AMD Ryzen or Intel — which CPU is best?
Whether you are looking for gaming performance, database hosting, or simply dedicated server hosting, you must be aware of the fierce battle for CPU dominance between these two titans and the AMD vs Intel battle that has grown in the last few years.
While Intel’s processors have historically outdone AMD processors in single-core raw power, AMD’s CPUs have made significant improvements in their core count and threads, and outsold its competition as a result, when it comes to multi-core performance.
Until 3 or 4 years ago, AMD’s marketing team seemed to struggle to get the same exposure that Intel garnered. Around this time they started targeting the PC gamer and made improvements to their packaging, using different color schemes, and taking a new tack with their marketing efforts. This led to the release of their Ryzen series which changed the game.
When different processors are becoming indistinguishable, it is essential to know which one you should use. In AMD’s favor, they have historically offered more value in their processors, while Intel holds the reins with stronger brand recognition (the Nike of microprocessors).
AMD vs Intel is currently in a battle for market share and are developing different technologies in their effort to get ahead. For example, Intel uses LGA1200 sockets for their processors while Ryzen chips rely on AM4 sockets, meaning that components such as motherboards must be chosen accordingly, or they will be incompatible.
Fortunately, both AMD and Intel offer a wide range of CPUs to suit all applications.
See Also: (Live Webinar) Meet ServerMania: Transform Your Server Hosting Experience
Consumer vs Enterprise CPUs
Not all CPUs are made the same. The CPUs that are built into your server are meant for sustained workloads and can run at 100% capacity all the time, whereas the parts in the desktop processors are not rated as high. Because of this, server CPUs are generally slightly more costly than would be for a desktop PC, but offer a higher level of productivity performance.
Most desktop processors also cannot handle server-only functions, such as performing error-correcting codes and registered memory. The largest difference between the two is the fact that server CPUs will more often than not have higher core counts than those used on a desktop PC, which results in higher power consumption. This is because server workloads are much more multi-threaded than most desktop workloads, due to the extra cores.
Intel processors have enjoyed supremacy in this segment for years, but AMD’s Ryzen Threadripper has changed the landscape quite a bit since its release. AMD traditionally doesn’t distinguish between its server processors and the desktop space. The AMD CPU used in servers are consumer-grade chips that are so powerful that they work incredibly well in servers (in 2017 AMD released their Epyc line, built specifically for servers). Whereas Intel has nearly always had a line of processors designed specifically for servers.
Intel vs AMD Processors Explained
As is the case for any brand, they usually have names for each model or series. AMD offers their Ryzen processors: Ryzen 3, Ryzen 5, Ryzen 7, Ryzen 9, and Epyc lines, while Intel offers their Silver, Gold, and Platinum lines as part of their Xeon brand.
AMD has always been a viable option for processors and has only improved with their Ryzen series of CPUs. The most recent line, AMD Ryzen 3, 5 and 7, and 9 chips incorporate solid multi-core performance and deliver affordable processors.
Intel’s Xeon E-2300 series of 3rd gen scalable processors were released in Q2 of 2021 and offer 10 new processor varieties, including options with 4, 6, or 8 cores.
AMD’s Ryzen 3000 CPUs offer a huge difference over the previous Ryzen 1000 and 2000 CPUs. They feature the redesigned Zen 2 architecture, AMD’s then-latest entry into its Ryzen line proved to be more than just a slight generational improvement, it delivered. Ryzen 3000 CPUs are so much in demand that it is very difficult to keep them in stock.
However, while AMD has already jumped to more advanced 10nm and 7nm architectures, many industry watchers were surprised by Intel’s decision to continue with 14-nanometer architecture.
Take AMD’s Ryzen 5800X chip, it comes in at a reasonable price and incredible performance improvements over the last generation, which makes the 5800X one of the best processors currently available. They still use AMD’s AM4 CPU socket, which means that they are backward and forward compatible, while Intel holds a long history of releasing new processors that are incompatible with older socket types.
AMD’s continuous use of AM4 sockets over the previous generations has provided users with tremendous value concerning future upgradability. For instance, if you were using a 3900 chip on an Asrock motherboard, upgrading to the new series is as easy as downloading a BIOS update for your board. While the odds of being able to take an old Intel chip and put it in your newer motherboard or vice versa is slim on Intel’s side.
Intel also offers a dual chipset in many of their lines, whereas AMD only started recently with the release of their Epyc line of server-specific chips.
AMD Ryzen 5800X Callout Graphic. Copy (two lines): Is the AMD Ryzen 5800X for you? Learn more
Intel vs AMD Performance Comparison
AMD changed its strategy a few years ago and put a focus on gaming performance to take market share from Intel and released the 3000 series. The CPU performance of this line showed a marked increase in workload capacity.
The 3900X features 12 cores, 24 threads, a base clock speed of 3.8GHz, a boost of up to 4.6GHz, and a TPD of 105W.
AMD’s Ryzen 3950X is one of their top server processors with 16 cores, 32 threads, a base clock speed of 3.5GHz, a maximum turbo boost of 4.7GHz, and a TPD of105W. Both these chips are phenomenal, making them perfect for high-end gaming or multimedia editing.
Upon first glance, you would think that the Intel Xeon E5-2695 v2 might not compare. To begin with, the price is dramatically lower than the 3950 and it may not look as beefy from the outset, seeing how it comes with 12 cores, 24 threads, a base clock of 2. 4 GHz, with a max boost to 3.2 GHz.
The interesting thing about the E5-2695 v2 and how it compares directly with the aforementioned 3950X is that the 2695 is not only far more cost-effective than the 3950, but when you consider the capability of the 2695 using a dual chipset, now it becomes a contender and still at a price considerably lower than the 3950.
With multi-core server workloads, these CPUs are perfect for any high-end gaming, creative tasks such as 4k video editing, or 3D rendering that need a large amount of power at an affordable price.
Conversely, AMD’s top-of-the-line variant, the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X is in a league of its own with high clock speeds due to its 64 cores and 128 threads. It has a base clock speed of 2.9GHz, a boost speed of up to 4.3 GHz, and a TPD of 290W. Thanks to its multi-threaded performance, this processor is an all-purpose workhorse that can be used for VPN, large data computations, AI, and military applications.
On the Intel side, its Xeon Silver 4214R is comparable to the Ryzen 3900X, also featuring 12 cores and 24 threads, however, the clock speed on this one is lower, with a base of 2.4 GHz, a max. of 3.5 GHz and a TPD of 100W.
While the Intel E5 2620 V4 matches AMD for cores, coming in at 16, again they fall just a little short on clock speed with the 2620 V4 having a base speed of 2.1 GHz and boosting as high as 3.0 GHz. The TPD is 85W.
It’s difficult comparing anything to Ryzen’s Threadripper, but the Intel Xeon E5-2699 v4 scalable processor compares very well, coming in with a core count of 22, making the thread count 44. The base clock on this chip is 2.2 GHz, while the max. boost comes in at 3.6 GHz.
Callout Graphic. Copy (two lines): Need Help Deciding? Book a Consultation.
Intel processors have commonly had the most overclocking headroom, which gives you more over the baseline speed performance and, in the past allowed for higher frequencies than AMD Ryzen CPUs. Still, it is also worth considering how stable your CPU will be with such high clock speeds. Here are some of the other popular Intel models that compare to AMD’s Ryzen 9 line.
CPU Processor Base Frequency Max. Turbo Frequency
AMD Ryzen 3900X 3.8 GHz 4.6 GHz
vs Xeon Silver 4214R 2.4 GHz 3.5 GHz
AMD Ryzen 3950X 3.5 GHz 4.7 GHz
vs E5 2690 v4 2.6 GHz 3.5 GHz
AMD Ryzen 3990X 2.9 GHz 4. 3 GHz
vs Xeon Gold 6338 2.0 GHz 3.2 GHz
AMD Ryzen vs Intel Xeon
With the increased market demand for AMD Ryzen Servers, vendors have had a hard time keeping enough of these in stock to service demands since they often sell out before even hitting the data centers (and is especially the case here at ServerMania). AMD cannot seem to keep up with demand, with many people reselling or even hoarding the 3900s for crypto. The scarcity of hardware is currently an issue for AMD, whereas Intel’s long history has allowed for a more reliable supply chain.
The most popular CPUs among enterprise customers is the beast we know as the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X which offers plenty of power and speed with its remarkable 64 cores, and 128 threads, making this the most powerful processor for product performance. This affordable processor is based on their Zen 2 microarchitecture, and is fabricated on TSMC‘s 7 nm process. It also supports 64 PCIe lanes at 4.0.
A comparable processor would be the Xeon 6338 Gold Series with its powerful 32 cores, 64 threads base clock speed of 2.0 Ghz, with max. turbo frequency of 3.2 Ghz. This processor is based on the X86 architecture and is highly sophisticated, allowing the Xeon line to suit a widening array of complex applications. Much like the 3990X, this processor also supports 64 PCIe lanes at 4.0.
It is worth mentioning again the Intel chips come with an integrated graphics card, whereas AMD does not.
Browse our Intel and AMD Dedicated Server Options
The war for domination must include AMD’s Epyc Series. Released two months prior to the 3950 was AMD’s EPYC 7402P which is a 64-bit tetracosa-core x86 server microprocessor and comes with 24 cores and 48 threads. It has a base clock at 2.8GHz, max speed at 3.35GHz, and a 180W power rating. This processor supports single-socket configurations only and up to 4 TiB of eight channels DDR4-3200 memory per socket. Epyc 7402P is based on the Rome 7nm family and part of the EPYC series.
Due to its massive memory bandwidth, capacity and exceptional I/O, this monster of a server processor is designed for intensive computational tasks such as artificial intelligence (AI) and high-performance computing such as industrial or military applications.
Callout Graphic. Copy: View These Servers (link)
AMD holds the title for more affordable of the two, however, Intel is doubling down AMD’s increased competitiveness over the past few years by adding more cores, threads, and power to the mix. And unlike an AMD processor, there is no increased gen-on pricing for these new processors, resulting in a better price-per-core and price-per-thread. As a response, AMD reduced its prices and stepped up the competition.
If you want an AMD Ryzen 9 (16 cores), you would be looking at a price in the vicinity of $600-800, whereas a comparable Intel processor would be the 2699 E4 would cost around $4000, but if you wanted a Xeon E5 2690 (14 cores), you would be looking at only $2000.
You should note that the Ryzen line does not offer dual CPU formats until you get to the Epyc which will run you around $4000-5000 per chip. If you do go with AMD, you will be required to purchase a separate dedicated graphics card.
Check out our 10GBPS Unmetered Dedicated Servers
Which is the Best CPU?
This article has covered the never-ending argument of comparing AMD vs Intel and who makes superior CPU architecture between two major corporations. It all comes down to your specific use and preference about AMD vs Intel.
CPU performance is about the same, depending on which line you go with, with the largest difference being the price between Intel and AMD.
Suppose you are looking for a high core count in the top segment. In that case, AMD CPUs hold an advantage with more core and thread count and a better price-per-dollar performance ratio.
On the flipside with Intel allowing for dual CPUs on the motherboard chipset, the Xeon E5-2695 v2 offers the better price-per-dollar performance ratio.
We understand that not everyone has the time to research all of their options, and the information available online can be much to sort through. We would encourage you to book a free server hosting consultation to provide answers to your questions about server hosting from our experts without any obligation or cost.
In addition, if you are looking for more help in deciding between AMD’s Ryzen processors and Intel’s Core series, which have similar features but with different price tags or need some assistance figuring out what type of processor might be best suited for your needs, you can browse our Intel and AMD Dedicated Server Options.
Difference Between AMD and Intel
By Mohit Uniyal|Updated : September 23rd, 2022
0 upvote0 commentsshare
With the growing need for high-speed processors, the debate of AMD vs Intel processor is becoming a hot topic over the years. Both companies produce high-quality products, and buyers find it difficult to choose which product. The difference between AMD and Intel depends on the core counts, clock speeds, and other specifications.
AMD vs Intel or the difference between AMD and Intel rises with the use and demand of the users. Here, we will first discuss what is Intel and AMD thereafter. We will see the difference between AMD and Intel processors based on the various specific aspects in the coming sections.
Difference Between AMD and Intel PDF
Read Full Article
Difference Between AMD And Intel
Both Intel and AMD are separate businesses that make the motherboards and central processor units (CPUs) used in personal computers. The difference between AMD and Intel are explained in the table provided below.
|AMD VS Intel|
|At a higher range, AMD is cost-effective.||At the lower range, Intel is cost-effective.|
|Processors remain cooler after hours of usage.||Processors may get heated sooner with usage.|
|Clock speed surpasses 5.0 GHz with a lot of heat production.||The clock speed surpasses 5.0 GHz.|
|Less efficient than Intel.||More efficient than AMD.|
|Can multiprocess upto 8 sockets/ 128 cores.||Can go up to 4 sockets/ 28 cores.|
|iGPU is not present in all series of AMD.||iGPU is present in almost all cores.|
|Example: AMD Ryzen, AMD EPYC, AMD FX-Series, AMD Threadripper, AMD Athlon 64, AMD Opteron, etc.||Example: Intel Core m series, Intel Xeon, Intel Core i series, etc.|
What is AMD?
AMD(Advanced Micro Devices) is an American-based manufacturing company focused on improving next-generation computing experiences. They produce microchips, CPUs, semiconductors, motherboards, and a lot more computer-based devices.
Over the years, AMD has produced Zen-based processors, which greatly impacted the market. The AMD has produced cost-effective power-hungry processors, improving the gaming experience and matching overall user expectations.
Example: AMD Ryzen, AMD EPYC, AMD FX-Series, AMD Threadripper, AMD Athlon 64, AMD Opteron, etc.
What is Intel?
Integrated Electronics or Intel is a multinational corporation and technology company. Intel has created its name in the market for its product and performance. They produce various products such as Central processing units, Microprocessors, Systems-on-chip (SoCs), Motherboard chipsets, Integrated graphics processing units (iGPU), Network interface controllers, etc.
The Intel processors consume higher power and generally consume more battery power. Intel processors have covered the complete Indian market for more than 15 years now.
Example: Intel Core m series, Intel Xeon, Intel Core I series, etc.
Here are some related topics to the difference between AMD and Intel:
FAQs on Difference Between AMD and Intel
What is the difference between AMD and Intel?
The major difference between AMD and Intel is that in the low range Intel is cost-effective whereas, in the higher range, AMD is cost-effective. It is advised to choose AMD in the higher range and vice versa for the low range.
Which is AMD vs Intel Processors?
The answer to this question depends on the demand of the user. If a user wants a product in the low range and cost-effective, they must opt for Intel, and for the cost-effective product in a higher range, users must opt for AMD. AMD processors are preferred for gaming as they remain cooler for numerous hours of operation.
What is the difference between AMD and Intel based on efficiency?
Intel processors are different from AMD processors in numerous ways. The AMD processors are more efficient than Intel but have a better cooling system. The AMD can not surpass the clock speed of 5.0 GHz whereas Intel can do it easily with less heat production.
Why is AMD cheaper than Intel?
AMD is cheaper than Intel in a high range. It is known to be cost-effective in that range. It is known that the AMD processor carries less manufacturing design which makes it cheaper for the users.
Is AMD slower than Intel?
It is known that AMD processors are generally slower than that Intel processors. As per the clock speed, AMD can not surpass the 5 GHz clock speed without producing much heat whereas Intel can surpass it easily.
GATE & PSU CS
Computer ScienceGATEGATE CSENIELITOther ExamsQuick LinksMock Test
Follow us for latest updates
- BYJU’S Exam Prep: The Exam Preparation App
GradeStack Learning Pvt. Ltd.Windsor IT Park, Tower — A, 2nd Floor,
Sector 125, Noida,
Uttar Pradesh 201303
Eternal confrontation between Intel and AMD. Or no longer? / Habr
What is more important, more gigahertz or a new technical process?
Who is developing and who is stagnating, and on the processor of which company to assemble a top-end system in 2020?
We will try to answer these questions in our comparison of two monster processors from Intel and AMD.
Rethinking HEDT Processors, Ultimate Solutions for Demanding Users
In the spring of 2019, Intel unveiled its new processors designed to propel the company to a leading position in the HEDT processor niche. The leading processor of the rethought line and the direction as a whole was the Intel Core i9-10980XE.
The Intel i9 10980XE is packed with 18 cores and 36 threads, has 24.75 MB of cache and boasts a clock speed of 3.0 GHz with Turbo boost Max support.
Intel’s most powerful HEDT processor line, the 10980XE, was designed to regain the leading position of the company and leave AMD far behind, but in fact, Intel had to adapt to a competitor.
Due to the decrease in demand for HEDT type processors and the appearance of a similar line from AMD at a lower price, Intel had to “curb its appetites” and release its top processor at a suggested retail price 9$79 at the time of its release.
The key features of this processor was the ability to use the proprietary Turbo Boost 3. 0 technology — overclocking the core from the standard 3.0 GHz to 4.8 GHz after using the utility. Intel at the time of the release of this processor positioned it as a new round in the HEDT segment due to the improvement of the 14 nm process technology, but did not expect such a powerful response from AMD.
Development or modernization
Fans of Intel took the appearance of the new processor rather coolly. After its rethinking, the production of other models of the line was suspended — because of which those who wanted to purchase a HEDT-type processor from Intel simply had no choice. If you, as a buyer, wanted to stay true to Intel and get the ultimate solution, all you had to do was buy a Core i9 processor10980XE.
Despite cutting the line and reducing the price under the onslaught of cheaper processors from AMD, Intel managed to create an ultimate solution — at least not for long.
256 GB of RAM and fixing vulnerabilities that Intel changed to be at the helm again
In order not to be unfounded, speaking about the ultimatum of its product, Intel has made a number of changes to the updated version of the top processor of the Core X line. 0007
This is how the DDR4 memory specification at 2933 MHz became available to us, if a pair of DIMMs per channel is installed, Intel offers a frequency of 2666 MHz. The Intel Core i9 10980XE is capable of up to 256 GB of RAM, making it a great solution for working with large amounts of information and video rendering, characterizing its multitasking.
Despite all the positive aspects, including the built-in Intel utility — Turbo Boost max 3.0 — the company failed to overclock all the processor cores. The difference in frequencies is such that if the conditionally first core frequency after Turbo boost max 3.0 is 4.8 GHz, then the frequency of the last processor core even after overclocking will be 3.8 GHz.
Such overclocking cannot be called bad, but it cannot be called the most efficient either. One of the problems with overclocking Intel processors is the conditions dictated by the company itself. Experienced overclockers have no room for thought — after all, any overclocking of Intel processors becomes problematic due to the company itself cutting off the ability to use the full potential of its processors.
Do not forget about the vulnerabilities of this line of processors. Despite all the efforts to close all the holes in the system, by closing some vulnerabilities, Intel opened others.
In turn, AMD did not create additional problems for users who want to get the maximum available power from the company’s products. Overclocking of Ryzen processors and AMD RAM allows even on motherboards with A-chipset, despite the fact that due to the number of power circuits it is better not to conduct such experiments.
The latest generation of Intel processors raised a lot of questions, it would seem that the ultimate product quickly lost its uniqueness due to the release of an updated line of HEDT type processors from AMD. Top processor Intel Core i9The 10980 XE could not stand the competition, which only aggravated the situation for Intel.
AMD, on the contrary, is going uphill, no matter how regrettable it may sound, but it seems that the company will soon occupy Intel’s niche in the processor market, and Intel has every chance to sink into oblivion with the advent of the era of ARM processors.
AMD’s answer, updated lineup and power beyond
AMD went the other way when presenting its updated line of Ryzen Threadriper processors at CES 2020, which caused a shock from Intel fans.
The top processor of the updated line is the Ryzen Threadripper 3990x, which uses 64 cores and 128 threads against Intel’s top solution — 18 cores and only 36 threads.
The new AMD processor is also a modification of its colleague — already released, but AMD, unlike Intel, took the EPYC 7202 P server processor as the basis for the new model.
The Threadripper 3990x reduced the available number of memory channels, due to the use of this processor not in servers, but in desktop solutions, but compensated for this loss by increasing the clock frequency from base 2.9GHz up to 4.3 GHz within one thermal package.
AMD does not intend to impose any restrictions on motherboards, the Ryzen Threadripper 3990x processor will work on all sTRX4 socket motherboards. The company also claims that regular DDR4 memory with a clock frequency of 3200 MHz is also suitable for the operation of this processor, only adding that for correct operation, the desired amount of RAM should be equal to 1 GB per 1 processor core.
AMD positions this processor as an ideal solution for content makers. System rendering speed with a single core of the Threadripper 39 processor90x is one and a half times faster than the rendering speed on a competing system with a 28-core Xeon platinum processor.
Thus, if you are engaged in content creation, rendering and editing, the Ryzen Threadripper 3990x processor will be the best solution from the desktop processors currently on the market.
From words to deeds, comparing Intel Core i9 10980XE and AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
In the table below, we compared two top processors from AMD and Intel
As we can see, based on the information in the table, these processors are located in completely different price categories, the cost of AMD’s top product is almost 4 times higher than its opponent, but it offers a 7 nm process technology, 64 cores versus 18 for Intel and better rendering performance .
Which platform to choose for building a powerful and multitasking PC
The answer to this question lies in your field of activity. If you want to build a system designed for game streaming and medium installation complexity, an Intel product is definitely your choice. The Core X processors handle the latest in video games well and excel at editing and rendering medium-length footage.
If you’re building a system designed for editing long and complex videos, creating content using 3D modeling or motion capture, the Ryzen Threadripper 3990x is definitely your choice. This processor can easily handle editing and rendering of any complexity due to its multi-core, and the 7-nanometer process technology will be a nice addition. If your field of activity is tied to processing large amounts of data and rendering, AMD will be a godsend for you.
As for the general opinion, it seems to me that Intel is losing its grip. Despite the fact that AMD has always been in the role of a «catching up» company, it gradually begins to absorb the processor market, releasing more and more affordable and powerful solutions. Building a system for more than one year and looking at the current situation on the processor market, I would definitely build such a system based on AMD processors.
By the way, according to information from several sources, Intel and AMD also clashed on the battlefield for a contract with TSMC, which owns the technology for manufacturing microcircuits using a 7-nm process technology. Here, the US government also plays on the side of Intel, because thanks to the sanctions imposed on Huawei, TSMC had to refuse to work with it and lose 15 to 20% of revenue.
Our company offers for rent servers with processors from Intel and AMD. In the latter case, these are epic servers! Virtual servers with AMD EPYC CPU, CPU core frequency up to 3.4 GHz. The maximum configuration will allow you to come off to the fullest — 128 CPU cores, 512 GB RAM, 4000 GB NVMe.
How do Intel processors differ from AMD processors?
More recently, the question of competition between Intel and AMD processors was discussed very actively by those interested: gamers and overclockers were ready to defend their preferences in network wars, all processor lines from both manufacturers were run on test benches. Today, with the development of the mobile electronics segment, in which the processors of both Intel and AMD are very poorly represented, the relevance of the comparison is a thing of the past. However, you can still hear advice on choosing one or another manufacturer, sometimes completely categorical. The user, who purchases the system in assembly or independently upgrades, still does not know what to give preference to. While the differences between Intel and AMD processors are far from obvious, knowing the main points of comparison can help you optimize your system.
- Definition of Intel and AMD processors
- Comparison of Intel and AMD
- Difference between Intel processors and AMD
Definition of Intel and AMD processors
Intel processors are microprocessors manufactured by the American corporation Intel, used in portable and stationary personal computers. Today they occupy about 80% of the market, several lines are considered relevant, models of which demonstrate varying degrees of performance.
AMD processors are microprocessors manufactured by the American corporation Advanced Micro Devices. They are used in stationary and portable systems. AMD does not manufacture components on its own, but only develops and orders from third-party manufacturers. To date, the share of AMD processors in the market is about 20%.
Comparison of Intel and AMD processors
What is the difference between Intel and AMD processors? The system-forming difference between Intel and AMD processors is the sockets, or slots, in which they are installed. In this case, there is no and cannot be a compromise cross-platform, so for a certain motherboard with a given set of characteristics, there is no choice between manufacturers. For today, sockets AM3, AM3 +, as well as sockets for a processor with an integrated graphics core FM1 and FM2, are relevant for AMD. Intel today offers processors for LGA 1155/1156 and LGA 2011 sockets. If processors for AM3 + are compatible with AM3, then LGA does not imply a replacement option. It is worth noting that the relevance is very relative, since it only concerns the sale of relevant components in Russian stores, and not production.
Many models of processor lines from both manufacturers with very different characteristics make it impossible to compare Intel and AMD in terms of the performance of their products. In the budget segment, represented today by processors with integrated graphics (considered as a solution for mobile systems), AMD with the Trinity line is cheaper (at the same clock speeds) than the younger generation of Sandy Bridge from Intel. Ditching a discrete graphics card is a real way to save on office and home systems that don’t run resource-hungry applications. If the cost criterion is not the main one, then Sandy Bridge wins somewhat in performance, primarily due to the larger third-level cache. The next generation of Ivy Bridge already outperforms Trinity in terms of processing power even when comparing dual-core and quad-core models, respectively. The graphics cores of hybrid processors are more powerful in AMD, so for a budget gaming system, Trinity or the cheapest Llano can be recommended.
If the user plans to set serious tasks for his system, for example, video processing, then AMD Vishera (FX) processors, thanks to optimized work with multiple threads, outperform even the top Core i7 in tests. The price difference is about $130, so the benefit of AMD’s offering is clear.
As for power consumption, which can be a serious selection criterion for an overclocker, the AMD processor line cannot boast of savings: even Trinity mobiles produce immodest 65 watts.
Difference between Intel and AMD processors
- AMD processors other than APUs are compatible with AM3 and AM3+ sockets, Intel processors require installation in one type of LGA socket.