Amd radeon hd 8400 benchmark: UserBenchmark: AMD Radeon HD 8400-R3

Unigine Superposition

—

Dieser integrierte Grafikprozessor ist in diesen CPUs zu finden:

#	CPU	Kerne/ Threads	Basisuhr	Turbo-Uhr	Leistung Score	In Laptops ab. ..
1.	AMD A6-5200	4 / 4	2.00 GHz	0.00 GHz		Preise anzeigen

Wir haben getestet AMD Radeon HD 8400 auf…

AMD Radeon HD 8400 — review. GPU Benchmark & Specs

AMD Radeon HD 8400 graphics card (also called GPU) comes in 883 in the performance rating. It is a good result. The graphics card AMD Radeon HD 8400 runs with the minimal clock speed 600 MHz. It is featured by the acceleration option and able to run up to . The manufacturer has equipped AMD with GB of memory, clock speed and bandwidth .

The power consumption of the graphics card is , and the fabrication process is only 28 nm. Below you will find the main data on the compatibility, sizes, technologies and gaming performance test results. Also you can read and leave the comments.

Let’s take a closer look at the most important specifications of the graphics card. To have a good idea what a graphics card is the best, we recommend to use comparison service.

2.1
Out of 14
Hitesti score

Popular graphics cards

Most viewed

AMD Radeon RX Vega 7

Intel UHD Graphics 630

Intel UHD Graphics 600

NVIDIA Quadro T1000

AMD Radeon RX Vega 10

NVIDIA GeForce MX330

Intel HD Graphics 530

Intel UHD Graphics 620

Intel HD Graphics 4600

Intel HD Graphics 520

Buy here:

AliExpress

General info

The basic set of information will help you find out the graphics card AMD Radeon HD 8400 release date and its purpose (laptops or PCs), as well as the price at the time of the release and the average current price. This data also includes the architecture employed by the producer, and the chip’s codename.

Technical specs

This is the important information that defines the graphics card’s capacity. The simpler the device production process, the better. The core’s power frequency is responsible for its speed (direct correlation) while the elaboration of signals is performed by the transistors (the more transistors, the faster the computations are carried out).

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Today there are numerous form factors for PC cases, so it is extremely important to know the length of the graphics card and the types of its connection. This will help facilitate the upgrade process.

Memory

The internal main memory is used for storing data while conducting computations. Contemporary games and professional graphic apps have high requirements for the memory’s volume and capacity. The higher this parameter, the more powerful and fast the graphics card is. Type of memory, the capacity and bandwidth for AMD Radeon HD 8400.

Video outputs and ports

As a rule, all contemporary graphics cards feature several connection types and additional ports. Knowing these peculiarities is crucial for avoiding problems with connecting the graphics card to the monitor or other peripheral devices.

API support

All API-supported AMD Radeon HD 8400 are listed below.

Overall gaming performance

All tests have been based on FPS counter. Let’s have a look on what place AMD Radeon HD 8400 has been taken in the gaming performance test (calculation has been made in accordance with the game developer recommendations about system requirements; it can differ from the real world situations).

Select games to view
Horizon Zero DawnDeath StrandingF1 2020Gears TacticsDoom EternalHunt ShowdownEscape from TarkovHearthstoneRed Dead Redemption 2Star Wars Jedi Fallen OrderNeed for Speed HeatCall of Duty Modern Warfare 2019GRID 2019Ghost Recon BreakpointFIFA 20Borderlands 3ControlF1 2019League of LegendsTotal War: Three KingdomsRage 2Anno 1800The Division 2Dirt Rally 2. 0AnthemMetro ExodusFar Cry New DawnApex LegendsJust Cause 4Darksiders IIIFarming Simulator 19Battlefield VFallout 76Hitman 2Call of Duty Black Ops 4Assassin´s Creed OdysseyForza Horizon 4FIFA 19Shadow of the Tomb RaiderStrange BrigadeF1 2018Monster Hunter WorldThe Crew 2Far Cry 5World of Tanks enCoreX-Plane 11.11Kingdom Come: DeliveranceFinal Fantasy XV BenchmarkFortniteStar Wars Battlefront 2Need for Speed PaybackCall of Duty WWIIAssassin´s Creed OriginsWolfenstein II: The New ColossusDestiny 2ELEXThe Evil Within 2Middle-earth: Shadow of WarFIFA 18Ark Survival EvolvedF1 2017Playerunknown’s Battlegrounds (2017)Team Fortress 2Dirt 4Rocket LeaguePreyMass Effect AndromedaGhost Recon WildlandsFor HonorResident Evil 7Dishonored 2Call of Duty Infinite WarfareTitanfall 2Farming Simulator 17Civilization VIBattlefield 1Mafia 3Deus Ex Mankind DividedMirror’s Edge CatalystOverwatchDoomAshes of the SingularityHitman 2016The DivisionFar Cry PrimalXCOM 2Rise of the Tomb RaiderRainbow Six SiegeAssassin’s Creed SyndicateStar Wars BattlefrontFallout 4Call of Duty: Black Ops 3Anno 2205World of WarshipsDota 2 RebornThe Witcher 3Dirt RallyGTA VDragon Age: InquisitionFar Cry 4Assassin’s Creed UnityCall of Duty: Advanced WarfareAlien: IsolationMiddle-earth: Shadow of MordorSims 4Wolfenstein: The New OrderThe Elder Scrolls OnlineThiefX-Plane 10. 25Battlefield 4Total War: Rome IICompany of Heroes 2Metro: Last LightBioShock InfiniteStarCraft II: Heart of the SwarmSimCityTomb RaiderCrysis 3Hitman: AbsolutionCall of Duty: Black Ops 2World of Tanks v8Borderlands 2Counter-Strike: GODirt ShowdownDiablo IIIMass Effect 3The Elder Scrolls V: SkyrimBattlefield 3Deus Ex Human RevolutionStarCraft 2Metro 2033Stalker: Call of PripyatGTA IV — Grand Theft AutoLeft 4 DeadTrackmania Nations ForeverCall of Duty 4 — Modern WarfareSupreme Commander — FA BenchCrysis — GPU BenchmarkWorld in Conflict — BenchmarkHalf Life 2 — Lost Coast BenchmarkWorld of WarcraftDoom 3Quake 3 Arena — TimedemoHalo InfiniteFarming Simulator 22Battlefield 2042Forza Horizon 5Riders RepublicGuardians of the GalaxyBack 4 BloodDeathloopF1 2021Days GoneResident Evil VillageHitman 3Cyberpunk 2077Assassin´s Creed ValhallaDirt 5Watch Dogs LegionMafia Definitive EditionCyberpunk 2077 1.5GRID LegendsDying Light 2Rainbow Six ExtractionGod of War

low

1280×720

med.

1920×1080

high

1920×1080

ultra

1920×1080

QHD

2560×1440

4K

3840×2160

Horizon Zero Dawn (2020)

low

1280×720

med.

1920×1080

high

1920×1080

ultra

1920×1080

QHD

2560×1440

4K

3840×2160

Death Stranding (2020)

low

1280×720

med.

1920×1080

high

1920×1080

ultra

1920×1080

QHD

2560×1440

4K

3840×2160

F1 2020 (2020)

low

1280×720

med.

1920×1080

high

1920×1080

ultra

1920×1080

QHD

2560×1440

4K

3840×2160

Gears Tactics (2020)

low

1280×720

med.

1920×1080

high

1920×1080

ultra

1920×1080

QHD

2560×1440

4K

3840×2160

Doom Eternal (2020)

low

1280×720

med.

1920×1080

high

1920×1080

ultra

1920×1080

QHD

2560×1440

4K

3840×2160

Legend
5	Stutter – The performance of this graphics cards with this game is not well explored yet. According to interpolated information obtained from graphics cards of similar efficiency levels, the game is likely to stutter and show low frame rates.
	May Stutter – The performance of this graphics cards with this game is not well explored yet. According to interpolated information obtained from graphics cards of similar efficiency levels, the game is likely to stutter and show low frame rates.
30	Fluent – According to all known benchmarks with the specified graphical settings, this game is expected to run at 25fps or more
40	Fluent – According to all known benchmarks with the specified graphical settings, this game is expected to run at 35fps or more
60	Fluent – According to all known benchmarks with the specified graphical settings, this game is expected to run at 58fps or more
	May Run Fluently – The performance of this graphics cards with this game is not well explored yet. According to interpolated information obtained from graphics cards of similar efficiency levels, the game is likely to show fluent frame rates.
?	Uncertain – The testing of this graphics cards on this game showed unexpected results. A slower card might be able to produce higher and more consistent frame rates when running the same benchmark scene.
	Uncertain – The performance of this graphics cards with this game is not well explored yet. No reliable data interpolation can be made based on the performance of similar cards of the same category.
The value in the fields reflects the average frame rate across the entire database. To obtain individual results, move your cursor over the value.

Benchmark

Benchmarks help determine the performance in standard tests for AMD Radeon HD 8400. We have listed the world’s most famous benchmarks so that you could obtain accurate results in each (see the description). Graphics card preliminary testing is especially important in the presence of high loads so that the user could see to what extent the graphic processing unit copes with computations and data elaboration.

Overall benchmark performance

AMD Radeon HD 6450A

NVIDIA GeForce 7900 GT

AMD Radeon HD 8400

NVIDIA NVS 4200M

AMD Radeon HD 8330E

Multi-platform Ice Storm test shows the videocard performance by using the off-screen rendering method. Standard testing conditions are 1280*720 (720p).

Intel HD Graphics 4400

AMD Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L)

AMD Radeon HD 8400

Intel HD Graphics 505

AMD Radeon R4 (Beema)

Unlike Ice Storm, Cloud Gate test elaborated by 3DMark employs more resource-intensive scenes. The better the final estimation, the faster your videocard is. The processing is carried out by means of DirectX 10.

Intel HD Graphics 500

AMD Radeon HD 8350G

AMD Radeon HD 8400

AMD Radeon HD 8610G

AMD Radeon HD 7420G

This is an advanced videocard benchmark. With DirectX 11 being used for conducting the processing, the normal testing time is 15 minutes. The higher the estimation, the faster the videocard is.

AMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)

Intel UHD Graphics 600

AMD Radeon HD 8400

AMD Radeon HD 8350G

AMD Radeon R2 (Mullins/Beema/Carrizo-L)

Complex graphic scenes require all the graphics card resources. They use the entire RAM and computing power. The test’s results can be viewed below.

AMD Radeon R3 (Mullins/Beema)

Intel HD Graphics 505

AMD Radeon HD 8400

AMD Radeon HD 8350G

Intel UHD Graphics 600

This benchmark analyzes the videocard’s game power with the use of Direct X 11 (multi-threading, tessellation, shader computations).

Intel HD Graphics 505

AMD Radeon R3 (Mullins/Beema)

AMD Radeon HD 8400

AMD Radeon R4 (Kaveri)

AMD Radeon HD 6490M

This Direct X10-based benchmark contains AI tests, physics, and 6 computing tests.

Intel HD Graphics 405

AMD Radeon HD 7520G

AMD Radeon HD 8400

AMD Radeon R4 (Kaveri)

Intel HD Graphics 2500

PassMark is a great benchmark that gets updated regularly and shows relevant information on the graphics card’s performance.

AMD Radeon HD 6450A

NVIDIA GeForce 7900 GT

AMD Radeon HD 8400

Intel HD Graphics 3000

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 510M

2. 1
Out of 14
Hitesti score

Share on social network:

In order to leave a review you need to log in

Reviews of AMD Radeon HD 8400

Compare AMD Radeon HD 8400

VS

NVIDIA GeForce 8500 GT

NVIDIA GRID K2

NVIDIA Tesla M60

NVIDIA Quadro K4000

NVIDIA Tesla K80

NVIDIA Quadro K1200

NVIDIA GRID K240Q

NVIDIA Quadro M2200

NVIDIA GRID M40

NVIDIA Quadro 4000M

AMD Radeon HD 8400 in 7 Benchmarks

It is time to review AMD Radeon HD 8400 benchmark performance. The base clock speed is 600 MHz, whilst its speed in turbo boost and supplementary overclocking (maximum) is .

AMD Radeon HD 8400 process technology is 28 nm that is a good result of the release date.

AMD manufacture has equipped graphic chips with  bandwidth and 600 MHz clock speed. AMD Radeon HD 8400 maximum memory is .

We recommend you learn all technical specifications in separate sections for a common understanding and high-speed of AMD Radeon HD 8400.

2.3
Out of 13
CMPTEK score

Compare AMD Radeon HD 8400

VS

NVIDIA GeForce Go 7950 GTX (218 views)

AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 (194 views)

NVIDIA GeForce MX330 (185 views)

NVIDIA Quadro P520 (183 views)

NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (181 views)

Intel UHD Graphics 630 (180 views)

AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 (177 views)

Intel UHD Graphics 620 (156 views)

Intel HD Graphics 4600 (156 views)

NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M (151 views)

General Information

Here is the release date, code name, core architecture, launch and current price. It is the general information to start learning AMD Radeon HD 8400.

AMD Radeon HD 8400 — Technical Specifications

Here are key features that determine AMD Radeon HD 8400 performance in benchmarks and other apps. The higher the figures are, the better it is. Please pay attention to all the characteristics provided. For example, the clock frequency directly affects the high-speed, and processing data and performing calculations (e.g, for mining) depend on the number of transistors. Also, check the TDP figure, because modern graphics cards may require a powerful PSU.

AMD Radeon HD 8400 — Dimensions and Compatibility

Nowadays, it is very important to know the dimensions — length, width and height of a desktop graphics card — and understand which power connector is included in the package. Also, please pay attention to the PCIe interface.

AMD Radeon HD 8400 — GPU RAM Frequency and Speed

Graphics Card Ram is a key element in computing and data storage — type, size, clock frequency and bandwidth — that directly affect the speed of work in gaming and working apps, which are currently quite demanding on graphics card resources. Note please the memory standard. The higher it is, the better it is. Let’s learn more about AMD Radeon HD 8400 video memory specifications.

AMD Radeon HD 8400 — Port and Display Support

In most cases, today all the problems connector compatibility can be solved with adapters or backwards-compatible cables such as HDMI / DVI. But, for general information, you learn below which ports are supported by AMD Radeon HD 8400.

AMD Radeon HD 8400 — API support

Here are general standards for DirectX and other unified complexes for the development of 3D images supported by AMD Radeon HD 8400 .

Overall AMD Radeon HD 8400 Gaming Performance

Find out to what extent AMD Radeon HD 8400 is suitable for gaming! We have compiled a database of popular games and their system requirements* that allows you to quickly and easily estimate its gaming performance at different screen resolutions. Graphics card gaming test is based on FPS. * There is a little margin error in the estimation of data.

Select games to view
Horizon Zero DawnDeath StrandingF1 2020Gears TacticsDoom EternalHunt ShowdownEscape from TarkovHearthstoneRed Dead Redemption 2Star Wars Jedi Fallen OrderNeed for Speed HeatCall of Duty Modern Warfare 2019GRID 2019Ghost Recon BreakpointFIFA 20Borderlands 3ControlF1 2019League of LegendsTotal War: Three KingdomsRage 2Anno 1800The Division 2Dirt Rally 2.0AnthemMetro ExodusFar Cry New DawnApex LegendsJust Cause 4Darksiders IIIFarming Simulator 19Battlefield VFallout 76Hitman 2Call of Duty Black Ops 4Assassin´s Creed OdysseyForza Horizon 4FIFA 19Shadow of the Tomb RaiderStrange BrigadeF1 2018Monster Hunter WorldThe Crew 2Far Cry 5World of Tanks enCoreX-Plane 11.11Kingdom Come: DeliveranceFinal Fantasy XV BenchmarkFortniteStar Wars Battlefront 2Need for Speed PaybackCall of Duty WWIIAssassin´s Creed OriginsWolfenstein II: The New ColossusDestiny 2ELEXThe Evil Within 2Middle-earth: Shadow of WarFIFA 18Ark Survival EvolvedF1 2017Playerunknown’s Battlegrounds (2017)Team Fortress 2Dirt 4Rocket LeaguePreyMass Effect AndromedaGhost Recon WildlandsFor HonorResident Evil 7Dishonored 2Call of Duty Infinite WarfareTitanfall 2Farming Simulator 17Civilization VIBattlefield 1Mafia 3Deus Ex Mankind DividedMirror’s Edge CatalystOverwatchDoomAshes of the SingularityHitman 2016The DivisionFar Cry PrimalXCOM 2Rise of the Tomb RaiderRainbow Six SiegeAssassin’s Creed SyndicateStar Wars BattlefrontFallout 4Call of Duty: Black Ops 3Anno 2205World of WarshipsDota 2 RebornThe Witcher 3Dirt RallyGTA VDragon Age: InquisitionFar Cry 4Assassin’s Creed UnityCall of Duty: Advanced WarfareAlien: IsolationMiddle-earth: Shadow of MordorSims 4Wolfenstein: The New OrderThe Elder Scrolls OnlineThiefX-Plane 10. 25Battlefield 4Total War: Rome IICompany of Heroes 2Metro: Last LightBioShock InfiniteStarCraft II: Heart of the SwarmSimCityTomb RaiderCrysis 3Hitman: AbsolutionCall of Duty: Black Ops 2World of Tanks v8Borderlands 2Counter-Strike: GODirt ShowdownDiablo IIIMass Effect 3The Elder Scrolls V: SkyrimBattlefield 3Deus Ex Human RevolutionStarCraft 2Metro 2033Stalker: Call of PripyatGTA IV — Grand Theft AutoLeft 4 DeadTrackmania Nations ForeverCall of Duty 4 — Modern WarfareSupreme Commander — FA BenchCrysis — GPU BenchmarkWorld in Conflict — BenchmarkHalf Life 2 — Lost Coast BenchmarkWorld of WarcraftDoom 3Quake 3 Arena — Timedemo

low

1280×720

med.

1920×1080

high

1920×1080

ultra

1920×1080

QHD

2560×1440

4K

3840×2160

Horizon Zero Dawn (2020)

low

1280×720

med.

1920×1080

high

1920×1080

ultra

1920×1080

QHD

2560×1440

4K

3840×2160

Death Stranding (2020)

low

1280×720

med.

1920×1080

high

1920×1080

ultra

1920×1080

QHD

2560×1440

4K

3840×2160

F1 2020 (2020)

low

1280×720

med.

1920×1080

high

1920×1080

ultra

1920×1080

QHD

2560×1440

4K

3840×2160

Gears Tactics (2020)

low

1280×720

med.

1920×1080

high

1920×1080

ultra

1920×1080

QHD

2560×1440

4K

3840×2160

Doom Eternal (2020)

low

1280×720

med.

1920×1080

high

1920×1080

ultra

1920×1080

QHD

2560×1440

4K

3840×2160

Legend
5	Stutter – How graphics cards operate in the game is being examined for the time being. As per interpolation of the similar graphics cards showing low frame rates, the game is possible to lag.
	May Stutter – How graphics cards operate in the game is being examined for the time being. As per interpolation of the similar graphics cards showing low frame rates, the game is possible to lag.
30	Fluent – In considering all graphics benchmarks, the game speed is likely to be 25 fps or more.
40	Fluent – In considering all graphics benchmarks, the game speed is likely to be 35 fps or more.
60	Fluent – In considering all graphics benchmarks, the game speed is likely to be 58 fps or more.
	May Run Fluently – How graphics cards operate in the game is being examined for the time being. As per interpolation of the similar graphics cards showing low frame rates, the game is possible to lag.
?	Uncertain – The graphics card testing has revealed a slower card might ensure a high and stable frame rate.
	Uncertain – How graphics cards operate in the game is being examined for the time being. The interpolation in the same category is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

AMD Radeon HD 8400 in Benchmarks

Let’s sum up the review by comparing the benchmarks results of AMD Radeon HD 8400 5 competitive models similar in technical specifications. The first block is the overall result for all benchmarks, then all the others, which this particular model was tested on.

The higher the benchmark score, the faster a video card performs in graphics apps and modern games. If you have any additional questions, please leave them in the comments, we will definitely help!

Overall benchmark performance

AMD Radeon HD 6450A

NVIDIA GeForce 7900 GT

AMD Radeon HD 8400

AMD Radeon HD 8330E

NVIDIA NVS 4200M

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

3DMark Ice Storm is the only fully cross-platform benchmark that runs on all devices. It’s great for comparing the 3D performance of smartphones, tablets, ultraportable laptops, and old or low-end PCs.

Intel HD Graphics 4400

AMD Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L)

AMD Radeon HD 8400

Intel HD Graphics 505

AMD Radeon R4 (Beema)

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

The 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU test is designed for mid-range laptops and home PCs with integrated video graphics. The test uses the DirectX 11 engine, which is limited by Direct3D 10 capabilities. Accordingly, Cloud Gate is best suited for testing modern entry-level systems and legacy DX10-enabled GPUs.

Intel HD Graphics 500

AMD Radeon HD 8350G

AMD Radeon HD 8400

AMD Radeon HD 8610G

AMD Radeon HD 7420G

3DMark Fire Strike Score

Fire Strike, Fire Strike Extreme, Fire Strike Ultra. Fire Strike includes two graphics tests, a physics test and a combined test that stresses the CPU and GPU.

AMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)

Intel UHD Graphics 600

AMD Radeon HD 8400

AMD Radeon HD 8350G

AMD Radeon R2 (Mullins/Beema/Carrizo-L)

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

3DMark Fire Strike for Graphics Cards helps you determine performance in a state-of-the-art synthetic test that consists of two levels — physical and combined testing.

AMD Radeon R3 (Mullins/Beema)

Intel HD Graphics 505

AMD Radeon HD 8400

AMD Radeon HD 8350G

Intel UHD Graphics 600

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

The result of the 3DMark 11 benchmark evaluation supports tessellation, compute shaders and graphics card multithreading will show which graphics card model is better and faster in games. The higher the score of the video card in the 3DMark 11 benchmark, the better.

Intel HD Graphics 505

AMD Radeon R3 (Mullins/Beema)

AMD Radeon HD 8400

AMD Radeon R4 (Kaveri)

AMD Radeon HD 6490M

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage Performance reveals the real performance of video cards tested by users in their computers. Only the best graphics card deserves the highest score in the 3DMark Vantage Performance benchmark.

Intel HD Graphics 405

AMD Radeon HD 7520G

AMD Radeon HD 8400

AMD Radeon R4 (Kaveri)

Intel HD Graphics 2500

Passmark GPU

Passmark is an effective benchmark that displays true results on the speed of data processing by GPU cores. We present the results of the evaluation of the performance of a video card in the modern Passmark benchmark, which evaluates the performance of a video card using its own rendering algorithms. The higher the score, the more powerful the graphics card.

AMD Radeon HD 6450A

NVIDIA GeForce 7900 GT

AMD Radeon HD 8400

Intel HD Graphics 3000

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 510M

2.3
Out of 13
CMPTEK score

AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP vs ATI Radeon 9200 LE

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP and ATI Radeon 9200 LE videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory.
Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark — G3D Mark, PassMark — G2D Mark, Geekbench — OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps).

AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP

Buy on Amazon

vs

ATI Radeon 9200 LE

Buy on Amazon

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP

• Videocard is newer: launch date 10 year(s) 6 month(s) later
• Around 60% higher core clock speed: 400 MHz vs 250 MHz
• 3.2x more texture fill rate: 3.2 GTexel / s vs 1 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 150 nm
• Around 12% lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 28 Watt
• 86x better performance in PassMark — G3D Mark: 258 vs 3

Launch date	23 November 2013 vs 1 May 2003
Core clock speed	400 MHz vs 250 MHz
Texture fill rate	3. 2 GTexel / s vs 1 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm vs 150 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	25 Watt vs 28 Watt
PassMark — G3D Mark	258 vs 3

Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon 9200 LE

• Around 64% better performance in PassMark — G2D Mark: 128 vs 78

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP
GPU 2: ATI Radeon 9200 LE

Name	AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP	ATI Radeon 9200 LE
PassMark — G3D Mark	258	3
PassMark — G2D Mark	78	128
Geekbench — OpenCL	1453
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s)	18.197
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1322.192
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s)	1.774
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s)	47.241
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	224.569
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames)	930
GFXBench 4. 0 — T-Rex (Frames)	1631
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps)	930
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps)	1631

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP	ATI Radeon 9200 LE
Architecture	GCN 2.0	Rage 7
Code name	Kalindi	RV280
Launch date	23 November 2013	1 May 2003
Place in performance rating	1149	1087
Type	Desktop	Desktop
Core clock speed	400 MHz	250 MHz
Floating-point performance	102. 4 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	150 nm
Pipelines	128
Texture fill rate	3.2 GTexel / s	1 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	25 Watt	28 Watt
Transistor count	1,178 million	36 million
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
Interface	IGP	AGP 8x
Supplementary power connectors		1x Molex
DirectX	12. 0 (12_0)	8.1
OpenGL	4.5	1.4
Memory type	System Shared	DDR
Maximum RAM amount		64 MB
Memory bandwidth		6.4 GB / s
Memory bus width		128 Bit
Memory clock speed		400 MHz

Navigation

Choose a GPU

Compare videocards

Compare AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP with others

AMD
Radeon HD 8400 IGP



vs



AMD
FirePro M8900




AMD
Radeon HD 8400 IGP



vs



AMD
Radeon HD 7570




AMD
Radeon HD 8400 IGP



vs



NVIDIA
Quadro K2000M




AMD
Radeon HD 8400 IGP



vs



NVIDIA
GeForce 840M




AMD
Radeon HD 8400 IGP



vs



NVIDIA
GeForce GT 740




AMD
Radeon HD 8400 IGP



vs



AMD
Radeon Vega 3

AMD Radeon HD 8400 Specs

AMD Radeon HD 8400 Specs

Specifications of the AMD Radeon HD 8400 graphics card dedicated to the desktop sector, with 128 shading units, its maximum frequency is 0,6GHz The table below makes it possible to observe well the lithography, the number of transistors (if present), the offered cache memory, the quantity of texture mapping units, of render output units, the release date, the GFLOPS performance, the values obtained in the benchmark platforms.

This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.

Specifications:

Graphics card		AMD Radeon HD 8400
Market (main)		Desktop
Release date		Q4 2013
Model number		Radeon HD 8400
GPU name		Kalindi
Architecture		GCN 2.0
Generation		Kabini HD 8000
Lithography		28 nm
Transistors		1. 178.000.000
Bus interface		IGP
GPU clock		600 MHz
TDP		25 W
Cores (compute units, SM, SMX)		2
Shading units		128
TMUs		8
ROPs		4
Pixel fillrate		2,4 GPixel/s
Texture fillrate		4,8 GTexel/s
Performance FP32 (float)		153,6 GFLOPS
Performance FP64 (double)		9,6 GFLOPS
Amazon
eBay

Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

TMUs: texture mapping units. This unit was a physical processor separated from the main graphics processing units. It is able to distort a bitmap image, and also to resize it, to rotate it and to place it as a texture onto a plane of a specific 3D model.

ROPs: render output units. The other name of this unit is raster operations pipeline. This hadware component is taking pixel and texel information, and processing it through vector and matrix operations. The result will be a depth value or a final pixel. It is able to control antialiasing with the merge of several sample into one pixel.

Performances :

Performance comparison between this graphics card and those of equivalent power, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark softwares and rendering performances.

Pixel fillrate performance comparison for this graphics card:

The term pixel fillrate is refering to the number of pixels that the video card is able to generate every second. This performance is achieved by multiplying the raster output units (ROPs) by the clock frequency of the graphics processor unit (GPU).

Texture fillrate performance comparison for this graphics card:

The term texture fillrate refers to the number of map texture elements (texels) that the GPU is capable of generating per second. This performance is achieved by multiplying the texture mapping units (TMUs) by the clock frequency of the graphics processor unit.

FP32 performance comparison (single precision; float; floating-point 32) for this graphics card:

Single precision floating point format, also known as FP32, is a computer number format that typically occupies 32 bits in PC memory. This represents a wide dynamic range of numeric values that employs a floating point.

List of comparisons:

AMDAMD RadeonAMD Radeon GraphicsAMD Radeon HDAMD Radeon HD 6000AMD Radeon HD 7000AMD Radeon HD 7800AMD Radeon HD 8000AMD Radeon MobileAMD Radeon ProAMD Radeon Pro MobileAMD Radeon R2AMD Radeon R4AMD Radeon R5AMD Radeon R6AMD Radeon R7AMD Radeon R7 200AMD Radeon R9AMD Radeon R9 200AMD Radeon RXAMD Radeon RX 300AMD Radeon RX 400AMD Radeon RX 500AMD Radeon RX 5000AMD Radeon RX 5000 MobileAMD Radeon RX 6000AMD Radeon RX 6000 MobileAMD Radeon RX 7000AMD Radeon RX VegaAMD Radeon VegaAMD Radeon Vega 11AMD Radeon Vega 3AMD Radeon Vega 6AMD Radeon Vega 8AMD Radeon Vega MobileAppleARMARM MaliARM Mali-400ARM Mali-450ARM Mali-470ARM Mali-G31ARM Mali-G51ARM Mali-G52ARM Mali-G57ARM Mali-G610ARM Mali-G68ARM Mali-G71ARM Mali-G710ARM Mali-G72ARM Mali-G76ARM Mali-G77ARM Mali-G78ARM Mali-T720ARM Mali-T760ARM Mali-T764ARM Mali-T820ARM Mali-T830ARM Mali-T860ARM Mali-T880ASRockAsusATIATI Radeon HDATI Radeon HD 3000ATI Radeon HD 4000ATI Radeon HD 5000BFGBroadcomBroadcom VideoCoreDMPEVGAGainwardGigabyteImaginationImagination PowerVRImagination PowerVR SGX543Imagination PowerVR SGX544IntelIntel ArcIntel Arctic SoundIntel HD GraphicsIntel Iris GraphicsIntel Iris Plus GraphicsIntel Iris Xe Graphics G7Intel Iris Xe Graphics MobileIntel UHD GraphicsIntel UHD Graphics 610Intel UHD Graphics 620Intel UHD Graphics 630Intel UHD Graphics 730Intel Xe GraphicsMSINvidiaNvidia GeForceNvidia GeForce 1000Nvidia GeForce 1000 MobileNvidia GeForce 1600Nvidia GeForce 1600 MobileNvidia GeForce 2000Nvidia GeForce 2000 MobileNvidia GeForce 3000Nvidia GeForce 3000 MobileNvidia GeForce 400Nvidia GeForce 4000Nvidia GeForce 500Nvidia GeForce 600Nvidia GeForce 600MNvidia GeForce 700Nvidia GeForce 700MNvidia GeForce 800M seriesNvidia GeForce 900Nvidia GeForce 900MNvidia GeForce GTNvidia GeForce GT 1000Nvidia GeForce GTXNvidia GeForce GTX 1000Nvidia GeForce GTX 1000 MobileNvidia GeForce GTX 1600Nvidia GeForce GTX 1600 MobileNvidia GeForce GTX 400Nvidia GeForce GTX 500Nvidia GeForce GTX 600Nvidia GeForce GTX 600 MobileNvidia GeForce GTX 700Nvidia GeForce GTX 700 MobileNvidia GeForce GTX 800 MobileNvidia GeForce GTX 900Nvidia GeForce GTX 900 MobileNvidia GeForce MXNvidia GeForce RTXNvidia GeForce RTX 2000Nvidia GeForce RTX 2000 MobileNvidia GeForce RTX 3000Nvidia GeForce RTX 3000 MobileNvidia GeForce RTX 4000Nvidia GM20BNvidia Quadro seriesNvidia TeslaNvidia VoltaQualcommQualcomm AdrenoSamsungSaplosSapphireVivanteXFXZotacGraphics cards groups

List of benchmarks:

FP32 performance

See also:

AMD Radeon HD 8400 Mobile

Processors with the graphics card AMD Radeon HD 8400:

AMD Athlon 5350

Equivalence:

AMD Radeon HD 8400 Nvidia equivalent

Disclaimer:

When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.

Information:

We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer’s website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.

Radeon HD 8400 [in 7 benchmarks]

Radeon HD 8400

• IGP Interface
• Core frequency 600
• Video memory size System Shared
• Memory type System Shared
• System Shared Memory Frequency
• Maximum resolution

Description

AMD started Radeon HD 8400 sales 23 May 2013. This is GCN architecture notebook card based on 28 nm manufacturing process and primarily aimed at office use.

In terms of compatibility, this is an integrated graphics card. Power consumption — 25 W.

It provides poor performance in tests and games at the level of

0.88%

from the leader, which is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti.

Radeon HD
8400

or

GeForce RTX
3090 Ti

General information

Information about the type (desktop or laptop) and architecture of the Radeon HD 8400, as well as when sales started and cost at the time.

Value for money

To obtain an index, we compare the characteristics of video cards and their cost, taking into account the cost of other cards.

• 0
• 50
• 100

Features

Radeon HD 8400’s general performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. They indirectly speak of Radeon HD 8400’s performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.

RAM

Parameters of the memory installed on Radeon HD 8400 — type, size, bus, frequency and bandwidth. For video cards built into the processor that do not have their own memory, a shared part of the RAM is used.

Video outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on Radeon HD 8400. As a rule, this section is relevant only for desktop reference video cards, since for laptop ones the availability of certain video outputs depends on the laptop model.

API 9 support

1.2.131

Benchmark tests

These are the results of Radeon HD 8400 rendering performance tests in non-gaming benchmarks. The overall score is set from 0 to 100, where 100 corresponds to the fastest video card at the moment.

---

Overall benchmark performance

This is our overall performance rating. We regularly improve our algorithms, but if you find any inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in the comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 8400
0.88

• Passmark
• 3DMark 11 Performance GPU
• 3DMark Vantage Performance
• 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
• 3DMark Fire Strike Score
• 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
• 3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Passmark

This is a very common benchmark included in the Passmark PerformanceTest package. He gives the card a thorough evaluation, running four separate tests for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11, and 12 (the latter being done at 4K resolution whenever possible), and a few more tests using DirectCompute.

Benchmark coverage: 26%

HD 8400
257

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is Futuremark’s legacy DirectX 11 benchmark. He used four tests based on two scenes: one is several submarines exploring a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All tests make extensive use of volumetric lighting and tessellation and, despite being run at 1280×720, are relatively heavy. Support for 3DMark 11 ended in January 2020 and is now being replaced by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

HD 8400
614

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark. It loads the graphics card with two scenes, one of which is a girl running away from some kind of military base located in a sea cave, and the other is a space fleet attacking defenseless planet. Support for 3DMark Vantage was discontinued in April 2017 and it is now recommended to use the Time Spy benchmark instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

HD 8400
2013

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is a legacy DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark used to test home PCs and low-end laptops. It displays several scenes of some strange teleportation device launching spaceships into the unknown at a fixed resolution of 1280×720. As with the Ice Storm benchmark, it was deprecated in January 2020 and 3DMark Night Raid is now recommended instead.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

HD 8400
2883

3DMark Fire Strike Score

Benchmark coverage: 14%

HD 8400
377

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests showing a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature that appears to be made of lava. Using resolution 1920×1080, Fire Strike shows quite realistic graphics and is quite demanding on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

HD 8400
401

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of the 3DMark package. Ice Storm has been used to measure the performance of entry-level laptops and Windows-based tablets. It uses DirectX 11 feature level 9 to render a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet at 1280×720 resolution. Support for Ice Storm ended in January 2020, now the developers recommend using Night Raid instead.

Benchmark coverage: 8%

HD 8400
36156

---

Game tests

FPS in popular games on the Radeon HD 8400, as well as compliance with system requirements. Remember that the official requirements of the developers do not always match the data of real tests.

Average FPS

Here are the average fps for a large selection of popular games at various resolutions:

Full HD

10

Full HD
Medium Preset

Full HD
High Preset

Full HD
Ultra Preset

1440p
High Preset

1440p
Ultra Preset

4K
High Preset

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

1-2

Assassin’s Creed Odyssey	1-2
Assassin’s Creed Valhalla	1-2
Battlefield 5	1-2
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	1-2
Cyberpunk 2077	1-2
Far Cry 5	1-2
Far Cry New Dawn	1-2
Forza Horizon 4	1-2
Hitman 3	1-2
Horizon Zero Dawn	1-2
Red Dead Redemption 2	1-2
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	1-2
Watch Dogs: Legion	1-2

Assassin’s Creed Odyssey	1-2
Assassin’s Creed Valhalla	1-2
Battlefield 5	1-2
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	1-2
Cyberpunk 2077	1-2
Far Cry 5	1-2
Far Cry New Dawn	1-2
Forza Horizon 4	1-2
Hitman 3	1-2
Horizon Zero Dawn	1-2
Metro Exodus	1-2
Red Dead Redemption 2	1-2
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	1-2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	1-2
Watch Dogs: Legion	1-2

Assassin’s Creed Odyssey	1-2
Assassin’s Creed Valhalla	1-2
Battlefield 5	1-2
Cyberpunk 2077	1-2
Far Cry 5	1-2
Far Cry New Dawn	1-2
Forza Horizon 4	1-2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	1-2
Watch Dogs: Legion	1-2

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	1-2
Hitman 3	1-2
Horizon Zero Dawn	1-2
Metro Exodus	1-2
Red Dead Redemption 2	1-2
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	1-2

Assassin’s Creed Odyssey	1-2
Assassin’s Creed Valhalla	1-2
Battlefield 5	1-2
Cyberpunk 2077	1-2
Far Cry 5	1-2
Far Cry New Dawn	1-2
Forza Horizon 4	1-2
Watch Dogs: Legion	1-2

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	1-2
Hitman 3	1-2
Horizon Zero Dawn	1-2
Metro Exodus	1-2
Red Dead Redemption 2	1-2
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	1-2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	1-2

Assassin’s Creed Odyssey	1-2
Assassin’s Creed Valhalla	1-2
Battlefield 5	1-2
Cyberpunk 2077	1-2
Far Cry 5	1-2
Far Cry New Dawn	1-2
Forza Horizon 4	1-2
Watch Dogs: Legion	1-2

Relative capacity

Overall Radeon HD 8400 performance compared to its nearest competitor notebook graphics cards.

---

Intel HD Graphics 2500
102.27

NVIDIA GeForce GT 120M
102.27

AMD Radeon HD 6480G
100

AMD Radeon HD 8400
100

Intel HD Graphics 3000
98.86

ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5430
97.73

AMD Radeon HD 8330
97.73

Competitor from NVIDIA

We believe that the nearest equivalent to Radeon HD 8400 from NVIDIA is GeForce Go 7950 GTX, which is slower by 2% and higher by 5 positions in our rating on average.

GeForce Go
7950 GTX

Compare

Here are some of NVIDIA’s closest competitors to the Radeon HD 8400:

NVIDIA GeForce Go 7900 GTX
104.55

NVIDIA GeForce GT 120M
102. 27

NVIDIA GeForce Go 7950 GTX
102.27

AMD Radeon HD 8400
100

NVIDIA GeForce 410M
95.45

NVIDIA GeForce 320M
84.09

NVIDIA GeForce Go 7600 GT
81.82

Other video cards

Here we recommend several video cards that are more or less similar in performance to the reviewed one.

Radeon HD
6480G

Compare

HD
Graphics 3000

Compare

HD
Graphics 2500

Compare

Radeon HD
8330

Compare

Radeon HD
7400G

Compare

Radeon R3
(Mullins/Beema)

Compare

Recommended processors

According to our statistics, these processors are most often used with the Radeon HD 8400.

A6
5200

76.9%

Athlon
5150

3%

Athlon
5350

1.2%

E1
2500

0.7%

A6
9225

0.7%

Core 2
Duo E8400

0.6%

A8
6410

0.4%

Ryzen 5
3500U

0.4%

Core 2
Quad Q8400

0.4%

A4
5150M

0. 3%

User rating

Here you can see the rating of the video card by users, as well as put your own rating.

---

Tips and comments

Here you can ask a question about the Radeon HD 8400, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.

---

Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.

specs and benchmarks in 25 games and 15 benchmarks

AMD started shipping the Radeon HD 8400 on November 23, 2013. This is a graphics card for laptops based on the GCN 2.0 architecture, with a 28 nm process technology. It does not have its own memory and uses the system memory, so the performance depends on the characteristics of the RAM.

Connected via the IGP interface. Power is not specified, the declared maximum power consumption is 25 watts.

Specifications

GPU

Architecture

GCN 2.0

Manufacturer

TSMC

Process

28 nm

Number of transistors

1178 million

Crystal area

110 mm²

Graphic card

Release date

November 23, 2013

Generation

Kabini (HD 8000)

Predecessor

Richland

Descendant

Mullins

Data bus interface

IGP

Clocks

GPU Clocks

600 MHz

Memory frequency

Uses system

Memory

Memory capacity

Uses system

Memory type

Uses system

Memory bus

Uses system

Memory bandwidth

Uses system

Learn more about memory usage of the integrated video card, how to increase or decrease the amount and where to view it.

Render configuration

Shader units

128

Compute modules

2

Texture blocks

8

Raster blocks

4

Rated output

Pixel fill rate

2.400 HP/s

Texture Fill Rate

4.800 GT/s

Performance FP32

153.6 GFlops

Performance FP64

9.6 GFlops

Graphics

DirectX

12 (12_0)

OpenGL

4.6

OpenCL

2

Vulcan

1. 2

Shader model

6.3

Video Card Design

Heat Sink Requirements

25W

Outputs

None

FPS in games

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

(2012)

Better than Intel UHD Graphics 610, but worse than Intel HD Graphics 3000.

1024×768 / Low / 60

1366×768 / Medium / 47

1366×768 / Tall / 33.7

1920×1080 / Ultra / 19. 3

The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim

(2011)

Better than AMD Radeon HD 7340, but worse than ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3450.

1280×720 / Low / 15.7

1366×768 / Medium / 10.6

X-Plane 11.11

(2018)

Better than Intel UHD Graphics 600, but worse than Intel UHD Graphics 605.

1280×720 / Low / 9.07

1920×1080 / Medium / 5.55

1920×1080 / Tall / 4. 68

Dota 2 Reborn

(2015)

Better than Intel HD Graphics 3000, but worse than Intel HD Graphics 515.

1280×720 / Low / 36.55

1366×768 / Medium / 20.85

1920×1080 / Tall / 8.6

1920×1080 / Ultra / 8

Team Fortress 2

(2017)

Better than Intel UHD Graphics 600, but worse than AMD Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge).

1280×720 / Low / 36.7

World of Warships

(2015)

Better than AMD Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L), but worse than Intel HD Graphics (Broadwell).

1366×768 / Low / 28.7

1366×768 / Medium / 18.7

Battlefield 4

(2013)

Better than Intel HD Graphics (Haswell), but worse than AMD Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L).

1024×768 / Low / 20.9

Metro: Last Light

(2013)

Better than Intel HD Graphics (Haswell), but worse than Intel HD Graphics 4200.

1024×768 / Low / 12

BioShock Infinite

(2013)

Better than Intel HD Graphics 3000, but worse than Intel HD Graphics 505.

1280×720 / Low / 23.3

1366×768 / Medium / 12.1

Crysis 3

(2013)

Better than AMD Radeon HD 7520G, but worse than AMD Radeon R4 (Beema).

1024×768 / Low / 14.2

Tomb Raider

(2013)

Better than Intel HD Graphics 400, but worse than AMD Radeon HD 8330.

1024×768 / Low / 25.55

1366×768 / Medium / 12.75

1366×768 / Tall / 9.8

The Sims 4

(2014)

Better than AMD Radeon R3, but worse than Intel HD Graphics 500.

1024×768 / Low / 71

1366×768 / Medium / 21.3

Thief

(2014)

Better than AMD Radeon HD 8450G, but worse than AMD Radeon R6 (Kaveri).

1024×768 / Low / 10.4

Wolfenstein: The New Order

(2014)

Better than AMD Radeon R3, but worse than Intel HD Graphics 5300.

1280×720 / Low / 16.2

The Elder Scrolls Online

(2014)

Better than AMD Radeon HD 8330, but worse than AMD Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L).

1024×768 / Low / 28.2

1366×768 / Medium / 16.8

1366×768 / Tall / 9

Hitman: Absolution

(2012)

Better than Intel HD Graphics 3000, but worse than AMD Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L).

1024×768 / Low / 16.2

Company of Heroes 2

(2013)

Better than Intel HD Graphics (Haswell), but worse than AMD Radeon HD 7420G.

1024×768 / Low / 7.4

StarCraft II: Heart of the Swarm

(2013)

Better than AMD Radeon R3, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce G210M.

1024×768 / Low / 72.8

1366×768 / Medium / 27.8

1366×768 / Tall / 13. 55

1920×1080 / Ultra / 7

SimCity

(2013)

Better than AMD Radeon HD 8330, but worse than AMD Radeon R4 (Beema).

1024×768 / Low / 27.1

1366×768 / Medium / 12

Diablo III

(2012)

Better than Intel HD Graphics (Haswell), but worse than NVIDIA GeForce G210M.

1024×768 / Low / 37.55

1366×768 / Medium / 24. 8

1366×768 / Tall / 20.6

1920×1080 / Ultra / 13.4

Deus Ex Human Revolution

(2011)

Better than Intel UHD Graphics 605, but worse than Intel HD Graphics (Braswell).

1024×768 / Low / 27.9

Total War: Rome II

(2013)

Better than AMD Radeon HD 7420G, but worse than AMD Radeon R4 (Beema).

1024×768 / Low / 23.7

1366×768 / Medium / 17. 8

X-Plane 10.25

(2013)

Better than AMD Radeon R4 (Beema), but worse than Intel HD Graphics (Haswell).

1024×768 / Low / 21.4

1366×768 / Medium / 10.9

1366×768 / Tall / 4.9

1920×1080 / Ultra / 3.4

World of Warcraft

(2005)

Better than Intel HD Graphics 615, but worse than Intel HD Graphics 5300.

800×600 / Low / 91

1024×768 / Medium / 43

1920×1080 / Ultra / 6.7

Call of Duty: Black Ops 2

(2012)

Better than Intel HD Graphics 4200, but worse than AMD Radeon HD 8330.

1024×768 / Low / 27.6

1366×768 / Medium / 18.8

Benchmark tests

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU: 2883 Better than AMD Radeon HD 7420G but worse than AMD Radeon HD 8350G.

3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score: 2633 Better than AMD Radeon R3 but worse than Intel HD Graphics 3000.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics: 401 Better than AMD Radeon HD 8350G but worse than Intel HD Graphics 505.

3DMark Fire Strike Score: 377 Better than AMD Radeon HD 8350G but worse than Intel HD Graphics 505.

3DMark Ice Storm GPU: 36156 Better than Intel HD Graphics 505 but worse than AMD Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L).

3DMark Vantage P: 2013 Better than AMD AMD Radeon R4 (Kaveri), but worse than NVIDIA GeForce 8700M GT.

3DMark06: 3532 Better than Intel UHD Graphics 605 but worse than AMD Radeon HD 7470M.

3DMark11 P: 686.5 Better than AMD Radeon R3 but worse than AMD Radeon HD 8350G.

3DMark11 P GPU: 614 Better than AMD AMD Radeon R4 (Kaveri), but worse than Intel HD Graphics 505.

Cinebench R10 32Bit OpenGL: 3010 Better than NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GT, but worse than NVIDIA Quadro FX 370M.

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit: 13.25 Better than AMD Radeon HD 7420G but worse than Intel HD Graphics (Haswell).

ComputeMark v2.1 Normal, Score: 363.5 Better than Intel UHD Graphics 600, but worse than Intel HD Graphics (Haswell).

GFXBench: 36 Better than Intel HD Graphics (Braswell), but worse than AMD Radeon R2 (Mullins/Beema/Carrizo-L).

LuxMark v2.0 64Bit Sala GPUs-only: 107 Better than Intel HD Graphics 405 but worse than AMD Radeon R3.

Passmark: 252 Better than AMD Radeon HD 8330 but worse than Intel HD Graphics 3000.

Comparison with other graphics cards

Map 1:

Map 2:

Video reviews and tests

AMD Radeon R3/HD 8400 Graphics — Test in 8 Games

AMD Radeon R3/HD 8400 Graphics — Test in 8 Games

Benchmarking GTA V with Amd laptop APU A6-5200 and HD 8400 / R3 series )

AMD Radeon HD 8400: Good or Bad?

AMD A6 5200 + Radeon HD 8400 / R3 = MINECRAFT [Sodium]

AMD Athlom 5150 APU — Radeon HD 8400 ¿Que juegos le van?

PUBG 1.0 AMD A6-5200 (Radeon HD 8400) Gameplay Benchmark Test

#Test NSUNS 3 on AMD A6 5200 IGPU Radeon HD 8400 60 FPS

How to Increase AMD Radeon HD NEW TRICK And More VRAM 1GB 2GB 3GB 4GB

Laptop Stuck (Mouse Cursor) — AMD Radeon HD 8200 / R3 Series (SOLVED)

Fortnite Battle Royale AMD Radeon HD 8400 (OUTDATED, NO LONGER) WORKS)

QUE TAL CORRE FORTNITE EN LA AMD 5150 APU? | TEST RAPIDO (Radeon HD 8400)

If you find a bug or have something to add, write in the comments. Have you had any experience with this video card? Is it worth buying such a card today?

AMD Radeon HD 8400 Overview. Benchmarks and specs

The AMD Radeon HD 8400 graphics card (GPU) is ranked 883 in our performance ranking. Manufacturer: AMD. The AMD Radeon HD 8400 runs at a minimum clock speed of 600 MHz. The graphics chip is equipped with an acceleration system and can operate in turbo mode or during overclocking. RAM size — GB with clock speed and bandwidth.

The power consumption of the AMD Radeon HD 8400 is , and the process technology is only 28 nm. Below you will find key compatibility, sizing, technology, and gaming performance test results. You can also leave comments if you have any questions.

Let’s take a closer look at the most important characteristics of the AMD Radeon HD 8400. To get an idea of ​​which video card is better, we recommend using the comparison service.

2.1
From 14
Hitesti Grade

Popular video cards

Most viewed

AMD Radeon RX Vega 7

Intel UHD Graphics 630

Intel UHD Graphics 600

NVIDIA Quadro T1000

AMD Radeon RX Vega 10

NVIDIA GeForce MX330

Intel HD Graphics 530

Intel UHD Graphics 620

Intel HD Graphics 4600

Intel HD Graphics 520

DE

Buy here:

AliExpress

General information

The base set of information will help you find out the release date of the AMD Radeon HD 8400 graphics card and its intended use (laptops or PCs), as well as the price at the time of release and the average current cost. This data also includes the architecture used by the manufacturer and the video processor code name.

Performance Rating Position:		992
Architecture:		GCN
Code name:		Kabini
Type:		Laptop
Release date:		23 May 2013 (8 years ago)
Current price:		$78
Value for money:		0.08
GPU Code Name:		Kabini
Market segment:		Laptop

Specifications

This is important information that determines all the power characteristics of the AMD Radeon HD 8400 video card. The smaller the chip manufacturing process, the better (in modern realities). The clock frequency of the core is responsible for its speed (direct correlation), while signal processing is carried out by transistors (the more transistors, the faster the calculations are performed, for example, in cryptocurrency mining).

Conveyors:		128
Core Clock:		600MHz
Process:		28nm
Number of texels processed in 1 second:		3.200
Pipelines / CUDA cores:		128
Number of transistors:		1.178 million
Estimated heat output:		25 Watt

Dimensions, Connectors and Compatibility

There are so many form factors for PC cases and laptop sizes that it’s important to know the length of your graphics card and how it’s connected (except for laptop versions). This will help make the upgrade process easier, as Not all cases can accommodate modern video cards.

Interface:

IGP

Memory (frequency and overclocking)

The internal memory is used to store data when performing calculations. Modern games and professional graphics applications place high demands on the amount and speed of memory. The higher this parameter, the more powerful and faster the video card. Memory type, size and bandwidth for AMD Radeon HD 8400 + turbo overclocking capability.

Memory type:		System Shared
Shared memory:		+

Support for ports and displays

As a rule, all modern video cards have several types of connections and additional ports, for example HDMI and DVI . Knowing these features is very important in order to avoid problems connecting a video card to a monitor or other peripherals.

Display connections:

No outputs

API Support

All APIs supported by the AMD Radeon HD 8400 graphics card are listed below. This is a minor factor that does not greatly affect the overall performance.

DirectX:

DirectX 11.1, Shader 5.0

General gaming performance

All tests are based on FPS. Let’s take a look at how the AMD Radeon HD 8400 scores in the gaming performance test (calculated based on the game developer’s recommended system requirements and may differ from actual situations).

Select games
Horizon Zero DawnDeath StrandingF1 2020Gears TacticsDoom EternalHunt ShowdownEscape from TarkovHearthstoneRed Dead Redemption 2Star Wars Jedi Fallen OrderNeed for Speed ​​HeatCall of Duty Modern Warfare 2019GRID 2019Ghost Recon BreakpointFIFA 20Borderlands 3ControlF1 2019League of LegendsTotal War: Three KingdomsRage 2Anno 1800The Division 2Dirt Rally 2. 0AnthemMetro ExodusFar Cry New DawnApex LegendsJust Cause 4Darksiders IIIFarming Simulator 19Battlefield VFallout 76Hitman 2Call of Duty Black Ops 4Assassin´s Creed OdysseyForza Horizon 4FIFA 19Shadow of the Tomb RaiderStrange BrigadeF1 2018Monster Hunter WorldThe Crew 2Far Cry 5World of Tanks enCoreX-Plane 11.11Kingdom Come: DeliveranceFinal Fantasy XV BenchmarkFortniteStar Wars Battlefront 2Need for Speed ​​PaybackCall of Duty WWIIAssassin´s Creed OriginsWolfenstein II: The New ColossusDestiny 2ELEXThe Evil Survival 2Middle-earth:8 Shadow of WarFIFA EvolvedF1 2017Playerunknown’s Battlegrounds (2017)Team Fortress 2Dirt 4Rocket LeaguePreyMass Effect AndromedaGhost Recon WildlandsFor HonorResident Evil 7Dishonored 2Call of Duty Infinite WarfareTitanfall 2Farming Simulator 17Civilization VIBattlefield 1Mafia 3Deus Ex Mankind Divid edMirror’s Edge CatalystOverwatchDoomAshes of the SingularityHitman 2016The DivisionFar Cry PrimalXCOM 2Rise of the Tomb RaiderRainbow Six SiegeAssassin’s Creed SyndicateStar Wars BattlefrontFallout 4Call of Duty: Black Ops 3Anno 2205World of WarshipsDota 2 RebornThe Witcher 3Dirt RallyGTA VDragon Age: InquisitionFar Cry 4Assassin’s Creed UnityCall of Duty: Advanced WarfareAlien: IsolationMiddle-earth: Shadow of MordorSims 4Wolfenstein: The New OrderThe Elder Scrolls OnlineThiefX-Plane 10. 25Battlefield 4Total War: Rome IICompany of Heroes 2Metro: Last LightBioShock InfiniteStarCraft II: Heart of the SwarmSimCityTomb RaiderCrysis 3Hitman: AbsolutionCall of Duty: Black Ops 2World of Tanks v8Border 2Counter-Strike: GODirt ShowdownDiablo IIIMass Effect 3The Elder Scrolls V: SkyrimBattlefield 3Deus Ex Human RevolutionStarCraft 2Metro 2033Stalker: Call of PripyatGTA IV — Grand Theft AutoLeft 4 DeadTrackmania Nations ForeverCall of Duty 4 — Modern WarfareSupreme Commander — FA BenchCrysi s — GPU BenchmarkWorld in Conflict — BenchmarkHalf Life 2 — Lost Coast BenchmarkWorld of WarcraftDoom 3Quake 3 Arena — TimedemoHalo InfiniteFarming Simulator 22Battlefield 2042Forza Horizon 5Riders RepublicGuardians of the GalaxyBack 4 BloodDeathloopF1 2021Days GoneResident Evil VillageHitman 3Cyberpunk 2077Assassin´s Creed ValhallaDirt 5Watch Dogs LegionMafia Definitive EditionCyberpunk 2077 1.5 GRID LegendsDying Light 2Rainbow Six ExtractionGod of War

low

1280×720

med.

1920×1080

high

1920×1080

ultra

1920×1080

QHD

2560×1440

4K

3840×2160

Horizon Zero Dawn (2020)

low

1280×720

med.

1920×1080

high

1920×1080

ultra

1920×1080

QHD

2560×1440

4K

3840×2160

Death Stranding (2020)

low

1280×720

med.

1920×1080

high

1920×1080

ultra

1920×1080

QHD

2560×1440

4K

3840×2160

F1 2020 (2020)

low

1280×720

med.

1920×1080

high

1920×1080

ultra

1920×1080

QHD

2560×1440

4K

3840×2160

Gears Tactics (2020)

low

1280×720

med.

1920×1080

high

1920×1080

ultra

1920×1080

QHD

2560×1440

4K

3840×2160

Doom Eternal (2020)

low

1280×720

med.

1920×1080

high

1920×1080

ultra

1920×1080

QHD

2560×1440

4K

3840×2160

Description
5	Stutter — The performance of this video card with this game has not yet been studied enough. Based on interpolated information from graphics cards of a similar performance level, the game is likely to stutter and display low frame rates.
	May Stutter — The performance of this video card with this game has not yet been studied enough. Based on interpolated information from graphics cards of a similar performance level, the game is likely to stutter and display low frame rates.
30	Fluent — According to all known benchmarks with the specified graphic settings, this game is expected to run at 25 fps or more
40	Fluent — According to all known benchmarks with the specified graphic settings, this game is expected to run at 35fps or more
60	Fluent — Based on all known benchmarks with the specified graphic settings, this game is expected to run at 58fps or more
	May Run Fluently — The performance of this video card with this game has not yet been studied enough. Based on interpolated information from graphics cards of a similar performance level, the game is likely to show smooth frame rates.
?	Uncertain — testing this video card in this game showed unexpected results. A slower card could deliver higher and more consistent frame rates while running the same reference scene.
	Uncertain — The performance of this video card in this game has not yet been studied enough. It is not possible to reliably interpolate data based on the performance of similar cards in the same category.
The value in the fields reflects the average frame rate across the entire database. To get individual results, hover over a value.

AMD Radeon HD 8400 in benchmark results

Benchmarks help determine the performance in standard AMD Radeon HD 8400 benchmarks. We have compiled a list of the world’s most famous benchmarks so you can get accurate results for each of them (see description). Pre-testing the graphics card is especially important when there are high loads, so that the user can see how the graphics processor copes with calculations and data processing.

Overall performance in benchmarks

AMD Radeon HD 6450A

NVIDIA GeForce 7900 GT

AMD Radeon HD 8400

NVIDIA NVS 4200M

AMD Radeon HD 8330E

The Ice Storm multi-platform test shows the performance of a graphics card using the screen rendering method. Standard test conditions — 1280*720 (720p).

Intel HD Graphics 4400

AMD Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L)

AMD Radeon HD 8400

Intel HD Graphics 505

AMD Radeon R4 (Beema)

Unlike Ice Storm, 3DMark’s Cloud Gate test uses more resource intensive scenes. The better the final score, the faster your graphics card. Processing is done with DirectX 10.

Intel HD Graphics 500

AMD Radeon HD 8350G

AMD Radeon HD 8400

AMD Radeon HD 8610G

AMD Radeon HD 7420G

This is an advanced graphics card benchmark. When using DirectX 11 for processing, typical testing time is 15 minutes. The higher the score, the faster the graphics card.

AMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)

Intel UHD Graphics 600

AMD Radeon HD 8400

AMD Radeon HD 8350G

AMD Radeon R2 (Mullins/Beema/Carrizo-L)

Complex graphic scenes require all the graphics card resources. They use the entire RAM and computing power. The test’s results can be viewed below.

AMD Radeon R3 (Mullins/Beema)

Intel HD Graphics 505

AMD Radeon HD 8400

AMD Radeon HD 8350G

Intel UHD Graphics 600

This benchmark analyzes the gaming performance of a graphics card using Direct X 11 (multithreading, tessellation, shader calculations).

Intel HD Graphics 505

AMD Radeon R3 (Mullins/Beema)

AMD Radeon HD 8400

AMD Radeon R4 (Kaveri)

AMD Radeon HD 6490M

This Direct X10 based benchmark contains tests for artificial intelligence, physics and 6 computational tests.

Intel HD Graphics 405

AMD Radeon HD 7520G

AMD Radeon HD 8400

AMD Radeon R4 (Kaveri)

Intel HD Graphics 2500

Passmark is an excellent benchmark that is updated regularly and shows relevant graphics card performance information.

AMD Radeon HD 6450A

NVIDIA GeForce 7900 GT

AMD Radeon HD 8400

Intel HD Graphics 3000

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 510M

2.1
From 14
Hitesti Grade

Share on social networks:

To leave a review, you need to log in

Review AMD Radeon HD 8400

Compare AMD Radeon HD 8400

VS

NVIDIA GeForce 8500 GT

NVIDIA GRID K2

NVIDIA Tesla M60

NVIDIA Quadro K4000

NVIDIA Tesla K80

NVIDIA Quadro K1200

NVIDIA GRID K240Q

NVIDIA Quadro M2200

NVIDIA GRID M40

NVIDIA Quadro 4000M

performance overview and gaming performance tests

The Radeon HD 8400 IGP graphics card was released by AMD, released on November 23, 2013. The graphics card is designed for desktop computers and is based on the GCN 2.0 architecture, codenamed Kalindi.

Core frequency — 400 MHz. Texturing speed — 3.2 GTexel / s. Number of shader processors — 128. Floating point performance — 102.4 gflops. Technological process — 28 nm. The number of transistors is 1,178 million. Power consumption (TDP) — 25 Watt.

Memory type: System Shared.

Benchmarks

PassMark G3D Mark	Top 1 GPU This GPU
PassMark G2D Mark	Top 1 GPU This GPU
Geekbench OpenCL	Top 1 GPU This GPU	237214
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop Face Detection	Top 1 GPU This GPU	735.800 mPixels/s 18.197 mPixels/s
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop Ocean Surface Simulation	Top 1 GPU This GPU	7585.258 Frames/s 1322.192 Frames/s
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop T-Rex	Top 1 GPU This GPU	67. 158 Frames/s 1.774 Frames/s
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop Video Composition	Top 1 GPU This GPU	383.037 Frames/s 47.241 Frames/s
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop Bitcoin Mining	Top 1 GPU This GPU	2600.207 mHash/s 224. 569 mHash/s
GFXBench 4.0 Manhattan	Top 1 GPU This GPU	27823 Frames 930 Frames
GFXBench 4.0 T-Rex	Top 1 GPU This GPU	69225 Frames 1631 Frames
GFXBench 4. 0 Manhattan	Top 1 GPU This GPU	27823.000 Fps 930.000 Fps
GFXBench 4.0 T-Rex	Top 1 GPU This GPU	69225.000 Fps 1631.000 Fps

Name	Meaning
PassMark — G3D Mark	258
PassMark — G2D Mark	78
Geekbench — OpenCL	1453
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection	18.197 mPixels/s
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation	1322.192 Frames/s
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex	1.774 Frames/s
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition	47.241 Frames/s
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining	224.569 mHash/s
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan	930 Frames
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex	1631 Frames
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan	930.000 Fps
GFXBench 4. 0 — T-Rex	1631.000 Fps

Gaming performance

1. Counter-Strike: GO (2012)
2.X-Plane 11.11 (2018)
3. Team Fortress 2 (2017)
4. World of Warships (2015)
5. Dota 2 Reborn (2015)
6 Sims 4 (2014)
7 Wolfenstein: The New Order (2014)
8. The Elder Scrolls Online (2014)
9 Thief (2014)
10. X-Plane 10.25 (2013)
11. Battlefield 4 (2013)
12. Total War: Rome II (2013)

13. Company of Heroes 2 (2013)
14 Metro: Last Light (2013)
15 BioShock Infinite (2013)
16 StarCraft II: Heart of the Swarm (2013)
17 SimCity (2013)
18. Tomb Raider (2013)
19 Crysis 3 (2013)
20. Hitman: Absolution (2012)
21. Call of Duty: Black Ops 2 (2012)
22. Diablo III (2012)
23. The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim (2011)
24 Deus Ex Human Revolution (2011)
25. World of Warcraft (2005)

Counter-Strike: GO (2012)

Low, 1024×768	60.00
Medium, 1366×768	47.00
High, 1366×768	33.70

X-Plane 11.11 (2018)

Low, 1280×720	9.07
Medium, 1920×1080	5.55
HIGH, 1920×1080	4.68

Team Fortress 2 (2017)

Low, 1280×720

0137 World of Warships (2015) Low, 1366×768 28. 70 Medium, 1366×768 18.70 Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 9009 900 900 9009 900 900 Low, 1280×720 36.55 Medium, 1366×768 20.85 HIGH, 1920×1080 8.60 Ultra, 1920×1080 0020 Sims 4 (2014) Low, 1024×768 71.00 Medium, 1366×768 21.30 Wolfenstein: The New Order (2014) Low, 1280×720 16.20 The Elder Scrolls Online (2014) 0059 High, 1366×768 Low, 1024×768 28.20 Medium, 1366×768 9. 00 Thief (2014) Low, 1024×768 10.40 X-Plane 10.25 (2013) Low, 1024×768 21.40 Medium, 1366×768 10.90 High, 1366×768 4.90 Ultra, 1920×1080 3.40 Battlefield 4 (2013) Low, 1024×768 20.90 Total War: Rome II (2013) Low, 1024×768 23.70 Medium, 1366×768 17.80 Company of Heroes 2 (2013) Low, 1024×768 7.40 Metro: Last Light (2013) Low, 1024×768 12.00 BioShock Infinite (2013) Low, 1280×720 23. 30 Medium, 1366×768 12.10 StarCraft II: Heart of the Swarm (2013) ,0060 LOW, 1024×768 72.80 Medium, 1366×768 27.80 HIGH, 1366×768 13.55 7.00 SimCity (2013) Low, 1024×768 27.10 Medium, 1366×768 12.00 Tomb Raider (2013) Low, 1024×768 25.55 Medium, 1366×768 12.75 HIGH, 1366×768 crysis 3 (2013)0057 Low, 1024×768 14.20 Hitman: Absolution (2012) Low, 1024×768 16.20 Call of Duty: Black Ops 2 (2012) LOW, 1024×768 27. 60 Medium, 1366×768 18.80 Diablo III (2012) LOW, 10249 LOW, 10249 LOUS, 10249 LOUS, 10249 LOW0068 Medium, 1366×768 24.80 High, 1366×768 20.60 Ultra, 1920×1080 13.40 The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim (2011) Low, 1280×720 15.70 Medium, 1366×768 10.60 Deus ex Human Revolution (2011) Low, 10249 Low, 10249 Low, 10249 LOU3253 Launch date Number of cores Max. frequency AMD Opteron X2150 Server Kyoto May 2013 4 1. 9 GHz AMD A6-5200 Laptop Kabini 23 May 2013 4 AMD A6-5200M Laptop 4 Features Architecture GCN 2.0 Codename Kalindi Production date November 23, 2013 Place in the ranking 1149 Type Desktop Core frequency 400MHz Floating point performance 102. 4 gflops Process 28nm Number of shaders 128 Texturing speed 3.2 GTexel/s Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt Number of transistors 1.178 million Video connectors No outputs Interface IGP DirectX 12.0 (12_0) OpenGL 4. 5 Memory type System Shared ✅ AMD Radeon HD 8400 graphics card in 7 benchmarks. Specifications The AMD Radeon HD 8400 graphics card was manufactured by AMD. Release date 23 May 2013 (8 years ago). Base clock 600 MHz + Turbo . AMD has equipped the AMD Radeon HD 8400 with built-in memory that runs at a frequency. throughput. The AMD Radeon HD 8400 TDP is . It is worth noting that the core was developed using the 28 nm process technology. You can see detailed characteristics and test results of the AMD Radeon HD 8400 video card in benchmarks below. 2.3 Ratings 13 User rating Compare AMD Radeon HD 8400 VS NVIDIA GeForce Go 7950 GTX (218 views) AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 (194 views) NVIDIA GeForce MX330 (185 views) NVIDIA Quadro P520 (183 views) NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (181 views) Intel UHD Graphics 630 (180 views) AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 (177 views) Intel UHD Graphics 620 (156 views) Intel HD Graphics 4600 (156 views) NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M (151 views) General information Release date, code name, basic architecture, launch and current price of the graphics card. This is general information to start learning AMD Radeon HD 8400. 1006 Architecture: GCN Codename: Kabini Type: Laptop Issue date: 23 May 2013 (8 years ago) Price now: $78 Value for money: 0.08 Video card code name: Kabini Market segment: Laptop AMD Radeon HD 8400 — Graphics Card Specifications Here are the key AMD Radeon HD 8400 features and specifications that determine performance in benchmarks and other applications. The higher the numbers, the better. Please take a look at all provided specifications. For example, clock speed directly affects performance, while data processing and computations (for example, for mining) depend on the number of transistors. Also check the TDP, as modern graphics cards may require a powerful power supply. Piping: 128 Core Clock: 600MHz Process technology: 28nm Texture Fill Rate: 3.200 Pipeline / CUDA cores: 128 Number of transistors: 1.178 million TDP: 25 Watt AMD Radeon HD 8400 — Dimensions and Compatibility These days it’s important to know the dimensions — length, width and height of a desktop graphics card — and understand which power connector is included. Also pay attention to the PCIe interface. Interface: IGP AMD Radeon HD 8400 — Memory frequency and speed Graphics card RAM is a key element in computing and data storage — type, size, clock speed and bandwidth — that directly affect the performance of games and work applications , which are currently quite demanding on the resources of the video card. Pay attention to the memory standard. The higher it is, the better. Let’s learn more about AMD Radeon HD 8400 video memory specifications. Memory type: System Shared Total memory: + AMD Radeon HD 8400 — Port and Display Support Most connector compatibility issues today can be resolved with adapters or backward compatible HDMI/DVI cables. But for general information, below you will find out which ports the AMD Radeon HD 8400 supports. 0005 Display connectors: No outputs AMD Radeon HD 8400 — API Support These are the general standards for DirectX and other unified 3D development suites supported by the AMD Radeon HD 8400 . DirectX: 12 (12_0) OpenGL: 4.6 Vulkan: 1.2.131 Shader model: 6.3 OpenCL: 2.0 AMD Radeon HD 8400 Gaming Performance Find out how AMD Radeon HD 8400 is capable of gaming! We’ve compiled a database of popular games and their system requirements*, making it quick and easy to evaluate its gaming performance at different screen resolutions. The video card gaming test is based on FPS. * There is a small error in the estimation of the data. Select games to watch Horizon Zero DawnDeath StrandingF1 2020Gears TacticsDoom EternalHunt ShowdownEscape from TarkovHearthstoneRed Dead Redemption 2Star Wars Jedi Fallen OrderNeed for Speed ​​HeatCall of Duty Modern Warfare 2019GRID 2019Ghost Recon BreakpointFIFA 20Borderlands 3ControlF1 2019League of LegendsTotal War: Three KingdomsRage 2Anno 1800The Division 2Dirt Rally 2.0AnthemMetro ExodusFar Cry New DawnApex LegendsJust Cause 4Darksiders IIIFarming Simulator 19Battlefield VFallout 76Hitman 2Call of Duty Black Ops 4Assassin´s Creed OdysseyForza Horizon 4FIFA 19Shadow of the Tomb RaiderStrange BrigadeF1 2018Monster Hunter WorldThe Crew 2Far Cry 5World of Tanks enCoreX-Plane 11.11Kingdom Come: DeliveranceFinal Fantasy XV BenchmarkFortnite WarsBattlefront PayassinIACalling ´s Creed OriginsWolfenstein II: The New ColossusDestiny 2ELEXThe Evil Within 2Middle-earth: Shadow of WarFIFA 18Ark Survival EvolvedF1 2017Playerunknown’s Battlegrounds (2017)Team Fortress 2Dirt 4Rocket LeaguePreyMass Effect AndromedaGhost Recon WildlandsFor HonorResident Evil 7Dishonored 2Call of Duty Infinite WarfareTitanfall 2Farming Simulator 17Civilization VIBattlefield 1Mafia 3Deus Ex Mankind DividedMirror’s Edge CatalystOverwatchDoomAshes of the SingularityHitman 2016The DivisionFar Cry PrimalXCOM 2Rise of the Tomb RaiderRainbow Six SiegeAssassin’s Creed SyndicateStar Wars BattlefrontFallout 4Call of Duty: Black Ops 3Anno 2205World of WarshipsDota 2 RebornThe Witcher 3Dirt RallyGTA VDragon Age: InquisitionFar Cry 4Assassin’s Creed UnityCall of Duty: Advanced WarfareAlien: IsolationMiddle-earth: Shadow of MordorSims 4Wolfenstein: The New OrderThe Elder Scrolls OnlineThiefX-Plane 10. 25Battlefield 4Total War: Rome IICompany of Heroes 2Metro InfiniteStarCraft II: Heart of the SwarmSimCityTomb RaiderCrysis 3Hitman: AbsolutionCall of Duty: Black Ops 2World of Tanks v8Borderlands 2Counter-Strike: GODirt ShowdownDiablo IIIMass Effect 3The Elder Scrolls V: SkyrimBattlefield 3Deus Ex Human RevolutionStarCraft 2Metro 2033Stalker: Call of PripyatGTA IV — Grand Theft AutoLeft 4 DeadTrackmania Nations ForeverCall of Duty 4 — Modern WarfareSupreme Commander — FA BenchCrysis — GPU BenchmarkWorld in Conflict — BenchmarkHalf Life 2 — Lost Coast BenchmarkWorld of WarcraftDoom 3Quake 3 Arena — Timedemo low 1280×720 med. 1920×1080 high 1920×1080 ultra 1920×1080 QHD 2560×1440 4K 3840×2160 Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) low 1280×720 med. 1920×1080 high 1920×1080 ultra 1920×1080 QHD 2560×1440 4K 3840×2160 Death Stranding (2020) low 1280×720 med. 1920×1080 high 1920×1080 ultra 1920×1080 QHD 2560×1440 4K 3840×2160 F1 2020 (2020) low 1280×720 med. 1920×1080 high 1920×1080 ultra 1920×1080 QHD 2560×1440 4K 3840×2160 Gears Tactics (2020) low 1280×720 med. 1920×1080 high 1920×1080 ultra 1920×1080 QHD 2560×1440 4K 3840×2160 Doom Eternal (2020) low 1280×720 med. 1920×1080 high 1920×1080 ultra 1920×1080 QHD 2560×1440 4K 3840×2160 Legend 5 Freeze — We are currently investigating how video cards work in the game. By interpolation of similar video cards showing low frame rates, the game may lag behind. May Stutter — Currently investigating how graphics cards work in the game. By interpolation of similar video cards showing low frame rates, the game may lag behind. 30 Loose — Based on all graphical benchmarks, game speeds are likely to be 25 fps or more. 40 Loose — Based on all graphical benchmarks, the game speed is likely to be 35 fps or more. 60 Loose — Based on all graphical benchmarks, the game speed is likely to be 58fps or more. May run freely — currently studying how video cards work in the game. By interpolation of similar video cards showing low frame rates, the game may lag behind. ? Uncertain — Video card testing has shown that a slower card can deliver high and stable frame rates. Unknown — We are currently investigating how graphics cards work in the game. Interpolation in the same category is not possible. The value displays the average frame rate. By hovering over a value, you can get an individual result. AMD Radeon HD 8400 Benchmarks Let’s summarize the review by comparing the results of AMD Radeon HD 8400 benchmarks of 5 competing models with similar specifications. The first block is the overall result for all benchmarks, then all the others on which this particular model was tested. The higher the test score, the faster the graphics card performs in graphics applications and modern games. If you have additional questions, please leave them in the comments, we will definitely help! Overall test performance AMD Radeon HD 6450A NVIDIA GeForce 7900 GT AMD Radeon HD 8400 AMD Radeon HD 8330E NVIDIA NVS 4200M 3DMark Ice Storm GPU 3DMark Ice Storm is the only fully cross-platform benchmark that runs on all devices. It’s great for comparing the 3D performance of smartphones, tablets, ultraportable laptops, and old or low-end PCs. Intel HD Graphics 4400 AMD Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L) AMD Radeon HD 8400 Intel HD Graphics 505 AMD Radeon R4 (Beema) Benchmark 3DMark Cloud Gate The 3DMark Cloud Gate benchmark is best suited for testing modern entry-level graphics cards and legacy DX10 capable graphics cards. Important: on modern video cards, the test result may not be accurate. Intel HD Graphics 500 AMD Radeon HD 8350G AMD Radeon HD 8400 AMD Radeon HD 8610G AMD Radeon HD 7420G 3DMark Fire Strike Score The 3DMark «Fire Strike Score» benchmark shows the result of user testing of the graphics card under harsh operating conditions. Of course, the higher the score of the video card in the benchmarks, the better the gaming performance and rendering speed. AMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge) Intel UHD Graphics 600 AMD Radeon HD 8400 AMD Radeon HD 8350G AMD Radeon R2 (Mullins/Beema/Carrizo-L) Benchmark 3DMark Fire Strike 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics is a professional synthetic graphics card benchmark that shows the average performance score of a graphics card in base (1920×1080 render), medium (2560×1440 render) and ultra mode (e. g. 4K gaming or 3840 rendering). × 2160 pixels). AMD Radeon R3 (Mullins/Beema) Intel HD Graphics 505 AMD Radeon HD 8400 AMD Radeon HD 8350G Intel UHD Graphics 600 Graphics card performance in 3DMark 11 The result of the 3DMark 11 benchmark, which supports tessellation, compute shaders and multithreading of the graphics card, will show us which model is better and faster in games. The higher the 3DMark 11 score, the better. Intel HD Graphics 505 AMD Radeon R3 (Mullins/Beema) AMD Radeon HD 8400 AMD Radeon R4 (Kaveri) AMD Radeon HD 6490M 3DMark Vantage Performance 3DMark Vantage Performance reveals the real performance of video cards tested by users in their computers. Only the best graphics card deserves the highest score in the 3DMark Vantage Performance benchmark. Intel HD Graphics 405 AMD Radeon HD 7520G AMD Radeon HD 8400 AMD Radeon R4 (Kaveri) Intel HD Graphics 2500 Passmark benchmark Passmark is an effective benchmark that displays true results on the speed of data processing by GPU cores. We present the results of a video card performance assessment in the modern Passmark benchmark, which evaluates the performance of a video card using its own rendering algorithms. The higher the score, the more powerful the graphics card. AMD Radeon HD 6450A NVIDIA GeForce 7900 GT AMD Radeon HD 8400 Intel HD Graphics 3000 NVIDIA Quadro NVS 510M 2.3 Ratings 13 User rating AMD Radeon HD 8400E video card Budget laptops are the most popular among consumers. Such solutions for little money enable the user to solve a lot of tasks, in particular, working with documents, viewing photos and videos, downloading web pages … All this can be done using an inexpensive laptop quite easily. But what if you want to get something more for the same price? Several years ago, AMD made a successful attempt to introduce a graphics core into budget processors, which, in theory, should allow the user to work with graphics at the same level as the owners of discrete adapters. How justified is this approach in the case of the AMD Radeon HD 8330 video card? Let’s try to figure it out. About the device The AMD Radeon HD 8330 is not inherently a graphics card in the proper sense of the term. The AMD product in question is a special core integrated into the central processor and designed for graphics processing. Processors with integrated graphics cores are called hybrid processors and, it is worth noting, they are quite widespread in entry-level and mid-range laptops due to their relative efficiency. The laptop, which is based on an AMD hybrid processor, is capable of more than the simplest office solution, at least according to the chip manufacturer. As for the AMD Radeon HD 8330, it is an integral part of the AMD A4-5000 quad-core processor running at 1.5 GHz. The presence of 128 shader cores that operate at a frequency of 497 MHz. Lack of own memory, but at the same time support for DDR3L-1600 common RAM for the system. Dual monitor support via HDMI 1.4a, DisplayPort 1.2, DVI and of course VGA. Integrated UVD 4.2 video decoder. VCE 2.0 Integrated Video Encoder. In general, the above figures are not something impressive, but at the time of their release, Kabini processors, including graphics cores like the HD8330, were considered a very interesting proposal. Especially when you consider their cost, as well as energy efficiency. The product in question is characterized by a TDP of only 15 W, which is certainly an excellent indicator for laptop processors. In the rating of video cards for laptops, few solutions can boast of such «frugality» in terms of power consumption. Compare Radeon HD 8400E with similar graphics cards Game performance Tested on: Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite, Crysis 2, Crysis 3, Dirt3, FarCry 3, Hitman: Absolution, Metro: Last Light , Thief, Alien: Isolation, Anno 2070, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, Diablo III, Dirt Rally, Dragon Age: Inquisition, The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim, FIFA 15, FIFA 16, GRID Autosport, Grand Theft Auto V, Sleeping Dogs, Tomb Raider, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt. Setting procedure This model of the accelerator is put into operation as follows: We dismantle the side panels from the system unit case. Removing the accelerator and packages. Dismantle the plug on the back cover of the housing in the place where the adapter will be installed. Installed in the expansion slot. We fix using a screw in the PC case. Putting the computer back together. We connect the monitor to the output of the accelerator. Turn on the PC and monitor. After loading the computer system, install the digital media into the drive. After that, install the AMD Radeon HD 7470 driver using its menu. We are rebooting the PC. On the monitor, use the “AUTO” button to correct the position of the picture. After that, the adapter is fully configured and ready for further operation as part of a computer system. Actual performance When announcing and releasing various solutions, manufacturers of processors and video adapters often exaggerate the capabilities of future products based on the proposed CPU and GPU. This trend has not bypassed the hybrid processors created on the Kabini platform. According to reviews, the AMD Radeon HD 8330 is not capable of providing a level of performance equal to or even higher than that of mid-range discrete adapters common at the time of the release of the solution in question. Not that AMD is cheating consumers, the HD8330 performs quite well in synthetic benchmarks. Games But in real gaming applications … The reality is that having a laptop created on the basis of such a solution, the user can count on a maximum of low settings, and in outdated «toys». Relatively new game projects, even if they start, will not be able to demonstrate a more or less acceptable level of performance. Reviews of the Radeon HD 8400E hell, Koduri went there to create a division of discrete cards, count almost from scratch. So in a year and a half, with a high degree of probability, we will see video cards from Intel. Or we will hear about them, if in the end they go only for servers and other profs. tasks I didn’t even say that this is a professional sound level meter, I use what I have at hand! but within the same room and the same measuring device in this case of the phone, you can still have some kind of picture of how much one vidyushka is noisier than the other! I have the same card. none of these games run normally in FullHD, and some even at low settings give FPS less than 10. maybe something will work fine at 720p, but I don’t believe that everything is on high and so smooth in places. Listen, you don’t have a stump 4 in-line and a mother on z170, it became interesting what this percentage is capable of in hard overclocking to 5 hertz and 3 hertz memory, so for the sake of interest (I myself have a mother on z170 but buy a stub for 5k a bit of a toad chokes) Tags:512 MB, 600 MHz, AMD, DDR3, GPU, Radeon HD 8400E Video processing As for video processing, the whole issue here rests on too low performance of the graphics core.