I5 8400 vs amd ryzen 5 2600x: AMD Ryzen 5 2600X vs Intel Core i5-8400 @ 2.80GHz [cpubenchmark.net] by PassMark Software

Intel Core i5-8400 vs. AMD Ryzen 5 1600 AF

Intel Core i5-8400

The Intel Core i5-8400 operates with 6 cores and 6 CPU threads. It run at 4.00 GHz base 3.80 GHz all cores while the TDP is set at 65 W.The processor is attached to the LGA 1151-2 CPU socket. This version includes 9.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 2 memory channels to support DDR4-2666 RAM and features 3.0 PCIe Gen 16 lanes. Tjunction keeps below — degrees C. In particular, Coffee Lake S Architecture is enhanced with 14 nm technology and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d. The product was launched on Q4/2017

AMD Ryzen 5 1600 AF

The AMD Ryzen 5 1600 AF operates with 6 cores and 6 CPU threads. It run at 3.60 GHz base 3.40 GHz all cores while the TDP is set at 65 W.The processor is attached to the AM4 CPU socket. This version includes 16.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 2 memory channels to support DDR4-2666 RAM and features 3.0 PCIe Gen 20 lanes. Tjunction keeps below 95 °C degrees C. In particular, Pinnacle Ridge (Zen+) Architecture is enhanced with 12 nm technology and supports AMD-V, SVM. The product was launched on Q4/2019

Intel Core i5-8400

AMD Ryzen 5 1600 AF

Compare Detail

2.80 GHz Frequency 3.20 GHz
6 Cores 6
4.00 GHz Turbo (1 Core) 3.60 GHz
3.80 GHz Turbo (All Cores) 3.40 GHz
No Hyperthreading Yes
No Overclocking Yes
normal Core Architecture normal

Intel UHD Graphics 630

GPU no iGPU
1.15 GHz GPU (Turbo) No turbo
14 nm Technology 12 nm
1.15 GHz GPU (Turbo) No turbo
12 DirectX Version
3 Max. displays
DDR4-2666 Memory DDR4-2666
2 Memory channels 2
Max memory
No ECC Yes
L2 Cache
9. 00 MB L3 Cache 16.00 MB
3.0 PCIe version 3.0
16 PCIe lanes 20
14 nm Technology 12 nm
LGA 1151-2 Socket AM4
65 W TDP 65 W
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d Virtualization AMD-V, SVM
Q4/2017 Release date Q4/2019

Show more data

Show more data

Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.

Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.

Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11. 5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

iGPU — FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.

Blender 2.81 (bmw27)

Blender is a free 3D graphics software for rendering (creating) 3D bodies, which can also be textured and animated in the software. The Blender benchmark creates predefined scenes and measures the time (s) required for the entire scene. The shorter the time required, the better. We selected bmw27 as the benchmark scene.

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)

Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The iGPU test uses the CPU internal graphic unit to execute OpenGL commands.

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-Comparison. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-Comparison’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.

Electric Usage Estimate

Average hours of use per day

Average CPU Utilization (0-100%)

Power cost, dollar per kWh

Electric Usage Estimate

Average hours of use per day

Average CPU Utilization (0-100%)

Power cost, dollar per kWh

Intel Core i5-8400 AMD Ryzen 5 1600 AF
65 W Max TDP 65 W
NA Power consumption per day (kWh) NA
NA Running cost per day NA
NA Power consumption per year (kWh) NA
NA Running cost per year NA

Popular Comparision

Comments

Intel Core i5-8400 vs AMD Ryzen 5 5600X








Intel Core i5-8400 vs AMD Ryzen 5 5600X

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the Intel Core i5-8400 on one side and the AMD Ryzen 5 5600X on the other side. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, It has 6 cores, 6 threads, a maximum frequency of 4,0GHz. The second is used on the desktop segment, it has a total of 6 cores, 12 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 4,6 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values ​​obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.

Specifications:

Processor

Intel Core i5-8400

AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
Market (main)

Desktop

Desktop
ISA

x86-64 (64 bit)

x86-64 (64 bit)
Microarchitecture

Coffee Lake

Zen 3
Core name

Coffee Lake-S

Vermeer
Family

Core i5-8000

Ryzen 5 5000
Part number(s), S-Spec

BX80684I58400,
BXC80684I58400,
CM8068403358811,
BOC80684I58400,
BO80684I58400,
SR3QT, QNMN

100-000000065,

100-100000065BOX,

100-100000065MPK

Release date

Q4 2017

Q4 2020
Lithography

14 nm++

7 nm FinFET
Cores

6

6
Threads

6

12
Base frequency

2,8 GHz

3,7 GHz
Turbo frequency

4,0 GHz

4,6 GHz
Cache memory

9 MB

32 MB
Max memory capacity

64 GB

128 GB
Memory types

DDR4-2666

DDR4-3200
Max # of memory channels

2

2
Max memory bandwidth

41,6 GB/s

47,68 GB/s
Max PCIe lanes

16

24
TDP

65 W

65 W
Suggested PSU

600W ATX Power Supply

600W ATX Power Supply
GPU integrated graphics

Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Coffee Lake)

None
GPU execution units

23


GPU shading units

184


GPU base clock

350 MHz


GPU boost clock

1050 MHz


GPU FP32 floating point

423,2 GFLOPS


Socket

LGA1151

AM4
Compatible motherboard

Socket LGA 1151 Motherboard 

Socket AM4 Motherboard 
Maximum temperature

100°C

95°C
CPU-Z single thread

442

629
CPU-Z multi thread

2. 666

4.871
Cinebench R15 single thread

169

261
Cinebench R15 multi-thread

954

1.971
Cinebench R23 single thread

1.017

1.531
Cinebench R23 multi-thread

5.839

11.190
PassMark single thread

2.401

3.378
PassMark CPU Mark

9.206

22.192
(Windows 64-bit)
Geekbench 4 single core

4.765

6.975
(Windows 64-bit)
Geekbench 4 multi-core

18. 154

33.553
(SGEMM)
GFLOPS performance

299,4 GFLOPS

408 GFLOPS
(Multi-core / watt performance)
Performance / watt ratio

279 pts / W

516 pts / W
Amazon


eBay


Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.

Suggested PSU: We assume that we have An ATX computer case, a high end graphics card, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, a 1TB HDD hard drive, a Blu-Ray drive. We will have to rely on a more powerful power supply if we want to have several graphics cards, several monitors, more memory, etc.

Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

We see that the two processors have an equivalent number of cores, the turbo frequency of AMD Ryzen 5 5600X is bigger, that their respective TDP are of the same order. The AMD Ryzen 5 5600X was started more recently.

Performances :

Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.





CPU-Z — Multi-thread & single thread score
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X

629

4.871
Intel Core i5-8400

442

2.666

In single core, the difference is 42%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 83%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.





Cinebench R15 — Multi-thread & single thread score
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X

261

1.971
Intel Core i5-8400

169

954

In single core, the difference is 54%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 107%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.





Cinebench R23 — Multi-thread & single thread score
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X

1.531

11.190
Intel Core i5-8400

1.017

5.839

In single core, the difference is 51%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 92%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Cinebench R23 is cross-platform testing software that allows you to assess the hardware capabilities of a device such as a computer, tablet, server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant. The test scene contains no less than 2,000 objects and more than 300,000 polygons in total.





PassMark — CPU Mark & single thread
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X

3.378

22.192
Intel Core i5-8400

2.401

9.206

In single core, the difference is 41%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 141%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.

On Windows 64-bit:





Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows 64-bit
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X

6.975

33.553
Intel Core i5-8400

4.765

18.154

In single core, the difference is 46%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 85%.

On Linux 64-bit:





Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux 64-bit
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X

6.975

38.157
Intel Core i5-8400

5.100

18.750

In single core, the difference is 37%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 104%.

On Mac OS X 64-bit:





Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Mac OS X 64-bit
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X

9.573

46.982
Intel Core i5-8400

5.098

20.285

In single core, the difference is 88%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 132%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.

Equivalence:

Intel Core i5-8400 AMD equivalentAMD Ryzen 5 5600X Intel equivalent

See also:

Intel Core i5-8400HIntel Core i5-8400T

AMD Ryzen 5 5600AMD Ryzen 5 5600GAMD Ryzen 5 5600GEAMD Ryzen 5 5600HAMD Ryzen 5 5600HSAMD Ryzen 5 5600U

Pre Marriage Counselling Sydney | Pre Marrital Counselling

About Relationship Counselling

Couple relationships predictably enter a phase of conflict or stress. In fact, relationship experts predict a conflict phase in most romantic long term relationships. Frequently the issues are sorted out and the relationship progresses or returns to its previous state. Often, however, when the issues can not be resolved, you may find that your relationship escalates into anger and resentment, avoidance of the core issues, sadness, emptiness or a lack of hope for the future.
Couple counselling promotes open communication between the partners. Each partner is given the chance to clearly state their view and the couple learns new skills for communication and intimacy. If both parties become willing participants, conflict can often be resolved, trust can be restored and past resentments can be overcome.

Relationship Counselling Helps You Stop Fighting & Gets You Really Relating

Relationship counselling is an opportunity for a fighting or dissatisfied couple to share their concerns in a safe and secure environment. While this sounds simple, it can be a powerful and life-changing experience for a dissatisfied couple to learn to hear and attend to each other’s concerns without defensiveness or conflict.
An experienced couple’s counsellor acts as a relationship mediator and teacher. He or she will help you talk openly and honestly about your issues, she will make sure both sides of the story are ‘heard’. She will train you to become better communicators and active listeners. She will help you identify the underlying frustrations behind your arguments, and help you to reconnect and rekindle lost intimacy.

Initially, your relationship counsellor will likely ask you each to share your view of the problem you are having. Your counsellor may also enquire about relevant aspects of your history as a couple, and any relevant individual history (for example, previous relationships, mental or physical health issues, past traumas). She will listen to each side of the story, helping each person to understand the other’s point of view, and helping to elucidate and clarify any misunderstandings in the way you communicate as a couple. This is often an essential insight because the vast majority of dissatisfied couples find that it is misunderstood communication that is at the heart of their problems. For example, he says “I’m just going to clean up the kitchen” and she hears it as “You’re doing a bad job keeping the kitchen clean”. The therapist may clarify what the message being sent was intended to convey. This may for example be “I am going to clean the kitchen, I would love to spend some time with you. Can you come be with me while I do it.”

By clarifying the underlying needs represented by each partners everyday communications, the therapist is able to show the couple a new more compassionate way of looking at the issues which include each partner’s desires and vulnerabilities, as well as practical strategies for improving the situation at home.

Why not to put off Relationship Counselling

Couples seek out relationship counselling for a variety of reasons and at different times or phases during their relationship. Many couples wait too long before seeking help. They avoid the problem, or fail to recognise it until they are really unhappy, or they are too embarrassed to admit that their relationship just isn’t working. This is a shame, most relationship problems are caused by small communication issues which eventually escalate and fester over time. Bad communication can lead to ongoing misunderstandings and arguments.  The couple may start to limit communication leading to further feelings of disconnectedness and a lack of intimacy. Sexual difficulties are a natural result of such dynamics.

The issues we work with as Relationship Counsellors

Issues frequently presented by couples who attend counselling are:

  • Arguments that recur often with neither party being clear about the underlying issue
  • Arguments about a repeated disappointment with the other person such as their lack of attention, cleanliness, care, intelligence or commitment.
  • Trust issues following infidelity or because of unresolved issues of jealousy
  • Sexual issues, such as a discrepancy between the partner’s sexual desire, a lack of sexual intimacy, or frustration with the lack of one partner’s willingness to initiate sex
  • The impact of significant life changes, such as the birth of a baby, illness or a big move
  • Conflict with other family members, including children, step-families and in-laws
  • Cultural or religious difference or conflict
  • Personal issues impacting the relationship, such as depression or addiction
  • Financial worry

What is Family Therapy?

Most issues that affect a couple affect their children as well. Family therapy is an opportunity for the entire family to seek assistance from a counsellor. The therapy works in a similar way to couples therapy, providing the opportunity to air grievances and concerns, develop communication skills and improve relationships.

Commonly, family therapy involves teenage and adult children only. Family therapy acknowledges that the children of a relationship are commonly impacted emotionally by the issues experienced by their parents, and the family meetings facilitate a solution that works for all members concerned. At other times, family therapy can be useful for solving issues between adult family members, such as disagreements over business decisions, deceased estates or care of elderly parents.

Selecting your couples therapist

Associated Counsellors offers access to a range of experienced and professional relationship & marriage counsellors at all of our locations. Our counsellors are trained in various modalities that have been shown to help you address your relationship issues. Likewise, all our couples counsellors are members of professional associations such as the APS, the AASW and PCAFA. This means that you can feel assured that your relationship is in safe hands. To discuss how our service might need your particular needs, please contact us via this website or at our phone number.

We welcome your enquiry.

ASSOCIATED RELATIONSHIP & MARRIAGE COUNSELLORS SYDNEY

TEL: (02) 8002 1020

Marriage Counselling across Sydney at:
Sydney CBD, Surry Hills, Bondi Junction, Glebe, Cremorne & at Gosford on the Central Coast.

CPUͼ







































































































2 3 4 5/6 7 8 9 10 11 12 5000 3000 2000 1000 ˴APU ߴAPU APU /
                    ߳˺3990X              
                  i9-12900KS 7 5800X3D

(Ϸ)
               
                i9-12900K/KF   ߳˺3970X              
                                     
                    ߳˺3960X              
                  9 5950X                
            ǿW-3175X   i7-12700K/KF     ߳˺2990WX            
                      ߳˺2970WX            
              i9-10980XE i7-12700/F 9 5900X                
            i9-9980XE   i5-12600K/KF   9 3950X              
                    9 3900XT              
        i9-7980XE       i5-12600   9 3900X              
                i9-11900K       ߳˺2950X            
            i9-9960X i9-10900K   7 5800X                
        i9-7960X     i9-10850K i5-12500 7 5700X 9 3900   ߳˺1950X          
              i9-10940X i7-11700K                    
        i9-7940X   i9-9940X   i7-11700   7 5700G                
              i9-10920X       ߳˺2920X            
        i9-7920X   i9-9920X   i5-12400                  
              i9-10900X     7 3800XT   ߳˺1920X          
            i9-9900X   i5-11600K   5 5600X                
            i9-9900KS     5 5600G 7 3800X              
        i9-7900X   i9-9820X                      
            i9-9900K/KF i7-10700K   5 5500 7 3700X              
                                   
      i7-6950X                            
            i7-9800X                      
        i7-7820X   i9-9900                      
          i7-8086K           7 2700X            
              i5-10600K   3 5300G 5 3600XT   ߳˺1900X          
            i7-9700K/KF   i5-11400F     5 3600X              
          i7-8700K i7-9700                      
            i9-9900T       5 3600              
      i7-6900K   i7-8700 i5-9600K/KF i5-10400/F       7 2700 7 1800X          
          i7-9700T   i3-12100/F       7 1700X          
    i7-5960X i7-6850K   i7-8700T         3 3300X              
        i7-7800X i5-8600K i5-9600         5 2600X 7 1700          
  i7-4960X i7-5930K i7-6800K                          
i7-3970X i7-4930K                              
i7-3960X   i7-5820K   i7-7740X i5-8600 i5-9500/F       5 3500X   5 1600X          
                    5 /3500 5 2600          
i7-4820K  

 

i5-8500 i5-9400/F       3 3100   5 1600          
i7-3930X     i7-7700K i5-8400                      
i7-990X   i7-6700K   i5-9600T                    
i7-980X   i7-4790K i7-7700 i5-8600T i5-9500T       5 3400G 5 2500X            
  i7-4770K E3-1230 v5 i5-8500T i3-9350K/KF         5 2400G         FX-9590  
            i5-9400T                    
          i5-8400T i3-9320       3 3200G 3 2300X 5 1500X          
i7-970   i3-9300         3 2200G            
i7-3820   i7-4771 i7-5775C i5-7640X i3-8350K             5 1400          
i7-3770K i7-4770 i5-5675C                          
i7-2700K i7-3770 E3-1230v3 i5-7600K   i3-9100/F                      
i7-2600K E3-1230v2 i5-6600K i5-7600 i3-8300                        
i7-2600 i5-4690K i5-6600 i5-7500 i3-8100 i3-9300T                   FX-9370  
E3-1230 i5-4670K i5-6500 i5-7400   i3-9100T           3 1300X       FX-8350  
i7-960 i5-3570K i5-6400 i3-8300T                     FX-8320  
i7-940 i5-3570   i3-8100T             3 1200       FX-8170  
i5-2550K i5-4590 i3-7350K                       FX-8150  
i7-870 i5-3550 i5-4570                       FX-8300 2 X6 1100T
i5-2500K i3-7320           3000G 240GE         FX-8140 2 X6 1090T
i7-920 i5-3470 i3-6320 i3-7300             220GE         FX-8120
i5-3450 i5-4440 i3-6300                       FX-8100 2 X6 1055T
i5-2400 i5-4430   G5620         200GE     A10-7890K    
i5-3330 i3-7100 G5600               X4 880K    
i5-2320 i3-6100 G5500 G5420             A12-9800 A10-7870K   FX-6300
i5-2310 i5-4440S G4620 G5400             X4 870K A10-6800K FX-6200 2 X4 980
i5-2300             FX-6100 2 X4 975
i5-760 i3-4330 G4600             A10-7850K/7860L A10-5800K FX-4320 2 X4 970
i5-750 i3-3225 G4520               X4 860K FX-4170 2 X4 965
i3-3220 G4560                 2 X4 955
i3-2130 i3-3210 i3-4130 G4500               A10-9700 A10-7800 A8-6600K  
i5-680                 X4 950 X4 845 A10-5700 A8-3870K 2 X4 940
i3-2120   G5600T               A10-7700K X4 760K X4 651K  
i3-2102 G5500T               X4 750K X4 641 2 X4 645
i3-2100 i3-4130T G4600T G5420T               A8-7670K A8-5600K   2 X4 640
G5400T G4950               X4 750 A6-3670K  
i3-530 G4500T G4560T G4930               FX-4100  
  G4920               A8-7650K A8-5500    
G3430 G4400 G4900                    
G2130 G3420 G3950 G4930T               A8-9600      
G870 G2120 G3220 G3920 G3930 G4900T                 A12-9800E A8-7600      
G860 G3900                     X4 840     X4 9750
G850 G3930T                         2 X3 450
G3420T G3900T                         2 X3 440
G645 G2020 G3220T                       A6-7400K     2 X3 435
G840 G2010                         A6-9500        
G640                                
                             
G555                             2 X2 560
G630                             2 X2 555
G1620                       A6-9500E     A6-5400K  
G550 G1610                               2 X2 265
G620                                 2 X2 255
G540                                 2 X2 250
G530                               A4-5300 2 X2 245
                                  A4-3400  
                                    2 X2 220
                                    2 X2 215
                                    X2-198
 


















Intel/AMD CPU
 
Alder Lake 12 2021-2022 7 (10nm Ehanced SuperFin)   Zen 4 7000 2022 5nm
Rocket Lake 11 2021 14nm+++   Zen 3 5000 2020 7nm
Comet Lake-S/Skylake-X ʮ 2019-2020 14nm+++   Zen 2 3000/߳˺3000 2019 7nm
Coffee Lake-Refresh/Skylake-X ھŴ 2018-2019 14nm++   Zen+ 2000߳˺2000 2018 12nm
Coffee Lake ڰ˴ 2017-2018 14nm++   Zen 1000/߳˺1000 2017 14nm
Kaby Lake ߴ 2016 14nm+   Piledrever ڶFX 2012-2013 32nm
Skylake 2015 14nm   Bulldozer һFX 2011 32nm
Broadwell 2014-2015 14nm   Godavari ߴAPU 2015 28nm
Haswell Ĵ 2013 22nm   Carrizo APU 2014 28nm
Ivy Bridge 2012 22nm   Richland APU 2013 32nm
Sandy Bridge ڶ 2011 32nm   Trinity ڶAPU 2012 32nm
Nehalem/Westmere һ 2008-2011 32nm   Llano һAPU 2011 32nm
Conroe 2 2006-2008 65/45nm   K10 / 2007-2011 45nm
Netburst 4/D 2000-2008 65nm   K8 64 2003-2007 65nm
Tualatin 3 1999-2001 130nm   K7 XP 1999-2004 130nm


&֮·Ȩ

ԥICP18024899-2ԥ 41010502003949

ݰοϸܸߵͶԱȡδȨתЧ

AMD Ryzen 7000 im Test: So schnell sind 7950X und 7700X: Leistungsaufnahme und Effizienz

 2/8

Jan-Frederik Timm et al.

673 Kommentare

Inhaltsverzeichnis

TDP und PPT steigen deutlich

Die Leistung gibt es bei Ryzen 7000 ab Werk nicht „umsonst“. AMD hat mit Ryzen 7000 sowohl die TDP als auch das „Package Power Target“ (PPT) angehoben – und das deutlich. CPUs, die vormals mit 105 Watt TDP und 142 Watt PPT daherkamen, sind als Ryzen 7000 jetzt bei 170 Watt TDP und 230 Watt PPT zu finden. Bisherige 65/76-Watt-CPUs steigen auf 105/142 Watt. Zur Erinnerung respektive Einordnung:

  • TDP: „Die TDP ist ein striktes Maß für die thermische Verlustleistung eines ASIC, die das minimale Kühlsystem definiert, um die spezifizierte Leistung zu erreichen“, definiert AMD. Die TDP hat zum Ziel, Herstellern vorzuschreiben, welche Verlustleistung ein Kühlsystem mindestens dauerhaft abführen muss, um den Prozessor nicht auszubremsen. Die TDP darf überschritten werden, solange die Temperaturen es zulassen. Maximal darf die TDP auf dem Niveau der PPT liegen.
  • PPT: Das „Package Power Target“ (PPT) stellt die von AMD fest definierte Obergrenze der CPU-Leistungsaufnahme dar. Solange es die Temperatur zulässt, darf die CPU oberhalb der TDP bis hinauf zur PPT operieren. Bei den X-CPUs ist das in der Regel unter Einsatz eines guten Tower-Kühlers der Fall. Details gibt es im Artikel CPU-Leistungsaufnahme: Was „TDP“ bei Intel Core und AMD Ryzen bedeutet.

Der Anstieg ist beachtlich und kommt in Anbetracht der identischen Anzahl an Kernen und dem effizienteren Prozess (5 nm vs. 7 nm) einer kleinen Überraschung gleich. AMD nennt als Gründe die Integration einer iGPU und insbesondere mit Blick auf die PPT von 230 Watt, die auch das Maximum für den neuen Sockel AM5 darstellt, eine gewisse Zukunftssicherheit. Doch Vorsicht: Nicht jedes günstige AM5-Mainboard wird auch für bis zu 230 Watt PPT ausgelegt sein, darauf weist AMD selbst hin.

TDP und PPT der X-CPUs mit Zen 4 und Zen 3 im Vergleich

CPU TDP max. Verbrauch (PPT) PPT/TDP
Ryzen 9 7950X 170 Watt 230 Watt 1,35
+62 % +62 %
Ryzen 9 5950X 105 Watt 142 Watt 1,35
Ryzen 9 7900X 170 Watt 230 Watt 1,35
+62 % +62 %
Ryzen 9 5900X 105 Watt 142 Watt 1,35
Ryzen 7 5800X 105 Watt 142 Watt 1,35
Ryzen 7 7700X 105 Watt 142 Watt 1,35
+62 % +87 %
Ryzen 7 5700X 65 Watt 76 Watt 1,17
Ryzen 5 7600X 105 Watt 142 Watt 1,35
+62 % +87 %
Ryzen 5 5600X 65 Watt 76 Watt 1,17

Leistungsaufnahme in Anwendungen ab Werk

Für die Leistungsaufnahme ab Werk bedeuten die neuen TDP- und PPT-Grenzwerte unter Mehr-Kern-Volllast isoliert betrachtet erst einmal nichts Gutes. Beide getesteten CPUs haben gegenüber dem direkten Vorgänger nicht nur auf dem Papier, sondern auch in der Praxis unter Last zugelegt. Die nachfolgenden Werte wurden auf dem Asus ROG Crosshair X670E Hero Wi-Fi ermittelt, das Onboard-WLAN-Modul war deaktiviert.

Grundsätzlich fällt auf: Ryzen 9 7950X und Ryzen 7 7700X agieren in vielen Anwendungen nicht an der PPT-Schwelle von 230 respektive 142 Watt. Der Ryzen 9 bewegt sich zwischen 190 und 230 Watt, der Ryzen 7 zwischen 120 und 142 Watt.

Neben dem gestiegenen Verbrauch unter Multi-Core-Volllast ist der Bedarf unter Single-Core-Lasten auf dem Asus Crosshair X670E Hero Wi-Fi auffällig, der zum Teil auch vom höheren Plattformverbrauch herrührt – gemessen wird die Leistungsaufnahme sowohl unter Teillast (CB R20 Single-Core) als auch unter Leerlauf (Windows-Desktop) an der Steckdose.

Ein Blick auf die Package-Power im jeweiligen Szenario sowohl auf dem Asus ROG Crosshair X670E Hero Wi-Fi (wie oben) als auch auf dem Gigabyte X670E Aorus Master zeigt: Im Cinebench R20 Single-Core liegt der Verbrauch auf der Platine von Asus höher, im Leerlauf ist hingegen das Board von Gigabyte leicht „zurück“. Wären die oben aufgeführten Messungen auf dem Mainboard von Gigabyte erfolgt, wäre der Strombedarf unter Teillast der Plattform gegenüber Ryzen 5000 höchstwahrscheinlich nicht gestiegen.

Die Volllasteffizienz ist gefallen

In der Regel wird mehr Verbrauch mit dem Argument „Aber die Leistung ist ja noch deutlicher gestiegen!“ abgetan (Stichwort Effizienz), wenngleich ein größerer Verbrauch einen größeren Verbrauch bedeutet. Bei Ryzen 7000 zieht dieses Argument ab Werk aber nicht.

Die neuen CPUs nehmen ab Werk unter Last nämlich nicht nur mehr elektrische Leistung auf, sie können das unter Mehr-Kern-Last auch nicht durch die Mehrleistung mit einem Verweis auf die gestiegene Effizienz abtun: Wie das nachfolgende Beispiel (Video-Transcoding UHD H.265 60 FPS in AV1 UHD 60 FPS in HandBrake) zeigt, agieren sowohl Ryzen 9 7950X als auch Ryzen 7 7700X ineffizienter.

CPU Dauer AV1-Encoding in HandBrake ∅ CPU-Leistungsaufnahme Energieverbrauch
Ryzen 9 7950X 1. 200 Sek. 191,1 Watt 63,7 Wh
Ryzen 9 5950X 1.545 Sek. 131,5 Watt 56,5 Wh
Ryzen 9 7900X Test steht noch aus
Ryzen 9 5900X 1.876 Sek. 142,3 Watt 74,1 Wh
Ryzen 7 5800X 2.565 Sek. 127,5 Watt 90,8 Wh
Ryzen 7 7700X 2.066 Sek. 124,9 Watt 71,7 Wh
Ryzen 7 5700X 2.825 Sek. 77,5 Watt 61,4 Wh
Ryzen 5 7600X Test steht noch aus
Ryzen 5 5600X 3.477 Sek. 77,3 Watt 74,6 Wh

Und wie sieht es in Spielen aus? Ausführlich ist ComputerBase diesem Thema im separaten Artikel Gaming-Benchmarks: Ryzen 9 7950X und Ryzen 7 7700X vs. 5950X und 12900KS nachgegangen, an dieser Stelle daher nur ein Auszug.

Leistungsaufnahme in Spielen ab Werk

In Spielen hält sich der Mehrverbrauch im Vergleich Ryzen 9 7950X vs. Ryzen 9 5950X mit 5 Watt in Grenzen. In diesem Fall zieht unter Berücksichtigung der Mehrleistung sogar wieder das Argument: „Aber die Effizienz!“ Der Ryzen 7 7700X zeigt sogar im Vergleich zum in Spielen extrem effizienten Ryzen 7 5800X3D nur einen minimalen Anstieg, gegenüber dem Ryzen 7 5800X (hier nicht aufgeführt) sollte die Leistungsaufnahme sogar gefallen sein (siehe auch: Gaming-Benchmarks: Ryzen 7 5800X3D vs. 5800X, Core i9-12900K und 12900KS).

Ryzen 9 7950X
Package-Power (AVG/Max)
Ryzen 9 5950X
Package-Power (AVG/Max)
Ryzen 7 5800X3D
Package-Power (AVG/Max)
Core i9-12900KS
Package-Power (AVG/Max)
Ryzen 7 7700X
Package-Power (AVG/Max)
Age of Empires IV 95/102 Watt 86/91 Watt 44/52 Watt 106/145 Watt 47/52 Watt
Anno 1800 101/104 Watt 96/100 Watt 56/64 Watt 135/139 Watt 59/64 Watt
CoD: Warzone 119/125 Watt 110/116 Watt 73/77 Watt 167/184 Watt 81/87 Watt
Cyberpunk 2077 125/130 Watt 122/129 Watt 73/76 Watt 198/212 Watt 61/62 Watt
Death Stranding 137/140 Watt 129/136 Watt 71/80 Watt 211/229 Watt 86/93 Watt
Dota 2 118/126 Watt 113/119 Watt 76/79 Watt 155/173 Watt 73/80 Watt
F1 22 114/120 Watt 114/118 Watt 71/74 Watt 155/161 Watt 77/80 Watt
Far Cry 6 111/116 Watt 107/112 Watt 66/70 Watt 141/150 Watt 69/74 Watt
Fortnite 120/124 Watt 113/118 Watt 68/70 Watt 175/182 Watt 78/83 Watt
Ghostwire: Tokyo 117/121 Watt 113/118 Watt 68/70 Watt 176/183 Watt 80/83 Watt
Guardians of the Galaxy 115/122 Watt 112/123 Watt 74/81 Watt 174/195 Watt 66/71 Watt
Resident Evil Village 114/119 Watt 106/113 Watt 71/75 Watt 155/167 Watt 78/85 Watt
Spider-Man Remastered 125/132 Watt 118/123 Watt 75/79 Watt 179/190 Watt 84/89 Watt
Spider-Man Remastered + RT 129/133 Watt 128/134 Watt 84/88 Watt 218/222 Watt 70/71 Watt
Valorant 127/134 Watt 125/131 Watt 77/81 Watt 169/177 Watt 71/75 Watt
Durchschnitt 118/123 Watt 113/119 Watt 70/74 Watt 168/181 Watt 72/77 Watt

Der ab Werk höhere Verbrauch von Ryzen 7000 gegenüber Ryzen 5000 ist damit insbesondere ein Thema bei Multi-Core-Volllasten. Im Leerlauf, bei Single-Core- und in Spiele-Lasten ist das hingegen weniger der Fall.

Die Frage, die sich anschließt, lautet: Benötigt Zen 4 in Multi-Core-Szenarien mit hoher Last denn wirklich derart viel Energie, um sich vom Vorgänger abzusetzen? Oder darf es auch etwas weniger ohne großen Leistungsverlust sein?

Effizienz bei reduzierter TDP (inkl. Eco-Mode)

Die Antwort lautet: Es darf etwas weniger sein und der Leistungsverlust ist verschwindend gering.

Ryzen 9 7950X bis zu 230 Watt statt vormals bis zu 142 Watt zuzugestehen, hebt die Leistung im Multi-Core-Testparcours um lediglich 5 Prozent an. Andersherum sinkt die Leistung um nur 5 Prozent, wenn die bekannte Obergrenze für den 16-Kern-Prozessor genutzt wird. Und selbst bei 88 Watt, also lediglich 38 % der offiziellen Obergrenze, ist die neue CPU noch 12 Prozent schneller als der Vorgänger.

Leistung Ryzen 9 7950X
Multi-Core-Leistung
Vorsprung auf Ryzen 9 5950X
mit 142 Watt PPT
230 Watt PPT (100 %) 100 % 37 %
142 Watt PPT (62 %) 95 % 31 %
88 Watt PPT (38 %) 82 % 12 %
65 Watt PPT (28 %) 69 % -6 %
45 Watt PPT (20 %) 45 % -39 %

Auch klassenübergreifend wird klar, dass Ryzen 7000 die höhere TDP im hausinternen Wettstreit nicht benötigt hätte. Der Ryzen 7 7700X (105/142 Watt), der offiziell dem Ryzen 7 5700X (65/76 Watt) folgt, lässt dem Ryzen 7 5800X (105/142 Watt) nicht den Hauch einer Chance, selbst wenn er bei maximal 65 Watt betrieben wird. Und mit 45 Watt maximaler Leistungsaufnahme erzielt diese CPU noch immer ein Patt mit dem größeren Vorgänger.

Mit 45 Watt effizienter als Ryzen 6000 Mobile

Noch ein Vergleich gefällig? Mit 45 Watt ist der Ryzen 7 7700X (8 Kerne) in Multi-Core-Szenarien über 20 Prozent schneller als die auf maximale Effizienz getrimmte Notebook-APU Ryzen 9 6900HS (8 Kerne) bei ebenfalls 45 Watt.

Auch gegenüber Intel gewinnt der neue 8-Kern-Prozessor wieder die Oberhand, wobei es stark davon abhängig ist, welche CPUs in welcher Wattklasse miteinander verglichen werden: Am oberen Ende schlägt ein Ryzen 9 7950X mit lediglich 65 Watt den Core i9-12900K mit voller Leistungsaufnahme, am unteren liegen Ryzen 7 7700X und Core i9-12900K bei 88 Watt nahe beieinander. Mit noch weniger Leistungsaufnahme geht das Rennen wiederum erneut deutlich zugunsten von AMD aus. Ebenfalls klar wird: Ohne E-Cores haben die Alder-Lake-CPUs keine Chance.

Effizienz bei reduzierter VCore (Undervolting)

Ein weiterer Ansatz, Ryzen 7000 zu mehr Effizienz zu bewegen, ist das Herabsenken der CPU-Versorgungsspannung (VCore), das auch als „Undervolting“ (UV) bekannt ist. Das schränkt die CPU im Gegensatz zu einem PPT-Limit nicht absolut in ihrer Leistungsaufnahme ein, sondern reduziert die Leistungsaufnahme in jedem Lastzustand. Beides kann damit auch kombiniert werden. Ein niedrigeres TDP-Limit geht in der Regel ohne Stabilitätsrisiken einher, während eine zu geringe VCore zum Absturz führt.

Im Test der Redaktion offenbarte der Ryzen 9 7950X großes UV-Potential: Mit einem VCore-Offset von -100 mV (-0,100 Volt) erwies sich das System zwar nicht mehr in allen Lasten als zuverlässig stabil, -90 mV (-0,090 Volt) waren in den getesteten Apps aber möglich. Leistungsaufnahme und Temperatur sanken dadurch signifikant. Zugleich stieg der Takt, wenngleich nur gering.

Leistungsdaten mit und ohne UV (Noctua NH-D15S), Handbrake

CPU ∅ CPU-Temperatur ∅ Leistungsaufnahme ∅ CPU-Takt
Ryzen 9 7950X 93,9 °C 189,3 Watt 5.085 MHz
Ryzen 9 7950X UV (-100 mV) 81,7 °C 169,5 Watt 5.173 MHz

Effizienz vs. Balken-Wettkampf-Wahn

Die ersten Absätze am Kopf dieser Seite haben es eher weniger vermuten lassen, doch Ryzen 7000 macht in Kombination aus neuem 5-nm-Prozess von TSMC und AMDs darauf angepasster Zen-4-Architektur gegenüber Zen 3 einen beachtlichen Sprung in Sachen Effizienz. Wer allerdings nur auf Leistung und Leistungsaufnahme im Werkszustand blickt bzw. die CPUs unter Volllast so betreibt, der bekommt davon nichts mit, denn AMD betreibt die CPUs weit jenseits ihres Sweetspots, um im Wettkampf um den längsten Balken mit Intel zu bestehen.

Bei 170 Watt ist Zen 4 effizienter als Zen 3, aber bei Zen 3 gab es keine SKU mit diesem Verbrauch (Bild: AMD)

Wer von der deutlich gestiegenen Effizienz der Ryzen-7000-CPUs profitieren will, der sollte die CPUs daher manuell in der Leistungsaufnahme einschränken. Der Leistungsverlust ist minimal, wenn vom neuen höheren auf das altbekannte Niveau zurückgewechselt wird. Auf die Performance in Spielen hat das keinen Einfluss, da die Verlustleistung noch darunter liegt.

In Anwendungen wird der jeweilige Vorgänger selbst mit 88 Watt (7950X) respektive 65 Watt (7700X) noch geschlagen. Die Spiele-Leistung würde bei einer solchen Deckelung in diesem Fall dann allerdings ebenfalls leicht sinken.

Vorige Seite

Seite 2/8

Nächste Seite
Temperaturen und Kühlung

  673 Kommentare

Themen:

  • AMD
  • CPU
  • Ryzen
  • Zen
  • Jan-Frederik TimmE-MailTwitter

    … ist Diplom-Ingenieur und schreibt auf ComputerBase seit dem Jahr 2001 über die neueste Hardware, macOS und Windows.

  • Volker RißkaE-Mail

    … schreibt seit dem Jahr 2002 über CPUs, deren Architekturen und Fertigungsverfahren sowie Mainboards und RAM.

Bildübersicht

CPU性能比較表【2022年最新版】 | PC自由帳