GT 1030 benchmark with i7-4770K 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K benchmarks at Ultra Quality
Compare To
Select..AMD Radeon 530 Mobile — $ 636AMD Radeon 540 Mobile — $ 1,086AMD Radeon 610M — $ 500AMD Radeon 660M — $ 550AMD Radeon 680M — $ 600AMD Radeon Graphics 384SP Mobile — $ 600AMD Radeon Graphics 448SP Mobile — $ 600AMD Radeon Graphics 512SP Mobile — $ 600AMD Radeon HD 6850 — $ 199AMD Radeon HD 6870 — $ 199AMD Radeon HD 6950 — $ 250AMD Radeon HD 6970 — $ 299AMD Radeon HD 6990 — $ 699AMD Radeon HD 7750 — $ 140AMD Radeon HD 7750M — $ 858AMD Radeon HD 7790 — $ 149AMD Radeon HD 7850 — $ 249AMD Radeon HD 7850M — $ 964AMD Radeon HD 7950 — $ 149AMD Radeon HD 7950M — $ 1,023AMD Radeon HD 7970 — $ 299AMD Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition — $ 299AMD Radeon HD 7970M — $ 1,079AMD Radeon HD 7990 — $ 999AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 Mobile — $ 1,959AMD Radeon R5 — $ 710AMD Radeon R5 — $ 701AMD Radeon R7 250 — $ 95AMD Radeon R7 265 — $ 149AMD Radeon R7 370 — $ 202AMD Radeon R9 270 — $ 275AMD Radeon R9 280 — $ 350AMD Radeon R9 280X — $ 350AMD Radeon R9 285 — $ 380AMD Radeon R9 290 — $ 310AMD Radeon R9 290X — $ 399AMD Radeon R9 295X2 — $ 1,499AMD Radeon R9 380 — $ 299AMD Radeon R9 380X — $ 229AMD Radeon R9 390 — $ 465AMD Radeon R9 390X — $ 495AMD Radeon R9 FURY — $ 549AMD Radeon R9 FURY X — $ 649AMD Radeon R9 M270X — $ 1,016AMD Radeon R9 M280X — $ 1,070AMD Radeon R9 M280X 2GB — $ 1,070AMD Radeon R9 M290X — $ 1,209AMD Radeon R9 M380 — $ 1,074AMD Radeon R9 Nano — $ 1,529AMD Radeon RX 460 — $ 140AMD Radeon RX 470 — $ 342AMD Radeon RX 470 Mobile — $ 1,203AMD Radeon RX 480 — $ 399AMD Radeon RX 480 Mobile — $ 1,275AMD Radeon RX 5300M — $ 650AMD Radeon RX 540 Mobile — $ 645AMD Radeon RX 550 — $ 74AMD Radeon RX 550 Mobile — $ 923AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 4GB — $ 169AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 8GB — $ 199AMD Radeon RX 5500M — $ 700AMD Radeon RX 550X Mobile — $ 923AMD Radeon RX 560 — $ 99AMD Radeon RX 560 Mobile — $ 987AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT — $ 279AMD Radeon RX 5600M — $ 1,220AMD Radeon RX 560X Mobile — $ 641AMD Radeon RX 560X Mobile 2GB — $ 987AMD Radeon RX 570 — $ 123AMD Radeon RX 570 Mobile — $ 1,260AMD Radeon RX 5700 — $ 349AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT — $ 399AMD Radeon RX 5700M — $ 1,300AMD Radeon RX 580 — $ 151AMD Radeon RX 580 Mobile — $ 1,307AMD Radeon RX 580X Mobile — $ 1,307AMD Radeon RX 590 — $ 214AMD Radeon RX 6300M — $ 700AMD Radeon RX 6450M — $ 900AMD Radeon RX 6500M — $ 800AMD Radeon RX 6550M — $ 1,000AMD Radeon RX 6550S — $ 1,100AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT — $ 379AMD Radeon RX 6600M — $ 1,350AMD Radeon RX 6600S — $ 900AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT — $ 399AMD Radeon RX 6650M — $ 1,100AMD Radeon RX 6650M XT — $ 1,200AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT — $ 479AMD Radeon RX 6700M — $ 1,450AMD Radeon RX 6700S — $ 1,200AMD Radeon RX 6800 — $ 579AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT — $ 649AMD Radeon RX 6800M — $ 1,650AMD Radeon RX 6800S — $ 1,700AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT — $ 1,700AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT — $ 999AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT — $ 1,099AMD Radeon RX 7600 — $ 269AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT — $ 899AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX — $ 999AMD Radeon RX VEGA 10 — $ 632AMD Radeon RX VEGA 3 — $ 567AMD Radeon RX VEGA 6 — $ 1,119AMD Radeon RX VEGA 8 — $ 601AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 — $ 269AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 Mobile — $ 1,579AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 — $ 419AMD Radeon VII — $ 664ATI Radeon HD 4870 — $ 299NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 — $ 79NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 — $ 199NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 — $ 129NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q — $ 1,282NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile — $ 750NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 2GB — $ 1,062NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB — $ 650NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti — $ 129NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q — $ 1,270NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile — $ 876NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB — $ 170NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB — $ 159NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q — $ 1,185NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile — $ 987NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 — $ 329NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q — $ 1,106NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile — $ 1,559NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti — $ 503NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 — $ 522NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q — $ 1,955NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile — $ 1,857NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti — $ 807NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 — $ 149NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q — $ 1,239NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile — $ 1,151NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER — $ 160NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q — $ 800NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile — $ 800NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 — $ 220NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER — $ 229NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti — $ 279NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q — $ 1,185NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile — $ 1,758NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 — $ 449NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 — $ 299NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280 — $ 649NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 — $ 249NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470 — $ 299NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 — $ 499NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti — $ 199NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 — $ 153NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti — $ 220NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 — $ 349NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 — $ 399NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590 — $ 699NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 — $ 49NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti — $ 64NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost — $ 169NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 — $ 79NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti — $ 299NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M — $ 987NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 — $ 79NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M — $ 1,058NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670MX — $ 1,058NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 — $ 485NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M — $ 1,083NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 — $ 439NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti — $ 279NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 — $ 320NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M — $ 1,036NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 — $ 179NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M — $ 1,100NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 — $ 355NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti — $ 410NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M — $ 1,162NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M — $ 1,162NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 — $ 89NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 — $ 89NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M — $ 1,066NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 — $ 449NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M — $ 1,249NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M 6GB — $ 1,249NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 — $ 249NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Mobile — $ 1,345NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti — $ 619NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M — $ 1,345NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980MX — $ 1,345NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN — $ 650NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK — $ 999NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X — $ 1,099NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Max-Q — $ 750NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile — $ 800NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 — $ 349NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q — $ 1,100NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q Refresh — $ 1,100NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile — $ 1,104NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile Refresh — $ 1,200NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER — $ 400NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 — $ 469NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q — $ 1,516NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q Refresh — $ 1,300NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile — $ 1,724NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile Refresh — $ 1,400NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER — $ 499NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Max-Q — $ 1,500NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Mobile — $ 1,500NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 — $ 693NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q — $ 1,772NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile — $ 1,942NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER — $ 699NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Max-Q — $ 1,700NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile — $ 1,800NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti — $ 1,187NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 — $ 200NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Max-Q — $ 750NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh 4 GB — $ 750NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh 6 GB — $ 750NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile — $ 750NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh 6 GB — $ 750NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti — $ 249NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile — $ 830NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 — $ 329NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q — $ 1,000NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile — $ 1,100NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti — $ 399NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 — $ 499NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q — $ 1,200NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile — $ 1,300NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti — $ 599NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Max-Q — $ 1,500NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile — $ 1,500NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 — $ 699NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Max-Q — $ 1,700NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile — $ 1,800NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti — $ 799NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Max-Q — $ 2,000NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile — $ 2,000NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 — $ 1,499NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti — $ 1,999NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 — $ 200NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q — $ 800NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile — $ 800NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 AD106 — $ 329NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Max-Q — $ 1,000NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile — $ 1,100NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB — $ 399NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 — $ 499NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Max-Q — $ 1,700NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile — $ 1,700NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti — $ 799NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 — $ 1,199NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Max-Q — $ 1,900NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile — $ 1,900NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Ti — $ 799NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 — $ 1,599NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Max-Q — $ 2,500NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile — $ 2,500NVIDIA TITAN RTX — $ 2,499NVIDIA TITAN V — $ 2,999NVIDIA TITAN Xp — $ 1,199
Change CPU To
Select. .AMD Athlon 5000 Dual-Core — $ 100AMD Athlon 5200 Dual-Core — $ 30AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4200+ — $ 130AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4400+ — $ 60AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4600+ — $ 360AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4800+ — $ 460AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5000+ — $ 331.5AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5200+ — $ 53.1AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5400+ — $ 53AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5600+ — $ 150AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5800+ — $ 25AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 6000+ — $ 46AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 6400+ — $ 260AMD Athlon 7550 Dual-Core — $ 60AMD Athlon 7750 Dual-Core — $ 148.7AMD Athlon 7850 Dual-Core — $ 209.7AMD Athlon Dual Core 5000B — $ 95AMD Athlon II X2 215 — $ 12AMD Athlon II X2 220 — $ 32.2AMD Athlon II X2 240 — $ 35AMD Athlon II X2 245 — $ 35AMD Athlon II X2 250 — $ 39AMD Athlon II X2 255 — $ 65.2AMD Athlon II X2 260 — $ 20AMD Athlon II X2 265 — $ 82.9AMD Athlon II X2 270 — $ 24AMD Athlon II X2 B22 — $ 36AMD Athlon II X2 B24 — $ 40AMD Athlon II X2 B28 — $ 49.1AMD Athlon II X3 425 — $ 104.
2AMD Athlon II X3 435 — $ 50AMD Athlon II X3 440 — $ 47AMD Athlon II X3 445 — $ 91AMD Athlon II X3 450 — $ 40AMD Athlon II X3 455 — $ 116.9AMD Athlon II X3 460 — $ 50AMD Athlon II X4 620 — $ 60AMD Athlon II X4 630 — $ 43AMD Athlon II X4 631 Quad-Core — $ 80AMD Athlon II X4 635 — $ 70AMD Athlon II X4 640 — $ 80AMD Athlon II X4 641 Quad-Core — $ 91.5AMD Athlon II X4 645 — $ 50AMD Athlon X4 740 Quad Core — $ 277AMD Athlon X4 760K Quad Core — $ 46AMD Athlon X4 840 — $ 78.7AMD Athlon X4 845 — $ 50AMD Athlon X4 860K — $ 64AMD Athlon X4 870K — $ 80AMD Athlon X4 880K — $ 90AMD Athlon X4 950 — $ 60AMD E2-3200 APU — $ 8AMD FX-4100 Quad-Core — $ 130AMD FX-4130 Quad-Core — $ 76AMD FX-4170 Quad-Core — $ 100AMD FX-4200 Quad-Core — $ 228.2AMD FX-4300 Quad-Core — $ 53.4AMD FX-4350 Quad-Core — $ 130AMD FX-6200 Six-Core — $ 340AMD FX-6300 Six-Core — $ 59AMD FX-6350 Six-Core — $ 130AMD FX-8120 Eight-Core — $ 100AMD FX-8150 Eight-Core — $ 383.5AMD FX-8300 Eight-Core — $ 80.6AMD FX-8320 Eight-Core — $ 79.5AMD FX-8320E Eight-Core — $ 98.
9AMD FX-8350 Eight-Core — $ 80AMD FX-8370 Eight-Core — $ 135AMD FX-8370E Eight-Core — $ 180AMD FX-9370 Eight-Core — $ 178.9AMD FX-9590 Eight-Core — $ 122AMD Phenom 8250e Triple-Core — $ 47AMD Phenom 8450 Triple-Core — $ 30AMD Phenom 8600 Triple-Core — $ 53AMD Phenom 8600B Triple-Core — $ 53AMD Phenom 8650 Triple-Core — $ 50AMD Phenom 9100e Quad-Core — $ 40AMD Phenom 9150e Quad-Core — $ 40AMD Phenom 9350e Quad-Core — $ 3382.1AMD Phenom 9450e Quad-Core — $ 105AMD Phenom 9500 Quad-Core — $ 60AMD Phenom 9550 Quad-Core — $ 40AMD Phenom 9600 Quad-Core — $ 50AMD Phenom 9600B Quad-Core — $ 147.2AMD Phenom 9650 Quad-Core — $ 55AMD Phenom 9750 Quad-Core — $ 60AMD Phenom 9850 Quad-Core — $ 50AMD Phenom 9950 Quad-Core — $ 180AMD Phenom II X2 545 — $ 44AMD Phenom II X2 550 — $ 50AMD Phenom II X2 555 — $ 142.1AMD Phenom II X2 565 — $ 30AMD Phenom II X2 B55 — $ 48AMD Phenom II X3 705e — $ 152.3AMD Phenom II X3 710 — $ 84.5AMD Phenom II X3 720 — $ 70AMD Phenom II X3 B73 — $ 75AMD Phenom II X4 805 — $ 174AMD Phenom II X4 810 — $ 116AMD Phenom II X4 820 — $ 75AMD Phenom II X4 840 — $ 90AMD Phenom II X4 905e — $ 212.
4AMD Phenom II X4 910 — $ 100AMD Phenom II X4 910e — $ 157AMD Phenom II X4 920 — $ 67AMD Phenom II X4 925 — $ 160AMD Phenom II X4 940 — $ 120AMD Phenom II X4 945 — $ 50AMD Phenom II X4 955 — $ 130.2AMD Phenom II X4 960T — $ 135AMD Phenom II X4 965 — $ 59.5AMD Phenom II X4 B95 — $ 73AMD Phenom II X4 B97 — $ 90AMD Phenom II X6 1035T — $ 189AMD Phenom II X6 1045T — $ 175AMD Phenom II X6 1055T — $ 185AMD Phenom II X6 1075T — $ 260AMD Phenom II X6 1090T — $ 396.1AMD Phenom II X6 1100T — $ 200AMD Phenom X3 8550 — $ 170AMD Ryzen 3 1200 — $ 95AMD Ryzen 3 1300X — $ 125AMD Ryzen 3 2200G — $ 98AMD Ryzen 3 3100 — $ 90AMD Ryzen 3 3200G — $ 99AMD Ryzen 3 3300X — $ 120AMD Ryzen 5 1400 — $ 134AMD Ryzen 5 1500X — $ 144.9AMD Ryzen 5 1600 — $ 155AMD Ryzen 5 1600X — $ 178.4AMD Ryzen 5 2400G — $ 159AMD Ryzen 5 2600 — $ 150AMD Ryzen 5 2600X — $ 210AMD Ryzen 5 3400G — $ 150AMD Ryzen 5 3500 — $ 148AMD Ryzen 5 3500X — $ 160.5AMD Ryzen 5 3600 — $ 199AMD Ryzen 5 3600X — $ 249AMD Ryzen 5 5500 — $ 160AMD Ryzen 5 5600X — $ 299AMD Ryzen 5 7600X — $ 299AMD Ryzen 7 1700 — $ 190AMD Ryzen 7 1700X — $ 200AMD Ryzen 7 1800X — $ 250AMD Ryzen 7 2700 — $ 249.
2AMD Ryzen 7 2700X — $ 305AMD Ryzen 7 3700X — $ 330AMD Ryzen 7 3800X — $ 399AMD Ryzen 7 5700X — $ 300AMD Ryzen 7 5800X — $ 399AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D — $ 450AMD Ryzen 7 7700X — $ 399AMD Ryzen 9 3900X — $ 499AMD Ryzen 9 3950X — $ 750AMD Ryzen 9 5900X — $ 499AMD Ryzen 9 5950X — $ 710AMD Ryzen 9 7900X — $ 549AMD Ryzen 9 7950X — $ 699AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X — $ 350AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X — $ 420AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X — $ 680AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X — $ 900AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX — $ 1720Intel Core i3-10100 — $ 122Intel Core i3-10300 — $ 143Intel Core i3-11100 — $ 122Intel Core i3-11300 — $ 143Intel Core i3-12100 — $ 122Intel Core i3-12300 — $ 143Intel Core i3-2100 @ 3.10GHz — $ 60Intel Core i3-2102 @ 3.10GHz — $ 58Intel Core i3-2105 @ 3.10GHz — $ 80Intel Core i3-2120 @ 3.30GHz — $ 30Intel Core i3-2125 @ 3.30GHz — $ 199Intel Core i3-2130 @ 3.40GHz — $ 70Intel Core i3-3210 @ 3.20GHz — $ 100Intel Core i3-3220 @ 3.30GHz — $ 34.9Intel Core i3-3225 @ 3.30GHz — $ 100Intel Core i3-3240 @ 3.
40GHz — $ 46Intel Core i3-3245 @ 3.40GHz — $ 80Intel Core i3-3250 @ 3.50GHz — $ 95Intel Core i3-4130 @ 3.40GHz — $ 140Intel Core i3-4150 @ 3.50GHz — $ 260Intel Core i3-4160 @ 3.60GHz — $ 140Intel Core i3-4170 @ 3.70GHz — $ 150Intel Core i3-4330 @ 3.50GHz — $ 180Intel Core i3-4340 @ 3.60GHz — $ 170Intel Core i3-4350 @ 3.60GHz — $ 170Intel Core i3-4360 @ 3.70GHz — $ 280Intel Core i3-4370 @ 3.80GHz — $ 450Intel Core i3-530 @ 2.93GHz — $ 20Intel Core i3-540 @ 3.07GHz — $ 21Intel Core i3-550 @ 3.20GHz — $ 180Intel Core i3-560 @ 3.33GHz — $ 30Intel Core i3-6098P @ 3.60GHz — $ 133.7Intel Core i3-6100 @ 3.70GHz — $ 166.1Intel Core i3-6300 @ 3.80GHz — $ 143Intel Core i3-6320 @ 3.90GHz — $ 160Intel Core i3-7100 @ 3.90GHz — $ 170Intel Core i3-7300 @ 4.00GHz — $ 210Intel Core i3-7320 @ 4.10GHz — $ 174.8Intel Core i3-7350K @ 4.20GHz — $ 230Intel Core i3-8100 @ 3.60GHz — $ 130Intel Core i3-8300 @ 3.70GHz — $ 179.4Intel Core i3-8350K @ 4.00GHz — $ 184Intel Core i3-9100 @ 3.60GHz — $ 170Intel Core i3-9100F @ 3.
60GHz — $ 105Intel Core i3-9320 @ 3.70GHz — $ 162Intel Core i3-9350KF @ 4.00GHz — $ 224Intel Core i5 750S @ 2.40GHz — $ 100Intel Core i5-10400 — $ 182Intel Core i5-10600K — $ 236.8Intel Core i5-11400 — $ 182Intel Core i5-11600K — $ 262Intel Core i5-12400 — $ 143Intel Core i5-12600K — $ 290Intel Core i5-13600K — $ 319Intel Core i5-2300 @ 2.80GHz — $ 80Intel Core i5-2310 @ 2.90GHz — $ 80Intel Core i5-2320 @ 3.00GHz — $ 195.3Intel Core i5-2380P @ 3.10GHz — $ 90Intel Core i5-2400 @ 3.10GHz — $ 84Intel Core i5-2400S @ 2.50GHz — $ 65.7Intel Core i5-2405S @ 2.50GHz — $ 164.4Intel Core i5-2450P @ 3.20GHz — $ 90Intel Core i5-2500 @ 3.30GHz — $ 105Intel Core i5-2500K @ 3.30GHz — $ 124Intel Core i5-2500S @ 2.70GHz — $ 75Intel Core i5-2550K @ 3.40GHz — $ 130Intel Core i5-3330 @ 3.00GHz — $ 100Intel Core i5-3330S @ 2.70GHz — $ 95Intel Core i5-3340 @ 3.10GHz — $ 262Intel Core i5-3340S @ 2.80GHz — $ 150Intel Core i5-3350P @ 3.10GHz — $ 170Intel Core i5-3450 @ 3.10GHz — $ 128Intel Core i5-3450S @ 2.80GHz — $ 100Intel Core i5-3470 @ 3.
20GHz — $ 125Intel Core i5-3470S @ 2.90GHz — $ 140.1Intel Core i5-3475S @ 2.90GHz — $ 143.5Intel Core i5-3550 @ 3.30GHz — $ 330Intel Core i5-3550S @ 3.00GHz — $ 341Intel Core i5-3570 @ 3.40GHz — $ 140Intel Core i5-3570K @ 3.40GHz — $ 144Intel Core i5-3570S @ 3.10GHz — $ 285Intel Core i5-4430 @ 3.00GHz — $ 180Intel Core i5-4430S @ 2.70GHz — $ 160Intel Core i5-4440 @ 3.10GHz — $ 170Intel Core i5-4440S @ 2.80GHz — $ 463Intel Core i5-4460 @ 3.20GHz — $ 170Intel Core i5-4460S @ 2.90GHz — $ 660Intel Core i5-4570 @ 3.20GHz — $ 175Intel Core i5-4570S @ 2.90GHz — $ 221.6Intel Core i5-4590 @ 3.30GHz — $ 185Intel Core i5-4590S @ 3.00GHz — $ 198Intel Core i5-4670 @ 3.40GHz — $ 188Intel Core i5-4670K @ 3.40GHz — $ 250Intel Core i5-4670R @ 3.00GHz — $ 276Intel Core i5-4690 @ 3.50GHz — $ 200Intel Core i5-4690K @ 3.50GHz — $ 200Intel Core i5-4690S @ 3.20GHz — $ 269.9Intel Core i5-5675C @ 3.10GHz — $ 400Intel Core i5-6400 @ 2.70GHz — $ 200Intel Core i5-6402P @ 2.80GHz — $ 190Intel Core i5-650 @ 3.20GHz — $ 100Intel Core i5-6500 @ 3.
20GHz — $ 234.4Intel Core i5-655K @ 3.20GHz — $ 60Intel Core i5-660 @ 3.33GHz — $ 49Intel Core i5-6600 @ 3.30GHz — $ 220Intel Core i5-6600K @ 3.50GHz — $ 288.9Intel Core i5-661 @ 3.33GHz — $ 100Intel Core i5-670 @ 3.47GHz — $ 90Intel Core i5-680 @ 3.60GHz — $ 90Intel Core i5-7400 @ 3.00GHz — $ 213.5Intel Core i5-750 @ 2.67GHz — $ 160.5Intel Core i5-7500 @ 3.40GHz — $ 210Intel Core i5-760 @ 2.80GHz — $ 100Intel Core i5-7600 @ 3.50GHz — $ 240Intel Core i5-7600K @ 3.80GHz — $ 251Intel Core i5-7640X @ 4.00GHz — $ 250Intel Core i5-8400 @ 2.80GHz — $ 200Intel Core i5-8500 @ 3.00GHz — $ 239Intel Core i5-8600 @ 3.10GHz — $ 244.5Intel Core i5-8600K @ 3.60GHz — $ 377.7Intel Core i5-9400 @ 2.90GHz — $ 170Intel Core i5-9400F @ 2.90GHz — $ 170Intel Core i5-9600K @ 3.70GHz — $ 280Intel Core i5-9600KF @ 3.70GHz — $ 215Intel Core i7-10700K — $ 409.1Intel Core i7-11700K — $ 410Intel Core i7-12700K — $ 470Intel Core i7-13700K — $ 409Intel Core i7-2600 @ 3.40GHz — $ 150Intel Core i7-2600K @ 3.40GHz — $ 198Intel Core i7-2600S @ 2.
80GHz — $ 200Intel Core i7-2700K @ 3.50GHz — $ 200Intel Core i7-3770 @ 3.40GHz — $ 179Intel Core i7-3770K @ 3.50GHz — $ 249Intel Core i7-3770S @ 3.10GHz — $ 200Intel Core i7-3820 @ 3.60GHz — $ 200Intel Core i7-3930K @ 3.20GHz — $ 399Intel Core i7-3960X @ 3.30GHz — $ 800Intel Core i7-3970X @ 3.50GHz — $ 954Intel Core i7-4770 @ 3.40GHz — $ 240Intel Core i7-4770K @ 3.50GHz — $ 285Intel Core i7-4770S @ 3.10GHz — $ 250Intel Core i7-4771 @ 3.50GHz — $ 300Intel Core i7-4790 @ 3.60GHz — $ 279Intel Core i7-4790K @ 4.00GHz — $ 307Intel Core i7-4790S @ 3.20GHz — $ 342.6Intel Core i7-4820K @ 3.70GHz — $ 500Intel Core i7-4930K @ 3.40GHz — $ 399Intel Core i7-4960X @ 3.60GHz — $ 770Intel Core i7-5775C @ 3.30GHz — $ 450Intel Core i7-5820K @ 3.30GHz — $ 300Intel Core i7-5930K @ 3.50GHz — $ 499Intel Core i7-5960X @ 3.00GHz — $ 770Intel Core i7-6700 @ 3.40GHz — $ 433.7Intel Core i7-6700K @ 4.00GHz — $ 335Intel Core i7-6800K @ 3.40GHz — $ 420Intel Core i7-6850K @ 3.60GHz — $ 550Intel Core i7-6900K @ 3.20GHz — $ 1200Intel Core i7-6950X @ 3.
00GHz — $ 1576Intel Core i7-7700 @ 3.60GHz — $ 325.1Intel Core i7-7700K @ 4.20GHz — $ 355Intel Core i7-7740X @ 4.30GHz — $ 349Intel Core i7-7800X @ 3.50GHz — $ 370Intel Core i7-7820X @ 3.60GHz — $ 930Intel Core i7-8086K @ 4.00GHz — $ 553Intel Core i7-860 @ 2.80GHz — $ 290Intel Core i7-860S @ 2.53GHz — $ 200Intel Core i7-870 @ 2.93GHz — $ 310Intel Core i7-8700 @ 3.20GHz — $ 454.5Intel Core i7-8700K @ 3.70GHz — $ 369.9Intel Core i7-875K @ 2.93GHz — $ 200Intel Core i7-880 @ 3.07GHz — $ 583Intel Core i7-920 @ 2.67GHz — $ 174Intel Core i7-930 @ 2.80GHz — $ 60Intel Core i7-940 @ 2.93GHz — $ 70.7Intel Core i7-950 @ 3.07GHz — $ 245Intel Core i7-960 @ 3.20GHz — $ 100Intel Core i7-965 @ 3.20GHz — $ 140Intel Core i7-970 @ 3.20GHz — $ 150Intel Core i7-9700 @ 3.00GHz — $ 330Intel Core i7-9700F @ 3.00GHz — $ 368Intel Core i7-9700K @ 3.60GHz — $ 410Intel Core i7-975 @ 3.33GHz — $ 180Intel Core i7-980 @ 3.33GHz — $ 200Intel Core i7-980X @ 3.33GHz — $ 220Intel Core i7-990X @ 3.47GHz — $ 350Intel Core i9-10900K — $ 590Intel Core i9-11900K — $ 488Intel Core i9-12900K — $ 590Intel Core i9-13900K — $ 589Intel Core i9-7900X @ 3.
30GHz — $ 1380Intel Core i9-7920X @ 2.90GHz — $ 1096.7Intel Core i9-7940X @ 3.10GHz — $ 1192.1Intel Core i9-7960X @ 2.80GHz — $ 2000Intel Core i9-7980XE @ 2.60GHz — $ 2005.5Intel Core i9-9900 @ 3.10GHz — $ 440Intel Core i9-9900K @ 3.60GHz — $ 835Intel Core2 Duo E4300 @ 1.80GHz — $ 158Intel Core2 Duo E4400 @ 2.00GHz — $ 9Intel Core2 Duo E4500 @ 2.20GHz — $ 40Intel Core2 Duo E4600 @ 2.40GHz — $ 158Intel Core2 Duo E4700 @ 2.60GHz — $ 100Intel Core2 Duo E6300 @ 1.86GHz — $ 13Intel Core2 Duo E6320 @ 1.86GHz — $ 50Intel Core2 Duo E6400 @ 2.13GHz — $ 20Intel Core2 Duo E6420 @ 2.13GHz — $ 50Intel Core2 Duo E6550 @ 2.33GHz — $ 15Intel Core2 Duo E6600 @ 2.40GHz — $ 15Intel Core2 Duo E6700 @ 2.66GHz — $ 30Intel Core2 Duo E6750 @ 2.66GHz — $ 13Intel Core2 Duo E6850 @ 3.00GHz — $ 50Intel Core2 Duo E7200 @ 2.53GHz — $ 75Intel Core2 Duo E7300 @ 2.66GHz — $ 20Intel Core2 Duo E7400 @ 2.80GHz — $ 29Intel Core2 Duo E7500 @ 2.93GHz — $ 15Intel Core2 Duo E7600 @ 3.06GHz — $ 120Intel Core2 Duo E8200 @ 2.66GHz — $ 50Intel Core2 Duo E8300 @ 2.
83GHz — $ 20Intel Core2 Duo E8400 @ 3.00GHz — $ 9.8Intel Core2 Duo E8500 @ 3.16GHz — $ 40Intel Core2 Duo E8600 @ 3.33GHz — $ 50Intel Core2 Extreme Q6800 @ 2.93GHz — $ 1125Intel Core2 Extreme Q6850 @ 3.00GHz — $ 1496Intel Core2 Extreme X6800 @ 2.93GHz — $ 263.6Intel Core2 Extreme X9650 @ 3.00GHz — $ 909Intel Core2 Extreme X9770 @ 3.20GHz — $ 1609Intel Core2 Extreme X9775 @ 3.20GHz — $ 1806Intel Core2 Quad Q6600 @ 2.40GHz — $ 40Intel Core2 Quad Q6700 @ 2.66GHz — $ 45Intel Core2 Quad Q8200 @ 2.33GHz — $ 23Intel Core2 Quad Q8300 @ 2.50GHz — $ 50Intel Core2 Quad Q8400 @ 2.66GHz — $ 99.5Intel Core2 Quad Q9300 @ 2.50GHz — $ 50Intel Core2 Quad Q9400 @ 2.66GHz — $ 34Intel Core2 Quad Q9450 @ 2.66GHz — $ 335Intel Core2 Quad Q9500 @ 2.83GHz — $ 35Intel Core2 Quad Q9505 @ 2.83GHz — $ 190Intel Core2 Quad Q9550 @ 2.83GHz — $ 49Intel Core2 Quad Q9650 @ 3.00GHz — $ 69.8Intel Pentium G2010 @ 2.80GHz — $ 34.9Intel Pentium G2020 @ 2.90GHz — $ 32.9Intel Pentium G2030 @ 3.00GHz — $ 41Intel Pentium G2120 @ 3.
10GHz — $ 46Intel Pentium G2130 @ 3.20GHz — $ 50Intel Pentium G2140 @ 3.30GHz — $ 50Intel Pentium G3220 @ 3.00GHz — $ 120Intel Pentium G3240 @ 3.10GHz — $ 80Intel Pentium G3250 @ 3.20GHz — $ 110Intel Pentium G3258 @ 3.20GHz — $ 178.3Intel Pentium G3260 @ 3.30GHz — $ 105Intel Pentium G3420 @ 3.20GHz — $ 110Intel Pentium G3430 @ 3.30GHz — $ 90Intel Pentium G3440 @ 3.30GHz — $ 159.9Intel Pentium G3450 @ 3.40GHz — $ 100Intel Pentium G3460 @ 3.50GHz — $ 288.2Intel Pentium G3470 @ 3.60GHz — $ 104.3Intel Pentium G4400 @ 3.30GHz — $ 80Intel Pentium G4500 @ 3.50GHz — $ 85.3Intel Pentium G4520 @ 3.60GHz — $ 110.9Intel Pentium G4560 @ 3.50GHz — $ 103.1Intel Pentium G4600 @ 3.60GHz — $ 100Intel Pentium G4620 @ 3.70GHz — $ 105.9Intel Pentium G640 @ 2.80GHz — $ 25Intel Pentium G645 @ 2.90GHz — $ 95Intel Pentium G840 @ 2.80GHz — $ 35Intel Pentium G850 @ 2.90GHz — $ 30Intel Pentium G860 @ 3.00GHz — $ 30Intel Pentium G870 @ 3.10GHz — $ 97Intel Pentium Gold G5400 @ 3.70GHz — $ 123.9Intel Pentium Gold G5500 @ 3.
80GHz — $ 100.3Intel Pentium Gold G5600 @ 3.90GHz — $ 100.9
Change Variant To
Select..ASL GT 1030 BattleASL GT 1030 SkynetASL GT 1030 WarhawkASUS GT 1030ASUS GT 1030 Silent BRKASUS GT 1030 Silent CSMASUS PHOENIX GT 1030ASUS PHOENIX GT 1030 OCBIOSTAR GT 1030Colorful GT 1030Colorful GT 1030 0DBColorful GT 1030 Gold EditionColorful GT 1030 Gold Edition V2Colorful GT 1030 Gold Edition V3Colorful GT 1030 Low ProfileEMTEK HV GT 1030EMTEK XENON GT 1030EVGA GT 1030 SCEVGA GT 1030 SC Low ProfileEVGA GT 1030 SC Passive Low ProfileGALAX GT 1030GALAX GT 1030 EXOC WhiteGALAX GT 1030 TigerGIGABYTE GT 1030 Low ProfileGIGABYTE GT 1030 OCGIGABYTE GT 1030 Silent Low ProfileGainward GT 1030 SilentFXGainward GT 1030 WhirlwindGainward GT 1030 WindwardInno3D GT 1030 0dBKFA2 GT 1030KFA2 GT 1030 EXOC WhiteKUROTOSHIKOU GT 1030 Low ProfileKUROTOSHIKOU GT 1030 Low Profile OCLeadtek WinFast GT 1030MAXSUN GT 1030 Hammer M.4MAXSUN GT 1030 TransformerMAXSUN GT 1030 Transformers IIMAXSUN GT 1030 Transformers M.
2MAXSUN GT 1030 Transformers M.3MAXSUN GT 1030V TransformersMSI GT 1030 AERO ITX OCMSI GT 1030 Low Profile OCMSI GT 1030 Low Profile OCV1MSI GT 1030 Low Profile OCV2MSI GT 1030 Low Profile Passive OCMSI GT 1030 Low Profile Passive OCV1MSI GT 1030 OCMSI GT 1030 OCMSI GT 1030 OCV1Manli GT 1030 Low ProfileONDA GT 1030 Model-DONDA GT 1030 Model-D v2.0ONDA GT 1030 Model-VPNY GT 1030Palit GT 1030Palit GT 1030 KalmXPalit GT 1030 Low ProfileYeston GT 1030 Speed EditionZOTAC GT 1030ZOTAC GT 1030 Low ProfileZOTAC GT 1030 Low ProfileZOTAC GT 1030 Thunder MAZOTAC GT 1030 Thunder TSI MAZOTAC GT 1030 Zone Edition
Desired Quality Setting
Select..Ultra Quality — MSAA, HBAO, and advanced shadowsHigh Quality — No MSAA, HBAO, or advanced shadowsMedium QualityLow Quality
Intel Core i7-4770K & i5-4670K Tested
by Anand Lal Shimpion June 1, 2013 10:00 AM EST
- Posted in
- CPUs
- Intel
- Haswell
210 Comments
|
210 Comments
IntroductionPower ImprovementsMemory, Platform & OverclockingThe Launch Lineup: Quad Cores For AllDie Size and Transistor CountCPU Performance: Five Generations of Intel CPUs ComparedCPU Performance: Going Even Further BackQuick Sync PerformanceFinal Words
This is a very volatile time for Intel.
In an ARM-less vacuum, Intel’s Haswell architecture would likely be the most amazing thing to happen to the tech industry in years. In mobile Haswell is slated to bring about the single largest improvement in battery life in Intel history. In graphics, Haswell completely redefines the expectations for processor graphics. There are even some versions that come with an on-package 128MB L4 cache. And on the desktop, Haswell is the epitome of polish and evolution of the Core microprocessor architecture. Everything is better, faster and more efficient.
There’s very little to complain about with Haswell. Sure, the days of insane overclocks without touching voltage knobs are long gone. With any mobile-first, power optimized architecture, any excess frequency at default voltages is viewed as wasted power. So Haswell won’t overclock any better than Ivy Bridge, at least without exotic cooling.
You could also complain that, for a tock, the CPU performance gains aren’t large enough.
Intel promised 5 — 15% gains over Ivy Bridge at the same frequencies, and most of my tests agree with that. It’s still forward progress, without substantial increases in power consumption, but it’s not revolutionary. We compare the rest of the industry to Intel’s excellent single threaded performance and generally come away disappointed. The downside to being on the top is that virtually all improvements appear incremental.
The fact of the matter is that the most exciting implementations of Haswell exist outside of the desktop parts. Big gains in battery life, power consumption and even a broadening of the types of form factors the Core family of processors will fit into all apply elsewhere. Over the coming weeks and months we’ll be seeing lots of that, but today, at least in this article, the focus is on the desktop.
Gallery: Intel Haswell Launch Gallery
Haswell is Intel’s second 22nm microprocessor architecture, a tock in Intel’s nomenclature.
I went through a deep dive on Haswell’s Architecture late last year after IDF, but I’ll offer a brief summary here.
At the front end of the pipeline, Haswell improved branch prediction. It’s the execution engine where Intel spent most of its time however. Intel significantly increased the sizes of buffers and datastructures within the CPU core. The out-of-order window grew, to feed an even more parallel set of execution resources.
Intel added two new execution ports (8 vs 6), a first since the introduction of the Core microarchitecture back in 2006.
On the ISA side, Intel added support for AVX2, which includes an FMA operation that considerably increases FP throughput of the machine. With a doubling of peak FP throughput, Intel doubled L1 cache bandwidth to feed the beast. Intel also added support for transactional memory instructions (TSX) on some Haswell SKUs.
The L3 cache is now back on its own power/frequency plane, although most of the time it seems to run in lockstep with the CPU cores.
There appears to be a 2 — 3 cycle access penalty as a result of decoupling the L3 cache.
Power Improvements
IntroductionPower ImprovementsMemory, Platform & OverclockingThe Launch Lineup: Quad Cores For AllDie Size and Transistor CountCPU Performance: Five Generations of Intel CPUs ComparedCPU Performance: Going Even Further BackQuick Sync PerformanceFinal Words
PRINT THIS ARTICLE
Core i7-4770K [in 16 benchmarks]
Intel
Core i7-4770K
- Interface
- Core frequency
- Video memory size
- Memory type
- Memory frequency
- Maximum resolution
Description
Intel started selling the Core i7-4770K on June 1, 2013 at a suggested price of $399. This is a Haswell architecture desktop processor primarily aimed at office systems. It has 4 cores and 8 threads and is manufactured using 22nm process technology, the maximum frequency is 3900MHz, the multiplier is unlocked.
In terms of compatibility, this is an FCLGA1150 socket processor with a TDP of 84W and a maximum temperature of 72°C. It supports DDR3 memory.
It provides poor benchmark performance at
5.65%
from the leader AMD EPYC 9654
Information about the type (for desktops or laptops) and architecture of the Core i7-4770K, as well as when sales started and cost at that time. Value for money To obtain an index, we compare the characteristics of processors and their cost, taking into account the cost of other processors.
Core i7-4770K quantitative parameters such as number of cores and threads, clock speeds, manufacturing process, cache size and multiplier lock state. They indirectly speak about the performance of the processor, but for an accurate assessment, you need to consider the results of the tests. 9005 4 256K (per core)
9 0053 900 63
Information on Core i7-4770K compatibility with other computer components. Please note that the power consumption of some processors can significantly exceed their nominal TDP even without overclocking. Some may even double their claims if the motherboard allows you to adjust the power settings of the processor.
Technology solutions and additional instruction sets supported by the Core i7-4770K are listed here. This information is needed if the processor is required to support specific technologies. 9
Technologies built into the Core i7-4770K that improve system security, such as those designed to protect against hacking.
Technologies supported by Core i7-4770K that speed up virtual machines are listed.
Types, maximum size and channels of RAM supported by Core i7-4770K. Higher memory frequency may be supported depending on the motherboard. Ryzen 9 7940HS
General parameters of the integrated video card in Core i7-4770K. 900 54 2 GB
900 53
Interfaces and connections supported by the integrated graphics card in the Core i7-4770K. 9 0054 +
Resolution available for the graphics card built into the Core i7-4770K, including through various interfaces.
APIs supported by the Core i7-4770K integrated graphics card, including their versions.
Core i7-4770K supported peripherals and how to connect them.
These are the results of the Core i7-4770K performance tests in non-gaming benchmarks. This is our overall performance rating. We regularly improve our algorithms, but if you find any inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in the comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
i7-4770K Passmark CPU Mark is a widely used benchmark that consists of 8 different tests, including integer and floating point calculations, extended instruction tests, compression, encryption, and game physics calculations. Also includes a separate single-threaded test. Benchmark coverage: 68%
i7-4770K GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application designed as CPU benchmarks that independently recreate certain real world tasks that can be used to accurately measure performance. Benchmark coverage: 37%
i7-4770K GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application designed as CPU benchmarks that independently recreate certain real world tasks that can accurately measure performance. This version uses all available processor cores. Benchmark coverage: 37%
i7-4770K Cinebench R10 is a very outdated ray tracing benchmark for processors developed by the authors of Cinema 4D — Maxon. The Single-Core version uses a single CPU thread to render a futuristic motorcycle model. Benchmark coverage: 20%
i7-4770K Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 that uses all processor threads. The possible number of threads in this version is limited to 16. Benchmark coverage: 19%
i7-4770K 3DMark06 is an outdated set of benchmarks based on DirectX 9 by Futuremark. Its processor part contains two tests, one of which calculates the pathfinding of game AI, the other emulates game physics using the PhysX package. Benchmark coverage: 19%
i7-4770K Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 that uses all processor threads. This version supports a maximum of 64 threads. Benchmark coverage: 17%
i7-4770K Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 that uses all CPU threads. Benchmark coverage: 14%
i7-4770K Cinebench R11. Benchmark coverage: 14%
i7-4770K TrueCrypt is a deprecated program that was widely used to encrypt disk partitions on the fly. It contains several built-in benchmarks, one of which is TrueCrypt AES. It measures the speed of data encryption using the AES algorithm. The result of the test is the encryption speed in gigabytes per second. Benchmark coverage: 13%
i7-4770K The x264 benchmark uses the MPEG 4 x264 compression method to encode the HD (720p) sample video. Pass 1 is a faster option that produces an output file at a constant bit rate. Benchmark coverage: 13%
i7-4770K x264 Pass 2 is a slower MPEG4 x264 video compression benchmark, resulting in a variable bit rate output file. This results in a better quality of the resulting video file, as a higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. The benchmark result is still measured in frames per second. Benchmark coverage: 13%
i7-4770K WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of the popular archiver. It contains an internal speed test using maximum compression by the RAR algorithm on large amounts of randomly generated data. Results are measured in kilobytes per second. Benchmark coverage: 12%
i7-4770K Benchmark coverage: 5%
i7-4770K Benchmark coverage: 4%
i7-4770K
Core i7-4770K performance in cryptocurrency mining.
Core i7-4770K overall performance compared to its nearest competitor desktop processors.
Intel Core i7-4790
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
Intel Core i7-4771
Intel Core i7-4770K
AMD Athlon Gold 3150G
Intel Core i7-990X
Intel Core i7-4770
We believe that the nearest equivalent to Core i7-4770K from AMD is Athlon Gold 3150G, which is approximately equal in speed and lower by 4 positions in our rating. Athlon Gold 3150G Compare
Here are some of AMD’s closest competitors to the Core i7-4770K:
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE
AMD Ryzen 3 3200GE
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
Intel Core i7-4770K
AMD Athlon Gold 3150G
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE
AMD Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE Here we recommend several processors that are more or less similar in performance to the reviewed one. Core i7 4771 Compare Core i7 4770 Compare Core i7 4790S Compare Core i7 4790 Compare Core i7 6700T 90 038 Compare We have 5363 configurations based on the Core i7-4770K in our database. According to statistics, these video cards are most often used with the Core i7-4770K: 8.6% 6.7% 4.4% 3.8% 3.4% 3.2% 3.1% 2.8% 2.5% 2.4% Here are the most powerful graphics cards used with the Core i7-4770K according to user statistics: 0. 0.04% (2/5363) 0.1% (7/5363) 0.4% (21/5363) 0.02% (1/5363) 0.02% (1/5363) 0.5% (27/5363) 0.02% (1/5363) 0.02% (1/5363) 0.2% (13/5363)
Here you can see the rating of the processor by users, as well as put your own rating.
Here you can ask a question about the Core i7-4770K processor, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site. Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus. ::>Processors 25-10-2022 Today we will set a temporary point on processors for the LGA 1150 — we will overclock the 4-core 8-thread Intel Core i7 4770K. Our goal is to find out what the maximum you can get from this platform. To do this, let’s look at the processor in stock, then speed up and compare with a cheaper alternative — the younger Core i5-4690K without overclocking and the Xeon E3 1240 V3. Because not everyone has boards that are compatible with overclocking and the ability to take 2400 MHz for RAM. How much power is wasted then? Maybe it makes no sense to look at the Core i7, but is it better to look for a server Xeon?
Performance ranking
1047
Value for money
1.46
Type
Desktop 900 41
Series
Intel Core i7 (Desktop)
Architecture code name
Haswell (2013−2015)
Release date
June 1, 2013 (10 years ago)
Release price
$399
out of 305 (Core i7-870) 900 55
Price now
$198 (0.
5x) of 14999 (Xeon Platinum 9282)
Features
Core
4
8
Base frequency
3.50 GHz
of 4.7 (FX-9590)
Maximum frequency
3. 9 GHz
of 6 (Core i9-13900KS)
Cache 1
64K (per core)
of 7475.
2 (Apple M2 Pro 10-Core)
L2 cache
of 36864 ( Apple M2 Max)
L3 Cache
8 MB (total)
out of 768 (EPYC 7373X)
Process
22 nm
of 4 (Ryzen 9 7940HS )
Chip size
177 mm 2
Maximum temperature cores
73 °C
out of 110 (Atom x7-E3950)
Maximum Case Temperature (TCase)
72°C
of 105 (Core i7-5950HQ)
Number of transistors
1.400 million
out of 9
0 (
64 bit support
—
Free multiplier
+
Compatible
Useful, for example, when choosing the configuration of a future computer or to upgrade an existing one.
Max. number of processors per configuration
1
of 8 (Opteron 842)
Socket
FCLGA1150 90 041
Power consumption (TDP)
84 W
of 400 (Xeon Platinum 9282)
Technology and additional instructions
Extended instructions
Intel® SSE4.
1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES -NI
+
AVX
+
vPro 53
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)
+
+
My WiFi
+
Turbo Boost Technology
2.0 -Threading Technology
+
TSX
—
9005 5
Idle States
+
3
SIPP
—
FDI
+
Safety technology
TXT
—
EDB
+ 90 041
Identity Protection 9005 5
+
OS Guard
+
Virtualization Technologies
AMD-V
+
VT-d
—
VT-x
+
EPT
+
RAM support
Allowable memory
32 GB
of 786 (Xeon E5-2670 v3)
Number of memory channels
2
of 12 (Xeon Platinum 9221)
Memory Bandwidth
25.
6 GB/ with of 460.8 (EPYC 9124)
ECC support
—
Embedded Video Specifications
Video core
Intel HD Graphics 4600
Video memory
Quick Sync Video
+
Clear Video HD
+
Max GPU Clock
1.25 GHz
InTru 3D
+
9 0055 Integrated video — interfaces
Maximum number of monitors
3
eDP
9004 0 +
DisplayPort
+
HDMI
+ 900 41
DVI
+
VGA
Integrated video — image quality
Maximum resolution via HDMI 1.4
4096×2304@24Hz
eDP
3840×2160@60Hz
Maximum Resolution via DisplayPort
3840×2160 @60Hz
Maximum resolution via VGA
1920×1200@60Hz
Integrated video — API support
DirectX
11.2/12
OpenGL
9 0040 4.3
Peripherals
PCI Express revision
to 3.0
of 5 (Core i9-12900K)
Number of PCI-Express lanes
16
out of 128 (EPYC 7551P)
Benchmark tests
The overall score is set from 0 to 100, where 100 corresponds to the fastest processor at the moment.
Overall benchmark performance
5.65
Passmark
7120
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
This version uses only one processor core.
1233
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
4003
Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
5845
Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core
22325
3DMark06 CPU
8030
Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core
8
Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core
770
Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core
5 is an old Maxon development benchmark. authors of Cinema 4D. It has been superseded by later versions of Cinebench which use more modern variants of the Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads one CPU thread with ray tracing, rendering a glossy room full of crystal spheres and lights.
1.8
TrueCrypt AES
4.4
x264 encoding pass 1
Its result is measured in frames per second, that is, how many frames of the source video file were encoded in one second on average.
175
x264 encoding pass 2
46
WinRAR 4.0
5119
Geekbench 2
12125
3DMark Fire Strike Physics
9120
Mining hashrates
Usually the result is measured in mhash / s — the number of millions of solutions generated by the video card in one second.
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
7.1 Mh/s
Relative capacity
101.77
100.88
100
100
99.65
99.47
99.29
Competitor from AMD
105.49
102.48
100.88
100
99.65
98.41
98.41
Other processors
Best graphics cards for Core i7-4770K
GeForce GTX
1060 6GB
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
GeForce GTX
1070
GeForce GTX
970
GeForce GTX
1060 3GB
Radeon RX
580
GeForce GTX
1660 Super
GeForce GTX
770
HD
Graphics 4600
GeForce GTX
1650
GeForce RTX
4090
8% (42/5363)
GeForce RTX
4080
GeForce RTX
4070 Ti
GeForce RTX
3090 Ti
Radeon RX
7900XT
Radeon RX
6950XT
GeForce RTX
3080 Ti
Radeon RX
6900XT
GeForce RTX
4070
GeForce RTX
3090
User rating
Tips and comments
Test Xeon E3-1240 v3 against Core i7-4770K. Intel LGA1150 platform in 2022 GECID.com.
>2022
> Test Xeon E3-1240 v3 vs. Core i7-4770K. Intel LGA1150 platform in 2022
So what is this Core i7-4770K gem? With the configuration of cores and threads, it’s clear — 4 by 8.
The maximum frequency is 3.9 GHz, TDP — 84 W, third-level cache — 8 MB. The main trump card is the ability to overclock and the ability to work with DDR3 memory at an increased frequency — from the recommended 1600 MHz to 2400 MHz. Which in combination gives a noticeable acceleration.
The Xeon E3 1240 V3 is an almost complete copy of the Core i7-4770K for the average user. The only thing is that the server processor offers a 100 MHz lower frequency and does not have an integrated video core. The price is a third less. And sometimes Xeon runs at a lower voltage and a little colder. The main thing is to find a normal living «stone». Most of the processors for the retro cycle were obtained from tera-flops.com.ua. Shop with new and also tested used hardware, which comes with a great warranty. For example, on the CPU — 1 year.
Yes, the results of the 4-core Core i5-4690K in stock from the previous review were added to this comparison. So that you can visually appreciate the difference from adding 4 virtual threads and overclocking.
Overclocking Core i7-4770K
In search of the maximum frequency:
- Raised the multiplier to 45;
- Activated XMP profile for RAM, which gave 2400 MHz;
- Fixed voltage at 1.4 V;
- And set CPU Load-Line Calibration to Level 1.
After that, the Core i7 ran steadily at 4.5 GHz across all cores and threads. We tried to take 4.6 GHz, but we could not find a reliable configuration of settings for our system.
When running two stress tests, the CPU temperature rose to 92°C. And power consumption has grown to 132 watts. Too much, but there were no missed bars. And in real games, the heating will be less.
By the way, in stock, the Core i7 had a maximum of 63°C at 63W, while the Xeon had 54°C and 60W, respectively. Next, we look at where we packed the “stones”, how they cooled and how they generally worked.
Test stand
The ASRock Z97 Extreme6 motherboard withstood the increased requirements for processor power and RAM frequency.
To prevent the hot 8 threads from boiling, CPU cooling was entrusted to be quiet! Pure Loop 2FX 360mm. Each fan has 9optimized blades that generate powerful air pressure up to 2.6 mm/h3O. She also has 18 ARGB LEDs and a convenient filling hole for adding liquid to the system.
16 GB of RAM used two sticks of 8 GB G.Skill Trident X DDR3-2400. It gave the maximum frequency only with an overclocked Core i7. The rest of the tests are at 1600 MHz to simulate a PC with an inexpensive motherboard. ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3090 Ti OC Edition with 24 GB VRAM. In addition to incredible power, it has reliable and efficient Axial-tech fans, as well as the ability to work completely silently — until the GPU reaches 50°C.
The disk subsystem was assembled from two drives. The 512 GB Kingston KC600 put the system and all the benchmarks, while the Kingston A400 put all the games in its 960 GB. Their read and write speeds are around 500 MB / s. The drives are reliable — time to fail or MTBF — 1 million hours.
This is 114 years of round-the-clock work.
Seasonic Prime PX-850 provided stable and reliable power supply to the components. The difference on the main lines has a deviation of only 0.5%. And the back panel and PCB are connected by the new Seasonic technology without cables using a copper plate, which also improves the quality of the output power.
And everything was assembled in the Cougar MX660 Mesh RGB case. It is spacious, equipped with three powerful VK 120 fans and, most importantly, the front panel is completely ventilated. Lighting and transparent glass are already nice bonuses.
Comparison Xeon E3 1240 V3 vs Core i7-4770 K vs Core i5-4690 K
To understand the place Core i7-4770K against the background of more or less modern counterparts, we turn to the Cinebench R23 base we have assembled.
And he looks good, especially in overclocking. For example, it outperforms the Core i3-10100 in multithreading by 9%, which also has 4 cores in 8 threads. Well, both Ryzen 3s can’t be said to have come off much.
Same benchmark but different competitors. First of all, we make sure once again that Xeon = Core i7. But in overclocking and with fast memory, the Crust is 23-24% better. And if we compare it with the stock 4-core Core i5-4690K, then the advantage of overclocked 8 threads increases to 14-54%.
3DMark Time Spy, in fact, does not see the difference between the main characters. Server / non-server — all plus or minus the statistical error. Core i7 in overclocking overtakes Xeon — by 24%, itself on the drain by 27%, Core i5 — by 53%.
7-ZIP Benchmark after overclocking Core i7 accelerates at the same level — 22-26%. Compared to the four cores of the Core i5, 61% prefer it. Excellent result!
And let’s also look at the complex PCMark 10.
i7 under overclocking outperforms the Xeon by 14-27%, and the 4-core one by 18-32%.
If we sum up all the results of synthetic tests, and take the Core i5-4690K indicator at stock frequencies as 100%, we get the following numbers:
135% Core i7-4770K OC @ 4.5GHz/DDR3 2400MHz
111% Core i7-4770K Stock @ 3.5/3.9GHz/DDR3 1600MHz 900 05
110% Xeon E3-1240 v3 Stock @ 3.4/3.8 GHz/DDR3 1600 MHz
there is no sacred benefit from 4 additional virtual threads without overclocking. The stock Core i7 and Xeon outperformed the 4690K by only 10-11%. But after overclocking, the separation of the 8-stream stone noticeably increases — up to 35%.
122% Core i7-4770K OC @ 4.5 GHz/DDR3 2400 MHz
100% Xeon E3-1240 v3 Stock @ 3.4/3.8 GHz/DDR3 1600 MHz 9 0005
If you leave only these two — we have a 22% advantage on average. Given the difference in cost, the need to pump many system components and the temperature of the overclocked processor, it’s really better to save money and take the Xeon.
Especially if you are thinking of resurrecting your old system or building it from used parts.
Well, with the work tasks and synthetics sorted out — now it’s time to play in Full HD resolution. This is where multithreading comes into play.
We fly into Assassin’s Creed Valhalla with Ultra High graphics. The benefit of overclocking the Core i7-4770K ranges from 10 to 25%. Xeon in this benchmark failed noticeably behind rare events, so the accelerated Core i7 outperformed it by 26-39%. The temperature of the leader, as expected, is normal … under the «dropsy» and in a good case.
Cyberpunk 2077 launched with ultra graphics without rays. The effect of overclocking is 33-41%. For example, very rare events for Core i7 and Xeon were 37-36 fps, and steel — 52 fps. This is a noticeable increase in the stability of the gameplay in some action scenes and polygon-saturated locations. Well, if you compare it with a 4-core processor, it generally has a 2-fold worse indicator of 0.
1%.
Watching Far Cry 6 with maximum picture without ray tracing. Increasing the frequency of the cores gave a 27-29% bonus. Thus, the «seventh plug» managed to bypass Xeon by 20-30% and by 37-133% Core i5-4690K at stock frequencies. Again, this is the key to a more pleasant and stable gameplay without noticeable drawdowns.
The benchmark Forza Horizon 5 with extreme graphics was less happy about the increase in i7 frequency and RAM. The difference with the stock itself and Xeon is only 9-18% on 0.1% low. Although if you look at the result of a 4-core, it’s still heaven and earth: 31 fps versus 60 fps.
For dessert, heavy artillery in the form of Total War Saga: Troy with Ultra graphics. Here, His Majesty randomly made a bandwagon to the base Core i7-4770K within the margin of error — it happens. However, the winners are not judged — overclocking put him ahead of the nearest pursuer by 20-29%.
In general, in games, the overclocking advantage of the Core i7-4770K is immediately noticeable. He outscored himself in par by 24–29% average. The frame rate stability of Cyberpunk 2077 and Total War Saga: Troy improved particularly well.
Approximately the same handicap over Xeon — 26-27% on average.
Without overclocking, these processors provide an identical level of comfort. Unless it happens in games, a restless hand interferes randomly.
As for the comparison with 4690K — you already understood. And now and according to the last review. Many Core i7 streams provide a completely different level of comfort — less twitches, jerks, faster loading of assets and, in general, a more stable video sequence. This is what directly affects the buzz from the game. And even if the 4-core driver is also overclocked, such an effect cannot be achieved.
So for games, if possible, spend money on memory, cooling, or if the system already allows it, it makes sense to overpay for the Core i7-4770K for overclocking.
Together with the RAM boost, this will give a noticeable increase, both against the background of the drain and against the background of the Xeon.
If you want to save as much as possible and get the best result in terms of price-ability — Xeon definitely wins in this category. You can find it for half the price.
i7 4770K Stock |VS| Xeon E3 1240 V3 | VS | i7 4770K OC
In live gameplay
And now we turn off serious analytics and voice our impressions of real gameplay in 10 games. Now we have taken the server Xeon E3 1240 V3 and compared it with two variants of the Core i7-4770K — nominal and overclocked. For obvious reasons, in online games it was not always possible to hit one map, but we tried.
Apex Legends spread its royal canyon in front of us with maximum picture quality. So, we have already figured out the difference in numbers, it is, we measured it in percentages. But it is in this game that you cannot feel it without monitoring.
Xeon with stock memory gives the same gameplay feel as an overclocked Core i7. Slight twitching can sometimes be found in all cases, but most of the time we have a very smooth video sequence, where the average frequency is well over a hundred.
In Battlefield 2042 for 128 players, the comparison turned out to be relative, because all processors got different cards. The hardest hit was the base Core i7 on the Manifesto map. With ultra-graphics, he had subsidence up to 30-35 fps. So we went down to the top. In the other two — the maximum picture. It turns out that for a couple of roller settings you will need to select and with an overclocked processor, the breadth of choice will be greater.
CoD: Warzone with maximum graphics comes with nuances. If you run on foot, there is a comfortable gameplay in all cases. If you sit behind the wheel, then sometimes there are unpleasant slowdowns, regardless of the frequency of the cores and memory.
By the way, monitoring also recorded the same level of drawdowns between the stock and overclocked processors.
Dota 2 is no worse than other games — got the maximum picture quality settings. True matches are different everywhere, so the comparison is relative. Based on impressions, we can say that smoothness and subsidence are the same. In the beginning, when the warm-up or the first cast of abilities can slow down a little, but then it plays great on all stones.
In Fortnite was running at epic settings on DX12. Here again is an element that you don’t plan much. Xeon was tested last season games, and Core i7 — already in the new one, where the terrain of our route became less detailed, which could affect the results. In any case, both processors give almost the same gameplay experience — for the most part pleasant. Small blunts sometimes happen everywhere, but they are not critical.
Grand Theft Auto V 9We also look at 0004 with the highest picture.
Plays comfortably on both processors, even with 1600 RAM. Most screen time is 60+ fps. Naturally, the overclocked Core i7 has the most stable and pleasing to the eye.
Multiplayer Halo Infinite with such processors can be afforded with «Ultra» graphics settings. The general impressions are again almost the same. If you turn off the monitoring and just play — that Xeon, that accelerated «crust» — are equally cool.
PUBG is notorious for being a CPU-intensive game and we often complain about it because of the constant little twitches. So this time — to Xeon and Core i7 you can make similar claims. But the overclocked «stone» in this regard is a little easier, which is also reflected by all monitoring indicators. In some moments, we have 1.5-2 times the best 0.1% Low.
Red Dead Redemption 2 does not lose the bar set by other games — the picture is at the maximum. There are practically no significant comments — the video sequence is smooth, and the controls are obedient.
In what parts of the city do not stop by and do not shoot at someone with new cartridges with explosive grease. Here you can not overpay for overclocking. Xeon offers almost the same gameplay.
And finally «Sixth Rainbow: Siege» on the map «Chalet» with full rendering and ultra-settings. An overclocked processor usually performs better, but stock processors do well, even for a 144Hz monitor. For 0.1% drops below 142 fps. And so the screen is consistently above two hundred.
Conclusions
Of course, if your goal is to get the most out of the LGA 1150 platform, there is a motherboard charged for overclocking, memory takes 2400 MHz and good processor cooling, the Core i7-4770K will be an excellent choice.
In games, it is faster than the face value and Xeon by 27-29%. Especially in difficult projects, this further stabilizes the frame rate and improves the smoothness of the picture. True, the overpayment in this case will be many times greater than the resulting acceleration.