R5 3500u benchmark: AMD Ryzen 5 3500U vs Intel Core i5-8365U @ 1.60GHz [cpubenchmark.net] by PassMark Software

Ryzen 5 3500U [in 20 benchmarks]

AMD
Ryzen 5 3500U

Buy

• Interface
• Core clock speed
• Max video memory
• Memory type
• Memory clock speed
• Maximum resolution

Summary

AMD started AMD Ryzen 5 3500U sales 6 January 2019. This is Picasso architecture notebook processor primarily aimed at office systems. It has 4 cores and 8 threads, and is based on 12 nm manufacturing technology, with a maximum frequency of 3700 MHz and a locked multiplier.

Compatibility-wise, this is AMD Socket FP5 processor with a TDP of 15 Watt. It supports
DDR4
Dual-channel memory.

It provides poor benchmark performance at

7.01%

of a leader’s which is AMD EPYC 7h22.

Ryzen 5
3500U

vs

EPYC
7h22

General info

Ryzen 5 3500U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and pricing.

Place in performance rating	951
Place by popularity	7
Market segment	Laptop
Series	AMD Ryzen 5
Architecture codename	Picasso (2019−2020)
Release date	6 January 2019 (3 years ago)
Current price	$672	of 14999 (Xeon Platinum 9282)

Technical specs

Basic microprocessor parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters can generally indicate CPU performance, but to be more precise you have to review its test results.

Physical cores	4 (Quad-Core)
Threads	8
Base clock speed	2.1 GHz	of 4.7 (FX-9590)
Boost clock speed	3.7 GHz	of 5.5 (Core i9-12900KS)
L1 cache	128K (per core)	of 1536 (EPYC Embedded 3401)
L2 cache	512K (per core)	of 12288 (Core 2 Quad Q9550)
L3 cache	4 MB (shared)	of 32 (Ryzen Threadripper 1998)
Chip lithography	12 nm	of 5 (Apple M1)
Die size	209.78 mm2
Number of transistors	4500 Million	of 57000 (Apple M1 Max)
64 bit support	+
Windows 11 compatibility	+

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 3500U compatibility with other computer components and devices: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one.

Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1 (Uniprocessor)	of 8 (Opteron 842)
Socket	FP5
Thermal design power (TDP)	15 Watt	of 400 (Xeon Platinum 9282)

Technologies and extensions

Technological capabilities and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 3500U. You’ll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
AES-NI	+
AVX	+

Virtualization technologies

Supported virtual machine optimization technologies. Some are specific to Intel only, some to AMD.

AMD-V

+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel number of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 3500U’s memory controller. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequency may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR4 Dual-channel	of 5200 (Ryzen 5 7600X)
Maximum memory size	64 GB	of 786 (Xeon E5-2670 v3)
Max memory channels	2	of 12 (Xeon Platinum 9221)
Maximum memory bandwidth	38.397 GB/s	of 281.6 (Xeon Platinum 9221)
ECC memory support	+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of GPU integrated into Ryzen 5 3500U.

Integrated graphics card

AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection types of supported peripherals.

PCIe version	3.0	of 5 (Core i9-12900K)
PCI Express lanes	12	of 128 (EPYC 7551P)

Benchmark performance

Single-core and multi-core benchmark results of Ryzen 5 3500U. Overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Overall score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 5 3500U
7.01

• Passmark
• GeekBench 5 Single-Core
• GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
• Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
• Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core
• 3DMark06 CPU
• Cinebench 11. 5 64-bit multi-core
• Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core
• Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core
• Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core
• TrueCrypt AES
• x264 encoding pass 2
• x264 encoding pass 1
• WinRAR 4.0
• Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core
• Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core
• Geekbench 2
• Geekbench 4.0 64-bit multi-core
• Geekbench 4.0 64-bit single-core

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Ryzen 5 3500U
7068

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 37%

Ryzen 5 3500U
708

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 37%

Ryzen 5 3500U
2482

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Ryzen 5 3500U
4558

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Ryzen 5 3500U
17231

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Ryzen 5 3500U
5951

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Ryzen 5 3500U
8

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core (sometimes called Multi-Thread) is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Ryzen 5 3500U
650

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 5 3500U
143

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 5 3500U
1. 7

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 5 3500U
4

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 12%

Ryzen 5 3500U
39

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 12%

Ryzen 5 3500U
135

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using ‘Best’ setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 12%

Ryzen 5 3500U
2455

Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core

Benchmark coverage: 6%

Ryzen 5 3500U
13040

Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core

Benchmark coverage: 6%

Ryzen 5 3500U
3443

Geekbench 2

Benchmark coverage: 5%

Ryzen 5 3500U
11917

Geekbench 4.

0 64-bit multi-core

Benchmark coverage: 3%

Ryzen 5 3500U
10597

Geekbench 4.0 64-bit single-core

Benchmark coverage: 3%

Ryzen 5 3500U
3669

---

Relative perfomance

Overall Ryzen 5 3500U performance compared to nearest competitors among notebook CPUs.

---

AMD Ryzen 7 3700U
102.71

Intel Core i7-7820HQ
101.14

Intel Core i7-4940MX
100.57

AMD Ryzen 5 3500U
100

Intel Core i7-6770HQ
99.86

Intel Core i7-5850EQ
99.57

Intel Core i7-10610U
99.43

Intel equivalent

We believe that the nearest equivalent to Ryzen 5 3500U from Intel is Core i7-6770HQ, which is nearly equal in speed and lower by 1 position in our rating.

Core i7
6770HQ

Compare

Here are some closest Intel rivals to Ryzen 5 3500U:

Intel Core i7-6920HQ
104.28

Intel Core i7-7820HQ
101.14

Intel Core i7-4940MX
100.57

AMD Ryzen 5 3500U
100

Intel Core i7-6770HQ
99.86

Intel Core i7-5850EQ
99.57

Intel Core i7-10610U
99.43

Similar processors

Here is our recommendation of several processors that are more or less close in performance to the one reviewed.

Core i7
6770HQ

Compare

Core i7
10610U

Compare

Core i7
7820HQ

Compare

Core i5
8305G

Compare

Ryzen 5
PRO 3500U

Compare

Core i7
1060NG7

Compare

Recommended graphics cards

These graphics cards are most commonly used with Ryzen 5 3500U according to our statistics.

Radeon RX
Vega 8

38.7%

GeForce GTX
1650

7.1%

GeForce GTX
1050 Ti

6.1%

GeForce GTX
1060 6 GB

3.6%

Radeon RX
Vega 11

2.7%

Radeon RX
Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)

2.5%

GeForce GTX
1050

2.3%

Radeon RX
Vega 7

1. 9%

Radeon RX
Vega 3

1.6%

Radeon RX
Vega Mobile

1.5%

User rating

Here is the rating given to the reviewed processor by our users. Let others know your opinion by rating it yourself.

---

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 3500U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.

---

Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.

CPU-Z Benchmark for AMD Ryzen 5 3500U with (8T)

Best CPU performance — 64-bit — September 2022

AMD Ryzen 5 3500U with (8T)

Back to validation

Intel Core i7-9700K

Intel Core i7-9700KF

Intel Core i7-9700F

Intel Core i7-9700

Intel Core i3-12100F

Intel Core i7-9700T

AMD Ryzen 7 4700U

AMD Ryzen 3 3300X 4-Core

AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G

AMD Ryzen 3 4300GE

AMD Ryzen 5 3600

Intel Core i3-10320

Intel Core i7-11370H

Intel Core i7-1195G7

AMD Ryzen 3 3100 4-Core

Intel Core i5-1155G7

Intel Core i7-7740X

Intel Core i7-7700K

Intel Core i5-1145G7

Intel Core i3-10105

Intel Core i3-10105F

Intel Core i5-11300H

Intel Core i7-1185G7

Intel Core i3-10100F

Intel Core i3-10100

Intel Core i5-11320H

AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G

AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

Intel Core i7-1165G7

Intel Core i7-8559U

Intel Core i5-1135G7

Intel Core i7-6700K

Intel Core i7-4790K

Intel Core i5-10200H

AMD Ryzen 5 3350G

Intel Core i7-7700

AMD Ryzen 5 1600

Intel Core i7-8809G

Intel Core i7-5775C

Intel Core i3-1125G4

AMD Ryzen 5 2400G

AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G

AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G

Intel Core i7-10610U

AMD Ryzen 5 1500X

AMD Ryzen 5 3400GE

Intel Core i5-10300H

Intel Xeon E3-1281 v3

Intel Core i7-6700

Intel Xeon E3-1271 v3

Intel Core i7-4790

Intel Core i5-8259U

Intel Core i5-10310U

Intel Xeon E3-1230 v5

Intel Core i7-7700T

Intel Core i7-4770K

Intel Xeon E3-1270 v3

Intel Xeon E3-1246 v3

Intel Core i7-4770

Intel Xeon E3-1241 v3

Intel Core i7-4771

Intel Core i7-7820HQ

Intel Xeon E3-1240 v3

Intel Core i7-4790S

Intel Core i7-4940MX

Intel Core i7-8665U

Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3

AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE w/

Intel Core i7-1160G7

Intel Xeon E3-1231 v3

Intel Core i7-7820HK

Intel Xeon E3-1280 V2

AMD Ryzen 7 3750H with

Intel Core i7-6700T

AMD Ryzen 3 5300U

Intel Xeon E3-1245 v3

Intel Core i7-10510U

AMD Ryzen 5 1400

Intel Core i5-9300H

Intel Xeon E3-1230 v3

Intel Core i5-10210U

Intel Core i7-4770S

Intel Core i7-4980HQ

Intel Core i7-1065G7

Intel Core i7-8565U

AMD Ryzen 5 3550H with

Intel Core i7-3770K

Intel Core i5-9300HF

(YOU) AMD Ryzen 5 3500U with

Intel Core i5-8365U

Intel Core i7-4820K

Intel Xeon E3-1270 V2

Intel Core i5-8300H

Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2

Intel Core i7-3770

Intel Core i5-8350U

Intel Core i7-6820HK

Intel Xeon E3-1245 V2

Intel Core i7-3940XM

Intel Xeon E3-1240 V2

Intel Xeon E5-1620

Intel Core i7-3820

Intel Core i7-7700HQ

Intel Core i7-8650U

Intel Core i7-4910MQ

Intel Core i7-4900MQ

Intel Core i5-8265U

AMD FX -9590

AMD Ryzen 7 3700U with

Intel Xeon E3-1230 V2

Intel Core i7-3770S

Intel Core i7-5700HQ

Intel Core i7-6700HQ

Intel Core i7-2700K

Intel Xeon X5687

Intel Core i7-6820HQ

Intel Xeon E31275

Intel Core i7-3740QM

Intel Core i5-1035G4

Intel Core i7-3840QM

Intel Core i7-2600K

Intel Core i5-8250U

Intel Core i5-1035G1

AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U w/

Intel Xeon E31270

Intel Core i7-3720QM

Intel Core i7-8550U

Intel Core i5-1035G7

Intel Core i7-2600

Intel Xeon E31245

AMD Ryzen 5 3500U with

Intel Core i7-3820QM

Intel Xeon E31240

AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U w/

Intel Core i7 975

Intel Core i7-4810MQ

Intel Xeon E31230

Intel Core i7-3630QM

Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5

Intel Core i7-4800MQ

AMD FX-8370

Intel Core i7-4710MQ

Intel Core i7-4720HQ

AMD FX -8350

AMD Ryzen 7 2700U with

AMD FX -9370

Intel Core i7-3610QM

Intel Xeon W3565

Intel Core i7-4710HQ

Intel Core i7 960

Intel Core i7-4700HQ

AMD Ryzen 5 2500U with

Intel Core i7-4700MQ

Intel Core i7 K 875

AMD Ryzen 5 3450U with

Intel Core i7 950

Intel Core i7-3632QM

Intel Xeon W3550

Intel Core i7 870

Intel Xeon X3470

Intel Core i7-2600S

Intel Core i7-4702MQ

Intel Core i7-3612QM

Intel Core i7-4750HQ

Intel Core i7-4712MQ

AMD FX -8320

Intel Xeon X5570

Intel Core i7 930

Intel Xeon W3530

Intel Core i7-2860QM

Intel Xeon X3460

Intel Core i7 860

Intel Core i7-2760QM

AMD FX -8300

AMD FX -8150

AMD FX-8370E

Intel Xeon X3450

Intel Core i7 920

Intel Xeon W3520

Intel Core i7-2820QM

AMD FX-8320E

Intel Core i7-2720QM

Intel Xeon X3440

Intel Core i7-2630QM

Intel Xeon E5620

Intel Core i7-2670QM

Intel Xeon E31260L

AMD FX -8120

Intel Core i7 Q 740

Intel Core i7 Q 720

AMD Ryzen 5 5500U vs Ryzen 5 3500U: performance comparison

VS

AMD Ryzen 5 5500U

AMD Ryzen 5 3500U

We compared two laptop CPUs: the 2. 1 GHz AMD Ryzen 5 5500U with 6-cores against the 2.1 GHz Ryzen 5 3500U with 4-cores. On this page, you’ll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information.

1. Review
2. Differences
3. Performance
4. Specs
5. Comments (2)

Review

General overview and comparison of the processors

Single-Core Performance

Performance in single-threaded apps and benchmarks

Ryzen 5 5500U

59

Ryzen 5 3500U

39

Performance

Measure performance when all cores are involved

Ryzen 5 5500U

34

Ryzen 5 3500U

17

Power Efficiency

The efficiency score of electricity consumption

Ryzen 5 5500U

82

Ryzen 5 3500U

59

NanoReview Final Score

Generic CPU rating

Ryzen 5 5500U

54

Ryzen 5 3500U

36

Key Differences

What are the key differences between 3500U and 5500U

Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 5500U

• Newer — released 2-years and 1-month later
• Has 4 MB larger L3 cache size
• 2x faster in a single-core Geekbench v5 test — 1108 vs 554 points
• More modern manufacturing process – 7 versus 12 nanometers
• Has 2 more physical cores
• Consumes up to 29% less energy than the Ryzen 5 3500U – 25 vs 35 Watt
• 8% higher Turbo Boost frequency (4 GHz vs 3. 7 GHz)

Benchmarks

Comparing the performance of CPUs in benchmarks

Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)

Ryzen 5 5500U
+53%

1168

Ryzen 5 3500U

765

Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)

Ryzen 5 5500U
+157%

7059

Ryzen 5 3500U

2752

Passmark CPU (Single-Core)

Ryzen 5 5500U
+23%

2437

Ryzen 5 3500U

1975

Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)

Ryzen 5 5500U
+87%

13179

Ryzen 5 3500U

7036

Geekbench 5 (Single-Core)

Ryzen 5 5500U
+100%

1102

Ryzen 5 3500U

550

Geekbench 5 (Multi-Core)

Ryzen 5 5500U
+71%

4920

Ryzen 5 3500U

2873

▶️ Submit your Cinebench R23 result

By purchasing through links on this site, we may receive a commission from Amazon. This does not affect our assessment methodology.

Specifications

Full technical specification of AMD Ryzen 5 5500U and Ryzen 5 3500U

General

Vendor	AMD	AMD
Released	January 12, 2021	January 6, 2019
Type	Laptop	Laptop
instruction set	x86-64	x86-64
Codename	Lucienne	Picasso
Socket	FP6	FP5
Integrated GPU	Radeon RX Vega 7	Radeon Vega 8

Performance

Cores	6	4
Threads	12	8
Base Frequency	2. 1 GHz	2.1 GHz
Turbo Boost Frequency	4 GHz	3.7 GHz
Bus frequency	100 MHz	100 MHz
Multiplier	21x	21x
L1 Cache	64K (per core)	96K (per core)
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	512K (per core)
L3 Cache	8MB (shared)	4MB (shared)
Unlocked Multiplier	No	No

Transistors	—	4.9 billions
Fabrication process	7 nm	12 nm
TDP	10-25 W	12-35 W
Max. temperature	105°C	105°C

Integrated Graphics	Radeon RX Vega 7	Radeon Vega 8
GPU Base Clock	300 MHz	300 MHz
GPU Boost Clock	1800 MHz	1200 MHz
Shading Units	448	512
TMUs	28	32
ROPs	7	8
Execution Units	—	8
TGP	10-45 W	65 W
Max. Resolution	—	3840×2160 — 60 Hz

iGPU FLOPS

Ryzen 5 5500U

1.108 TFLOPS

Ryzen 5 3500U

1.13 TFLOPS

Memory support

Memory types	DDR4-3200, LPDDR4-4266	DDR4-2400
Memory Size	32 GB	32 GB
Max. Memory Channels	2	2
Max. Memory Bandwidth	—	35.76 GB/s
ECC Support	No	Yes

Official site	AMD Ryzen 5 5500U official page	AMD Ryzen 5 3500U official page
PCI Express Version	3.0	3.0
PCI Express Lanes	12	12

Cast your vote

Choose between two processors

Ryzen 5 5500U

737 (83. 3%)

Ryzen 5 3500U

148 (16.7%)

Total votes: 885

ompetitors

1.
AMD Ryzen 5 4500U or AMD Ryzen 5 5500U

2.
Intel Core i5 1135G7 or AMD Ryzen 5 5500U

3.
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U or AMD Ryzen 5 5500U

4.
Apple M1 or AMD Ryzen 5 5500U

5.
Intel Core i5 1235U or AMD Ryzen 5 5500U

6.
Intel Core i3 1115G4 or AMD Ryzen 5 3500U

7.
AMD Ryzen 3 5300U or AMD Ryzen 5 3500U

So which CPU will you choose: AMD Ryzen 5 3500U or Ryzen 5 5500U?

Name

Message

Promotion

Benchmark Amd Ryzen R5-3500U 2022 2022

March 8, 2022
Benchmarking

7 Views

Benchmark Amd Ryzen R5-3500U 2022. Amd ryzen 5 3500u we compared two laptop cpus: Based on 87,857 user benchmarks for the amd ryzen 5 3500u and the ryzen 5 5600h, we rank them both on effective speed and value for money against the best 1,347 cpus.

Amd Ryzen 7 5800H Benchmark Cheat Games Info from cheatgame.info

4 (2 logical cores per physical) created with highcharts 7.2.0. This is the laptop th processor, the codename of the architecture picasso, developed by 12 nm technology. Amd ryzen 5 3500u gaming.

Source: cheatgame.info

Seems like what’s clear and pure is sure, as the r3 4300u actually is pretty good. Amd ryzen 5 3500u apu vega 8 tested 10 games in 2021 from www.youtube.com.

Source: cheatgame.info

Amd ryzen 5 3500u we compared two laptop cpus: Cpu benchmark amd ryzen th….

Source: dirtysouthpro.com

Amd ryzen 5 3500u, amd ryzen 5 3500u with radeon vega mobile gfx. This is the laptop th processor, the codename of the architecture picasso, developed by 12 nm technology.

Source: satu.techcurry.co

Has 2 more physical cores. We compared two laptop cpus:

Source: cheatgame.info

Avx is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial apps, as well as. The amd ryzen 5 5625u is a processor for thin and light laptops based on the cezanne generation.

Source: cheatgame.info

Amd’s ryzen 3 2200g is a budget apu (accelerated processing unit: Amd ryzen 5 3500u contains 4 processing cores.

Source: www.reddit.com

Based on 70,370 user benchmarks. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the amd ryzen 5 3500u performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.

Source: www.notebookcheck.net

Based on 77,809 user benchmarks for the amd ryzen 5 3500u and the ryzen 7 5700u, we rank them both on effective speed and value for money against the best 1,347 cpus. The processor amd ryzen 5 3500u is developed on the 12 nm technology node and architecture picasso (zen+).

Source: www.myfixguide.com

Amd ryzen 9 3900x amd ryzen threadripper 2990wx. Cpu benchmark amd ryzen th….

Source: news.xfastest.com

We compared two laptop cpus: Based on 70,370 user benchmarks.

Source: games.filmfestivalcollection.com

Amd ryzen 5 3500u, amd ryzen 5 3500u with radeon vega mobile gfx. The amd ryzen 5 pro 3500u is a mobile soc for business laptops that was announced in april 2019.

Source: rumble.com

It is part of the barcelo refresh in early 2022 and offers 100 mhz higher. Based on 70,370 user benchmarks.

Source: otosection.com

Amd ryzen 5 pro 3500u. Has 2 more physical cores.

Source: cheatgame.info

Amd ryzen 9 3900x amd ryzen threadripper 2990wx. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the amd ryzen 5 3500u performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.

Source: www.cpu-rumors.com

This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the amd ryzen 5 3500u performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions. Cpu benchmark amd ryzen th….

Source: cheatgame. info

Amd ryzen 5 3500u gaming. Based on 77,809 user benchmarks for the amd ryzen 5 3500u and the ryzen 7 5700u, we rank them both on effective speed and value for money against the best 1,347 cpus.

Source: cheatgame.info

It also has radeon vega 8 graphics. Avx is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial apps, as well as.

Source: cheatgame.info

On this page, you’ll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information. Aes is used to speed up encryption and decryption.

Source: cpufinder.com

Benchmark results for the amd ryzen 5 3500u can be found below. It’s pretty meaningless to benchmark 15w mobile cpus by gaming, but such benchmarks keep getting posted.

Source: cheatgame.info

The amd ryzen 5 pro 3500u is a mobile soc for business laptops that was announced in april 2019. Seems like what’s clear and pure is sure, as the r3 4300u actually is pretty good.

· 1Y Sapphire Rx480 8Gb | Ryzen 5 1600.

It’s pretty meaningless to benchmark 15w mobile cpus by gaming, but such benchmarks keep getting posted. The $105 price tag also includes a wraith stealth cooler. Amd ryzen 5 3500u we compared two laptop cpus:

On This Page, You’ll Find Out Which Processor Has Better Performance In Benchmarks, Games And Other Useful Information.

Based on 70,370 user benchmarks. Openbenchmarking.org runs / minute, more is better selenium benchmark: Amd ryzen 5 pro 3500u.

Openbenchmarking.org Score, Fewer Is Better Selenium Benchmark:

Multithreading technology (such as intel’s hyperthreading or amd’s simultaneous multithreading) provides increased performance by splitting each of the processor’s physical cores into virtual cores, also known as threads. Benchmark score compare amd ryzen 5 3500u performance to most popular processors cpu benchmark amd ryzen 5 3500u intel pentium g4560 intel i3 8100 amd ryzen 5 2600 intel i7 9700k intel i9. 4 (2 logical cores per physical) created with highcharts 7.2.0.

Based On 77,809 User Benchmarks For The Amd Ryzen 5 3500U And The Ryzen 7 5700U, We Rank Them Both On Effective Speed And Value For Money Against The Best 1,347 Cpus.

Combined cpu and gpu) from its raven ridge product line. 11 rows amd ryzen 5 3500u benchmarks. To make a right choice for computer upgrading, please get familiar with the detailed technical.

Advantages Of Amd Ryzen 3 5300U.

Cpu benchmark amd ryzen th…. Ryzen 5 3500u vega 8. We compared two laptop cpus:

Tags 2022 benchmark

AMD Ryzen 5 3500U review

53points

AMD Ryzen 5 3500U

Built for thinner, mid-range notebooks, the AMD Ryzen 5 3500U comes loaded with features that allow for optimum performance for daily tasks.

The processor combines four Zen+ cores for eight threads that can clock speeds up to 3.8GHz. The integrated graphics card for the Ryzen 5 3500U is a Radeon RX Vega 8 that features 512 shading units, the small processors responsible for processing different aspects of the image.  

In terms of safety features, the Ryzen 5 3500U features the standard NX bit to help protect the device from malicious attacks. You’ll certainly find this in other Ryzen processors, however, such as the AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U.

AMD Ryzen 5 3500U

Why is AMD Ryzen 5 3500U better than the average?

• CPU threads?
  8vs7.48
• GPU clock speed?
  1200MHzvs420.86MHz
• CPU temperature?
  105°Cvs95.74°C
• Semiconductor size?
  12nmvs17.13nm
• Thermal Design Power (TDP)?
  15Wvs46.75W
• L1 cache?
  384KBvs280.91KB
• L2 core?
  0.5MB/corevs0.44MB/core
• OpenGL version?
  4.6vs4.25

Which are the most popular comparisons?

AMD Ryzen 5 5500U

vs

Intel Core i5-1135G7

AMD Ryzen 3 3250U

vs

Intel Core i3-1115G4

AMD Ryzen 3 5300U

vs

Intel Core i3-1115G4

AMD Ryzen 7 5700U

vs

Intel Core i7-1165G7

AMD Ryzen 7 3700U

vs

Intel Core i5-10210U

AMD Ryzen 5 5500U

vs

Intel Core i3-1115G4

AMD Ryzen 5 3500U

vs

Intel Core i5-10210U

Intel Core i3-1115G4

vs

Intel Core i5-1135G7

AMD Ryzen 7 5800H

vs

Intel Core i7-11800H

Intel Celeron N4020

vs

Intel Core i3-1005G1

Price comparison

User reviews

Overall Rating

AMD Ryzen 5 3500U

9 User reviews

AMD Ryzen 5 3500U

8. 7/10

9 User reviews

Features

Value for money

8.8/10

8 votes

Gaming

7.9/10

8 votes

Performance

8.6/10

8 votes

Reliability

9.3/10

8 votes

Energy efficiency

9.3/10

8 votes

Performance

1.CPU speed

4 x 2.1GHz

The CPU speed indicates how many processing cycles per second can be executed by a CPU, considering all of its cores (processing units). It is calculated by adding the clock rates of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors employing different microarchitectures, of each group of cores.

2.CPU threads

More threads result in faster performance and better multitasking.

3.turbo clock speed

3.7GHz

When the CPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased performance.

4.Has an unlocked multiplier

✖AMD Ryzen 5 3500U

Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier which makes them easy to overclock, allowing you to gain increased performance in games and other apps.

5.L2 cache

A larger L2 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.

6.L3 cache

A larger L3 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.

7.L1 cache

A larger L1 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.

8.L2 core

0.5MB/core

More data can be stored in the L2 cache for access by each core of the CPU.

9.L3 core

1MB/core

More data can be stored in the L3 cache for access by each core of the CPU.

Memory

1.RAM speed

2400MHz

It can support faster memory, which will give quicker system performance.

2.maximum memory bandwidth

35.76GB/s

This is the maximum rate that data can be read from or stored into memory.

3.DDR memory version

DDR (Double Data Rate) memory is the most common type of RAM. Newer versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy-efficient.

4.memory channels

More memory channels increases the speed of data transfer between the memory and the CPU.

5.maximum memory amount

The maximum amount of memory (RAM) supported.

6.bus transfer rate

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value.

The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.

7.Supports ECC memory

✖AMD Ryzen 5 3500U

Error-correcting code memory can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when is it essential to avoid corruption, such as scientific computing or when running a server.

8.eMMC version

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value.

A higher version of eMMC allows faster memory interfaces, having a positive effect on the performance of a device. For example, when transferring files from your computer to the internal storage over USB.

9.bus speed

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value.

The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.

Benchmarks

1.PassMark result

This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using multiple threads.

2.PassMark result (single)

This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using a single thread.

3.Geekbench 5 result (multi)

Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s multi-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)

4.Cinebench R20 (multi) result

Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s multi-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.

5.Cinebench R20 (single) result

Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s single-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.

6.Geekbench 5 result (single)

Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s single-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)

7.Blender (bmw27) result

638.36seconds

The Blender (bmw27) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.

8.Blender (classroom) result

1920.96seconds

The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.

9.performance per watt

This means the CPU is more efficient, giving a greater amount of performance for each watt of power used.

Features

1.uses multithreading

✔AMD Ryzen 5 3500U

Multithreading technology (such as Intel’s Hyperthreading or AMD’s Simultaneous Multithreading) provides increased performance by splitting each of the processor’s physical cores into virtual cores, also known as threads. This way, each core can run two instruction streams at once.

2.Has AES

✔AMD Ryzen 5 3500U

AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.

3.Has AVX

✔AMD Ryzen 5 3500U

AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial apps, as well as improving Linux RAID software performance.

4. SSE version

SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing an image or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.

5.Has F16C

✔AMD Ryzen 5 3500U

F16C is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.

6.bits executed at a time

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value.

NEON provides acceleration for media processing, such as listening to MP3s.

7.Has MMX

✔AMD Ryzen 5 3500U

MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.

8.Has TrustZone

✖AMD Ryzen 5 3500U

A technology integrated into the processor to secure the device for use with features such as mobile payments and streaming video using digital rights management (DRM).

9. front-end width

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value.

The CPU can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), meaning that the CPU performs better

Price comparison

Cancel

Which are the best CPUs?

AMD Ryzen 5 3500U processor review: CPU specs, performance benchmarks

Buy on Amazon

Ryzen 5 3500U processor released by AMD. The processor is designed for laptop-computers.

CPU is unlocked for overclocking. Total number of cores — 4, threads — 8. Maximum CPU clock speed — 3.7 GHz. Maximum operating temperature — 105°C. Manufacturing process technology — 12 nm. Cache size: L1 — 384 KB, L2 — 2 MB, L3 — 4 MB.

Supported socket types: FP5. Power consumption (TDP): 15 Watt.

The processor has integrated graphics Radeon Vega 8 Graphics with the following parameters: maximum frequency — 1200 MHz, cores count — 8.

Benchmarks

PassMark Single thread mark	Top 1 CPU This CPU
PassMark CPU mark	Top 1 CPU This CPU	117612
Geekbench 4 Single Core	Top 1 CPU This CPU
Geekbench 4 Multi-Core	Top 1 CPU This CPU
3DMark Fire Strike Physics Score	Top 1 CPU This CPU

Name	Value
PassMark — Single thread mark	1974
PassMark — CPU mark	7070
Geekbench 4 — Single Core	726
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core	2562
3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score	2550

Boost clock speed	1300 MHz
Core clock speed	300 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt
Transistor count	4,940 million

Specifications (specs)

Family	AMD Ryzen Processors
OPN Tray	YM3500C4T4MFG
Place in performance rating	1211
Series	AMD Ryzen 5 Mobile Processors with Radeon Vega Graphics
Vertical segment	Laptop
Base frequency	2. 1 GHz
Compute Cores	12
L1 cache	384 KB
L2 cache	2 MB
L3 cache	4 MB
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm
Maximum core temperature	105°C
Maximum frequency	3.7 GHz
Number of cores	4
Number of GPU cores	8
Number of threads	8
Unlocked
Max memory channels	2
Supported memory frequency	2400 MHz
Graphics max frequency	1200 MHz
iGPU core count	8
Processor graphics	Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
DisplayPort
HDMI
DirectX	12
Sockets supported	FP5
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt
AMD SenseMI
FreeSync
The «Zen» Core Architecture

Navigation

Choose a CPU

Compare processors

Compare AMD Ryzen 5 3500U with others

AMD
Ryzen 5 3500U



vs



Intel
Xeon E5-2658




AMD
Ryzen 5 3500U



vs



Intel
Core i3-4100E




AMD
Ryzen 5 3500U



vs



AMD
FX-7600P




AMD
Ryzen 5 3500U



vs



AMD
A6-9225




AMD
Ryzen 5 3500U



vs



Intel
Celeron G3900TE




AMD
Ryzen 5 3500U



vs



AMD
RX-425BB

Testing AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U and Vega 8

First, the obvious. Want a complete review of the Lenovo ThinkPad T495 laptop, with a detailed description of each aspect of the device? I provide a link. Specifically, in this article, I will try to analyze the performance of the hardware platform. Namely, the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U processor, the Vega 8 video core and 16 GB of 2400 MHz RAM in dual-channel mode.

1. Oddities at work

2. Frequently Asked Question

3. Tests themselves

4. Results for AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U and Vega 8

Oddities in operation

The first thing to understand is a ThinkPad connected to a power adapter and a ThinkPad running on battery are very different animals. In any case, on Lenovo’s native power consumption scheme, without unnecessary settings and manipulations. Take, for example, the results in CPU-Z at maximum performance.

We get about 300 points* for one core and within 1080 for multi-core. But it’s worth unplugging the laptop from the outlet, and on the same power scheme we get, suddenly for a minute, 136 and 991 points respectively. Frequencies drop, as does performance in general.

*I also note that the processor can earn 385 points, up to a certain level of heating and after a certain optimization of background applications — which we will talk about a little later.

On the one hand, it’s clear that no one will play on a business laptop without an external power supply connected. And hardly anyone will be from the battery. On the other hand, Linus Sebastian once said one smart thing — sometimes a short burst of power can solve the problem more effectively than long-term operation at low frequencies. And in general, the Ryzen 5 3500U single-core boost works well.

Even now, while I am writing these lines, the third core of the processor is often boosted up to 2400 MHz, the fourth is sometimes boosted, but the rest lag at the level of 1400. The boost when powered from the mains, if anything, is 3700 MHz. Not for all cores, but not bad.

Of course, you can play around with the energy plan. In particular, we will be concerned about the states of the CPU, the minimum and maximum. However, I recommend playing not on Lenovo’s proprietary profile, but on a balanced plan — it’s nearby, a little lower.

But this will be of little use — I could not get the laptop to boost from the battery. In any case, without entering the BIOS, where the option is located. I talked about it in the article about pumping T495.

Read also: Upgrading Lenovo ThinkPad T495. Programmatically and physically

Frequency question

Next is the second moment, which concerns games and tasks that require a high-frequency VIDEO core. Despite the promised 1200 MHz boost frequencies, Vega 8 does not even work out 1000 under normal conditions. In CS:GO, for example, work took place at 600 MHz, and when it dropped to 200 MHz by itself, gameplay lags began.

This significantly reduces the area of ​​application of the integrated video core in the Ryzen 5 3500U, and I’m not just talking about the T495’s explicit business model. Lenovo, as mentioned in the review, also has much more affordable models on the R5 3500U, though not on the Pro version. But this is the essence of one chip, and the capacities of the versions do not differ almost in any way.

How do I know it’s not a problem with my particular APU in my particular laptop? Because the notorious Beard from the Pro Hi-Tech channel made a similar observation, but in the budget Lenovo S540. I will not climb into the jungle into which Beard climbed, for the sake of at least an alluring gigahertz on Vega 8, I will not. But I would advise you to take this into account.

Also an important note. The frequency of the video core itself varied within 200 — 600 MHz, in rare games it came close to a thousand. The frequency of VIDEO MEMORY changed and reached 1200 MHz.

It’s understandable why this is so, one power channel and one cooling system are allocated for the processor and the video core. And neither the power supply nor the cooling can cope with everything at once. Therefore, the more actively the CPU works, the less resources the GPU gets.

Read also: Lenovo IdeaPad L340-15IRH Gaming Review – Inexpensive Gaming Laptop

Tests themselves

Performance benchmarks on your screens. In addition to what was in the full review, we also have 3DMark, PCMark and Blender in a bunch. According to synthetics in Fire Strike Physis, this is the Core i3-9100F level, which is almost exactly two times worse than AMD Ryzen 5 2600.

performance with the GTX 650 and MX150. Games with it were tested in HD resolution, at minimum graphics settings almost everywhere. Spoiler — even old games, like Lost Planet: Extreme Conditions, managed to lag at maximum speeds.

However, most of the games at objective settings worked quite well. Far Cry: New Dawn and PUBG were unplayable, and GTA V generally crashed with an error, preventing you from entering either the benchmark or the story mode in principle.

On the other hand, esports games like DotA 2 and Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (when the GPU frequencies are not reduced to 200 MHz) were played briskly at the minimum settings and rarely sank below 60 FPS. This also includes DotA Autochess, where there are turn-based battles, but in general the FPS was decent.

Another game that ran surprisingly well on the system was DiRT Rally, also 60+ FPS at minimum. At low settings, Bioshock: Infinity showed the same amount along with ARMA 2. Although the latter had problems with frame instability.

The most frustrating thing for me was the editing process in Premiere Pro. Purely theoretically, the eight-threading quite provides work with the timeline, but the preview stuttered even at 1/2 of the resolution. I’m generally silent about editing with Lumetri, after adding any effect, the editing process turned into a cycle of “paused”, “applied the effect”, “adjusted the effect without turning on the video”, “disabled all effects” and “continued editing”, “ repeated.»

And this is especially disappointing, since editing on the desktop Intel Pentium G4400, a dual-threaded processor with an Intel HD 510 video core, was much more pleasant. Of course, thanks to the fact that the integrated graphics in Intel work perfectly with Premiere Pro, speeding up H.264 decoding, so that even 4K video plays with little to no stutter.

Ryzen 5 3500U does not have a compatible built-in. But, for example, the final render still almost does not use graphics from Intel, especially if pictures, text, changing the footage speed and Lumetri are involved. And here Ryzen takes over, rendering in 40 minutes in BATTERY mode a video that took Penok more than 4 and a half hours.

UPDATE : as it turned out, performance in working with Premiere Pro really likes to rest not only on the processor, but also on the disk. And since I’m running the project from a 2.5-inch external hard drive, 4K sequential playback with Lumetri at 1:1 resolution occurs with 1-2 lost frames per 10 seconds. But it’s worth it for small files to enter into business — and that’s it, the slide show is even 1/4.

On the one hand, hubs like the MAIWO K308H practically do not cut the speed of even a SATA3 SSD, so an external solid-state drive with a capacity of 500 GB or more, but inserted into such a hub — or just an adapter, can solve the problem. Moreover, the laptop has a full-sized USB Type-A 3.1 Gen2.

On the other hand, downloading the project and editing it directly from the built-in PCIe drive is no longer an option, because the Lenovo ThinkPad T495 has only 250 GB of capacity, it has one and no second expansion slot. Therefore, here is a material about pumping T495, including about increasing the capacity of the drive.

Results for AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U and Vega 8

Unfortunately, the combination of an eight-thread processor and an eight-core video core is not fully disclosed, in particular, due to the very tight TDP framework. Theoretically, Vega 8 could at least take a playable FPS, but its frequencies never reach the promised ones. But the performance of the Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U is impressive, and in processor-dependent tasks it shows itself very worthy. And even in office work it works out at 100%, not yielding to competitors.

However, the processor is not 100% suitable for my personal goals. And it’s all about Premiere Pro, optimizing Intel HD for decoding. Therefore, I am extremely interested, firstly, in the tests of laptops on the 10th generation of Intel, and secondly, on the Ryzen 4000 Mobile, which, by their processor power alone, will have to pull out decoding even at 4K.

Read also: Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab Review: Smart Display Tablet

HP 15z Ryzen 5 3500U (2.10 GHz) RX Vega 8 Gaming Laptop Benchmarks

Compare with
Select..Acer Aspire 7 15 — $ 48,668Acer Aspire 7 A717-72G — $ 66,705 123,047CER CONCEPTD 3 Ezel — ₽ 97.401ACER Conceptd 7 — ₽ 116,816CERACER Conceptd 7 EZEL — ₽ 162,270CER NITRO 5 — ₽ 46,7666CER NITRO 5 15 — ₽ 49.652ACER NITRO 5 17 — ₽ 57,129ACER NITRO 73. Nitro 7 15-593 (GTX 1070) — ₽ 104,157ACER Predator G9-793 — ₽ 100.353ACER Predator Helios 300 PH417-54 — ₽ 81,2666CER Predator Helios 300 15 — ₽ 64,7373CELIOS 300 — ₽ 80.8733CER PREARIS HEL — ₽ 95,368Acer Predator Helios 500 17 — ₽ 122,719Acer Predator Helios 500 17 AMD — ₽ 103,567Acer Predator Helios 700 17 — ₽ 227,269Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52 — ₽ 84,349Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51 — ₽ 97,073Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52 Acer Predator Triton 900 PT917-71 — ₽ 278,495CER Predator Triton PT715-51 — ₽ 107. 502ACER SWIFT 3 SF315-41 — ₽ 44,536ACER SWIFT 3 SF315-41G — ₽ 42,306ASUS 15 Q537 — ₽ 97,401ASUS 2 -In -q535 — ₽ 129. ROG FX503 — ₽ 67,164ASUS ROG FX503 (GTX 1060) — ₽ 67.8866ASUS ROG FX550IU — ₽ 50.701ASUS ROG GL502 (GTX 1060) — ₽ 109.994ASUS ROG GL502 (GTX 1070) — ₽ 128,819ASUS ROG GL503 (GTX 1060) 91.892asus ROG GL503 (GTX 1070) — ₽ 126,261ASUS ROG GL553 (GTX 1050 TI) — ₽ 86,185ASUS ROG GL702 — ₽ 87,169ASUS ROG GL753 — ₽ 69,525ASUS ROG M15 — ₽ 76.281ASUS ROG STRIX G5137,336Asus ROG Strix G17 G712 — ₽ 97,336Asus ROG Strix G17 G713 — ₽ 97,336Asus ROG Strix G531 — ₽ 59,753Asus ROG Strix G531 — ₽ 70,116Asus ROG Strix GL504 (GTX 1060) — ₽ 85,595Asus ROG Strix GL504 (GTX 1070) — ₽ 102,255Asus ROG Strix GL731 — ₽ 117,341Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532 — ₽ 123,309Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533 — ₽ 129,868Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G732 — ₽ 214,283Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733 — ₽ 142,789Asus ROG Strix Scar GL703 — $113,012Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL504 (RTX 2060) — $109,994Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL504 (RTX 2070) — $113,077Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704 (RTX 2060) — $109,994Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704 (RTX 2070) Zephyrus Duo 15 — ₽ 142,855Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA401 — ₽ 63,622Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502 — ₽ 84,414Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503 — ₽ 97,336Asus ROG Zephyrus GA502 — ₽ 77,724Asus ROG Zephyrus GM501 (GTX 1060) — ₽ 116,160Asus ROG Zephyrus GM501 (GTX 1070) — $134,984Asus ROG Zephyrus GU502 — $116,488Asus ROG Zephyrus GX501 — $128,229Asus ROG Zephyrus GX502 — ₽ 122,981Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX502 — ₽ 97,270Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX531 — ₽ 122,981Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701 — ₽ 135,903Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX701 — ₽ 114,258Asus StudioBook ProArt 17 — ₽ 190,408Asus TUF A15 — ₽ 51,947Asus TUF A17 — ₽ 71,428Asus TUF Dash 15 — ₽ 74,641Asus TUF FX505 — ₽ 42,043Asus TUF FX565 — ₽ 112,684Asus TUF FX705 — ₽ 71,165Asus TUF FX705DY — ₽ 57,982Asus VivoBook 15 K570 — ₽ 50,570Asus ZenBook 15 UX533 — RUB 84,086Asus ZenBook 15 UX534 — RUB 70,575Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q528 — RUB 72,871Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX535 — RUB 84,349Asus ZenBook Pro Duo — ₽ 149,348Asus ZenBook Pro UX550 — ₽ 107,502Clevo N870 — ₽ 90,908Clevo N950 — ₽ 61,196Clevo N970 — ₽ 79,889Clevo NB50 — ₽ 56,473Clevo NH50 — ₽ 77,659Clevo NH58 — ₽ 53,259Clevo NH58 — ₽ 62,048Clevo NH58 — ₽ 88,612Clevo NH58 — ₽ 93,859Clevo NH70 — ₽ 65,787Clevo NH77 — ₽ 97,336Clevo NV41 — ₽ 101,533Clevo P650 (GTX 1060) — ₽ 77,396Clevo P650 (GTX 1070) — ₽ 107,305Clevo P750 — ₽ 119,833Clevo P955 — ₽ 106,846 Clevo P960 — ₽ 97,270 Clevo P960 (RTX 2070) — ₽ 109,798 Clevo P970 — ₽ 97. 795Clevo P970 (RTX 2070) — ₽ 106,649Clevo PA71 — ₽ 130,721Clevo PB51 — ₽ 112,290Clevo PB51 — ₽ 116,881Clevo PB71 — ₽ 113,143Clevo PC70 — ₽ 131,442Clevo X170KM — ₽ 159,056Dell Alienware 15 R4 — ₽ 132,754Dell Alienware 17 R5 — ₽ 126,261Dell Alienware m15 — ₽ 100,353Dell Alienware m15 R3 — ₽ 110,716Dell Alienware m15 R4 — ₽ 120,095Dell Alienware m17 — ₽ 126,589Dell Gaming G15 5510 — ₽ 52,144Dell Gaming G3 15 3500 — ₽ 47,422Dell Gaming G3 15 3590 — ₽ 61,655Dell Gaming G3 17 3779 — ₽ 61,523Dell Gaming G7 15 7500 — ₽ 90.842Dell Gaming G7 15 7588 — ₽ 77,724Dell Gaming GAMING G7 15 7590 — ₽ 123,047Dell Gaming G7 7700 — ₽ 80.741Dell Gaming G7 7790 (RTX 2060) — ₽ 72,411DELL GAMING GAMING G7 17 7790 (RTX 2070) Inspiron 15 5585 — ₽ 37,190Dell Inspiron 15 7501 — ₽ 71,362Dell Inspiron 15 7591 — ₽ 73,330Dell Precision 17 7730 — ₽ 128,491Dell Vostro 15 3583 — ₽ 41,715Dell Vostro 15 7590 (GTX 1050) — ₽ 78,118Dell Vostro 15 7590 ( GTX 1650) — $75,494Dell XPS 15 7590 — $68,148Dell XPS 15 9560 — $84,414Dell XPS 15 9570 — ₽ 99,041Gigabyte Aero 15 — ₽ 122,981Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic — ₽ 125,539Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED — ₽ 94,122Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED — ₽ 110,322Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED — ₽ 113,602Gigabyte Aero 15S OLED — ₽ 142,789Gigabyte Aero 15W — ₽ 129,540Gigabyte Aero 17 — ₽ 117,406Gigabyte Aorus 15 (RTX 2060) — ₽ 113,012Gigabyte Aorus 15 (RTX 2070) — ₽ 122,981Gigabyte Aorus 15G — ₽ 103,895Gigabyte Aorus 15G — ₽ 110,322Gigabyte Aorus 15P — ₽ 110,322Gigabyte Aorus 17G — ₽ 168,829Gigabyte Aorus 5 — ₽ 84,021Gigabyte Aorus 7 — ₽ 104,419HP 17 — ₽ 65,328HP 17Z — ₽ 45,979HP Elitebook 1050 G1 — ₽ 135,312HP Elitebook 755 G5 — ₽ 73,395HP ENVY 14T — ₽ 75,953HP ENVY X360 — ₽ 51,816HP ENVY X360 15Z — ₽ 58. 1 HP Omen 15t(GTX 1050) GTX 1070) — Rs.8HP Pavilion Gaming 15t (GTX 1050) — Rs. 49,193HP Pavilion Gaming 15t (GTX 1650) — Rs. 84,152HP Pavilion Gaming 16 — Rs. Create G7 — $156,760LG Ultra 17 — $83,103Lenovo Ideapad 330-15 AMD — $39,879Lenovo Ideapad 330S-15 AMD — $52,997Lenovo Ideapad 720S-15 — $83,299Lenovo Ideapad Gaming 3 15 — $45 — ₽ 66,705Lenovo Ideapad L340-17 (GTX 1050) — ₽ 68,410Lenovo Ideapad L340-17 (GTX 1650) — ₽ 74,051Lenovo Ideapad Legion Y520 — ₽ 55,227Lenovo Ideapad Legion Y530-15 — ₽ 57,457Lenovo Ideapad Legion Y720 — ₽ 71,231 Lenovo Ideapad Legion Y730-15 — ₽ 79,495Lenovo Ideapad Legion Y730-17 — ₽ 77,724Lenovo Ideapad Legion Y740-15 (RTX 2060) — ₽ 87,432Lenovo Ideapad Legion Y740-15 (RTX 2070) — ₽ 99,434 17 (RTX 2060) — ₽ 110.060lenovo Ideapad S340-15 — ₽ 39,420lenovo Ideapad S740-15 — ₽ 87.628LENOVO Legion 5 15 — ₽ 51.226LENOVO LEGION 5 — ₽ 83.103LENOVO LEGION 5I — ₽ 6i 17 — ₽ 6i 17 — ₽ 6i 17 — ₽ ₽ 86,316Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 15 — ₽ 118,193Lenovo Legion Y540-15 — ₽ 63,557Lenovo Legion Y540-17 — ₽ 85,726Lenovo Legion Y545-15 — ₽ 76,544Lenovo Legion Y740-15 — ₽ 116,160Lenovo Legion Y740-17 — ₽ 101,205 Lenovo ThinkBook 15p — RUB 66,443Lenovo Thinkpad E585 — RUB 41,453Lenovo Thinkpad T15g — RUB 112. 946Lenovo Thinkpad T15p — ₽ 84,086Lenovo Thinkpad X1 Extreme — ₽ 103,435Lenovo Yoga 720-15 — ₽ 76,806Lenovo Yoga C940-15 — ₽ 83,824MSI Creator 15 A10 — ₽ 87,628MSI Creator 15M A10 — ₽ 104,419MSI Creator 15M A9 — ₽ 74,576 MSI Creator 17 A10 — ₽ 116,816MSI Creator 17 B11 — ₽ 155,776MSI Creator 17 B11 — ₽ 227,204MSI Creator 17M A9 — ₽ 194,737MSI Creator P65 — ₽ 154,071MSI Creator Z16 A11 — ₽ 165,549MSI Gaming GE62 — ₽ 90,645MSI Gaming GE63 — RUB 125,539MSI Gaming GE65 — RUB 97,336MSI Gaming GE66 — RUB 110,257MSI Gaming GE66 — RUB 149,283MSI Gaming GE75 (RTX 2060) — ₽ 116,488MSI Gaming GE75 (RTX 2070) — ₽ 116,488MSI Gaming GE76 — ₽ 168,763MSI Gaming GE76 — ₽ 188,243MSI Gaming GE76 — ₽ 201,230MSI Gaming GF62 — ₽ 76,019MSI Gaming GF63 — ₽ 45,388MSI Gaming GF65 — ₽ 55,555MSI Gaming GF75 — ₽ 53,128MSI Gaming GL63 — ₽ 78,315MSI Gaming GL65 — ₽ 75,822MSI Gaming GL75 — ₽ 71,362MSI Gaming GP63 — ₽ 78,446MSI Gaming GP65 — ₽ 88,022MSI Gaming GP66 — ₽ 116,816MSI Gaming GP66 — RUB 129,803MSI Gaming GP73 (GTX 1050 Ti) — RUB 87,366MSI Gaming GP73 (GTX 1070) — RUB 103,567MSI Gaming GP75 — RUB 78,315MSI Gaming GP75 — RUB 82,643MSI Gaming GP76 — RUB 6. 296MSI Gaming GS63 — ₽ 98,451MSI Gaming GS65 (GTX 1070) — ₽ 116,422MSI Gaming GS65 (RTX 2060) — ₽ 122,981MSI Gaming GS66 — ₽ 87,956MSI Gaming GS75 — ₽ 119,833MSI Gaming GS76 — ₽ 129,803MSI Gaming GT63 — ₽ 129,475 MSI Gaming GT75 — ₽ 259,671MSI Gaming GT76 Titan DT — ₽ 292,138MSI Prestige 14 A10 — ₽ 64,541MSI Prestige 14 A11 — ₽ 90,842MSI Prestige 15 A10 — ₽ 90,908MSI Prestige 15 A11 — ₽ 117,275MSI Prestige P65 (GTX 1050 Ti) — RUB 77,659MSI Prestige P65 (GTX 1070) — RUB 115,832MSI Prestige PE62 — RUB 90,580MSI Prestige PS63 (GTX 1050 Ti) — RUB 97,073MSI Prestige PS63 (GTX 1050) — ₽ 90,580MSI Stealth 15M — ₽ 77,921MSI Stealth GS66 — ₽ 155,776Microsoft Surface Book 2 13.5 — ₽ 106,518Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5 — ₽ 110,322Microsoft Surface Book 3 15 — ₽ 129,803Razer Blade 15 2018 h3 — ₽ 104,091Razer Blade 15 2020 — ₽ 80,676Razer Blade Pro 17 (2021) — ₽ 149,348Samsung Notebook 9 Pro 15 NP940X5 — ₽ 71,231Samsung Notebook Odyssey NP800G5 (GTX 1050) — ₽ 129,475Samsung Notebook Odyssey NP800G5 (GTX 1060) — ₽ 77,724Samsung Notebook Odyssey NP850XBC — ₽ 129,540Samsung Notebook Odyssey Z 15. 6 — ₽ 116,553Tongfang GK5CP0Z — ₽ 99,369Tongfang GK5CP5X — ₽ 50,963Tongfang GK5CP6T — ₽ 90,842Tongfang GK5CQ7Z — ₽ 105,862Tongfang GK5CQ7Z (9th gen) — ₽ 112,356Tongfang GK5MP5V — ₽ 38,895Tongfang GK5MR0O — ₽ 66,902Tongfang GK5NP5O — ₽ 48,668Tongfang GK5NR0V — ₽ 58,375Tongfang GK7CP0S — ₽ 96,155Tongfang GK7CP0S (9th gen) — ₽ 102,648Tongfang GK7CP7S — ₽ 109,076Tongfang GK7CP7S (9th gen) — ₽ 115,570Tongfang GK7NR0R — ₽ 90,908Tongfang GM5MPHW — ₽ 110,322Tongfang GM5MQ8Y — ₽ 117,144Tongfang GM5NG0O — ₽ 97,401Tongfang GM5NG0Y — ₽ 110,388Tongfang GM5NG8W — ₽ 168,829Tongfang GM7MG7M — ₽ 136,362Tongfang GM7MG7P — ₽ 142,855Tongfang GM7MP0S — ₽ 74,641Tongfang GM7MPHP — ₽ 116,881Tongfang GM7NG0M — ₽ 110,388Tongfang GM7NG0P — ₽ 116,881Tongfang GM7NG0R — ₽ 97,401Xiaomi Mi Gaming 15.6 — RUB 95,171Xiaomi Mi Gaming 15.6 — RUB 73,789

Ryzen 5 3500U [in 20 benchmarks]

AMD
Ryzen 5 3500U

• Interface
• Core frequency
• Video memory size
• Memory type
• Memory frequency
• Maximum resolution

Description

AMD started AMD Ryzen 5 3500U sales on January 6, 2019. This is Picasso architecture notebook processor primarily aimed at office systems. It has 4 cores and 8 threads and is manufactured using 12 nm process technology, the maximum frequency is 3700 MHz, the multiplier is locked.

In terms of compatibility, this is an AMD Socket FP5 processor with a TDP of 15W. It supports memory
DDR4
dual-channel.

It provides poor benchmark performance at

7.01%

from the leader, which is AMD EPYC 7h22.

Ryzen 5
3500U

or

EPYC
7h22

General information

Information about the type (desktop or laptop) and architecture of the Ryzen 5 3500U, as well as the time when sales started and the cost at that time.

Place in the performance rating	951
place	7		of 14999 (Xeon Platinum 9282)

Features

Ryzen 5 3500U quantitative parameters such as number of cores and threads, clock speeds, manufacturing process, cache size and multiplier lock state. They indirectly speak about the performance of the processor, but for an accurate assessment, you need to consider the results of the tests.

Core	4
threads	+

RAM support

Types, maximum size and channels of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 3500U. Higher memory frequency may be supported depending on the motherboard.

RAM types	DDR4 Dual-channel	of 5200 (Ryzen 5 7600X)
Allowable memory General parameters of the integrated video card in Ryzen 5 3500U. GPU AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) Peripherals Ryzen 5 3500U supported peripherals and how to connect them. PCI Express revision 3. 0 of 5 (Core i9-12900K) Number of PCI-Express lanes 12 out of 128 (EPYC 7551P) Benchmark tests These are the Ryzen 5 3500U non-gaming benchmark results. The overall score is set from 0 to 100, where 100 corresponds to the fastest processor at the moment. Overall performance in tests This is our overall performance rating. We regularly improve our algorithms, but if you find any inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in the comments section, we usually fix problems quickly. Ryzen 5 3500U 7.01 Passmark GeekBench 5 Single Core GeekBench 5 Multi-Core Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core 3DMark06 CPU Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core Cinebench 11. 5 64-bit single-core TrueCrypt AES x264 encoding pass 2 x264 encoding pass 1 WinRAR 4.0 Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core Geekbench 2 Geekbench 4.0 64-bit multi-core Geekbench 4.0 64-bit single-core Passmark Passmark CPU Mark is a widely used benchmark consisting of 8 different tests, including integer and floating point calculations, extended instruction tests, compression, encryption and game physics calculations. Also includes a separate single-threaded test. Benchmark coverage: 68% Ryzen 5 3500U 7068 GeekBench 5 Single-Core GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application designed as CPU benchmarks that independently recreate certain real world tasks that can accurately measure performance. This version uses only one processor core. Benchmark coverage: 37% Ryzen 5 3500U 708 GeekBench 5 Multi-Core GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application designed as CPU benchmarks that independently recreate certain real world tasks that can accurately measure performance. This version uses all available processor cores. Benchmark coverage: 37% Ryzen 5 3500U 2482 Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core Cinebench R10 is a very outdated ray tracing benchmark for processors developed by the authors of Cinema 4D — Maxon. The Single-Core version uses a single CPU thread to render a futuristic motorcycle model. Benchmark coverage: 20% Ryzen 5 3500U 4558 Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 that uses all processor threads. The possible number of threads in this version is limited to 16. Benchmark coverage: 19% Ryzen 5 3500U 17231 3DMark06 CPU 3DMark06 is an outdated set of benchmarks based on DirectX 9 by Futuremark. Its processor part contains two tests, one of which calculates the pathfinding of game AI, the other emulates game physics using the PhysX package. Benchmark coverage: 19% Ryzen 5 3500U 5951 Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 that uses all processor threads. This version supports a maximum of 64 threads. Benchmark coverage: 17% Ryzen 5 3500U 8 Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core (sometimes referred to as Multi-Thread) is a variant of Cinebench R15 that uses all of the processor threads. Benchmark coverage: 14% Ryzen 5 3500U 650 Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core Cinebench R15 (Release 15) is a benchmark created by Maxon, the creator of the popular Cinema 4D 3D modeling package. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench using more modern variants of the Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes referred to as Single-Thread) uses only one CPU thread to render a room full of mirror balls and complexly shaped lights. Benchmark coverage: 13% Ryzen 5 3500U 143 Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core Cinebench R11.5 is an old Maxon development benchmark. authors of Cinema 4D. It has been superseded by later versions of Cinebench which use more modern variants of the Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads one CPU thread with ray tracing, rendering a glossy room full of crystal spheres and lights. Benchmark coverage: 13% Ryzen 5 3500U 1.7 TrueCrypt AES TrueCrypt is a deprecated program that was widely used to encrypt disk partitions on the fly. It contains several built-in benchmarks, one of which is TrueCrypt AES. It measures the speed of data encryption using the AES algorithm. The result of the test is the encryption speed in gigabytes per second. Benchmark coverage: 13% Ryzen 5 3500U 4 x264 encoding pass 2 x264 Pass 2 is a slower MPEG4 x264 video compression benchmark, resulting in a variable bit rate output file. This results in a better quality of the resulting video file, as a higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. The benchmark result is still measured in frames per second. Benchmark coverage: 12% Ryzen 5 3500U 39 x264 encoding pass 1 The x264 benchmark uses the MPEG 4 x264 compression method to encode the HD (720p) sample video. Pass 1 is a faster option that produces an output file at a constant bit rate. Its result is measured in frames per second, that is, how many frames of the source video file were encoded in one second on average. Benchmark coverage: 12% Ryzen 5 3500U 135 WinRAR 4.0 WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of the popular archiver. It contains an internal speed test using maximum compression by the RAR algorithm on large amounts of randomly generated data. Results are measured in kilobytes per second. Benchmark coverage: 12% Ryzen 5 3500U 2455 Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core Benchmark coverage: 6% Ryzen 5 3500U 13040 Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core Benchmark coverage: 6% Ryzen 5 3500U 3443 Geekbench 2 Benchmark coverage: 5% Ryzen 5 3500U 11917 Geekbench 4. 0 64-bit multi-core Benchmark coverage: 3% Ryzen 5 3500U 10597 Geekbench 4.0 64-bit single-core Benchmark coverage: 3% Ryzen 5 3500U 3669 Relative capacity Overall performance of the Ryzen 5 3500U compared to its nearest competitor in notebook processors. AMD Ryzen 7 3700U 102.71 Intel Core i7-7820HQ 101.14 Intel Core i7-4940MX 100.57 AMD Ryzen 5 3500U 100 Intel Core i7-6770HQ 99.86 Intel Core i7-5850EQ 99.57 Intel Core i7-10610U 99.43 Competitor from Intel We believe that the nearest equivalent to Ryzen 5 3500U from Intel is Core i7-6770HQ, which is approximately equal in speed and lower by 1 position in our rating. Core i7 6770HQ Compare Here are a few of Intel’s closest competitors to the Ryzen 5 3500U: Intel Core i7-6920HQ 104.28 Intel Core i7-7820HQ 101.14 Intel Core i7-4940MX 100.57 AMD Ryzen 5 3500U 100 Intel Core i7-6770HQ 99.86 Intel Core i7-5850EQ 99.57 Intel Core i7-10610U 99.43 Other processors Here we recommend several processors that are more or less similar in performance to the reviewed one. Core i7 6770HQ Compare Core i7 10610U Compare Core i7 7820HQ Compare Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U Compare Core i7 7700HQ Compare Ryzen 7 3700U Compare Recommended Graphics Cards Based on our statistics, these graphics cards are most commonly used with the Ryzen 5 3500U: Radeon RX Vega 8 38. 7% GeForce GTX 1650 7.1% GeForce GTX 1050 Ti 6.1% GeForce GTX 1060 6GB 3.6% Radeon RX Vega 11 2.7% Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) 2.5% GeForce GTX 1050 2.3% Radeon RX Vega 7 1.9% Radeon RX Vega 3 1.6% Radeon RX Vega Mobile 1.5% User rating Here you can see the evaluation of the processor by users, as well as put your own rating. Tips and comments Here you can ask a question about the Ryzen 5 3500U processor, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site. Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus. AMD Ryzen 5 3500U Processor Review and Test AMD Ryzen 5 3500U Review and Test Material information Author: Matvey Kochergin Category: AMD processors Published: September 15, 2019 Views: 126713 AMD has unveiled the new second generation Ryzen 5 3500U mobile processor with a maximum power consumption of about 15W and integrated Vega graphics. This processor, according to AMD, is designed for compact laptops, and is designed for both work and entertainment. Features of the microarchitecture Zen + (APUs Picasso) on which the new product was created made it possible to improve performance per clock by about 3% compared to first-generation processors at the same power consumption. The Ryzen 5 3500U has four compute cores that can process eight threads simultaneously. The operating frequencies of the novelty are 2.1 GHz in the nominal in overclocking mode, they can be increased up to 3.7 GHz. The built-in dual-channel memory controller supports the DDR4-2400 standard. The L2 cache is 512 KB per core, and the total L3 cache is 4 MB. As for architectural changes, there are practically none APUs Picasso differ little from their predecessors based on the Raven Ridge architecture. In terms of performance, the Ryzen 5 3500U is on par with the previous generation Ryzen 7 2700U processor (2.2-3.8 GHz), and the Ryzen 5 3500U will apparently have to compete with the Core i5-8250U. AMD made a comparison between the Ryzen 5 3500U and the Core i5-8250U, in which the AMD processor is not inferior in performance to an opponent from Intel in Microsoft Office applications, but at the same time outperforms the competitor in browsers by 14% and outperforms Intel in coding by 27%. files (in Adobe Photoshop). The processor has a Radeon Vega 8 graphics core, which includes 512 ALUs, 32 texture units and 16 raster units. The video card works at a frequency of up to 1200 MHz. Peak performance of Radeon Vega 8 reaches 1126 GFLOPS. AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 is also guaranteed to support DirectX 12 with feature level 12_1, OpenGL 4.6, Open CL 2.0 and Vulkan 1.0. AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 is fully suitable for simple office work, this integrated video card will also cope with multimedia tasks, since it is able to play video in any current resolution (even 4K at 60 fps). Specifications Manufacturer AMD Series Ryzen 5 Microarchitecture (AMD Zen) Number of cores/threads 4/8 Clock frequency 2.1-3.7GHz L3 cache 4MB Power input 15W Graphics core Radeon Vega 8 Actuators 512 Clock frequency (graphics) 1200 MHz Memory bus width 64/128 bit Memory (type, size) — DirectX DirectX 12, Shader 5. 0 Technology 12 N.m. Price — Synthetic tests The need to test the computer processor appears in the case of overclocking or comparing characteristics with other models. The built-in tools of the operating system do not allow this, so you need to use third-party software. Popular representatives of such software offer a choice of several analysis options. CineBench R15 rendering CINEBENCH cross-platform benchmark benchmark — a test widely used to evaluate the performance of Intel and AMD processors. It is based on the popular animation software CINEMA 4D of the German company MAXON, which is actively used by studios around the world to create 3D content. The CPU test involves rendering a certain scene in multi-threaded mode (all CPU cores are used). Rendering is the process of obtaining an image from a model using a computer program. Based on the result of the processor test, it is easy to calculate its speed — the faster the processor calculates the render, the more points it gets. CineBench R15  CPU Single  Intel Core i5-8250U 146 Intel  Core i7-8550U 162 Intel Core i7-8565U 169 AMD RYZEN 5 3500U 143 AMD Ryzen 7 2700u 148 AMD Ryzen 5 2500u 9000 9000 9000 9000 AMD Ryzen 3 2200u 117 CineBench R15  CPU Multi Intel Core i5-8250U 556 Intel Core i7-8550U 623 Intel Core i7-8565U 593 AMD Ryzen 5 3500u 650 AMD Ryzen 7 2700u 680 AMD Ryzen 5 2500u 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 AMD Ryzen 3 2200u 348 x264 HD Benchmark, this utility tests system performance when transcoding HD video to H. 264. The test is of great practical importance, since it is the most realistic task, and the applied x264 codec is used in many existing transcoding utilities. Benchmark Futuremark 3DMark Fire Strike includes all the most advanced developments in the field of computer graphics and physics. Therefore, it makes rather high demands not only on the video subsystem of the computer, but also on the capabilities of the processor. 3D Mark Fire Strike physics 1920×1080: 9425 X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 — Pass 2: 138 FPS X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 — Pass 1: 39.5 FPS 3DMark 3DMark Fire Strike is a beautiful and popular DirectX 11 API-enabled application for testing PCs with high performance gaming graphics cards in a Windows environment. The 3DMark Fire Strike results help evaluate the relative performance of the graphics card and its suitability for the most demanding PC games. 3DMark — Fire Strike Graphics 1920×1080 Nvidia GeForce MX150 (Intel Core i5-8250U) 3739 AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 (AMD Ryzen 5 2400G) 3599 AMD Radeon RX VEGA 11 (AMD Ryzen 5 3400G) 3681 NVIDIA GeForce MX130 (Intel Core i5-8250U) 9000 9000 9000 9000 AMD RADEON RX VEGA 10 (AMDEN RADEON RADEON RADEON RADEON RADEON RADEON RADEON RADEON RADEON RADEON0028 2469 AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (AMD Ryzen 3 2200G) 2036 AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (AMD Ryzen 5 3500U) 1981 Nvidia GeForce MX110 (Intel Core i5 -8250U) 1732 AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (AMD Ryzen 3 2300U) 1506 UHD Intel Graphics 630 (Intel Core i7-8086K) 1439 AMD Radeon RX Vega 3 (AMD Ryzen 3 3200U) 1301 Literally, FPS stands for «Frame per second», or frames per second. Accordingly, the larger this number, the smoother the picture on the display will be during the game. How many FPS is needed for a comfortable game? It is difficult to unequivocally answer this question, if only because in different game engines with the same number of frames per second, the image quality can be different. However, there is a widespread belief that 30 FPS will be enough for a smooth game. In gaming applications, the older model Vega 11 does not lag far behind the eight, by about 5-15 percent (depending on the specific game). Competitors from Intel, Vega 8 stably bypasses in all games and does not leave them any chances. This graphics card can provide smooth gameplay in games like The Division 2, Far Cry New Dawn at 720p display resolution and low detail. Next, we tested the RX Vega 8 in popular games at low graphics settings at a resolution of 1280×720 pixels, based on 60 frames per second (FPS). less than 25FPS Low Frameite 25-30FPS Average Framreta 30 FPS and more than Comfortable Framretite 9000 Display resolution: 1280×720 points. Graphics settings: low 60fps Metro EXODUS 18FPS30% FAR CRY New Dawn ,0002 ANTHEM ANTHEM ANTHA0028 25FPS42% Fortnite 67FPS100% Forza Horizon 4 35FPS43% 9000 9000 9000 9000 73FPS100 151 AMD Ryzen 5 4500U vs. 3500U This content was written by a website visitor and has been rewarded. Before the 4000th line of Ryzen processors in the desktop segment, there is still some time to wait. At the same time, in the world of mini-PCs and laptops, the Ryzen Mobile 4th series has already managed to register in a fairly large number of models, which is only getting bigger every day. At the same time, there are still many devices on sale based on the previous generation APU, which are often cheaper than new products. A clear reason to think about the validity of the overpayment, especially since I just had the opportunity to compare the fresh Ryzen 5 4500U with its direct predecessor Ryzen 5 3500U in the closest possible conditions. A little bit about Ryzen 4000 Mobile The first thing everyone who doesn’t follow closely the state of affairs of the AMD processor division should know is that the numbering of desktop and mobile chips diverges by one generation. That is, the laptop Ryzen 4000 , also known under the code designation Renoir , corresponds to the desktop Ryzen 3000. They are also based on the Zen 2 architecture and are manufactured using TSMC’s 7nm process technology. This made it possible to achieve an increase in almost all key characteristics of the new CPUs relative to their predecessors, while remaining within the same TDP limits. They got more physical cores, higher frequencies, and all this with an increased IPC (the number of instructions executed in one processor cycle). Together, these factors promise a significant superiority of fresh models. recommendations In addition to processor cores, AMD mobile chips also include graphics accelerators from the Radeon family. And here, to some disappointment of brand fans, there were no special improvements. Like the 3000 series, the new generation is equipped with graphics based on the Vega architecture (GCN 5.0). True, it is worth noting that AMD carried out a number of optimizations when transferring graphics to the 7nm process technology, which made it possible to achieve higher operating frequencies. However, at the same time, the number of computing units of graphics cores was reduced — we will talk about how this affected the performance of integrated graphics a little later. Another important advantage of the updated CPUs is support for faster memory — up to DDR4-3200 versus DDR4-2400. In addition to the general beneficial effect on performance, high-speed RAM also has a very positive effect on the performance of integrated graphics, which is devoid of its own video memory and has to rely on the system one. What are we comparing? In this comparison, we will evaluate the capabilities of the AMD Ryzen 5 3500U and its direct successor Ryzen 5 4500U . The first was introduced at the beginning of 2019 and entered the line of mobile APUs with the code designation Picasso. It is manufactured on the 12nm process technology based on the Zen + architecture, which is also used in desktop Ryzen 2nd generation. The Ryzen 5 3500U includes 4 physical cores that can process up to 8 data streams with support for SMT (Simultaneous MultiThreading) technology. The operating frequencies of this model are in the range from 2.3 to 3.7 GHz with a TDP of 15 watts. The graphics part is represented by the Radeon Vega 8 video chip with eight processing cores, which is equivalent to 512 stream processors with a maximum frequency of 1200 MHz. For the needs of graphical computing, 1 GB is allocated from the on-board RAM. Ryzen 5 4500U, like its predecessor, is at the bottom of the lineup — only 4300U is located below it. However, it got an impressive 6 physical cores. At the same time, the 4500U lacks support for SMT, and therefore each core is capable of processing only one data stream. In the context of the comparison, it will be interesting to look at the confrontation between the formula of 4 cores / 8 threads of the Zen + architecture with 6 cores / 6 threads based on Zen 2. True, higher frequencies will play on the side of the fresh model: the base value for the Ryzen 4500U is 2.3 GHz, overclockable up to 4 GHz. By the way, looking ahead a little, I’ll note that it really reaches the upper limit in real use and is able to hold it for all cores for some time. L2 and L3 caches also grew to 3 and 8 MB versus 2 and 4 MB, respectively. But the graphical part of the novelty, as I said, has become simpler. The built-in Radeon Vega video chip received only 6 computing units, which gives a total of 384 stream processors. The memory limit allocated for its needs has also been reduced — only 512 MB, although the BIOS of some laptops allows it to be increased. Test stands Obviously, it is not possible to test both processors on the same machine, so two different laptops were included in the comparison. Fortunately, I had a couple of very close models at my disposal for a while, which led me to the idea to make this comparison. The previous generation was represented by Huawei MateBook D 14, which appeared in Russian retail in early 2020. The second model was the updated Honor MagicBook 14, which is as close as possible in design to its relative under the Huawei brand, but equipped with a fresh APU. In this note, I will not dwell on it in detail, since this is already beyond the scope of comparison, but for everyone who is interested, I can offer to see a detailed review of this device on my YouTube channel. The table below shows the main parameters of both laptops. The tests were carried out with the Adrenalin 20.8.2 driver (the screenshot was taken with an earlier one) in the case of Huawei MateBook D 14 and Adrenalin 20.8.3 for the Honor MagicBook 14 Synthetic benchmarks 3DMark Let’s start with synthetics and our favorite 3DMark. What can I say — the advantage of the new version is obvious. Absolute values ​​are now on your screens, and if we talk about relative ones, then the Ryzen 5 4500U turned out to be faster from 5% if we take the results of the Fire Strike test, and up to a hard 37% in Night Raid. Moreover, which is even a little unexpected for me, according to graphic scores, the new percent is also ahead. Excellent effect from the higher frequency of the video chip. GeekBench 5 But in GeekBench, the graphics are no longer involved at all, so here you can just evaluate what turns out to be more effective — honest 6 Zen 2 cores, or 4 Zen + with SMT support. As you can see, the novelty won without a chance for a competitor in both single-core and multi-core modes. Single-core, by the way, is also no less important, as it allows you to directly evaluate the effect of a more recent architecture and increased frequencies. CIneBench R20 And one more test where you can evaluate both multithreading and single-core performance. What can I say … Here the novelty simply destroyed its predecessor. Plus 61% in single-core performance and +68% in multi-threaded mode. As they say, my respect. By the way, do not forget that TDP remained at the same level. PCMark 10 The last synthetic benchmark before testing with real games is PCMark, which emulates a variety of types of workload and gives a sort of overall performance rating. And according to him, the 4500U was faster by 25% compared to the previous generation model. Games I tested all games at 1280×720 resolution on medium graphics presets — if there were deviations from this rule somewhere, then this will be discussed separately. I chose these settings as the closest to the possible real use, because. Full HD gaming at high quality settings is clearly not what thin ultrabooks without a discrete video accelerator are designed for. As usual, all tests were carried out three times and the results were average. I didn’t record video clips this time because … Because writing video clips on ultrabooks with integrated graphics is such a pain 🙂 Assassin’s Creed: Odyssey First in line is Assassin’s Creed: Odyssey. And even on sparing settings, the game is by and large unplayable, either on one or the other processor. But, in the case of the new generation, there is still an increase, and if you look at the relative values, then this is almost 30% of the average fps. But still, if you are a fan of Assassin and expect to play it on a laptop, then it is better to look after a more gaming model. Resident Evil 3 Remake But the latest Resident Evil at the moment suddenly turned out to be faster on the old processor. Yes, quite a bit, but still. Perhaps the fact that the latest editions of Resident Evil are picky about the amount of video memory played a role here, and in the new product exactly half as much is allocated for the needs of the video chip. This is just a guess, but I couldn’t think of a better explanation. The Witcher 3 The Third Witcher doesn’t even fly in this mode, but, in principle, you can play in both cases. The novelty here is again faster and quite seriously — on average by almost 20%. Considering that this is an RPG, and rare drawdowns of up to 20-odd frames per second cannot fatally prevent, in principle, from going to the next one (or the first one, if you still haven’t passed it like me) — it’s quite possible. War Thunder Today we have War Thunder for online projects. With its excellent optimization, in fact, you can play even at high and in Full HD. Well, on such settings that I chose, neither the conditionally old Ryzen, nor, especially, the new one, has problems with it. If we talk about comparison, then + 30% performance in terms of the average number of frames per second when switching to a laptop with a new processor. GTAV The fifth GTA also shows decent performance on average, on “normal” settings, as they are called in the game, but in fact, it’s probably more correct to call them low. True, there is a problem with drawdowns at the minimum, and in the case of the new processor, they turned out to be even a little stronger. But on average, the advantage is 17%. Borderlands 3 Borderlands 3 also can not be called a suitable game for a compact laptop with integrated graphics — both on the old processor and on the new one can not speak of comfort. However, the Ryzen 5 4500U, at least on average, delivers more than 25 frames per second. Not the ultimate dream, but it’s not a gaming laptop either. Results If we talk about the overall average difference, then in synthetics MagicBook with the new processor turned out to be 33% faster. In games, the advantage is slightly more modest — 19%. In other words, there is growth and it is quite tangible. If the question is a laptop based on which CPU to choose, then you can be sure that the decision in favor of the novelty will not disappoint. Write your thoughts, additions and comments in the comments. Check out my YouTube channel for more articles 🙂 This material was written by a site visitor and has been rewarded. AMD Ryzen 5 3500U vs Intel Core i5-8265U: What is the difference? 53 Ballla AMD Ryzen 5 3500u 54 Ballla Intel Core i5-8265U Winter when compared to VS 64 AMD Ryzen 5 3500U 000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 INTER Is Ryzen 5 3500U better than Intel Core i5-8265U? 31.25% higher CPU speed? 4 x 2.1GHz vs 4 x 1.6GHz GPU frequency 900MHz higher? 1200MHz vs 300MHz Semiconductor size 2nm smaller? 12nm vs 14nm 1MB more L2 cache? 2MB vs 1MB 16. 13% higher PassMark score? 7119 vs 6130 128KB more L1 cache? 384KB vs 256KB 0.25MB/core more L2 cache per core? 0.5MB/core vs 0.25MB/core 93.57seconds faster Blender test result (bmw27)? 638.36seconds vs 731.93seconds 0.2GHz higher turbo clock speed? 3.9GHz vs 3.7GHz 2MB more L3 cache? 6MB vs 4MB 7.45% higher PassMark score (single)? 2135 vs 1987 32GB more max memory? 64GB vs 32GB 14.08% higher Geekbench 5 multi-core result? 2835 vs 2485 226.33seconds faster Blender (classroom) result? 1694.63seconds vs 1920.96seconds 30.13% higher single core Geekbench 5 result? 920 vs 707 0. 5MB/core more L3 cache per core? 1.5MB/core vs 1MB/core Which comparisons are the most popular? AMD RYZEN 5 3500U VS Intel Core i5-10210U Intel Core i5-8265U VS A9-9425 000 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS Intel Core i5-8265U vs AMD Ryzen 3 5300U AMD Ryzen 5 3500U vs Intel Core i3-10110U Intel Core i5-8265U vs Intel Pentium Silver N5030 AMD Ryzen 5 3500U vs Intel Core i5-8250U Intel Core i5-8265u VS AMD A6-9225 AMD RYZEN 5 3500U VS Intel Core i5-1135g7 Intel Core I5-8265U 9000 9000 000 9000 AMD Ry 5 3500U VS AMD Ryzen 5 5500u Intel Core i5-8265U VS Intel Core i5-1135G7 AMD Ryzen 5 3500U 9000 AMD Ryzen 3 5300u 9000 9000. 5 5000 I5 5300U 9000 INTRAL 3 5300U 9000 INTIL 3 5300U 9000 INTILS 3 5300U 9000 INTER vs AMD Ryzen 7 2700U AMD Ryzen 5 3500U vs Intel Core i5-1035G1 Intel Core i5-8265U vs Intel Core i3-1115G4 AMD Ryzen 5 3500U vs AMD RYZEN 3 3250U Intel Core i5-8265u VS Intel Core i3-10110u Comers 3 User reviews0009 3 reviews of users Functions Price and quality ratio 8.8 /10 8 Votes 8.3 /10 3 Votes 9000 9000 7.3 /10 3 Votes performance 8.6 /10 8 Votes /10 3 Votes 9000 9000 9000 009 9.3 /10 8 Votes 9.3 /10 3 Votes Energy efficiency 9.3 /10 8 Votes 9000 9000 9000 8.3 /10 9000 9 Votes 9 1. CPU speed 4 x 2.1GHz 4 x 1.6GHz The CPU speed indicates how many processing cycles per second a processor can perform, considering all its cores (processors). It is calculated by adding the clock speeds of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors, each group of cores. 2nd processor thread More threads result in better performance and better multitasking. 3.speed turbo clock 3.7GHz 3.9GHz When the processor is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance. 4. Has unlocked multiplier ✖AMD Ryzen 5 3500U ✖Intel Core i5-8265U Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier and are easier to overclock, allowing for better performance in games and other applications. 5.L2 Cache More L2 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning. 6.L3 cache More L3 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning. 7.L1 cache More L1 cache results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning. 8.core L2 0.5MB/core 0.25MB/core More data can be stored in the L2 scratchpad for access by each processor core. 9.core L3 1MB/core 1.5MB/core More data can be stored in the L3 scratchpad for access by each processor core. Memory 1.RAM speed 2400MHz 2400MHz Can support faster memory which speeds up system performance. 2.max memory bandwidth 35.76GB/s 37.5GB/s This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory. 3. DDR memory version DDR (Double Data Rate Synchronous Dynamic Random Access Memory) is the most common type of main memory. New versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy efficient. 4.Memory channels More memory channels increase the speed of data transfer between memory and processor. 5.maximum memory capacity Maximum memory capacity (RAM). 6.bus baud rate Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 3500U) The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device. 7.Supports memory troubleshooting code ✖AMD Ryzen 5 3500U ✖Intel Core i5-8265U Memory error recovery code can detect and repair data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server. 8.eMMC version Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 3500U) Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-8265U) The newer version of eMMC — built-in flash memory card — speeds up the memory interface, has a positive effect on device performance, for example, when transferring files from a computer to internal memory via USB. 9.bus frequency Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 3500U) Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-8265U) The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device Geotagging 1. PassMark result This test measures processor performance using multi-threading. 2. PassMark result (single) This test measures processor performance using a thread of execution. 3. Geekbench 5 result (multi-core) Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures the performance of a multi-core processor. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022) 4. Cinebench R20 result (multi-core) Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-8265U) Cinebench R20 is a benchmark that measures the performance of a multi-core processor by rendering a 3D scene. 5.Cinebench R20 result (single core) Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-8265U) Cinebench R20 is a test to evaluate the performance of a single core processor when rendering a 3D scene. 6.Geekbench 5 result (single core) Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform test that measures the single core performance of a processor. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022) 7. Blender test result (bmw27) 638.36seconds 731.93seconds Blender benchmark (bmw27) measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time. 8.Blender result (classroom) 1920.96seconds 1694.63seconds The Blender (classroom) test measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time. 9.performance per watt This means that the processor is more efficient, giving more performance per watt of power used. Features 1.uses multithreading ✔AMD Ryzen 5 3500U ✔Intel Core i5-8265U processor cores into logical cores, also known as threads. Thus, each core can run two instruction streams at the same time. 2. Has AES ✔AMD Ryzen 5 3500U ✔Intel Core i5-8265U AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption. 3. Has AVX ✔AMD Ryzen 5 3500U ✔Intel Core i5-8265U AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial applications, and to improve the performance of the Linux RAID program. 4.Version SSE SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing images or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements. 5. Has F16C ✔AMD Ryzen 5 3500U ✔Intel Core i5-8265U F16C is used to speed up tasks such as image contrast adjustment or volume control. 6 bits transmitted at the same time Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 3500U) Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-8265U) NEON provides faster media processing such as MP3 listening. 7. Has MMX ✔AMD Ryzen 5 3500U ✔Intel Core i5-8265U MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting image contrast or adjusting volume. 8. TrustZone enabled ✖AMD Ryzen 5 3500U ✖Intel Core i5-8265U Technology is integrated into the processor to ensure device security when using features such as mobile payments and video streaming through Digital Rights Management (DRM) ).