Benchmark of processors: PassMark Software — CPU Benchmark Charts

Intel Core i9-13900KS 6GHz CPU Benchmarks: Breaking Records

homePC ComponentsProcessors

Back in September, Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger announced Raptor Lake, the company’s 13th generation of Core processors, and teased a chip coming to stores in early 2023 that would be able to hit 6GHz right out of the box. Well, it’s now 2023, and Intel launched the world’s first 6GHz CPU this morning. Bearing the name Core i9-13900KS, this speed demon takes the eight Performance cores (P-cores) of the i9-13900K and boosts their max frequency by 200MHz, to achieve that 6GHz frequency.

This increase in performance comes at a $110 price premium over the existing Core i9-13900K, putting the MSRP of the 13900KS at $699. However, finding one of these 6GHz processors at MSRP may be challenging at first, as the CPU is currently listed at $70 over MSRP on Amazon. Fortunately, we were able to get our hands on one of these puppies thanks to our friends at Falcon Northwest, and we have some initial performance numbers to share.

Falcon Northwest sent over one of its compact FragBox PCs for review (full review coming soon). Our review unit features the hot new i9-13900KS paired with a NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 GPU. The fact that Falcon Northwest managed to fit these two beasts into a relatively small package with adequate cooling is impressive. Nonetheless, physics dictates that the thermal capacity of the compact, small form factor system will be limited in comparison to larger rigs, and in some circumstances may hold back the 6GHz processor somewhat when under heavy load.

When launching programs, we saw a few of the P-cores in the i9-13900KS jump up to that magic 6GHz number, but sustaining that number likely won’t be possible without top-shelf cooling. Under sustained load, the CPU temperatures quickly climbed to 100°C and the P-cores mostly hovered around 5.6GHz, often dipping down to 5.5GHz. The water cooler, radiator, and fans in this little rig do their best to keep up, but the i9-13900KS may be able to sustain higher frequencies in a setup with higher cooling capacity.

Keep this potential thermal limitation in mind while looking at our test results below, as the other processors were benchmarked in a larger chassis, with additional air volume, more fans, and more distance separating the CPU and GPU. In a couple of the charts, the i9-13900KS lands below the i9-13900K. Nonetheless, these two Intel CPUs still lead the entire pack, and the i9-13900KS jumps ahead elsewhere, putting up higher numbers than we’ve ever seen before from a stock CPU and indicating outstanding performance. Take a look for yourself below.

Geekbench v5.4.1 CPU Benchmark

In the GeekBench tests, we’re stressing only the CPU cores in a system (not the graphics card/GPU), with both single and multi-threaded workloads. The tests are comprised of encryption processing, image compression, HTML5 parsing, physics calculations and other general purpose compute processing workloads.

Speedometer 2. 0 Benchmark

Here we have numbers from the Speedometer 2.0 tests available at browserbench.org. The Speedometer Benchmark Suite uses a wide array of latency and throughput benchmarks to evaluate web application performance, then tabulates all the individual results into a final score. This benchmarks measures performance of an array of browser-based technologies used on modern, rich web applications. Scores in this benchmark are an indicator of the performance users would see when browsing the web and running advanced web apps. All of the systems were tested using the latest version of Microsoft’s Edge browser, with default browser settings, on a clean, fully-updated install of Windows 11.

Cinebench R23 Rendering Benchmark

Cinebench is a rendering performance test based on Maxon’s Cinema 4D, which is a 3D rendering and animation tool suite used by animation houses and producers like Sony Animation and many others. It’s very demanding on system processor resources, and it can utilize any number of threads, which make it an excellent gauge of computational throughput. This is a multi-threaded, multi-processor aware benchmark that renders and animates 3D scenes and tracks the length of the entire process. The rate at which each test system was able to render the entire scene is represented in the graph below.

UL PCMark 10 Benchmarks

Next up, we have some full-system testing with PCMark. We’re reporting all test results from the PCMark 10 benchmark suite, including the Essentials, Productivity, Digital Content Creation and and total PCMark score. The Essentials test covers workloads like web browsing, video conferencing and app start-up times, while Productivity tests everyday office apps from spreadsheets to word processing. Finally, the Digital Content Creation test evaluates performance of a machine with respect to photo and video editing, as well as rendering and visualization.

UL 3DMark CPU Physics Benchmark

This final test is a little bit academic, because there are very few (if any) games that use multi-threaded physics in the way that this test simulates. As such, this test will scale to high numbers of cores, and it favors Intel’s architectures somewhat. AMD’s CPUs underperform in this benchmark compared to their real-world game performance.

This is just a quick taste of what the Intel Core i9-13900KS and the powerful, small form factor Falcon Northwest FragBox can do. We just got our hands on the system and are diligently poking, prodding, photographing, and testing it, and will have our full review — complete with many more benchmarks and images — published soon. We’re also hoping to take the Core i9-13900KS for a spin in our Raptor Lake test rig, to evaluate the CPU under the same conditions as the rest of the reference data here. So stay tuned for more — we’ll get everything published as fast as we can.

New benchmark suits multicore processors

August 11, 2016

Blog

Even if you’re just using a single-core microcontroller in your system design, chances are good that you aren’t running just one function or kernel. T…

Even if you’re just using a single-core microcontroller in your system design, chances are good that you aren’t running just one function or kernel. This is even more true for a multicore processor. Hence, the performance benchmarks that you run to compare and contrast the various devices or analyze the capability of your system should also be comprised of more complex multi-function and parallel workloads.

What does this mean exactly? From a theoretical perspective, it means that the system should be utilizing at least a minimal scheduler to help coordinate the execution of the workload’s components (the scheduler could also be part of an RTOS or more advanced OS such as Linux).

From a practical perspective, take a look at the original EEMBC AutoBench benchmark, comprised of 16 single-function, serial-coded kernels (this version of AutoBench dates back to 1999, long before multicore processors were the norm). Does this benchmark run faster on a 1-GHz single-core processor or a 250-MHz quad-core processor? The simple answer is that the former processor would be 4X faster because the out-of-the-box AutoBench would only run on one core because each kernel is single-threaded.

While it’s possible to run the AutoBench kernels in multicore mode by instructing the operating system to launch multiple instances of each kernel, it’s more realistic to run more complex workloads that are subdivided as separate threads. For this reason, EEMBC recently launched AutoBench 2.0, the multicore version that integrates with the consortium’s MultiBench tool.

With the increasing adoption of multicore technology into automotive applications, AutoBench 2.0 provides an important performance metric for system designers testing the efficacy of multicore processors. To demonstrate the effectiveness of the new benchmark, we ran the workloads on a Linux-based Intel Xeon (yes, I know this isn’t an automotive processor, but it provides an easy-to-use test platform).

Results show that when running on 1, 2, 4, and 8 cores, the geometric mean of all workload scores goes from 275, 519, 785, and 1108, respectively. This represents a scaling of 1.9, 2.9, and 4.0, demonstrating that the more workload contexts that are enabled, the more overhead that’s brought into play. From a benchmark perspective, this is a good thing. In other words, it wouldn’t be a very good multicore benchmark if the processor results scaled linearly with the number of cores.

Markus Levy is president of EEMBC, which he founded in April 1997. As president, he manages the business, marketing, press relations, member logistics, and supervision of technical development. Mr. Levy is also president of the Multicore Association, which he co-founded in 2005.

Markus Levy, EEMBC

Subscribe

Categories

Processing

Automotive

Quectel Offers ASIL Solutions for ADAS

January 24, 2023

• Renesas Announces New Automotive Intelligent Power Device for Efficient Power Distribution in E/E Architectures

  January 20, 2023

• Sheeva. AI & AeonCharge Partner to Improve EV Charging

  January 17, 2023

• TDK Enhances Automotive ADAS Applications

  January 16, 2023

• Owl Autonomous Imaging Announces Monocular 3D Thermal Ranger Computer Vision and Evaluation Kit

  January 11, 2023

MORE

IoT

Firmware Engineers Need Formal Training, Just Like their Hardware and Software Counterparts

January 24, 2023

• Morse Micro and Chicony Release Wi-Fi Certified HaLow IoT Security Cameras

  January 24, 2023

• Product of the Week: Laird Connectivity’s Summit SOM 8M Plus

  January 23, 2023

• Semtech Corporation Completes Acquisition of Sierra Wireless

  January 20, 2023

• Product of the Week: Artila’s Arduino-Based Programmable Industrial IoT Gateway, the Matrix-310

  January 16, 2023

MORE

Networking & 5G

Embedded Executive: Paul Stager, Director of Engineering, EdgeQ

January 18, 2023

• The Road to embedded world ’23: Taipei City, Taiwan, ICOP

  January 11, 2023

• Airgain Lifts 5g with its Outdoor 5G FWA Design

  January 08, 2023

• There’s Always a Smarty Pants: Analog Devices Releases SPoE for Smart Buildings

  December 08, 2022

• Your Smartphone Uses More Power Than You Think

  December 02, 2022

MORE

Tech News Roundup

MORE

Processor Performance Rating — PassMark, specs and scores

The most popular benchmark, PassMark is a test suite that performs complex mathematical calculations to determine processor performance in file compression, encryption, and physics-related tasks.

Processor

AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 3995WX

Score1

88725

Cores

64

Hertz

2.70GHz

TDP (PL1)

280 W

Release date

Q1/2021

Processor

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Score1

80798

Cores

64

Hertz

2.90 GHz

TDP (PL1)

280 W

Release date

Q1/2020

Processor

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

Score1

64198

Cores

32

Hertz

3. 70 GHz

TDP (PL1)

280 W

Release date

Q4/2019

Processor

AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX

Score1

63812

Cores

32

Hertz

3.50 GHz

TDP (PL1)

280 W

Release date

Q3/2020

Processor

AMD Epyc 7702

Score1

62410

Cores

64

Hertz

2.00 GHz

TDP (PL1)

200 W

Release date

Q3/2019

Processor

AMD Epyc 7662

Score1

61057

Cores

64

Hertz

2. 00 GHz

TDP (PL1)

225 W

Release date

Q1/2020

Processor

AMD Epyc 74F3

Score1

61051

Cores

24

Hertz

3.20 GHz

TDP (PL1)

240 W

Release date

Q1/2021

Processor

Intel Core i9-13900K

Score1

59155

Cores

24

Hertz

3.80 GHz

TDP (PL1)

125 W

Release date

Q4/2022

Processor

Intel Core i9-13900KF

Score1

59155

Cores

24 / 32

Hertz

3. 00 GHz (5.80 GHz)

TDP (PL1)

125 W

Release date

Q4/2022

Processor

AMD Epyc 7443

Score1

57891

Cores

24

Hertz

2.85 GHz

TDP (PL1)

200 W

Release date

Q1/2021

Processor

AMD Epyc 7443P

Score1

57806

Cores

24

Hertz

2.85 GHz

TDP (PL1)

200 W

Release date

Q1/2021

Processor

AMD Epyc 7543P

Score1

57664

Cores

32

Hertz

2. 80 GHz

TDP (PL1)

225W

Release date

Q1/2021

Processor

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X

Score1

55032

Cores

24

Hertz

3.80 GHz

TDP (PL1)

280 W

Release date

Q4/2019

Processor

AMD Epyc 7453

Score1

53499

Cores

28

Hertz

2.75 GHz

TDP (PL1)

225 W

Release date

Q1/2021

Processor

AMD Ryzen 9 7900X

Score1

52031

Cores

12 / 24

Hertz

4. 70 GHz

TDP (PL1)

170 W

Release date

Q4/2022

Processor

AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 5955WX

Score1

51003

Cores

16/32

Hertz

4.00 GHz

TDP (PL1)

280 W

Release date

Q1/2022

Processor

AMD Epyc 7413

Score1

49021

Cores

24

Hertz

2.65 GHz

TDP (PL1)

180 W

Release date

Q1/2021

Processor

AMD Epyc 7742

Score1

47359

Cores

64

Hertz

2. 25 GHz

TDP (PL1)

225 W

Release date

Q3/2019

Processor

Intel Core i7-13700K

Score1

47002

Cores

16

Hertz

3.40 GHz

TDP (PL1)

125 W

Release date

Q4/2022

Processor

Intel Core i7-13700KF

Score1

47002

Cores

16 / 24

Hertz

3.40 GHz (5.40 GHz)

TDP (PL1)

125 W

Release date

Q4/2022

Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3

Intel Core i3-10100F

MSI Radeon RX 6600 XT GAMING X 8G

ASUS TUF Gaming X3 Radeon RX 5600XT OC Evo

Colorful iGame GeForce GTX 1660 Ultra 6G-V

MSI GeForce GTX 1660 AERO ITX 6G
nine0003

Colorful iGame GeForce GTX 1660 Advanced OC 6G-V

ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 TI OC

NVIDIA RTX A5500

NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile

Colorful iGame GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER Ultra OC 4G-V

AMD Radeon RX 5700

Intel Core i7-4870HQ

Intel Core i7-7820HK

NVIDIA RTX A4500

NVIDIA RTX A5500

Intel Pentium N4200

Intel Core i3-7100U
nine0003

Intel Core i9-13900K

Intel Core i9-10900X

Intel Core i5-3570

Intel Core i7-3820

KFA2 GeForce GTX 1070 Ti EX

Sapphire Radeon RX 5700 8G

Palit GeForce GTX 1070 Ti Super JetStream

MSI Radeon RX 580 Gaming X+ 8G

ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3070OC

Palit GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Gaming Pro OC

Processors / Overclockers.

ua

10/21/202266

After the release of new processors or platforms, buyers for their gaming PCs usually go to the store for more affordable models that are 1.5–3 times cheaper than the top ones…

09/28/202245

we have already got acquainted with the new AMD Zen 4 architecture, which, in addition to the transition to more subtle technological standards, has brought us a new design of the most…

26.09. For five years, users could not change the motherboard and stay in service all the time, …

09/16/202228

Yes, this is exactly the thought that many will have when they first encounter this processor. The same Celeron G6900 suffers terribly from two physical cores, while…

08/17/202234

Although not immediately, the LGA 1700 platform received budget-class processors at its disposal. Everyone knows about the excellent performance of a single Alder Lake core, which…

12/29/202184

The processor has always been a product that attracted the attention of enthusiasts and even more than graphics cards. Its participation is extremely important in all applications, and it does not matter whether there are …

12/13/202194

We won’t dwell on the reasons for the shortage of gaming graphic solutions, we will limit ourselves to stating a fact. Cards are scarce and very expensive. In this regard…

05/13/2021175

The main goal of the CTR project is to improve the energy efficiency and performance of the processor by fine tuning the frequency relative to voltage. Huge customization options will satisfy the needs of any user. Most processes…

05/02/202179

How can you get rid of buying a discrete video card? That’s right — to build a computer without the ability to use dGPU in the SFF form factor! Miners bypass the APU, because the pathetic 3…

03/30/202191

Intel has long been a leader in technical terms, following its own «Tick-Tock» strategy, starting with the once very successful Core architecture. But after switching to 14nm. ..

03/28/202164

Continuing the theme of AMD Ryzen 5000 series processor reviews, we will look at more affordable solutions, namely Ryzen 7 5800X and Ryzen 5 5600X. Since his…

02/17/202134

Secret board from the Chinese Chongqing catacombs, which does not exist according to AMD. However, here she is, carrying an eight-core AMD Jaguar A9-9820 with Radeon…

03.02.2021144

All of the following can lead to failure of computer components. Neither the editors nor the author bear any responsibility. You act at your own peril and risk!…

01/29/202184

And this is not a plywood flight over Paris? Of course, this is still the cheapest and weakest solution for the LGA 1200 platform, but if you look back at the previous ones…

01/18/202139

Welcome to 2021 or 2020 New Game+. How about dusting off the ancient forgotten practice of processor binning? As many as ten copies of Ryzen 3 3100,…

• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• 5
• 6
• 7

nine0603 8

• →

nine0641 Alder Lake-S

nine0635

nine0641 LGA 1156

nine0641AM4

nine0641 8

nine0641 Raven Ridge

nine0641 FX-8150

nine0641 Athlon 5350

nine0641AM2

Manufacturer	Model	Socket	Core	Number of cores
Intel
Intel	Pentium Gold G7400	LGA 1200	Alder Lake-S	2
Intel	Celeron G6900	LGA 1700	2
Intel	Core i7-11700KF	LGA 1200	Rocket Lake-S	8
Intel	Core i5-10400	LGA 1200	Comet Lake-S	6
Intel	Core i3-10100	LGA 1200	Comet Lake-S	4
Intel	Celeron G5905	LGA 1200	Comet Lake-S	2
Intel	Core i7-9700K	LGA 1151-2	Coffee Lake	8
Intel	Core i5-9600K	LGA 1151-2	Coffee Lake	6
Intel	Core i5-8600K	LGA 1151-2	Coffee Lake	6
Intel	Pentium Gold G5400	LGA 1151-2	Coffee Lake	2
Intel	Core i7-6950X	LGA 2011-3	Broadwell-E	10
Intel	Core i7-6700K	LGA 1151	Skylake-S	4
Intel	Core i7-5960X	LGA 2011-3	Haswell-E	8
Intel	Core i5-5675C	LGA 1150	Broadwell-H	4
Intel	Core i7-4960X	LGA 2011	Ivy Bridge-E	6
Intel	Core i5-4690K	LGA 1150	Haswell	4
Intel	Core i7-4770K	LGA 1150	Haswell	4
Intel	Core i7-3930K	LGA 2011	Sandy Bridge-E	6
Intel	Core i7-2600K	LGA 1155	Sandy Bridge	4
Intel	Core i5-3330	LGA 1155	Ivy Bridge	4
Intel	Core i5-2500K	LGA 1155	Sandy Bridge	4
Intel	Core i5-2300	LGA 1155	Sandy Bridge	4
Intel	Core i3-2130	LGA 1155	Sandy Bridge	2
Intel	Core i3-2120	LGA 1155	Sandy Bridge	2
Intel	Core i3-2100	LGA 1155	Sandy Bridge	2
Intel	Pentium G840	LGA 1155	Sandy Bridge	2
Intel	Pentium G620	LGA 1155	Sandy Bridge	2
Intel	Celeron G540	LGA 1155	Sandy Bridge	2
Intel	Core i7 980X	LGA 1366	Gulftown	6
Intel	Core i7 920	LGA 1366	Bloomfield	4
Intel	Core i7-860	Lynnfield	4
Intel	Core i5-750	LGA 1156	Lynnfield	4
Intel	Core i5-660	LGA 1156	Clarkdale	2
Intel	Pentium G6950	LGA 1156	Clarkdale	2
Intel	Core 2 Quad Q9450	LGA 775	Yorkfield	4
Intel	Core 2 Quad Q8200	LGA 775	Yorkfield	4
Intel	Core 2 Duo E8400	LGA 775	Wolfdale	2
Intel	Core 2 Duo E8200	LGA 775	Wolfdale	2
Intel	Core 2 Duo E7400	LGA 775	Wolfdale	2
Intel	Core 2 Duo E7200	LGA 775	Wolfdale	2
Intel	Core 2 Quad Q6600	LGA 775	Kentsfield	4
Intel	Core 2 Duo E4400	LGA 775	Allendale	2
Intel	Pentium Dual-Core E5200	LGA 775	Wolfdale	2
Intel	Pentium Dual-Core E2220	LGA 775	Allendale	2
Intel	Pentium 4 3. 2E	Socket 478	Prescott	1
AMD
AMD	Ryzen 9 7950X	AM5	Raphael	16
AMD	Ryzen 7 7700X	AM5	Raphael	8
AMD	Ryzen 9 5950X	AM4	Vermeer	16
AMD	Ryzen 9 5900X	Vermeer	12
AMD	Ryzen 7 5800X	AM4	Vermeer	8
AMD	Ryzen 5 5600X	AM4	Vermeer	6
AMD	Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G	AM4	Renoir	6
AMD	Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G	AM4	Renoir	4
AMD	Ryzen Threadripper 3960X	sTRX4	Castle Peak	24
AMD	Ryzen 9 3950X	AM4	Matisse	16
AMD	Ryzen 9 3900XT	AM4	Matisse	12
AMD	Ryzen 9 3900X	AM4	Matisse	12
AMD	Ryzen 7 3800XT	AM4	Matisse	8
AMD	Ryzen 7 3700X	AM4	Matisse	8
AMD	Ryzen 5 3400G	AM4	Picasso	4
AMD	Ryzen 3 3300X	AM4	Matisse	4
AMD	Ryzen 3 3100	AM4	Matisse	4
AMD	Athlon 3000G	AM4	Raven Ridge	2
AMD	Ryzen 7 2700	AM4	Pinnacle Ridge
AMD	Ryzen 5 2400G	AM4	Raven Ridge	4
AMD	Ryzen 5 2400G	AM4	Raven Ridge	4
AMD	Ryzen 3 2200G	AM4	Raven Ridge	4
AMD	Athlon 200GE	AM4	2
AMD	Ryzen 7 1800X	AM4	Summit Ridge	8
AMD	Ryzen 5 1600AF	AM4	Pinnacle Ridge	6
AMD	Ryzen 5 1600	AM4	Summit Ridge	6
AMD	Ryzen 5 1400	AM4	Summit Ridge	4
AMD	Ryzen 3 1300X	AM4	Summit Ridge	4
AMD	Ryzen 3 1200	AM4	Summit Ridge	4
AMD	FX-8320	AM3+	Vishera	4
AMD	AM3+	Zambezi	4
AMD	FX-8120	AM3+	Zambezi	8
AMD	FX-6100	AM3+	Zambezi	3
AMD	A10-7870K	FM2+	Godavari	4
AMD	AM1	Kabini	4
AMD	A10-7850K	FM2+	Kaveri	4
AMD	Athlon X4 860K	FM2+	Kaveri	4
AMD	Athlon X4 760K	FM2	Trinity	4
AMD	A10-5800K	FM2	Trinity	4
AMD	A8-3850	FM1	Llano	4
AMD	Phenom II X6 1055T	AM3	Thuban	6
AMD	Athlon II X2 215	AM3	Regor	2
AMD	Athlon X2 7850	AM2+	Kuma	2
AMD	Athlon X2 7750	AM2+	Kuma	2
AMD	Phenom II X4 955 BE	AM3	Deneb (C2/C3)	4
AMD	Phenom II X4 910	AM3	Deneb	4
AMD	Phenom II X4 810	AM3	Deneb	4
AMD	Phenom II X3 720	AM3	Heka	3
AMD	Phenom II X3 705e	AM3	Heka	3
AMD	Phenom II X2 550 BE	AM3	Callisto	2
AMD	Phenom X4 9650	AM2+	Agena	4
AMD	Phenom X4 9550	AM2+	Agena	4
AMD	Phenom X3 8450	AM2+	Toliman	3
AMD	Athlon 64 X2 5200+ (Brisbane)	Brisbane	2

nine0641 LGA 1150

nine0641 Sandy Bridge

nine0635

nine0635

Manufacturer	Model	Socket	Core	Number of cores
LGA 1200
Intel	Pentium Gold G7400	LGA 1200	Alder Lake-S	2
Intel	Core i7-11700KF	LGA 1200	Rocket Lake-S	8
Intel	Core i5-10400	LGA 1200	Comet Lake-S	6
Intel	Core i3-10100	LGA 1200	Comet Lake-S	4
Intel	Celeron G5905	LGA 1200	Comet Lake-S	2
LGA 1700
Intel	Celeron G6900	LGA 1700	Alder Lake-S	2
LGA 1151-2
Intel	Core i7-9700K	LGA 1151-2	Coffee Lake	8
Intel	Core i5-9600K	LGA 1151-2	Coffee Lake	6
Intel	Core i5-8600K	LGA 1151-2	Coffee Lake	6
Intel	Pentium Gold G5400	LGA 1151-2	Coffee Lake	2
LGA 1151
Intel	Core i7-6700K	LGA 1151	Skylake-S	4
LGA 2011-3
Intel	Core i7-6950X	LGA 2011-3	Broadwell-E	10
Intel	Core i7-5960X	LGA 2011-3	Haswell-E	8
LGA 1150
Intel	Core i5-5675C	LGA 1150	Broadwell-H	4
Intel	Core i5-4690K	Haswell	4
Intel	Core i7-4770K	LGA 1150	Haswell	4
LGA 2011
Intel	Core i7-4960X	LGA 2011	Ivy Bridge-E	6
Intel	Core i7-3930K	LGA 2011	Sandy Bridge-E	6
LGA 1155
Intel	Core i7-2600K	LGA 1155	Sandy Bridge	4
Intel	Core i5-3330	LGA 1155	Ivy Bridge	4
Intel	Core i5-2500K	LGA 1155	Sandy Bridge	4
Intel	Core i5-2300	LGA 1155	Sandy Bridge	4
Intel	Core i3-2130	LGA 1155	Sandy Bridge	2
Intel	Core i3-2120	LGA 1155	Sandy Bridge	2
Intel	Core i3-2100	LGA 1155	2
Intel	Pentium G840	LGA 1155	Sandy Bridge	2
Intel	Pentium G620	LGA 1155	Sandy Bridge	2
Intel	Celeron G540	LGA 1155	Sandy Bridge	2
LGA 1366
Intel	Core i7 980X	LGA 1366	Gulftown	6
Intel	Core i7 920	LGA 1366	Bloomfield	4
LGA 1156
Intel	Core i7-860	LGA 1156	Lynnfield	4
Intel	Core i5-750	LGA 1156	Lynnfield	4
Intel	Core i5-660	LGA 1156	Clarkdale	2
Intel	Pentium G6950	LGA 1156	Clarkdale	2
LGA 775
Intel	Core 2 Quad Q9450	LGA 775	Yorkfield	4
Intel	Core 2 Quad Q8200	LGA 775	Yorkfield	4
Intel	Core 2 Duo E8400	LGA 775	Wolfdale	2
Intel	Core 2 Duo E8200	LGA 775	Wolfdale	2
Intel	Core 2 Duo E7400	LGA 775	Wolfdale	2
Intel	Core 2 Duo E7200	LGA 775	Wolfdale	2
Intel	Core 2 Quad Q6600	LGA 775	Kentsfield	4
Intel	Core 2 Duo E4400	LGA 775	Allendale	2
Intel	Pentium Dual-Core E5200	LGA 775	Wolfdale	2
Intel	Pentium Dual-Core E2220	LGA 775	Allendale	2
Socket 478
Intel	Pentium 4 3.