Celeron J4125 [in 15 benchmarks]
Intel
Celeron J4125
Buy
- Interface
- Core clock speed
- Max video memory
- Memory type
- Memory clock speed
- Maximum resolution
Summary
Intel started Intel Celeron J4125 sales 4 November 2019. This is a Gemini Lake Refresh architecture notebook processor primarily aimed at office systems. It has 4 cores and 4 threads, and is based on 14 nm manufacturing technology, with a maximum frequency of 2700 MHz and a locked multiplier.
Compatibility-wise, this is FCBGA1090 processor with a TDP of 10 Watt. It supports DDR4, DDR4 memory.
It provides poor benchmark performance at
2.40%
of a leader’s which is AMD EPYC 9654.
EPYC
9654
Compare
General info
Celeron J4125 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and pricing.
| Place in performance rating | 1627 | |
| Market segment | Laptop | |
| Architecture codename | Gemini Lake Refresh (2019) | |
| Release date | 4 November 2019 (3 years old) |
|
| Current price | $221 | of 25332 (Xeon Platinum 8276L) |
Technical specs
Basic microprocessor parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters can generally indicate CPU performance, but to be more precise you have to review its test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | |
| Threads | 4 | |
| Base clock speed | 2 GHz | of 4.7 (FX-9590) |
| Boost clock speed | 2.7 GHz | of 6 (Core i9-13900KS) |
| L2 cache | 4 MB | of 36 (Apple M2 Max) |
| L3 cache | 4 MB | of 768 (EPYC 7373X) |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | of 4 (Ryzen 9 7940HS) |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | of 110 (Atom x7-E3950) |
| 64 bit support | + | |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | |
| Unlocked multiplier | — |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron J4125 compatibility with other computer components and devices: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc.
Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one.
Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | of 8 (Opteron 842) |
| Socket | FCBGA1090 | |
| Thermal design power (TDP) | 10 Watt | of 400 (Xeon Platinum 9282) |
Technologies and extensions
Technological capabilities and additional instructions supported by Celeron J4125. You’ll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.2 | |
| AES-NI | + | |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | |
| Speed Shift | — | |
| Turbo Boost Technology | — | |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | — | |
| Idle States | + | |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | |
| Smart Response | — | |
| GPIO | + | |
Turbo Boost Max 3. 0 |
— |
Security technologies
Processor technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| EDB | + | |
| Secure Key | + | |
| MPX | + | |
| Identity Protection | + | |
| SGX | Yes with Intel® ME | |
| OS Guard | + | |
| Anti-Theft | — |
Virtualization technologies
Supported virtual machine optimization technologies. Some are specific to Intel only, some to AMD.
| VT-d | + | |
| VT-x | + | |
| EPT | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel number of RAM supported by Celeron J4125’s memory controller.
Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequency may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4, DDR4 | of 5600 (Ryzen 9 7940HS) |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB | of 786 (Xeon E5-2670 v3) |
| Max memory channels | 2 | of 12 (Xeon Platinum 9221) |
| ECC memory support | — |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of GPU integrated into Celeron J4125.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel UHD Graphics 600 | |
| Max video memory | 8 GB | |
| Quick Sync Video | + | |
| Graphics max frequency | 750 MHz | |
| Execution Units | 12 |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J4125’s integrated GPU.
| Number of displays supported | 3 | |
| eDP | + | |
| DisplayPort | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| MIPI-DSI | + |
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron J4125’s integrated GPU, including resolutions over different interfaces.
| 4K resolution support | + | |
| Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | 4096×[email protected] | |
| Max resolution over eDP | 4096×[email protected] | |
| Max resolution over DisplayPort | 4096×[email protected] |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Celeron J4125’s integrated GPU, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | 12 | |
| OpenGL | 4.4 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection types of supported peripherals.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | of 5 (Core i9-12900K) |
| PCI Express lanes | 6 | of 128 (EPYC 7551P) |
| USB revision | 2.0/3.0 | |
| Total number of SATA ports | 2 | |
| Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports | 2 | |
| Number of USB ports | 8 | |
| Integrated LAN | — | |
| UART | + |
Benchmark performance
Single-core and multi-core benchmark results of Celeron J4125. Overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Overall score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Celeron J4125
2.40
- Passmark
- GeekBench 5 Single-Core
- GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
- Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
- Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core
- 3DMark06 CPU
- Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core
- Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core
- Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core
- Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core
- TrueCrypt AES
- x264 encoding pass 2
- x264 encoding pass 1
- WinRAR 4.
0
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 67%
Celeron J4125
2982
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
Benchmark coverage: 37%
Celeron J4125
427
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance.
This version uses all available CPU cores.
Benchmark coverage: 37%
Celeron J4125
1371
Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.
Benchmark coverage: 20%
Celeron J4125
2183
Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.
Benchmark coverage: 19%
Celeron J4125
7232
3DMark06 CPU
3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.
Benchmark coverage: 19%
Celeron J4125
3805
Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.
Benchmark coverage: 17%
Celeron J4125
3
Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core (sometimes called Multi-Thread) is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.
Benchmark coverage: 14%
Celeron J4125
246
Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core
Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.
Benchmark coverage: 14%
Celeron J4125
76
Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core
Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.
Benchmark coverage: 14%
Celeron J4125
0.9
TrueCrypt AES
TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.
Benchmark coverage: 13%
Celeron J4125
2
x264 encoding pass 2
x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more.
Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.
Benchmark coverage: 12%
Celeron J4125
14
x264 encoding pass 1
x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.
Benchmark coverage: 12%
Celeron J4125
66
WinRAR 4.0
WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using ‘Best’ setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.
Benchmark coverage: 12%
Celeron J4125
1094
Relative perfomance
Overall Celeron J4125 performance compared to nearest competitors among notebook CPUs.
Intel Core i7-5600U
100.42
AMD Athlon Silver 3050U
100.42
Intel Core i5-4308U
100
Intel Celeron J4125
100
AMD Turion II M520
99.17
Intel Core i3-10100Y
98.75
Intel Core i7-3540M
98.33
Celeron J4125 AMD equivalent
We believe that the nearest equivalent to Celeron J4125 by AMD is Athlon Silver 3050U, which is nearly equal in speed and higher by 5 positions in our rating.
Athlon Silver
3050U
Compare
Here are some closest AMD rivals to Celeron J4125:
AMD A10-5757M
103.
33
AMD Athlon Silver 3050e
100.83
AMD Athlon Silver 3050U
100.42
Intel Celeron J4125
100
AMD Turion II M520
99.17
AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-52
98.33
AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-60
97.92
Similar processors
Here is our recommendation of several processors that are more or less close in performance to the one reviewed.
Athlon Silver
3050U
Compare
Athlon Silver
3050e
Compare
Core i3
10100Y
Compare
Pentium Gold
6500Y
Compare
Core m3
8100Y
Compare
Ryzen
Embedded R1305G
Compare
Best GPUs for Celeron J4125
People consider these graphics cards to be good for Celeron J4125, according to our PC configuration statistics.
UHD
Graphics 600
56.6%
UHD
Graphics 630
3.4%
HD
Graphics 500
2.6%
UHD
Graphics 620
2.5%
HD
Graphics
2.3%
UHD
Graphics
2.2%
HD
Graphics 610
1.2%
HD
Graphics 620
1.
1%
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
1.1%
HD
Graphics 4000
1%
These are the fastest graphics cards for Celeron J4125 in our user configuration statistics.
There is a total of 1767 configurations based on Celeron J4125 in our database.
GeForce GTX
1080 SLI Mobile
0.06% (1/1767)
Iris Xe
MAX Graphics
0.06% (1/1767)
Iris Xe
Graphics G7 96EUs
0.06% (1/1767)
Radeon RX
Vega 7
0.
7% (12/1767)
GeForce RTX
4090
0.3% (5/1767)
Iris Plus
Graphics 655
0.2% (3/1767)
GeForce RTX
3090 Ti
0.3% (6/1767)
GeForce RTX
3080 Ti
0.2% (4/1767)
GeForce RTX
3090
0.2% (3/1767)
Radeon RX
6900 XT
0.06% (1/1767)
User rating
Here is the rating given to the reviewed processor by our users.
Let others know your opinion by rating it yourself.
Questions and comments
Here you can ask a question about Celeron J4125, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.
Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.
CPU-Z Benchmark for Intel Celeron J4125 (1T)
Best CPU performance — 64-bit — February 2023
Intel Celeron J4125 (1T)
Back to validation
Intel Core i9-13900K
Intel Core i7-13700K
Intel Core i9-12900KS
Intel Core i9-12900KF
Intel Core i9-12900K
Intel Core i7-12700KF
Intel Core i7-12700K
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
Intel Core i5-12600K
Intel Core i5-12600KF
Intel Core i7-12700
Intel Core i7-12700F
Intel Core i9-12900H
Intel Core i7-12700H
Intel Core i5-12500
Intel Core i5-12500H
Intel Core i9-11900K
Intel Core i5-12490F
Intel Core i5-12400
Intel Core i3-12100
Intel Core i5-12400F
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
Intel Core i3-12100F
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X
Intel Core i7-11700K
Intel Core i7-11700KF
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X
Intel Core i5-11600K
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
Intel Core i7-11700
Intel Core i7-11700F
AMD Ryzen 7 5700G
AMD Ryzen 5 5600
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
Intel Core i9-10900K
Intel Core i7-11800H
Intel Core i9-10850K
Intel Core i7-10700KF
Intel Core i5-11400
AMD Ryzen 5 5500
Intel Core i9-9900KF
Intel Core i5-11400F
Intel Core i7-9700KF
Intel Core i5-11400H
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
Intel Core i7-10700K
Intel Core i7-9700K
Intel Core i9-9900K
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
Intel Core i5-10600KF
Intel Core i5-9600KF
Intel Core i5-10600K
Intel Core i7-10700
Intel Core i5-11300H
Intel Core i7-10700F
Intel Core i7-1165G7
Intel Core i7-9700
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
Intel Core i5-9600K
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X
Intel Core i7-8700K
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
Intel Core i5-8600K
Intel Core i5-1135G7
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X
Intel Core i7-7700K
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
Intel Core i7-8700
AMD Ryzen 5 3500X
AMD Ryzen 5 3500
Intel Core i3-1115G4
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
Intel Core i7-10750H
Intel Core i3-9100F
Intel Core i3-10105F
Intel Core i7-6700K
Intel Core i5-8500
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
Intel Core i5-9400
Intel Core i5-10400
Intel Core i3-10100
Intel Core i5-9400F
Intel Core i5-6600K
Intel Core i3-10100F
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
Intel Core i5-10400F
Intel Core i7-4790K
AMD Ryzen 3 3100 4-Core
Intel Core i5-10300H
Intel Core i5-8400
Intel Core i7-9750H
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
Intel Core i7-7700
Intel Core i7-8750H
Intel Core i5-4690K
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
Intel Core i5-9300H
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
Intel Core i3-8100
Intel Core i5-7500
Intel Core i7-10510U
Intel Core i5-8300H
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
Intel Core i7-8565U
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
Intel Core i7-4770K
Intel Core i5-4690
Intel Core i5-10210U
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
Intel Core i7-4790
Intel Core i5-1035G1
Intel Core i7-6700
AMD Ryzen 7 2700
Intel Core i7-4770
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
Intel Core i5-8265U
AMD Ryzen 5 1600
Intel Core i5-4590
Intel Core i3-1005G1
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H with
Intel Core i5-3570K
Intel Core i5-6500
Intel Core i5-7400
Intel Core i7-3770K
Intel Xeon E3-1231 v3
Intel Core i7-8550U
Intel Core i5-4570
Intel Core i3-7100
AMD Ryzen 3 1200
Intel Xeon E5-2666 v3
Intel Core i5-3570
Intel Core i3-10110U
Intel Core i5-2500K
Intel Core i7-3770
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H with
Intel Core i7-2600K
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
Intel Core i5-8250U
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
Intel Core i5-6400
Intel Core i3-6100
Intel Core i5-4460
Intel Core i5-3470
Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U with
Intel Core i5-4440
Intel Xeon E3-1230 V2
Intel Core i3-4170
Intel Core i5-2500
Intel Pentium G4560
AMD Athlon 3000G
Intel Core i7-2600
Intel Core i3-4160
Intel Xeon E5-2689
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
Intel Core i7-7500U
Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3
Intel Core i5-2400
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2
Intel Core i3-4130
Intel Core i5-3330
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U
Intel Core i5-7200U
Intel Core i3-3240
Intel Core i3-3220
Intel Core i5-6300U
Intel Core i3-2120
Intel Core i5-3230M
Intel Core i3-2100
Intel Core 2 Duo E8400
Intel Core i5-6200U
Intel Core i5-2520M
Intel Core i5-5200U
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550
Intel Core i5 650
Intel Core 2 Duo E7500
Intel Core i5-3210M
AMD FX -8350
Intel Core i5-2450M
AMD FX -8320
Intel Core i5-2410M
AMD FX -6300
Intel Core i5-4210U
AMD FX -8300
Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600
Intel Core i3-7020U
(YOU) Intel Celeron J4125
Intel Core i5-4200U
Intel Core i3-5005U
Intel Core i3-6006U
Intel Core i3-4005U
Intel Celeron J4125 — processor overview.
Tests and Specs
The Intel Celeron J4125 processor is based on a 14 nm process and the Gemini Lake Refresh architecture. The base clock is 2.00 GHz and the maximum turbo clock is 2.70 GHz. Intel Celeron J4125 contains 4 processor cores. To make the right choice for upgrading your computer, check out the detailed specifications and test results. Please check your motherboard socket compatibility before choosing.
4.0
From 66
Hitesti Score
TOP 10 processors
Most popular on the site
Intel Celeron N4020
2x 1.
10 GHz (2.80 GHz)
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
6x 2.10 GHz (4.00 GHz) HT
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
8x 1.80 GHz (4.30 GHz) HT
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U
2x 2.60 GHz (3.50 GHz) HT
AMD Athlon Silver 3050U
2x 2.
30 GHz (3.20 GHz)
Intel Core i3-1115G4
2x 1.70 GHz (4.10 GHz) HT
Intel Core i5-1135G7
4x 2.40 GHz (4.00 GHz) HT
Intel Celeron N4500
2x 1.10 GHz (2.90 GHz)
AMD Ryzen 5 4600G
6x 3.
70 GHz (4.20 GHz) HT
Intel Pentium Silver N5030
4x 1.10 GHz (3.10 GHz)
Buy here:
Yandex Market
SberMegaMarket
AliExpress
General information
Intel Celeron J4125 base and maximum clock speed, number of processor cores and threads. The more the better (marked in green).
CPU cores, base and turbo speeds
The overall performance of a processor can be easily determined based on its number of cores and threads, as well as its standard and turbo clock speeds.
The more GHz, cores and L2-L3 cache a processor has, the better. Please note that high specs require a powerful cooling system and a quality chipset (check the VRM on the motherboard).
| Clock frequency: | 2.00 GHz | Number of cores: | 4 | |
| Turbo (1 core): | 2.70 GHz | Number of threads: | 4 | |
| Hyper trading: | No. |
Acceleration: | No. | |
| Turbo (4 Cores): | 2.70 GHz |
Internal graphics
Some manufacturers (most often Intel) supplement processors with graphics chips, such a solution is especially popular in laptops, but ineffective in workstations and gaming stations.
The higher the clock speed of the video card and the more memory on board, the better.
| GPU name: | Intel UHD Graphics 600 | |||
| GPU frequency: | 0.25 GHz | GPU (Turbo): | 0.75 GHz | |
| Generation: | 9. 5 |
DirectX version: | 12 | |
| Execution units: | 12 | Number of shaders: | 96 | |
| Maximum memory: | 8GB | Number of monitors: | 3 | |
| Technology: | 14 nm | Release date: | Q4/2017 | |
Hardware codec support
Here we are dealing with specifications that are used by some processor manufacturers.
These figures are mostly technical and can be disregarded for comparative purposes.
| h364: | Decode/Encode | |||
| JPEG: | Decode/Encode | |||
| h365 8bit: | Decode/Encode | |||
| h365 10bit: | Decode/Encode | |||
| VP8: | Decode/Encode | |||
| VP9: | Decode/Encode | |||
| VC-1: | Decode | |||
| AVC: | Decode/Encode | |||
RAM and PCIe
These are the memory standards supported by processors.
The higher the standard and clock frequency with the amount of RAM, the better the performance and speed of the processor. It is also worth considering the possibility of memory operation in multichannel mode.
| Memory type: | DDR4-2400LPDDR4-2400 | Maximum memory: | 8GB | |
| Memory channels: | 2 | ECC: | No. |
|
| PCIe version: | 2.0 | PCIe lanes: | 6 |
Encryption
Support for data encryption
| AES-NI: | Yes |
Thermal management and TDP
| TDP: | 10W | Maximum temperature: | — | |
| Maximum TDP: | — | TDP down: | — |
Technical details
These are key parameters that will help you determine which processor is best.
Pay special attention to the release date, the technological aspects of the manufacturing process (measured in nanometers) and the third level (L3) cache.
| L3-Cache: | 4.00 MB | Technology: | 14nm | |
| Architecture: | Gemini Lake Refresh | Virtualization: | VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d | |
| Socket: | BGA 1090 | Release date: | Q4/2019 |
Devices compatible with this processor
You probably already know which devices use processors.
It can be a desktop computer or a laptop.
| Used in: | Unknown | |||
The latter is used to create 3D models and shapes. Cinebench R15 is used to benchmark the performance of single core processors. Hyperthreading capability is not taken into account. It is an updated version of Cinebench 11.5. Like all new versions, the updated benchmark is based on Cinema 4 Suite
software
AMD Phenom II X6 1045T
6x 2.70 GHz (3.20 GHz)
AMD Athlon II X4 740
4x 3.
20 GHz (3.70 GHz)
Intel Celeron J4125
4x 2.00 GHz (2.70 GHz)
Intel Pentium Silver N5000
4x 1.10 GHz (2.70 GHz)
AMD Phenom II X6 1035T
6x 2.60 GHz (3.10 GHz)
Cinebench R15 can be used to test the performance of multi-core processors.
The test produces accurate and reliable results. This benchmark is an updated version of Cinebench 11.5, which is based on Cinema 4 Suite soft.
Intel Core i3-4330T
2x 3.00 GHz (No turbo) HT
Intel Core i3-4150T
2x 3.00 GHz (No turbo) HT
Intel Celeron J4125
4x 2.
00 GHz (2.70 GHz)
Intel Core i5-4200M
2x 2.50 GHz (3.10 GHz) HT
Intel Core i3-3225
2x 3.30 GHz (No turbo) HT
This test measures the performance of integrated graphics on Intel and AMD processors. The result is the calculated processing power in Single-Precision mode FP32
Intel Celeron J3160
4x 1.
60 GHz (2.24 GHz)
Intel Celeron J3060
2x 1.60 GHz (2.48 GHz)
Intel Celeron J4125
4x 2.00 GHz (2.70 GHz)
AMD E2-3200
2x 2.40 GHz (No turbo)
AMD A4-3300
2x 2.
50 GHz (No turbo)
4.0
From 66
Hitesti Score
Share on social networks:
In order to leave a review, you need to login
Review Intel Celeron J4125
Compare Intel Celeron J4125
VS
Intel Celeron N5095
Intel Celeron N4020
Intel Celeron N4120
Raspberry Pi 4B (Broadcom BCM2711)
Intel Celeron N4500
Intel Pentium Silver N6000
Intel Celeron J6412
Intel Celeron J4025
Intel Core i3-1000G1
Intel Core i7-1060NG7
Intel Celeron J4125 Processor Review: Specifications, Benchmark Tests
The Celeron J4125 processor was released by Intel, release date: 4 Nov 2019.
At the time of release, the processor cost $107. The processor is designed for desktop computers and is built on the Gemini Lake Refresh architecture.
Processor locked for overclocking. The total number of cores is 4, threads are 4. The maximum clock speed of the processor is 2.70 GHz. The maximum temperature is 105 °C. Technological process — 14 nm. Cache size: L1 — 224 KB, L2 — 4 MB.
Supported memory type: DDR4/LPDDR4 upto 2400 MT/s. Maximum supported memory size: 8 GB.
Supported socket type: FCBGA1090. The maximum number of processors in the configuration is 1. Power consumption (TDP): 10 Watt.
The processor is integrated with Intel UHD Graphics 600 graphics with the following graphics settings: maximum frequency — 750 MHz, maximum memory size — 8 GB.
Benchmarks
| PassMark Single thread mark |
|
|||||
| PassMark CPU mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4. 0 Car Chase Offscreen |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 Car Chase Offscreen |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 Manhattan |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4. 0 Manhattan |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 T-Rex |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 T-Rex |
|
|
000 Fps | Name | Meaning |
|---|---|
| PassMark — Single thread mark | 1167 |
| PassMark — CPU mark | 2982 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen | 458 Frames |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen | 458.000 Fps |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan | 871 Frames |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan | 871.000 Fps |
GFXBench 4. 0 — T-Rex |
1558 Frames |
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex | 1558.000 Fps |
| Boost 9 core clock0057 | 750MHz |
| Core frequency | 200MHz |
| Process | 14nm |
| Number of shaders | 12 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 5 Watt |
| Number of transistors | 189 million |
Gaming performance
1 Fall Guys (2020)
2 Valorant (2020)
3.
Strange Brigade (2018)
4 Gears Tactics (2020)
5 Hearthstone (2020)
6. Counter-Strike: GO (2012)
7. Total War: Three Kingdoms (2019)
8. League of Legends (2019)
9. F1 2019 (2019)
10. Anno 1800 (2019)
11. The Division 2 (2019))
12. Dirt Rally 2.0 (2019)
13. Far Cry New Dawn (2019)
14 Apex Legends (2019)
15. World of Tanks enCore (2018)
16. Just Cause 4 (2018)
17. Darksiders III (2018)
18 Assassin’s Creed Odyssey (2018)
19.
Forza Horizon 4 (2018)
20. Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018)
21. F1 2018 (2018)
22. Far Cry 5 (2018)
23. X-Plane 11.11 (2018)
24. Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)
25. Middle-earth: Shadow of War (2017)
26. Playerunknown’s Battlegrounds (PUBG) (2017)
27. Team Fortress 2 (2017)
28 Rocket League (2017)
29. For Honor (2017)
30 Overwatch (2016)
31 Rainbow Six Siege (2015)
32. World of Warships (2015)
33. Dota 2 Reborn (2015)
34. The Witcher 3 (2015)
35.
Dirt Rally (2015)
36. GTA V (2015)
37 Sims 4 (2014)
38 BioShock Infinite (2013)
39. StarCraft II: Heart of the Swarm (2013)
40. Tomb Raider (2013)
41. Diablo III (2012)
42. The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim (2011)
43 Starcraft 2 (2010)
44 Trackmania Nations Forever (2008)
45. World of Warcraft (2005)
Fall Guys (2020)
| Low, 1280×720 | 11.30 |
Valorant (2020)
| Low, 1280×720 | 31.90 |
| Medium, 1920×1080 | 12.80 |
| High, 1920×1080 | 11. 30 |
Strange Brigade (2018)
| Low, 1280×720 | 8.75 |
| Medium, 1920×1080 | 6.10 |
| High, 1920×1080 | 5.80 |
| Ultra, 1920×1080 | 3.60 |
GEARS TACTICS (2020)
| LOW, 1280×720 | 5.10 9.10 9.10 9.10 9.10 9.10 9.10 9.10 9.10 9.10 9.10 9.10 9.10 9.10 9.10 9.10 9.10 9.10 9.10451 |
Hearthstone (2020)
| Low, 1920×1080 | 29.00 |
| Medium, 1920×1080 | 28.90 |
| High, 1920×1080 | 14.90 |
Counter-Strike: GO (2012 )
| LOW, 1024×768 | 27.40 |
Total War: Three Kingdoms (2019)
| LOW, 1280×720 9007 9.80 |
League of Legends (2019)
| Low, 1280×720 | 42. 50 |
| Medium, 1920×1080 | 29.80 |
| High, 1920×1080 | 22.00 |
| Ultra, 1920×1080 | 19.20 |
F1 2019 (2019)
| LOW, 1280×720 | 7.33 |
Anno 1800 (2019)
0 900.1720, 1280×0057
The Division 2 (2019)
| Low, 1280×720 | 2.00 |
Dirt Rally 2.0 (2019)
| Low, 1280×720 | 17.70 |
Far Cry New Dawn (2019)
| LOW, 1280×720 | 1.00 |
APEX Legends (2019)
| LOW, 1280HD0057 |
World of Tanks enCore (2018)
| Low, 1366×768 | 34.80 |
| Medium, 1920×1080 | 4. 72 |
Just Cause 4 (2018)
| Low 1280×720 | 3.00 |
Darksiders III (2018)
| LOW, 1280×720 | 7.00 |
AssisSSISED ODEDDD0862
| Low, 1280×720 | 4.00 |
Forza Horizon 4 (2018)
| Low, 1280×720 | 4.55 |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018)
| LOW, 1280×720 | 4.00 |
F1 2018 (2018)
| LOW, 1280×720 |
Far Far Far Far Far FARY 50435
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)
| Low, 1280×720 | 6.89 |
| Medium, 1920×1080 | 4. 87 |
| High, 1920×1080 | 4.44 |
final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)
| LOW, 1280×720 | 4.52 |
| 2.25 2.22 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.0066 | |
| High, 1920×1080 | 1.55 |
| QHD | 1.12 |
Middle-earth: Shadow of War (2017)
| Low, 1280×720 | 9.00 |
Playerunknown’s Battlegrounds (PUBG) (2017)
| LOW, 1280×720 | 5.50 |
Team Fortress 2 (2017)
| LOW, 1280×720 9007 930 | |
| Medium, 1366×768 | 28.70 |
Rocket League (2017)
| Low, 1280×720 | 17.30 |
| Medium, 1920×1080 | 11.70 |
| High, 1920×1080 | 9. 00451 |
Overwatch (2016)
| Low, 1280×720 | 5.00 |
| Medium, 1366×768 | 3.00 |
Rainbow Six Siege (2015)
| Low, 1024×768 | 17.10 |
| Medium, 1366×768 | 10.80 |
World of Warships (2015)
| LOW, 1366×768 |
| 13.10 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)
| Low, 1280×720 | 33.55 |
| Medium, 1366×768 | 15.40 |
| High, 1920×1080 | 7.30 |
| Ultra, 1920×1080 | 6.90 |
The Witcher 3 (2015)
| Low, 1024×768 | 4.69 |
Dirt Rally (2015)
| Low, 1024×768 | 43. 30 |
| Medium, 1366×768 | 12.50 |
| High, 1920×1080 | 12.50 |
GTA V (2015)
| Low, 1024×768 | 14.00056 Medium, 1366×768 | 17.70 |
| High, 1920×1080 | 10.20 |
BioShock Infinite (2013)
| Low, 1280×720 | 21.40 | |
| Medium, 1366×768 | 10.00 | |
| HIGH, 1366×768 | 11.50 | |
| Ultra, 1920×1080 |
Starcraft II: Heart of the Swarm
| Low, 1024×768 | 78.80 |
| Medium, 1366×768 | 16.30 |
Tomb Raider (2013)
| Low, 1024×768 | 33.45 | |||
| Medium, 1366×768 | 16. 30 |
|||
| HIGH, 1366×768 | 10.95 | |||
| Ultra, 1920×1080 | 5.00 | |||
| 24.60 | |
| Medium, 1366×768 | 15.80 |
The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim (2011)
| Low, 1280×720 | 19.20 |
| Medium, 1366×768 | 12.90 |
| HIGH, 1366×768 | 9.60 |
Starcraft 2 (2010)
| Low, 1024×768 | 14.90 |
| High, 1360×768 | 10.60 |
Trackmania Nations Forever (2008)
| Low, 640×480 | 153.00 |
| High, 1024×768 | 25.10 |
| Ultra, 1920×1080 | 12.30 |
World of Warcraft (2005)
| Low, 800×600 | 43. 90 |
055 | Ultra, 1920×1080 | 3.30 |
Features
| Architecture Name | Gemini Lake Refresh |
| Production date | Nov 4, 2019 |
| Price at first issue date | $107 |
| Ranking | 2016 |
| Processor Number | J4125 |
| Series | Intel Celeron Processor J Series |
| Status | Launched |
| Applicability | Desktop |
| Support 64 bit | |
| Base frequency | 2. 00 GHz |
| Level 1 cache | 224KB |
| Level 2 cache | 4MB |
| Process | 14nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 °C |
| Maximum frequency | 2.70 GHz |
| Number of cores | 4 |
| Number of threads | 4 |
| Maximum number of memory channels | 2 |
| Maximum memory size | 8GB |
| Supported memory types | DDR4/LPDDR4 upto 2400MT/s |
| Device ID | 0x3185 |
| Number of execution units | 12 |
| Graphics base frequency | 250 MHz |
| Maximum GPU clock | 750MHz |
| Video memory size | 8GB |
| Integrated graphics | Intel UHD Graphics 600 |
| DisplayPort | |
| eDP | |
| HDMI | |
| MIPI-DSI | |
| Maximum number of monitors supported | 3 |
| 4K support | |
| Maximum resolution via DisplayPort | [email protected] |
| Maximum resolution via eDP | [email protected] |
Maximum resolution via HDMI 1. 4 |
[email protected] |
| DirectX | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 |
| Maximum number of processors in configuration | 1 |
| Package Size | 25mm x 24mm |
| Supported sockets | FCBGA1090 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt |
| Integrated LAN | |
| Integrated Wireless | Intel Wireless-AC MAC |
| Number of PCI Express lanes | 6 |
| Maximum number of SATA 6 Gb/s ports | 2 |
| Number of USB ports | 8 |
| PCI Express revision | 2. 0 |
| PCIe configurations | 1×4 + 1×2 or 4×1 or 2×1+1×2 + 1×2 |
| Total number of SATA ports | 2 |
| UART | |
| USB revision | 2.0/3.0 |
| Anti-Theft Technology | |
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | |
| Intel® Identity Protection Technology | |
| Intel® Memory Protection Extensions (Intel® MPX) | |
| Intel® OS Guard | |
| Intel® Secure Key Technology | |
| Intel® Software Guard Extensions (Intel® SGX) | |
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® Technology | |
| General Purpose Input/Output (GPIO) | |
| Idle States | |
| Extended instructions | Intel SSE4.
|