I7 8086k benchmarks: Intel Core i7-8086K Benchmarks — Geekbench Browser

Intel Core i7-8086K ReviewThermal Interface and Extreme Overclocking, with Alva JonathanAmbient Overclocking and Power Scaling AnalysisBenchmarking Performance: CPU System TestsBenchmarking Performance: CPU Rendering TestsBenchmarking Performance: CPU Encoding TestsBenchmarking Performance: CPU Office TestsBenchmarking Performance: CPU Legacy TestsGPU Tests: Civilization 6GPU Tests: Shadow of Mordor GPU Tests: Rise of the Tomb Raider GPU Tests: Rocket LeagueGPU Tests: Grand Theft Auto VOverclocking Performance: CPU TestsOverclocking Performance: GPU TestsConclusions: Save Your Money

Intel launching the Core i7-8086K as a 40^th Anniversary part took us by surprise. The processor on paper is a slightly higher binned version of the Core i7-8700K, with a +300 MHz bump on the base frequency and the single core turbo frequency, allowing Intel to announce the 8086K as Intel’s first 5 GHz processor in the market.

Buy Intel Core i7-8086K on Amazon.com

We must give a BIG thanks to ASRock for letting us borrow a system in Taipei at such short notice.

Our Final Analysis comes in three parts, depending on how you are planning to use the processor.

1) Running at Stock

On paper, the change in specifications are a little underwhelming to be honest. At stock frequencies, the per-core turbo of the CPU is identical to the i7-8700K from two-cores of load up to a full-load. Meanwhile the processor will almost never shift out of turbo and drop to its improved base frequency thanks to the ample power and cooling capabilities of desktop PCs. This means that the only real performance benefit users will see is when the CPU is under a single-core stress.

Given the nature of PCs having multiple applications open at once or running in the background, a truely isolated single-core load almost never happens: in fact with our processor we only able to trigger a core to 5. 0 GHz unless we set the affinity to a single core. In that respect, the Core i7-8086K is very limited, especially when it commands a premium price ($425) over its nearest rival, which is often sold at much less (8700K at $350 or below).

In our ‘stock’ results, this analysis bore fruit. In most benchmarks, the 8086K was on par with the 8700K. In a few, like CineBench R15 ST, it took a lead and afforded a new record due to the high frequency, but in others it seemed to perform worse, such as Blender and WinRAR, likely due to the thermal performance and response of our specific chip.

For anyone looking to buy the Core i7-8086K to run it at stock frequencies, save your money. There are better deals elsewhere.

2) Going to Overclock

In our testing, and corroborated by extreme overclocker Alva Jonathan, the Core i7-8086K seems to be a nice part if you want all six cores running at 5.0 GHz. Our chip ran a full flat 5.0 GHz by only adjusting the CPU multiplier, and the motherboard sorting out the rest, and with a little care we could get 5. 1 GHz under our Blender-stable test.

High performance is great, and a Core i7-8086K at 5.0 GHz gets a nice level of performance. It is possible to get a nice Core i7-8700K for overclocking within the silicon lottery, but these processors are binned slightly better, so the chances of a full flat 5.0 GHz are much higher. If removing that risk is worth another $65+, then the Core i7-8086K should be on that list.

Buy ASRock Z370 Taichi on Amazon.com

As showed by Alva, going beyond 1.3 volts can benefit from delidding the processor, as it uses the same thermal goop found in the previous Coffee Lake processors. Intel did not make any change to the thermal interface, which I know is not what enthusiasts want to hear. Intel constantly states its commitment to its enthusiasts, and moving away from the very average thermal interface would be the easiest way to show that commitment.

A downside to going up and over 5.0 GHz is the power consumption. Overclocking to 5. 0GHz improved performance by 16% in CPU-bound scenarios thanks to the matching frequency gain, but it increased the chip’s power consumption by 68%. Intel’s 14++ manufacturing process can indeed turn out a Skylake CPU core capable of these kinds of high frequencies, but it’s clear that it’s well past the knee in terms of energy efficiency. The up shot is that while energy efficiency does take a dive when overclocking, the performance can still easily be yours, as these kinds of voltages and wattages are exactly what high-end CPU coolers are designed for.

3) For CPU Collectors

Intel is set to only produce 50,000 of these processors, so it is likely a must-buy for any collectors, and you probably have your orders in already. If not, our Amazon link is below.

Buy Intel Core i7-8086K on Amazon.com

Or fingers crossed that you entered the sweepstakes and might win. Those processors are likely to arrive in 6-8 weeks.

Is This Launch Just a Stunt?

Ultimately Intel did not need to launch a 40^th Anniversary processor. While it is a multiple of ten, 40^th anniversaries are not especially notable for corporations. Still, for a product that was seemingly spurred by a Twitter joke, the 8086K is not entirely without merit.

At this point Intel is between a rock and a hard place: the Core i7-8700K competes directly against the Ryzen 7 2700X, winning in single threaded performance and low resolution gaming, losing in multi-threaded performance, and equal at GPU-limited high resolution gaming. We know that the 8-core Coffee Lake processor is due out later this year, but that is in Q4, which is a while away. In that time, AMD will launch a 32-core Threadripper 2 product available to everyone. In terms of actual launches, this is more a hold-over.

Intel had many options for a new Coffee Lake processor, and on paper the Core i7-8086K does not look that great compared to the Core i7-8700K. The best thing Intel could have done here is given the top SKU a little extra TDP to play with, so that the per-core turbo values across the range would get a sizeable bump. Sure going to 105W might seem like Intel was copying AMD, but the performance should speak for itself. Otherwise users are paying +$75 for a better binned part.

The danger of offering a significantly higher performance processor in that way might be seen as cannibalizing future sales. If the 9th Generation ‘i7-9700K’ does not have a 105W TDP, it might not sell. But Intel is promising that these 8086K processors are limited edition and a limited run, meaning that Intel controls the flow of product in the market. If there are no 8086K processors left to buy, then the 9700K takes the best spot. Intel could have done this, and make the Core i7-8086K a better step up worthy of an anniversary edition, but the company decided not to. It’s clear why Intel did not seed the press for the launch of the part, given the minor uptick in frequencies, but also Intel expects to sell the whole lot anyway, so additional media coverage wasn’t really needed.

The flip side of that however is that – as Ryan and I have been debating internally – is whether this is a processor even meant for stock usage. Intel’s binning process means that for one core to be able to run at 5.0 GHz at a reasonable voltage, all of the other cores are practically guaranteed to do this as well. Which is to say that this chip is incredibly trivial to overclock to 5.0 GHz, even more so than the 8700K. In fact it feels like Intel really wanted to release a true all-core 5GHz CPU – damn the power requirements – but chickened out at the last moment and decided to require end-users to press the magic awesome button to unlock its full potential.

Ryan says that he can’t imagine anyone well-read on the subject of CPUs not overclocking this chip to a flat 5.0 GHz, and after discussion I’m inclined to agree with him. Which makes the 8086K’s merits all about how it’s framed. Is it a one-off CPU whose stock performance improvement is too low to matter, or is it a backdoor attempt by Intel to release a highly-binned, high wattage Coffee Lake processor for customers who want the highest clocked Intel CPU out there?

Ultimately the question becomes whether the Core i7-8086K is a good buy or not. The Core i7-8086K is, without a doubt, Intel’s best performing mainstream desktop processor ever, and benefits in some tests from the additional single core turbo frequency, although only in a few select tests. The best benefits of the processor come in its overclocking, with the two units mentioned in this review easily hitting 5.0 GHz across all cores. It is nice performance, and if you want the best it makes sense that you have to pay the most (or get lucky), but it is a hard sell for most users.

Intel Could Have Done More

My advice? If you are truly deciding between the Core i7-8700K and the Core i7-8086K, then get the i7-8700K. While having an anniversary edition might make you feel proud in the short term, being able to have it in your forum signature or reddit flair for a few years, or having that higher overclock puts a grin on your face, the ultimate difference is minimal and down to perception and placebo effect. Spend the extra on a bigger SSD or more memory. It’s a nice part, but Intel could have done more.  

Overclocking Performance: GPU Tests

Intel Core i7-8086K ReviewThermal Interface and Extreme Overclocking, with Alva JonathanAmbient Overclocking and Power Scaling AnalysisBenchmarking Performance: CPU System TestsBenchmarking Performance: CPU Rendering TestsBenchmarking Performance: CPU Encoding TestsBenchmarking Performance: CPU Office TestsBenchmarking Performance: CPU Legacy TestsGPU Tests: Civilization 6GPU Tests: Shadow of Mordor GPU Tests: Rise of the Tomb Raider GPU Tests: Rocket LeagueGPU Tests: Grand Theft Auto VOverclocking Performance: CPU TestsOverclocking Performance: GPU TestsConclusions: Save Your Money

Tweet

PRINT THIS ARTICLE

Core i7-8086K [in 15 benchmarks]

Intel
Core i7-8086K

Buy

• Interface
• Core clock speed
• Max video memory
• Memory type
• Memory clock speed
• Maximum resolution

Summary

Intel started Intel Core i7-8086K sales 1 June 2018 at a recommended price of $425. This is Coffee Lake-S architecture desktop processor primarily aimed at office systems. It has 6 cores and 12 threads, and is based on 14 nm manufacturing technology, with a max turbo frequency of 5000 MHz and an unlocked multiplier.

Compatibility-wise, this is Intel Socket 1151 processor with a TDP of 95 Watt and a maximum temperature of 72 °C. It supports DDR3, DDR4 memory.

It provides poor benchmark performance at

14.40%

of a leader’s which is AMD EPYC 7h22.

Core i7
8086K

vs

EPYC
7h22

General info

Core i7-8086K processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and pricing.

Place in performance rating	496
Value for money	9. 95
Market segment	Desktop processor
Series	Intel Core i7
Architecture codename	Coffee Lake-S (2017−2018)
Release date	1 June 2018 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$425	of 305 (Core i7-870)
Current price	$624 (1.5x MSRP)	of 14999 (Xeon Platinum 9282)

Value for money

To get the index we compare the characteristics of the processors and their cost, taking into account the cost of other processors.

• 0
• 50
• 100

Technical specs

Basic microprocessor parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters can generally indicate CPU performance, but to be more precise you have to review its test results.

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-8086K compatibility with other computer components and devices: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one.

Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Technologies and extensions

Technological capabilities and additional instructions supported by Core i7-8086K. You’ll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI	+
AVX	+
vPro	+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+
Turbo Boost Technology	2. 0
Hyper-Threading Technology	+
TSX	+
TSX	+
Idle States	+
Thermal Monitoring	+
SIPP	—

Security technologies

Processor technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

Virtualization technologies

Supported virtual machine optimization technologies. Some are specific to Intel only, some to AMD.

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel number of RAM supported by Core i7-8086K’s memory controller. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequency may be supported.

Graphics specifications

General parameters of GPU integrated into Core i7-8086K.

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-8086K’s integrated GPU.

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i7-8086K’s integrated GPU, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support	+
Max resolution over HDMI 1. 4	4096 x 2304@24Hz
Max resolution over eDP	4096 x 2304@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPort	4096 x 2304@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i7-8086K’s integrated GPU, sometimes API versions are included.

Peripherals

Specifications and connection types of supported peripherals.

Benchmark performance

Single-core and multi-core benchmark results of Core i7-8086K. Overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Overall score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-8086K
14.40

• Passmark
• GeekBench 5 Single-Core
• GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
• Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
• Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core
• 3DMark06 CPU
• Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core
• Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core
• Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core
• Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core
• TrueCrypt AES
• WinRAR 4.0
• x264 encoding pass 2
• x264 encoding pass 1

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i7-8086K
14513

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 37%

i7-8086K
1313

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 37%

i7-8086K
7003

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

i7-8086K
7216

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

i7-8086K
35896

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

i7-8086K
11218

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

i7-8086K
15

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core (sometimes called Multi-Thread) is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

i7-8086K
1349

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

i7-8086K
206

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11. 5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

i7-8086K
2.3

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i7-8086K
8

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using ‘Best’ setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 12%

i7-8086K
6752

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 12%

i7-8086K
85

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 12%

i7-8086K
231

Relative perfomance

Overall Core i7-8086K performance compared to nearest competitors among desktop CPUs.

AMD Ryzen 7 2700E
100.97

Intel Core i7-9700K
100.28

Intel Core i5-10600KF
100

Intel Core i7-8086K
100

Intel Core i5-10600K
99.93

Intel Core i7-9700KF
99.44

Intel Core i3-12100F
99.03

AMD equivalent

We believe that the nearest equivalent to Core i7-8086K from AMD is Ryzen 7 2700E, which is faster by 1% and higher by 8 positions in our rating.

Ryzen 7
2700E

Compare

Here are some closest AMD rivals to Core i7-8086K:

AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
104. 72

AMD Ryzen 7 1700
102.22

AMD Ryzen 7 2700E
100.97

Intel Core i7-8086K
100

AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
96.67

AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
96.18

AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE
94.24

Similar processors

Here is our recommendation of several processors that are more or less close in performance to the one reviewed.

Core i5
10600KF

Compare

Core i5
10600K

Compare

Core i7
9700K

Compare

Core i7
9700KF

Compare

Ryzen 7
2700E

Compare

Core i7
6900K

Compare

Recommended graphics cards

These graphics cards are most commonly used with Core i7-8086K according to our statistics.

GeForce GTX
1080 Ti

12.3%

GeForce GTX
1060 6 GB

9.2%

GeForce GTX
1080

6.9%

GeForce RTX
2080

6.2%

GeForce RTX
2070

4.6%

GeForce RTX
2080 Ti

3.8%

GeForce GTX
1050 Ti

3.1%

GeForce GTX
1070 Ti

3. 1%

GeForce RTX
3080

3.1%

GeForce GTX
1070

2.3%

User rating

Here is the rating given to the reviewed processor by our users. Let others know your opinion by rating it yourself.

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-8086K, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.

Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.

CPU-Z Benchmark for Intel Core i7-8086K (1T)

Best CPU performance — 64-bit — October 2022

Intel Core i7-8086K (1T)

Back to validation

Intel Core i9-12900KF

Intel Core i9-12900K

Intel Core i7-12700K

Intel Core i7-12700KF

Intel Core i5-12600K

Intel Core i5-12600KF

Intel Core i9-11900K

AMD Ryzen 9 5900X

AMD Ryzen 9 5950X

Intel Core i7-11700K

AMD Ryzen 7 5800X

Intel Core i7-11700KF

Intel Core i5-11600K

AMD Ryzen 5 5600X

Intel Core i5-11600KF

Intel Core i7-11700

Intel Core i7-11700F

AMD Ryzen 7 5700G

AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX

Intel Core i5-11500

Intel Core i9-10900KF

AMD Ryzen 5 5600G

(YOU) Intel Core i7-8086K

Intel Core i7-11800H

Intel Core i9-10900K

Intel Core i9-10850K

Intel Core i7-10700KF

Intel Core i5-11400

Intel Core i9-10900

Intel Core i5-11400F

Intel Core i5-11400H

Intel Core i9-9900KF

AMD Ryzen 7 5800H

Intel Core i7-9700KF

Intel Core i7-10700K

Intel Core i7-9700K

AMD Ryzen 5 5600H

Intel Core i9-9900K

Intel Core i5-10600KF

Intel Core i5-9600KF

Intel Core i5-10600K

Intel Core i7-10700

Intel Core i7-10700F

Intel Core i7-1165G7

AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT

Intel Core i7-9700F

Intel Core i7-9700

AMD Ryzen 9 3950X

Intel Core i5-9600K

AMD Ryzen 9 3900X

AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT

AMD Ryzen 7 3800X

Intel Core i7-8700K

AMD Ryzen 7 3700X

Intel Core i5-1135G7

AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G

Intel Core i5-8600K

AMD Ryzen 7 5700U

AMD Ryzen 5 3600X

AMD Ryzen 7 4800H

Intel Core i7-7700K

Intel Core i7-10875H

Intel Core i5-7600K

AMD Ryzen 5 3600

Intel Core i7-8700

AMD Ryzen 5 3500X

Intel Core i3-1115G4

AMD Ryzen 5 3500

Intel Core i7-10870H

AMD Ryzen 5 4500U

AMD Ryzen 5 5500U

Intel Core i7-10750H

Intel Core i3-10105F

Intel Core i3-9100F

Intel Core i5-8500

Intel Core i7-6700K

AMD Ryzen 5 4600H

Intel Core i5-10400

Intel Core i5-9400

Intel Core i3-10100

Intel Core i3-10100F

Intel Core i5-6600K

Intel Core i5-9400F

Intel Core i5-10400F

AMD Ryzen 3 3100 4-Core

AMD Ryzen 7 2700X

Intel Core i5-10300H

Intel Core i7-4790K

Intel Core i7-9750H

Intel Core i5-8400

AMD Ryzen 5 2600X

Intel Core i7-7700

Intel Core i7-8750H

AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

Intel Core i5-4690K

AMD Ryzen 3 3200G

Intel Core i5-9300H

AMD Ryzen 5 2600

Intel Core i3-8100

Intel Core i7-10510U

Intel Core i5-7500

Intel Core i5-8300H

Intel Core i5-4670K

AMD Ryzen 5 1600X

Intel Core i7-8565U

AMD Ryzen 3 2200G

Intel Core i7-4770K

Intel Core i5-10210U

Intel Core i5-4690

Intel Core i5-1035G1

AMD Ryzen 5 2400G

AMD Ryzen 7 1700X

Intel Core i7-4790

Intel Core i7-6700

AMD Ryzen 7 2700

Intel Core i7-4770

AMD Ryzen 7 1700

Intel Core i5-8265U

AMD Ryzen 5 1600

Intel Core i3-1005G1

AMD Ryzen 5 3550H with

Intel Core i5-4590

Intel Core i5-3570K

Intel Core i5-7400

Intel Core i7-3770K

Intel Core i5-6500

Intel Xeon E3-1231 v3

Intel Core i7-8550U

Intel Core i5-4570

Intel Core i3-7100

AMD Ryzen 3 1200

Intel Core i5-2500K

Intel Core i5-3570

AMD Ryzen 7 3750H with

Intel Core i7-3770

Intel Core i7-2600K

Intel Core i7-7700HQ

Intel Core i5-8250U

Intel Core i5-7300HQ

Intel Core i5-6400

AMD Ryzen 5 1400

Intel Core i3-6100

Intel Core i5-4460

AMD Ryzen 5 3500U with

Intel Core i5-3470

Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3

Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3

AMD Athlon 3000G

Intel Core i5-4440

Intel Xeon E3-1230 V2

Intel Core i3-4170

Intel Core i5-2500

Intel Pentium G4560

Intel Core i7-2600

Intel Core i3-4160

AMD Ryzen 5 2500U with

Intel Xeon E5-2689

Intel Core i7-7500U

Intel Core i7-6700HQ

Intel Core i5-2400

Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3

Intel Core i3-4130

Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2

Intel Core i5-3330

Intel Core i5-7200U

Intel Core i3-3240

Intel Core i7-6500U

Intel Core i3-3220

Intel Core i5-6300U

Intel Xeon E5450

Intel Core i3-2120

Intel Core i5-3230M

Intel Core i3-2100

Intel Core i5-6200U

Intel Core 2 Duo E8400

Intel Core i5 750

Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550

Intel Core i5-5200U

Intel Core i5-2520M

Intel Core 2 Duo E7500

Intel Core i5 650

Intel Core i5-3210M

Intel Core i7 920

AMD FX -8350

Intel Core i5-2450M

Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400

AMD FX -4300

AMD FX -8320

AMD FX -6300

Intel Core i5-2410M

AMD FX -8300

Intel Core i5-4210U

Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600

Intel Core i3-7020U

Pentium E5200

Intel Core i5-4200U

Intel Core i3-3110M

Intel Core i3-5005U

Intel Core i3-6006U

AMD Phenom II X4 955

Intel Core i3-4005U

GTX 1050 Ti benchmark with i7-8086K 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K benchmarks at Ultra Quality

Compare To
Select. .AMD Radeon 530 Mobile — $ 636AMD Radeon 540 Mobile — $ 1,086AMD Radeon HD 6850 — $ 199AMD Radeon HD 6870 — $ 199AMD Radeon HD 6950 — $ 250AMD Radeon HD 6970 — $ 299AMD Radeon HD 6990 — $ 699AMD Radeon HD 7750 — $ 140AMD Radeon HD 7750M — $ 858AMD Radeon HD 7790 — $ 149AMD Radeon HD 7850 — $ 249AMD Radeon HD 7850M — $ 964AMD Radeon HD 7950 — $ 149AMD Radeon HD 7950M — $ 1,023AMD Radeon HD 7970 — $ 299AMD Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition — $ 299AMD Radeon HD 7970M — $ 1,079AMD Radeon HD 7990 — $ 999AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 Mobile — $ 1,959AMD Radeon R5 — $ 710AMD Radeon R5 — $ 701AMD Radeon R7 250 — $ 95AMD Radeon R7 265 — $ 149AMD Radeon R7 370 — $ 202AMD Radeon R9 270 — $ 275AMD Radeon R9 280 — $ 350AMD Radeon R9 280X — $ 350AMD Radeon R9 285 — $ 380AMD Radeon R9 290 — $ 310AMD Radeon R9 290X — $ 399AMD Radeon R9 295X2 — $ 1,499AMD Radeon R9 380 — $ 299AMD Radeon R9 380X — $ 229AMD Radeon R9 390 — $ 465AMD Radeon R9 390X — $ 495AMD Radeon R9 FURY — $ 549AMD Radeon R9 FURY X — $ 649AMD Radeon R9 M270X — $ 1,016AMD Radeon R9 M280X — $ 1,070AMD Radeon R9 M280X 2GB — $ 1,070AMD Radeon R9 M290X — $ 1,209AMD Radeon R9 M380 — $ 1,074AMD Radeon R9 Nano — $ 1,529AMD Radeon RX 460 — $ 140AMD Radeon RX 470 — $ 342AMD Radeon RX 470 Mobile — $ 1,203AMD Radeon RX 480 — $ 399AMD Radeon RX 480 Mobile — $ 1,275AMD Radeon RX 540 Mobile — $ 645AMD Radeon RX 550 — $ 74AMD Radeon RX 550 Mobile — $ 923AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 4GB — $ 169AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 8GB — $ 199AMD Radeon RX 550X Mobile — $ 923AMD Radeon RX 560 — $ 99AMD Radeon RX 560 Mobile — $ 987AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT — $ 279AMD Radeon RX 560X Mobile — $ 641AMD Radeon RX 560X Mobile 2GB — $ 987AMD Radeon RX 570 — $ 123AMD Radeon RX 570 Mobile — $ 1,260AMD Radeon RX 5700 — $ 349AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT — $ 399AMD Radeon RX 580 — $ 151AMD Radeon RX 580 Mobile — $ 1,307AMD Radeon RX 580X Mobile — $ 1,307AMD Radeon RX 590 — $ 214AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT — $ 379AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT — $ 479AMD Radeon RX 6800 — $ 579AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT — $ 649AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT — $ 999AMD Radeon RX VEGA 10 — $ 632AMD Radeon RX VEGA 3 — $ 567AMD Radeon RX VEGA 6 — $ 1,119AMD Radeon RX VEGA 8 — $ 601AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 — $ 269AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 Mobile — $ 1,579AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 — $ 419AMD Radeon VII — $ 664ATI Radeon HD 4870 — $ 299NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 — $ 79NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 — $ 79NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 — $ 199NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 — $ 129NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q — $ 1,282NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile — $ 750NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 2GB — $ 1,062NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q — $ 1,270NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile — $ 876NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB — $ 170NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB — $ 159NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q — $ 1,185NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile — $ 987NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 — $ 329NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q — $ 1,106NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile — $ 1,559NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti — $ 503NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 — $ 522NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q — $ 1,955NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile — $ 1,857NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti — $ 807NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 — $ 149NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q — $ 1,239NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile — $ 1,151NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER — $ 160NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 — $ 220NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER — $ 229NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti — $ 279NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q — $ 1,185NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile — $ 1,758NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 — $ 449NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 — $ 299NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280 — $ 649NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 — $ 249NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470 — $ 299NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 — $ 499NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti — $ 199NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 — $ 153NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti — $ 220NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 — $ 349NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 — $ 399NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590 — $ 699NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 — $ 49NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti — $ 64NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost — $ 169NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 — $ 79NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti — $ 299NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M — $ 987NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 — $ 79NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M — $ 1,058NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670MX — $ 1,058NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 — $ 485NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M — $ 1,083NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 — $ 439NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti — $ 279NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 — $ 320NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M — $ 1,036NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 — $ 179NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M — $ 1,100NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 — $ 355NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti — $ 410NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M — $ 1,162NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M — $ 1,162NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 — $ 89NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 — $ 89NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M — $ 1,066NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 — $ 449NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M — $ 1,249NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M 6GB — $ 1,249NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 — $ 249NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Mobile — $ 1,345NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti — $ 619NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M — $ 1,345NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980MX — $ 1,345NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN — $ 650NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK — $ 999NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X — $ 1,099NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 — $ 349NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile — $ 1,104NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER — $ 400NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 — $ 469NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q — $ 1,516NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile — $ 1,724NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER — $ 499NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 — $ 693NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q — $ 1,772NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile — $ 1,942NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER — $ 699NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti — $ 1,187NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 — $ 200NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti — $ 249NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 — $ 329NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti — $ 399NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 — $ 499NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti — $ 599NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 — $ 699NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti — $ 799NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 — $ 1,499NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 — $ 200NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 — $ 329NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti — $ 399NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 — $ 499NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 — $ 699NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Ti — $ 799NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 — $ 1,499NVIDIA TITAN RTX — $ 2,499NVIDIA TITAN V — $ 2,999NVIDIA TITAN Xp — $ 1,199

Change CPU To
Select. .AMD Athlon 5000 Dual-Core — $ 100AMD Athlon 5200 Dual-Core — $ 30AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4200+ — $ 130AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4400+ — $ 60AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4600+ — $ 360AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4800+ — $ 460AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5000+ — $ 331.5AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5200+ — $ 53.1AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5400+ — $ 53AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5600+ — $ 150AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5800+ — $ 25AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 6000+ — $ 46AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 6400+ — $ 260AMD Athlon 7550 Dual-Core — $ 60AMD Athlon 7750 Dual-Core — $ 148.7AMD Athlon 7850 Dual-Core — $ 209.7AMD Athlon Dual Core 5000B — $ 95AMD Athlon II X2 215 — $ 12AMD Athlon II X2 220 — $ 32.2AMD Athlon II X2 240 — $ 35AMD Athlon II X2 245 — $ 35AMD Athlon II X2 250 — $ 39AMD Athlon II X2 255 — $ 65.2AMD Athlon II X2 260 — $ 20AMD Athlon II X2 265 — $ 82.9AMD Athlon II X2 270 — $ 24AMD Athlon II X2 B22 — $ 36AMD Athlon II X2 B24 — $ 40AMD Athlon II X2 B28 — $ 49.1AMD Athlon II X3 425 — $ 104. 2AMD Athlon II X3 435 — $ 50AMD Athlon II X3 440 — $ 47AMD Athlon II X3 445 — $ 91AMD Athlon II X3 450 — $ 40AMD Athlon II X3 455 — $ 116.9AMD Athlon II X3 460 — $ 50AMD Athlon II X4 620 — $ 60AMD Athlon II X4 630 — $ 43AMD Athlon II X4 631 Quad-Core — $ 80AMD Athlon II X4 635 — $ 70AMD Athlon II X4 640 — $ 80AMD Athlon II X4 641 Quad-Core — $ 91.5AMD Athlon II X4 645 — $ 50AMD Athlon X4 740 Quad Core — $ 277AMD Athlon X4 760K Quad Core — $ 46AMD Athlon X4 840 — $ 78.7AMD Athlon X4 845 — $ 50AMD Athlon X4 860K — $ 64AMD Athlon X4 870K — $ 80AMD Athlon X4 880K — $ 90AMD Athlon X4 950 — $ 60AMD E2-3200 APU — $ 8AMD FX-4100 Quad-Core — $ 130AMD FX-4130 Quad-Core — $ 76AMD FX-4170 Quad-Core — $ 100AMD FX-4200 Quad-Core — $ 228.2AMD FX-4300 Quad-Core — $ 53.4AMD FX-4350 Quad-Core — $ 130AMD FX-6200 Six-Core — $ 340AMD FX-6300 Six-Core — $ 59AMD FX-6350 Six-Core — $ 130AMD FX-8120 Eight-Core — $ 100AMD FX-8150 Eight-Core — $ 383.5AMD FX-8300 Eight-Core — $ 80.6AMD FX-8320 Eight-Core — $ 79.5AMD FX-8320E Eight-Core — $ 98. 9AMD FX-8350 Eight-Core — $ 80AMD FX-8370 Eight-Core — $ 135AMD FX-8370E Eight-Core — $ 180AMD FX-9370 Eight-Core — $ 178.9AMD FX-9590 Eight-Core — $ 122AMD Phenom 8250e Triple-Core — $ 47AMD Phenom 8450 Triple-Core — $ 30AMD Phenom 8600 Triple-Core — $ 53AMD Phenom 8600B Triple-Core — $ 53AMD Phenom 8650 Triple-Core — $ 50AMD Phenom 9100e Quad-Core — $ 40AMD Phenom 9150e Quad-Core — $ 40AMD Phenom 9350e Quad-Core — $ 3382.1AMD Phenom 9450e Quad-Core — $ 105AMD Phenom 9500 Quad-Core — $ 60AMD Phenom 9550 Quad-Core — $ 40AMD Phenom 9600 Quad-Core — $ 50AMD Phenom 9600B Quad-Core — $ 147.2AMD Phenom 9650 Quad-Core — $ 55AMD Phenom 9750 Quad-Core — $ 60AMD Phenom 9850 Quad-Core — $ 50AMD Phenom 9950 Quad-Core — $ 180AMD Phenom II X2 545 — $ 44AMD Phenom II X2 550 — $ 50AMD Phenom II X2 555 — $ 142.1AMD Phenom II X2 565 — $ 30AMD Phenom II X2 B55 — $ 48AMD Phenom II X3 705e — $ 152.3AMD Phenom II X3 710 — $ 84.5AMD Phenom II X3 720 — $ 70AMD Phenom II X3 B73 — $ 75AMD Phenom II X4 805 — $ 174AMD Phenom II X4 810 — $ 116AMD Phenom II X4 820 — $ 75AMD Phenom II X4 840 — $ 90AMD Phenom II X4 905e — $ 212. 4AMD Phenom II X4 910 — $ 100AMD Phenom II X4 910e — $ 157AMD Phenom II X4 920 — $ 67AMD Phenom II X4 925 — $ 160AMD Phenom II X4 940 — $ 120AMD Phenom II X4 945 — $ 50AMD Phenom II X4 955 — $ 130.2AMD Phenom II X4 960T — $ 135AMD Phenom II X4 965 — $ 59.5AMD Phenom II X4 B95 — $ 73AMD Phenom II X4 B97 — $ 90AMD Phenom II X6 1035T — $ 189AMD Phenom II X6 1045T — $ 175AMD Phenom II X6 1055T — $ 185AMD Phenom II X6 1075T — $ 260AMD Phenom II X6 1090T — $ 396.1AMD Phenom II X6 1100T — $ 200AMD Phenom X3 8550 — $ 170AMD Ryzen 3 1200 — $ 95AMD Ryzen 3 1300X — $ 125AMD Ryzen 3 2200G — $ 98AMD Ryzen 3 3100 — $ 90AMD Ryzen 3 3200G — $ 99AMD Ryzen 3 3300X — $ 120AMD Ryzen 5 1400 — $ 134AMD Ryzen 5 1500X — $ 144.9AMD Ryzen 5 1600 — $ 155AMD Ryzen 5 1600X — $ 178.4AMD Ryzen 5 2400G — $ 159AMD Ryzen 5 2600 — $ 150AMD Ryzen 5 2600X — $ 210AMD Ryzen 5 3400G — $ 150AMD Ryzen 5 3500 — $ 148AMD Ryzen 5 3500X — $ 160.5AMD Ryzen 5 3600 — $ 199AMD Ryzen 5 3600X — $ 249AMD Ryzen 5 5500 — $ 160AMD Ryzen 5 5600X — $ 299AMD Ryzen 7 1700 — $ 190AMD Ryzen 7 1700X — $ 200AMD Ryzen 7 1800X — $ 250AMD Ryzen 7 2700 — $ 249. 2AMD Ryzen 7 2700X — $ 305AMD Ryzen 7 3700X — $ 330AMD Ryzen 7 3800X — $ 399AMD Ryzen 7 5700X — $ 300AMD Ryzen 7 5800X — $ 399AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D — $ 450AMD Ryzen 9 3900X — $ 499AMD Ryzen 9 3950X — $ 750AMD Ryzen 9 5900X — $ 499AMD Ryzen 9 5950X — $ 710AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X — $ 350AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X — $ 420AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X — $ 680AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X — $ 900AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX — $ 1720Intel Core i3-10100 — $ 122Intel Core i3-10300 — $ 143Intel Core i3-11100 — $ 122Intel Core i3-11300 — $ 143Intel Core i3-12100 — $ 122Intel Core i3-12300 — $ 143Intel Core i3-2100 @ 3.10GHz — $ 60Intel Core i3-2102 @ 3.10GHz — $ 58Intel Core i3-2105 @ 3.10GHz — $ 80Intel Core i3-2120 @ 3.30GHz — $ 30Intel Core i3-2125 @ 3.30GHz — $ 199Intel Core i3-2130 @ 3.40GHz — $ 70Intel Core i3-3210 @ 3.20GHz — $ 100Intel Core i3-3220 @ 3.30GHz — $ 34.9Intel Core i3-3225 @ 3.30GHz — $ 100Intel Core i3-3240 @ 3.40GHz — $ 46Intel Core i3-3245 @ 3.40GHz — $ 80Intel Core i3-3250 @ 3. 50GHz — $ 95Intel Core i3-4130 @ 3.40GHz — $ 140Intel Core i3-4150 @ 3.50GHz — $ 260Intel Core i3-4160 @ 3.60GHz — $ 140Intel Core i3-4170 @ 3.70GHz — $ 150Intel Core i3-4330 @ 3.50GHz — $ 180Intel Core i3-4340 @ 3.60GHz — $ 170Intel Core i3-4350 @ 3.60GHz — $ 170Intel Core i3-4360 @ 3.70GHz — $ 280Intel Core i3-4370 @ 3.80GHz — $ 450Intel Core i3-530 @ 2.93GHz — $ 20Intel Core i3-540 @ 3.07GHz — $ 21Intel Core i3-550 @ 3.20GHz — $ 180Intel Core i3-560 @ 3.33GHz — $ 30Intel Core i3-6098P @ 3.60GHz — $ 133.7Intel Core i3-6100 @ 3.70GHz — $ 166.1Intel Core i3-6300 @ 3.80GHz — $ 143Intel Core i3-6320 @ 3.90GHz — $ 160Intel Core i3-7100 @ 3.90GHz — $ 170Intel Core i3-7300 @ 4.00GHz — $ 210Intel Core i3-7320 @ 4.10GHz — $ 174.8Intel Core i3-7350K @ 4.20GHz — $ 230Intel Core i3-8100 @ 3.60GHz — $ 130Intel Core i3-8300 @ 3.70GHz — $ 179.4Intel Core i3-8350K @ 4.00GHz — $ 184Intel Core i3-9100 @ 3.60GHz — $ 170Intel Core i3-9100F @ 3.60GHz — $ 105Intel Core i3-9320 @ 3.70GHz — $ 162Intel Core i3-9350KF @ 4. 00GHz — $ 224Intel Core i5 750S @ 2.40GHz — $ 100Intel Core i5-10400 — $ 182Intel Core i5-10600K — $ 236.8Intel Core i5-11400 — $ 182Intel Core i5-11600K — $ 262Intel Core i5-12400 — $ 143Intel Core i5-12600K — $ 290Intel Core i5-2300 @ 2.80GHz — $ 80Intel Core i5-2310 @ 2.90GHz — $ 80Intel Core i5-2320 @ 3.00GHz — $ 195.3Intel Core i5-2380P @ 3.10GHz — $ 90Intel Core i5-2400 @ 3.10GHz — $ 84Intel Core i5-2400S @ 2.50GHz — $ 65.7Intel Core i5-2405S @ 2.50GHz — $ 164.4Intel Core i5-2450P @ 3.20GHz — $ 90Intel Core i5-2500 @ 3.30GHz — $ 105Intel Core i5-2500K @ 3.30GHz — $ 124Intel Core i5-2500S @ 2.70GHz — $ 75Intel Core i5-2550K @ 3.40GHz — $ 130Intel Core i5-3330 @ 3.00GHz — $ 100Intel Core i5-3330S @ 2.70GHz — $ 95Intel Core i5-3340 @ 3.10GHz — $ 262Intel Core i5-3340S @ 2.80GHz — $ 150Intel Core i5-3350P @ 3.10GHz — $ 170Intel Core i5-3450 @ 3.10GHz — $ 128Intel Core i5-3450S @ 2.80GHz — $ 100Intel Core i5-3470 @ 3.20GHz — $ 125Intel Core i5-3470S @ 2.90GHz — $ 140.1Intel Core i5-3475S @ 2. 90GHz — $ 143.5Intel Core i5-3550 @ 3.30GHz — $ 330Intel Core i5-3550S @ 3.00GHz — $ 341Intel Core i5-3570 @ 3.40GHz — $ 140Intel Core i5-3570K @ 3.40GHz — $ 144Intel Core i5-3570S @ 3.10GHz — $ 285Intel Core i5-4430 @ 3.00GHz — $ 180Intel Core i5-4430S @ 2.70GHz — $ 160Intel Core i5-4440 @ 3.10GHz — $ 170Intel Core i5-4440S @ 2.80GHz — $ 463Intel Core i5-4460 @ 3.20GHz — $ 170Intel Core i5-4460S @ 2.90GHz — $ 660Intel Core i5-4570 @ 3.20GHz — $ 175Intel Core i5-4570S @ 2.90GHz — $ 221.6Intel Core i5-4590 @ 3.30GHz — $ 185Intel Core i5-4590S @ 3.00GHz — $ 198Intel Core i5-4670 @ 3.40GHz — $ 188Intel Core i5-4670K @ 3.40GHz — $ 250Intel Core i5-4670R @ 3.00GHz — $ 276Intel Core i5-4690 @ 3.50GHz — $ 200Intel Core i5-4690K @ 3.50GHz — $ 200Intel Core i5-4690S @ 3.20GHz — $ 269.9Intel Core i5-5675C @ 3.10GHz — $ 400Intel Core i5-6400 @ 2.70GHz — $ 200Intel Core i5-6402P @ 2.80GHz — $ 190Intel Core i5-650 @ 3.20GHz — $ 100Intel Core i5-6500 @ 3.20GHz — $ 234.4Intel Core i5-655K @ 3.20GHz — $ 60Intel Core i5-660 @ 3. 33GHz — $ 49Intel Core i5-6600 @ 3.30GHz — $ 220Intel Core i5-6600K @ 3.50GHz — $ 288.9Intel Core i5-661 @ 3.33GHz — $ 100Intel Core i5-670 @ 3.47GHz — $ 90Intel Core i5-680 @ 3.60GHz — $ 90Intel Core i5-7400 @ 3.00GHz — $ 213.5Intel Core i5-750 @ 2.67GHz — $ 160.5Intel Core i5-7500 @ 3.40GHz — $ 210Intel Core i5-760 @ 2.80GHz — $ 100Intel Core i5-7600 @ 3.50GHz — $ 240Intel Core i5-7600K @ 3.80GHz — $ 251Intel Core i5-7640X @ 4.00GHz — $ 250Intel Core i5-8400 @ 2.80GHz — $ 200Intel Core i5-8500 @ 3.00GHz — $ 239Intel Core i5-8600 @ 3.10GHz — $ 244.5Intel Core i5-8600K @ 3.60GHz — $ 377.7Intel Core i5-9400 @ 2.90GHz — $ 170Intel Core i5-9400F @ 2.90GHz — $ 170Intel Core i5-9600K @ 3.70GHz — $ 280Intel Core i5-9600KF @ 3.70GHz — $ 215Intel Core i7-10700K — $ 409.1Intel Core i7-11700K — $ 410Intel Core i7-12700K — $ 470Intel Core i7-2600 @ 3.40GHz — $ 150Intel Core i7-2600K @ 3.40GHz — $ 198Intel Core i7-2600S @ 2.80GHz — $ 200Intel Core i7-2700K @ 3.50GHz — $ 200Intel Core i7-3770 @ 3.40GHz — $ 179Intel Core i7-3770K @ 3. 50GHz — $ 249Intel Core i7-3770S @ 3.10GHz — $ 200Intel Core i7-3820 @ 3.60GHz — $ 200Intel Core i7-3930K @ 3.20GHz — $ 399Intel Core i7-3960X @ 3.30GHz — $ 800Intel Core i7-3970X @ 3.50GHz — $ 954Intel Core i7-4770 @ 3.40GHz — $ 240Intel Core i7-4770K @ 3.50GHz — $ 285Intel Core i7-4770S @ 3.10GHz — $ 250Intel Core i7-4771 @ 3.50GHz — $ 300Intel Core i7-4790 @ 3.60GHz — $ 279Intel Core i7-4790K @ 4.00GHz — $ 307Intel Core i7-4790S @ 3.20GHz — $ 342.6Intel Core i7-4820K @ 3.70GHz — $ 500Intel Core i7-4930K @ 3.40GHz — $ 399Intel Core i7-4960X @ 3.60GHz — $ 770Intel Core i7-5775C @ 3.30GHz — $ 450Intel Core i7-5820K @ 3.30GHz — $ 300Intel Core i7-5930K @ 3.50GHz — $ 499Intel Core i7-5960X @ 3.00GHz — $ 770Intel Core i7-6700 @ 3.40GHz — $ 433.7Intel Core i7-6700K @ 4.00GHz — $ 335Intel Core i7-6800K @ 3.40GHz — $ 420Intel Core i7-6850K @ 3.60GHz — $ 550Intel Core i7-6900K @ 3.20GHz — $ 1200Intel Core i7-6950X @ 3.00GHz — $ 1576Intel Core i7-7700 @ 3.60GHz — $ 325.1Intel Core i7-7700K @ 4. 20GHz — $ 355Intel Core i7-7740X @ 4.30GHz — $ 349Intel Core i7-7800X @ 3.50GHz — $ 370Intel Core i7-7820X @ 3.60GHz — $ 930Intel Core i7-8086K @ 4.00GHz — $ 553Intel Core i7-860 @ 2.80GHz — $ 290Intel Core i7-860S @ 2.53GHz — $ 200Intel Core i7-870 @ 2.93GHz — $ 310Intel Core i7-8700 @ 3.20GHz — $ 454.5Intel Core i7-8700K @ 3.70GHz — $ 369.9Intel Core i7-875K @ 2.93GHz — $ 200Intel Core i7-880 @ 3.07GHz — $ 583Intel Core i7-920 @ 2.67GHz — $ 174Intel Core i7-930 @ 2.80GHz — $ 60Intel Core i7-940 @ 2.93GHz — $ 70.7Intel Core i7-950 @ 3.07GHz — $ 245Intel Core i7-960 @ 3.20GHz — $ 100Intel Core i7-965 @ 3.20GHz — $ 140Intel Core i7-970 @ 3.20GHz — $ 150Intel Core i7-9700 @ 3.00GHz — $ 330Intel Core i7-9700F @ 3.00GHz — $ 368Intel Core i7-9700K @ 3.60GHz — $ 410Intel Core i7-975 @ 3.33GHz — $ 180Intel Core i7-980 @ 3.33GHz — $ 200Intel Core i7-980X @ 3.33GHz — $ 220Intel Core i7-990X @ 3.47GHz — $ 350Intel Core i9-10900K — $ 590Intel Core i9-11900K — $ 488Intel Core i9-12900K — $ 590Intel Core i9-7900X @ 3. 30GHz — $ 1380Intel Core i9-7920X @ 2.90GHz — $ 1096.7Intel Core i9-7940X @ 3.10GHz — $ 1192.1Intel Core i9-7960X @ 2.80GHz — $ 2000Intel Core i9-7980XE @ 2.60GHz — $ 2005.5Intel Core i9-9900 @ 3.10GHz — $ 440Intel Core i9-9900K @ 3.60GHz — $ 835Intel Core2 Duo E4300 @ 1.80GHz — $ 158Intel Core2 Duo E4400 @ 2.00GHz — $ 9Intel Core2 Duo E4500 @ 2.20GHz — $ 40Intel Core2 Duo E4600 @ 2.40GHz — $ 158Intel Core2 Duo E4700 @ 2.60GHz — $ 100Intel Core2 Duo E6300 @ 1.86GHz — $ 13Intel Core2 Duo E6320 @ 1.86GHz — $ 50Intel Core2 Duo E6400 @ 2.13GHz — $ 20Intel Core2 Duo E6420 @ 2.13GHz — $ 50Intel Core2 Duo E6550 @ 2.33GHz — $ 15Intel Core2 Duo E6600 @ 2.40GHz — $ 15Intel Core2 Duo E6700 @ 2.66GHz — $ 30Intel Core2 Duo E6750 @ 2.66GHz — $ 13Intel Core2 Duo E6850 @ 3.00GHz — $ 50Intel Core2 Duo E7200 @ 2.53GHz — $ 75Intel Core2 Duo E7300 @ 2.66GHz — $ 20Intel Core2 Duo E7400 @ 2.80GHz — $ 29Intel Core2 Duo E7500 @ 2.93GHz — $ 15Intel Core2 Duo E7600 @ 3.06GHz — $ 120Intel Core2 Duo E8200 @ 2.66GHz — $ 50Intel Core2 Duo E8300 @ 2. 83GHz — $ 20Intel Core2 Duo E8400 @ 3.00GHz — $ 9.8Intel Core2 Duo E8500 @ 3.16GHz — $ 40Intel Core2 Duo E8600 @ 3.33GHz — $ 50Intel Core2 Extreme Q6800 @ 2.93GHz — $ 1125Intel Core2 Extreme Q6850 @ 3.00GHz — $ 1496Intel Core2 Extreme X6800 @ 2.93GHz — $ 263.6Intel Core2 Extreme X9650 @ 3.00GHz — $ 909Intel Core2 Extreme X9770 @ 3.20GHz — $ 1609Intel Core2 Extreme X9775 @ 3.20GHz — $ 1806Intel Core2 Quad Q6600 @ 2.40GHz — $ 40Intel Core2 Quad Q6700 @ 2.66GHz — $ 45Intel Core2 Quad Q8200 @ 2.33GHz — $ 23Intel Core2 Quad Q8300 @ 2.50GHz — $ 50Intel Core2 Quad Q8400 @ 2.66GHz — $ 99.5Intel Core2 Quad Q9300 @ 2.50GHz — $ 50Intel Core2 Quad Q9400 @ 2.66GHz — $ 34Intel Core2 Quad Q9450 @ 2.66GHz — $ 335Intel Core2 Quad Q9500 @ 2.83GHz — $ 35Intel Core2 Quad Q9505 @ 2.83GHz — $ 190Intel Core2 Quad Q9550 @ 2.83GHz — $ 49Intel Core2 Quad Q9650 @ 3.00GHz — $ 69.8Intel Pentium G2010 @ 2.80GHz — $ 34.9Intel Pentium G2020 @ 2.90GHz — $ 32.9Intel Pentium G2030 @ 3.00GHz — $ 41Intel Pentium G2120 @ 3. 10GHz — $ 46Intel Pentium G2130 @ 3.20GHz — $ 50Intel Pentium G2140 @ 3.30GHz — $ 50Intel Pentium G3220 @ 3.00GHz — $ 120Intel Pentium G3240 @ 3.10GHz — $ 80Intel Pentium G3250 @ 3.20GHz — $ 110Intel Pentium G3258 @ 3.20GHz — $ 178.3Intel Pentium G3260 @ 3.30GHz — $ 105Intel Pentium G3420 @ 3.20GHz — $ 110Intel Pentium G3430 @ 3.30GHz — $ 90Intel Pentium G3440 @ 3.30GHz — $ 159.9Intel Pentium G3450 @ 3.40GHz — $ 100Intel Pentium G3460 @ 3.50GHz — $ 288.2Intel Pentium G3470 @ 3.60GHz — $ 104.3Intel Pentium G4400 @ 3.30GHz — $ 80Intel Pentium G4500 @ 3.50GHz — $ 85.3Intel Pentium G4520 @ 3.60GHz — $ 110.9Intel Pentium G4560 @ 3.50GHz — $ 103.1Intel Pentium G4600 @ 3.60GHz — $ 100Intel Pentium G4620 @ 3.70GHz — $ 105.9Intel Pentium G640 @ 2.80GHz — $ 25Intel Pentium G645 @ 2.90GHz — $ 95Intel Pentium G840 @ 2.80GHz — $ 35Intel Pentium G850 @ 2.90GHz — $ 30Intel Pentium G860 @ 3.00GHz — $ 30Intel Pentium G870 @ 3.10GHz — $ 97Intel Pentium Gold G5400 @ 3.70GHz — $ 123.9Intel Pentium Gold G5500 @ 3. 80GHz — $ 100.3Intel Pentium Gold G5600 @ 3.90GHz — $ 100.9

Change Variant To
Select..AFOX GTX 1050 TiAFOX GTX 1050 Ti V2ASL GTX 1050 Ti Battle FlagASL GTX 1050 Ti SkynetASL GTX 1050 Ti SkynetASL GTX 1050 Ti Skynet War FlagASL GTX 1050 Ti Soar DragonASL GTX 1050 Ti WolverineASL GTX 1050 Ti WolverineASUS CERBERUS GTX 1050 Ti AdvancedASUS CERBERUS GTX 1050 Ti OCASUS DUAL GTX 1050 TiASUS DUAL GTX 1050 Ti OCASUS DUAL GTX 1050 Ti OC V2ASUS EXPEDITION GTX 1050 TiASUS EXPEDITION GTX 1050 Ti OCASUS PHOENIX GTX 1050 TiASUS ROG STRIX GTX 1050 Ti GAMINGASUS ROG STRIX GTX 1050 Ti GAMING OCAxigon GTX 1050 Ti GhostBIOSTAR GTX 1050 TiBIOSTAR GTX 1050 Ti Dual CoolingColorful GTX 1050 Ti GAMINGColorful GTX 1050 Ti GAMING V2Colorful GTX 1050 Ti GAMING V3Colorful GTX 1050 Ti GAMING V5Colorful GTX 1050 Ti Low ProfileColorful GTX 1050 Ti Mini OCColorful GTX 1050 Ti Smart SharkColorful GTX 1050 Ti Smart Shark V3Colorful GTX 1050 Ti Smart Shark V5Colorful GTX 1050 Ti Smart Shark-LEColorful GTX 1050 Ti Smart Shark-LE V2Colorful GTX 1050 Ti TomahawkColorful GTX 1050 Ti Tomahawk V2Colorful iCafe GTX 1050 TiColorful iCafe GTX 1050 Ti GAMINGColorful iCafe GTX 1050 Ti GreenColorful iCafe GTX 1050 Ti Green V2Colorful iCafe GTX 1050 Ti V2Colorful iGame GTX 1050 Ti Fire Ares SColorful iGame GTX 1050 Ti Flame Ares UColorful iGame GTX 1050 Ti Flame Ares U-LEColorful iGame GTX 1050 Ti Flame Ares U-TOPColorful iGame GTX 1050 Ti Frozen Knight MiniColorful iGame GTX 1050 Ti Vulcan UColorful iGame GTX 1050 Ti Vulcan U ECDigital Alliance GTX 1050 Ti Dual OCDigital Alliance GTX 1050 Ti StormXELSA GTX 1050 Ti S. A.CEMTEK HV GTX 1050 Ti GAMER Edition OCEMTEK HV GTX 1050 Ti MINI MONSTEREMTEK HV GTX 1050 Ti OCEVGA GTX 1050 Ti ACX 2.0EVGA GTX 1050 Ti FTW ACX 3.0EVGA GTX 1050 Ti FTW DT ACX 3.0EVGA GTX 1050 Ti Low Profile ACX 2.0EVGA GTX 1050 Ti SC ACX 2.0EVGA GTX 1050 Ti SSC ACX 3.0FORSA GTX 1050 TiGALAX GTX 1050 Ti BlackGALAX GTX 1050 Ti EXOCGALAX GTX 1050 Ti EXOC WhiteGALAX GTX 1050 Ti GAMERGALAX GTX 1050 Ti GeneralGALAX GTX 1050 Ti OCGALAX GTX 1050 Ti OC Low ProfileGALAX GTX 1050 Ti TigerGALAX GTX 1050 Ti Tiger V2GIGABYTE GTX 1050 TiGIGABYTE GTX 1050 Ti G1 GamingGIGABYTE GTX 1050 Ti OCGIGABYTE GTX 1050 Ti OC Low ProfileGIGABYTE GTX 1050 Ti WindForce X2 OCGainward GTX 1050 TiGainward GTX 1050 Ti GaleGainward GTX 1050 Ti Gale EXGainward GTX 1050 Ti Gale RGBGainward GTX 1050 Ti HurricaneGainward GTX 1050 Ti ListenGainward GTX 1050 Ti WindGainward GTX 1050 Ti Wind V2Gainward GTX 1050 Ti Wind V3Gainward GTX 1050 Ti Wind-PInno3D GTX 1050 Ti 1-Slot EditionInno3D GTX 1050 Ti CompactInno3D GTX 1050 Ti Compact Lineage IIInno3D GTX 1050 Ti Twin X2JYVGA GTX 1050 Ti GAMINGKFA2 GTX 1050 Ti OCKUROTOSHIKOU GTX 1050 Ti OCKUROTOSHIKOU GTX 1050 Ti OCKUROTOSHIKOU GTX 1050 Ti OC LPLeadtek WinFast GTX 1050 TiLeadtek WinFast GTX 1050 Ti Rev. BMAXSUN GTX 1050 Ti Gaming EditionMAXSUN GTX 1050 Ti Gaming Edition M.2MAXSUN GTX 1050 Ti Gaming Edition M.4MAXSUN GTX 1050 Ti GiantMAXSUN GTX 1050 Ti Giant M.4MAXSUN GTX 1050 Ti JetStreamMAXSUN GTX 1050 Ti JetStream M.4MAXSUN GTX 1050 Ti TerminatorMAXSUN GTX 1050 Ti Terminator FrostFireMAXSUN GTX 1050 Ti Terminator M.2MAXSUN GTX 1050 Ti Terminator M.3MAXSUN GTX 1050 Ti Terminator M.4MAXSUN GTX 1050 Ti TransformersMAXSUN GTX 1050 Ti i-CafeMAXSUN GTX 1050 Ti i-Cafe Limited EditionMAXSUN GTX 1050 Ti i-Cafe Limited EditionMSI GTX 1050 TiMSI GTX 1050 Ti AERO ITXMSI GTX 1050 Ti AERO ITX OCMSI GTX 1050 Ti AERO ITX OCV1MSI GTX 1050 Ti GAMINGMSI GTX 1050 Ti GAMING XMSI GTX 1050 Ti LPMSI GTX 1050 Ti OCMSI GTX 1050 Ti OCManli GTX 1050 Ti F352GManli GTX 1050 Ti F365GManli GTX 1050 Ti GallardoONDA GTX 1050 Ti AegisONDA GTX 1050 Ti Aegis v2.0ONDA GTX 1050 Ti Aegis v3.0ONDA GTX 1050 Ti ClassicONDA GTX 1050 Ti Model PIOPNY GTX 1050 TiPNY XLR8 GTX 1050 Ti Gaming OCPalit GTX 1050 Ti DualPalit GTX 1050 Ti Dual OCPalit GTX 1050 Ti KalmXPalit GTX 1050 Ti StormXPoint of View GTX 1050 TiVeineda GTX 1050 TiViewMax GTX 1050 Ti Cyborg AssassinYeston GTX 1050 Ti GAEAYeston GTX 1050 Ti Speed EditionZOGIS GTX 1050 TiZOGIS GTX 1050 Ti SuperClockZOTAC GTX 1050 Ti Destroyer OCZOTAC GTX 1050 Ti Galactic PAZOTAC GTX 1050 Ti Galactic PBZOTAC GTX 1050 Ti Low ProfileZOTAC GTX 1050 Ti MiniZOTAC GTX 1050 Ti Mini Low ProfileZOTAC GTX 1050 Ti OC EditionZOTAC GTX 1050 Ti Thunder HYZOTAC GTX 1050 Ti Thunder PAZOTAC GTX 1050 Ti Thunder PBZOTAC GTX 1050 Ti Thunder SMZOTAC GTX 1050 Ti Thunder TSI HYZOTAC GTX 1050 Ti Thunder TSI PAZOTAC GTX 1050 Ti Thunder TSI SMZOTAC GTX 1050 Ti X-Gaming OC

Desired Quality Setting
Select. .Ultra Quality — MSAA, HBAO, and advanced shadowsHigh Quality — No MSAA, HBAO, or advanced shadowsMedium QualityLow Quality

Intel Core i7-8086K review | 64 facts and highlights

65points

Intel Core i7-8086K

Intel Core i7-8086K

Why is Intel Core i7-8086K better than the average?

• CPU speed?
  6 x 4GHzvs12.47GHz
• RAM speed?
  2666MHzvs2487.36MHz
• CPU threads?
  12vs7.72
• Semiconductor size?
  14nmvs17.01nm
• PassMark result?
  14489vs8616.84
• Turbo clock speed?
  5GHzvs3.83GHz
• L3 cache?
  12MBvs9.52MB
• Maximum memory bandwidth?
  41.6GB/svs37.63GB/s

Which are the most popular comparisons?

AMD Ryzen 5 5500U

vs

Intel Core i5-1135G7

AMD Ryzen 3 3250U

vs

Intel Core i3-1115G4

AMD Ryzen 3 5300U

vs

Intel Core i3-1115G4

AMD Ryzen 5 3500U

vs

Intel Core i5-10210U

AMD Ryzen 7 3700U

vs

Intel Core i5-10210U

AMD Ryzen 7 5800H

vs

Intel Core i7-11800H

AMD Ryzen 5 3500U

vs

Intel Core i3-1115G4

AMD Ryzen 5 4600H

vs

Intel Core i5-10300H

Intel Core i3-1115G4

vs

Intel Core i5-1135G7

AMD Ryzen 5 5500U

vs

Intel Core i3-1115G4

Price comparison

User reviews

Performance

1. CPU speed

6 x 4GHz

The CPU speed indicates how many processing cycles per second can be executed by a CPU, considering all of its cores (processing units). It is calculated by adding the clock rates of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors employing different microarchitectures, of each group of cores.

2.CPU threads

More threads result in faster performance and better multitasking.

3.turbo clock speed

When the CPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased performance.

4.Has an unlocked multiplier

✔Intel Core i7-8086K

Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier which makes them easy to overclock, allowing you to gain increased performance in games and other apps.

5.L2 cache

A larger L2 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.

6.L3 cache

A larger L3 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.

7.L1 cache

A larger L1 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.

8.L2 core

0.25MB/core

More data can be stored in the L2 cache for access by each core of the CPU.

9.L3 core

2MB/core

More data can be stored in the L3 cache for access by each core of the CPU.

Memory

1.RAM speed

2666MHz

It can support faster memory, which will give quicker system performance.

2.maximum memory bandwidth

41.6GB/s

This is the maximum rate that data can be read from or stored into memory.

3.DDR memory version

DDR (Double Data Rate) memory is the most common type of RAM. Newer versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy-efficient.

4.memory channels

More memory channels increases the speed of data transfer between the memory and the CPU.

5.maximum memory amount

The maximum amount of memory (RAM) supported.

6.bus transfer rate

The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.

7.Supports ECC memory

✖Intel Core i7-8086K

Error-correcting code memory can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when is it essential to avoid corruption, such as scientific computing or when running a server.

8.eMMC version

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value.

A higher version of eMMC allows faster memory interfaces, having a positive effect on the performance of a device. For example, when transferring files from your computer to the internal storage over USB.

9.bus speed

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value.

The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.

Benchmarks

1.PassMark result

This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using multiple threads.

2.PassMark result (single)

This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using a single thread.

3.Geekbench 5 result (multi)

Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s multi-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)

4.Cinebench R20 (multi) result

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value.

Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s multi-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.

5.Cinebench R20 (single) result

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value.

Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s single-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.

6.Geekbench 5 result (single)

Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s single-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)

7.Blender (bmw27) result

206.8seconds

The Blender (bmw27) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.

8.Blender (classroom) result

654.4seconds

The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.

9.performance per watt

This means the CPU is more efficient, giving a greater amount of performance for each watt of power used.

Features

1.uses multithreading

✔Intel Core i7-8086K

Multithreading technology (such as Intel’s Hyperthreading or AMD’s Simultaneous Multithreading) provides increased performance by splitting each of the processor’s physical cores into virtual cores, also known as threads. This way, each core can run two instruction streams at once.

2.Has AES

✔Intel Core i7-8086K

AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.

3.Has AVX

✔Intel Core i7-8086K

AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial apps, as well as improving Linux RAID software performance.

4.SSE version

SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing an image or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.

5.Has F16C

✔Intel Core i7-8086K

F16C is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.

6.bits executed at a time

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value.

NEON provides acceleration for media processing, such as listening to MP3s.

7.Has MMX

✔Intel Core i7-8086K

MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.

8.Has TrustZone

✖Intel Core i7-8086K

A technology integrated into the processor to secure the device for use with features such as mobile payments and streaming video using digital rights management (DRM).

9.front-end width

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value.

The CPU can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), meaning that the CPU performs better

Price comparison

Cancel

Which are the best CPUs?

Intel Core i7-8086K — processor overview. Tests and specifications

The Intel Core i7-8086K processor is designed based on 14 nm process technology and Coffee Lake architecture. The base clock is 3.70 GHz and the maximum turbo clock is 5.00 GHz. Intel Core i7-8086K contains 6 processor cores. To make the right choice for upgrading your computer, check out the detailed specifications and test results. Please check your motherboard socket compatibility before choosing.

5.0
From 1
Hitesti Score

TOP 10 processors

Most popular on the site

Intel Celeron N4020
2x 1.10 GHz (2.80 GHz)

AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
6x 2. 10 GHz (4.00 GHz) HT

Intel Celeron J4125
4x 2.00 GHz (2.70 GHz)

AMD Ryzen 3 3250U
2x 2.60 GHz (3.50 GHz) HT

AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
8x 1.80 GHz (4.30 GHz) HT

AMD Athlon Silver 3050U
2x 2. 30 GHz (3.20 GHz)

Intel Core i3-1115G4
2x 1.70 GHz (4.10 GHz) HT

Intel Core i5-1135G7
4x 2.40 GHz (4.00 GHz) HT

AMD Ryzen 5 4600G
6x 3.70 GHz (4.20 GHz) HT

Intel Celeron N4500
2x 1. 10 GHz (2.90 GHz)

Buy here:

AliExpress

General information

Base and maximum clock speed of the Intel Core i7-8086K processor, number of processor cores and threads. The more the better (marked in green).

CPU cores, base and turbo frequencies

The overall performance of a processor can be easily determined based on the number of processor cores and threads, as well as the clock speed in standard mode and turbo. The more GHz, cores and L2-L3 cache a processor has, the better. Please note that high specs require a powerful cooling system and a quality chipset (check the VRM on the motherboard).

Clock frequency:	3.70 GHz		Number of cores:	6
Turbo (1 core):	5. 00 GHz		Number of threads:	12
Hyper trading:	Yes		Acceleration:	Yes
Turbo (6 cores):	4. 30 GHz

Internal graphics

Some manufacturers (most often Intel) supplement processors with graphics chips, such a solution is especially popular in laptops, but ineffective in workstations and gaming stations. The higher the clock speed of the video card and the more memory on board, the better.

GPU name:		Intel UHD Graphics 630
GPU frequency:	0.35 GHz		GPU (Turbo):	1. 20 GHz
Generation:	9.5		DirectX version:	12
Execution units:	24		Number of shaders:	192
Maximum memory:	64GB		Number of monitors:	3
Technology:	14 nm		Release date:	Q4/2017

Hardware codec support

Here we are dealing with specifications that are used by some processor manufacturers. These figures are mostly technical and can be disregarded for comparative purposes.

RAM and PCIe

These are the memory standards supported by processors. The higher the standard and clock frequency with the amount of RAM, the better the performance and speed of the processor. It is also worth considering the possibility of memory operation in multichannel mode.

Memory type:	DDR4-2666		Memory channels:	2
ECC:	No.		PCIe version:	3. 0
PCIe lanes:	16

Encryption

Data encryption support

Thermal management and TDP

Technical details

These are key parameters that will help you determine which processor is best. Pay special attention to the release date, the technological aspects of the manufacturing process (measured in nanometers) and the third level (L3) cache.

L3-Cache:	12.00 MB		Technology:	14 nm
Architecture:	Coffee Lake		Virtualization:	VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
Socket:	LGA 1151-2		Release date:	Q2/2018
Price:	ca. 410 $

Devices compatible with this processor

You probably already know which devices use processors. It can be a desktop computer or a laptop.

This synthetic benchmark will help you determine the actual processing power of a single CPU core. Cinebench R11.5 is based on MAXON CINEMA 4D and uses 9 different test scenarios0003

Intel Core i7-8086K
6x 3. 70 GHz (5.00 GHz) HT

Intel Core i9-8950HK
6x 2.90 GHz (4.80 GHz) HT

Intel Core i7-9700KF
8x 3.60 GHz (4.90 GHz)

Cinebench R11.5 performs simultaneous cross-platform tests on all processor cores. Running realistic 3D scenes, this benchmark will unleash the full potential of your single-core Intel or AMD

processor

Intel Xeon E5-2660 v3
10x 2. 60 GHz (3.30 GHz) HT

Intel Xeon E5-2658 v3
12x 2.20 GHz (2.90 GHz) HT

Intel Core i7-8086K
6x 3.70 GHz (5.00 GHz) HT

Intel Core i7-8700
6x 3.20 GHz (4.60 GHz) HT

AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 1700
8x 3. 00 GHz (3.70 GHz) HT

Cinebench 11.5 is based on Cinema 4D Suite, a popular software for creating shapes and other things in 3D. The iGPU test uses the processor’s internal graphics unit to execute OpenGL commands.

Intel Core i9-9900
8x 3.10 GHz (5.00 GHz) HT

AMD A10-5700
4x 3.40 GHz (4.00 GHz)

Intel Core i7-8086K
6x 3. 70 GHz (5.00 GHz) HT

Intel Core i7-7600U
2x 2.80 GHz (3.90 GHz) HT

Intel Core i7-8650U
4x 1.90 GHz (4.20 GHz) HT

The latter is used to create 3D models and shapes. Cinebench R15 is used to benchmark the performance of single core processors. Hyperthreading capability is not taken into account. It is an updated version of Cinebench 11.5. Like all new versions, the updated benchmark is based on Cinema 4 Suite

software

Intel Core i7-10700K
8x 3. 80 GHz (5.10 GHz) HT

Intel Core i9-9900KS
8x 4.00 GHz (5.00 GHz) HT

Intel Core i7-8086K
6x 3.70 GHz (5.00 GHz) HT

AMD Ryzen 9 3950X
16x 3.50 GHz (4.70 GHz) HT

Intel Core i5-10600KF
6x 4. 10 GHz (4.80 GHz) HT

Cinebench R15 can be used to test the performance of multi-core processors. The test produces accurate and reliable results. This benchmark is an updated version of Cinebench 11.5, which is based on Cinema 4 Suite soft.

Intel Xeon E5-2650L v4
14x 1.70 GHz (2.50 GHz) HT

AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
6x 3.00 GHz (4.00 GHz) HT

Intel Core i7-8086K
6x 3. 70 GHz (5.00 GHz) HT

Intel Core i7-8700K
6x 3.70 GHz (4.70 GHz) HT

Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3
8x 3.20 GHz (3.60 GHz) HT

Cinebench R23 is a new version of the most popular single-core CPU rendering benchmark, Cinebench. We have results for all modern

processors

AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT
6x 4. 00 GHz (4.50 GHz) HT

AMD Ryzen 7 3800X
8x 3.90 GHz (4.50 GHz) HT

Intel Core i7-8086K
6x 3.70 GHz (5.00 GHz) HT

Intel Core i5-8600K
6x 3.60 GHz (4.30 GHz)

Intel Core i7-10700KF
8x 3. 80 GHz (5.10 GHz) HT

Cinebench R23 is a new version of the most popular multi-core CPU rendering benchmark, Cinebench. We have results for all modern

processors

Intel Core i5-10600KF
6x 4.10 GHz (4.80 GHz) HT

Intel Core i5-10600K
6x 4.10 GHz (4.80 GHz) HT

Intel Core i7-8086K
6x 3. 70 GHz (5.00 GHz) HT

AMD Ryzen 7 4800U
8x 1.80 GHz (4.20 GHz) HT

AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
6x 3.30 GHz (4.20 GHz) HT

Geekbench 3 is a benchmark for 64-bit Intel and AMD processors. It uses a new power rating system for a single processor core. This software simulates real scenarios for accurate results

Intel Core i7-9700K
8x 3. 60 GHz (4.90GHz)

Intel Core i9-8950HK
6x 2.90 GHz (4.80 GHz) HT

Intel Core i7-8086K
6x 3.70 GHz (5.00 GHz) HT

Intel Core i7-8700K
6x 3.70 GHz (4.70 GHz) HT

Intel Core i7-8700
6x 3. 20 GHz (4.60 GHz) HT

Geekbench 3 supports multi-core AMD and Intel processors. Being based on MAXON CINEMA 4D, it allows you to get the real comparative potential of the

processor

Intel Xeon E5-2630 v2
6x 2.60 GHz (3.10 GHz) HT

Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4
8x 2.10 GHz (3.00 GHz) HT

Intel Core i7-8086K
6x 3. 70 GHz (5.00 GHz) HT

Intel Core i7-8700K
6x 3.70 GHz (4.70 GHz) HT

Intel Core i7-8700
6x 3.20 GHz (4.60 GHz) HT

Geekbench 5 is the latest software. Completely new algorithms provide fairly accurate test results for single-core processors.

Intel Core i9-9900KF
8x 3. 60 GHz (5.00 GHz) HT

Intel Core i9-9900K
8x 3.60 GHz (5.00 GHz) HT

Intel Core i7-8086K
6x 3.70 GHz (5.00 GHz) HT

Apple A13 Bionic
6x 1.80 GHz (2.65 GHz)

AMD Ryzen

X
16x 3. 50 GHz (4.70 GHz) HT

Geekbench 5 software package shows benchmark results for memory performance and multi-core processor speed. This takes into account the ability to hyperthreading.

AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
8x 3.70 GHz (4.30 GHz) HT

Intel Core i9-9900T
8x 2.10 GHz (4.40 GHz) HT

Intel Core i7-8086K
6x 3. 70 GHz (5.00 GHz) HT

Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2
12x 2.70 GHz (3.50 GHz) HT

AMD Ryzen 5 3600X
6x 3.80 GHz (4.40 GHz) HT

We use the Blender benchmark to monitor CPU performance. Test results show how fast the device performs when performing multiprocessing tasks

Intel Core i5-10600K
6x 4. 10 GHz (4.80 GHz) HT

Intel Core i7-10875H
8x 2.30 GHz (5.10 GHz) HT

Intel Core i7-8086K
6x 3.70 GHz (5.00 GHz) HT

AMD Ryzen 7 1700X
8x 3.40 GHz (3.80 GHz) HT

Intel Core i7-9700K
8x 3. 60 GHz (4.90 GHz)

It tests all and general CPU performance (math calculations, compression and decompression speed, 2D&3D graphics tests). Please note that data may differ from actual situations.

Intel Xeon E5-1680 v3
8x 3.20 GHz (3.80 GHz) HT

Intel Xeon E5-2658 v3
12x 2.20 GHz (2.90 GHz) HT

Intel Core i7-8086K
6x 3. 70 GHz (5.00 GHz) HT

Intel Xeon E5-2667 v2
8x 3.30 GHz (4.00 GHz) HT

AMD Ryzen 5 3500X
6x 3.60 GHz (4.10 GHz)

This test measures the performance of integrated graphics on Intel and AMD processors. The result is the calculated processing power in Single-Precision mode FP32

AMD A8-3820
4x 2. 50 GHz (2.80 GHz)

AMD A8-3800
4x 2.40 GHz (2.70 GHz)

Intel Core i7-8086K
6x 3.70 GHz (5.00 GHz) HT

Intel Xeon E3-1275 v5
4x 3.60 GHz (4.00 GHz) HT

Intel Xeon E3-1245 v5
4x 3. 50 GHz (3.90 GHz) HT

5.0
From 1
Hitesti Score

Share on social networks:

In order to leave a review, you need to login

Review Intel Core i7-8086K

Compare Intel Core i7-8086K

VS

Intel Xeon Platinum 9282

Intel Core i5-6442EQ

AMD A10-5800K

AMD A6-9225

AMD A8-3530MX

Intel Core i9-10900KF

AMD A10-4657M

AMD A10-4600M

AMD A10-5700

AMD A8-7650K

Core i7-8086K [in 15 benchmarks]

Intel
Core i7-8086K

• Interface
• Core frequency
• Video memory size
• Memory type
• Memory frequency
• Maximum resolution

Description

Intel started Intel Core i7-8086K sales on June 1, 2018 at a suggested price of $425. This is a desktop processor based on the Coffee Lake-S architecture, primarily designed for office systems. It has 6 cores and 12 threads and is manufactured using 14nm process technology, the maximum frequency is 5000MHz, the multiplier is unlocked.

In terms of compatibility, this is an Intel Socket 1151 processor with a TDP of 95W and a maximum temperature of 72°C. It supports DDR3, DDR4 memory.

It provides poor benchmark performance at

14.40%

from the leader, which is AMD EPYC 7h22.

Core i7
8086K

or

EPYC
7h22

General information

Information about the type (desktop or laptop) and architecture of the Core i7-8086K, as well as when sales started and cost at that time.

+

Virtualization Technologies

Technologies supported by Core i7-8086K that speed up virtual machines are listed.

RAM support

Types, maximum size and channels of RAM supported by Core i7-8086K. Higher memory frequency may be supported depending on the motherboard.

These are the results of Core i7-8086K performance tests in non-gaming benchmarks. The overall score is set from 0 to 100, where 100 corresponds to the fastest processor at the moment.

Overall benchmark performance

This is our overall performance rating. We regularly improve our algorithms, but if you find any inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in the comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-8086K
14.40

• Passmark
• GeekBench 5 Single Core
• GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
• Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
• Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core
• 3DMark06 CPU
• Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core
• Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core
• Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core
• Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core
• TrueCrypt AES
• WinRAR 4.0
• x264 encoding pass 2
• x264 encoding pass 1

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widely used benchmark that consists of 8 different tests, including integer and floating point calculations, extended instruction tests, compression, encryption, and game physics calculations. Also includes a separate single-threaded test.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i7-8086K
14513

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application designed as CPU benchmarks that independently recreate certain real world tasks that can accurately measure performance. This version uses only one processor core.

Benchmark coverage: 37%

i7-8086K
1313

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application designed as CPU benchmarks that independently recreate certain real world tasks that can accurately measure performance. This version uses all available processor cores.

Benchmark coverage: 37%

i7-8086K
7003

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is a very outdated ray tracing benchmark for processors developed by the authors of Cinema 4D, Maxon. The Single-Core version uses a single CPU thread to render a futuristic motorcycle model.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

i7-8086K
7216

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 that uses all processor threads. The possible number of threads in this version is limited to 16.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

i7-8086K
35896

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is an outdated set of benchmarks based on DirectX 9 by Futuremark. Its processor part contains two tests, one of which calculates the pathfinding of game AI, the other emulates game physics using the PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

i7-8086K
11218

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 that uses all processor threads. This version supports a maximum of 64 threads.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

i7-8086K
15

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core (sometimes referred to as Multi-Thread) is a variant of Cinebench R15 that uses all of the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

i7-8086K
1349

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (Release 15) is a benchmark created by Maxon, the creator of the popular Cinema 4D 3D modeling package. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench using more modern variants of the Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes referred to as Single-Thread) uses only one CPU thread to render a room full of mirror balls and complexly shaped lights.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

i7-8086K
206

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark developed by Maxon. authors of Cinema 4D. It has been superseded by later versions of Cinebench which use more modern variants of the Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads one CPU thread with ray tracing, rendering a glossy room full of crystal spheres and lights.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

i7-8086K
2.3

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a deprecated program that was widely used to encrypt disk partitions on the fly. It contains several built-in benchmarks, one of which is TrueCrypt AES. It measures the speed of data encryption using the AES algorithm. The result of the test is the encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i7-8086K
8

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of the popular archiver. It contains an internal speed test using maximum compression by the RAR algorithm on large amounts of randomly generated data. Results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 12%

i7-8086K
6752

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower MPEG4 x264 video compression benchmark, resulting in a variable bit rate output file. This results in a better quality of the resulting video file, as a higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. The benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.

Benchmark coverage: 12%

i7-8086K
85

x264 encoding pass 1

The x264 benchmark uses the MPEG 4 x264 compression method to encode the HD (720p) sample video. Pass 1 is a faster option that produces an output file at a constant bit rate. Its result is measured in frames per second, that is, how many frames of the source video file were encoded in one second on average.

Benchmark coverage: 12%

i7-8086K
231

Relative capacity

Core i7-8086K overall performance compared to its nearest competitor desktop processors.

AMD Ryzen 7 2700E
100.97

Intel Core i7-9700K
100.28

Intel Core i5-10600KF
100

Intel Core i7-8086K
100

Intel Core i5-10600K
99.93

Intel Core i7-9700KF
99.44

Intel Core i3-12100F
99.03

AMD competitor

We believe that the nearest equivalent to Core i7-8086K from AMD is Ryzen 7 2700E, which is 1% faster on average and higher by 8 positions in our rating.

Ryzen 7
2700E

Compare

Here are some of AMD’s closest competitors to the Core i7-8086K:

AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
104.72

AMD Ryzen 7 1700
102.22

AMD Ryzen 7 2700E
100.97

Intel Core i7-8086K
100

AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
96.67

AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
96.18

AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE
94.24

Other processors

Here we recommend several processors that are more or less similar in performance to the reviewed one.

Core i5
10600KF

Compare

Core i5
10600K

Compare

Core i7
9700K

Compare

Core i7
9700KF

Compare

Ryzen 7
2700E

Compare

Core i7
6900K

Compare

Recommended graphics cards

According to our statistics, these cards are most often used with Core i7-8086K:

GeForce GTX
1080 Ti

12. 3%

GeForce GTX
1060 6GB

9.2%

GeForce GTX
1080

6.9%

GeForce RTX
2080

6.2%

GeForce RTX
2070

4.6%

GeForce RTX
2080 Ti

3.8%

GeForce GTX
1050 Ti

3.1%

GeForce GTX
1070 Ti

3.1%

GeForce RTX
3080

3.1%

GeForce GTX
1070

2.3%

User rating

Here you can see the evaluation of the processor by users, as well as put your own rating.

Tips and comments

Here you can ask a question about the Core i7-8086K processor, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.

Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.

Intel Core i7-8086K Processor Overview

In 1978, Intel launched the first 16-bit 8086 processor, and 40 years later (in the 4th quarter of 2018) the unlocked Core i7-8086K appeared on the market. In fact, the novelty is the anniversary device , which will be of interest primarily to collectors and enthusiasts who love to tinker with in something unique and special.

The Intel Core i7-8086K is built for overclocking, no doubt about it.

The fact is that the Intel Core i7-8086K is nothing more than a 6-core Core i7-8700K, but with a slightly increased clock speed. The nominal 8086K is 4 GHz (for all cores), in Turbo Boost mode, one core is accelerated to 5 GHz. At 8700K, these figures are more modest, but we are well aware that with the help of an unlocked multiplier, these figures can be equalized without any problems.

At the same time, the Intel Core i7-8086K is more expensive than the Core i7-8700K. There is nothing surprising in this, for obvious reasons it is necessary to overpay for unique things.

After the announcement of the Intel Core i7-8086K , information about the limited availability of this processor was circulating on the net, but the hero of the day will be enough for everyone. Even after 6 months, this CPU can really be found in some domestic stores.

Specifications

The 14 nm Intel Core i7-8086K (Coffee Lake) has six physical cores and 12 computing threads. The cache size is 12 MB. TDP — 95W. The device is compatible with motherboards based on Socket LGA 1151.

The processor can work with dual-channel DDR4-2666 RAM, the maximum amount is 128 GB. Core i7-8086K supports, perhaps, all modern developments and teams from Intel (Optane, Intel SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2), except for vPro.

The Core i7-8086K also has an integrated Intel UHD 630 graphics core. More or less playable fps was only possible at 1366×768 at the lowest picture quality settings (effects, lights and shadows had to be turned off).

But even in this situation, noticeable fps drops occurred regularly (on some cards).

We won’t call the Intel Core i7-8086K a hot processor. Claimed 95 watts definitely needs to be vented with a quality air cooler. But, if you do not plan to overclock this processor, even the most budgetary tower-type CO for $20-30 will be enough for specialized needs. The situation changes during overclocking, but we will talk about this later.

Test bench:

Motherboard — ASUS ROG Strix Z390-E Gaming
RAM — Kingston HyperX Fury DDR4-2666 8 GB
Video card — ASUS ROG Strix GTX 1080 Ti
Storage — Patriot Viper 25 GB6
Power supply — Xilence Performance X 850 W

Performance and test results

The tests carried out once again convince us that the Intel Core i7-8086K is by and large no different from the Core i7-8700K. In some tests we see absolute equality.

Before us is a top-end 6-core processor, the power of which is enough to quickly process all existing multimedia tasks; the device is also suitable for professional needs (which do not require more than 12 computing threads).

The high single core frequency helps the Intel Core i7-8086K to unleash the potential of high-end graphics cards, although this CPU is too good for PC games. If you take a look at the test charts, you will be convinced that for a consistently high average frame/s for modern 3D projects, more affordable gems, for example, the Core i3 level, are enough.

Overclocking

The Intel Core i7-8086K is built for overclocking, no doubt about it. But the problem is that nominally this CPU operates at a fairly high clock speed. To achieve more or less serious results, you will need a top-end air cooler (with two or even three fans), a liquid cooling system or nitrogen.

An ID-Cooling SE-913X ordinary single-propeller cooler is enough for stable operation of the Intel Core i7-8086K at 5 GHz (all six cores), while the voltage will automatically rise to 1. 345 V (1.305 is not enough, blue screen crashes), and these are no longer the nominal 95 W, but about 135-155 W (according to the monitoring program).

If you are not embarrassed by periodic temperature jumps (and they will reach 86-89 degrees), you can not look for high-quality CO. However, for constants should choose something more serious; level Scythe Mugen 5 TUF Gaming Alliance. In this case, the monitored CPU will not be in danger of overheating (maximum 75 degrees).

On air , our engineering sample wound up at 5200 GHz, but there was no question of stability.

Conclusion

The Intel Core i7-8086K is definitely unique. It is designed for those who are willing to pay for it. A user who really needs a powerful processor with 6 physical cores (12 computing threads) should pay attention to the more affordable Core i7-8700K. He is no worse.

Nevertheless, this fact does not negate the originality and some mystery of the Intel Core i7-8086K, which will definitely not lose relevance for another 5-7 years (a comparison with the Core i7-2600K comes to mind, it was born in 2011 ).

If you install an Intel Core i7-8086K, smart memory sticks, an anniversary motherboard (for example, from ASUS) and a limited video card in a profile system, you will get a single product that is not like the others. Recommended.

Keywords: Intel

Intel Core i7-8086K Processor Review: Features, Benchmarks

The Core i7-8086K processor was released by Intel, release date: June 1, 2018. At the time of release, the processor cost $425. The processor is designed for desktop computers and is built on the Coffee Lake architecture.

Processor unlocked for overclocking. The total number of cores is 6, threads are 12. The maximum clock speed of the processor is 5.00 GHz. The maximum temperature is 100°C. Technological process — 14 nm. Cache size: L1 — 384 KB, L2 — 1.5 MB, L3 — 12 MB.

Supported memory type: DDR4-2666. Maximum supported memory size: 128 GB.

Supported socket type: FCLGA1151. The maximum number of processors in the configuration is 1. Power consumption (TDP): 95 Watt.

The processor is integrated with Intel® UHD Graphics 630 with the following graphics settings: maximum memory size — 64 GB.

Benchmarks

Boost Core Clock	1200MHz
Core frequency	350MHz
Floating point performance	460. 8 gflops
Process	14nm
Number of shaders	24
Texturing speed	28.8 GTexel/s
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt
Number of transistors	189 million

Gaming performance

1. Days Gone (2021)
2. Mass Effect Legendary Edition (2021)
3 Outriders (2021)
4. Hitman 3 (2021)
5 Immortals Fenyx Rising (2020)
6. Crysis Remastered (2020)
7. Yakuza Like a Dragon (2020)
8. FIFA 21 (2020)
9 Serious Sam 4 (2020)
10. Death Stranding (2020)
11. F1 2020 (2020)
12. Strange Brigade (2018)
13. Gears Tactics (2020)
14. Escape from Tarkov (2020)
15. Red Dead Redemption 2 (2019)
16. Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order (2019)
17. FIFA 20 (2019)
18. Borderlands 3 (2019)
19. Control (2019)
20. Counter-Strike: GO (2012)
21. Total War: Three Kingdoms (2019)
22. League of Legends (2019)
23. F1 2019 (2019)
24. Rage 2 (2019)
25. The Division 2 (2019)
26. Dirt Rally 2.0 (2019)
27. Anthem (2019)
28. Metro Exodus (2019))
29 Far Cry New Dawn (2019)
30 Apex Legends (2019)
31. World of Tanks enCore (2018)
32. Just Cause 4 (2018)
33. Farming Simulator 19 (2018)
34. Battlefield V (2018)
35. Fallout 76 (2018)
36. Hitman 2 (2018)
37. Call of Duty Black Ops 4 (2018)
38 Assassin’s Creed Odyssey (2018)
39. FIFA 19 (2018)
40. Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018)
41. F1 2018 (2018)
42. Monster Hunter World (2018)
43. The Crew 2 (2018)
44. Far Cry 5 (2018)
45. X-Plane 11.11 (2018)
46. ​​Kingdom Come: Deliverance (2018)

47. Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)
48. Star Wars Battlefront 2 (2017)
49 Need for Speed ​​Payback (2017)
50. Call of Duty WWII (2017)
51. Assassin’s Creed Origins (2017)
52 Wolfenstein II: The New Colossus (2017)
53. Destiny 2 (2017)
54. ELEX (2017)
55. The Evil Within 2 (2017)
56. Middle-earth: Shadow of War (2017)
57. FIFA 18 (2017)
58. F1 2017 (2017)
59. Playerunknown’s Battlegrounds (PUBG) (2017)
60 Team Fortress 2 (2017)
61. Dirt 4 (2017)
62 Rocket League (2017)
63. Prey (2017)
64 Mass Effect Andromeda (2017)
65. Ghost Recon Wildlands (2017)
66. For Honor (2017)
67 Resident Evil 7 (2017)
68. Farming Simulator 17 (2016)
69 Civilization VI (2016)
70. Battlefield 1 (2016)
71. Deus Ex Mankind Divided (2016)
72. Mirror’s Edge Catalyst (2016)
73. Overwatch (2016)
74. Doom (2016)
75. The Division (2016)
76 Far Cry Primal (2016)
77 Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016)
78 Rainbow Six Siege (2015)
79. Anno 2205 (2015)
80. World of Warships (2015)
81. Dota 2 Reborn (2015)
82. The Witcher 3 (2015)
83. Dirt Rally (2015)
84. GTA V (2015)
85. Dragon Age: Inquisition (2014)
86. Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor (2014)
87 Sims 4 (2014)
88. BioShock Infinite (2013)
89. Tomb Raider (2013)
90. Diablo III (2012)
91. The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim (2011)
92. StarCraft 2 (2010)

Days Gone (2021)

Mass Effect Legendary Edition (2021)

Outriders (2021)

Hitman 3 (2021)

0057

LOW, 1280×720	21. 80
Medium, 1920×1080

Immortals Fenyx Rising (2020)

Crysis Remastered (2020)

Yakuza Like a Dragon (2020 )

FIFA 21 (2020)

550056 Low, 1280×720

Serious Sam 4 (2020)

Death Stranding (2020)

20×1080

13. 70

7.78

F1 2020 (2020)

Strange Brigade (2018)

9005

Gears Tactics (2020)

Escape from Tarkov (2020)

)

Low, 1280×720	13. 40
Medium, 1920×1080	7.40

Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order (2019)

FIFA 20 (2019)

Borderlands 3 (2019)

Control (2019)

Counter-Strike

0054

Total War: Three Kingdoms (2019)

Leagends (2019)

F1 2019 (2019)

The Division 2 (2019)

Dirt Rally 2.0 (2019)

Low, 1280×720	52.10
Medium, 1920×1080	16. 00

Anthem (2019)

LOW, 1280×720 572 Metro Exodus (2019) Low, 1280×720 15.40 Medium, 1920×1080 7.60 Far Cry New Dawn (2019) Low, 1280×720 17.00 Medium, 1920×1080 8.00 APEX LEGENDS (2019) Low, 1280×720 35.10 900.0 35.10 900.0 35.10 900.0 35.10 35.10 900.10 900.0 35.120×1080 13.10 World of Tanks enCore (2018) Low, 1366×768 207.90 Medium, 1920×1080 25.20 Ultra, 1920×1080 9.60 JUST CAUSE 4 (2018) Low, 1280×720 15. 50 Medium, 1920×1080 8.90 999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999EAREL(2018) Low, 1280×720 71.10 Medium, 1920×1080 23.90 High, 1920×1080 11.30 Battlefield V (2018) Low 1280×720 22.60 Fallout 76 (2018) LOW, 1280×720 16.70 Medium, 1920×10.10057 Hitman 2 (2018) Low, 1280×720 12.80 Medium, 1920×1080 7.50 Call of Duty Black Ops 4 (2018) Low, 1280×720 25.90 Medium, 1920×1080 9.70 Assassin’s Creed Odyssey (2018) Low, 1280×720 11. 00 Medium, 1920×1080 7.00 FIFA 19 (2018) Low, 1280×720 57.10 Medium, 1920×1080 29.90 High, 1920×1080 27.20 Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) 9007 9007 9007 9007 9007 9007 57 Low, 1280×720 17.00 Medium, 1920×1080 F1 2018 (2018) Low, 1280×720 35.00 Medium, 1920×1080 16.00 Monster Hunter World (2018) Low, 1280×720 20.00055 Medium, 1920×1080 6.80 Far Cry 5 (2018) Low, 1280×720 14.00 Medium, 1920×1080 6. 00 X-Plane 11.11 ( 2018) Low, 1280×720 20.00 Medium, 1920×1080 14.60 High, 1920×1080 13.05 4K, 3840×2160 6.96 Kingdom Come: Deliverance (2018) Low, 1280×720 16.90 Medium, 1920×1080 6.90 Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) Star Wars Battlefront 2 (2017) LOW, 1280×720 11.30 Medium, 1920×1080 056 Low, 1280×720 19.90 Medium, 1920×1080 6.50 Need for Speed ​​Payback (2017) Low, 1280×720 19. 30 Medium, 1920×1080 8.90 Call of Duty WWII (2017) 0099 Assassin’s Creed Origins (2017) LOW, 1280×720 29.80 Medium, 1920×1080 17.40 Low, 1280×720 10.00 Medium, 1920×1080 7.00 Wolfenstein II: The New Colossus (2017) Low, 1280×720 17.70 Medium, 1920×1080 9.10 DESSTINY 2 (2017) LOW, 1280×720 9007 17.0066 Medium, 1920×1080 9.20 ELEX (2017) Low, 1280×720 14.50 Medium, 1920×1080 6.80 The Evil Within 2 (2017 ) Middle-Earth: Shadow0609 LOW, 1280×720 11. 40 Medium, 1920×1080 6.10 Low, 1280×720 20.00 Medium, 1920×1080 12.00 FIFA 18 (2017) F10057 Low, 1280×720 74.65 Medium, 1920×1080 41.70 HIGH, 1920×1080 32.30 Ultra, 1920×1080 26.95 38.50 Playerunknown’s Battlegrounds (PUBG) (2017) Low, 1280×720 24.90 Team Fortress 2 (2017) DIRT 4 (2017) Low, 1280×720 113.00 Medium, 1366×768 92.50 HIGH, 1920×1080 51.60 LOW0057 52. 00 Medium, 1920×1080 13.80 Rocket League (2017) Low, 1280×720 67.80 Medium, 1920×1080 38.60 High, 1920×1080 26.40 PREY (2017) LOW, 1280×720 28.90 Medium, 1920×1080 9005 11.0057 Mass Effect Andromeda (2017) Low, 1280×720 18.30 Ghost Recon Wildlands (2017) Low, 1280×720 19.10 For Honor (2017) Low, 1280×720 30.70 Medium, 1920×1080 11.60 Resident Evil 70054
Low, 1280×720	29. 50
Medium, 1920×1080	12.60

Farming Simulator 17 (2016)

Battlefield 1 (2016)

Deus ex mankind divided (2016)

MIRORORERS EDGE CATALEST (2016)0573

Overwatch (2016)

Low, 1280×720	62.00
Medium, 1366×768	41. 50
HIGH, 1920×1080	19.50

Doom (2016)

669

6666669

66666666669

9

6666669

669

666666669

66666666666666EV0056 Medium, 1366×768

The Division (2016)

Far Cry Primal (2016)

Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016)

Rainbow Six SIX SIX SIX SIX SIX SIX SIX SIX SIX SIX SIX SIX0056 Low, 1024×768

Anno 2205 (2015)

Low, 1024×768	32.40
Medium, 1366×768	16. 90

World of Warships (2015)

Dota 2 Reborn (2015)

The Witcher 3 (2015)

Dirt Rally (2015)

GTA V (2015)

Low, 1024×768	51. 30
Medium, 1366×768	40.25
High, 1920×1080	9.05
Ultra, 1920×1080	4.18

Dragon Age: Inquisition (2014)

Middle-Earth: Shadow of Mordor (2014)

Sims 4 (2014)

BIOSHOCK Infinite (2013)

LOW, 1280×720	67.20
	, 13666×768	0066
High, 1366×768	31. 90
Ultra, 1920×1080	10.30

Tomb Raider (2013)

Diablo III (2012)

0056 Medium, 1366×768

The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim (2011)

9.770056 June 1, 2018

Low, 1280×720	63.30
Medium, 1366×768	31.90
HIGH, 1366×768	18. 50
Ultra, 1920×1080
Price at first issue date	$425
Place in the ranking	462
Price now	$552.96
Processor Number	i7-8086K
Series	8th Generation Intel® Core™ i7 Processors
Status	Launched
Price/performance ratio (0-100)	8.98
Application	Desktop
Support 64 bit
Base frequency	4. 00 GHz
Bus Speed ​​	8 GT/s DMI3
Level 1 cache	384KB
Level 2 cache	1.5MB
Level 3 cache	12MB
Process	14nm
Maximum case temperature (TCase)	72 °C
Maximum core temperature	100°C
Maximum frequency	5.00 GHz
Number of cores	6
Number of threads	12
Unlocked
Maximum number of memory channels	2
Maximum memory bandwidth	41. 6 GB/s
Maximum memory size	128GB
Supported memory types	DDR4-2666
Device ID	0x3E92
Graphics base frequency	350MHz
Graphics max dynamic frequency	1.20 GHz
Intel® Clear Video HD Technology
Intel® Clear Video Technology
Intel® InTru™ 3D Technology
Intel® Quick Sync Video
Video memory size	64GB
Integrated graphics	Intel® UHD Graphics 630
Maximum number of monitors supported	3
4K support
Maximum resolution via DisplayPort	[email protected]
Maximum resolution via eDP	[email protected]
Maximum resolution via HDMI 1. 4	[email protected]
DirectX	12
OpenGL	4.5
Low Halogen Options Available
Maximum number of processors in configuration	1
Package Size	37.5mm x 37.5mm
Supported sockets	FCLGA1151
Power consumption (TDP)	95 Watt
Thermal Solution	PCG 2015D (130W)
Number of PCI Express lanes	16
PCI Express revision	3. 0
PCIe configurations	Up to 1×16, 2×8, 1×8+2×4
Scalability	1S Only
Execute Disable Bit (EDB)
Intel® Identity Protection Technology
Intel® Memory Protection Extensions (Intel® MPX)
Intel® OS Guard
Intel® Secure Key Technology
Intel® Software Guard Extensions (Intel® SGX)
Intel® Trusted Execution Technology (TXT)
Secure Boot
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® Technology
Idle States
Extended instructions	Intel® SSE4. 1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
Intel 64
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX)
Intel® AES New Instructions
Intel® Hyper-Threading Technology
Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported
Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP)
Intel® TSX-NI
Intel® Turbo Boost Technology
Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility
Thermal Monitoring
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™)
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x)
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d)
Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT)

The Intel Core i7-8086K (part 1) / Habr

Part 1 >> Part 2 >> Part 3 >> Part 4

The Intel Core i7-8086K Overview

Intel announced the release of a new processor, and we, in turn, asked the company to provide us with one sample for testing. Having received in response — «no samples for the press», we simply bought the processor ourselves. In honor of the 40th anniversary of the x86 microarchitecture and the 8086 processor, Intel released the Coffee Lake-based Core i7-8086K with a turbo frequency of up to 5.0 GHz. Intel released a limited batch of 50,000 processors, 8086 of which participate in regional lotteries and are distributed free of charge to winners. This is what Intel’s «daring» marketing move looks like in promoting its main product line. Like most processors, binning is the secret, and this is truly the fastest mainstream processor Intel has ever released. However, the 8086K may not be as good as it sounds.

Reason for the holiday: 40 years x86

Anniversary processors, also known as limited edition processors, remain a «dark horse» for many years. Back in June 2014, Intel released the Pentium Anniversary Edition G3258 — an overclocking dual-core processor — to a lot of noise and hype, but no matter how overclocked the processor was, it never came close to matching a full quad-core processor. In 2009, AMD launched the Phenom II X4 TWKR, limited to 100 units, a processor designed to break world performance records. It has never been available at retail. However, in honor of the 50th anniversary of Intel and the 40th anniversary of the x86 architecture, the new Core i7-8086K is available to a lucky 50,000 users.

A round of applause for Wikichip’s David Shore, who predicted the 8th Gen 5.0GHz six-core Coffee Lake called the i7-8086K on the June 8th anniversary date.

Whether David has spies at Intel, or access to a time machine, or an incredible ability to influence Intel’s manufacturing decisions, he was able to predict the product’s release on January 18th.

The

Core i7-8086K is, as David predicted, a six-core Coffee Lake processor running at a turbo frequency of 5.0 GHz. Although the batch of processors is, in fact, just the best examples of Core i7-8700K binning.

The main thing to note is that the processor does not deliver 5 GHz on all cores. The CPU still has an official TDP rating of 95W, so instead of jacking up the TDP and squeezing a little more, Intel is playing within its TDP range. We’ve already seen that the recent move to six-core processors as the mainstream platform has resulted in Intel processors exceeding their TDP ratings, thus causing confusion among consumers and the press. It’s important to note that Intel’s TDP rating is only valid at the base frequency, which is 9 in this case.5W at 4.0GHz and any turbo modes can draw as much power as needed. We will talk about this point in the current review.

So one of the key questions for this «faster» processor is exactly how much faster it is than the Core i7-8700K. Several years ago, Intel already launched a range of Devil’s Canyon processors as the «best overclocking version» of mainstream Haswell processors, which provided higher frequency and better thermal response to frequency and voltage. If you expected the same from the Core i7-8086K, I’m afraid you may be disappointed.

The Intel Core i7-8086K has the same core frequencies as the Core i7-8700K except for one core. Just one core in turbo mode has been clocked up from 4.7GHz to 5.0GHz, but that’s what’s causing all the hype.

Boosting the turbo of just one CPU core has limited benefits. For all but the cleanest single-core tests, there should be no difference in the results. The problem is that in very few situations modern machines have only one kernel loaded: almost every user has programs running in the background, such as other browser tabs, virus scanners, or unscrupulous updates. Gamers should not expect any noticeable benefits.

Technically, the base frequency has been raised from 3.7 GHz to 4.0 GHz, which means that Intel guarantees a higher minimum frequency for 95 W TDP, which is almost irrelevant for users who simply plug a processor into their system. The fact is that the processor will never use this base frequency. The interesting part of this review is that the 4. 0GHz base clock means this is a processor from the best binning, and should overclock better.

Based on the results, it will become obvious that increasing the turbo frequency of just one processor core did not become a big breakthrough, which is indicated by the figure «5.0 GHz» on the side panel of the box. And the pricing points to that fact: Intel has set the MSRP for the Core i7-8086K at $425, compared to the $350 retail price for the Core i7-8700K. That’s a difference of $75+, or even more, as the 8700K periodically goes on sale for even less.

Some test features

The processor tested here was not donated to us by Intel. We were told at Computex that Intel has no plans to provide samples to the media. This is somewhat disappointing, given the amount of hype the company has raised around new processors. There is an assumption that Intel will sell all anniversary processors without any problems, and therefore there is no point in stimulating additional sales by attracting the media. After the review, other suggestions may arise as to why the company is not interested in conducting a survey from the media.

I was in Taiwan — I had to attend a few meetings after Computex and couldn’t get back home to my office for a few days. So when Intel said they weren’t providing the processor, we had two options: try winning one in the lottery and wait eight weeks, or wait until I got home and buy a processor. We found our own, the third option is the AnandTech option: buy a processor from one of the local stores and check it out here.

Some guy with a cpu in a box

We reached out to a partner to borrow the system for testing in a hotel room for a couple of days, and ASRock kindly provided the motherboard. Already in the evening, a completely finished system from the showroom was delivered to my hotel.

Many thanks to ASRock for their help in making testing possible. They also provided a Core i7-8700K. This test system is obviously different from my test system at the office as we tend to use a permanent system to test processors for the sake of review fairness. To be objective, we will only compare 8700K and 8086K. There is more good news — I took my standard OS for testing, and the tests themselves with me to Taiwan. Never leave home without them guys.

Test system

As mentioned, many thanks to ASRock for providing the system in such a short time. Without them, this review would not have been possible in the desired time frame.

It should be noted that, as in previous reviews, our basic CPU settings include setting the memory to the maximum supported processor frequency. In this case, we are using DDR4-2666 for Intel Coffee Lake processors.

It should be noted that ASRock could not provide us with the same GPU that I usually use for game testing. We were able to install the RX 580 instead, so that means our gaming test data will also only have two points of reference: Core i7-8700K and Core i7-8086K.

As mentioned earlier, one of the key differences in this test is the motherboard. At the office we used an ASRock Z370 Gaming i7 (P1.70 BIOS) to test our Coffee Lake, while here we use an ASRock Z370 Taichi (P1.80 BIOS). Different motherboards, even from the same company, use different methods to manage the internal frequencies on the board (like Uncore) or power limits (PL2), which can differ from BIOS to BIOS. It is difficult to keep these sequences across systems, so some variation in results is expected.

In the short time we spent with the processor, we jotted down a few pages to keep you interested:

1 part

• Thermal interface and extreme overclocking with lucky_n00b
• Overclocking and power analysis

part 2

• Performance test: CPU System Tests
• Performance Testing: CPU Rendering Tests
• Performance Test: CPU Encoding Tests
• Benchmarking: CPU Office Tests
• Performance Testing: CPU Legacy Tests

Part 3

• Game performance: Civilization 6
• Gaming performance: Shadow of Mordor
• Gaming performance: Rise of the Tomb Raider
• Gaming performance: Rocket League
• Gaming performance: Grand Theft Auto V

4 part

• Overclocking performance at 5. 0 GHz: CPU Tests
• Overclocking performance at 5.0 GHz: GPU Tests
• Leads

Thermal interface and extreme overclocking

One of the major questions surrounding the new processor is whether Intel has decided to make changes to the way the CPU and heatsink are connected. The best contact method is to use Indium-Tin soldering or liquid metal to ensure that the heat load from the CPU is transferred directly to the cooler. A cheaper method (but also more reliable) is with thermal paste, which is more resistant to thermal expansion coefficients over the life cycle of the processor. Ideally, we expect the highest performing processors to use the soldering method, while cheaper processors may use thermal paste. However, Intel has recently been making its processors exclusively with thermal paste, as a result of which extreme enthusiasts resort to «opening» the processor and replacing the thermal paste with liquid metal. AMD uses thermal paste in their APUs and we did a teardown guide a few weeks ago:0003

Delidding The AMD Ryzen 5 2400G APU: How To Guide and Results

The method of opening the Intel chip is basically the same. However, the question before us is: what if Intel switched from the thermal paste used on the Core i7-8700K to a more overclockable and thermally conductive material for the Core i7-8086K. The idea is that if Intel is aimed at enthusiasts, soldering should be used, right?

Make it possible

We are extremely grateful to Alva Jonathan, also known as «Lucky_n00b», overclocker and journalist for Jagat Review. I’ve known Alv for almost 10 years, and like me, he also bought his Core i7-8086K during Computex this week, except he went straight to opening the CPU and cooling it with liquid nitrogen. He allowed us to share his results with our audience, so a big thank you to Alva!

Alva gives an impressive overclocking review on all new platforms in the Jagat Review (in Indonesian) and also excels in overclocking competitions around the world. This week he took third place in the G.Skill live overclocking event at Computex, winning good equipment and a cash prize.

Opening the chip

Suffice it to say that Intel has made zero changes to the thermal interface on the Core i7-8086K. It is completely identical to the Core i7-8700K, using the same heat conductor as previous generations of chips. With modern Coffee Lake processors, removing the thermal paste and replacing it with a liquid metal implementation usually results in a temperature drop of 5 to 15 °C (depending on the quality of the application) or another 100-300 MHz gain, depending on the effect of voltage on the chip.

Alva recommends disassembling the processor for higher frequencies or lower temperatures only if you plan to apply more than 1.30 volts to the processor. At this voltage, with a good cooler, the CPU temperature will be around 80 C under full CPU load (we can confirm, our results are similar), which is a tipping point for those who consider taking the CPU apart as an option.

Alva reached 5.0 GHz at 1.20 volts on his processor, and the CPU was stable enough to score 1627 on CineBench R15 (compared to 1424 on a stock processor with fast memory). The processor also managed 5.2 GHz at 1.35 V, which raised its scores to 1692. Alva used KingpinCooling KPX as the thermal interface material to replace the thermal paste.

Going beyond with liquid nitrogen (LN2)

Extreme overclocking is an interesting pastime, but for users at the top of this sport, every MHz counts. The result is achieved not only by cooling, but also by physically modifying the systems, improving the power supply or adjusting the voltage manually, and not through software. For those who know how to do it, this is a real competition that can deliver a lot of thrills.

As we can see from Alva’s test notes, he started with an MSI Z370 Godlike Gaming motherboard prepared for ultra-low temperature cooling and used a heavy LN2 copper vessel to control the temperature with liquid nitrogen. After the system had cooled down to -100C, he booted up by setting the BIOS so that the processor was at 6.0 GHz (60×100), with an uncore of 5.0 GHz, and at a processor voltage of 1.70 volts. Don’t try this without over-cooling (!). Other voltages were as follows:

• SA/IO Voltage: 1.35V
• DMI Voltage: 1.80V
• CPU PLL Voltage: 2.20V
• CPU PLL OC Voltage 2.20V
• CPU ST Voltage: 1.35V
• CPU ST V6 Voltage: 1.35V

The CPU was supported in full 6C/12T mode.

After booting into the OS, MSI Command Center Lite was used to adjust CPU variables (multiplier, base clock, voltage) in real time. The system was cooled to the limit, known as «full pot» liquid nitrogen benchmarking, and the multiplier was increased to find the absolute CPU frequency limit.

End result? 7309 MHz: here

In general, Skylake-based processors tend to peak frequencies when cooled with liquid nitrogen around 7. 1-7.4 GHz, so the new processor is no different from the usual one. Alva said he is very pleased with the chip he received, however he will need to test a few more to see exactly where there is variation (if any) in the die/batch from Intel. When Alva publishes his full overclocking article, I will contact him.

Update: Here is Alva’s article.

Acceleration and power analysis

To test overclocking for consistent 24/7 performance, we used the system in our hotel room to gauge how the Core i7-8086K performs on closed-loop liquid cooling, going through multipliers one by one. To do this, we used our standard overclocking method.

Home overclocking step by step

Due to timing and location, our overclocking method was as follows:

1. Start with a 40x multiplier processor and 1.05 volts
2. Set Line Load Calibration to Level 1 (ASRock Z370 Taichi)
3. Download OS
4. Run our Blender test, take power and temperature data from AIDA
5. If the system fails or the temperature exceeds 95C, stop testing
6. If system fails, add +0. 025V and go to step 3
7. If the test is successful, record Blender’s result, add the multiplier, and return to step 3

Blender includes a good combination of hard drive load, memory load and, as a result, power consumption. Any problems that require additional voltage for stabilization can be found quite quickly after the start of the test.

The Blender test lasts about five minutes on the Core i7-8086K, which is long enough for our quick overclocking test. For users who insist on reliable 24/7 stability, this is not the most suitable test, but it still provides an excellent load on the system.

Results

Using this methodology, we achieved the following results:

With default settings, our system would hit a full blown turbo at 4.3 GHz and complete the test in 311 seconds on Blender, with a CPU temperature of 62 degrees and a consumption of 115 watts. We also tested the system «on auto», but set the frequency to 5. 0 GHz on all cores. This gave a test result of 268 seconds, but significantly higher temperature (82 C) and power consumption (175 W).

If we manually increase the frequency starting from 4.0 GHz, we can see that the OS stops receiving power information: AIDA64 showed a voltage that slowly increased as the multiplier was increased, even if the voltage setting in the BIOS was not changed. AIDA64 also shows a failure at 1.364 volts, although the voltage adjustment in the BIOS helped with higher ratios. It was weird, but I think the representative results in the table are Blender, Temperature, and Power.

I’m going to set Blender output to «render per hour» — this is easier to visualize on a graph.

The key result here is 5.0 GHz, which is a great compromise between power and performance as well as temperature and voltage. At this level, the system gives +16% performance at the cost of an additional +16% frequency. However, there are nutritional issues.

Comparison of manual overclocking 5. 0 GHz with the «default» processor shows a 32% increase in power consumption. But when compared to an equivalent manual «overclock» at 4.3 GHz, the difference in power consumption is now 68%. At this stage, we really «stretch» the microarchitectural design to the limit.

It should be noted that at default settings, the system consumed 115 W, which is 20 W higher than the declared TDP. As mentioned earlier, TDP is determined at the base frequency, which in this case is 4.0 GHz. We observed power consumption of 80W at base frequency, showing that the processor is still – technically – under its TDP value, at least if the user optimizes the voltage. At 95W, if we maxed out for that TDP, we should see a base frequency of 4.4GHz on this chip.

However, consider what might have happened if Intel had decided to increase the TDP by +10W or +15W, to 110W. In this case, we would have a chip with a base frequency of around 4.6 GHz, based on our testing results. As we’ll see in the results on the following pages, Intel really missed a good chance by refusing to increase TDP.

Climbing to the top

For anyone interested in the upper limits of our chip, 5.1 GHz is a realistic maximum. I couldn’t get 5.2 GHz and keep the system stable in Blender for more than 30 seconds. As the BIOS ramped up to 1.425 volts, the system saw peak temperatures around 100°C, well over the comfort limit. Although it is worth mentioning Alva and his excellent chip: he stated that with delidding (disassembling the chip and replacing the thermal conductor), the frequency of 5.2 GHz is quite achievable, but further increase can be quite difficult, given how quickly the voltage in our sample increases.

As for the absolute maximum at which we were able to boot Windows, we observed 5.4 GHz. No load was applied for fear of overheating, and at 5.5 GHz the system could not work.

5.0 GHz test

As part of our testing, we were able to run several tests with both high overclocking and fast memory (as well as simultaneously). Again, many thanks to ASRock for providing the system.

Thank you for staying with us. Do you like our articles? Want to see more interesting content? Support us by placing an order or recommending to friends, 30% discount for Habr users on a unique analogue of entry-level servers, which was invented by us for you: The whole truth about VPS (KVM) E5-2650 v4 (6 Cores) 10GB DDR4 240GB SSD 1Gbps from $20 or how to properly share a server ? (available with RAID1 and RAID10, up to 24 cores and up to 40GB DDR4).

Dell R730xd 2 times cheaper? Only here 2 x Intel Dodeca-Core Xeon E5-2650v4 128GB DDR4 6x480GB SSD 1Gbps 100 TV from $249 in the Netherlands and USA! Read about How to Build Infrastructure Corp. class using Dell R730xd E5-2650 v4 servers costing 9000 euros for pennies?

Intel Core i7-8086K vs Intel Core i9-9900K: What is the difference?

65 BALLLA

Intel Core i7-8086k

67 Ballla

Intel Core i9-9900k

VS

64 Facts compared to

Intel Core Core Core

Intel Core i9666 Is 8086K better than Intel Core i9-9900K?

• 4 higher hour multiplier?
  40 vs 36

Why Intel Core i9Is -9900K better than Intel Core i7-8086K?

• 20% higher CPU speed?
  8 x 3. 6GHz vs 6 x 4GHz
• 4 more CPU threads?
  16 vs 12
• 0.5MB more L2 cache?
  2MB vs 1.5MB
• 30.43% higher PassMark score?
  18898 vs 14489
• 4MB more L3 cache?
  16MB vs 12MB
• 228KB more L1 cache?
  512KB vs 284KB
• 21.51% higher Geekbench 5 multi-core result?
  8496 vs 6992
• 110.4seconds faster Blender (classroom) result?
  544seconds vs 654.4seconds

Which comparisons are the most popular?

Intel Core i7-8086K

vs

Intel Core i7-9700K

Intel Core i9-9900K

vs

Apple M1 Pro (10-Core)

Intel Core i7-8086k

VS

Intel Core i7-8700k

Intel Core i9-9900k

VS

AMD Ryzen 9 3900x

Intel Core I7 -866

VS

Intel Core i7-7820EQ

Intel Core i9-9900k

VS

Intel Core i9-9900

Intel Core i7-8086k

VS

Intel I5-10600 Core CORE I5-10600 Core

vs

Intel Core i5-12600K

Intel Core i7-8086k

VS

Intel Core i7-12700K

Intel Core i9-9900k

VS

Intel Core I7-9700K

Intel Core I7-80866K 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 10600kf

Intel Core i9-9900k

VS

AMD Ryzen 7 5800x

Intel Core i7-8086k

VS

Intel Core I7-39302

0002 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 rt 000 2 ntit Core i9-9900k

0002 10700K

Intel Core i7-8086K

vs

Intel Core i5-10300H

Intel Core i9-9900K

vs

AMD Ryzen 5 5600X

Intel Core i7-8086K

vs

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X

Intel Core i9-9900K

VS

AMD Ryzen 5 3600

Intel Core i9-9900k

VS

AMD Ryzen 9 5900x

Comparison0573

Intel Core i7-8086k

0 Reviews of users

Intel Core i7-8086k

0. 06 /10