Nvidia GTX 1650 vs RX 570: Clash of the best budget graphics cards
The Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 is the latest graphics card in Nvidia’s budget-oriented Turing line-up. Aimed at 1080p gamers looking to get 60fps on either Medium to High settings, it’s a tempting buy for just £139 / $149. But when the 8GB version of AMD’s Radeon RX 570 can be found for practically the same amount of money these days, the battle for which graphics card belongs inside your PC gets a little more complicated. To help you decide, I’ve put both of them head to head via the medium of some lovely bar charts to see which one’s best. Because nothing settles a best graphics card debate like some good, old, lovely graphs.
Watch on YouTube
GTX 1650 vs RX 570: How we test
As per usual, I’ve run each card through my general games benchmarking suite at 1920×1080 and 2560×1440 resolutions to see how they perform across different graphics quality settings. The idea is to see what it takes to get a decent 60fps in each game, and how far each card is able to stretch itself before things get too choppy for comfort.
The games in question are Assassin’s Creed Odyssey, Final Fantasy XV (with Nvidia’s fancy HairWorks, TurfEffects, VXAO and ShadowLibs effects turned off), Monster Hunter: World, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Total War: Warhammer II, Forza Horizon 4, The Witcher III and Metro Exodus (albeit only on Medium settings because that game’s benchmark tool is rough on anything more demanding).
Paired with my Intel Core i5-8600K CPU and 16GB of Corsair Vengeance 2133MHz RAM, I’ve seen what each card can do on Ultra, High and Medium settings at 1080p, and Medium at 1440p (because realistically you’re not going to be pushing either card any higher than that), and taken an average frame rate either from their own built-in benchmarks or from my own repeated manual gameplay tests to see how they stack up against each other.
Today, I’ve got Zotac’s GeForce GTX 1650 OC edition and the 8GB PowerColor Radeon RX 570 Red Dragon, both of which are at the lower end of their respective price spectrums.
This should give us a pretty good idea of what to expect as a baseline experience from each type of card, and puts both of them on a level playing field — which is important for those looking to make the most of their hard-earned pennies.
GTX 1650 vs RX 570: 1080p performance
Starting with how the GTX 1650 and RX 570 performed on Ultra settings at 1080p, you can see from the graph below that the RX 570 has the upper hand in every game going. Admittedly, neither of these cards are really ‘Ultra’-tier GPUs — that’s more GTX 1660 / RX 580 kind of territory — but if you’re the sort of person who values graphical fidelity over super fast speeds, then the RX 570 is definitely the best card for the job here.
In the GTX 1650’s defence, there are still a couple of games where it’s more or less neck and neck with the RX 570. In Total War: Warhammer II and Final Fantasy XV, for example, there’s an average gap of just 2-3fps — something you’re arguably not going to notice in-game.
However, what these graphs don’t show you is the highs and lows of each of those games, and in both cases it was the GTX 1650 that dipped below the tell-tale 30fps line rather than the RX 570. Whereas AMD’s effort always managed to keep its head about 30fps when the action got a bit heated in these games, the GTX 1650 dropped to a stuttery 28fps. Again, it doesn’t sound like much on paper, but in practice it’s huge. Every frame counts when you’re hovering around the 30fps mark, and just a couple of extra fps here and there can make all the difference between a playable action sequence and a spluttering slideshow.
Still, as I said earlier, Ultra quality isn’t really what you’re going for with these cards. Instead, you’re almost certainly going to be more comfortable on High, the results of which you can see below. I’ve omitted Forza Horizon 4 from this graph, as both cards already hit a comfortable 60fps over on Ultra, but you can see it’s a much tighter race on this particular quality setting, with the GTX 1650 closing the gap in Assassin’s Creed Odyssey and offering much more playable speeds in Shadow of the Tomb Raider.
Looking at this graph, you might think it was a bit unfair to come out so firmly in favour of the RX 570 in my GTX 1650 review, but there are still a couple of things to note here. Firstly, while Shadow of the Tomb Raider is a lot smoother for the GTX 1650 here, the RX 570 achieved the same average on the next graphics setting up. Likewise, you’re starting to enter the realms of high refresh rate monitor territory with the RX 570 here (just look at that massive lead over on The Witcher III), while the GTX 1650 is still averaging below 60fps on this setting.
Moreover, as you can see from the Medium settings graph below, the RX 570 creates an even bigger performance gap here, offering 10fps boosts in Final Fantasy XV and Shadow of the Tomb Raider (although as I’ve noted before, Medium seems to be weirdly identical to Tomb Raider’s High setting in this particular game), and almost an extra 20fps in Metro Exodus.
For me, that’s enough to tip the scales in the RX 570’s favour at this resolution, as it’s not only able to offer better speeds on the very top settings, but it’s also able to hit 60fps much more consistently down on Medium settings as well.
GTX 1650 vs RX 570: 1440p performance
But it’s not just 1080p where the RX 570 comes out on top. It’s also able to offer superior performance at 2560×1440 as well. I’ve stuck with just Medium settings for this resolution, as even this is a bit of a struggle for these particular cards, but as you can see below, on average the RX 570 is faster in every single game.
At this resolution, the RX 570’s 8GB of memory really comes in handy, giving it a massive leg up when it comes to dealing with higher resolution texture packs. Just look at that Metro Exodus result, for example. Whereas the GTX 1650 is completely unplayable on the benchmark’s Normal settings, the RX 570 managed an impressive average of 42fps, which is no mean feat considering how taxing it is. Likewise, even older games such as The Witcher III benefit here, with the RX 570 offering almost a 10fps lead over the GTX 1650.
These games are all still largely playable on the GTX 1650, of course, but with averages right down in the low 30s in most cases, it can be a bit borderline.
The RX 570, on the other hand, is comfortably in the low 40fps zone in a lot of games here, giving it just that little bit of extra versatility for those with higher resolution monitors.
GTX 1650 vs RX 570: Conclusion
Overall, then, I think it’s a clear win for the RX 570 here. The GTX 1650 pulls it back a bit when playing on High settings at 1080p, but everywhere else it simply can’t match the speeds offered by its AMD rival, especially if you’re looking to get a bit of 1440p gaming in there as well.
The GTX 1650 might still be worth considering if it suddenly came down in price (or the RX 570 suddenly got much more expensive), but when both graphics cards cost roughly the same amount of money — the Zotac’s GTX 1650 OC, for instance, costs £139 in the UK, while the PowerColor RX 570 is £145 — you’d need a very good reason indeed to choose the GTX 1650 over the RX 570 right now. As I mentioned in my GTX 1650 review, it could be that you want to take advantage of the GTX’s tiny stature to build a particularly compact PC, or you don’t want to shell out for a beefier PSU given how it already draws all the power it needs direct from your motherboard.
But if you’re just building a regular PC and want the best speeds for the least amount of money, then the RX 570 has the GTX 1650 beaten hands down. Plus, until June 8, you also get a free copy of The Division 2 and World War Z with the RX 570, which is arguably a much better deal than Nvidia’s free Fortnite gear pack.
AMD Radeon RX 570 vs Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1650 Gaming OC: What is the difference?
50points
AMD Radeon RX 570
43points
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1650 Gaming OC
vs
54 facts in comparison
AMD Radeon RX 570
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1650 Gaming OC
Why is AMD Radeon RX 570 better than Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1650 Gaming OC?
- 1.75 TFLOPS higher floating-point performance?
5 TFLOPSvs3.25 TFLOPS - 57.6 GTexels/s higher texture rate?
159.2 GTexels/svs101.6 GTexels/s - 96GB/s more memory bandwidth?
224GB/svs128GB/s - 128bit wider memory bus width?
256bitvs128bit - 1152 more shading units?
2048vs896 - 1000million more transistors?
5700 millionvs4700 million - 72 more texture mapping units (TMUs)?
128vs56 - 1 newer version of OpenCL?
2.
2vs1.2
Why is Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1650 Gaming OC better than AMD Radeon RX 570?
- 317MHz faster GPU clock speed?
1485MHzvs1168MHz - 18.28 GPixel/s higher pixel rate?
58.08 GPixel/svs39.8 GPixel/s - 45W lower TDP?
75Wvs120W - 250MHz faster memory clock speed?
2000MHzvs1750MHz - 1002MHz higher effective memory clock speed?
8002MHzvs7000MHz - 571MHz faster GPU turbo speed?
1815MHzvs1244MHz - 2nm smaller semiconductor size?
12nmvs14nm - Supports 3D?
Which are the most popular comparisons?
AMD Radeon RX 570
vs
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1650 Gaming OC
vs
Asus Radeon RX 550 4GB
AMD Radeon RX 570
vs
Gigabyte Radeon RX 6500 XT Gaming OC
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1650 Gaming OC
vs
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8
AMD Radeon RX 570
vs
AMD Radeon RX 580
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1650 Gaming OC
vs
MSI GeForce GTX 1650 Ventus XS OC
AMD Radeon RX 570
vs
MSI GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Gaming
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1650 Gaming OC
vs
AMD Radeon RX 550
AMD Radeon RX 570
vs
AMD Radeon RX 6400
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1650 Gaming OC
vs
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100
AMD Radeon RX 570
vs
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1650 Gaming OC
vs
Inno3D GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 Twin X2 OC
AMD Radeon RX 570
vs
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1650 Gaming OC
vs
MSI GeForce GTX 1650 Ventus XS
AMD Radeon RX 570
vs
Nvidia Geforce GTX 1660 Super
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1650 Gaming OC
vs
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1650 OC
AMD Radeon RX 570
vs
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1650 Gaming OC
vs
Asus ROG Strix GeForce GTX 1060
Price comparison
User reviews
Overall Rating
AMD Radeon RX 570
2 User reviews
AMD Radeon RX 570
8.
5/10
2 User reviews
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1650 Gaming OC
0 User reviews
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1650 Gaming OC
0.0/10
0 User reviews
Features
Value for money
9.5/10
2 votes
No reviews yet
Gaming
8.5/10
2 votes
No reviews yet
Performance
8.5/10
2 votes
No reviews yet
Fan noise
7.5/10
2 votes
No reviews yet
Reliability
8.5/10
2 votes
No reviews yet
Performance
1.GPU clock speed
1168MHz
1485MHz
The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a higher clock speed.
2.GPU turbo
1244MHz
1815MHz
When the GPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased performance.
3.
pixel rate
39.8 GPixel/s
58.08 GPixel/s
The number of pixels that can be rendered to the screen every second.
4.floating-point performance
5 TFLOPS
3.25 TFLOPS
Floating-point performance is a measurement of the raw processing power of the GPU.
5.texture rate
159.2 GTexels/s
101.6 GTexels/s
The number of textured pixels that can be rendered to the screen every second.
6.GPU memory speed
1750MHz
2000MHz
The memory clock speed is one aspect that determines the memory bandwidth.
7.shading units
Shading units (or stream processors) are small processors within the graphics card that are responsible for processing different aspects of the image.
8.texture mapping units (TMUs)
TMUs take textures and map them to the geometry of a 3D scene.
More TMUs will typically mean that texture information is processed faster.
9.render output units (ROPs)
The ROPs are responsible for some of the final steps of the rendering process, writing the final pixel data to memory and carrying out other tasks such as anti-aliasing to improve the look of graphics.
Memory
1.effective memory speed
7000MHz
8002MHz
The effective memory clock speed is calculated from the size and data rate of the memory. Higher clock speeds can give increased performance in games and other apps.
2.maximum memory bandwidth
224GB/s
128GB/s
This is the maximum rate that data can be read from or stored into memory.
3.VRAM
VRAM (video RAM) is the dedicated memory of a graphics card. More VRAM generally allows you to run games at higher settings, especially for things like texture resolution.
4.memory bus width
256bit
128bit
A wider bus width means that it can carry more data per cycle. It is an important factor of memory performance, and therefore the general performance of the graphics card.
5.version of GDDR memory
Newer versions of GDDR memory offer improvements such as higher transfer rates that give increased performance.
6.Supports ECC memory
✖AMD Radeon RX 570
✖Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1650 Gaming OC
Error-correcting code memory can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when is it essential to avoid corruption, such as scientific computing or when running a server.
Features
1.DirectX version
DirectX is used in games, with newer versions supporting better graphics.
2.OpenGL version
OpenGL is used in games, with newer versions supporting better graphics.
3.OpenCL version
Some apps use OpenCL to apply the power of the graphics processing unit (GPU) for non-graphical computing. Newer versions introduce more functionality and better performance.
4.Supports multi-display technology
✔AMD Radeon RX 570
✔Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1650 Gaming OC
The graphics card supports multi-display technology. This allows you to configure multiple monitors in order to create a more immersive gaming experience, such as having a wider field of view.
5.load GPU temperature
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1650 Gaming OC)
A lower load temperature means that the card produces less heat and its cooling system performs better.
6.supports ray tracing
✖AMD Radeon RX 570
✖Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1650 Gaming OC
Ray tracing is an advanced light rendering technique that provides more realistic lighting, shadows, and reflections in games.
7.Supports 3D
✖AMD Radeon RX 570
✔Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1650 Gaming OC
Allows you to view in 3D (if you have a 3D display and glasses).
8.supports DLSS
✖AMD Radeon RX 570
✖Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1650 Gaming OC
DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling) is an upscaling technology powered by AI. It allows the graphics card to render games at a lower resolution and upscale them to a higher resolution with near-native visual quality and increased performance. DLSS is only available on select games.
9.PassMark (G3D) result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1650 Gaming OC)
This benchmark measures the graphics performance of a video card. Source: PassMark.
Ports
1.has an HDMI output
✔AMD Radeon RX 570
✔Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1650 Gaming OC
Devices with a HDMI or mini HDMI port can transfer high definition video and audio to a display.
2.HDMI ports
More HDMI ports mean that you can simultaneously connect numerous devices, such as video game consoles and set-top boxes.
3.HDMI version
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Radeon RX 570)
HDMI 2.0
Newer versions of HDMI support higher bandwidth, which allows for higher resolutions and frame rates.
4.DisplayPort outputs
Allows you to connect to a display using DisplayPort.
5.DVI outputs
Allows you to connect to a display using DVI.
6.mini DisplayPort outputs
Allows you to connect to a display using mini-DisplayPort.
Price comparison
Cancel
Which are the best graphics cards?
GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon RX 570
GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon RX 570
- Home
- VGA Benchmarks
- GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon RX 570
-
GeForce GTX 1650
100%
-
Radeon RX 570
120%
Relative performance
Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 1650 |
This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
| Supports PhysX |
| Supports G-Sync |
| Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
| Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute |
| Supports DirectX Raytracing (DXR) |
| Supports Deep Learning Super-Sampling (DLSS) |
Reasons to consider Radeon RX 570 |
| 20% higher gaming performance. |
| Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute |
| Supports FreeSync |
| Supports ReLive (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
| Supports TrueAudio |
| Based on an outdated architecture (AMD GCN), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
HWBench recommends Radeon RX 570
The Radeon RX 570 is the better performing card based on the game benchmark suite used (18 combinations of games and resolutions).
Core Configuration
| GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon RX 570 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPU Name | TU107 () | vs | Ellesmere (Ellesmere PRO) | |
| Fab Process | 12 nm | vs | 14 nm | |
| Die Size | 0 mm² | vs | 232 mm² | |
| Transistors | unknown | vs | 5,700 million | |
| Shaders | 896 | vs | 2048 | |
| Compute Units | 14 | vs | 32 | |
| Core clock | 1485 MHz | vs | 926 MHz | |
| ROPs | 32 | vs | 32 | |
| TMUs | 56 | vs | 128 |
Memory Configuration
| GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon RX 570 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | vs | GDDR5 | |
| Bus Width | 128 bit | vs | 256 bit | |
| Memory Speed | 2000 MHz 8000 MHz effective |
vs | 1650 MHz 6600 MHz effective |
|
| Memory Size | 4096 Mb | vs | 4096 Mb |
Additional details
| GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon RX 570 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TDP | 0 watts | vs | 120 watts | |
| Release Date | 30 Apr 2019 | vs | 1 Apr 2017 |
-
GeForce GTX 1650
53.
28 GP/s -
Radeon RX 570
38.60 GP/s
GigaPixels — higher is better
-
GeForce GTX 1650
93.24 GT/s
-
Radeon RX 570
154.40 GT/s
GigaTexels — higher is better
-
GeForce GTX 1650
128.00 GB/s
-
Radeon RX 570
211.20 GB/s
GB/s — higher is better
-
GeForce GTX 1650
2984.00 GFLOPs
-
Radeon RX 570
4940.00 GFLOPs
GFLOPs — higher is better
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64
-
GeForce GTX 1650
52
-
Radeon RX 570
65
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra quality TTA DirectX11 Windows10 x64
-
GeForce GTX 1650
53
-
Radeon RX 570
56
FPS (higher is better)
Highest quality DirectX11 Windows10 x64
-
GeForce GTX 1650
62
-
Radeon RX 570
70
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra quality DirectX12 Windows10 x64
-
GeForce GTX 1650
48
-
Radeon RX 570
66
FPS (higher is better)
DX11, Max Details, 16:1 AF, 2xMSAA
-
GeForce GTX 1650
77
-
Radeon RX 570
82
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, HR Textures, DirectX11, Windows 10 x64
-
GeForce GTX 1650
56
-
Radeon RX 570
52
FPS (higher is better)
Highest Details, Pure hair, HBAO+, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64
-
GeForce GTX 1650
42
-
Radeon RX 570
52
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra quality DirectX12 Async Compute Windows10 x64
-
GeForce GTX 1650
54
-
Radeon RX 570
76
FPS (higher is better)
DX11,Max Details, 16:1 HQ-AF, +AA
-
GeForce GTX 1650
51
-
Radeon RX 570
58
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64
-
GeForce GTX 1650
32
-
Radeon RX 570
47
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra quality TTA DirectX11 Windows10 x64
-
GeForce GTX 1650
39
-
Radeon RX 570
43
FPS (higher is better)
Highest quality DirectX11 Windows10 x64
-
GeForce GTX 1650
42
-
Radeon RX 570
51
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra quality DirectX12 Windows10 x64
-
GeForce GTX 1650
31
-
Radeon RX 570
42
FPS (higher is better)
DX11, Max Details, 16:1 AF, 2xMSAA
-
GeForce GTX 1650
49
-
Radeon RX 570
56
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, HR Textures, DirectX11, Windows 10 x64
-
GeForce GTX 1650
38
-
Radeon RX 570
36
FPS (higher is better)
Highest Details, Pure hair, HBAO+, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64
-
GeForce GTX 1650
27
-
Radeon RX 570
34
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra quality DirectX12 Async Compute Windows10 x64
-
GeForce GTX 1650
37
-
Radeon RX 570
55
FPS (higher is better)
DX11,Max Details, 16:1 HQ-AF, +AA
-
GeForce GTX 1650
35
-
Radeon RX 570
42
FPS (higher is better)
| VS | ||
| GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB |
| VS | ||
| GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon RX 470 |
| VS | ||
| Radeon RX 570 | GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB |
| VS | ||
| Radeon RX 570 | Radeon RX 470 |
| VS | ||
| GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | Radeon RX 580 2048SP |
| VS | ||
| Radeon RX 580 2048SP | Radeon RX 580X |
Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.
Which is Best for Budget Gaming?
In this article, we’ll test out and compare 12 different games at 1080p with medium, high, and ultra settings. This way you see the performance difference between them. I’m using the MSI Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 and the ASUS ROG Strix Radeon RX 570 4GB in this detailed comparison.
|
5
2Expert Reviews For Nvidia GTX 1650:
By PCGamer
The GTX 1650 is the fastest 75W GPU around, if that’s what you need, but it faces stiff competition from many other graphics cards.
By TomsHardware
GeForce GTX 1650 has potential. It needs to be less expensive, for starters. We also want to see a card that gets all of its power from the PCIe slot. For the time being, AMD’s Radeon RX 570 8GB is faster, less expensive, and better able to handle games with big memory requirements.By PCMag
Zotac’s GeForce GTX 1650 OC offers budget-constrained gamers and compact-PC builders a new low-power alternative, but this video card’s performance isn’t quite a match for its price in 2019.By Techspot
For mainstream and affordable GPU options we saw the appeal of the RTX 2060, GTX 1660 Ti and 1660, in all cases receiving our recommendations. For less money however the RX 570 lives on.By AnandTech
So while it’s still a solid choice for small systems, it’s not going to be an entirely silent card in the process. But if nothing else, this leaves Zotac with some room for a fully passive GTX 1650, which, I suspect, is something that would be particularly well-received in the HTPC market.
Expert Reviews For AMD RX 570:
By PCGamesN
When it first came out the RX 570 was a bit of an also-ran. A mildly updated GPU, giving only a little extra performance. Fast forward to now and the RX 570 is the best budget graphics card you can buy.By TomsHardware
While we don’t like it when AMD re-names existing hardware to make it sound new, the Radeon RX 570 does serve up good performance at 1920×1080 in today’s games. Its primary competition isn’t as consistent. The Asus Strix RX 570 sample we tested incorporates AMD’s slight improvements at a price point well under $200, too.By PCWorld
The Gigabyte Aorus is a gorgeous, well-performing graphics card. The Radeon RX 570 is the best sub-$200 gaming option around—but it isn’t much of a step up over the RX 470.By Play3r
If you are interested in RGB and are all about the light shows within your system, this card does not match up to expectations.It has one little area which has an area that you can control, but it is nowhere near as nice as the bigger STRIX cards which are some of the nicest and best implemented RGB cards on the market.
By TrustedReviews
A real brute of a mid-range GPU, the RX 570 is a great addition to the AMD lineup. But watch the competition’s pricing closely.
Pros and Cons Listed:
[i2pc pros_icon=”icon icon-plus-thick” cons_icon=”icon icon-minus-thick” show_title=”true” title=”Nvidia GTX 1650″ show_button=”false” pros_title=”Pros” cons_title=”Cons” ][i2pros]Some versions do not require auxiliary power
Great performance per watt
[/i2pros][i2cons]Expensive relative to Radeon RX 570
Some versions do require auxiliary power
Not quite capable of smooth performance at max-quality 1080p
Missing newest-generation NVENC encoder hardware
[/i2cons][/i2pc]
[i2pc pros_icon=”icon icon-plus-thick” cons_icon=”icon icon-minus-thick” show_title=”true” title=”AMD RX 570″ show_button=”false” pros_title=”Pros” cons_title=”Cons” ][i2pros]Slightly faster than Radeon RX 470, excellent 1080p performance
AMD maintains competitive pricing
Ample memory (4GB GDDR5) proves valuable in comparisons to GeForce GTX 1060 3GB
[/i2pros][i2cons]Less-capable thermal solutions than Radeon RX 580
Little overclocking headroom
[/i2cons][/i2pc]
Above we have shown the overview and depth specifications of both the graphics card.
Now, we are sharing the full review and comparison of both graphics cards.
|
QUICK SPECS: GTX 1650 vs RX 570 |
|
GTX 1650 |
RX 570 |
| 896 Cuda Cores | 2048 Stream Processors |
| 1485MHz Base Clock | 1168 MHz Base Clock |
| 1665MHz Boost Clock | 1244 MHz Boost Clock |
| 4GB GDDR5 Memory | 4GB GDDR5 Memory |
| 8 GBPS Memory Speed | 7 GBPS Memory Speed |
| 128 GB/S Memory Bandwidth | 224 GB/S Memory Bandwidth |
| 128-Bit Memory Interface | 256-Bit Memory Interface |
Let’s quickly take a look at how these two cards differ in terms of specs, note that things like Cuda cores and stream processors are not directly comparable, even clock speeds aren’t too comparable here given both are different architectures.
It’s worth noting the RX 570 is available in both 4GB and 8GB versions, I’ve got a 4GB one here, so it’s got the same amount of GDDR5 memory as 1650.
|
PERFORMANCE: GTX 1650 vs RX 570 |
These are lower-end graphics cards. They sell for between $100 – $150. Anyway because of that I test them at 1080p. In most of the new games that I’m testing with currently, the RX 570 will good for over 60 FPS at 1080p using the ultra quality preset. Those of you with higher refresh rate monitors do like to keep the minimum FPS above 60 FPS. So I have tested both GPUs using the higher medium presets and I’m interested to see if this changes the margins.
For the testing, I’m using the MSI Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 and the ASUS ROG Strix Radeon RX 570 4GB, expect slightly different results with different models.
The system that I’m testing with has an Intel i7-8700K CPU overclocked to 5.
0GHz, along with 32GB of DDR4-3400 memory.
|
Assassin’s Creed Odyssey
Here you see pretty similar scaling performance within the GTX 1650 and RX 570. Dropping down to medium does seem like an appropriate quality preset for these GPUs and Assassin’s Creed Odyssey as it allowed us to average just over 60 FPS.
Battlefield 5
The Battlefield 5 results are really surprising, really strange even, I retested the GTX 1650 a few times to try and work out what was going on here but for whatever reason, I saw almost no performance uplift when downgrading the quality preset from ultra to high. Then from high to medium, the frame rates jumped by 23% so that was clearly some changes being made but it just wasn’t as impactful as I would have expected.
Dirt Rally 2.0
Preset scaling on dirt rally to was pretty standard much like what we saw in Assassin’s Creed Odyssey. Here the performance margins remained very much the same between the RX 570 and GTX 1650.
Far Cry New Dawn
The margins also remained very similar when testing far cry new dawn. Here the RX 570 was around 20% faster regardless of the quality preset used.
Fortnite
Like most of the games we’ve looked at so far, the margins remained much the same when testing with Fortnite. The 1% low performance for the GTX 1650 does improve with the high preset but then fell away once again with the medium preset.
Forza Horizon 4
The GTX 1650 does fare a little better in Forza horizon 4 as we reduced the quality levels. Using the ultra preset, the RX 570 was 26% faster. Then with the higher quality preset that margin is reduced to 21% and then 20% using the medium.
Not a massive difference but the GTX 1650 did come back a little.
Metro Exodus
Metro Exodus which is an Nvidia sponsored title favors the Radeon GPU much more we’re using the high and medium quality presets. With the ultra settings enabled the RX 570 was just 10% faster, however that margin is extended to 26% with the higher quality preset maintained with the medium quality settings.
Resident Evil 2
The RX 570 enjoyed a 30% lead over the GTX 1650 in resident evil 2 when using the ultra quality settings that margin though is reduced to 23% with the high and medium quality presets.
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
The RX 570 and GTX 1650 are fairly well matched and shadow of the Tomb Raider with the ultra quality preset enabled. However, once we drop down to the high preset the Radeon GPU pulls ahead by an 18% margin and we also see a similar margin to that when using the medium quality settings.
Division 2
We see much the same with the division 2 the margins remained very similar to Dirt rally 2.0, using the ultra, high, and medium quality presets. Naturally, the frame rates did increase quite dramatically as we lowered the quality settings but the margins remained much the same. As a result here the RX 570 was 27% faster across the board.
Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege
When testing with Rainbow six siege, we see the GTX 1650 and RX 570 are basically neck-and-neck when using the ultra quality preset. Similar margins were seen when using the higher quality preset while the RX 570 does sneak away a little bit with the medium quality settings.
World War Z
This is another big win for the Radeon GPU. Here the RX 570 was 38% faster with the ultra quality settings and that margin was pretty well maintained with the high and medium quality presets as well.
|
WHICH TO BUY: GTX 1650 or RX 570 |
The GTX 1650 was launched at $149 and can currently be bought for that price on the low end. The RX 570, on the other hand, has been out for around two years, and while not only performing better as we’ve just seen, it’s also a fair bit cheaper too, with lower-end models coming in at the $129 mark. With these numbers, the entry-level GTX 1650 costs 15% more money while performing worse as we just saw.
The GTX 1650 performs ok, it’s just priced poorly against what AMD’s been offering for two years.
To me the AMD RX 570 is the clear winnerhere, it’s available for less money and performs a fair bit better in all 12 games tested. The GTX 1650 does have the advantage of less power draw, but that seems to be about it, and the no 6 pin power connector thing in some niche use cases.
Radeon RX 570 vs GeForce GTX 1650
Availability
MSRP in USD: $169
XFX Radeon RX 570 RS XXX Edition 1286MHz, 8gb GDDR5, DX12 VR Ready, Dual BIOS, 3xDP HDMI DVI, AMD Graphics Card (RX-570P8DFD6)
Buy on Amazon
$359.
99
In Stock
1244 1264 MHz
Boost Clock
Updated 67 minutes agoASRock Phantom Gaming D Radeon RX 570 DirectX 12 RX570 4G 4GB 256-Bit GDDR5 PCI Express 3.0 x16 HDCP Ready Video Card
Buy on Amazon
$405
In Stock
Same as Founder’s Edition
Updated 67 minutes agoMSI Gaming Radeon RX 570 256-bit 8GB GDRR5 DirectX 12 VR Ready CFX Graphcis Card (RX 570 ARMOR 8G OC)
Buy on Amazon
$449
In Stock
1244 1256 MHz
Boost Clock
Updated 67 minutes agoSapphire 11266-14-20G Radeon Nitro+ Rx 570 4GB GDDR5 Dual HDMI/ DVI-D/ Dual DP with Backplate (UEFI) PCI-E Graphics Card
Buy on Amazon
$549
In Stock
1244 1340 MHz
Boost Clock
Updated 67 minutes agoXFX Radeon RX 570 RS Black Edition 1328MHz, 8gb 256bit GDDR5, DX12 VR Ready, Dual BIOS, 3xDP HDMI DVI, AMD Graphics Card (RX-570P8DBD6)
Buy on Amazon
$655
In Stock
1244 1286 MHz
Boost Clock
Updated 67 minutes agoSapphire Pulse Radeon Rx 570 4GB GDDR5 Graphics Card
Buy on Amazon
$1,632.
68
In Stock
1244 1284 MHz
Boost Clock
Updated 67 minutes ago
Availability
MSRP in USD: $149
Asus GeForce GTX 1650 Overclocked 4GB Dual-Fan Edition VR Ready HDMI DP 1.4 DVI Graphics Card (Dual-GTX1650-O4G)
Buy on Amazon
$167.99
In Stock
Same as Founder’s Edition
Updated 67 minutes agoMSI G1650VXS4C Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 128-Bit HDMI/DP 4GB GDRR5 HDCP Support DirectX 12 VR Ready OC Graphics Card (GTX 1650 Ventus XS 4G OC)
Buy on Amazon
$184.99
In Stock
1665 1740 MHz
Boost Clock
Updated 67 minutes agoGIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1650 D6 OC Low Profile 4G Graphics Card, Low Profile Design, 4GB 128-Bit GDDR6, GV-N1656OC-4GL Video Card
Buy on Amazon
$189.99
In Stock
1665 1710 MHz
Boost Clock
Updated 67 minutes agoASUS Dual NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 OC Edition Graphics Card (PCIe 3.0, 4GB GDDR6, HDMI 2.0, DisplayPort 1.
4a, IP5X Dust Resistance, Auto-Extreme Technology, GPU Tweak II)
Buy on Amazon
$189.99
In Stock
1665 1725 MHz
Boost Clock
Updated 755 minutes agoMSI Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 128-Bit HDMI/DP/DVI 4GB GDRR6 HDCP Support DirectX 12 VR Ready OC Graphics Card (GTX 1650 D6 Ventus XS OC)
Buy on Amazon
$229.95
In Stock
1665 1740 MHz
Boost Clock
Updated 67 minutes agoGigabyte GeForce GTX 1650 OC Low Profile 4G Graphics Card, 2X Windforce Fans, 4GB 128-Bit GDDR5, Gv-N1650OC-4GL Video Card
Buy on Amazon
$259.99
In Stock
1665 1785 MHz
Boost Clock
Updated 67 minutes ago
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — GeForce GTX 1650 outperforms the more expensive Radeon RX 570 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing GeForce GTX 1650 is 735 days newer than the more expensive Radeon RX 570.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
-
Performs up to 1% better in Fortnite than Radeon RX 570 — 133 vs 132 FPS
-
Up to 53% cheaper than Radeon RX 570 — $167.
99 vs $359.99 -
Up to 54% better value when playing Fortnite than Radeon RX 570 — $1.26 vs $2.73 per FPS
-
Consumes up to 50% less energy than AMD Radeon RX 570 — 75 vs 150 Watts
Fortnite
Resolution
1920×1080
Game Graphics
High
Radeon RX 570
Desktop • Apr 18th, 2017
FPS
132
99%
Value, $/FPS
$2.73/FPS
-17%
Price, $
$359.99
46%
XFX Radeon RX 570 RS XXX Edition 1286MHz, 8gb GDDR5, DX12 VR Ready, Dual BIOS, 3xDP HDMI DVI, AMD Graphics Card (RX-570P8DFD6)
Buy for $359.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 67 minutes ago
GeForce GTX 1650
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
133
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.26/FPS
100%
Price, $
$167.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Asus GeForce GTX 1650 Overclocked 4GB Dual-Fan Edition VR Ready HDMI DP 1.4 DVI Graphics Card (Dual-GTX1650-O4G)
Buy for $167.
99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 67 minutes ago
Resolution
1920×1080
Game Graphics
High
Radeon RX 570
Desktop • Apr 18th, 2017
GeForce GTX 1650
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
539
FPS
495
FPS
League of Legends
125
FPS
123
FPS
Grand Theft Auto V
240
FPS
221
FPS
VALORANT
148
FPS
138
FPS
Apex Legends
113
FPS
110
FPS
PlayerUnknown’s Battlegrounds
Theoretical Performance
Radeon RX 570
Desktop • Apr 18th, 2017
Pixel Fillrate
39.81 GPixel/s
75%
Texel Fillrate
159.2 GTexel/s
100%
GeForce GTX 1650
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
29%
|
AMD Radeon RX 570 |
vs |
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 18th, 2017 | Release Date |
Apr 23rd, 2019 |
| Polaris | Generation | GeForce 16 |
| $169 | MSRP |
$149 |
| 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| 1x 6-pin | Power Connectors | None |
|
Desktop |
Segment |
Desktop |
| 4 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
| GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
| 256-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
|
224 GB/s |
Bandwidth | 128. 1 GB/s |
| 1168 MHz | Base Clock Speed |
1485 MHz |
| 1244 MHz | Boost Clock Speed |
1665 MHz |
| 1750 MHz | Memory Clock Speed |
2001 MHz |
Builds Using Radeon RX 570 or GeForce GTX 1650
Fortnite, 1080p, High
HP Pavilion Gaming PC
125 FPS
$5.91/FPS
GeForce GTX 1650
Core i5-11400F
8 GB, 512 GB SSD
Buy on Amazon
$739
In Stock
Updated 60 minutes ago
HP Pavilion Gaming Premium Desktop PC
126 FPS
$6.19/FPS
GeForce GTX 1650
Core i5-11400
8 GB, 256 GB SSD
Buy on Amazon
$779.99
In Stock
Updated 59 minutes ago
YEYIAN SAI X11 Gaming PC
125 FPS
$6.23/FPS
GeForce GTX 1650
Core i5-11400F
8 GB, 500 GB SSD
Buy on Amazon
$779
In Stock
Updated 57 minutes ago
CUK Mantis Professional Student Desktop PC
125 FPS
$6.
24/FPS
GeForce GTX 1650
Core i5-11400F
16 GB, 512 GB SSD + 2 TB HDD
Buy on Amazon
$779.99
In Stock
Updated 57 minutes ago
Acer Nitro 50 N50-620-UA91 Gaming Desktop PC
125 FPS
$6.26/FPS
GeForce GTX 1650
Core i5-11400F
8 GB, N/A Storage
Buy on Amazon
$781.99
In Stock
Updated 60 minutes ago
JoJo&Venus Gaming MEK Hero G1 I1416FV Gaming PC
125 FPS
$6.26/FPS
GeForce GTX 1650
Core i5-11400F
4 GB, N/A Storage
Buy on Amazon
$782.99
In Stock
Updated 49 minutes ago
Acer Nitro 50 N50-620-UA91 Gaming Desktop PC
125 FPS
$6.58/FPS
GeForce GTX 1650
Core i5-11400F
8 GB, 512 GB SSD
Buy on Amazon
$822.88
In Stock
Updated 57 minutes ago
iBUYPOWER Pro Gaming PC
103 FPS
$6.7/FPS
GeForce GTX 1650
Ryzen 5 3600
8 GB, 480 GB SSD
Buy on Amazon
$690
In Stock
Updated 58 minutes ago
iBUYPOWER Pro Gaming PC
125 FPS
$6.
8/FPS
GeForce GTX 1650
Core i5-11400F
8 GB, 500 GB SSD
Buy on Amazon
$849.99
In Stock
Updated 52 minutes ago
SkyTech Archangel Gaming Computer PC
103 FPS
$6.8/FPS
GeForce GTX 1650
Ryzen 5 3600
8 GB, 500 GB SSD
Buy on Amazon
$699.99
In Stock
Updated 59 minutes ago
Select from the most popular similar graphics card comparisons. Most compared graphics card combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
GeForce RTX 3050
$289.99
GeForce GTX 1650
$167.99
Radeon RX 6500 XT
$167.98
GeForce GTX 1650
$167.99
GeForce GTX 1650
$167.99
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU
N/A Stock
GeForce GTX 970
N/A Stock
GeForce GTX 1650
$167.99
Radeon RX 570
$359.99
Radeon HD 7990
N/A Stock
GeForce GTX 650
GeForce GTX 1650
$167.
99
GeForce GTX 1650
$167.99
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU
N/A Stock
GeForce GTX 680
N/A Stock
Radeon RX 570
$359.99
GeForce GTX 760M
N/A Stock
Radeon RX 570
$359.99
▷ Nvidia GTX 1650 vs AMD RX 570
Tan solo hace unos días que apareció la nueva tarjeta de Nvidia, así que hemos decidido hacer una comparativa entre Nvidia GTX 1650 vs AMD RX 570. Son dos tarjetas gráficas que claramente se sitúan en la gama baja del panorama gaming actual, con un rendimiento similar, así que será muy interesante para los usuarios saber a ciencia cierta cuál de ellas nos ofrece el mejor rendimiento.
Para ello, hemos utilizando nuestro banco de pruebas actual con las tarjetas MSI GeForce GTX 1650 Gaming X y la MSI RX 570 Armor. Sin más, ¡comencemos esta comparativa!
Índice de contenidos
Ficha técnica y características
Ya podéis ver que tiene bastante sentido hacer la comparativa de estas dos GPU, AMD también se merece algo de protagonismo, sobre todo en esta gama con sus anteriores RX.
Aún a día de hoy son tarjetas muy válidas y además a muy buenos precios. En cualquier caso, es normal que esta nueva GTX 1650 sea algo más cara, además de que la especificación Gaming X es superior a la gama Armor, ¿hará justicia el precio al rendimiento?
Ciñéndonos a las especificaciones, vemos como hay un empate en las unidades de renderizado en ambas tarjetas, mientras que en las de texturizado gana de largo la RX 570. Recordemos también que ninguna de las dos tarjetas cuenta con procesadores capaces de realizar Ray Tracing en tiempo real, algo presente solo en la gama RTX. Pero Nvidia ha lanzado unos nuevos drivers que permiten realizar este procesamiento directamente con los núcleos CUDA, por supuesto en detrimento del rendimiento general de la GPU. En esta GTX 1650 no tendría mucho sentido hacerlo, pero la posibilidad está latente, mientras que en la RX 570 no existe.
Algo bueno de la GTX es también su ínfimo consumo de energía, justamente la mitad que la RX 570.
Las tarjetas AMD suelen consumir bastante más, sobre todo esta familia RX con procesos de fabricación en 14 nm, frente a los 12 nm de la arquitectura Turing. Pese a ello, RX 570 nos ofrece más ancho de banda y de bus, aunque menor frecuencia de procesamiento. Son dos GPU muy distintas así que las especificaciones solo se pueden coger entre pinzas en una comparativa. Pasemos ya a ver los resultados.
Test sintéticos de rendimiento Nvidia GTX 1650 vs AMD RX 570
Ya hemos visto las especificaciones, así que ahora toca ver cómo se van a desenvolver estas dos tarjetas en las pruebas sintéticas de benchmark, y más adelante en los juegos. Para ello, hemos utilizado el siguiente banco de pruebas:
|
Procesador: |
Intel Core i9-9900k |
| Placa Base: | Asus Maximus XI Hero |
|
Memoria: |
Corsair Vengeance PRO RGB 16 GB @3600 MHz |
|
Disipador |
Corsair h200i V2 |
|
Disco Duro |
Kingston UV400 |
|
Tarjeta Gráfica |
GTX 1650y AMD RX 570 |
|
Fuente de Alimentación |
Corsair RM1000X |
Y los test que hemos llevado a cabo son:
- 3DMark Time Spy
- 3DMark Fire Strike
- 3DMark Tire Strike Ultra
- VRMark Orange Room
Vemos que en todos los casos las puntuaciones de la RX 570 son significativamente superiores, pero, ¿cuánto son superiores? Comenzando por la prueba en Fire Strike, tenemos un rendimiento superior en un 25%, bastante más que por ejemplo una 1660 respecto a una 1660 Ti.
Siguiente con la versión Fire Strike Ultra, la que se desarrolla en resolución 4K, tendremos nada menos que un 36% de potencia respecto a la GTX 1650, que ciertamente es muchísimo.
Siguiendo con el test Time Spy y VRMark tendremos un 9% y un 8,6% que son resultado algo más ajustados sin duda, y vamos a explicar por qué. Estos test miden el rendimiento de las GPU en DirectX 12 en el caso de Time Spy y de DirectX 12 orientado a VR en el caso de VRMark. Entonces vemos que, a pesar de ser claramente una GPU menos potente, la GTX 1650 se acerca mucho a su rival, y esto se debe a las mejoras de shaders y de caché que Nvidia ha introducido en sus nuevas GPU Turing.
Test de rendimiento en juegos
Continuamos con los test de rendimiento en juegos, en este caso no hemos optado por probar los juegos en resolución 4K, ya que son unas tarjetas gráficas que no están orientadas a jugar en estas resoluciones, básicamente porque obtendremos unas tasas de FPS inferiores a 30, lo cual no es suficiente para generar una experiencia positiva.
Los juegos que hemos probando son los mismos en ambas tarjetas, con el mismo banco de pruebas, la última versión de los drivers disponibles y la misma configuración gráfica en cada título.
En la tabla de datos de resolución 1080p la AMD RX 570 superior en todos los casos a la GTX 1650. Con las dos tarjetas la experiencia de juego va a ser satisfactoria, superando los 50 FPS en casi todos los casos. Recordemos que nosotros colocamos los gráficos en calidad alta o muy alta, así que disminuyendo éstos el rendimiento aumentará. Vemos resultados muy cercanos por ejemplo en DOOM probado con Open GL 4.5, también muy cercanos en Far Cry 5 y Final Fantasy XV bajo DirectX 12. Ciertamente la distancia se reduce entre las tarjetas respecto a los test sintéticos así que es algo positivo para la GTX 1650.
En la resolución 2K la cosa se le complica al producto de Nvidia, vemos distancias bastante más abultadas sobre todo en Doom y Far Cry 5 y sin embargo más cercanas en los títulos Deux y Tomb Rider que es justo lo contario a lo visto en 1080p.
Esto puede deberse en parte a lo que drivers para esta GTX 1650 aún están un poco verdes, ya que durante nuestra review de las tarjetas (y probamos tres) no daba la sensación de que aún podrían dar más de sí. El futuro solo Nvidia lo sabe, por ahora esto es lo que os podemos decir.
Consumo y temperaturas
Dejamos atrás el baño que la GPU AMD de ha dado a la Nvidia, y pasamos a ver los vamos de temperatura y consumo de las GPU. Sobre el papel ya vimos que la arquitectura Polaris derrocha más y tiene más calentamiento que la Turing, así que deberíamos de esperar peores resultados aquí de la RX 570.
Como siempre, los resultados de consumo están medidos sobre el equipo completo, que ya decirnos que es exactamente el mismo banco de pruebas.
Fijaos, ambas GPU (y equipo) consumen lo mismo en reposo, unos 68 W que está muy bien. Pero cuando le metemos caña a ambas, Polaris hace de las suyas subiendo el consumo hasta los 224 W, mientras que la GPU Turing se mantienen 48 W por debajo de ésta, al menos eficiente, sí que lo es.
Y con la temperatura pasa exactamente lo mismo, a nadie le pilla por sorpresa que las nuevas Radeon Vega son unas barbacohas, pero en cambio las RX sí que controlan mejor la temperatura. Concretamente esta RX 570 tiene un disipador Twin Frozr que rinde verdaderamente bien, llega hasta los 70 grados en carga y nada menos que 30 en reposo, sensacional para una GPU. Mientras tanto, la GTX oscila en los 42 grados y unos 61 de máxima, aunque también es cierto que el disipador de la Gaming X es un poquito mejor que la gama Armor cuando está en carga.
Experiencia en overclocking
También nos hemos tomado nuestro tiempo en realizar un overclocking a estas dos tarjetas y así ver hasta dónde pueden llegar, siempre manteniendo la estabilidad claro. Para ello, hemos seleccionado el Deux Ex Mankind Divided como conejillo de indias para ver las mejoras de FPS.
| Deus EX | MSI RX 570 Armor Stock | MSI RX 570 Armor Overclock |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) | 63 FPS | 66 FPS |
| 2560 x 1440 (WQHD) | 40 FPS | 42 FPS |
| Deus EX | MSI GTX 1650 Gaming X Stock | MSI GTX 1650 Gaming X Overclock |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) | 49 FPS | 54 FPS |
| 2560 x 1440 (WQHD) | 32 FPS | 35 FPS |
En el caso de la MSI RX Armor, hemos conseguido establecer una frecuencia de GPU de 1450 MHz y de 2100 MHz para la memoria GDDR5.
Los resultados ya los veis, 3 FPS de mejora para 1080p y 2 para 2K. Muy poquita mejora.
Pasamos con la MSI GTX 1650 Gaming X que hemos conseguido colocar a 1615 MHz de frecuencia de reloj de GPU y 2341 MHz. Y los resultados arrojan una mejora de 5 FPS en 1080p y de 2 FPS en 2K, que es algo más, y deja patente la excelente capacidad de overclocking que tienen las Nvidia. Por supuesto una mejor temperatura y un TDP mejor ajustado de esta, favorece mucho la obtenía de buenos resultados.
Así que, en este apartado, gana de largo la GPU de gama baja de Nvidia. Pero el rendimiento de la RX 570 es muy superior. A nivel de precio, está claro cual es la candidata para nuestra configuración de gama media, ¿Verdad?
Conclusión final sobre Nvidia GTX 1650 vs AMD RX 570
Si algo podemos sacar en claro de esta comparativa, es que la nueva Nvidia GTX 1650 no refleja el rendimiento que, al menos nosotros, esperábamos.
En las review hemos determinado que supera por poco a una GTX 1050 Ti de la anterior generación y vamos entre 10 y 20 euros más, lo cual tampoco ayuda.
Centrándonos más en la comparativa, la RX 570 es, de largo, la mejor opción de entre las dos. Está muy bien que la GTX sea de nueva arquitectura, consuma menos y se caliente menos, pero lo que realmente importante es el rendimiento en juegos, y aquí la RX 570 es mejor. Y mejor de largo tanto en resoluciones Full HD como 2K, y no nos engañemos, poco usuarios van a optar por overclockear una GPU de gama baja como esta.
Te recomendamos la lectura de las mejores tarjetas gráficas del mercado
Y luego tenemos el tema del precio, una versión MSI RX 570 Armor de 4 GB como esta, la podemos encontrar actualmente por un precio de 147 euros en Amazon, y si subimos a los 8 GB, la tendremos por 170 euros, que aun así es bastante menos que los 195 euros que cuesta la MSI GeForce GTX 1650.
En definitiva, no es una tarjeta gráfica que a día de hoy merezca mucho la pena, porque AMD tiene buenas bazas en esta gama, y las GTX 1660 y 1660 Ti son una mejor opción de largo. Si bien es cierto que los drivers están bastante verdes, no esperamos que una simple optimización de ellos resuelva la brecha entre ambas tarjetas ni nada por el estilo, así que, por nuestra parte, la ganadora de la comparativa Nvidia GTX 1650 vs AMD RX 570, es sin duda la GPU de AMD RX 570. Queremos conocer vuestra opinión.
0024
224GB/s vs 128GB/s
256bit vs 128bit
2048 vs 896
5700 million vs 4700 million
128 vs 56
2.
2 vs 1.2 - GPU frequency 317MHz higher?
1485MHz vs 1168MHz - 18.28 GPixel/s higher pixel rate?
58.08 GPixel/s vs 39.8 GPixel/s - 45W below TDP?
75W vs 120W - 250MHz faster memory speed?
2000MHz vs 1750MHz - 1002MHz higher effective clock speed?
8002MHz vs 7000MHz - 571MHz faster GPU turbo speed?
1815MHz vs 1244MHz - Semiconductor size 2nm smaller?
12nm vs 14nm - Support 3D?
What are the most popular comparisons?
AMD Radeon RX 570
vs
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1650 Gaming OC
vs
Asus Radeon RX 550 4GB
AMD Radeon RX 570
vs
Gigabyte Radeon RX 6500 XT Gaming OC
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1650 Gaming OC
vs
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8
AMD Radeon RX 570
vs
AMD Radeon RX 580
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1650 Gaming OC
vs
MSI GeForce GTX 1650 Ventus XS OC
AMD Radeon RX 570
vs
MSI GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Gaming
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1650 Gaming OC
VS
AMD Radeon RX 5500003
AMD Radeon RX 570
vs
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1650 Gaming OC
vs
Inno3D GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 Twin X2 OC
AMD Radeon RX 570
vs
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1650 Gaming OC
vs
MSI GeForce GTX 1650 Ventus XS
AMD Radeon RX 570
vs
Nvidia Geforce GTX 1660 Super
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1650 Gaming OC
8.
5 /10
2 VOTES
Reviews not yet
fan noise
7.5 /10
2 VOTES
Reviews are not yet
9000 9000 9000)
2 votes
No reviews yet
Performance
2.turbo GPU
1244MHz
1815MHz
When the GPU is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.
3.pixel rate
39.8 GPixel/s
58.08 GPixel/s
The number of pixels that can be displayed on the screen every second.
4.flops
5 TFLOPS
3.25 TFLOPS
FLOPS is a measure of GPU processing power.
5.texture size
159.2 GTexels/s
101.6 GTexels/s
Number of textured pixels that can be displayed on the screen every second.
6.
GPU memory speed
1750MHz
2000MHz
Memory speed is one aspect that determines memory bandwidth.
7.shading patterns
Shading units (or stream processors) are small processors in a video card that are responsible for processing various aspects of an image.
8.textured units (TMUs)
TMUs accept textured units and bind them to the geometric layout of the 3D scene. More TMUs generally means texture information is processed faster.
9 ROPs
ROPs are responsible for some of the final steps of the rendering process, such as writing the final pixel data to memory and for performing other tasks such as anti-aliasing to improve the appearance of graphics.
Memory
1.memory effective speed
7000MHz
8002MHz
The effective memory clock frequency is calculated from the memory size and data transfer rate.
A higher clock speed can give better performance in games and other applications.
2.max memory bandwidth
224GB/s
128GB/s
This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.
3.VRAM
VRAM (video RAM) is the dedicated memory of the graphics card. More VRAM usually allows you to run games at higher settings, especially for things like texture resolution.
4.memory bus width
256bit
128bit
Wider memory bus means it can carry more data per cycle. This is an important factor in memory performance, and therefore the overall performance of the graphics card.
5.versions of GDDR memory
Later versions of GDDR memory offer improvements such as higher data transfer rates, which improve performance.
6. Supports memory debug code
✖AMD Radeon RX 570
✖Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1650 Gaming OC
Memory debug code can detect and fix data corruption.
It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.
Functions
1.DirectX version
DirectX is used in games with a new version that supports better graphics.
2nd version of OpenGL
The newer version of OpenGL, the better graphics quality in games.
OpenCL version 3.
Some applications use OpenCL to use the power of the graphics processing unit (GPU) for non-graphical computing. Newer versions are more functional and better quality.
4. Supports multi-monitor technology
✔AMD Radeon RX 570
✔Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1650 Gaming OC
The video card has the ability to connect multiple screens. This allows you to set up multiple monitors at the same time to create a more immersive gaming experience, such as a wider field of view.
5.
GPU temperature at boot
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1650 Gaming OC)
Lower boot temperature means the card generates less heat and the cooling system works better.
6.supports ray tracing
✖AMD Radeon RX 570
✖Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1650 Gaming OC
Ray tracing is an advanced light rendering technique that provides more realistic lighting, shadows and reflections in games.
7. Supports 3D
✖AMD Radeon RX 570
✔Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1650 Gaming OC
Allows you to view in 3D (if you have a 3D screen and glasses).
8.supports DLSS
✖AMD Radeon RX 570
✖Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1650 Gaming OC
DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling) is an AI based scaling technology. This allows the graphics card to render games at lower resolutions and upscale them to higher resolutions with near-native visual quality and improved performance.
DLSS is only available in some games.
9. PassMark result (G3D)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1650 Gaming OC)
This test measures the graphics performance of a graphics card. Source: Pass Mark.
Ports
1.has HDMI output
✔AMD Radeon RX 570
✔Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1650 Gaming OC
Devices with HDMI or mini HDMI ports can stream HD video and audio to the connected display.
2.HDMI connectors
More HDMI connectors allow you to connect multiple devices at the same time, such as game consoles and TVs.
HDMI version 3
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Radeon RX 570)
HDMI 2.0
New versions of HDMI support higher bandwidth, resulting in higher resolutions and frame rates.
4. DisplayPort outputs
Allows connection to a display using DisplayPort.
5.DVI outputs
Allows connection to a display using DVI.
6. Mini DisplayPort 9 outputs0003
Allows you to connect to a display using Mini DisplayPort.
Price Match
Cancel
Which graphics cards are better?
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs Radeon RX 570
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs Radeon RX 570 — Th200
Contents
- Introduction
- Features
- Tests
- Games
- Key differences
- Conclusion
- Comments
Video card
Video card
Introduction
We compared two graphics cards: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs AMD Radeon RX 570. On this page, you will learn about the key differences between them, as well as which one is better in terms of features and performance.
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER Turing GeForce 16 Generation Graphics Card released Nov 22nd, 2019. It comes with 4GB of GDDR6 memory running at 1500MHz, has a 1x 6-pin power connector and draws up to 165W.
The AMD Radeon RX 570 is a Polaris (RX 500) generation GCN 4.0 graphics card released on Apr 18th, 2017. It comes with 4GB of GDDR5 memory running at 1750MHz, has a 1x 6-pin power connector and consumes up to 165 W.
Specification
Graphics Card
Name
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
12 (12_1)
12 (12_0)
Opengl
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
2.1
CUDA
Vulkan
9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000. 23
Heating
100W
150W
Power connectors
1x 6-pin
1x 6-pin
Width
Dual-Slot
Dual-Slot
Tests
3DMark Graphics
3DMark is a test tool designed and developed by UL to measure the performance of computer hardware. Upon completion, the program gives a score, where a higher value indicates better performance.
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
+24%
AMD Radeon RX 570
Blender bmw27
Blender is the most popular 3D content creation software. It has its own test, which is widely used to determine the rendering speed of processors and video cards. We chose the bmw27 scene. The result of the test is the time taken to render the given scene.
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
AMD Radeon RX 570
Th200 RP
Th200 RP is a test created by Th200. It measures the raw power of the components and gives a score, with a higher value indicating better performance.
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
+2%
AMD Radeon RX 570
Games
1920×1080, Ultra
| Game | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | Radeon RX 570 |
|---|---|---|
| Assassin’s Creed Odyssey | ||
| Battlefield V | ||
| Far Cry 5 | ||
| Hitman 2 | ||
| Metro Exodus | ||
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | ||
| The Witcher 3 | ||
| Average | 57. |
48.89 fps |
2560×1440, Ultra
| Game | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | Radeon RX 570 |
|---|---|---|
| Anno 1800 | ||
| Assassin’s Creed Odyssey | ||
| Battlefield V | ||
| Far Cry 5 | ||
| Hitman 2 | ||
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | ||
| The Witcher 3 | ||
| Average | 42. |
36.26 fps |
3840×2160, Ultra
| Game | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | Radeon RX 570 |
|---|---|---|
| Anno 1800 |
+1% |
|
| Assassin’s Creed Odyssey |
+5% |
|
| Battlefield V | ||
| Far Cry 5 | ||
| Hitman 2 | ||
| Metro Exodus | ||
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | ||
| The Witcher 3 | ||
| Average | 22. |
19.71 fps |
Key differences
Why is NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER better than AMD Radeon RX 570?
Newer — released 2 years later
Has 2% higher performance
Has 17% higher average FPS in games at 1080p — 57.00 FPS versus 48.89FPS
Has 18% higher average FPS in games at 1440p — 42.66 FPS versus 36.26 FPS
Has 13% higher average FPS in games at 2160p — 22.16 FPS versus 19.71 FPS
Consumes 34% less power vs 100W W
More modern manufacturing process — 12 nm vs 14 nm
More advanced memory type — GDDR6 vs GDDR5
Has a 39% higher pixel fill rate — 55.20 GPixel/s vs 39.81 GPixel/s
Why is AMD Radeon RX 570 better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER?
Has a slightly larger memory bus
Has a 17% higher throughput — 224.0 GB/s vs 192.0 GB/s
Has a 16% higher texture fill rate — 159.2 GTexel/s vs 138. 0 GTexel/s
Has 768 more shading units
Conclusion
Which is better GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER or Radeon RX 570?
The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER delivers 2% better performance, consumes up to 34% less energy and holds the same amount of memory. Based on our research, GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 3990X is more powerful than Radeon RX 570.
What AMD graphics cards is equivalent to GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER?
The Radeon RX 580 2048SP is AMD’s closest competitor to the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER. It is 1% more powerful, uses 50% more energy, and holds the same amount of memory.
What NVIDIA graphics cards is equivalent to GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER?
The GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB is NVIDIA’s closest competitor to the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER. It is 6% more powerful, uses 20% more energy, and holds 1 GB less memory.
How does GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER perform compared to Radeon RX 570 and other graphics cards?
Relative performance
Total performance
Bench performance
Which is better AMD Radeon RX 570 or Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1650 Gaming OC
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1650 Gaming OC
AMD Radeon RX 570
GPU base clock
The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a high clock speed.
1485MHz
max 2457
Average: 938 MHz
1168MHz
max 2457
Average: 938 MHz
GPU memory frequency
This is an important aspect calculating memory bandwidth
2000MHz
max 16000
Average: 1326.6 MHz
1750MHz
max 16000
Average: 1326.6 MHz
FLOPS
The measurement of processing power of a processor is called FLOPS.
3.11 TFLOPS
max 1142.32
Average: 92. 5 TFLOPS
5.2TFLOPS
max 1142.32
Average: 92.5TFLOPS
Turbo GPU
If the speed of the GPU drops below its limit, it can switch to a high clock speed to improve performance.
Show all
1815MHz
max 2903
Average: 1375.8 MHz
1244MHz
max 2903
Average: 1375.8 MHz
Texture size
A certain number of textured pixels are displayed on the screen every second.
Show all
101.6 GTexels/s
max 756.8
Average: 145.4 GTexels/s
159. 2 GTexels/s
max 756.8
Average: 145.4 GTexels/s
Architecture name
Turn
GCN 4.0
Graphic processor name
TU1117
Polaris 20
003
Memory bandwidth
This is the speed at which the device stores or reads information.
128GB/s
max 2656
Average: 198.3 GB/s
224GB/s
max 2656
Average: 198.3 GB/s
Effective memory speed
The effective memory clock speed is calculated from the size and information transfer rate of the memory. The performance of the device in applications depends on the clock frequency. The higher it is, the better.
Show all
8002MHz
max 19500
Average: 6984.5 MHz
7000MHz
max 19500
Average: 6984.5 MHz
RAM
4 GB
max 128
Average: 4.6 GB
4 GB
max 128
Average: 4.6 GB
GDDR Memory Versions
Latest GDDR memory versions provide high data transfer rates to improve overall performance
Show all
5
Average: 4.5
5
Average: 4.5
Memory bus width
A wide memory bus means that it can transfer more information in one cycle. This property affects the performance of the memory as well as the overall performance of the device’s graphics card.
Show all
128bit
max 8192
Average: 290.1bit
256bit
max 8192
Average: 290.1bit
Heat dissipation (TDP)
Heat dissipation requirement (TDP) is the maximum amount of energy that can be dissipated by the cooling system. The lower the TDP, the less power will be consumed.
Show all
75W
Average: 140.4 W
150W
Average: 140.4 W
Process
The small size of the semiconductor means it is a new generation chip.
12 nm
Average: 47.5 nm
14 nm
Average: 47.5 nm
Number of transistors
The higher their number, the more processor power it indicates
4700 million
max 80000
Average: 5043 million
5700 million
max 80000
Average: 5043 million
PCIe version
Considerable speed is provided by the expansion card used to connect the computer to peripherals. The updated versions have impressive throughput and provide high performance.
Show all
3
Mean: 2. 8
3
Mean: 2.8
Width
265mm
max 421.7
Average: 242.6mm
241mm
max 421.7
Average: 242.6mm
Height
118mm
max 180
Average: 119.1mm
mm
max 180
Average: 119.1mm
DirectX
Used in demanding games, providing enhanced graphics
12
max 12.2
Average: 11.1
12
max 12. 2
Average: 11.1
OpenCL version
Used by some applications to enable GPU power for non-graphical calculations. The newer the version, the more functional it will be
Show all
1.2
max 4.6
Average: 1.7
2.1
max 4.6
Average: 1.7
opengl version
Later versions provide better game graphics
4.5
max 4.6
Average: 4
4.6
max 4.6
Average: 4
Shader model version
6. 5
max 6.6
Average: 5.5
6.4
max 6.6
Average: 5.5
version VULKAN
1.2
1.2
version CUDA
No data
has HDMI output
9000 They can transmit video and audio to the display.
Full display
Yes
Yes
HDMI version
The latest version provides a wide signal transmission channel due to the increased number of audio channels, frames per second, etc.
Show all
2
max 2.1
Average: 2
max 2.1
Average: 2
DisplayPort
Allows connection to a display using DisplayPort
one
Average: 2
3
Average: 2
Number of HDMI sockets
The more there are, the more devices can be connected at the same time (for example, game/TV type consoles)
Show all
3
Average: 1. 1
one
Average: 1.1
HDMI
Yes
Yes
Passmark score
7602
max 29325
Average: 7628.6
6828
max 29325
Average: 7628.6
3DMark Cloud Gate GPU test score
49538
max 1
Average: 80042.3
69674
max 1
Average: 80042.3
3DMark Fire Strike Score
8619
max 38276
Average: 12463
11717
max 38276
Average: 12463
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics test score
9019
max 49575
Average: 11859. 1
13550
max 49575
Average: 11859.1
3DMark 11 Performance GPU score
13372
max 57937
Average: 18799.9
18588
max 57937
Average: 18799.9
3DMark Vantage Performance score
43800
max 97887
Average: 37830.6
44649
max 97887
Average: 37830.6
3DMark Ice Storm GPU score
365866
max 533357
Average: 372425. 7
367642
max 533357
Average: 372425.7
SPECviewperf 12 test score — Solidworks
45
max 202
Average: 62.4
max 202
Average: 62.4
SPECviewperf 12 test score — specvp12 sw-03
44
max 202
Average: 64
max 202
Average: 64
SPECviewperf 12 evaluation — Siemens NX
7
max 212
Average: 14
max 212
Average: 14
SPECviewperf 12 test score — specvp12 showcase-01
fifty
max 232
Average: 121. 3
max 232
Average: 121.3
SPECviewperf 12 test score — Medical
22
max 107
Average: 39.6
max 107
Average: 39.6
SPECviewperf 12 test score — specvp12 mediacal-01
21
max 107
Average: 39
max 107
Average: 39
SPECviewperf 12 test score — Maya
88
max 177
Average: 129.8
max 177
Average: 129.8
SPECviewperf 12 test score — specvp12 maya-04
89
max 180
Average: 132. 8
max 180
Average: 132.8
SPECviewperf 12 — Energy score
four
max 25
Average: 9.7
max 25
Average: 9.7
SPECviewperf 12 test score — specvp12 energy-01
5
max 21
Average: 10.7
max 21
Average: 10.7
SPECviewperf 12 — Creo 9 test score1085
thirty
max 153
Average: 49.5
max 153
Average: 49.5
SPECviewperf 12 test score — specvp12 creo-01
34
max 153
Average: 52. 5
max 153
Average: 52.5
SPECviewperf 12 evaluation — specvp12 catia-04
43
max 189
Average: 91.5
max 189
Average: 91.5
SPECviewperf 12 evaluation — Catia
42
max 189
Average: 88.6
max 189
Average: 88.6
SPECviewperf 12 test score — specvp12 3dsmax-05
104
max 316
Average: 189.5
max 316
Average: 189.5
SPECviewperf 12 test score — 3ds Max
103
max 269
Average: 169. 8
max 269
Average: 169.8
Games against video cards 4. GeForce GTX 1650, GeForce GTX 1060, Radeon RX 580 and other budget video cards in 12 games / Overclockers.ua Categories: General Information, Specifications, Video Outputs and Ports, Compatibility, Dimensions, Requirements, API Support, Memory, Technology Support. Analysis of video card performance by benchmarks: PassMark — G3D Mark, PassMark — G2D Mark, Geekbench — OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T -Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score.
AMD Radeon RX 570
vs
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB
Overall Comparison
Game Performance
Tested with: Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite, FarCrysis 3, Crysis 3 3, Hitman: Absolution, Metro: Last Light, Thief, Alien: Isolation, Anno 2070, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, Diablo III, Dirt Rally, Dragon Age: Inquisition, The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim, FIFA 15, FIFA 16 , GRID Autosport, Grand Theft Auto V, Sleeping Dogs, Tomb Raider, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt.
Video card tests performed on: Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite, Crysis 2, Crysis 3, Dirt3, FarCry 3, Hitman: Absolution, Metro: Last Light, Thief, Alien: Isolation, Anno 2070, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive , Diablo III, Dirt Rally, Dragon Age: Inquisition, The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim, FIFA 15, FIFA 16, GRID Autosport, Grand Theft Auto V, Sleeping Dogs, Tomb Raider, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor, Fire Strike Factor, Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation, Particle Simulation, Video Composition, Bitcoin Mining, TDP.
| 119.051 |
| 1376.407 |
| 21.452 |
| 456.147 |
Benefits
Why is the Radeon RX 570 better?
| Better floating point performance | 5.095 GFLOPS
Test results: performance comparisonAssassin’s Creed Origins
1920×1080 Denomination Please enable JavaScript to see graphs Crysis 3
1920 × 1080 Nominal Turn on JavaScript to see graphics 25601084 Nominal 9 of 1920×1080 Rating Enable JavaScript to see graphs Overclocking 2560411085 Hitman (2016)
1920×1080 Denomination Please enable JavaScript to see graphs
Comparative analysis of video cards NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and AMD Radeon RX 570 by all known characteristics in the categories: General information, Specifications, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions, requirements, API support, Memory, Technology support. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
versus
AMD Radeon RX 570 BenefitsReasons to choose NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
: 1350 MHz vs 926-1168 MHz
Reasons to choose AMD Radeon RX 570
Benchmark comparison
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
Feature comparison
the main thing from AMD RX 6500 XT reviews is DTF-based hardware Too “cut down” adapter, in which hardware ray tracing acceleration blocks are just “for show”. 22,880 On January 19, AMD announced the start of sales of the entry-level graphics card Radeon RX 6500 XT. The company positions it as a graphics accelerator for 1080p gaming and believes that it will be a replacement for GeForce GTX 1650 and Radeon RX 570-level adapters. We chose the most important of them. Specifications RX 6500 XT
Impressions and performance tests Reviewers at Tom’s Hardware believe that AMD cut the RX 6500 XT’s specifications too far in order to make the graphics card as cheap as possible. A budget processor, 4 GB of video memory with a 64-bit bus and support for only four lines of the PCI Express 4.0 interface had an extremely negative impact on the performance of the adapter. For comparison, even the predecessor RX 5500 XT had support for eight PCIe 4.0 lanes. As a result, in tests in seven games at «medium» settings at 1080p resolution, the adapter on average lost out to the RX 5500 XT with both 8 GB and 4 GB of memory. Tom’s Hardware emphasized that the results were generally consistent with AMD’s statements. According to the company’s tests, the RX 6500 XT outperforms the RX 570 with 4 GB of memory by 25%. Average performance in Borderlands 3, Far Cry 6, Flight Simulator, Forza Horizon 5, Horizon Zero Dawn, Red Dead Redemption 2 and Watch Dogs Legion on «medium» settings On the Ultra preset at 1080p, the RX 6500 XT was outperformed by the RX 5500 XT and GeForce GTX 1650 Super with 4GB of memory. At the same time, the RX 5500 XT with 8 GB of memory demonstrated a 25% higher performance. It is noteworthy that at first AMD released this model at the same recommended price as the RX 6500 XT — 199 dollars. Reviewers also noted that the GTX 1060 with 6 GB of memory, released in mid-2016, was only slightly behind the RX 5500 XT. Average performance in seven games on «ultra» settings TechSpot got similar test scores, most of which outperformed the RX 6500 XT. Test results in games with ray tracing turned on were expected. Tests on «medium» settings with «beams» turned on showed that the RX 6500 XT is unable to provide more than 20 fps in Metro Exodus Enhanced Edition, Cyberpunk 2077 and other demanding titles. The only game tested with an average frame rate above 30 was the battle royale Fortnite. In Control, the test failed at all, as the game required DXR support. RX 6500 XT performance with ray tracing enabled Based on the test results at 1080p resolution, Tom’s Hardware did not perform benchmarks in 2K or 4K.
Among the advantages of the video card, all observers named the high gaming frequency of the video chip — 2610 MHz, low power consumption and compactness. PCWorld separately noticed that the small amount of video memory does not allow using the card for Ethereum mining. |