AMD A8-7600 vs Intel Core i3-530 Benchmarks, Specs, Performance Comparison and Differences
|
|
|
|
|
AMD A8-7600 vs Intel Core i3-530
Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the AMD A8-7600 on one side and the Intel Core i3-530 on the other side. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, It has 4 cores, 4 threads, a maximum frequency of 3,8GHz. The second is used on the desktop segment, it has a total of 2 cores, 4 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 2,9 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specification comparison:
| Processor | AMD A8-7600 | Intel Core i3-530 | ||||||
| Market (main) | Desktop | Desktop | ||||||
| ISA | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) | ||||||
| Microarchitecture | Steamroller | Westmere | ||||||
| Core name | Steamroller | Clarkdale | ||||||
| Family | A8-7000 | Core i3-500 | ||||||
| Part number(s), S-Spec |
AD7600YBI44JA, |
BX80616I3530, |
||||||
| Release date | Q3 2014 | Q1 2010 | ||||||
| Lithography | 28 nm | 32 nm | ||||||
| Transistors | 2. 410.000.000 |
382.000.000 | ||||||
| Cores | 4 | 2 | ||||||
| Threads | 4 | 4 | ||||||
| Base frequency | 3,1 GHz | 2,9 GHz | ||||||
| Turbo frequency | 3,8 GHz | — | ||||||
| Cache memory | 4 MB | 4 MB | ||||||
| Max memory capacity | 8 GB | 16,38 GB | ||||||
| Memory types |
DDR3-2133 |
DDR3 1066/1333 |
||||||
| Max # of memory channels | 2 | 2 | ||||||
| Max memory bandwidth | 34,1 GB/s | 21,3 GB/s | ||||||
| Max PCIe lanes | 8 | 16 | ||||||
| TDP | 65 W | 73 W | ||||||
| Suggested PSU | 600W ATX Power Supply | 600W ATX Power Supply | ||||||
| GPU integrated graphics | AMD Radeon R7 Graphics 384 Cores (Kaveri) | Intel HD Graphics (Westmere) | ||||||
| GPU cores | 6 | — | ||||||
| GPU execution units | — | 12 | ||||||
| GPU shading units | 384 | 96 | ||||||
| GPU base clock | 351 MHz | 733 MHz | ||||||
| GPU boost clock | 720 MHz | — | ||||||
| GPU FP32 floating point | 553 GFLOPS | 102,3 GFLOPS | ||||||
| Socket | FM2+ | LGA1156 | ||||||
| Compatible motherboard | — | Socket LGA 1156 Motherboard | ||||||
| Maximum temperature | 71. 3°C |
72.6°C | ||||||
| CPU-Z single thread | 208 | 285 | ||||||
| CPU-Z multi thread | 696 | 836 | ||||||
| Cinebench R15 single thread | 84 | 70 | ||||||
| Cinebench R15 multi-thread | 291 | 172 | ||||||
| Cinebench R20 single thread | 176 | 134 | ||||||
| Cinebench R20 multi-thread | 599 | 330 | ||||||
| PassMark single thread | 1.425 | 1.171 | ||||||
| PassMark CPU Mark | 3. 197 |
1.431 | ||||||
| (Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 single core |
2.246 | 2.271 | ||||||
| (Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 multi-core |
5.812 | 4.593 | ||||||
| (Windows) Geekbench 5 single core |
491 | 459 | ||||||
| (Windows) Geekbench 5 multi-core |
1.409 | 1.018 | ||||||
| (SGEMM) GFLOPS performance |
53,86 GFLOPS | 33,9 GFLOPS | ||||||
| (Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio |
89 pts / W | 63 pts / W | ||||||
| Amazon | ||||||||
| eBay |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.
Suggested PSU: We assume that we have An ATX computer case, a high end graphics card, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, a 1TB HDD hard drive, a Blu-Ray drive. We will have to rely on a more powerful power supply if we want to have several graphics cards, several monitors, more memory, etc.
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
The processor AMD A8-7600 has more cores, the maximum frequency of AMD A8-7600 is greater, that the PDT of AMD A8-7600 is lower. The AMD A8-7600 was designed earlier.
Performance comparison with the benchmarks:
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.
| CPU-Z — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i3-530 |
285 836 |
| AMD A8-7600 |
208 696 |
In single core, the difference is 37%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 20%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.
| Cinebench R15 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| AMD A8-7600 |
84 291 |
| Intel Core i3-530 |
70 172 |
In single core, the difference is 20%.
In multi-core, the differential gap is 69%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.
| Cinebench R20 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| AMD A8-7600 |
176 599 |
| Intel Core i3-530 |
134 330 |
In single core, the difference is 31%.
In multi-core, the differential gap is 82%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R20 is a multi-platform test software which allows to evaluate the hardware capacities of a device such as a computer, a tablet, a server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant.
| PassMark — CPU Mark & single thread | |
|---|---|
| AMD A8-7600 |
1.425 3.197 |
| Intel Core i3-530 |
1.171 1.431 |
In single core, the difference is 22%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 123%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.
On Windows 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| AMD A8-7600 |
2.246 5.812 |
| Intel Core i3-530 |
2.271 4.593 |
In single core, the difference is -1%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 27%.
On Linux 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| AMD A8-7600 |
2.  2365.713 |
| Intel Core i3-530 |
2.300 4.588 |
In single core, the difference is -3%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 25%.
On Mac OS X 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Mac OS X 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| AMD A8-7600 |
2.084 5.502 |
| Intel Core i3-530 |
1.225 2.738 |
In single core, the difference is 70%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 101%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing.
This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
On Windows:
| Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows | |
|---|---|
| AMD A8-7600 |
491 1.409 |
| Intel Core i3-530 |
459 1.018 |
In single core, the difference is 7%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 38%.
On Linux:
| Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux | |
|---|---|
| AMD A8-7600 |
483 1.428 |
| Intel Core i3-530 |
473 938 |
In single core, the difference is 2%.
In multi-core, the differential gap is 52%.
On macOS:
| Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — macOS | |
|---|---|
| AMD A8-7600 |
443 1.302 |
| Intel Core i3-530 |
481 1.096 |
In single core, the difference is -8%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 19%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.
Equivalence:
AMD A8-7600 Intel equivalentIntel Core i3-530 AMD equivalent
Intel Core i3-1125G4 vs AMD A8-7410
Comparative analysis of Intel Core i3-1125G4 and AMD A8-7410 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics image quality, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization, Peripherals.
Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.
0 — Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps).
Intel Core i3-1125G4
Buy on Amazon
vs
AMD A8-7410
Buy on Amazon
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Core i3-1125G4
- 4 more threads: 8 vs 4
- Around 48% higher clock speed: 3.70 GHz vs 2.5 GHz
- Around 11% higher maximum core temperature: 100°C vs 90°C
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 10 nm SuperFin vs 28 nm
- 2.5x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- 3.1x better performance in PassMark — Single thread mark: 2508 vs 804
- 5.5x better performance in PassMark — CPU mark: 9884 vs 1813
| Number of threads | 8 vs 4 |
| Maximum frequency | 3. 70 GHz vs 2.5 GHz |
| Maximum core temperature | 100°C vs 90°C |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm SuperFin vs 28 nm |
| L2 cache | 5 MB vs 2 MB |
| PassMark — Single thread mark | 2508 vs 804 |
| PassMark — CPU mark | 9884 vs 1813 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Core i3-1125G4
CPU 2: AMD A8-7410
| PassMark — Single thread mark |
|
|
||
| PassMark — CPU mark |
|
|
| Name | Intel Core i3-1125G4 | AMD A8-7410 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark — Single thread mark | 2508 | 804 |
| PassMark — CPU mark | 9884 | 1813 |
| Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 262 | |
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 781 | |
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
2.521 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6.553 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.116 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) | 7.405 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 22.317 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 661 | |
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames) |
1234 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) | 3706 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 661 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) | 1234 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) | 3706 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Core i3-1125G4 | AMD A8-7410 | |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture codename | Tiger Lake | Carrizo-L |
| Launch date | Q1’21 | 7 May 2015 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $281 | |
| Place in performance rating | 689 | 1975 |
| Processor Number | i3-1125G4 | |
| Series | 11th Generation Intel Core i3 Processors | AMD A8-Series APU for Laptops |
| Status | Launched | |
| Vertical segment | Mobile | Laptop |
| Family | AMD A-Series Processors | |
| OPN Tray | AM7410JBY44JB | |
| 64 bit support | ||
| Bus Speed | 4 GT/s | |
| L1 cache | 384 KB | |
| L2 cache | 5 MB | 2 MB |
| L3 cache | 8 MB | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm SuperFin | 28 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 100°C | 90°C |
| Maximum frequency | 3. 70 GHz |
2.5 GHz |
| Number of cores | 4 | 4 |
| Number of threads | 8 | 4 |
| Base frequency | 2.2 GHz | |
| Transistor count | 930 Million | |
| Unlocked | ||
| Max memory channels | 2 | 1 |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB | |
| Supported memory types | DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-3733 | DDR3L |
| Supported memory frequency | 1866 MHz | |
| Device ID | 0x9A78 | |
| Execution Units | 48 | |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1. 25 GHz |
|
| Intel® Clear Video HD technology | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Processor graphics | Intel UHD Graphics for 11th Gen Intel Processors | AMD Radeon R5 Graphics |
| Enduro | ||
| Graphics max frequency | 847 MHz | |
| Switchable graphics | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
| Number of displays supported | 4 | |
| DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Max resolution over DisplayPort | [email protected] | |
| Max resolution over eDP | [email protected] | |
| DirectX | 12. 1 |
12 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| Vulkan | ||
| Configurable TDP-down | 12 Watt | |
| Configurable TDP-down Frequency | 900 MHz | |
| Configurable TDP-up | 28 Watt | |
| Configurable TDP-up Frequency | 2.00 GHz | |
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | |
| Package Size | 46. 5×25 |
|
| Sockets supported | FCBGA1449 | FP4 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
| Intel® OS Guard | ||
| Intel® Software Guard Extensions (Intel® SGX) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
| Mode-based Execute Control (MBE) | ||
| Secure Boot | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Instruction set extensions | Intel SSE4. 1, Intel SSE4.2, Intel AVX2, Intel AVX-512 |
|
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Intel® Volume Management Device (VMD) | ||
| Speed Shift technology | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
| AMD App Acceleration | ||
| AMD Elite Experiences | ||
| AMD HD3D technology | ||
| Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP) | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| PowerGating | ||
| PowerNow | ||
| VirusProtect | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
IOMMU 2. 0 |
||
| PCI Express revision | 2.0 |
AMD A8-7680 vs Intel Core i3-10100F: What is the difference?
52 BALLLA
AMD A8-7680
50 BALLLA
Intel Core i3-10100f
Winter when comparing
VS
66 facts compared to
AMD A8-7680
INTEL CORE I3-10100F
Is A8-7680 better than Intel Core i3-10100F?
- 3MB more L2 cache?
4MB vs 1MB - Has integrated graphics?
- Has an unlocked multiplier?
- 256KB more L1 cache?
512KB vs 256KB - 0.75MB/core more L2 cache per core?
1MB/core vs 0.25MB/core - 2 higher hour multiplier?
38 vs 36
Why is Intel Core i3-10100F better than AMD A8-7680?
- 533MHz higher RAM speed?
2666MHz vs 2133MHz - 4 more CPU threads?
8 vs 4 - 26°C higher than maximum operating temperature?
100°C vs 74°C - 14nm smaller semiconductors?
14nm vs 28nm - 0.
5GHz higher turbo clock speed?
4.3GHz vs 3.8GHz - 2.47x higher PassMark score?
8805 vs 3568 - 27.69GB/s more memory bandwidth?
41.6GB/s vs 13.91GB/s - 1.59x higher PassMark score (single)?
2615 vs 1640
Which comparisons are the most popular?
AMD A8-7680
VS
AMD A8-7600
Intel Core i3-10100F
VS
AMD RYZEN 3 4100
AMD A8-7680
VS
Intel Core INTEL Core INTEL Core INTEL Core INTEL Core INTEL Core INTEL CORE INTEL Core i3-10100F
VS
AMD Ryzen 5 4500
AMD A8-7680
VS
AMD A6-7480
Intel Core i3-10100F
Intel Core i3-10100 9000
Intel Core i5-3470
Intel Core i3-10100f
VS
Intel Core i3-12100
AMD A8-7680
9000 INTEL CORE ANTEL CORE INTEL CORE INTE AMD Ryzen 5 5600G
AMD A8-7680
VS
Intel Core i5-4570
Intel Core i3-10100F
VS
Intel Core i3-10105
VS 9000 INTEL Core Intel Core Intel Core.
Intel Core i3-10100f
VS
Intel Core i5-10400
AMD A8-7680
VS
AMD A10-7850K
Intel Core i3-10100f
9000
AMD Ryzen 5 AMD Ryzen 5 A8-7680
vs
AMD A10-7860K
Intel Core i3-10100F
VS
Intel Core i7-3770
AMD A8-7680
VS
Intel Core I3-100F Intel Core i5-3470
Comparison of prices
cheaper
users reviews
General rating
AMD A8-7680
2 Reviews of Users
A8-7680 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000
004 2 reviews of users
Intel Core i3-10100f
4 Reviews of users
Intel Core i3-10100f
8.0 /10
4 Users
Functions
9000 10
2 Votes
8.8 /10
4 Votes
Games
5.5 /10
2 VOTES
8.3 /10
9000 4 VOTES
performance
5.
5 /10
2 Votes
/10
4 Votes
Reliability
8.0 9000
2 VOTES
9000.000 9000 9000 9,000 9000 9000 9000 9000.000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000
Energy efficiency
5.5 /10
2 Votes
8.5 /10
4 Votes
performance
Central processor speed
4 x 3.5GHz
4 x 3.6GHz
CPU speed indicates how many processing cycles per second the processor can perform, considering all its cores (processors). It is calculated by adding the clock speeds of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors, each group of cores.
processor thread
More threads result in better performance and better multitasking.
turbo clock speed
3.8GHz
4.3GHz
When the processor is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.
Has an unlocked multiplier
✔AMD A8-7680
✖Intel Core i3-10100F
Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier and can be easily overclocked for better performance in games and other applications.
L2 Cache
More L2 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
L3 cache
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A8-7680)
More L3 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
L1 cache
More L1 cache results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
L2 core
1MB/core
0.25MB/core
More data can be stored in L2 scratchpad for access by each processor core.
L3 core
Unknown. Help us offer a price.
(AMD A8-7680)
1.5MB/core
More data can be stored in the L3 scratchpad for access by each processor core.
Geotagging
PassMark result
This benchmark measures CPU performance using multithreading.
PassMark result (single)
This test measures processor performance using a thread of execution.
Geekbench 5 result (multi-core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A8-7680)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures multi-core processor performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2023)
Cinebench R20 result (multi-core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A8-7680)
Cinebench R20 is a benchmark that measures the performance of a multi-core processor by rendering a 3D scene.
Cinebench R20 result (single core)
Unknown.
Help us offer a price. (AMD A8-7680)
Cinebench R20 is a test to evaluate the performance of a single core processor when rendering a 3D scene.
Geekbench 5 result (single core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A8-7680)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures the single-core performance of a processor. (Source: Primate Labs, 2023)
Blender test result (bmw27)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A8-7680)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-10100F)
Blender benchmark (bmw27) measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.
Blender result (classroom)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A8-7680)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-10100F)
The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene.
More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.
performance per watt
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A8-7680)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-10100F)
This means that the processor is more efficient, giving more performance per watt of power used.
Integrated graphics
GPU clock speed
720MHz
∅
N/A
Graphics processing unit (GPU) has a higher clock speed.
turbo GPU
720MHz
∅
Not applicable
When the GPU is running below its limits, it may jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.
GPU Executors
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A8-7680)
∅
N/A
A graphics processing unit (GPU) with more execution units can provide better graphics.
monitor support
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A8-7680)
∅
N/A
By using multiple displays, you can increase your workspace, making it easier to work across multiple applications.
DirectX version
∅
N/A
DirectX is used in games with a new version that supports better graphics.
OpenGL version
∅
N/A
The newer the OpenGL version, the better the graphics in games.
OpenCL version
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-10100F)
Some applications use OpenCL to take advantage of graphics processing unit (GPU) power for non-graphical computing. Newer versions are more functional and better quality.
texture units (TMUs)
∅
N/A
TMUs take texture units and map them to the geometric location of the 3D scene.
More TMUs generally means texture information is processed faster.
ROPs
∅
N/A
ROPs are responsible for some of the final steps of the rendering process, such as writing the final pixel data to memory and for performing other tasks such as anti-aliasing to improve the appearance of graphics.
Memory
RAM speed
2133MHz
2666MHz
Can support faster memory which speeds up system performance.
maximum memory bandwidth
13.91GB/s
41.6GB/s
This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.
DDR version
DDR (Double Data Rate Synchronous Dynamic Random Access Memory) is the most common type of main memory. New versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy efficient.
memory channels
More memory channels increase the speed of data transfer between memory and processor.
maximum memory
Maximum memory (RAM).
bus baud rate
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A8-7680)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device.
Supports memory recovery code
✖AMD A8-7680
✖Intel Core i3-10100F
Memory error recovery code can detect and repair data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.
eMMC version
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A8-7680)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-10100F)
A newer version of eMMC — Built-in Flash Memory Card — speeds up the memory interface, has a positive effect on device performance, for example, when transferring files from a computer to internal memory via USB.
bus frequency
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A8-7680)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-10100F)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device
Functions
uses multi-threading
Intel’s Hyperthreading or AMD’s Simultaneous Multithreading provides better performance by dividing each physical processor core into logical cores, also known as threads. Thus, each core can run two instruction streams at the same time.
Has AES
✔AMD A8-7680
✔Intel Core i3-10100F
AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.
Has AVX
✔AMD A8-7680
✔Intel Core i3-10100F
AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial applications, and to improve the performance of the Linux RAID program.
version of SSE
SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing images or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.
Has F16C
✔AMD A8-7680
✔Intel Core i3-10100F
F16C is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting image contrast or adjusting volume.
bits transmitted at the same time
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A8-7680)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-10100F)
NEON provides faster media processing such as MP3 listening.
Has MMX
✔AMD A8-7680
✔Intel Core i3-10100F
MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting image contrast or adjusting volume.
Has TrustZone
✖AMD A8-7680
✖Intel Core i3-10100F
Technology is integrated into the processor to ensure device security when using features such as mobile payments and digital rights management (DRM) video streaming.
interface width
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A8-7680)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-10100F)
The processor can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), which means that the processor performs better
Price comparison
Which CPUs are better?
AMD A8-4500M vs Intel Core i3-1005G1
Intel Core i3-1005G1
AMD A8-4500M
VS
WINNER
Intel Core i3-1005G1
Rating: 9 points
AMD A8-4500M
Rating: 3 points
Test results
Technologies
Performance
Memory specification
Interfaces and communications
Top specifications and features
- PassMark CPU score
- PassMark CPU score
- Heat dissipation (TDP)
- Technological process
- Geekbench score 5
PassMark CPU score
Intel Core i3-1005G1: 5052
AMD A8-4500M: 1562
Cinebench21.
5 score (single) UBER
Intel Core i3-1005G1: 4
AMD A8-4500M: 2
Thermal Dissipation (TDP)
Intel Core i3-1005G1: 15 W
AMD A8-4500M: 35 W
Process technology
Intel Core i3-1005G1: 10 nm
AMD A8-4500M: 32 nm
Geekbench score 5
Intel Core i3-1005G1: 937.592
AMD A8-4500M:
Description
The Intel Core i3-1005G1 runs at 1.2Hz, the second AMD A8-4500M runs at 1.9Hz. Intel Core i3-1005G1 is capable of overclocking up to 3.4 Hz, and the second up to 2.8 Hz. The maximum power consumption of the first processor is 15W, while that of AMD A8-4500M is 35W.
Regarding the architecture, the Intel Core i3-1005G1 is based on 10nm technology. AMD A8-4500M on 32 nm architecture.
Regarding processor memory. Intel Core i3-1005G1 can support DDR4. The maximum supported volume is 64 MB.
It should be noted that the maximum memory bandwidth is 58.3. The second processor AMD A8-4500M is capable of supporting DDR No data. Throughput is No data. And the maximum amount of supported RAM is No data MB.
Graphics. The Intel Core i3-1005G1 has an Intel UHD graphics core. The frequency of which is — 300 MHz. AMD A8-4500M received the AMD Radeon HD 7640G video core. Here the frequency is 496 MHz.
How processors perform in benchmarks. In the PassMark benchmark, the Intel Core i3-1005G1 scored 5052. And the AMD A8-4500M scored 1562.
Why Intel Core i3-1005G1 is better than AMD A8-4500M
- PassMark CPU score 5052 vs 1562 , 223% higher
- Thermal Dissipation (TDP) 15 W vs 35 W, -57% less
- Process 10 nm vs 32 nm, -69% less
Comparison Intel Core i3-1005g1 and AMD A8-4500M: Main points
Intel Core i3-1005g1
A8-4500M
PASSMARK CPU CPUS CPUS CPUS CPUS write speed and seek time when testing SSD performance.
Show all
5052
max 89379
Average: 6033.5
1562
max 89379
Average: 6033.5
Geekbench 5 (Multi-Core)
1940.424
max 23628.202
Average: 5219.2
max 23628.202
Average: 5219.2
Geekbench score 5
937.592
max 1600.56
Average: 936.8
max 1600.56
Average: 936.8
3DMark06 score
5204
max 18628
Average: 3892.
6
2353
max 18628
Average: 3892.6
Cinebench R11.5 /64bit test score (Multi-Core)
4.2872
max 45.3622
Average: 5.3
1.6337
max 45.3622
Average: 5.3
Cinebench R15 score (Multi-Core)
384
max 4614
Average: 638.4
max 4614
Average: 638.4
Cinebench R15 score (Single-Core)
150
max 276
4
max 256
Average: 10.
7
4
max 256
Average: 10.7
L1 cache size
A large amount of L1 memory accelerates results in the CPU and system performance settings
Show all
160KB
max 4608
Average: 299.3 KB
192KB
max 4608
Average: 299.3 KB
L2 cache size
L2 cache with large scratchpad memory to increase processor speed and overall system performance.
Show all
1MB
max 512
Average: 4.5 MB
4MB
max 512
Average: 4.
5 MB
L3 cache size
A large amount of L3 memory accelerates results in the CPU and system performance settings
Show all
4MB
max 768
Average: 16.3 MB
MB
max 768
Average: 16.3 MB
Maximum Turbo Clock Speed
When the processor’s speed drops below its limit, it can jump to a higher clock speed to improve performance.
Show all
3.4GHz
max 5.5
Average: 3.2 GHz
2.8GHz
max 5.5
Average: 3.2 GHz
Number of cores
2
max 72
Mean: 5.
8
4
max 72
Mean: 5.8
CPU base clock
1.2GHz
max 4.7
Average: 2.5 GHz
1.9GHz
max 4.7
Average: 2.5 GHz
Idle States
Yes
N/A
Turbo Boost Technology
Turbo Boost is a technology that allows the processor to run at over its maximum frequency. This increases its productivity (including when performing complex tasks)
Show all
2
Mean: 1.9
Mean: 1.9
Max. graphics system frequency
0.
9GHz
max 1.55
Average: 1.1 GHz
GHz
max 1.55
Average: 1.1 GHz
Max. number of processors in the configuration
1
Mean: 1.3
1
Mean: 1.3
DDR version
4
Mean: 3.5
Mean: 3.5
Max. memory bandwidth
This is the speed at which the device stores or reads information.
58.3GB/s
max 352
Average: 41.4 GB/s
GB/s
max 352
Average: 41.
4 GB/s
Memory frequency
RAM can be faster to improve system performance.
Show all
3733MHz
max 4800
Average: 2106.2 MHz
MHz
max 4800
Average: 2106.2 MHz
Max. number of memory channels
The greater their number, the higher the data transfer rate from memory to processor
2
max 16
Mean: 2.9
max 16
Mean: 2.9
Max. memory size
Largest RAM memory.
64 GB
max 6000
Average: 404.
4 GB
GB
max 6000
Average: 404.4 GB
System bus frequency
Data between computer components and other devices is transferred via the bus.
Show all
4 GT/s
max 1600
Average: 156.1 GT/s
GT/s
max 1600
Average: 156.1 GT/s
ECC memory support
Memory debugging code is used when it is necessary to avoid data corruption in scientific computing or server startup. It finds possible errors and repairs data corruption.
Full text
No
No data
Max. resolution (DP)
5120 x [email protected]
n.
a.
vPro
n.a.
4.6
max 4.6
Average: 4.1
1.2
max 4.6
Average: 4.1
Intel® AES-NI Commands
AES is needed to speed up encryption and decryption.
Yes
Yes
Hyper-Threading Technology
Many Intel processors use state-of-the-art hyper-threading technology. Thus, each processor core works simultaneously on two threads, which significantly increases performance. Most processors work on the principle: one thread per core, therefore, their performance is lower.
Full text
Yes
No data
OpenGL
Later versions provide better game graphics
4.
5
max 4.6
Mean: 4.4
max 4.6
Mean: 4.4
AVX
AVX allows you to increase the speed of calculations in multimedia, financial and scientific applications, it also improves the performance of Linux RAID.
Show all
Yes
Yes
sse version
Allows you to speed up multimedia tasks (such as volume control). Each subsequent version has a number of improvements
Show all
4.2
max 4.2
Average: 4.1
4
max 4.2
Average: 4.1
Socket
FCBGA1526
FS1r2
Speed Shift 9
there is
No data
SGX
there is
No data
OS Guard
There are 9000
9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000
VT-X
there is
No data
EPT
There is
No data
Quick Sync Video
32 nm
Average: 36.
8 nm
Heat dissipation (TDP)
Heat dissipation requirement (TDP) is the maximum amount of energy that can be dissipated by the cooling system. The lower the TDP, the less power will be consumed.
Show all
15W
Average: 67.6 W
35W
Average: 67.6 W
PCI Express Edition
3
Mean: 2.9
Mean: 2.9
condition
Launched
No data
Release date
01.07.2019
Available options for built -in systems 908 9000
50mm x 25mm
n.a.0003
GPU base clock
The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a high clock speed.
300MHz
max 2400
Average: 535.8 MHz
496MHz
max 2400
Average: 535.8 MHz
Supports 64-bit system
A 64-bit system can support more than 4 GB of RAM, unlike a 32-bit system. This increases productivity. It also allows you to run 64-bit applications.
Show all
Yes
Yes
DirectX
Used in demanding games providing enhanced graphics
12
max 12.1
Average: 12
max 12.1
Average: 12
Maximum processor temperature
A reset may occur if the maximum temperature at which the processor operates is exceeded.
Show all
100°C
max 110
Average value: 96 °C
°C
max 110
Average value: 96 °C
OpenGL
Later versions provide better game graphics
4.5
max 4.6
Mean: 4.4
max 4.6
Mean: 4.4
Turbo GPU
If the speed of the GPU drops below its limit, then to improve performance, it can go to a high clock speed.
Show all
900MHz
max 2100
Average: 1091 MHz
685MHz
max 2100
Average: 1091 MHz
Monitor support
Multiple monitors can be connected to the device, making it easier to work by increasing the working space.
Show all
3
Mean: 2.9
4
Mean: 2.9
Codename
Ice Lake
Trinity
Purpose
Mobile
Laptop
FAQ
Can Intel Core i3-1005G1 and AMD A8-4500M work in 4K mode?
Intel Core i3-1005G1 — Not available. AMD A8-4500M — No data available.
How many PCIe lanes
Intel Core i3-1005G1 — Not available. AMD A8-4500M — No data available.
How much RAM is supported?
Intel Core i3-1005G1 supports 64 GB. AMD A8-4500M supports N/AGB.
How fast are processors?
Intel Core i3-1005G1 operates at 1.2 GHz.9 GHz.
How many cores does the processor have?
Intel Core i3-1005G1 has 2 cores. AMD A8-4500M has 4 cores.
Do the processors support ECC memory?
Intel Core i3-1005G1 — no.
AMD A8-4500M — No data available.
Does the Intel Core i3-1005G1 have integrated graphics?
Intel Core i3-1005G1 — UHD Intel. AMD A8-4500M — AMD Radeon HD 7640G
What RAM does the
support? Intel Core i3-1005G1 supports DDR4. AMD A8-4500M supports DDR No data available.
What is the socket of the processors?
FCBGA1526 is used to install the Intel Core i3-1005G1. FS1r2 is used to install AMD A8-4500M.
What architecture is used?
The Intel Core i3-1005G1 is based on the Ice Lake architecture. AMD A8-4500M is based on the Trinity architecture.
Is the multiplier unlocked on the Intel Core i3-1005G1 processor?
Intel Core i3-1005G1 — Not available. AMD A8-4500M — No data available.
How do processors perform in benchmarks?
According to PassMark, the Intel Core i3-1005G1 scored 5052 points. AMD A8-4500M scored 1562 points.
What is the maximum frequency of the processors?
The maximum frequency of the Intel Core i3-1005G1 reaches 3.