RTX 2060 benchmark with i7-8700K 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K benchmarks at Ultra Quality
Compare To
Select..AMD Radeon 530 Mobile — $ 636AMD Radeon 540 Mobile — $ 1,086AMD Radeon HD 6850 — $ 199AMD Radeon HD 6870 — $ 199AMD Radeon HD 6950 — $ 250AMD Radeon HD 6970 — $ 299AMD Radeon HD 6990 — $ 699AMD Radeon HD 7750 — $ 140AMD Radeon HD 7750M — $ 858AMD Radeon HD 7790 — $ 149AMD Radeon HD 7850 — $ 249AMD Radeon HD 7850M — $ 964AMD Radeon HD 7950 — $ 149AMD Radeon HD 7950M — $ 1,023AMD Radeon HD 7970 — $ 299AMD Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition — $ 299AMD Radeon HD 7970M — $ 1,079AMD Radeon HD 7990 — $ 999AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 Mobile — $ 1,959AMD Radeon R5 — $ 710AMD Radeon R5 — $ 701AMD Radeon R7 250 — $ 95AMD Radeon R7 265 — $ 149AMD Radeon R7 370 — $ 202AMD Radeon R9 270 — $ 275AMD Radeon R9 280 — $ 350AMD Radeon R9 280X — $ 350AMD Radeon R9 285 — $ 380AMD Radeon R9 290 — $ 310AMD Radeon R9 290X — $ 399AMD Radeon R9 295X2 — $ 1,499AMD Radeon R9 380 — $ 299AMD Radeon R9 380X — $ 229AMD Radeon R9 390 — $ 465AMD Radeon R9 390X — $ 495AMD Radeon R9 FURY — $ 549AMD Radeon R9 FURY X — $ 649AMD Radeon R9 M270X — $ 1,016AMD Radeon R9 M280X — $ 1,070AMD Radeon R9 M280X 2GB — $ 1,070AMD Radeon R9 M290X — $ 1,209AMD Radeon R9 M380 — $ 1,074AMD Radeon R9 Nano — $ 1,529AMD Radeon RX 460 — $ 140AMD Radeon RX 470 — $ 342AMD Radeon RX 470 Mobile — $ 1,203AMD Radeon RX 480 — $ 399AMD Radeon RX 480 Mobile — $ 1,275AMD Radeon RX 540 Mobile — $ 645AMD Radeon RX 550 — $ 74AMD Radeon RX 550 Mobile — $ 923AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 4GB — $ 169AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 8GB — $ 199AMD Radeon RX 550X Mobile — $ 923AMD Radeon RX 560 — $ 99AMD Radeon RX 560 Mobile — $ 987AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT — $ 279AMD Radeon RX 560X Mobile — $ 641AMD Radeon RX 560X Mobile 2GB — $ 987AMD Radeon RX 570 — $ 123AMD Radeon RX 570 Mobile — $ 1,260AMD Radeon RX 5700 — $ 349AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT — $ 399AMD Radeon RX 580 — $ 151AMD Radeon RX 580 Mobile — $ 1,307AMD Radeon RX 580X Mobile — $ 1,307AMD Radeon RX 590 — $ 214AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT — $ 379AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT — $ 479AMD Radeon RX 6800 — $ 579AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT — $ 649AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT — $ 999AMD Radeon RX VEGA 10 — $ 632AMD Radeon RX VEGA 3 — $ 567AMD Radeon RX VEGA 6 — $ 1,119AMD Radeon RX VEGA 8 — $ 601AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 — $ 269AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 Mobile — $ 1,579AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 — $ 419AMD Radeon VII — $ 664ATI Radeon HD 4870 — $ 299NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 — $ 79NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 — $ 79NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 — $ 199NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 — $ 129NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q — $ 1,282NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile — $ 750NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 2GB — $ 1,062NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti — $ 129NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q — $ 1,270NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile — $ 876NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB — $ 170NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB — $ 159NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q — $ 1,185NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile — $ 987NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 — $ 329NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q — $ 1,106NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile — $ 1,559NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti — $ 503NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 — $ 522NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q — $ 1,955NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile — $ 1,857NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti — $ 807NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 — $ 149NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q — $ 1,239NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile — $ 1,151NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER — $ 160NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 — $ 220NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER — $ 229NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti — $ 279NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q — $ 1,185NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile — $ 1,758NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 — $ 449NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 — $ 299NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280 — $ 649NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 — $ 249NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470 — $ 299NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 — $ 499NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti — $ 199NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 — $ 153NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti — $ 220NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 — $ 349NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 — $ 399NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590 — $ 699NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 — $ 49NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti — $ 64NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost — $ 169NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 — $ 79NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti — $ 299NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M — $ 987NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 — $ 79NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M — $ 1,058NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670MX — $ 1,058NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 — $ 485NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M — $ 1,083NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 — $ 439NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti — $ 279NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 — $ 320NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M — $ 1,036NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 — $ 179NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M — $ 1,100NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 — $ 355NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti — $ 410NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M — $ 1,162NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M — $ 1,162NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 — $ 89NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 — $ 89NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M — $ 1,066NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 — $ 449NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M — $ 1,249NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M 6GB — $ 1,249NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 — $ 249NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Mobile — $ 1,345NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti — $ 619NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M — $ 1,345NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980MX — $ 1,345NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN — $ 650NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK — $ 999NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X — $ 1,099NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile — $ 1,104NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER — $ 400NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 — $ 469NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q — $ 1,516NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile — $ 1,724NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER — $ 499NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 — $ 693NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q — $ 1,772NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile — $ 1,942NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER — $ 699NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti — $ 1,187NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 — $ 200NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti — $ 249NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 — $ 329NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti — $ 399NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 — $ 499NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti — $ 599NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 — $ 699NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti — $ 799NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 — $ 1,499NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 — $ 200NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 — $ 329NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti — $ 399NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 — $ 499NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 — $ 699NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Ti — $ 799NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 — $ 1,499NVIDIA TITAN RTX — $ 2,499NVIDIA TITAN V — $ 2,999NVIDIA TITAN Xp — $ 1,199
Change CPU To
Select. .AMD Athlon 5000 Dual-Core — $ 100AMD Athlon 5200 Dual-Core — $ 30AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4200+ — $ 130AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4400+ — $ 60AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4600+ — $ 360AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4800+ — $ 460AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5000+ — $ 331.5AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5200+ — $ 53.1AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5400+ — $ 53AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5600+ — $ 150AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5800+ — $ 25AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 6000+ — $ 46AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 6400+ — $ 260AMD Athlon 7550 Dual-Core — $ 60AMD Athlon 7750 Dual-Core — $ 148.7AMD Athlon 7850 Dual-Core — $ 209.7AMD Athlon Dual Core 5000B — $ 95AMD Athlon II X2 215 — $ 12AMD Athlon II X2 220 — $ 32.2AMD Athlon II X2 240 — $ 35AMD Athlon II X2 245 — $ 35AMD Athlon II X2 250 — $ 39AMD Athlon II X2 255 — $ 65.2AMD Athlon II X2 260 — $ 20AMD Athlon II X2 265 — $ 82.9AMD Athlon II X2 270 — $ 24AMD Athlon II X2 B22 — $ 36AMD Athlon II X2 B24 — $ 40AMD Athlon II X2 B28 — $ 49.1AMD Athlon II X3 425 — $ 104.
2AMD Athlon II X3 435 — $ 50AMD Athlon II X3 440 — $ 47AMD Athlon II X3 445 — $ 91AMD Athlon II X3 450 — $ 40AMD Athlon II X3 455 — $ 116.9AMD Athlon II X3 460 — $ 50AMD Athlon II X4 620 — $ 60AMD Athlon II X4 630 — $ 43AMD Athlon II X4 631 Quad-Core — $ 80AMD Athlon II X4 635 — $ 70AMD Athlon II X4 640 — $ 80AMD Athlon II X4 641 Quad-Core — $ 91.5AMD Athlon II X4 645 — $ 50AMD Athlon X4 740 Quad Core — $ 277AMD Athlon X4 760K Quad Core — $ 46AMD Athlon X4 840 — $ 78.7AMD Athlon X4 845 — $ 50AMD Athlon X4 860K — $ 64AMD Athlon X4 870K — $ 80AMD Athlon X4 880K — $ 90AMD Athlon X4 950 — $ 60AMD E2-3200 APU — $ 8AMD FX-4100 Quad-Core — $ 130AMD FX-4130 Quad-Core — $ 76AMD FX-4170 Quad-Core — $ 100AMD FX-4200 Quad-Core — $ 228.2AMD FX-4300 Quad-Core — $ 53.4AMD FX-4350 Quad-Core — $ 130AMD FX-6200 Six-Core — $ 340AMD FX-6300 Six-Core — $ 59AMD FX-6350 Six-Core — $ 130AMD FX-8120 Eight-Core — $ 100AMD FX-8150 Eight-Core — $ 383.5AMD FX-8300 Eight-Core — $ 80.6AMD FX-8320 Eight-Core — $ 79.5AMD FX-8320E Eight-Core — $ 98.
9AMD FX-8350 Eight-Core — $ 80AMD FX-8370 Eight-Core — $ 135AMD FX-8370E Eight-Core — $ 180AMD FX-9370 Eight-Core — $ 178.9AMD FX-9590 Eight-Core — $ 122AMD Phenom 8250e Triple-Core — $ 47AMD Phenom 8450 Triple-Core — $ 30AMD Phenom 8600 Triple-Core — $ 53AMD Phenom 8600B Triple-Core — $ 53AMD Phenom 8650 Triple-Core — $ 50AMD Phenom 9100e Quad-Core — $ 40AMD Phenom 9150e Quad-Core — $ 40AMD Phenom 9350e Quad-Core — $ 3382.1AMD Phenom 9450e Quad-Core — $ 105AMD Phenom 9500 Quad-Core — $ 60AMD Phenom 9550 Quad-Core — $ 40AMD Phenom 9600 Quad-Core — $ 50AMD Phenom 9600B Quad-Core — $ 147.2AMD Phenom 9650 Quad-Core — $ 55AMD Phenom 9750 Quad-Core — $ 60AMD Phenom 9850 Quad-Core — $ 50AMD Phenom 9950 Quad-Core — $ 180AMD Phenom II X2 545 — $ 44AMD Phenom II X2 550 — $ 50AMD Phenom II X2 555 — $ 142.1AMD Phenom II X2 565 — $ 30AMD Phenom II X2 B55 — $ 48AMD Phenom II X3 705e — $ 152.3AMD Phenom II X3 710 — $ 84.5AMD Phenom II X3 720 — $ 70AMD Phenom II X3 B73 — $ 75AMD Phenom II X4 805 — $ 174AMD Phenom II X4 810 — $ 116AMD Phenom II X4 820 — $ 75AMD Phenom II X4 840 — $ 90AMD Phenom II X4 905e — $ 212.
4AMD Phenom II X4 910 — $ 100AMD Phenom II X4 910e — $ 157AMD Phenom II X4 920 — $ 67AMD Phenom II X4 925 — $ 160AMD Phenom II X4 940 — $ 120AMD Phenom II X4 945 — $ 50AMD Phenom II X4 955 — $ 130.2AMD Phenom II X4 960T — $ 135AMD Phenom II X4 965 — $ 59.5AMD Phenom II X4 B95 — $ 73AMD Phenom II X4 B97 — $ 90AMD Phenom II X6 1035T — $ 189AMD Phenom II X6 1045T — $ 175AMD Phenom II X6 1055T — $ 185AMD Phenom II X6 1075T — $ 260AMD Phenom II X6 1090T — $ 396.1AMD Phenom II X6 1100T — $ 200AMD Phenom X3 8550 — $ 170AMD Ryzen 3 1200 — $ 95AMD Ryzen 3 1300X — $ 125AMD Ryzen 3 2200G — $ 98AMD Ryzen 3 3100 — $ 90AMD Ryzen 3 3200G — $ 99AMD Ryzen 3 3300X — $ 120AMD Ryzen 5 1400 — $ 134AMD Ryzen 5 1500X — $ 144.9AMD Ryzen 5 1600 — $ 155AMD Ryzen 5 1600X — $ 178.4AMD Ryzen 5 2400G — $ 159AMD Ryzen 5 2600 — $ 150AMD Ryzen 5 2600X — $ 210AMD Ryzen 5 3400G — $ 150AMD Ryzen 5 3500 — $ 148AMD Ryzen 5 3500X — $ 160.5AMD Ryzen 5 3600 — $ 199AMD Ryzen 5 3600X — $ 249AMD Ryzen 5 5500 — $ 160AMD Ryzen 5 5600X — $ 299AMD Ryzen 7 1700 — $ 190AMD Ryzen 7 1700X — $ 200AMD Ryzen 7 1800X — $ 250AMD Ryzen 7 2700 — $ 249.
2AMD Ryzen 7 2700X — $ 305AMD Ryzen 7 3700X — $ 330AMD Ryzen 7 3800X — $ 399AMD Ryzen 7 5700X — $ 300AMD Ryzen 7 5800X — $ 399AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D — $ 450AMD Ryzen 9 3900X — $ 499AMD Ryzen 9 3950X — $ 750AMD Ryzen 9 5900X — $ 499AMD Ryzen 9 5950X — $ 710AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X — $ 350AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X — $ 420AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X — $ 680AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X — $ 900AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX — $ 1720Intel Core i3-10100 — $ 122Intel Core i3-10300 — $ 143Intel Core i3-11100 — $ 122Intel Core i3-11300 — $ 143Intel Core i3-12100 — $ 122Intel Core i3-12300 — $ 143Intel Core i3-2100 @ 3.10GHz — $ 60Intel Core i3-2102 @ 3.10GHz — $ 58Intel Core i3-2105 @ 3.10GHz — $ 80Intel Core i3-2120 @ 3.30GHz — $ 30Intel Core i3-2125 @ 3.30GHz — $ 199Intel Core i3-2130 @ 3.40GHz — $ 70Intel Core i3-3210 @ 3.20GHz — $ 100Intel Core i3-3220 @ 3.30GHz — $ 34.9Intel Core i3-3225 @ 3.30GHz — $ 100Intel Core i3-3240 @ 3.40GHz — $ 46Intel Core i3-3245 @ 3.40GHz — $ 80Intel Core i3-3250 @ 3.
50GHz — $ 95Intel Core i3-4130 @ 3.40GHz — $ 140Intel Core i3-4150 @ 3.50GHz — $ 260Intel Core i3-4160 @ 3.60GHz — $ 140Intel Core i3-4170 @ 3.70GHz — $ 150Intel Core i3-4330 @ 3.50GHz — $ 180Intel Core i3-4340 @ 3.60GHz — $ 170Intel Core i3-4350 @ 3.60GHz — $ 170Intel Core i3-4360 @ 3.70GHz — $ 280Intel Core i3-4370 @ 3.80GHz — $ 450Intel Core i3-530 @ 2.93GHz — $ 20Intel Core i3-540 @ 3.07GHz — $ 21Intel Core i3-550 @ 3.20GHz — $ 180Intel Core i3-560 @ 3.33GHz — $ 30Intel Core i3-6098P @ 3.60GHz — $ 133.7Intel Core i3-6100 @ 3.70GHz — $ 166.1Intel Core i3-6300 @ 3.80GHz — $ 143Intel Core i3-6320 @ 3.90GHz — $ 160Intel Core i3-7100 @ 3.90GHz — $ 170Intel Core i3-7300 @ 4.00GHz — $ 210Intel Core i3-7320 @ 4.10GHz — $ 174.8Intel Core i3-7350K @ 4.20GHz — $ 230Intel Core i3-8100 @ 3.60GHz — $ 130Intel Core i3-8300 @ 3.70GHz — $ 179.4Intel Core i3-8350K @ 4.00GHz — $ 184Intel Core i3-9100 @ 3.60GHz — $ 170Intel Core i3-9100F @ 3.60GHz — $ 105Intel Core i3-9320 @ 3.70GHz — $ 162Intel Core i3-9350KF @ 4.
00GHz — $ 224Intel Core i5 750S @ 2.40GHz — $ 100Intel Core i5-10400 — $ 182Intel Core i5-10600K — $ 236.8Intel Core i5-11400 — $ 182Intel Core i5-11600K — $ 262Intel Core i5-12400 — $ 143Intel Core i5-12600K — $ 290Intel Core i5-2300 @ 2.80GHz — $ 80Intel Core i5-2310 @ 2.90GHz — $ 80Intel Core i5-2320 @ 3.00GHz — $ 195.3Intel Core i5-2380P @ 3.10GHz — $ 90Intel Core i5-2400 @ 3.10GHz — $ 84Intel Core i5-2400S @ 2.50GHz — $ 65.7Intel Core i5-2405S @ 2.50GHz — $ 164.4Intel Core i5-2450P @ 3.20GHz — $ 90Intel Core i5-2500 @ 3.30GHz — $ 105Intel Core i5-2500K @ 3.30GHz — $ 124Intel Core i5-2500S @ 2.70GHz — $ 75Intel Core i5-2550K @ 3.40GHz — $ 130Intel Core i5-3330 @ 3.00GHz — $ 100Intel Core i5-3330S @ 2.70GHz — $ 95Intel Core i5-3340 @ 3.10GHz — $ 262Intel Core i5-3340S @ 2.80GHz — $ 150Intel Core i5-3350P @ 3.10GHz — $ 170Intel Core i5-3450 @ 3.10GHz — $ 128Intel Core i5-3450S @ 2.80GHz — $ 100Intel Core i5-3470 @ 3.20GHz — $ 125Intel Core i5-3470S @ 2.90GHz — $ 140.1Intel Core i5-3475S @ 2.
90GHz — $ 143.5Intel Core i5-3550 @ 3.30GHz — $ 330Intel Core i5-3550S @ 3.00GHz — $ 341Intel Core i5-3570 @ 3.40GHz — $ 140Intel Core i5-3570K @ 3.40GHz — $ 144Intel Core i5-3570S @ 3.10GHz — $ 285Intel Core i5-4430 @ 3.00GHz — $ 180Intel Core i5-4430S @ 2.70GHz — $ 160Intel Core i5-4440 @ 3.10GHz — $ 170Intel Core i5-4440S @ 2.80GHz — $ 463Intel Core i5-4460 @ 3.20GHz — $ 170Intel Core i5-4460S @ 2.90GHz — $ 660Intel Core i5-4570 @ 3.20GHz — $ 175Intel Core i5-4570S @ 2.90GHz — $ 221.6Intel Core i5-4590 @ 3.30GHz — $ 185Intel Core i5-4590S @ 3.00GHz — $ 198Intel Core i5-4670 @ 3.40GHz — $ 188Intel Core i5-4670K @ 3.40GHz — $ 250Intel Core i5-4670R @ 3.00GHz — $ 276Intel Core i5-4690 @ 3.50GHz — $ 200Intel Core i5-4690K @ 3.50GHz — $ 200Intel Core i5-4690S @ 3.20GHz — $ 269.9Intel Core i5-5675C @ 3.10GHz — $ 400Intel Core i5-6400 @ 2.70GHz — $ 200Intel Core i5-6402P @ 2.80GHz — $ 190Intel Core i5-650 @ 3.20GHz — $ 100Intel Core i5-6500 @ 3.20GHz — $ 234.4Intel Core i5-655K @ 3.20GHz — $ 60Intel Core i5-660 @ 3.
33GHz — $ 49Intel Core i5-6600 @ 3.30GHz — $ 220Intel Core i5-6600K @ 3.50GHz — $ 288.9Intel Core i5-661 @ 3.33GHz — $ 100Intel Core i5-670 @ 3.47GHz — $ 90Intel Core i5-680 @ 3.60GHz — $ 90Intel Core i5-7400 @ 3.00GHz — $ 213.5Intel Core i5-750 @ 2.67GHz — $ 160.5Intel Core i5-7500 @ 3.40GHz — $ 210Intel Core i5-760 @ 2.80GHz — $ 100Intel Core i5-7600 @ 3.50GHz — $ 240Intel Core i5-7600K @ 3.80GHz — $ 251Intel Core i5-7640X @ 4.00GHz — $ 250Intel Core i5-8400 @ 2.80GHz — $ 200Intel Core i5-8500 @ 3.00GHz — $ 239Intel Core i5-8600 @ 3.10GHz — $ 244.5Intel Core i5-8600K @ 3.60GHz — $ 377.7Intel Core i5-9400 @ 2.90GHz — $ 170Intel Core i5-9400F @ 2.90GHz — $ 170Intel Core i5-9600K @ 3.70GHz — $ 280Intel Core i5-9600KF @ 3.70GHz — $ 215Intel Core i7-10700K — $ 409.1Intel Core i7-11700K — $ 410Intel Core i7-12700K — $ 470Intel Core i7-2600 @ 3.40GHz — $ 150Intel Core i7-2600K @ 3.40GHz — $ 198Intel Core i7-2600S @ 2.80GHz — $ 200Intel Core i7-2700K @ 3.50GHz — $ 200Intel Core i7-3770 @ 3.40GHz — $ 179Intel Core i7-3770K @ 3.
50GHz — $ 249Intel Core i7-3770S @ 3.10GHz — $ 200Intel Core i7-3820 @ 3.60GHz — $ 200Intel Core i7-3930K @ 3.20GHz — $ 399Intel Core i7-3960X @ 3.30GHz — $ 800Intel Core i7-3970X @ 3.50GHz — $ 954Intel Core i7-4770 @ 3.40GHz — $ 240Intel Core i7-4770K @ 3.50GHz — $ 285Intel Core i7-4770S @ 3.10GHz — $ 250Intel Core i7-4771 @ 3.50GHz — $ 300Intel Core i7-4790 @ 3.60GHz — $ 279Intel Core i7-4790K @ 4.00GHz — $ 307Intel Core i7-4790S @ 3.20GHz — $ 342.6Intel Core i7-4820K @ 3.70GHz — $ 500Intel Core i7-4930K @ 3.40GHz — $ 399Intel Core i7-4960X @ 3.60GHz — $ 770Intel Core i7-5775C @ 3.30GHz — $ 450Intel Core i7-5820K @ 3.30GHz — $ 300Intel Core i7-5930K @ 3.50GHz — $ 499Intel Core i7-5960X @ 3.00GHz — $ 770Intel Core i7-6700 @ 3.40GHz — $ 433.7Intel Core i7-6700K @ 4.00GHz — $ 335Intel Core i7-6800K @ 3.40GHz — $ 420Intel Core i7-6850K @ 3.60GHz — $ 550Intel Core i7-6900K @ 3.20GHz — $ 1200Intel Core i7-6950X @ 3.00GHz — $ 1576Intel Core i7-7700 @ 3.60GHz — $ 325.1Intel Core i7-7700K @ 4.
20GHz — $ 355Intel Core i7-7740X @ 4.30GHz — $ 349Intel Core i7-7800X @ 3.50GHz — $ 370Intel Core i7-7820X @ 3.60GHz — $ 930Intel Core i7-8086K @ 4.00GHz — $ 553Intel Core i7-860 @ 2.80GHz — $ 290Intel Core i7-860S @ 2.53GHz — $ 200Intel Core i7-870 @ 2.93GHz — $ 310Intel Core i7-8700 @ 3.20GHz — $ 454.5Intel Core i7-8700K @ 3.70GHz — $ 369.9Intel Core i7-875K @ 2.93GHz — $ 200Intel Core i7-880 @ 3.07GHz — $ 583Intel Core i7-920 @ 2.67GHz — $ 174Intel Core i7-930 @ 2.80GHz — $ 60Intel Core i7-940 @ 2.93GHz — $ 70.7Intel Core i7-950 @ 3.07GHz — $ 245Intel Core i7-960 @ 3.20GHz — $ 100Intel Core i7-965 @ 3.20GHz — $ 140Intel Core i7-970 @ 3.20GHz — $ 150Intel Core i7-9700 @ 3.00GHz — $ 330Intel Core i7-9700F @ 3.00GHz — $ 368Intel Core i7-9700K @ 3.60GHz — $ 410Intel Core i7-975 @ 3.33GHz — $ 180Intel Core i7-980 @ 3.33GHz — $ 200Intel Core i7-980X @ 3.33GHz — $ 220Intel Core i7-990X @ 3.47GHz — $ 350Intel Core i9-10900K — $ 590Intel Core i9-11900K — $ 488Intel Core i9-12900K — $ 590Intel Core i9-7900X @ 3.
30GHz — $ 1380Intel Core i9-7920X @ 2.90GHz — $ 1096.7Intel Core i9-7940X @ 3.10GHz — $ 1192.1Intel Core i9-7960X @ 2.80GHz — $ 2000Intel Core i9-7980XE @ 2.60GHz — $ 2005.5Intel Core i9-9900 @ 3.10GHz — $ 440Intel Core i9-9900K @ 3.60GHz — $ 835Intel Core2 Duo E4300 @ 1.80GHz — $ 158Intel Core2 Duo E4400 @ 2.00GHz — $ 9Intel Core2 Duo E4500 @ 2.20GHz — $ 40Intel Core2 Duo E4600 @ 2.40GHz — $ 158Intel Core2 Duo E4700 @ 2.60GHz — $ 100Intel Core2 Duo E6300 @ 1.86GHz — $ 13Intel Core2 Duo E6320 @ 1.86GHz — $ 50Intel Core2 Duo E6400 @ 2.13GHz — $ 20Intel Core2 Duo E6420 @ 2.13GHz — $ 50Intel Core2 Duo E6550 @ 2.33GHz — $ 15Intel Core2 Duo E6600 @ 2.40GHz — $ 15Intel Core2 Duo E6700 @ 2.66GHz — $ 30Intel Core2 Duo E6750 @ 2.66GHz — $ 13Intel Core2 Duo E6850 @ 3.00GHz — $ 50Intel Core2 Duo E7200 @ 2.53GHz — $ 75Intel Core2 Duo E7300 @ 2.66GHz — $ 20Intel Core2 Duo E7400 @ 2.80GHz — $ 29Intel Core2 Duo E7500 @ 2.93GHz — $ 15Intel Core2 Duo E7600 @ 3.06GHz — $ 120Intel Core2 Duo E8200 @ 2.66GHz — $ 50Intel Core2 Duo E8300 @ 2.
83GHz — $ 20Intel Core2 Duo E8400 @ 3.00GHz — $ 9.8Intel Core2 Duo E8500 @ 3.16GHz — $ 40Intel Core2 Duo E8600 @ 3.33GHz — $ 50Intel Core2 Extreme Q6800 @ 2.93GHz — $ 1125Intel Core2 Extreme Q6850 @ 3.00GHz — $ 1496Intel Core2 Extreme X6800 @ 2.93GHz — $ 263.6Intel Core2 Extreme X9650 @ 3.00GHz — $ 909Intel Core2 Extreme X9770 @ 3.20GHz — $ 1609Intel Core2 Extreme X9775 @ 3.20GHz — $ 1806Intel Core2 Quad Q6600 @ 2.40GHz — $ 40Intel Core2 Quad Q6700 @ 2.66GHz — $ 45Intel Core2 Quad Q8200 @ 2.33GHz — $ 23Intel Core2 Quad Q8300 @ 2.50GHz — $ 50Intel Core2 Quad Q8400 @ 2.66GHz — $ 99.5Intel Core2 Quad Q9300 @ 2.50GHz — $ 50Intel Core2 Quad Q9400 @ 2.66GHz — $ 34Intel Core2 Quad Q9450 @ 2.66GHz — $ 335Intel Core2 Quad Q9500 @ 2.83GHz — $ 35Intel Core2 Quad Q9505 @ 2.83GHz — $ 190Intel Core2 Quad Q9550 @ 2.83GHz — $ 49Intel Core2 Quad Q9650 @ 3.00GHz — $ 69.8Intel Pentium G2010 @ 2.80GHz — $ 34.9Intel Pentium G2020 @ 2.90GHz — $ 32.9Intel Pentium G2030 @ 3.00GHz — $ 41Intel Pentium G2120 @ 3.
10GHz — $ 46Intel Pentium G2130 @ 3.20GHz — $ 50Intel Pentium G2140 @ 3.30GHz — $ 50Intel Pentium G3220 @ 3.00GHz — $ 120Intel Pentium G3240 @ 3.10GHz — $ 80Intel Pentium G3250 @ 3.20GHz — $ 110Intel Pentium G3258 @ 3.20GHz — $ 178.3Intel Pentium G3260 @ 3.30GHz — $ 105Intel Pentium G3420 @ 3.20GHz — $ 110Intel Pentium G3430 @ 3.30GHz — $ 90Intel Pentium G3440 @ 3.30GHz — $ 159.9Intel Pentium G3450 @ 3.40GHz — $ 100Intel Pentium G3460 @ 3.50GHz — $ 288.2Intel Pentium G3470 @ 3.60GHz — $ 104.3Intel Pentium G4400 @ 3.30GHz — $ 80Intel Pentium G4500 @ 3.50GHz — $ 85.3Intel Pentium G4520 @ 3.60GHz — $ 110.9Intel Pentium G4560 @ 3.50GHz — $ 103.1Intel Pentium G4600 @ 3.60GHz — $ 100Intel Pentium G4620 @ 3.70GHz — $ 105.9Intel Pentium G640 @ 2.80GHz — $ 25Intel Pentium G645 @ 2.90GHz — $ 95Intel Pentium G840 @ 2.80GHz — $ 35Intel Pentium G850 @ 2.90GHz — $ 30Intel Pentium G860 @ 3.00GHz — $ 30Intel Pentium G870 @ 3.10GHz — $ 97Intel Pentium Gold G5400 @ 3.70GHz — $ 123.9Intel Pentium Gold G5500 @ 3.
80GHz — $ 100.3Intel Pentium Gold G5600 @ 3.90GHz — $ 100.9
Change Variant To
Select..ASUS DUAL RTX 2060ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 Advanced EditionASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 Advanced Edition EVOASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 EVOASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 MINIASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 MINI OC EditionASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 OC EditionASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 OC Edition EVOASUS PHOENIX RTX 2060ASUS Phoenix GeForce RTX 2060ASUS ROG STRIX RTX 2060 GAMING OCASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2060ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2060 Advanced EditionASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2060 EVOASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2060 EVO Advanced EditionASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2060 EVO OC EditionASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2060 OC EditionASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 2060ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 2060 OC EditionASUS TURBO RTX 2060ASUS Turbo GeForce RTX 2060Colorful GeForce RTX 2060 6G V2-VColorful GeForce RTX 2060 6G-VColorful GeForce RTX 2060 NB-VColorful GeForce RTX 2060 SI 6G-VColorful iGame GeForce RTX 2060 Advanced OC-VColorful iGame GeForce RTX 2060 Ultra OC-VColorful iGame GeForce RTX 2060 Ultra-VEVGA GeForce RTX 2060 GAMINGEVGA GeForce RTX 2060 KO GAMINGEVGA GeForce RTX 2060 KO ULTRA GAMINGEVGA GeForce RTX 2060 SC BLACK GAMINGEVGA GeForce RTX 2060 SC OVERCLOCKEDEVGA GeForce RTX 2060 SC ULTRA BLACKEVGA GeForce RTX 2060 SC ULTRA GAMINGEVGA GeForce RTX 2060 XC BLACK GAMINGEVGA GeForce RTX 2060 XC OVERCLOCKEDEVGA GeForce RTX 2060 XC ULTRA BLACK GAMINGEVGA GeForce RTX 2060 XC ULTRA GAMINGGALAX GeForce RTX 2060GALAX GeForce RTX 2060 (1-Click OC)GALAX GeForce RTX 2060 EX (1-Click OC)GALAX GeForce RTX 2060 EX WHITE (1-Click OC)GALAX GeForce RTX 2060 Mini (1-Click OC)GALAX GeForce RTX 2060 PLUS (1-Click OC)GALAX GeForce RTX 2060 PLUS EX (1-Click OC)GALAX GeForce RTX 2060 PLUS EX White (1-Click OC)GALAX GeForce RTX 2060 PLUS Gamer (1-Click OC)GALAX GeForce RTX 2060 WHITE Mini (1-Click OC)GALAX RTX 2060GALAX RTX 2060 1-Click OCGIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 2060 XTREME 6G (rev.
1.0)GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 2060 XTREME 6G (rev. 2.0)GIGABYTE AORUS RTX 2060 XTREMEGIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2060 D6 6GGIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2060 GAMING OC 6GGIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2060 GAMING OC PRO 6G (rev. 1.0)GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2060 GAMING OC PRO 6G (rev. 2.0)GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2060 GAMING OC PRO WHITE 6GGIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2060 MINI ITX 6GGIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2060 MINI ITX OC 6G (rev 1.0)GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2060 MINI ITX OC 6G (rev 2.0)GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2060 OC 6G (rev. 1.0)GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2060 OC 6G (rev. 2.0)GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2060 WINDFORCE 6G (rev. 1.0)GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2060 WINDFORCE 6G (rev. 2.0)GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2060 WINDFORCE OC 6G (rev. 1.0)GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2060 WINDFORCE OC 6G (rev. 2.0)GIGABYTE RTX 2060 GAMING OCGIGABYTE RTX 2060 GAMING OC PROGIGABYTE RTX 2060 MINI ITX OCGIGABYTE RTX 2060 OCGIGABYTE RTX 2060 WindForce 2X OCGainward GeForce RTX 2060 GhostGainward GeForce RTX 2060 Ghost OCGainward GeForce RTX 2060 PegasusGainward GeForce RTX 2060 Pegasus OCGainward GeForce RTX 2060 PhoenixGainward GeForce RTX 2060 Phoenix GSGainward RTX 2060 PhoenixGainward RTX 2060 Phoenix GSINNO3D GeForce RTX 2060 COMPACTINNO3D GeForce RTX 2060 GAMING OC X2INNO3D GeForce RTX 2060 ICHILL X3INNO3D GeForce RTX 2060 TWIN OC X2INNO3D GeForce RTX 2060 TWIN X2INNO3D GeForce RTX 2060 TWIN X2 OC RGBINNO3D GeForce RTX 2060 TWIN X2 V1Inno3D RTX 2060 Twin X2KFA2 GeForce RTX 2060KFA2 GeForce RTX 2060 (1-Click OC)KFA2 GeForce RTX 2060 EX (1-Click OC)KFA2 GeForce RTX 2060 EX WHITE (1-Click OC)KFA2 GeForce RTX 2060 Mini (1-Click OC)KFA2 GeForce RTX 2060 PLUS (1-Click OC)KFA2 GeForce RTX 2060 PLUS EX (1-Click OC)KFA2 GeForce RTX 2060 PLUS Gamer (1-Click OC)KFA2 GeForce RTX 2060 WHITE Mini (1-Click OC)KFA2 RTX 2060KFA2 RTX 2060 1-Click OCMAXSUN RTX 2060 TerminatorMAXSUN RTX 2060 Turbo X2MSI GeForce RTX 2060 AERO ITX 6GMSI GeForce RTX 2060 AERO ITX 6G OCMSI GeForce RTX 2060 GAMING 6GMSI GeForce RTX 2060 GAMING 6G PLUSMSI GeForce RTX 2060 GAMING Z 6GMSI GeForce RTX 2060 GAMING Z 6G PLUSMSI GeForce RTX 2060 VENTUS 6GMSI GeForce RTX 2060 VENTUS 6G OCMSI GeForce RTX 2060 VENTUS GPMSI GeForce RTX 2060 VENTUS GP OCMSI GeForce RTX 2060 VENTUS XS 6GMSI GeForce RTX 2060 VENTUS XS 6G OCMSI RTX 2060 AERO ITXMSI RTX 2060 AERO ITX OCMSI RTX 2060 GamingMSI RTX 2060 Gaming XMSI RTX 2060 Gaming ZMSI RTX 2060 VENTUSMSI RTX 2060 VENTUS OCManli GeForce RTX 2060 (M1432)Manli GeForce RTX 2060 (M2435)Manli GeForce RTX 2060 Gallardo (F401G)Manli GeForce RTX 2060 Gallardo (M2435)Manli GeForce RTX 2060 Gallardo (M2435) V2NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Founders EditionPNY GeForce RTX 2060 6GBPNY GeForce RTX 2060 6GB XLR8 Gaming OC Champions EditionPNY GeForce RTX 2060 6GB XLR8 Gaming OC Edition (Single Fan)PNY GeForce RTX 2060 6GB XLR8 Gaming OC Edition (Twin Fan)PNY GeForce RTX 2060 BlowerPalit GeForce RTX 2060 DualPalit GeForce RTX 2060 Dual OCPalit GeForce RTX 2060 Dual OC V1Palit GeForce RTX 2060 Dual V1Palit GeForce RTX 2060 GamingProPalit GeForce RTX 2060 GamingPro OCPalit GeForce RTX 2060 StormXPalit GeForce RTX 2060 StormX OCPalit RTX 2060 GamingProPalit RTX 2060 GamingPro OCZOTAC GAMING GeForce RTX 2060 (ZT-T20600H-10M)ZOTAC GAMING GeForce RTX 2060 (ZT-T20600K-10M)ZOTAC GAMING GeForce RTX 2060 AMPZOTAC GAMING GeForce RTX 2060 AMP ExtremeZOTAC GAMING GeForce RTX 2060 Twin FanZOTAC RTX 2060 AMPZOTAC RTX 2060 Extreme Plus OC6ZOTAC RTX 2060 OC HAZOTAC RTX 2060 Twin FanZOTAC RTX 2060 X-GAMING OC
Desired Quality Setting
Select.
.Ultra Quality — MSAA, HBAO, and advanced shadowsHigh Quality — No MSAA, HBAO, or advanced shadowsMedium QualityLow Quality
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 benchmarks: faster than the GTX 1070
The RTX 2060 is the most affordable RTX card from Nvidia’s Turing series, offering better rasterised performance over the previous generation plus support for new technologies like hardware accelerated real-time ray tracing (RT) and deep learning super sampling (DLSS). It’s a convincing package, even though the card’s launch price of £330/€369/$350 is significantly higher than that of the GTX 1060. In this article, we’ll show you exactly how well this card performs in a range of recent games — and how it compares to its closest competition from AMD and Nvidia.
While traditional (ie non ray-traced) performance is of the most interest to our readers, we’ll also examine what happens when DLSS is introduced to the mix. This tech serves as an alternative to traditional anti-aliasing, allowing graphics hardware to render scenes at a lower internal resolution and make up the difference with an algorithm trained on extremely high-resolution images of the game in question.
That process, made possible by the extra AI capabilities of the RTX architecture, can boost frame-rates substantially in games that support it — and support is growing, slowly.
So which cards are best suited to put the RTX 2060’s performance into perspective? First of all, we have included two more RTX cards to give you an idea of how much extra performance you’ll unlock by moving up the ladder to the RTX 2070 or RTX 2080. We’ll also show you how the RTX 2060 compares to the card that it effectively replaces, the last-generation GTX 1070. (It’s worth noting that the RTX 2070 and RTX 2080 cards we tested come with a factory overclock, something you won’t find on the Founders Edition of the RTX 2060 or the GTX 1070.) Our final representative will be AMD’s penultimate flagship card, the Vega 64, which is in the same general price bracket as the RTX 2060.
To see how the RTX 2060 compares to Nvidia’s new GTX 1660 Ti, check out our dedicated article on this topic: RTX 2060 vs GTX 1660 Ti.
The RTX 2060 may outperform the GTX 1070, thanks to its inclusion of RTX and DLSS technologies plus impressive rasterised performance.
| RTX 2080 | RTX 2070 | RTX 2060 | GTX 1070 | Vega 64 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPU cores | 2944 | 2304 | 1920 | 1920 | 4096 |
| Giga Rays/sec | 8 | 6 | 5 | ? | ? |
| RTX-OPS | 60T (57T) | 45T (42T) | 37T | ? | ? |
| VRAM | 8GB GDDR6 | 8GB GDDR6 | 6GB GDDR6 | 8GB GDDR5 | 8GB HBM2 |
| Memory Bus | 256-bit | 256-bit | 192-bit | 256-bit | 2048-bit |
| Mem. Bandwidth | 448GB/s | 448GB/s | 336GB/s | 256GB/s | 439GB/s |
| Base Clock | 1515MHz | 1410MHz | 1365MHz | 1506MHz | 1200MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1800MHz (1710MHz) |
1710MHz (1620MHz) |
1680MHz | 1683MHz | 1536MHz |
| TDP | 225W (215W) | 185W (170W) | 160W | 150W | 295W |
The table above includes the Founders Edition figures, with the reference equivalents in parentheses.
Our new benchmark system was implemented around one year ago, in early 2018, and we’re using it once again for the RTX cards. The idea is that instead of using static graphs or burned-in video data, we’re combining the two into a dynamic system. Press play on the test scene for each game, and you’ll see live telemetry for frame-times and frame-rates that gives you a better idea of performance than a simple average frame-rate figure. You can add or remove different cards or resolutions with the controls to the right of the video, with up to four data sources being shown simultaneously. If you’re in a rush, you can also find average frame-rate figures in a barchart below. Here, you can also mouse over the chart to see how each card did at the best or worst moments of the benchmark, which can tell a different stories than the averages alone. You can also click on the chart to change between frame-rate values and percentages, which can make it easier to compare two results without the need for mental maths.
Now, let’s get into the results!
Assassin’s Creed Odyssey
We begin with one of the biggest hits of last year, Assassin’s Creed Odyssey. The sweeping vistas of this game are accurately represented in the benchmark, giving even modern cards a challenge at the ultra high preset we’ve selected. The RTX 2060 is just a few frames shy of a 60fps average, showing a 16 per cent advantage over the GTX 1070. That gap widens as we go up the resolution ladder, with the new RTX card providing a 23 per cent higher average frame-rate at 1440p. The Vega 64 isn’t a dab hand in this engine, showing among the lowest scores of the group.
AC Odyssey: Ultra High, TAA
Please enable JavaScript to use our comparison tools.
Assassin’s Creed Unity
Unity, the 2014 Assassin’s Creed release, shows a similar trend for the RTX 2060 over the GTX 1070. There’s a 12 per cent gap at 1080p, a 13 per cent gap at 1440p and a 14 per cent gap at 4K. The 95fps shown by the RTX 2060 at 1080p is enough to make some use of a high refresh rate monitor, particularly if you opted for a lower preset than ultra high.
The Vega 64 shows the greatest variance in this test, with extremely high scores in some scenes and very low scores when the depth-of-field effect is applied.
Assassin’s Creed Unity: Ultra High, FXAA
Please enable JavaScript to use our comparison tools.
Battlefield 1
Battlefield 1 is our next test. This DirectX 12 title isn’t too demanding even on its highest preset, allowing mid-range and better cards to deliver high frame-rates at lower resolutions and reasonable results at 4K too. The RTX 2060 shows a massive lead over the GTX 1070 in Battlefield 1 at 1080p, at 140fps compared to 110fps — a gap of 22 per cent. The RTX 2060 sits about five per cent behind the RTX 2070 and 20 per cent behind the RTX 2080 at the same resolution. However, at 1440p and 4K, we see a greater difference between the RTX trio, with the RTX 2060 to RTX 2080 gap widening to 28 per cent at 4K. The Vega 64 performs much better here, outperforming the RTX 2060 and usually coming close to the RTX 2070 as well.
Battlefield 1: Ultra, TAA
Please enable JavaScript to use our comparison tools.
Crysis 3
Despite being released six years ago, Crysis 3 remains a challenging game for the latest graphics cards — and particularly the explosive pass we look at here from the game’s singleplayer campaign. The RTX 2060 is about 10 per cent faster than the GTX 1070 at all three resolutions, while the Vega 64 provides nearly exactly the same frame-rates as the mid-range RTX card. The gap between the RTX 2060 and RTX 2080 is also significant, at around 30 per cent for each resolution we tested.
Crysis 3: Very High, SMAA T2X
Please enable JavaScript to use our comparison tools.
Far Cry 5
Once again, we see a 10 to 14 per cent difference between the frame-rates of the RTX 2060 and GTX 1070 in this relaxing benchmark taken from the 2018 Far Cry release. There’s a similar gap between the RTX 2060 and RTX 2070, which the latter card unsurprisingly scoring higher.
The Vega 64 scores highly here as well, beating out the RTX 2060 at each resolution and coming darn close to the RTX 2070 at 4K.
Far Cry 5: Ultra, TAA
Please enable JavaScript to use our comparison tools.
Ghost Recon Wildlands
Ghost Recon Wildlands is a 2017 release, but it remains the most challenging benchmark in our collection when using its ultra preset and temporal anti-aliasing. The RTX 2060 is again about 12 per cent ahead of the GTX 1070, showing that its raw compute power does make up for its lower RAM count even in this challenging title. The Vega 64 becomes more competitive at higher resolutions, starting out worse than the RTX 2060 at 1080p — perhaps due to higher driver overhead that’s better seen in more CPU-bound scenarios — but becoming four per cent better at 4K.
Ghost Recon Wildlands: Ultra, TAA
Please enable JavaScript to use our comparison tools.
Rise of the Tomb Raider
Rise of the Tomb Raider is a poor simulation, being easier to run than the actual game, but its three scene workload is still valuable for comparing graphics hardware performance.
The RTX 2060 is 12 to 14 per cent ahead of the GTX 1070 here once again. Interestingly, the RTX 2070 and RTX 2080 can flex their muscles better at higher resolutions, with the gap between the RTX 2060 and RTX 2070 widening from 11 per cent to 15 per cent when moving from 1080p to 4K.
Rise of the Tomb Raider: Very High, SMAA
Please enable JavaScript to use our comparison tools.
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
Shadow of the Tomb Raider is the 2018 release of the Lara Croft franchise. The game didn’t get quite as strong reviews as the second game in the modern remake series, but it does provide a more realistic — and more challenging! — integrated benchmark. The more recent engine seems to include a few optimisations supported by the RTX hardware, as the RTX 2060 moves out to a 17 per cent lead over the GTX 1070. However, the Vega 64 performs very well here, offering about 9 per cent better performance at 4K.
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Highest, TAA
Please enable JavaScript to use our comparison tools.
The Witcher 3
If you’ve got a 1080p 144Hz monitor to use with your RTX 2060, The Witcher 3 is a great game choice. You can expect 116fps at this resolution, as long as your processor can keep up — we’re using an overclocked Core i7-8700K pinned to 4.7GHz. That’s about 13 per cent faster than the GTX 1070, a gap that remains nearly constant at every resolution we tested. The bigger RTX cards do show comparatively better performance at higher resolutions, with the RTX 2070 going from 14 per cent better than the RTX 2060 at 1080p to 18 per cent better at 4K.
Witcher 3: Ultra, Post-AA, No Hairworks
Please enable JavaScript to use our comparison tools.
Wolfenstein 2: The New Colossus
Our final title is Wolfestein 2: The New Colossus, where BJ takes a flammenwerfer-equipped Panzerhund for a late-night stroll through New Orleans. The RTX 2060 performs extremely well here, with scores 20 per cent higher than the GTX 1070 at 1080p and 1440p. This game also supports the 20-series Variable Rate Shading (VRS) feature, which can add another 15 per cent performance to the RTX 2060 at its most aggressive setting.
Note: due to incompatibilities between this game and our video capture software, Vega performance numbers aren’t available.
Wolfenstein 2 Vulkan: Uber, TSSAA 8X
Please enable JavaScript to use our comparison tools.
DLSS vs TAA: Final Fantasy 15
We conclude with a look at DLSS, to see how this technology can boost performance in supported games. The Final Fantasy 15 benchmark isn’t the best-designed piece of testing software in the world, but it does show pretty effectively how DLSS compares to traditional TAA at 4K resolution. The RTX 2060 jumps from 23fps average to 32fps, a jump of nearly 40 per cent that’s in line with that of more expensive RTX cards. DLSS support will soon arrive in other titles too, like Battlefield 5, and could become this card’s secret weapon against its Nvidia 10-series and AMD competitors.
Final Fantasy 15 Demo: TAA vs DLSS
Please enable JavaScript to use our comparison tools.
With game performance summarised and our short look at DLSS concluded, that’s the end of the article.
For more details on the first mainstream RTX card, check out our full RTX 2060 review or our RTX 2060 video review on YouTube.
GeForce RTX 2060 FPS performance test in games
At the beginning of 2019, the RTX 2060 video card was released, which immediately became very popular. But many are wondering whether to buy it or take a top one. We have conducted many tests in games and are constantly expanding this list.
RTX 2060 in Metro Exodus
On March 26, 2019, the Metro Exodus Ranger update was released, which, in addition to fixing bugs, improved the performance of the game itself. nine0007 Below is a performance video on the system: AMD Ryzen 5 2600 processor, Palit Nvidia RTX 2060 Gaming PRO OC graphics card. As you can see from the test, the average frame rate is 67 frames, the minimum is 52, and the maximum is 86. The test was carried out in FullHD resolution, which is normal for this video card.
Location for testing Metro Exodus Ranger Update — Volga.
Below is the testing location: Caspian.
And, finally, the most difficult location for testing any video card, incl. and RTX 2060 — Taiga. This location is presented in the test before the scene with the bear, i.e. most of it. nine0003
RTX 2060 in Tom Clancy’s The Division 2
Consider another game, Tom Clancy’s The Division 2.
The test results show that the average load on the graphics card is 80% at 60 frames per second. The test failed to disable vertical sync.
RTX 2060 in Borderlands 2
In Bordelands 2, the graphics card naturally performs quite well. The frame rate varies from 80 to 220 with an average GPU load of 50%. Those. this game with RTX 2060 can be safely run in 4K resolution. nine0003
RTX 2060 in DiRT 4 RTX
DiRT 4 was tested in multiple locations, and the card performs well at 1080p, averaging 100 FPS. Naturally, the load on the GPU is also not bad, above 90%.
At this resolution, you can spare your graphics card and turn on v-sync for a comfortable and playable picture.
RTX 2060 in 7 games
In the next video, we combined 7 games at once. These are: Metro Exodus, Darksiders 3, FarCry 5, FarCry New Dawn, Tom Clancy’s The Division 2, Assassin’s Creed Odyssey, Shadow of the Tomb Raider. It is in this order that the games are located in the video itself. The biggest load on the video card is provided by 2 games Metro Exodus and Shadow of the Tomb Raider. And this is natural, since it is in these games that the new ray tracing technology is present. Watch FPS test:
[banner_in_full_story_top_stat]
{banner_in_full_story_top_stat}
[/banner_in_full_story_top_stat]
Borderlands GOTY Enhanced.
RTX 2060 Test FPS
With the updated version of Borderlands, the video card does a great job, you can safely increase the resolution to 4K. The average frame rate is 152 with an average CPU load of 50%. The game is already becoming a classic, with the texture update bringing it to life a bit.
Borderlands 2 Remastered. RTX 2060 Test FPS
Basically, I did not see much increase in load with texture changes in the second part of the game. The average frame rate is kept around 120 frames per second, the minimum does not go beyond 60. This is rather the only difference, since in the normal version of Borderlands 2 the minimum frame rate was higher by an average of 20 frames.
This game was tested at Ultra graphics settings. Again, I can safely say that the video card can easily cope with the load at a resolution of 1080p. The picture is playable, the minimum frame rate is 51, the maximum is 90. The load on video cards is naturally decent. But again, in the arrangement that I’m testing, I didn’t hear any extra noise. So let’s watch the test video.
I can say that the graphics in the game meet modern standards, but what will happen to the video card when you start tracing in the game, you can only guess. Ray tracing is not included in the game, but anything is possible and maybe in a year or two this technology will be added to the game. nine0003
RTX 2060 in A Plague Tale: Innocence
The game is very beautiful, great graphics. The video card also shows itself well, managing to process all the textures and objects. The only thing is that the game warmed up the video card to 72 degrees, so I would advise the number of frames to be synchronized to 60. The maximum value is 90, the minimum is 55.
RTX 2060 in Wrc 8 Fia World Rally Championship look, not with the best graphics. Here the equipment also copes without problems. So: the average number of frames is 111, the maximum is 131, and the minimum is 93. The load on the video card is maximum during tests.
RTX 2060 in Remnant: From The Ashes
Since there is no ray tracing in this game, the graphics card can handle 80 frames per second. This is the average value at 97% load on the device. You can safely turn on vertical synchronization and feel sorry for the GPU. Watch the video test.
Results
In general, I can say that the video card copes with FullHD resolution with a bang. If you are going to play in UltraHD resolution, then I advise you to get an RTX 2080. The list of games in the article is constantly expanding as they become available. Add links to your tests of this video card in the comments, I will add the best ones to the text of the article.
nine0003
2K monitor for every home! GECID.com.
::>Video cards
>2022
> Test GeForce RTX 3050 in 20 games in Quad HD: a 2K monitor in every home!
06-06-2022
The GeForce RTX 3050 video card was created for FullHD resolution, and we have already raced it in this mode. But since it has 8 GB of memory, and QuadHD monitors are not so expensive, the question may arise: “can it pull this resolution too?”. Let’s look for the answer, as usual — on the example of 20 games! nine0003
|
Model |
GeForce RTX 3080 |
GeForce RTX 3070 |
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
GeForce RTX 3060 |
GeForce RTX 3050 |
|
Technical process, nm |
8 |
||||
|
Microarchitecture |
Ampere |
||||
|
GPU |
GA102-200 |
GA104-300 |
GA104-200 |
GA106-300 |
|
|
Number of SM units |
68 |
46 |
38 |
28 |
20 |
|
Number of CUDA cores |
8704 |
5888 |
4864 |
3584 |
2560 |
|
Number of texture units |
272 |
184 |
152 |
112 nine0115 |
80 |
|
Number of raster blocks |
96 |
96 |
80 |
48 |
32 |
|
Number of Tensor Cores |
nine0002 272 |
184 |
152 |
112 |
80 |
|
Number of cores RT |
68 |
46 |
38 |
28 nine0115 |
20 |
|
Base/dynamic frequency, MHz |
1440/1710 |
1500/1725 |
1410/1665 |
1320/1777 |
1552/1777 |
|
Memory type |
GDDR6X |
GDDR6 |
GDDR6 |
GDDR6 |
GDDR6 |
|
Memory capacity |
10 |
8 |
8 |
8 |
|
|
Effective memory frequency, MHz |
19 000 |
14 000 |
14 000 |
15,000 |
14,000 |
| nine0002 Memory bus, bit |
320 |
256 |
256 |
192 |
128 |
|
Bandwidth, GB/s |
760 |
448 |
nine0002 448 |
360 |
224 |
|
Energy consumption, W |
320 |
220 |
200 |
170 |
130 |
|
Additional power connectors |
2×8-pin |
1×8-pin |
1×8-pin |
1×8-pin |
1×8-pin |
|
Recommended power supply, W |
650 |
650 |
650 |
550 |
|
|
Recommended price, $ |
699 |
499 |
399 |
nine0002 329 |
249 |
To begin with, we recall that now the GeForce RTX 3050 is the youngest card in the NVIDIA Ampere line. It is based on the GA106-150 graphics core, which contains 2560 CUDA cores, 80 tensor and 20 RT cores. 8 GB of GDDR6 memory work with a 128-bit bus and a speed of 224 GB / s. We agree that it’s not much, but, as we already learned earlier, 8 PCIe 4.0 lanes are enough to feel comfortable even on old boards with a PCIe 3.0 interface. Plus, modest power requirements contribute to this — a 550 W unit and one 8-pin connector are enough. nine0003
We tested the video card Palit GeForce RTX 3050 Dual OC . First of all, it has a cool cooling system. Small, two-slot, with two fans with a diameter of 85 mm. They allow you to overclock the graphics core up to 2 GHz, and the memory up to 15.8 GHz. And this is + 11% and + 13% to the base frequencies, respectively. At the same time, in order to keep the GPU temperature within 65 ° C, only 60% of the power of the coolers is required. In this mode, the noise is quite comfortable and does not interfere. nine0003
And now let’s get acquainted with what surrounded the map in the system unit.
The brain is a 6-core 12-thread Intel Core i5-12400 with a maximum frequency of 4.4 GHz and a heat dissipation of 117 watts. The Brain store and the IT-Box marketplace helped us get the processor. Both have a huge range of digital appliances, PC kits, TVs, home appliances and more.
The ASUS PRIME B660M-A WIFI D4 microATX motherboard uses a reinforced PCIe 4.0 x16 slot for graphics card installation. It runs models of bygone generations in PCIe 3.0 mode. In addition, the motherboard has two M.2 slots, one with a heatsink, and 4 slots for DDR4 memory up to 5333MHz in overclocking. nine0003
The liquid cooling system ASUS TUF GAMING LC 240 ARGB provided an absolutely comfortable processor temperature.
16 GB of RAM without any fuss with overclocking was launched using the XMP profile at the frequency that is hardcoded in the name of the modules — DDR4-3600 PATRIOT Viper Steel . This is a peer-to-peer kit based on SK Hynix chips.
Operating system, benchmarks and game clients have been set to M.2 SSD PATRIOT P300 512 GB. For games, they took a similar, but more capacious 2-terabyte model. Both are created in M.2 2280 format with PCIe 3.0 x4 interface.
«Gold» Seasonic G12 GC-650 provided reliable and stable power supply. Here we can highlight the basic list of protections, efficient circuitry, easy-to-install cables, a quiet fan and a whole 5 year warranty.
No problem, all components contained the case Lian Li PC-O11 Air . The front, top, back and even one of the sides are dotted with ventilation holes. Up to 14 fans can be installed on them.
Monitor Philips Brilliance 329P9H was used to display the image. An external system with AVerMedia Live Gamer 4K helped with recording gameplay, that is, without loss of performance.
Let’s move on to the main part — the gameplay in 20 games in a resolution of 2560 by 1440 or in a popular way — 2K.
We start with Apex Legends at maximum graphics settings. At the beginning of the match, there are sometimes slight twitches, but this is extremely rare. There is nothing more to complain about — it plays perfectly at a minimum of 65 and an average of 87 frames per second. By the way, this is a good margin for a heavier map of Olympus, where the frame rate is likely to be lower in grassy meadows.
ARK: Survival Evolved takes over with medium preset and 100% render. With these settings, the RTX 3050 is very modest in terms of video memory consumption — less than 3 GB. You can evade Diplodocus attempts to give you bream at an average of 54 and a minimum of 39fps. In general, it is played and controlled comfortably. If you want, you can run around with high settings, the frame rate will be about 35-40 fps.
Assassin’s Creed Valhalla Set in the vibrant village of Ravenstrop, features beautiful, fluid gameplay at high settings. The maximum that fits into this idyll is rare light subfreezes that do not affect anything at all. The frame rate is on average kept at 45 fps, and the minimum moves away from it to 36. If there are few such indicators, you can reset the graphics settings to medium — this will raise the indicators by 10 points. nine0003
Battlefield 2042 also launched with high settings and enabled DLSS technology in Quality mode. Again, at first there may be minor stutters until all the M2 data of the drive and the network is placed in the video and RAM. But after that, everything goes well on a consistent basis. Management is sensitive, with average 58 and drawdowns up to 38 fps.
In СoD: Warzone they did not restrain themselves and turned up the maximum graphics settings. For a long time we have not seen Kolyan Dutoy so beautiful and clear — after all, QuadHD after all! Even the textures didn’t look like they had been gnawed by ants.
.. well, you get the idea that everything is stable and smooth on the dashboard. Only sometimes the time frame chart creaks, which indicates subtle twitches. But they are also very small. So, once again, everything is beautiful and smooth with drawdowns up to 43 fps and an average frequency of almost the coveted level of 60 fps. nine0003
Cyberpunk 2077 traditionally explore in more detail. We start with ultra graphics, enabled ray tracing on ultra and DLSS in performance mode. To be honest, I don’t like it. The graphics seem to be the maximum, but DLSS noticeably lathers the picture and the frame rate drops below 30 fps in some places, so there is not enough smoothness. So let’s go in search of the best option for the soul.
The next stage of research may be high graphics and DLSS on the balance sheet. It is already getting better — the picture is pleasing to the eye, and the smoothness is approaching the “more or less good” indicator. Unless with an active action, in battles where you will need to jump, run and shoot, the minimum frame rate of 33 fps may not be enough.
And since there is enough of this goodness in Cyberpunk, we are looking for more. nine0003
Well, the most optimal mode, in our opinion, is the average graphics with DLSS in the «Quality» position. Here they hit the target, as our tester between these machines — snipers will envy! Sharper textures and environments, combined with increased fluidity, provide an enjoyable game experience for both the youngest graphics card in the Ampere line and QuadHD resolution. We have a minimum of 40, and an average of 52 frames per second.
Similar to Cyberpunk 2077 , got confused with Dying Light 2 . We think that not many of you go through the settings so carefully when you first start the game. We start with high graphics, enabled ray tracing and DLSS in «Performance» mode. The minimum is 31, and the average is 39 fps. Not much, but you can play if you want. In some places, the rays make the picture even a little better — there is a contrast.
But what we personally do not like is the extra blurring of textures.
When switching to high settings, without rays and with DLSS switched to «Balance», the picture does not change globally. Only subsidence becomes a little more comfortable — 36 fps minimum and 47 — on average. Excessive blurring of objects has not gone away. Although the card has 8 GB of VRAM, and the textures sometimes look like underloaded. nine0003
And finally, a kind of zen, we reach at medium graphics settings. Although they are lower in rank, they subjectively look better. And it’s not about DLSS. Technology is still in balance mode. In general, the picture becomes noticeably clearer and smoother — the frame rate is in the range from 44 to 55 fps. This is in our opinion the most optimal mode for the RTX 3050 at 1440p.
0119 , where you can set everything to «Very High» and not worry. The average frame rate almost reaches two hundred fps, so the monitor can be not only QuadHD, but also high-hertz.
Escape From Tarkov at high settings cannot boast of cosmic frame rates, but it pleases with a stable frequency — equal to that of the Ukrainian Kherson steppes. The range is not great, ranging from 40 to 49 fps. If you do not have a hawk’s eye, then without monitoring, almost 50 fps are perceived on average as 60. Otherwise, you can reset a couple of settings and squeeze out this treasured frequency. nine0003
What can I say, Fortnite with epic settings and DLSS in Quality mode pulls the game perfectly. On average, we see 73 frames per second, and only sometimes there are dulling with a drop in frequency to 42 fps. If this is not enough for someone, you can reset the settings a little.
In God of War at high graphics settings, we want to praise the work of DLSS technology. Without it, the average frame rate is pressed to 50 fps and the gameplay becomes uncomfortable. The camera reacts too sensitively to mouse movements, becomes uncontrollable.
But with DLSS turned on in Quality mode, the average frequency rises to 62 fps — the gameplay and controls become excellent. nine0003
In GTA 5 everything was turned to the maximum, except for the damn quality of the shadows. Most of the time the game runs just fine — even the drawdowns stay around 60 fps. But there may be moments of weakness — when there is a desire to crush the grass on the hills, the video card becomes about twice as heavy. The sag drops to 35 fps, and the average frequency drops to 49. If it’s unpleasant to play like that, it’s enough to reduce the quality of the grass.
Long-suffering Halo Infinite raced in free multiplayer. The first run was done at medium settings. Monitoring shows nice numbers — an average of 54 fps, but in strict reality it seems that the game is constantly twitching. It is hardly visible on the recording, but the live sensations are just that.
This is why the RTX 3050 multiplayer works best with minimal graphics.
She will not give you a stable 60 fps for this, but based on the live impressions of the mouse connection, the reaction and the picture on the screen, it is much more comfortable to control. Therefore, we recommend these settings. nine0003
In PUBG we drove around the map of Erangel with «Ultra» graphics. And interestingly, there were no subfreezes even on the first run. Although the saturation of the locations was different, the picture pleased with smoothness at an average frequency of 71 fps. But when the counter managed to catch 35-39 fps of the 0.1% Low indicator — is it not clear at all? Therefore, this is the case when subsidence can be ignored.
And PUBG is also to be commended for the cool crisp 1440p picture when switching from the coolest graphics to the folk preset with minimal settings and «Ultra» textures. We can say that she did not sink at all even if she looked at distant objects. At the same time, the frequency flies into space — an average of 116 fps plus excellent control.
nine0003
We move on, or rather we jump. Catch our perfect RTX 3050 preset in Red Dead Redemption 2 at 1440p. These are «High» settings, «Ultra» textures and DLSS in «Quality». Here is the formula for comfortable gameplay with an average frame rate of 60 and a rate of 0.1% at 44 fps. By the way, DLSS is one of the main ingredients here, because without this technology, the frame rate slides to the region of 40-50 fps.
B Rust turned everything to the maximum except for Graphics Quality, and set the «Balance» mode for DLSS. After that, the game got on a righteous track and averaged 64 frames per second. Sometimes it goes off the rails in the form of already familiar twitches, freezes and subsidence up to 38 fps, but in general everything is smooth. For what I really want to present, this is for 14.5 GB !! eaten RAM. Despite the fact that the game bit off a disproportionately small amount of video memory — only 3.7 GB. A little more and you will have to close the Crome game with 15 tabs before launching?! Well, where is it supposed to be? nine0003
In Rainbow Six: Siege with «Ultra» graphics and full render scale, even very rare events exceed 70 fps.
Management, smoothness — everything is good. Needless to say, everything is fine with the average frequency. If you tweak the settings a little, you can easily squeeze out 144 frames per second for a high-frequency monitor.
The Witcher 3 , which hasn’t hunted anything wild for a long time, but just does jogging, was driven out of Ultra by graphics and high further processing. From the first time there may be some minor subfreezes here and there. But on the other hand, when the miserable 2.5 GB finally settles down in the video memory, everything goes well and quite smoothly. Very rare events reached 39, and the average frame rate was around 55 fps.
Far Cry 6 carefully run several times in a row. So, the first pass is just «High» graphics. There are no comments — smoothly, clearly and sensitively. On average 55 fps, 43 fps skips a little. It seems that there is no more stock and there is nowhere to increase the graphics, but the FSR technology says this — well, hold my hat.
We turn it and the graphics on «Ultra» quality — and voila — we get a better picture and an even higher frame rate. Now the minimum that can be caught is no longer 43, but 48 fps, and the average has risen from 55 to 61 frames per second. We love this exchange. nine0003
Well, for the third time they got insolent — they loaded the RTX 3050 to the fullest. «Ultra» graphics, ray tracing and FSR in quality mode. As a result… The frame rate is a little lower, but instead all the whims are turned on. I must say that tracing in this case works in the “not for everyone” mode. That is, not for all reflections and shadows. But despite this, it is played quite comfortably at an average of 54 fps.
And finally, Forza Horizon 5 with «Ultra» graphics. If you look at the record several times, you can dig up some light freezes. But they are not significant — the control is obedient, and the turns pass, as if the navigator is whispering in your ear.
Conclusions
Conclusions are easy to make. The GeForce RTX 3050 does well at 2560×1440. Moreover, in the vast majority of games, we managed to choose high or close to them graphics settings. So, somewhere they stumbled over Halo with its clumsy optimization, somewhere there were small blunts at the beginning of the rink, and somewhere DLSS or FSR technologies came to the rescue. But in any case, it was always possible to get a beautiful clear picture, as well as sensitive control. Of course, in most cases there is no sky-high fps. nine0003
Often the GeForce RTX 3050 was a little short of the coveted 60 fps, but for most, believe me, this will be an absolutely normal level. Plus, you can always give up one or two insignificant options and get to the magic number six and zero on the fps counter.