Gtx 1650 vs amd rx 570: GTX 1650 vs RX 570 Game Performance Benchmarks (i7-8700K vs i7-7700K)

Nvidia GTX 1650 vs RX 570: Clash of the best budget graphics cards

The Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 is the latest graphics card in Nvidia’s budget-oriented Turing line-up. Aimed at 1080p gamers looking to get 60fps on either Medium to High settings, it’s a tempting buy for just £139 / $149. But when the 8GB version of AMD’s Radeon RX 570 can be found for practically the same amount of money these days, the battle for which graphics card belongs inside your PC gets a little more complicated. To help you decide, I’ve put both of them head to head via the medium of some lovely bar charts to see which one’s best. Because nothing settles a best graphics card debate like some good, old, lovely graphs.

Watch on YouTube

GTX 1650 vs RX 570: How we test

As per usual, I’ve run each card through my general games benchmarking suite at 1920×1080 and 2560×1440 resolutions to see how they perform across different graphics quality settings. The idea is to see what it takes to get a decent 60fps in each game, and how far each card is able to stretch itself before things get too choppy for comfort.

The games in question are Assassin’s Creed Odyssey, Final Fantasy XV (with Nvidia’s fancy HairWorks, TurfEffects, VXAO and ShadowLibs effects turned off), Monster Hunter: World, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Total War: Warhammer II, Forza Horizon 4, The Witcher III and Metro Exodus (albeit only on Medium settings because that game’s benchmark tool is rough on anything more demanding).

Paired with my Intel Core i5-8600K CPU and 16GB of Corsair Vengeance 2133MHz RAM, I’ve seen what each card can do on Ultra, High and Medium settings at 1080p, and Medium at 1440p (because realistically you’re not going to be pushing either card any higher than that), and taken an average frame rate either from their own built-in benchmarks or from my own repeated manual gameplay tests to see how they stack up against each other.

Today, I’ve got Zotac’s GeForce GTX 1650 OC edition and the 8GB PowerColor Radeon RX 570 Red Dragon, both of which are at the lower end of their respective price spectrums. This should give us a pretty good idea of what to expect as a baseline experience from each type of card, and puts both of them on a level playing field — which is important for those looking to make the most of their hard-earned pennies.

GTX 1650 vs RX 570: 1080p performance

Starting with how the GTX 1650 and RX 570 performed on Ultra settings at 1080p, you can see from the graph below that the RX 570 has the upper hand in every game going. Admittedly, neither of these cards are really ‘Ultra’-tier GPUs — that’s more GTX 1660 / RX 580 kind of territory — but if you’re the sort of person who values graphical fidelity over super fast speeds, then the RX 570 is definitely the best card for the job here.

In the GTX 1650’s defence, there are still a couple of games where it’s more or less neck and neck with the RX 570. In Total War: Warhammer II and Final Fantasy XV, for example, there’s an average gap of just 2-3fps — something you’re arguably not going to notice in-game.

However, what these graphs don’t show you is the highs and lows of each of those games, and in both cases it was the GTX 1650 that dipped below the tell-tale 30fps line rather than the RX 570. Whereas AMD’s effort always managed to keep its head about 30fps when the action got a bit heated in these games, the GTX 1650 dropped to a stuttery 28fps. Again, it doesn’t sound like much on paper, but in practice it’s huge. Every frame counts when you’re hovering around the 30fps mark, and just a couple of extra fps here and there can make all the difference between a playable action sequence and a spluttering slideshow.

Still, as I said earlier, Ultra quality isn’t really what you’re going for with these cards. Instead, you’re almost certainly going to be more comfortable on High, the results of which you can see below. I’ve omitted Forza Horizon 4 from this graph, as both cards already hit a comfortable 60fps over on Ultra, but you can see it’s a much tighter race on this particular quality setting, with the GTX 1650 closing the gap in Assassin’s Creed Odyssey and offering much more playable speeds in Shadow of the Tomb Raider.

Looking at this graph, you might think it was a bit unfair to come out so firmly in favour of the RX 570 in my GTX 1650 review, but there are still a couple of things to note here. Firstly, while Shadow of the Tomb Raider is a lot smoother for the GTX 1650 here, the RX 570 achieved the same average on the next graphics setting up. Likewise, you’re starting to enter the realms of high refresh rate monitor territory with the RX 570 here (just look at that massive lead over on The Witcher III), while the GTX 1650 is still averaging below 60fps on this setting.

Moreover, as you can see from the Medium settings graph below, the RX 570 creates an even bigger performance gap here, offering 10fps boosts in Final Fantasy XV and Shadow of the Tomb Raider (although as I’ve noted before, Medium seems to be weirdly identical to Tomb Raider’s High setting in this particular game), and almost an extra 20fps in Metro Exodus.

For me, that’s enough to tip the scales in the RX 570’s favour at this resolution, as it’s not only able to offer better speeds on the very top settings, but it’s also able to hit 60fps much more consistently down on Medium settings as well.

GTX 1650 vs RX 570: 1440p performance

But it’s not just 1080p where the RX 570 comes out on top. It’s also able to offer superior performance at 2560×1440 as well. I’ve stuck with just Medium settings for this resolution, as even this is a bit of a struggle for these particular cards, but as you can see below, on average the RX 570 is faster in every single game.

At this resolution, the RX 570’s 8GB of memory really comes in handy, giving it a massive leg up when it comes to dealing with higher resolution texture packs. Just look at that Metro Exodus result, for example. Whereas the GTX 1650 is completely unplayable on the benchmark’s Normal settings, the RX 570 managed an impressive average of 42fps, which is no mean feat considering how taxing it is. Likewise, even older games such as The Witcher III benefit here, with the RX 570 offering almost a 10fps lead over the GTX 1650.

These games are all still largely playable on the GTX 1650, of course, but with averages right down in the low 30s in most cases, it can be a bit borderline. The RX 570, on the other hand, is comfortably in the low 40fps zone in a lot of games here, giving it just that little bit of extra versatility for those with higher resolution monitors.

GTX 1650 vs RX 570: Conclusion

Overall, then, I think it’s a clear win for the RX 570 here. The GTX 1650 pulls it back a bit when playing on High settings at 1080p, but everywhere else it simply can’t match the speeds offered by its AMD rival, especially if you’re looking to get a bit of 1440p gaming in there as well.

The GTX 1650 might still be worth considering if it suddenly came down in price (or the RX 570 suddenly got much more expensive), but when both graphics cards cost roughly the same amount of money — the Zotac’s GTX 1650 OC, for instance, costs £139 in the UK, while the PowerColor RX 570 is £145 — you’d need a very good reason indeed to choose the GTX 1650 over the RX 570 right now. As I mentioned in my GTX 1650 review, it could be that you want to take advantage of the GTX’s tiny stature to build a particularly compact PC, or you don’t want to shell out for a beefier PSU given how it already draws all the power it needs direct from your motherboard.

But if you’re just building a regular PC and want the best speeds for the least amount of money, then the RX 570 has the GTX 1650 beaten hands down. Plus, until June 8, you also get a free copy of The Division 2 and World War Z with the RX 570, which is arguably a much better deal than Nvidia’s free Fortnite gear pack.

AMD Radeon RX 570 vs Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1650 Gaming OC: What is the difference?

50points

AMD Radeon RX 570

43points

Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1650 Gaming OC

vs

54 facts in comparison

AMD Radeon RX 570

Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1650 Gaming OC

Why is AMD Radeon RX 570 better than Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1650 Gaming OC?

  • 1.75 TFLOPS higher floating-point performance?
    5 TFLOPSvs3.25 TFLOPS
  • 57.6 GTexels/s higher texture rate?
    159.2 GTexels/svs101.6 GTexels/s
  • 96GB/s more memory bandwidth?
    224GB/svs128GB/s
  • 128bit wider memory bus width?
    256bitvs128bit
  • 1152 more shading units?
    2048vs896
  • 1000million more transistors?
    5700 millionvs4700 million
  • 72 more texture mapping units (TMUs)?
    128vs56
  • 1 newer version of OpenCL?
    2. 2vs1.2

Why is Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1650 Gaming OC better than AMD Radeon RX 570?

  • 317MHz faster GPU clock speed?
    1485MHzvs1168MHz
  • 18.28 GPixel/s higher pixel rate?
    58.08 GPixel/svs39.8 GPixel/s
  • 45W lower TDP?
    75Wvs120W
  • 250MHz faster memory clock speed?
    2000MHzvs1750MHz
  • 1002MHz higher effective memory clock speed?
    8002MHzvs7000MHz
  • 571MHz faster GPU turbo speed?
    1815MHzvs1244MHz
  • 2nm smaller semiconductor size?
    12nmvs14nm
  • Supports 3D?

Which are the most popular comparisons?

AMD Radeon RX 570

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060

Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1650 Gaming OC

vs

Asus Radeon RX 550 4GB

AMD Radeon RX 570

vs

Gigabyte Radeon RX 6500 XT Gaming OC

Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1650 Gaming OC

vs

AMD Radeon RX Vega 8

AMD Radeon RX 570

vs

AMD Radeon RX 580

Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1650 Gaming OC

vs

MSI GeForce GTX 1650 Ventus XS OC

AMD Radeon RX 570

vs

MSI GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Gaming

Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1650 Gaming OC

vs

AMD Radeon RX 550

AMD Radeon RX 570

vs

AMD Radeon RX 6400

Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1650 Gaming OC

vs

AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100

AMD Radeon RX 570

vs

Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060

Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1650 Gaming OC

vs

Inno3D GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 Twin X2 OC

AMD Radeon RX 570

vs

Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop

Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1650 Gaming OC

vs

MSI GeForce GTX 1650 Ventus XS

AMD Radeon RX 570

vs

Nvidia Geforce GTX 1660 Super

Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1650 Gaming OC

vs

Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1650 OC

AMD Radeon RX 570

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660

Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1650 Gaming OC

vs

Asus ROG Strix GeForce GTX 1060

Price comparison

User reviews

Overall Rating

AMD Radeon RX 570

2 User reviews

AMD Radeon RX 570

8. 5/10

2 User reviews

Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1650 Gaming OC

0 User reviews

Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1650 Gaming OC

0.0/10

0 User reviews

Features

Value for money

9.5/10

2 votes

No reviews yet

 

Gaming

8.5/10

2 votes

No reviews yet

 

Performance

8.5/10

2 votes

No reviews yet

 

Fan noise

7.5/10

2 votes

No reviews yet

 

Reliability

8.5/10

2 votes

No reviews yet

 

Performance

1.GPU clock speed

1168MHz

1485MHz

The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a higher clock speed.

2.GPU turbo

1244MHz

1815MHz

When the GPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased performance.

3. pixel rate

39.8 GPixel/s

58.08 GPixel/s

The number of pixels that can be rendered to the screen every second.

4.floating-point performance

5 TFLOPS

3.25 TFLOPS

Floating-point performance is a measurement of the raw processing power of the GPU.

5.texture rate

159.2 GTexels/s

101.6 GTexels/s

The number of textured pixels that can be rendered to the screen every second.

6.GPU memory speed

1750MHz

2000MHz

The memory clock speed is one aspect that determines the memory bandwidth.

7.shading units

Shading units (or stream processors) are small processors within the graphics card that are responsible for processing different aspects of the image.

8.texture mapping units (TMUs)

TMUs take textures and map them to the geometry of a 3D scene. More TMUs will typically mean that texture information is processed faster.

9.render output units (ROPs)

The ROPs are responsible for some of the final steps of the rendering process, writing the final pixel data to memory and carrying out other tasks such as anti-aliasing to improve the look of graphics.

Memory

1.effective memory speed

7000MHz

8002MHz

The effective memory clock speed is calculated from the size and data rate of the memory. Higher clock speeds can give increased performance in games and other apps.

2.maximum memory bandwidth

224GB/s

128GB/s

This is the maximum rate that data can be read from or stored into memory.

3.VRAM

VRAM (video RAM) is the dedicated memory of a graphics card. More VRAM generally allows you to run games at higher settings, especially for things like texture resolution.

4.memory bus width

256bit

128bit

A wider bus width means that it can carry more data per cycle. It is an important factor of memory performance, and therefore the general performance of the graphics card.

5.version of GDDR memory

Newer versions of GDDR memory offer improvements such as higher transfer rates that give increased performance.

6.Supports ECC memory

✖AMD Radeon RX 570

✖Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1650 Gaming OC

Error-correcting code memory can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when is it essential to avoid corruption, such as scientific computing or when running a server.

Features

1.DirectX version

DirectX is used in games, with newer versions supporting better graphics.

2.OpenGL version

OpenGL is used in games, with newer versions supporting better graphics.

3.OpenCL version

Some apps use OpenCL to apply the power of the graphics processing unit (GPU) for non-graphical computing. Newer versions introduce more functionality and better performance.

4.Supports multi-display technology

✔AMD Radeon RX 570

✔Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1650 Gaming OC

The graphics card supports multi-display technology. This allows you to configure multiple monitors in order to create a more immersive gaming experience, such as having a wider field of view.

5.load GPU temperature

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1650 Gaming OC)

A lower load temperature means that the card produces less heat and its cooling system performs better.

6.supports ray tracing

✖AMD Radeon RX 570

✖Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1650 Gaming OC

Ray tracing is an advanced light rendering technique that provides more realistic lighting, shadows, and reflections in games.

7.Supports 3D

✖AMD Radeon RX 570

✔Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1650 Gaming OC

Allows you to view in 3D (if you have a 3D display and glasses).

8.supports DLSS

✖AMD Radeon RX 570

✖Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1650 Gaming OC

DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling) is an upscaling technology powered by AI. It allows the graphics card to render games at a lower resolution and upscale them to a higher resolution with near-native visual quality and increased performance. DLSS is only available on select games.

9.PassMark (G3D) result

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1650 Gaming OC)

This benchmark measures the graphics performance of a video card. Source: PassMark.

Ports

1.has an HDMI output

✔AMD Radeon RX 570

✔Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1650 Gaming OC

Devices with a HDMI or mini HDMI port can transfer high definition video and audio to a display.

2.HDMI ports

More HDMI ports mean that you can simultaneously connect numerous devices, such as video game consoles and set-top boxes.

3.HDMI version

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Radeon RX 570)

HDMI 2.0

Newer versions of HDMI support higher bandwidth, which allows for higher resolutions and frame rates.

4.DisplayPort outputs

Allows you to connect to a display using DisplayPort.

5.DVI outputs

Allows you to connect to a display using DVI.

6.mini DisplayPort outputs

Allows you to connect to a display using mini-DisplayPort.

Price comparison

Cancel

Which are the best graphics cards?

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon RX 570


GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon RX 570


  1. Home
  2. VGA Benchmarks
  3. GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon RX 570
  • GeForce GTX 1650

    100%

  • Radeon RX 570

    120%

Relative performance

Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 1650
This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support.
Supports PhysX
Supports G-Sync
Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty)
Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute
Supports DirectX Raytracing (DXR)
Supports Deep Learning Super-Sampling (DLSS)
Reasons to consider Radeon RX 570
20% higher gaming performance.
Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute
Supports FreeSync
Supports ReLive (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty)
Supports TrueAudio
Based on an outdated architecture (AMD GCN), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications

HWBench recommends Radeon RX 570

The Radeon RX 570 is the better performing card based on the game benchmark suite used (18 combinations of games and resolutions).

Core Configuration
GeForce GTX 1650 Radeon RX 570
GPU Name TU107 () vs Ellesmere (Ellesmere PRO)
Fab Process 12 nm vs 14 nm
Die Size 0 mm² vs 232 mm²
Transistors unknown vs 5,700 million
Shaders 896 vs 2048
Compute Units 14 vs 32
Core clock 1485 MHz vs 926 MHz
ROPs 32 vs 32
TMUs 56 vs 128

Memory Configuration
GeForce GTX 1650 Radeon RX 570
Memory Type GDDR5 vs GDDR5
Bus Width 128 bit vs 256 bit
Memory Speed 2000 MHz

8000 MHz effective
vs 1650 MHz

6600 MHz effective
Memory Size 4096 Mb vs 4096 Mb
Additional details
GeForce GTX 1650 Radeon RX 570
TDP 0 watts vs 120 watts
Release Date 30 Apr 2019 vs 1 Apr 2017
  • GeForce GTX 1650

    53. 28 GP/s

  • Radeon RX 570

    38.60 GP/s

GigaPixels — higher is better

  • GeForce GTX 1650

    93.24 GT/s

  • Radeon RX 570

    154.40 GT/s

GigaTexels — higher is better

  • GeForce GTX 1650

    128.00 GB/s

  • Radeon RX 570

    211.20 GB/s

GB/s — higher is better

  • GeForce GTX 1650

    2984.00 GFLOPs

  • Radeon RX 570

    4940.00 GFLOPs

GFLOPs — higher is better

Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64

  • GeForce GTX 1650

    52

  • Radeon RX 570

    65

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra quality TTA DirectX11 Windows10 x64

  • GeForce GTX 1650

    53

  • Radeon RX 570

    56

FPS (higher is better)

Highest quality DirectX11 Windows10 x64

  • GeForce GTX 1650

    62

  • Radeon RX 570

    70

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra quality DirectX12 Windows10 x64

  • GeForce GTX 1650

    48

  • Radeon RX 570

    66

FPS (higher is better)

DX11, Max Details, 16:1 AF, 2xMSAA

  • GeForce GTX 1650

    77

  • Radeon RX 570

    82

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, HR Textures, DirectX11, Windows 10 x64

  • GeForce GTX 1650

    56

  • Radeon RX 570

    52

FPS (higher is better)

Highest Details, Pure hair, HBAO+, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

  • GeForce GTX 1650

    42

  • Radeon RX 570

    52

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra quality DirectX12 Async Compute Windows10 x64

  • GeForce GTX 1650

    54

  • Radeon RX 570

    76

FPS (higher is better)

DX11,Max Details, 16:1 HQ-AF, +AA

  • GeForce GTX 1650

    51

  • Radeon RX 570

    58

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64

  • GeForce GTX 1650

    32

  • Radeon RX 570

    47

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra quality TTA DirectX11 Windows10 x64

  • GeForce GTX 1650

    39

  • Radeon RX 570

    43

FPS (higher is better)

Highest quality DirectX11 Windows10 x64

  • GeForce GTX 1650

    42

  • Radeon RX 570

    51

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra quality DirectX12 Windows10 x64

  • GeForce GTX 1650

    31

  • Radeon RX 570

    42

FPS (higher is better)

DX11, Max Details, 16:1 AF, 2xMSAA

  • GeForce GTX 1650

    49

  • Radeon RX 570

    56

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, HR Textures, DirectX11, Windows 10 x64

  • GeForce GTX 1650

    38

  • Radeon RX 570

    36

FPS (higher is better)

Highest Details, Pure hair, HBAO+, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

  • GeForce GTX 1650

    27

  • Radeon RX 570

    34

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra quality DirectX12 Async Compute Windows10 x64

  • GeForce GTX 1650

    37

  • Radeon RX 570

    55

FPS (higher is better)

DX11,Max Details, 16:1 HQ-AF, +AA

  • GeForce GTX 1650

    35

  • Radeon RX 570

    42

FPS (higher is better)

VS
GeForce GTX 1650 GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB
VS
GeForce GTX 1650 Radeon RX 470
VS
Radeon RX 570 GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB
VS
Radeon RX 570 Radeon RX 470
VS
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER Radeon RX 580 2048SP
VS
Radeon RX 580 2048SP Radeon RX 580X

Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.

Which is Best for Budget Gaming?

In this article, we’ll test out and compare 12 different games at 1080p with medium, high, and ultra settings. This way you see the performance difference between them. I’m using the MSI Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 and the ASUS ROG Strix Radeon RX 570 4GB in this detailed comparison.

Model

MSI GTX 1650

ASUS RX 570

Brand MSI ASUS
Model GTX 1650 GAMING X 4G ROG-STRIX-RX570-O4G-GAMING

Interface

MSI GTX 1650

ASUS RX 570

Interface PCI Express 3.0 x16 PCI Express 3.0

Chipset

MSI GTX 1650

ASUS RX 570

Chipset Manufacturer NVIDIA AMD
GPU GeForce GTX 1650 Radeon RX 570
Boost Clock 1860 MHz 1310 MHz (OC mode)
1300 MHz (Gaming mode)
CUDA Cores 896 2048 Stream Processors

Memory

MSI GTX 1650

ASUS RX 570

Effective Memory Clock 8 Gbps 7000 MHz
Memory Size 4GB 4GB
Memory Interface 128-Bit 256-Bit
Memory Type GDDR5 GDDR5

3D API

MSI GTX 1650

ASUS RX 570

DirectX DirectX 12
OpenGL OpenGL 4. 5 OpenGL 4.5

Ports

MSI GTX 1650

ASUS RX 570

HDMI 1 x HDMI 2.0b 1 x HDMI 2.0b
Multi-Monitor Support 3
DisplayPort 2 x DisplayPort 1.4 1 x DisplayPort 1.4

Details

MSI GTX 1650

ASUS RX 570

Max Resolution 7680 x 4320 5120 x 2880
SLI Support
Virtual Reality Ready
Yes
Cooler
Double Fans Double Fans
Operating Systems Supported
Thermal Design Power
85W 150W
System Requirements
Recommended PSU: 300W
Power Connector
6-Pin 8-Pin
HDCP Ready
2. 2 Yes

Form Factor & Dimensions

MSI GTX 1650

ASUS RX 570

Max GPU Length 245 mm 240 mm
Card Dimensions (L x H 9.65″ x 5.00″ 9.45″ x 5.08″
Slot Width Dual Slot Dual Slot

Additionl Information

MSI GTX 1650

ASUS RX 570

Date First Available April 02, 2019 December 20, 2019
BUY NOW BUY NOW

Expert Reviews For Nvidia GTX 1650:

By PCGamer
The GTX 1650 is the fastest 75W GPU around, if that’s what you need, but it faces stiff competition from many other graphics cards.

By TomsHardware
GeForce GTX 1650 has potential. It needs to be less expensive, for starters. We also want to see a card that gets all of its power from the PCIe slot. For the time being, AMD’s Radeon RX 570 8GB is faster, less expensive, and better able to handle games with big memory requirements.

By PCMag
Zotac’s GeForce GTX 1650 OC offers budget-constrained gamers and compact-PC builders a new low-power alternative, but this video card’s performance isn’t quite a match for its price in 2019.

By Techspot
For mainstream and affordable GPU options we saw the appeal of the RTX 2060, GTX 1660 Ti and 1660, in all cases receiving our recommendations. For less money however the RX 570 lives on.

By AnandTech
So while it’s still a solid choice for small systems, it’s not going to be an entirely silent card in the process. But if nothing else, this leaves Zotac with some room for a fully passive GTX 1650, which, I suspect, is something that would be particularly well-received in the HTPC market.

Expert Reviews For AMD RX 570:

By PCGamesN
When it first came out the RX 570 was a bit of an also-ran. A mildly updated GPU, giving only a little extra performance. Fast forward to now and the RX 570 is the best budget graphics card you can buy.

By TomsHardware
While we don’t like it when AMD re-names existing hardware to make it sound new, the Radeon RX 570 does serve up good performance at 1920×1080 in today’s games. Its primary competition isn’t as consistent. The Asus Strix RX 570 sample we tested incorporates AMD’s slight improvements at a price point well under $200, too.

By PCWorld
The Gigabyte Aorus is a gorgeous, well-performing graphics card. The Radeon RX 570 is the best sub-$200 gaming option around—but it isn’t much of a step up over the RX 470.

By Play3r
If you are interested in RGB and are all about the light shows within your system, this card does not match up to expectations. It has one little area which has an area that you can control, but it is nowhere near as nice as the bigger STRIX cards which are some of the nicest and best implemented RGB cards on the market.

By TrustedReviews
A real brute of a mid-range GPU, the RX 570 is a great addition to the AMD lineup. But watch the competition’s pricing closely.

Pros and Cons Listed:

[i2pc pros_icon=”icon icon-plus-thick” cons_icon=”icon icon-minus-thick” show_title=”true” title=”Nvidia GTX 1650″ show_button=”false” pros_title=”Pros” cons_title=”Cons” ][i2pros]Some versions do not require auxiliary power
Great performance per watt
[/i2pros][i2cons]Expensive relative to Radeon RX 570
Some versions do require auxiliary power
Not quite capable of smooth performance at max-quality 1080p
Missing newest-generation NVENC encoder hardware
[/i2cons][/i2pc]
[i2pc pros_icon=”icon icon-plus-thick” cons_icon=”icon icon-minus-thick” show_title=”true” title=”AMD RX 570″ show_button=”false” pros_title=”Pros” cons_title=”Cons” ][i2pros]Slightly faster than Radeon RX 470, excellent 1080p performance
AMD maintains competitive pricing
Ample memory (4GB GDDR5) proves valuable in comparisons to GeForce GTX 1060 3GB
[/i2pros][i2cons]Less-capable thermal solutions than Radeon RX 580
Little overclocking headroom
[/i2cons][/i2pc]

Above we have shown the overview and depth specifications of both the graphics card. Now, we are sharing the full review and comparison of both graphics cards.

QUICK SPECS: GTX 1650 vs RX 570

GTX 1650

RX 570

896 Cuda Cores 2048 Stream Processors
1485MHz Base Clock 1168 MHz Base Clock
1665MHz Boost Clock 1244 MHz Boost Clock
4GB GDDR5 Memory 4GB GDDR5 Memory
8 GBPS Memory Speed 7 GBPS Memory Speed
128 GB/S Memory Bandwidth 224 GB/S Memory Bandwidth
128-Bit Memory Interface 256-Bit Memory Interface

Let’s quickly take a look at how these two cards differ in terms of specs, note that things like Cuda cores and stream processors are not directly comparable, even clock speeds aren’t too comparable here given both are different architectures. It’s worth noting the RX 570 is available in both 4GB and 8GB versions, I’ve got a 4GB one here, so it’s got the same amount of GDDR5 memory as 1650.

PERFORMANCE: GTX 1650 vs RX 570

These are lower-end graphics cards. They sell for between $100 – $150. Anyway because of that I test them at 1080p. In most of the new games that I’m testing with currently, the RX 570 will good for over 60 FPS at 1080p using the ultra quality preset. Those of you with higher refresh rate monitors do like to keep the minimum FPS above 60 FPS. So I have tested both GPUs using the higher medium presets and I’m interested to see if this changes the margins.

For the testing, I’m using the MSI Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 and the ASUS ROG Strix Radeon RX 570 4GB, expect slightly different results with different models.

The system that I’m testing with has an Intel i7-8700K CPU overclocked to 5. 0GHz, along with 32GB of DDR4-3400 memory.

Note -: These all games are tested at 1080p and the FPS are shown are average.

Assassin’s Creed Odyssey

Here you see pretty similar scaling performance within the GTX 1650 and RX 570. Dropping down to medium does seem like an appropriate quality preset for these GPUs and Assassin’s Creed Odyssey as it allowed us to average just over 60 FPS.

Battlefield 5

The Battlefield 5 results are really surprising, really strange even, I retested the GTX 1650 a few times to try and work out what was going on here but for whatever reason, I saw almost no performance uplift when downgrading the quality preset from ultra to high. Then from high to medium, the frame rates jumped by 23% so that was clearly some changes being made but it just wasn’t as impactful as I would have expected.

Dirt Rally 2.0

Preset scaling on dirt rally to was pretty standard much like what we saw in Assassin’s Creed Odyssey. Here the performance margins remained very much the same between the RX 570 and GTX 1650.

Far Cry New Dawn

The margins also remained very similar when testing far cry new dawn. Here the RX 570 was around 20% faster regardless of the quality preset used.

Fortnite

Like most of the games we’ve looked at so far, the margins remained much the same when testing with Fortnite. The 1% low performance for the GTX 1650 does improve with the high preset but then fell away once again with the medium preset.

Forza Horizon 4

The GTX 1650 does fare a little better in Forza horizon 4 as we reduced the quality levels. Using the ultra preset, the RX 570 was 26% faster. Then with the higher quality preset that margin is reduced to 21% and then 20% using the medium. Not a massive difference but the GTX 1650 did come back a little.

Metro Exodus

Metro Exodus which is an Nvidia sponsored title favors the Radeon GPU much more we’re using the high and medium quality presets. With the ultra settings enabled the RX 570 was just 10% faster, however that margin is extended to 26% with the higher quality preset maintained with the medium quality settings.

Resident Evil 2

The RX 570 enjoyed a 30% lead over the GTX 1650 in resident evil 2 when using the ultra quality settings that margin though is reduced to 23% with the high and medium quality presets.

Shadow of the Tomb Raider

The RX 570 and GTX 1650 are fairly well matched and shadow of the Tomb Raider with the ultra quality preset enabled. However, once we drop down to the high preset the Radeon GPU pulls ahead by an 18% margin and we also see a similar margin to that when using the medium quality settings.

Division 2

We see much the same with the division 2 the margins remained very similar to Dirt rally 2.0, using the ultra, high, and medium quality presets. Naturally, the frame rates did increase quite dramatically as we lowered the quality settings but the margins remained much the same. As a result here the RX 570 was 27% faster across the board.

Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege

When testing with Rainbow six siege, we see the GTX 1650 and RX 570 are basically neck-and-neck when using the ultra quality preset. Similar margins were seen when using the higher quality preset while the RX 570 does sneak away a little bit with the medium quality settings.

World War Z

This is another big win for the Radeon GPU. Here the RX 570 was 38% faster with the ultra quality settings and that margin was pretty well maintained with the high and medium quality presets as well.

WHICH TO BUY: GTX 1650 or RX 570

The GTX 1650 was launched at $149 and can currently be bought for that price on the low end. The RX 570, on the other hand, has been out for around two years, and while not only performing better as we’ve just seen, it’s also a fair bit cheaper too, with lower-end models coming in at the $129 mark. With these numbers, the entry-level GTX 1650 costs 15% more money while performing worse as we just saw.

The GTX 1650 performs ok, it’s just priced poorly against what AMD’s been offering for two years.

To me the AMD RX 570 is the clear winnerhere, it’s available for less money and performs a fair bit better in all 12 games tested. The GTX 1650 does have the advantage of less power draw, but that seems to be about it, and the no 6 pin power connector thing in some niche use cases.

Radeon RX 570 vs GeForce GTX 1650

Availability

MSRP in USD: $169

XFX Radeon RX 570 RS XXX Edition 1286MHz, 8gb GDDR5, DX12 VR Ready, Dual BIOS, 3xDP HDMI DVI, AMD Graphics Card (RX-570P8DFD6)

Buy on Amazon

$359. 99

In Stock


1244 1264 MHz

Boost Clock

Updated 67 minutes agoASRock Phantom Gaming D Radeon RX 570 DirectX 12 RX570 4G 4GB 256-Bit GDDR5 PCI Express 3.0 x16 HDCP Ready Video Card

Buy on Amazon

$405

In Stock


Same as Founder’s Edition

Updated 67 minutes agoMSI Gaming Radeon RX 570 256-bit 8GB GDRR5 DirectX 12 VR Ready CFX Graphcis Card (RX 570 ARMOR 8G OC)

Buy on Amazon

$449

In Stock


1244 1256 MHz

Boost Clock

Updated 67 minutes agoSapphire 11266-14-20G Radeon Nitro+ Rx 570 4GB GDDR5 Dual HDMI/ DVI-D/ Dual DP with Backplate (UEFI) PCI-E Graphics Card

Buy on Amazon

$549

In Stock


1244 1340 MHz

Boost Clock

Updated 67 minutes agoXFX Radeon RX 570 RS Black Edition 1328MHz, 8gb 256bit GDDR5, DX12 VR Ready, Dual BIOS, 3xDP HDMI DVI, AMD Graphics Card (RX-570P8DBD6)

Buy on Amazon

$655

In Stock


1244 1286 MHz

Boost Clock

Updated 67 minutes agoSapphire Pulse Radeon Rx 570 4GB GDDR5 Graphics Card

Buy on Amazon

$1,632. 68

In Stock


1244 1284 MHz

Boost Clock

Updated 67 minutes ago

Availability

MSRP in USD: $149

Asus GeForce GTX 1650 Overclocked 4GB Dual-Fan Edition VR Ready HDMI DP 1.4 DVI Graphics Card (Dual-GTX1650-O4G)

Buy on Amazon

$167.99

In Stock


Same as Founder’s Edition

Updated 67 minutes agoMSI G1650VXS4C Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 128-Bit HDMI/DP 4GB GDRR5 HDCP Support DirectX 12 VR Ready OC Graphics Card (GTX 1650 Ventus XS 4G OC)

Buy on Amazon

$184.99

In Stock


1665 1740 MHz

Boost Clock

Updated 67 minutes agoGIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1650 D6 OC Low Profile 4G Graphics Card, Low Profile Design, 4GB 128-Bit GDDR6, GV-N1656OC-4GL Video Card

Buy on Amazon

$189.99

In Stock


1665 1710 MHz

Boost Clock

Updated 67 minutes agoASUS Dual NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 OC Edition Graphics Card (PCIe 3.0, 4GB GDDR6, HDMI 2.0, DisplayPort 1. 4a, IP5X Dust Resistance, Auto-Extreme Technology, GPU Tweak II)

Buy on Amazon

$189.99

In Stock


1665 1725 MHz

Boost Clock

Updated 755 minutes agoMSI Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 128-Bit HDMI/DP/DVI 4GB GDRR6 HDCP Support DirectX 12 VR Ready OC Graphics Card (GTX 1650 D6 Ventus XS OC)

Buy on Amazon

$229.95

In Stock


1665 1740 MHz

Boost Clock

Updated 67 minutes agoGigabyte GeForce GTX 1650 OC Low Profile 4G Graphics Card, 2X Windforce Fans, 4GB 128-Bit GDDR5, Gv-N1650OC-4GL Video Card

Buy on Amazon

$259.99

In Stock


1665 1785 MHz

Boost Clock

Updated 67 minutes ago

Key Differences

In short, we have a clear winner — GeForce GTX 1650 outperforms the more expensive Radeon RX 570 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing GeForce GTX 1650 is 735 days newer than the more expensive Radeon RX 570.

Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

  • Performs up to 1% better in Fortnite than Radeon RX 570 — 133 vs 132 FPS

  • Up to 53% cheaper than Radeon RX 570 — $167. 99 vs $359.99

  • Up to 54% better value when playing Fortnite than Radeon RX 570 — $1.26 vs $2.73 per FPS

  • Consumes up to 50% less energy than AMD Radeon RX 570 — 75 vs 150 Watts

Fortnite

Resolution

1920×1080

Game Graphics

High

Radeon RX 570

Desktop • Apr 18th, 2017


FPS

132

99%

Value, $/FPS

$2.73/FPS

-17%

Price, $

$359.99

46%

XFX Radeon RX 570 RS XXX Edition 1286MHz, 8gb GDDR5, DX12 VR Ready, Dual BIOS, 3xDP HDMI DVI, AMD Graphics Card (RX-570P8DFD6)

Buy for $359.99 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 67 minutes ago

GeForce GTX 1650

Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019


FPS

133

100%

Value, $/FPS

$1.26/FPS

100%

Price, $

$167.99

100%

FPS and Value Winner

Asus GeForce GTX 1650 Overclocked 4GB Dual-Fan Edition VR Ready HDMI DP 1.4 DVI Graphics Card (Dual-GTX1650-O4G)

Buy for $167. 99 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 67 minutes ago

Resolution

1920×1080

Game Graphics

High

Radeon RX 570

Desktop • Apr 18th, 2017

GeForce GTX 1650

Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019

539

FPS

495

FPS

League of Legends

125

FPS

123

FPS

Grand Theft Auto V

240

FPS

221

FPS

VALORANT

148

FPS

138

FPS

Apex Legends

113

FPS

110

FPS

PlayerUnknown’s Battlegrounds

Theoretical Performance

Radeon RX 570

Desktop • Apr 18th, 2017


Pixel Fillrate

39.81 GPixel/s

75%

Texel Fillrate

159.2 GTexel/s

100%

GeForce GTX 1650

Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019


Pixel Fillrate

53.28 GPixel/s

100%

Texel Fillrate

93.24 GTexel/s

29%

AMD Radeon RX 570

vs

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

Apr 18th, 2017 Release Date

Apr 23rd, 2019

Polaris Generation GeForce 16
$169 MSRP

$149

1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort Outputs 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
1x 6-pin Power Connectors None

Desktop

Segment

Desktop

4 GB Memory 4 GB
GDDR5 Type GDDR5
256-bit Bus 128-bit

224 GB/s

Bandwidth 128. 1 GB/s
1168 MHz Base Clock Speed

1485 MHz

1244 MHz Boost Clock Speed

1665 MHz

1750 MHz Memory Clock Speed

2001 MHz

Builds Using Radeon RX 570 or GeForce GTX 1650

Fortnite, 1080p, High

HP Pavilion Gaming PC

125 FPS

$5.91/FPS

GeForce GTX 1650

Core i5-11400F

8 GB, 512 GB SSD

Buy on Amazon

$739

In Stock

Updated 60 minutes ago

HP Pavilion Gaming Premium Desktop PC

126 FPS

$6.19/FPS

GeForce GTX 1650

Core i5-11400

8 GB, 256 GB SSD

Buy on Amazon

$779.99

In Stock

Updated 59 minutes ago

YEYIAN SAI X11 Gaming PC

125 FPS

$6.23/FPS

GeForce GTX 1650

Core i5-11400F

8 GB, 500 GB SSD

Buy on Amazon

$779

In Stock

Updated 57 minutes ago

CUK Mantis Professional Student Desktop PC

125 FPS

$6. 24/FPS

GeForce GTX 1650

Core i5-11400F

16 GB, 512 GB SSD + 2 TB HDD

Buy on Amazon

$779.99

In Stock

Updated 57 minutes ago

Acer Nitro 50 N50-620-UA91 Gaming Desktop PC

125 FPS

$6.26/FPS

GeForce GTX 1650

Core i5-11400F

8 GB, N/A Storage

Buy on Amazon

$781.99

In Stock

Updated 60 minutes ago

JoJo&Venus Gaming MEK Hero G1 I1416FV Gaming PC

125 FPS

$6.26/FPS

GeForce GTX 1650

Core i5-11400F

4 GB, N/A Storage

Buy on Amazon

$782.99

In Stock

Updated 49 minutes ago

Acer Nitro 50 N50-620-UA91 Gaming Desktop PC

125 FPS

$6.58/FPS

GeForce GTX 1650

Core i5-11400F

8 GB, 512 GB SSD

Buy on Amazon

$822.88

In Stock

Updated 57 minutes ago

iBUYPOWER Pro Gaming PC

103 FPS

$6.7/FPS

GeForce GTX 1650

Ryzen 5 3600

8 GB, 480 GB SSD

Buy on Amazon

$690

In Stock

Updated 58 minutes ago

iBUYPOWER Pro Gaming PC

125 FPS

$6. 8/FPS

GeForce GTX 1650

Core i5-11400F

8 GB, 500 GB SSD

Buy on Amazon

$849.99

In Stock

Updated 52 minutes ago

SkyTech Archangel Gaming Computer PC

103 FPS

$6.8/FPS

GeForce GTX 1650

Ryzen 5 3600

8 GB, 500 GB SSD

Buy on Amazon

$699.99

In Stock

Updated 59 minutes ago

Select from the most popular similar graphics card comparisons. Most compared graphics card combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

GeForce RTX 3050

$289.99

GeForce GTX 1650

$167.99

Radeon RX 6500 XT

$167.98

GeForce GTX 1650

$167.99

GeForce GTX 1650

$167.99

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU

N/A Stock

GeForce GTX 970

N/A Stock

GeForce GTX 1650

$167.99

Radeon RX 570

$359.99

Radeon HD 7990

N/A Stock

GeForce GTX 650

GeForce GTX 1650

$167. 99

GeForce GTX 1650

$167.99

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU

N/A Stock

GeForce GTX 680

N/A Stock

Radeon RX 570

$359.99

GeForce GTX 760M

N/A Stock

Radeon RX 570

$359.99

▷ Nvidia GTX 1650 vs AMD RX 570

Tan solo hace unos días que apareció la nueva tarjeta de Nvidia, así que hemos decidido hacer una comparativa entre Nvidia GTX 1650 vs AMD RX 570. Son dos tarjetas gráficas que claramente se sitúan en la gama baja del panorama gaming actual, con un rendimiento similar, así que será muy interesante para los usuarios saber a ciencia cierta cuál de ellas nos ofrece el mejor rendimiento.

Para ello, hemos utilizando nuestro banco de pruebas actual con las tarjetas MSI GeForce GTX 1650 Gaming X y la MSI RX 570 Armor. Sin más, ¡comencemos esta comparativa!

Índice de contenidos

Ficha técnica y características

Ya podéis ver que tiene bastante sentido hacer la comparativa de estas dos GPU, AMD también se merece algo de protagonismo, sobre todo en esta gama con sus anteriores RX. Aún a día de hoy son tarjetas muy válidas y además a muy buenos precios. En cualquier caso, es normal que esta nueva GTX 1650 sea algo más cara, además de que la especificación Gaming X es superior a la gama Armor, ¿hará justicia el precio al rendimiento?

Ciñéndonos a las especificaciones, vemos como hay un empate en las unidades de renderizado en ambas tarjetas, mientras que en las de texturizado gana de largo la RX 570. Recordemos también que ninguna de las dos tarjetas cuenta con procesadores capaces de realizar Ray Tracing en tiempo real, algo presente solo en la gama RTX. Pero Nvidia ha lanzado unos nuevos drivers que permiten realizar este procesamiento directamente con los núcleos CUDA, por supuesto en detrimento del rendimiento general de la GPU. En esta GTX 1650 no tendría mucho sentido hacerlo, pero la posibilidad está latente, mientras que en la RX 570 no existe.

Algo bueno de la GTX es también su ínfimo consumo de energía, justamente la mitad que la RX 570. Las tarjetas AMD suelen consumir bastante más, sobre todo esta familia RX con procesos de fabricación en 14 nm, frente a los 12 nm de la arquitectura Turing. Pese a ello, RX 570 nos ofrece más ancho de banda y de bus, aunque menor frecuencia de procesamiento. Son dos GPU muy distintas así que las especificaciones solo se pueden coger entre pinzas en una comparativa. Pasemos ya a ver los resultados.

Test sintéticos de rendimiento Nvidia GTX 1650 vs AMD RX 570

Ya hemos visto las especificaciones, así que ahora toca ver cómo se van a desenvolver estas dos tarjetas en las pruebas sintéticas de benchmark, y más adelante en los juegos. Para ello, hemos utilizado el siguiente banco de pruebas:

Procesador:

Intel Core i9-9900k

Placa Base: Asus Maximus XI Hero

Memoria:

Corsair Vengeance PRO RGB 16 GB @3600 MHz

Disipador

Corsair h200i V2

Disco Duro

Kingston UV400

Tarjeta Gráfica

GTX 1650y AMD RX 570

Fuente de Alimentación

Corsair RM1000X

Y los test que hemos llevado a cabo son:

  • 3DMark Time Spy
  • 3DMark Fire Strike
  • 3DMark Tire Strike Ultra
  • VRMark Orange Room

Vemos que en todos los casos las puntuaciones de la RX 570 son significativamente superiores, pero, ¿cuánto son superiores? Comenzando por la prueba en Fire Strike, tenemos un rendimiento superior en un 25%, bastante más que por ejemplo una 1660 respecto a una 1660 Ti. Siguiente con la versión Fire Strike Ultra, la que se desarrolla en resolución 4K, tendremos nada menos que un 36% de potencia respecto a la GTX 1650, que ciertamente es muchísimo.

Siguiendo con el test Time Spy y VRMark tendremos un 9% y un 8,6% que son resultado algo más ajustados sin duda, y vamos a explicar por qué. Estos test miden el rendimiento de las GPU en DirectX 12 en el caso de Time Spy y de DirectX 12 orientado a VR en el caso de VRMark. Entonces vemos que, a pesar de ser claramente una GPU menos potente, la GTX 1650 se acerca mucho a su rival, y esto se debe a las mejoras de shaders y de caché que Nvidia ha introducido en sus nuevas GPU Turing.

Test de rendimiento en juegos

Continuamos con los test de rendimiento en juegos, en este caso no hemos optado por probar los juegos en resolución 4K, ya que son unas tarjetas gráficas que no están orientadas a jugar en estas resoluciones, básicamente porque obtendremos unas tasas de FPS inferiores a 30, lo cual no es suficiente para generar una experiencia positiva.

Los juegos que hemos probando son los mismos en ambas tarjetas, con el mismo banco de pruebas, la última versión de los drivers disponibles y la misma configuración gráfica en cada título.

En la tabla de datos de resolución 1080p la AMD RX 570 superior en todos los casos a la GTX 1650. Con las dos tarjetas la experiencia de juego va a ser satisfactoria, superando los 50 FPS en casi todos los casos. Recordemos que nosotros colocamos los gráficos en calidad alta o muy alta, así que disminuyendo éstos el rendimiento aumentará. Vemos resultados muy cercanos por ejemplo en DOOM probado con Open GL 4.5, también muy cercanos en Far Cry 5 y Final Fantasy XV bajo DirectX 12. Ciertamente la distancia se reduce entre las tarjetas respecto a los test sintéticos así que es algo positivo para la GTX 1650.

En la resolución 2K la cosa se le complica al producto de Nvidia, vemos distancias bastante más abultadas sobre todo en Doom y Far Cry 5 y sin embargo más cercanas en los títulos Deux y Tomb Rider que es justo lo contario a lo visto en 1080p. Esto puede deberse en parte a lo que drivers para esta GTX 1650 aún están un poco verdes, ya que durante nuestra review de las tarjetas (y probamos tres) no daba la sensación de que aún podrían dar más de sí. El futuro solo Nvidia lo sabe, por ahora esto es lo que os podemos decir.

Consumo y temperaturas

Dejamos atrás el baño que la GPU AMD de ha dado a la Nvidia, y pasamos a ver los vamos de temperatura y consumo de las GPU. Sobre el papel ya vimos que la arquitectura Polaris derrocha más y tiene más calentamiento que la Turing, así que deberíamos de esperar peores resultados aquí de la RX 570.

Como siempre, los resultados de consumo están medidos sobre el equipo completo, que ya decirnos que es exactamente el mismo banco de pruebas.

Fijaos, ambas GPU (y equipo) consumen lo mismo en reposo, unos 68 W que está muy bien. Pero cuando le metemos caña a ambas, Polaris hace de las suyas subiendo el consumo hasta los 224 W, mientras que la GPU Turing se mantienen 48 W por debajo de ésta, al menos eficiente, sí que lo es.

Y con la temperatura pasa exactamente lo mismo, a nadie le pilla por sorpresa que las nuevas Radeon Vega son unas barbacohas, pero en cambio las RX sí que controlan mejor la temperatura. Concretamente esta RX 570 tiene un disipador Twin Frozr que rinde verdaderamente bien, llega hasta los 70 grados en carga y nada menos que 30 en reposo, sensacional para una GPU. Mientras tanto, la GTX oscila en los 42 grados y unos 61 de máxima, aunque también es cierto que el disipador de la Gaming X es un poquito mejor que la gama Armor cuando está en carga.

Experiencia en overclocking

También nos hemos tomado nuestro tiempo en realizar un overclocking a estas dos tarjetas y así ver hasta dónde pueden llegar, siempre manteniendo la estabilidad claro. Para ello, hemos seleccionado el Deux Ex Mankind Divided como conejillo de indias para ver las mejoras de FPS.

Deus EX MSI RX 570 Armor Stock MSI RX 570 Armor Overclock
1920 x 1080 (Full HD) 63 FPS 66 FPS
2560 x 1440 (WQHD) 40 FPS 42 FPS
Deus EX MSI GTX 1650 Gaming X Stock MSI GTX 1650 Gaming X Overclock
1920 x 1080 (Full HD) 49 FPS 54 FPS
2560 x 1440 (WQHD) 32 FPS 35 FPS

En el caso de la MSI RX Armor, hemos conseguido establecer una frecuencia de GPU de 1450 MHz y de 2100 MHz para la memoria GDDR5. Los resultados ya los veis, 3 FPS de mejora para 1080p y 2 para 2K. Muy poquita mejora.

Pasamos con la MSI GTX 1650 Gaming X que hemos conseguido colocar a 1615 MHz de frecuencia de reloj de GPU y 2341 MHz. Y los resultados arrojan una mejora de 5 FPS en 1080p y de 2 FPS en 2K, que es algo más, y deja patente la excelente capacidad de overclocking que tienen las Nvidia. Por supuesto una mejor temperatura y un TDP mejor ajustado de esta, favorece mucho la obtenía de buenos resultados.

Así que, en este apartado, gana de largo la GPU de gama baja de Nvidia. Pero el rendimiento de la RX 570 es muy superior. A nivel de precio, está claro cual es la candidata para nuestra configuración de gama media, ¿Verdad?

Conclusión final sobre Nvidia GTX 1650 vs AMD RX 570

Si algo podemos sacar en claro de esta comparativa, es que la nueva Nvidia GTX 1650 no refleja el rendimiento que, al menos nosotros, esperábamos. En las review hemos determinado que supera por poco a una GTX 1050 Ti de la anterior generación y vamos entre 10 y 20 euros más, lo cual tampoco ayuda.

Centrándonos más en la comparativa, la RX 570 es, de largo, la mejor opción de entre las dos. Está muy bien que la GTX sea de nueva arquitectura, consuma menos y se caliente menos, pero lo que realmente importante es el rendimiento en juegos, y aquí la RX 570 es mejor. Y mejor de largo tanto en resoluciones Full HD como 2K, y no nos engañemos, poco usuarios van a optar por overclockear una GPU de gama baja como esta.

Te recomendamos la lectura de las mejores tarjetas gráficas del mercado

Y luego tenemos el tema del precio, una versión MSI RX 570 Armor de 4 GB como esta, la podemos encontrar actualmente por un precio de 147 euros en Amazon, y si subimos a los 8 GB, la tendremos por 170 euros, que aun así es bastante menos que los 195 euros que cuesta la MSI GeForce GTX 1650.

En definitiva, no es una tarjeta gráfica que a día de hoy merezca mucho la pena, porque AMD tiene buenas bazas en esta gama, y las GTX 1660 y 1660 Ti son una mejor opción de largo. Si bien es cierto que los drivers están bastante verdes, no esperamos que una simple optimización de ellos resuelva la brecha entre ambas tarjetas ni nada por el estilo, así que, por nuestra parte, la ganadora de la comparativa Nvidia GTX 1650 vs AMD RX 570, es sin duda la GPU de AMD RX 570. Queremos conocer vuestra opinión.

0024

  • 57.6 GTexels/s higher number of textured pixels? more memory bandwidth?
    224GB/s vs 128GB/s
  • 128bit wider memory bus?
    256bit vs 128bit
  • 1152 more stream processors?
    2048 vs 896
  • 1000million more transistors?
    5700 million vs 4700 million
  • 72 more texture units (TMUs)?
    128 vs 56
  • 1 newer version of OpenCL?
    2. 2 vs 1.2
    • GPU frequency 317MHz higher?
      1485MHz vs 1168MHz
    • 18.28 GPixel/s higher pixel rate?
      58.08 GPixel/s vs 39.8 GPixel/s
    • 45W below TDP?
      75W vs 120W
    • 250MHz faster memory speed?
      2000MHz vs 1750MHz
    • 1002MHz higher effective clock speed?
      8002MHz vs 7000MHz
    • 571MHz faster GPU turbo speed?
      1815MHz vs 1244MHz
    • Semiconductor size 2nm smaller?
      12nm vs 14nm
    • Support 3D?

    What are the most popular comparisons?

    AMD Radeon RX 570

    vs

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060

    Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1650 Gaming OC

    vs

    Asus Radeon RX 550 4GB

    AMD Radeon RX 570

    vs

    Gigabyte Radeon RX 6500 XT Gaming OC

    Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1650 Gaming OC

    vs

    AMD Radeon RX Vega 8

    AMD Radeon RX 570

    vs

    AMD Radeon RX 580

    Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1650 Gaming OC

    vs

    MSI GeForce GTX 1650 Ventus XS OC

    AMD Radeon RX 570

    vs

    MSI GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Gaming

    Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1650 Gaming OC

    VS

    AMD Radeon RX 5500003

    AMD Radeon RX 570

    vs

    Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060

    Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1650 Gaming OC

    vs

    Inno3D GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 Twin X2 OC

    AMD Radeon RX 570

    vs

    Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop

    Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1650 Gaming OC

    vs

    MSI GeForce GTX 1650 Ventus XS

    AMD Radeon RX 570

    vs

    Nvidia Geforce GTX 1660 Super

    Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1650 Gaming OC

    8. 5 /10

    2 VOTES

    Reviews not yet

    fan noise

    7.5 /10

    2 VOTES

    Reviews are not yet

    9000 9000 9000)

    2 votes

    No reviews yet

    Performance

    2.turbo GPU

    1244MHz

    1815MHz

    When the GPU is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.

    3.pixel rate

    39.8 GPixel/s

    58.08 GPixel/s

    The number of pixels that can be displayed on the screen every second.

    4.flops

    5 TFLOPS

    3.25 TFLOPS

    FLOPS is a measure of GPU processing power.

    5.texture size

    159.2 GTexels/s

    101.6 GTexels/s

    Number of textured pixels that can be displayed on the screen every second.

    6. GPU memory speed

    1750MHz

    2000MHz

    Memory speed is one aspect that determines memory bandwidth.

    7.shading patterns

    Shading units (or stream processors) are small processors in a video card that are responsible for processing various aspects of an image.

    8.textured units (TMUs)

    TMUs accept textured units and bind them to the geometric layout of the 3D scene. More TMUs generally means texture information is processed faster.

    9 ROPs

    ROPs are responsible for some of the final steps of the rendering process, such as writing the final pixel data to memory and for performing other tasks such as anti-aliasing to improve the appearance of graphics.

    Memory

    1.memory effective speed

    7000MHz

    8002MHz

    The effective memory clock frequency is calculated from the memory size and data transfer rate. A higher clock speed can give better performance in games and other applications.

    2.max memory bandwidth

    224GB/s

    128GB/s

    This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.

    3.VRAM

    VRAM (video RAM) is the dedicated memory of the graphics card. More VRAM usually allows you to run games at higher settings, especially for things like texture resolution.

    4.memory bus width

    256bit

    128bit

    Wider memory bus means it can carry more data per cycle. This is an important factor in memory performance, and therefore the overall performance of the graphics card.

    5.versions of GDDR memory

    Later versions of GDDR memory offer improvements such as higher data transfer rates, which improve performance.

    6. Supports memory debug code

    ✖AMD Radeon RX 570

    ✖Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1650 Gaming OC

    Memory debug code can detect and fix data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.

    Functions

    1.DirectX version

    DirectX is used in games with a new version that supports better graphics.

    2nd version of OpenGL

    The newer version of OpenGL, the better graphics quality in games.

    OpenCL version 3.

    Some applications use OpenCL to use the power of the graphics processing unit (GPU) for non-graphical computing. Newer versions are more functional and better quality.

    4. Supports multi-monitor technology

    ✔AMD Radeon RX 570

    ✔Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1650 Gaming OC

    The video card has the ability to connect multiple screens. This allows you to set up multiple monitors at the same time to create a more immersive gaming experience, such as a wider field of view.

    5. GPU temperature at boot

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1650 Gaming OC)

    Lower boot temperature means the card generates less heat and the cooling system works better.

    6.supports ray tracing

    ✖AMD Radeon RX 570

    ✖Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1650 Gaming OC

    Ray tracing is an advanced light rendering technique that provides more realistic lighting, shadows and reflections in games.

    7. Supports 3D

    ✖AMD Radeon RX 570

    ✔Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1650 Gaming OC

    Allows you to view in 3D (if you have a 3D screen and glasses).

    8.supports DLSS

    ✖AMD Radeon RX 570

    ✖Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1650 Gaming OC

    DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling) is an AI based scaling technology. This allows the graphics card to render games at lower resolutions and upscale them to higher resolutions with near-native visual quality and improved performance. DLSS is only available in some games.

    9. PassMark result (G3D)

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1650 Gaming OC)

    This test measures the graphics performance of a graphics card. Source: Pass Mark.

    Ports

    1.has HDMI output

    ✔AMD Radeon RX 570

    ✔Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1650 Gaming OC

    Devices with HDMI or mini HDMI ports can stream HD video and audio to the connected display.

    2.HDMI connectors

    More HDMI connectors allow you to connect multiple devices at the same time, such as game consoles and TVs.

    HDMI version 3

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Radeon RX 570)

    HDMI 2.0

    New versions of HDMI support higher bandwidth, resulting in higher resolutions and frame rates.

    4. DisplayPort outputs

    Allows connection to a display using DisplayPort.

    5.DVI outputs

    Allows connection to a display using DVI.

    6. Mini DisplayPort 9 outputs0003

    Allows you to connect to a display using Mini DisplayPort.

    Price Match

    Cancel

    Which graphics cards are better?

    GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs Radeon RX 570

    GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs Radeon RX 570 — Th200

    Contents

    1. Introduction
    2. Features
    3. Tests
    4. Games
    5. Key differences
    6. Conclusion
    7. Comments

    Video card

    Video card

    Introduction

    We compared two graphics cards: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs AMD Radeon RX 570. On this page, you will learn about the key differences between them, as well as which one is better in terms of features and performance.

    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER Turing GeForce 16 Generation Graphics Card released Nov 22nd, 2019. It comes with 4GB of GDDR6 memory running at 1500MHz, has a 1x 6-pin power connector and draws up to 165W.

    The AMD Radeon RX 570 is a Polaris (RX 500) generation GCN 4.0 graphics card released on Apr 18th, 2017. It comes with 4GB of GDDR5 memory running at 1750MHz, has a 1x 6-pin power connector and consumes up to 165 W.

    Specification

    Graphics Card

    Name

    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

    12 (12_1)

    12 (12_0)

    Opengl

    4.6

    4.6

    OpenCL

    2.1

    CUDA

    Vulkan

    9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000. 23

    Heating

    100W

    150W

    Power connectors

    1x 6-pin

    1x 6-pin

    Width

    Dual-Slot

    Dual-Slot

    Tests

    3DMark Graphics

    3DMark is a test tool designed and developed by UL to measure the performance of computer hardware. Upon completion, the program gives a score, where a higher value indicates better performance.

    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
    +24%

    AMD Radeon RX 570

    Blender bmw27

    Blender is the most popular 3D content creation software. It has its own test, which is widely used to determine the rendering speed of processors and video cards. We chose the bmw27 scene. The result of the test is the time taken to render the given scene.

    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

    AMD Radeon RX 570

    Th200 RP

    Th200 RP is a test created by Th200. It measures the raw power of the components and gives a score, with a higher value indicating better performance.

    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
    +2%

    AMD Radeon RX 570

    Games

    1920×1080, Ultra

    Game GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER Radeon RX 570
    Assassin’s Creed Odyssey
    Battlefield V
    Far Cry 5
    Hitman 2
    Metro Exodus
    Shadow of the Tomb Raider
    The Witcher 3
    Average 57. 00 fps 48.89 fps

    2560×1440, Ultra

    Game GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER Radeon RX 570
    Anno 1800
    Assassin’s Creed Odyssey
    Battlefield V
    Far Cry 5
    Hitman 2
    Shadow of the Tomb Raider
    The Witcher 3
    Average 42. 66 fps 36.26 fps

    3840×2160, Ultra

    Game GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER Radeon RX 570
    Anno 1800

    +1%

    Assassin’s Creed Odyssey

    +5%

    Battlefield V
    Far Cry 5
    Hitman 2
    Metro Exodus
    Shadow of the Tomb Raider
    The Witcher 3
    Average 22. 16 fps 19.71 fps

    Key differences

    Why is NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER better than AMD Radeon RX 570?

    Newer — released 2 years later

    Has 2% higher performance

    Has 17% higher average FPS in games at 1080p — 57.00 FPS versus 48.89FPS

    Has 18% higher average FPS in games at 1440p — 42.66 FPS versus 36.26 FPS

    Has 13% higher average FPS in games at 2160p — 22.16 FPS versus 19.71 FPS

    Consumes 34% less power vs 100W W

    More modern manufacturing process — 12 nm vs 14 nm

    More advanced memory type — GDDR6 vs GDDR5

    Has a 39% higher pixel fill rate — 55.20 GPixel/s vs 39.81 GPixel/s

    Why is AMD Radeon RX 570 better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER?

    Has a slightly larger memory bus

    Has a 17% higher throughput — 224.0 GB/s vs 192.0 GB/s

    Has a 16% higher texture fill rate — 159.2 GTexel/s vs 138. 0 GTexel/s

    Has 768 more shading units

    Conclusion

    Which is better GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER or Radeon RX 570?

    The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER delivers 2% better performance, consumes up to 34% less energy and holds the same amount of memory. Based on our research, GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 3990X is more powerful than Radeon RX 570.

    What AMD graphics cards is equivalent to GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER?

    The Radeon RX 580 2048SP is AMD’s closest competitor to the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER. It is 1% more powerful, uses 50% more energy, and holds the same amount of memory.

    What NVIDIA graphics cards is equivalent to GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER?

    The GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB is NVIDIA’s closest competitor to the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER. It is 6% more powerful, uses 20% more energy, and holds 1 GB less memory.

    How does GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER perform compared to Radeon RX 570 and other graphics cards?

    Relative performance

    Total performance

    Bench performance

    Which is better AMD Radeon RX 570 or Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1650 Gaming OC

    Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1650 Gaming OC

    AMD Radeon RX 570

    GPU base clock

    The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a high clock speed.

    1485MHz

    max 2457

    Average: 938 MHz

    1168MHz

    max 2457

    Average: 938 MHz

    GPU memory frequency

    This is an important aspect calculating memory bandwidth

    2000MHz

    max 16000

    Average: 1326.6 MHz

    1750MHz

    max 16000

    Average: 1326.6 MHz

    FLOPS

    The measurement of processing power of a processor is called FLOPS.

    3.11 TFLOPS

    max 1142.32

    Average: 92. 5 TFLOPS

    5.2TFLOPS

    max 1142.32

    Average: 92.5TFLOPS

    Turbo GPU

    If the speed of the GPU drops below its limit, it can switch to a high clock speed to improve performance.
    Show all

    1815MHz

    max 2903

    Average: 1375.8 MHz

    1244MHz

    max 2903

    Average: 1375.8 MHz

    Texture size

    A certain number of textured pixels are displayed on the screen every second.
    Show all

    101.6 GTexels/s

    max 756.8

    Average: 145.4 GTexels/s

    159. 2 GTexels/s

    max 756.8

    Average: 145.4 GTexels/s

    Architecture name

    Turn

    GCN 4.0

    Graphic processor name

    TU1117

    Polaris 20

    003

    Memory bandwidth

    This is the speed at which the device stores or reads information.

    128GB/s

    max 2656

    Average: 198.3 GB/s

    224GB/s

    max 2656

    Average: 198.3 GB/s

    Effective memory speed

    The effective memory clock speed is calculated from the size and information transfer rate of the memory. The performance of the device in applications depends on the clock frequency. The higher it is, the better.
    Show all

    8002MHz

    max 19500

    Average: 6984.5 MHz

    7000MHz

    max 19500

    Average: 6984.5 MHz

    RAM

    4 GB

    max 128

    Average: 4.6 GB

    4 GB

    max 128

    Average: 4.6 GB

    GDDR Memory Versions

    Latest GDDR memory versions provide high data transfer rates to improve overall performance
    Show all

    5

    Average: 4.5

    5

    Average: 4.5

    Memory bus width

    A wide memory bus means that it can transfer more information in one cycle. This property affects the performance of the memory as well as the overall performance of the device’s graphics card.
    Show all

    128bit

    max 8192

    Average: 290.1bit

    256bit

    max 8192

    Average: 290.1bit

    Heat dissipation (TDP)

    Heat dissipation requirement (TDP) is the maximum amount of energy that can be dissipated by the cooling system. The lower the TDP, the less power will be consumed.
    Show all

    75W

    Average: 140.4 W

    150W

    Average: 140.4 W

    Process

    The small size of the semiconductor means it is a new generation chip.

    12 nm

    Average: 47.5 nm

    14 nm

    Average: 47.5 nm

    Number of transistors

    The higher their number, the more processor power it indicates

    4700 million

    max 80000

    Average: 5043 million

    5700 million

    max 80000

    Average: 5043 million

    PCIe version

    Considerable speed is provided by the expansion card used to connect the computer to peripherals. The updated versions have impressive throughput and provide high performance.
    Show all

    3

    Mean: 2. 8

    3

    Mean: 2.8

    Width

    265mm

    max 421.7

    Average: 242.6mm

    241mm

    max 421.7

    Average: 242.6mm

    Height

    118mm

    max 180

    Average: 119.1mm

    mm

    max 180

    Average: 119.1mm

    DirectX

    Used in demanding games, providing enhanced graphics

    12

    max 12.2

    Average: 11.1

    12

    max 12. 2

    Average: 11.1

    OpenCL version

    Used by some applications to enable GPU power for non-graphical calculations. The newer the version, the more functional it will be
    Show all

    1.2

    max 4.6

    Average: 1.7

    2.1

    max 4.6

    Average: 1.7

    opengl version

    Later versions provide better game graphics

    4.5

    max 4.6

    Average: 4

    4.6

    max 4.6

    Average: 4

    Shader model version

    6. 5

    max 6.6

    Average: 5.5

    6.4

    max 6.6

    Average: 5.5

    version VULKAN

    1.2

    1.2

    version CUDA

    No data

    has HDMI output

    9000 They can transmit video and audio to the display.
    Full display

    Yes

    Yes

    HDMI version

    The latest version provides a wide signal transmission channel due to the increased number of audio channels, frames per second, etc.
    Show all

    2

    max 2.1

    Average: 2

    max 2.1

    Average: 2

    DisplayPort

    Allows connection to a display using DisplayPort

    one

    Average: 2

    3

    Average: 2

    Number of HDMI sockets

    The more there are, the more devices can be connected at the same time (for example, game/TV type consoles)
    Show all

    3

    Average: 1. 1

    one

    Average: 1.1

    HDMI

    Yes

    Yes

    Passmark score

    7602

    max 29325

    Average: 7628.6

    6828

    max 29325

    Average: 7628.6

    3DMark Cloud Gate GPU test score

    49538

    max 1

    Average: 80042.3

    69674

    max 1

    Average: 80042.3

    3DMark Fire Strike Score

    8619

    max 38276

    Average: 12463

    11717

    max 38276

    Average: 12463

    3DMark Fire Strike Graphics test score

    9019

    max 49575

    Average: 11859. 1

    13550

    max 49575

    Average: 11859.1

    3DMark 11 Performance GPU score

    13372

    max 57937

    Average: 18799.9

    18588

    max 57937

    Average: 18799.9

    3DMark Vantage Performance score

    43800

    max 97887

    Average: 37830.6

    44649

    max 97887

    Average: 37830.6

    3DMark Ice Storm GPU score

    365866

    max 533357

    Average: 372425. 7

    367642

    max 533357

    Average: 372425.7

    SPECviewperf 12 test score — Solidworks

    45

    max 202

    Average: 62.4

    max 202

    Average: 62.4

    SPECviewperf 12 test score — specvp12 sw-03

    44

    max 202

    Average: 64

    max 202

    Average: 64

    SPECviewperf 12 evaluation — Siemens NX

    7

    max 212

    Average: 14

    max 212

    Average: 14

    SPECviewperf 12 test score — specvp12 showcase-01

    fifty

    max 232

    Average: 121. 3

    max 232

    Average: 121.3

    SPECviewperf 12 test score — Medical

    22

    max 107

    Average: 39.6

    max 107

    Average: 39.6

    SPECviewperf 12 test score — specvp12 mediacal-01

    21

    max 107

    Average: 39

    max 107

    Average: 39

    SPECviewperf 12 test score — Maya

    88

    max 177

    Average: 129.8

    max 177

    Average: 129.8

    SPECviewperf 12 test score — specvp12 maya-04

    89

    max 180

    Average: 132. 8

    max 180

    Average: 132.8

    SPECviewperf 12 — Energy score

    four

    max 25

    Average: 9.7

    max 25

    Average: 9.7

    SPECviewperf 12 test score — specvp12 energy-01

    5

    max 21

    Average: 10.7

    max 21

    Average: 10.7

    SPECviewperf 12 — Creo 9 test score1085

    thirty

    max 153

    Average: 49.5

    max 153

    Average: 49.5

    SPECviewperf 12 test score — specvp12 creo-01

    34

    max 153

    Average: 52. 5

    max 153

    Average: 52.5

    SPECviewperf 12 evaluation — specvp12 catia-04

    43

    max 189

    Average: 91.5

    max 189

    Average: 91.5

    SPECviewperf 12 evaluation — Catia

    42

    max 189

    Average: 88.6

    max 189

    Average: 88.6

    SPECviewperf 12 test score — specvp12 3dsmax-05

    104

    max 316

    Average: 189.5

    max 316

    Average: 189.5

    SPECviewperf 12 test score — 3ds Max

    103

    max 269

    Average: 169. 8

    max 269

    Average: 169.8

    Games against video cards 4. GeForce GTX 1650, GeForce GTX 1060, Radeon RX 580 and other budget video cards in 12 games / Overclockers.ua Categories: General Information, Specifications, Video Outputs and Ports, Compatibility, Dimensions, Requirements, API Support, Memory, Technology Support. Analysis of video card performance by benchmarks: PassMark — G3D Mark, PassMark — G2D Mark, Geekbench — OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T -Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score.

    AMD Radeon RX 570

    vs

    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB

    Overall Comparison

    Game Performance

    Tested with: Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite, FarCrysis 3, Crysis 3 3, Hitman: Absolution, Metro: Last Light, Thief, Alien: Isolation, Anno 2070, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, Diablo III, Dirt Rally, Dragon Age: Inquisition, The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim, FIFA 15, FIFA 16 , GRID Autosport, Grand Theft Auto V, Sleeping Dogs, Tomb Raider, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt.

    Video card tests performed on: Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite, Crysis 2, Crysis 3, Dirt3, FarCry 3, Hitman: Absolution, Metro: Last Light, Thief, Alien: Isolation, Anno 2070, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive , Diablo III, Dirt Rally, Dragon Age: Inquisition, The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim, FIFA 15, FIFA 16, GRID Autosport, Grand Theft Auto V, Sleeping Dogs, Tomb Raider, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor, Fire Strike Factor, Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation, Particle Simulation, Video Composition, Bitcoin Mining, TDP. GPU 1 GPU 2 6967 PassMark — G2D Mark GPU 1 626 Geekbench — OpenCL GPU 1 41252 CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) GPU 1 105.688

    119.051
    CompuBench 1.50782 GPU 1 1083.926

    1376.407
    CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) GPU 1 8.251 CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s ) GPU 1 79.029

    21.452
    CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) GPU 1 520.089

    456.147
    GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) GPU 1 9172 GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames) GPU 1 3624 GFXBench 4.0 — T- Rex (Frames) GPU 1 3346 GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) GPU 1 9172 GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) GPU 1 41252 35852 CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) 105.688 119.051 CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1083.926 1376.407 CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) 8.251 8.694 CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video9 Composition (Frames/s)

    3

    3

    30782 21.452 CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 520.089 456.147 GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 9172 12442 GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames) 3624 3691 GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) 3346 3340 GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 9172 12442 GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) 3624 3691 GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) 3346 3340 3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score 3839 4187

    Benefits

    Why is the Radeon RX 570 better?

    Better floating point performance 5.095 GFLOPS

    Test results: performance comparison

    Assassin’s Creed Origins

    • Version 1.4.2.
    • DirectX 11.
    • FOV — 100.
    • Dynamic resolution — off.
    • Smoothing — high.
    • Shadow quality is the highest.
    • The quality of the environment is the highest.
    • Texture detail — high.
    • Tessellation — very high.
    • The quality of the relief is high.
    • The density of small objects is very high.
    • Fog quality is very high.
    • Water quality is very high.
    • The quality of full-screen reflections is very high.
    • Volume clouds — enabled.
    • The quality of the characters is the highest.
    • Volumetric illumination — very high.
    • Depth of field — on.

    1920×1080

    Denomination Please enable JavaScript to see graphs
    Overclocking
    Enable JavaScript to see charts
    Minimum and Average FPS

    Crysis 3

    • Version 1.3.
    • DirectX 11.
    • Full screen anti-aliasing (MSAA) — 4.
    • Anisotropic filtering (AF) — 16.
    • Texture resolution — maximum.
    • The quality of the effects is maximum.
    • The quality of objects is maximum.
    • Particle quality — maximum.
    • Post-processing quality — maximum.
    • Shading quality — maximum.
    • Shadow quality — maximum.
    • Water quality — maximum.
    • The degree of blur is high.
    • Glare — enabled.

    1920 × 1080

    Nominal Turn on JavaScript to see graphics
    Turn on the JavaScript to see graphics

    25601084 Nominal 9 of

  • DirectX 11.
  • Texture filtering quality is maximum.
  • Shadow quality — maximum.
  • The quality of the geometry of the world and vegetation is the maximum.
  • The quality of the environment is maximum.
  • Water quality is high.
  • Landscape quality is high.
  • Volumetric fog quality is high.
  • Smoothing — SMAA.
  • Motion blur — enabled.
  • Field of view scale — 90.
  • Resolution scale — 1. 0.
  • 1920×1080

    Rating Enable JavaScript to see graphs Overclocking
    Enable JavaScript to see graphs

    2560411085
    Overclocking
    Enable JavaScript to see graphs
    Minimum and average FPS

    Hitman (2016)

    • Version 1.13.2.
    • DirectX 11.
    • Anti-aliasing post effect — FXAA.
    • Anisotropic filtering — x16.
    • Detail level — ultra high.
    • Texture quality is high.
    • Complex shading (SSAO) — enabled.
    • Shadow quality is ultra high.

      Need for Speed ​​Payback

      • Version 1.07.
      • DirectX 11.
      • Motion blur — enabled.
      • Texture quality is ultra high.
      • Texture filtering — ultra high.
      • Post-processing quality is ultra high.
      • Shadow quality is ultra high.
      • Global Illumination — HBAO.
      • Ultra high quality effects.
      • Geometry quality is ultra high.
      • Anti-aliasing — FXAA.
        Minimum and average FPS

        Outlast 2

        • Version 1.0.17518.0.
        • DirectX 11.
        • Texture quality is very high.
        • Texture filtering — 16x.
        • Shadow quality is high.
        • The quality of the relief is high.
        • Fog quality is high.
        • The quality of the effects is high.
        • Anti-aliasing — FXAA.

        1920×1080

        Denomination Please enable JavaScript to see graphs

      • High resolution textures — enabled.
      • The quality of visual effects is high.
      • Blur — on.
      • Dynamic lighting — included.
      • Shadows — included.
      • Shadow resolution is 8192×8192.
      • Overlay resolution is 4096×4096.
      • Full Screen Overlay — Enabled.
      • Landscape quality is high.
      • High resolution terrain geometry — enabled.
      • High resolution terrain textures — included.
      • High quality terrain shaders — enabled.
      • Volumetric lighting — included.
      • Volumetric lighting render resolution is 2048×2048.
      • High noise detail — enabled.
      • High resolution water — included.
      • High quality water shaders included.
      • Water reflections — 4 steps.
      • Leader animation is high.

      1920×1080

      Denomination Please enable JavaScript to see graphs

    • Water quality is high.
    • Anti-aliasing — FXAA.
    • Antialiasing quality is high.
    • Glow — on.
    • Glare — enabled.
    • Depth of field — on.
    • Motion blur — high.
    • Global shading — high.
    • Reflection quality is high.
    • Halftone — enabled.

    1920×1080

    Denomination Please enable JavaScript to see graphs

    Comparative analysis of video cards NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and AMD Radeon RX 570 by all known characteristics in the categories: General information, Specifications, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions, requirements, API support, Memory, Technology support.
    Analysis of video card performance by benchmarks: PassMark — G3D Mark, PassMark — G2D Mark, Geekbench — OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T -Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score.

    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti

    versus

    AMD Radeon RX 570

    Benefits

    Reasons to choose NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti

    • Newer graphics card, release dates 2 year(s) 11 month(s) about 4% higher
    • : 1350 MHz vs 926-1168 MHz

    • 23% higher core clock in Boost mode: 1485 MHz vs 1206-1244 MHz
    • nm
    • 3 times lower power consumption: 50 Watt vs 150 Watt
    • Approximately 8% increase in PassMark — G3D Mark benchmark: 7504 vs 6967
    • Approximately 4% increase in Geekbench — OpenCL performance: 42452 vs 40810 9027 CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (Frames/s) about 43% more performance: 151.562 vs 105.688
    • CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) about 70% more performance: 1843.045 vs 1083.926
    • About 29% more performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) benchmark: 10.685 vs 8.251
    • About 47% more performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) benchmark: 116.231 vs 79.029
    • About 24% more performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 644.011 vs 520.089
    • About 33% more performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12180 vs 9172
    • 2.5 times greater performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) benchmark: 8926 vs 3624
    • 2.4 times greater performance in GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) benchmark: 8062 vs 3346 9027
    • About 33% more performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) benchmark: 12180 vs 9172
    • 2.5x more performance in GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Fps) benchmark: 8926 vs 3624
    • Benchmark performance GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) 2.4 times bigger: 8062 vs 3346
    Issue date 2 Apr 2020 vs 18 April 2017
    Core frequency 1350 MHz vs 926-1168 MHz
    Boost core clock 1485 MHz vs 1206-1244 MHz
    Process 12 nm vs 14 nm
    Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt vs 150 Watt
    PassMark — G3D Mark 7504 vs 6967
    Geekbench — OpenCL 42452 vs 40810
    CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) 151.562 vs 105.688
    CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1843.045 vs 1083.926
    CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) 10.685 vs 8.251
    CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) 116.231 vs 79.029
    CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 644.011 vs 520.089
    GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 12180 vs 9172
    GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) 8926 vs 3624
    GFXBench 4. 0 — T-Rex (Frames) 8062 vs 3346
    GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 12180 vs 9172
    GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) 8926 vs 3624
    GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) 8062 vs 3346

    Reasons to choose AMD Radeon RX 570

    • 68% faster texturing speed: 159.23 GTexel/s vs 95.04 GTexel/s
    • 2x more shader processor(s): 2048 vs 1024 9024 2x more: 8 GB vs 4 GB
    • 4.7 times faster memory frequency: 7000 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
    • About 57% faster performance in PassMark — G2D Mark benchmark: 626 vs 399
    • Performance in 3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics benchmark Score about 4% more: 3841 vs 3677
    Texturing speed 159. 23 GTexel/s vs 95.04 GTexel/s
    Number of shader processors 2048 vs 1024
    Maximum memory size 8 GB vs 4 GB
    Memory frequency 7000 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
    PassMark — G2D Mark 626 vs 399
    3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score 3841 vs 3677

    Benchmark comparison

    GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
    GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 570

    PassMark — G3D Mark
    GPU 1
    GPU 2
    PassMark — G2D Mark
    GPU 1
    GPU 2
    Geekbench — OpenCL
    GPU 1
    GPU 2
    CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s)
    GPU 1
    GPU 2
    151.562
    105.688
    CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
    GPU 1
    GPU 2
    1843.045
    1083.926
    CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s)
    GPU 1
    GPU 2
    10. 685
    CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s)
    GPU 1
    GPU 2
    116.231
    79.029
    CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
    GPU 1
    GPU 2
    644.011
    520.089
    GFXBench 4. 0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
    GPU 1
    GPU 2
    GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames)
    GPU 1
    GPU 2
    GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames)
    GPU 1
    GPU 2
    GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
    GPU 1
    GPU 2
    GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Fps)
    GPU 1
    GPU 2
    GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps)
    GPU 1
    GPU 2
    3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score
    GPU 1
    GPU 2
    Name NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti AMD Radeon RX 570
    PassMark — G3D Mark 7504 6967
    PassMark — G2D Mark 399 626
    Geekbench — OpenCL 42452 40810
    CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) 151.562 105.688
    CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1843.045 1083.926
    CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) 10.685 8.251
    CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) 116.231 79.029
    CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 644.011 520.089
    GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 12180 9172
    GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames) 8926 3624
    GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) 8062 3346
    GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 12180 9172
    GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) 8926 3624
    GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) 8062 3346
    3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score 3677 3841

    Feature comparison

    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti AMD Radeon RX 570
    Architecture Turing GCN 4. 0
    Codename TU117 Polaris 20
    Production date 2 Apr 2020 18 April 2017
    Place in the rating 168 263
    Type Laptop Desktop, Laptop
    Design Radeon RX 500 Series
    Generation GCN 4th Gen
    Price at the date of the first issue $169
    Price now $149. 99
    Price/performance ratio (0-100) 59.00
    Boost core clock 1485 MHz 1206-1244 MHz
    Core frequency 1350 MHz 926-1168 MHz
    Process 12nm 14 nm
    Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 95.04 GFLOPS (1:32)
    Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 6.083 TFLOPS (2:1)
    Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 3. 041 TFLOPS
    Number of shaders 1024 2048
    Pixel fill rate 47.52GPixel/s 39.81GP/s
    Texturing speed 95.04 GTexel/s 159.23 GTexel/s
    Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 150 Watt
    Number of transistors 4700 million 5,700 million
    Floating point performance 5.1 TFLOPs
    Render output units 32
    Stream Processors 2048
    Texture Units 128
    Video connectors No outputs 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
    DisplayPort support
    Dual-link DVI support
    HDMI
    VGA
    Interface PCIe 3. 0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
    Additional power connectors None 1x 6-pin
    CrossFire without bridge
    Length 241 mm
    Recommended power supply 450 Watt
    DirectX 12.1 12.0 (12_0)
    OpenCL 1.2 2.0
    OpenGL 4.6 4. 6
    Shader Model 6.5
    Vulcan
    Maximum memory size 4GB 8GB
    Memory bandwidth 192.0 GB/s 224 GB/s
    Memory bus width 128bit 256bit
    Memory frequency 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) 7000MHz
    Memory type GDDR6 GDDR5
    4K h364 Decode
    4K h364 Encode
    AMD Eyefinity
    AMD Radeon™ Chill
    AMD Radeon™ ReLive
    CrossFire
    FreeSync
    h365/HEVC Decode
    h365/HEVC Encode
    HDMI 4K Support
    PowerTune
    Unified Video Decoder (UVD)
    Virtual Super Resolution (VSR)

    the main thing from AMD RX 6500 XT reviews is DTF-based hardware

    Too “cut down” adapter, in which hardware ray tracing acceleration blocks are just “for show”.

    22,880
    views

    On January 19, AMD announced the start of sales of the entry-level graphics card Radeon RX 6500 XT. The company positions it as a graphics accelerator for 1080p gaming and believes that it will be a replacement for GeForce GTX 1650 and Radeon RX 570-level adapters. We chose the most important of them.

    Specifications RX 6500 XT

    • GPU — Navi 24 (6 nm)
    • Actuators — 16
    • Stream Processors — 1024
    • Ray tracing hardware acceleration blocks — 16
    • Game frequency — 2610 MHz
    • Maximum frequency — 2815 MHz
    • Memory — 4 GB GDDR6, 64-bit bus, 144 GB/s bandwidth
    • Infinity Cache — 16 MB
    • Power consumption — 107 W
    • PCI Express 4. 0 interface lines — 4
    • Support for AV1 decoder and h364/HEVC encoders N/A
    • Connectors — DisplayPort 1.4a and HDMI 2.1 VRR

    Impressions and performance tests

    Reviewers at Tom’s Hardware believe that AMD cut the RX 6500 XT’s specifications too far in order to make the graphics card as cheap as possible.

    A budget processor, 4 GB of video memory with a 64-bit bus and support for only four lines of the PCI Express 4.0 interface had an extremely negative impact on the performance of the adapter. For comparison, even the predecessor RX 5500 XT had support for eight PCIe 4.0 lanes.

    As a result, in tests in seven games at «medium» settings at 1080p resolution, the adapter on average lost out to the RX 5500 XT with both 8 GB and 4 GB of memory. Tom’s Hardware emphasized that the results were generally consistent with AMD’s statements. According to the company’s tests, the RX 6500 XT outperforms the RX 570 with 4 GB of memory by 25%. Benchmarks of the publication showed that the video card has a 20% increased performance.

    Average performance in Borderlands 3, Far Cry 6, Flight Simulator, Forza Horizon 5, Horizon Zero Dawn, Red Dead Redemption 2 and Watch Dogs Legion on «medium» settings

    On the Ultra preset at 1080p, the RX 6500 XT was outperformed by the RX 5500 XT and GeForce GTX 1650 Super with 4GB of memory. At the same time, the RX 5500 XT with 8 GB of memory demonstrated a 25% higher performance.

    It is noteworthy that at first AMD released this model at the same recommended price as the RX 6500 XT — 199 dollars. Reviewers also noted that the GTX 1060 with 6 GB of memory, released in mid-2016, was only slightly behind the RX 5500 XT.

    Average performance in seven games on «ultra» settings

    TechSpot got similar test scores, most of which outperformed the RX 6500 XT.

    Test results in games with ray tracing turned on were expected. The video card has only 16 blocks of hardware RT-acceleration, which is not enough to provide acceptable performance.

    Tests on «medium» settings with «beams» turned on showed that the RX 6500 XT is unable to provide more than 20 fps in Metro Exodus Enhanced Edition, Cyberpunk 2077 and other demanding titles. The only game tested with an average frame rate above 30 was the battle royale Fortnite. In Control, the test failed at all, as the game required DXR support.

    RX 6500 XT performance with ray tracing enabled

    Based on the test results at 1080p resolution, Tom’s Hardware did not perform benchmarks in 2K or 4K.

    Nobody should ever consider the RX 6500 XT as a 1440p or 4K graphics card.

    Jarred Walton

    Among the advantages of the video card, all observers named the high gaming frequency of the video chip — 2610 MHz, low power consumption and compactness. PCWorld separately noticed that the small amount of video memory does not allow using the card for Ethereum mining.

    2022 © All rights reserved