Cpu benchmarks for gaming: Best CPU for Gaming in 2022 — Top Gaming CPUs for the Money

What’s the best CPU for gaming? AMD and Intel picks for 2022

Home / PCs & Components / Best Picks

Best Picks

Game on with these picks for every budget.

By Brad Chacos

PCWorld Jun 13, 2022 3:30 am PDT

Rob Schultz/IDG

Buying a processor for a gaming rig isn’t as hard as it used to be. Now that AMD’s Ryzen 5000-series and Intel’s 12th-gen Core CPUs come with more performance and cores than ever before, it’s hard to buy a stinker these days—especially because most games favor graphics firepower over CPU oomph. All that said, there are specific chips that stand out from the horde as the best gaming CPUs due to their price, performance, or nifty extras. And they won’t all break the bank like the powerful, but pricey Ryzen 7 5800X3D with its radical V-Cache and Intel’s 5.5GHz Core i9-12900KS.

Whether you’re on a budget or willing to pay for sheer face-melting speed, these are the best CPUs for gaming PCs that you can buy.

The best CPUs for gaming

Intel Core i5-12400 – Best gaming CPU for most people

Midrange CPUs are the sweet spot for PC gamers. In fact, if you don’t need the additional cores of pricier CPU options, this class of chip offers essentially the same gaming experience of processors that cost hundreds more. The reason? Most of the computing burden falls on your graphics card.

At an MSRP of about $200, the Intel Core i5-12400 strikes a smooth balance between performance and affordability. Sure, you don’t get the fancy mix of performance cores and efficiency cores found in the faster Alder Lake chips, but this six-core, 12-thread processor doesn’t suffer by having only performance cores. Have a peek at gaming benchmarks in reviews (like those at Guru3D and PCGamer) and you’ll see the Core i5-12400 usually trails behind the $320 Core i5-12600K and $589 Core i9-12900K by only a handful of frames at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. You also don’t need to upgrade to Windows 11 to get the most out of this chip.

This CPU also outperforms AMD’s rival Ryzen 5 5600 slightly, which also just launched. If you’re upgrading from an older AM4 B450 motherboard, you may find it more cost-effective to stick with AMD, but otherwise, the 12400 is the chip to get.

Intel Core i9-12900K – Best high-end gaming CPU

Need more cores for productivity tasks, want eight cores for streaming or future-proofing against console hardware configurations, or simply demand the absolute fastest potential frame rates in any situation? The $589 Intel Core i9-12900K is the 16-core, 24-thread processor for you.

Its even faster variant, the newly released Core i9-12900KS, now holds the title of “fastest gaming processor,” but this standard version is the one you want. Paying an extra $150 nets you just a tiny bump in gaming performance. You may as well invest that money instead into cutting-edge (read: pricey) DDR5 memory and get most out of the 12900K.

AMD’s $550 Ryzen 9 5900X is another solid option that offers high frame rates, but paying that much for a 12-core chip doesn’t make sense if pure gaming is your goal.

If you simply want ultra-fast gaming frame rates and don’t need a borderline insane amount of CPU cores for productivity work, consider the step-down Core i7-12700K and Ryzen 7 5800X as well. Each costs roughly $450 and offer 12 and 8 cores, respectively. Meanwhile, if you don’t mind spending up for the ultimate 1080p gaming performance and already have a first- or second-generation Ryzen motherboard, the Ryzen 7 5800X3D is a killer—albeit pricey—upgrade option.

Intel Core i3-12100F – Best budget gaming CPU

At last, builders on a budget finally have affordable chips to choose from. In a throwback to better times, you have several options in the $100 to $135(ish) range, with one extremely compelling standout among them. As you’ll see in gaming benchmarks from sites like Tom’s Hardware and TechSpot, Intel’s $110 Core i3-12100F doesn’t just offer a hefty boost in frame rates compared to AMD’s comparable offering. It also posts gaming performance nearly on par with Intel’s last-gen Core i5-11600K—a processor that costs twice as much.

You must have a dedicated graphics card to pair with this CPU, however. This variant of the $135 Core i3-12100 lacks integrated graphics, which is how you save cash. If you’re still saving your pennies for a (reasonably) affordable graphics card, you may instead want one of AMD’s APUs, which we discuss in the next entry below.

Ryzen 5 5600G – Best CPU if you can’t get a graphics card

It’s a rough time to build a gaming PC on a budget, especially given the availability and pricing of graphics cards. One workaround is to purchase an APU, or CPUs with supercharged integrated graphics. Both the $260 Ryzen 5 5600G and $360 Ryzen 7 5700G processors let you play most games at 720p or 1080p resolution. And after you snag a graphics card, you can simply drop it into your system, because the CPU cores are very good for mainstream gaming, as our Ryzen 7 5700G review showed.

The 5600G offers 6 cores and 12 threads, paired with 7 Radeon graphics cores clocked at 1.9GHz. The step-up 5700G bumps that up to 8 cores and 16 threads, alongside 8 Radeon cores running at 2GHz. Most shoppers on a budget are better off with the cheaper part, unless you have a specific need for the higher CPU core count in the Ryzen 7 chip.

How we test CPUs

We evaluate CPUs based on the benchmark results that span multiple use categories. Gaming performance is a key focus, and we run both synthetic tests (that is, dedicated benchmarking programs) and in-game benchmarks in a variety of modern titles. Our current suite includes Far Cry New Dawn, Gears Tactics, Horizon Zero Dawn, Metro Exodus, CS: Go, Red Dead Redemption, Ashes of the Singularity, and Rainbow Siege Six.

Test PCs are built with the CPU’s capabilities in mind—for example, Intel’s Core i9-12900K supports DDR5 RAM. Rival and older chips used for comparison are retested at the same time, with a similar use of appropriate contemporaneous hardware. In all our test rigs, we use a current high-end flagship graphics card to better isolate differences in the CPUs’ performance.

Coupon Codes

Dell CouponGet 10% off select Alienware PCs & peripherals — Dell coupon code
Samsung Promo CodeSamsung promo code: Up to 40% off your order
Motley Fool DiscountMotley Fool discount: $20 off Stock Advisor 2-year membership
eBay Coupon$5 eBay new user promo code for any order
Hp Coupon CodeHP Monthly Coupons & Promo Codes
Rosetta Stone Promo CodeRosetta Stone coupon — 50% off 1-year exclusive

3DMark Update Adds New Gaming and OC CPU Benchmarks

Peter Donnell / 1 year ago

UL Benchmarks has just released the latest expansion for their ever-popular 3DMark software suite. We’re big fans of 3DMark here at eTeknix, and it gets used pretty much daily for a range of hardware reviews that we do. However, today they’re adding a new set of dedicated CPU benchmarks. The 3DMark CPU Profile introduces a new approach to CPU benchmarking that shows how CPU performance scales with the number of cores and threads used. The new CPU Profile benchmark tests are available now in 3DMark Advanced Edition and 3DMark Professional Edition.

Instead of just producing a single number, the new 3DMark CPU Profile shows how CPU performance scales and changes with the number of cores and threads used. The CPU Profile has six tests, each of which uses a different number of threads. The benchmark starts by using all available threads. It then repeats using 16 threads, 8 threads, 4 threads, 2 threads, and ends with a single-threaded test.

The end result should give us a much better understanding of how any CPU scales with various tasks across each of the cores available. Not only will it give a good comparison for other CPUs, but other those of the same model, as a sort of test that you’re meeting the right performance standard; handy for stress testing and overclocking too!

3DMark has given us a plethora of information explaining all of this, which you can read below or on the 3DMark page here. The 3DMark CPU Profile is available now as a free update for 3DMark Advanced Edition. The 3DMark CPU Profile benchmarks are available as a free update for 3DMark Professional Edition customers with a valid annual license.

More Cores, More Theads!

The trend in processor development is towards an increasing number of cores. More cores mean more work can be performed at the same time. Simultaneous multithreading (SMT) enables each core to run multiple threads. The more threads you have, the greater the throughput of work. However, core counts are increasing faster than the ability of popular applications to make use of them. Some tasks are more suited to multithreading and multiple cores than others.

A modern CPU benchmark should demonstrate the benefits of having many cores and threads by scaling beyond 16 threads. It should also show how a processor performs for gaming and other real-world activities where performance rarely scales beyond a modest number of cores and threads. It is not possible to represent both these aspects of CPU performance with a single number. A different type of benchmark is needed.

3DMark CPU Profile benchmarks

The 3DMark CPU Profile includes six tests that feature a combination of physics computations and custom simulations. All six tests use the same workload; it is only the amount of threading that changes, with tests limited to using either 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, or the maximum number of available threads.

Each of the six tests produces a score. Scores are comparable across tests. You can compare the 8-thread score with the 4-thread score, for example. A higher score means the CPU performed the work faster. A hardware monitoring chart shows you how the CPU clock frequency and CPU temperature changed while the tests were running.

How to benchmark and compare CPU performance

The 3DMark CPU Profile shows you how your CPU scores compare with other results from the same processor. The green bars on the 3DMark CPU Profile result screen show you how your scores compare with the best scores for your CPU. The longer the green bar, the closer your score is to the best result for your CPU model. The median score, shown by the marker, shows the performance level you should expect for your CPU. In most cases, the median represents performance with stock settings. If your score is below the median, it may indicate a problem with cooling or background processes. Check the hardware monitoring chart to see how the CPU temperature changed during the run. The distance from the median marker to the end of the bar represents the overclocking potential of the CPU. For overclockers, the 3DMark CPU Profile provides more ways to measure the effects of overclocking and more ways to compete for the highest scores!

Please note that these features are powered by benchmark results from 3DMark users. These insights may be unavailable for some CPU models until enough results are submitted. Your 3DMark CPU Profile scores should increase up to the number of threads supported by your CPU. In this screenshot from a CPU with 4 cores and 8 threads, you can see that the scores for 8 threads, 16 threads and Max threads are the same within the usual 3% accuracy range for UL benchmarks. For CPUs with SMT, which have more threads than cores, the benefit of having more threads decreases beyond the number of CPU cores.

Six Levels of CPU Performance

The 3DMark CPU Profile includes six tests. These six levels make it easier to compare the performance of different CPU models by looking at the results from thread levels they have in common.

Max Threads

The Max-threads score represents the full performance potential of your CPU when using all available threads. The practical use cases for this score lie outside of gaming in extremely heavy, multithreading workloads such as movie-quality rendering, simulations, and scientific analysis.

16 Threads

Computationally intensive tasks such as digital content creation and 3D rendering benefit from more threads, but the 16-threads score is less relevant for estimating practical gaming performance.

8 Threads

Modern DirectX 12 games make better use of multithreaded performance beyond 4 cores. The gaming performance of a CPU usually correlates most closely with the 8-threads score. This score also has a high correlation with the 3DMark Time Spy CPU score.

4 Threads and 2 Threads

Older games developed for DirectX 9 are often bottlenecked by the CPU on modern gaming PCs. The frame rates of popular esports titles, such as DotA 2, League of Legends, and Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, usually correlate most closely with the 2-threads and 4-threads scores.

1 Thread

The 1-thread score is a fundamental measure of the processor’s performance. For games and real-world use cases, however, the multithreaded scores are usually a better indicator of practical performance.

Intel Core i7-6700K Skylake CPU Review & Gaming Benchmarks | GamersNexus

Note: Some tests were conducted additional times for parity. We test a minimum of three passes for each benchmark to ensure accuracy. In some instances — like the Witcher 3 tests — we double-up on passes to ensure the disparity seen is more significant than margin of error.

Intel i7-6700K vs. 4770K, 4790K GRID: Autosport Benchmarks

GRID: Autosport reveals a slight disparity between 4790K and 6700K performance.

At 145 FPS against 142 FPS, there’s hardly anything to write home about. Both the 4790K and 6700K offer high enough framerates to fulfill 144Hz display demands (assuming the GPU cooperates), with similarly high 0.1% low metrics.

Intel i7-6700K vs. 4770K, 4790K GTA V CPU Benchmarks

GTA V shows effectively zero difference between the Haswell i7 units and newcomer Skylake:

The 6700K and 4790K are effectively tied (0.1% disparity is within margin of test error). We don’t see much difference until dropping down to an i3 in GTA V. The G3258 – although it is on this chart – is unplayable at these settings, as indicated by 0.1% and 1% lows.

Intel i7-6700K vs. 4770K, 4790K The Witcher 3 CPU Benchmarks

The Witcher 3 exhibits seemingly anomalous performance. We performed additional test passes on the Witcher 3 to ensure a larger dataset. Each test pass placed the 6700K below our other CPUs (aside from the generations-old 3570K), something that we’d attribute to lower IPC or a mix of DDR4 CAS timing differences.

Intel i7-6700K vs. 4770K, 4790K Metro: Last Light Benchmarks

Metro: Last Light shows a slight difference, as GRID did:

The 6700K marginally leads the 4790K with a 2FPS delta. Not much exciting here by way of FPS jumps, but an improvement nonetheless. The Ivy Bridge architecture is led more dramatically, though it’s also a 4C/4T 3570K and Metro very clearly fronts a hyperthreading bias.

Intel i7-6700K vs.

4770K, 4790K Shadow of Mordor Benchmarks

As with some of the other games, Shadow of Mordor shows effectively zero difference between Haswell and Skylake CPUs when it comes to 1080p gaming on a 980 Ti.

Intel i7-6700K Overclocking

We struggled to overclock our i7-6700K. Our sample is an engineering sample running on a pre-production motherboard, though both should be as close to the end product as possible without being actual retail devices.

Here’s our chart of simplified changes:

Multiplier	vCore	Pass / Fail
44	1.280v	P
46	1.280v	F
46	1.320v	P
47	1.320v	F
47	1.350v	F
47	1.360v	F

We ultimately settled on 4. 6GHz at 1.30v for the i7-6700K. Time restricted the ability to dive deeper with some of the new cache and BCLK unlocks, but this is a topic we will revisit in greater depth in the immediate future. A full article will be dedicated to Skylake overclocking once we’ve got a better feel for what’s preventing a sturdier OC than our 4.6GHz output.

Conclusion

The biggest advantage of moving to a Skylake / Z170 platform is in memory capabilities, for those who can’t afford X99 but may perform tasks that’d benefit from DDR4. Gaming is not one of those tasks (there may actually be slight overhead for gaming). Video production and photo editing immediately see benefit from DDR4.

After the memory change, the next most noteworthy improvement over Z87/Z97 is the lane increment. At 36 lanes, Skylake and Z170 support more expansion devices than its 24-lane predecessor. This is something we won’t tap into until our next test, which will explore lane scalability on multiple platforms using various, real-world PCI-e configurations.

As it stands here and now, today, the i7-6700K feels similar to most of Intel’s other recent launches. For anyone on a remotely recent architecture, there’s just no reason to make the jump to Skylake unless for memory reasons – and those users likely know who they are. For gamers, anyone from Sandy Bridge onward should still be happily limited more by the GPU than the CPU. At a couple FPS – if lucky – Skylake isn’t a raw framerate-boosting platform. It’s more focused on technology, shrinking the process, and adding DDR4 to the consumer marketplace. The processor certainly isn’t bad, it’s just not exciting. Anyone who would have purchased a 4770K or 4790K should now consider the 6700K instead (assuming memory cost is a non-issue). Anyone who already owns Devil’s Canyon, Haswell Refresh, Haswell, Ivy Bridge, or Sandy Bridge can likely hold off.

(Thanks, iBUYPOWER, for the loaner Skylake platform).

— Steve “Lelldorianx” Burke.

« Prev Next

Intel Raptor Lake flagship CPU leaked gaming benchmarks are causing some concern

TechRadar is supported by its audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Here’s why you can trust us.

(Image credit: Intel)

Audio player loading…

Intel’s Raptor Lake flagship CPU has seen some further leaked benchmarks, and unlike the previous spillage, this is a juicier affair because they’re actual gaming tests.

The game benchmarks come from the same source on Chinese video sharing website Bilibili who provided results for the likes of CineBench and Geekbench recently, as flagged up by @harukaze5719 on Twitter.

i9 12900K vs i9 13900K gaming comparison. (relative)*NOTE : some high perf is due to radical perf improve in some games https://t.co/IC9tvXupeo pic.twitter.com/B8GEW9TVIrJuly 17, 2022

Again, this is an engineering sample of the Core i9-13900K processor which is compared to its predecessor the 12900K, but we have to bear firmly in mind that it’s a pre-release chip, and also be very cautious about any leaked benchmarking, anyway.

Bearing those caveats in mind, across a selection of games including some popular titles like Red Dead Redemption 2, Horizon Zero Dawn and PUBG, the 13900K turned out to be about 5% faster for average frame rates at 1080p resolution, around 7% quicker at 1440p, and 3% better at 4K resolution.

The rough upshot of this is around a 5% increase for gaming performance compared to the 12900K, which feels rather disappointing on the face of it. Plus power usage is considerably cranked up for this 13900K sample, too, at least for the provided peak consumption figures which see the Raptor Lake chip hit 150W to 160W, when the 12900K sits at more like 120W to 140W (the figures vary quite widely depending on the game being played, as you’d expect).

This isn’t the best look for the incoming 13900K, then, but we definitely shouldn’t jump to any conclusions here. Realistically, we’d expect more of an increase for a new generation of CPUs than this, and we’re likely to get exactly that for a number of reasons.

Firstly, as we’ve already mentioned, this is a (purported) pre-release sample, and the finished flagship processor will be faster anyway. For starters, in these tests, the 13900K is boosting to 5.5GHz, and the rumored boost speed for the flagship is more like 5.8GHz or thereabouts. And the Raptor Lake platform is obviously not fully realized yet either, with for example early BIOS versions for Raptor Lake motherboards that are still not ready for launch – these too are works in progress.

The power consumption figures also seem a bit off to us, likely pointing to some wonkiness around the engineering sample being run through its paces here. Some of the individual benchmark results themselves look a little odd, too, with some seriously hefty hikes in performance for minimum frame rates here and there.

All of which is to say we wouldn’t be running around panicking about Raptor Lake being a damp squib just yet. Remember that the mentioned earlier benchmarking looked pretty promising, particularly around multi-core performance, with the chip still in a pre-release incarnation at that.

Intel made good progress with 12th-gen Alder Lake processors, snaring many an accolade particularly in terms of gaming versus Ryzen, so even just a reasonable step forward with this Raptor Lake refresh will still mean AMD needs to pull something out of the bag with Ryzen 7000.

Fortunately for Team Red, all rumors point to the new Zen 4 chips being something special, so it’s likely that the next-gen CPU battle will be a close fought race; certainly in terms of performance. This new 13th-gen leak does also hint at AMD being more likely to get a firmer lead in terms of the power efficiency crown, mind, and that could be more important than usual given the state of power bills which are currently getting out of control for many folks, and set to worsen in the future.

Today’s best processor deals

$90.44

View

Reduced Price

$162. 02

$141.59

View

Reduced Price

$299.99

$199.99

View

Show More Deals

Via Tom’s Hardware

Darren is a freelancer writing news and features for TechRadar (and occasionally T3) across a broad range of computing topics including CPUs, GPUs, various other hardware, VPNs, antivirus and more. He has written about tech for the best part of three decades, and writes books in his spare time (his debut novel — ‘I Know What You Did Last Supper’ — was published by Hachette UK in 2013).

TechRadar is part of Future US Inc, an international media group and leading digital publisher. Visit our corporate site .

Laptops with the Best CPU Performance

(Image credit: Laptop Mag)

If you’re crunching numbers in a giant spreadsheet, transcoding a huge 4K video or playing a demanding game, you’ll need a computer that’s just plain speedy. We use Geekbench 4 (and 4.1), a synthetic benchmark, to measure overall performance. We then took the scores from all the laptops we’ve tested and listed the top 10 in order of best CPU performance.

As expected, the laptops with the latest Intel Core i9 (H-series) processors topped the list, followed by those with Core i7 CPUs. If you’d like to learn more about the components powering these laptops, check out our laptop processor comparison. You’ll also notice that most of these top machines are featured on our best gaming laptops ranking, proving that these RGB-illuminated rigs aren’t just great at gaming, but also at powering demanding programs.

If you’re interested in buying a gaming laptop, you should check out our list of the laptops with the best graphics performance and our best and worst gaming laptop brands report. If you prefer a laptop for business use, consider one of the laptops on our best workstations page.

Best laptop CPU performance (Geekbench 4.1)

1. Asus ROG Mothership: 34,879
2. Alienware Area-51m: 32,591
3. MSI GT76 Titan: 32,167
4. Apple MacBook Pro (15-inch): 31,012
5. Alienware m17 R2: 29,862
6. Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR: 28,879
7. Dell XPS 15: 28,165
8. Origin PC Eon17-X: 27,347
9. Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX581: 26,470
10. Dell Precision 7730: 24,800

Here is a closer look at the 10 laptops with the best CPU performance.

Part laptop, part all-in-one, this unique hybrid device offers shockingly fast performance, thanks to its Intel Core i9-9980HK GPU and Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 GPU. Yes, you could argue that the ROG Mothership isn’t really a laptop, but we don’t care: This thing is crazy powerful, having notched a record-breaking 34,879 on the Geekbench 4.1 overall performance test. Despite that insane power, the ROG Mothership remained cool throughout our testing. Impressive.

Read our Asus ROG Mothership review

The Alienware Area-51m topped our best graphics performance ranking and now comes in second in CPU performance. It’s no wonder Alienware marketed this beast as a true desktop replacement. It lives up to that title, not just for the performance it brings but also because all of its major components are upgradable. Beyond the numbers, the Alienware Area-51m has a striking design, a comfortable keyboard and a superfast SSD.

Read our Alienware Area-51m review

The GT76 Titan isn’t just one of the most powerful laptops around, it’s also one of the most well rounded. Sure, it’s a beefy monster and costs a small fortune, but you get a lot for your money, including a gorgeous 4K panel, a supercomfortable keyboard and an attractive aluminum design. Now, about that CPU performance: With a score of 32,167 on the Geekbench test, the GT76 is faster than almost every other laptop we’ve tested. It’s really no wonder the GT76 Titan is featured on both our best gaming laptops and best 4K laptops pages.

Read our MSI GT76 Titan review

Notice anything about the top laptops on this list? That’s right, they’re all chunky, heavy gaming rigs. But then there is Apple’s incredibly sleek MacBook Pro, which offers class-leading performance when equipped with an Intel Core i9-9980HK CPU and 32GB of RAM. At 4 pounds and 0.6 inches, the MacBook Pro is much more portable than just about every other laptop on this list. And the MacBook Pro’s more than 10 hours of battery life crushes any gaming laptop on the market. If that powerful Intel CPU weren’t enough performance, Apple outfitted the MacBook Pro with the fastest SSDs we’ve ever clocked. Oh, and you also get Apple’s reliably gorgeous Retina display.

Read our Apple MacBook Pro (15-inch) review

If you can get past its lofty price, the Alienware m17 R2 is essentially the perfect productivity laptop. Unlike most of its gaming laptop rivals, the m17 R2 is actually surprisingly portable and even gets decent battery life (for a gaming laptop). If you’re wondering how it shapes up against the MacBook Pro, we can say with confidence that the m17 R2 has a much better keyboard and stronger graphics performance. When it comes to the CPU, the Core i9-9980HK inside the m17 R2 is an absolute beast at productivity.

Read our Alienware m17 R2 review

Gigabyte might not be a mainstream laptop brand, but the company’s flagship Aero 17 HDR can go toe-to-toe with the best of them. The laptop’s 0.8-inch-thin chassis houses a beastly Intel Core i9-9980HK processor, which blazed through our real-world performance tests without the slightest hint of lag. Along with that excellent performance, the Aero 17 HDR has a bright, 4K display, a comfortable keyboard and surprisingly long battery life (5:30).

Read our Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR review

Dell’s XPS 15 is the bigger, more powerful brother of the best overall laptop, the XPS 13. As such, it offers a lot of the same perks, including a compact, premium design, a stunning 4K OLED display and excellent performance. Because the XPS 15 packs a beefier Core i9-9980HK processor, you can expect significantly faster performance than what its smaller cousin can muster. All things considered, the XPS 15 is the best MacBook Pro (15-inch) alternative Windows has to offer, and one of the best laptops on the market.

Read our Dell XPS 15 review

With blistering performance offered by its Core i9-9900K CPU and a supercomfortable keyboard, the Origin PC’s Eon17-X is an outstanding laptop for gamers or creators. That said, the laptop’s screen is very dim, so we recommend buying a monitor while you’re plunking down several thousands of dollars on this beast. Fortunately, you won’t need to purchase a pair of headphones, because the speakers in this tank of a laptop can seriously jam.

Read our Origin PC Eon17-X review

The Asus ZenBook Pro Duo’s outstanding performance will undoubtedly be overshadowed by its dual, 15. 6-inch and 14-inch displays. And that’s just fine by us. After all, the highlight of this innovative machine is the secondary, 14-inch, 4K display on the deck, which lets you multitask like never before. The components that allow you to do so — an Intel Core i9 CPU and RTX 2060 –– might not be as sexy, but they’re churning away while your eyes feast on the ZenBook Pro Duo’s stunning displays.

Read our Asus ZenBook Pro Duo review

Some of the fastest laptops we review are for gaming, but don’t rule out workstations, or devices meant specifically for productivity. Among those, the Precision 7730 offers the fastest CPU performance when equipped with an Intel Core i9-8950HK processor and 32GB of RAM. But the best reason to buy the Precision 7730 rather than any of these other laptops is for its extensive security features and endless configuration options. Moving away from the specs sheet, the Precision 7730 has a gorgeous 4K display, a durable chassis and a comfortable keyboard.

Read our Dell Precision 7730 review

Phillip Tracy is the assistant managing editor at Laptop Mag where he reviews laptops, phones and other gadgets while covering the latest industry news. After graduating with a journalism degree from the University of Texas at Austin, Phillip became a tech reporter at the Daily Dot. There, he wrote reviews for a range of gadgets and covered everything from social media trends to cybersecurity. Prior to that, he wrote for RCR Wireless News covering 5G and IoT. When he’s not tinkering with devices, you can find Phillip playing video games, reading, traveling or watching soccer.

AMD and Intel CPU FPS Benchmarks
– Gadget Mountain

When deciding to buy a CPU, it is so difficult to pick one with the number of options available out there today. You have to look at hundreds of features and models to even be close to making a decision. One of the things you can look at is how CPUs perform with different games. Here, I’ve listed 15 of them, along with their FPS benchmarks to help you understand their strengths. Let’s dive into the details!

Table of contents

Why FPS as Benchmarks?

Red Dead Redemption 2ValorantRainbow Six SiegeGTA V

Fortnite

MinecraftPlayer Unknown’s Battleground (PUBG)Overwatch

Cyberpunk 2077

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Assassin’s Creed Odyssey

Shadow of the Tomb Raider

Forza Horizon 4

The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt

Rocket league

Conclusion

What’s Next?

Why FPS as Benchmarks?
FPS are a great metric to measure a CPU’s strengths. Gamers use it as benchmarks as it gives clear estimates about its performance. It shows you how a CPU handles the graphics, its encoding and decoding, engines that run the game, and ray-tracing.

Since a game puts different engines into work and stresses the CPU in various ways, you can’t just only look into the game’s algorithms’ rendering speed, compression, MIPS, or decoding time. The FPS works best to understand the CPU’s power whilst handling a game.

For example, a CPU manages a lot of things whilst running a game. If it is handling all the tasks well, like animations, character’s movement, surrounding world, NPCs, etc, you observe smooth FPS. But when it throttles in any task the CPU drops its FPS to minimize its work.

So, the average FPS that you get throughout a game would give a better insight into CPU performance. If it manages to maintain the frames per second, it means the CPU is powerful enough to perfectly handle the game. So, you need to look for CPUs with higher FPS as it means that the processor is more powerful and can handle more tasks at once.

Below I have listed 15 games of which I have frames per second in low and high-end settings to give you an idea of what kind of range a CPU can perform well in. The lower FPS scores table is in 1080p resolution with low settings to give you estimations of the maximum potential of CPU. The second FPS scores table is in 4K resolution and ultra settings, so you can understand how much power a CPU has. These scores are with the GeForce RTX 3080 Ti. This is done to stop the GPU from causing any bottlenecks. Let’s start benchmarking:

Red Dead Redemption 2

First on our list is Red Dead Redemption 2 (RDR2). It is an open-world awesome game by Rockstar Games, launched in 2018. Till now, it has been marvellous in entertaining hardcore and casual gamers. It is set in the Western 19th century.

The game has a built-in benchmark tool. It tests the best results with the available hardware, so you can adjust the settings accordingly. However, the Vulkan or DirectX 12 APIs also help you out with figuring out graphics needs. Here’s are the FPS results in different settings:

FPS at 1080p resolution with low settings

Processor

FPS

Core-i9 12900K

451

Ryzen 9 5950X

421

Core-i712700K

432

Core-i9 11900K

418

Ryzen 9 3950X

380

Ryzen 7 5800X

401

Core-i5 11600K

395

Core-i3 10300

340

Ryzen 7 5700G

386

Ryzen 5 5600X

390

FPS at 4K resolution with ultra settings

Processor

FPS

Core-i9 12900K

68

Ryzen 9 5950X

62

Core-i712700K

63

Core-i9 11900K

60

Ryzen 9 3950X

55

Ryzen 7 5800X

57

Core-i5 11600K

55

Core-i3 10300

45

Ryzen 7 5700G

54

Ryzen 5 5600X

55

Valorant

Valorant is a unique multiplayer game created by Riot Games. It is a 5v5 online first-person shooting-based launched in 2019. It is PC-exclusive (sorry console players) and has been famous among many gamers. They are even organizing a global tournament for it. Here are its maximum and minimum FPS:

FPS at 1080p resolution with low settings

Processor

FPS

Core-i9 12900K

1135

Ryzen 9 5950X

1065

Core-i712700K

1099

Core-i9 11900K

1076

Ryzen 9 3950X

975

Ryzen 7 5800X

1038

Core-i5 11600K

1030

Core-i3 10300

912

Ryzen 7 5700G

1006

Ryzen 5 5600X

1018

FPS at 4K resolution with ultra settings

Processor

FPS

Core-i9 12900K

305

Ryzen 9 5950X

352

Core-i712700K

358

Core-i9 11900K

341

Ryzen 9 3950X

311

Ryzen 7 5800X

325

Core-i5 11600K

316

Core-i3 10300

261

Ryzen 7 5700G

310

Ryzen 5 5600X

312

Rainbow Six Siege

Rainbow six siege is a first-person shooting multiplayer game where teamwork and tactical skills are everything. The game works on collaboration, as you are vulnerable to only a few bullets. The floors, walls, and ceilings in the game are also destructible. So, it opens many strategic possibilities to raid a room. Here are AMD and Intel CPU benchmarks of FPS to test out their performances in the game:

FPS at 1080p resolution with low settings

Processor

FPS

Core-i9 12900K

1155

Ryzen 9 5950X

1087

Core-i712700K

1119

Core-i9 11900K

1095

Ryzen 9 3950X

998

Ryzen 7 5800X

1058

Core-i5 11600K

1049

Core-i3 10300

932

Ryzen 7 5700G

1026

Ryzen 5 5600X

1037

FPS at 4K resolution with ultra settings

Processor

FPS

Core-i9 12900K

169

Ryzen 9 5950X

155

Core-i712700K

158

Core-i9 11900K

150

Ryzen 9 3950X

136

Ryzen 7 5800X

142

Core-i5 11600K

138

Core-i3 10300

112

Ryzen 7 5700G

135

Ryzen 5 5600X

136

GTA V

GTA V needs no introduction. You won’t find any hardcore gamer that has never played it. What made it most successful is its online open-world nature with a great offline story. Developed by Rockstar Games in 2013, you need to experience it at least once in your life. So, below are its FPS for famous CPUs:

FPS at 1080p resolution with low settings

Processor

FPS

Core-i9 12900K

690

Ryzen 9 5950X

643

Core-i712700K

661

Core-i9 11900K

641

Ryzen 9 3950X

579

Ryzen 7 5800X

614

Core-i5 11600K

605

Core-i3 10300

520

Ryzen 7 5700G

591

Ryzen 5 5600X

597

FPS at 4K resolution with ultra settings

Processor

FPS

Core-i9 12900K

97

Ryzen 9 5950X

89

Core-i712700K

90

Core-i9 11900K

86

Ryzen 9 3950X

77

Ryzen 7 5800X

81

Core-i5 11600K

78

Core-i3 10300

63

Ryzen 7 5700G

77

Ryzen 5 5600X

77

Fortnite

Fortnite is a popular battle royale game made by Epic Games, where 99 players kill each other in a contracting safe zone. The unique feature of the game is that you can build blocks with materials that you gather while exploring the map. It brings versatility in attacks and (particularly) defence. These are its FPS at 1080p and 4K resolutions:

FPS at 1080p resolution with low settings

Processor

FPS

Core-i9 12900K

717

Ryzen 9 5950X

668

Core-i712700K

685

Core-i9 11900K

663

Ryzen 9 3950X

602

Ryzen 7 5800X

636

Core-i5 11600K

626

Core-i3 10300

537

Ryzen 7 5700G

612

Ryzen 5 5600X

618

FPS at 4K resolution with ultra settings

Processor

FPS

Core-i9 12900K

92

Ryzen 9 5950X

84

Core-i712700K

85

Core-i9 11900K

80

Ryzen 9 3950X

73

Ryzen 7 5800X

76

Core-i5 11600K

73

Core-i3 10300

57

Ryzen 7 5700G

71

Ryzen 5 5600X

72

Minecraft

Minecraft is the sold game at the time of writing. With more than 238 million copies sold, it is ahead of GTA V, which has sold a mere 160 million copies. Minecraft is also an open-world game developed by Mojang in 2009. It tests a player’s creativity as he progresses and utilises resources they gathered according to desire. Here are its amazing FPS ratings on popular CPUs:

FPS at 1080p resolution with low settings

Processor

FPS

Core-i9 12900K

1588

Ryzen 9 5950X

1564

Core-i712700K

1632

Core-i9 11900K

1669

Ryzen 9 3950X

1563

Ryzen 7 5800X

1662

Core-i5 11600K

1699

Core-i3 10300

1703

Ryzen 7 5700G

1667

Ryzen 5 5600X

1691

FPS at 4K resolution with ultra settings

Processor

FPS

Core-i9 12900K

497

Ryzen 9 5950X

459

Core-i712700K

464

Core-i9 11900K

441

Ryzen 9 3950X

402

Ryzen 7 5800X

419

Core-i5 11600K

405

Core-i3 10300

329

Ryzen 7 5700G

397

Ryzen 5 5600X

399

Player Unknown’s Battleground (PUBG)

Player Unknown’s Battleground, or better known as PUBG, is another battle royale game that gained immense popularity back in 2018 when it was released by Tencent Games. Today, the game is ruling PCs, consoles, and even mobiles with different styles of gameplay. Below are its FPS for low and ultra settings:

FPS at 1080p resolution with low settings

Processor

FPS

Core-i9 12900K

641

Ryzen 9 5950X

597

Core-i712700K

613

Core-i9 11900K

594

Ryzen 9 3950X

537

Ryzen 7 5800X

569

Core-i5 11600K

560

Core-i3 10300

481

Ryzen 7 5700G

548

Ryzen 5 5600X

553

FPS at 4K resolution with ultra settings

Processor

FPS

Core-i9 12900K

97

Ryzen 9 5950X

89

Core-i712700K

90

Core-i9 11900K

85

Ryzen 9 3950X

77

Ryzen 7 5800X

81

Core-i5 11600K

78

Core-i3 10300

62

Ryzen 7 5700G

76

Ryzen 5 5600X

77

Overwatch

Overwatch is Blizzard Entertainment’s flagship game. Based on team battles, this multiplayer shooting game was released in 2016 and quickly gained popularity due to its great graphics. Mainly, it has four playing modes with 32 playable heroes. It even has global tournaments that are worth-watching. These are its FPS benchmarks:

FPS at 1080p resolution with low settings

Processor

FPS

Core-i9 12900K

955

Ryzen 9 5950X

894

Core-i712700K

919

Core-i9 11900K

895

Ryzen 9 3950X

813

Ryzen 7 5800X

862

Core-i5 11600K

851

Core-i3 10300

744

Ryzen 7 5700G

832

Ryzen 5 5600X

841

FPS at 4K resolution with ultra settings

Processor

FPS

Core-i9 12900K

145

Ryzen 9 5950X

133

Core-i712700K

134

Core-i9 11900K

126

Ryzen 9 3950X

114

Ryzen 7 5800X

119

Core-i5 11600K

115

Core-i3 10300

90

Ryzen 7 5700G

112

Ryzen 5 5600X

113

Cyberpunk 2077

Cyberpunk 2077 has been one of the more controversial game lately. Fans waited for it for over a decade, with teasers like Keanu Reeves featuring, and when it was released a lot of fans were disappointed. Apart from all the negative remarks, the game is still amazing in its category.

It is open world with many astonishing graphics and an interesting storyline. The latest 47.1 GB update solved many graphical, ray-tracing, 4K, and other visual issues. Below are its FPS ratings after the update:

FPS at 1080p resolution with low settings

Processor

FPS

Core-i9 12900K

439

Ryzen 9 5950X

410

Core-i712700K

420

Core-i9 11900K

407

Ryzen 9 3950X

370

Ryzen 7 5800X

391

Core-i5 11600K

384

Core-i3 10300

332

Ryzen 7 5700G

376

Ryzen 5 5600X

380

FPS at 4K resolution with ultra settings

Processor

FPS

Core-i9 12900K

74

Ryzen 9 5950X

69

Core-i712700K

70

Core-i9 11900K

67

Ryzen 9 3950X

61

Ryzen 7 5800X

63

Core-i5 11600K

62

Core-i3 10300

51

Ryzen 7 5700G

60

Ryzen 5 5600X

61

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Microsoft Flight Simulator is easy to enjoy but hard to master. The game is technically a simulation of you flying a plane (as the name suggests). This 83 GB game with incredible graphics was released back in 2020 and soon flew worldwide.

But make sure that you have good hardware, as it stresses every part of your system out. The CPU and GPU are under an immense workload because they have to try and simulate a very detailed world. These are its FPS for various CPUs:

FPS at 1080p resolution with low settings

Processor

FPS

Core-i9 12900K

321

Ryzen 9 5950X

300

Core-i712700K

306

Core-i9 11900K

296

Ryzen 9 3950X

270

Ryzen 7 5800X

284

Core-i5 11600K

279

Core-i3 10300

240

Ryzen 7 5700G

273

Ryzen 5 5600X

275

FPS at 4K resolution with ultra settings

Processor

FPS

Core-i9 12900K

55

Ryzen 9 5950X

51

Core-i712700K

51

Core-i9 11900K

49

Ryzen 9 3950X

45

Ryzen 7 5800X

47

Core-i5 11600K

45

Core-i3 10300

37

Ryzen 7 5700G

45

Ryzen 5 5600X

45

Assassin’s Creed Odyssey

Assassin’s Creed Odyssey was launched by Ubisoft in 2018. It takes us all back to ancient Greece, where you can choose between two protagonists, Alexios and Kassandra. Gamers love the story more than playing with anyone in the open world. Here are the FPS benchmarks:

FPS at 1080p resolution with low settings

Processor

FPS

Core-i9 12900K

476

Ryzen 9 5950X

441

Core-i712700K

453

Core-i9 11900K

437

Ryzen 9 3950X

391

Ryzen 7 5800X

417

Core-i5 11600K

409

Core-i3 10300

344

Ryzen 7 5700G

399

Ryzen 5 5600X

403

FPS at 4K resolution with ultra settings

Processor

FPS

Core-i9 12900K

76

Ryzen 9 5950X

69

Core-i712700K

70

Core-i9 11900K

66

Ryzen 9 3950X

59

Ryzen 7 5800X

62

Core-i5 11600K

60

Core-i3 10300

47

Ryzen 7 5700G

59

Ryzen 5 5600X

59

Shadow of the Tomb Raider

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is another game with built-in benchmarking. It uses DirectX 12, but you can also use DirectX 11. You can view the CPU and GPU performance, rendering times, and 95th percentile.

It is also an open-world game that was released in 2018. The twisting adventures of Lara Croft for artefacts, in the beautiful worlds of Mexico and the USA, keep you glued to your PC for hours at a time. Here are its FPS ratings:

FPS at 1080p resolution with low settings

Processor

FPS

Core-i9 12900K

638

Ryzen 9 5950X

589

Core-i712700K

608

Core-i9 11900K

588

Ryzen 9 3950X

523

Ryzen 7 5800X

561

Core-i5 11600K

552

Core-i3 10300

464

Ryzen 7 5700G

537

Ryzen 5 5600X

543

FPS at 4K resolution with ultra settings

Processor

FPS

Core-i9 12900K

83

Ryzen 9 5950X

76

Core-i712700K

77

Core-i9 11900K

73

Ryzen 9 3950X

66

Ryzen 7 5800X

69

Core-i5 11600K

67

Core-i3 10300

53

Ryzen 7 5700G

65

Ryzen 5 5600X

66

Forza Horizon 4

Forza Horizon 4 is the last game on this list that has a built-in benchmark. It gives you an insight into three frame rates. You can see CPU and GPU rendering, along with CPU simulation. Moreover, it shows the required RAM and VRAM that you need to improve performance.

It is also the only racing game on this list. It was released in 2018 by Turn 10 Studios and Playground Games. The fascinating graphics and enticing races keep gamers hooked. Below are its FPS rating for low and ultra settings:

FPS at 1080p resolution with low settings

Processor

FPS

Core-i9 12900K

728

Ryzen 9 5950X

680

Core-i712700K

697

Core-i9 11900K

675

Ryzen 9 3950X

614

Ryzen 7 5800X

648

Core-i5 11600K

638

Core-i3 10300

551

Ryzen 7 5700G

624

Ryzen 5 5600X

630

FPS at 4K resolution with ultra settings

Processor

FPS

Core-i9 12900K

146

Ryzen 9 5950X

133

Core-i712700K

135

Core-i9 11900K

127

Ryzen 9 3950X

115

Ryzen 7 5800X

120

Core-i5 11600K

116

Core-i3 10300

91

Ryzen 7 5700G

113

Ryzen 5 5600X

114

The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt

The Witcher 3 is a single-player game released in 2015. It doesn’t have many customisations for the player. However, a large map is exciting enough because you get the ability to explore something new each day. You will see fascinating combats due to its interesting graphics. Below are its FPS benchmarks for 1080p and 4K resolutions:

FPS at 1080p resolution with low settings

Processor

FPS

Core-i9 12900K

659

Ryzen 9 5950X

622

Core-i712700K

636

Core-i9 11900K

621

Ryzen 9 3950X

623

Ryzen 7 5800X

601

Core-i5 11600K

594

Core-i3 10300

529

Ryzen 7 5700G

583

Ryzen 5 5600X

588

FPS at 4K resolution with ultra settings

Processor

FPS

Core-i9 12900K

123

Ryzen 9 5950X

111

Core-i712700K

116

Core-i9 11900K

111

Ryzen 9 3950X

96

Ryzen 7 5800X

104

Core-i5 11600K

102

Core-i3 10300

81

Ryzen 7 5700G

99

Ryzen 5 5600X

100

Rocket League

Rocket League is nothing but a crazy man’s dream coming true. It is an insane hybrid yet utterly successful game combining football and racing. The action game was launched back in 2015 by Psyonix. The gamers love the concept, and now, its global tournaments are arranged where many players participate. Here are its FPS ratings:

FPS at 1080p resolution with low settings

Processor

FPS

Core-i9 12900K

1572

Ryzen 9 5950X

1503

Core-i712700K

1548

Core-i9 11900K

1535

Ryzen 9 3950X

1419

Ryzen 7 5800X

1498

Core-i5 11600K

1499

Core-i3 10300

1391

Ryzen 7 5700G

1470

Ryzen 5 5600X

1486

FPS at 4K resolution with ultra settings

Processor

FPS

Core-i9 12900K

232

Ryzen 9 5950X

214

Core-i712700K

217

Core-i9 11900K

206

Ryzen 9 3950X

187

Ryzen 7 5800X

195

Core-i5 11600K

189

Core-i3 10300

153

Ryzen 7 5700G

185

Ryzen 5 5600X

186

Conclusion
Getting a new processor can be challenging. It can affect your gaming experience in both good and bad ways. So, it is vital that you select a CPU after a thorough comparison. Above are the FPS comparisons of 10 AMD and Intel CPU benchmarks that will help you in choosing the right one. Compare the stats, and select the one withthe highest FPS rating in your budget range. Happy Gaming!

If you need more help deciding which CPU you should buy check out this article on a guide of how to and this article outlining the top Intel CPUs.

If you have any questions feel free to contact me, you can use the comments section below or a contact form.

Did you find this article helpful? Let us know in the comments below and feel free to share it with your friends and family!

What’s Next?
We have a few ideas on what articles we want to write in the coming weeks, we host polls on our Instagram Page to see what our community wants more articles on.

For our next article, the community has settled on a piece talking about the best AMD processors in 2022.

Let us know if you have any content suggestions below and let us know what you think of this article.

8 Ways to Test Your Computer’s Performance

There are three things you can look at endlessly: flowing water, a burning fire, and… a spinning Windows cursor. Yes, if the computer is not distinguished by “mind” and performance, it will take a long time to contemplate the green (or blue) wheel while waiting for programs to start.

Productivity (speed) of a PC is a multifaceted and relative concept. To help us figure out whether it is sufficient, many tests and evaluations have been devised. But the final conclusions can only be drawn by a person — the user.

Types of PC performance evaluation

To check the performance of your computer and give it a subjective assessment, be guided, first of all, by your own feelings.

Your PC or laptop is powerful enough if:

It loads quickly and shuts down the operating system.

Installed applications and games start without a long wait.

You can use as many programs as you want (within reason), work with files of any size and not experience discomfort from delays. Slowdowns due to peripherals or low internet speeds don’t count.

Failure to meet at least one of these conditions indicates insufficient computer power for specific tasks. But this does not always mean that the device is weak. Compared to others, it can be much more powerful and faster.

The performance of computer equipment is assessed by two different approaches:

According to the correspondence of hardware and software capabilities to the tasks for which the device is used or intended.

Compared to reference (benchmarking). A device with a conditionally “ideal” speed is taken as a standard when performing laboratory operations (synthetic and semi-synthetic tests) that are close to real work on a PC. Benchmark testing shows how much the tested computer is faster or, conversely, slower than the reference one. As benchmarks, programs specially designed for this purpose are used, as well as ordinary applications and games loaded with test work (playing videos, scripts, etc.). The results of the test are evaluated by the number of points scored or real values, for example, the speed of data exchange between the processor and memory in Mb / s.

Performance evaluation can be carried out both for individual devices, for example, only processors or hard drives, or comprehensively for the entire system. In a comprehensive assessment of the level of PC performance, it is customary to consider the average of all its components, and in some cases, the weakest link.

Which computer components to compare

Processor (CPU) Benchmark

First of all, you should compare your processor. After all, it is not simply called the central processing unit.

While many games rely on the GPU, you still need to make sure your CPU is up to par before purchasing the latest games. In addition, CPU performance applies to the entire system, not just games or videos like the GPU does.

If we imagine a computer as a body, then the processor will be its brain, indispensable and more important than any other part.

Graphics Card (GPU) Benchmark

Next comes the GPU, which has the most impact on gaming performance…unless it’s bottlenecked by other components or the game is CPU bound instead of GPU bound.

The GPU will do most of the work in your games and many of your testing applications. If there are any instabilities or issues with your GPU, these tests should show them as well as give you an idea of your build’s performance.

Whole System Benchmark

Last but not least, Whole System Benchmark! It usually doesn’t make sense to run tests on individual components other than the CPU and GPU, so a full system test is used.

In any case, with the help of complete system tests, you can easily and accurately obtain data about your memory and drives. The only time it makes sense to run tests on individual components is if you are a reviewer or journalist, but this is not necessary for consumers.

How to evaluate the speed of your computer on the fly

In the era of Windows 7, it was a piece of cake to find out how powerful the device you have on your desk or store counter was. It was enough to open its Control Panel, go to the «System Properties» section — and here they are, the cherished numbers.

Windows 10 does not have this feature, but there are third-party apps that successfully replace it. These are free WSAT and Winaero WEI Tool.

Both utilities work without installation on the computer and give the same results. To find out the performance index according to Windows calculations, you just need to run them.

Comparison and verification of processor characteristics

All characteristics of a particular processor can be viewed on the official website of the manufacturer. After installing the processor in your computer, see if the characteristics correspond to the declared ones.

Open the classic Task Manager (relevant for the latest versions of Windows 10). Go to Performance > CPU (Central Processing Unit).

Compare processor specifications. For example, look at the base frequency and the current operating speed. Check the number of physical kernels and log. streams. Additionally, you can view the characteristics of the processor in the BIOS or UEFI.

Now it’s very important, you buy a laptop and see the top processor from Intel. What is your surprise when, after reinstalling the operating system, the processor has changed. Directly on its CPU cover, you can see the exact model.

Online Speed Test

To test the speed of your PC and its individual components with the following tools, you will need nothing more than a browser and Internet access.

During the test, it is recommended to close all programs and close browser tabs, except for the working one, which should be expanded to full screen. This will allow you to get the most reliable indicators.

CPU Expert

The CPU Expert service is designed to measure the speed of processors of desktop systems, servers, laptops and mobile gadgets online. Its set includes two tests: CPU Benchmark and CPU Stress.

The CPU Benchmark lets you analyze your CPU performance for free and see how fast it compares to others. After completing the test, which lasts 5 minutes, you will receive a permanent link to the result and can share it with other people.

The CPU Stress test lets you see how fast your processor can perform under stress. How much to load it, you determine yourself, the duration of testing — too. To control the results, 5 scales are displayed on the screen: speed, number of threads, load level (power), points (number of calculated hashes) and FPS (number of frames per second that the browser can display). More detailed instructions for taking measurements during stress testing are given on his page in English.

SilverBench

SilverBench is another free online service that allows you to measure and compare your PC’s processor performance with benchmarks. It includes 3 sets of tests:

Benchmark — a quick test with a basic load level.

Extreme test — an enhanced test that lasts about 10 times longer than the basic test.

Stress test – stress test without automatic stop. It determines the FPS in relation to the number of frames played.

The page below shows the results of the latest checks and the best scores obtained from different users.

BrowserBench.org

The BrowserBench.org service is designed to evaluate the overall performance of computers and mobile devices by the speed of performing certain operations in the browser.

BrowserBench also includes 3 test suites:

JetStream 2 is a set of JavaScript and WebAssembly algorithms for diagnosing browser performance when running modern web applications. It reflects the combined speed of the processor, graphics and RAM.

MotionMark is a graphics system benchmark that measures browser performance when animating complex scenes at a given frame rate.

Speedometer — The job of this test is to measure the responsiveness of web applications by simulating user actions. It serves to evaluate the performance of all major computer systems.

Speed-Battle

Speed-Battle is another popular online tool for evaluating PC performance by browsing. It can be used to determine:

Which of the installed web browsers is the fastest.

Which operating system is faster when using the same computer and browser.

Which computer runs faster when using the same operating system and browser.

There is only one set of tests. Its result is displayed without much detail in a small pivot table. Under it are the average, maximum and minimum indicators among all users of the service.

HeavyLoad

HeavyLoad measures the performance of the processor at maximum load. In addition, you can use the program to test the graphics processor (i.e. video card) and RAM.

How to use the HeavyLoad program

Start the program, open the Test Options section in the menu.

Select Stress CPU.

Click the Play — Start selected tests icon.

Wait for test results.

In the HeavyLoad settings, you can specify the number of cores to test and the priority.

The best applications for checking PC performance

Checking using online services is convenient because it is simple and does not require additional steps for downloading, installing, etc. However, according to experienced people, it is not particularly accurate and is very limited in set tools.

Specialized programs that are installed on a disk or run from a USB flash drive, allow for accurate, narrowly targeted testing of individual subsystems and computer devices. In addition to measuring performance, they provide an opportunity to obtain information about the characteristics of iron, its condition, health, serviceability, and even identify some problems.

Aida64: A multifaceted assessment of system parameters and stability

Aida64 is perhaps one of the most, if not the most popular PC hardware information gathering program with testing functions (benchmarking, stability). It is available in several paid editions, two of which — Engineer and Extreme, contain the functionality we are interested in.

The Aida64 test suite includes:

Disk Benchmark is a collection of hard drive, SSD, RAID evaluation algorithms.

Cache & Memory Benchmark — cache and memory speed estimation algorithms.

GPGPU Benchmark — graphics system benchmark.

Monitor Diagnostics — monitor diagnostic test.

Reading from memory.

Write to memory.

Memory copy.

Delays in memory.

CPU Queen, CPU ZLib, CPU AES, CPU PhotoWorxx, FPU Julia, FPU Mandel and a number of other CPU speed tests. Explanations for them are given in the main window of Aida64 in the «Test» section.

Maxon Cinebench — a comprehensive processor performance test

Maxon Cinebench — a free benchmark for evaluating the performance of the latest generation of processors (with SSE3 support). Unlike analogues, this program allows you to test the full functionality of the CPU in the process of rendering three-dimensional scenes generated by the Cinema 4D engine. For comparison: the majority of benchmarks use abstract synthetic tests that allow you to evaluate only individual processor functions.

The current version of the benchmark — Cinebench R23, tests the performance of both all and one core. The minimum duration of the test can be set manually in the program settings.

Maxon Cinebench has an English-language, but rather simple interface: to start the test, just press the «Start» button, to stop — «Stop». Because rendering 3D images puts a lot of stress on the CPU, it’s a good idea to control CPU heat.

To minimize the influence of background processes on the test results, the benchmark developers recommend running it in command line mode. Launch parameters are given on the official product page.

Although the benchmark uses a graphics scene, Maxon Cinebench does not evaluate graphics card performance. To do this, there are other, no less worthy benchmarks — 3D Mark , Furmark , etc. What are these programs and how to evaluate video performance with their help is described in the article on the test of a video card for stability and performance.

They will put down almost any computer. Top Benchmark Games

Approximately once every few years, games appear whose system requirements can be summed up in the laconic phrase “you need a top PC”. If some computers are capable of running such a product at maximum settings, then they are only absurdly expensive. And sometimes it takes years for the next generation of video cards and processors to somehow begin to cope with the game. Together with ASUS, we recalled such projects: some of them are new, others are more than ten years old, but even taking into account their age, they can get on the nerves of an average gaming computer.

Crysis

The German studio Crytek became famous for its high-tech shooters. It all started with Far Cry, which impressed with its sunsets and lush greenery of the jungle. Then the rights to the franchise were transferred to Ubisoft, and Crytek took up a new product — Crysis. For the game, the company wrote its own CryEngine engine, which gave gamers a lot of problems.

The fact is that at the time of the release of the game in 2007, there was literally no computer that could show Crysis the way it looked on promotional screenshots. It was a constant compromise: you set the quality of textures and effects to «very high» — get ready to give in to anti-aliasing and draw distance or twist other visual settings. In fact, it all came down to finding acceptable parameters when the game looks beautiful and at the same time shows at least 30 frames per second. In the case of low and medium picture settings, everything was fine, but the Crysis feature is in an amazing physical model and phenomenal graphics.

The game itself, oddly enough, is not that much of a success: yes, it has a free world with the ability to independently plan and carry out an attack, different game situations, but at the same time a primitive plot and the absence of bright choreographed moments. By the way, Crytek fixed this in the second and third parts of Crysis — also real benchmarks for hardware. But still, Crysis is a unique game: even 14 years after the release, it looks decent.

Cyberpunk 2077

Released at the end of last year, «long-term», to put it mildly, did not turn out as gamers expected. The point is in the disgusting state of the game: a ton of bugs, constant freezes and crashes, poor balance and terrible optimization — it seems that this has not happened since Gothic 3. Nevertheless, Cyberpunk 2077 is an excellent adventure for dozens of hours, a game with CD Projekt RED signature style, great character and story development. It is also a new benchmark for the coming years.

The game uses newfangled ray tracing technology, which adds to the load on the system. The recommended requirements for playing at maximum settings at 4K resolution are impressive: Core i7 or Ryzen 5 3600, a GeForce 2080 RTX or Radeon RX6800 XT video card with 8 GB of video memory, 16 GB of RAM. Imagine such a car? Now keep in mind that these are the recommended requirements without ray tracing. For this technology, a video card no worse than GeForce RTX 3070 is recommended.

As a reward for such a computer, Cyberpunk 2077 will delight you with chic views of Night City: dazzling neon signs, a beautiful play of light and shadow, and high detail of the environment. True, this does not save you from bugs, but the visual component of the action movie is really worthy of the highest rating.

Company of Heroes

The Canadians from Relic Entertainment in 2006 released a spectacular World War II strategy game that could easily take down a very powerful PC. Now the recommended requirements seem ridiculous: 3 GHz processor, GeForce 6800 level video card with 256 MB of memory, 1 GB of RAM. But for real 60 frames per second, and even on a large monitor, the hardware should ideally be even more powerful. And don’t forget: the game came out 15 years ago.

Company of Heroes impressed with the detail: here we are looking at the battlefield from a height, where fighters are the size of ants, and then with a long scroll of the mouse wheel we are already examining infantrymen in close-up — and they are drawn almost like in medium-sized shooters. Such tricks required very productive hardware.

Perhaps, at that time, only the Total War series could produce a comparable level of picture in strategies, but Company of Heroes wins due to its entertainment. Traced bullets, juicy explosions, voluminous smoke from burning vehicles, beautiful destructibility of shelters — Relic Entertainment has embodied the real Hollywood in the game.

Resident Evil Village

The new part of the horror Resident Evil continued the line of the previous game. The protagonist Ethan Winters this time finds himself in a Romanian village, in which something is clearly going on. The game alternates many locations: a village, a castle, swamps, dungeons, a factory — and they all look great, and the same can be said about monsters: the creatures look disgusting in a good way. All this entailed serious system requirements.

Full HD 60fps Resident Evil Village requires Intel Core i7 8700 or AMD Ryzen 53600, AMD Radeon RX 5700 or Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 graphics card, 16GB RAM. But there is an addition to these requirements: fps can sag in saturated scenes. Moreover, the game supports ray tracing, and for this technology, prepare a GeForce RTX 2070 or Radeon RX6700 XT. Such requests make Village one of the most demanding games on hardware.

S.T.A.L.K.E.R.: Shadow of Chernobyl

The legendary «long-term construction» also became a regular guest in iron performance tests in the second half of the 2000s. Minimum S.T.A.L.K.E.R. were at first glance divine: a processor with a frequency of 2 GHz, 512 MB of RAM, a 128 MB video card. But here, as in the case of Crysis, the game reveals itself only at high graphics settings: the zone becomes especially gloomy and ominous, the artifacts look more bewitching, and the thunderclouds above the abandoned research institutes look so cool! However, this required a computer of a completely different level.

The X-Ray engine was announced back in 2001, and S.T.A.L.K.E.R. came out in 2007. Despite a decent age for the engine, X-Ray showed a very decent picture. Most of the technical issues were due to bugs, but S.T.A.L.K.E.R. ruled patches and in general quickly brought to mind. In addition, a powerful fan community helped: it’s not a problem to find mods with improved textures, effects, and so on. As for the game itself, now the shooter, although it is perceived as outdated, but causes an attack of nostalgia regularly. And judging by the trailer of the second part, the developers from GSC Game World will put pressure on “return my 2007”.

Project CARS 2

Races are almost equal in quality of graphics with the broadcasts of real car competitions. If on consoles the picture standards are set by Gran Turismo and Forza (although it is already on the PC), then on computers there is another top series — Project CARS. An important note right away: this is a game for real motorsport fans who, with a happy smile, are ready to monotonously wind dozens of laps around the track, avoiding collisions and violations of the rules. If you are used to something like FlatOut, this is definitely not for you.

Project CARS 2 shows excellent detailing of cars and tracks, and also works out the effects great — which is worth only the most beautiful voluminous raindrops on the body. It’s not even appropriate to talk about the quality of the cars themselves: amazing workmanship down to the smallest detail. Unfortunately, the price to pay for this is the system requirements. The game requires a Core Intel i7 6700K, a GeForce 1080 GTX graphics card, and 16 GB of RAM. If you’re planning to run Project CARS 2 at 4K resolution, then prepare an even more powerful graphics card.

Red Dead Redemption 2

Rockstar’s sequel to the western appeared according to the company’s usual scheme: first the version for consoles, and then for the PC — with an improved picture. The graphics even on the previous generation consoles in the game are more than tolerable, and Rockstar manages to optimize their products well. In the case of computers, the situation is generally the same, but the hardware requirements for the game are very high.

The game is especially CPU finicky: Core i7 4770K or Ryzen 5 1500X recommended. The requirements for the video card are slightly weaker: the GeForce GTX 1060 will do, but something more modern is better. And add to this 12 GB of RAM, and in order to be completely sure of stable fps at high resolution and maximum settings, 16 GB will not be superfluous.

But it all pays off, because Red Dead Redemption 2 is not only one of the best games of recent years, but also one of the most beautiful. You can endlessly look at the rider galloping into the sunset, whose horse raises a column of dust, at atmospheric saloons with an abundance of details and at the most beautiful cities that are filled with life.

Hitman 2

Stealth action with format change only got better: huge locations allow you to complete missions for hours, discovering more and more new ways to «solve the issue» that cannot be resolved without Agent 47. The game is very measured, thoughtful and requires a lot of attention, although you can get an assault rifle in the old fashioned way and kill everyone in a row. However, this is not held in high esteem here: aerobatics is to complete a mission without ever arousing the suspicions of the guards and killing only the target, and not with a shot or a noose, but by rigging an accident (say, a chandelier suddenly falls on a person or he, as it were, accidentally drinks poison instead of guilt).

The system requirements of the game are solid. A powerful processor of the level Intel Core i7 4790 with a frequency of 4 GHz, GeForce GTX 1070 or Radeon RX Vega 56 with 8 GB of video memory and as much as 16 GB of RAM is recommended. At 4K resolution, even this may not be enough. But during the game, there are no questions about where so many computer resources go: in Hitman 2 there is excellent lighting without unnatural glare, high-quality character models, detailed environments.

Powerful and portable ROG Strix SCAR 15 with Windows 10 Pro! Opto-mechanical keyboard for precise control, powerful components with AMD Ryzen 9 processorThe 5900HX and the GeForce RTX 3080 graphics card deliver quality images on a display that is available in two options: fast (300Hz / 3ms) or high resolution (WQHD / 165Hz). Modern gaming platform with excellent performance — an advantage in any fight!

The special project was prepared with the support of DeltaStream LLC, UNP 192492702. About the design of Windows 11

«Games are made by teams, not individuals.» World of Warships Product Director on his job and the indispensability of

Our channel in Telegram. Join now!

Got something to talk about? Write to our telegram bot. This is anonymous and fast. [email protected]

News Benchmark — Shazoo

cyber_samovar 14:00, March 9, 2022

2

Basemark releases the world’s first cross-platform ray tracing benchmark

Yesterday, the Finnish company Basemark announced the release of the world’s first free cross-platform ray tracing benchmark called Relic of Life. The program supports Windows 10/11, Linux, macOS, Android and iOS. From the supported APIs on…

carduckx7 19:00 December 9, 2021

29

Rumor: Named the best budget processors for gaming PCs

On the Chinese Bilibili platform, a user posted screenshots of the benchmark results for the Intel Core i3-12300 and Core i3-12100 processors. None of them have yet been officially confirmed by Intel. Despite this, the test results are really impressive. Processors allegedly tested …

cyber_samovar 13:00, September 29, 2021

105

20-30 FPS on high settings in Cyberpunk 2077 — the first tests of Steam Deck

Tom’s Hardware, citing a Chinese enthusiast who received a Steam Deck devkit, published the first tests of Valve’s portable PC in some games. The results are really great, especially in a monster like Cyberpunk 2077. At high…

Cohen 21:15, 23 September 2021

22

GeForce Experience UI can drop framerates in games like Cyberpunk 2077

The GeForce Experience interface is quite useful, especially for those who record gameplay or like to monitor performance. In some cases, this Nvidia application helps to increase the frame rate, however, new benchmarks indicate that …

scavenz 11:15, June 9, 2020

eleven

New Ryzen 7 3800XT processor spotted in Ashes of Singularity test

AMD is rumored to be introducing new Matisse Refresh processors next week. The line of fresh chips will include three models, one of which appeared in the Ashes of Singularity game test. We are talking about Ryzen 7 3800XT….

scavenz 12:00 November 14, 2019

21

Crytek releases neon noir CryEngine benchmark

In March, Crytek announced that by the end of this year, CryEngine will have ray tracing on all graphics cards. At the same time, the company published a Neon Noir video demonstrating the technology. Now the benchmark can be downloaded for free from the official website and…

CryptoNick 15:20, October 30, 2019

25

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare performance analysis — good job

DSOG has analyzed the performance of Call of Duty: Modern Warfare. According to Infinity Ward, the game uses a new engine and supports DirectX 12. An Intel i9 9900K with 16GB of DDR4 memory on…

was used for this test.

Cohen 08:00, June 27, 2019

22

3D Mark supports PCIe 4.0 benchmark — what it looks like

UL Benchmarks has announced that PCIe 4. 0 testing is now available through its 3D Mark benchmark program. According to the developers, 3DMark PCI Express includes a test that measures the throughput of your GPU when working through the PCI Express interface. Fourth…

Cohen 09:20, January 11, 2019

45

Official AMD Radeon VII benchmarks in 25 games

AMD has shared the first official benchmark of the Radeon VII graphics card unveiled at CES 2019. The company compared the performance of the new flagship with the RX Vega 64 in 25 games and the result is generally in line with what you can expect from the GPU. …

Cohen 17:40, January 9, 2019

9

Port Royal’s ray-traced benchmark comes to 3D Mark

Futuremark has released a new version of its 3D Mark Port Royal Raytracing Benchmark for PC ray tracing testing. Unfortunately, Port Royal is currently only available in the advanced and professional 3D Mark version, that is…

Cohen 12:00, 15 September 2018

33

Official tests of the RTX 2080 Ti and RTX 2080 graphics cards in 12 games

Nvidia has published its own performance charts for the new GeForce RTX 2080 Ti and RTX 2080 graphics cards compared to the previous flagship. And not simple ones, but all of them were carried out in modern games with 4K resolution and maximum settings…

Cohen 06:40 pm February 2, 2018

51

8K screenshots of Final Fantasy XV from the PC version

Beware, this collection of 8K screenshots is very heavy. If you are on the site from a mobile device and with limited traffic, then watch the frames only after connecting to Wi-Fi! You can see all this for yourself…

Cohen 15:00, July 5, 2017

59

Microsoft’s first official Xbox One X benchmark

Eurogamer, which in April unveiled the technical specifications of the Xbox One X, the most powerful gaming console capable of displaying games in native 4K (a number of titles with upscaling). Eurogamer today released the official Xbox One X benchmarks made by Microsoft…

TOMCREO 18:05, March 5, 2017

174

AMD Ryzen Processor Benchmarks — AMD is back in the game

The latest processor architecture from AMD was not very successful, and in general, things were not going well for AMD. In the absence of competition in the processor market, Intel has almost completely captured the market, but now everything may change. …

TOMCREO 17:45, February 22, 2017

42

New leak of AMD Ryzen R7 1700x benchmarks

Only a week is left before the embargo is lifted, but apparently some journalists can’t resist and they leak the test results of the latest AMD processors to the network. These tests have leaked from the xfastest.com resource, at the moment the article is password protected. On the ground…

Test AMD Athlon X4 860K in 20 games in 2022. 8 year old CPU in modern games? GECID.com.

::>Processors
>2022
> Test AMD Athlon X4 860K in 20 games in 2022. 8 year old CPU in modern games?

01-07-2022

It’s been a while since we mentioned such a good old AMD Athlon X4 860K back in 2014. This processor probably still works for someone in home or work computers and performs various tasks. And someone, perhaps, is only eyeing something from this series on the used market to use as the basis for a budget build. Well, let’s find out what this 4-core is capable of in 2022 using the example of 20 modern games.

First of all, it is worth recalling what kind of beast this is — Athlon X4 860K. The processor is designed for the FM2+ platform. It has four cores based on the Kaveri architecture, structurally very similar to the blocks in AMD’s FX line of processors.

Namely, they have a modular layout with dual FPU and separate ALUs. The solution is ambiguous and has a lot of shortcomings. For example, there is a difficulty with the efficient parallelization of tasks on all 4 available threads.

The main difference between Athlon X4 860K and FX is the absence of the 3rd level cache, which is very important for this platform. However, the architecture itself is a bit fresher and even supports PCI Express 3.0. Other parameters are as follows: process technology — 28 nm, frequency — from 3.7 to 4 GHz, total level 2 cache — 4 MB, TDP — 95 watts. The processor has support for DDR3 memory up to 2133 MHz and even faster if you’re lucky. And the unlocked multiplier allows for further overclocking.

We will test the processor in the following system and, looking ahead, we note that it is not even close to being the optimal budget compilation. The components are selected so that the processor works at its maximum level, and it is convenient for us to assemble and test.

The ASRock Fatal1ty FM2A88X+ Killer became the «house» for the Athlon X4 860K. This is a 2013 gaming solution based on the AMD A88X chipset, which stands out with a good 4 + 2-phase power subsystem, so the board offers good overclocking capabilities.

For CPU cooling, which we are planning to overclock, we have chosen Pan’s Corsair iCUE h250i Elite Capellix RGB liquid cooling system. Its three 120mm fans are not only beautiful due to RGB LEDs, but also reliable — they are based on a magnetic levitation bearing. No wonder Corsair gives it a 5-year warranty.

The 16 GB RAM was equipped with two G.Skill Trident X DDR3-2400 sticks. In stock, we ran it at 1600 MHz, and entrusted the selection of timings to automation. In overclocking, we chose an XMP profile with a frequency of 2400 MHz and timings of 10-12-12-31.

In order not to run into the graphics subsystem in any case, we took the top-end video card Sapphire Radeon RX 6900 XT NITRO + SE . The video memory on it is as much as 16 GB, how much, how much RAM is in our test bench.

We have this video card from the Telemart.ua online store, where there is a wide selection of new components for assembling a computer for work, education and games. In general, for any scenarios and any wallet. Yes, and ready-made PCs are also available.

Installed the system and utilities on a 960 GB SATA SSD Patriot Burst .

Games were launched from the 2-terabyte Patriot Burst Elite , the performance of which turned out to be even higher than the declared ones — about 560 MB / s for reading and a little more than 500 MB / s for writing. Under ideal conditions, of course.

The Corsair RM750x White 9 power supply was trusted to power the system with confidence0027 with a power of 750 watts. It has an 80 PLUS gold certification and over 90% efficiency, and is equipped with all-Japanese capacitors. Whoever watches our PSU reviews knows that this indicates a high reliability of the element base.

Everything «pieces of iron» sheltered the case Corsair 5000D Tempered Glass White , made in the Mid-Tower format. The model is very large and heavy, but at the same time quite spacious and functional. The organization of cable management deserves special praise. Yes, and the 360-mm «dropsy» has become, like a native, on the top panel.

Separately, we want to note the gaming mouse, with which pixels were driven around the screen. This is an updated version of the famous Endgame Gear XM1 — XM1R Dark Frost . The novelty received a translucent case, pleasant and fast Kailh GM 8.0 switches and a sensor with a sensitivity from 50 to 19000 dpi. And to make sliding like clockwork, Endgame also has its own gaming mats, for example, MPC-450 Cordura .

By the way, Endgame brand products are available exclusively on the website of our friends — Telemart.ua.

Configuration

Designation

Processor

AMD Athlon X4 860K

Motherboards

ASRock Fatal1ty FM2A88X+ Killer

Cooling system

Corsair iCUE h250i Elite Capellix RGB

RAM

G. Skill Trident X 2x8GB DDR3-2400

Video card

Sapphire Radeon RX 6900XT NITRO+ SE

Accumulators

Patriot Burst 960GB
Patriot Burst Elite 1.92TB

Power supply

Corsair RM750x White 750W

Housing

Corsair 5000D Tempered Glass White

Monitor

AOC U2790PQU

Periphery

Endgame Gear XM1R Dark Frost + Endgame MPC-450 Cordura

In conclusion, we note that a monitor AOC U2790 PQU was used to display the image. And gameplays were recorded on a separate PC with a capture card AVerMedia Live Gamer 4 K so as not to lose a single frame.

Now overclocking, because the processor supports it. After short experiments, it was possible to stabilize the system by the following values:

the bus multiplier was set to 43, due to which the core frequency was increased to 4300 MHz;

the voltage was fixed at 1.45 V;

the northbridge frequency was raised to 2000 MHz at 1.43 V;

enabled the XMP memory profile at 2400 MHz.

And now, in order to evaluate the bonuses from these manipulations, let’s make a mini-comparison in 4 synthetic and 3 game benchmarks.

V CPU- Z Benchmark overclocking improved AMD Athlon X4 860K performance by 13% in single-threaded mode and 15% in multi-threaded.

Geekbench 5.4.5 estimated the improvement at about the same relative units — 13% and 12% for one and many cores, respectively.

But CineBench R23 was better able to open Athlon in multithreading. After overclocking, the results improved by 32%. In single-threaded mode, the increase correlates with other benchmarks — 15%.

And finally, working with memory in AIDA64 . Reading and copying became faster by 29% and 44% respectively. The recording, one might say, remained at the same level — an improvement of only 5%, and the speed of memory access, or latency, improved by 16%.

Therefore, on average, overclocking in synthetics accelerated the system by 16%. Now let’s see how much it will be in games.

Assassin’ s Creed: Valhalla launched in Full HD resolution with «Low» graphics settings. Render left at 100%. If you look at the dry numbers, the difference does not seem to be significant. For example, the average fps was 54, but it became 66. But in relative units, this is a 22% increase. The minimum drawdown, that is, the 0.1% Low indicator, improved by almost 30%. And this is already a noticeable acceleration!

In Cyberpunk 2077, also selected the «Low» graphics preset. Again, if you look at the situation in general, the bonus is excellent. Rare events improved from 12 to 17 fps, and average frame rate improved from 36 to 47 fps. This is a 30% increase.

Forza Horizon 5 , with the same «low» settings, pleased with about the same results. Overclocking the processor improved the average frequency by 27% and tightened the drawdown by 15%.

To recap. Overclocking the Athlon X4 860K improved performance in synthetics, that is, work tasks, by an average of 16% and by about 25% in games. This is a great result! Although with a certain amount of luck and straight hands, you can get a little more. So, if the system components allow, be sure to use this option.

We leave the system in overclocking and look forward to the main dish — a gameplay test in 20 modern and relevant games in popular Full HD. We have no doubt that all of them will be launched, because Athlon X4 860K, despite its 8 years, supports all the necessary technologies and instructions. But will it be possible to get a beautiful picture and an acceptable gameplay? That’s the intrigue!

Starting with Apex Legends at maximum graphics settings on the Olympus map. I did not like the first match at all because of the constant twitching, which sometimes gave way to subfreezes. All in all, it’s very frustrating to play.

But we decided to try again and there was no limit to our surprise. The average frame rate has changed from 56 to 76 fps, and the drawdown has changed from 20 to 30 fps. Thus, if you go to more than one “skating rink” and have a little patience, you can play, and even with maximum graphics. In this case, it is desirable to activate the frame rate limit at 60 fps or enable V-Sync, which stabilizes the smoothness of the video sequence.

First time in Assassin Creed: Valhalla ran around the Ravenstrop location with minimal graphics settings. Well, how we ran, running is, by definition, a continuous process. And when your character hangs in the air for a second or two, this is a different discipline. In general, seriously, the processor does not have enough power to pull up assets in a timely manner, so the game pauses while it goes about its business.

Unsurprisingly, the game experience can be improved by limiting the frame rate to 30 fps. Plus, enable «Ultra» graphics, if the video card allows. Seems like the numbers have dropped a lot. For example, rare events from 33 to 22 fps and the frame time graph are terrible. But there is a big «BUT»! The processor finally has time, and the game goes on without «pauses». Of course, I want more smoothness, but it’s a sin to complain about the almost stable 30 fps and the most beautiful picture. 8 years ago we would have called this cool console gameplay.

Battlefield 2042 launched in «Conquest» mode for 128 players on the lowest chart. With this game, we had a short conversation. Such an online Athlon X4 860K simply does not pull, with any settings and all our attempts.

B C oD: Warzone tricked us into an approximately low level of graphics, but the resolution of textures and shadows, as well as anti-aliasing, were left at the maximum. This is the best that we managed to squeeze out of the processor’s capabilities. At first, the drawdown matches were the largest — up to 19k / s. Then they decreased and the frequency stabilized at 40 fps. However, the twitches still remained, plus there were some problems with the sound. In general, it is unpleasant to play, but it is possible. Unfortunately, any limits, V-Sync and simplification of settings do not improve the situation.

In Cyberpunk 2077, didn’t want to bully the 8 year old Athlon too much, so they stayed on the low preset. You can only play if you really want to. For comparison, if you played Crysis on a GeForce 6600 GT with 128 MB of video memory, you can do it here too. After all, despite the miserable indicators of monitoring and drawdowns up to 11 fps, the control is quite obedient.

Deathloop managed to roam with high graphics and relatively comfortable gameplay. Yes, sometimes there are frame rate dips up to 24 fps, but on average we have 38 fps. In general, the picture is quite smooth, and the controls are obedient.

The choice of high quality graphics in Dying Light 2 surprisingly did not make the processor «bo-bo». In the first few minutes, the game caches the necessary data, which makes it a little dull. Then everything passes and the average frame rate balances around 91 fps is a great result. The only thing to consider is that there are unpleasant subfreezes at the junction of locations.

Continues the successful streak for Athlon Dota 2 on medium graphics. At first she twitches a little, but then goes without nuances. The gameplay is comfortable, and the average frame rate is over 60 fps, with drawdowns in the region of 40 during heavy fights. Monitoring caught somewhere around 24 fps at 0.1% Low, but this is indeed a very rare event.

Escape From Tarkov launched in PvE mode and graphics on «Ultra». On the Shoreline map. It is pleasant to play, there are almost no freezes, and the control is excellent. On average, monitoring counted 54 fps with a minimum of 0.1% low — 36 fps. When switching from «Ultra» to «High» graphics, you can add 2-4 more frames.

But in Far Cry 6 our Athlon sharply cuts off the positive mood with any graphics settings. There is no point in looking for a balance of beauty and smoothness. There is neither one nor the other — the processor does not pull.

It’s good that there is Forza Horizon 5 , which allows you to hit the pedals with slippers and turn on the «High» level of graphics. Of course, somewhere unpleasant little things can suddenly pop up, like drunken pedestrians at night, but in general everything is fine. On average, 75 fps and somewhere sometimes slips 25 fps.

And there is an option to go up to «Ultra» graphics. The game becomes a little more beautiful and sometimes less smooth — 65 and 20 fps, respectively. The choice is yours.

Fortnite and «High» graphics preset with 100% render scale. Not bad, very good… from the second match. Let’s say right away that in this case you can not look at the indicator of 0.1%. The closest to reality is the average fps, and it is excellent — the processor manages to cook about 70 frames per second. It was thought that the frequency limit or V-Sync equalizes 0.1%, but nothing changes. So don’t worry and play calmly.

God of War is nuanced, but still playable with the Original preset. The gameplay is relatively convenient, at least when exploring locations and when fighting a couple of monsters. With the sensitivity of the control, everything is basically fine, except that sometimes the camera reacts too quickly to mouse movement. If you need more stability, you can limit the frame rate to 30 fps.

Multiplayer Halo Infinite paired with the Athlon X4 860K violates the laws of physics and encroaches on Einstein’s theory of relativity. The fact is that with «Ultra» graphics, the performance is better than with «Low». Of the negative — only shaking camera. Is this how the developers intended it, or lags? Who plays Halo — unsubscribe, is this normal?

On «Ultra» 0.1% was 29 fps, and on «Low» it was almost half that. At the same time, for some reason, the game actively starts pulling data from the drive. The Covenant must have staged a diversion.

Hitman 3 can be played with «High» graphics. On average, it will be 45 fps, and in places where there are a large number of NPCs, you can observe a drawdown below 30 fps. Given the slow pace of the gameplay, this is quite forgivable.

For PUBG , the “folk” preset is the most optimal, namely low settings plus anti-aliasing and textures on “Ultra”. Although the gameplay is not very comfortable due to constant slowdowns and twitching of the video sequence. On the record, it’s not particularly noticeable, but when you play — there is a difference. For an online battle royale game, however, this is a critical moment. But perhaps not for everyone — an average of 75 fps.

Rainbow Six: Siege traditionally does not fail. Even with «Ultra» graphics and 100% render scale. There are a handful of blunts at first, but they quickly disappear like an advance at the beginning of the month. As a result, an average of 128 fps, smooth video sequence and excellent control.

Improved «engine» and «high» graphics is a good choice for Warframe . Here, as with PUBG, there is a feeling of constant micro-jerks. Therefore, despite the nice picture and cool average fps, the situation is as follows: in general, it is quite comfortable to play, but we assume that weak twitches can distract someone.

Surprisingly, Resident Evil 8: Village started up fine with «Maximum» graphics settings. At first, of course, there were some little things, but at the 19th game you no longer pay attention to this — we saw it and we know what will happen. An average of 72 l / s and precise control.

And another beautiful project that made me happy in the end — Rust . With «maximum» settings, it ran fine at 52 fps on average. The 0.1% low indicator does not look very accurate, but in fact everything is quite ok — it does not hurt your eyes. The only doubt creeps into the account of the fullness of the server. Maybe everything is so good, because he is only a third killed?

Conclusions

Well, 20 games are over, some of which were launched primarily for sporting interest. Now let’s move on to the conclusions. With the Athlon X4 860K processor, the monitoring numbers don’t always match the live gameplay experience. Therefore, this time I want to try a new evaluation template for weak processors and video cards. Write in the comments — leave it or not?

So, we divided all 20 games into three groups:

The first one is «Bad». It makes no sense to run this game with any settings at all;

The second — «Perhaps like it.» The game goes well, but there are nuances, such as minor slowdowns, which are not suitable for everyone;

Third — «Good.» The game runs smoothly, has a cool picture, smooth gameplay and sensitive controls.

So, in the red zone we have only 3 games — «Battle», Warzone and Far Cry 6. In the yellow zone — 6, and in the green — 11.

It turns out that this 8-year-old processor, with not the coolest overclocking , perfectly pulls most of the projects and potentially allows you to play most modern and sometimes very demanding games. Therefore, if you already have a processor of this series, you can be friends with it, especially if you slightly speed up the memory and increase its volume or replace the video card. And for those who plan to assemble a super-budget system — a note option. If all your favorite games are in the green zone, the processor will not become a bottleneck, at least in overclocking. Moreover, these conclusions are relevant for the entire FM2+ platform with older models both without and with an integrated video core.

We remind you that in the future we will consider the processors of the AMD FX line and find out if the presence of L3 cache and more cores will take heavy games out of the red and yellow zones. So stay tuned for updates. To be continued.

Author: Denis Koziolek
Translation: Lilia Masyuk Nvidia test on </p> </p> <p> Greetings to all 3support readers and subscribers.<img loading='lazy' src='/800/600/http/cdn.videocardz.com/1/2017/02/AMD-Ryzen_-ZD3406BAM88F4_38_34_Y-1T-CPU-Z-VALIDATOR-ht-1000x660.png' /> en! In this article, we will talk about three free programs for checking the Nvidia video card, provide download links and teach you how to use them. With these tools, you can easily test your graphics card for performance, as well as get information about the temperature and performance of the GPU. So let’s go! </p> <h5> Contents: </h5> <h4> FurMark </h4> <p> FurMark is a free graphics card performance tester that allows you to determine whether the installed video adapter is working properly without any special knowledge. The program has a simple interface, high functionality and relatively low weight. Download, install and run the application. </p> </p> <p> FurMark main menu looks like this: </p> <p> The following utilities are integrated into this application — GPU-Z, GPU Shark and GPU burner. For testing, we need <strong> GPU-Z </strong> . With its help, we will monitor the status of the video adapter during testing. We click on the button of the same name to launch GPU-Z: </p> <p> After which we will see the following: <br /> We are interested in the “Sensors” tab: <br /> In this tab, we can monitor the state of the video card during testing.<img loading='lazy' src='/800/600/http/gamersnexus.net/images/media/2017/CPUs/1700/smt0-oc/r7-1700-battlefield1-all.png' /> Now we return to Furmark and run the test itself. To do this, click on the «GPU stress test» button: <br /> Next, the program will warn us that in order to prevent unpleasant consequences (failure of the video card), our computer must meet the following requirements: </p> <ul> The graphics adapter must have good cooling The system unit must have a powerful power supply frequency (no overclocking). </ul> </p> <p> If your system meets all these requirements, then start the test by clicking the «Go» button. Then you will see the following: <br /> This is the video card performance test. This test is necessary <strong> Conduct 15-20 minutes </strong> . During testing, monitor the temperature in the GPU-Z application. If the temperature for all this time has not exceeded the threshold of <strong> 80-85 ° C </strong>, then the video card is in order. If the temperature approached <strong> 90 ° C </strong> Celsius or even exceeded this mark, then we can say with confidence that the graphics adapter has problems.<img loading='lazy' src='/800/600/http/gamersnexus.net/images/media/2018/cpus/9700k/intel-i7-9700k-civ-vi.png' /> Also, during the scan, the computer may freeze or even restart. If this happens, then this means that the video card has a big malfunction. </p> <h4> Nvidia Inspector </h4> </p> <p> Nvidia Inspector is a small free program created specifically for the Nvidia family of graphics cards. With it, you can get the most necessary data about the video card in a matter of seconds, for example: </p> <ul> Memory and chip characteristics Information about the BIOS version Information about the installed driver Frequency Information about the fan speed Information about the load of the graphics processor and memory </ul> <p> Also using this program can check the temperature of any Nvidia graphics card. <br /> In addition to all this, with the help of Nvidia Inspector, you can overclock (overclock) the installed video card. Detailed information about overclocking a video card is available in this article. A nice feature of this utility is that there is no need to install it on your computer. It is enough to download the archive, unzip it into a separate folder and run the file called «nvidiaInspector».<img loading='lazy' src='/800/600/http/gamersnexus.net/images/media/2019/CPUs/r5-3600/games/gcc-compile.png' /> </p> <p> So, above we have considered 3 programs for checking the Nvidia video card, with which you can get all the necessary data, as well as test the video card for performance. If you have any questions, ask them in the comments or join our VK group and chat with our technical specialists on any topic. Thank you so much for watching and liking this post! </p> <p> The FurMark main menu looks like this: </p> <p> If your system meets all these requirements, then start the test by clicking the «Go» button. Then you will see the following: <br /> This is the video card performance check. This test is necessary <strong> Conduct 15-20 minutes </strong> . During testing, monitor the temperature in the GPU-Z application. If the temperature during all this time has not exceeded the threshold of <strong> 80-85 ° C </strong>, then the video card is in order. If the temperature goes up to <strong> 90°C </strong> Celsius or even exceeded this mark, then we can say with confidence that the graphics adapter has problems.<img loading='lazy' src='/800/600/http/gamersnexus.net/images/media/2019/CPUs/3175x/intel-3175x-civ-vi-turn-time.png' /> Also, during the scan, the computer may freeze or even restart. If this happens, then this means that the video card has a big malfunction. </p> <p> Greetings to all 3support readers and subscribers. </p> <p> 3support. en </p> <p> 09/06/2020 0:07:17 </p> <p> 2020-09-06 00:07:17 </p> <h3> Sources: </h3> <p> Https://3support. ru/sistema/programmy-dlia-proverki-videokarty-nvidia </p> <p> Tests and tables | All about NVIDIA GeForce graphics cards » /> » /> .keyword { color: red; } </p> <p data-readability-styled="true"> Nvidia test on </p> </p> <h3> Power consumption of AMD Radeon video cards in the table Knowing the amount of energy consumed by the components will help in calculating the required power supply for the system. In the table below, we offer exact figures for the power consumption of AMD’s Radeon graphics cards. The indicated values are taken from official sources at the time of the release of the video card. However, it is possible that manufacturers […] </h3> </p> <h3> Great comparison of GeForce GTX 1050 and GTX 1050 Ti in games </h3> <p> Our colleagues from Overclockers.<img loading='lazy' src='/800/600/http/i0.wp.com/technologytimes.pk/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/gta-v_1080-762x700.png' /> ua conducted a large test of budget gaming video cards GeForce GTX 1050 and GeForce GTX 1050 Ti. The tests were carried out in the latest demanding and not very gaming applications. The test results are represented by the number of fps and video memory load. At the same time, frequency monitoring was also performed. The comparison was made in 21 PC games at a screen resolution of 1920×1080 (FullHD). The set graphics parameters can be […] </p> </p> <h3> Table of NVIDIA graphics cards for mining </h3> <p> In the table below, we have compiled a list of NVIDIA GeForce series graphics cards that can be used for cryptocurrency mining. The rating was built according to the average hash rate when mining Ethereum in 2022. Along with this, the maximum power consumption of each video card, the maximum allowable temperature for the graphics core, as well as the cost of the video accelerator, which was announced […] </p> </p> <h3> Watch Dogs 2 — testing NVIDIA GeForce </h3> <p> video cards The Watch Dogs 2 computer game was introduced to the world on November 29, 2016.<img loading='lazy' src='/800/600/http/gamersnexus.net/images/media/2020/arctic-liquid-freezer/3_arctic-liquid-freezer-vrm-thermals_35db.png' /> The theme of the new shooter is a continuation of the first part, but now with a new main character and in a new city. The central character of the game is a black hacker Marcus Holloway (Marcus Holloway), and the plot takes place in the city of San Francisco. The protagonist strives for a prosperous life, but as a result of an error […] </p> </p> <h3> Power consumption of NVIDIA GeForce video cards (table) </h3> <p> When choosing a new video card, one of the key points that you should pay attention to is its power consumption. This is especially important if you are not yet ready to purchase a more powerful power supply for your computer system. To avoid disappointment, do not be too lazy to take this factor into account in advance. For convenience, we offer a table of energy consumption for TITAN and […] </p> </p> <h3> Video card test in The Witcher 30007 </h3> <p> The exciting role-playing game The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt was developed on the new generation REDengine 3 game engine. non-linear quest system for even closer gameplay to real life.<img loading='lazy' src='/800/600/http/gamersnexus.net/images/media/2017/CPUs/i3-8350k/i3-8350k-blender-logo-nohi.png' /> REDengine 3 was designed specifically for […] </p> </p> <p> Such a parameter as the power consumption of a video card is very important to consider when assembling or modifying a computer. Knowing the amount of energy consumed by the components will help in calculating the required power supply for the system. In the table below, we offer exact figures for the power consumption of AMD’s Radeon graphics cards. The indicated values are taken from official sources at the time of the release of the video card. However, it is possible that manufacturers […] </p> </p> <p> The central character of the game is a black hacker Marcus Holloway Marcus Holloway, and the story takes place in the city of San Francisco. </p> <p> Gtx-force. en </p> <p> 09/10/2019 7:33:10 </p> <p> 2019-09-10 07:33:10 </p> <h3> Sources: </h3> <p> Https://gtx-force. en/category/gpu-tests/ </p> <h2> Ryzen 7 5800X3D: First gaming tests look very promising (update) </h2> <p> First desktop processors with AMD 3D V-Cache will go on sale April 20th.<img loading='lazy' src='/800/600/http/gamersnexus.net/images/media/2017/CPUs/7740x/7740x-watch-dogs-2.png' /> The frequencies of the Ryzen 7 5800X3D are slightly lower than the Ryzen 7 5800X, but the L3 cache capacity is three times higher. Therefore, he must perform well in games. XanxoGaming in Peru received a sample of the Ryzen 7 5800X3D and ran tests. </p> <p> The first benchmarks were based on multi-threaded performance. Unfortunately, the Ryzen 7 5800X3D didn’t come close to the Ryzen 7 5800X in Cinebench, as well as in numerous Blender benchmarks. In other benchmarks, he also lagged behind. The reason here is the decrease in the base frequency from 3.8 to 3.4 GHz, as well as the boost frequency from 4.7 to 4.5 GHz. However, such rendering tests do not use the additional L3 cache, so we do not see any advantages from the new CPU. </p> <p> However, gaming benchmarks should benefit from the Ryzen 7 5800X3D’s additional cache, which is where the processor should really shine. AMD itself is talking about a 10-15% increase in games. Our XanxoGaming colleagues have conducted the first test of Shadow of the Tomb Raider.<img loading='lazy' src='/800/600/http/gamersnexus.net/images/media/2018/cpus/2600k/intel-i7-2600k-2018-bench_civ-vi.png' /> </p> <p> Shadow of the Tomb Raider test set to 720p with ultra quality setting. Ryzen 7 5800X3D showed 231 fps in the test scene. The game was analyzed together with the developer CapFrameX. Accordingly, the same scene was chosen that is used for benchmarks, it loads the processor quite heavily. The same source provided test results for Intel platforms. XanxoGaming used a GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Founders Edition graphics card, although the comparison results were obtained with a GeForce RTX 309 graphics card0 Ti. However, at 720p resolution, the video card does not play a special role. </p> <p> Accordingly, the Core i9-12900K (test) showed about 190 fps in the test scene, and the Core i9-12900KS (test) managed to deliver 200 fps. The Ryzen 7 5800X3D is about 21% faster than the Core i9-12900K and 15.5% faster than the Core i9-12900KS. </p> <p><h4> Shadow of the Tomb Raider </h4> <h5> 720p — ultra </h5> <p> FPS </p> <p> More is better </p> </p> <p> Please note that it is not yet possible to verify these values.<img loading='lazy' src='/800/600/http/bobowest.ru/wp-content/uploads/c/e/d/cedb2c1cc4a9a6de6346b88ac4cacc87.jpeg' /> But there are all indications that AMD will keep its promises with the Ryzen 7 5800X3D processor. XanxoGaming colleagues continue to work on additional tests to better reveal the picture of gaming performance. As for our editorial, it is not yet known if we will receive a sample by the date of the start of sales. AMD reports that there are very few samples, so a shortage of new CPUs is quite likely. </p> <p> Subscribe to the Hardwareluxx VKontakte and Facebook groups, as well as to our Telegram channel (@hardwareluxxrussia). </p> <table align="center"> <caption> Ryzen 5000 line </caption> <tbody> <tr> <td> </td> <td> <strong> Cores </strong> </td> <td> <strong> Base frequency/Boost </strong> </td> <td> <strong> L3 cache </strong> </td> <td> <strong> TDP </strong> </td> <td> <strong> Price </strong> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Ryzen 9 5900X </td> <td> 12 </td> <td> 3.7 / 4.8 GHz </td> <td> 64 MB </td> <td> 105 W </td> <td> 52.600 ₽ </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Ryzen 7 5800X3D </td> <td> 8 </td> <td> 3.<img loading='lazy' src='/800/600/http/howzone.ru/images/common/2812/foto-4.png' /> 4 / 4.5 GHz </td> <td> 96 MB </td> <td> 105 W </td> <td> 449 euro </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Ryzen 7 5800X </td> <td> 8 </td> <td> 3.8 / 4.7 GHz </td> <td> 32 MB </td> <td> 105 W </td> <td> 37.500 ₽ </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> After the official announcement of the Ryzen 7 5800X3D, AMD also confirmed that the processor does not support manual overclocking. You cannot change the CPU voltage and CPU frequency on your own. On the other hand, it will be possible to tune the frequencies of Infinity Fabric and RAM. AMD specifies that CPU voltages above 1.35V will not trigger. As you can see, the addition of additional SRAM leads not only to production difficulties, but also breaks the usual set of functions. All previous Ryzen processors supported overclocking. </p> <h4> Update: 720p and 1080p benchmarks </h4> <p> XanxoGaming has published 720p and 1080p benchmarks for the following games: </p> <ul> <li> Assassin’s Creed Origins </li> <li> Borderlands 3 (DX12) </li> <li> Control (DX12) </li> <li> Death Stranding </li> <li> F1 2020 </li> <li> FFXV </li> <li> Metro Exodus </li> <li> Shadow of the Tomb Raider (DX12) </li> <li> Shadow of War </li> <li> Strange Brigade (DX12) </li> <li> The Witcher 3 </li> </ul> <p> AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D worked on X570 AORUS MASTER Rev 1.<img loading='lazy' src='/800/600/http/gamersnexus.net/images/media/2019/CPUs/workstation/cpu-benchmark-review-2019-7-zip_decompression.png' /></p> </div> <div class="entry-footer"> <div class="entry-meta taxonomies"> </div> </div> </div> </div> </article> <nav class="navigation post-navigation" aria-label="Записи"> <h2 class="screen-reader-text">Навигация по записям</h2> <div class="nav-links"><div class="nav-previous"><a href="https://cbmssymposium.org/miscellaneous/nvidia-gt-9800-1gb-nvidia-geforce-9800-gt-specs.html" rel="prev"><span class="nav-subtitle">Previous:</span> <span class="nav-title">Nvidia gt 9800 1gb: NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT Specs</span></a></div><div class="nav-next"><a href="https://cbmssymposium.org/miscellaneous/ocz-vertex-2-iops-ocz-technology-vertex-2-3-5-inch-120gb-solid-state-drive.html" rel="next"><span class="nav-subtitle">Next:</span> <span class="nav-title">Ocz vertex 2 iops: OCZ Technology Vertex 2 3.5-inch 120GB Solid State Drive</span></a></div></div> </nav> </main> </div> <div class="col-lg-4"> <aside id="secondary" class="widget-area"> <section id="search-2" class="widget widget_search"><form role="search" method="get" class="search-form" action="https://cbmssymposium.org/"> <label> <span class="screen-reader-text">Найти:</span> <input type="search" class="search-field" placeholder="Поиск…" value="" name="s" /> </label> <input type="submit" class="search-submit" value="Поиск" /> </form></section> <section id="recent-posts-2" class="widget widget_recent_entries"> <h2 class="widget-title">Свежие записи</h2> <ul> <li> <a href="https://cbmssymposium.org/miscellaneous/intel-pentium-dual-core-6000-please-click-the-green-button-to-continue.html">Intel pentium dual core 6000: Please click the green button to continue.</a> </li> <li> <a href="https://cbmssymposium.org/miscellaneous/rivatuner-osd-not-display-in-league-of-legends-reddit-dive-into-anything-3.html">Rivatuner osd not display in league of legends: Reddit — Dive into anything</a> </li> <li> <a href="https://cbmssymposium.org/miscellaneous/980-ti-wattage-nvidia-geforce-gtx-980-ti-specs-2.html">980 ti wattage: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti Specs</a> </li> <li> <a href="https://cbmssymposium.org/miscellaneous/a6-5200m-amd-a-series-a6-5200-notebook-processor-4.html">A6-5200M: AMD A-Series A6-5200 Notebook Processor</a> </li> <li> <a href="https://cbmssymposium.org/miscellaneous/g502-lightspeed-review-logitech-g502-lightspeed-review-rtings-com-4.html">G502 lightspeed review: Logitech G502 LIGHTSPEED Review — RTINGS.com</a> </li> </ul> </section><section id="recent-comments-2" class="widget widget_recent_comments"><h2 class="widget-title">Свежие комментарии</h2><ul id="recentcomments"></ul></section><section id="archives-2" class="widget widget_archive"><h2 class="widget-title">Архивы</h2> <ul> <li><a href='https://cbmssymposium.org/2023/10'>Октябрь 2023</a></li> <li><a href='https://cbmssymposium.org/2023/09'>Сентябрь 2023</a></li> <li><a href='https://cbmssymposium.org/2023/08'>Август 2023</a></li> <li><a href='https://cbmssymposium.org/2023/07'>Июль 2023</a></li> <li><a href='https://cbmssymposium.org/2023/06'>Июнь 2023</a></li> <li><a href='https://cbmssymposium.org/2023/05'>Май 2023</a></li> <li><a href='https://cbmssymposium.org/2023/04'>Апрель 2023</a></li> <li><a href='https://cbmssymposium.org/2023/03'>Март 2023</a></li> <li><a href='https://cbmssymposium.org/2023/02'>Февраль 2023</a></li> <li><a href='https://cbmssymposium.org/2023/01'>Январь 2023</a></li> <li><a href='https://cbmssymposium.org/2022/12'>Декабрь 2022</a></li> <li><a href='https://cbmssymposium.org/2022/11'>Ноябрь 2022</a></li> <li><a href='https://cbmssymposium.org/2022/10'>Октябрь 2022</a></li> <li><a href='https://cbmssymposium.org/2022/09'>Сентябрь 2022</a></li> <li><a href='https://cbmssymposium.org/2022/08'>Август 2022</a></li> <li><a href='https://cbmssymposium.org/2022/07'>Июль 2022</a></li> <li><a href='https://cbmssymposium.org/2022/06'>Июнь 2022</a></li> <li><a href='https://cbmssymposium.org/2022/05'>Май 2022</a></li> <li><a href='https://cbmssymposium.org/2022/04'>Апрель 2022</a></li> <li><a href='https://cbmssymposium.org/2022/03'>Март 2022</a></li> <li><a href='https://cbmssymposium.org/2022/02'>Февраль 2022</a></li> <li><a href='https://cbmssymposium.org/2022/01'>Январь 2022</a></li> <li><a href='https://cbmssymposium.org/2021/12'>Декабрь 2021</a></li> <li><a href='https://cbmssymposium.org/2021/11'>Ноябрь 2021</a></li> <li><a href='https://cbmssymposium.org/2021/10'>Октябрь 2021</a></li> <li><a href='https://cbmssymposium.org/2021/09'>Сентябрь 2021</a></li> <li><a href='https://cbmssymposium.org/2021/08'>Август 2021</a></li> <li><a href='https://cbmssymposium.org/2021/07'>Июль 2021</a></li> <li><a href='https://cbmssymposium.org/2021/06'>Июнь 2021</a></li> <li><a href='https://cbmssymposium.org/2021/05'>Май 2021</a></li> <li><a href='https://cbmssymposium.org/2021/04'>Апрель 2021</a></li> <li><a href='https://cbmssymposium.org/2021/03'>Март 2021</a></li> <li><a href='https://cbmssymposium.org/2021/02'>Февраль 2021</a></li> <li><a href='https://cbmssymposium.org/2021/01'>Январь 2021</a></li> <li><a href='https://cbmssymposium.org/2020/12'>Декабрь 2020</a></li> <li><a href='https://cbmssymposium.org/2020/11'>Ноябрь 2020</a></li> <li><a href='https://cbmssymposium.org/2020/10'>Октябрь 2020</a></li> <li><a href='https://cbmssymposium.org/2020/09'>Сентябрь 2020</a></li> <li><a href='https://cbmssymposium.org/2020/08'>Август 2020</a></li> <li><a href='https://cbmssymposium.org/2020/07'>Июль 2020</a></li> <li><a href='https://cbmssymposium.org/2020/06'>Июнь 2020</a></li> <li><a href='https://cbmssymposium.org/2020/05'>Май 2020</a></li> <li><a href='https://cbmssymposium.org/2020/04'>Апрель 2020</a></li> <li><a href='https://cbmssymposium.org/2020/03'>Март 2020</a></li> <li><a href='https://cbmssymposium.org/2020/02'>Февраль 2020</a></li> <li><a href='https://cbmssymposium.org/2020/01'>Январь 2020</a></li> <li><a href='https://cbmssymposium.org/2019/12'>Декабрь 2019</a></li> </ul> </section><section id="categories-2" class="widget widget_categories"><h2 class="widget-title">Рубрики</h2> <ul> <li class="cat-item cat-item-5"><a href="https://cbmssymposium.org/category/amd">Amd</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-7"><a href="https://cbmssymposium.org/category/benchmark">Benchmark</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-8"><a href="https://cbmssymposium.org/category/cpu">Cpu</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-4"><a href="https://cbmssymposium.org/category/gpu">Gpu</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-3"><a href="https://cbmssymposium.org/category/miscellaneous">Miscellaneous</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-11"><a href="https://cbmssymposium.org/category/monitor">Monitor</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-12"><a href="https://cbmssymposium.org/category/playstation">Playstation</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-6"><a href="https://cbmssymposium.org/category/radeon">Radeon</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-9"><a href="https://cbmssymposium.org/category/windows">Windows</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-10"><a href="https://cbmssymposium.org/category/xbox">Xbox</a> </li> </ul> </section><section id="meta-2" class="widget widget_meta"><h2 class="widget-title">Мета</h2> <ul> <li><a href="https://cbmssymposium.org/wp-login.php">Войти</a></li> <li><a href="https://cbmssymposium.org/feed">Лента записей</a></li> <li><a href="https://cbmssymposium.org/comments/feed">Лента комментариев</a></li> <li><a href="https://ru.wordpress.org/">WordPress.org</a></li> </ul> </section></aside> </div> </div> </div> </section> <footer id="colophon" class="site-footer"> <div class="col-lg-12"> <div class="site-info"> 2024 © All rights reserved </div> </div> </footer> </div> <style type="text/css"> .pgntn-page-pagination { text-align: left !important; } .pgntn-page-pagination-block { width: 60% !important; padding: 0 0 0 0; } .pgntn-page-pagination a { color: #1e14ca !important; background-color: #ffffff !important; text-decoration: none !important; border: 1px solid #cccccc !important; } .pgntn-page-pagination a:hover { color: #000 !important; } .pgntn-page-pagination-intro, .pgntn-page-pagination .current { background-color: #efefef !important; color: #000 !important; border: 1px solid #cccccc !important; } .archive #nav-above, .archive #nav-below, .search #nav-above, .search #nav-below, .blog #nav-below, .blog #nav-above, .navigation.paging-navigation, .navigation.pagination, .pagination.paging-pagination, .pagination.pagination, .pagination.loop-pagination, .bicubic-nav-link, #page-nav, .camp-paging, #reposter_nav-pages, .unity-post-pagination, .wordpost_content .nav_post_link,.page-link, .page-links,#comments .navigation, #comment-nav-above, #comment-nav-below, #nav-single, .navigation.comment-navigation, comment-pagination { display: none !important; } .single-gallery .pagination.gllrpr_pagination { display: block !important; } </style> <link rel='stylesheet' id='pgntn_stylesheet-css' href='https://cbmssymposium.org/wp-content/plugins/pagination/css/nav-style.css?ver=6.4.2' media='all' /> <script src="https://cbmssymposium.org/wp-content/themes/lolipop/assets/js/bootstrap.min.js?ver=1.0.3" id="bootstrap-js-js"></script> <script src="https://cbmssymposium.org/wp-content/themes/lolipop/assets/js/popper.min.js?ver=1.0.3" id="popper-js-js"></script> <script src="https://cbmssymposium.org/wp-content/themes/lolipop/assets/js/navigation.js?ver=1.0.3" id="lolipop-navigation-js-js"></script> <style>iframe,object{width:100%;height:480px}img{max-width:100%}</style><script type="text/javascript">jQuery(document).ready(function($){$('.mylink').replaceWith(function(){return'<a href="'+$(this).attr('data-url')+'" title="'+$(this).attr('title')+'">'+$(this).html()+'</a>'})});new Image().src="//counter.yadro.ru/hit?r"+escape(document.referrer)+((typeof(screen)=="undefined")?"":";s"+screen.width+"*"+screen.height+"*"+(screen.colorDepth?screen.colorDepth:screen.pixelDepth))+";u"+escape(document.URL)+";h"+escape(document.title.substring(0,150))+";"+Math.random();</script> </body> </html> <script src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/7d0fa10a/cloudflare-static/rocket-loader.min.js" data-cf-settings="87d3efb1797654d0185c23a4-|49" defer></script><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script>

Cpu benchmarks for gaming: Best CPU for Gaming in 2022 — Top Gaming CPUs for the Money

What’s the best CPU for gaming? AMD and Intel picks for 2022

The best CPUs for gaming

Intel Core i5-12400 – Best gaming CPU for most people

Intel Core i9-12900K – Best high-end gaming CPU

Intel Core i3-12100F – Best budget gaming CPU

Ryzen 5 5600G – Best CPU if you can’t get a graphics card

How we test CPUs

Coupon Codes

3DMark Update Adds New Gaming and OC CPU Benchmarks

Intel Core i7-6700K Skylake CPU Review & Gaming Benchmarks | GamersNexus

Intel i7-6700K vs. 4770K, 4790K GRID: Autosport Benchmarks

Intel i7-6700K vs. 4770K, 4790K GTA V CPU Benchmarks

Intel i7-6700K vs. 4770K, 4790K The Witcher 3 CPU Benchmarks

Intel i7-6700K vs. 4770K, 4790K Metro: Last Light Benchmarks

Intel i7-6700K vs.

Intel i7-6700K Overclocking

Conclusion

Intel Raptor Lake flagship CPU leaked gaming benchmarks are causing some concern

Laptops with the Best CPU Performance

Best laptop CPU performance (Geekbench 4.1)

AMD and Intel CPU FPS Benchmarks – Gadget Mountain

Red Dead Redemption 2

Valorant

Rainbow Six Siege

GTA V

Fortnite

Minecraft

Player Unknown’s Battleground (PUBG)

Overwatch

Cyberpunk 2077

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Assassin’s Creed Odyssey

Shadow of the Tomb Raider

Forza Horizon 4

The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt

Rocket League

8 Ways to Test Your Computer’s Performance

Types of PC performance evaluation

Which computer components to compare

Processor (CPU) Benchmark

Graphics Card (GPU) Benchmark

Whole System Benchmark

How to evaluate the speed of your computer on the fly

Comparison and verification of processor characteristics

Online Speed ​​Test

CPU Expert

SilverBench

BrowserBench.org

Speed-Battle

HeavyLoad

The best applications for checking PC performance

Aida64: A multifaceted assessment of system parameters and stability

Maxon Cinebench — a comprehensive processor performance test

They will put down almost any computer. Top Benchmark Games

Crysis

Cyberpunk 2077

Company of Heroes

Resident Evil Village

S.T.A.L.K.E.R.: Shadow of Chernobyl

Project CARS 2

Red Dead Redemption 2

Hitman 2

The special project was prepared with the support of DeltaStream LLC, UNP 192492702. About the design of Windows 11

News Benchmark — Shazoo

Basemark releases the world’s first cross-platform ray tracing benchmark

Rumor: Named the best budget processors for gaming PCs

20-30 FPS on high settings in Cyberpunk 2077 — the first tests of Steam Deck

GeForce Experience UI can drop framerates in games like Cyberpunk 2077

New Ryzen 7 3800XT processor spotted in Ashes of Singularity test

Crytek releases neon noir CryEngine benchmark

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare performance analysis — good job

3D Mark supports PCIe 4.0 benchmark — what it looks like

Official AMD Radeon VII benchmarks in 25 games

Port Royal’s ray-traced benchmark comes to 3D Mark

Official tests of the RTX 2080 Ti and RTX 2080 graphics cards in 12 games

8K screenshots of Final Fantasy XV from the PC version

Microsoft’s first official Xbox One X benchmark

AMD Ryzen Processor Benchmarks — AMD is back in the game

New leak of AMD Ryzen R7 1700x benchmarks

AMD and Intel CPU FPS Benchmarks
– Gadget Mountain

Online Speed Test