shouldn’t influence your purchasing decision unless AMD makes it official.
Intel’s 500-series motherboards leave your only upgrade option as the eight-core Core i9-11900K that comes with the same eight cores as the 11700K. That isn’t an attractive option, as you’ll pay much more cash for a slim performance upgrade. But, as usual, Intel is the only option if you need an eight-core chip with integrated graphics. AMD looks to correct that issue with the Ryzen 7 5700G ‘Cezanne’ APUs that will come to market in August.
Overall, the Ryzen 7 5800X provides the best blend of overall platform costs, performance, and power consumption, winning the Core i7-11700K vs Ryzen 7 5800X battle.
Today’s best AMD Ryzen 7 5800X and Intel Core i7-11700K deals
Low Stock
Reduced Price
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X
$449.99
$328.99
View
See all prices
Reduced Price
Intel Core i7-11700K
$419.99
View
See all prices
Intel Socket 1200 (Z590) | Core i9-11900K, Core i5-11600K, Core i7-11700KCore i5-10600K, Core i7-10700K, Core i9-10850K |
ASUS Maximus XIII Hero | |
2x 8GB Trident Z Royal DDR4-3600 — 10th-Gen: Stock: DDR4-2933, OC: DDR4-4000, 11th-Gen varies, outlined above (Gear 1) | |
AMD Socket AM4 (X570) | AMD Ryzen 9 5900X, Ryzen 7 5800X, Ryzen 5 5600X |
MSI MEG X570 Godlike | |
2x 8GB Trident Z Royal DDR4-3600 — Stock: DDR4-3200, OC: DDR4-4000, DDR4-3600 | |
All Systems | Gigabyte GeForce RTX 3090 Eagle — Gaming and ProViz applications |
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Ti FE — Application tests | |
2TB Intel DC4510 SSD | |
EVGA Supernova 1600 T2, 1600W | |
Open Benchtable | |
Windows 10 Pro version 2004 (build 19041. 450) | |
Cooling | Corsair h215i, Custom loop |
Paul Alcorn is the Deputy Managing Editor for Tom’s Hardware US. He writes news and reviews on CPUs, storage and enterprise hardware.
Topics
CPUs
AMD Ryzen 7 vs Intel Core i7: Which Is The Better Flagship CPU
AMD Ryzen 7 vs Intel Core i7: Which Is The Better Flagship CPU | Cashify Laptops Blog
Select City
Sell Phone
Sell Gadgets
Find New Gadget
Recycle
Cashify Store
Share:
Intel Core i7 vs AMD Ryzen 7 is the battle currently going on since Intel announced its latest Alder Lake line of CPUs. Both the CPUs have very comparable specs and performance, so we have put both of them side by side to see which one is the ultimate winner.
…Read More…Read Less
By Akhil Taneja |
Updated: 23rd Jul 2022 12:56 IST
Buying Guide
Laptop
Write a Comment!
Share:
Table Of Contents
Highlights of the Story
- Intel Core i7-12700K and AMD Ryzen 7 5800X are probably the two best processors available in the market right now and they are very popular among gamers and content creators for their performance.
- But as both these CPUs offer so comparable performance it is tough to choose just the one based only on specifications
- So we have compared both these processors on various parameters so you can choose one that best fits your budget and needs.
These two latest CPUs from Intel and AMD are some of the best processors you can currently buy right now. Not only for your day-to-day multitasking but these two CPUs are great choices for gaming, video rendering, 3-D modelling and any task that requires extensive computing power. In the end, it is not only about how good they are but also about your requirements and what is your budget.
Both the processors, AMD Ryzen 7 and Intel Core i7 are flagship top of the line CPUs. And these are rated to deliver best in class performance and can handle any tasks that we throw at them. Although these two are somewhat in the higher price range and are mainly for gamers, graphic designers, video editors and for users who require excellent performance.
AMD Ryzen 7 vs Intel Core i7: Which Is The Better Flagship CPU
The thing with Intel Core i7 and AMD Ryzen 7 is that they are almost equally powerful in terms of performance. Here we will make it easier for you to device the best pick in terms of practical use and how they will fit you better in actual real-life use.
AMD Ryzen 7 vs Intel Core i7: Specifications
Specs | Ryzen 7 (5800X3D) | Core i7 (12700k) |
Cores | 8 | 12 (8P + 4E) |
Threads | 16 | 20 |
Base Clock | 3.4GHz | 3.60GHz (P-core)2.70GHz (E-core) |
Max Boost Clock | 4.5GHz | 4.90GHz (P-core)3.80GHz (E-core) |
L3 Cache | 96MB | 25MB |
Default TDP | 105W | 125W |
Unlocked(for overclocking) | NO | YES |
CPU socket | AMD AM4 | LGA 1700 |
AMD took the crown in terms of performance from Intel for a while since they launched their Ryzen 5 series of processors. But with its latest 12th Gen Core i7 processors Intel has brought the battle back to AMD, which is a win-win situation for all PC enthusiasts. This time Intel has more or less decided to copy the design of its CPU cores from Apple and AMD. The “Alder Lake” generation of chips has a hybrid core design that mixes multi-threaded Performance cores and single-threaded efficiency cores into the same chip.
In this scenario, the performance cores take all the heavier workload that requires to use of multiple threads while the efficiency cores handle all the lightweight tasks. In the table above we have provided, you can see that the Intel Core i7 offers a total of 12 cores from which eight cores are performance cores while the four cores are efficiency cores. On the other hand, the Ryzen 7 chip has a total of 8 cores without any hybrid design.
Despite what Intel claims with its Intel 7 series they are still using the 10nm manufacturing process. While all the latest processors from AMD including the Ryzen 7 5800X are made from the 7nm process. The Intel i7-12700K runs at 125W TDP while the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X runs at a lower 105W TDP. Both the processors can be overclocked for maximum performance. While only the Intel i7 series comes with integrated graphics, if you truly are looking for the best performance from these chips you might be better off pairing them with the best graphics cards like Nvidia or AMD.
Also read: Intel Processor: A Complete Buying Guide For 2022
AMD Ryzen 7 vs Intel Core i7: Performance
CPU | Intel Core-i7 12700K | AMD Ryzen 7 5800X |
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core) | 757 | 624 |
Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core) | 8750 | 11847 |
Passmark CPU (Single-Core) | 4039 | 3487 |
Passmark CPU (Multi-Core) | 33977 | 28379 |
Geekbench 5 (Single-Core) | 1872 | 1619 |
Geekbench 5 (Multi-Core) | 14992 | 9732 |
Obviously, both these CPUs are the latest offerings from Intel and AMD so they will offer very impressive performance in both gaming as well as other graphic intensive tasks such as content creation. Both the processors have solid specs on the paper. The Ryzen 7 with its octa-core configuration offers a blazing fast clock boost of 3.80GHz while the Intel i7 12700K offers a slightly lower base clock speed of 3.6GHz. When overclocked both the performance cores of Intel i7 can reach a maximum clock speed of 4.7GHz. The same is what AMD offers when the Ryzen 7 5800X is overclocked. Also, there is another added advantage of the Intel i7 12700K is that it supports Turbo Boost Max 3.0 that hits 5.0GHz in certain single-threaded tasks.
When it comes to benchmarks the scales tip in favour of Core i7-12700K because of its raw numbers. Both the CPUs perform extremely well in terms of benchmarks but it is the Intel i7 that beats AMD Ryzen 7 5800X by a margin of up to 15-20% better performance. This should not come as a shock because in many of the instances only the Core i5-12600K was enough to match the general performance of Ryzen 7 5800X.
For Intel, counting from their latest new hybrid architecture and the new intelligent Thread Director applications, there are a lot of things that work in favour of Core i7 12700k to yield this solid performance. As both the CPUs support overclocking you can obviously get much more from just the benchmark numbers. But in overall performance, Intel is still the favourite pick in comparison between these two.
AMD Ryzen 7 vs Intel Core i7: Gaming Performance
Due to the raw power of Core i7-12700k, it offers a much better gaming performance than Ryzen 7 5800X. With the latest hybrid core design where the CPU can prioritize tasks to P-core and E-core, it can deliver up to 10% better performance uptick. While the difference between DDR4 and DDR5 is significantly low, at this point for DDR5 we are seeing some impressive performance from Core i7-12700K. The more impressive performance in terms of gaming from Core i7-12700K is that it comes very close to what Core i9-12900K offers. It is very impressive since Core i9 processors cost significantly higher. But talking about the 12900K the performance of both is more comparable in terms of P-core since E-core for Core i9 handles background tasks in a much better way.
Also, the Intel Core i7-12700K comes with integrated graphics inside which is the Intel UHD 770. The integrated GPU provides a base clock of 300MHz and a boost clock of 1500MHz. So if you do not have a discrete GPU then compared to AMD, the best performance you’ll get from Intel.
Compared to AMD chips the Intel chips also show a significant improvement in power consumption. This is largely due to the new and more efficient architecture that Intel has introduced with the Alder Lake series. It significantly reduces power consumption and improves efficiency for intel core i7 processors. But then also compared to its Ryzen counterparts the processors still draw more power.
The AMD Ryzen chips have shown a drastic improvement in terms of power efficiency and they are still ahead of any processor in the market in this department. Arguably the Core i7-12700K is significantly better in terms of CPU performance but you will definitely need a processor that is much cooler in terms of heat dissipation. But it is important to point out that the new 12th gen Intel Core i7 processors are more power-efficient than any of the other processors from Intel from the previous generation.
Below we have the gaming benchmarks for both these processors:
Far Cry 6 (1080p, Ultra, RT Ultra, DLSS Quality, DirectX 12) | Average | Minimum |
Intel Core i7-12700K (12C / 20T) | 141 | 105 |
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X (8C / 16T) | 129 | 97 |
Intel Core i7-12700K (Overclocked) | 140 | 108 |
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X (Overclocked) | 127 | 96 |
Watch Dogs: Legion (1080p, Ultra, RT Ultra, DLSS Quality, DirectX 12) | Average | Minimum |
Intel Core i7-12700K (12C / 20T) | 97 | 80 |
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X (8C / 16T) | 73 | 91 |
Intel Core i7-12700K (Overclocked) | 95 | 78 |
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X (Overclocked) | 92 | 74 |
Dirt 5 (1080p, Ultra, RT Ultra, DLSS Quality, DirectX 12) | Average | Minimum |
Intel Core i7-12700K (12C / 20T) | 108 | 93 |
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X (8C / 16T) | 106 | 92 |
Also read: 6 Best Cheap Gaming Laptops to Buy in India April 2022
AMD Ryzen 7 vs Intel Core i7: Platform and Compatibility
Intel Core i7-12700K supports DDR5 memory modules and the PCIe 5. 0 standard. The Ryzen 7 5800X doesn’t support DDR5 but only DDR4 and PCIe 4.0 standards. While this obviously puts Intel ahead and makes it better for the future, none of its advantages offers better outcomes in the immediate future. DDR5 is of no use right now because mainly the new DDR5 kits are very expensive and hard to get your hands on. Also according to the current market DDR5 needs more time to mature as currently, they don’t offer much significant performance compared to DDR4 memory standard.
Also Read: DDR5 RAM Explained? Should You Upgrade?
The same issue is with the PCIe 5.0 standard, until more hardware compatible with it doesn’t show up on the market you can’t take full advantage of Core i7-12700K. Currently, there is negligible hardware in the market that supports PCIe 5.0 so it doesn’t make sense to jump ships from AMD to Intel at the moment. That being said it is better to future-proof your system if your budget allows you to do so. In the case of AMD Ryzen 7, if you want support for DDR5 and PCIe 5. 0 you might have to wait at least a year until AMD releases its new line of AM5 platforms.
Similar to what we mentioned in our previous AMD Ryzen 3 vs Intel Core i3 articles, if you want to go with the latest Intel CPUs and build your setup then it might get very costly for you. But with AMD it is a different story. If you choose AMD Ryzen 7 CPUs you can use any of the existing motherboards available in the market but with Intel, you will have to buy the new LGA 1700 motherboards. This is especially because of the newly added DDR5 and PCIe 5.0 support. Also, you will have to spend more money to get that DDR5 memory and a new LGA 1700 CPU cooler for 12700K. If you are already a user of AMD then upgrading for you might be very easy and inexpensive. But overall it all boils down to your personal preferences and choosing performance over budget.
Also read: 5 Best MSI Laptop For Gamers And Professionals April 2022
AMD Ryzen 7 vs Intel Core i7: Price
If you know the price of previous-gen 11700K processors then you’ll be happy to know that the new Core i7-12700K has the same price tag of Rs. 41,000. While the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X is priced at around Rs. 32,000 and is readily available and is even cheaper compared to Intel. This makes Ryzen a better overall pick when it comes to pricing. Also, neither of the processors comes bundled with a cooler so you will have to buy one if you don’t already have one. If you are planning to overclock your CPUs then the beefier the cooler the better results you’ll get. Moreover, both these CPUs are readily available in the market so you don’t need to worry about either of them running out of stock.
Final Verdict
It’s still too soon to say how good Intel Core i7-12700K will turn out compared to AMD Ryzen 7 5800X. But one thing is definitely clear: building a custom PC with Intel will definitely cost more than AMD. But still buying Intel will set you up for many years in the future. As more hardware comes up in the market that supports DDR5 and PCIe 5.0 your system will ultimately provide you with better performance.
The Ryzen 7 5800X is also a good option to pick up as compared to the Alder Lake series it consumes way less power. Also, it won’t set you back a lot in terms of money when you are building up your system. So it is worth buying the Ryzen 7 5800X if you don’t want to pay a huge cost to build your gaming rig.
Akhil Taneja
Explore More >
I am an Android Enthusiast and a Ninja at content creation. I love writing anything about technology and pro at reviewing smartphones. Big time expert in multiple facets of content generation
Previous
How To Clean Up Mac And Free Up Some Extra Storage?
7 Best Free Mac Apps Every Mac Owner Should Have In 2022
Comments
Featured Videos
-
iQOO 9T Vs OnePlus 9RT Full Comparison: Which One To Buy?
We will discuss the iQOO 9T Vs OnePlus 9RT comparison in the article. Both phones come with the same price tag. In addition, both of these phones come with impressive specs and features. However, there exist some significant differences too. To know these differences, let’s explore the article and know which one to choose among the iQOO 9T &…
27th Sep 2022
-
Vivo V25 Pro Vs Oppo Reno8 FAQs Comparison
Today, we’ll talk about the Vivo V25 Pro Vs Oppo Reno8 and discuss some frequently asked questions. Both of these phones are excellent performers as well as competitors in the range of Rs 30,000 to 40,000. Moreover, both phones are camera-centric and have the same processor. However, the price difference between the two is around Rs 10,000. Let’s explore…
26th Sep 2022
-
How To Buy Apple iPhone 12 At 29,999 in India?
Are you planning to buy Apple iPhone 12 in India on Amazon and Flipkart Sale? Then, you should read this article to learn the best deals on how to buy Apple iPhone 12. It’s September 2022, and it’s the best time to buy Apple iPhone 12 in India. Furthermore, the sale on both platforms will…
22nd Sep 2022
-
How To Buy iPhone 13 At 34,999 In India?
Are you looking forward to buy Apple iPhone 13 this time of year as well, like us? Yes, everyone in India is delighted, but not because of the holidays or the fact that they get time off from work. But because the Amazon Great India Festival Sale and the Flipkart Big Billion Days sale will…
22nd Sep 2022
-
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE Vs OnePlus 9RT FAQs Comparison
We’ll talk about the Samsung Galaxy S21 FE Vs OnePlus 9RT, which are competitors in this smartphone category from Samsung and OnePlus, respectively. Moreover, both of these phones were released in 2022, and although they have a few minor changes. However, they target a similar audience. In this post, we’ll compare the Samsung Galaxy S21 FE and…
22nd Sep 2022
Latest Reviews
View All
-
Samsung Galaxy Book 2 Pro Review: Power-Packed With Performance
23rd May 2022
-
Acer Predator Helios 300 Review: Most Recommended Gaming Laptop at Solid Price
13th May 2022
-
Asus Zenbook 14 Flip Review: Classy And Powerful But Priced High
12th May 2022
-
HP Pavilion 15 Review: Mid-Range Laptop with Great Performance
6th May 2022
-
HP Victus 16 Review – A Valuable Gaming Choice
22nd Apr 2022
Best Recharge Plans
All Jio Prepaid Recharge Plans for October 2022
All BSNL Prepaid Recharge Plans For October 2022
All Vi Prepaid Recharge Plans List for October 2022
All Jio Postpaid Recharge Plans
All BSNL Postpaid Recharge Plans Online
You May Also Read
Micromax Mobile Price List
Micromax is one of the oldest Indian smartphone brands which is now struggling with gloomy sales, mostly due to a lack of modern features and poor marketing. However, the brand does offer a decent price to performance ratio along with decent internals and acceptable modern hardware. Micromax smartphone line-up is definitely vast with the company…
Our Picks
View All
Best Ubon Bluetooth Speakers In India October 2022
1st Oct 2022
Best Philips Bluetooth Speakers In India October 2022
1st Oct 2022
5 Best Sharp Air Purifiers In India October 2022
1st Oct 2022
5 Best Air Purifiers Under 10000 In India October 2022
30th Sep 2022
How To Use Instagram’s Newest Feature – Instagram Notes
30th Sep 2022
Recent News
View All
Vivo Y73t Debuts In China , Will Be Available Soon In Global Markets Too
30th Sep 2022
OnePlus 11R Unofficially Leaked Online, Debut Still Unknown
30th Sep 2022
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Leaks Before Debut
30th Sep 2022
Oppo A77s and Oppo A17 Now In Physical Stores
30th Sep 2022
Vi Collaborates With OnePlus To Make 5G More Accessible
29th Sep 2022
New Launches
Dell Inspiron 15 3515 (D560710WIN9S) (AMD Dual Core Ryzen 3/8 GB/1 TB/Windows 11)
Starting from:
₹40,880
HP Pavilion x360 14-dy1010TU (533U0PA) (Core i5 11th Gen/16 GB/512 GB SSD/Windows 11)
Starting from:
₹73,990
Fujitsu UH-X 4ZR1F38024 (Core i7 11th Gen/16 GB/512 GB SSD/Windows 11)
Starting from:
₹83,590
Xiaomi Notebook Pro 120G (Core i5 12th Gen/16 GB/512 GB SSD/Windows 11)
Starting from:
₹74,990
Lenovo Thinkpad T14 (20W0S0TD00) (Core i7 11th Gen/32 GB/512 GB SSD/Windows 10)
Starting from:
₹1,59,890
Xiaomi Notebook Pro 120 (Core i5 12th Gen/16 GB/512 GB SSD/Windows 11)
Starting from:
₹78,999
Nokia PureBook Pro 15. 6 (Core i3 12th Gen/8 GB/512 GB SSD/Windows 11)
Lenovo ThinkBook 13s Gen 2 (20V9A036IH) (Core i7 11th Gen/16 GB/512 GB SSD/DOS)
Starting from:
₹95,990
Acer Swift 3 OLED (NX.KAVSI.002) (Core i5 12th Gen/16 GB/512 GB SSD/Windows 11)
Asus VivoBook 14 X415JA-BV302WS (Core i3 10th Gen/8 GB/1 TB/Windows 11)
Starting from:
₹29,990
Intel Core i7-12700K vs AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D: Which one to buy?
AMD recently announced the launch date and price for its new Ryzen 7 5800X3D CPU, alongside a half-dozen new processors. The Ryzen 7 5800X3D is a top-end chip, which according to AMD, is now the “world’s best gaming processor”. In this article, we’re going to take a look at the Intel Core i7-12700K vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D comparison, to find out which one’s better to buy for your new gaming PC build.
Navigate this article:
- Specifications
- Performance Difference
- No overclocking support for 5800X3D
- Pricing & Availability
- Which one should you buy?
Specifications
Before we begin the comparison, here’s a quick look at the specifications table to see what each CPU brings to the table:
Specification | Intel Core i7-12700K | AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D |
---|---|---|
CPU Socket | LGA 1700 | AMD AM4 |
Cores | 12 (8P + 4E) | 8 |
Threads | 20 | 16 |
Lithography | Intel 7 (10nm) | TSMC 7nm FinFET |
Base Frequency | 3. 60GHz (P-core) | 2.70GHz (E-core) | 3.4GHz |
Boost Frequency | 4.90GHz (P-core) | 3.80GHz (E-core) | Up to 4.5GHz |
Unlocked for overclocking? | Yes | No |
L3 Cache | 25MB | 96MB |
Default TDP | 125W | 105W |
Max. Operating Temperature (Tjmax) | 100°C | 90°C |
Memory Support | DDR4 3200MT/s | DDR5-4800MT/s Up to 128GB |
DDR4 up to 3200MHz Up to 128GB |
Integrated Graphics | Intel UHD 770 | NA |
Performance Difference
Both the Ryzen 7 5800X3D and the Intel Core i7-12700K are relatively new CPUs. They both are fully kitted and are perfect options to consider for a high-end gaming rig. And as you can see, both the processors are a lot similar in terms of the specifications too. The Intel Core i7-12700K features a hybrid core architecture and has eight performance cores (P-cores) and four efficiency cores (E-cores). The Ryzen 7 5800X3D, on the other hand, has eight cores and 16 threads. There’s no denying that both CPUs will offer impressive performance in both gaming as well as content creation workloads. These are two high-end CPUs going head-to-head against each other with a solid set of specs.
The Core i7-s performance cores have a base frequency of 3.60GHz, whereas the Ryzen 7’s standard octa-core configuration offers 3.8GHz as the base frequency. When boosted, the Core i7’s 12700K’s P-cores can hit a max turbo frequency of 4.7GHz, while the Ryzen 7 5800X3D can boost up to 4.5GHz. The core frequencies are slightly slower on the new Ryzen chips, likely because of the thermal concerns. We talked about this in our Ryzen 7 5800X3D vs Intel Core i7-12700 comparison, so be sure to check it out too.
One of the main advantages of the new Ryzen chip is the additional 3D V-cache memory. As you can see, the Intel Core i7-12700K only has 25MB of L3 cache but the new Ryzen chip fires back with as many as 96MB. This is going to allow the Ryzen 7 5800X3D to perform significantly better in gaming and other similarly threaded tasks. According to AMD’s internal testing, it looks like the new Ryzen 7 5800X3D delivers the same level of performance as the Intel Core i9-12900K. We haven’t had a chance to test the new Ryzen chip yet, but here’s a quick look at some performance comparison figures shared by AMD:
No overclocking support for 5800X3D
It’s official! The Ryzen 7 5800X3D doesn’t support overclocking. This is a bummer, especially considering the fact that the 5800X3D is a high-performance chip. According to AMD, they’re still figuring out how to fine-tune the packaging for its V-cache CPUs. The Ryzen 7 5800X3D being the first one of its kind, they decided to voltage lock it at 1.35V. Fabric and memory overclocking are still enabled though, which means enthusiasts will still be able to tweak some settings. We hope this won’t be the fate of future V-cache CPUs, and AMD manages to figure out a way to tune these new chips. We’ll have more to talk about this when the new Ryzen 7000 series processor enters the market.
The Intel Core i7-12700K, on the other hand, supports overclocking. Both chips, however, aren’t bundled with a CPU cooler, which means you’ll have to buy a third-party cooler. You might want to check out our collection of the best CPU coolers in case you are looking for some cooler options on the market.
Pricing & Availability
AMD’s Ryzen 7 5800X3D is now official and it goes on sale starting April 20 for $449. That’s great pricing since AMD is positioning the 5800X3D as its top gaming CPU right now. In fact, it’s the same price at which the AMD debuted the Ryzen 7 5800X. The Intel Core i7-12700K, on the other hand, is available for just $384 right now. Alternatively, you can also buy the Intel Core i7-12700KF without integrated graphics for around $370.
Intel Core i7-12700K
-
The Intel Core i7-12700K is one of the best Intel chips out there right now for high-end PCs. This particular processor also supports overclocking.
- Buy from Best Buy
Intel Core i7-12700K vs AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D: Which one should you buy?
The Intel Core i7-12700K may not have the same amount of L3 cache as the Ryzen 7 5800X3D, but it can handle gaming very well and it also supports overclocking. We think it offers a great set of features overall including DDR5 and PCIe 5.0. However, you will have to buy a new motherboard for it. The AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D will drop in the existing set of AM4 motherboards that are readily available on the market, that too at relatively affordable prices. We suggest you take a look at our best AMD motherboards collection to find some good options.
If you don’t mind waiting for a few more months before building your new PC, then we highly suggest you wait for AMD to launch its Ryzen 7000 series desktop chips. We expect the company to announce some powerful chips that’ll go head-to-head with Intel’s Alder Lake chips to compete for the top spot in our best CPUs collection. And if you don’t mind buying a laptop instead, then be sure to take a look at AMD’s Ryzen 6000 series mobile processors too.
Intel Core i7-12700K vs. AMD Ryzen 7 5800X: Which is better for your PC?
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X
(Image credit: Windows Central)
Intel Core i7-12700K
12th Gen Intel power
The 12th Gen Intel Core i7-12700K delivers better raw power and gaming performance compared to the Ryzen 7 5800X. It includes support for DDR5 RAM and PCIe 5.0, but it does require a new motherboard for the latest chipset. It also costs more alone than the Ryzen 7, but it’s the right choice for utmost speed.
For
- DDR5 and PCIe 5.0 support
- 125W TDP at stock
- Exceptional performance
- Hybrid core design (Power and Efficient)
- Down to 10nm
Against
- Costs more than Ryzen 7
- Requires new motherboard
- No cooler included
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X
Proven performance
The AMD Ryzen 7 5800X might not be quite as powerful as Intel’s Core i7-12700K, but it costs less and doesn’t require a completely new motherboard thanks to AM4 compatibility. There’s no DDR5 or PCIe 5.0 support, but it does have PCIe 4.0. If you want to spend less and still get a great CPU, this is the way to go.
For
- No new motherboard required
- Costs less than Core i7
- PCIe 4.0 support
- 105W TDP at stock
- Excellent performance
Against
- No DDR5 or PCIe 5.0 support
- No cooler included
These two CPUs from Intel and AMD are among the best processors you can buy today, but you’re no doubt only looking for one for your next PC build. Both are ultimately going to deliver a ton of performance for gaming and design work, and the final choice will likely come down to how much you’re willing to spend and whether or not you want to invest in a new socket and chipset on the Intel side. There are also design differences between the two chips that might make more sense for some people.
Intel’s Core i7-12700K is a recent release that shows off the new «Intel 7» (10nm) manufacturing process, new «big. LITTLE» hybrid core design, DDR5 RAM support, and PCIe 5.0. On the other hand, the older Ryzen 7 5800X is still a high-end option for performance builds. It uses a 7nm manufacturing process (Intel is still trying to get there), it has eight cores and 16 threads, and it offers PCIe 4.0 support. It’s still using the AM4 socket, meaning you likely don’t have to start with a fresh motherboard if you have an existing AMD build.
Let’s have a deeper look at these two CPUs by breaking down the features and performance available in both.
Core i7-12700K vs. Ryzen 7 5800X: Features and performance
Source: Daniel Rubino / Windows Central (Image credit: Source: Daniel Rubino / Windows Central)
Intel’s 12th Gen Core processors have brought the CPU battle back to AMD, which is a good thing for all PC enthusiasts. The «Alder Lake» generation from Intel has a new big.LITTLE hybrid core design that is similar to what we’ve seen from ARM and Apple. It mixes multi-threaded Performance cores (P cores) and single-threaded Efficient cores (E cores) into the same chip.
The P cores remain free to take on heavier workloads that require multiple threads, while the E cores handle low-priority tasks. In the chart below that compares the i7 and Ryzen 7 you can see the split cores. The Core i7 has a total of 12 cores, eight being reserved for performance and four reserved for efficiency. The Ryzen 7 has eight total cores without any of the hybrid design.
Core i7-12700K | Ryzen 7 5800X | |
---|---|---|
Cores | 12 (8P, 4E) |
8 |
Threads | 20 | 16 |
TDP | 125W | 105W |
Base clock | P: 3.60GHz E: 2.70GHz |
3.80GHz |
Boost | P: 4.90GHz E: 3.80GHz |
4.70GHz |
Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | 5.0GHz | None |
Overclockable | Yes | Yes |
L3 cache | 25MB | 32MB |
Manufacturing node | 10nm | 7nm |
Memory | DDR4-3200/DDR5-4800 Up to 128MB |
DDR4-3200 Up to 128MB |
Integrated graphics | Intel UHD 770 | None |
Socket | LGA 1700 | AM4 |
Cooler | None | None |
Intel is working with a 10nm manufacturing process despite them branding it «Intel 7» — nice try, Intel — while AMD’s Ryzen 5000 series CPUs are down to a 7nm process. The Ryzen 7 5800X runs at a lower 105W TDP, while the Core i7-12700K runs at a 125W TDP. Both can be overclocked for added performance. Only the Core i7 includes integrated graphics, though that’s less of an issue since these high-performance CPUs are usually paired with one of the best graphics cards.
The Core i7-12700K adds support for PCIe 5.0, blowing past the PCIe 4.0 standard that the Ryzen 7 5800X supports. The Core i7 can also run faster DDR5 RAM, while the Ryzen 7 is capped at DDR4. One thing to note is that high DDR5 RAM prices and poor availability makes this feature sort of a moot point. At least for now. The best DDR5 RAM for 12th Gen Intel Core CPUs is almost constantly sold out, though that will change in the future. This makes the Core i7 a better decision for anyone who’s not looking to upgrade again for a few years.
Source: Windows Central (Image credit: Source: Windows Central)
Upgrading to the Ryzen 7 5800X will cost you less for the CPU alone, plus its compatibility with AM4 sockets means you might not have to replace the motherboard if you’re already an AMD user. A modern motherboard is always recommended if you want to get the most out of your CPU, but with the Ryzen chip you can take the upgrade a bit slower. If you buy the Core i7-12700K, you will have to invest in a new motherboard due to the chip requiring a new LGA 1700 socket. This will add cost to an already more expensive CPU. Our collection of the best motherboards has some advice on where to begin in either case.
When it comes to performance, the high-level view is that both are going to deliver a ton for gaming or specialized work. Intel’s P cores (of which there are eight) have a base clock of 3.60GHz, while the Ryzen 7 has eight cores with a base clock of 3.80GHz. Boosted, the Core i7’s P cores hit a 4.90Ghz ceiling, while the Ryzen 7 hits 4.70GHz. Intel has Turbo Boost Max 3.0 as well, which can jump the clock in certain cores up to 5.0GHz for single-threaded tasks.
These stats tell a story that leans toward the Core i7 on paper, and in real-world benchmarks it’s mostly the same. In general, you can expect anywhere from about 15% to about 30% better performance from the Core i7-12700K compared to the Ryzen 7 5800X.
Image 1 of 3
These numbers will no doubt differ slightly from system to system, but the bottom line here is that you’re going to get better performance from Intel’s latest Core i7. Since the Ryzen 7 5800X still offers a ton of power — more than what a lot of people will utilize — it’s really down to whether or not you want to spend more on the CPU and a new motherboard for the Core i7.
Next-gen Intel for the future
The new Intel Core i7-12700K brings a big.LITTLE hybrid core design, 10nm manufacturing process, and a ton of power for gaming or specialized work. It beats out the Ryzen 7 5800X in raw benchmarks, but it will cost more for the CPU alone as well as a new motherboard to accommodate the fresh LGA 1700 socket. Nevertheless, with DDR5 RAM and PCIe 5.0 support, it’s setting you up nicely for the future. Have a look at our guide on how to pick the right 12th Gen Intel Core CPU if you think the Core i7 isn’t quite right for you.
12th Gen Intel power
Intel Core i7-12700K
The Core i7-12700K is a big step forward for Intel, bringing it back within firing range of AMD’s Ryzen lineup. It will cost more, but it brings better performance and better future-proofing.
Proven AMD Ryzen performance
The Ryzen 7 5800X can’t quite keep up with the Core i7-12700K’s raw power, but its lower 105W TDP, PCIe 4.0 support, AM4 socket compatibility, and lower overall cost are all high points. If you want to spend less right now and upgrade as budget allows, this CPU will still absolutely crush heavy work or gaming.
Still great
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X
The Ryzen 7 5800X might not have quite the same power as Intel’s new Core i7, but it costs less and still delivers a ton of performance for PC enthusiasts.
Cale Hunt is a Senior Editor at Windows Central. He focuses mainly on laptop reviews, news, and accessory coverage. He’s been reviewing laptops and accessories full time since 2016, with hundreds of reviews published for Windows Central. He is an avid PC gamer and multi-platform user, and spends most of his time either tinkering with or writing about tech.
0024 35W vs 45W
1MB/core vs 0.25MB/core
1303 million vs 1200 million
4 vs 3
1.2 vs 1.1
Why is Intel Core i7-3630QM better than AMD A8-4500M?
- 26.32% higher CPU speed?
4 x 2.4GHz vs 4 x 1.9GHz - 4 more CPU threads?
8 vs 4 - GPU frequency 154MHz higher?
650MHz vs 496MHz - Semiconductor size 10nm smaller?
22nm vs 32nm - 4. 64x higher PassMark result?
7773 vs 1676 - 0.6GHz higher turbo clock speed?
3.4GHz vs 2.8GHz - 1 newer PCI Express (PCIe) version?
3 vs 2 - 64KB more L1 cache?
256KB vs 192KB
Which comparisons are the most popular?
AMD A8-4500M
vs
Intel Core i5-3210M
Intel Core i7-3630QM
vs
Intel Core i7-3632QM
AMD A8-4500M
VS
Intel Core i5-3380M
Intel Core i7-3630QM
VS
Intel Pentium Silver N6000
A8-4500M
VS
VS
INTEL INTEL IS Core i7-3630QM
VS
Intel Core i7-3840Qm
AMD A8-4500M
VS
AMD A10-4600M
Intel Core i7-3630QM
VS
AMRE Core INTEL Core INTEL CORE INTEL CORE INTEL CORE INTEL CORE INTEL CORE -4500M
VS
AMD A8-55503
Intel Core i7-3630QM
VS
Intel Core i7-10510U
A8-4500M
VS
-3120M
Intel Core
Intel Core
Intel Core
INTE VS
Intel Core i5-6200u
A8-4500M
VS
Intel Core i3-3130M
Intel Core i7-3630Qm
A10-4600M
AMD AMD AMD AMD AMD AMD AMD AMD AMD AMD AMD AMD AMD AMD AMD A8-4500M
AMD AMD AMD A8-4500M
Intel Core i3-3110M
Intel Core i7-3630QM
VS
Intel Core i5-4300m
AMD A8-4500M
VS
AMD A6-4400M
Intel Core i7-3630QM 9000) VS 9000H 9000. 9000H 9000H 9000H 9000.
AMD A8-4500M
VS
Intel Core i5-4570
Intel Core i7-3630Qm
VS
Intel Core i7-2670QM
Users
Reviews
AM 9013
2 reviews of users
A8-4500M
10.0 /10
2 Reviews of users
Intel Core i7-3630QM
0 Reviews of Users
Intel Core i7-3630Qm
9000 / Games0265 7. votes
No reviews yet
Energy efficiency
9.0 /10
2 votes
No reviews yet
0021
1.CPU speed
4 x 1.9GHz
4 x 2.4GHz
CPU speed indicates how many processing cycles per second a processor can perform, considering all its cores (processors). It is calculated by adding the clock speeds of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors, each group of cores.
2nd processor thread
More threads result in better performance and better multitasking.
3.speed turbo clock
2.8GHz
3.4GHz
When the processor is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.
4. Unlocked
✖AMD A8-4500M
✖Intel Core i7-3630QM
Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier and can be easily overclocked for better performance in games and other applications.
5.L2 cache
More L2 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
6.L3 cache
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A8-4500M)
More L3 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
7.L1 cache
More L1 cache results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
8.core L2
1MB/core
0. 25MB/core
More data can be stored in L2 scratchpad for access by each processor core.
9. L3 core
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A8-4500M)
1.5MB/core
More data can be stored in L3 scratchpad for access by each processor core.
Memory
1.RAM speed
1600MHz
1600MHz
Can support faster memory which speeds up system performance.
2.max memory bandwidth
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A8-4500M)
25.6GB/s
This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.
3.DDR version
DDR (Double Data Rate Synchronous Dynamic Random Access Memory) is the most common type of RAM. New versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy efficient.
4.Memory channels
More memory channels increase the speed of data transfer between memory and processor.
5.max memory
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A8-4500M)
Maximum amount of memory (RAM).
6.bus baud rate
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A8-4500M)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device.
7. Supports memory debug code
✖AMD A8-4500M
✖Intel Core i7-3630QM
Memory debug code can detect and fix data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.
8.eMMC version
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A8-4500M)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-3630QM)
A newer version of eMMC — built-in flash memory card — speeds up the memory interface, has a positive effect on device performance, for example, when transferring files from a computer to internal memory via USB.
9.bus frequency
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A8-4500M)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-3630QM)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device
Geotagging
1. PassMark result
This test measures CPU performance using multithreading.
2. PassMark result (single)
This test measures processor performance using a thread of execution.
3.Geekbench 5 result (multi-core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A8-4500M)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-3630QM)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures the performance of a multi-core processor. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)
4. Cinebench R20 result (multi-core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A8-4500M)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-3630QM)
Cinebench R20 is a benchmark that measures the performance of a multi-core processor by rendering a 3D scene.
5.Cinebench R20 result (single core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A8-4500M)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-3630QM)
Cinebench R20 is a test to evaluate the performance of a single core processor when rendering a 3D scene.
6.Geekbench 5 result (single core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A8-4500M)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-3630QM)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform test that measures the single-core performance of a processor. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)
7. Blender test result (bmw27)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A8-4500M)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-3630QM)
The Blender benchmark (bmw27) measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.
8.Blender result (classroom)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A8-4500M)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-3630QM)
The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.
9.performance per watt
This means that the processor is more efficient, giving more performance per watt of power used.
Functions
1.uses multithreading
✖AMD A8-4500M
✔Intel Core i7-3630QM
Multithreading technology (such as Intel’s Hyperthreading or AMD’s Simultaneous Multithreading) provides higher performance by dividing each physical processor core into logical cores, also known as flows. Thus, each core can run two instruction streams at the same time.
2. Has AES
✔AMD A8-4500M
✔Intel Core i7-3630QM
AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.
3. Has AVX
✔AMD A8-4500M
✔Intel Core i7-3630QM
AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial applications, and to improve the performance of the Linux RAID program.
4.Version SSE
SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing images or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.
5. Has F16C
✔AMD A8-4500M
✔Intel Core i7-3630QM
F16C is used to speed up tasks such as image contrast adjustment or volume control.
6.bits transmitted at the same time
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A8-4500M)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-3630QM)
NEON provides faster media processing such as MP3 listening.
7.Has MMX
✔AMD A8-4500M
✔Intel Core i7-3630QM
MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting image contrast or adjusting volume.
8.Has TrustZone
✖AMD A8-4500M
✖Intel Core i7-3630QM
Technology is integrated into the processor to ensure device security when using features such as mobile payments and streaming video using Digital Rights Management (DRM) technology ).
9.interface width
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A8-4500M)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-3630QM)
The processor can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), which means that the processor performs better
Price comparison
Cancel
Which CPUs are better?
This page is currently only available in English.
Intel Core i7 11800H vs AMD Ryzen 7 5800H: 9 performance comparison0001
VS
Intel Core i7 11800H
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
Which is better: Intel Core i7 11800H at 1.9-2.3 GHz (with Turbo Boost up to 4.6) or AMD Ryzen 7 5800H at 3.2 GHz (with Turbo Core up to 4.4)? To find out, read our comparative testing of these 8-core laptop processors in popular benchmarks, games and heavy applications.
- Overview
- Differences
- Performance
- Features
- Comments (5)
Overview
Overview and comparison of the main metrics from NanoReview
Single -flow performance
Rating in tests using one core
Core i7 11800h
79
Ryzen 7 5800h
75
Multi -flow performance
Tests in benchmarks where all nucleus
Core 28000002 58
Ryzen 7 5800h
55
Energy Efficiency
Effect Energy Consumption Chip
Core i7 11800h
70
Ryzen 7 5800 9000 9000
67
Ryzen 7 5800H
67
Key differences
What are the main differences between 5800H and 11800H
Reasons to choose Intel Core i7 11800H
- Supports up to 128GB DDR4-3200
- Has 8MB more L3 cache
- New PCI Express 4. 0 standard
- 17% lower power consumption than Ry00H5 – 45 vs 54 Watts
- 5% higher Turbo Boost frequency (4.6 GHz vs 4.4 GHz)
Reasons to choose AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
- More modern process — 7 vs. 10 nanometers
- 17.07 GB/s (33%) higher maximum memory bandwidth
Benchmark tests
Compare the results of processor tests in benchmarks
Cinebench R23 (single core)
Core i7 11800H
!!!
+2%
3140
Ryzen 7 5800H
3081
Passmark CPU (multi-core)
+1%
21562
Geekbench 5 (single core)
Core i7 11800H
+7%
1568
Ryzen 7 5800H
1461
Geekbench 5 (multi-core)
Core i7 11800H
+19%
8833
Ryzen 7 5800H
7420
▶️ Add your score to Cinebench R23
Specifications
List of full technical specifications for Intel Core i7 11800H and AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
General information
Manufacturer | Intel | |
Release date | May 11, 2021 | January 12, 2021 |
Type | For laptop | For laptop |
Instruction set architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 |
Codename | Tiger Lake h55 | Cezanne |
Model number | i7-11800H | — |
Socket | BGA-1787 | FP6 |
Integrated graphics | UHD Graphics for 11th Gen (32 EU) | Radeon RX Vega 8 |
Performance
Cores | 8 | 8 |
Number of threads | 16 | 16 |
Frequency | 1. 9-2.3GHz | 3.2 GHz |
Max. frequency in Turbo Boost | 4.6 GHz | 4.4 GHz |
Bus frequency | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
Multiplier | 19-23x | 32x |
Tire speed | 8 GT/s | — |
Level 1 cache | 96KB (per core) | 64KB (per core) |
Level 2 cache | 1280KB (per core) | 512KB (per core) |
Level 3 cache | 24MB (shared) | 16MB (shared) |
Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Power consumption
Process | 10 nanometers | 7 nanometers |
Power consumption (TDP) | 35-45W | 35-54W |
Critical temperature | 100°C | 105°C |
Integrated graphics | Intel UHD Graphics for 11th Gen (32 EU) | Radeon RX Vega 8 |
GPU frequency | 350 MHz | — |
Boost GPU frequency | 1450 MHz | 2000 MHz |
Shader blocks | 256 | 512 |
TMUs | 16 | 32 |
ROPs | 8 | 8 |
Computer units | 32 | — |
TGP | 15W | 15W |
Igpu Flops
Core i7 11800h
0. 742 Teraflops
Ryzen 7 5800h
N/D
Memory Support
Memorial type | DDR4-3200 | DDR4-3200, LPDDR4-4266 | |
Max. size | 128 GB | 64 GB | |
Number of channels | 2 | 2 | |
Max. bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | 68.27 GB/s | |
ECC support | No | Yes |
Other
Official site | Site Intel Core i7 11800H | AMD Ryzen 7 5800H |
PCI Express Version | 4.0 | 3.0 |
Max. PCI Express lanes | 20 | 16 |
Poll
What processor do you think is the best?
Core i7 11800H
2305 (54.1%)
Ryzen 7 5800H
1953 (45.9%)
Total Votes: 4258
6
Competitors
1.
Intel Core i7 12700H vs. Intel Core i7 11800H
2.
Apple M1 vs Intel Core i7 11800H
3.
Intel Core i5 12500H vs. Intel Core i7 11800H
4.
Apple M2 vs Intel Core i7 11800H
5.
Intel Core i5 12450H vs. Intel Core i7 11800H
6.
Intel Core i7 12700H vs AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
7.
Apple M1 vs AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
8.
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H vs. AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
9.
Intel Core i7 12650H vs. AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
10.
Intel Core i7 1260P vs AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
What will you choose: AMD Ryzen 7 5800H or Intel Core i7 11800H?
Name
Message
Intel Core i7 1185G7 vs AMD Ryzen 7 4800U:
performance comparison
VS
Intel Core i7 1185G7
AMD Ryzen 7 4800U
Which is better: 4-core Intel Core i7 1185G7 at 1. 2-3.0 GHz or AMD Ryzen 7 4800U with 8 cores at 1.8 GHz? To find out, read our comparative testing of these notebook processors in popular benchmarks, games and heavy applications.
- Overview
- Differences
- Performance
- Features
- Comments
Overview
Overview and comparison of the main metrics from NanoReview
Single-threaded performance
Ranking in tests using a single core
Core i7 1185G7
74
Ryzen 7 4800U
963
Multi-threaded performance
0002 Tests in benchmarks, where all nuclei are involved in all the nuclei
Core i7 1185g7
30
Ryzen 7 4800u
45
Energy
Energy Effects Chip
9000 Core i7 1185g7
74
480000 Ryzen
NanoReview Rating
Final CPU Score
Core i7 1185G7
58
Ryzen 7 4800U
58
Key differences
What are the main differences between 4800U and 1185G7
Reasons to choose Intel Core i7 1185G7
- Has 4 MB more L3 cache
- 8 months later than rival
- New PCI Express standard — 4. 0
- 26% faster in single core v3 test — Geekbe4nch5 and 1180 points
- 14% higher frequency in Turbo Boost (4.8 GHz vs. 4.2 GHz)
Reasons to choose AMD Ryzen 7 4800U
- Has 4 more physical cores
- Supports 4-channel memory
- More modern process technology — 7 vs. 10 nanometers
- 11% lower than Core i7 1185G7 peak power consumption — 25 vs 28 watts
Benchmark tests
Compare the results of processor tests in benchmarks
Cinebench R23 (single core)
Core i7 1185G7
+18%
1460
Ryzen 7 4800U
1239
Cinebench R23 (multi-core)
Core i7 1185G7
5767
Ryzen 7 4800U
+71%
9851
Passmark CPU (single core)
Core i7 1185G7
+10%
2895
Ryzen 7 4800U
2621
Passmark CPU (multi-core)
Core i7 1185G7
10910 9002 9002
+58%
17189
Geekbench 5 (single core)
Core i7 1185G7
+26%
1485
Ryzen 7 4800U
1183
Geekbench 5 (multi-core)
Core i7 1185G7
5212
Ryzen7 5212
+23%
6421
▶️ Add your score to Cinebench R23
Specifications
List of full technical specifications for Intel Core i7 1185G7 and AMD Ryzen 7 4800U
General
Manufacturer | Intel | |
Release date | September 2, 2020 | January 6, 2020 |
Type | For laptop | For laptop |
Instruction set architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 |
Codename | Tiger Lake UP3 | Zen 2 |
Model number | i7-1185G7 | — |
Socket | BGA-1449 | FP6 |
Integrated graphics | Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU | Radeon Vega 8 |
Performance
Cores | 4 | 8 |
Number of threads | 8 | 16 |
Frequency | 1. 2-3.0 GHz | 1.8 GHz |
Max. frequency in Turbo Boost | 4.8 GHz | 4.2 GHz |
Bus frequency | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
Multiplier | 12-30x | 18x |
Tire speed | 4 GT/s | — |
Level 1 cache | 96KB (per core) | 32KB (per core) |
Level 2 cache | 1280KB (per core) | 512KB (per core) |
Level 3 cache | 12MB (shared) | 8MB (shared) |
Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Power consumption
Process technology | 10 nanometers | 7 nanometers |
Power consumption (TDP) | 12-28W | 10-25W |
Critical temperature | 100°C | 105°C |
Integrated graphics | Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU | Radeon Vega 8 |
GPU frequency | 300 MHz | — |
Boost GPU frequency | 1350 MHz | 1750 MHz |
Shader blocks | 768 | 512 |
TMUs | 48 | 32 |
ROPs | 24 | 8 |
Computer units | 96 | — |
TGP | 15W | 15W |
iGPU FLOPS
Core i7 1185G7
1. 69 teraflops
Ryzen 7 4800U
n/a
Memory support
DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-4267 | DDR4-3200, LPDDR4X-4266 | |
Max. size | 64 GB | 64 GB |
Number of channels | 2 | 4 |
Max. bandwidth | — | 68.27 GB/s |
ECC support | No | Yes |
Other
Official site | Site Intel Core i7 1185G7 | AMD Ryzen 7 4800U |
PCI Express Version | 4.0 | 3.0 |
Max. PCI Express lanes | 16 | 16 |
Poll
What processor do you think is the best?
Core i7 1185G7
56 (28.3%)
Ryzen 7 4800U
142 (71.7%)
Total votes: 198
Competitors
1.
Core i7 11800H or Core i7 1185G7
2.
Apple M1 or Core i7 1185G7
3.
Core i5 1145G7 or Core i7 1185G7
4.
Core i7 1270P or Core i7 1185G7
5.
Core i5 1240P or Core i7 1185G7
6.
Core i5 1135G7 or Ryzen 7 4800U
7.
Ryzen 9 5900HX or Ryzen 7 4800U
8.
Ryzen 7 5800U or Ryzen 7 4800U
What will you choose: AMD Ryzen 7 4800U or Intel Core i7 1185G7?
Name
Message
cores against GECID.com threads. Page 1
::>Processors
>2018
> Intel Core i5-8600K versus Intel Core i7-7700K, Intel Core i7-8700K and AMD Ryzen 5 1600: cores vs. threads
09-01-2018
Page 1
Page 2
One page
The top processor is, of course, the dream of any gamer, but sometimes you have to compromise, which as a result can turn out to be an even better purchase. Let’s check if this applies to the 6-core Intel Core i5-8600K.
We already got acquainted with the processors of the Intel Coffee Lake line earlier, so we will only briefly recall that all the new Intel Core i5 series received 6 cores instead of 4 at their disposal. But they still lack support for Intel Hyper-Threading technology and have a smaller L3 cache, which distinguishes them from the older Intel Core i7.
The Intel Core i5-8600K runs at a base frequency of 3.6 GHz and can dynamically accelerate up to 4.3 GHz. But since its multiplier is unlocked, it becomes possible to overclock. It also has in its structure a 2-channel RAM controller with guaranteed support for DDR4-2666 modules and an Intel UHD Graphics 630 video core with 24 execution units. The thermal package is 95 W, and the critical temperature is at 100°.
Basic configuration:
- Intel Core i5-8600K / Intel Core i7-8700K
- GIGABYTE Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming
- Thermalright Archon SB-E X2
- Inno3D iChill GeForce GTX 1080 X3
- 2x8GB DDR4-3200 Patriot Viper 4
- GOODRAM Iridium PRO 240GB
- GOODRAM Iridium PRO 960GB
- Seagate IronWolf 2TB
- Seasonic PRIME 850W Titanium
- AOC U2879VF
We will compare this novelty with three competitors. The first is the flagship of the Kaby Lake series — the Intel Core i7-7700K. It has only 4 full cores, but can handle up to 8 threads. Let’s see if 6 cores can compete with 8 threads. And the price tags at the time of preparation of the material are quite close: $330 for the Intel Core i5-8600K and $370 for the Intel Core i7-7700K.
Perhaps it would be more appropriate to take the Intel Core i5-7600K for comparison, but we simply do not have it in stock, like some other close competitors.
Moving on. The second opponent will be the recently reviewed 6-core flagship Intel Core i7-8700K. Of course, their price ranges are quite different, because the top model is $130 more expensive. But still we want to check whether the additional 6 threads solve a lot and whether it is worth overpaying for them.
There are two competitors in the AMD Ryzen series: the 6-core AMD Ryzen 5 1600X with an average price tag of $290 and the 8-core AMD Ryzen 7 1700 for $350. But, since we do not have them in stock, we will limit ourselves to the more affordable AMD Ryzen 5 1600, which can be found on average for $230. It features support for 12 threads, but runs at lower clock speeds: from 3.2 to 3.6 GHz. Although its multiplier is also unlocked, so it is overclockable.
We got to know the test participants. They will be assisted by GIGABYTE Z370 Ultra Gaming, ASUS PRIME Z270-A and MSI X370 SLI Plus motherboards. The Thermalright Archon SB-E X2 cooler is responsible for cooling. The RAM is provided by a dual-channel Patriot Viper 4 kit, while the operating systems themselves and most games were installed on GOODRAM Iridium Pro series SSDs.
We will compare the processors in two stages: first, we compare the results in the nominal mode when running synthetic and gaming tests, and then in overclocking.
Opens a test session AIDA64 . In terms of reading, writing and copying data, the novelty loses to all competitors, but the gap is small, in the region of 1-7%.
But its data access latency is lower than that of Ryzen 5, although both representatives of the Core i7 series have even lower rates.
In the 7-ZIP archiver, the presence of additional threads plays a more important role than the frequency of the cores, so again the Intel Core i5-8600K is in last place. But if the advantage of 8700K is more than 40%, then for Ryzen 5 it does not exceed 26%, and for 7700K it reaches a maximum of 3%.
WinRAR is not yet very good friends with the Ryzen series, so the new product outperforms its external counterpart by 7%, but lags behind 7700K and 8700K by 20 and 45%, respectively.
Scene rendering in Corona is the fastest flagship of the Coffee Lake series. The Intel Core i5-8600K was also first, only from the end, trailing the leader by 78 seconds or 36%.
In the benchmark V-Ray , the new product managed to improve its positions: now it takes the third place and is 32 seconds or 26% behind the leader.
But with video encoding in x265 , the Coffee Lake series models did better than their competitors: the flagship took just over 40 seconds, and the Intel Core i5-8600K took 47 seconds.
An ambiguous situation happened in CineBench R15 : the CPU test puts the Intel Core i5-8600K next to the Intel Core i7-7700K, and the Intel Core i7-8700K takes the lead. But already in OpenGL, the 4-core Kaby Lake shows the highest results, followed by the 6-core Coffee Lake, ahead of the flagship.
And for the dessert of the synthetic block, we suggest taking a look at RealBench . According to the overall result, the new product is again approximately at the level of the 8-thread Core i7. The leadership is held by the Intel Core i7-8700K, and AMD Ryzen 5 acts as a catch-up.
Now let’s move on to games. We have chosen those projects that are typical representatives of their classes.
For example, Far Cry Primal is heavily dependent on CPU performance in single-threaded mode. GTA V nominally supports multithreading, but its optimization is very weak, and the engine is outdated. In The Third Witcher, code parallelization is already better, but still, the optimization is far from ideal. But WATCH_DOGS 2 is good at using additional cores and threads. Also included in the test are popular representatives of heavy online shooters. And in some games, we deliberately used the maximum presets to rest against the video card and appreciate the difference between the systems.
In a word, games and settings were chosen in such a way as to explore different classes of projects and different scenarios for their work, making the test more objective and complex.
Let’s start with Battlefield 1 online at Full HD resolution and ultra graphics preset. The Intel Core i5-8600K and Intel Core i7-7700K lead the way with 125 FPS on average, while the Intel Core i7-8700K takes the lead with 103 fps on the minimum.
To reduce the impact of the video card, in Assassin’s Creed Origins we lowered the resolution to HD, but left the graphics settings at maximum. The best results were shown by representatives of the Intel Core i7 series. Intel Core i5-8600K lagged behind the leader by 8-10%.
Ultra preset benchmark Far Cry Primal in HD resolution showed quite unexpected results: despite fewer threads and lower clock speed, Intel Core i5-8600K outperforms Core i7-8700K by 13-16%. The Core i7-7700K became the leader: it beat the novelty by 2-3 FPS.
Even more interesting is the situation in the Rainbow Six Siege benchmark at ultra preset and HD resolution. The first place in terms of average frame rate went to the 6-core Intel Core i5. The second and third are shared by representatives of the Intel Core i7 series. In terms of the minimum speed, the Intel Core i7-8700K already takes the lead, outperforming internal competitors by 5 frames / s.
WATCH_DOGS 2 responds well to more threads and higher clock speeds. Therefore, the 12-thread flagship of the Intel Coffee Lake line proved to be the best. The tested model lagged behind it by 20-25%, but in turn managed to get ahead of AMD Ryzen 5 by 6-8%.0003
According to the benchmark, the Core i7-7700K is best for exploring the world of Middle-earth in HD resolution and at the ultra preset. But between the two representatives of the Coffee Lake series, it is better to give preference to the Core i5, which is ahead of the flagship by 6-9%.
In Rise of the Tomb Raider , things are not so simple. At the minimum frequency, the 12-thread Core i7 takes the lead with an indicator of 71 FPS. But on average, it is the Core i5-8600K that is ahead of everyone, although the Core i7-7700K is less than 1 FPS behind it.
choosing the best ultrabook processor / Processors and memory
We have a lot of reviews of light, thin and compact ultrabooks on our site. It may not be entirely correct to call them that, but users of laptops with similar characteristics are strongly associated with this word. In 2020, we told you about several models using energy-efficient AMD Ryzen chips: ASUS ZenBook 14 UM433IQ, HP ProBook x360 435 G7, HP ProBook 455 G7, Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 (14ARE05). And here is a list of models that have low-voltage Intel Core chips installed: Acer Swift 3 (SF314-57-735H), ASUS ZenBook 14 Ultralight UX435EGL, ASUS ZenBook Flip S UX371EA, ASUS ZenBook 14 (UX425JA), Dell XPS 13 9300, MSI Modern 15 (A11SB), MSI Prestige 14 (A10SC). However, it so happened that throughout the year we could not compare laptops with advanced red and blue chips — Ryzen 7 4800U and Core i7-1165G7, respectively. Well, ahead of the upcoming Ryzen 5000U release, we’re fixing that.
In the previous paragraph, the Ryzen 5000U series is mentioned for a reason. Representatives of the Ryzen 4000U family appeared in mobile computers in the middle of last year, and now they already belong to the previous generation solutions. Ryzen 5000U processors, which are about to start appearing in commercially available laptops, may be better than the Ryzen 7 4800U considered in this case. However, you need to keep in mind that, firstly, the Zen 3 architecture is not used in all Ryzen 5000U models, and a good half of this series is the same previous generation, but with a slight overclocking. And secondly, the integrated graphics in the Ryzen 5000U have not changed at all.
⇡#Subject of research
It is important to understand that this article focuses on comparing the capabilities of the flagship «ultrabook» processors from AMD and Intel. So you won’t find a detailed review of the two laptops in use here. And we used the Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7 and MSI Prestige 14 Evo models.
Obviously, for a relevant comparison of platforms, processors, memory and graphics used in a laptop, one must take absolutely identical models that use exactly the same cooling systems and additional components. Only now it turns out to be very difficult to find such laptops, and therefore, when comparing platforms, you will have to take into account that we are still dealing with different devices. Nevertheless, we tried to pick up two laptops that are as similar as possible. Both models have only APUs that use integrated graphics and 16 GB of fast (by ultrabook standards) 16 GB LPDDR4x-4267 RAM.
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7 |
MSI Prestige 14 Evo |
The Ryzen 7 4800U is the flagship of the Renoir series of chips that fit into compact, lightweight laptops. It is based on the Zen 2 microarchitecture, which you can read about in our detailed review. The Ryzen 7 4800U is the first 8-core SMT processor with a TDP of 15W. Intel has only 6- and 4-core chips in a close heat pack today. Moreover, the most progressive model — Core i7-1165G7 — is just equipped with only four cores. So we will answer the vital question: how many cores does an ultrabook need? Below are the technical characteristics of the compared mobile chips, as well as screenshots with the main characteristics of the laptops.
AMD Ryzen 7 4800U | Intel Core i7-1165G7 | |
Codename | Renoir | Tiger Lake |
Process | 7 nm | 10 nm |
Number of cores/threads | 8/16 | 4/8 |
Clock frequency | 1.8 (4.2) GHz | 2.8 (4.7) GHz |
Memory controller | DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-4267 | DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-4267 |
Number of memory channels | 2 | 2 |
TDP level | 15 W | 12-28W |
Processor integrated graphics | Radeon RX Vega 8 | Intel Iris Xe Graphics |
Graphics frequency | 1. 75 GHz | 1.3 GHz |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7 (AMD Ryzen 7 4800U) |
MSI Prestige 14 Evo (Intel Core i7-1165G7) |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7 (AMD Ryzen 7 4800U) |
MSI Prestige 14 Evo (Intel Core i7-1165G7) |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7 (AMD Ryzen 7 4800U) |
MSI Prestige 14 Evo (Intel Core i7-1165G7) |
The Core i7-1165G7 processor at the beginning of 2021 can be safely considered unique. The fact is that this is the first serial Intel chip using advanced (for the company) technologies and production capabilities. So, the 4-core is based on the Willow Cove cores and the new graphics core of the X 9 family2141 e . The new microarchitecture is a further development of the Sunny Cove microarchitecture, which was first used in Ice Lake notebook chips. According to Intel, Synny Cove cores provide a massive 18% IPC gain compared to Skylake architecture, and Willow Cove should be even more powerful.
The second notable improvement is the use of the 10nm SuperFin process. Interestingly, the new desktop Core processors, codenamed Rocket Lake, although they will receive Cypress Cove cores, which are quite closely related to Tiger Lake, will still be produced according to 14-nanometer process standards. So the uniqueness of the Core i7-1165G7 is undeniable.
However, you can read about all the features and specifics of Tiger Lake chips in the article “Tiger Lake: Eleventh Generation Intel Core Processor Architecture”.
And the Core i7-1165G7 became the basis for the updated Intel notebook platform called EVO. This is a kind of quality mark, and if you see the corresponding sticker on the laptop case, then you know that the device has certain qualities, functions and characteristics. Here they are:
- 11th Gen Core Mobile Processors with X 9 Graphics2141 e .
- Support for Intel Wi-Fi 6 and Bluetooth 5.
- Thunderbolt 4 support.
- NVMe SSD with at least 256 GB.
- Minimum 8 GB of RAM running in dual-channel mode.
- Two digital speakers with a minimum volume level of 63 dBA.
- Support for Intel Smart Sound Technology.
- More than 9 hours of battery life in Full HD resolution and fast battery charging.
- Wake up from sleep mode in less than 1 second.
- Uses a quality sensor with 100% sRGB color gamut.
If the manufacturer provides their product with all the listed characteristics, and if the device meets the performance targets, then it will become part of the EVO platform. As a matter of fact, the MSI Prestige 14 Evo model is just one of these laptops — this is immediately displayed in its name, which is very convenient.
⇡# Test results
Before proceeding to testing, it is necessary to analyze one more point. At the very beginning of the material, we said that it is very difficult to find two identical laptops with processors from different companies, and therefore, when comparing AMD and Intel chips installed in Lenovo and MSI laptops, you need to know how efficiently they work. An increase in the number of cores in a mobile processor will certainly affect the level of power consumption of the chip. We faced this problem in earnest in 2018, when Intel introduced the first mass-produced 6-core Coffee Lake chips used in powerful gaming stations. Now we are talking about energy-efficient processors installed in ultrabooks. Thus, the TDP level of the 8-core Ryzen 7 4800U is 15 W, but the processor can work beyond the power limit for some time, which we observed during the testing of Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7. For example, video rendering in Adobe Premiere Pro 2020 was carried out with an average frequency for all eight cores 2.7 GHz. The power consumption of the chip varied in the range from 14 to 34 W (see the screenshot below).
Ryzen mobile chips beyond their advertised TDP are powered by STT V2, a technology that helps CPUs and GPUs run more efficiently by capturing accurate temperature data from the system as a whole. Even if the processor consumption at some point in time does not reach a critical limit, its frequency growth can be limited by the temperatures of both the chip itself and the laptop chassis.
The Core i7-1165G7, like many other Intel chips, has two power limits at once. The PL2 parameter allows for an indefinite (short) time to seriously go beyond, let’s say, the rational power consumption of the processor. This is done so that the laptop performs some simple task — whether it is starting the operating system, opening a browser, or downloading an application — as quickly as possible. For example, in the MSI Prestige 14 Evo, the PL2 value of the processor is an impressive 64W.
After a certain time, the chip switches from PL2 to PL1, which will definitely be lower. The MSI laptop has a PL1 value of 36W, but we can see that the laptop’s cooler can’t handle the load. Therefore, the power consumption of the Core i7-1165G7 actually varies in the range from 22 to 43 watts. This fits in well with the manufacturer’s performance specifications, since the 4-core Tiger Lake has a configurable TDP value in the range of 12-28 watts. That is, in other laptops, the Core i7-1165G7 can work both faster and noticeably slower. The same words apply to the Ryzen 7 4800U.
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7 (AMD Ryzen 7 4800U) |
MSI Prestige 14 Evo (Intel Core i7-1165G7) |
We used various software to test the laptops.
Applications:
- Corona 1.3. Testing rendering speed using the renderer of the same name. Measures the build speed of the standard BTR scene used to measure performance.
- WinRAR 6.0. Built-in benchmark.
- Blender 2.90. Determination of the final rendering speed in one of the popular free packages for creating three-dimensional graphics. The duration of building the final pavillon_barcelona_v1.2 model from Blender Benchmark is measured.
- x264 FHD Benchmark. Testing the speed of video transcoding to H.264/AVC format.
- x265 HD Benchmark. Testing the speed of video transcoding to H.265/HEVC format. The tables and graphs indicate the average integer value obtained after five runs of the test.
- Cinebench R23 is the standard benchmark for testing rendering speed in Cinema 4D R23.
- Adobe Premiere Pro 2020 Rendering a project in 4K resolution. Running Standard Benchmark with PugetBench for Premiere Pro 0.92 BETA.
- Adobe Photoshop CC 2020. Running Basic Benchmark with PugetBench for Photoshop CC 0.93 BETA.
- Topaz Video Enhance AI v1.2.3. Performance testing in an AI-based program to improve video detail. The test uses the original video at 1280 × 720 resolution, which is increased by 150% using the Artemis-HQ model: P, HQ, MC.
- JetStream 2 and WebXPRT 3 (browser — Google Chrome). Performance testing of Internet applications built using HTML5 and JavaScript algorithms.
- VeraCrypt 1.24. Cryptographic performance testing. The benchmark built into the program is used, which uses Kuznyechik-Serpent-Camellia triple encryption.
- Fritz 9 Chess Benchmarks. Testing the speed of a popular chess engine.
Comprehensive benchmarks:
- Futuremark PCMARK10 Professional Edition 2.1.2177. Testing in Essentials scenarios (typical work of the average user: launching applications, surfing the Internet, video conferencing), Productivity (office work with word processing and spreadsheets), Digital Content Creation (digital content creation: photo editing, non-linear video editing, 3D rendering and visualization -models).
- 3DMark Professional Edition 2.11.6846. Testing in the Time Spy scene.
Games (Full HD resolution):
- World of Tanks enCore. DirectX 11. Benchmark. Medium mode.
- Gears Tactics. DirectX 12. Benchmark. Average graphics quality, 4x AF.
- Fallout 4. DirectX 11. Wasteland. Medium graphics quality, 4x AF, TAA,
- GTA V. DirectX 11. Built-in benchmark (last scene). High quality graphics, 4x AF, AA — off, shadows — soft, advanced quality settings — off.
- Counter Strike: Global Offensive. DirectX 9. FPS benchmark. Average graphics quality, 4x AF, 4x AA.
Notebook gaming performance was measured using the well-known MSI Afterburner program. It allows you to get the rendering time of each frame. The use of the 99th percentile instead of the minimum frames per second is due to the desire to clean up the results from random bursts of performance that were provoked by reasons not directly related to the operation of the main components of the platform.
Notebooks tested on Windows 10 2004 with the latest drivers preinstalled.
⇡ # Typical laptop load
The most difficult question that we will have to answer is this: why exactly do you need a compact and lightweight laptop? It is clear that using models such as Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7 and MSI Prestige 14 Evo is very convenient, because you can take them with you anywhere and anytime. We are talking about something else. Someone uses such a laptop exclusively as a typewriter and an entertainment center while traveling. The laptop will allow you to always be online, use the browser, instant messengers, social networks, watch videos, listen to music and sometimes play some simple games. Sometimes, yes, you will need to run Photoshop on such a machine in order to quickly process a couple of photos — and that’s all.
And someone, perhaps, considers such devices as a full-fledged workstation, “hanging” rather resource-intensive tasks on a laptop: constant rendering of graphics and video, working with photography and sound — there are different situations, and laptops have different applications.
We think that the owners of ultrabooks often use their «camping equipment» according to the first scenario. And here the Core i7-1165G7 does not look like a whipping boy in comparison with the Ryzen 7 4800U.
For example, in the PCMARK 10 test, the Lenovo (AMD-based) laptop outperformed the MSI (Intel-based) by only 492 points. The difference is symbolic (10%), and it was obtained mainly due to the Digital Content Creation subtest. It is dedicated to multi-threaded resource-intensive workloads: photo and video editing, as well as 3D rendering and visualization — and here the twofold superiority in the number of cores of the Ryzen 7 4800U makes itself felt.
But in a scenario such as Essentials (application launch speed, browser performance and web conferencing), the MSI laptop even came out ahead. Because the Core i7-1165G7 runs at a higher frequency and also has a new fast microarchitecture.
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7 (AMD Ryzen 7 4800U) |
MSI Prestige 14 Evo (Intel Core i7-1165G7) |
The same browser tests give the palm only to the system with the Core i7-1165G7. Because here we are talking about the load on one or two processor threads.
I’m sure you’ve read «Tiger Lake: 11th Gen Intel Core Processor Architecture» and know that the graphics in the Core i7-1165G7 have received the most improvements. If the built-in GPU of Ice Lake chips consisted of 64 execution units of the eleventh generation, then in Tiger Lake the number of execution units increased to 96 items. And the 10 nm SuperFin process technology also contributed to the growth of the clock frequency — up to 1.3 GHz. All this has led to the fact that in games the MSI laptop is noticeably ahead of the Lenovo model. On average, the advantage of the X e graphics over the accelerator built into the Ryzen chips was 26% — you can’t call such a symbolic difference.
Still, integrated graphics are integrated graphics. It would be naive to expect from it accomplishments like those that entry-level gaming graphics cards (for example, the GeForce GTX 1650) are capable of. On the other hand, we see that the Intel X 9 GPU2141 e allows you to play undemanding games, as well as hits of yesteryear — without having to turn all the settings to the minimum.
⇡#Performance in resource-intensive applications
Where the Ryzen 7 4800U laptop really shines is in resource-intensive applications that use maximum CPU threads. Here, the Lenovo laptop based on AMD is noticeably ahead of the MSI laptop with an Intel chip. Indeed, we are comparing 16 Zen 2 streams with 8 Willow Cove streams.
On the other hand, it’s not like we’ve seen the Core i7-1165G7 crash. Nowhere is there a twofold advantage of the Ryzen 7 4800U over the opponent. For example, in Vera Crypt, the Lenovo laptop was the fastest by 6%. In the «Crown», the system with the «red» chip copes with rendering 41% faster. This means that the Willow Cove microarchitecture really turns out to be noticeably more productive than the «forever young» Skylake — those chips can just fall behind twice.
Things are interesting with testing laptops in Adobe programs. For example, rendering a small video at 4K resolution was 23% slower by MSI laptop — not a big lag for a chip with half the number of threads. Everything is very simple: not all operations in this photo editor are well parallelized into eight threads. As a result, Intel’s quad-core running at a higher clock speed can significantly reduce the advantage.
Proof of my words are the results of PugetBench benchmarks, which simulate various laptop boot patterns, using not only the power of computing cores, but also the capabilities of integrated graphics. In these benchmarks, the Core i7-1165G7 turned out to be the winner. You could see this before if you read our other reviews of compact laptops.
⇡#Conclusions
In our opinion, both AMD and Intel have good platforms for use in light compact laptops. Chips such as the Ryzen 7 4800U excel in resource-intensive applications (if we are talking about low-voltage processors with a modest TDP). Laptops with Core i7-1165G7 perform better in the field of content consumption: web surfing and games. It is impossible not to notice that the integrated graphics of the X e has become noticeably faster than both its ancestors and competitors.
And yet, we believe that a laptop is chosen not only by the capabilities of the central processor. When choosing an ultrabook, it is important to focus on other characteristics, including the screen and mechanical qualities. Therefore, the test results presented in this article are only a guideline. We are sure you will make the right choice.
Comparison of AMD Ryzen 9 5900X and Intel Core i7-10700
Comparative analysis of AMD Ryzen 9 5900X and Intel Core i7-10700 processors by all known characteristics in the categories: General information, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals, Technologies, Virtualization, Graphics, Graphic interfaces, Picture quality in graphics, Graphics API support, Safety and reliability.
Analysis of processor performance by benchmarks: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score, GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames ), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps).
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
versus
Intel Core i7-10700
Advantages
reasons to select AMD Ryzen 9 5900x
- Reveal processor, the difference in release 5 Month (S)
- processor is unlocked, an unlocked multiplier allows you to easily make overoking
- 8 more threads: 24 vs 16
- A newer manufacturing process for the processor allows it to be more powerful, but with less power consumption: 7 nm vs 14 nm
- L1 cache is about 50% larger, which means more data can be stored in it for quick access
- L2 cache in 3 times(s) more, means more data can be stored in it for quick access
- L3 cache is 4 times(s) larger, which means more data can be stored in it for quick access
- Performance in the PassMark — Single thread mark benchmark is approximately 19% more: 3469 vs 2920
- 2. 3x more performance in PassMark — CPU mark benchmark: 39318 vs 16814
- About 28% more performance in 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score benchmark: 13090 vs 10238
- About 5% more max core temperature: 100°C vs 95°C
- About 62% less power consumption: 65 Watt vs 105 Watt
- 0788
Maximum core temperature 100°C vs 95°C Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt vs 105 Watt Benchmark comparison
CPU 1: AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
CPU 2: Intel Core i7-10700PassMark — Single thread mark CPU 1 CPU 2 PassMark — CPU mark CPU 1 CPU 2 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score CPU 1 CPU 2 Name AMD Ryzen 9 5900X Intel Core i7-10700 PassMark — Single thread mark 3469 2920 PassMark — CPU mark 39318 16814 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score 13090 10238 GFXBench 4. 0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2034 GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2034 GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) 6970 GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) 6970 GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) 11748 GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) 11748 Feature comparison
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X Intel Core i7-10700 Architecture name Zen 3 Comet Lake Production date Nov 5, 2020 27 May 2020 Price at first issue date $549 $323 OPN PIB 100-100000061WOF OPN Tray 100-000000061 Place in the rating 28 29 Applicability Desktop Desktop Processor Number i7-10700 Series 10th Generation Intel Core i7 Processors Status Launched Base frequency 3. 7 GHz 2.90 GHz Level 1 cache 768KB 512KB Level 2 cache 6MB 2MB Level 3 cache 64MB 16MB Process 7nm 14nm Maximum core temperature 95°C 100°C Maximum frequency 4.8 GHz 4.80 GHz Number of cores 12 8 Number of threads 24 16 Unlocked Support 64 bit Bus Speed 8 GT/s ECC support Maximum number of memory channels 2 2 Maximum memory bandwidth 47. 68 GB/s 45.8 GB/s Maximum memory size 128GB 128GB Supported memory types DDR4-3200 DDR4-2933 Supported sockets AM4 LGA 1200 Power consumption (TDP) 105 Watt 65 Watt Maximum number of processors in configuration
1 Package Size 37.5mm x 37.5mm Thermal Solution PCG 2015C Number of PCI Express lanes 20 16 PCI Express revision 4. 0 3.0 PCIe configurations 1×16+x4, 2×8+x4, 1×8+2×4+x4 Up to 1×16, 2×8, 1×8+2×4 Scalability 1S Only AMD SenseMI AMD StoreMI technology Fused Multiply-Add 3 (FMA3) Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions 2 (AVX2) Intel® AES New Instructions Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® Technology Idle States Extended instructions Intel SSE4. 1, Intel SSE4.2, Intel AVX2 Intel 64 Intel® Hyper-Threading Technology Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported Intel® Thermal Velocity Boost Intel® Turbo Boost Technology Thermal Monitoring AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) Device ID 0x9BC5 Graphics base frequency 350MHz Graphics max dynamic frequency 1. 20 GHz Intel® Clear Video Technology HD Intel® Clear Video Technology Intel® InTru™ 3D Technology Intel® Quick Sync Video Video memory size 64 GB Integrated graphics Intel UHD Graphics 630 Maximum number of monitors supported 3 4K support Maximum resolution via DisplayPort [email protected] Maximum resolution via eDP [email protected] Maximum resolution via HDMI 1.
4 more cores, the ability to run more applications simultaneously: 12 vs 8
Issue date | 5 Nov 2020 vs 27 May 2020 |
Unlocked | Unlocked / Locked |
Number of cores | 12 vs 8 |
Number of threads | 24 vs 16 |
Process | 7nm vs 14nm |
Level 1 cache | 768 KB vs 512 KB |
Level 2 cache | 6MB vs 2MB |
Level 3 cache | 64 MB vs 16 MB |
PassMark — Single thread mark | 3469 vs 2920 |
PassMark — CPU mark | 39318 vs 16814 |
3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score | 13090 vs 10238 |
Reasons to choose Intel Core i7-10700
9