Intel t5600 benchmark: Intel Core 2 Duo T5600 Benchmarks

Intel Core 2 Duo T5600 Benchmarks

Benchmark results for the Intel Core 2 Duo T5600 can be found below. The data on this chart is gathered from user-submitted Geekbench 5 results from the Geekbench Browser.

Geekbench 5 scores are calibrated against a baseline score of 1000 (which is the score of an Intel Core i3-8100). Higher scores are better, with double the score indicating double the performance.

CPU Benchmark Scores

224

Single-Core Score

409

Multi-Core Score

Processor Information

Processor	Intel Core 2 Duo T5600
Frequency	1830 MHz
Cores	2
Threads	2
TDP	34 W
Codename	Merom
Package	PBGA479, PPGA478

Merom Benchmarks

Single-Core
Multi-Core

Processor	Score
Intel Core 2 Extreme X7900 2. 8 GHz (2 cores)	625
Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 2.4 GHz (2 cores)	554
Intel Core 2 Duo T7800 2.6 GHz (2 cores)	517
Intel Core 2 Duo T5850 2.2 GHz (2 cores)	493
Intel Core 2 Duo T7600 2.3 GHz (2 cores)	472
Intel Core 2 Duo T7400 2.2 GHz (2 cores)	469
Intel Core 2 Duo T5900 2.2 GHz (2 cores)	466
Intel Core 2 Duo T7300 2.0 GHz (2 cores)	465
Intel Core 2 Duo T7500 2.2 GHz (2 cores)	459
Intel Core 2 Duo L7700 1.8 GHz (2 cores)	455
Intel Core 2 Duo T5870 2. 0 GHz (2 cores)	445
Intel Core 2 Duo T7250 2.0 GHz (2 cores)	436
Intel Core 2 Duo T7200 2.0 GHz (2 cores)	431
Intel Pentium T3400 2.2 GHz (2 cores)	425
Intel Core 2 Duo T5750 2.0 GHz (2 cores)	418
Intel Core 2 Duo T5800 2.0 GHz (2 cores)	413
Intel Core 2 Duo T7100 1.8 GHz (2 cores)	412
Intel Core 2 Duo T5670 1.8 GHz (2 cores)	411
Intel Core 2 Duo T5550 1.8 GHz (2 cores)	409
Intel Core 2 Duo T5600 1.8 GHz (2 cores)	409
Intel Celeron T1700 1. 8 GHz (2 cores)	397
Intel Celeron T1600 1.7 GHz (2 cores)	396
Intel Pentium T2410 2.0 GHz (2 cores)	396
Intel Pentium T3200 2.0 GHz (2 cores)	394
Intel Core 2 Duo T5300 1.7 GHz (2 cores)	389
Intel Core 2 Duo T5500 1.7 GHz (2 cores)	363
Intel Pentium T2370 1.7 GHz (2 cores)	359
Intel Core 2 Duo L7500 1.6 GHz (2 cores)	355
Intel Pentium T2330 1.6 GHz (2 cores)	352
Intel Core 2 Duo T5270 1.4 GHz (2 cores)	349
Intel Pentium T2390 1.9 GHz (2 cores)	337
Intel Pentium T2310 1. 5 GHz (2 cores)	324
Intel Core 2 Duo T5200 1.6 GHz (2 cores)	321
Intel Core 2 Duo T5470 1.6 GHz (2 cores)	317
Intel Core 2 Duo T5250 1.5 GHz (2 cores)	314
Intel Core 2 Duo T5450 1.7 GHz (2 cores)	308
Intel Core 2 Duo U7700 1.3 GHz (2 cores)	307
Intel Core 2 Duo U7600 1.2 GHz (2 cores)	262
Intel Core 2 Duo U7500 1.1 GHz (2 cores)	247
Intel Core 2 Duo L7100 1.2 GHz (2 cores)	237
Intel Celeron 560 2.1 GHz (1 core)	219
Intel Celeron M 530 1. 7 GHz (1 core)	218
Intel Celeron 550 2.0 GHz (1 core)	208
Intel Celeron 540 1.9 GHz (1 core)	178

Core 2 Duo T5600 [in 5 benchmarks]

Intel
Core 2 Duo T5600

Buy

Interface

Core clock speed

Max video memory

Memory type

Memory clock speed

Maximum resolution

Summary

Intel started Intel Core 2 Duo T5600 sales 28 July 2006 at a recommended price of $241. This is Merom architecture notebook processor primarily aimed at office systems. It has 2 cores and 2 threads, and is based on 65 nm manufacturing technology, with a maximum frequency of 1830 MHz and a locked multiplier.

Compatibility-wise, this is PPGA478, PBGA479 processor with a TDP of 34 Watt.

It provides poor benchmark performance at

0.66%

of a leader’s which is AMD EPYC 7h22.

Core 2
Duo T5600

EPYC
7h22

General info

Core 2 Duo T5600 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and pricing.

Place in performance rating	2581
Market segment	Laptop
Series	Intel Core 2 Duo
Architecture codename	Merom (2006−2008)
Release date	28 July 2006 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$241	of 305 (Core i7-870)
Current price	$31 (0. 1x MSRP)	of 14999 (Xeon Platinum 9282)

Technical specs

Basic microprocessor parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters can generally indicate CPU performance, but to be more precise you have to review its test results.

Physical cores	2 (Dual-core)
Threads	2
Base clock speed	1.83 GHz	of 4.7 (FX-9590)
Boost clock speed	1.83 GHz	of 5.8 (Core i9-13900K)
Bus support	667 MHz
L1 cache	64 KB	of 1536 (EPYC Embedded 3401)
L2 cache	2 MB	of 12 (Core 2 Quad Q9550)
L3 cache	0 KB	of 32768 (Ryzen Threadripper 1998)
Chip lithography	65 nm	of 5 (Apple M1)
Die size	143 mm²
Maximum core temperature	100 °C	of 110 (Atom x7-E3950)
Number of transistors	291 Million	of 57000 (Apple M1 Max)
64 bit support	+
Windows 11 compatibility	—
Unlocked multiplier	—
VID voltage range	1. 0375V-1.3V

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo T5600 compatibility with other computer components and devices: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one.

Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	of 8 (Opteron 842)
Socket	PPGA478, PBGA479
Thermal design power (TDP)	34 Watt	of 400 (Xeon Platinum 9282)

Technologies and extensions

Technological capabilities and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo T5600. You’ll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+
Turbo Boost Technology	—
Hyper-Threading Technology	—
Idle States	—
Demand Based Switching	—
FSB parity	—

Security technologies

Processor technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	—
EDB	+

Virtualization technologies

Supported virtual machine optimization technologies. Some are specific to Intel only, some to AMD.

Benchmark performance

Single-core and multi-core benchmark results of Core 2 Duo T5600. Overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Overall score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Duo T5600
0.66

Passmark

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

3DMark06 CPU

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Core 2 Duo T5600
662

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 37%

Core 2 Duo T5600
224

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 37%

Core 2 Duo T5600
409

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Core 2 Duo T5600
1560

Relative perfomance

Overall Core 2 Duo T5600 performance compared to nearest competitors among notebook CPUs.

Intel Celeron N3060
100

AMD Turion X2 RM-75
100

Intel Celeron Dual-Core T3000
100

Intel Core 2 Duo T5600
100

Intel Celeron T3000
100

AMD Athlon II N330
100

Intel Celeron B800
98.48

AMD equivalent

We believe that the nearest equivalent to Core 2 Duo T5600 from AMD is Athlon II N330, which is nearly equal in speed and higher by 3 positions in our rating.

Athlon II
N330

Compare

Here are some closest AMD rivals to Core 2 Duo T5600:

AMD E2-3000M
101.52

AMD Turion X2 RM-75
100

AMD Athlon II N330
100

Intel Core 2 Duo T5600
100

AMD Athlon II M300
98.48

AMD A4-3320M
95.45

AMD Athlon 64 X2 TK-57
95.45

Similar processors

Here is our recommendation of several processors that are more or less close in performance to the one reviewed.

Turion X2
RM-75

Compare

Celeron Dual
Core T3000

Compare

Celeron M
585

Compare

Core 2
Duo T5900

Compare

Core 2
Duo T5850

Compare

Core 2
Duo L7200

Compare

Recommended graphics cards

These graphics cards are most commonly used with Core 2 Duo T5600 according to our statistics.

GeForce Go
7400

10%

GeForce Go
7600

10%

GMA
950

10%

GeForce GT
220

GeForce Go
7300

GeForce GTX
260 Core 216 Rev. 2

2.5%

HD
Graphics

2.5%

Graphics Media
Accelerator (GMA) 3600

2. 5%

Graphics Media
Accelerator (GMA) 950

2.5%

GeForce
945M

2.5%

User rating

Here is the rating given to the reviewed processor by our users. Let others know your opinion by rating it yourself.

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Duo T5600, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.

Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.

Intel Core 2 Duo T5600 processor review: CPU specs, performance benchmarks

Buy on Amazon

Core 2 Duo T5600 processor released by Intel; release date: 28 July 2006. At the time of release, the processor cost $241. The processor is designed for mobile-computers and based on Merom microarchitecture.

CPU is locked to prevent overclocking. Total number of cores — 2, threads — 2. Maximum CPU clock speed — 1.83 GHz. Maximum operating temperature — 100°C. Manufacturing process technology — 65 nm. Cache size: L1 — 64 KB, L2 — 2048 KB.

Supported socket types: PPGA478, PBGA479. Maximum number of processors in a configuration — 1. Power consumption (TDP): 34 Watt.

Benchmarks

PassMark
Single thread mark

Top 1 CPU

This CPU

PassMark
CPU mark

Top 1 CPU

This CPU

118142

Geekbench 4
Single Core

Top 1 CPU

This CPU

Geekbench 4
Multi-Core

Top 1 CPU

This CPU

Name	Value
PassMark — Single thread mark	701
PassMark — CPU mark	662
Geekbench 4 — Single Core	1043
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core	1639

Specifications (specs)

Architecture codename	Merom
Launch date	28 July 2006
Launch price (MSRP)	$241
Place in performance rating	1880
Processor Number	T5600
Series	Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors
Status	Discontinued
Vertical segment	Mobile
64 bit support
Base frequency	1. 83 GHz
Bus Speed	667 MHz FSB
Die size	143 mm2
Front-side bus (FSB)	667 MHz
L1 cache	64 KB
L2 cache	2048 KB
Manufacturing process technology	65 nm
Maximum core temperature	100°C
Maximum frequency	1.83 GHz
Number of cores	2
Number of threads	2
Transistor count	291 million
VID voltage range	1. 0375V-1.300V

Low Halogen Options Available
Max number of CPUs in a configuration	1
Package Size	35mm x 35mm
Scenario Design Power (SDP)	0 W
Sockets supported	PPGA478, PBGA479
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	34 Watt
Execute Disable Bit (EDB)
Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT)
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology
FSB parity
Idle States
Intel 64
Intel® Demand Based Switching
Intel® Hyper-Threading technology
Intel® Turbo Boost technology
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x)

Navigation

Choose a CPU

Compare processors

Compare Intel Core 2 Duo T5600 with others

Intel
Core 2 Duo T5600

vs

Intel
Celeron N3160

Intel
Core 2 Duo T5600

vs

Intel
Atom Z3775

Intel
Core 2 Duo T5600

vs

AMD
GX-420CA

Intel
Core 2 Duo T5600

vs

Intel
Celeron N4120

Intel
Core 2 Duo T5600

vs

AMD
GX-420MC

Intel
Core 2 Duo T5600

vs

AMD
A4-9120e

CPU-Z Benchmark for Intel Core 2 T5600 (1T)

Best CPU performance — 64-bit — October 2022

Intel Core 2 T5600 (1T)

Back to validation

Intel Core i7-7700K

Intel Core i7-6700K

Intel Core i5-6600K

Intel Core i7-4790K

Intel Core i7-6850K

Intel Core i5-4690K

Intel Core i7-6900K

Intel Core i7-6800K

Intel Core i7-6950X

Intel Core i7-5930K

Intel Core i5-6600

Intel Core i7-4770K

Intel Core i7-6700

Intel Core i5-4670K

Intel Core i3-6100

Intel Pentium G3258

Intel Core i7-5820K

Intel Core i7-3770K

Intel Xeon E3-1230 v5

Intel Core i5-3570K

Intel Core i7-4790

Intel Core i7-4930K

Intel Core i7-4820K

Intel Core i5-4690

Intel Core i7-7500U

Intel Core i7-4770

Intel Core i5-6500

Intel Pentium G4400

Intel Core i5-4670

Intel Core i7-5960X

Intel Core i3-4170

Intel Core i7-3770

Intel Xeon E3-1231 v3

Intel Core i7-6820HK

Intel Core i5-4590

Intel Core i3-4160

Intel Core i5-3570

Intel Core i5-6400

Intel Xeon E3-1230 v3

Intel Core i5-2500K

Intel Core i5-4570

Intel Core i7-2700K

Intel Core i5-3550

Intel Core i3-4150

Intel Core i7-2600K

Intel Xeon E3-1230 V2

Intel Core i7-4720HQ

Intel Core i7-3960X

Intel Core i3-4130

Intel Core i5-3470

Intel Core i7-3820

Intel Core i5-7200U

Intel Pentium G3260

Intel Core i5-2550K

Intel Core i7-6700HQ

Intel Core i7-4710HQ

Intel Core i5-4460

Intel Core i7-4710MQ

Intel Core i5-4210H

Intel Core i5-3450

Intel Core i7-3930K

Intel Core i7-3520M

Intel Core i5-4200H

Intel Core i7-4700MQ

Intel Core i7-4700HQ

Intel Core i3-3240

Intel Core i5-4440

Intel Core i7-6500U

Intel Core i7 X 990

Intel Core i5-4430

Intel Core i3-3220

Intel Core i5-6300HQ

Intel Core i5-6300U

Intel Core i7-3630QM

Intel Core i5-3350P

AMD FX -9590

Intel Core i7-2600

Intel Core i5-4210M

Intel Pentium G3220

Intel Core i7-4702MQ

Intel Core i7-5500U

Intel Core i7-3610QM

Intel Core i7 X 980

Intel Core i5-3330

Intel Core i5-3320M

Intel Core i5-2500

Intel Xeon W3690

AMD FX -9370

Intel Pentium G2030

Intel Core i7-4510U

Intel Core i5-6200U

Intel Core i7-3632QM

Intel Core i5-3230M

Intel Core i5-4200M

AMD FX-8370

Intel Pentium G2020

Intel Core i7-3612QM

AMD FX -4350

Intel Core i5-2400

Intel Core i5-3210M

AMD FX -8350

AMD A10-6800K

AMD A10-7890K

Intel Xeon X5675

Intel Xeon X5470

Intel Xeon E5-2683 v3

AMD Athlon X4 880K

AMD FX-8370E

Intel Core i3-2120

Intel Xeon X5670

Intel Core i7-2620M

AMD FX -6350

Intel Core i5-4300U

Intel Core i7 870

Intel Core i5-2320

Intel Core i7 960

Intel Core i5-5200U

AMD Athlon X4 845

AMD A8-6600K

AMD A10-5800K

Intel Core i5-2540M

Intel Xeon E5-2670

AMD A6-6400K

AMD FX -8320

Intel Core i5 760

AMD Athlon X4 870K

AMD A10-7870K

Intel Core i5-2310

AMD Athlon X4 760K

Intel Core i7 950

AMD FX -8300

AMD FX -4300

AMD FX -6300

AMD Athlon X4 860K

AMD FX-8320E

Intel Core i3-2100

AMD A10-7850K

Intel Core i5 650

Intel Core 2 Duo E8600

Intel Xeon X5460

Intel Core i5-2520M

Intel Core i5-2300

Intel Core i7 860

Intel Core i3-6100U

AMD Athlon X4 750K

AMD A10-7860K

AMD A6-5400K

AMD A8-5600K

Intel Core i5 750

Intel Core i3 550

Intel Core i7-2670QM

Intel Core 2 Duo E8500

Intel Xeon E5450

AMD A10-7700K

AMD A10-7800

Intel Core i5-3337U

Intel Core i7 930

Intel Core i5-2430M

Intel Core i3 540

Intel Core 2 Quad Q9650

Intel Core i5 M 560

Intel Xeon X5650

AMD A8-7600

Intel Xeon X5450

Intel Core i5-2450M

Intel Xeon X3440

AMD A8-7650K

Pentium E5700

Intel Core 2 Duo E8400

Intel Core i5-2410M

Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550

AMD Athlon X4 740

Intel Core 2 Duo E6850

Intel Core i7-2630QM

Intel Xeon E5440

Intel Core i3-3110M

Intel Core 2 Duo E7500

Intel Core i7 920

Pentium E6500

Intel Core i3 530

Intel Core i5 M 480

Intel Pentium G620

Intel Core 2 Duo E7400

Pentium E5500

Intel Core 2 Quad Q9450

Intel Core i5 M 460

Intel Core i5 M 520

Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400

Intel Core i3-5005U

Intel Core 2 Duo E7300

Pentium E5400

Intel Core 2 Quad Q8400

Pentium E5300

Intel Core 2 Duo E6750

Intel Core 2 Quad Q9300

AMD FX -8150

Pentium E5200

Intel Xeon L5420

Intel Core 2 Quad Q8300

Intel Core i3 M 380

Intel Core i3-2350M

Intel Core i5 M 430

Intel Core i7 Q 720

AMD FX -8120

Intel Core i3 M 370

Intel Core i3-4030U

Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600

Intel Core i3-2330M

Intel Core 2 Quad

AMD FX -6100

AMD FX -4100

Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200

Intel Core 2 Duo E6550

Intel Core i3-2310M

AMD A10-8700P

Intel Core i3 M 350

Intel Core i3-3217U

Intel Core i3-4005U

AMD Phenom II X6 1100T

AMD Phenom II X6 1090T

Intel Core 2 Duo E4500

Intel Core i3 M 330

AMD Phenom II X6 1055T

AMD Phenom II X4 965

AMD A8-7410

AMD Phenom II X4 B55

AMD Phenom II X4 955

AMD A8-6410

AMD A8-4500M

AMD Phenom II X4 840

AMD Phenom II X4 B50

AMD A6-6310

AMD Phenom II X4 945

AMD Athlon II X2 250

AMD Athlon II X4 640

(YOU) Intel Core 2 T5600

AMD Athlon II X2 245

AMD Phenom II X4 925

AMD Athlon II X4 630

AMD Athlon II X2 240

AMD Athlon II X4 620

AMD Athlon 64 X2 6000+

AMD Athlon 64 X2 5200+

AMD Athlon 64 X2 5000+

Intel Pentium N3540

Intel Celeron N2840

Intel Celeron N3050

Intel Atom x5-Z8300

Test System And Benchmarks — Dell Precision T5600: Two Eight-Core CPUs In A Workstation

Tom’s Hardware is supported by its audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Here’s why you can trust us.

iBuyPower provides our reference workstation hardware, and we continue using the company’s P500X as the baseline point of comparison in our workstation coverage. Check out our review of that system in iBuyPower P500X And P900DX Workstations, Reviewed.

Test System Specifications
	iBuyPower P500X	Dell T5600
CPU	Intel Xeon E3-1270 v2 (Ivy Bridge), 3.5 GHz, Quad-Core, LGA 1155, 8 MB Shared L3, Hyper-Threading enabled, Power-savings enabled	2 x Intel Xeon E5-2687W (Sandy Bridge-EP), 3.1 GHz, Octa-Core, LGA 2011, 20 MB Shared L3, Hyper-Threading enabled, Power-savings enabled
Cooler	Asetek 550LC	2 x Dell Heat Sink and Fan Combo
Motherboard	Asus P8B WS, Intel C206 PCH, BIOS 2009	Dell 0Y56T3, Intel C602 PCH, BIOS A08
RAM	2 x Kingston KVR1333D3E9S/4G, ECC DDR3-1333 CAS9	8 x Hynix HMT325R7CFR8C, ECC DDR3-1333 CAS9
Graphics	PNY Quadro 2000 1 GB625 MHz GPU, 1300 MHz Memory128-bit GDDR5, 42 GB/s Memory Bandwidth292 CUDA cores	PNY Quadro K5000 4 GB706 MHz GPU, 1350 MHz Memory256-bit GDDR5, 173 GB/s Memory Bandwidth2536 CUDA cores
RAID Controller	N/A	Dell PowerEdge RAID Controller h410, SAS/SATA RAID, PCIe 2. 0 x8
SSD	Kingston Hyper-X Sh200S3B/120G, 120 GB MLC SSD	2 x Samsung PM830 MZ-7PC256D, 256 GB MLC SSD
Hard Drive	HGST HDS732020BLA642 2 TB, 7K3000, 7200 RPM	N/A
Optical	Lite-On iHAS124-04(C) 24x Dual-Layer DVD±RW Writer	Samsung/Toshiba SN-208 Slimline 8x DVD+/-RW SATA
Sound	Echo Digital Audio AudioFire 2 (not included in price)	Echo Digital Audio AudioFire 2 (not included in price)Creative Labs Sound Blaster Recon3D PCIe (not used in testing)
Networking	Integrated Intel 82574L	Integrated Intel 82579
FireWire	Integrated VIA 6308S	LSI L-FW323-07 Three-Port PCI FireWire Card
Power Supply	Corsair TX650 V2, 80 PLUS Bronze, 650 W	Dell H825EF-00, 825 W
Case	Cooler Master Silencio 550	Dell T5600 Case
Software
Operating System	Windows 7 Professional x64	Windows 7 Professional x64
Graphics Driver	Quadro Driver 320. 49	Quadro Driver 320.49
Audio Driver	5.8	5.8
ASIO Driver	Included in audio driver	Included in audio driver
Warranty and Price
Warranty	Three-year labor, one-year parts	Three-year basic hardware service with three-year NBD on-site service after remote diagnostic
Price As Configured	$1999	$8012

Since our last workstation review, Adobe shipped its Creative Cloud suite, while Autodesk released the 2014 versions of their apps. So, the workstation tests are updated to reflect those changes.

Application Benchmarks and Settings
Compression/Archiving
7-Zip	Version 9.28: THG-Workload (1.3 GB) to .7z, command line switches «a -t7z -r -m0=LZMA2 -mx=5»
WinRAR	Version 4. 2: THG-Workload (1.3 GB) to RAR, command line switches «winrar a -r -m3»
WinZip	Version 17.0 Pro: THG-Workload (1.3 GB) to ZIP, command line switches «-a -ez -p -r»
Content Creation
Newtek Lightwave 3D 11.5	Custom workload: High-polygon-count Tom’s Hardware logo, Modeler test: Scripted cloning of surface details across a segment of the logo, Render test: 1920×1080 render of logo with photoreal motion blur, ray-traced shadows, global illumination, OpenGL Test: Generate OpenGL preview of animation for real-time playback on screen
Blender	Version: 2.68a Syntax blender -b thg.blend -f 1, Resolution: 1920×1080, Anti-Aliasing: 8x, Render: THG.blend frame 1, Cycles renderer and internal tile renderer (9×9)
e-on SoftwareVue 11 Infinite PLE	Custom workload: Landscape (generated in Vue 8 full version and imported into PLE)
Autodesk 3ds Max 2014	Space Flyby Mentalray, Frame 248, 1440×1080 Tom’s Hardware Logo render in V-Ray, 1920×1080, global illumination, photorealistic motion blur, ray-traced shadows, Create Nitrous preview of logo scene, to Y: RAM drive, Autodesk chair scene in iray, 1920×1080, 250 passes, GPU (CUDA) only rendering, Car render in V-Ray RT, 1920×1080, 256 passes, CUDA-only
Autodesk Maya 2014	Tom’s Hardware Logo render in mental ray, 1920×1080, global illumination, photo-realistic motion blur, ray-traced shadows, OpenGL Test: Generate Playblast (OpenGL preview) animation to Y: RAM drive
Maxon Cinebench r11. 5	3D Rendering and OpenGL Benchmarks, built-in benchmarks with default settings
Adobe Premiere Pro CC	Custom Workload: Edit of 59.94 fps 720p DVCProHD footage, with transitions and some color correction, Render To H.264 720p
Adobe Photoshop CC	Filter 15.7 MB TIF Image: Radial Blur, Shape Blur, Median, Polar Coordinates filters
Adobe After Effects CC	Custom Workload: SD motion graphics sequence with three picture-in-picture frames sourced from 720p HD QuickTime, Same scene rendered using a frame sequence instead of from QuickTime sources, HD redo of the project using frame sequences, to 1080p
Adobe Acrobat XI	Version 11: Print PDF from 115 Page PowerPoint, 128-bit RC4 Encryption
Reaper v.4.402	DAWBench Universal 2012: Test number of simultaneous copies of ReaXComp that the system can effectively run, Custom Workload: Render and mix down to . wav custom score project, multiple tracks of audio, VST synthesizers and effects
Visual Studio 2010	Compile Chrome project (1/31/2012) with devenv.com /build Release
Encoding Benchmarks and Settings
HandBrake CLI	Version: 0.9.9Video: Big Buck Bunny (720×480, 23.972 frames) 5 Minutes, Audio: Dolby Digital, 48,000 Hz, Six-Channel, English, to Video: AVC Audio: AC3 Audio2: AAC (High Profile)
TotalCode Studio 2.5	Version: 2.5.0.10677: MPEG-2 to H.264, MainConcept H.264/AVC Codec, 28 sec HDTV 1920×1080 (MPEG-2), Audio: MPEG-2 (44.1 kHz, 2 Channel, 16-Bit, 224 Kb/s), Codec: H.264 Pro, Mode: PAL 50i (25 FPS), Profile: H.264 BD HDMV
LAME MP3	Version 3.98.3: Audio CD «Terminator II SE», 53 min, convert WAV to MP3 audio format, Command: -b 160 —nores (160 Kb/s)
Synthetic Benchmarks and Settings
SPECviewperf 11	Default GUI options; Workloads: CATIA, EnSight, LightWave, Maya, Pro/E, SolidWorks, Teamcenter Visualization Mockup, Siemens NX
LuxMark 2. 0	OpenCL-based rendering benchmark, default settings
CASE Euler3D	CFD simulation over NACA 445.6 aeroelastic test wing at Mach 0.5
Thesycon DPCLat	DPC Latency Checker, run with default settings
SiSoftware Sandra	CPU Test=CPU Arithmetic/Multimedia, Memory Test=Bandwidth Benchmark, Cryptography
Iometer 1.1.0	Workers = 1, 16 GB repeating data, 4 KB random, 128 KB sequential
AS SSD 1.7.4739	Sequential, 4 KB Random, and 4K-64 THRD tests

Current page:
Test System And Benchmarks

Prev Page Inside And Outside Of Dell’s Precision T5600 Workstation

Next Page Results: Adobe Creative Cloud

Tom’s Hardware is part of Future US Inc, an international media group and leading digital publisher. Visit our corporate site .

Historical Performance Benchmarks

Introduction

The specific benchmark used was a molecular dynamics simulation which involved
simulating a calcium aluminosilicate glass consisting of 6500 atoms at room
temperature under atmospheric pressure for 25,000 timesteps, or 25ps. The
radial cutoff distance was 5.5 Å. All of the data was able to fit into the
physical RAM of each system, resulting in no swapping. However, the simulation
code used tabulates the potentials and forces rather than recalculating them
at each time step, making the performance depend heavily on memory performance
(latency and bandwidth) and the cache hierarchy in addition to floating point
arithmetic.

All binaries were compiled with optimizations for the platform on which the
benchmark was being run, including any special SIMD instruction sets that the
compiler could generate on its own. There are differences in the optimizations
performed by the compilers, but I’ve tried to use each compiler’s most
sensible set of optimization options. To see the exact options I used for
each benchmark, in addition to a plethora of other metadata, you can view the
raw data used to generate this page in my website’s git repository.

Here is a graphical respresentation of the performance data:

Some measurements below also have an «Optimized Time» column. This measurement
was made on a version of the application that periodically sorts the atomic
positions in memory to increase cache hit rate. Because this optimization was
not available at the time I started doing these benchmarks, many of the older
systems do not have it.

SPARC Processors

System	Processor	Clock	Time (sec)
Sun Ultra 10	UltraSPARC IIi	1 × 360 MHz	5829
Sun Enterprise 4500	UltraSPARC II	1 × 400 MHz	5639
Sun Netra T1	UltraSPARC IIi	1 × 440 MHz	5686
Sun Ultra 60	UltraSPARC II	1 × 360 MHz	5561
Sun Ultra 60	UltraSPARC II	1 × 450 MHz	4974
Sun Blade 100	UltraSPARC IIe	1 × 500 MHz	8634
Sun Fire v100	UltraSPARC IIi	1 × 548 MHz	5640
Sun Blade 150	UltraSPARC IIi	1 × 550 MHz	5249
Sun Blade 150	UltraSPARC IIi	1 × 650 MHz	5023
Sun Blade 1000	UltraSPARC III	1 × 750 MHz	2520
Sun Blade 1000	UltraSPARC III Cu	1 × 900 MHz	2030
Sun Fire v210	UltraSPARC IIIi	1 × 1. 0 GHz	2053
Sun Blade 1500 (Red)	UltraSPARC IIIi	1 × 1.1 GHz	1862
Sun Fire v240	UltraSPARC IIIi	1 × 1.5 GHz	1558
Sun Blade 1500 (Silver)	UltraSPARC IIIi	1 × 1.5 GHz	1501
Sun Blade 2500 (Silver)	UltraSPARC IIIi	1 × 1.6 GHz	1428

MIPS Processors

System	Processor	Clock	Time (sec)
SGI O2	MIPS R5000	1 × 180 MHz	25299
SGI O2	MIPS R10000	1 × 195 MHz	14064
SGI Indigo2	MIPS R10000	1 × 195 MHz	8438
SGI Octane	MIPS R10000	1 × 225 MHz	5744
SGI Fuel	MIPS R14000	1 × 500 MHz	2507
SGI Fuel	MIPS R14000	1 × 600 MHz	1787

POWER/PowerPC Processors

System	Processor	Clock	Time (sec)
IBM RS/6000 43p 150	PowerPC 604e	1 × 375 MHz	10889
Apple Power Mac G4	PowerPC 7450	1 × 733 MHz	7291
Apple Power Mac G4	PowerPC 7450	1 × 933 MHz	4533
Apple Power Mac G5	PowerPC 970	1 × 1. 6 GHz	2317
IBM Blue Gene/P	PowerPC 450	1 × 850 MHz	3030
IBM Blue Gene/P	PowerPC 450	4 × 850 MHz	1720
IBM Power 550 Express	POWER6	1 × 4.2 GHz	646
IBM Power 550 Express	POWER6	4 × 4.2 GHz	414

PA-RISC Processors

System	Processor	Clock	Time (sec)
HP C8000	PA-8800	1 × 1.0 GHz	801

Itanium Processors

System	Processor	Clock	Time (sec)	Optimized Time (sec)
HP rx2600	Itanium 2 900	1 × 900 MHz	1294	1212
HP rx2600	Itanium 2 900	2 × 900 MHz	1094	986

ARM Processors

System	Processor	Clock	Time (sec)	Optimized Time (sec)
Raspberry Pi Model B	ARM1176JZF-S	1 × 700 MHz	16459	10000
BeagleBone Black Rev C	ARM Cortex-A8	1 × 1. 0 GHz	9781	8213
Terasic DE10-Nano	ARM Cortex-A9	1 × 800 MHz	3639	2501
Terasic DE10-Nano	ARM Cortex-A9	2 × 800 MHz	3203	2011
BeagleBone AI	ARM Cortex-A15	1 × 1.5 GHz	1220	1004
BeagleBone AI	ARM Cortex-A15	2 × 1.5 GHz	1146	946
Raspberry Pi 3	ARM Cortex-A53	1 × 1.2 GHz	2531	1463
Raspberry Pi 3	ARM Cortex-A53	2 × 1.2 GHz	2427	1489
Raspberry Pi 3	ARM Cortex-A53	4 × 1.2 GHz	2508	1939
Raspberry Pi 4	ARM Cortex-A72	1 × 1. 5 GHz	879	732
Raspberry Pi 4	ARM Cortex-A72	2 × 1.5 GHz	815	592
Raspberry Pi 4	ARM Cortex-A72	3 × 1.5 GHz	939	589
Raspberry Pi 4	ARM Cortex-A72	4 × 1.5 GHz	1146	639
NVIDIA Jetson Nano	ARM Cortex-A57	1 × 1.4 GHz	876	778
NVIDIA Jetson Nano	ARM Cortex-A57	2 × 1.4 GHz	738	592
NVIDIA Jetson Nano	ARM Cortex-A57	3 × 1.4 GHz	707	541
NVIDIA Jetson Nano	ARM Cortex-A57	4 × 1.4 GHz	667	528
MacBook Air M1	Apple M1/Rosetta	1 × 3. 2 GHz	118	108
MacBook Air M1	Apple M1/Rosetta	2 × 3.2 GHz	93	83
MacBook Air M1	Apple M1/Rosetta	3 × 3.2 GHz	84	77
MacBook Air M1	Apple M1/Rosetta	4 × 3.2 GHz	78	73
MacBook Air M1	Apple M1/Rosetta	8 × 3.2 GHz	80	78
MacBook Air M1	Apple M1	1 × 3.2 GHz	94	86
MacBook Air M1	Apple M1	2 × 3.2 GHz	73	67
MacBook Air M1	Apple M1	3 × 3.2 GHz	66	61
MacBook Air M1	Apple M1	4 × 3. 2 GHz	61	59
MacBook Air M1	Apple M1	8 × 3.2 GHz	65	65
MacBook Pro M1 Pro	Apple M1 Pro	1 × 3.2 GHz	93	106
MacBook Pro M1 Pro	Apple M1 Pro	2 × 3.2 GHz	72	65
MacBook Pro M1 Pro	Apple M1 Pro	4 × 3.2 GHz	60	60
MacBook Pro M1 Pro	Apple M1 Pro	6 × 3.2 GHz	60	61
MacBook Pro M1 Pro	Apple M1 Pro	8 × 3.2 GHz	63	64
D64pls_v5	Ampere Altra Q80-30	1 × 3.0 GHz	212	195
D64pls_v5	Ampere Altra Q80-30	2 × 3. 0 GHz	163	148
D64pls_v5	Ampere Altra Q80-30	3 × 3.0 GHz	144	136
D64pls_v5	Ampere Altra Q80-30	4 × 3.0 GHz	136	134
D64pls_v5	Ampere Altra Q80-30	8 × 3.0 GHz	144	145
D64pls_v5	Ampere Altra Q80-30	16 × 3.0 GHz	196	197
D64pls_v5	Ampere Altra Q80-30	32 × 3.0 GHz	313	310
D64pls_v5	Ampere Altra Q80-30	64 × 3.0 GHz	548	557

x86 Processors

System	Processor	Clock	Time (sec)	Optimized Time (sec)
Dell Inspiron 8100	Pentium III M	1 × 1. 1 GHz	3680
Tyan MPX S2466	Athlon MP 1900+	1 × 1.6 GHz	3660
Dell OptiPlex GX260	Pentium 4 (Northwood)	1 × 1.8 GHz	2170
Dell OptiPlex GX260	Pentium 4 (Northwood)	1 × 2.4 GHz	1661
Gateway E-4650	Pentium 4 (Northwood)	1 × 2.2 GHz	1743
Dell PowerEdge 2850	Xeon 2.8 (Nocona)	1 × 2.8 GHz	974
—	Pentium D	1 × 3.2 GHz	929
Asus Z70va	Pentium M 760	1 × 2.0 GHz	731
Sun Fire X4100	Opteron 275	1 × 2.2 GHz	806
Sun Fire X2200 M2	Opteron 2214	1 × 2.2 GHz	873
Sun Fire X2200 M2	Opteron 2376	1 × 2. 3 GHz	592
Supermicro	Opteron 2216	1 × 2.4 GHz	713
Supermicro X8DTT	Xeon X5560	1 × 2.8 GHz	304
Dell	Core 2 Duo E6700	1 × 2.7 GHz	439
Dell OptiPlex 760	Core 2 Duo E7500	1 × 2.9 GHz	346
Dell OptiPlex 990	Core i7-2600	1 × 3.4 GHz	201
HP dc7800p	Core 2 Duo E8400	1 × 3.0 GHz	318
HP e9180f	Core i7 920	1 × 2.7 GHz	334
HP ProLiant SL390s G7	Xeon X5672	1 × 3.2 GHz	310
HP ProLiant DL360 G7	Xeon X5672	1 × 3.2 GHz	308
—	Xeon X5650	1 × 2. 7 GHz	316
—	Xeon X5680	1 × 3.3 GHz	313
—	Xeon W5590	1 × 3.3 GHz	273
Supermicro H8DGT	Opteron 6212	1 × 2.6 GHz	353
—	Opteron 6176	1 × 2.3 GHz	575
Supermicro SC818TQ-1400LPB	Opteron 6136	1 × 2.2 GHz	565	483
Supermicro SC818TQ-1400LPB	Opteron 6136	2 × 2.2 GHz	477	419
Supermicro SC818TQ-1400LPB	Opteron 6136	4 × 2.2 GHz	412	407
Supermicro SC818TQ-1400LPB	Opteron 6136	8 × 2.2 GHz	476	470
Appro gB222X	Xeon E5530	1 × 2. 4 GHz	416
Appro gB222X	Xeon E5530	2 × 2.4 GHz	306
Appro gB222X	Xeon E5530	4 × 2.4 GHz	265
Appro gB222X	Xeon E5530	8 × 2.4 GHz	256
HP ProLiant SL230s G8	Xeon E5-2660	1 × 3.0 GHz	270
HP ProLiant SL230s G8	Xeon E5-2660	2 × 3.0 GHz	208
HP ProLiant SL230s G8	Xeon E5-2660	4 × 3.0 GHz	171
HP ProLiant SL230s G8	Xeon E5-2660	8 × 3.0 GHz	171
HP ProLiant SL230s G8	Xeon E5-2660	16 × 3.0 GHz	164
Appro gB512X	Xeon E5-2670	1 × 2.6 GHz	292	237
Appro gB512X	Xeon E5-2670	4 × 2. 6 GHz	175	155
Appro gB512X	Xeon E5-2670	8 × 2.6 GHz	164	141
Dell T5600	Xeon E5-2687W	1 × 3.1 GHz	205
Dell T5600	Xeon E5-2687W	2 × 3.1 GHz	165
Dell T5600	Xeon E5-2687W	4 × 3.1 GHz	133
Dell T5600	Xeon E5-2687W	8 × 3.1 GHz	128
Dell PowerEdge C8220X	Xeon Phi SE10P	8 × 1.1 GHz	1802	1209
Dell PowerEdge C8220X	Xeon Phi SE10P	16 × 1.1 GHz	1589
Dell PowerEdge C8220X	Xeon Phi SE10P	32 × 1.1 GHz	1479	1106
Cray XC30	Xeon E5-2695 v2	1 × 2. 4 GHz	279	225
Cray XC30	Xeon E5-2695 v2	2 × 2.4 GHz	216	173
Cray XC30	Xeon E5-2695 v2	4 × 2.4 GHz	180	163
Cray XC30	Xeon E5-2695 v2	6 × 2.4 GHz	176	154
Cray XC30	Xeon E5-2695 v2	12 × 2.4 GHz	163	149
Cray XC30	Xeon E5-2695 v2	24 × 2.4 GHz	166	153
Cray XC40	Xeon E5-2698 v3	1 × 2.3 GHz	232	178
Cray XC40	Xeon E5-2698 v3	2 × 2.3 GHz	176	137
Cray XC40	Xeon E5-2698 v3	4 × 2.3 GHz	150	130
Cray XC40	Xeon E5-2698 v3	8 × 2. 3 GHz	150	132
Cray XC40	Xeon E5-2698 v3	16 × 2.3 GHz	149	136
Cray XC40	Xeon E5-2698 v3	32 × 2.3 GHz	152	143
—	Xeon E5-2643 v4	1 × 3.4 GHz	202	160
—	Xeon E5-2643 v4	2 × 3.4 GHz	154	122
—	Xeon E5-2643 v4	3 × 3.4 GHz	132	110
—	Xeon E5-2643 v4	6 × 3.4 GHz	116	102
Cray XC40	Xeon Phi 7250	4 × 1.4 GHz	1259	839
Cray XC40	Xeon Phi 7250	4 × 1.4 GHz	1009	774
Cray XC40	Xeon Phi 7250	4 × 1. 4 GHz	858	687
Cray XC40	Xeon Phi 7250	4 × 1.4 GHz	763	667
Cray XC40	Xeon Phi 7250	4 × 1.4 GHz	725	667
Cray XC40	Xeon Phi 7250	4 × 1.4 GHz	713	674
Cray XC40	Xeon Phi 7250	4 × 1.4 GHz	744	712
Apple iMac 18,3	Core i5-7600K	1 × 3.8 GHz	189	143
Apple iMac 18,3	Core i5-7600K	2 × 3.8 GHz	125	107
Apple iMac 18,3	Core i5-7600K	4 × 3.8 GHz	115	97
Apple MacBookPro 15,2	Core i7-8559U	1 × 2. 7 GHz	147	118
Apple MacBookPro 15,2	Core i7-8559U	2 × 2.7 GHz	117	98
Apple MacBookPro 15,2	Core i7-8559U	3 × 2.7 GHz	106	87
Apple MacBookPro 15,2	Core i7-8559U	4 × 2.7 GHz	97	84
—	AMD EPYC 7702	1 × 2.0 GHz	160	146
—	AMD EPYC 7702	2 × 2.0 GHz	123	112
—	AMD EPYC 7702	4 × 2.0 GHz	101	98
—	AMD EPYC 7702	8 × 2.0 GHz	106	105
—	AMD EPYC 7702	16 × 2.0 GHz	122	119
—	AMD EPYC 7702	32 × 2. 0 GHz	163	163
—	AMD EPYC 7702	64 × 2.0 GHz	303	302
Mac Mini 8,2	Intel i7-8700B	1 × 3.2 GHz	169	100
Mac Mini 8,2	Intel i7-8700B	2 × 3.2 GHz	127	96
Mac Mini 8,2	Intel i7-8700B	3 × 3.2 GHz	113	96
Mac Mini 8,2	Intel i7-8700B	4 × 3.2 GHz	107	104
Mac Mini 8,2	Intel i7-8700B	6 × 3.2 GHz	109	137
Cray EX235n	AMD EPYC 7763	1 × 2.5 GHz	141	124
Cray EX235n	AMD EPYC 7763	2 × 2.5 GHz	145	121
Cray EX235n	AMD EPYC 7763	3 × 2. 5 GHz	116	104
Cray EX235n	AMD EPYC 7763	4 × 2.5 GHz	114	101
Cray EX235n	AMD EPYC 7763	8 × 2.5 GHz	105	98
Cray EX235n	AMD EPYC 7763	16 × 2.5 GHz	127	118
Cray EX235n	AMD EPYC 7763	32 × 2.5 GHz	180	160
Cray EX235n	AMD EPYC 7763	64 × 2.5 GHz	237	233
Cray EX235n	AMD EPYC 7763	128 × 2.5 GHz	472	425
Lenovo P14s Gen2	Intel i7-1185G7	1 × 3.0 GHz	116	97
Lenovo P14s Gen2	Intel i7-1185G7	2 × 3. 0 GHz	89	83
Lenovo P14s Gen2	Intel i7-1185G7	3 × 3.0 GHz	86	81
Lenovo P14s Gen2	Intel i7-1185G7	4 × 3.0 GHz	89	85
Lenovo P14s Gen2	Intel i7-1185G7	8 × 3.0 GHz	172	127
Intel NUC 12 Extreme	Intel i7-12700	1 × 2.1 GHz	88	82
Intel NUC 12 Extreme	Intel i7-12700	2 × 2.1 GHz	72	66
Intel NUC 12 Extreme	Intel i7-12700	4 × 2.1 GHz	61	64
Intel NUC 12 Extreme	Intel i7-12700	8 × 2.1 GHz	69	68
Intel NUC 12 Extreme	Intel i7-12700	10 × 2. 1 GHz	74	75
Intel NUC 12 Extreme	Intel i7-12700	20 × 2.1 GHz	125	134

Core 2 Duo T5600 [in 5 benchmarks]

Intel
Core 2 Duo T5600

Interface
Core frequency
Video memory size
Memory type
Memory frequency
Maximum resolution

Description

Intel started Intel Core 2 Duo T5600 sales on July 28, 2006 at a suggested price of $241. This is a notebook processor based on the Merom architecture, primarily designed for office systems. It has 2 cores and 2 threads and is manufactured using 65 nm process technology, the maximum frequency is 1830 MHz, the multiplier is locked.

In terms of compatibility, this is a processor for socket PPGA478, PBGA479 with a TDP of 34W.

It provides poor benchmark performance at

0. 66%

from the leader, which is AMD EPYC 7h22.

Core 2
Duo T5600

EPYC
7h22

General information

Information about the type (desktop or laptop) and architecture of the Core 2 Duo T5600, as well as when sales started and cost at the time.

place in performance rating	2581
	282)

Features

Core 2 Duo T5600 quantitative parameters such as number of cores and threads, clock speeds, manufacturing process, cache size and multiplier lock state. They indirectly speak about the performance of the processor, but for an accurate assessment, you need to consider the results of the tests.

9009

) 1998)

Core	2
Thread	2 0060
Cache 2nd level	2 MB	out of 12 (Core 2 QUAD Q9550)
levels	0 KB
Technological process	65 nm	of 5 (Apple M1)
Crystal size	143 mm ² 9006	Free multiplier	—
Permissible nucleus voltage	1. 0375V -1.3V

compliance

1 9000
Information on Core 2 Duo T5600 compatibility with other computer components. Useful, for example, when choosing the configuration of a future computer or to upgrade an existing one.

Please note that the power consumption of some processors can significantly exceed their nominal TDP even without overclocking. Some may even double their claims if the motherboard allows you to adjust the power settings of the processor.

9013 9013
Technologies embedded in the Core 2 Duo T5600 that enhance system security, such as hack protection.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+
Turbo Boost Technology	—
Hyper-Threading Technology	—
0060
Demand Based Switching	—
Plains FSB		9002 9009

TXT	—
EDB	+

Virtualization Technologies

Technologies supported by Core 2 Duo T5600 that speed up virtual machines are listed.

Benchmark tests

These are the results of Core 2 Duo T5600 performance tests in non-gaming benchmarks. The overall score is set from 0 to 100, where 100 corresponds to the fastest processor at the moment.

Overall test performance

This is our overall performance rating. We regularly improve our algorithms, but if you find any inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in the comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Duo T5600
0.66

Passmark
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
3DMark06 CPU

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widely used benchmark that consists of 8 different tests, including integer and floating point calculations, extended instruction tests, compression, encryption, and game physics calculations. Also includes a separate single-threaded test.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Core 2 Duo T5600
662

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application designed as CPU benchmarks that independently recreate certain real world tasks that can be used to accurately measure performance. This version uses only one processor core.

Benchmark coverage: 37%

Core 2 Duo T5600
224

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application designed as CPU benchmarks that independently recreate certain real world tasks that can accurately measure performance. This version uses all available processor cores.

Benchmark coverage: 37%

Core 2 Duo T5600
409

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is an outdated set of benchmarks based on DirectX 9 by Futuremark. Its processor part contains two tests, one of which calculates the pathfinding of game AI, the other emulates game physics using the PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Core 2 Duo T5600
1560

Relative capacity

Overall performance of the Core 2 Duo T5600 compared to its nearest competitor in notebook processors.

Intel Celeron N3060
100

AMD Turion X2 RM-75
100

Intel Celeron Dual-Core T3000
100

Intel Core 2 Duo T5600
100

Intel Celeron T3000
100

AMD Athlon II N330
100

Intel Celeron B800
98.48

AMD competitor

We believe that the nearest equivalent to Core 2 Duo T5600 from AMD is Athlon II N330, which is approximately equal in speed and is 3 positions higher in our rating.

Athlon II
N330

Compare

Here are some of AMD’s closest competitors to the Core 2 Duo T5600:

AMD E2-3000M
101. 52

AMD Turion X2 RM-75
100

AMD Athlon II N330
100

Intel Core 2 Duo T5600
100

AMD Athlon II M300
98.48

AMD A4-3320M
95.45

AMD Athlon 64 X2 TK-57
95.45

Other processors

Here we recommend several processors that are more or less similar in performance to the reviewed one.

Turion X2
RM-75

Compare

Celeron Dual
Core T3000

Compare

Core 2
Duo T5900

Compare

Celeron M
585

Compare

Pentium Dual
Core T3400

Compare

Core 2
Duo L7200

Compare

Comparison of Intel Core 2 Duo T5670 and Intel Core 2 Duo T5600

Comparative analysis of Intel Core 2 Duo T5670 and Intel Core 2 Duo T5600 processors by all known characteristics in the categories: General information, Performance, Compatibility, Security and reliability, Technologies, Virtualization.
Analysis of processor performance by benchmarks: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core.

Intel Core 2 Duo T5670

versus

Intel Core 2 Duo T5600

Advantages

reasons to choose the Intel Core 2 Duo T5670

Release processor, the difference in release 1 year (s)
GEECBENCHBENCHBENCHBENS Single Core about 5% more: 1097 vs 1043
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core about 5% more performance: 1713 vs 1639

Production date	1 March 2008 vs 28 July 2006
Geekbench 4 — Single Core	1097 vs 1043
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core	1713 vs 1639

Reasons to choose Intel Core 2 Duo T5600

About 2% more clock speed: 1. 83 GHz vs 1.8 GHz
About 3% less power consumption: 34 Watt vs 35 Watt
About 8% more performance in PassMark — Single thread mark: 701 vs 650
Performance in PassMark benchmark — CPU mark about 16% higher: 662 vs 573

Maximum frequency	1.83 GHz vs 1.8 GHz
Power consumption (TDP)	34 Watt vs 35 Watt
PassMark — Single thread mark	701 vs 650
PassMark — CPU mark	662 vs 573

Benchmark comparison

CPU 1: Intel Core 2 Duo T5670
CPU 2: Intel Core 2 Duo T5600

PassMark — Single thread mark

CPU 1

CPU 2

PassMark — CPU mark

CPU 1

CPU 2

Geekbench 4 — Single Core

CPU 1

CPU 2

Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core

CPU 1

CPU 2

Name	Intel Core 2 Duo T5670	Intel Core 2 Duo T5600
PassMark — Single thread mark	650	701
PassMark — CPU mark	573	662
Geekbench 4 — Single Core	1097	1043
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core	1713	1639

Performance comparison

	Intel Core 2 Duo T5670	Intel Core 2 Duo T5600
Architecture name	Merom	Merom
Production date	March 1, 2008	July 28, 2006
Rank	1879	1880
Processor Number	T5670	T5600
Series	Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors	Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors
Status	Discontinued	Discontinued
Applicability	Mobile	Mobile
Price at first issue date		$241
Support 64 bit
Base frequency	1. 80 GHz	1.83 GHz
Bus Speed	800 MHz FSB	667 MHz FSB
Crystal area	143 mm2	143 mm2
System bus (FSB)	800MHz	667MHz
Level 2 cache	2048KB	2048 KB
Process	65nm	65nm
Maximum core temperature	100°C	100°C
Maximum frequency	1. 8 GHz	1.83 GHz
Number of cores	2	2
Number of threads	2	2
Number of transistors	291 million	291 million
Permissible core voltage	1.0375V-1.30V	1.0375V-1.300V
Level 1 cache		64KB
Low Halogen Options Available
Package Size	35mm x 35mm	35mm x 35mm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	34 Watt
Maximum number of processors per configuration		1
Scenario Design Power (SDP)		0 W
Supported sockets		PPGA478, PBGA479
Execute Disable Bit (EDB)
Intel® Trusted Execution Technology (TXT)
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® Technology
Parity FSB
Idle States
Intel 64
Intel® Demand Based Switching
Intel® Hyper-Threading Technology
Intel® Turbo Boost Technology
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x)

90,000 characteristics Intel Core2 T5600 Merom, Price, Test, competitors

>
Processors

9000>

Intel
T5600

Processor Core2 T5600, price new on amazon and ebay — 99 USD

Quantity of cores — 2, manufactured according to 65 nm process technology, Merom architecture.

Core2 T5600 base frequency — 1.83 GHz. The maximum frequency in Intel Turbo Boost mode reaches 1.8 GHz. Please note that the Intel Core2 T5600 cooler must cool processors with a TDP of at least 34W at stock frequencies. When overclocked, the requirements increase.

Price in Russia

Do you want to buy Core2 T5600 cheaply? Look at the list of stores that already sell the processor in your city.

Family

Core2 T5200
Core2 T5300
Core2 T5500

Benchmarks Intel Core2 T5600

The performance of 4 cores, if any, and performance per core has the greatest impact on the result, since most games do not fully use more than 4 cores.

The speed of caches and working with RAM is also important.

Speed in office use

Performance in everyday work such as browsers and office applications.

The performance of 1 core has the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications use only one, ignoring the rest.

Similarly, many professional applications such as various CADs ignore multi-threaded performance.

Speed in heavy applications

Performance in resource-intensive tasks loading a maximum of 8 cores.

The performance of all cores and their number has the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications willingly use all the cores and increase the speed accordingly.

At the same time, certain periods of work can be demanding on the performance of one or two cores, for example, applying filters in the editor.

Data obtained from tests by users who tested their systems with and without overclocking. Thus, you see the average values corresponding to the processor.

Speed of numerical operations

Simple household tasks

Minimum	Average	Maximum
36	Memory: 57

65 9000

Memory 60.3
14	1 core: 26	29
1 core 12.5
24	2 cores: 48	57
2 cores 11.8

Demanding games and tasks

Minimum	Average	Maximum
26	4 Cores: 49

57 9005

4 cores

6. 2

8 cores: 50

8 cores

3.2

Extreme

Minimum	Average	Maximum
27	All cores: 51	07 9006
All cores 0.9

Different tasks require different CPU strengths. A system with few fast cores and low memory latency will be fine for the vast majority of games, but will be inferior to a system with a lot of slow cores in a rendering scenario.

We believe that a minimum of 4/4 (4 physical cores and 4 threads) processor is suitable for a budget gaming PC. At the same time, some games can load it at 100%, slow down and freeze, and performing any tasks in the background will lead to a drop in FPS.

Ideally, the budget shopper should aim for a minimum of 4/8 and 6/6. A gamer with a big budget can choose between 6/12, 8/8 and 8/16. Processors with 10 and 12 cores can perform well in games with high frequency and fast memory, but are overkill for such tasks. Also, buying for the future is a dubious undertaking, since in a few years many slow cores may not provide sufficient gaming performance.

When choosing a processor to work with, consider how many cores your programs use. For example, photo and video editors can use 1-2 cores when working with filtering, and rendering or converting in the same editors already uses all threads.

Data obtained from tests by users who tested their systems both with overclocking (maximum value in the table) and without (minimum). A typical result is shown in the middle, the more filled in the color bar, the better the average result among all tested systems.

Tests in games

FPS measured by us in popular games on Intel Core2 T5600 and compliance with system requirements. Please note that the official requirements of developers in games do not always match the data of real tests. Also, the result is strongly influenced by the overclocking of the system and the graphic settings in the game. We test at high settings in FullHD resolution to get numbers close to real gameplay.

On average for all gaming tests, the processor scored 27.

no data

SSD

850 EVO 500GB
MTS400 M.2 256GB
SSDNOW V300 120GB

We have collected a list of components most often by collecting a computer based on Core2 T5600. Also with these components, the best results in tests and stable operation are achieved.

The most popular config: motherboard for Intel Core2 T5600 — Dell MP061, video card — GeForce GTX 570M, SSD — 850 Evo 500GB.

Characteristics

The data is not yet filled in, so the tables may lack information or existing functions may be omitted.

Basic

Manufacturer	Intel
DescriptionInformation about the processor, taken from the official website of the manufacturer.	Intel® Core™2 Duo Processor T5600 (2M Cache, 1.83 GHz, 667 MHz FSB)
ArchitectureCode name for the microarchitecture generation.	Merom
Process The manufacturing process, measured in nanometers. The smaller the technical process, the more perfect the technology, the lower the heat dissipation and power consumption.	65 nm
Date of release The month and year the processor was released.	10-2016
Model Official name.	T5600
Cores The number of physical cores.	2
ThreadsNumber of threads. The number of logical processor cores that the operating system sees.	2
Multi-Threading Technology With Intel’s Hyper-threading and AMD’s SMT technology, one physical core is recognized by the operating system as two logical cores, thereby increasing processor performance in multi-threaded applications.	Missing
Base frequencyGuaranteed frequency of all processor cores at maximum load. Performance in single-threaded and multi-threaded applications and games depends on it. It is important to remember that speed and frequency are not directly related. For example, a new processor at a lower frequency may be faster than an old one at a higher one.	1.83 GHz
Turbo frequencyThe maximum frequency of one processor core in turbo mode. Manufacturers allow modern processors to independently increase the frequency of one or more cores under heavy load, due to which performance is noticeably increased. It may depend on the nature of the load, the number of loaded cores, temperature and the specified limits. Significantly affects the speed in games and applications that are demanding on the frequency of the CPU.	1.8 GHz
L3 cache size The third level cache acts as a buffer between the computer’s RAM and the processor’s level 2 cache. Used by all cores, the speed of information processing depends on the volume.	2 MB
Instructions	64-bit
Embedded Options Available Two housing versions. Standard and designed for mobile devices. In the second version, the processor can be soldered on the motherboard.	No
Bus frequency The speed of communication with the system.	667 MHz FSB
TDPThermal Design Power is an indicator that determines the heat dissipation in standard operation. The cooler or water cooling system must be rated for a larger value. Remember that with a factory bus or manual overclocking, TDP increases significantly.	34W

Video core

RAM

PCI

Data protection

Design

Competitors

Please note that competitors are selected automatically based on performance in a specific task. Therefore, some may puzzle you. We are improving our selection algorithm, treat with understanding.

Compare

Intel Core2 T5600 vs AMD A9-9400 APUs (2016 M.SR)

Intel Core2 T5600 vs AMD Turion X2 Dual-Core Mobile RM-70

Intel Core2 T5600 vs AMD E2-3000M APU

Intel Core2 T5600 vs AMD Athlon 64 3200+

Intel Core2 T5600 vs AMD AthlonX2 DualCore QL-60

Processors contain 2 nuclei Both processors have 2 streams The maximum possible kernel temperature of the presented models is 100 degrees Both CPUs Both CPUs Both CPUs Both CPUs Both CPUs Both CPUs Both CPUs Both CPUs Both CPUs Both CPUs Both CPUs Both CPUs Both CPUs Both CPUs Both CPUs Both CPUs Both CPUs Both CPUs Both CPUs Both CPUs Both CPUs.

Differences
Intel Celeron N2810	Intel Core 2 Duo T5600
Celeron N2810 belongs to the Celeron 9 processor family0060	Core 2 Duo T5600 is slightly inferior in terms of clock frequency, 1800 MHz compared to 2000 MHz Duo T5600	Core 2 The Duo T5600 is less technologically advanced, since its technical process is much larger and is 65 nanometers
Celeron N2810 has a strong advantage in terms of heat dissipation, its TDP is lower than that of the competitor at 7.5W0060	The Core 2 Duo T5600 processor will need a more powerful cooling system, since its heat dissipation is 34 watts equal to 1.0375V-1.3V
The L1 cache of the Celeron N2810 CPU is slightly less compared to the Core 2 Duo T5600 and equals 112 KB	The L1 cache of the CPU Core 2 Duo T5600 is slightly larger than that of the Celeron N28102 Kilobyte
The Celeron N2810 L2 cache is much smaller compared to the Core 2 Duo T5600 and is 1024 kilobytes

Comparison of instructions and technologies

Name of technology or instruction Intel Celeron N2810 Intel Core 2 Duo T5600 Short description Turbo Boost Intel Auto Overclocking Technology.

Energy saving technologies
Technology or instruction name	Intel Celeron N2810	Short description
EIST (Enhanced Intel SpeedStep)		Enhanced Intel SpeedStep Energy Saving Technology.
Stop Grant state	—	Energy saving status.
Sleep state	—	Sleep state.
Deep Sleep state	—	Deep sleep state.
Deeper Sleep state	—	Deeper sleep state.
Enhanced Deeper Sleep state	—	Improved state of deeper sleep.
Dynamic Cache sizing	—	Dynamic cache resizing.
Idle States		Idle states.

Standard extension set
Technology or instruction name	Intel Core 2 Duo T5600	Short description
MMX (Multimedia Extensions)		Multimedia extensions.
SSE (Streaming SIMD Extensions)		Processor streaming SIMD extension.
SSE2 (Streaming SIMD Extensions 2)		Processor Streaming SIMD Extension 2.
SSE3 (Streaming SIMD Extensions 3)		Streaming SIMD Processor Extension 3.
SSSE3 (Supplemental Streaming SIMD Extension 3)		Additional SIMD extensions for streaming 3.
EM64T (Extended Memory 64-bit Technology)		64-bit extended memory technology.
NX (Execute disable bit)		Execution inhibit bit.
SSE4 (Streaming SIMD Extensions 4)	—	Processor Streaming SIMD Extension 4.

Safety Technologies
Technology or instruction name	Intel Celeron N2810	Intel Core 2 Duo T5600	Short description
TXT (Trusted Execution Technology)	—		Trusted Execution Technology.
EDB (Execute Disable Bit)			Execute trip bit.
Anti-Theft		—	Anti-theft.

Virtualization Technologies
Technology or instruction name	Intel Celeron N2810	Intel Core 2 Duo T5600	Short description
VT-x (Virtualization technology)			Virtualization technology.
VT-d (Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O)		—	Virtualization technology for directed I/O.

Other technologies and instructions
Technology or instruction name	Intel Celeron N2810	Intel Core 2 Duo T5600	Brief description
Hyper-Threading			Hyperthreading technology.
Dynamic FSB frequency switching	—		Dynamic FSB frequency switching.
vPro		—	Intel Technology Suite, vPro is a marketing term.
DBS (Demand Based Switching)	—		Switching on request.
Smart Connect Technology		—	Smart connection.
RST (Rapid Storage Technology)		—	Rapid storage technology.

Integrated video comparison

Basic
Parameter or technology	Intel Celeron N2810
Maximum GPU clock	756 MHz
Clear Video HD
InTru 3D

Interface
Interface name	Intel Celeron N2810
Maximum number of monitors	2

Other data

Periphery
Technology or parameter name	Intel Celeron N2810
USB version	3. 0 and 2.0
Number of SATA ports	2
Number of USB ports	5

Benchmarks

Overall performance rating

The summary rating is calculated by the formula, taking into account indicators: test results of all benchmarks, structure, socket, instructions, overclocking technologies, temperature data, frequency, number of cores and threads, year of release, and other data. The results of the overall rating showed that the Core 2 Duo T5600 surpasses its rival Celeron N2810 in most parameters. The Celeron N2810 barely scores 561.82 points compared to its competitor.

PassMark CPU Mark

Perhaps the most popular benchmark on the Internet. All our CPUs have been tested in PassMark. It includes a wide range of tools for large-scale evaluation of PC performance, including CPU. Among which are compression, game physics calculations, integer calculations, encryption, floating point calculations, extended instructions checking, multi-threaded and single-threaded tests. It is also possible to compare indicators with other configurations in the database. The Performance Test showed a clear advantage for the Core 2 Duo T5600 (634 points) over the Celeron N2810 (465 points). The Celeron N2810 with a score of 465 clearly loses in this test.

Cinebench 10 (32 bit) Single-threaded test

It is possible to test multiple processor systems. The test is carried out on Windows and Mac operating systems. The main performance test mode is multi-level reflections, spatial light sources, working with light, global illumination simulation, photorealistic rendering of a 3D scene, and procedural shaders. This benchmark for processors and video cards is already obsolete today. Released by MAXON, it was based on the Cinema 4D 3D editor. Single-Core version — in its work it uses only one thread for rendering and one core. It uses the ray tracing method.

Cinebench 10 (32 bit) Multi-thread test

The Multi Core version is another test option in Cinebench R10 that already uses multi-thread and multi-core test mode. It is important to note that the possible number of threads in this version is limited to sixteen.

Cinebench 11.5 (64-bit) Multi-threaded test

Multi-threaded version of CINEBENCH R11.5 benchmark, it can test the processor 100 percent using all threads and cores. Unlike previous versions of the program, 64 threads are already used here. Testing the Core 2 Duo T5600 in Cinebench version R11.5 gave a score of 1.03, which indicates a higher performance of this model. While the Celeron N2810 scores 0.7 points, it is far behind its rival in this test.

Cinebench 11.5 (64-bit) Single-threaded test

Excellent fully functional Cinebench version R11.5 from Maxon. In tests, as before, the ray tracing method is used, a highly detailed three-dimensional room with many translucent and crystalline and glass spheres is rendered. His tests are still up to date. In this Single-Core variant, tests are performed using one core and one thread. The result of the check is the «frames per second» parameter. Core 2 Duo T5600 single-thread test results in Cinebench 11.5 Single-Core showed high performance compared to the competitor, its score was 0.49points. But the Celeron N2810 itself, scoring 0.37 points in this test, is far behind it.

Cinebench 15 (64-bit) Multi-threaded test

Multi Core Cinebench R15 — will boot your system completely, showing what it can do. Cinebench 15 is ideal for testing new multithreaded CPUs from Intel and AMD. it is capable of using 256 threads. All processor cores and threads are involved in the process of rendering highly detailed 3D models. Core 2 Duo T5600 with a score of 92.2 points, unconditionally scores more points in the Multi-Core test from Cinebench 15. While its competitor Celeron N2810 is far behind with 59 points in the test.

Cinebench 15 (64-bit) Single-threaded test

Cinebench R15 is the latest tester from the Finns from Maxon today. In the Single Core version of the program, only 1 thread is involved in rendering. The whole system is tested: both video cards and CPU. For processors, the result of the analysis will be the number of PTS points, and for video adapters, the number of frames per second. FPS. A complex 3D scene is rendered with a large number of light sources, highly detailed objects and reflections. The single-threaded test of the Core 2 Duo T5600 processor in the Cinebench R15 program indicates its high performance, the result is 41.87 points. Compared to it, its competitor Celeron N2810 fails this test with a score of 31 points.

Geekbench 4.0 (64-bit) Multi-threaded test

This is already a 64-bit multi-threaded Geekbench 4 test. It is the multiplatform OS and device support that makes Geekbench tests the most common at the present time. In Geekbench 4, the 64-bit multi-core Core 2 Duo T5600 received a score of 1940, slightly better than the Celeron N2810. In this test, the Celeron N2810 scores 1556 points.

Geekbench 4.0 (64-bit) Single thread test

Geekbench 4’s latest single-threaded version for testing laptops and desktops. The Single-Core test uses one thread. This tester, like its earlier versions, still runs on systems running Windows, Mac OS, Linux. For the first time in this version of the benchmark, tablets and smartphones running iOS and Android operating systems are also supported. The Core 2 Duo T5600 scores the highest in Geekbench 4 single-threaded testing with a score of 1159points, but not much ahead of the opponent. But the Celeron N2810 itself also showed a good score of 960 points, slightly giving way to the Core 2 Duo T5600.

Geekbench 3 (32 bit) Multi-threaded benchmark

Multi-Thread version of Geekbench 3 benchmark — can allow you to make a big synthetic test of your processor and demonstrate the stability of your system.

Geekbench 3 (32 bit) Single-threaded test

Cross-platform Geekbench is often used to evaluate the system under Mac, but it can be run on both Linux and Windows. The main purpose is to test CPU performance. The 32-bit version of the benchmark loads only one CPU core and one thread.

Geekbench 2

Older version of Geekbench 2. There are more recent updates, 5v and 4v. Our archive contains almost 200 CPU models that have test results in this benchmark.

X264 HD 4.0 Pass 1

In essence, this is a practical test of processor performance by transcoding HD files to H.264 format or the so-called MPEG 4 x264 codec. This test is faster than Pass 2 because it renders at a constant speed. This is the most appropriate test for multi-core and multi-thread processors. The number of frames processed per second. is the benchmark for the test. The MPEG 4 video processing speed of the Core 2 Duo T5600 is slightly higher than that of the Celeron N2810, and amounted to 25.73 FPS. Celeron N2810 was able to score 23 FPS, slightly behind the first processor.

X264 HD 4.0 Pass 2

This is a slightly different, slower test based on video file compression. The final figure is also measured in frames per second. As a result, we get better video quality. The same MPEG4 x264 codec is used, but the rendering is already happening at a variable rate. It is important to understand that a very real task is being simulated, and the x264 codec is used in many encoders. Therefore, the results of the checks realistically reflect the effectiveness of the platform. When measuring the speed of video file compression by the Core 2 Duo T5600 processor in mpeg4 format, the result was 5.6 Frames / s. Its competitor Celeron N2810 showed a much lower video encoding rate compared to it — 4 Frames / s.

3DMark06 CPU

This benchmark is often used by gamers, overclockers and overclockers. CPUs are tested in 2 ways: the game AI performs pathfinding, and another test emulates the system using PhysX. Based on DirectX 9.0 by Finnish team Futuremark. Benchmark program for testing CPU and video systems. The Core 2 Duo T5600 performs significantly faster in the pathfinding and game physics tests, with a score of 1560. Celeron N2810 coped worse with this task, receiving 1043 points.

3DMark Fire Strike Physics

It can be argued that almost two hundred CPUs on our Internet resource have data in the 3DMark Physics test. It includes an accurate test that makes calculations in game physics.

WinRAR 4.0

Everyone knows the file archiver. The checks were made under the control of the Windows system. The speed of compression into the RAR format was evaluated; for this, huge volumes of randomly generated files were generated. The resulting speed during compression «kilobytes per second» — this is the test indicator. Core 2 Duo T5600 is slightly ahead of the competitor in WinRAR file compression speed, the data encoding result is 703.33 Kb/s. The Celeron N2810 delivered an encoding rate of 680 Kb/s.

TrueCrypt AES

This is not quite a tester, but the results of its use can evaluate the performance of the entire system. Our site presents the results of encryption speed in Gb / s using the AES algorithm. The program can fully function in different operating systems: Mac OS X, Linux and Windows. Unfortunately, support for this program was stopped on May 28, 2014. It has a built-in ability to quickly encrypt disk partitions.

Intel Core2 Duo T7600

Home / Processors / Intel Core2 Duo T7600

Edelmark rating — 0 out of 10;
Release date: August, 2006;
Number of cores: 2;
Frequency: 2.33 GHz;
Power consumption (TDP): 34W;

Characteristics Intel Core2 Duo T7600

General parameters

Clock frequency	2.33 GHz
Cores	2
Socket	479

Functions

NX-bit (XD-bit) present	Yes
Trusted Computing Support	No
Virtualization support	Yes
Instructions supported	MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 Supplemental SSE3
Support for dynamic frequency scaling (CPU Throttling)	Yes

Power consumption

Power consumption	34W
Annual cost of electricity (NON-commercial use)	8. 19 $/year
Capacity per W	1.49pt/W
Average energy consumption	27.63W

Bus

Architecture	FSB
Clock frequency	667MHz

Parts and Features

Architecture	x86-64
Threads	2
Second level cache (L2)	4MB
Second level cache per core (L2)	2 MB/core
Process	65 nm
Number of transistors	291,000,000
Maximum processors	1
Processor multiplier	14
Voltage range	1.04 — 1.3V

Overclocking Core2 Duo T7600

Overclocking Clock	2. 76 GHz
Water-cooled boost clock	2.33GHz
Air cooled boost clock	2.76 GHz

Integrated (integrated) graphics

Graphics core	No
Brand	No
Latest DirectX	No
Number of displays supported	No
Graphics core clock speed	No
Maximum clock frequency	No
3DMark06	No

Comparison of Core2 Duo T7600 with similar processors

Performance

Performance using all cores.

Processor tested on: PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark, Geekbench 3 Multi-Core.

Core2 Duo T7600	5.0 out of 10
Core2 Duo T7200	4.0 out of 10
Core2 Duo T5600	3. 8 out of 10

Performance per core

Base performance per processor core.

Processor tested on: PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core, Geekbench 3 AES Single Core.

Core2 Duo T7600	5.0 out of 10
Core2 Duo T7200	4.8 out of 10
Core2 Duo T5600	4.7 out of 10

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics tasks.

Core2 Duo T7600	0.0 out of 10
Core2 Duo T7200	0.0 out of 10
Core2 Duo T5600	0.0 out of 10

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing.

CPU benchmarks were performed on: CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining, CompuBench 1.5 Face detection, CompuBench 1.5 Ocean Surface Simulation, CompuBench 1.5 T-Rex, CompuBench 1. 5 Video composition.

Core2 Duo T7600	0.0 out of 10
Core2 Duo T7200	0.0 out of 10
Core2 Duo T5600	0.0 out of 10

Performance per W

How efficiently the processor uses electricity.

Tests used: Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining, CompuBench 1.5 Face detection, CompuBench 1.5 Ocean Surface Simulation, CompuBench 1.5 T-Rex, CompuBench 1.5 Video composition, PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark, Geekbench 3 Multi-Core, PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core, Geekbench 3 AES Single Core, TDP.

Core2 Duo T7600	2.8 out of 10
Core2 Duo T7200	2.7 out of 10
Core2 Duo T5600	2.7 out of 10

Price-performance ratio

How much you overpay for performance.

Tests used: Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1. 5 Bitcoin mining, CompuBench 1.5 Face detection, CompuBench 1.5 Ocean Surface Simulation, CompuBench 1.5 T-Rex, CompuBench 1.5 Video composition, PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark, Geekbench 3 Multi-Core, PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core, Geekbench 3 AES Single Core, System Price (adjusted).

Core2 Duo T7600	4.8 out of 10
Core2 Duo T7200	n/a
Core2 Duo T5600	n/a

Total Edelmark rating

Total processor rating.

Core2 Duo T7600	0.0 out of 10
Core2 Duo T7200	0.0 out of 10
Core2 Duo T5600	0.0 out of 10

Benchmarks Core2 Duo T7600

CompuBench 1.5 (Bitcoin mining)

Core2 Duo T7600	1.7 mHash/s
Core2 Duo T7200	n/a
Core2 Duo T5600	n/a

CompuBench 1.

5 (Face detection)

Core2 Duo T7600	0.25 mPixels/s
Core2 Duo T7200	no data
Core2 Duo T5600	n/a

CompuBench 1.5 (Video composition)

Core2 Duo T7600	0.35 fps
Core2 Duo T7200	n/a
Core2 Duo T5600	n/a

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core)

Core2 Duo T7600	2.224
Core2 Duo T5600	1.761
Core2 Duo T7200	1.908

GeekBench 3 (Single Core)

Core2 Duo T7600	1.193
Core2 Duo T5600	991
Core2 Duo T7200	1.076

GeekBench 3 (AES single core)

Core2 Duo T7600	99.3 MB/s
Core2 Duo T7200	80,800 MB/s
Core2 Duo T5600	74,100 MB/s

PassMark

Core2 Duo T7600	1. 348
Core2 Duo T5600	1.024
Core2 Duo T7200	1.164

PassMark (Single Core)

Core2 Duo T7600

815

Core2 Duo T5600

651

Core2 Duo T7200

So, you check the frequency of the memory and the bus, it is cut down because it has nowhere to get the megahertz added by you on the bus. When you drive on the bus, reduce the memory frequency accordingly. And you’re smart, you thought you’d throw it on as much as you want, yeah =) It’s cut out because it resets the overclocking parameters, what the POST screen writes to you there is not an overclocking indicator … As soon as you set everything correctly, it will turn off and turn on normally without repeated shutdowns

+ Grandfather Zapadlo does not have this program on all motherboards, because after overclocking the computer became faster, and if this program was, I would not see an increase in performance, since the program itself would overclock it, but I felt the increase, all the more good! My friend has switches on the motherboard with which you can overclock the percentage, I don’t remember only the model, but the thing is cool!

+Poleznoe TV I looked, it seems like the percentage is chasing, I’ll try it through the software, although I understand very little about it. And in the BIOS, you can only configure the boot priority and fan speed, although the mother looks pretty good: heat pipes on mosfets, all polymer conduits, SLI support …. But there is one caveat — the manufacturer of this motherboard has not existed for a long time (((

Tags:2.33GHz, 34W, Core2 Duo T7600, CPU, Intel

MSI PR210 Ya Edition notebook review GECID.com.

::>Notebooks and Tablets
>2008
> MSI PR210 Ya Edition

09-02-2008

Notebooks have recently begun to be produced, which, in most cases, only the female audience pays attention to. These laptops are easy to spot because they have both an attractive design and a pronounced color scheme. As a rule, they are designed to emphasize their special image and use both in the business environment and in educational institutions, as well as home multimedia entertainment.

MSI PR210 Ya Edition

At the beginning of last year, the elegant MSI PR210 notebook was introduced, which used a special black glossy finish for that time. Now, the slightly redesigned MSI PR210 Ya Edition series has appeared on the market, which brings three new color schemes, namely: denim blue, wasabi green, coral pink, as well as exclusive accessories. These color variations will appeal to both the male and female audience, although, most likely, they are simply youth.

Inside, we find a box with a laptop, a branded bag, and a special exclusive folder for easy transportation of the laptop. The box is made in white tone, it has several images of the laptop, the manufacturer’s logo, model, and several main functions. Having unpacked the box, we find a laptop sandwiched with cardboard tabs, as well as another box with a complete set.

Specification

0005

Manufacturer	MSI
Model	PR210
Processor	AMD Turion 64 X2 Mobile TK-53, 1700 MHz (8. 5 x 200) 65 nm, 512 kb L2
Chipset	AMD RS690T + SB600
Memory	1024MB DDR2-667MHz SDRAM (Transcend TS128MSQ64V6J)
Hard disk	WDC WD1200BEVS-22UST0 ATA Device (120 GB, 5400 RPM, SATA)
Optical drive	HL-DT-ST DVDRAM GSA-T20N ATA Device (DVD+R9:4x, DVD-R9:4x, DVD+RW:8x/8x, DVD-RW:8x/6x, DVD-RAM:5x, DVD-ROM :8x, CD:24x/24x/24x DVD+RW/DVD-RW/DVD-RAM)
Card Reader	Ricoh (SD/MMC/MS/MSpro)
Graphics Accelerator	ATI Radeon Xpress 1270 (up to 256 MB from system)
Display	SAMSUNG SEC4241 [12. 1″ TFT] WXGA (1280×800), AVC (Amazing Crystal Vision)
Audio	Realtek ALC883 High Definition Audio Controller
Interface connectors	3 x USB 2.0 1 x HDMI 1 x Card-Reader 1 x Express Card 34/54 1 x RJ11 Phone line modem connector 1 x RJ45 network interface 1 x headphone output (SPDIF) 1 x microphone input 1 x VGA out (D-sub 15-pin)
Networking	— modem (Agere Systems HDA Modem) — network card (Realtek Semiconductor RTL8168/8111 PCI-E Gigabit Ethernet NIC) — wireless adapter (Atheros Communications Inc AR5006 family 802.11abg Wireless NIC)
Extension cards	1 x Type II PC Card
Multimedia	— stereo speakers — stereo headphone/line — stereo microphone input — built-in microphone — built-in webcam
Security	— fingerprint reader — BIOS boot protection — secure and secure lock Kensington lock
AC/DC power supply	100-240V, 2. 0A, 50-60Hz / 65W, 19V, 3.42A
Battery	Li-Ion 4800 mAh; 14.4 V; 53.2 Wh
Dimensions (L x W x H), mm	303 x 231.5 x 16-29.5
Weight, kg	1.8
Operating system	Microsoft Windows Vista Home Premium
Manufacturer’s website	http://www.msi.com.tw/
Average price	View in price.ua. View in price.ru.

As expected, the laptop is not focused on the gaming component, but it will work fine with office applications. Having a webcam allows you to participate in video conferences wherever you are. In addition, the laptop is very compact and does not bring inconvenience during transportation.

Complete set

The complete set would be normal, if not for the nice bonuses specially prepared for MSI PR210 Ya Edition:

Bag for transportation.
Exclusive transport bag.
Exclusive MSI manipulator.
Accumulator.
Power supply.
Cable for connecting the power supply to the network 220 V.
Laptop wipe.
One CD with drivers and two DVDs (Recovery, Solution DVD — recovery and utilities)
Booklet describing the quick installation and subsequent setup of the notebook.
A booklet with a description of the laptop and its features.
Warranty card.
A booklet with a description of the operating system.

The manufacturer really took care of the users by equipping the laptop with a manipulator, however, not very large in size, just under the female handle. The device is made of plastic, painted to match the color of the laptop.

Also included is a special bag that can be used to easily transport the laptop. The bag is made of nylon fabric with leather inserts in areas more likely to rub. There is a strap inside the bag for easy carrying.

In Ya Edition, in addition to the bag, there is also a folder for storing and transporting the laptop. The folder is made of soft material wrapped with a mesh fabric and has a laptop color scheme.

Appearance and ergonomics

The design of the laptop is successful, and therefore immediately attracts attention, not only due to its color scheme, but also due to compactness. Externally, MSI PR210 Ya Edition is made of a combination of pink (outer part of the lid), black (bottom) and silver with a pink tint (insert on the top edge of the lid) colors. The firm’s logo is emblazoned at the top in the center.

The front part contains two mini-jack connectors: a microphone input and a headphone output. There are also four LED indicators: sleep mode, battery status, wireless network, hard drive usage.

On the right side there are communication connectors, among which it is worth noting the Express Card slot, card reader, two USB 2.0 connectors, RJ-11, HDMI output, external antenna connector, power connector. Also on this side is a ventilation compartment through which heated air escapes.

On the left side are the following connectors: VGA, network RJ45, USB 2.0 port. There is also an optical drive and a Kensington lock, which is designed to protect the laptop from theft.

The entire back of the notebook is occupied by the battery. Nothing else fit here.

Turning the notebook over reveals the air vents. There are also two buttons for the battery, one of which is a latch, and the second, equipped with a reverse action spring, serves to disconnect the battery.

Matrix and input devices

This notebook uses a 12. 1” AVC LCD display with a resolution of up to 1280×800. A mirror coating was also applied, thanks to which the image on the display remains readable when exposed to direct sunlight. Amazing Crystal Vision (or simply AVC) technology provides a detailed image with high contrast. Thanks to this, the eyes do not feel tired, even after long-term work at the laptop.

The work area of the PR210 Ya Edition is made of silver plastic with a pink tint. While the touchpad uses just gray plastic, and the keyboard is white. Speaking of the keyboard, it is full-sized and, despite the compactness of the laptop, has not changed much. Basically, the cursor keys succumbed to the reduction. In total, the keyboard holds 87 keys, with which there is no discomfort. Like most laptops, the function button is located in place of the left , which will take some getting used to. I would also like to note the not entirely successful application of characters on the keyboard, because. both Latin and Cyrillic are gray in approximately the same size.

The touchpad is good and pleasant to work with, but it feels a bit lacking in sensitivity. As usual, under the touchpad are two standard keys, made of the same material as the touchpad itself, and responsible for LMB and RMB. A biometric sensor is installed between the keys, with which you can protect the laptop from unwanted guests.

Above the main keyboard there is a metal grill, in the center of which there is an additional block of keys and indicators. The quick launch buttons are used to: launch Windows Media Player; launching the Webcam function; launching a dialog with which you can select the desired function (WLAN, Bluetooth, TV Tuner, 3G and GPS — these functions are optional). Then there are three indicators responsible for enabling/disabling the lock-keys. The last button turns the laptop on and off.

Acoustics

Acoustic speakers are located on the edges of the same metal grille. The sound produced by the speakers is quite loud and clear, even at maximum volume, but the music lover will not be satisfied. The volume control has about 20 positions, and therefore everyone can set exactly the volume level that is needed at the moment.

Webcam

The webcam sits on the top edge above the LCD as usual. The camera position is fixed, so you’ll have to adjust the screen position to set the desired tilt level. The resolution of the camera module is 1.3 megapixels. There is only one microphone, so you can not hope for stereo sound.

Power supply and battery

The notebook uses an ADP-65HB BB (65W, 19V, 3.42A) power supply manufactured by DELTA ELECTRONICS, INC. During operation, the power supply practically does not heat up.

The battery has a slightly unusual shape due to the slightly rounded outside. It is based on an 8-cell lithium-ion battery — BTY-S27 (14.4 V, 4800 mAh).

Testing

Two more competitors were selected for testing:

Samsung R40-XY09 (RS600M, Intel Celeron M 440 @ 1866 MHz, ATI Radeon Xpress 1250, 1024 Mb DDR2-667, Hitachi HTS541612J9SA00 ).
DELL LATITUDE D520 (Intel i945GM, Intel Core 2 Duo T5600 @ 1833 MHz, Intel GMA 950, 512+512 Mb DDR2-533, SAMSUNG HM120JI).

Since we did not test 12″ laptops, we had to choose competitors with approximately the same configuration, but with 15″ matrices. All laptops were running the Windows Vista operating system.

First, let’s see what the built-in test in the operating system tells us.

The test gave a score of 3.0 to the inside of the laptop. The reason lies in the installed video card, and this is understandable, because. it was not originally designed for games.

Thanks to the CPU-Z program, we get information about the frequency characteristics of the core of the installed processor, its multiplier and capabilities, as well as information about the RAM.

With the help of the GPU-Z program, we got a complete description of the video card installed in the laptop.

The processor does a good job of processing information, but in graphics applications there is a catastrophic lack of performance of the video system, which is based on an entry-level integrated video card. The laptop is simply not designed for games. Its capabilities are only enough for something very simple from the category of office games.

Drives

HD-Tune was used to obtain information about the laptop’s disk subsystem. The laptop has a WDC WD1200BEVS-22UST0 hard drive with a capacity of 120 GB and a spindle speed of 5400 rpm.

This notebook has an optical drive manufactured by LG. Model HL-DT-ST DVDRAM GSA-T20N, which copes well with almost all discs, regardless of their «old and scratched». In our case, the test was performed with such a disk, but the drive may refuse to read more scratched disks.

The result of reading is:

And here is the list of drive features.

Battery life

Using the Battery Eater program, we measured the battery life of the laptop. The measurement took place in the options: at maximum and minimum load. The results were as follows: a charge (4800 mAh) at maximum load was enough for 95 minutes of continuous operation, but during the minimum load, the laptop turned off after 271 minutes of operation, which is a very good result. It takes about 176 minutes to recharge the charge.

Note that the tested laptop is running Windows Vista, which drains the battery by only 5%.

Results

MSI laptops are certainly in demand in the market, but not as much as their competitors. Therefore, MSI began to produce special editions of its products, many remember the Crystal series of notebooks, for example, which helped to establish the company as something of a standout notebook manufacturer. Now MSI has released a multi-colored Ya Edition series, which many have reached out to because of the compactness and attractiveness of these laptops. Such a model as the PR210 Ya Edition is very convenient for emphasizing one’s individuality, which, in fact, was emphasized. But the filling of the laptop is chosen quite functional, which will allow you to work, study and relax. In addition, a pleasant feature of the tested model is a fairly long battery life.

Pros:

Attractive design.

Навигация по записям

Previous: Hp elitebook 8460p model number: HP EliteBook 8460p Notebook PC Product Information
Next: Ati tray tools download: Download ATI Tray Tools — MajorGeeks
Найти:
Свежие записи
Свежие комментарии
Архивы
Рубрики
- Amd
- Benchmark
- Cpu
- Gpu
- Miscellaneous
- Monitor
- Playstation
- Radeon
- Windows
- Xbox
Мета
2024 © All rights reserved

Intel t5600 benchmark: Intel Core 2 Duo T5600 Benchmarks

Intel Core 2 Duo T5600 Benchmarks

CPU Benchmark Scores

Processor Information

Merom Benchmarks

Core 2 Duo T5600 [in 5 benchmarks]

Summary

General info

Technical specs

Compatibility

Technologies and extensions

Security technologies

Virtualization technologies

Benchmark performance

Overall score

Passmark

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

3DMark06 CPU

Relative perfomance

AMD equivalent

Similar processors

Recommended graphics cards

User rating

Questions and comments

Intel Core 2 Duo T5600 processor review: CPU specs, performance benchmarks

Benchmarks

Specifications (specs)

Navigation

Choose a CPU

Compare processors

Compare Intel Core 2 Duo T5600 with others

CPU-Z Benchmark for Intel Core 2 T5600 (1T)

Intel Core 2 T5600 (1T)

Test System And Benchmarks — Dell Precision T5600: Two Eight-Core CPUs In A Workstation

Historical Performance Benchmarks

Introduction

SPARC Processors

MIPS Processors

POWER/PowerPC Processors

PA-RISC Processors

Itanium Processors

ARM Processors

x86 Processors

Core 2 Duo T5600 [in 5 benchmarks]

Description

General information

Features

compliance

Virtualization Technologies

Benchmark tests

Overall test performance

Passmark

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

3DMark06 CPU

Relative capacity

AMD competitor

Other processors

Recommended video cards

User rating

Tips and comments

Comparison of Intel Core 2 Duo T5670 and Intel Core 2 Duo T5600

Advantages

reasons to choose the Intel Core 2 Duo T5670

Reasons to choose Intel Core 2 Duo T5600

Benchmark comparison

Performance comparison

Price in Russia

Family

Benchmarks Intel Core2 T5600

Speed ​​in office use

Speed ​​in heavy applications

Speed ​​of numerical operations

Simple household tasks

Demanding games and tasks

Extreme

Tests in games

SSD

Characteristics

Speed in office use

Speed in heavy applications

Speed of numerical operations