AMD Phenom II X4 965 vs Intel Core i7-3770: What is the difference?
25points
AMD Phenom II X4 965
46points
Intel Core i7-3770
Comparison winner
vs
66 facts in comparison
AMD Phenom II X4 965
Intel Core i7-3770
Why is AMD Phenom II X4 965 better than Intel Core i7-3770?
- 1MB bigger L2 cache?
2MBvs1MB - Has an unlocked multiplier?
- 256KB bigger L1 cache?
512KBvs256KB - 0.25MB/core more L2 cache per core?
0.5MB/corevs0.25MB/core
Why is Intel Core i7-3770 better than AMD Phenom II X4 965?
- 267MHz higher ram speed?
1600MHzvs1333MHz - 4 more CPU threads?
8vs4 - 23nm smaller semiconductor size?
22nmvs45nm - 2.2x higher PassMark result?
9460vs4306 - 48W lower TDP?
77Wvs125W - 2MB bigger L3 cache?
8MBvs6MB - 1 newer version of PCI Express (PCIe)?
3vs2 - Has integrated graphics?
Which are the most popular comparisons?
AMD Phenom II X4 965
vs
Intel Core i5-3470
Intel Core i7-3770
vs
Intel Core i5-3470
AMD Phenom II X4 965
vs
AMD Athlon II X2 270
Intel Core i7-3770
vs
Intel Core i5-6500
AMD Phenom II X4 965
vs
AMD FX-8350
Intel Core i7-3770
vs
Intel Core i7-3770K
AMD Phenom II X4 965
vs
Intel Core i5-3330
Intel Core i7-3770
vs
Intel Core i5-3570
AMD Phenom II X4 965
vs
AMD FX-6300
Intel Core i7-3770
vs
Intel Core i7-2600
AMD Phenom II X4 965
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
Intel Core i7-3770
vs
Intel Core i5-4570
AMD Phenom II X4 965
vs
Intel Core i3-3220
Intel Core i7-3770
vs
Intel Core i3-10100
AMD Phenom II X4 965
vs
AMD Athlon II X3 460
Intel Core i7-3770
vs
Intel Core i5-7400
AMD Phenom II X4 965
vs
Intel Core i5-2400
Intel Core i7-3770
vs
Intel Core i7-4770
AMD Phenom II X4 965
vs
AMD FX-4300
Intel Core i7-3770
vs
Intel Core i5-10400
Price comparison
User reviews
Overall Rating
AMD Phenom II X4 965
1 User reviews
AMD Phenom II X4 965
10. 0/10
1 User reviews
Intel Core i7-3770
4 User reviews
Intel Core i7-3770
8.8/10
4 User reviews
Features
Value for money
10.0/10
1 votes
8.3/10
4 votes
Gaming
10.0/10
1 votes
9.0/10
4 votes
Performance
10.0/10
1 votes
9.5/10
4 votes
Reliability
9.0/10
1 votes
10.0/10
4 votes
Energy efficiency
8.0/10
1 votes
8.3/10
4 votes
Performance
CPU speed
4 x 3.4GHz
4 x 3.4GHz
The CPU speed indicates how many processing cycles per second can be executed by a CPU, considering all of its cores (processing units). It is calculated by adding the clock rates of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors employing different microarchitectures, of each group of cores.
CPU threads
More threads result in faster performance and better multitasking.
turbo clock speed
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Phenom II X4 965)
3.9GHz
When the CPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased performance.
Has an unlocked multiplier
✔AMD Phenom II X4 965
✖Intel Core i7-3770
Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier which makes them easy to overclock, allowing you to gain increased performance in games and other apps.
L2 cache
A larger L2 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
L3 cache
A larger L3 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
L1 cache
A larger L1 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
L2 core
0.5MB/core
0.25MB/core
More data can be stored in the L2 cache for access by each core of the CPU.
L3 core
1.5MB/core
2MB/core
More data can be stored in the L3 cache for access by each core of the CPU.
Benchmarks
PassMark result
This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using multiple threads.
PassMark result (single)
This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using a single thread.
Geekbench 5 result (multi)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Phenom II X4 965)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s multi-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)
Cinebench R20 (multi) result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Phenom II X4 965)
Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s multi-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.
Cinebench R20 (single) result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Phenom II X4 965)
Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s single-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.
Geekbench 5 result (single)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Phenom II X4 965)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s single-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)
Blender (bmw27) result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Phenom II X4 965)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i7-3770)
The Blender (bmw27) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.
Blender (classroom) result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Phenom II X4 965)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i7-3770)
The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.
performance per watt
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Phenom II X4 965)
This means the CPU is more efficient, giving a greater amount of performance for each watt of power used.
Integrated graphics
GPU clock speed
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Phenom II X4 965)
650MHz
The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a higher clock speed.
GPU turbo
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Phenom II X4 965)
1150MHz
When the GPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased performance.
GPU execution units
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Phenom II X4 965)
A graphics processing unit (GPU) with a greater number of execution units can deliver better graphics.
supported displays
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Phenom II X4 965)
Using multiple displays you can create a larger workspace, making it easier to work across multiple apps.
DirectX version
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Phenom II X4 965)
DirectX is used in games, with newer versions supporting better graphics.
OpenGL version
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Phenom II X4 965)
OpenGL is used in games, with newer versions supporting better graphics.
OpenCL version
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Phenom II X4 965)
Some apps use OpenCL to apply the power of the graphics processing unit (GPU) for non-graphical computing. Newer versions introduce more functionality and better performance.
texture mapping units (TMUs)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Phenom II X4 965)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i7-3770)
TMUs take textures and map them to the geometry of a 3D scene. More TMUs will typically mean that texture information is processed faster.
render output units (ROPs)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Phenom II X4 965)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i7-3770)
The ROPs are responsible for some of the final steps of the rendering process, writing the final pixel data to memory and carrying out other tasks such as anti-aliasing to improve the look of graphics.
Memory
RAM speed
1333MHz
1600MHz
It can support faster memory, which will give quicker system performance.
maximum memory bandwidth
21. 3GB/s
25.6GB/s
This is the maximum rate that data can be read from or stored into memory.
DDR memory version
DDR (Double Data Rate) memory is the most common type of RAM. Newer versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy-efficient.
memory channels
More memory channels increases the speed of data transfer between the memory and the CPU.
maximum memory amount
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Phenom II X4 965)
The maximum amount of memory (RAM) supported.
bus transfer rate
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Phenom II X4 965)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.
Supports ECC memory
✖AMD Phenom II X4 965
✖Intel Core i7-3770
Error-correcting code memory can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when is it essential to avoid corruption, such as scientific computing or when running a server.
eMMC version
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Phenom II X4 965)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i7-3770)
A higher version of eMMC allows faster memory interfaces, having a positive effect on the performance of a device. For example, when transferring files from your computer to the internal storage over USB.
bus speed
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Phenom II X4 965)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i7-3770)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.
Features
uses multithreading
✖AMD Phenom II X4 965
✔Intel Core i7-3770
Multithreading technology (such as Intel’s Hyperthreading or AMD’s Simultaneous Multithreading) provides increased performance by splitting each of the processor’s physical cores into virtual cores, also known as threads. This way, each core can run two instruction streams at once.
Has AES
✖AMD Phenom II X4 965
✔Intel Core i7-3770
AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.
Has AVX
✖AMD Phenom II X4 965
✔Intel Core i7-3770
AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial apps, as well as improving Linux RAID software performance.
SSE version
SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing an image or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.
Has F16C
✖AMD Phenom II X4 965
✔Intel Core i7-3770
F16C is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.
bits executed at a time
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Phenom II X4 965)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i7-3770)
NEON provides acceleration for media processing, such as listening to MP3s.
Has MMX
✔AMD Phenom II X4 965
✔Intel Core i7-3770
MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.
Has TrustZone
✖AMD Phenom II X4 965
✖Intel Core i7-3770
A technology integrated into the processor to secure the device for use with features such as mobile payments and streaming video using digital rights management (DRM).
front-end width
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Phenom II X4 965)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i7-3770)
The CPU can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), meaning that the CPU performs better
Price comparison
Which are the best CPUs?
Intel Core i7 Vs. AMD Phenom II X6
Like it? Share it!
If you can’t make up your mind about which one to go for, the comparison between Intel core i7 980X and AMD Phenom II X6 processors, presented in this article, will simplify your job.
Both Intel and AMD have taken power computing to a whole new level, with the launch of six core processors, in the form of Phenom II X6 and the i7 980X. The battle between the two chip giants continues, with both developing new technologies, that boost the product performance beyond existing limits. While Intel seems to be ahead right now, due to the major technological improvements in chip processing, that have helped it deliver the fastest processors on the planet, AMD is not far behind and competes with its comparatively low prices.
Intel i7 and AMD Phenom II X6 Compared
What does one look for when comparing computer processors? One of the most important comparison parameters is the maximum clocking frequency achieved by them, which determines the speed with which they will process applications. Besides the clocking frequency, you should compare the number of cores made available in the processor, as it decides how many parallel programming threads are processed. More the cores, faster is the processor and better it is, at multitasking. If you are into overclocking of CPUs, the CPU multiplier, maximum operating voltage, and maximum operating temperature also matter. Memory bandwidth and L3 cache size also affects the performance speed.
Specifications | Intel Core i7 980X | AMD Phenom II X6 (1100T) |
Processor Clocking Frequency | 3.3 GHz (3.6 GHz With Turbo Boost) | 3.3 GHz (3.6 GHz with TurboCore) |
Number of Cores | 6 | 6 |
L3 Cache Size | 12 MB | 6 MB |
L2 Cache Size | 6 × 256 KB | 6 x 512 KB |
CPU Multiplier | 25X | 16X |
Voltage Range | 0.8-1.375 V | 1.0-1.475 V |
Maximum Temperature | 67.9° C | 62° C |
Power Output | 130 W | 125 W |
Lithography | 32 nm | 45 nm |
Maximum Memory Bandwidth | 25.![]() |
21 GB/s |
Price | USD 999.00 | USD 239.99 |
As the above numbers make it clear, in terms of specifications, the Intel core i7 980X is the best processor in the market today. The higher L3 cache size, higher memory bandwidth, along with the superior Intel Turbo Boost, as well as virtualization technologies at work, the core i7 980X is certainly superior to its AMD counterpart. However, as far as price is concerned, AMD is the clear winner, as its cost is almost one-fourth of the core i7 980X price. Clearly, the Intel product is designed for power users, who need high performance speeds.
Which one will you go for? The low cost alternative among the two is obviously AMD Phenom II X6, but it cannot match the performance speeds that the core i7 980X offers. However, as discussed before, the differences between the two processors will only be noticeable to high-end users, who are into high-end graphic intensive and simulation applications. I suggest that you go for the core i7 processor if you are into gaming and run heavy-duty applications that test processor performance to the limits.
Otherwise, the AMD Phenom II X6 is a great choice for the average user, who needs it for basic applications like word processing, web browsing, watching movies and listening to songs, while also serving the requirements of gamers and people into video editing. Phenom II X6 grants phenomenal computing power at low cost, which may be overkill for the average computer user. Still, if you are looking for raw and robust computing power at your disposal and don’t want to settle for anything less than the best, go for the Intel core i7 line.
IT Jobs
Get Updates Right to Your Inbox
Sign up to receive the latest and greatest articles from our site automatically each week (give or take)…right to your inbox.
Blog Updates
Email Address
*
0026 2MB vs 1MB
512KB vs 256KB

0.5MB/core vs 0.25MB/core
Why is Intel Core i7-3770K better than AMD Phenom II X4 965?
- 267MHz higher RAM speed?
1600MHz vs 1333MHz - 4 more CPU threads?
8 vs 4 - Semiconductors smaller than 23nm?
22nm vs 45nm - 49.88% higher PassMark score?
6454 vs 4306 - 48W below TDP?
77W vs 125W - 2MB more L3 cache?
8MB vs 6MB - 1 newer PCI Express (PCIe) version?
3 vs 2 - Has integrated graphics?
What are the most popular comparisons? nine0103
AMD Phenom II X4 965
VS
Intel Core i5-3470
Intel Core i7-3770K
VS
Intel Core i7-3770
AMD Phenom II 9000 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 270
Intel Core i7-3770k
VS
Intel Core i7-3770S
AMD Phenom II X4 965
VS
AMD FX-8350
I7-3770K
VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 10100
AMD Phenom II X4 965
VS
Intel Core i5-3330
Intel Core i7-3770K
VS
Intel Core i5-3470
AMD Phenom II X4
VS
9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000. 3770k
VS
Intel Core i5-3570K
AMD Phenom II X4 965
VS
AMD Ryzen 5 1600x
VS
Intel Core INTEL CORE INTEL CORE INTEL CORE INTEL CORE INTEL CORE INTEL CORE 965
vs
Intel Core i3-3220
Intel Core i7-3770k
VS
Intel Pentium Silver N5000
AMD Phenom II X4 965
VS
AMD AMD ATHA X3 460 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000.
Intel Core i7-2600K
AMD Phenom II X4 965
VS
Intel Core i5-2400
Intel Core i7-3770k
VS
AMD Ryzen 5 5600g
AMD Phenom II
AMD FX-4300
Intel Core i7-3770K
VS
Intel Core i5-3570
Costs
Reviews Users
AMD AMD Phenom II 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000) II X4 965
10.0 /10
1 reviews of users
Intel Core i7-3770k
1 Reviews of users
Intel Core i7-3770k
10. 0 /10 9
1 reviews of users
Functions
Price and quality ratio
10.0238 /10
1 Votes
/10
1 Votes
10.0 /10 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9
9.0 /10
1 votes
performance
10.0 /10
1 Votes
8.0 /10
1 Votes
Reliability
003
9.0 /10
1 votes
10.0 /10
1 Votes
Energy
8.0 /10
1 Votes
9000 9000 9000)
CPU speed
4 x 3.4GHz
4 x 3.5GHz
CPU speed indicates how many processing cycles per second a processor can perform, considering all its cores (processors). It is calculated by adding the clock speeds of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors, each group of cores. nine0003
processor thread
More threads result in better performance and better multitasking.
turbo clock speed
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Phenom II X4 965)
3.9GHz
When the processor is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.
Has an unlocked multiplier of
✔AMD Phenom II X4 965
✔Intel Core i7-3770K
Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier and are easier to overclock, allowing for better performance in games and other applications.
L2 Cache
More L2 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
L3 cache
More L3 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning. nine0003
L1 cache
More L1 cache results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
L2 core
0. 5MB/core
0.25MB/core
More data can be stored in L2 scratchpad for access by each processor core.
L3 core
1.5MB/core
2MB/core
More data can be stored in L3 scratchpad for access by each processor core. nine0003
Geotagging
PassMark result
This benchmark measures CPU performance using multithreading.
PassMark result (single)
This benchmark measures processor performance using a thread of execution.
Geekbench 5 result (multi-core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Phenom II X4 965)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures multi-core processor performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)
Cinebench R20 result (multi-core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Phenom II X4 965)
Cinebench R20 is a benchmark that measures multi-core processor performance by rendering a 3D scene.
Cinebench R20 result (single core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Phenom II X4 965)
Cinebench R20 is a test to evaluate the performance of a single core processor when rendering a 3D scene. nine0003
Geekbench 5 result (single core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Phenom II X4 965)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures the single-core performance of a processor. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)
Blender test result (bmw27)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Phenom II X4 965)
577.2seconds
The Blender benchmark (bmw27) measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time. nine0003
Blender (classroom) result
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Phenom II X4 965)
2186.2seconds
The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.
performance per watt
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Phenom II X4 965)
This means that the processor is more efficient, giving more performance per watt of power used. nine0003
Integrated graphics
GPU clock speed
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Phenom II X4 965)
650MHz
The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a higher clock speed.
Turbo GPU
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Phenom II X4 965)
1150MHz
When the GPU is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance. nine0003
GPU execution units
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Phenom II X4 965)
A graphics processing unit (GPU) with more execution units can provide better graphics.
monitor support
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Phenom II X4 965)
By using multiple displays, you can expand your workspace, making it easier to work across multiple applications.
DirectX version
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Phenom II X4 965)
DirectX is used in games with a new version that supports better graphics.
OpenGL version
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Phenom II X4 965)
The newer version of OpenGL, the better graphics quality in games.
OpenCL version
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Phenom II X4 965)
Some applications use OpenCL to use the graphics processing unit (GPU) for non-graphical computing. Newer versions are more functional and better quality.
texture units (TMUs)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Phenom II X4 965)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-3770K)
TMUs take texture units and map them to the geometric layout of the 3D scene. More TMUs generally means texture information is processed faster. nine0003
imaging units ROPs
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Phenom II X4 965)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-3770K)
ROPs are responsible for some of the final steps of the rendering process, such as writing the final pixel data to memory and for performing other tasks such as anti-aliasing to improve the appearance of graphics.
Memory
RAM speed
1333MHz
1600MHz
Can support faster memory which speeds up system performance.
maximum memory bandwidth
21.3GB/s
25.6GB/s
This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.
DDR memory version
DDR (Double Data Rate Synchronous Dynamic Random Access Memory) is the most common type of main memory. New versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy efficient. nine0003
memory channels
More memory channels increase the speed of data transfer between memory and processor.
maximum memory
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Phenom II X4 965)
Maximum amount of memory (RAM).
bus baud rate
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Phenom II X4 965)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device. nine0003
Supports memory debug code
✖AMD Phenom II X4 965
✖Intel Core i7-3770K
Memory debug code can detect and repair data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.
eMMC version
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Phenom II X4 965)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-3770K)
A newer version of eMMC — built-in flash memory card — speeds up the memory interface, has a positive effect on device performance, for example, when transferring files from a computer to internal memory via USB.
bus frequency
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Phenom II X4 965)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-3770K)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device
Features
uses multithreading
✖AMD Phenom II X4 965
✔Intel Core i7-3770K
processor into logical cores, also known as threads. Thus, each core can run two instruction streams at the same time.
Has AES
✖AMD Phenom II X4 965
✔Intel Core i7-3770K
AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.
Has AVX
✖AMD Phenom II X4 965
✔Intel Core i7-3770K
AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial applications, and to improve the performance of the Linux RAID program.
version of SSE
SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing images or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements. nine0003
Has F16C
✖AMD Phenom II X4 965
✔Intel Core i7-3770K
F16C is used to speed up tasks such as image contrast adjustment or volume control.
bits transmitted at the same time
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Phenom II X4 965)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-3770K)
NEON provides faster media processing such as MP3 listening. nine0003
Has MMX
✔AMD Phenom II X4 965
✔Intel Core i7-3770K
MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting image contrast or adjusting volume.
Has TrustZone
✖AMD Phenom II X4 965
✖Intel Core i7-3770K
Technology is integrated into the processor to ensure device security when using features such as mobile payments and video streaming through Digital Rights Management (DRM) . nine0003
interface width
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Phenom II X4 965)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-3770K)
The processor can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), which means the processor performs better
Price Comparison
Which CPU is better?
This page is currently only available in English.
Comparison of Intel Core i7-2600 and AMD Phenom II X4 945 (95W)
Comparative analysis of Intel Core i7-2600 and AMD Phenom II X4 945 (95W) processors by all known characteristics in the categories: General Information, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphical Interfaces, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security and Reliability, Technologies, Virtualization.
Analysis of processor performance by benchmarks: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
nine0003
Intel Core i7-2600
versus
AMD Phenom II X4 945 (95W)
Benefits
Reasons to choose Intel Core i7-2600
- Newer processor, 1 year(s) 9025 month(s) difference in release dates % more clock speed: 3.80 GHz vs 3 GHz
- Newer manufacturing process of the processor allows it to be more powerful, but with lower power consumption: 32 nm vs 45 nm
- Approximately 33% larger L3 cache means more data can be stored in it for quick access
- Approximately 82% more performance in Geekbench 4 — Single Core: 727 vs 399
- Performance in Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core benchmark 2 times more: 2727 vs 1333
- Approximately 23% more performance in CompuBench 1.
5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s): 4.393 vs 3.576
- Performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames) /s) 5.1 times more: 74.312 vs 14.5
- 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) benchmark: 0.54 vs 0.212
- 5.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) benchmark more: 2.109 vs 0.394
- Performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) about 22% more: 5.019 vs 4.125
Release date | January 2011 vs July 2009 |
Maximum frequency | 3.80 GHz vs 3 GHz |
Process | 32 nm vs 45 nm |
Level 3 cache | 8192 KB (shared) vs 6144 KB (shared) |
Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 727 vs 399 |
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 2727 vs 1333 |
CompuBench 1.![]() |
4.393 vs 3.576 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.54 vs 0.212 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) | 2.109 vs 0.394 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
Reasons to choose AMD Phenom II X4 945 (95W)
- 2x larger L1 cache means more data can be stored in it for quick access
- 2x larger L2 cache means more data can be stored in it for quick access
Level 1 cache | 128 KB (per core) vs 64 KB (per core) |
Level 2 cache | 512 KB (per core) vs 256 KB (per core) |
Benchmark comparison
CPU 1: Intel Core i7-2600
CPU 2: AMD Phenom II X4 945 (95W)
Geekbench 4 — Single Core |
|
||||
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core |
|
nine0688 | |||
CompuBench 1.![]() |
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
|||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | nine0684 | ||||
CPU 1 | |||||
CPU 2 |

CPU 1 |
CPU 2 |
nine0687
CPU 1 |
CPU 2 |
nine0691
Name | Intel Core i7-2600 | AMD Phenom II X4 945 (95W) |
---|---|---|
PassMark — Single thread mark | 1743 | |
PassMark — CPU mark | 5350 | |
Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 727 | 399 |
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 2727 | 1333 |
3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score | 3002 | |
CompuBench 1.![]() |
4.393 | 3.576 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 74.312 | 14.5 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.54 | 0.212 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) | 2.109 | 0.394 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 5.019 | 4.125 |
Performance comparison
Intel Core i7-2600 | AMD Phenom II X4 945 (95W) | |
---|---|---|
Architecture name | Sandy Bridge | Deneb |
Issue date | ||
Price at first issue date | $247 | |
Place in the rating | 1652 | 2653 |
Price now | ||
Processor Number | i7-2600 | |
Series | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors | |
Status | Launched | |
Price/performance ratio (0-100) | 16.20 | |
Applicability | Desktop | Desktop |
Support 64 bit | ||
Base frequency | 3.40 GHz | |
Bus Speed | 5 GT/s DMI | |
Crystal area | 216 mm | 258 mm |
Level 1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 128 KB (per core) |
Level 2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 512 KB (per core) |
Level 3 cache | 8192 KB (shared) | |
Process | 32nm | 45nm |
Maximum core temperature | 72.![]() |
|
Maximum frequency | 3.80 GHz | |
Number of cores | 4 | 4 |
Number of threads | 8 | |
Number of transistors | 1160 million | 758 million |
Maximum number of memory channels | 2 | |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 21 GB/s | |
Maximum memory size | 32GB | |
Supported memory types | DDR3 1066/1333 | DDR3 |
Device ID | 0x102 | |
Graphics base frequency | 850MHz | |
Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.![]() |
|
Maximum GPU clock | 1.35 GHz | |
Intel® Clear Video Technology HD | ||
Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | ||
Intel® InTru™ 3D Technology | ||
Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
Integrated graphics | Intel® HD Graphics 2000 | |
Maximum number of monitors supported | 2 | |
WiDi support | ||
Low Halogen Options Available | ||
Maximum number of processors in | 1 | 1 |
Package Size | 37.![]() |
|
Supported sockets | LGA1155 | AM3 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 95 Watt |
Number of PCI Express lanes | 16 | |
PCI Express revision | 2.0 | |
Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
Intel® Identity Protection Technology | ||
Intel® Trusted Execution Technology (TXT) | ||
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® Technology | ||
Flexible Display interface (FDI) | ||
Idle States | ||
Extended instructions | Intel® SSE4.![]() |