Amd e1 6010 benchmark: AMD E1-6010 APU vs Intel Core i5-2410M @ 2.30GHz [cpubenchmark.net] by PassMark Software

E1-6010 [in 17 benchmarks]

AMD
E1-6010

Buy

• Interface
• Core clock speed
• Max video memory
• Memory type
• Memory clock speed
• Maximum resolution

Summary

AMD started AMD E1-6010 sales 29 April 2014. This is Beema architecture notebook processor primarily aimed at office systems. It has 2 cores and 2 threads, and is based on 28nm manufacturing technology, with a maximum frequency of 1350 MHz and a locked multiplier.

Compatibility-wise, this is FT3b processor with a TDP of 10 Watt. It supports DDR3 memory.

It provides poor benchmark performance at

0.52%

of a leader’s which is AMD EPYC 7h22.

E1
6010

vs

EPYC
7h22

General info

E1-6010 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and pricing.

Place in performance rating	2662
Market segment	Laptop
Series	AMD E-Series
Architecture codename	Beema (2014)
Release date	29 April 2014 (8 years ago)
Current price	$314	of 15411 (EPYC 7351)

Technical specs

Basic microprocessor parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters can generally indicate CPU performance, but to be more precise you have to review its test results.

Physical cores	2 (Dual-core)
Threads	2
Boost clock speed	1. 35 GHz	of 5.8 (Core i9-13900K)
L2 cache	1024 KB	of 12288 (Core 2 Quad Q9550)
Chip lithography	28 nm	of 5 (Apple M1)
64 bit support	+
Windows 11 compatibility	—

Compatibility

Information on E1-6010 compatibility with other computer components and devices: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one.

Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Socket	FT3b
Thermal design power (TDP)	10 Watt	of 400 (Xeon Platinum 9282)

Technologies and extensions

Technological capabilities and additional instructions supported by E1-6010. You’ll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, Single-Channel DDR3L-1333
AES-NI	+
FMA	FMA4
AVX	+
PowerTune	—
TrueAudio	—
PowerNow	+
PowerGating	+
Out-of-band client management	—
VirusProtect	+

Virtualization technologies

Supported virtual machine optimization technologies. Some are specific to Intel only, some to AMD.

AMD-V	1
IOMMU 2. 0	+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel number of RAM supported by E1-6010’s memory controller. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequency may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR3	of 5200 (Ryzen 5 7600X)
Max memory channels	1	of 12 (Xeon Platinum 9221)

Graphics specifications

General parameters of GPU integrated into E1-6010.

Integrated graphics card	AMD Radeon R2 Graphics
Enduro	+
Switchable graphics	1
UVD	+
VCE	+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of E1-6010’s integrated GPU.

DisplayPort	+
HDMI	+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by E1-6010’s integrated GPU, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX	DirectX® 12
Vulkan	1

Peripherals

Specifications and connection types of supported peripherals.

PCIe version

2.0

of 5 (Core i9-12900K)

Benchmark performance

Single-core and multi-core benchmark results of E1-6010. Overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Overall score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

E1-6010
0.52

• Passmark
• GeekBench 5 Single-Core
• GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
• Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
• Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core
• 3DMark06 CPU
• Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core
• Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core
• Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core
• Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core
• TrueCrypt AES
• WinRAR 4.0
• x264 encoding pass 2
• x264 encoding pass 1
• Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core
• Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 69%

E1-6010
527

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 37%

E1-6010
138

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 37%

E1-6010
245

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

E1-6010
1006

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

E1-6010
1784

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

E1-6010
927

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

E1-6010
1

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core (sometimes called Multi-Thread) is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

E1-6010
49

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

E1-6010
25

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11. 5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

E1-6010
0.3

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

E1-6010
0

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using ‘Best’ setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 12%

E1-6010
516

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 12%

E1-6010
4

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 12%

E1-6010
19

Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core

Benchmark coverage: 6%

E1-6010
1324

Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core

Benchmark coverage: 6%

E1-6010
760

---

Relative perfomance

Overall E1-6010 performance compared to nearest competitors among notebook CPUs.

---

AMD Athlon II Neo K345
100

AMD Athlon Neo X2 L335
100

Intel Pentium T2370
100

AMD E1-6010
100

Intel Pentium T2310
100

Intel Pentium Dual Core T2310
100

Intel Core 2 Duo L7400
98.08

Intel equivalent

We believe that the nearest equivalent to E1-6010 from Intel is Pentium Dual Core T2310, which is nearly equal in speed and lower by 3 positions in our rating.

Pentium Dual
Core T2310

Compare

Here are some closest Intel rivals to E1-6010:

Intel Pentium T2370
100

Intel Pentium Dual Core T2310
100

Intel Pentium T2310
100

AMD E1-6010
100

Intel Celeron T3100
98. 08

Intel Celeron T1600
98.08

Intel Core 2 Duo L7400
98.08

Similar processors

Here is our recommendation of several processors that are more or less close in performance to the one reviewed.

Celeron
N2830

Compare

Celeron
J1800

Compare

Celeron
N2840

Compare

E1
7010

Compare

E1
2500

Compare

Celeron
N3050

Compare

Recommended graphics cards

These graphics cards are most commonly used with E1-6010 according to our statistics.

HD
Graphics 4000

40.3%

Radeon R2
Graphics

9.4%

GeForce GTX
660

6.2%

GeForce GTX
1050 Ti

5.2%

GeForce GTX
1060 6 GB

4.4%

GeForce RTX
3090

4.3%

UHD
Graphics 630

3%

UHD
Graphics 620

2. 8%

Radeon RX
Vega 3

1.5%

GeForce GTX
1650

1.5%

User rating

Here is the rating given to the reviewed processor by our users. Let others know your opinion by rating it yourself.

---

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about E1-6010, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.

---

Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.

CPU-Z Benchmark for AMD E1-6010 (1T)

Best CPU performance — 64-bit — October 2022

AMD E1-6010 (1T)

Back to validation

Intel Core i9-12900KF

Intel Core i9-12900K

Intel Core i7-12700K

Intel Core i7-12700KF

Intel Core i5-12600K

Intel Core i5-12600KF

Intel Core i9-11900K

AMD Ryzen 9 5950X

AMD Ryzen 9 5900X

Intel Core i7-11700K

AMD Ryzen 7 5800X

Intel Core i7-11700KF

Intel Core i5-11600K

AMD Ryzen 5 5600X

Intel Core i5-11600KF

Intel Core i7-11700

Intel Core i7-11700F

AMD Ryzen 7 5700G

AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX

Intel Core i5-11500

Intel Core i9-10900KF

AMD Ryzen 5 5600G

Intel Core i7-11800H

Intel Core i9-10900K

Intel Core i9-10850K

Intel Core i7-10700KF

Intel Core i5-11400

Intel Core i5-11400F

Intel Core i9-10900

Intel Core i5-11400H

AMD Ryzen 7 5800H

Intel Core i9-9900KF

Intel Core i7-9700KF

Intel Core i7-10700K

Intel Core i7-9700K

AMD Ryzen 5 5600H

Intel Core i9-9900K

Intel Core i5-10600KF

Intel Core i5-9600KF

Intel Core i7-10700

Intel Core i5-10600K

Intel Core i7-10700F

Intel Core i7-1165G7

AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT

Intel Core i7-9700F

Intel Core i7-9700

AMD Ryzen 9 3950X

Intel Core i5-9600K

AMD Ryzen 9 3900X

AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT

AMD Ryzen 7 3800X

Intel Core i7-8700K

AMD Ryzen 7 3700X

Intel Core i5-1135G7

AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G

Intel Core i5-8600K

AMD Ryzen 7 5700U

AMD Ryzen 5 3600X

Intel Core i7-7700K

AMD Ryzen 7 4800H

Intel Core i7-10875H

Intel Core i5-7600K

AMD Ryzen 5 3600

Intel Core i7-8700

AMD Ryzen 5 3500X

Intel Core i3-1115G4

AMD Ryzen 5 3500

Intel Core i7-10870H

AMD Ryzen 5 4500U

AMD Ryzen 5 5500U

Intel Core i7-10750H

Intel Core i3-10105F

Intel Core i3-9100F

Intel Core i5-8500

Intel Core i7-6700K

Intel Core i5-10400

Intel Core i5-9400

AMD Ryzen 5 4600H

Intel Core i3-10100

Intel Core i3-10100F

Intel Core i5-9400F

Intel Core i5-6600K

Intel Core i5-10400F

AMD Ryzen 3 3100 4-Core

AMD Ryzen 7 2700X

Intel Core i5-10300H

Intel Core i7-4790K

Intel Core i7-9750H

Intel Core i5-8400

AMD Ryzen 5 2600X

Intel Core i7-7700

Intel Core i5-4690K

AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

Intel Core i7-8750H

AMD Ryzen 3 3200G

Intel Core i5-9300H

AMD Ryzen 5 2600

Intel Core i3-8100

Intel Core i7-10510U

Intel Core i5-7500

Intel Core i5-4670K

Intel Core i5-8300H

AMD Ryzen 5 1600X

Intel Core i7-8565U

AMD Ryzen 3 2200G

Intel Core i7-4770K

Intel Core i5-4690

Intel Core i5-10210U

Intel Core i5-1035G1

AMD Ryzen 5 2400G

Intel Core i7-4790

AMD Ryzen 7 1700X

Intel Core i7-6700

AMD Ryzen 7 2700

Intel Core i7-4770

Intel Core i5-8265U

AMD Ryzen 7 1700

AMD Ryzen 5 1600

Intel Core i3-1005G1

Intel Core i5-4590

AMD Ryzen 5 3550H with

Intel Core i5-3570K

Intel Core i5-7400

Intel Core i7-3770K

Intel Core i5-6500

Intel Xeon E3-1231 v3

Intel Core i7-8550U

Intel Core i5-4570

Intel Core i3-7100

AMD Ryzen 3 1200

Intel Core i5-3570

Intel Core i5-2500K

AMD Ryzen 7 3750H with

Intel Core i7-3770

Intel Core i7-2600K

Intel Core i7-7700HQ

Intel Core i5-8250U

Intel Core i5-7300HQ

Intel Core i5-6400

AMD Ryzen 5 1400

Intel Core i3-6100

Intel Core i5-4460

Intel Core i5-3470

AMD Ryzen 5 3500U with

Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3

Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3

AMD Athlon 3000G

Intel Core i5-4440

Intel Xeon E3-1230 V2

Intel Core i3-4170

Intel Core i5-2500

Intel Pentium G4560

Intel Core i7-2600

Intel Core i3-4160

AMD Ryzen 5 2500U with

Intel Xeon E5-2689

Intel Core i7-6700HQ

Intel Core i7-7500U

Intel Core i5-2400

Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3

Intel Core i3-4130

Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2

Intel Core i5-3330

Intel Core i5-7200U

Intel Core i3-3240

Intel Core i7-6500U

Intel Core i3-3220

Intel Core i5-6300U

Intel Xeon E5450

Intel Core i3-2120

Intel Core i5-3230M

Intel Core i3-2100

Intel Core 2 Duo E8400

Intel Core i5-6200U

Intel Core i5 750

Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550

Intel Core i5-5200U

Intel Core i5-2520M

Intel Core 2 Duo E7500

Intel Core i5 650

Intel Core i5-3210M

Intel Core i7 920

AMD FX -8350

Intel Core i5-2450M

Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400

AMD FX -4300

AMD FX -8320

AMD FX -6300

Intel Core i5-2410M

Intel Core i5-4210U

AMD FX -8300

Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600

Intel Core i3-7020U

Pentium E5200

Intel Core i5-4200U

Intel Core i3-3110M

Intel Core i3-5005U

Intel Core i3-6006U

AMD Phenom II X4 955

Intel Core i3-4005U

(YOU) AMD E1-6010

AMD E1-1200 APU vs Intel Core i5-6200U

• CPU
• GPU
• SSD
• HDD
• RAM
• USB

▲
52861
▼

  

2 Cores, 4 Threads @2. 3 GHz, Skylake.
Release date ≈ Q4 2015.

VS

YouTube*NEW*

About

▲
5060
▼

  

Release date ≤ Q4 2013.

Real World Speed

Performance profile from 141,570 user samples

Benchmark your CPU here

134,586 User Benchmarks

Best Bench: 61% Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 35% Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 0.4 GHz (avg)

Poor: 35%

Great: 61%

SPEED RANK: 749^th / 1364

Gaming 51% Yacht

Desktop 57% Gunboat

Workstation 36% Jet ski

6,984 User Benchmarks

Best Bench: 38% Base clock 1.4 GHz, turbo 1.35 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 13% Base clock 1. 4 GHz, turbo 0.75 GHz (avg)

Poor: 13%

Great: 38%

SPEED RANK: 1328^th / 1364

Gaming 24% Surfboard

Desktop 26% Raft

Workstation 15% Surfboard

Effective Speed Effective CPU Speed		50.8 %	Hugely faster effective speed. +114%		23.7 %

Memory Avg. Memory Latency		69.4 Pts	Much lower memory latency. +61%		43.2 Pts
1-Core Avg. Single Core Speed		68.9 Pts	Hugely faster single-core speed. +389%		14.1 Pts
2-Core Avg. Dual Core Speed		123 Pts	Hugely faster dual-core speed. +373%		26 Pts
4-Core Avg. Quad Core Speed		187 Pts	Hugely faster quad-core speed. +593%		27 Pts
8-Core Avg. Octa Core Speed		191 Pts	Hugely faster octa-core speed. +585%		27.9 Pts

Memory OC Memory Latency		85. 2 Pts	Lower OC memory latency. +16%		73.4 Pts
1-Core OC Single Core Speed		83.2 Pts	Hugely faster OC single-core speed. +384%		17.2 Pts
2-Core OC Dual Core Speed		150 Pts	Hugely faster OC dual-core speed. +340%		34.1 Pts
4-Core OC Quad Core Speed		228 Pts	Hugely faster OC quad-core speed. +569%		34.1 Pts
8-Core OC Octa Core Speed		226 Pts	Hugely faster OC octa-core speed. +563%		34.1 Pts

Market Share

Based on 55,906,073 CPUs tested.

See market share leaders

Market Share Market Share (trailing 30 days)		0.34 %	Insanely higher market share. +3,300%		0.01 %
User Rating UBM User Rating		52 %	+4%		50 %

Age Newest		84+ Months	More recent. +20%		105+ Months
64-Core OC Multi Core Speed		226 Pts	Hugely faster OC 64-core speed. +569%		33.8 Pts
64-Core Avg. Multi Core Speed		193 Pts	Hugely faster 64-core speed. +610%		27.2 Pts

ADVERTISEMENT

NOT IMPRESS! Compare to a 2 generation older comparable i5 CPU the i5-4250 it’s not mush faster (well you wont notice it) What have you done Intel in 22 month!  ^{[Dec ’19 Strauby]}

MORE DETAILS

This CPU is clocked at 1.40 GHz with no turbo, it has a terrible iGPU, TERRIBLE CPU. ^{[Oct ’20 iiEpicGamerYT]}

MORE DETAILS

Systems with these CPUs

Top Builds that include these CPUs

• HP Pavilion Notebook (793)
• HP Notebook (655)
• Dell Inspiron 5559 (615)
• HP EliteBook 840 G3 (408)
• HP ProBook 450 G3 (402)
• Lenovo 80Q7 (269)
• Acer Aspire E5-575G (264)

• HP Compaq CQ58 Notebook PC (31)
• HP 655 Notebook PC (21)
• Packard imedia S2110 (14)
• Packard EasyNote TE11BZ (11)
• Packard ENLE11BZ (11)
• HP 20-b014 (10)
• Toshiba Satellite C855D (9)

Custom PC Builder (Start a new build)
Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance)
October 2022 CPU Rankings.

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. ^[CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

• Best user rated — User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
• Best value for money — Value for money is based on real world performance.
• Fastest real world speed — Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build)
Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming

Desktop

ProGaming

CPUGPUSSDHDDRAMUSB

How it works

• — Download and run UserBenchmark.
• — CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
• — GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
• — Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
• — RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
• — SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy.
• — Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
• — Identify the strongest components in your PC.
• — See speed test results from other users.
• — Compare your components to the current market leaders.
• — Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
• — Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

•   

  Intel Core i5-12600K

•   

  Intel Core i5-12400F

•   

  Intel Core i7-12700K

•   

  Intel Core i3-12100F

•   

  Intel Core i5-12400

•   

  Intel Core i5-11600K

•   

  Intel Core i7-11700K

•   

  AMD Ryzen 5 5600X

•   

  AMD Ryzen 5 3600

•   

  Intel Core i5-11400F

•   

  Intel Core i5-9600K

•   

  Intel Core i5-11400

About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube
Feedback

AMD E1-6010 — processor overview.

Tests and Specs

AMD E1-6010 processor is based on 28 nm process technology and Beema architecture. The base clock is 1.35 GHz and the maximum turbo clock is No turbo. AMD E1-6010 contains 2 processor cores. To make the right choice for upgrading your computer, check out the detailed specifications and test results. Please check your motherboard socket compatibility before choosing.

3.2
From 11
Hitesti Score

TOP 10 processors

Most popular on the site

Intel Celeron N4020
2x 1.10 GHz (2.80 GHz)

AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
6x 2. 10 GHz (4.00 GHz) HT

Intel Celeron J4125
4x 2.00 GHz (2.70 GHz)

AMD Ryzen 3 3250U
2x 2.60 GHz (3.50 GHz) HT

AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
8x 1.80 GHz (4.30 GHz) HT

AMD Athlon Silver 3050U
2x 2. 30 GHz (3.20 GHz)

Intel Core i3-1115G4
2x 1.70 GHz (4.10 GHz) HT

Intel Core i5-1135G7
4x 2.40 GHz (4.00 GHz) HT

AMD Ryzen 5 4600G
6x 3.70 GHz (4.20 GHz) HT

Intel Celeron N4500
2x 1. 10 GHz (2.90 GHz)

Buy here:

AliExpress

General information

AMD E1-6010 base and maximum clock speed, number of processor cores and threads. The more the better (marked in green).

CPU cores, base and turbo speeds

The overall performance of a processor can be easily determined based on the number of processor cores and threads, as well as the clock speed in standard mode and turbo. The more GHz, cores and L2-L3 cache a processor has, the better. Please note that high specifications require a powerful cooling system and a quality chipset (check the VRM on the motherboard).

Clock frequency:	1.35 GHz		Number of cores:	2
Turbo (1 core):	No turbo		Number of threads:	2
Turbo (2 Cores):	No turbo		Hyper trading:	No.
Acceleration:	No

Internal graphics

Some manufacturers (most often Intel) supplement processors with graphics chips, this solution is especially popular in laptops, but ineffective in workstations and gaming stations. The higher the clock speed of the video card and the more memory on board, the better.

GPU name:		AMD Radeon R2 (Beema)
GPU frequency:	0. 35 GHz		GPU (Turbo):	No turbo
Generation:	6		DirectX version:	12
Execution units:	2		Number of shaders:	128
Maximum memory:	2GB		Number of monitors:	2
Technology:	28nm		Release date:	Q1/2015

Hardware codec support

Here we are dealing with specifications that are used by some processor manufacturers. These figures are mostly technical and can be disregarded for comparative purposes.

h364:		Decode
JPEG:		Decode/Encode
h365 8bit:		No.
h365 10bit:		No.
VP8:		No.
VP9:		No.
VC-1:		Decode
AVC:		Decode

RAM and PCIe

These are the memory standards supported by processors. The higher the standard and clock frequency with the amount of RAM, the better the performance and speed of the processor. It is also worth considering the possibility of memory operation in multichannel mode.

Memory type:	DDR3L-1333 SO-DIMM		Memory channels:	1
ECC:	No

Encryption

Support for data encryption

AES-NI:

Yes

Thermal management and TDP

TDP:	10W		Maximum temperature:	—
Maximum TDP:	—		TDP down:	—

Technical details

These are key parameters that will help you determine which processor is best. Pay special attention to the release date, the technological aspects of the manufacturing process (measured in nanometers) and the third level (L3) cache.

L3-Cache:			Technology:	28nm
Architecture:	Beema		Virtualization:	AMD-V
Socket:	AM1		Release date:	Q2/2014

Devices compatible with this processor

You probably already know which devices use processors. It can be a desktop computer or a laptop.

Used in:

Unknown

This synthetic benchmark will help you determine the actual processing power of a single CPU core. Cinebench R11.5 is based on MAXON CINEMA 4D and uses various test scenarios

AMD E-450
2x 1.65 GHz (No turbo)

AMD E-350
2x 1. 60 GHz (No turbo)

AMD E1-6010
2x 1.35 GHz (No turbo)

Intel Pentium D1509
2x 1.50 GHz (1.50 GHz)

Intel Celeron N29ten
4x 1.60 GHz (No turbo)

Cinebench R11. 5 performs simultaneous cross-platform tests on all processor cores. Running realistic 3D scenes, this benchmark will unleash the full potential of your single-core Intel or AMD

processor

AMD E-450
2x 1.65 GHz (No turbo)

AMD E-350
2x 1.60 GHz (No turbo)

AMD E1-6010
2x 1. 35 GHz (No turbo)

Intel Celeron 847
2x 1.10 GHz (No turbo)

Intel Pentium D15092x 1.50 GHz (1.50 GHz)

The latter is used to create 3D models and shapes. Cinebench R15 is used to benchmark the performance of single core processors. Hyperthreading capability is not taken into account. It is an updated version of Cinebench 11.5. Like all new versions, the updated benchmark is based on Cinema 4 Suite

software

Intel Celeron N2930
4x 1. 83 GHz (2.16 GHz)

AMD A4-5000
4x 1.50 GHz (No turbo)

AMD E1-6010
2x 1.35 GHz (No turbo)

Intel Celeron N29ten
4x 1.60 GHz (No turbo)

Intel Pentium D1509
2x 1. 50 GHz (1.50 GHz)

Cinebench R15 can be used to test the performance of multi-core processors. The test produces accurate and reliable results. This benchmark is an updated version of Cinebench 11.5, which is based on Cinema 4 Suite soft.

Intel Celeron N2806
2x 1.60 GHz (2.00 GHz)

Intel Pentium D1509
2x 1.50 GHz (1.50 GHz)

AMD E1-6010
2x 1. 35 GHz (No turbo)

Intel Pentium D1507
2x 1.20 GHz (1.20 GHz)

Geekbench 3 is a benchmark for 64-bit Intel and AMD processors. It uses a new power rating system for a single processor core. This software simulates real scenarios for accurate results

Intel Atom Z3460
2x (1.60 GHz)

AMD E1-2500
2x 1. 40 GHz (No turbo)

AMD E1-6010
2x 1.35 GHz (No turbo)

Intel Celeron N29ten
4x 1.60 GHz (No turbo)

Intel Atom E3826
2x 1.46 GHz (No turbo)

Geekbench 3 supports multi-core AMD and Intel processors. Based on MAXON CINEMA 4D, it allows you to get the real comparative potential of the

processor

Intel Atom D2550
2x 1.86 GHz (No turbo) HT

AMD E-450
2x 1.65 GHz (No turbo)

AMD E1-6010
2x 1.35 GHz (No turbo)

AMD E2-1800
2x 1. 70 GHz (No turbo)

Intel Atom E3825
2x 1.33 GHz (No turbo)

Geekbench 5 is the latest software. Completely new algorithms provide fairly accurate test results for single-core processors.

Intel Celeron N3000
2x 1.04 GHz (2.08 GHz)

AMD Sempron 2650
2x 1. 45 GHz (No turbo)

AMD E1-6010
2x 1.35 GHz (No turbo)

AMD E2-1800
2x 1.70 GHz (No turbo)

AMD E-350
2x 1.60 GHz (No turbo)

Geekbench 5 shows benchmark results for memory performance and multi-core processor speed. This takes into account the ability to hyperthreading.

AMD E2-2000
2x 1.75 GHz (No turbo)

AMD E1-2500
2x 1.40 GHz (No turbo)

AMD E1-6010
2x 1.35 GHz (No turbo)

AMD Sempron 2650
2x 1. 45 GHz (No turbo)

AMD E-350
2x 1.60 GHz (No turbo)

It tests all and general CPU performance (math calculations, compression and decompression speed, 2D&3D graphics tests). Please note that data may differ from actual situations.

Intel Atom S1260
2x 2.00 GHz (No turbo) HT

AMD E1-2500
2x 1. 40 GHz (No turbo)

AMD E1-6010
2x 1.35 GHz (No turbo)

Intel Celeron N2806
2x 1.60 GHz (2.00 GHz)

Intel Atom E3827
2x 1.75 GHz (No turbo)

This test measures the performance of integrated graphics on Intel and AMD processors. The result is the calculated processing power in Single-Precision mode FP32

Intel Celeron 1000M
2x 1.80 GHz (No turbo)

Intel Celeron G530
2x 2.40 GHz (No turbo)

AMD E1-6010
2x 1.35 GHz (No turbo)

Intel Celeron 1047UE
2x 1. 40 GHz (No turbo)

AMD E1-1500
2x 1.48 GHz (No turbo)

3.2
From 11
Hitesti Score

Share on social networks:

In order to leave a review, you need to login

Review AMD E1-6010

Compare AMD E1-6010

VS

Intel Core i5-8259U

AMD A4-5000

AMD Ryzen 7 4800H

AMD A6-3500

AMD A6-9225

Intel Xeon E7-8880 v2

Intel Core i9-10900KF

AMD A8-7650K

Intel Core i7-1160G7

Intel Core2 Duo E6700

AMD E1-6010 processor review: specifications, benchmark tests

The E1-6010 processor was released by AMD, release date: 29 April 2014. The processor is designed for laptop computers and is built on the Beema architecture.

Processor unlocked for overclocking. Total number of cores — 2, threads — 2. Technological process — 28 nm. Cache size: L2 — 1 MB.

Supported memory type: DDR3L-1333.

Supported socket type: FT3b. Power consumption (TDP): 10 Watts.

AMD Radeon R2 Graphics is integrated into the processor.

Benchmarks

PassMark Single thread mark	Top1 CPU This CPU
PassMark CPU mark	Top1 CPU This CPU	118142
Geekbench 4 Single Core	Top1 CPU This CPU
Geekbench 4 Multi-Core	Top1 CPU This CPU
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop Face Detection	Top1 CPU This CPU	56.680 mPixels/s 2.155 mPixels/s
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop Ocean Surface Simulation	Top1 CPU This CPU	741.453 Frames/s 62.055 Frames/s
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop T-Rex	Top1 CPU This CPU	3. 237 Frames/s 0.196 Frames/s
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop Video Composition	Top1 CPU This CPU	49.002 Frames/s 3.689 Frames/s
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop Bitcoin Mining	Top1 CPU This CPU	218.231 mHash/s 11. 178 mHash/s
GFXBench 4.0 Car Chase Offscreen	Top1 CPU This CPU	9047 Frames 377 Frames
GFXBench 4.0 Manhattan	Top1 CPU This CPU	7128 Frames 877 Frames
GFXBench 4. 0 T-Rex	Top1 CPU This CPU	12887 Frames 2018 Frames
GFXBench 4.0 Car Chase Offscreen	Top1 CPU This CPU	9047.000 Fps 377.000 Fps
GFXBench 4.0 Manhattan	Top1 CPU This CPU	7128. 000 Fps 877.000 Fps
GFXBench 4.0 T-Rex	Top1 CPU This CPU	12887.000 Fps 2018.000 Fps

Name	Meaning
PassMark — Single thread mark	422
PassMark — CPU mark	527
Geekbench 4 — Single Core	142
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core	250
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection	2.155 mPixels/s
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation	62.055 Frames/s
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex	0.196 Frames/s
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition	3.689 Frames/s
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining	11.178 mHash/s
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen	377 Frames
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan	877 Frames
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex	2018 Frames
GFXBench 4. 0 — Car Chase Offscreen	377.000 Fps
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan	877.000 Fps
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex	2018.000 Fps

Core clock	700MHz
Floating point performance	179.2 gflops
Process	28nm
Number of shaders	128
Texturing speed	5.6 GTexel/s
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt
Number of transistors	930 million

Gaming performance

1. Counter-Strike: GO (2012)
2. Team Fortress 2 (2017)
3. Rocket League (2017)
4 Prey (2017)
5. Farming Simulator 17 (2016)
6 Civilization VI (2016)
7 Overwatch (2016)
8 Rainbow Six Siege (2015)
9. World of Warships (2015)
10. Dota 2 Reborn (2015)

11. Dirt Rally (2015)
12. Dragon Age: Inquisition (2014)
13 Alien: Isolation (2014)
14 Sims 4 (2014)
15 BioShock Infinite (2013)
16. Tomb Raider (2013)
17. Diablo III (2012)
18. The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim (2011)
19. Deus Ex Human Revolution (2011)
20. Starcraft 2 (2010)
21. World of Warcraft (2005)

Counter-Strike: GO (2012)

Low, 1024×768	26.90
Medium, 1366×768	21.70
High, 1366×768	20.00

Team Fortress 2 (2017)

Low, 1280×720	19.70
Medium, 1366×768	18.50

Rocket League (2017)

LOW, 1280×720

30.80

PREY

LOW, 1280×720, 1280×7200057

9.40

Farming Simulator 17 (2016)

Low, 1280×720	43. 50
Medium, 1366×768	26.40

Civilization VI (2016)

Low, 1024×768	21.60
Medium, 1366×768	8.50

Overwatch (2016)

Low, 1280×0056 17.50
Medium, 1366×768	15.00

Rainbow Six Siege (2015)

Low, 1024×768	20.40
Medium, 1366×768	13.80

World Of Warships (2015)

Low, 1366×768	25.50
Medium, 1366×768	.30

99999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999EVE1179

Low, 1280×720	28.70
Medium, 1366×768	18. 40

Dirt Rally (2015)

Low, 1024×768	25.10
Medium, 1366×768	13.00

Dragon Age: Inquisition (2014)

LOW, 1024×768	11.20
Medium, 13666×768 9005 8.0057

Alien: Isolation (2014)

Low, 1024×768	17.80
Medium, 1366×768	10.30

Sims 4 (2014)

Low, 1024×768	82.10
Medium, 1366×768	20.70

BIOSHOCK Infinite (2013)

1

Low, 1280×720 3.0055

Medium, 1366×768 17.25 High, 1366×768 14.00

Tomb Raider (2013)

Low, 1024×768	35. 70
Medium, 1366×768	15.70
High, 1366×768	11.10

Diablo III (2012)

LOW, 1024×768	28.500057	17.80
High, 1366×768	15.90

The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim (2011)

Low, 1280×720	24.70
Medium, 1366×768	16.30
HIGH, 1366×768	10.80

Deus Ex Human Revolution (2011)

Low, 1024×768

HIITI0057

41.00

20.30

StarCraft 2 (2010)

Low, 1024×768	59.60
Medium, 1360×768	17.80
High, 1360×768	14.10

World Of Warcraft (2005)

characteristics0054

Low, 800×600	65. 20
Medium, 1024×768	33.20
Architecture name	Beema
Family	AMD E-Series Processors
Production date	April 29, 2014
OPN Tray	EM6010IUJ23JB
Ranking	2225
Series	AMD E1-Series APU for Laptops
Applicability	Laptop
Support 64 bit
Base frequency	1. 35 GHz
Level 2 cache	1MB
Process	28nm
Number of cores	2
Number of threads	2
Unlocked
Maximum number of memory channels	1
Supported memory types	DDR3L-1333
Enduro
Integrated graphics	AMD Radeon R2 Graphics
Switchable graphics
Unified Video Decoder (UVD)
Video Codec Engine (VCE)
DisplayPort
HDMI
DirectX	12
Vulcan
Supported sockets	FT3b
Power consumption (TDP)	10 Watt
PCI Express revision	2. 0
AMD App Acceleration
AMD Elite Experiences
AMD HD3D technology
Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP)
Fused Multiply-Add (FMA)
Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4)
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX)
Intel® AES New Instructions
PowerGating
PowerNow
System Image Stability
VirusProtect
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™)
IOMMU 2. 0

Processor E1-6010 [in 17 benchmarks]

AMD
E1-6010

• Interface
• Core clock
• Video memory size
• Memory type
• Memory frequency
• Maximum resolution

Description

AMD started AMD E1-6010 sales 29 April 2014. This is Beema architecture notebook processor primarily aimed at office systems. It has 2 cores and 2 threads and is manufactured using 28nm process technology, the maximum frequency is 1350MHz, the multiplier is locked.

In terms of compatibility, this is an FT3b socket processor with a TDP of 10W. It supports DDR3 memory.

It provides poor benchmark performance at

0.52%

from the leader, which is AMD EPYC 7h22.

E1
6010

or

EPYC

9005 9005 9005 9005 9005 9005 9005 9005 9005 9005 9005 9005 9005 9005 9005 9005 9005 9005 9005 9005 9005 9005 9005 9ATH -NI

Expanded instructions	86x SSE (1, 3, 3S, 4. 1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, SINGLE-CHANNEL DDR3L-1333
+
FMA	FMA4
AVX	+
PowerTune	—
TrueAudio	—
PowerNow	+
PowerGating	+
Out-of-band	—
Virusprotect	+

Virtualization technologies

Peripherals

E1-6010 supported peripherals and how to connect them.

Revision PCI Express

2.0

of 5 (Core i9-12900K)

Tests
These are the results of the E1-6010 performance tests in non-gaming benchmarks. The overall score is set from 0 to 100, where 100 corresponds to the fastest processor at the moment.

---

Overall benchmark performance

This is our overall performance rating. We regularly improve our algorithms, but if you find any inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in the comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

E1-6010
0.52

• Passmark
• GeekBench 5 Single-Core
• GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
• Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
• Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core
• 3DMark06 CPU
• Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core
• Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core
• Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core
• Cinebench 11. 5 64-bit single-core
• TrueCrypt AES
• WinRAR 4.0
• x264 encoding pass 2
• x264 encoding pass 1
• Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core
• Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widely used benchmark consisting of 8 different tests, including integer and floating point calculations, extended instruction tests, compression, encryption and game physics calculations. Also includes a separate single-threaded test.

Benchmark coverage: 69%

E1-6010
527

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application designed as CPU benchmarks that independently recreate certain real world tasks that can be used to accurately measure performance. This version uses only one processor core.

Benchmark coverage: 37%

E1-6010
138

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application designed as CPU benchmarks that independently recreate certain real world tasks that can accurately measure performance. This version uses all available processor cores.

Benchmark coverage: 37%

E1-6010
245

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is a very outdated ray tracing benchmark for processors developed by the authors of Cinema 4D — Maxon. The Single-Core version uses a single CPU thread to render a futuristic motorcycle model.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

E1-6010
1006

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 that uses all processor threads. The possible number of threads in this version is limited to 16.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

E1-6010
1784

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is an outdated set of benchmarks based on DirectX 9 by Futuremark. Its processor part contains two tests, one of which calculates the pathfinding of game AI, the other emulates game physics using the PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

E1-6010
927

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 that uses all processor threads. This version supports a maximum of 64 threads.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

E1-6010
1

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core (sometimes referred to as Multi-Thread) is a variant of Cinebench R15 that uses all of the processor’s threads.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

E1-6010
49

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (Release 15) is a benchmark created by Maxon, the creator of the popular Cinema 4D 3D modeling package. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench using more modern variants of the Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes referred to as Single-Thread) uses only one CPU thread to render a room full of mirror balls and complexly shaped lights.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

E1-6010
25

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark developed by Maxon. authors of Cinema 4D. It has been superseded by later versions of Cinebench which use more modern variants of the Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads one CPU thread with ray tracing, rendering a glossy room full of crystal spheres and lights.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

E1-6010
0.3

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a deprecated program that was widely used to encrypt disk partitions on the fly. It contains several built-in benchmarks, one of which is TrueCrypt AES. It measures the speed of data encryption using the AES algorithm. The result of the test is the encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

E1-6010
0

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4. 0 is an outdated version of the popular archiver. It contains an internal speed test using maximum compression by the RAR algorithm on large amounts of randomly generated data. Results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 12%

E1-6010
516

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower MPEG4 x264 video compression benchmark, resulting in a variable bit rate output file. This results in a better quality of the resulting video file, as a higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. The benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.

Benchmark coverage: 12%

E1-6010
4

x264 encoding pass 1

The x264 benchmark uses the MPEG 4 x264 compression method to encode the sample video in HD (720p). Pass 1 is a faster option that produces an output file at a constant bit rate. Its result is measured in frames per second, that is, how many frames of the source video file were encoded in one second on average.

Benchmark coverage: 12%

E1-6010
19

Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core

Benchmark coverage: 6%

E1-6010
1324

Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core

Benchmark coverage: 6%

E1-6010
760

---

Relative capacity

Overall performance of the E1-6010 compared to its closest competitor in notebook processors.

---

AMD Athlon II Neo K345
100

AMD Athlon Neo X2 L335
100

Intel Pentium T2370
100

AMD E1-6010
100

Intel Pentium T2310
100

Intel Pentium Dual Core T2310 100

Intel Core 2 Duo L7400
98.08

Competitor from Intel

We believe that the closest equivalent to E1-6010 from Intel is Pentium Dual Core T2310, which is approximately equal in speed and lower by 3 positions in our rating.

Pentium Dual
Core T2310

Compare

Here are some of Intel’s closest competitors to the E1-6010:

Intel Pentium T2370
100

Intel Pentium Dual Core T2310
100

Intel Pentium T2310
100

AMD E1-6010
100

Intel Celeron T3100
98.08

Intel Celeron T1600
98.08

Intel Core 2 Duo L7400
98.08

Other processors

Here we recommend several processors that are more or less similar in performance to the reviewed one.

Celeron
N2830

Compare

Celeron
867

Compare

Celeron
J1800

Compare

Celeron
N2840

Compare

E1
7010

Compare

E1
2500

Compare

Recommended video cards

According to our statistics, these video cards are most often used with E1-6010:

HD
Graphics 4000

40. 3%

Radeon R2
Graphics

9.4%

GeForce GTX
660

6.2%

GeForce GTX
1050 Ti

5.2%

GeForce GTX
1060 6GB

4.4%

GeForce RTX
3090

4.3%

UHD
Graphics 630

3%

UHD
Graphics 620

2.8%

Radeon RX
Vega 3

1.5%

GeForce GTX
1650

1.5%

User rating

Here you can see the evaluation of the processor by users, as well as put your own rating.