Intel i7 vs amd fx 9590: AMD FX-9590 vs Intel Core i7-7700K

AMD FX-9590 vs Intel Core i7-3770: What is the difference?

39points

AMD FX-9590

42points

Intel Core i7-3770

Comparison winner

vs

64 facts in comparison

AMD FX-9590

Intel Core i7-3770

Why is AMD FX-9590 better than Intel Core i7-3770?

• 2.76x faster CPU speed?
  8 x 4.7GHzvs4 x 3.4GHz
• 266MHz higher ram speed?
  1866MHzvs1600MHz
• 7MB bigger L2 cache?
  8MBvs1MB
• 11.36% higher PassMark result?
  10535vs9460
• 1.1GHz higher turbo clock speed?
  5GHzvs3.9GHz
• 128KB bigger L1 cache?
  384KBvs256KB
• Has an unlocked multiplier?
• 0.75MB/core more L2 cache per core?
  1MB/corevs0.25MB/core

Why is Intel Core i7-3770 better than AMD FX-9590?

• 48°C higher maximum operating temperature?
  105°Cvs57°C
• 10nm smaller semiconductor size?
  22nmvs32nm
• 143W lower TDP?
  77Wvs220W
• 1 newer version of PCI Express (PCIe)?
  3vs2
• Has integrated graphics?
• 4. 6GB/s more memory bandwidth?
  25.6GB/svs21GB/s
• 18.05% higher PassMark result (single)?
  2073vs1756
• 1MB/core more L3 cache per core?
  2MB/corevs1MB/core

Which are the most popular comparisons?

AMD FX-9590

vs

AMD FX-8350

Intel Core i7-3770

vs

Intel Core i5-3470

AMD FX-9590

vs

AMD Ryzen 3 3200G

Intel Core i7-3770

vs

Intel Core i5-3570

AMD FX-9590

vs

AMD Ryzen 5 3600

Intel Core i7-3770

vs

Intel Core i5-6500

AMD FX-9590

vs

AMD Ryzen 5 1600

Intel Core i7-3770

vs

Intel Core i7-2600

AMD FX-9590

vs

Intel Core i7-4790K

Intel Core i7-3770

vs

Intel Core i7-3770K

AMD FX-9590

vs

AMD Ryzen 5 5600G

Intel Core i7-3770

vs

Intel Core i7-3770S

AMD FX-9590

vs

AMD FX-6300

Intel Core i7-3770

vs

Intel Core i5-10400

AMD FX-9590

vs

AMD FX-9370

Intel Core i7-3770

vs

Intel Core i5-4570

AMD FX-9590

vs

AMD Ryzen 5 5600X

Intel Core i7-3770

vs

Intel Core i3-10100

AMD FX-9590

vs

AMD Ryzen 5 2600

Intel Core i7-3770

vs

Intel Core i5-7400

Price comparison

User reviews

Overall Rating

AMD FX-9590

1 User reviews

AMD FX-9590

10. 0/10

1 User reviews

Intel Core i7-3770

3 User reviews

Intel Core i7-3770

9.0/10

3 User reviews

Features

Value for money

10.0/10

1 votes

8.7/10

3 votes

Gaming

9.0/10

1 votes

9.0/10

3 votes

Performance

10.0/10

1 votes

10.0/10

3 votes

Reliability

10.0/10

1 votes

10.0/10

3 votes

Energy efficiency

3.0/10

1 votes

9.0/10

3 votes

Performance

1.CPU speed

8 x 4.7GHz

4 x 3.4GHz

The CPU speed indicates how many processing cycles per second can be executed by a CPU, considering all of its cores (processing units). It is calculated by adding the clock rates of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors employing different microarchitectures, of each group of cores.

2.CPU threads

More threads result in faster performance and better multitasking.

3.turbo clock speed

3.9GHz

When the CPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased performance.

4.Has an unlocked multiplier

✔AMD FX-9590

✖Intel Core i7-3770

Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier which makes them easy to overclock, allowing you to gain increased performance in games and other apps.

5.L2 cache

A larger L2 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.

6.L3 cache

A larger L3 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.

7.L1 cache

A larger L1 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.

8. L2 core

1MB/core

0.25MB/core

More data can be stored in the L2 cache for access by each core of the CPU.

9.L3 core

1MB/core

2MB/core

More data can be stored in the L3 cache for access by each core of the CPU.

Memory

1.RAM speed

1866MHz

1600MHz

It can support faster memory, which will give quicker system performance.

2.maximum memory bandwidth

21GB/s

25.6GB/s

This is the maximum rate that data can be read from or stored into memory.

3.DDR memory version

DDR (Double Data Rate) memory is the most common type of RAM. Newer versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy-efficient.

4.memory channels

More memory channels increases the speed of data transfer between the memory and the CPU.

5. maximum memory amount

The maximum amount of memory (RAM) supported.

6.bus transfer rate

5.4GT/s

The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.

7.Supports ECC memory

✖AMD FX-9590

✖Intel Core i7-3770

Error-correcting code memory can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when is it essential to avoid corruption, such as scientific computing or when running a server.

8.eMMC version

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD FX-9590)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i7-3770)

A higher version of eMMC allows faster memory interfaces, having a positive effect on the performance of a device. For example, when transferring files from your computer to the internal storage over USB.

9.bus speed

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD FX-9590)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i7-3770)

The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.

Benchmarks

1.PassMark result

This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using multiple threads.

2.PassMark result (single)

This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using a single thread.

3.Geekbench 5 result (multi)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD FX-9590)

Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s multi-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)

4.Cinebench R20 (multi) result

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD FX-9590)

Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s multi-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.

5. Cinebench R20 (single) result

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD FX-9590)

Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s single-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.

6.Geekbench 5 result (single)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD FX-9590)

Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s single-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)

7.Blender (bmw27) result

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD FX-9590)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i7-3770)

The Blender (bmw27) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.

8.Blender (classroom) result

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD FX-9590)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i7-3770)

The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.

9.performance per watt

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD FX-9590)

This means the CPU is more efficient, giving a greater amount of performance for each watt of power used.

Features

1.uses multithreading

✖AMD FX-9590

✔Intel Core i7-3770

Multithreading technology (such as Intel’s Hyperthreading or AMD’s Simultaneous Multithreading) provides increased performance by splitting each of the processor’s physical cores into virtual cores, also known as threads. This way, each core can run two instruction streams at once.

2.Has AES

✔AMD FX-9590

✔Intel Core i7-3770

AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.

3.Has AVX

✔AMD FX-9590

✔Intel Core i7-3770

AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial apps, as well as improving Linux RAID software performance.

4.SSE version

SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing an image or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.

5.Has F16C

✔AMD FX-9590

✔Intel Core i7-3770

F16C is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.

6.bits executed at a time

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD FX-9590)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i7-3770)

NEON provides acceleration for media processing, such as listening to MP3s.

7.Has MMX

✔AMD FX-9590

✔Intel Core i7-3770

MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.

8.Has TrustZone

✖AMD FX-9590

✖Intel Core i7-3770

A technology integrated into the processor to secure the device for use with features such as mobile payments and streaming video using digital rights management (DRM).

9.front-end width

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD FX-9590)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i7-3770)

The CPU can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), meaning that the CPU performs better

Price comparison

Cancel

Which are the best CPUs?

Core i7-11800H vs FX-9590 — How Many FPS

Availability

No items available

Availability

AMD FD9590FHHKWOF FX-9590 8-core 4.7 GHz Socket AM3+ 220W Black Edition Desktop Processor

Buy on Amazon

$344.04

In Stock

Updated 20 minutes ago

Key Differences

In short — Core i7-11800H outperforms FX-9590 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-11800H is 2866 days newer than FX-9590.

Advantages of Intel Core i7-11800H

• Performs up to 38% better in Grand Theft Auto V than FX-9590 — 293 vs 213 FPS

• Consumes up to 80% less energy than AMD FX-9590 — 45 vs 220 Watts

• Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-9590 doesn’t have integrated graphics

Grand Theft Auto V

Resolution

1920×1080

Game Graphics

High

Core i7-11800H

Mobile • May 11th, 2021

---

FPS

293

100%

Value, $/FPS

Price, $

FPS Winner

FX-9590

Desktop • Jul 6th, 2013

---

FPS

213

62%

Value, $/FPS

$1. 62/FPS

100%

Price, $

$344.04

100%

Value Winner

AMD FD9590FHHKWOF FX-9590 8-core 4.7 GHz Socket AM3+ 220W Black Edition Desktop Processor

Buy for $344.04 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 20 minutes ago

Resolution

1920×1080

Game Graphics

High

Core i7-11800H

Mobile • May 11th, 2021

FX-9590

Desktop • Jul 6th, 2013

293

FPS

213

FPS

Grand Theft Auto V

510

FPS

372

FPS

VALORANT

322

FPS

229

FPS

Apex Legends

1163

FPS

864

FPS

League of Legends

315

FPS

231

FPS

Fortnite

Geekbench 5 Benchmarks

Core i7-11800H

Mobile • May 11th, 2021

---

Single-Core

1467

100%

Multi-Core

7920

100%

FX-9590

Desktop • Jul 6th, 2013

---

Single-Core

641

-29%

Multi-Core

3131

-53%

Intel Core i7-11800H	vs	AMD FX-9590
May 11th, 2021	Release Date	Jul 6th, 2013
Core i7	Collection	FX
Tiger Lake	Codename	Vishera
Intel BGA 1499	Socket	AMD Socket AM3+
Mobile	Segment	Desktop
8	Cores	8
16	Threads	8
2. 3 GHz	Base Clock Speed	4.7 GHz
4.6 GHz	Turbo Clock Speed	5.0 GHz
45 W	TDP	220 W
10 nm	Process Size	32 nm
23.0x	Multiplier	23.5x
UHD Graphics 750	Integrated Graphics	None
No	Overclockable	Yes

Builds Using Core i7-11800H or FX-9590

Grand Theft Auto V, 1080p, High

Acer Predator Triton 300 15.6″ FHD 144Hz Gaming Notebook

149 FPS

$6.03/FPS

GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile

Core i7-11800H

16 GB, 512 GB SSD

Buy on Amazon

$899

In Stock

Updated 20 minutes ago

Omen 17 Gaming Laptop

194 FPS

$6.69/FPS

GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile

Core i7-11800H

16 GB, 512 GB SSD

Buy on Amazon

$1,298

In Stock

Updated 18 minutes ago

MSI Pulse GL66 Gaming Laptop

194 FPS

$6. 7/FPS

GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile

Core i7-11800H

16 GB, 512 GB SSD

Buy on Amazon

$1,300

In Stock

Updated 20 minutes ago

GIGABYTE AORUS 15P XD — 15.6″ FHD IPS Anti-Glare 240Hz, Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop

194 FPS

$7.21/FPS

GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile

Core i7-11800H

16 GB, 1 TB SSD

Buy on Amazon

$1,398

In Stock

Updated 18 minutes ago

MSI GL66 15.6″ 144Hz FHD Premium Gaming Laptop

194 FPS

$7.38/FPS

GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile

Core i7-11800H

16 GB, N/A Storage

Buy on Amazon

$1,432.05

In Stock

Updated 16 minutes ago

Latest Lenovo Legion 7i Gen 6 Gaming Laptop

194 FPS

$7.42/FPS

GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile

Core i7-11800H

32 GB, 1 TB SSD

Buy on Amazon

$1,440.07

In Stock

Updated 18 minutes ago

Acer Predator Helios 300 Ph415-54-74FG 15. 6″ Full HD 144Hz Gaming Notebook

194 FPS

$7.47/FPS

GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile

Core i7-11800H

16 GB, 512 GB SSD + 1 TB HDD

Buy on Amazon

$1,449.99

In Stock

Updated 15 minutes ago

MSI Crosshair15 15.6″ 144Hz 3ms FHD Gaming Laptop

149 FPS

$7.66/FPS

GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile

Core i7-11800H

16 GB, 512 GB SSD

Buy on Amazon

$1,140.7

In Stock

Updated 18 minutes ago

Acer Predator Triton 300 Gaming Laptop

194 FPS

$7.7/FPS

GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile

Core i7-11800H

16 GB, 512 GB SSD

Buy on Amazon

$1,494.72

In Stock

Updated 16 minutes ago

Acer Predator Triton 300 15 Gaming Laptop

149 FPS

$7.71/FPS

GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile

Core i7-11800H

16 GB, 512 GB SSD

Buy on Amazon

$1,149

In Stock

Updated 16 minutes ago

Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Core i7-11370H

N/A Stock

Core i7-11800H

N/A Stock

Core i7-11800H

N/A Stock

Core i5-11400H

N/A Stock

Core i7-11800H

N/A Stock

Ryzen 7 5800H

N/A Stock

Core i7-11800H

N/A Stock

Ryzen 9 5900HX

N/A Stock

E-240

N/A Stock

Core i7-11800H

N/A Stock

Core i7-11800H

N/A Stock

Xeon W-2135

N/A Stock

Core i7-11800H

N/A Stock

A8-6500B

N/A Stock

Core i7-11800H

N/A Stock

Core i7-11375H

N/A Stock

Core i7-11800H

N/A Stock

FX-8310

N/A Stock

AMD FX-9590 vs Intel Core i7-4790K

Summary

• AMD FX-9590

  100%

• Intel Core i7-4790K

  139%

Relative performance

• AMD FX-9590

  100%

• Intel Core i7-4790K

  161%

Relative performance

• AMD FX-9590

  100%

• Intel Core i7-4790K

  124%

Relative performance

Reasons to consider AMD FX-9590

None

Reasons to consider Intel Core i7-4790K

Much higher single threaded performance (around 61% higher), makes a noticeable performance difference in gaming and the majority of applications.

Much higher multi threaded performance (around 24% higher). This allows for higher performance in professional applications like encoding or heavy multitasking.

132 watts lower power draw.

Has an integrated GPU, which allows to run the system without a dedicated graphics card, unlike the AMD FX-9590.

Around 39% higher average synthetic performance.

---

Gaming

HWBench recommends Intel Core i7-4790K

Based on game and synthetic benchmarks, and theoretical specifications.

---

Productivity

HWBench recommends Intel Core i7-4790K

Based on productivity benchmarks, overall multithreaded performance and theoretical specifications.

Features

AMD FX-9590			Intel Core i7-4790K
MMX
SSE
SSE2
SSE3
SSSE3
SSE4. 1
SSE4.2
SSE4a
AMD64
AMD-V
AES
AVX
CLMUL
CVT16
EVP
FMA4
XOP
Turbo Core
HT3.1
AVX2
EIST
Intel 64
XD bit
VT-x
VT-d
HTT
AES-NI
TSX
TXT
FMA3
F16C
BMI1
BMI2
Boost 2. 0

Architecture

	AMD FX-9590		Intel Core i7-4790K
Architecture	AMD Piledriver	vs	Intel_Haswell
Market	Desktop	vs	Desktop
Memory Support	DDR3	vs	DDR3
Codename	Vishera	vs	Haswell
Release Date	Jul 2013	vs	May 2014

Cores

	AMD FX-9590		Intel Core i7-4790K
Cores	8	vs	4
Threads	8	vs	8
SMPs	1	vs	1
Integrated Graphics	No	vs	Intel HD 4600

Cache

	AMD FX-9590		Intel Core i7-4790K
L1 Cache	384 KB	vs	64 KB (per core)
L2 Cache	8192 KB	vs	256 KB (per core)
L3 Cache	8192 KB (shared)	vs	8192 KB (shared)

Physical

	AMD FX-9590		Intel Core i7-4790K
Socket	AMD Socket AM3+	vs	Intel Socket 1150
Max Case Temp	unknown	vs	72°C
Package	uPGA	vs
Die Size	315mm²	vs	177mm²
Process	32 nm	vs	22 nm

Performance

	AMD FX-9590		Intel Core i7-4790K
Cpu Frequency	4700 MHz	vs	4000 MHz
Turbo Clock	5000 MHz	vs	4400 MHz
Base Clock	200 MHz	vs	100 MHz
Voltage	1. 912 V	vs	unknown
TDP	220 W	vs	88 W

• AMD FX-9590

  3050 points

• Intel Core i7-4790K

  4928 points

Points — higher is better

• AMD FX-9590

  18807 points

• Intel Core i7-4790K

  21504 points

Points — higher is better

• AMD FX-9590

  12929

• Intel Core i7-4790K

  15488

points — higher is better

• AMD FX-9590

  2686

• Intel Core i7-4790K

  4442

points — higher is better

• AMD FX-9590

  13605

• Intel Core i7-4790K

  17114

points — higher is better

• AMD FX-9590

  2500

• Intel Core i7-4790K

  4016

points — higher is better

• AMD FX-9590

  1702

• Intel Core i7-4790K

  1807

points per second — higher is better

• AMD FX-9590

  26893

• Intel Core i7-4790K

  25285

MIPS — higher is better

• AMD FX-9590

  84. 21

• Intel Core i7-4790K

  145.67

points — higher is better

• AMD FX-9590

  455.77

• Intel Core i7-4790K

  831.12

points — higher is better

• AMD FX-9590

  717

• Intel Core i7-4790K

  846

points — higher is better

points — higher is better

	VS
AMD FX-9590		AMD Ryzen 7 4700U

	VS
AMD FX-9590		AMD Ryzen 5 4600U

	VS
Intel Core i7-4790K		AMD Ryzen 3 4300GE

	VS
Intel Core i7-4790K		AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE

	VS
AMD Ryzen 3 5300G		Intel Core i5-11400

	VS
Intel Core i5-11400		Intel Core i5-11500

Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.

AMD FX-9590 vs Intel Core i7-860

AMD FX-9590 vs Intel Core i7-860

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the AMD FX-9590 on one side and the Intel Core i7-860 on the other side. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, It has 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximum frequency of 5,0GHz. The second is used on the desktop segment, it has a total of 4 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 3,5 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values ​​obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.

Specifications:

Processor		AMD FX-9590				Intel Core i7-860
Market (main)		Desktop				Desktop
ISA		x86-64 (64 bit)				x86-64 (64 bit)
Microarchitecture		Piledriver				Nehalem
Core name		Vishera				Lynnfield
Family		FX-9000				Core i7-800
Part number(s), S-Spec		FD9590FHW8KHK, FD9590FHHKWOF, FD9590FHHKWOX, FX-9590 Black Edition				BX80605I7860, BXC80605I7860, BV80605001908AK, Q3AL, SLBJJ
Release date		Q2 2013				Q3 2009
Lithography		32 nm SOI				45 nm
Transistors		1. 200.000.000				774.000.000
Cores		8				4
Threads		8				8
Base frequency		4,7 GHz				2,8 GHz
Turbo frequency		5,0 GHz				3,5 GHz
Cache memory		8 MB				8 MB
Max memory capacity		32 GB				16 GB
Memory types		DDR3-1866				DDR3 1066/1333
Max # of memory channels		2				2
Max memory bandwidth		29,9 GB/s				21 GB/s
Max PCIe lanes		32				16
TDP		220 W				95 W
Suggested PSU		750W ATX Power Supply				600W ATX Power Supply
GPU integrated graphics		None				None
Socket		AM3+				LGA1156
Compatible motherboard		Socket AM3+ Motherboard				Socket LGA 1156 Motherboard
Maximum temperature		57°C				72. 7°C
CPU-Z single thread		262				229
CPU-Z multi thread		1.772				1.273
Cinebench R15 single thread		110				97
Cinebench R15 multi-thread		730				549
Cinebench R23 single thread		554				530
Cinebench R23 multi-thread		3.824				2.452
PassMark single thread		1.831				1.310
PassMark CPU Mark		6.762				2. 851
(Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 single core		2.907				2.513
(Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 multi-core		11.922				8.111
(SGEMM) GFLOPS performance		91,52 GFLOPS				64,6 GFLOPS
(Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio		54 pts / W				85 pts / W
Amazon
eBay

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.

Suggested PSU: We assume that we have An ATX computer case, a high end graphics card, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, a 1TB HDD hard drive, a Blu-Ray drive. We will have to rely on a more powerful power supply if we want to have several graphics cards, several monitors, more memory, etc.

Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

The processor AMD FX-9590 has more cores, the maximum frequency of AMD FX-9590 is greater, that the thermal dissipation power of Intel Core i7-860 is less. The AMD FX-9590 was designed earlier.

Performances :

Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.

	CPU-Z — Multi-thread & single thread score
AMD FX-9590	262 1. 772
Intel Core i7-860	229 1.273

In single core, the difference is 14%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 39%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.

	Cinebench R15 — Multi-thread & single thread score
AMD FX-9590	110 730
Intel Core i7-860	97 549

In single core, the difference is 13%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 33%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.

	Cinebench R23 — Multi-thread & single thread score
AMD FX-9590	554 3.824
Intel Core i7-860	530 2.452

In single core, the difference is 5%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 56%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Cinebench R23 is cross-platform testing software that allows you to assess the hardware capabilities of a device such as a computer, tablet, server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant. The test scene contains no less than 2,000 objects and more than 300,000 polygons in total.

	PassMark — CPU Mark & single thread
AMD FX-9590	1.831 6.762
Intel Core i7-860	1.310 2.851

In single core, the difference is 40%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 137%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.

On Windows 64-bit:

	Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows 64-bit
AMD FX-9590	2.907 11.922
Intel Core i7-860	2.513 8.111

In single core, the difference is 16%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 47%.

On Linux 64-bit:

	Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux 64-bit
AMD FX-9590	2.863 10.935
Intel Core i7-860	2.771 7.423

In single core, the difference is 3%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 47%.

On Mac OS X 64-bit:

	Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Mac OS X 64-bit
AMD FX-9590	2.866 12.820
Intel Core i7-860	2.312 7.485

In single core, the difference is 24%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 71%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.

Equivalence:

AMD FX-9590 Intel equivalentIntel Core i7-860 AMD equivalent

See also:

Intel Core i7-8650UIntel Core i7-8665U

Intel Core i7-8700T vs AMD FX-9590

Comparative analysis of Intel Core i7-8700T and AMD FX-9590 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics image quality, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization.
Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score, GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

Intel Core i7-8700T

Buy on Amazon

vs

AMD FX-9590

Buy on Amazon

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Core i7-8700T

• CPU is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 9 month(s) later
• 4 more threads: 12 vs 8
• Around 75% higher maximum core temperature: 100°C vs 57°C
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 14 nm vs 32 nm SOI
• Around 50% more L3 cache; more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later
• 6. 3x lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 220 Watt
• Around 27% better performance in PassMark — Single thread mark: 2325 vs 1829
• Around 52% better performance in PassMark — CPU mark: 10337 vs 6797
• Around 67% better performance in Geekbench 4 — Single Core: 1054 vs 633
• Around 64% better performance in Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core: 4983 vs 3042
• 2x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score: 6753 vs 3336

Launch date	April 2018 vs July 2013
Number of threads	12 vs 8
Maximum core temperature	100°C vs 57°C
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 32 nm SOI
L3 cache	12288 KB (shared) vs 8 MB
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	35 Watt vs 220 Watt
PassMark — Single thread mark	2325 vs 1829
PassMark — CPU mark	10337 vs 6797
Geekbench 4 — Single Core	1054 vs 633
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core	4983 vs 3042
3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score	6753 vs 3336

Reasons to consider the AMD FX-9590

• Processor is unlocked, an unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
• 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 8 vs 6
• Around 25% higher clock speed: 5 GHz vs 4. 00 GHz
• 5.3x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later

Unlocked	Unlocked vs Locked
Number of cores	8 vs 6
Maximum frequency	5 GHz vs 4.00 GHz
L2 cache	8 MB vs 256 KB (per core)

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: Intel Core i7-8700T
CPU 2: AMD FX-9590

PassMark — Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2
PassMark — CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2
Geekbench 4 — Single Core	CPU 1 CPU 2
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core	CPU 1 CPU 2
3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score	CPU 1 CPU 2

Name	Intel Core i7-8700T	AMD FX-9590
PassMark — Single thread mark	2325	1829
PassMark — CPU mark	10337	6797
Geekbench 4 — Single Core	1054	633
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core	4983	3042
3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score	6753	3336
GFXBench 4. 0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1797
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames)	5227
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames)	7864
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1797
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps)	5227
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps)	7864
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s)		10. 765
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		25.735
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s)		0.45
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s)		1.418
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		8.59

Compare specifications (specs)

	Intel Core i7-8700T	AMD FX-9590
Architecture codename	Coffee Lake	Vishera
Launch date	April 2018	July 2013
Place in performance rating	283	1593
Price now	$429	$99. 99
Processor Number	i7-8700T
Series	8th Generation Intel® Core™ i7 Processors	AMD FX 8-Core Black Edition Processors
Status	Launched
Value for money (0-100)	8.58	30.03
Vertical segment	Desktop	Desktop
Family		AMD FX-Series Processors
OPN PIB		FD9590FHHKWOF
OPN Tray		FD9590FHW8KHK
64 bit support
Base frequency	2. 40 GHz	4.7 GHz
Bus Speed	8 GT/s DMI3
L1 cache	64 KB (per core)	384 KB
L2 cache	256 KB (per core)	8 MB
L3 cache	12288 KB (shared)	8 MB
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	32 nm SOI
Maximum case temperature (TCase)	72 °C
Maximum core temperature	100°C	57°C
Maximum frequency	4. 00 GHz	5 GHz
Number of cores	6	8
Number of threads	12	8
Die size		315 mm
P0 Vcore voltage		Min: 1.375 V — Max: 1.5375 V
Transistor count		1200 million
Unlocked
Max memory channels	2
Maximum memory bandwidth	41. 6 GB/s
Maximum memory size	128 GB
Supported memory types	DDR4-2666	DDR3
Supported memory frequency		1866 MHz
Device ID	0x3E92
Graphics base frequency	350 MHz
Graphics max dynamic frequency	1.20 GHz
Intel® Clear Video HD technology
Intel® Clear Video technology
Intel® InTru™ 3D technology
Intel® Quick Sync Video
Max video memory	64 GB
Processor graphics	Intel® UHD Graphics 630
Number of displays supported	3
4K resolution support
Max resolution over DisplayPort	[email protected]
Max resolution over eDP	[email protected]
Max resolution over HDMI 1. 4	[email protected]
DirectX	12
OpenGL	4.5
Configurable TDP-down	25 W
Configurable TDP-down Frequency	1.90 GHz
Low Halogen Options Available
Max number of CPUs in a configuration	1	1
Package Size	37. 5mm x 37.5mm
Sockets supported	FCLGA1151	AM3+
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	35 Watt	220 Watt
Thermal Solution	PCG 2015A (35W)
Max number of PCIe lanes	16
PCI Express revision	3.0	n / a
PCIe configurations	Up to 1×16, 2×8, 1×8+2×4
Scalability	1S Only
Execute Disable Bit (EDB)
Intel® Identity Protection technology
Intel® Memory Protection Extensions (Intel® MPX)
Intel® OS Guard
Intel® Secure Key technology
Intel® Software Guard Extensions (Intel® SGX)
Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT)
Secure Boot
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology
Idle States
Instruction set extensions	Intel® SSE4. 1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
Intel 64
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX)
Intel® AES New Instructions
Intel® Hyper-Threading technology
Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported
Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP)
Intel® TSX-NI
Intel® Turbo Boost technology
Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility
Thermal Monitoring
Fused Multiply-Add (FMA)
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x)
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d)
Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT)
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™)

AMD FX 9590 vs Intel i7 4770K ~ Computers and More

Vishvesh Mishra
 Gaming PC, PC Assembly, processors
 4 comments

Recently at E3 AMD launched its latest and the world’s fastest processor the AMD FX 9590 which is a clock beast with a base frequency of 5ghz, the highest score achieved by any processor built so far! Its still based on Vishera Piledriver architecture but has definitely brought its competitors on their heels and giving them a run for their money, as the AMD FX 9590 is the first commercially available 5GHz CPU.

This took the Computer industry by storm leaving the enthusiast Gamers scratching their heads to which one to go for for better performance as the recent advent of games like Crysis3 that sucked out all the cores available by a processor created a demand for drastic improvements in many people’s rigs.
The answer to this from Intel has been nothing leaving the only worthy competitor to the 9590, the Intel i7 4770K. Why are we comparing these:

• The Intel i7 4770K is the only main stream top notch desktop processor from Intel that can be put up against the AMD FX 9590 as the Intel 3960X is not something that you can use on a dialy basis leave alone the Xeon series.
• Where AMD has not worked on the their typical high power consumption areas and answered with a very high clock speed, Intel with its still the latest 4770K has focused on lower power consumption and improved graphics.
• Last the Intel i7 4770K is the only processor that AMD could not beat in performance with the Bulldozer or the Piledriver series top level processors, even the FX 8350 could only beat it in some fields and not came out a clear winner with its whooping 8-cores! So the AMD FX 9590 maybe the final answer.

So lets take a closer look to these pentacle of processing technology and see that which one is the best for you. 

These are the latest stats releases by the companies respectively, you can clearly see that the AMD FX 9590 is a heck more powerful processor than the Intel i7 4770K but but but…..hold on did you notice the TDp of the 9590 its a gargantuan 220WTDP!! thats a hell lot of electricity consumed. I’ll get back o that later in this article but lets just take a deeper look into the other specifications of these hardwares.

Advantages of AMD FX 9590:

• More CPU cores on the AMD FX-9590 help to process multiple tasks or heavily multi-threaded programs.
• Operating frequency of the FX-9590 microprocessor is higher than the frequency of the Core i7-4770K CPU.
• FMA4 and XOP instructions are enabled on this microprocessor. These
  extensions are not widely used by applications yet, however their
  support should improve in future programs.

Advantages of Intel i7 4770K:

• The Core i7-4770K includes AVX2 instructions, that were introduced
  in modern CPUs not too far ago. These extensions are not broadly used in
  applications yet, but this should improve in future apps.
• The processor features on-chip HD 4600 GPU. This graphics is not
  powerful enough to run latest games with all settings on, however it can
  be used for casual gaming and 3D applications.
• The i7-4770K is 62% more energy efficient.

My Verdict:

I guess there is very less left to say now, the price of the FX9590 is way above then that of i7 4770K, the market experts say that it would come down but as of now it is over-priced plus the magnanimous power demands of the 9590 makes it another sore in the eyes. I mean be honest for a 220W TDP processor you will not only have to have a minimum of 750W PSU but also a very good cooling system if not the expensive liquid coolers, making it another add on expense for those who reply on gaming performance from just a good CPU and  GPU with not a fortune to spend on other stuff like big PSUs and Liquid Coolers.
There are rumors that as the new gen gaming consoles like the PS4 and Xbox One have AMD Jaguar processors along with AMD Radeon GPUs inside it will favor the AMD side of hardwares more but thats a total misconception as console games are differently built and are re-built for PCs again so its just talks and no fact. Although AMD has been quite a lot active in bringing in ‘custom supports’ from big gaming titles like Battlefield 4 etc but that doesn’t mean that you buy a processor that may require you to rob a bank for!
I say that we should wait and for all those who want to buy a AMD processor can go for the AMD FX 8350 which is just 19% slower than the FX 9590 but 76% energy efficient, and obviouly a hell lot cheaper than not only the 9590 but even the i7 4770K, making it the best choice so far, even it can beat the i7 in many places including games courtesy to its superior architecture and octa-core structure. Its future proof as its on the same AM3+ socket type that will be supported by the upcoming Steam-roller series as well as the Excavator series hopefully.
If you are not a hardcore AMD fan and have a good budget then definitely go for the Intel i7 4770K as its not only energy efficient but requires you to spend less on cooling features etc saving you money for other hardwares like a good GPU and Mobo. Not only this but the mere advantage that the 9590 has of a superior processing power over the 4770K is nullified by the fact that most applications don’t need that much of a processing power and you only need to be a lunatic to take your processor up there!

So that was all that I’d to say for now, I’ll keep updating this article as and when any new development takes place on the AMD side. If you have any more points to add please leave a comment and feel free to ask anything regarding the same.

Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

AMD FX-9590 vs Intel Core i7-4770K: What is the difference?

39 BALLLA

AMD FX-9590

49 BALLLA

Intel Core i7-4770K

Winter when comparing

VS

64 Facts compared to

AMD FX-9590

9000 Is FX-9590 better than Intel Core i7-4770K?

• 2. 69x higher CPU speed?
  8 x 4.7GHz vs 4 x 3.5GHz
• 266MHz higher RAM speed?
  1866MHz vs 1600MHz
• 7MB more L2 cache?
  8MB vs 1MB
• 49.6% higher PassMark score?
  10535 vs 7042
• 1.1GHz higher turbo clock speed?
  5GHz vs 3.9GHz
• 128KB more L1 cache?
  384KB vs 256KB
• 0.75MB/core more L2 cache per core?
  1MB/core vs 0.25MB/core
• 0.4GT/s higher data rate?
  5.4GT/s vs 5GT/s

• Smaller 10nm semiconductors?
  22nm vs 32nm
• 136W below TDP?
  84W vs 220W
• 1 newer PCI Express (PCIe) version?
  3 vs 2
• Has integrated graphics?
• 4.6GB/s more memory bandwidth?
  25.6GB/s vs 21GB/s
• 22. 32% higher PassMark score (single)?
  2148 vs 1756
• 1MB/core more L3 cache per core?
  2MB/core vs 1MB/core
• 200million more transistors?
  1400 million vs 1200 million

Which comparisons are the most popular?

AMD FX-9590

vs

AMD FX-8350

Intel Core i7-4770K

VS

AMD A10-7850K

AMD FX-9590

VS

AMD Ryzen 3 3200G

Intel Core i7-4770k

VS

Intel Core I7-4790K

AMD FXD FXD FXD

AMD RYZEN 5 3600

Intel Core i7-4770k

VS

AMD FX-8350

AMD FX-

VS

AMD Ryzen 9000

000 I7-4770K 9000 VS 9000 VS Core i5-9400F

AMD FX-9590

VS

Intel Core i7-4790k

Intel Core i7-4770K

VS

Intel Core i5-11400h

AMD RYS 5600g

VS

VS

VS 9000) Core i7-4770K

VS

Intel Atom X5-Z8350

AMD FX-9590

VS

AMD FX-6300

Intel Core I7-47703

VS

AMD Ryzen 5 3600 9000 AMD 9590

vs

AMD FX-9370

Intel Core i7-4770k

VS

AMD Ryzen 3 2200G

AMD FX-9590

AMD Ryzen 5 5600x

VS 9000)

AMD FX-9590

VS

AMD RYZEN 5 2600

Intel Core i7-4770K

VS

Intel Core i5-10400

Comers comparisons

590

1 Reviews of users

AMD FX-9590

10. 0 /10

1 Reviews Users

Intel Core i7-4770K 9000K

0 Reviews of Users

Intel Core i7-4770k

9000.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0ER

0 Reviews of users

Functions

Price and quality ratio

10.0 /10

1 Votes

270 9.0

/10

1 Votes

Reviews not yet

9000 votes

No reviews yet

Energy efficiency

3.0 /10

1 votes

No reviews yet

0021

1. CPU speed

8 x 4.7GHz

4 x 3.5GHz

CPU speed indicates how many processing cycles per second a processor can perform, considering all its cores (processors). It is calculated by adding the clock speeds of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors, each group of cores.

2nd processor thread

More threads result in better performance and better multitasking.

3.speed turbo clock

3.9GHz

When the processor is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.

4. Unlocked

✔AMD FX-9590

✔Intel Core i7-4770K

Some processors come with unlocked multipliers and are easier to overclock, allowing you to get better performance in games and other applications.

5.L2 cache

More L2 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.

6.L3 cache

More L3 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.

7.L1 cache

More L1 cache results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.

8.core L2

1MB/core

0.25MB/core

More data can be stored in L2 scratchpad for access by each processor core.

9.core L3

1MB/core

2MB/core

More data can be stored in L3 scratchpad for access by each processor core.

Memory

1.RAM speed

1866MHz

1600MHz

Can support faster memory which speeds up system performance.

2.max memory bandwidth

21GB/s

25.6GB/s

This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.

3. DDR version

DDR (Dynamic Dynamic Random Access Memory Double Data Rate) is the most common type of RAM. New versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy efficient.

4.Memory channels

More memory channels increase the speed of data transfer between memory and processor.

5.maximum memory capacity

Maximum memory capacity (RAM).

6.baud rate bus

5.4GT/s

The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.

7. Supports memory troubleshooting code

✖AMD FX-9590

✖Intel Core i7-4770K

Memory error recovery code can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.

8.eMMC version

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-9590)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-4770K)

A newer version of eMMC — built-in flash memory card — speeds up the memory interface, has a positive effect on device performance, for example, when transferring files from a computer to internal memory via USB.

9.bus frequency

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-9590)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-4770K)

The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device

Geotagging

1. PassMark result

This test measures processor performance using multi-threading.

2. PassMark result (single)

This test measures processor performance using a thread of execution.

3.Geekbench 5 result (multi-core)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-9590)

Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures multi-core processor performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)

4. Cinebench R20 result (multi-core)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-9590)

Cinebench R20 is a benchmark that measures the performance of a multi-core processor by rendering a 3D scene.

5. Cinebench R20 result (single core)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-9590)

Cinebench R20 is a benchmark for evaluating the performance of a single core processor when rendering a 3D scene.

6.Geekbench 5 result (single core)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-9590)

Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures the single-core performance of a processor. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)

7. Blender test result (bmw27)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-9590)

440.7seconds

The Blender benchmark (bmw27) measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.

8.Blender result (classroom)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-9590)

1376.9seconds

The Blender (classroom) test measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.

9.performance per watt

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-9590)

This means the processor is more efficient, giving more performance per watt of power used.

Functions

1.uses multithreading

✖AMD FX-9590

✔Intel Core i7-4770K

processor cores into logical cores, also known as threads. Thus, each core can run two instruction streams at the same time.

2. Has AES

✔AMD FX-9590

✔Intel Core i7-4770K

AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.

3. Has AVX

✔AMD FX-9590

✔Intel Core i7-4770K

AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial applications, and to improve the performance of the Linux RAID program.

4. Version SSE

SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing images or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.

5. Has F16C

✔AMD FX-9590

✔Intel Core i7-4770K

F16C is used to speed up tasks such as image contrast adjustment or volume control.

6.bits transmitted at the same time

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-9590)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-4770K)

NEON provides faster media processing such as MP3 listening.

7. Has MMX

✔AMD FX-9590

✔Intel Core i7-4770K

MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting image contrast or adjusting volume.

8.Has TrustZone

✖AMD FX-9590

✖Intel Core i7-4770K

Technology is integrated into the processor to ensure device security when using features such as mobile payments and streaming video using Digital Rights Management (DRM) technology ).

9.interface width

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-9590)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-4770K)

The processor can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), which means that the processor performs better

Price comparison

Cancel

Which CPUs are better?

AMD FX-9590 vs Intel Core i7-7700K: What is the difference?

39 points

AMD FX-9590

60 points

Intel Core i7-7700K

Comparison winner

vs

64 facts in comparison

AMD FX-9590

Intel Core i7-7700K

i9

• 2.24x higher CPU speed?
  8 x 4.7GHz vs 4 x 4.2GHz
• 7MB more L2 cache?
  8MB vs 1MB
• 8.21% higher PassMark score?
  10535 vs 9736
• 0.5GHz higher turbo clock speed?
  5GHz vs 4. 5GHz
• 128KB more L1 cache?
  384KB vs 256KB
• 0.75MB/core more L2 cache per core?
  1MB/core vs 0.25MB/core
• Has FMA4?

Why is Intel Core i7-7700K better than AMD FX-9590?

• 534MHz higher RAM speed?
  2400MHz vs 1866MHz
• Is the maximum operating temperature higher than 43°C?
  100°C vs 57°C
• Are 18nm semiconductors smaller?
  14nm vs 32nm
• 129W below TDP?
  91W vs 220W
• 1 newer PCI Express (PCIe) version?
  3 vs 2
• Has integrated graphics?
• 17.4GB/s more memory bandwidth?
  38.4GB/s vs 21GB/s
• 1.58x higher PassMark score (single)?
  2776 vs 1756

Which comparisons are the most popular?

AMD FX-9590

VS

AMD FX-8350

Intel Core i7-7700k

VS

AMD RYZEN 5 1600X

AMD FX-

VS

ATEL AMD RYZEN 3200GSEN 3200. TEL AMD i7-7700K

vs

AMD Ryzen 7 1700

AMD FX-9590

VS

AMD Ryzen 5 3600

Intel Core i7-7700k

VS

AMD Ryzen 7 1800x

AMD FX-9590

9000 INTEL Core I777 ,77777777777777777777777777A vs

AMD RYZEN 3 1300X

AMD FX-9590

VS

Intel Core i7-4790k

Intel Core i7-7700k

VS

9000

AMD Ryzen 5 5600G

Intel Core i7-7700k

VS

AMD Ryzen 5 5600x

AMD FX-9590

AMD FX-6300

Intel Core i7-7700K

9000

AMD Ryzen 5000 AMD Ryzen FX-9590

VS

AMD FX-9370

Intel Core i7-7700K

VS

Intel Core i5-12400f

AMD FX-

VS

AMD Ryzen 5 5600x 9000 9 7700K

vs

AMD RYZEN 5 5600G

AMD FX-9590

VS

AMD RYZEN 5 2600

Intel Core i7-7700K

VS

Intel Core 9000 950 Reviews

User reviews0004 Intel Core i7-7700k

5. 3 /10

3 reviews of users

Functions

Quality

10.0 /10

1 Votes

9000 9000 9000 3 Votes

Games

/10

1 Votes

6.3 /10

3 Votes

10.0 /10

1 VOTES

9000 9000 6.3 9 /10

3 Votes

Reliability

10.0 /10

1 Votes

5.7 /10

3 VOTES 9000 /10

3 votes

Performance

1.CPU speed

8 x 4.7GHz

4 x 4.2GHz

). It is calculated by adding the clock speeds of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors, each group of cores.

2nd processor thread

More threads result in better performance and better multitasking.

3.speed turbo clock

4.5GHz

When the processor is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.

4. Has unlocked multiplier

✔AMD FX-9590

✔Intel Core i7-7700K

Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier and are easier to overclock, allowing for better performance in games and other applications.

5.L2 Cache

More L2 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.

6.L3 cache

More L3 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.

7.L1 cache

More L1 cache results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.

8.core L2

1MB/core

0.25MB/core

More data can be stored in the L2 scratchpad for access by each processor core.

9.core L3

1MB/core

2MB/core

More data can be stored in L3 scratchpad for access by each processor core.

Memory

1.RAM speed

1866MHz

2400MHz

Can support faster memory which speeds up system performance.

2.max memory bandwidth

21GB/s

38.4GB/s

This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.

3. DDR version

DDR (Dynamic Dynamic Random Access Memory Double Data Rate) is the most common type of RAM. New versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy efficient.

4.Memory channels

More memory channels increase the speed of data transfer between memory and processor.

5.maximum memory capacity

Maximum memory capacity (RAM).

6.baud rate bus

5.4GT/s

The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.

7. Supports memory troubleshooting code

✖AMD FX-9590

✖Intel Core i7-7700K

Memory error recovery code can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.

8.eMMC version

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-9590)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-7700K)

A newer version of eMMC — Built-in Flash Memory Card — speeds up the memory interface, has a positive effect on device performance, for example, when transferring files from a computer to internal memory via USB.

9.bus frequency

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-9590)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-7700K)

The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device

Geotagging

1. PassMark result

This test measures processor performance using multi-threading.

2. PassMark result (single)

This test measures processor performance using a thread of execution.

3.Geekbench 5 result (multi-core)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-9590)

Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures multi-core processor performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)

4. Cinebench R20 result (multi-core)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-9590)

Cinebench R20 is a benchmark that measures the performance of a multi-core processor by rendering a 3D scene.

5.Cinebench R20 result (single core)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-9590)

Cinebench R20 is a benchmark for evaluating the performance of a single core processor when rendering a 3D scene.

6. Geekbench 5 result (single core)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-9590)

Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures the single-core performance of a processor. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)

7. Blender test result (bmw27)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-9590)

339.9seconds

The Blender benchmark (bmw27) measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.

8.Blender result (classroom)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-9590)

1117.4seconds

The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.

9.performance per watt

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-9590)

This means the processor is more efficient, giving more performance per watt of power used.

Functions

1.uses multithreading

✖AMD FX-9590

✔Intel Core i7-7700K

processor cores into logical cores, also known as threads. Thus, each core can run two instruction streams at the same time.

2. Has AES

✔AMD FX-9590

✔Intel Core i7-7700K

AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.

3. Has AVX

✔AMD FX-9590

✔Intel Core i7-7700K

AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial applications, and to improve the performance of the Linux RAID program.

4.Version SSE

SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing images or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.

5. Has F16C

✔AMD FX-9590

✔Intel Core i7-7700K

F16C is used to speed up tasks such as image contrast adjustment or volume control.

6.bits transmitted at the same time

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-9590)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-7700K)

NEON provides faster media processing such as MP3 listening.

7. Has MMX

✔AMD FX-9590

✔Intel Core i7-7700K

MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting image contrast or adjusting volume.

8.Has TrustZone

✖AMD FX-9590

✖Intel Core i7-7700K

Technology is integrated into the processor to ensure device security when using features such as mobile payments and video streaming using Digital Rights Management (DRM) technology ).

9.interface width

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-9590)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-7700K)

The processor can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), which means that the processor performs better

Price comparison

Cancel

Which CPUs are better?

Comparison of AMD FX-9590 and Intel Core i7-4770K

Comparative analysis of AMD FX-9 processors590 and Intel Core i7-4770K by all known characteristics in the categories: General Information, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals, Technology, Virtualization, Graphics, Graphical Interfaces, Picture Quality in Graphics, Graphics API Support, Security and Reliability.
Analysis of processor performance by benchmarks: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T- Rex (Fps).

AMD FX-9590

versus

Intel Core i7-4770K

Benefits

Reasons to choose AMD FX-9590

• Newer processor, 1 month(s) difference in release dates
• Run more applications at the same time: 4 cores, 8 more applications vs 4
• About 28% more clock speed: 5 GHz vs 3. 90 GHz
• About 50% more L1 cache means more data can be stored in it for quick access
• L2 cache is 8 times larger, which means more data can be stored in it for quick access
• CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) performance is 2.1 times larger: 10.765 vs 5.223
• Performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) about 36% better: 8.59 vs 6.308

Release date	July 2013 vs 1 June 2013
Number of cores	8 vs 4
Maximum frequency	5 GHz vs 3.90 GHz
Level 1 cache	384 KB vs 256 KB
Level 2 cache	8MB vs 1MB
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s)	10.765 vs 5.223
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	8.59 vs 6.308

Reasons to choose Intel Core i7-4770K

• About 28% more max core temperature: 72.72°C vs 57°C
• A newer manufacturing process for the processor allows it to be more powerful, but with lower power consumption: 22 nm vs 32 nm SOI
• 2.6 times less power consumption: 84 Watt vs 220 Watt
• 18% more: 2167 vs 1829
• About 5% more performance in PassMark benchmark — CPU mark: 7132 vs 6797
• About 55% more performance in Geekbench 4 — Single Core benchmark: 982 vs 633
• Approximately 21% improvement in Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core benchmark: 3688 vs 3042
• Approximately 24% improvement in 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score performance: 4123 vs 3336
• Comp. Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 3.5x better: 89.554 vs 25.735
• Performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) about 39% better: 0.625 vs 0.45
• CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) about 78% faster performance: 2.525 vs 1.418

Max core temperature	72.72°C vs 57°C
Process	22 nm vs 32 nm SOI
Power Demand (TDP)	84 Watt vs 220 Watt
PassMark — Single thread mark	2167 vs 1829
PassMark — CPU mark	7132 vs 6797
Geekbench 4 — Single Core	982 vs 633
Geekbench 4 — Multi Core	3688 vs 3042
3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score	4123 vs 3336
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	89.554 vs 25.735
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.625 vs 0.45
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s)	2.525 vs 1.418

Benchmark comparison

CPU 1: AMD FX-9590
CPU 2: Intel Core i7-4770K

PassMark — Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2
PassMark — CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2
Geekbench 4 — Single Core	CPU 1 CPU 2
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core	CPU 1 CPU 2
3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score	CPU 1 CPU 2
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s)	CPU 1 CPU 2	10.765
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	CPU 1 CPU 2	25.735 89.554
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s)	CPU 1 CPU 2
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s)	CPU 1 CPU 2
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	CPU 1 CPU 2

Name	AMD FX-9590	Intel Core i7-4770K
PassMark — Single thread mark	1829	2167
PassMark — CPU mark	6797	7132
Geekbench 4 — Single Core	633	982
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core	3042	3688
3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score	3336	4123
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s)	10.765	5.223
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	25.735	89.554
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.45	0.625
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s)	1.418	2.525
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	8.59	6.308
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)		1347
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames)		2349
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames)		3778
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)		1347
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps)		2349
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps)		3778

Features comparison

July 2013

configuration

	AMD FX-9590	Intel Core i7-4770K
Architecture name	Vishera	Haswell
Family	AMD FX-Series Processors
Issue date		1 June 2013
OPN PIB	FD9590FHHKWOF
OPN Tray	FD9590FHW8KHK
Place in the rating	1593	1061
Price now	$99. 99	$284.99
Series	AMD FX 8-Core Black Edition Processors	4th Generation Intel® Core™ i7 Processors
Price/performance ratio (0-100)	30.03.	10.43
Applicability	Desktop	Desktop
Price at first issue date		$399
Processor Number		i7-4770K
Status		Discontinued
Support 64 bit
Base frequency	4. 7 GHz	3.50 GHz
Crystal area	315 mm	177 mm
Level 1 cache	384KB	256KB
Level 2 cache	8MB	1MB
Level 3 cache	8MB	8MB
Process	32nm SOI	22nm
Maximum core temperature	57°C	72.72°C
Maximum frequency	5GHz	3. 90 GHz
Number of cores	8	4
Number of threads	8	8
Voltage P0 Vcore	Min: 1.375V — Max: 1.5375V
Number of transistors	1200 million	1400 Million
Unlocked
Bus Speed ​​		5 GT/s DMI2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)		72 °C
Supported memory frequency	1866 MHz
Supported memory types	DDR3	DDR3-1333/1600, DDR3L-1333/1600 @ 1. 5V
Maximum number of memory channels		2
Maximum memory bandwidth		25.6 GB/s
Maximum memory size		32GB
Maximum number of processors in	1	1
Supported sockets	AM3+	FCLGA1150
Power Demand (TDP)	220 Watt	84 Watt
Low Halogen Options Available
Package Size		37. 5mm x 37.5mm
Thermal Solution		PCG 2013D
PCI Express revision	n/a	Up to 3.0
Number of PCI Express lanes		16
PCIe configurations		Up to 1×16, 2×8, 1×8+2×4
Scalability		1S Only
Fused Multiply-Add (FMA)
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX)
Intel® AES New Instructions
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® Technology
Flexible Display interface (FDI)
Idle States
Extended instructions		Intel® SSE4. 1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
Intel 64
Intel® Hyper-Threading Technology
Intel® My WiFi Technology
Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP)
Intel® TSX-NI
Intel® Turbo Boost Technology
Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility
Thermal Monitoring
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™)
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x)
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d)
Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT)
Device ID		0x412
Graphics base frequency		350MHz
Graphics max dynamic frequency		1. 25 GHz
Maximum GPU clock		1.25 GHz
Intel® Clear Video HD Technology
Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI)
Intel® InTru™ 3D Technology
Intel® Quick Sync Video
Video memory size		2GB
Integrated graphics		Intel® HD Graphics 4600
DisplayPort
DVI
eDP
HDMI
Maximum number of monitors supported		3
VGA
WiDi support
Maximum resolution via DisplayPort		[email protected]
Maximum resolution via eDP		[email protected]
Maximum resolution via HDMI 1. 4		[email protected]
Maximum resolution via VGA		[email protected]
DirectX		11.2/12
OpenGL		4.3
Anti-Theft Technology
Execute Disable Bit (EDB)
Intel® Identity Protection Technology
Intel® OS Guard
Intel® Secure Key Technology
Intel® Trusted Execution Technology (TXT)

Compare Intel Core i7 4790 and AMD FX 9590

Intel Core i7 4790

3. 6 GHz | 4 cores | LGA 1150

VS

AMD FX 9590

4.7GHz | 8 cores | AM3+

Benchmarks

General result

Based on 8 tests:

Intel Core i7 4790 faster than 17.82%

Intel Core i7 4790

117.82

AMD FX 9000

Geekbench 3 (Multi-Core) (Multi-Core) 9590 faster by 0.73%

Intel Core i7 4790

13718

AMD FX 9590

13818

Geekbench 3 (Single Core)

003

Intel Core i7 4790

2286

AMD FX 9590

1727

reasons to choose the Intel Core i7 4790

• Smaller processor (22 nm vs 32 nm) allows for greater performance with lower heat heating

more level per core: 2 MB/core vs. 1 MB/core

• High critical temperature (72.72°C vs. 57°C) allows the processor to work in harsher temperature conditions
• The presence of an integrated video processor eliminates the need for an external video card

Reasons to choose AMD FX 9590

• High frequency (4. 7 GHz vs 3.6 GHz) means more operations per second
• High turbo frequency: 5 GHz vs 4 GHz
• More cores (8 vs. 4) allows more processes to run simultaneously, speeding up computer performance and processing speed
• Unlocked multiplier makes it easier to overclock the processor mmx sse sse2 sse3 ssse3 sse4 9
  4

  SSE41

  24

  SSE

  6
  5

  9129 9129

  9AR1225 sse42

  fma3
  fma4
  amd64
  amd_v
  abm
  XOP		6 5 TBM 5 4 AVX 6 9126 9126 9126 9126 9AR1226 avx_11 avx_20 bmi1 f16c aes cvt16 clmul1226 68. 25 W 178.75 W Intel Core i7-4770K vs. AMD FX-9590 Intel Core i7-4770K Intel Core i7-4770K runs with 4 and 8 CPU threads It runs at 3.90 GHz base 3.70 GHz all cores while TDP is set to 84 W .CPU connects to socket LGA 1150 CPU This version includes 8.00 MB of L3 cache on a single die, supports 2 to support DDR3-1600 RAM, and supports 3.0 PCIe Gen 16 . Tjunction is kept below — degrees C. In particular, Haswell S Architecture is advanced beyond 22 nm and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d . The product was launched Q2/2013 AMD FX-9590 AMD FX-9590 runs with 8 and 8 CPU threads It runs at 5.00 GHz base 5.00 GHz all cores while TDP is set to 220 W .CPU connects to AM3+ CPU socket This version includes 8.00 MB of L3 cache on a single die, supports 2 to support DDR3-1866 RAM, and supports PCIe Gen . Tjunction is kept below — degrees C. In particular, the Vishera (Piledriver) architecture has been advanced over 32 nm and supports AMD-V . The product was launched Q3/2013 Intel Core i7-4770K AMD FX-9590 Frequency 4.70 GHz 4 Cores 8 3.90GHz Turbo (1 core) 5.00 GHz 3.70GHz Turbo (all cores) 5.00 GHz Yes Hyper Threading No. Yes Acceleration Yes normal Basic architecture normal Intel HD Graphics 4600 GPU no iGPU 1.25GHz GPU (Turbo) No turbo 22nm Technology 32nm 1.25 GHz GPU (Turbo) No turbo 11.1 DirectX Version 3 Max. displays DDR3-1600 memory capacity DDR3-1866 2 Memory channels 2 Maximum memory No. ECC Yes — L2 Cache — 8.00MB L3 Cache 8.00 MB 3.0 PCIe version 16 PCIe lanes 22nm Technology 32nm LGA 1150 Connector AM3+ 84W TDP 220W VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d Virtualization AMD-V Q2/2013 Release date Q3/2013 Show more details Show more details Cinebench R23 (Single-Core) Cinebench R23 is the successor to Cinebench R20 and is also based on Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D shapes. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account. Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core) Cinebench R23 is the successor to Cinebench R20 and is also based on Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D forms. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading. Cinebench R20 (Single-Core) Cinebench R20 is the successor to Cinebench R15 and is also based on Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D forms. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account. Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core) Cinebench R20 is the successor to Cinebench R15 and is also based on Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D forms. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading. Cinebench R15 (Single-Core) Cinebench R15 is the successor to Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D forms. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account. Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core) Cinebench R15 is the successor to Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D forms. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading. Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core) Geekbench 5 is a memory-intensive cross-platform benchmark. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account. Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core) Geekbench 5 is a memory-intensive, cross-platform test. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading. iGPU — FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS) Theoretical processing performance of the processor’s internal graphics unit with simple precision (32 bits) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS specifies how many billions of floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second. Blender 2.81 (bmw27) Blender is a free 3D graphics software for rendering (creating) 3D bodies that can also be textured and animated in the program. The Blender test creates predefined scenes and measures the time(s) required for the entire scene. The less time it takes, the better. We chose the bmw27 as our reference scene. Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core) Geekbench 3 is a cross-platform benchmark that is memory intensive. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account. Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core) Geekbench 3 is a cross-platform benchmark that is memory intensive. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading. Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core) Cinebench 11.5 is based on Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular for creating shapes and other 3D. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account. Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core) Cinebench 11.5 is based on Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular for creating shapes and other things in 3D. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading. Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL) Cinebench 11.5 is based on Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular for creating shapes and other things in 3D. The iGPU test uses the CPU’s internal graphics unit to execute OpenGL commands. Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark Some of the processors listed below have been tested with CPU-Comparison. However, most of the processors were not tested and the results were evaluated by the secret patented CPU-Comparison formula. As such, they do not accurately reflect the actual values ​​of Passmark CPU ratings and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd. Energy usage estimate Average hours of use per day Average CPU usage (0-100%) Cost of electricity, USD/kWh Energy usage estimate Average hours of use per day Average CPU usage (0-100%) Cost of electricity, USD/kWh Intel Core i7-4770K AMD FX-9590 84W Max TDP 220W NA Power consumption per day (kWh) NA NA Operating cost per day NA NA Power consumption per year (kWh) NA NA Cost per year NA Popular comparison0004 59. 5 Performance in games and similar applications, according to our tests. The performance of 4 cores, if any, and performance per core has the greatest impact on the result, since most games do not fully use more than 4 cores. The speed of caches and working with RAM is also important. Office speed Core i7-3770 64.6 (+5.3%) FX-9590 61.2 Performance in everyday work such as browsers and office programs. The performance of 1 core has the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications use only one, ignoring the rest. Similarly, many professional applications such as various CADs ignore multi-threaded performance. Speed ​​in heavy applications Core i7-3770 37.8 (+2.1%) FX-9590 37 Performance in resource-intensive tasks that load a maximum of 8 cores. The performance of all cores and their number has the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications willingly use all the cores and increase the speed accordingly. At the same time, certain periods of work can be demanding on the performance of one or two cores, for example, applying filters in the editor. Data obtained from tests by users who tested their systems with and without overclocking. Thus, you see the average values ​​corresponding to the processor. Speed ​​of numerical operations Simple household tasks Core i7-3770 61 (+13%) FX-9590 53.1 Demanding games and tasks Core i7-3770 36.2 (+5.8%) FX-9590 34.1 Extreme Core i7-3770 8.9 FX-9590 9. 2 (+3.3%) Different tasks require different CPU strengths. A system with few fast cores and low memory latency will be fine for the vast majority of games, but will be inferior to a system with a lot of slow cores in a rendering scenario. We believe that a minimum of 4/4 (4 physical cores and 4 threads) processor is suitable for a budget gaming PC. At the same time, some games can load it at 100%, slow down and freeze, and performing any tasks in the background will lead to a drop in FPS. Ideally, the budget shopper should aim for a minimum of 4/8 and 6/6. A gamer with a big budget can choose between 6/12, 8/8 and 8/16. Processors with 10 and 12 cores can perform well in games with high frequency and fast memory, but are overkill for such tasks. Also, buying for the future is a dubious undertaking, since in a few years many slow cores may not provide sufficient gaming performance. When choosing a processor for your work, consider how many cores your programs use. For example, photo and video editors can use 1-2 cores when working with filtering, and rendering or converting in the same editors already uses all threads. Data obtained from tests of users who tested their systems both with overclocking (maximum value in the table) and without (minimum). A typical result is shown in the middle, the fuller the color bar, the better the average result among all tested systems. Benchmarks Benchmarks were run on stock hardware, that is, without overclocking and with factory settings. Therefore, on overclocked systems, the points can noticeably differ upwards. Also, small performance changes may be due to the BIOS version. Cinebench R15 Multi Core Intel Core i7-3770 669 AMD FX-9590 713 (+6.2%) BMW27 9000 9000 INTEL CORE I7-NETEL CORE I7-NETL0003 AMD FX-9590 625.9 (+4.5%) Geekbench 3 Single Core Intel Core i7-3770 3424 (+24.4%) AMD FX-9590 2587 9000 GEEK Intel Core i7-3770 13296 (+1. 4%) AMD FX-9590 13110 Cinebench R11.5 Intel Core i7-37770 9590 1.37 Cinebench R11.5 Intel Core i7-3770 7.48 AMD FX-9590 8.52 (+12.2%) Features The data is not yet complete, so the tables may be missing information or existing features. Basic Manufacturer Intel AMD DescriptionInformation about the processor, taken from the official website of the manufacturer. Intel® Core™ i7-3770 Processor (8M Cache, up to 3.90 GHz) ArchitectureCode name for the microarchitecture generation. Ivy Bridge Process The manufacturing process, measured in nanometers. The smaller the technical process, the more perfect the technology, the lower the heat dissipation and power consumption. 22 No data Release dateMonth and year of the processor’s availability. 09-2014 09-2016 Model Official name. i7-3770 Cores The number of physical cores. 4 8 ThreadsNumber of threads. The number of logical processor cores that the operating system sees. 8 8 Multi-Threading Technology With Intel’s Hyper-threading and AMD’s SMT technology, one physical core is recognized by the operating system as two logical cores, thereby increasing processor performance in multi-threaded applications. Hyper-threading (note that some games may not work well with Hyper-threading, for maximum FPS you can disable the technology in the BIOS of the motherboard). Missing Base frequencyGuaranteed frequency of all processor cores at maximum load. Performance in single-threaded and multi-threaded applications and games depends on it. It is important to remember that speed and frequency are not directly related. For example, a new processor at a lower frequency may be faster than an old one at a higher one. 3.4 GHz 4.7 GHz Turbo frequencyThe maximum frequency of one processor core in turbo mode. Manufacturers allow modern processors to independently increase the frequency of one or more cores under heavy load, due to which performance is noticeably increased. It may depend on the nature of the load, the number of loaded cores, temperature and the specified limits. Significantly affects the speed in games and applications that are demanding on the frequency of the CPU. 3.9 No data L3 cache size The third level cache acts as a buffer between the computer’s RAM and the processor’s level 2 cache. Used by all cores, the speed of information processing depends on the volume. 8 No data Instructions 64-bit Extended instruction set Allows you to speed up calculations, processing and execution of certain operations. Also, some games require instruction support. SSE4.1/4.2, AVX Embedded Options Available Two enclosure versions. Standard and designed for mobile devices. In the second version, the processor can be soldered on the motherboard. Yes No Bus frequency The speed of communication with the system. 5 GT/s DMI Number of QPI links TDPThermal Design Power is an indicator that determines the heat dissipation in standard operation. The cooler or water cooling system must be rated for a larger value. Remember that with a factory bus or manual overclocking, TDP increases significantly. 77 No data Cooling system specifications 2011D Video core Integrated graphics core Allows you to use your computer without a discrete graphics card. The monitor is connected to the video output on the motherboard. If earlier integrated graphics made it possible to simply work at a computer, today it can replace budget video accelerators and makes it possible to play most games at low settings. Intel® HD Graphics 4000 GPU base clockFrequency in 2D and idle. 650 No data Max GPU ClockMaximum 3D clock. 1150 No data Intel® Wireless Display (Intel® WiDi) Supports Wireless Display technology using the Wi-Fi 802.11n standard. Thanks to it, a monitor or TV equipped with the same technology does not require a cable to connect. No data Supported monitorsThe maximum number of monitors that can be connected to the integrated video core at the same time. 3 RAM Maximum RAM Amount of RAM that can be installed on the motherboard with this processor. 32 No data Supported type of RAM The type of RAM depends on its frequency and timings (speed), availability, price. DDR3 1333/1600 RAM Channels The multi-channel memory architecture increases data transfer speed. On desktop platforms, two-channel, three-channel and four-channel modes are available. 2 Memory bandwidth 25.6 GB/s ECC memory Support for error-correcting memory, which is used in servers. Usually more expensive than usual and requires more expensive server components. However, second-hand server processors, Chinese motherboards and ECC memory sticks, which are sold relatively cheaply in China, have become widespread. No data No data PCI configuration options PCI-E The computer bus version of PCI Express. The bandwidth and power limit depend on the version. There is backward compatibility. 3 No data PCI up to 1×16, 2×8, 1×8 & 2×4 up to 1×16, 2×8, 1×8 & 2×4 Number of PCI lanes No data up to 1×16, 2×8, 1×8 & 2×4 Data Security AES-NI The AES command set extension speeds up applications that use appropriate encryption. No data No data Intel® Secure Key An RDRAND instruction that allows you to create a high performance random number generator. No data No data Decoration Dimensions No data No data Supported sockets No data No data Maximum processors per motherboard No data No data Which is better Intel Core i7-3770 On average, gaming performance is 4% better. The speed of work in office applications and browsers is increased by 3%.