New Intel «Core Ultra 7» CPU Benchmark Spotted
When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Here’s how it works.
(Image credit: Shutterstock)
A new PugetBench result shared by @Benchleaks on Twitter has revealed yet another Meteor Lake processor with Intel’s new «Core Ultra» branding. This time the new naming scheme was seen on a mysterious new chip called the Intel Core Ultra 7 1003H.
We were introduced to Intel’s new naming system a month ago, when Intel told us it would be rebranding in preparation for the upcoming Meteor Lake launch. Intel didn’t officially say the new branding meant adding «Ultra» to the name, but we also saw an Ashes of Singularity listing showing a Meteor Lake processor called the Core Ultra 5 1003H — suggesting this was the re-branding Intel was referring to.
This new PugetBench result from PugetSystems is the second leak we’ve seen with the Core Ultra branding. We’re not sure what «Ultra» implies, but it could be one of several names (e.g. «Ultra,» «Pro,» «Max,» etc.) to further split SKUs between the entry-level, mid-range, and high-end markets.
The new PugetBench listing does imply that Intel will be keeping its 3/5/7/9 numbering system. The newly-spotted chip is the Core Ultra 7, and the chip we saw earlier was the Core Ultra 5.
(Image credit: PugetBench — PugetSystems)
(Image credit: PugetBench — PugetSystems)
According to the PugetBench benchmark results, the new Core Ultra 7 1003H appears to be a mobile SKU (if the letter H didn’t give that away). The chip scored a mediocre 534.5 points in the PugetBench Lightroom Classic benchmark, which is just 32.5 points beyond another PugetBench system featuring a much older Intel Core i7-8665U mobile processor.
Obviously this benchmark score needs to be taken with a grain of salt, since the chip could be a pre-production sample with performance issues that still need to be worked out.
Also, the Lightroom Classic benchmark usually isn’t indicative of real-world performance, anyway.
Meteor Lake will serve as Intel’s 14th-generation CPU architecture, sporting several major enhancements over Raptor Lake — including an upgraded process node called Intel 4, a new multi-tile design language, Low-Power E-Cores, AI enhancements, and more powerful Arc Alchemist integrated graphics.
Join the experts who read Tom’s Hardware for the inside track on enthusiast PC tech news — and have for over 25 years. We’ll send breaking news and in-depth reviews of CPUs, GPUs, AI, maker hardware and more straight to your inbox.
Contact me with news and offers from other Future brandsReceive email from us on behalf of our trusted partners or sponsors
Aaron Klotz is a freelance writer for Tom’s Hardware US, covering news topics related to computer hardware such as CPUs, and graphics cards.
Topics
CPUs
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D Gaming Benchmarks — AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D Review: New Gaming Champ Beats Pricier CPUs
When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission.
Here’s how it works.
Sub-$450 CPU is even faster for gaming than Ryzen 9 7950X3D.
Editor’s Choice
(Image: © Tom’s Hardware)
Why you can trust Tom’s Hardware
Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D Gaming Benchmarks — The TLDR
You can find the particulars of our overclock and test setup on the previous page, including an explanation about our adjustment of the core parking settings for our tests. Here we have the geometric mean of our gaming tests at 1080p and 1440p, with each resolution split into its own chart. We’re testing with an Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 to reduce GPU-imposed bottlenecks as much as possible, and differences between test subjects will shrink with lesser cards or higher resolutions and fidelity. You’ll find further game-by-game breakdowns below.
Image 1 of 6
(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)
We simplified the first slides by excluding the overclocking configs, while the remainder contains the full roster of tested configurations.
The $449 Ryzen 7 7800X3D is an incredibly fast gaming chip but be aware that the 3D V-Cache doesn’t accelerate all titles equally, so you’ll have to assess the trends in the individual game benchmarks below. The 3D V-Cache tech can also lead to slower performance in productivity applications, as you’ll see on the following page.
The 3D V-Cache tech puts AMD’s X3D chips in a league of their own, so the $449 7800X3D contends with the $699 16-core Ryzen 9 7950X3D for the lead — a victory it wins by a mere 1% in its stock configuration. Interestingly, the 7800X3D increases its lead over the 7950X3D to 2.5% at 1440p, but this is still a very close contest that falls into the imperceptible range. The biggest difference between these two chips is the price tag and the number of cores; the 7950X3D costs $250 more and has twice the number of cores, which will help in productivity workloads.
The Ryzen 7 7800X3D is 12% faster in 1080p gaming than the $580 Core i9-13900K, and overclocking only narrows that to 8%.
The Core i9-13900K requires exceptionally aggressive accommodations for overclocking. In contrast, the Ryzen 7 7800X3D runs cool and didn’t exceed 90W in our testing. Overall, the 7800X3D will run faster and cooler than the 13900K in every gaming scenario, but the 13900K is a far more adept all-rounder.
The $417 Core i7-13700K trails the 7800X3D by ~ 14%, but its lower price tag and more balanced performance in productivity applications might make it attractive if you’re looking for more than a chip optimized specifically for gaming. As you’ll see on the following page, the 7800X3D can’t keep pace with the 13700K in productivity apps.
Overclocking the Ryzen 7 7800X3D was a mixed bag. Engaging the DDR5-6000 Expo profile on our memory kit (labeled ‘Expo’ in the charts) yielded a mere ~2% speedup, and combining the faster memory with the auto-overclocking Precision Boost Overdrive and undervolting (labeled as PBO and UV) resulted in an underwhelming total gain of 3%. Most gamers will be best served running the chip at stock settings.
The Ryzen 9 7950X3D has a bit more overclocking headroom than the 7800X3D at 1080p, but that isn’t worth the stiff premium. The 7950X3D also takes the lead over the 7800X3D in 99th percentiles at the 1080p resolution, but we don’t see that same trend with 1440p. This stems from lower-than-expected 99th percentile framerates with the 7800X3D in Hitman 3 at 1080p, which we’ll analyze deeper as time permits. The dual-compute-chiplet X3D chips also hold a significant advantage in the 99th percentiles in Cyberpunk 2077 over single-chiplet models. However, we don’t feel these outliers represent a meaningful weakness of the 7800X3D — this isn’t uncommon with immature launch BIOSes and drivers.
- AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D (AMD Ryzen 7) at Amazon for $449
The $599 Ryzen 9 7900X3D also noses into the conversation at $150 more than the 7800X3D, but it is slower than the 7800X3D in gaming and its proximity to the 7950X3D’s pricing makes this a tough chip to recommend at its current pricing.
If you’re looking to save some cash and are only interested in gaming, the Ryzen 7 5800X3D is still a great chip. The 7800X3D is 15% faster than the $319 Ryzen 7 5800X3D, but you’ll pay $130 more just for the chip. Those savings compound after adding the savings from less-expensive AM4 boards and cheaper DDR4 memory. The 5800X3D also has trade-offs associated with the 3D V-Cache, but it is a viable contender for value seekers.
The Ryzen 7 7800X3D is 27% faster than the standard $430 Ryzen 9 7900X at stock settings, showing that it is heads and shoulders ahead of any of the vanilla Ryzen 7000 models in the same price range.
Our test suite heavily favors the improvements from 3D V-Cache, so we also included a table at the bottom of the page with results from five more games that we don’t normally test. Those additional titles aren’t factored into the cumulative measurements above but show the same general trends.
Swipe to scroll horizontally
| Tom’s Hardware | 1080p Game Benchmarks |
| $449 — Ryzen 7 7800X3D | 100% |
| $699 — Ryzen 9 7950X3D | 99. 1% |
| $599 — Ryzen 9 7900X3D | 94.6% |
| $580 — Core i9-13900K | 89.0% |
| $417 — Core i7-13700K | 87.6% |
| $318 — Ryzen 7 5800X3D | 86.5% |
| $319 — Core i5-13600K | 83.4% |
| $699 — Ryzen 9 7950X | 80.0% |
| $430 — Ryzen 9 7900X | 78.9% |
Cyberpunk 2077 Benchmarks on AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D
(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)
The Ryzen 7 7800X3D is simply stellar in games, but it isn’t bulletproof. The Core i5-13600K is 6% faster in this title. However, the deltas between many of these highest-end chips are slim in this benchmark. We also noticed the 7800X3D suffers from lower 99th percentile fps in this title compared to the Ryzen X3D models with dual compute chiplets.
Far Cry 6 Benchmarks on AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Image 1 of 2
(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)
The stock Ryzen 7 7800X3D leads all chips, including the heavily-overclocked Intel models, in this benchmark. The 7800X3D even outstrips the overclocked Ryzen 9 7950X3D, too.
F1 2021 Benchmarks on AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Image 1 of 2
(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)
It’s obvious that F1 2021 enjoys a massive boost from the increased L3 capacity as the X3D chips take a huge lead over competing models, particularly after overclocking. Much of the gain from the overclocked configs stems from the faster DDR5-6000 Expo memory profile.
Even the Ryzen 7 5800X3D gets in on the chart-topping action, but the 3D V-Cache-equipped Ryzen 9 7900X3D inexplicably lands further down the pecking order among the ‘normal’ chips.
Hitman 3 Benchmarks on AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D
(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)
Hitman 3 is designed specifically to leverage the e-cores for certain game engine tasks, which has typically given Intel an advantage.
However, the game also responds well to extra L3 cache, giving the X3D Ryzen chips the lead. Notably, the Intel Core i9-13900K and i7-13700K both need intense overclocking to match the stock Ryzen 7 7800X3D. At stock settings, the 7800X3D is 7.5% faster than the 13900K.
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2021 Benchmarks on AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Image 1 of 2
(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)
The Ryzen X3D chips’ performance in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2021 is almost unbelievable — the Ryzen 7 7800X3D is 35.5% faster than the 13900K at stock settings.
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2021 obviously benefits tremendously from L3 cache, but these deltas aren’t representative of the 7800X3D’s performance in all titles. This illustrates how outliers can make the 7800X3D seem more impressive in cumulative measurements, so be sure to examine performance in individual games.
Red Dead Redemption 2 Benchmarks on AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Image 1 of 2
(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)
The Red Dead Redemption 2 chart splits into two clear classes, with the X3D chips delivering next-level performance compared to the Intel chips and standard Ryzen models.
Notably, all of the X3D models land within 2% of each other, including the Zen 3-powered 5800X3D, so it is clear that the L3 cache delivers the overwhelming amount of the uplift in this title.
Warhammer 3 Benchmarks on AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Image 1 of 2
(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)
Watch Dogs Legion Benchmarks on AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Image 1 of 2
(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)
Watch Dogs Legion closes out our testing in much the same way we saw throughout this series of gaming benchmarks; a nearly-uncontested lead for the Zen 4 Ryzen X3D chips, with the 7800X3D edging out the Ryzen 9 7950X3D to take a slim lead.
Extra AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D Game Benchmarks — GTA V, Project Cars 3, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Far Cry 5, Borderlands 3
Swipe to scroll horizontally
| Tom’s Hardware — 1080p Extras | Ryzen 7 7800X3D | 7800X3D vs 13900K | 7800X3D vs 7950X3D | Ryzen 9 7950X3D | Core i9-13900K | Ryzen 9 7900X3D |
| Grand Theft Auto V | 182. 9 fps |
-1.4% | +0.3% | 182.4 fps | 185.5 fps | 182.4 fps |
| Project Cars 3 | 358.5 fps | +21.5% | +0.3% | 357.6 fps | 295 fps | 340.6 fps |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 355.2 fps | +29.4% | +6.9% | 332.2 fps | 274.6 fps | 309.3 fps |
| Borderlands 3 | 235.7 fps | +26.4% | +1.8% | 231.6 fps | 186.4 fps | 227.7 fps |
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 276.8 fps | +27% | +4. 6% |
264.7 fps | 218 fps | 241.9 fps |
After seeing some of the large deltas in our test suite, we expanded our view to a few more game titles we don’t normally test. So we threw together this quick table to give a basic view of a different mix of game titles with stock processor settings.
These numbers aren’t reflected in our overall geometric mean listed above but provide further context. The Ryzen 7 7800X3D provides 13900K-beating performance in a broad range of titles, ranging from -1.4% to +29.4%. Notably, the Ryzen 7 7800X3D beats the 13900K by more than 20% in four of the five tested titles and by more than 25% in three. That’s simply an insurmountable advantage in this group of titles.
AMD’s Ryzen 7 7800X3D Gaming Benchmarks
Image 1 of 5
(Image credit: AMD)(Image credit: AMD)(Image credit: AMD)(Image credit: AMD)(Image credit: AMD)
AMD has provided its own Ryzen 7 7800X3D gaming benchmarks for comparison.
As with all vendor-provided benchmarks, you should take them with a grain of salt. We typically wouldn’t share vendor-provided tests in our reviews, but we’re making an exception because the Ryzen 7 7800X3D doesn’t improve performance in all titles, and this more expansive list provides additional context. We also provide the test notes at the end of the above album.
- MORE: AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D vs Intel Core i9-13900K vs Core i7-13700K
- MORE: Best CPU for gaming
- MORE: CPU Benchmark Hierarchy
- MORE: Intel vs AMD
- MORE: How to Overclock a CPU
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D: Price Comparison
$449.99
View
powered by
Current page:
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D Gaming Benchmarks
Prev Page AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D: Boost Frequencies, Thermal Benchmarks, Voltages, and Core Parking Problems
Next Page AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D Productivity Benchmarks
Paul Alcorn is the Deputy Managing Editor for Tom’s Hardware US.
He writes news and reviews on CPUs, storage and enterprise hardware.
|
3DNews Technologies and IT market. News Processors Reviews Ryzen 7 7800X3D: the world’s best pro… The most interesting in the reviews
04/05/2023 [18:06], Andrey Sozinov The Ryzen 7 7800X3D, the youngest processor currently on the market that combines Zen 4 cores and an additional 3D V-Cache, starts selling tomorrow. And today, the specialized press published reviews of the novelty, in which it proved to be the best gaming processor in the world — even better than the flagships! Here we present the main data from these reviews.
Image source: Tom’s Hardware As a reminder, the Ryzen 7 7800X3D has eight Zen 4 cores with sixteen threads. Its base clock frequency is 4. Average gaming performance. Image Source: Tom’s Hardware
As mentioned at the outset, the $449 Ryzen 7 7800X3D proved to be the world’s best gaming processor. In the tests of the American portal Tom’s Hardware, the novelty outperformed even the much more expensive flagship 16-core Ryzen 9 7950X3D ($699), albeit only by 1% in Full HD resolution (1920 × 1080 dots) and 2.5% higher in Quad HD (2560 × 1440 dots). But the German portal ComputerBase conducted tests in HD resolution (1280 × 720 pixels), and there the flagship was ahead by 3%. Gaming Benchmarks Ryzen 7 7800X3D In addition, the Ryzen 7 7800X3D was 12% faster in games at Full HD resolution compared to the $580 Core i9-13900K, and overclocking the latter closes the gap to just 8%. At the same time, the Intel processor has a very high power consumption, while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D consumed no more than 90 W. Average performance in multi-threaded workloads. Image Source: Tom’s Hardware Ryzen 7 7800X3D Benchmarks and Applications If the Ryzen 7 7800X3D gets a significant performance boost in games due to the additional cache compared to the same Ryzen 7 7700X, then the situation is reversed in applications. Due to the lower frequency, the novelty is 7% slower than its counterpart in multi-threaded tests, and up to 15% in single-threaded loads, according to Tom’s Hardware. Break with Core i9-13900K even more: 32% in single threaded scenarios and 89% in multithreaded ones. In ComputerBase’s tests, the new Ryzen 7 7800X3D was even weaker than the Core i5-13500 in multi-threaded tests, but still managed to catch up with it in single-threaded workloads. Maximum power consumption. Image source: ComputerBase Another positive side of the Ryzen 7 7800X3D, reviewers call low power consumption. According to the German portal, the processor consumption in games averaged only 60 watts — more than half the 141 watts of the Core i9.-13900K. The maximum of the chip managed to «squeeze» 155 watts. In Tom’s Hardware tests, the Ryzen 7 7800X3D also proved to be a very power efficient chip, drawing up to 80W in most scenarios. The temperature of the Ryzen 7 7800X3D under load did not exceed 79 ° C in the tests of the American resource and 81 ° C in the tests of the German one. Maximum frequency, minimum frequency, power consumption and temperature . Image Source: Tom’s Hardware Overall, reviewers agree that the Ryzen 7 7800X3D is the best choice for a PC that will primarily be used for gaming. If you use a computer for professional activities that rely on CPU performance, then the new product will clearly not be the best choice — both AMD and Intel have much more attractive solutions in this price category. Sources:
If you notice an error, select it with the mouse and press CTRL+ENTER. Materials on the topic Permanent URL: https://3dnews.ru/1084591/obzori-ryzen-7-7800x3d Tags: ← В |
2 GHz, and the maximum frequency with automatic overclocking is 5.0 GHz. This is noticeably less than 4.5 and 5.4 GHz for the related Ryzen 7 7700X processor. However, the novelty wins due to a much larger cache volume — due to the 64 MB SRAM memory chip installed on top of the crystal with cores, the total cache volume of the third level is 96 MB. In addition, the Ryzen 7 7800X3D has a TDP of 120W, 15W more than the Ryzen 7 7700X. 
First Intel 10th Generation Comet Lake-H Processor Family Benchmarks Show Weak Lead Over AMD Ryzen 4000
Blogs
Solid_blog Post rewarded
Upgrade for 9th generation Intel owners doesn’t make much sense
recommendations the first benchmarks have appeared that evaluate the performance of the new Intel Comet Lake-H Core i9-10880H, Core i7-10750H and Core i5-10300H. In the notebookcheck publication, they were compared with AMD’s competitive offerings — Ryzen 9 4900HS and Ryzen 7 4800H.
While these benchmark results once again show the superiority of Intel chips in single-core mode, it is clear that AMD is already on the heels and maintains a strong position in multi-core tests. In addition to new products, 9th generation Intel processors participated in the comparison.
On laptops with 16 GB of RAM (dual-channel DDR4-2666), Core i9 was driven in tests-10880H, Core i7-10750H, Core i5-10300H. The results were compared to the averages of the respective benchmarks for the AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS, AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, Core i9-9880H, Core i7-9750H, and Core i5-9300H processors.
Intel seems to be focusing on single core performance. So the new items took the first lines in the summary table, and the competitive Ryzen 9 4900HS is approximately at the level of the Core i5-10300H. However, it is worth noting that AMD is significantly reducing the gap in this test.
In multi-core tests, AMD products performed well. In the Cinebench R15 multi test, the Ryzen 9 4900HS processor was 4% ahead of its competitor, the Core i9-10880H.
However, the new product from Intel showed a noticeable improvement over the previous generation chip — Core i9-9980HK.
Multi-core test results Cinebench R15, Cinebench R20, Passmark, 3DMark Time Spy CPU, Fire Strike Physics:
recommendations
Please note that these are only preliminary tests. A clearer picture will emerge when laptops with the latest Intel processors become widely available.
This material was written by a site visitor and has been rewarded.
#amd
#intel
#benchmark
Related materials
Effective advertising for your business
Prigozhin thanked the Russian soldiers and said that the offensive of the Armed Forces of Ukraine will continue
Bild published an article entitled «The Russians destroyed the first Leopard» and this caused a resonance
Destruction of a convoy with Leopard tanks was recorded in the Zaporozhye direction
B SU for the first time used Leopard-2 tanks in the Zaporozhye direction
Daily Reckoning: new BRICS currency could put an end to the dominance of the dollar and US hegemony
FSP introduced updated ATX 3.