AMD A6-9225 vs Intel Core i5-9400
Comparative analysis of AMD A6-9225 and Intel Core i5-9400 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization, Graphics image quality, Security & Reliability.
Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score.
AMD A6-9225
Buy on Amazon
vs
Intel Core i5-9400
Buy on Amazon
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD A6-9225
- 4.
3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 65 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 65 Watt |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core i5-9400
- 4 more cores, run more applications at once: 6 vs 2
- Around 58% higher clock speed: 4.10 GHz vs 2.6 GHz
- Around 11% higher maximum core temperature: 100°C vs 90°C
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 50% more L2 cache; more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark — Single thread mark: 2464 vs 1168
- 7.1x better performance in PassMark — CPU mark: 9457 vs 1329
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1738 vs 754
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1738 vs 754
- 2.
3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames): 3574 vs 1522
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps): 3574 vs 1522
- Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames): 6414 vs 4199
- Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps): 6414 vs 4199
Number of cores | 6 vs 2 |
Maximum frequency | 4.10 GHz vs 2.6 GHz |
Maximum core temperature | 100°C vs 90°C |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
L2 cache | 256K (per core) vs 1 MB |
PassMark — Single thread mark | 2464 vs 1168 |
PassMark — CPU mark | 9457 vs 1329 |
GFXBench 4.![]() |
1738 vs 754 |
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1738 vs 754 |
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) | 3574 vs 1522 |
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) | 3574 vs 1522 |
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) | 6414 vs 4199 |
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) | 6414 vs 4199 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD A6-9225
CPU 2: Intel Core i5-9400
PassMark — Single thread mark |
|
|
||
PassMark — CPU mark |
|
|
||
GFXBench 4.![]() |
|
|
||
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||
GFXBench 4.![]() |
|
|
||
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD A6-9225 | Intel Core i5-9400 |
---|---|---|
PassMark — Single thread mark | 1168 | 2464 |
PassMark — CPU mark | 1329 | 9457 |
GFXBench 4.![]() |
754 | 1738 |
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 754 | 1738 |
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) | 1522 | 3574 |
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) | 1522 | 3574 |
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) | 4199 | 6414 |
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) | 4199 | 6414 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 1.![]() |
|
Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 1075 | |
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 4645 | |
3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score | 3760 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD A6-9225 | Intel Core i5-9400 | |
---|---|---|
Family | AMD A-Series Processors | |
Launch date | Q2 2018 | October 2018 |
OPN Tray | AM9225AYN23AC | |
OS Support | Windows 10 — 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit | |
Place in performance rating | 1392 | 585 |
Series | AMD A6-Series APU for Laptops | 9th Generation Intel® Core™ i5 Processors |
Vertical segment | Laptop | Desktop |
Architecture codename | Coffee Lake | |
Processor Number | i5-9400 | |
Status | Launched | |
Base frequency | 3.![]() |
2.90 GHz |
Compute Cores | 5 | |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 256K (per core) |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Maximum core temperature | 90°C | 100°C |
Maximum frequency | 2.6 GHz | 4.10 GHz |
Number of cores | 2 | 6 |
Number of GPU cores | 3 | |
Unlocked | ||
64 bit support | ||
Bus Speed | 8 GT/s DMI3 | |
L1 cache | 64K (per core) | |
L3 cache | 9 MB (shared) | |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 72 °C | |
Number of threads | 6 | |
Max memory channels | 1 | 2 |
Supported memory frequency | 2133 MHz | |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 41.![]() |
|
Maximum memory size | 128 GB | |
Supported memory types | DDR4-2666 | |
Enduro | ||
Graphics max frequency | 686 MHz | |
Processor graphics | AMD Radeon R4 Graphics | Intel® UHD Graphics 630 |
Switchable graphics | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
Device ID | 0X3E98/x92 | |
Graphics base frequency | 350 MHz | |
Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.![]() |
|
Intel® Clear Video HD technology | ||
Intel® Clear Video technology | ||
Intel® InTru™ 3D technology | ||
Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
Max video memory | 64 GB | |
DisplayPort | ||
HDMI | ||
Number of displays supported | 3 | |
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
Vulkan | ||
OpenGL | 4.![]() |
|
Configurable TDP | 10-15 Watt | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 65 Watt |
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | |
Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | |
Sockets supported | FCLGA1151 | |
Thermal Solution | PCG 2015C (65W) | |
PCI Express revision | 3.![]() |
3.0 |
Max number of PCIe lanes | 16 | |
PCIe configurations | Up to 1×16, 2×8, 1×8+2×4 | |
Scalability | 1S Only | |
Adaptive Voltage and Frequency Scaling (AVFS) | ||
AMD App Acceleration | ||
AMD HD3D technology | ||
AMD Mantle API | ||
DualGraphics | ||
Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
Idle States | ||
Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.![]() |
|
Intel 64 | ||
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported | ||
Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
Intel® TSX-NI | ||
Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
Thermal Monitoring | ||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
4K resolution support | ||
Max resolution over DisplayPort | [email protected] | |
Max resolution over eDP | [email protected] | |
Max resolution over HDMI 1.![]() |
[email protected] | |
Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
Intel® Identity Protection technology | ||
Intel® Memory Protection Extensions (Intel® MPX) | ||
Intel® OS Guard | ||
Intel® Secure Key technology | ||
Intel® Software Guard Extensions (Intel® SGX) | ||
Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Secure Boot |
Comparison AMD A6-7000 vs Intel Core i5-2550K what is better?
Home / CPU / AMD A6-7000 vs Intel Core i5-2550K
AMD A6-7000
2%
DeviceList score
vs
Intel Core i5-2550K
7%
DeviceList score
We compared the characteristics of AMD A6-7000 and Intel Core i5-2550K and compiled a list of advantages and a comparison table for you. Find out which one to choose in 2023 year.
AMD A6-7000 benefits
Manufacturing process technology |
28 nm -4 nm (-12.5%) better
vs
32 nm
|
Power Consumption (TDP) |
17 Wt -78 Wt (-82.1%) better
vs
95 Wt
|
Intel Core i5-2550K benefits
Winner in comparison
Number of cores |
4 2 (100%) better
vs
2
|
Number of threads |
4 2 (100%) better
vs
2
|
Maximum frequency |
3. 0.8 GGz (26.7%) better
vs
3 GGz
|
Passmark |
3449 2453 (246.3%) better
vs
996
|
General information | |
Type |
|
Для ноутбуков | Десктопный |
Architecture codename |
|
Kaveri | Sandy Bridge |
Number of cores A large number of cores improves performance in multithreaded applications.
|
|
2 | 4
2 (100%) better
|
Number of threads More threads help the cores process information more efficiently. |
|
2 | 4
2 (100%) better
|
Manufacturing process technology |
|
28 nm
-4 nm (-12.5%) better
|
32 nm |
Crystal size |
|
no data | 216 мм2 |
Transistor count |
|
no data | 1160 million |
Maximum frequency Processors with high clock speeds perform more calculations per second and thus provide better performance. |
|
3 GGz | 3.8 GGz
0.8 GGz (26.7%) better
|
64 bit support |
|
Max number of CPUs in a configuration |
|
no data | 1 |
Socket |
|
FT3 | LGA1155 |
AMD-V |
|
Series |
|
AMD Kaveri | no data |
Start price |
|
no data | 189 USD |
Price-quality ratio The sum of all the advantages of the device divided by its price. |
|
no data | 46.7 % |
Maximum core temperature |
|
no data | 73 °C |
vPro |
|
TXT Intel Trusted Execution Technology for hardware protection against malware. For each protected program, the processor allocates its own isolated section of RAM. |
|
PCI Express revision |
|
3.0 | 2.0 |
PCI-Express line count |
|
no data | 16 |
Identity Protection |
|
no data | + |
Flex Memory Access |
|
no data | + |
Quick Sync |
|
no data | + |
HDMI |
|
+ | no data |
FMA |
|
+ | no data |
FRTC |
|
+ | no data |
TrueAudio |
|
+ | no data |
PowerNow |
|
+ | no data |
PowerGating |
|
+ | no data |
Out-of-band |
|
+ | no data |
VirusProtect |
|
+ | no data |
HSA |
|
+ | no data |
IOMMU 2. |
|
+ | no data |
Number of iGPU cores |
|
3 | no data |
Enduro |
|
+ | no data |
Switchable graphics |
|
+ | no data |
UVD |
|
+ | no data |
VCE |
|
+ | no data |
FDI |
|
no data | — |
Vulkan NVIDIA’s Vulkan technology allows developers to gain low-level GPU access to optimize graphics instructions (better than OpenGL and Direct3D APIs).
|
|
+ | no data |
Fast Memory Access |
|
no data | + |
L1 Cache More threads help the cores process information more efficiently. Real performance will be noticeable in very specific tasks (video editing, databases). |
|
no data | 64 Кб (на ядро) |
L2 Cache |
|
1024 Кб | 256 Кб (на ядро) |
L3 Cache |
|
no data | 6144 Кб (всего) |
Free Multiplier |
|
Power Consumption (TDP) The calculated heat output shows the average heat output in operation under load,
|
|
17 Wt
-78 Wt (-82.1%) better
|
95 Wt |
EDB |
|
no data | + |
InTru 3D |
|
no data | — |
DisplayPort |
|
+ | no data |
Benchmarks | |
Passmark |
|
996 | 3449
2453 (246.3%) better
|
3DMark Fire Strike Physics |
|
no data | 5840 |
Technologies and extensions | |
Advanced instructions |
|
no data | Intel® SSE4.![]() |
Turbo Boost |
|
no data | 2.0 |
Idle States |
|
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) More threads help the cores process information more efficiently. Real performance will be noticeable in very specific tasks (video editing, databases). |
|
Thermal Monitoring |
|
Hyper-Threading More threads help the cores process information more efficiently. Real performance will be noticeable in very specific tasks (video editing, databases). |
|
AES-NI More threads help the cores process information more efficiently. |
|
+ | + |
AVX The presence of AVX commands improves performance in floating-point operations and in processor-demanding
|
|
RAM parameters | |
Supported memory types |
|
no data | DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333 |
Maximum memory size The maximum amount of RAM that can be used with this processor. |
|
no data | 32 Gb |
Max memory channels |
|
2 | 2 |
Virtualization technologies | |
VT-x |
|
EPT |
|
VT-d Intel’s virtualization technology allows devices on the PCI bus to be forwarded to the guest operating system so that it can work with them using its standard tools. |
|
Graphics specifications | |
Clear Video HD |
|
Integrated graphics The presence of a video core allows you to use a computer without using a video card. |
|
+ | no data |
DirectX |
|
DirectX® 12 | no data |
AMD A6-5200 vs Intel Core i5-3450: comparison
AMD A6-5200
Intel Core i5-3450
VS
AMD A6-5200
Rating: 3 points
Winner
Intel Core i5-3450
Rating: 7 points
test results
Technologies
Custom
Specification of memory
Basic characteristics
Top specifications and features
- PassMark CPU score
- PassMark CPU score
- Heat dissipation (TDP)
- Technological process
- Number of transistors
PassMark CPU score
AMD A6-5200: 1709
Intel Core i5-3450: 4338
Cinebench21.
5 score (single) UBER
AMD A6-5200: 2
Intel Core i5-3450:
Thermal Dissipation (TDP)
AMD A6-5200: 25 W
Intel Core i5-3450: 77 W
Process
AMD A6-5200: 28 nm
Intel Core i5-3450: 22 nm
Number of transistors
AMD A6-5200: 1178 million
Intel Core i5-3450: 1200 million
Description
AMD A6-5200 runs at 2Hz, second Intel Core i5-3450 runs at 3.1Hz. AMD A6-5200 is capable of overclocking up to No data Hz, and the second up to 3.5 Hz. The maximum power consumption of the first processor is 25W, while the Intel Core i5-3450 has 77W.
Regarding the architecture, AMD A6-5200 is based on 28 nm technology. Intel Core i5-3450 on 22 nm architecture.
Regarding processor memory. AMD A6-5200 can support DDR3. Maximum supported size N/A MB. It should be noted that the maximum memory bandwidth is No data. The second Intel Core i5-3450 processor is capable of supporting DDR3. The throughput is 25.6. And the maximum amount of supported RAM is 32 MB.
Graphics. AMD A6-5200 has an AMD Radeon HD 8400 graphics core. Its frequency is 600 MHz. The Intel Core i5-3450 received the Intel HD Graphics 2500 video core. Here the frequency is 650 MHz.
How processors perform in benchmarks. In the PassMark benchmark, the AMD A6-5200 scored 1709. And the Intel Core i5-3450 scored 4338 points.
Why Intel Core i5-3450 is better than AMD A6-5200
- Thermal Dissipation (TDP) 25 W vs 77 W, -68% less
- L2 cache size 2 MB vs 1 MB, 100% more
Comparison AMD A6-5200 and Intel Core i5-3450: Main points
AMD A6-5200
Intel Core i5-3450
Passmark CPU
PSMARK CPUSM write speed and seek time when testing SSD performance.
Show all
1709
max 89379
Average: 6033. 5
4338
max 89379
Average: 6033.5
3DMark06 score
2750
max 18628
Average: 3892.6
max 18628
Average: 3892.6
Cinebench R11.5 /64bit test score (Multi-Core)
1.7993
max 45.3622
Average: 5.3
max 45.3622
Average: 5.3
Cinebench R15 score (Multi-Core)
162
max 4614
Average: 638.4
max 4614
Average: 638. 4
Cinebench R15 score (Single-Core)
44
max 276
Average: 128.5
max 276
The more threads, the higher the performance of the processor, and it will be able to perform several tasks at the same time.
Show all
4
max 256
Average: 10.7
4
max 256
Average: 10.7
L1 cache size
A large amount of L1 memory accelerates results in the CPU and system performance settings
Show all
256KB
max 4608
Average: 299.3 KB
256KB
max 4608
Average: 299. 3 KB
L2 Cache Size
L2 cache with large scratchpad memory to increase processor speed and overall system performance.
Show all
2MB
max 512
Average: 4.5 MB
1MB
max 512
Average: 4.5 MB
Number of cores
4
max 72
Mean: 5.8
4
max 72
Mean: 5.8
Processor base clock speed
2GHz
max 4.7
Average: 2.5 GHz
3.1GHz
max 4. 7
Average: 2.5 GHz
Unlocked CPU multiplier
Some processors have an unlocked multiplier, which makes them faster and better in games and other applications.
N/A
N/A
Graphics
AMD Radeon HD 8400
Intel HD Graphics 2500
Max. number of processors in configuration
1
Mean: 1.3
1
Mean: 1.3
DDR version
3
Mean: 3.5
3
Mean: 3.5
Memory frequency
RAM can be faster to improve system performance.
Show all
1600MHz
max 4800
Average: 2106.2 MHz
1600MHz
max 4800
Average: 2106.2 MHz
Max. number of memory channels
The greater their number, the higher the data transfer rate from memory to processor
1
max 16
Mean: 2.9
2
max 16
Mean: 2.9
OpenCL
1.1
max 4.6
Average: 4.1
max 4.6
Average: 4.1
Intel® AES-NI Commands
AES is required to speed up encryption and decryption.
Yes
Yes
AVX
AVX allows you to increase the speed of calculations in multimedia, financial and scientific applications, it also improves the performance of Linux RAID.
Show all
Yes
Yes
sse version
Allows you to speed up multimedia tasks (such as volume control). Each subsequent version has a number of improvements
Show all
4
max 4.2
Average: 4.1
4.2
max 4.2
Average: 4.1
Socket
FT3
FCLGA1155
AMD Virtualization Technology
is
No data
DisplayPort
is
No data
HDMI
9000
Small Technology 9,0002 9,0002 9,0002 9,0002 9,0002 9,0002 9,0002 9,0002 9,0002 9,0002 9,0002 9,0002 9,0002 9,0002 9,0002 9,0002 9,0002 9,0002 9,0002 9,0002 9,0002 9,0002 9,0002 2 next generation chip.
28 nm
Average: 36.8 nm
22 nm
Average: 36.8 nm
Number of transistors
The higher their number, the more processor power it indicates
1178 million
max 57000
Average: 1517.3 million
1200 million
max 57000
Average: 1517.3 million
Heat dissipation (TDP)
Heat dissipation requirement (TDP) is the maximum amount of energy that can be dissipated by the cooling system. The lower the TDP, the less power will be consumed.
Show all
25W
Average: 67. 6 W
77W
Average: 67.6 W
Line
AMD A-Series Processors
n.a.
600 MHz
max 2400
Average: 535.8 MHz
650MHz
max 2400
Average: 535.8 MHz
DirectX
Used in demanding games providing enhanced graphics
0
max 12.1
Average: 12
max 12.1
Average: 12
Maximum processor temperature
A reset may occur if the maximum temperature at which the processor operates is exceeded.
Show all
90°C
max 110
Average value: 96 °C
°C
max 110
Average value: 96 °C
Turbo GPU
If the GPU speed drops below its limit, it can go to a high clock speed to improve performance.
Show all
875MHz
max 2100
Average: 1091 MHz
1100MHz
max 2100
Average: 1091 MHz
Code name
Kabini
Ivy Bridge
Maximum temperature Tcase
90°C
max 105
Average: 75. 1 °C
67.4°C
max 105
Average: 75.1 °C
Purpose
Desktop
Desktop
FAQ
Can AMD A6-5200 and Intel Core i5-3450 work in 4K mode?
AMD A6-5200 — Not available. Intel Core i5-3450 — Not available.
How many PCIe lanes
AMD A6-5200 — Not available. Intel Core i5-3450 — Not available.
How much RAM is supported?
AMD A6-5200 supports No GB data. Intel Core i5-3450 supports 32GB.
How fast are the processors?
AMD A6-5200 operates at 2 GHz.1 GHz.
How many cores does the processor have?
AMD A6-5200 has 4 cores. Intel Core i5-3450 has 4 cores.
Do the processors support ECC memory?
AMD A6-5200 — Not available. Intel Core i5-3450 — no.
Does the AMD A6-5200 have integrated graphics?
AMD A6-5200 — AMD Radeon HD 8400. Intel Core i5-3450 — Intel HD Graphics 2500
What kind of RAM does the
AMD A6-5200 support DDR3. The Intel Core i5-3450 supports DDR3.
What is the socket of the processors?
AMD A6-5200 is installed using FT3. The FCLGA1155 is used to install the Intel Core i5-3450.
What architecture is used?
AMD A6-5200 is based on the Kabini architecture. The Intel Core i5-3450 is based on the Ivy Bridge architecture.
Is the AMD A6-5200 multiplier unlocked?
AMD A6-5200 — no. Intel Core i5-3450 — Not available.
How do processors perform in benchmarks?
AMD A6-5200 scored 1709 points according to PassMark. Intel Core i5-3450 scored 4338 points.
What is the maximum frequency of the processors?
AMD A6-5200 maximum frequency reaches No data Hz. The maximum frequency of the Intel Core i5-3450 reaches 3.5 Hz.
How much energy do they consume?
The power consumption of the AMD A6-5200 can be up to 25 watts. The Intel Core i5-3450 has up to 25 watts.
AMD A6-5200
VS
Intel Core i5-3450
Intel Core i5-7500
VS
Intel Pentium G4600
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
VS
Intel Core i5-8500
Intel Celeron G530
VS
Intel Core i5-2400
Intel Xeon E3-1220 v2
VS
Intel Xeon E3-1285v3
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
VS
Intel Core i7-4700HQ
AMD A10-7850K
VS
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
Intel Core i5-7400
VS
Intel Core i5-9500
Intel Core i5-6402P
VS
Intel Core i7-4790K
AMD Ryzen 3 3100
VS
Intel Core i5-9300H
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
VS
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U
Intel Core i5-2450M
VS
Intel Core i5-7200U
AMD A12-9720P
VS
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U
AMD FX-4300
VS
Intel Pentium G4560
Intel Core i7-3537U
VS
Intel Pentium G3220
AMD A10-7700K
VS
Intel Core i3-6100
AMD FX-4100
VS
Intel Core i5-6400
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
VS
Intel Core i7-6950X
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
VS
Intel Core i7-10510U
Intel Core i3-3220
VS
Intel Core i5-6500
AMD A6-3410MX APU Llano specifications: tests, competitors, price
- Main page
- >
- Processors
- >
- AMD
- >
- A6-3410MX APU
Processor A6-3410MX nm APU
A6-3410MX APU core clock is 1.6 GHz. The maximum frequency in AMD Turbo Core mode reaches 2.3 GHz. Please note that the AMD A6-3410MX APU cooler must cool processors with a TDP of at least 45W at stock frequencies. When overclocked, the requirements increase.
Thanks to the built-in Radeon HD 6520G video core, the computer can work without a discrete graphics card because the monitor is connected to the video output on the motherboard.
Price in Russia
Do you want to buy cheap A6-3410MX APU? Look at the list of stores that already sell the processor in your city.
Family
- A6-3420M APU
- A6-3400M APU
Benchmarks AMD A6-3410MX APU
Game speed
Performance in our tests and similar games.
The performance of 4 cores, if any, and performance per core has the greatest impact on the result, since most games do not fully use more than 4 cores.
The speed of caches and working with RAM is also important.
Speed in office use
Performance in everyday work such as browsers and office applications.
The performance of 1 core has the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications use only one, ignoring the rest.
Similarly, many professional applications such as various CADs ignore multi-threaded performance.
Speed in heavy applications
Performance in resource-intensive tasks loading a maximum of 8 cores.
The performance of all cores and their number have the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications willingly use all the cores and increase the speed accordingly.
At the same time, certain periods of work can be demanding on the performance of one or two cores, for example, applying filters in the editor.
Data obtained from tests by users who tested their systems with and without overclocking. Thus, you see the average values corresponding to the processor.
Speed of numerical operations
Simple household tasks |
||
Minimum | Average | Maximum |
45 | Memory: 61 | 68 |
Memory 62.7 |
||
17 | 1 core: 28 | 34 |
1 core 12. |
||
36 | 2 cores: 54 | 67 |
2 cores 11.7 |
||
Demanding games and tasks |
||
Minimum | Average | Maximum |
58 | 4 cores: 96 | 110 |
4 cores 10.5 |
||
65 | 8 cores: 98 | 110 |
8 cores 5. |
Extreme |
||
Minimum | Average | Maximum |
70 | All cores: 99 | 111 904 |
All cores 1.8 |
Different tasks require different CPU strengths. A system with few fast cores and low memory latency will be fine for the vast majority of games, but will be inferior to a system with a lot of slow cores in a rendering scenario.
We believe that a minimum of 4/4 (4 physical cores and 4 threads) processor is suitable for a budget gaming PC. At the same time, some games can load it at 100%, slow down and freeze, and performing any tasks in the background will lead to a drop in FPS.
Ideally, the budget shopper should aim for a minimum of 4/8 and 6/6. A gamer with a big budget can choose between 6/12, 8/8 and 8/16. Processors with 10 and 12 cores can perform well in games with high frequency and fast memory, but are overkill for such tasks. Also, buying for the future is a dubious undertaking, since in a few years many slow cores may not provide sufficient gaming performance.
When choosing a processor for your work, consider how many cores your programs use. For example, photo and video editors can use 1-2 cores when working with filtering, and rendering or converting in the same editors already uses all threads.
Data obtained from tests by users who tested their systems both with overclocking (maximum value in the table) and without (minimum). A typical result is shown in the middle, the more filled in the color bar, the better the average result among all tested systems.
Compare
Benchmarks
Benchmarks were run on stock hardware, that is, without overclocking and with factory settings. Therefore, on overclocked systems, the points can noticeably differ upwards. Also, small performance changes may be due to the BIOS version.
Cinebench R11.5 iGPU, OpenGL
Intel Core i5-4690
20.9
Intel Core i5-4258U
20.7
Intel Core i5-4460S
20.1
Intel Core i5-4590S
20.1
Intel Core i5-4570S
20.1
AMD A6-3410MX APU
20
Intel Celeron J3355
19.6
Intel Core M-5Y71
19.5
Intel Core M-5Y51
19.5
Intel Core i7-4600U
19.3
Intel Core i5-4430
19.2
Passmark
Intel Core i3-2328M
1223
Intel Pentium G620
1221
Intel Celeron G550
1214
AMD Phenom 8450 Triple-Core
1214
Intel Pentium E6700
1210
AMD A6-3410MX APU
1209
Intel Pentium N3540 9000 1208
Intel N3150000
AMD Phenom 8650 Triple-Core
1205
Intel Core i3-2310m
1202
Intel Core i3-3217U
1195
Tests in games
FPS on Am and compliance with system requirements. Please note that the official requirements of developers in games do not always match the data of real tests. Also, the result is strongly influenced by the overclocking of the system and the graphic settings in the game. We test at high settings in FullHD resolution to get numbers close to real gameplay.
- no data
SSD
- A400 240GB
- MX500 50042
- A400 480GB
We collected a list of components most often selecting a computer based on A6-3410MX APU. Also with these components, the best results in tests and stable operation are achieved.
Most popular config: motherboard for AMD A6-3410MX APU — HP Pavilion dv6 Notebook PC, video card — HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz), SSD — A400 240GB.
Features
Main
Socket Installed in motherboards with a suitable socket. Note that a socket is not guaranteed to be compatible. The manufacturer may not add support to the BIOS. | FS1 |
Manufacturer Firm | AMD |
Presentation datePresentation in the media, official information.![]() |
2011-06-14 |
Code name of the Microarchitecture family. | Llano |
GenerationCode name for the microarchitecture generation. | A6 (Llano) |
Performance
Cores The total number of physical cores. | 4 |
ThreadsNumber of threads. The number of logical processor cores that the operating system sees. | 4 |
Multi-Threading Technology With Intel’s Hyper-threading and AMD’s SMT technology, one physical core is recognized as two logical cores by the operating system, thereby increasing processor performance in multi-threaded applications. | Missing |
Base frequencyGuaranteed frequency of all cores (P-cores in the case of the corresponding architecture) of the processor at maximum load.![]() |
1.6 GHz |
Turbo Frequency The maximum frequency of a single processor core in turbo mode. Manufacturers allow modern processors to independently increase the frequency of one or more cores under low-threaded loads, due to which performance is noticeably increased. It may depend on the nature of the load, the number of loaded cores, temperature and the specified limits. Significantly affects the speed in games and applications that are demanding on the frequency of the CPU, but do not load all threads. | 2.3 GHz |
BCLK System bus frequency. Some motherboards allow you to achieve a good performance boost by slightly raising the bus frequency. Often this has a bad effect on the stability of the system.![]() |
100 |
CPU multiplier. The final CPU frequency is determined by the simple formula BCLK * CPU multiplier. Modern processors instantly change the multiplier of each of the cores, taking into account the type of load, temperature, consumption and settings in the BIOS. | 16 |
TDPThermal Design Power is an indicator that determines heat dissipation in standard operation. The cooler or water cooling system must be rated for a larger value. Remember that with a factory bus or manual overclocking, TDP increases significantly. | 45 W |
Cache and RAM
L1 Cache First level cache. Modern processors use a multi-level cache. The first is the fastest, but the smallest. In the case of an L1 access and a miss, the L2 cache is searched for the next stage. | 128K (per core) |
L2 Cache Second level cache.![]() |
1MB (per core) |
Supported type of RAM The type of RAM depends on its frequency and timings (speed), availability, price. | DDR3 Dual-channel |
Video core
Integrated graphics core Allows you to use your computer without a discrete graphics card. The monitor is connected to the video output on the motherboard. If earlier integrated graphics made it possible to simply work at a computer, today it can replace budget video accelerators and makes it possible to play most games at low settings. | Radeon HD 6520G |
PCI
Details
Architecture Code name for the microarchitecture generation. | Llano |
Number of transistors | 1,000,000 |
Process The manufacturing process, measured in nanometers.![]() |