FirePro W4100 [in 7 benchmarks]
FirePro W4100
Buy
- Interface PCIe 3.0 x16
- Core clock speed 630
- Max video memory 2048 MB
- Memory type GDDR5
- Memory clock speed 4000
- Maximum resolution 4096×2160
Summary
AMD started FirePro W4100 sales 2 October 2015. This is GCN architecture desktop card based on 28 nm manufacturing process and primarily aimed at designers. 2 GB of GDDR5 memory clocked at 4 GHz are supplied, and together with 128 Bit memory interface this creates a bandwidth of 72 GB/s.
Compatibility-wise, this is single-slot card attached via PCIe 3.0 x16 interface. Its manufacturer default version has a length of 171 mm. No additional power connector is required, and power consumption is at 400 Watt.
It provides poor gaming and benchmark performance at
5. 22%
of a leader’s which is NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti.
FirePro
W4100
vs
GeForce RTX
3090 Ti
General info
Of FirePro W4100’s architecture, market segment and release date.
Place in performance rating | 575 | |
Value for money | 0.87 | |
Architecture | GCN (2011−2017) | |
GPU code name | Cape Verde | |
Market segment | Workstation | |
Release date | 2 October 2015 (6 years ago) | |
Current price | $271 | of 49999 (A100 SXM4) |
Value for money
To get the index we compare the characteristics of video cards and their relative prices.
- 0
- 50
- 100
Technical specs
FirePro W4100’s general performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU base clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of FirePro W4100’s performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 512 | of 18432 (AD102) |
Core clock speed | 630 MHz | of 2610 (Radeon RX 6500 XT) |
Number of transistors | 1,500 million | of 14400 (GeForce GTX 1080 SLI Mobile) |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | of 4 (GeForce RTX 4080 Ti) |
Thermal design power (TDP) | 400 Watt | of 900 (Tesla S2050) |
Texture fill rate | 20.![]() |
of 939.8 (h200 SXM5) |
Floating-point performance | 645.1 gflops | of 16384 (Radeon Pro Duo) |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Information on FirePro W4100’s compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it’s interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Length | 171 mm | |
Width | 1-slot | |
Form factor | low profile / half length | |
Supplementary power connectors | None |
Memory
Parameters of memory installed on FirePro W4100: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors don’t have dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | of 128 (Radeon Instinct MI250X) |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | of 8192 (Radeon Instinct MI250X) |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | of 21000 (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti) |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | of 14400 (Radeon R7 M260) |
Shared memory | — |
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on FirePro W4100. As a rule, this section is relevant only for desktop reference video cards, since for notebook ones the availability of certain video outputs depends on the laptop model.
Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort | |
Dual-link DVI support | 1 |
Technologies
Technological solutions and APIs supported by FirePro W4100. You’ll probably need this information if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
AppAcceleration | + |
API support
APIs supported by FirePro W4100, sometimes including their particular versions.
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 |
Benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark performance of FirePro W4100. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.
Overall score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
FirePro W4100
5.22
- Passmark
- 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
- 3DMark Fire Strike Score
- 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
- GeekBench 5 OpenCL
- GeekBench 5 Vulkan
- Unigine Heaven 3.0
Passmark
This is probably the most ubiquitous benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Benchmark coverage: 26%
FirePro W4100
1534
3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280×720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.
Benchmark coverage: 14%
FirePro W4100
12657
3DMark Fire Strike Score
Benchmark coverage: 14%
FirePro W4100
1594
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature seemingly made of lava. Using 1920×1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic enough graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.
Benchmark coverage: 14%
FirePro W4100
1665
GeekBench 5 OpenCL
Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU’s processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.
Benchmark coverage: 9%
FirePro W4100
6575
GeekBench 5 Vulkan
Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU’s processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.
Benchmark coverage: 5%
FirePro W4100
7852
Unigine Heaven 3.0
This is an old DirectX 11 benchmark using Unigine, a 3D game engine by eponymous Russian company. It displays a fantasy medieval town sprawling over several flying islands. Version 3.0 was released in 2012, and in 2013 it was superseded by Heaven 4.0, which introduced several slight improvements, including a newer version of Unigine.
Benchmark coverage: 5%
FirePro W4100
20
Mining hashrates
Cryptocurrency mining performance of FirePro W4100. Usually measured in megahashes per second.
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 79 Mh/s |
Game benchmarks
Let’s see how good FirePro W4100 is for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in frames per second. Comparisons with game system requirements are included, but remember that sometimes official requirements may reflect reality inaccurately.
Average FPS
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular modern games across different resolutions:
Full HD | 16 | |
4K | 3 |
Popular games
- Full HD
Low Preset - Full HD
Medium Preset - Full HD
High Preset - Full HD
Ultra Preset - 1440p
High Preset - 1440p
Ultra Preset - 4K
High Preset - 4K
Ultra Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 5−6 |
Assassin’s Creed Odyssey | 5−6 | |
Assassin’s Creed Valhalla | 5−6 | |
Battlefield 5 | 5−6 | |
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 5−6 | |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 5−6 | |
Far Cry 5 | 5−6 | |
Far Cry New Dawn | 5−6 | |
Forza Horizon 4 | 5−6 | |
Hitman 3 | 5−6 | |
Horizon Zero Dawn | 5−6 | |
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 5−6 | |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 5−6 | |
Watch Dogs: Legion | 5−6 |
Assassin’s Creed Odyssey | 5−6 | |
Assassin’s Creed Valhalla | 5−6 | |
Battlefield 5 | 5−6 | |
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 5−6 | |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 5−6 | |
Far Cry 5 | 5−6 | |
Far Cry New Dawn | 5−6 | |
Forza Horizon 4 | 5−6 | |
Hitman 3 | 5−6 | |
Horizon Zero Dawn | 5−6 | |
Metro Exodus | 5−6 | |
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 5−6 | |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 5−6 | |
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 7 | |
Watch Dogs: Legion | 5−6 |
Assassin’s Creed Odyssey | 5−6 | |
Assassin’s Creed Valhalla | 5−6 | |
Battlefield 5 | 5−6 | |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 5−6 | |
Far Cry 5 | 5−6 | |
Far Cry New Dawn | 5−6 | |
Forza Horizon 4 | 5−6 | |
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5−6 | |
Watch Dogs: Legion | 5−6 |
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 5−6 | |
Hitman 3 | 5−6 | |
Horizon Zero Dawn | 5−6 | |
Metro Exodus | 5−6 | |
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 5−6 | |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 5−6 |
Assassin’s Creed Odyssey | 5−6 | |
Assassin’s Creed Valhalla | 5−6 | |
Battlefield 5 | 5−6 | |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 5−6 | |
Far Cry 5 | 5−6 | |
Far Cry New Dawn | 5−6 | |
Forza Horizon 4 | 5−6 | |
Watch Dogs: Legion | 5−6 |
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 5−6 | |
Hitman 3 | 5−6 | |
Horizon Zero Dawn | 5−6 | |
Metro Exodus | 5−6 | |
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 5−6 | |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 5−6 | |
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5−6 |
Assassin’s Creed Odyssey | 5−6 | |
Assassin’s Creed Valhalla | 5−6 | |
Battlefield 5 | 5−6 | |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 5−6 | |
Far Cry 5 | 5−6 | |
Far Cry New Dawn | 5−6 | |
Forza Horizon 4 | 5−6 | |
Watch Dogs: Legion | 5−6 |
Relative perfomance
Overall FirePro W4100 performance compared to nearest competitors among server video cards.
NVIDIA Quadro P400
103.45
AMD FirePro W600
103.45
NVIDIA Quadro K2000
101.72
AMD FirePro W4100
100
AMD FirePro W6150M
98.85
NVIDIA Quadro 4000
96.74
ATI FirePro V5800
92.34
NVIDIA equivalent
The nearest FirePro W4100’s NVIDIA equivalent is Quadro K2000, which is faster by 2% and higher by 6 positions in our rating.
Quadro
K2000
Compare
Here are some closest NVIDIA rivals to FirePro W4100:
NVIDIA Quadro K2000D
105. 17
NVIDIA Quadro P400
103.45
NVIDIA Quadro K2000
101.72
AMD FirePro W4100
100
NVIDIA Quadro 4000
96.74
NVIDIA Tesla M2070-Q
85.06
NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800
80.65
Similar GPUs
Here is our recommendation of several graphics cards that are more or less close in performance to the one reviewed.
FirePro
W2100
Compare
Recommended processors
These processors are most commonly used with FirePro W4100 according to our statistics.
Core i7
4790
25%
Xeon E3
1220 v3
8. 3%
Core i5
4590
5.6%
Xeon E3
1245 v2
2.8%
Celeron
G540
2.8%
Core 2
Quad Q9550
2.8%
Core i5
9300H
2.8%
Core i7
6700HQ
2.8%
Xeon E5
2670 v2
2.8%
Core i7
5600U
2. 8%
User rating
Here you can see the user rating of the graphics card, as well as rate it yourself.
Questions and comments
Here you can ask a question about FirePro W4100, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.
Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.
AMD FirePro W4100 — review. GPU Benchmark & Specs
AMD FirePro W4100 graphics card (also called GPU) comes in 459 in the performance rating. It is a good result. The graphics card AMD FirePro W4100 runs with the minimal clock speed 630 MHz. It is featured by the acceleration option and able to run up to . The manufacturer has equipped AMD with GB of 2 GB memory, clock speed 4000 MHz and bandwidth 72 GB/s.
The power consumption of the graphics card is 50 Watt, and the fabrication process is only 28 nm. Below you will find the main data on the compatibility, sizes, technologies and gaming performance test results. Also you can read and leave the comments.
Let’s take a closer look at the most important specifications of the graphics card. To have a good idea what a graphics card is the best, we recommend to use comparison service.
5.0
Out of 4
Hitesti score
Popular graphics cards
Most viewed
AMD Radeon RX Vega 7
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Intel UHD Graphics 600
NVIDIA Quadro T1000
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10
NVIDIA GeForce MX330
Intel HD Graphics 530
Intel UHD Graphics 620
Intel HD Graphics 4600
Intel HD Graphics 520
DE
Buy here:
AliExpress
General info
The basic set of information will help you find out the graphics card AMD FirePro W4100 release date and its purpose (laptops or PCs), as well as the price at the time of the release and the average current price. This data also includes the architecture employed by the producer, and the chip’s codename.
Place in performance rating: | 534 | |||
Value for money (0-100): | 6.55 | |||
Architecture: | GCN | |||
Code name: | Cape Verde | |||
Type: | Workstation | |||
Release date: | 2 October 2015 (6 years ago) | |||
Price now: | $212 | |||
Value for money: | 4.56 | |||
GPU code name: | Cape Verde | |||
Market segment: | Workstation |
Technical specs
This is the important information that defines the graphics card’s capacity. The simpler the device production process, the better. The core’s power frequency is responsible for its speed (direct correlation) while the elaboration of signals is performed by the transistors (the more transistors, the faster the computations are carried out).
Pipelines: | 512 | |||
Core clock speed: | 630 MHz | |||
Transistor count: | 1,500 million | |||
Manufacturing process technology: | 28 nm | |||
Power consumption (TDP): | 50 Watt | |||
Texture fill rate: | 20.16 | |||
Floating-point performance: | 645.![]() |
|||
Pipelines / CUDA cores: | 512 | |||
Number of transistors: | 1,500 million | |||
Thermal design power (TDP): | 400 Watt |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Today there are numerous form factors for PC cases, so it is extremely important to know the length of the graphics card and the types of its connection. This will help facilitate the upgrade process.
Interface: | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |||
Length: | 171 mm | |||
Supplementary power connectors: | None | |||
Bus support: | PCIe 3.![]() |
|||
Form factor: | low profile / half length |
Memory
The internal main memory is used for storing data while conducting computations. Contemporary games and professional graphic apps have high requirements for the memory’s volume and capacity. The higher this parameter, the more powerful and fast the graphics card is. Type of memory, the capacity and bandwidth for AMD FirePro W4100.
Memory type: | GDDR5 | |||
Maximum RAM amount: | 2 GB | |||
Memory bus width: | 128 Bit | |||
Memory clock speed: | 4000 MHz | |||
Memory bandwidth: | 72 GB/s | |||
Shared memory: | — |
Video outputs and ports
As a rule, all contemporary graphics cards feature several connection types and additional ports. Knowing these peculiarities is crucial for avoiding problems with connecting the graphics card to the monitor or other peripheral devices.
Display Connectors: | 4x mini-DisplayPort | |||
Dual-link DVI support: | 1 |
Technologies
Each graphic card manufacturer complements its products with branded technologies that are used both in games and in the working process. Below is the list of peculiar features that you may find rather useful.
AppAcceleration: | + | |||
PowerPlay: | + |
API support
All API-supported AMD FirePro W4100 are listed below.
DirectX: | 12 (11_1) | |||
OpenGL: | 4.![]() |
|||
Vulkan: | 1.2.131 | |||
Shader Model: | 5.1 | |||
OpenCL: | 1.2 |
Overall gaming performance
All tests have been based on FPS counter. Let’s have a look on what place AMD FirePro W4100 has been taken in the gaming performance test (calculation has been made in accordance with the game developer recommendations about system requirements; it can differ from the real world situations).
Select games to view
Horizon Zero DawnDeath StrandingF1 2020Gears TacticsDoom EternalHunt ShowdownEscape from TarkovHearthstoneRed Dead Redemption 2Star Wars Jedi Fallen OrderNeed for Speed HeatCall of Duty Modern Warfare 2019GRID 2019Ghost Recon BreakpointFIFA 20Borderlands 3ControlF1 2019League of LegendsTotal War: Three KingdomsRage 2Anno 1800The Division 2Dirt Rally 2. 0AnthemMetro ExodusFar Cry New DawnApex LegendsJust Cause 4Darksiders IIIFarming Simulator 19Battlefield VFallout 76Hitman 2Call of Duty Black Ops 4Assassin´s Creed OdysseyForza Horizon 4FIFA 19Shadow of the Tomb RaiderStrange BrigadeF1 2018Monster Hunter WorldThe Crew 2Far Cry 5World of Tanks enCoreX-Plane 11.11Kingdom Come: DeliveranceFinal Fantasy XV BenchmarkFortniteStar Wars Battlefront 2Need for Speed PaybackCall of Duty WWIIAssassin´s Creed OriginsWolfenstein II: The New ColossusDestiny 2ELEXThe Evil Within 2Middle-earth: Shadow of WarFIFA 18Ark Survival EvolvedF1 2017Playerunknown’s Battlegrounds (2017)Team Fortress 2Dirt 4Rocket LeaguePreyMass Effect AndromedaGhost Recon WildlandsFor HonorResident Evil 7Dishonored 2Call of Duty Infinite WarfareTitanfall 2Farming Simulator 17Civilization VIBattlefield 1Mafia 3Deus Ex Mankind DividedMirror’s Edge CatalystOverwatchDoomAshes of the SingularityHitman 2016The DivisionFar Cry PrimalXCOM 2Rise of the Tomb RaiderRainbow Six SiegeAssassin’s Creed SyndicateStar Wars BattlefrontFallout 4Call of Duty: Black Ops 3Anno 2205World of WarshipsDota 2 RebornThe Witcher 3Dirt RallyGTA VDragon Age: InquisitionFar Cry 4Assassin’s Creed UnityCall of Duty: Advanced WarfareAlien: IsolationMiddle-earth: Shadow of MordorSims 4Wolfenstein: The New OrderThe Elder Scrolls OnlineThiefX-Plane 10.
25Battlefield 4Total War: Rome IICompany of Heroes 2Metro: Last LightBioShock InfiniteStarCraft II: Heart of the SwarmSimCityTomb RaiderCrysis 3Hitman: AbsolutionCall of Duty: Black Ops 2World of Tanks v8Borderlands 2Counter-Strike: GODirt ShowdownDiablo IIIMass Effect 3The Elder Scrolls V: SkyrimBattlefield 3Deus Ex Human RevolutionStarCraft 2Metro 2033Stalker: Call of PripyatGTA IV — Grand Theft AutoLeft 4 DeadTrackmania Nations ForeverCall of Duty 4 — Modern WarfareSupreme Commander — FA BenchCrysis — GPU BenchmarkWorld in Conflict — BenchmarkHalf Life 2 — Lost Coast BenchmarkWorld of WarcraftDoom 3Quake 3 Arena — TimedemoHalo InfiniteFarming Simulator 22Battlefield 2042Forza Horizon 5Riders RepublicGuardians of the GalaxyBack 4 BloodDeathloopF1 2021Days GoneResident Evil VillageHitman 3Cyberpunk 2077Assassin´s Creed ValhallaDirt 5Watch Dogs LegionMafia Definitive EditionCyberpunk 2077 1.5GRID LegendsDying Light 2Rainbow Six ExtractionGod of War
low
1280×720
med.
1920×1080
high
1920×1080
ultra
1920×1080
QHD
2560×1440
4K
3840×2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020)
low
1280×720
med.
1920×1080
high
1920×1080
ultra
1920×1080
QHD
2560×1440
4K
3840×2160
Death Stranding (2020)
low
1280×720
med.
1920×1080
high
1920×1080
ultra
1920×1080
QHD
2560×1440
4K
3840×2160
F1 2020 (2020)
low
1280×720
med.
1920×1080
high
1920×1080
ultra
1920×1080
QHD
2560×1440
4K
3840×2160
Gears Tactics (2020)
low
1280×720
med.
1920×1080
high
1920×1080
ultra
1920×1080
QHD
2560×1440
4K
3840×2160
Doom Eternal (2020)
low
1280×720
med.
1920×1080
high
1920×1080
ultra
1920×1080
QHD
2560×1440
4K
3840×2160
Legend | |
5 | Stutter – The performance of this graphics cards with this game is not well explored yet. According to interpolated information obtained from graphics cards of similar efficiency levels, the game is likely to stutter and show low frame rates. |
May Stutter – The performance of this graphics cards with this game is not well explored yet. According to interpolated information obtained from graphics cards of similar efficiency levels, the game is likely to stutter and show low frame rates. | |
30 | Fluent – According to all known benchmarks with the specified graphical settings, this game is expected to run at 25fps or more |
40 | Fluent – According to all known benchmarks with the specified graphical settings, this game is expected to run at 35fps or more |
60 | Fluent – According to all known benchmarks with the specified graphical settings, this game is expected to run at 58fps or more |
May Run Fluently – The performance of this graphics cards with this game is not well explored yet.![]() |
|
? | Uncertain – The testing of this graphics cards on this game showed unexpected results. A slower card might be able to produce higher and more consistent frame rates when running the same benchmark scene. |
Uncertain – The performance of this graphics cards with this game is not well explored yet. No reliable data interpolation can be made based on the performance of similar cards of the same category. | |
The value in the fields reflects the average frame rate across the entire database. To obtain individual results, move your cursor over the value. |
Benchmark
Benchmarks help determine the performance in standard tests for AMD FirePro W4100. We have listed the world’s most famous benchmarks so that you could obtain accurate results in each (see the description). Graphics card preliminary testing is especially important in the presence of high loads so that the user could see to what extent the graphic processing unit copes with computations and data elaboration.
Overall benchmark performance
ATI FirePro M7740
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
AMD FirePro W4100
NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTX SLI
NVIDIA GeForce MX110
Unlike Ice Storm, Cloud Gate test elaborated by 3DMark employs more resource-intensive scenes. The better the final estimation, the faster your videocard is. The processing is carried out by means of DirectX 10.
NVIDIA Quadro P500
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M
AMD FirePro W4100
AMD FirePro M4000
AMD Radeon R9 M265X
This is an advanced videocard benchmark. With DirectX 11 being used for conducting the processing, the normal testing time is 15 minutes. The higher the estimation, the faster the videocard is.
AMD FirePro M4000
AMD Radeon R9 M275
AMD FirePro W4100
NVIDIA Quadro K2100M
Intel Iris Graphics 550
Complex graphic scenes require all the graphics card resources. They use the entire RAM and computing power. The test’s results can be viewed below.
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
AMD Radeon R9 M375
AMD FirePro W4100
Intel Iris Graphics 550
NVIDIA GeForce 940M
PassMark is a great benchmark that gets updated regularly and shows relevant information on the graphics card’s performance.
AMD Radeon HD 7870M
NVIDIA Quadro 4000
AMD FirePro W4100
NVIDIA GeForce MX110
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640
This test works for all types of videocards, has an innovative cross-platform core, and supports Direct X 9/10/11 and OpenGL.
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
AMD FirePro M4000
AMD FirePro W4100
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Intel HD Graphics 630
5. 0
Out of 4
Hitesti score
Share on social network:
In order to leave a review you need to log in
Reviews of AMD FirePro W4100
Compare AMD FirePro W4100
VS
NVIDIA Quadro K2000
NVIDIA Quadro 4000
AMD Cypress
AMD Baffin
AMD Cedar
AMD Tonga
NVIDIA NVS 810
AMD Bonaire
AMD Cayman
NVIDIA TITAN V
AMD FirePro W4100 — compare, specifications and benchmarks
General parameters AMD FirePro W4100: GPU, video memory, compatibility, video outputs, recommended hardware, performance and other characteristics.
Characteristics | Value |
---|---|
General information | |
Card name | AMD FirePro W4100 |
Manufacturing company | AMD |
Graphics category | For PC |
Architecture |
GCN 1.![]() |
Release date | 2014 |
Type of video card | Discrete |
SLI/CrossFireX | |
GPU | |
Process technology | 28 (nm) |
Core | Cape Verde |
Number of chips | 1 |
Number of transistors | 1500 (mln) |
Area | 123 (²) |
Core frequency | 630 (MHz) |
Universal Shader blocks | 512 |
Rasterization Blocks (ROP) | 16 |
Texture Blocks (TMU) | 32 |
Pixel speed | 10.![]() |
Texture speed | 20.2 (GTexel/s) |
Video memory | |
Video memory capacity | 2 Gb |
Type of video memory | GDDR5 |
Video memory frequency | 4000 (MHz) |
Memory bus width | 128 (Bit) |
Memory bandwidth | 64.0 (Gb/s) |
Nutrition | |
Power Consumption (TDP) | 50 (W) |
Min.![]() |
300 (W) |
Compatibility | |
DirectX | DX12 |
Shader Model | 5 |
OpenGL | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.2 |
Video Outputs | |
Technologies and instructions (virtualization, security) | |
Technologies and instructions | AMD PowerPlay,AMD PowerTune,AMD ZeroCore,Vulkan API,AMD App Acceleration |
* Graphics card specifications are subject to change by the manufacturer without notice |
A brief overview of the video card AMD FirePro W4100 from the company AMD. Card release date 2014 year.
This is the Desktop video card, the codename of the architecture is GCN 1.0, DirectX is 12,
developed using 28 nm technology, it has 2 Gb of GDDR5 memory installed at 4000 MHz,
and together with the 128 Bit interface, this creates a bandwidth of 64.0 GB/sec.
The power consumption (TDP) is 50 W, the maximum temperature at which the video card AMD FirePro W4100 can work is n/a.
AMD FirePro W4100 in 5 Benchmarks
It is time to review AMD FirePro W4100 benchmark performance. The base clock speed is 630 MHz, whilst its speed in turbo boost and supplementary overclocking (maximum) is .
AMD FirePro W4100 process technology is 28 nm that is a good result of the release date.
AMD manufacture has equipped graphic chips with 72 GB/s bandwidth and 630 MHz clock speed. AMD FirePro W4100 maximum memory is 2 GB.
We recommend you learn all technical specifications in separate sections for a common understanding and high-speed of AMD FirePro W4100.
5.0
Out of 3
CMPTEK score
Compare AMD FirePro W4100
VS
NVIDIA Quadro K2000 (353 views)
NVIDIA Quadro 4000 (339 views)
AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 (186 views)
NVIDIA GeForce MX330 (186 views)
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (186 views)
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (186 views)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M (183 views)
Intel HD Graphics 4600 (181 views)
NVIDIA Quadro P520 (177 views)
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (173 views)
General Information
Here is the release date, code name, core architecture, launch and current price. It is the general information to start learning AMD FirePro W4100.
Place in performance rating: | 551 | |||
Value for money (0-100): | 6.![]() |
|||
Architecture: | GCN | |||
Code name: | Cape Verde | |||
Type: | Workstation | |||
Release date: | 2 October 2015 (6 years ago) | |||
Price now: | $137 | |||
Value for money: | 5.97 | |||
GPU code name: | Cape Verde | |||
Market segment: | Workstation |
AMD FirePro W4100 — Technical Specifications
Here are key features that determine AMD FirePro W4100 performance in benchmarks and other apps. The higher the figures are, the better it is. Please pay attention to all the characteristics provided. For example, the clock frequency directly affects the high-speed, and processing data and performing calculations (e.g, for mining) depend on the number of transistors. Also, check the TDP figure, because modern graphics cards may require a powerful PSU.
Pipelines: | 512 | |||
Core clock speed: | 630 MHz | |||
Transistor count: | 1,500 million | |||
Manufacturing process technology: | 28 nm | |||
Power consumption (TDP): | 50 Watt | |||
Texture fill rate: | 20.![]() |
|||
Floating-point performance: | 645.1 gflops | |||
Pipelines / CUDA cores: | 512 | |||
Number of transistors: | 1,500 million | |||
Thermal design power (TDP): | 400 Watt |
AMD FirePro W4100 — Dimensions and Compatibility
Nowadays, it is very important to know the dimensions — length, width and height of a desktop graphics card — and understand which power connector is included in the package. Also, please pay attention to the PCIe interface.
Interface: | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |||
Length: | 171 mm | |||
Supplementary power connectors: | None | |||
Bus support: | PCIe 3.![]() |
|||
Form factor: | low profile / half length |
AMD FirePro W4100 — GPU RAM Frequency and Speed
Graphics Card Ram is a key element in computing and data storage — type, size, clock frequency and bandwidth — that directly affect the speed of work in gaming and working apps, which are currently quite demanding on graphics card resources. Note please the memory standard. The higher it is, the better it is. Let’s learn more about AMD FirePro W4100 video memory specifications.
Memory type: | GDDR5 | |||
Maximum RAM amount: | 2 GB | |||
Memory bus width: | 128 Bit | |||
Memory clock speed: | 4000 MHz | |||
Memory bandwidth: | 72 GB/s | |||
Shared memory: | — |
AMD FirePro W4100 — Port and Display Support
In most cases, today all the problems connector compatibility can be solved with adapters or backwards-compatible cables such as HDMI / DVI. But, for general information, you learn below which ports are supported by AMD FirePro W4100.
Display Connectors: | 4x mini-DisplayPort | |||
Dual-link DVI support: | 1 |
AMD FirePro W4100 — Technologies
Healthy competition drives progress, so each manufacturer tries to surprise its consumer with special technologies available in this graphics card. This can be useful in graphics or gaming apps.
AppAcceleration: | + | |||
PowerPlay: | + |
AMD FirePro W4100 — API support
Here are general standards for DirectX and other unified complexes for the development of 3D images supported by AMD FirePro W4100 .
DirectX: | 12 (11_1) | |||
OpenGL: | 4.6 | |||
Vulkan: | 1.2.131 | |||
Shader Model: | 5.1 | |||
OpenCL: | 1.2 |
AMD FirePro W4100 — Mining hashrates
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256): | 79 Mh/s |
Overall AMD FirePro W4100 Gaming Performance
Find out to what extent AMD FirePro W4100 is suitable for gaming! We have compiled a database of popular games and their system requirements* that allows you to quickly and easily estimate its gaming performance at different screen resolutions. Graphics card gaming test is based on FPS. * There is a little margin error in the estimation of data.
Select games to view
Horizon Zero DawnDeath StrandingF1 2020Gears TacticsDoom EternalHunt ShowdownEscape from TarkovHearthstoneRed Dead Redemption 2Star Wars Jedi Fallen OrderNeed for Speed HeatCall of Duty Modern Warfare 2019GRID 2019Ghost Recon BreakpointFIFA 20Borderlands 3ControlF1 2019League of LegendsTotal War: Three KingdomsRage 2Anno 1800The Division 2Dirt Rally 2.0AnthemMetro ExodusFar Cry New DawnApex LegendsJust Cause 4Darksiders IIIFarming Simulator 19Battlefield VFallout 76Hitman 2Call of Duty Black Ops 4Assassin´s Creed OdysseyForza Horizon 4FIFA 19Shadow of the Tomb RaiderStrange BrigadeF1 2018Monster Hunter WorldThe Crew 2Far Cry 5World of Tanks enCoreX-Plane 11.11Kingdom Come: DeliveranceFinal Fantasy XV BenchmarkFortniteStar Wars Battlefront 2Need for Speed PaybackCall of Duty WWIIAssassin´s Creed OriginsWolfenstein II: The New ColossusDestiny 2ELEXThe Evil Within 2Middle-earth: Shadow of WarFIFA 18Ark Survival EvolvedF1 2017Playerunknown’s Battlegrounds (2017)Team Fortress 2Dirt 4Rocket LeaguePreyMass Effect AndromedaGhost Recon WildlandsFor HonorResident Evil 7Dishonored 2Call of Duty Infinite WarfareTitanfall 2Farming Simulator 17Civilization VIBattlefield 1Mafia 3Deus Ex Mankind DividedMirror’s Edge CatalystOverwatchDoomAshes of the SingularityHitman 2016The DivisionFar Cry PrimalXCOM 2Rise of the Tomb RaiderRainbow Six SiegeAssassin’s Creed SyndicateStar Wars BattlefrontFallout 4Call of Duty: Black Ops 3Anno 2205World of WarshipsDota 2 RebornThe Witcher 3Dirt RallyGTA VDragon Age: InquisitionFar Cry 4Assassin’s Creed UnityCall of Duty: Advanced WarfareAlien: IsolationMiddle-earth: Shadow of MordorSims 4Wolfenstein: The New OrderThe Elder Scrolls OnlineThiefX-Plane 10. 25Battlefield 4Total War: Rome IICompany of Heroes 2Metro: Last LightBioShock InfiniteStarCraft II: Heart of the SwarmSimCityTomb RaiderCrysis 3Hitman: AbsolutionCall of Duty: Black Ops 2World of Tanks v8Borderlands 2Counter-Strike: GODirt ShowdownDiablo IIIMass Effect 3The Elder Scrolls V: SkyrimBattlefield 3Deus Ex Human RevolutionStarCraft 2Metro 2033Stalker: Call of PripyatGTA IV — Grand Theft AutoLeft 4 DeadTrackmania Nations ForeverCall of Duty 4 — Modern WarfareSupreme Commander — FA BenchCrysis — GPU BenchmarkWorld in Conflict — BenchmarkHalf Life 2 — Lost Coast BenchmarkWorld of WarcraftDoom 3Quake 3 Arena — Timedemo
low
1280×720
med.
1920×1080
high
1920×1080
ultra
1920×1080
QHD
2560×1440
4K
3840×2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020)
low
1280×720
med.
1920×1080
high
1920×1080
ultra
1920×1080
QHD
2560×1440
4K
3840×2160
Death Stranding (2020)
low
1280×720
med.
1920×1080
high
1920×1080
ultra
1920×1080
QHD
2560×1440
4K
3840×2160
F1 2020 (2020)
low
1280×720
med.
1920×1080
high
1920×1080
ultra
1920×1080
QHD
2560×1440
4K
3840×2160
Gears Tactics (2020)
low
1280×720
med.
1920×1080
high
1920×1080
ultra
1920×1080
QHD
2560×1440
4K
3840×2160
Doom Eternal (2020)
low
1280×720
med.
1920×1080
high
1920×1080
ultra
1920×1080
QHD
2560×1440
4K
3840×2160
Legend | |
5 | Stutter – How graphics cards operate in the game is being examined for the time being.![]() |
May Stutter – How graphics cards operate in the game is being examined for the time being. As per interpolation of the similar graphics cards showing low frame rates, the game is possible to lag. | |
30 | Fluent – In considering all graphics benchmarks, the game speed is likely to be 25 fps or more. |
40 | Fluent – In considering all graphics benchmarks, the game speed is likely to be 35 fps or more. |
60 | Fluent – In considering all graphics benchmarks, the game speed is likely to be 58 fps or more. |
May Run Fluently – How graphics cards operate in the game is being examined for the time being. As per interpolation of the similar graphics cards showing low frame rates, the game is possible to lag.![]() |
|
? | Uncertain – The graphics card testing has revealed a slower card might ensure a high and stable frame rate. |
Uncertain – How graphics cards operate in the game is being examined for the time being. The interpolation in the same category is not possible. | |
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results. |
AMD FirePro W4100 in Benchmarks
Let’s sum up the review by comparing the benchmarks results of AMD FirePro W4100 5 competitive models similar in technical specifications. The first block is the overall result for all benchmarks, then all the others, which this particular model was tested on.
The higher the benchmark score, the faster a video card performs in graphics apps and modern games. If you have any additional questions, please leave them in the comments, we will definitely help!
Overall benchmark performance
ATI FirePro M7740
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
AMD FirePro W4100
NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTX SLI
NVIDIA GeForce MX110
3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
The 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU test is designed for mid-range laptops and home PCs with integrated video graphics. The test uses the DirectX 11 engine, which is limited by Direct3D 10 capabilities. Accordingly, Cloud Gate is best suited for testing modern entry-level systems and legacy DX10-enabled GPUs.
NVIDIA Quadro P500
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M
AMD FirePro W4100
AMD FirePro M4000
AMD Radeon R9 M265X
3DMark Fire Strike Score
Fire Strike, Fire Strike Extreme, Fire Strike Ultra. Fire Strike includes two graphics tests, a physics test and a combined test that stresses the CPU and GPU.
AMD FirePro M4000
AMD Radeon R9 M275
AMD FirePro W4100
NVIDIA Quadro K2100M
Intel Iris Graphics 550
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
3DMark Fire Strike for Graphics Cards helps you determine performance in a state-of-the-art synthetic test that consists of two levels — physical and combined testing.
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
AMD Radeon R9 M375
AMD FirePro W4100
Intel Iris Graphics 550
NVIDIA GeForce 940M
Passmark GPU
Passmark is an effective benchmark that displays true results on the speed of data processing by GPU cores. We present the results of the evaluation of the performance of a video card in the modern Passmark benchmark, which evaluates the performance of a video card using its own rendering algorithms. The higher the score, the more powerful the graphics card.
AMD Radeon HD 7870M
NVIDIA Quadro 4000
AMD FirePro W4100
NVIDIA GeForce MX110
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640
Unigine Heaven 3. 0
Unigine Heaven 3.0 is Unigine’s benchmark for Direct3D and OpenGL tessellation. Benchmark is great for checking the efficiency and performance of older graphics cards.
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
AMD FirePro M4000
AMD FirePro W4100
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Intel HD Graphics 630
5.0
Out of 3
CMPTEK score
AMD FirePro W4100 100-505979 2GB 128-bit GDDR5 PCI Express 3.0 x16 Half Height Workstation Video Card
LOADING…
Visit Micron Tech Store
See more «amd firepro»
- 2GB GDDR5 memory (72 GB/s)
- 512 GCN Stream Processors
- 645.1 GFLOPS single precision floating point performance
- 4 x Mini DisplayPort
Overview
Specs
Reviews
The AMD FirePro™ W4100 professional graphics card represents a completely new class of product – one that provides you with great graphics performance and display versatility while housed in a compact, low-power design.
Based on AMD’s revolutionary Graphics Core Next architecture like all the other cards in W-Series family, AMD FirePro™ W4100 features four-display support, and offers a perfect solution for users who need a performance boost to address ever-evolving challenges in their workflows.
W4100 |
K620 |
Advantage |
||
Cores | 512 | 384 |
AMD |
|
SP Peak (TFLOPs) | 0.![]() |
0.823 | NV | |
GPU Memory | 2 | 2 |
— |
|
Memory Bandwidth (GBps) | 64 | 29 |
AMD |
|
PCIe | 3 | 2 |
AMD |
|
TDP (W) | 50 | 45 | — | |
Maximum Displays | 6 | 4 |
AMD |
Features
Certified Applications
AMD FirePro™ graphics accelerators are carefully certified by AMD and leading software vendors for use with the most widely used software applications to help ensure stable, optimized performance, outstanding productivity and unbeaten user experiences professionals demand.
- Engineering and Design (CAD/CAE/AEC)
- Digital Content Creation (DCC) & Digital Media
- Geographical Information Systems (GIS) & Visualization
- Life Sciences
- Oil & Gas
28nm Graphic Core Next (GCN) Architecture
The new 28nm GCN Architecture with more efficient process technology puts more transistors in less space, enabling a dramatic increase in processing power and graphics performance.
- Each compute unit can execute instructions from multiple kernels at once
- Design for high-utilization, high-throughput, and multi-tasking
- Dual geometry Engines for faster triangle («primitive») processing
- First GPU family to fully support OpenCL 1.
2 and DirectX 11
AMD Eyefinity 2.0 Multi-Monitor Technology
The next generation of AMD Eyefinity multi-monitor control technology is here, featuring all-new support for stereo 3D, universal bezel compensation and brand new display configurations.
AMD Eyefinity 2.0 Enables:
- Easy multi-display setup and customization
- Virtually unlimited number of display devices
- Stereo 3D-multi-display stereoscopic 3D support via DisplayPort 1.2
- 16K x 16K maximum display group resolution-output up to 268 Megapixels per GPU
Full 30-Bit Display Pipeline
With a full 30-bit display pipeline producing more than one billion colors (10-bit per RGB component). The AMD FirePro™ is ideally suited for applications that benefit from accurate color reproduction and superior visual quality.
PowerTune
This state of the art power management technology provides direct control over GPU power usage. Applications enjoy ultimate performance with dynamic clock optimization, while minimizing workstation energy usage .
AMD ZeroCore Power Technology
AMD ZeroCore Power Technology is the AMD exclusive innovation. Up to 95% idle power reduction by shutting down GPU.
Quad HD Display Support (4K Support)
4K (4096 x 2160-pixel) support for ultra-high-resolution display devices and advanced configurations through DisplayPort 1.2 and AMD Catalyst Pro drivers ensures future-forward compatibility for advanced workflows.
Projector Overlap Support
Easily refine display alignment settings when configuring multiple, high resolution display devices or projectors.
Discrete Digital Multi-Point Audio (DDMA)
DisplayPort 1.2 simultaneously outputs multiple, independent audio streams.
Bezel Compensation
Stretch display resolutions to prevent bezel interference and image distortion when displaying a single large image across multiple displays.
Partially Resident Texture (PRT)
Graphics memory behaves as a hardware-managed cache. Data can be streamed in on demand.
Video Codec Engine (VCE)
Powerful, «fixed-function» multi-stream hardware dramatically improves the performance of H.264 HD encoding for a range of applications and pipelines.
HydraVision
Use HydraVision to manage desktop displays and workspaces in multi-display environments:
- Explicitly set the behavior of pop-up windows and dialogs in different applications though Desktop Manager.
- Provide multiple layers of the desktop workspace through Multi Desktop.
- Restrict application window placement across multiple desktops through HydraGrid.
Display Output Post Processing
Display Output Post Processing, or D.O.P.P., provides software applications with access to a FirePro GPU’s framebuffer before content reaches the card’s signal output stage. This functionality enables ISVs and OEMs with added flexibility and performance they can leverage to create new, exciting and innovative methods for creating and displaying visual content.
AutoDetect Technology
AMD FirePro™ products incorporate a unique AutoDetect technology. As users open new 3D applications, or move between them, optimized AMD FirePro™ graphics driver settings are automatically configured for maximum performance, no matter what the user’s workflow demands.
Low Power Consumption
AMD is devoted to saving energy, and see to it that their products provide customers with the highest efficiency possible through sophisticated design. AMD is working with their customers to protect Earth’s vital resources. AMD’s FirePro™ workstation graphics cards is your best multi-monitor systems and low-cost electricity idea.
Low Profile Design
Enables flexible installation in a variety of computing systems, from small form factors to full-height systems.
Warranty
Professional and Customized Warranty and Support
- Long Product Life Cycle: 3+ Years
- 3-Year Limited Warranty
- Enterprise-Level Support
- E-Mail Access to dedicated Technical Support
- Advanced Parts Replacement Option
Warranty & Returns
Warranty, Returns, And Additional Information
LOADING. ..
LOADING…
GPU Compare | Graphics Card Comparison
The FirePro W4100 will run 53% of the top 10,000 PC games. It will also run 29% of these games at the recommended or best experience levels.
- Manufacturer
-
AMD - Generation
- 11 generations old
- Category
-
Workstation - Dedicated RAM
-
2.0 GB - DirectX
-
11.2 - Rank
-
67th percentile of AMD GPUs - Rank in Power
-
172nd of AMD GPUs - Rank in Popularity
-
240th of AMD GPUs
Can the FirePro W4100 run the Top PC games? You can see a GPU comparison by choosing another video card. How many games can your GPU run?
FirePro W4100
|
Radeon RX 6950 XT
|
||
---|---|---|---|
Rank | Game |
|
|
1 |
Cyberpunk 2077 |
|
|
2 |
Grand Theft Auto V |
|
|
3 |
FIFA 23 |
|
|
4 |
VALORANT |
|
|
5 |
Need for Speed Heat |
|
|
6 |
Call of Duty: Warzone |
|
|
7 |
Elden Ring |
|
|
8 |
Red Dead Redemption 2 |
|
|
9 |
Fortnite |
|
|
10 |
Marvel’s Spider-Man Remastered |
|
|
11 |
Minecraft |
|
|
12 |
FIFA 22 |
|
|
13 |
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II |
|
|
14 |
God of War |
|
|
15 |
League of Legends |
|
|
16 |
Genshin Impact |
|
|
17 |
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive |
|
|
18 |
Forza Horizon 5 |
|
|
19 |
Apex Legends |
|
|
20 |
Assassin’s Creed Valhalla |
|
|
21 |
ARK: Survival Evolved |
|
|
22 |
PLAYERUNKNOWN’S BATTLEGROUNDS |
|
|
23 |
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt |
|
|
24 |
The Sims 4 |
|
|
25 |
Assassin’s Creed Odyssey |
|
|
26 |
Far Cry 6 |
|
|
27 |
Overwatch 2 |
|
|
28 |
Assassin’s Creed: Origins |
|
|
29 |
Phasmophobia |
|
|
30 |
World War 3 |
|
|
31 |
Dying Light 2 Stay Human |
|
|
32 |
Batman: Arkham Knight |
|
|
33 |
Middle-earth: Shadow of War |
|
|
34 |
Assassin’s Creed Unity |
|
|
35 |
Battlefield 2042 |
|
|
36 |
Overwatch |
|
|
37 |
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare |
|
|
38 |
Grounded |
|
|
39 |
Mortal Kombat 11 |
|
|
40 |
Battlefield 1 |
|
|
41 |
Forza Horizon 4 |
|
|
42 |
Assassin’s Creed IV Black Flag |
|
|
43 |
Call of Duty: Black Ops II |
|
|
44 |
Assassin’s Creed Mirage |
|
|
45 |
GTA 5 Thor Mod |
|
|
46 |
Rust |
|
|
47 |
Fallout 4 |
|
|
48 |
Call of Duty: WW2 |
|
|
49 |
Batman: Arkham City |
|
|
50 |
Grand Theft Auto IV |
|
|
51 |
Far Cry 3 |
|
|
52 |
Slime Rancher 2 |
|
|
53 |
Rocket League |
|
|
54 |
Destiny 2 |
|
|
55 |
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3 |
|
|
56 |
Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor |
|
|
57 |
Assassin’s Creed Syndicate |
|
|
58 |
BONELAB |
|
|
59 |
Dota 2 |
|
|
60 |
The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim |
|
|
61 |
SEKIRO: SHADOWS DIE TWICE |
|
|
62 |
Assassin’s Creed II |
|
|
63 |
GTA 5 Premium Online Edition |
|
|
64 |
Valheim |
|
|
65 |
Battlefield 4 |
|
|
66 |
World of Warcraft |
|
|
67 |
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 |
|
|
68 |
FIFA 15 |
|
|
69 |
Sea of Thieves |
|
|
70 |
Fortnite: Battle Royale |
|
|
71 |
Assassin’s Creed |
|
|
72 |
Escape from Tarkov |
|
|
73 |
Dark Souls 3 |
|
|
74 |
Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six: Siege |
|
|
75 |
Dragon Ball FighterZ |
|
|
76 |
Persona 5 Royal |
|
|
77 |
Battlefield 5 |
|
|
78 |
FIFA 17 |
|
|
79 |
Terraria |
|
|
80 |
Skyrim Special Edition |
|
|
81 |
Assassin’s Creed III |
|
|
82 |
Call of Duty: Black Ops III |
|
|
83 |
Dragon Ball Z Kakarot |
|
|
84 |
FIFA 21 |
|
|
85 |
FIFA 19 |
|
|
86 |
Batman: Arkham Asylum |
|
|
87 |
CS:GO — Operation Riptide |
|
|
88 |
Far Cry 5 |
|
|
89 |
Back 4 Blood |
|
|
90 |
Stray |
|
|
91 |
WARZONE |
|
|
92 |
FIFA 20 |
|
|
93 |
Assassin’s Creed Rogue |
|
|
94 |
Roblox |
|
|
95 |
The Forest |
|
|
96 |
Far Cry 4 |
|
|
97 |
FIFA 16 |
|
|
98 |
PUBG Lite |
|
|
99 |
Hogwarts Legacy |
|
|
100 |
eFootball 2022 |
|
|
AMD
NVIDIA
Intel
Rank | GPU |
---|---|
AMD FirePro W4100 Review.
Benchmarks and Specifications
The AMD FirePro W4100 graphics card (GPU) is ranked 459 in our performance ranking. Manufacturer: AMD. The AMD FirePro W4100 runs at a minimum clock speed of 630 MHz. The graphics chip is equipped with an acceleration system and can operate in turbo mode or during overclocking. The RAM size is 2 GB GB with a clock speed of 4000 MHz and a bandwidth of 72 GB/s.
The AMD FirePro W4100 power consumption is 50 Watt and the process technology is only 28 nm. Below you will find key compatibility, sizing, technology, and gaming performance test results. You can also leave comments if you have any questions.
Let’s take a closer look at the most important features of the AMD FirePro W4100. To have an idea of which video card is better, we recommend using the comparison service.
5.0
From 4
Hitesti Grade
Popular video cards
Most viewed
AMD Radeon RX Vega 7
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Intel UHD Graphics 600
NVIDIA Quadro T1000
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10
NVIDIA GeForce MX330
Intel HD Graphics 530
Intel UHD Graphics 620
Intel HD Graphics 4600
Intel HD Graphics 520
DE
Buy here:
AliExpress
General information
The base set of information will help you find out the release date of the AMD FirePro W4100 graphics card and its intended use (laptops or PCs), as well as the price at the time of release and the average current cost. This data also includes the architecture used by the manufacturer and the video processor code name.
Performance Rating Position: | 534 | |||
Value for money: | 6.55 | |||
Architecture: | GCN | |||
Code name: | Cape Verde | |||
Type: | Workstation | |||
Release date: | October 2, 2015 (6 years ago) | |||
Current price: | $212 | |||
Value for money: | 4.56 | |||
GPU Code Name: | Cape Verde | |||
Market segment: | Workstation |
Specifications
This is important information that determines all the performance characteristics of the AMD FirePro W4100 graphics card. The smaller the technological process of manufacturing a chip, the better (in modern realities). The clock frequency of the core is responsible for its speed (direct correlation), while signal processing is carried out by transistors (the more transistors, the faster the calculations are performed, for example, in cryptocurrency mining).
Conveyors: | 512 | |||
Core Clock: | 630MHz | |||
Number of transistors: | 1,500 million | |||
Process: | 28nm | |||
Power consumption (TDP): | 50 Watt | |||
Number of texels processed in 1 second: | 20.16 | |||
Floating point: | 645.1 gflops | |||
Pipelines / CUDA cores: | 512 | |||
Number of transistors: | 1,500 million | |||
Estimated heat output: | 400 Watt |
Dimensions, Connectors, and Compatibility
There are so many form factors for PC cases and laptop sizes that it’s important to know the length of your graphics card and how it’s connected (except for laptop versions). This will help make the upgrade process easier, as Not all cases can accommodate modern video cards.
Interface: | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |||
Length: | 171mm | |||
Additional power: | None | |||
Tire support: | PCIe 3.0 | |||
Form factor: | low profile / half length |
Memory (frequency and overclocking)
The internal memory is used to store data when performing calculations. Modern games and professional graphics applications place high demands on the amount and speed of memory. The higher this parameter, the more powerful and faster the video card. Memory type, size and bandwidth for AMD FirePro W4100 + turbo overclocking option.
Memory type: | GDDR5 | |||
Maximum RAM amount: | 2GB | |||
Memory bus width: | 128 Bit | |||
Memory frequency: | 4000MHz | |||
Memory bandwidth: | 72 GB/s | |||
Shared memory: | — |
Port and display support
As a rule, all modern video cards have several types of connections and additional ports, for example HDMI and DVI . Knowing these features is very important in order to avoid problems connecting a video card to a monitor or other peripherals.
Display connections: | 4x mini-DisplayPort | |||
Dual-link DVI support: | 1 |
Technologies
Each graphics card manufacturer complements their products with proprietary technologies that are used both in games and in the workflow. Below is a list of features that will be useful to you.
AppAcceleration: | + | |||
PowerPlay: | + |
API support
All APIs supported by the AMD FirePro W4100 graphics card are listed below. This is a minor factor that does not greatly affect the overall performance.
DirectX: | 12 (11_1) | |||
OpenGL: | 4.![]() |
|||
Vulkan: | 1.2.131 | |||
Shader Model: | 5.1 | |||
OpenCL: | 1.2 |
Overall gaming performance
All tests are based on FPS. Let’s see how the AMD FirePro W4100 scores in the gaming performance test (calculated according to the game developer’s recommendations for system requirements; it may differ from actual situations).
Select games
Horizon Zero DawnDeath StrandingF1 2020Gears TacticsDoom EternalHunt ShowdownEscape from TarkovHearthstoneRed Dead Redemption 2Star Wars Jedi Fallen OrderNeed for Speed HeatCall of Duty Modern Warfare 2019GRID 2019Ghost Recon BreakpointFIFA 20Borderlands 3ControlF1 2019League of LegendsTotal War: Three KingdomsRage 2Anno 1800The Division 2Dirt Rally 2.0AnthemMetro ExodusFar Cry New DawnApex LegendsJust Cause 4Darksiders IIIFarming Simulator 19Battlefield VFallout 76Hitman 2Call of Duty Black Ops 4Assassin´s Creed OdysseyForza Horizon 4FIFA 19Shadow of the Tomb RaiderStrange BrigadeF1 2018Monster Hunter WorldThe Crew 2Far Cry 5World of Tanks enCoreX-Plane 11. 11Kingdom Come: DeliveranceFinal Fantasy XV BenchmarkFortniteStar Wars Battlefront 2Need for Speed PaybackCall of Duty WWIIAssassin´s Creed OriginsWolfenstein II: The New ColossusDestiny 2MEDLE-Evil Within : Shadow of WarFIFA 18Ark Survival EvolvedF1 2017Playerunknown’s Battlegrounds (2017)Team Fortress 2Dirt 4Rocket LeaguePreyMass Effect AndromedaGhost Recon WildlandsFor HonorResident Evil 7Dishonored 2Call of Duty Infinite WarfareTitanfall 2Farming Simulator 17Civilization VIBattlefield 1Mafia 3Deus Ex Mankind DividedMirror’s Edge CatalystOverwatchDoomAshes of the SingularityHitman 2016The DivisionFar Cry PrimalXCOM 2Rise of the Tomb RaiderRainbow Six SiegeAssassin’s Creed SyndicateStar Wars BattlefrontFallout 4Call of Duty: Black Ops 3Anno 2205World of WarshipsDota 2 RebornThe Witcher 3Dirt RallyGTA VDragon Age: InquisitionFar Cry 4Assassin’s Creed Un ityCall of Duty: Advanced WarfareAlien: IsolationMiddle-earth: Shadow of MordorSims 4Wolfenstein: The New OrderThe Elder Scrolls OnlineThiefX-Plane 10.
25Battlefield 4Total War: Rome IICompany of Heroes 2Metro: Last LightBioShock InfiniteStarCraft II: Heart of the SwarmSimCityTomb RaiderCrysis 3Hitman: AbsolutionCall of Duty : Black Ops 2World of Tanks v8Borderlands 2Counter-Strike: GODirt ShowdownDiablo IIIMass Effect 3The Elder Scrolls V: SkyrimBattlefield 3Deus Ex Human RevolutionStarCraft 2Metro 2033Stalker: Call of PripyatGTA IV — Grand Theft AutoLeft 4 DeadTrackmania Nations ForeverCall of Duty 4 — Modern WarfareSupreme Commander — FA BenchCrysis — GPU BenchmarkWorld in Conflict — BenchmarkHalf Life 2 — Lost Coast BenchmarkWorld of WarcraftDoom 3Quake 3 Arena — TimedemoHalo InfiniteFarming Simulator 22Battlefield 2042Forza Horizon 5Riders RepublicGuardians of the GalaxyBack 4 BloodDeathloopF1 2021Days GoneResident Evil VillageHitman 3Cyberpunk 2077Assassin´s Creed ch Dogs LegionMafia Definitive EditionCyberpunk 2077 1.5GRID LegendsDying Light 2Rainbow Six ExtractionGod of War
low
1280×720
med.
1920×1080
high
1920×1080
ultra
1920×1080
QHD
2560×1440
4K
3840×2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020)
low
1280×720
med.
1920×1080
high
1920×1080
ultra
1920×1080
QHD
2560×1440
4K
3840×2160
Death Stranding (2020)
low
1280×720
med.
1920×1080
high
1920×1080
ultra
1920×1080
QHD
2560×1440
4K
3840×2160
F1 2020 (2020)
low
1280×720
med.
1920×1080
high
1920×1080
ultra
1920×1080
QHD
2560×1440
4K
3840×2160
Gears Tactics (2020)
low
1280×720
med.
1920×1080
high
1920×1080
ultra
1920×1080
QHD
2560×1440
4K
3840×2160
Doom Eternal (2020)
low
1280×720
med.
1920×1080
high
1920×1080
ultra
1920×1080
QHD
2560×1440
4K
3840×2160
Description | |
5 | Stutter — The performance of this video card with this game has not yet been studied enough.![]() |
May Stutter — The performance of this video card with this game has not yet been studied enough. Based on interpolated information from graphics cards of a similar performance level, the game is likely to stutter and display low frame rates. | |
30 | Fluent — According to all known benchmarks with the specified graphic settings, this game is expected to run at 25 fps or more |
40 | Fluent — Based on all known benchmarks with the specified graphic settings, this game is expected to run at 35fps or more |
60 | Fluent — Based on all known benchmarks with the specified graphic settings, this game is expected to run at or above 58 fps |
May Run Fluently — The performance of this video card with this game has not yet been sufficiently studied.![]() |
|
? | Uncertain — testing this video card in this game showed unexpected results. A slower card could deliver higher and more consistent frame rates while running the same reference scene. |
Uncertain — The performance of this video card in this game has not yet been studied enough. It is not possible to reliably interpolate data based on the performance of similar cards in the same category. | |
The value in the fields reflects the average frame rate across the entire database. To get individual results, hover over a value. |
AMD FirePro W4100 in 9 benchmark results0043
Benchmarks help determine performance in standard AMD FirePro W4100 benchmarks. We have compiled a list of the most famous benchmarks in the world so that you can get accurate results for each of them (see description). Pre-testing the graphics card is especially important when there are high loads, so that the user can see how the graphics processor copes with calculations and data processing.
Overall performance in benchmarks
ATI FirePro M7740
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
AMD FirePro W4100
NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTX SLI
NVIDIA GeForce MX110
Unlike Ice Storm, 3DMark’s Cloud Gate test uses more resource intensive scenes. The better the final score, the faster your graphics card. Processing is done with DirectX 10.
NVIDIA Quadro P500
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M
AMD FirePro W4100
AMD FirePro M4000
AMD Radeon R9 M265X
This is an advanced graphics card benchmark. When using DirectX 11 for processing, typical testing time is 15 minutes. The higher the score, the faster the graphics card.
AMD FirePro M4000
AMD Radeon R9 M275
AMD FirePro W4100
NVIDIA Quadro K2100M
Intel Iris Graphics 550
Complex graphic scenes require all the graphics card resources. They use the entire RAM and computing power. The test’s results can be viewed below.
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
AMD Radeon R9 M375
AMD FirePro W4100
Intel Iris Graphics 550
NVIDIA GeForce 940M
Passmark is an excellent benchmark that is updated regularly and shows relevant graphics card performance information.
AMD Radeon HD 7870M
NVIDIA Quadro 4000
AMD FirePro W4100
NVIDIA GeForce MX110
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640
This test works for all types of video cards, has an innovative cross-platform core, supports Direct X 9/10/11 and OpenGL.
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
AMD FirePro M4000
AMD FirePro W4100
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Intel HD Graphics 630
5.0
From 4
Hitesti Grade
Share on social networks:
You need to log in to leave a review.
NVIDIA Quadro K2000
NVIDIA Quadro 4000
AMD Cypress
AMD Baffin
AMD Cedar
AMD Tonga
NVIDIA NVS 810
AMD Bonaire
AMD Cayman
NVIDIA TITAN V
FirePro W4100 video card [in 7 benchmarks]
FirePro W4100
- PCIe 3.
0 x16 interface
- Core frequency 630
- Video memory size 2048 MB
- Memory type GDDR5
- Memory frequency 4000
- Maximum resolution 4096×2160
Description
AMD started FirePro W4100 sales 2 October 2015. This is GCN architecture desktop card based on 28 nm manufacturing process and primarily aimed at designers. It has 2 GB of GDDR5 memory at 4 GHz, and coupled with a 128-bit interface, this creates a bandwidth of 72 GB / s.
In terms of compatibility, this is a single-slot PCIe 3.0 x16 card. The length of the reference version is 171 mm. An additional power cable is not required for connection, and the power consumption is 400 watts.
It provides poor performance in tests and games at the level of
5.22%
from the leader, which is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti.
firepro
W4100
or
GeForce RTX
3090 Ti
General information
Information about the type (desktop or laptop) and architecture of the FirePro W4100, as well as when sales started and cost at that time.
Performance rating | 575
FeaturesFirePro W4100’s general performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. They indirectly speak of FirePro W4100’s performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.
RAMParameters of the memory installed on FirePro W4100 — type, size, bus, frequency and bandwidth. For video cards built into the processor that do not have their own memory, a shared part of the RAM is used.
Video outputs7 7 7 9000
9027
Benchmark tests |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 79 Mh/s |
Game tests
FPS in popular games on FirePro W4100, as well as compliance with system requirements. Remember that the official requirements of the developers do not always match the data of real tests.
Average FPS
Here are the average FPS values for a large selection of popular games at various resolutions:
Full HD0050 | 3 |
Popular games
- Full HD
Low Preset - Full HD
Medium Preset - Full HD
High Preset - Full HD
Ultra Preset - 1440p
High Preset - 1440p
Ultra Preset - 4K
High Preset - 4K
Ultra Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 5-6 |
Assassin’s Creed Odyssey | 5-6 | |
Assassin’s Creed Valhalla | 5-6 | |
Battlefield 5 | 5-6 | |
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 5-6 | |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 5-6 | |
Far Cry 5 | 5-6 | |
Far Cry New Dawn | 5-6 | |
Forza Horizon 4 | 5-6 | |
Hitman 3 | 5-6 | |
Horizon Zero Dawn | 5-6 | |
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 5-6 | |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 5-6 | |
Watch Dogs: Legion | 5-6 |
Assassin’s Creed Odyssey | 5-6 | |
Assassin’s Creed Valhalla | 5-6 | |
Battlefield 5 | 5-6 | |
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 5-6 | |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 5-6 | |
Far Cry 5 | 5-6 | |
Far Cry New Dawn | 5-6 | |
Forza Horizon 4 | 5-6 | |
Hitman 3 | 5-6 | |
Horizon Zero Dawn | 5-6 | |
Metro Exodus | 5-6 | |
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 5-6 | |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 5-6 | |
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 7 | |
Watch Dogs: Legion | 5-6 |
Assassin’s Creed Odyssey | 5-6 | |
Assassin’s Creed Valhalla | 5-6 | |
Battlefield 5 | 5-6 | |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 5-6 | |
Far Cry 5 | 5-6 | |
Far Cry New Dawn | 5-6 | |
Forza Horizon 4 | 5-6 | |
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5-6 | |
Watch Dogs: Legion | 5-6 |
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 5-6 | |
Hitman 3 | 5-6 | |
Horizon Zero Dawn | 5-6 | |
Metro Exodus | 5-6 | |
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 5-6 | |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 5-6 |
Assassin’s Creed Odyssey | 5-6 | |
Assassin’s Creed Valhalla | 5-6 | |
Battlefield 5 | 5-6 | |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 5-6 | |
Far Cry 5 | 5-6 | |
Far Cry New Dawn | 5-6 | |
Forza Horizon 4 | 5-6 | |
Watch Dogs: Legion | 5-6 |
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 5-6 | |
Hitman 3 | 5-6 | |
Horizon Zero Dawn | 5-6 | |
Metro Exodus | 5-6 | |
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 5-6 | |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 5-6 | |
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5-6 |
Assassin’s Creed Odyssey | 5-6 | |
Assassin’s Creed Valhalla | 5-6 | |
Battlefield 5 | 5-6 | |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 5-6 | |
Far Cry 5 | 5-6 | |
Far Cry New Dawn | 5-6 | |
Forza Horizon 4 | 5-6 | |
Watch Dogs: Legion | 5-6 |
Relative capacity
Overall performance of the FirePro W4100 compared to its closest competitor in workstation graphics cards.
NVIDIA Quadro P400
103.45
AMD FirePro W600
103.45
NVIDIA Quadro K2000
101.72
AMD FirePro W4100
100
AMD FirePro W6150M
98.85
NVIDIA Quadro 4000
96.74
ATI FirePro V5800
92.34
Competitor from NVIDIA
We believe that the nearest equivalent to FirePro W4100 from NVIDIA is Quadro K2000, which is slower by 2% and higher by 6 positions in our rating.
Quadro
K2000
Compare
Here are some of NVIDIA’s closest competitors to the FirePro W4100:
NVIDIA Quadro K2000D
105.17
NVIDIA Quadro P400
103. 45
NVIDIA Quadro K2000
101.72
AMD FirePro W4100
100
NVIDIA Quadro 4000
96.74
NVIDIA Tesla M2070-Q
85.06
NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800
80.65
Other video cards
Here we recommend several video cards that are more or less similar in performance to the reviewed one.
firepro
W2100
Compare
Recommended Processors
According to our statistics, these processors are most commonly used with the FirePro W4100.
Core i7
4790
25%
Xeon E3
1220v3
8.3%
Core i5
4590
5. 6%
Xeon E3
1245v2
2.8%
Celeron
G540
2.8%
Core 2
Quad Q9550
2.8%
Core i5
9300H
2.8%
Core i7
6700HQ
2.8%
Xeon E5
2670v2
2.8%
Core i7
5600U
2.8%
User rating
Here you can see the rating of the video card by users, as well as put your own rating.
Tips and comments
Here you can ask a question about the FirePro W4100, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.
Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.
Comparison of AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 and AMD FirePro W4100
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 and AMD FirePro W4100 video cards by all known characteristics in the categories: General information, Specifications, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions, requirements, API support, Memory, Technology support.
Analysis of video card performance by benchmarks: PassMark — G3D Mark, PassMark — G2D Mark, Geekbench — OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T -Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps).
AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100
versus
AMD FirePro W4100
Benefits
Reasons to choose AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100
- Newer graphics card, release dates difference 2 year(s) 2 month(s)
- 3.8x more texture speed: 76.86 GTexel / s vs 20.16 GTexel / s
- 2x more shader processors: 1024 vs 512
- 3.8 times better floating point performance: 2,460 gflops vs 645.1 gflops 2 times faster: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- 50% faster memory clock: 6000 MHz vs 4000 MHz
- 2.4 times faster performance in PassMark — G3D Mark benchmark: 3730 vs 1534
- Benchmark performance PassMark — G2D Mark about 26% bigger: 661 vs 523
- 3x better performance in Geekbench — OpenCL benchmark: 19770 vs 6575
- 3.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.
5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s): 55.077 vs 15.474
- CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) about 54% better: 830.773 vs 538.098
- CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) 2.5x better performance: 4.132 vs 1.631
- 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) benchmark: 82.584 vs 31.327
- 3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) benchmark: 225.985 vs 75.244
- 2.8 times more performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) benchmark: 5431 vs 1951
- About 65% more performance in GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) benchmark vs 2678 1620
- 2.8 times more performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5431 vs 1951
- Performance in GFXBench 4.0 benchmark — T-Rex (Fps) about 65% more: 2678 vs 1620
approx. 1125 MHz vs 630 MHz
Release date | 10 November 2016 vs 13 August 2014 |
Core frequency | 1125 MHz vs 630 MHz |
Texturing Speed | 76.![]() |
Number of shaders | 1024 vs 512 |
Floating point performance | 2.460 gflops vs 645.1 gflops |
Process | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory frequency | 6000 MHz vs 4000 MHz |
PassMark — G3D Mark | 3730 vs 1534 |
PassMark — G2D Mark | 661 vs 523 |
Geekbench — OpenCL | 19770 vs 6575 |
CompuBench 1.![]() |
55.077 vs 15.474 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 830.773 vs 538.098 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.132 vs 1.631 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) | 82.584 vs 31.327 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 225.985 vs 75.244 |
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5431 vs 1951 |
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) | 2678 vs 1620 |
GFXBench 4.![]() |
5431 vs 1951 |
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) | 2678 vs 1620 |
Reasons to choose AMD FirePro W4100
- 3 times more performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames): 3399 vs 1123
- ) more: 3399 vs 1123
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) | 3399 vs 1123 |
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) | 3399 vs 1123 |
Benchmark comparison
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W4100
PassMark — G3D Mark |
|
|||||
PassMark — G2D Mark |
|
|||||
Geekbench — OpenCL |
|
|||||
CompuBench 1.![]() |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|||||
CompuBench 1.![]() |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|||||
GFXBench 4.![]() |
|
|||||
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|||||
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|||||
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|||||
GFXBench 4.![]() |
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 | AMD FirePro W4100 |
---|---|---|
PassMark — G3D Mark | 3730 | 1534 |
PassMark — G2D Mark | 661 | 523 |
Geekbench — OpenCL | 19770 | 6575 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 55.![]() |
15.474 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 830.773 | 538.098 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.132 | 1.631 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) | 82.584 | 31.327 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 225.985 | 75.244 |
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5431 | 1951 |
GFXBench 4.![]() |
1123 | 3399 |
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) | 2678 | 1620 |
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5431 | 1951 |
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) | 1123 | 3399 |
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) | 2678 | 1620 |
Performance comparison
AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 | AMD FirePro W4100 | |
---|---|---|
Architecture | GCN 4.![]() |
GCN 1.0 |
Codename | Baffin | Cape Verde |
Production date | November 10, 2016 | 13 August 2014 |
Price at first issue date | $399 | |
Place in the ranking | 452 | 805 |
Price now | $259.99 | |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Price/performance ratio (0-100) | 19.![]() |
|
Boost core clock | 1201MHz | |
Core frequency | 1125MHz | 630MHz |
Floating point performance | 2.460 gflops | 645.1 gflops |
Process | 14nm | 28nm |
Number of shaders | 1024 | 512 |
Texturing Speed | 76.86 GTexel/s | 20.16 GTexel/s |
Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 50 Watt |
Number of transistors | 3,000 million | 1,500 million |
Video connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort | 4x mini-DisplayPort |
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Interface | PCIe 3.![]() |
PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Additional power connectors | None | None |
Tire | PCIe 3.0 | |
Form factor | Low Profile / Half Length | |
Length | 171 mm | |
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Maximum memory size | 4GB | 2GB |
Memory bandwidth | 96GB/s | 72GB/s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory frequency | 6000MHz | 4000MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
AppAcceleration | ||
Powerplay |
Comparison AMD FirePro W4100 vs AMD Radeon R9 M470 what is better?
Home / Graphics Card / AMD FirePro W4100 vs AMD Radeon R9M470
AMD FirePro W4100
62%
DeviceList score
vs
AMD Radeon R9 M470
54%
DeviceList score
We compared the characteristics of AMD FirePro W4100 and AMD Radeon R9 M470 and compiled a list of advantages and a comparison table for you. Find out which one to choose in 2022 year.
AMD FirePro W4100 benefits
AMD Radeon R9 M470 benefits
Winner in comparison
Number of shader processors |
768 256 (50%) better vs 512 |
Core Frequency |
1000 MHz 370 MHz (58.7%) better than vs 630 MHz |
Maximum RAM amount |
4 2 (100%) better vs 2 |
Memory clock speed |
6000 MHz 2000 MHz (50%) better than vs 4000 MHz |
Memory Bandwidth |
96 24 (33. vs 72 |
General information | |
Price-quality ratio The higher the%, the better the quality per unit price in comparison with all analogues. |
|
92.6% | no data |
Architecture |
|
GCN 1.0 | GCN 2.0 |
Code name |
|
Cape Verde | Emerald |
Type |
|
Workstation | For laptops |
Number of shader processors |
|
512 | 768
256 (50%) better than |
Core Frequency |
|
630 MHz | 1000 MHz
370 MHz (58.7%) better than |
Frequency in Boost mode |
|
no data | 1000 MHz |
Number of transistors |
|
1.![]() |
2.080 million |
Technological process |
|
28 nm | 28nm |
Interface |
|
PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Power Consumption (TDP) The calculated heat output shows the average heat output in operation under load, |
|
50 Wt | no data |
Length |
|
171 mm | no data |
Additional power connectors |
|
no | no data |
Bus |
|
PCIe 3.0 | no data |
AppAcceleration |
|
+ | no data |
Form Factor |
|
low profile / half length | no data |
Support for dual-channel (dual-link) DVI |
|
+ | no data |
DirectCompute 5. |
|
no data | + |
Video connectors |
|
4x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
DirectX |
|
12 (11_1) | 12 (12_0) |
Floating-point performance |
|
645.1 gflops | 1.536 gflops |
Benchmarks |
Memory | |
Memory Type |
|
gddr5 900 9005 900 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount Large amount of video memory allows you to run demanding games with a lot of textures, |
|
2 | 4
2 (100%) better |
Memory bus width The wider the video memory bus width, the more data is transferred to the GPU per unit of time and the better the performance in demanding games. |
|
128bit | 128bit |
Shared memory |
|
— | — |
Memory clock speed A high memory frequency has a positive effect on the speed of a video card with a large amount of data. |
|
4000MGz | 6000 MHz
2000 MHz (50%) better |
Memory Bandwidth The higher the data transfer bandwidth, the more effective RAM your PC can use. |
|
72 | 96
24 (33.3%) better than |
specs and benchmarks in 9 games and 12 benchmarks
AMD started selling the FirePro M4100 on October 16, 2013. This is a graphics card for mobile workstations, based on the GCN 1.0 architecture, with a 28 nm process technology. It has 2 GB of GDDR5 memory with a frequency of 1000 MHz, a 128-bit bus, which provides a bandwidth of 4 Gb / s.
The card occupies 1 slot, connected via PCIe 3.0 x8 interface. Meals are not specified.
Specifications
GPU
- Architecture
- GCN 1.0
- Manufacturer
- TSMC
- Process
- 28 nm
- Number of transistors
- 950 million
- Crystal area
- 77 mm²
Graphic card
- Release date
- October 16, 2013
- Generation
- FirePro Mobile (Mx100)
- Data bus interface
- PCIe 3.0 x8
clock
- GPU clock
- 670 MHz
- Memory frequency
- 1000 MHz
Memory
- Memory capacity
- 2 GB
- Memory type
- GDDR5
- Memory bus
- 128 bit
- Memory speed
- 4 Gb/s
- Memory Bandwidth
- 64 GB/s
Render configuration
- Shader units
- 384
- Compute modules
- 6
- Texture blocks
- 24
- Screen blocks
- 8
- L1 cache
- 16 KB
- L2 cache
- 256 KB
Rated output
- Pixel fill rate
- 5.
360 HP/s
- Texture Fill Rate
- 16.08 GT/s
- Performance FP32
- 514.6 GFlops
- Performance FP64
- 32.16 GFlops
Graphics capabilities
- DirectX
- 12 (11_1)
- OpenGL
- 4.6
- OpenCL
- 1.2
- Vulcan
- 1.2
- Shader model
- 5.1
Video card design
- Occupied slots
- 1
- Outputs
- None
FPS in games
Metro: Last Light
(2013)
Better than NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M, but worse than AMD Radeon HD 7660D.
1024×768 / Low / 35 |
1920×1080 / Ultra / 8 |
BioShock Infinite
(2013)
Better than Intel HD Graphics 630, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M.
1920×1080 / Ultra / 9 |
Tomb Raider
(2013)
Better than AMD Radeon R5 M320, but worse than Intel Iris Graphics 5100.
1024×768 / Low / 59 |
1920×1080 / Ultra / 9 |
Hitman: Absolution
(2012)
Better than AMD Radeon HD 8650G, but worse than AMD Radeon HD 8670M.
1024×768 / Low / 26 |
1920×1080 / Ultra / 8 |
Company of Heroes 2
(2013)
Better than NVIDIA GeForce 820M, but worse than Intel HD Graphics 620.
1024×768 / Low / 21 |
Diablo III
(2012)
Better than NVIDIA GeForce 820M, but worse than AMD Radeon HD 8790M.
1024×768 / Low / 96 |
1920×1080 / Ultra / 21 |
Total War: Rome II
(2013)
Better than Intel HD Graphics 520, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce 920M.
1024×768 / Low / 45 |
1920×1080 / Ultra / 6 |
Borderlands 2
(2012)
Better than NVIDIA GeForce GT 520MX, but worse than AMD Radeon R5 M230.
1024×768 / Low / 37 |
1920×1080 / Ultra / 19 |
World of Warcraft
(2005)
Better than NVIDIA NVS 5200M, but worse than NVIDIA Quadro K2100M.
800×600 / Low / 272 |
1024×768 / Medium / 165 |
1280×1024 / Tall / 29 |
1920×1080 / Ultra / 12 |
Benchmark tests
3DMark Cloud Gate GPU: 6297 Better than AMD Radeon R7 M340, but worse than AMD Radeon R7 M270.
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score: 5125 Better than AMD Radeon HD 7560D but worse than AMD Radeon HD 8730M.
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics: 857 Better than Intel HD Graphics 615 but worse than Intel Iris Graphics 6100.
3DMark Fire Strike Score: 815 Better than AMD Radeon HD 7670M but worse than Intel Iris Graphics 5100.
3DMark06: 9320 Better than NVIDIA GeForce 825M, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M.
3DMark11 P: 1921 Better than AMD Radeon R5 M255 but worse than Intel UHD Graphics 620.
3DMark11 P GPU: 1728 Better than NVIDIA GeForce GT 730M, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M.
Cinebench R10 32Bit OpenGL: 6578 Better than NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M, but worse than ATI Radeon HD 5850.